Abstract
The lateral septum (LS) has been implicated in the regulation of locomotion. Nevertheless, the neurons synchronizing LS activity with the brain’s clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) remain unknown. By interrogating the molecular, anatomical and physiological heterogeneity of dopamine neurons of the periventricular nucleus (PeVN; A14 catecholaminergic group), we find that Th+/Dat1+ cells from its anterior subdivision innervate the LS in mice. These dopamine neurons receive dense neuropeptidergic innervation from the SCN. Reciprocal viral tracing in combination with optogenetic stimulation ex vivo identified somatostatin-containing neurons in the LS as preferred synaptic targets of extrahypothalamic A14 efferents. In vivo chemogenetic manipulation of anterior A14 neurons impacted locomotion. Moreover, chemogenetic inhibition of dopamine output from the anterior PeVN normalized amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion, particularly during sedentary periods. Cumulatively, our findings identify a hypothalamic locus for the diurnal control of locomotion and pinpoint a midbrain-independent cellular target of psychostimulants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The hypothalamus is an evolutionarily conserved brain region with its many distinct neural circuitries recognized for orchestrating peripheral endocrine signals in all vertebrates. The profound cellular heterogeneity of hypothalamic neuronal networks is seen as causal to their ability to orchestrate not only basic physiological needs, including sleep and wakefulness, reproduction, food or fluid intake1,2,3, but also complex behaviors, e.g., stress, aggression, sexuality, and parenting4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. To this end, hypothalamic neuronal subtypes gain operational competence through combinations of fast neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and hormones (including dopamine)12,13,14,15 whose permutations can generate functional specificity16.
Dopamine in the hypothalamus is best known for inhibiting prolactin release from the pituitary when released into the hypophyseal portal system in a diurnal fashion17,18. However, the presence of dopamine neurons within a patchwork of nuclei within the hypothalamus (A11, A12, A14, and A15 groups), as well as in adjacent hypothalamic/extrahypothalamic brain areas (e.g. A8–A11 and A13)19,20,21 suggests that molecularly segregated dopamine subtypes could differ in their intra- and/or extrahypothalamic circuit motifs and thus be critical to generate non-endocrine hypothalamic output. Such functional heterogeneity is faithfully illustrated by A12 neurons being a source of dopamine to inhibit prolactin release from the pituitary gland5,18 vs. A13 or A15 neurons. While the A13 locus regulates brown fat thermogenesis3, those in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus (A15 locus) control maternal care and oxytocin secretion22. Despite recent progress in recognizing the manifold roles of dopamine signaling, the existence of subtypes amongst A14 dopamine neurons, which are dispersed in the medial subdivision of the periventricular nucleus (PeVN) stretching along the third ventricle, and their differential contributions to either endocrine processes13 or too motivated behaviors via extrahypothalamic projections remain unexplored.
A14 neurons receive dense neuromedin S (NMS)+ innervation from the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN)13, suggesting a tentative position in the circadian pacemaker circuit23,24 and entrainment by a significant intrahypothalamic source25,26,27. However, if molecular diversity exists amongst A14 neurons that populate the PeVN affecting their synaptic efferent projections, cellular targets, and ultimately, function in any discrete neurocircuit is known. Here, we use virus-assisted circuit reconstruction in combination with intersectional mouse genetics and intact tissue microscopy to show that dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN act as hypothalamic relays for the circadian clock circuit by projecting to the lateral septum (LS). This circuit layout is then implicated in the control of exploratory and locomotor activity, which undergo diurnal fluctuations28,29,30, and are phase-locked with the nocturnal nature of rodents. Lastly, we recognize that Dat1 expression by dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN could assign them as a cellular target for psychostimulants, particularly amphetamine, which are known to shift the circadian clock, thus inducing hyperlocomotion during time epochs naturally associated with resting (or even sleep)31,32,33,34,35,36. Indeed, recent brain-wide imaging suggests an amphetamine-sensitive locus in the periventricular hypothalamus37. We find that dopamine neuron in the PeVN account for the amphetamine-induced neuronal activation in the hypothalamus with their inactivation preventing amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion during inactive periods when naïve rodent behavior is sedentary.
Results
Subclasses of A14 dopamine neurons
The molecular machinery for dopamine production relies on the enzymes tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and aromatic-l-amino-acid decarboxylase (AADC), while its release requires vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) to load dopamine into synaptic vesicles16,38. The corresponding genes (Th, Ddc, Slc18a2) are considered phenotypic determinants of hypothalamic neuroendocrine neurons producing dopamine for systemic release at the median eminence (ME)13,18,38,39,40. In contrast, the plasmalemmal transporter for dopamine reuptake (DAT/Dat1) is less promiscuous in hypothalamic dopamine neurons13, and is only expressed by specific neuronal populations that do5,13 or do not produce dopamine7 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Thus, we consider the coincident presence of Th, Ddc, Slc18a2, and Dat1 as specific marks for A14 neurons in the PeVN that use dopamine for synaptic neurotransmission13 (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). Here, we chose Dat1-Ires-Cre::Ai14 reporter mice combined with post-hoc TH histochemistry (Supplementary Fig. 1a) to correlatively test the morphological, physiological, and functional properties of A14 dopamine neurons, and specifically addressed if they could act as cellular interfaces of a circadian multi-synaptic loop that links the SCN to extrahypothalamic targets13,41,42.
Firstly, we performed patch-clamp recordings of TdTomato+ neurons spatially mapped along the longitudinal axis of the PeVN in acute brain slices (n = 17 mice, n = 54 cells). By combining electrophysiological analysis with the post-hoc three-dimensional reconstruction of biocytin-filled, TH-labeled TdTomato-positive(+) neurons, we identified two groups of intercalated Dat1+ A14 neurons, which we classified as subtype “1” and “2”, based on their action potential (AP) waveforms and frequency, location, and extent of dendritic arborization (Fig. 1b, c, Supplementary Fig. 2a). Rostro-caudally, subtype “1” neurons are present at the level of the SCN. In contrast, subtype “2” neurons are located more posterior, with their accumulation peaking at the level of the arcuate nucleus. Electrophysiologically, subtype “1” neurons are distinguished by the ability to generate initial bursts upon current injection (2.68 ± 0.24 AP/burst, n = 22; Fig. 1b), whereas subtype “2” cell are characterized by being tonically depolarized upon step current injection, the accommodation of APs (Fig. 1c), and spontaneous bursting (Supplementary Fig. 2b). As such, these electrophysiological properties resemble those of classical tuberoinfundibular dopamine (TIDA) neurons43,44.
A14 dopamine neurons are ubiquitously innervated by the SCN
Earlier single-cell RNA-seq studies showed that dopamine neurons in the PeVN express receptors for neuromedins (Nmbr, Nmur2), nociceptin, and PACAP13. Among these, abundant Nmur2 expression (100% of cells with 3.17 ± 1.25 RNA molecules/cell13, Supplementary Fig. 1c) suggests sensitivity to its cognate ligand, NMS. NMS is produced in a circadian fashion13,42 within the SCN (Fig. 1d). Here, we show that NMS+ terminals indeed innervate dendrites of most A14 neurons reconstructed after post-hoc identification, including both subtype “1” and “2” cells (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. 2c). These data define SCN-to-PeVN innervation targets, which hitherto were ambiguous13.
Next, and considering the electrophysiological and morphological heterogeneity of dopamine neurons (Fig. 1b, c), we asked whether diurnal differences in NMS responsiveness could exist between the two subtypes. Our electrophysiological experiments revealed that 80% of neurons from both electrophysiological subtypes (15/18 cells (subtype “1”) and 20/25 cells (subtype “2”)) were activated by exogenous NMS superfusion (Fig. 1f, g, data were summarized for recordings performed during the day and at night) but not by superfusion of control bath solution (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Next, we confirmed that NMS levels indeed vary in the SCN13 in a circadian manner, with a significant increase (Supplementary Fig. 1e, f) during late-night hours42. Accordingly, the spontaneous activity of A14 dopamine neurons in acute vibroslices increased during dark hours (circadian time (CT): 18:00–23:00) for both subtypes (Supplementary Fig. 2g). Altogether, we suggest that despite the internal heterogeneity of dopamine cells in the PeVN, they all are directly entrained by SCN afferents27, respond to NMS, and are diurnally regulated at least ex vivo. Overall, at the level of SCN input specificity, the two subtypes of A14 dopamine neurons do not differ. Nevertheless, their segregation along the rostrocaudal axis of the PeVN could confer differences in axonal targeting, that is projections to different anatomical locations in- and outside the hypothalamus. If so, one might also posit that extrahypothalamic outputs of A14 neuron subtypes could underpin diurnal variations in higher brain functions.
Brain-wide mapping of dopamine efferents identifies the LS as a target for subtype “1” neurons
The circuit function of A14 dopamine neurons is unclear. Previous data show that some A14 dopamine neurons13, alike other secretory command neurons (e.g. A12)5, project to the ME and participate in dopamine secretion into the hypophyseal-blood portal system to control prolactin release from the hypophysis18,19. Yet, brain-wide mapping of A14 output has yet to be performed to define if subtype-specific target segregation exists. To this end, we stereotaxically injected Cre-dependent GFP-producing AAV2 viral particles into the PeVN of Dat1-IRES-Cre mice (Fig. 2a) and used tissue clearing and ultramicroscopy (light-sheet microscopy) to map individual axons at distant locations45,46. We found that A14 neurons give rise to long projections that leave the hypothalamus and densely innervate the LS (Fig. 2b, c, Supplementary Fig. 3a, Supplementary Video 1, n = 4 animals), with additional efferents coursing towards the central amygdaloid nucleus and the ME (Supplementary Video 2). To distinguish the participation of subtype “1” and “2” A14 dopamine neurons in establishing zonal innervation, we compared the distribution of axonal projections by spatially segregated tracing of either subtype “1” (40 nl virus injections at the SCN level, bregma = −0.6 mm; see Supplementary Fig. 3b, c) or subtype “2” cells (40 nl virus injections at the level of the periventricular nucleus, bregma = −1.6) in Dat1-Ires-Cre mice. The experimental approach allowed us to exclusively map subtype “1” neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c) and show that these cells innervate the LS (Fig. 2d). In contrast, subtype “2” neurons predominantly projected to the ME (Fig. 2e) suggesting their primary involvement in regulating prolactin secretion. In the rest of this study, we exclusively focused on the LS-projecting subset of subtype “1” neurons, because earlier results suggest the involvement of the LS in the control of motor activity in rodents29,47,48. However, to the best of our knowledge, earlier data did not identify either the cellular origins of a clock network that would provide upstream regulation to LS neurons or the specific neuronal contingent within the LS that is directly entrained by hypothalamic efferents.
Based on previous tract-tracing and functional studies suggesting that somatostatin (Sst)+ neurons of the LS receive particularly rich synaptic inputs from non-identified non-tegmental dopamine neurons30,49,50, we hypothesized that dopamine neurons of the anterior PeVN could form any such projection. Here, we combined in situ hybridization to visualize Sst+ neurons in the LS (n = 4 animals) and anti-mCherry immunohistochemistry to localize nerve endings of A14 dopamine neurons that were virally transduced to express mCherry in a Cre recombinase-dependent fashion (Fig. 2a, f and Supplementary Fig. 3d). These experiments revealed mCherry+ nerve endings in close apposition to 48.21 ± 2.47% of Sst+ LS neurons (Fig. 2f, but see also high-resolution laser scanning microscopy for SST; Supplementary Fig. 3d), which themselves are long-axon principal GABA cells receiving inputs from the hippocampus and innervating the ventral tegmental area and ventral forebrain (nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle, and the substantia innominata)47,50,51.
For Sst+ neurons to decode dopamine signals, they ought to express either D1 or D2 dopamine receptors, or both. Here, we used D1-EGFP and D2-EGFP reporter mice52,53 to show that Sst+ neurons are indeed GFP+, suggesting their ability to respond to dopamine. To reinforce this notion, we show that virally traced A14 projections indeed appose Sst+ neurons co-expressing mRNAs for Drd1 and Drd2 (Fig. 2f, g, Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). These data support the existence of an extrahypothalamic dopaminergic pathway terminating on Sst+ GABA neurons of the LS.
To substantiate that feed-forward dopaminergic neurotransmission exists between A14 neurons and their Sst+ targets in the LS, we examined if nerve terminals from A14 dopamine neurons of Dat1-Ires-Cre mice that had been stereotaxically transduced to express AAV-DIO-mCherry (bregma = −0.6 mm) contain TH and/or VMAT2 (Slc18a2). Indeed, we revealed the presynaptic co-localization of both TH (Fig. 3a) and VMAT2 (Supplementary Fig. 4a), coincidently required for the synthesis and vesicular release of dopamine, with mCherry in the LS.
Lastly, we performed retrograde tracing by injecting AAV-CAG-tdTomato viral particles into the LS (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4b). We identified tdTomato+ cell bodies in the anterior PeVN, which were co-labeled with either TH or Onecut3 (Fig. 3b), the latter being a transcription factor selectively expressed by of subtype “1” dopamine neurons in the PeVN40. Together, our reciprocal Cre-dependent axonal mapping and brain-wide imaging data highlight that Dat1+/Onecut3+ dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN project to the LS and harbor the enzymatic and release machinery to use dopamine as neurotransmitter in a projection pathway targeting Drd1+/Drd2+/Sst+ GABA neurons in the LS.
Dopamine efferents from the PeVN modulate neuronal activity in the LS
To demonstrate that a PeVN-to-LS projection operates with dopamine as neurotransmitter acting at metabotropic GPCRs, we injected Cre-dependent AAV viruses co-expressing channelrhodopsin-2 (hChR2) and mCherry (AAV-DIO-hChR2-mCherry) into the PeVN and used a combination of slice electrophysiology and in vitro optogenetics for circuit mapping (Fig. 3c–e, Supplementary Fig. 4c–f; for direct activation of dopamine neurons in PeVN see Fig. 3d). Simultaneous light stimulation of the LS and probing of individual neurons by patch-clamp electrophysiology (n = 24) showed that optogenetic activation of nerve terminals originating from the anterior PeVN evoked transient inward currents (max amplitude −43.88 ± 6.69 pA for blue (470 nm) but not green (533 nm) light stimulation vs. −9.53 ± 1.71 pA in control) and increased the frequency of spontaneous currents (3.44 ± 0.71 Hz vs. 0.56 ± 0.1 Hz in control) in 11/24 neurons (Fig. 3e). Control recordings with blue light had no effect on either the induction or frequency of currents (Supplementary Fig. 3f). The fact that optogenetic stimulation remained efficient even in the presence of tetrodotoxin (Supplementary Fig. 4c) reinforced the monosynaptic action of dopamine released onto the recorded cells54. Anatomical support for the above conclusions was obtained by post-hoc immunohistochemistry showing that ChR2+ nerve endings contacted LS neurons that we had probed electrophysiologically (Fig. 3f). The optogenetic activation that persisted in the presence of tetrodotoxin (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Fig. 4c) was relatively slow, which suggests synaptic signaling through metabotropic rather than fast ionotropic receptors55,56,57. This concept is compatible with the molecular and morphological signature of dopamine neurons establishing both targeted innervation and en passant synapses in the LS, allowing for the broad-range volumetric activation of D1 and D2 G-protein-coupled receptors58,59. Likewise, our observations support a primarily metabotropic mechanism, unlike neurotransmitters activating ionotropic receptors at the millisecond range55.
Chemogenetic dissection of dopamine neurotransmission in the LS
Next, we assessed the impact of chemogenetically manipulating A14 dopamine neurons on the activity of LS. For this, we first infected the anterior PeVN of Dat1-Ires-Cre mice with a virus encoding AAV-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry to enrich excitatory DREADDs in synaptic terminals in the LS60. Three days later, we infected LS neurons with a Cre-independent virus locally to read out Ca2+ signals by gCAMP6f, a genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator61 whose synapsin-1 promoter ascertained neuronal enrichment (Fig. 4a). This experimental design allowed us to specifically activate A14 projections ex vivo in slices containing the LS, with neuronal activity therein monitored by Ca2+-imaging (as green fluorescence). Considering that A14 dopamine neurons are entrained by the core circadian pacemaker, we hypothesized that their activity could change diurnally13,42. Thus, we performed two identical sets of experiments during the light (CT: 06:00–11:00) and dark phases (CT: 18:00–23:00). Bath-applied clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) altered neuronal activity, producing either activation or inhibition, in 70–85% of LS neurons during both time periods (Supplementary Fig. 5a–c). CNO remained ineffective in control recordings performed on brain slices from sham-injected animals (Supplementary Fig. 5d).
We then used a pharmacological approach to dissect the D1/D2 receptor selectivity of hypothalamic dopamine drive in the LS. This led us to distinguish three target neuronal cohorts in the LS (Fig. 4b–d, Supplementary Fig. 5a–c): (i) silent neurons activated upon CNO application (day: n = 16, oscillation frequency increased to 455.8 ± 53.14%, p < 0.001, amplitude: 300.3 ± 68.37%, p < 0.05; night: n = 11, oscillation frequency increased to 403.4 ± 47.15%, p < 0.001, amplitude: 197.9 ± 46.91%, p < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 5a). These effects were blocked by SCH23390 but not sulpiride, D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, respectively (Fig. 4b). Since D1 receptors are excitatory62, we suggest direct dopamine action on these postsynaptic neurons. (ii) Neurons whose activity was significantly inhibited by CNO (day: n = 18, oscillation frequency decreased to 73.98 ± 2.7%, p < 0.001, amplitude: 100 ± 6.26%, p = 0.99; night: n = 33, oscillation frequency decreased to 58.66 ± 4.56%, p < 0.001, amplitude: 106.2 ± 8.25%, p = 0.45; Supplementary Fig. 5b). This action was blocked by sulpiride (at D2 receptors; Fig. 4c) but only during night. This finding suggests that alternative neurotransmitters might be recruited during the daytime. (iii) Neurons with increased activity in a D2 receptor-dependent manner (day: n = 26, oscillation frequency increased to 149.8 ± 8.01%, p < 0.001, amplitude: 93.65 ± 3.85%, p = 0.12; night: n = 11, oscillation frequency increased to 181.7 ± 23.86%, p < 0.01, amplitude: 128.5 ± 9.23%, p < 0.05; Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 5c, d). Since D2 receptors are inhibitory in neurons62, we propose the indirect activation of these cells by recruitment of inhibitory neurons (feed-forward inhibition).
Likewise, we found that the allocation of neurons to the specific groups differed during day and night, with an increasing fraction of non-responsive cells during daytime (corresponding to inactive epochs; Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 5f). This finding provides direct evidence for the ability of A14 neurons to undergo cell state-changes in response to a physiological stimulus. Accordingly, phospho40-TH levels significantly increased during night hours (Fig. 4f, Supplementary Fig. 5g), a histochemical surrogate of TH enzymatic activity63,64. This observation also correlates with NMS dynamics (Supplementary Fig. 2e, f), the diurnal activity (Supplementary Fig. 2g), and night-only effects of sulpiride-mediated inhibition of A14 dopamine neurons (Fig. 4c), suggesting a shift between day and night modes for A14 neurons through the tuning of dopamine neurotransmission.
GABA neurotransmission is dispensable for LS entrainment
Previously, we showed that hypothalamic dopamine cells originate from GABAergic precursors and retain the expressional machinery to produce and release GABA even in adulthood13,40. Indeed, most Th+/Onecut3+ dopamine neurons in the PeVN harbor Gad1 (70%), Gad2 (88%), and Slc32a1 (88%) postnatally (Supplementary Fig. 6a). At the same time, TH/VGAT double-positive synapses exist in the LS (Supplementary Fig. 6b), prompting the question if the coexistence of dopamine and GABA in the same terminals in the LS reflects the neurochemical heterogeneity of A14 dopamine efferents39,56,65.
When selectively assessing dual-neurotransmitter production at the protein level, VGAT localization within virally traced projections of dopamine neurons situated in the anterior PeVN showed only sporadic co-localization of VGAT with mCherry (2.9 ± 1%; Supplementary Fig. 6c). This finding suggests a remarkably minor contribution of GABA neurotransmission in PeVN-to-LS communication during either day or night. Accordingly, bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist, did not affect the CNO-induced activation of excitatory neurotransmission from Dat1+ nerve terminals in the LS ex vivo (Supplementary Fig. 6d). These data reinforce the primary role of dopamine in entraining LS neuronal ensembles.
Dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN modulate spontaneous locomotion
AP firing of neurons in the LS correlates with speed and acceleration during locomotion28. In contrast, electrolytic lesions of the LS produce hyper-reactivity in rodents29,48,66. More specifically, recent studies show that Sst+ interneurons of the dorsal LS regulate animal mobility47. Therefore, we hypothesized that A14 dopamine neurons could be central to the diurnal regulation of locomotor epochs.
To test this hypothesis, we either chemogenetically activated (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 7a, b) or inhibited (Fig. 5b) dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN and assessed spontaneous locomotor activity (that is, mobility in the home cage including in a running wheel but without external stressors) with emphasis on (i) walking duration, (ii) distance moved, (iii) frequency of wheel running, and (iv) the percentage of activity upon continuous monitoring of baseline and CNO-induced activities (CNO was made available in drinking water) each registered for 3 days. Locomotor activity was separately analyzed during both light and dark phases.
We found that the conditional activation of dopamine neurons significantly increased locomotion, particularly during the dark phase (Fig. 5a, p < 0.05 for all recorded parameters). In turn, DREADD-induced inhibition of dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN suppressed locomotion (Fig. 5b, p < 0.05 for all recorded parameters except distance moved). In control experiments (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d), CNO alone in naïve animals or in Cre-expressing mice without DREADD vectors failed to impact locomotion. These findings support the contribution of dopamine A14 neurons to the diurnal control of locomotion as circadian effectors upstream of the LS (Fig. 5a, b).
Next, we tested the hierarchical relationship of the PeVN and LS neurons in the control of locomotion. To do so, we have tested locomotion after chemogenetically manipulating LS neurons through the focal delivery of either Cre-independent AAV-hM4D(Gi) or AAV-hM3D(Gq) (Supplementary Fig. 7e–g). We found that chemogenetic inhibition of LS neurons reduced locomotion during the active phase (CT: 00:00–06:00). Chemogenetic activation of LS neurons did not alter locomotion (Supplementary Fig. 7g), which we argued as a likely output given the many counteractions of septal neurons. Subsequently, we combined the Cre-dependent activation of dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN and simultaneous chemogenetic inhibition of LS neurons (Fig. 5c). CNO exposure significantly reduced locomotion upon combined viral transduction, relative to its typical increase upon chemogenetically activating dopamine neurons in the PeVN alone (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 7g). These data cumulatively suggest that the LS is subordinate to the PeVN in the neurocircuit controlling locomotion.
Amphetamine-induced activation of A14 dopamine neurons triggers hyperlocomotion
The inhibition of DAT is considered a key mechanism for psychostimulants, e.g., methylphenidate or amphetamine, to affect locomotion67,68,69, and to alter day vs. night activity35,36,67. Given those A14 dopamine neurons in the anterior PeVN express Dat1, these neurons could be recruited by psychostimulants to produce sustained excitation of the LS and thus increase motility. This mechanism could particularly be overridden by psychostimulants during the day when nocturnal rodents are generally immobile, and the network is at its ground state. We tested this hypothesis in mice that received intraperitoneal injections of amphetamine twice daily (CT: 00:00/12:00) with or without chemogenetic inhibition of dopamine neurons populating the anterior PeVN (Fig. 6a). Amphetamine significantly increased locomotor activity in control mice during both day (passive) and night (active) phases, recapitulating earlier findings67,70,71. Notably, chemogenetic inhibition of A14 dopamine neurons during the lit but not dark phase (Fig. 6b, c) significantly attenuated amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion. These in vivo data suggest that the activation of A14 dopamine cells in the PeVN of the hypothalamus is a cellular substrate for amphetamine to impact mobility, and their drive on the LS is independent of those of midbrain dopamine neurons30,72,73.
Discussion
It is a formidable challenge to assess the functional complexity of the many hypothalamic nuclei and their emerging subdomains given the extraordinary cellular diversity in this brain region1,16. The introduction of single-cell profiling tools coupled with viral-assisted neurocircuit interrogation by now allows us to map molecular requirements of function determination in hypothalamic neurons at never-before-seen resolution12,13,74,75,76,77,78. Because of these technical advances, a paradigm shift is taking place with the hypothalamus being recognized, beyond its hormonal control of body-wide endocrine and metabolic processes, for its contribution to complex behaviors through extrahypothalamic projections, particularly towards limbic and motor systems79,80,81. Therefore, expanding knowledge on hypothalamic neurocircuit functions, output, and drug sensitivity is of paramount interest for translational and clinical biosciences.
Here, we focused on A14 neurons to identify the level of their heterogeneity by sophisticated electrophysiology, tract tracing, and behavioral assays. Our data allowed us to recognize neuronal subdivisions in the PeVN, an elongated nucleus that stretches along the wall of the 3rd ventricle over >2 mm in mice. We demonstrated that anterior A14 dopamine neurons are wired into the core circadian clock neurocircuit by revealing them being targeted by NMS+ excitatory inputs from the SCN. This assertion was additionally justified by diurnal variations in (i) NMS levels, (ii) the amount of biochemically active tyrosine hydroxylase (defined by Ser40 phosphorylation), and (iii) a significant increase in A14 neuron excitability during the night phase evoked by the increased frequency of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents. These data support that A14 dopamine neurons undergo rhythmic cell-state changes, which do not only manifest as expressional oscillations for transcription factors and neuropeptides41 but the robustness of their excitability and synaptic output. The fact that A14 neurons are entrained by the SCN formulate the concept that it is their efferent output and postsynaptic target specificity rather than molecular determinants of intrinsic excitability that engrave network specificity and function assignment.
Among the many concepts of a hypothalamic organization that had prevailed for decades is the perception of neurochemical unity and continuity, assuming that the neurotransmitter phenotype of neurons alone is sufficient to define functions through the spatial segregation of efferent connectivity. For dopamine neurons, an increasing number of studies show that their subtypes instead differ in a matrix of parameters, including transcription factors, developmental trajectories, input-output constellations, and, for some, circadian clock features. It is therefore not surprising that the detailed interrogation of circuit maps for subsets of dopamine neurons by sophisticated experimental strategies3,5,13,22,56 lags 50 years behind their first anatomical description as the A11, A13, A14, A15 dopamine loci20,21,82. At present, brain-wide imaging is customary to identify hitherto unknown neuronal projections and to precisely dissect if intercalated cohorts of neurons in fact produce topologically organized afferentation maps83,84. Here, we worked at the intersection of immunohistochemistry, tissue-clearing, and intact brain imaging at the single axon level to describe anterior vs. posterior A14 dopamine contingents: anterior subtype “1” neurons project to the LS. In contrast, axons of posterior subtype “2” dopamine neurons preferentially terminate at the external layer of the ME, thus being classical neuroendocrine output cells. The existence of these subclasses is reminiscent of those for, e.g., magnocellular oxytocin and parvocellular corticotropin-releasing hormone-containing neurons56,63,79,80, even if in some cases collateral axons rather than spatially segregated cell pools may be sufficient to serve for either endocrine or neuronal functions. The positional and morphological dichotomy amongst dopamine neurons allowed us to assign their pool in the anterior PeVN to being hypothalamic relays of the clock network, periodically modulating the dorsolateral segment of the LS. Considering that the dorsolateral LS is positioned between upstream hippocampal spatial information processing and downstream movement regulation28,51 its entrainment by the circadian clock circuit integrates the element of time to define inactive vs. active daily periods, particularly in the nocturnal species studied here.
Our ex vivo Ca2+ imaging experiments showed that pharmacogenetically activating nerve terminals of A14 dopamine neurons leads to global, synchronous, and protracted network activity in the LS. This effect was mediated by dopamine action on metabotropic D1 and D2 receptors postsynaptically, whose cellular diversity defined activation vs. inhibition through Gs and Gi protein recruitment, respectively59,62. Nevertheless, hypothalamic dopamine cells differentiate from a prototypic GABA progenitor phenotype of all during brain development40 and retain Gad1/2 and Slc32a1 expression of in adulthood. To this end, we tested the hypothesis that GABA could contribute to neuromodulation in the LS either through disinhibition of Sst+ neurons or directly. In contrast to other hypothalamic dopamine groups56,65, we did not find a biologically meaningful contribution of GABA signaling at either the neuronal network or behavioral levels, emphasizing the purely dopaminergic mode of operation for A14 neurons. We suggest that a GABAergic molecular phenotype might be used either in specific signaling contexts or recruited to specific projections dominating, e.g., intrahypothalamic connectivity and/or contributing to dendritic (retrograde) neurotransmission described for neurons85.
At the organismal level, we found that chemogenetic activation of A14 dopamine neurons of the anterior PeVN led to hyperlocomotion in the active phase of their circadian cycle, suggesting that this neuronal ensemble chronospecifically modulates animal activity. Based on our experimental data, we can suggest that neurotransmitter levels and content fluctuate in the A14-to-LS pathway during the circadian cycle. This notion is experimentally supported by the periodic increase in the enzymatically active (that is, phosphorylated) form of tyrosine hydroxylase only during the dark period. Similar molecular regulatory mechanisms (e.g., phosphorylation) can equally impact receptor sensitivity and competence for signal transduction in LS neurons. Along these thoughts, our results significantly go beyond existing knowledge not only on the synaptic layout and hierarchy of the SCN → anterior PeVN → LS circuit for the circadian control of locomotion28,29,48,66 but regarding cellular substrate(s) for psychostimulant action. Psychostimulant effects in the brain are, in a large part (but see ref. 86), mediated by inhibition of Dat1 on neurons87. Direct DAT inhibition increases extracellular dopamine availability, thus causing excess excitation that evokes hyperlocomotion. The explanation provided here on how amphetamine can override the neural control of the central pacemaker on locomotion is of significant human relevance because shift workers, combat pilots, and others extensively use amphetamine to increase focus and boost their own activity at night, which is the traditionally passive phase in humans. We also propose that increased evening and night activity, a primary side effect of methylphenidate treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), might also be related to the drug’s efficacy to inhibit both dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake along the SCN → anterior PeVN → LS circuit. Altogether, our results identify A14 dopamine neurons as a hypothalamic junction to link the hypothalamus to executive neurocircuits of a motivated behavior in a circuit design that complements and expands the well-described role of midbrain dopamine neurons in locomotion88 (Fig. 7).
Methods
Animals
Mice were housed under a 12/12-h light/dark cycle (CT 00:00—light on; CT 12:00—light off) in a temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and humidity (50 ± 10%) controlled environment with food and water available ad libitum. We used Tg(Th-EGFP)21-31Koba (Riken Bioresource Center)13 and Dat1-Ires-Cre (JAX:006660)89 mice, the latter crossed with Ai14 (JAX:007914)90 reporters for the anatomical and electrophysiological characterization of A14 neurons. Homozygous Dat1-Ires-Cre mice were used for the viral targeting of A14 neurons with Cre-dependent AAV viruses (Supplementary Table 1). Data for retrograde axonal tracings were obtained from wild-type C57Bl/6J (Charles River) males. Drd1-GFP and Drd2-GFP52,53 (GENSAT, Rockefeller University) mice were used to validate D1/D2 receptor expression in Sst+ neurons of the LS. No statistical methods were used to predetermine the sample size. The experiments were not randomized and did not require data collection in a blinded fashion. Tissue collection and experiments on live animals conformed to the 2010/63/EU directive and were approved by the Austrian Ministry of Science and Research (66.009/0277-WF/V/3b/2017). The 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) were systematically applied throughout the study. Particular effort was taken to minimize animal suffering during experiments.
Virus microinjections in vivo
Stereotaxic injections were performed as described earlier13,63. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (5%, 1 L/min flow rate) and placed in a stereotaxic frame (RWD). A Stereotaxic Injector (Stoelting or RWD) was used to inject virus particles at a speed of 50 nl/min. A 5-min delay was used prior to withdrawing the glass pipette (Drummond) to achieve optimal and localized viral diffusion in situ. Viral constructs were listed in Supplementary Table 1. Fourteen to 21 days after injection, animals were used for (i) mapping local and long‐range projections, (ii) ex vivo optogenetics, (iii) Ca2+ imaging, and (iv) behavioral tests. For chemo- and optogenetic stimulation, Cre-dependent viruses were bilaterally injected into the PeVN of Dat1-Ires‐Cre mice (40–50 nl/side; coordinates relative to bregma: AP: −0.6 mm, DV: 5.15 mm, ML: ±0.2 mm). Cre-independent AAVs carrying DREADDs were bilaterally injected into the LS (75 nl/side, coordinates relative to bregma: AP: +0.26 mm, DV: 3.25 mm, ML: ± 0.5 mm) alone or five days after delivering a Cre-dependent viral construct into the PeVN (for the simultaneous modulation of the PeVN and LS). In Ca2+ imaging experiments, viruses containing activating DREADD (hM3Dq) were bilaterally expressed in A14 dopamine neurons (40 nl/side; coordinates relative to bregma: AP: −0.6 mm, DV: 5.15 mm, ML: ±0.2 mm). Three days later, Cre-independent AAVs carrying GCAMP6f were bilaterally injected into the LS (75 nl, coordinates relative to bregma: AP: +0.26 mm, DV: 3.25 mm, ML: ±0.5 mm).
Anterograde tracing
Dat1-Ires-Cre mice (n = 13 at 3 weeks after birth) received a unilateral injection of either AAV-hSyn-DIO-mCherry or AAV-hSyn-DIO-EGFP.WPRE.hGH virus at two AP positions within the PeVN (40 nl; coordinates from bregma: (i) AP: −0.6 mm, DV: 5.15 mm, ML: ±0.2 mm or (ii) AP: −1.6 mm, DV: 5.10 mm, ML: ±0.2 mm) under deep anesthesia (see above) with their heads fixed in a stereotaxic frame. Fourteen to 25 days after surgery, the animals were transcardially perfused, and their brains were processed for immunohistochemistry or light-sheet microscopy.
Retrograde tracing
C57Bl/6J mice (n = 3 at 3 weeks of age) received a unilateral injection of retrograde AAV-CAG-tdTomato (75 nl) tracer to the LS at coordinates: AP: +0.26 mm, DV: 3.25 mm, ML: ±0.5 mm or AP: 0.5 mm, DV: 2.5 mm, and ML: −4.5 mm. After a 21‐day survival period, animals were transcardially perfused, with their brains processed for immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemistry
Animals were anesthetized with phenobarbital (50 mg/ml, Sigma BP901) and transcardially perfused with a fixative composed of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.4) that was preceded by a short pre-rinse with physiological saline containing heparin (10 units/ml, Sigma H0777). In experiments investigating diurnal changes in TH phosphorylation and neuromedin-S production, transcardial perfusions were carried out during the periods of CT: 08:00–09:00 (day, light) and 20:00–21:00 (night, dark). After overnight postfixation in the same fixative, 50 μm-thick serial free-floating sections were coronally cut on a vibratome (Leica VT1200S) and processed for multiple immunofluorescence histochemistry. The list of primary antibodies used for the study is provided in Supplementary Table 2. mCherry and TdTomato immunofluorescence were amplified in virally infected and transgenic animals using polyclonal anti-mCherry antibody (EnCor Biotech). Non-specific immunoreactivity was suppressed by incubating free-floating sections in a blocking cocktail composed of 5% normal donkey serum (NDS; Jackson), 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma), and 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PB for 1 h at 22–24 °C. Sections were then exposed to a specific combination of primary antibodies in PB also containing 2% NDS, 0.1% BSA, and 0.3% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 48–72 h.
For post-hoc analysis, 300 μm-thick vibroslices after patch-clamp recordings were immersion fixed in 4% PFA in 0.1 M PB at 4 °C for 18 h. Next, sections were thoroughly washed with PB and processed to suppress non-specific immunoreactivity in 0.1 M PB to which 10% NDS, 5% BSA and 0.5% Triton X-100 had been added for 2 h. Subsequently, slices were immersed into a primary antibody solution that consisted of 2% NDS, 0.1% BSA, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 5% DMSO (Sigma) in PB for 72 h (Supplementary Table 2).
Immunoreactivities were revealed by Alexa Fluor 488, carbocyanine (Cy) 3; Alexa Fluor 488, or Cy5-tagged secondary antibodies diluted in 2% BSA in PB (1:300, Jackson ImmunoResearch) at 22–24 °C for 2 h. To visualize cells filled with biocytin, AlexaFluor-conjugated streptavidin (1:300, Jackson ImmunoResearch) was used in a mixture of secondary antibodies. Sections were mounted on fluorescence-free glass slides and air dried for 30 min prior to being coverslipped with Entellan (in toluene; Merck).
Laser-scanning microscopy and image analysis
Images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM 880 laser-scanning microscope at ×20, ×40, or ×63 primary magnification. The emission spectrum for each dye was limited as follows: Alexa488/Cy2 (505–530 nm), Cy3 (560–610 nm), and Alexa647/Cy5 (650–720 nm). Biocytin-filled neurons were 3D‐reconstructed from z-stack images acquired at ×40 primary magnification using the ZEN2013 software package (Zeiss). For the analysis of phospho40-TH and TH immunofluorescence, montages of confocal micrographs in single optical sections spanning the entire PeVN were acquired at ×20 or ×10 primary magnification. Three serial sections/animal were selected for quantification of fluorescently labeled neurons. The PeVN was divided into three levels: rostral, bregma, approx. −0.2 mm; mid, bregma −0.6 mm (at the suprachiasmatic nucleus); and caudal, bregma −0.9 mm (at the retrochiasmatic nucleus). All images were acquired with the same laser power, pinhole, master, and digital gain settings on an LSM 880 microscope. Quantitative analysis of the immunofluorescence intensity was performed in Fiji ImageJ for the individual color channels. To determine diurnal changes in neuromedin-S expression, labeled neurons were inspected in the SCN. Two sections/animal were selected for quantification of the fluorescence intensity using the ZEN2013 software.
Electron microscopy
Animals were transcardially perfused with 4% PFA and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB. Brains were dissected out and cut on a vibratome (Leica V1200S, 50 µm). Sections were processed for TH immunohistochemistry (pre-embedding chromogenic detection with mouse anti-TH (1:500; Millipore MAB5280, clone 2/40/15) and biotin-SP (long spacer) AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Cat. № 715-065-151), then post-fixed in buffered 1% OsO4 at 22–24 °C for 1 h, and flat-embedded in Durcupan ACM (Fluka)63. The LS was selected and embedded for ultrasectioning. Ultrathin sections (100 nm) were collected on single-slot nickel grids coated with Formvar and subsequently processed for post-embedding VGAT-immunogold staining. The primary anti-VGAT antibody (SySy, rabbit, Cat. no. 131 003) was diluted 1:100. Anti-rabbit IgG-coated colloidal gold antibody (BBI Solutions, Cat. no. EM.GAR15) was diluted 1:15.
Whole-brain tissue clearing and light-sheet microscopy
Dat1-Ires-Cre mice underwent unilateral injection of AAV-hSyn-DIO-EGFP.WPRE.hGH construct into the PeVN. Three weeks after the injection, the animals were transcardially perfused, and their brains dissected for optical clearing with a dehydration-based approach.
Cleared samples were illuminated with the light sheets of an ultramicroscope from two sides45 with either of the two Sapphire lasers: 488 nm/200 mW and 532 nm/200 mW (Coherent, Germany). An Andor Neo 2560 × 2160 camera with 6.5 µm pixel size was used for image capture. Two filters were used for image processing: 525/20 ET Bandpass F47-528 (AHF, Germany) and 605/70 ET Bandpass F47-605 (AHF, Germany). Signal detection refractive index (RI)-corrected objectives were used: (i) ×4 objective (Olympus, XLFluor4×/340, 0.28 NA, WD = 29.5 mm) utilizing custom-built correction of optics for a RI of 1.56 (WD = 10 mm post correction) and (ii) ×16 objective (Leica, HC FLUOTAR L ×16 NA, 0.6 IMM CORR, WD = 2.5 mm) adjusted to an RI of 1.56. Imaging specifications for individual panels, including objectives, pixel size, z-step, imaging depth, and orientation, from which the image was recorded, are provided in Supplementary Table 3. Images were deconvolved as reported earlier91. Briefly, image processing from light-sheet microscopy was performed by using MATLAB 9 (MathWorks) with contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) and Fast-Fourier-Transform-based de-striping algorithms91. Amira 6.7 software (Thermofisher) was used for 3D image reconstruction.
RNA-scope in situ hybridization
Dat1-Ires-Cre mice containing Cre-dependent viral tracer(s) and Drd1-EGFP/Drd2-EGFP mice were used to verify potential targets of A14 efferent projections in the LS and to assess whether innervated neurons expressed D1/D2 receptors. Mice were transcardially perfused with 4% PFA in PB (pH 7.4). After overnight postfixation of the brains in the same fixative, samples were incubated in 30% sucrose for at least 48 h and then cryostat-sectioned at 20-μm-thickness directly onto fluorescence-free glass slides. RNA-scope 2.0 was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics)92. RNA-scope probes for the detection of Sst ad Egfp were designed by the manufacturer and are commercially available. Imaging was performed using A Zeiss LSM 880 microscope equipped with a ×40 objective.
Ca2+ imaging
Coronal slices containing the LS were prepared from Dat1-Ires-Cre mice (4-5 weeks old) after AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry or sham injections to the PeVN and subsequent injection of AAV-hSyn1-GCaMP6f-P2A-nls-dTomato into the LS. 2–3 weeks after viral injections, mice were deeply anesthetized (phenobarbital, 50 mg/ml) and perfused with ice-cold preoxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2) cutting solution containing (in mM) 93 N-methyl-d-glucamine (NMDG), 30 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 20 HEPES–NaOH, 5 Na-ascorbate, 3 Na-pyruvate, 0.5 CaCl2, 8 MgSO4, and 25 glucose, pH 7.493. Next, 300 μm-thick coronal slices were cut on a vibratome (VT1200S, Leica). Slices were then transferred to a recovery chamber filled with the same solution (32 °C) for 12 min and kept (a minimum 60 min prior to the recordings) in a solution containing (in mM): 90 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 3 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 20 HEPES–NaOH, 5 Na‐ascorbate, 3 Na‐pyruvate, 1.5 CaCl2, 2 MgSO4, 0.5 l‐glutathione, and 25 glucose (pH 7.4, 22–24 °C). Recordings were performed in oxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 2 MgSO4, 1.5 CaCl2, and 12.5 glucose (pH 7.4, 22–24 °C). Ca2+ measurements were done using a VisiChrome monochromator to excite GCaMP6f and VisiView 3.0.3.0 software (Visitron Systems) on an AxioExaminer.D1 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a CoolSnap HQ2 camera (Photometrics) and a water‐immersion ×20/differential interference contrast objective (Plan‐Apochromat/N.A. 1.0). To infer diurnal changes in basal A14 neuronal activity, animals were processed for Ca2+ measurements during the day (slice preparation started at CT: 04:00; recording during CT: 06:00-11:00) and night (slice preparation started at CT:16:00 with recording during CT:18:00-23:00). DREADDs were stimulated by superfusing clozapine N-oxide dihydrochloride (20 µM, CNO, Tocris Cat. No. 6329). R(+)-SCH-23390 (1 µM, Sigma D054) and (±)-sulpiride (10 µM, Sigma S8010) were used to block D1 and D2 receptors, respectively. Drugs were directly applied into the recording chamber at the final concentration indicated. Ca2+ responses were evaluated using Clampfit 10.0 (Molecular Devices) and GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad).
Patch-clamp electrophysiology and ex vivo optogenetics
Whole-cell recordings were carried out as described63,94. Dat1-Ires-Cre mice crossed with an appropriate reporter strain or expressing a Cre-dependent virus in the PeVN (n = 38; 21–28 days old) and TH-GFP mice (n = 5; 21–28 days old) were used for patch-clamp recordings. Mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused with ice-cold pre-oxygenated cutting solution (see the section “Ca2+ imaging”). Subsequently, 300 μm‐thick coronal slices were cut on a vibratome with a pre-selection of slices containing the PeVN. For optogenetic stimulation, slices containing the LS were selected. After a 12-min recovery period at 32 °C, all slices were immersed in ACSF at 22–24 °C for 1–5 h before recording. For the experiments involving measurements of diurnal changes in the intrinsic properties of A14 DAT+ neurons, mice were perfused and used for electrophysiological recordings during the day (start of slice preparation at CT 04:00; recording during CT:06:00–11:00) and night (start of slice preparation at CT 16:00; recording during CT:18:00–23:00). Whole‐cell recordings in current‐clamp or voltage‐clamp mode were carried out on an EPC-10 triple amplifier (HEKA) controlled by PatchMaster 2.80. Glass electrodes of 3–5 MΩ resistance were filled with an intracellular solution containing (in mM): 130 K-gluconate, 3 KCl, 4 ATP-Na2, 0.35 GTP-Na2, 8 phosphocreatine-Na2, 10 HEPES, 0.5 ethyleneglycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetate (EGTA), (pH 7.2 set with KOH) and 0.5% biocytin (Sigma) to allow for post-hoc neuronal reconstruction. Base current and spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were recorded from DAT+/TH+ neurons clamped at −70 mV. To investigate the sensitivity of A14 neurons to neuromedin-S, recombinant peptide (Tocris Cat. No. 3648) was administrated directly into the bath chamber at a final concentration of 1 µM.
Ex vivo optogenetics employed excitation switches between 470 and 535 nm on a pE‐100 CoolLED illumination system (CoolLED) at a uniform light intensity of 0.2 mW, measured at the tissue surface. AAV-EF1a-double floxed-hChR2(H134R)-mCherry-WPRE-HGHpA virus was bilaterally expressed in 3-week-old Dat1-Ires-Cre mice (n = 24) at the PeVN. Two to three weeks after injection, animals were used for electrophysiological recordings as described above. Light stimulation was corrected for light intensity and duration to achieve optimal excitation of ChR2 terminals in the LS. Electrophysiological data were analyzed using Clampfit 10.0 (Molecular Devices) and GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad).
Monitoring of home-cage activity
To investigate the role of A14 neurons and their neurotransmitter systems in defining locomotor activity, we used different viruses (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 7e) including negative controls (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d). Seventeen days after the last surgery, animals were single housed in PhenoTyper cages (Noldus) with one day of habituation and 6 days of continuous activity measurements. Food and water were available ad libitum. DREADDs were stimulated by diluting CNO in the drinking water (5 mg/kg, calculated upon average water intake being 5 ml per day) with 2–3 experimental repeats for each animal. Home-cage activity was analyzed from CT 00:00–06:00 (“day-time”) and CT 12:00–18:00 (“nighttime”). The following parameters were defined: distance moved (m), total activity (%), walking duration (%), and wheel running (number of wheel rotations). At the end of the experiments, the animals were sacrificed, with their brains used for post-hoc verification of the injection sites. Data were analyzed using EthoVision XT15 software (Noldus) and GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad).
Home-cage activity monitoring before and after amphetamine exposure
Dat1-Ires-Cre mice (3 week-old, n = 7) received a bilateral injection of AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry virus95 into the PeVN. After 21 days of recovery, animals were single-housed in PhenoTyper cages (Noldus) with a 1-day habituation period prior to home cage activity monitoring with food and water available ad libitum. DREADDs were activated via CNO administration in the drinking water (5 mg/kg, calculated based on 5 ml/day average water intake). Measurements of motor activity were performed for 2 days (12 h day/12 h night) using normal drinking water to determine their baseline activity, followed by 2 days of CNO treatment. To estimate the effects of dopamine signaling in the PeVN on the animal motor activity, the same mice were administered intraperitoneal amphetamine (10 mg/kg, Sigma) after a day of post-CNO recovery. Amphetamine was administrated at CT 00:00 and 12:00 for 4 days to determine changes in diurnal activity in the absence (2 days) or presence (2 days) of CNO in the drinking water. The sequence of single amphetamine and amphetamine + CNO treatment alternated between animal batches. The activity was evaluated from 6-h epochs of monitoring during the day (CT 00:00–06:00) and night (CT 12:00–18:00) by the following parameters: distance moved, walking duration (%), total activity (%), and wheel running (number of wheel rotations). After the experiments, animals were sacrificed, and their brains were used for post-hoc histochemical analysis. Data were analyzed using the EthoVision XT15 software (Noldus) and GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad).
Statistics and data analysis
None of the experiments required data collection in a blinded fashion. Fold changes represent the percentage change from the mean control value in individual experiments. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Quantitative analysis of immunoreactive neurons and immunofluorescence intensities were evaluated by unpaired Student’s t-test. Data from Ca2+‐imaging experiments and electrophysiology studies were defined by unpaired or paired two-tailed Student’s t-test when appropriate. Behavioral data upon chemogenetic manipulation of A14 and LS neurons, as well as after amphetamine exposure were statistically assessed by paired Student’s t-test or ANOVA. Statistical assessment was undertaken in either GraphPad Prism 7 or SigmaPlot 13.0. Gene expression in single-cell RNA-seq count matrices from refs. 13, 40 were analyzed by basic functions of the Seurat396 (https://satijalab.org/seurat/articles/pbmc3k_tutorial.html) and tidyverse97 packages.
Figure preparation
Multi‐panel figures were assembled in CorelDraw X9 (Corel Corp.). We used Biorender and Adobe Illustrator CS6 to draw schemes and illustrations. Photoshop CS6 (Adobe) was used to crop the original histochemical images.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Single cell RNA-seq data were published earlier and can be downloaded in raw and processed forms from NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus with accession numbers GSE74672 and GSE132730. Data generated in this study are available in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The code used for data analysis can be found in the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/Harkany-Lab/Korchynska22_Nature_Comm
References
Saper, C. B. & Lowell, B. B. The hypothalamus. Curr. Biol. 24, R1111–R1116 (2014).
Krashes, M. J. et al. An excitatory paraventricular nucleus to AgRP neuron circuit that drives hunger. Nature 507, 238–242 (2014).
Folgueira, C. et al. Hypothalamic dopamine signaling regulates brown fat thermogenesis. Nat. Metab. 1, 811–829 (2019).
Swanson, L. W. & Mogenson, G. J. Neural mechanisms for the functional coupling of autonomic, endocrine and somatomotor responses in adaptive behavior. Brain Res. Rev. 3, 1–34 (1981).
Stagkourakis, S. et al. A neuro-hormonal circuit for paternal behavior controlled by a hypothalamic network oscillation. Cell 182, 960–975.e915 (2020).
Todd, W. D. et al. A hypothalamic circuit for the circadian control of aggression. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 717–724 (2018).
Stagkourakis, S. et al. A neural network for intermale aggression to establish social hierarchy. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 834–842 (2018).
Venkataraman, A. et al. Incerto-thalamic modulation of fear via GABA and dopamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 46, 1658–1668 (2021).
Lin, D. et al. Functional identification of an aggression locus in the mouse hypothalamus. Nature 470, 221–226 (2011).
Wu, Z., Autry, A. E., Bergan, J. F., Watabe-Uchida, M. & Dulac, C. G. Galanin neurons in the medial preoptic area govern parental behaviour. Nature 509, 325–330 (2014).
Harris, G. C. & Aston-Jones, G. Arousal and reward: a dichotomy in orexin function. Trends Neurosci. 29, 571–577 (2006).
Campbell, J. N. et al. A molecular census of arcuate hypothalamus and median eminence cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 484–496 (2017).
Romanov, R. A. et al. Molecular interrogation of hypothalamic organization reveals distinct dopamine neuronal subtypes. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 176–188 (2017).
Hnasko, T. S. & Edwards, R. H. Neurotransmitter corelease: mechanism and physiological role. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 74, 225–243 (2012).
Nusbaum, M. P., Blitz, D. M., Swensen, A. M., Wood, D. & Marder, E. The roles of co-transmission in neural network modulation. Trends Neurosci. 24, 146–154 (2001).
Romanov, R. A., Alpár, A., Hökfelt, T. & Harkany, T. Unified classification of molecular, network, and endocrine features of hypothalamic neurons. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 1–26 (2019).
Gudelsky, G. A. Tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons and the regulation of prolactin secretion. Psychoneuroendocrinology 6, 3–16 (1981).
Ben-Jonathan, N. & Hnasko, R. Dopamine as a prolactin (PRL) inhibitor. Endocr. Rev. 22, 724–763 (2001).
Bjorklund, A., Lindvall, O. & Nobin, A. Evidence of an incerto-hypothalamic dopamine neurone system in the rat. Brain Res. 89, 29–42 (1975).
Dahlström, A. & Fuxe, K. Localization of monoamines in the lower brain stem. Experientia 20, 398–399 (1964).
Hokfelt, T., Martensson, R., Bjorklund, A., Kleinau, S. & Goldstein, M. Distribution maps of tyrosine-hydroxylase-immunoreactive neurons in the rat brain. In Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy (eds Bjorklund, A. & Hokfelt, T.) (Elsevier Science Publishers, 1984).
Scott, N., Prigge, M., Yizhar, O. & Kimchi, T. A sexually dimorphic hypothalamic circuit controls maternal care and oxytocin secretion. Nature 525, 519–522 (2015).
Lee, I. T. et al. Neuromedin s-producing neurons act as essential pacemakers in the suprachiasmatic nucleus to couple clock neurons and dictate circadian rhythms. Neuron 85, 1086–1102 (2015).
Mori, K. et al. Identification of neuromedin S and its possible role in the mammalian circadian oscillator system. EMBO J. 24, 325–335 (2005).
Abizaid, A., Horvath, B., Keefe, D. L., Leranth, C. & Horvath, T. L. Direct visual and circadian pathways target neuroendocrine cells in primates. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20, 2767–2776 (2004).
Horvath, T. L. An alternate pathway for visual signal integration into the hypothalamo-pituitary axis: retinorecipient intergeniculate neurons project to various regions of the hypothalamus and innervate neuroendocrine cells including those producing dopamine. J. Neurosci. 18, 1546–1558 (1998).
Horvath, T. L. Suprachiasmatic efferents avoid phenestrated capillaries but innervate neuroendocrine cells, including those producing dopamine. Endocrinology 138, 1312–1320 (1997).
Wirtshafter, H. S. & Wilson, M. A. Locomotor and hippocampal processing converge in the lateral septum. Curr. Biol. 29, 3177–3192.e3173 (2019).
Albert, D. J., Brayley, K. N. & Milner, J. A. Connections from the lateral septum modulating reactivity in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 21, 761–767 (1978).
Jakab, R. L. & Leranth, C. Presence of somatostatin or neurotensin in lateral septal dopaminergic axon terminals of distinct hypothalamic and midbrain origins: convergence on the somatospiny neurons. Exp. Brain Res. 92, 420–430 (1993).
Hart, C. L., Ward, A. S., Haney, M., Nasser, J. & Foltin, R. W. Methamphetamine attenuates disruptions in performance and mood during simulated night-shift work. Psychopharmacology 169, 42–51 (2003).
Hart, C. L., Haney, M., Nasser, J. & Foltin, R. W. Combined effects of methamphetamine and zolpidem on performance and mood during simulated night shift work. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 81, 559–568 (2005).
Bower, E. A. & Phelan, J. R. Use of amphetamines in the military environment. Lancet 362, s18–s19 (2003).
Wright, K. P. Jr., Bogan, R. K. & Wyatt, J. K. Shift work and the assessment and management of shift work disorder (SWD). Sleep Med. Rev. 17, 41–54 (2013).
Snitselaar, M. A., Smits, M. G., van der Heijden, K. B. & Spijker, J. Sleep and circadian rhythmicity in adult ADHD and the effect of stimulants. J. Atten. Disord. 21, 14–26 (2017).
Antle, M. C. et al. Methylphenidate modifies the motion of the circadian clock. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 2446–2455 (2012).
Fuzik, J. et al. Brain-wide genetic mapping identifies the indusium griseum as a prenatal target of pharmacologically unrelated psychostimulants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 25958–25967 (2019).
Bjorklund, A. & Dunnett, S. B. Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update. Trends Neurosci. 30, 194–202 (2007).
Everitt, B. J., Hökfelt, T., Wu, J.-Y. & Goldstein, M. Coexistence of tyrosine hydroxylase-like and gamma-aminobutyric acid-like immunoreactivities in neurons of the arcuate nucleus. Neuroendocrinology 39, 189–191 (1984).
Romanov, R. A. et al. Molecular design of hypothalamus development. Nature 582, 246–252 (2020).
Dulcis, D., Jamshidi, P., Leutgeb, S. & Spitzer, N. C. Neurotransmitter switching in the adult brain regulates behavior. Science 340, 449–453 (2013).
Porcu, A. et al. Seasonal changes in day length induce multisynaptic neurotransmitter switching to regulate hypothalamic network activity and behavior. Science Advances 8, eabn9867 (2022).
Lyons, D. J., Horjales-Araujo, E. & Broberger, C. Synchronized network oscillations in rat tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons: switch to tonic discharge by thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Neuron 65, 217–229 (2010).
Stagkourakis, S., Kim, H., Lyons, D. J. & Broberger, C. Dopamine autoreceptor regulation of a hypothalamic dopaminergic network. Cell Rep. 15, 735–747 (2016).
Pende, M. et al. High-resolution ultramicroscopy of the developing and adult nervous system in optically cleared Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Commun. 9, 4731 (2018).
Pende, M. et al. A versatile depigmentation, clearing, and labeling method for exploring nervous system diversity. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0365 (2020).
Besnard, A. et al. Dorsolateral septum somatostatin interneurons gate mobility to calibrate context-specific behavioral fear responses. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 436–446 (2019).
Albert, D. J. & Richmond, S. E. Neural pathways mediating septal hyperreactivity. Physiol. Behav. 17, 451–455 (1976).
Jakab, R. L. & Leranth, C. Catecholaminergic GABAergic and Hippocamposeptal innervation of GABAergic neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 302, 305–321 (1990).
Köhler, C. & Eriksson, L. G. An immunohistochemical study of somatostatin and neurotensin positive neurons in the septal nuclei of the rat brain. Anat. Embryol. 170, 1–10 (1984).
van der Veldt, S., Etter, G., Sosa, F., Mosser, C.-A. & Williams, S. Conjunctive spatial and self-motion codes are topographically organized in the GABAergic cells of the lateral septum. PLoS biology 19, e3001383 (2021).
Gong, S. et al. A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature 425, 917–925 (2003).
Bonito-Oliva, A. et al. Differential regulation of the phosphorylation of Trimethyl-lysine27 histone H3 at serine 28 in distinct populations of striatal projection neurons. Neuropharmacology 107, 89–99 (2016).
Petreanu, L., Mao, T., Sternson, S. M. & Svoboda, K. The subcellular organization of neocortical excitatory connections. Nature 457, 1142–1145 (2009).
Fenselau, H. et al. A rapidly acting glutamatergic ARC → PVH satiety circuit postsynaptically regulated by α-MSH. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 42–51 (2017).
Zhang, X. & van den Pol, A. N. Hypothalamic arcuate nucleus tyrosine hydroxylase neurons play orexigenic role in energy homeostasis. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1341–1347 (2016).
Aosaki, T., Kiuchi, K. & Kawaguchi, Y. Dopamine D1-like receptor activation excites rat striatal large aspiny neurons in vitro. J. Neurosci. 18, 5180–5190 (1998).
Fuxe, K., Borroto-Escuela, D. O., Romero-Fernandez, W., Zhang, W. B. & Agnati, L. F. Volume transmission and its different forms in the central nervous system. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 19, 323–329 (2013).
Surmeier, D. J., Ding, J., Day, M., Wang, Z. & Shen, W. D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor modulation of striatal glutamatergic signaling in striatal medium spiny neurons. Trends Neurosci. 30, 228–235 (2007).
Urban, D. J. & Roth, B. L. DREADDs (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs): chemogenetic tools with therapeutic utility. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 55, 399–417 (2015).
Chen, T.-W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).
Missale, C., Nash, S. R., Robinson, S. W., Jaber, M. & Caron, M. G. Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 78, 189–225 (1998).
Alpar, A. et al. Hypothalamic CNTF volume transmission shapes cortical noradrenergic excitability upon acute stress. EMBO J. 37, e100087 (2018).
Lindgren, N. et al. Dopamine D2 receptors regulate tyrosine hydroxylase activity and phosphorylation at Ser40 in rat striatum. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 773–780 (2001).
Negishi, K. et al. Distributions of hypothalamic neuron populations coexpressing tyrosine hydroxylase and the vesicular GABA transporter in the mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 528, 1833–1855 (2020).
Albert, D. J. & Richmond, S. E. Septal hyperreactivity: a comparison of lesions within and adjacent to the septum. Physiol. Behav. 15, 339–347 (1975).
Gaytan, O., Ghelani, D., Martin, S., Swann, A. & Dafny, N. Dose response characteristics of methylphenidate on different indices of rats’ locomotor activity at the beginning of the dark cycle. Brain Res. 727, 13–21 (1996).
Spielewoy, C. et al. Hypolocomotor effects of acute and daily d-amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Psychopharmacology 159, 2–9 (2001).
Cole, S. O. Brain mechanisms of amphetamine-induced anorexia, locomotion, and stereotypy: a review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2, 89–100 (1978).
Costa, E., Groppetti, A. & Naimzada, M. Effects of amphetamine on the turnover rate of brain catecholamines and motor activity. Br. J. Pharmacol. 44, 742–751 (1972).
Gaytan, O., Swann, A. & Dafny, N. Diurnal differences in rat’s motor response to amphetamine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 345, 119–128 (1998).
Mendoza, J. & Challet, E. Circadian insights into dopamine mechanisms. Neuroscience 282, 230–242 (2014).
Grippo, R. M., Purohit, A. M., Zhang, Q., Zweifel, L. S. & Güler, A. D. Direct midbrain dopamine input to the suprachiasmatic nucleus accelerates circadian entrainment. Curr. Biol. 27, 2465–2475.e2463 (2017).
Mickelsen, L. E. et al. Cellular taxonomy and spatial organization of the murine ventral posterior hypothalamus. Elife 9, e58901 (2020).
Mickelsen, L. E. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of the lateral hypothalamic area reveals molecularly distinct populations of inhibitory and excitatory neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 642–656 (2019).
Moffitt, J. R. et al. Molecular, spatial, and functional single-cell profiling of the hypothalamic preoptic region. Science 362, eaau5324 (2018).
Ma, D. et al. Spatiotemporal single-cell analysis of gene expression in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 456–467 (2020).
Kim, D.-W. et al. Multimodal analysis of cell types in a hypothalamic node controlling social behavior. Cell 179, 713–728.e717 (2019).
Knobloch, H. S. et al. Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response. Neuron 73, 553–566 (2012).
Fuzesi, T., Daviu, N., Wamsteeker Cusulin, J. I., Bonin, R. P. & Bains, J. S. Hypothalamic CRH neurons orchestrate complex behaviours after stress. Nat. Commun. 7, 11937 (2016).
Zhang, R. et al. Loss of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone markedly reduces anxiety behaviors in mice. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 733–744 (2017).
Fuxe, K. Cellular localization of monoamines in the median eminence and the infundibular stem of some mammals. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 61, 710–724 (1963).
Tomer, R. et al. SPED light sheet microscopy: fast mapping of biological system structure and function. Cell 163, 1796–1806 (2015).
Furth, D. et al. An interactive framework for whole-brain maps at cellular resolution. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 139–149 (2018).
Zilberter, Y., Kaiser, K. M. & Sakmann, B. Dendritic GABA release depresses excitatory transmission between layer 2/3 pyramidal and bitufted neurons in rat neocortex. Neuron 24, 979–988 (1999).
Harraz, M. M. et al. A high-affinity cocaine binding site associated with the brain acid soluble protein 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200545119 (2022).
Schmitt, K. C. & Reith, M. E. Regulation of the dopamine transporter: aspects relevant to psychostimulant drugs of abuse. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1187, 316–340 (2010).
Rivetti di Val Cervo, P. et al. Induction of functional dopamine neurons from human astrocytes in vitro and mouse astrocytes in a Parkinson’s disease model. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 444–452 (2017).
Backman, C. M. et al. Characterization of a mouse strain expressing Cre recombinase from the 3’ untranslated region of the dopamine transporter locus. Genesis 44, 383–390 (2006).
Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).
Hahn, C. et al. High‐resolution imaging of fluorescent whole mouse brains using stabilised organic media (sDISCO) (Wiley Online Library, 2019).
Wang, F. et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J. Mol. Diagn. 14, 22–29 (2012).
Drexel, M. et al. Selective silencing of hippocampal parvalbumin interneurons induces development of recurrent spontaneous limbic seizures in mice. J. Neurosci. 37, 8166–8179 (2017).
Romanov, R. A. et al. A secretagogin locus of the mammalian hypothalamus controls stress hormone release. EMBO J. 34, 36–54 (2015).
Krashes, M. J. et al. Rapid, reversible activation of AgRP neurons drives feeding behavior in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 121, 1424–1428 (2011).
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e1821 (2019).
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
Acknowledgements
A. Reinthaler and E. Annavini are acknowledged for their expert technical assistance. The authors thank D.D. Pollak for support with the running and analysis of behavioral experiments. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (T.Hö., T.Ha.); Novo Nordisk Foundation (T.Hö., T.Ha.); Hjärnfonden (T.Ha.), European Research Council (SECRET-CELLS, 2015-AdG-695136; T.Ha.; FOODFORLIFE, 2020-AdG-101021016; T.Ha. and SECRET-DOCK, ERC-2022-POC2-101082277; T.Ha.), National Brain Research Program of Hungary (2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00002; A.A.), the Excellence Program for Higher Education of Hungary (FIKP-2021; A.A.) and intramural funds of the Medical University of Vienna (T.Ha., R.A.R.). R.A.R. is an EMBO advanced research fellow (ALTF 493-2017).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.Ha., T.Hö., and R.A.R. conceived the project, T.Hö. and T.Ha. procured funding; G.F., R.A.R., and T.Ha. designed experiments; S.K., M.P., L.B., A.A., R.T., P.R., K.Ba., P.W., T.L.H., and R.A.R. performed experiments and analyzed data, K.Be., S.S., H.-U.D., and T.L.H. provided unique techniques. T.Ha. and R.A.R. wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Qingchun Tong, Ken-ichiro Nakajima and Yunlei Yang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Korchynska, S., Rebernik, P., Pende, M. et al. A hypothalamic dopamine locus for psychostimulant-induced hyperlocomotion in mice. Nat Commun 13, 5944 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33584-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33584-3
This article is cited by
-
Unveiling Hypothalamic Molecular Signatures via Retrograde Viral Tracing and Single-Cell Transcriptomics
Scientific Data (2023)
-
Inactivation of hypocretin receptor-2 signaling in dopaminergic neurons induces hyperarousal and enhanced cognition but impaired inhibitory control
Molecular Psychiatry (2023)
-
MUW researcher of the month
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (2023)
-
The Dopaminergic System Modulates the Electrophysiological Activity of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Dependent on the Circadian Cycle
Neurochemical Research (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.