Abstract
The silkworm Bombyx mori is an important economic insect for producing silk, the “queen of fabrics”. The currently available genomes limit the understanding of its genetic diversity and the discovery of valuable alleles for breeding. Here, we deeply re-sequence 1,078 silkworms and assemble long-read genomes for 545 representatives. We construct a high-resolution pan-genome dataset representing almost the entire genomic content in the silkworm. We find that the silkworm population harbors a high density of genomic variants and identify 7308 new genes, 4260 (22%) core genes, and 3,432,266 non-redundant structure variations (SVs). We reveal hundreds of genes and SVs that may contribute to the artificial selection (domestication and breeding) of silkworm. Further, we focus on four genes responsible, respectively, for two economic (silk yield and silk fineness) and two ecologically adaptive traits (egg diapause and aposematic coloration). Taken together, our population-scale genomic resources will promote functional genomics studies and breeding improvement for silkworm.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Genomic data greatly accelerated the development of biological research in the last two decades. Recently, the focus of genome research has shifted from a single reference genome to a pan-genome approach that provides greater insights into the entire genomic content of a species1,2,3,4,5,6. Taking advantage of the highly efficient detection of structural variants (SVs; >50 bp) and falling costs, third-generation sequencing (TGS) technologies have started to supersede next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in the construction of pan-genomes. Recently, increasing long-read based pan-genomes of a single plant or animal species, including soybean7, tomato8, rice9, apple10, rapeseed11, Drosophila12,13, butterfly14, and human being15,16 have been constructed, facilitating insight into intra-species genomic variation and its contributions to trait determination.
Silkworm, Bombyx mori, is an economically important insect that was domesticated from its wild ancestor, B. mandarina, ~5000 years ago17. The reference silkworm genome (∼450 Mb) was first released in 2004 and subsequently updated twice, greatly facilitating functional genomics studies in silkworm and other insects18,19,20,21. To date, more than one hundred silkworm accessions have been re-sequenced by NGS technology22. However, due to the scarcity of wild silkworms and technical limitations in the previous studies, many trait-associated sites might be missing and furthermore, SVs remain to be explored.
Here, we deeply re-sequence 1078 silkworm strains, generate long-read assemblies for 545 accessions of those strains, and construct a high-resolution pan-genome. We identify hundreds of SVs and genes potentially underlying domestication and breeding of silkworm. We also provide four examples showcasing the utility of these genomes to decode the genetic variation related to key traits. These comprehensive silkworm genome resources will facilitate the basic research and precise breeding in silkworm and enlighten pan-genome studies on other species.
Results
Deep resequencing of 1078 silkworms
To explore the full genomic diversity within silkworm (including B. mori and B. mandarina), we collected as comprehensively as possible 1078 samples of silkworms comprising 205 local strains, 194 improved varieties, and 632 genetic stocks of domestic silkworm (B. mori), and 47 wild silkworms (B. mandarina) (Fig. 1, Fig. 2a, Supplementary Data 1). A total of 31.52 Tb NGS reads with an average sequencing depth of ~65× per sample was obtained (Supplementary Data 1). Using NGS data of the 1078 silkworms plus four previously released wild silkworm genomes23,24, 43,012,261 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 9,344,375 small insertions or deletions (Indels, <50 bp) were identified. The SNP and Indel density were one SNP per 11 bp and one Indel per 49 bp, indicating a high degree of genomic diversity in silkworms.
The enormously diverse phenotypes of silkworms are displayed throughout all developmental stages from the eggs to larvae and pupae (including cocoons and pupae) and adults (clockwise from the north-west quadrant).
a Geographic distribution of 1082 silkworms. b Phylogenetic tree based on genome-wide SNPs of 1082 samples. The clades in the green circle represent the local strains from the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River area. The same color of circles and lines in a and b represents the same silkworm cluster. CHN-I (purple), improved strains in China; JPN-I (light blue), improved strains in Japan; China-Local (blue), local strains in China; Europe-Local (orange), local strains in Europe; Japan-Local (yellow), local strains in Japan; Tropics-Local (red), local strains in the tropic region (Guangdong and Guangxi provinces of China, South Asia, and Southeast Asia); Wild (black), wild silkworm; Genetic stock (gray); Unknown-Local (light gray), local strains without geographic information.
Principal component analyses (PCA) based on whole-genome SNPs of the 1082 genomes showed that PC1 splits individuals into wild and domestic groups, while PC2 further divide individuals into groups based on their geographic origin in general (Supplementary Fig 1a). Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis, like PCA, showed that the 1082 strains are divided into wild group versus domestic population and further subdivided into the subclusters China-local, Europe-local, Tropical-local, and the improved strains in China (CHN-I) and in Japan (JPN-I) (Fig. 2b). Of note, the genetic stock strains are widely distributed within the different subclades of the domestic silkworm clade (Fig. 2b) and cover therefore broadly across the diversity of domesticated silkworm. Our results show the existence of four major subgroups (wild, China-local, CHN-I, and JPN-I), like the results reported previously22, but also provide three new insights. First, Europe-local strains are divided into two distinct subclades with some of them close to China-local and others close to the Japan-local resources (absent in the prior study), implying that after the introduction of Chinese silkworm into Europe, silkworm trade also happened between Japan and Europe. Secondly, the improved strains are highly concentrated in two groups, CHN-I and JPN-I, which reflects the narrow genetic base of commercial silkworms (Fig. 2b), while the genetic stock strains present extensive genetic diversity and harbor some special valuable breeding traits, such as disease resistance, excellent feeding performance, or special silk properties. These results suggest that the exploitation and utilization of these abundant genetic resources are essential for future silkworm breeding. Thirdly, the local strains from the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River located at the basal position of the domestic silkworm clade (Fig. 2b), which implies that silkworms were domesticated from this single geographical site, a conclusion further supported by archeological evidence25,26,27,28.
Long-read genomes of 545 silkworms
To present an overview of genomic content in silkworms, 545 representatives from each group evenly covering the phylogenetic tree were selected to perform long-read sequencing (nanopore platform) and genome assembly (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 1b). We obtained a total of 24.06 Tb TGS read data with an average sequencing depth of 97× and an average read length of 23 kb (Fig. 3b, c). De novo assemblies of these 545 genomes revealed an average genome size of 457.9 Mb, an average contig N50 size of 7.6 Mb (about half the average length of a silkworm chromosome), and about two chromosome-level contigs per genome (Fig. 3d). In addition, repetitive elements constituted 46-49% of the genomes with an average of 47% (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Data 2). Among the repetitive elements, non-LTR transposons, including long interspersed elements (LINEs) and short interspersed elements (SINEs), were the most abundant, accounting for 23-28% of the genomes with an average of 26%, a value like that in the reference genome. The BUSCO evaluation value and mapping ratio of NGS reads to the assembled genomes were 98% and 99% on average, including single-copy, duplicated as well as fragmented genes (Fig. 3f, Supplementary Data 2), indicating that the assembled genomes have high completeness.
a The strategy of genome sequencing and assembling. b The average long-read coverage distribution among strains. c The average read length distribution among strains. d The distribution of contig N50 length among genomes. e The proportional distribution of repeat sequences. f BUSCO evaluation values. g Evaluation of pan-gene plateau. The black curves are fitted with actual data, and the yellow dotted curves are extrapolated by the model of y = A + BeCx. The pan-genes obtained from 80, 90, and 100 genomes are similar. h Counts of pan-gene (green) and core-gene (orange) with increased samples. i Comparisons of gene counts between wild, local, improved, and genetic stock groups. j Frequency of gene number. The pie chart shows the proportion of core, softcore, dispensable, and private genes in those genomes. k, l genes with significant frequency differentiation between wild-local (k) and local-improved comparisons (l). In the two comparisons, genes with significantly increased (red) or reduced (blue) frequencies either in domestication (k) or improvement (l) are shown with different colors.
To evaluate the full landscape of silkworm genes, we first estimated how many genomes are enough to capture the full set of genes of silkworms using a gradually superimposed approach (see Method). We found that the pan-genes obtained from 80, 90, and 100 genomes were similar with a plateau reached at n = 80 (Fig. 3g, Supplementary Fig. 1c). Thus, the pan-genes contained in the 100 annotated genomes (14 wild, 41 local, 15 improved, and 30 genetic stock genomes) are representative for the species. These genomes contain an average of 16,234 genes, 687 transfer RNAs, 123 ribosome RNAs, 13 small nuclear RNAs, and 6432 microRNAs (Fig. 3h, i, Supplementary Data 3). A total of 19,411 orthogroups of protein coding genes were identified in the 100 genomes, containing 4260 (22%) core (shared by all 100 samples), 6501 (34%) softcore (shared by >90% samples but not all), 8535 (44%) dispensable (shared by more than one but ≤90% samples), and 115 (1%) private (present in only one sample) genes (Fig. 3j, Supplementary Fig. 1d, Supplementary Data 4). Core genes had the lowest dN/dS values, with 98% of the genes containing an InterPro domain (Supplementary Fig. 1e, f). They were expressed at higher levels and in more tissues than dispensable and private genes (Supplementary Fig. 1g, h). GO annotations showed that core genes are enriched in genes of transcription regulator activity and DNA-binding transcription factor activity compared with the other three groups (Supplementary Fig. 1i, j). We further found that the orthogroups of silkworm core genes displayed the widest distribution and the highest sequence identity among 24 insects of 10 orders compared to that of the softcore and dispensable genes (Supplementary Fig. 1k, l, Supplementary Data 5). These results suggest that the functions of core genes are more conserved and that they may play important roles in gene regulation.
Of these 19,411 orthogroups, 7308 (38%) are absent in the gene set of the prior reference genome21 and are thus newly identified. Around 83% (5807) of the newly identified genes have GO terms or transcriptional evidence (Supplementary Data 4), and ~99% of the new orthogroups are present in more than two genomes (Supplementary Fig. 1m), suggesting that they are truly present and are informative for further functional genomics studies in silkworm. Distribution analysis showed that 251 and 241 orthogroups had a significant frequency change (FDR < 0.0001 and fold change >2) in comparisons between wild-local as well as local-improved populations (Fig. 3k, l). Among these genes, 72% and 82% were newly identified, which indicates that the newly identified genes have potential roles in silkworm domestication and breeding.
SV characters and graph-based pan-genome
To construct a high-resolution silkworm pan-genome, we mapped the long reads of each of the 545 genomes to the reference genome21 and obtained an average of 120,216 SVs per genome (Fig. 4a). The average SV count in wild silkworm genomes is significantly higher (p < 0.0001, t test) than in domestic silkworms (Supplementary Data 2). Insertions (INS) and deletions (DEL) (referred to as PAVs, presence/absence variations) constitute ~99% of the SVs (Supplementary Data 2, Fig. 4b). To validate the quality of identified SVs, we checked the previously experimentally verified SVs in our sequenced strains and found that all nine reported SVs were present in our identified SVs29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37 (Supplementary Data 6). Next, we randomly selected 50 SVs to perform polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which confirmed 48 newly identified SVs (96%) (Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 7). These results imply that the SV calling was reliable in general. All SVs were merged to generate 3,432,266 non-redundant SVs (nrSVs) with a majority (96%) shorter than 15 kb length and a large proportion (81%) of rare alleles (allele frequencies less than 0.05) (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 3a, b), presenting an open silkworm pan-SV (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 3c) and a high SV density (one SV per 134 bp) in the silkworm population (Fig. 4d).
a SV count of insertions (INS), deletions (DEL), duplications (DUP), and inversions (INV) in each of the 545 genomes. The proportions of DUP and INV are too low to be observed in the graph. b Allele frequency of nrSVs from 545 samples. c Pan-SV and core-SV counts with additional genomes. d Distribution map of genetic variations in 1082 genomes. (i) Chromosomes. (ii) Gene density. (iii) SNP and (iv) Indel densities across 1082 genomes. (v) Non-redundant SVs density of 545 TGS genomes. (vi) Density of non-redundant SVs of 537 NGS-only genomes. (vii) TE density. e Components of transposable elements (TEs) in sequences of insertion (INS), deletion (DEL), inversion (INV), and duplication (DUP). f Correlations of TGS-SV and TE counts. TGS-SV and TE numbers were counted in uninterrupted 500 kb windows. There is a significant linear relationship between the SV and TE distributions on chromosomes (Linear regression, R2 = 0.53, Pearson’s r = 0.7281, p = 3.426e-145, F test). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
The average SV count per genome in silkworms is, to our knowledge, ~60 and six times higher than in Drosophila12,13,38 and human15,16. A primary explanation could be that the silkworm genome harbors a higher density (2075 copies per Mb per genome) of transposable elements (TEs) compared with Drosophila39 (229 copies per Mb per genome) and human40 (1222 copies per Mb per genome), since TEs are regarded as the major contributor to genomic SVs. Indeed, we found that TEs constituted the largest component (67%) of SV sequences in silkworm genomes (Fig. 4e). Further, the distribution of SVs on chromosomes related significantly to that of TEs (R2 = 0.53, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4f). Another possible explanation could be that SV events occur with a high mutation rate, as reflected by the appearance of a high proportion (47%) of multiple SV alleles (ranging from 2 to 135 nrSVs in a single site) in all the silkworms (Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). Moreover, domestic silkworms are more tolerant to deleterious or slightly deleterious mutations (rare alleles, allele frequency <0.05) because they are entirely dependent on humans and under weak natural selection pressure. This speculation is further supported by our finding that the proportion of rare allele SVs in domestic silkworm (70%) is higher than in wild silkworm (56%).
We constructed a graph-based pan-genome by integrating all PAVs into the linear reference genome21. We mapped the short reads of each long-read sequencing strain to the pan-genome and found that the average values of the precision, recall, and F1 scores were 0.88, 0.74, and 0.80, indicating that the SVs identified on the basis of long reads are reliable. Further, mapping the short reads of the remaining 537 NGS sequenced genomes to the pan-genome led to the identification of 454,671 SVs, containing 59,037 novel SVs (Supplementary Fig. 3f). The distribution pattern of SVs on chromosomes based on NGS data is consistent with that of SVs identified by TGS data (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 3g). These results suggest that the pan-genome could be used as a comprehensive reference to analyze genomic variations in the short-read sequenced genomes.
Impact of SVs on gene expression
To investigate the effects of SVs on gene expression, we first analyzed their relative genomic positions. We found that 55% of the SVs are in potential expression regulatory regions (including the introns and the ±5 kb flanking regions of a gene, as analyzed in this study) or coding sequence (CDS) of reference genes in the entire silkworm population. Among these SVs, we found ~93% (1,762,169) in potential expression regulatory regions (Supplementary Fig. 3h) with the other 7% (130,669) influencing the CDS of 12,661 genes (75% of reference genes). We next investigated gene expression using RNA-seq data of 84 samples from fourteen strains that harbored 178,309 SVs in potential expression regulatory regions, forming 26,188 SV-gene pairs (for each pair, at least three strains with and three strains without the SV). Among these pairs, 2396 SV-gene pairs (9.2%) contain a total of 1560 genes that show differential expression (FDR < 0.001) in at least one tissue between strains with and without corresponding SVs (Supplementary Fig. 3h).
Genes and SVs underlying silkworm domestication and breeding
The identification of the artificially selected genes and SVs that underlie silkworm domestication and breeding will facilitate the understanding and improvement of desirable traits in silkworms. We calculated the population divergence index (FST), neutrality tests (Tajima’s D), and a cross-population composite likelihood ratio test (XP-CLR) using SNP markers. We defined the intersections of FST, Tajima’s D and XP-CLR as selective sweep regions and identified 468 (2.8% of the whole-genome genes) domestication-associated genes (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Data 8a), containing 264 newly identified domestication-associated genes compared with previous studies22,41,42. These 468 genes are enriched in amino-acid metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, and circadian rhythm, probably caused by human selection on silkworm growth and development, synthesis of silk protein, and environmental adaptation (Supplementary Fig. 4a). We further compared the allele frequencies of SVs between wild and local silkworms, and identified 5353 domestication-associated SVs (presenting significant divergent frequencies between wild and local groups) (Fig. 5b). A total of 872 domestication-associated SVs were found in or close to domestication-associated genes, predominantly (95%) distributed in their potential expression regulatory regions (Supplementary Data 8a).
a FST shows selective signal in silkworm domestication. The previously reported domestic genes associated with silk production (AS, GS, GDH, and GOGAT), circadian rhythm (CLOCK, CRY2), development (EO), and body color (TH) are marked and show obvious selective signal. TH (tyrosine hydroxylase), GS (glutamine synthetase 2), CLOCK (circadian locomoter output cycle protein kaput), GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase), CRY2 (cryptochrome 2), GOGAT (glutamate synthase), AS (asparagine synthetase), and EO (ecdysone oxidase). b Frequency distribution of SVs in domestication (in wild and local groups); dots represent SVs. We identified 5,353 SVs (red dots) which have potentially played roles in domestication of silkworm because they show differences in their AFs in wild and domestic silkworms (FDR < 0.0001, fold change >2). c Selective regions of CHN-I (red, Chinese improved strains) and JPN-I (blue, Japanese improved strains) resulting from the process of breeding.
We next performed comparative analyses among improved and local strains to identify breeding associated genes. CHN-I and JPN-I are the improved groups currently used for generating heterosis (or hybrid vigor). We identified 126 (CHN-I) and 116 (JPN-I) improvement-associated regions containing 106 and 92 improvement-associated genes (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Data 8b). Compared with a previous study22, 185 improvement-associated genes were newly identified. Interestingly, the two improved groups shared only around 3% of these improvement-associated regions (Fig. 5c), suggesting that breeding proceeded independently in CHN-I and JPN-I. These results reveal parts of the genetic bases of silkworm heterosis and provide potential targets for improvement in silkworm breeding. To identify improvement-associated SVs (specifically those showing significant divergent frequencies between improved and local groups), we compared allele frequencies of SVs between local and improved silkworms. We detected 3574 and 3516 improvement-associated SVs in local versus CHN-I and local versus JPN-I comparisons (Supplementary Fig. 4b). In the genomic and flanking (±5 Kb) regions of improvement-associated genes, we identified 312 improvement-associated SVs, most of which (99.7%) are within the potential expression regulatory regions of these genes (Supplementary Data 8b).
Identification of loci related to commercially important traits
Artificial selection of silkworm has focused on the economically important silk-related traits, such as yield or quality of silk. But few causal genes and loci for these commercially valuable traits are characterized so far. Taking advantage of the high-resolution pan-genome, we explored the genes and variations contributing to those desirable breeding traits.
Silk yield is largely affected by the number and endoreplication of silk gland cells synthesizing the silk proteins. Among the improvement-associated genes, we found that the transcription factor BmE2F1 involved in cell cycle progression shows a significant selection signal during breeding (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 5a). The BmE2F1 gene harbors four improvement-associated SVs including one deletion and three insertions in its cis-regulatory region and introns (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Fig. 5b). The allele frequencies of these four SVs are significantly higher in improved silkworms (FDR < 0.0001, fold change >2) than in local silkworms (Supplementary Fig. 5b). The silk yield of the strains harboring the four improvement-associated SVs is significantly higher than that of the strains without these SVs (Supplementary Fig 5c). Further, CRISPR-cas9 mediated knockout of BmE2F1 reduces the number of silk gland cells by 7.68% and silk yield by 22%. In contrast, the transgenic overexpression of BmE2F1 increases the number of silk gland cells by 23% and silk yield by 16% (Fig. 6c, d, Supplementary Fig. 5d, e). These results indicate that the BmE2F1 gene participates in the determination of the number of silk gland cells, thereby affecting silk yield.
a, b The genomic region of BmE2F1 shows a signature of a positive selection (a) with four SVs (red dots) showing a significant frequency divergence (b) between local and CHN-I silkworms. c Embryonic silk gland nuclei stained with DAPI (blue fluorescence). d Silk gland cell count of BmE2F1 knockout (KO) line, BmE2F1 overexpression (OE) line, and wild type (WT, Dazao) lines (left histogram). Cocoon shell weight (CSW) and cocoons of BmE2F1 KO, BmE2F1 OE, and WT lines (right histogram and picture of cocoons). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Scale bar, 1 cm. Student’s t test (two-tailed). e Silk with fine and coarse denier under a scanning electron microscope. f An 11.1 kb insertion in intron and a 6.2 kb downstream insertion of the BmChit β-GlcNAcase gene in the fineness strains Chunfeng and Suxiu. g CRISPR-cas9 mediated knockout of BmChit β-GlcNAcase produced coarser silk. Student’s t test (two-tailed). In box plots, horizontal lines within boxes indicate the medians, box boundaries indicate the 1st and 3rd quartiles, and whiskers indicate the minima and maxima. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fine silk has higher economic value in sericulture, but the genetic basis of fiber fineness is unknown. We previously found that a part of the spinneret, the silk press, is related to fineness43. Here we performed RNA-seq of the silk press in four strains including two fine silk strains (Suxiu, Chunfeng) and two coarse silk strains (Xiafang, Qiubai) (Fig. 6e) and identified 40 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Supplementary Fig. 6a). We scanned the variations in the genomic regions of these DEGs to identify SVs that are unique to the fine silk strains relative to the coarse silk strains and rare in the entire silkworm population. We found an 11.1 kb intron insertion and a 6.2 kb downstream insertion of the chitooligosaccharidolytic beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase (BmChit β-GlcNAcase) gene in Chunfeng and Suxiu strains (Fig. 6f). We found that the BmChit β-GlcNAcase gene is expressed at a significantly higher level in fine silk strains (Suxiu, Chunfeng) and has an expression peak in silk press at the wandering stage (which occurs at the start of spinning) (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). CRISPR-cas9 mediated knockout of the BmChit β-GlcNAcase gene produced coarser silk (Fig. 6g, Supplementary Fig. 6d). All these results suggest a key role of the BmChit β-GlcNAcase gene in the determination of silk fineness.
Decoding insect adaptation-related genes using the pan-genome
Diapause is a common adaptive strategy that ensures the survival of organisms under deleterious environmental conditions44. Although the diapause hormone (DH), an embryonic diapause inducer, was first discovered in silkworm45, little information is available concerning the embryonic diapause genes.
The pnd strain produces non-diapause homozygous (pnd/pnd) eggs and diapause heterozygous (pnd/+) offspring that are determined by a genetic factor in chromosome 11 (11–55.89 cM) after fertilization, but not by the diapause factor during oogenesis46,47,48,49. To identify the embryonic diapause gene, we searched the genomic variations in the pnd/pnd homozygote (BomM479) within the region between the previously reported black pupa (bp) locus (11-42.5 cM, KWMTBOMO06855)34 and the end of chromosome 11. We found 10 genes with exonic sequence variation in the investigated range (Supplementary Fig. 7a). According to the gene function annotation, a gene (KWMTBOMO06872, BmTret1-like) encoding a sugar transporter appeared to be an ideal candidate because trehalose transport is crucial for insect diapause50. A 747 bp deletion was found in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of BmTret1-like in pnd homozygotes, while both the mutant and normal copies are detectable in heterozygotes (pnd/+) (Fig. 7a; Supplementary Fig. 7b). During the early embryonic stage, we observed that the expression level of BmTret1-like in homozygotes (pnd/pnd) is significantly lower (p < 0.01, t test) than that in heterozygotes (pnd/+) (Fig. 7b). To test the function of BmTret1-like, CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout was performed in bivoltine strain Dazao (a strain that generates diapause eggs when the maternal embryos are incubated at 25 °C). The injected eggs and their offspring were always incubated at 25 °C. After three generations of hybridization and mutation screening, we obtained three batches of BmTret1-like−/− homozygotes that resulted in a non-diapause phenotype (Fig. 7c). These results suggest that BmTret1-like is a critical embryonic diapause determinant after fertilization.
a When compared to diapause wild type (+pnd/+pnd), a 747 bp deletion can be identified in the 3′-UTR of BmTret1-like in non-diapause pnd. b In embryonic stages at 6, 12, and 18 hours, the expression level of BmTret1-like in homozygotes (pnd/pnd) is significantly lower than that in heterozygotes (+pnd/pnd). Three biological duplications were conducted. Data are shown as mean ± SD. c CRISPR/Cas9 mediated BmTret1-like knockout (KO) in wild type (WT, Dazao) individuals. Three BmTret1-like−/− lines, KO1, KO2, and KO3 contain a 25 bp, 28 bp, and 8 bp deletion in BmTret1-like. The BmTret1-like knockout lines generate non-diapause eggs under 25 °C. The wild-type bivoltine strain (WT, Dazao) generates diapause eggs when the maternal embryos were incubated under 25 °C. d Large insertion and duplication in the L locus and the difference between Wnt1-1 and Wnt1-2. e Large deletion in LC locus. f Expression of Wnt1 in +/+ and LC/+, three biological duplications were conducted. Data are shown as mean ± SD. g Wnt1 expression and phenotype after Wnt1 RNAi (n = 20). CT, control (LC/+). Scale bar, 5 mm. Student’s t test (two-tailed). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Aposematic coloration, the presence of conspicuous body markings acting as signals, is another important adaptive trait. Two silkworm allelic mutants, Multilunar (L) and Caltrop-type multilunar (LC) (Fig. 7d, e), lead to similar twin-spot markings commonly used as aposematic markings to avoid predators in caterpillars51,52. A prior study speculated that the L phenotype could be caused by short sequence changes in the 5′-flanking 19 kb region of Wnt1 on chromosome 453. In our assembled 545 genomes, nine strains contain an L allele (Supplementary Fig. 7c, Supplementary Data 1). Comparative genomic analysis between samples with- and without- L allele revealed that two SVs, a duplication (34 kb) containing an additional Wnt1 copy (named Wnt1-2) with a 5944 bp deletion in its cis-regulatory region and an insertion (109 kb) derived from chromosome 14 in the 5′-terminal 18 kb site of Wnt1-1 (original Wnt1) (Fig. 7d), are present in each of the nine strains containing an L allele but are absent in any strain without an L allele. We next investigated SNPs and Indels in the ±20 kb flanking region of the Wnt1-1 gene and found that only three variants (one Indel and two SNPs) located in the second intron of Wnt1-1 are specifically present but not fixed in the L strains (Supplementary Fig. 7d). These results suggest that the L phenotype could be related to these structural variations in the upstream region of Wnt1-1.
A prior study revealed that three SNP markers distinguish Wnt1 transcript in L (g01) from non-L (N4, p50) strains53. Fortunately, two of those SNPs are also able to differentiate Wnt1-1 and Wnt1-2 in a single L strain, BomM527 (Supplementary Fig. 7e). To investigate which copy of Wnt1 is expressed in the spot marking region of epidermis in the BomM527 strain, we performed RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing, and detected only the Wnt1-1 transcript in the epidermis (Supplementary Fig. 7f). Taking these results together, we can speculate that the L-specific SVs upstream of Wnt1-1 may cause its ectopic expression in the spot marking region of the epidermis, resulting in the L phenotype.
For the LC mutant, we found a specific large deletion (271 kb) in the 3′-flanking region of Wnt1 (Fig. 7e). We observed that the Wnt1 expression was significantly higher in the epidermis of heterozygous LC (LC/+) mutants than in normal strains (+/+) (Fig. 7f). Further, Wnt1 RNAi applied in the left side of the epidermis of LC (LC/+) larvae blocked spot marking formation (Fig. 7g). These results reveal that large and complex SVs in L alleles, which cannot be obtained by map-based cloning, affect the expression pattern of Wnt1 and result in twin-spot markings.
Discussion
In this work, we provide a large-scale digital gene bank of silkworm bioresources and find a high level of genetic diversity in silkworms. We have a larger sample size and a wider geographic distribution of sample set than in the previous publications that contain 40 strains (11 wild silkworms and 29 domestic silkworms) in 200941 and 144 strains (seven wild silkworms and 137 domestic silkworms) in 201822. We release 1078 high-depth NGS and 545 high-quality reference genomes and construct almost the entire pan-genome of silkworm with 7038 newly identified genes, more than fifty million short variants (SNPs and Indels), and over three million SVs. This dataset enables the functional investigation of many types of sequences. These include many coding genes absent from the existing silkworm reference genome, the core/private genes in silkworms and the variable genes among populations, the complex SVs that are difficult to detect from NGS data, and the genomic variants in the non-coding regions that were rarely touched in previous studies using forward and reverse genetic approaches. These new resources will greatly support high-throughput screening of novel traits for functional genomic research and breeding improvement of silkworms and serve as a guideline for pan-genome study in other species.
Although the domestic silkworm (B. mori) is a completely domesticated economic insect entirely dependent on humans for survival, only a few economically important genes have been clearly identified so far. In this study, we identify 468 domestication-associated genes and 189 improvement-associated genes. Compared with prior studies22,41,42, the current report represents an additional set of 264 genes associated with domestication and 185 genes associated with improvement. The analysis of the functions of these genes will reveal the genetic basis of artificial selection, provide improvement targets, and promote our understanding of the behavior differences between B. mori and B. mandarina, such as larval ability to withstand crowding and handling, relatively docile feeding (without a strong drive for finding food), and loss of flight ability. In addition, this study reveals differences between the artificial selection loci of the Chinese and Japanese improvement lines, which will help unravel the underlying basis of hybrid vigor generated from these two populations and aid in the design of better combinations of beneficial loci for subsequent improvement of silkworm. Furthermore, our application of a large-scale pan-genome to decipher two genes that control important economic traits in silkworms may also be used to reveal genetic mechanisms and traits associated with the survival of wild populations and evolution of new species under strong natural selection by human and non-human factors.
Silkworm harbors extensive phenotypic diversity in embryonic and larval phases (Fig. 1); this differs from the well-known model system Drosophila that exhibits phenotypic diversity mainly in the adult stage. This feature makes silkworm valuable for studies of morphological diversity in insects. Notably, most of our sequenced silkworms are well described phenotypically, especially for the group that comprises the genetic stocks (Supplementary Data 1). Benefiting from long-term research on silkworm genetics, many loci related to phenotypes have been mapped to the 28 chromosomes of silkworm, generating a comprehensive genetic linkage map49. Our pan-genome data, combined with the genetic linkage map, will facilitate the genetic interpretation of intriguing traits and contribute to insect biology. For instance, we found that the ectopic expression of the Wnt1 (Wnt1-1) gene, which is probably caused by structural variations, is responsible for the new color patterning of twin-spot markings on caterpillars. A similar but altered patterning (LC) could also be achieved by the variation of cis-regulatory sequences influencing the same gene, Wnt1. This finding has increased our understanding of genetic mechanisms underlying the evolution and diversity of color patterns. Thus, the deciphering of the genotype-phenotype relationships in these abundant silkworm resources can further promote our understanding of the genetic architecture of diversification and adaptive evolution in this lepidopteran and may also apply to other insects.
Our results show that the generated pan-genome, based on hundreds of long-read sequenced genomes, provides resources for high-throughput and accurate assessment of valuable alleles for silkworm functional genomics research and breeding. This ushers a new era for silkworm basic research and molecular breeding and provides guidelines for the large-scale pan-genome research of other species.
Methods
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized, and investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessments.
Silkworm collection
We collected 1078 silkworms, representing 1031 domestic silkworms (B. mori, including 205 local strains, 194 improved varieties, and 632 genetic stocks) and 47 wild silkworms (B. mandarina). For collection of wild silkworms, permits were not required. Local strains are breeding resources that were long maintained, without further selective breeding, in diverse geographic regions of the traditional silk producing countries (e.g., China, Japan, Korea, India, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Russia, France, Italy, Germany, Hungary, Spain, Turkey, Romania, Morocco, Cambodia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, and Bulgaria). Improved varieties showing desirable properties for commercial breeding (e.g., high yield and quality silk, natural color cocoon, greater robustness, uniform development, and high hatchability) are strains highly selectively bred for modern sericulture. Genetic stocks are the natural mutants discovered during domestication and breeding improvement process, together with the artificial mutants induced by chemical or physical treatment or genetic engineering. Wild silkworms collected from a full range of their geographic distributions in China represent the ancestor (B. mandarina) of the domesticated silkworm. It is worth mentioning that the silkworm genetic stocks maintained since the 1900s constitute a unique resource for silkworm breeding and insect biology. They harbor some special valuable breeding traits, such as adult wings with few scales, excellent feeding performance, high stress tolerance, disease resistance, or special silk properties. More than 400 mutants have been mapped to all 28 linkage groups of silkworms using classical linkage analysis49.
Most collections (~90%) are from the silkworm genetic resource banks at Southwest University (Chongqing, China). A minority of germplasms was collected from other universities and sericulture research institutes mentioned in the Acknowledgement section.
Genomic DNA extraction
Pupae or larvae (without midgut) were collected and stored at −80 °C for genomic DNA extraction (Supplementary Data 1). For ONT sequencing, a blood & cell culture DNA midi kit (catalog# 13343, QIAGEN) was used to extract genomic DNA following the manufacturer’s procedure. For short-read sequencing, the phenol/chloroform method was used to extract genomic DNA. The extracted DNA pellet was dissolved in 30–200 μL Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer solution for further study.
Short-read sequencing
For NGS, a paired-end sequencing library of each sample of 1078 silkworms was constructed with insertion sizes ranging from 300 to 400 bp and sequenced through the DNBSEQ platform of BGI (China). SOAPnuke54 v1.5.6 was used to filter out the low-quality reads (a read containing over 40% low-quality bases, base quality value less than 20 was considered as low-quality) and remove PCR duplication reads with parameters -n 0.03 -l 20 -q 0.4 -G -d -Q 2. The two prior resequencing projects of silkworms22,41 generated low coverage depths (only ~3× and ~13× coverage depth), limiting the utilization of those data in genome assembly and detection of structural variation. Thus, we sequenced all our samples in high depth ranging from 22× to 181× (approximately 65× on average). To ensure a better genome assembly for samples used in long-read sequencing, higher coverage depths ranging from 52× to 181× (82× on average) were generated. The sequencing information for each sample is listed in Supplementary Data 1.
Long-read sequencing
For long-read DNA sequencing, 545 samples containing 39 wild, 162 local, 117 improved, and 227 genetic stock silkworms were selected to build Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing libraries in BGI (China). According to the standard procedure of library construction of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies Company, 20 kb DNA library of each sample was used to sequence on the PromethION platform with R9.4 chemistry using the Ligation Sequencing Kit SQK-LSK109 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). For the pooling library of two samples, reads of each sample must be split before filtering. Therefore, guppy_barcoder v3.1.50 (https://nanoporetech.com/) and qcat v1.0.1 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/qcat) were applied to split reads and the intersection of the two results was used as split data. The porechop v0.2.4 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop) program was used to find and remove adapters. We also removed the reads with length <5 kb and average quality <7. The final sequencing depth ranged from 48× to 277×. The N50 read sizes ranged from 13.5 to 44.9 kb with an average of 30 kb (Supplementary Data 2).
Transcriptome sequencing
For RNA-Seq, six tissues including cuticle, fat body, head, hemolymph, midgut, and silk gland of fourteen samples (BomL85, BomL194, BomL41, BomL84, BomP79, BomL114, BomL170, BomL122, BomL31, BomL210, BomL13, BomL112, BomP128, and BomW44) were collected on the 3rd day of the final larval stage. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen). An RNA-seq library was constructed using the MGIEasy RNA Library Prep Kit. All RNA sequencing was carried out at Frasergen (Wuhan, China) and Novogene (Tianjin, China). The mRNAs of each tissue were collected from more than three individuals, with two biological replicates.
SNP and Indel calling
The short reads of the 1082 silkworm strains were mapped to the silkworm reference genome by BWA55 v0.7.17 mem with default parameters. The SAMtools56 v1.11 and Picard v2.23.5 (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) programs were used to filter the unmapped and duplicated reads. A GVCF file of each sample was obtained using the GATK57 v4.1.8.1 HaplotypeCaller with the parameter -ERC = GVCF. The GVCF files of all samples were merged with GATK CombineGVCFs. The joint-call step of all 1082 samples was performed using GATK GenotypeGVCFs to generate a combined VCF file. Finally, the variants were filtered by GATK VariantFiltration with the following parameters: -filter “QUAL < 50.0”–filter-name LowQ -filter “DP < 200”–filter-name LowD -filter “DP > 100000”–filter-name HigD–filter-expression “MQ < 40.0, QD < 2.0, FS > 60.0, SOR > 5.0, MQRankSum < −12.5, ReadPosRankSum < −8.0”–filter-name LowQualFilter–missing-values-evaluate-as-failing. A total of 43,012,261 SNPs and 9,344,375 Indels were identified. A previous study identified ~37 million SNPs (the number of Indels was not given) in 144 silkworms22. The SNP coordinates were not comparable because we used a different version of the reference genome. However, at least six million SNPs were newly identified in our study.
Phylogenetic and PCA analysis
VCF2Dis v1.42 (https://github.com/BGI-shenzhen/VCF2Dis) was used to estimate p distances between every two samples based on a VCF file containing SNPs. PHYLIPNEW v3.69 fneighbor (http://emboss.sourceforge.net/apps/cvs/embassy/phylipnew/) was used to build the Neighbor-Joining Tree. For PCA analysis, we used plink58 v2.0 (–make-bed) to convert a VCF file to a bed file. Subsequently, the GCTA59 v1.93.0 beta program was used to estimate the genetic relationship matrix (GRM) and calculate eigenvectors.
Selective sweeps
Artificial selection regions were estimated using a sliding window approach with 5 kb window and 500 bp step size. For each window, we calculated the population divergence index (FST), neutrality tests (Tajima’s D), and XP-CLR based on the prior formulas60,61,62. Domestication-associated regions were identified by comparing wild with local silkworms and improvement-associated regions were defined by comparing local with improved silkworms in China (CHN-I) and Japan (JPN-I) separately. The overlapped genome regions of the top 1% FST, top 5% XP-CLR and lowest 5% Tajima’s Ddescendant (and Tajima’s Ddescendant < Tajima’s Dancestral) signatures were defined as candidate selective sweep regions. The genes included in these regions were regarded as potentially associated with silkworm domestication and breeding.
Genome assembly
Before assembly, Jellyfish63 v2.2.6 was used to count k-mer frequencies (k = 17). Then, the genome characters including genome size, repetitiveness, and the rate of heterozygosity were predicted with genomeScope64 v1.0 using NGS data.
The de novo genome assembly was performed with the following pipeline: (a) The ONT reads were corrected by Canu65 v1.8. (b) The corrected ONT reads were assembled into contigs by Smartdenovo66 v1.0 with the following parameters: wtpre –J 5000; wtzmo –k 16 –z 10 –Z 16 –U −1 –m 0.6 –A 1000; wtclp –d 3 –k 300 –m 0.6; wtlay –w 300 –s 200 –m 0.6 –r 0.95 –c 1; wtcns –m 0.6. (c) The contigs were corrected three times with ONT reads by racon67 v1.3.3, and one time by medaka v0.7.1 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka). In this step, minimap268 v2.17 was used to map ONT reads to the contigs, and racon was used to correct contigs and generated consensus sequences. The final correction was conducted using the medaka program. (d) pilon69 v1.23 software was used to polish the corrected contigs. In this step, NGS reads were mapped to corrected contigs using BWA mem, and pilon was used to polish with the following parameters:–fix bases–mindepth 20–verbose–diploid. We only used the reads with a mapping quality above 20 for this step. (e) If the assembled genome exceeded the estimated size of genome survey by >5%, we performed de-redundancy using Purge Haplotigs70 v1.0.0. (f) To obtain chromosome-level genomes, we used RagTag71 v1.0.0 to correct and anchor the contigs to chromosomes of the reference genome with the corrected ONT reads. Finally, we mapped NGS reads to the assembled genome, and assessed the genome coverage and mapping ratio (using all mapped reads). We also used Benchmarking Universal Single-copy Orthologues (BUSCO v 5.2.1) to estimate the integrity of the assembled genome (including complete single-copy, duplicated, and fragmented BUSCOs) using insecta_odb1072.
Repetitive element annotation
For the annotation of repetitive elements, simple sequence repeats were identified by GMATA73 v2.2. Tandem repeats (TRs) were identified by Tandem Repeats Finder (TRF)74 v4.09. Then, we used ab initio, structure, and homology-based methods to annotate TEs. Briefly, MITE-Hunter75 v2 (https://github.com/Adamtaranto/MITE_Hunter_2) was used to search miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs). LTR_finder76 v1.07, GenomeTools v1.5.9 LTR_harverst77, and LTR_retriver78 v2.9.0 were used to identify long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. We performed de novo searching to identify repeats by RepeatModeler v2.0.1 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler/) and we classified the repeats into TEs superfamilies through TEclass79 v2.1.3c. Finally, all TEs were merged into a repeat library that was used to annotate and mask sequences in the genome by RepeatMasker v4.1.1 (http://repeatmasker.org/).
Gene annotation
Three approaches including ab initio prediction, homology-based prediction, and transcriptome-based assembly were used to predict gene structure in 100 genomes, including 14 wild, 41 local, 15 improved, and 30 genetic stocks. For homology-based prediction, GeMoMa80 v1.6.10 was used to align the protein sequences of the reference silkworm, Drosophila melanogaster, Apis mellifera, and Danaus plexippus to the newly assembled silkworm genomes. For the transcriptome-based assembly, STAR81 v2.7.3a was used to map the mRNA sequencing reads from 56 RNA samples, 15 strains, and 7 tissues (CNGB BioProject ID: CNP0001815, NCBI project ID: PRJNA262539, PRJNA264587, PRJNA407019) to the newly assembled genomes, stringtie82 v2.1.4 was used to perform RNA assembly, and PASA v2.3.383 was used to predict open reading frames (ORFs). augustus84 v3.4.0 with default parameters was used to perform ab initio gene prediction based on the training set obtained by PASA. Finally, EVidenceModeler85 v1.1.1 (EVM) was used to produce an integrated gene set.
For each genome, information about gene function, motifs, and domains was obtained through homology searches against public databases including Swiss-Prot, NCBI non-redundant (NR) proteins, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Eukaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG), and Gene Ontology (GO). The GO terms of genes were identified using the InterProScan86 v5.41-82.0 program with default parameters. For the other four annotations, the proteins of each genome were used as queries in BLAST+87 v2.9.0 BLASTP (e value <1e-5) searches against Swiss-Prot, NR, KEGG, and KOG databases.
ncRNA annotation
For the annotation of non-coding RNA (ncRNA), tRNAscan-SE88 v2.0 was used to identify transfer RNAs (tRNAs), and Infernal89 v1.1.3 cmscan was used to identify microRNAs and small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) by searching against the Rfam database (http://rfam.xfam.org/). Then, RNAmmer90 v1.2 was used to identify rRNAs.
Pan-gene analysis
OrthoFinder91 v2.3.7 with default parameters was used to cluster all genes of the 100 assembled genomes into orthologous groups that were classified into core, softcore, dispensable, and private genes.
Identification, verification, and annotation of SVs
For ONT reads, SV calling based on the assembly and read-mapping approaches showed an overlap of 90% on average in genomes of tomato7. In this study, a similar pipeline was employed to identify structural variations for long-read sequenced samples. First, the ONT reads of each sample were aligned to the reference genome using NGMLR92 v0.2.7. Then, Sniffles92 v1.0.11 was used to call SVs. For filtering potentially spurious SVs, we first identified regions of the reference genome prone to producing false SV calls. To identify these regions, SURVIVOR93 v1.0.3 was used to simulate ONT reads (~100× the genome coverage) from the reference genome and Sniffles92 was used to call SVs. A total of 10 simulations was performed and the 10 VCF files containing structural variations were merged by SURVIVOR93 (minimum distance = 1 kb, same SV type, and minimum SV length = 50 bp). The SVs located in these error-prone regions and their 2.5 kb flanking regions were filtered. SVs larger than 100 kb or with a “0/0” genotype were also removed. All SVs of the 545 genomes were merged using Jasmine v1.0.1 (min_support = 1, max_dist = 500, k_jaccard = 9, min_seq_id = 0.25, spec_len = 30,–run_iris).
To confirm the quality of the identified SVs, we first checked the reported SVs in our sequenced strains and counted how many SVs could be accurately identified. Next, we assayed 50 PAVs in the strains with and without SV by PCR with primer pairs flanking each SV followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Finally, we mapped the short reads of each long-read sequencing strain to the pan-genome and estimated the precision, recall, and F1 score.
To identify repeat elements of SV sequences, the repeat library constructed from our 100 de novo assembled genomes was used to annotate and mask sequences in SVs using RepeatMasker v4.1.1 (http://repeatmasker.org/) with RMBlast v2.9.0-p2 (http://repeatmasker.org/RMBlast.html). The positional relationship between SVs and genes was annotated using Vcfanno94 v0.3.2.
Estimation of pan-gene plateau
Curves describing pan-gene number were fitted with the nls function in R according to previous studies95,96,97. The pan-gene number was estimated using the model y = A + BeCx. To evaluate pan-gene number in groups with a different number of genomes, we first selected 10 representative genomes based on phylogenetic relationships (Supplementary Fig. 1a) to carry out pan-gene number analysis. Subsequently, 10 genomes were added step by step up to 100 genomes in the following regression analyses. In total, 10 regression analyses were carried out. From the regression of 10 samples to the regression of 100 samples, the increment of gene number decreases gradually and was finally close to zero. The pan-gene increment fitted curve of each additional sample was also drawn (Fig. 3g, Supplementary Fig. 1c).
Graph-based pan-genome construction
The linear reference genome and all PAVs of the 545 long-read sequencing genomes were used to construct a graph-based genome via Vg toolkit98 v1.30.0. Based on this graph-based genome, we then used Vg toolkit pipeline considering the novel variants (using the augmented graph and gam) to call SVs in all the 537 samples that were only sequenced through NGS technology.
RNA-seq analysis and qRT-PCR assay
The RNA sequencing data of each sample were mapped to the reference genome using bowtie299 v2.4.2. Gene read counts were calculated using RSEM100 v1.3.3 and gene expression was normalized using the number of Fragments Per Kilobase per Million bases (FPKM). We performed qPCR using a Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Yeasen) reaction system on the qTOWER3G system (Analytik Jena). The primers used in the qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Data 9.
The impact of SVs on gene expression
The impact of SVs on gene expression was investigated using the previous approach8. Briefly, each SV-gene pair was defined by the distance (<5 kb) between SV and its related gene. We filtered these SV-gene pairs to retain the pairs that had one SV present in at least three and absent in at least three of the 14 samples with RNA-seq data. For each SV-gene pair, the samples were classified according to the presence or absence of SV groups. The differential expression genes between the two groups were compared using a student’s t test, and p values underwent FDR correction using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
Identification of the SVs associated with domestication and improvement traits
The frequency of each SV between groups was compared using Fisher’s exact test. The corrected p values (FDR) were calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. The SVs with significantly divergent frequencies (FDR < 0.0001, fold change >2) in wild-local or local-improved comparisons were defined as domestication- or improve-associated SVs.
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, transgenic overexpression, and RNA interference
For gene knockout, guide RNAs were designed with CRISPRdirect101 v140413 and synthesized in BGI (China). The Cas9 protein was purchased from Invitrogen. Then, the mixture of Cas9 protein (0.5–0.8 ng) and guide RNA (5–8 ng) was injected into newly laid eggs by microinjection.
The transgenic vector piggyBac [3×P3-EGFP, Fib-H-BmE2F1-SV40] was constructed to overexpress BmE2F1 gene in silk gland. The vector was injected with the helper plasmid pHA3PIG containing the piggyBac transposase sequence and the B. mori actin 3 promoter102 into newly laid eggs by microinjection.
For RNA interference, short interfering RNAs were designed and synthesized in BGI (China). The siRNAs (250 µM, 0.5–0.75 µl/individual) were injected into the left side of the intersegment between the 7th and 8th segments of 3rd instar larvae. Then, conductive gel was placed at the injection site (left, positive pole) and control site (right, negative pole) and 15 V electric voltage was applied103. The sequences of sgRNA and siRNA used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 9.
Fineness measurement
Cocoons were reeled into single silk fibers. The silk fiber length and weight were measured. We then calculated fineness (F, dtex) of each cocoon using the formula:
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Raw data of the long-read sequencing and short-read sequencing (including RNA-seq and whole-genome sequencing) used in this study have been deposited in the CNGB Nucleotide Sequence Archive (CNSA) of China National GeneBank DataBase (CNGBdb, https://db.cngb.org) with BioProject ID CNP0001815 and also in the Genome Sequence Archive (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/) with accession number CRA007878. All 545 genome assemblies, 100 genome annotations (gff files), pan-genome, and VCF files (SNP, SV) have also been deposited in the CNGBdb with BioProject ID CNP0002456. This study also analyzed data for four released wild silkworm genomes that are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database according to accession numbers DRX054041, DRX054040, ERS402904, ERS402902. All phenotypic data have been listed in the eighth column of Supplementary Data 1. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The bioinformatic tools used in our study are all published or publicly available and are described in Methods.
References
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015).
Bayer, P. E., Golicz, A. A., Scheben, A., Batley, J. & Edwards, D. Plant pan-genomes are the new reference. Nat. Plants 6, 914–920 (2020).
Collins, R. L. et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics. Nature 581, 444–451 (2020).
Sherman, R. M. & Salzberg, S. L. Pan-genomics in the human genome era. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 243–254 (2020).
Tao, Y., Jordan, D. R. & Mace, E. S. A graph-based pan-genome guides biological discovery. Mol. Plant 13, 1247–1249 (2020).
Golicz, A. A., Bayer, P. E., Bhalla, P. L., Batley, J. & Edwards, D. Pangenomics comes of age: from bacteria to plant and animal applications. Trends Genet. 36, 132–145 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 182, 162–176 e113 (2020).
Alonge, M. et al. Major impacts of widespread structural variation on gene expression and crop improvement in tomato. Cell 182, 145–161 e123 (2020).
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 e3516 (2021).
Sun, X. et al. Phased diploid genome assemblies and pan-genomes provide insights into the genetic history of apple domestication. Nat. Genet. 52, 1423–1432 (2020).
Song, J. M. et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus. Nat. Plants 6, 34–45 (2020).
Chakraborty, M., Emerson, J. J., Macdonald, S. J. & Long, A. D. Structural variants exhibit widespread allelic heterogeneity and shape variation in complex traits. Nat. Commun. 10, 4872 (2019).
Kim, B.Y., et al. Highly contiguous assemblies of 101 drosophilid genomes. Elife 10, e66405 (2021).
Ruggieri A.A., et al. A butterfly pan-genome reveals a large amount of structural variation underlies the evolution of chromatin accessibility. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.14.488334v1 (2022).
Audano, P. A. et al. Characterizing the major structural variant alleles of the human genome. Cell 176, 663–675 e619 (2019).
Wu, Z.K., et al. Structural variants in the Chinese population and their impact on phenotypes, diseases and population adaptation. Nat. Commun. 12, 6501 (2021).
Underhill A. P. Current issues in Chinese Neolithic archaeology. J. World Prehistory 11, 103–160 (1997).
Mita, K. et al. The genome sequence of silkworm, Bombyx mori. DNA Res. 11, 27–35 (2004).
Xia, Q. et al. A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori). Science 306, 1937–1940 (2004).
International Silkworm Genome, C. The genome of a lepidopteran model insect, the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 1036–1045 (2008).
Kawamoto, M. et al. High-quality genome assembly of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 107, 53–62 (2019).
Xiang, H. et al. The evolutionary road from wild moth to domestic silkworm. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1268–1279 (2018).
Zhao, Q., Han, M. J., Sun, W. & Zhang, Z. Copy number variations among silkworms. BMC Genomics 15, 251 (2014).
Kawamoto M., Kiuchi T., Katsuma S. SilkBase: an integrated transcriptomic and genomic database for Bombyx mori and related species. Database (Oxford) 2022, baac040 (2022).
Jiang, Y. L. Analysis of the half cocoon shell unearthed from Xiyin village. Acta Sericologica Sin. 8, 39–40 (1982).
Goldsmith, M. R., Shimada, T. & Abe, H. The genetics and genomics of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50, 71–100 (2005).
Li, B. & Shen, W. Advances on the origins of Bombyx mori and Bombyx mandarina. Zhongguo Canye 2, 11–23 (2008).
Duan, T. J. et al. The harvest of excavation in ruins of the Neolithic Age in Shicun, Xia county, Shanxi province during 2019-2020. World Antiquity 2, 2–7 (2021). (In Chinese).
Sakudoh, T. et al. Carotenoid silk coloration is controlled by a carotenoid-binding protein, a product of the yellow blood gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8941–8946 (2007).
Ito, K. et al. Yellow-e determines the color pattern of larval head and tail spots of the silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 5624–5629 (2010).
Liu, C. et al. Repression of tyrosine hydroxylase is responsible for the sex-linked chocolate mutation of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12980–12985 (2010).
Fujii, T., Abe, H., Katsuma, S. & Shimada, T. Identification and characterization of the fusion transcript, composed of the apterous homolog and a putative protein phosphatase gene, generated by 1.5-Mb interstitial deletion in the vestigial (Vg) mutant of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41, 306–312 (2011).
Sakudoh, T. et al. CD36 homolog divergence is responsible for the selectivity of carotenoid species migration to the silk gland of the silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Lipid Res. 54, 482–495 (2013).
Dai, F. et al. Aspartate decarboxylase is required for a normal pupa pigmentation pattern in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Sci. Rep. 5, 10885 (2015).
Fujii, T., Abe, H., Kawamoto, M., Banno, Y. & Shimada, T. Positional cloning of the sex-linked giant egg (Ge) locus in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Mol. Biol. 24, 213–221 (2015).
Tong, X. et al. A novel laminin beta gene BmLanB1-w regulates wing-specific cell adhesion in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Sci. Rep. 5, 12562 (2015).
Daimon, T. et al. The number of larval molts is controlled by hox in caterpillars. Curr. Biol. 31, 884–891 e883 (2021).
Long, E., Evans, C., Chaston, J. & Udall, J. A. Genomic structural variations within five continental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. G3-Genes Genom. Genet. 8, 3247–3253 (2018).
Rahman, R. et al. Unique transposon landscapes are pervasive across Drosophila melanogaster genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 10655–10672 (2015).
Mills, R. E., Bennett, E. A., Iskow, R. C. & Devine, S. E. Which transposable elements are active in the human genome? Trends Genet. 23, 183–191 (2007).
Xia, Q. et al. Complete resequencing of 40 genomes reveals domestication events and genes in silkworm (Bombyx). Science 326, 433–436 (2009).
Zhu, Z., Guan, Z., Liu, G., Wang, Y. & Zhang, Z. SGID: a comprehensive and interactive database of the silkworm. Database (Oxford) 2019, baz134 (2019).
Guo, N. et al. Structure analysis of the spinneret from Bombyx mori and its influence on silk qualities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 126, 1282–1287 (2019).
Nijhout, H.F. Insect hormones. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994).
Hasegawa, K. Diapause hormone of the silkworm, Bombyx-mori. Nature 179, 1300–1301 (1957).
Fujio, K. Non-maternal inheritance in voltinism observed in the crossing experiments between Indonesian polyvoltine and Japanese bivoltine races of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. J. Sericult. Sci. Jpn. 37, 453–461 (1968).
Yamamoto, T., Gamo, T. & Hirobe, T. Genetical studies of the pigmented and non-diapause egg mutant in Bombyx mori. J. Sericult. Sci. Jpn. 47, 181–185 (1978).
Haruyuki, S., Kumiko, M. & Hiroo, N. Studies on embryonic diapause in the pnd mutant of the silkworm, Bombyx mori: Genetic control of embryogenesis. J. Insect Physiol. 32, 215–220 (1986).
Banno, Y. A guide to the silkworm mutants 2005-gene name and gene symbol. (Silkwork Genetics Division, Institute of Genetic Resources, Kyushu University, Kyushu, Japan; 2005).
Toshio, O. & Okitsugu, Y. Changes in glucose and fructose contents during embryonic development of the silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Sericult. Sci. Jpn. 50, 190–196 (1981).
Sherratt, T. N. & Beatty, C. D. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Am. Nat. 162, 377–389 (2003).
Prudic, K. L., Oliver, J. C. & Sperling, F. A. H. The signal environment is more important than diet or chemical specialization in the evolution of warning coloration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19381–19386 (2007).
Yamaguchi, J., et al. Periodic Wnt1 expression in response to ecdysteroid generates twin-spot markings on caterpillars. Nat. Commun. 4, 1857 (2013).
Chen, Y. et al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience 7, 1–6 (2018).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).
Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).
Hudson, R. R., Slatkin, M. & Maddison, W. P. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132, 583–589 (1992).
Chen, H., Patterson, N. & Reich, D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 20, 393–402 (2010).
Marcais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764–770 (2011).
Vurture, G. W. et al. GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads. Bioinformatics 33, 2202–2204 (2017).
Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722–736 (2017).
Liu, H. L., Wu, S. G., Li, A. L. & Ruan, J. SMARTdenovo: a de novo assembler using long noisy reads. Gigabyte 1, 2021 (2021).
Vaser, R., Sovic, I., Nagarajan, N. & Sikic, M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27, 737–746 (2017).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PloS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
Roach, M. J., Schmidt, S. A. & Borneman, A. R. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 460 (2018).
Alonge, M. et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 20, 224 (2019).
Simao, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Wang, X. & Wang, L. GMATA: An integrated software package for genome-scale SSR mining, marker development and viewing. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1350 (2016).
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999).
Han, Y. & Wessler, S. R. MITE-Hunter: a program for discovering miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements from genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e199 (2010).
Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265–W268 (2007).
Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 18 (2008).
Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: a highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol. 176, 1410–1422 (2018).
Abrusan, G., Grundmann, N., DeMester, L. & Makalowski, W. TEclass–a tool for automated classification of unknown eukaryotic transposable elements. Bioinformatics 25, 1329–1330 (2009).
Keilwagen, J., Hartung, F., Paulini, M., Twardziok, S. O. & Grau, J. Combining RNA-seq data and homology-based gene prediction for plants, animals and fungi. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 189 (2018).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Kovaka, S. et al. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 20, 278 (2019).
Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654–5666 (2003).
Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R. & Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24, 637–644 (2008).
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).
Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 1–14 (2019).
Nawrocki, E. P. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29, 2933–2935 (2013).
Lagesen, K. et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3100–3108 (2007).
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
Pedersen, B. S., Layer, R. M. & Quinlan, A. R. Vcfanno: fast, flexible annotation of genetic variants. Genome Biol. 17, 118 (2016).
Tettelin, H. et al. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: Implications for the microbial “pan-genome”. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13950–13955 (2005).
Mongodin, E. F. et al. Inter- and intra-specific pan-genomes of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: genome stability and adaptive radiation. BMC Genomics 14, 693 (2013).
Golicz, A. A. et al. The pangenome of an agronomically important crop plant Brassica oleracea. Nat. Commun. 7, 13390 (2016).
Garrison, E. et al. Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference. Nat. Biotech. 36, 875–879 (2018).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Li B. & Dewey C.N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
Naito, Y., Hino, K., Bono, H. & Ui-Tei, K. CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics 31, 1120–1123 (2015).
Tamura, T. et al. Germline transformation of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. using a piggyBac transposon-derived vector. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 81–84 (2000).
Ando, T. & Fujiwara, H. Electroporation-mediated somatic transgenesis for rapid functional analysis in insects. Development 140, 454–458 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We thank Chao Su at Northwest A&F University, Bing Li at Soochow University, Keping Chen at Jiangsu University, Yuyin Chen at Zhejiang University, Weizheng Cui at Shandong Agriculture University, Chaobin Luo at Sericulture Institute of Guizhou, Yongqiang Wang at Zhejiang Academy of Agriculture Science, Wenfu Xiao, Gang Liu, and Yian Chen at Sericulture Research Institute of Sichuan, Zhanpeng Dong at Sericulture and Apicultural Research institute of Yunnan, Anjie Wang at Shandong Institute of Sericulture, Tao Fan at Sericulture Institute of Anhui, Lihui Bi at Sericulture Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (GZAR), Fan Wu at Economy Crops Institute of Hubei, Yuxia Wang at Shanxi Research Institute of Sericulture, and Junwen Ai at the Sericultural Research Institute of Hunan for helping in the collection of silkworm strains. We also thank Desheng Zhang from Southwest University for the figure “Phenotypic diversity in silkworms”. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31830094) to F.D., (no. U20A2058) to X.T., (no. 32002228) to LingLi Z., and (no. 32002229) to X.D., China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (no. CARS-18-ZJ0102) to F.D., Creative Research Group of the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing to F.D., and High-level Talents Program of Southwest University (no. SWURC2021001) to F.D.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.D., W.W., and X.T. conceived the project. F.D., Z.X., W.W., Z.T., and C.L. designed and supervised this project. F.D., H.H., X.T., Shubo L., Y.Y., C.L., T.G., Yahui Z., Jiangwen L., L.Z., Jinghou L., W.Z., Jiangbo S., S.H., S.W., Yunlong Z., Lei Z., Linli Z., L.C., Y.T., G.C., L.Y., R.Y., H.Q., Yanqun L., Y.P., Y.X., T.L., and A.X. collected samples for RNA-seq and Genome sequencing and performed phenotypic analysis. M.J.H., K.L., S.T., Yucheng L., Shubo L., Jianghong S., A.L., C.Z., Yanhong L., Z.W., W.H., J.X., T.F., Ye.Y., and J.W. performed genome assembly, SNP calling and phylogenetic analysis. M.J.H., K.L., Yanhong L., Shubo L., Jianghong S., A.L., and C.Z. performed genome annotation and pan-genome analysis. F.D., W.W., X.T., M.J.H., K.L., S.T., Y.L., Shubo L., Jianghong S., A.L., and C.Z. conducted the analysis of genomic variations related to complex traits. X.D., S.L., Q.G., B.Z., D.T., Y.Y., N.G., L.L., and Yaru L. conducted experiments. X.T., M.J.H., K.L., Shubo L., Jianghong S., A.L., C.Z., and Yucheng L. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. F.D., W.W., Z.T., E.W., and A.M. revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Marian Goldsmith, Tianzhu Xiong and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, X., Han, MJ., Lu, K. et al. High-resolution silkworm pan-genome provides genetic insights into artificial selection and ecological adaptation. Nat Commun 13, 5619 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33366-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33366-x
This article is cited by
-
From phyllosphere to insect cuticles: silkworms gather antifungal bacteria from mulberry leaves to battle fungal parasite attacks
Microbiome (2024)
-
A pan-genome of 69 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions reveals a conserved genome structure throughout the global species range
Nature Genetics (2024)
-
A review of the pangenome: how it affects our understanding of genomic variation, selection and breeding in domestic animals?
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology (2023)
-
Telomere-to-telomere assemblies of 142 strains characterize the genome structural landscape in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nature Genetics (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
