Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31506-x, published online 08 July 2022

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 1 and Fig. 3. In the original version of Figs. 1 and 3, the sugars were drawn with the L form instead of the D form. The sugars in this work were obtained from the naturally occurring D enantiomers.

The correct version of Fig. 1 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

The correct version of Fig. 3 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.