Dicer ablation in Kiss1 neurons impairs puberty and fertility preferentially in female mice

Roa, Juan; Ruiz-Cruz, Miguel; Ruiz-Pino, Francisco; Onieva, Rocio; Vazquez, Maria J.; Sanchez-Tapia, Maria J.; Ruiz-Rodriguez, Jose M.; Sobrino, Veronica; Barroso, Alexia; Heras, Violeta; Velasco, Inmaculada; Perdices-Lopez, Cecilia; Ohlsson, Claes; Avendaño, Maria Soledad; Prevot, Vincent; Poutanen, Matti; Pinilla, Leonor; Gaytan, Francisco; Tena-Sempere, Manuel

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32347-4

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 09 August 2022

Dicer ablation in Kiss1 neurons impairs puberty and fertility preferentially in female mice

Juan Roa ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8970-421X^1,2,3,4^na1^na2,
Miguel Ruiz-Cruz ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-4709^1,2,3,4^na1,
Francisco Ruiz-Pino^1,2,3,4,
Rocio Onieva^1,2,3,4,
Maria J. Vazquez^1,2,3,4,
Maria J. Sanchez-Tapia^1,2,3,4,
Jose M. Ruiz-Rodriguez ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-7422^1,2,3,4,
Veronica Sobrino^1,2,3,4,
Alexia Barroso^1,2,3,4,
Violeta Heras^1,2,3,4,
Inmaculada Velasco^1,2,3,4,
Cecilia Perdices-Lopez^1,2,3,4,
Claes Ohlsson ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9633-2805⁵,
Maria Soledad Avendaño^1,2,3,4,
Vincent Prevot ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7185-3615⁶,
Matti Poutanen^5,7,
Leonor Pinilla^1,2,3,4,
Francisco Gaytan^1,2,3,4 &
…
Manuel Tena-Sempere ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-5567^1,2,3,4,7^na2

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 4663 (2022) Cite this article

3578 Accesses
5 Citations
34 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Kiss1 neurons, producing kisspeptins, are essential for puberty and fertility, but their molecular regulatory mechanisms remain unfolded. Here, we report that congenital ablation of the microRNA-synthesizing enzyme, Dicer, in Kiss1 cells, causes late-onset hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in both sexes, but is compatible with pubertal initiation and preserved Kiss1 neuronal populations at the infantile/juvenile period. Yet, failure to complete puberty and attain fertility is observed only in females. Kiss1-specific ablation of Dicer evokes disparate changes of Kiss1-cell numbers and Kiss1/kisspeptin expression between hypothalamic subpopulations during the pubertal-transition, with a predominant decline in arcuate-nucleus Kiss1 levels, linked to enhanced expression of its repressors, Mkrn3, Cbx7 and Eap1. Our data unveil that miRNA-biosynthesis in Kiss1 neurons is essential for pubertal completion and fertility, especially in females, but dispensable for initial reproductive maturation and neuronal survival in both sexes. Our results disclose a predominant miRNA-mediated inhibitory program of repressive signals that is key for precise regulation of Kiss1 expression and, thereby, reproductive function.

Protein-truncating variants in BSN are associated with severe adult-onset obesity, type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease

Article Open access 04 April 2024

Cdk8/CDK19 promotes mitochondrial fission through Drp1 phosphorylation and can phenotypically suppress pink1 deficiency in Drosophila

Article Open access 18 April 2024

Restoration of neuronal progenitors by partial reprogramming in the aged neurogenic niche

Article 29 March 2024

Introduction

Fertility is governed by multiple regulatory factors that impinge on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis to modulate, in most cases, the activity of GnRH neurons as the final output pathway for the brain control of reproduction¹. These neurons are scattered through the preoptic area (POA) of the hypothalamus, projecting their axons to the median eminence where gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is secreted to the portal system to stimulate the secretion of gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), by the pituitary². Acquisition of reproductive capacity occurs during the pubertal period, a phenomenon driven by an increase in the activity of the GnRH pulse generator that dictates the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropins to stimulate gonadal maturation. This pattern of pulsatile secretion of GnRH and gonadotropins is also mandatory for the proper functioning of the reproductive axis thereafter. While numerous factors, including intrinsic properties of GnRH neurons³, are involved in the maintenance of GnRH pulsatility, Kiss1 neurons have emerged in the last years as a major component of the so-called GnRH pulse generator⁴.

Kiss1 neurons produce kisspeptins, a family of neuropeptides encoded by Kiss1, that stimulate GnRH secretion acting via the G-protein coupled receptor, Gpr54¹. A wealth of data have conclusively documented that Kiss1 and Grp54 are essential for the acquisition and maintenance of reproductive capacity in mammals, including humans^1,5; mice and humans harboring inactivating mutations of these genes suffer impuberism and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. This essential role in the control of reproductive axis is conducted by discrete populations of Kiss1 neurons, which in rodents are mainly located in two different hypothalamic areas, namely the arcuate-nucleus (ARC) and the anteroventral periventricular nucleus (AVPV)⁶. While both populations produce kisspeptins, they display interesting neuro-anatomical and functional divergences. Thus, the AVPV Kiss1 neuronal population is far more prominent in females and is activated by estrogens to mediate their positive feedback for the induction of the preovulatory LH surge. In contrast, the ARC Kiss1 neuronal population is present in both sexes and is repressed by gonadal steroids to convey their negative feedback actions essential for the tonic release of GnRH⁷. The molecular underpinnings for these differential features remain largely unknown.

ARC Kiss1 neurons have been shown to produce also other neuropeptides with essential roles in reproductive control, namely, neurokinin B (NKB) and Dynorphin (Dyn); hence, the term KNDy (for Kisspeptin, Neurokinin B, and Dynorphin) has been coined to name this neuronal population. In fact, KNDy neurons have been pointed to as the cornerstone of the GnRH pulse generator system⁴, by virtue of the presence of para/autocrine regulatory mechanisms involving NKB, Dyn, and their receptors, to drive the activity of Kiss1 neurons in a pulsatile manner⁸. This regulatory network, which was initially formulated on the basis of expression analyses and electrophysiological data^8,9, has been recently corroborated by optogenetic photo-stimulation of KNDy neurons¹⁰. Likewise, GCaMP fiber photometry and optogenetics/pharmacogenetics in vivo have documented that KNDy neuron activation produces a self-priming increase of basal and episodic calcium events, correlating with pulsatile LH secretion⁴, as a surrogate marker of GnRH bursts. These data conclusively document the key role of KNDy neurons within the GnRH pulse generator.

While our understanding of the physiology and regulation of Kiss1 neurons has expanded substantially^11,12,13, critical aspects of the molecular mechanisms whereby the development and function of Kiss1 neuronal populations are precisely controlled remain poorly characterized. Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms have recently emerged as putative modulators of puberty, through regulation of Kiss1 expression via SIRT1-mediated modifications of the chromatin landscape¹⁴. In addition, changes in histone acetylation in the Kiss1 promoter in AVPV vs. ARC neurons seemingly contribute to the differential feedback actions of estrogen at these sites¹⁵. However, the putative role of other non-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in the precise control of Kiss1 neurons remains largely unexplored. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA sequences that regulate a large proportion of human protein-coding genes, mainly by post-transcriptional repression^16,17. Canonical biogenesis of miRNAs involves a concatenated series of nuclear and cytoplasmatic events, in which the RNAse III enzyme, Dicer, is mandatory for final generation of mature miRNAs, and initiates also the formation of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), responsible for gene repression¹⁸. Over the last decades, miRNAs have been shown to participate in the regulation of a large number of physiological and pathological processes, ranging from somatic development to cancer progression^19,20. Interestingly, several studies have suggested a major role of miRNA-regulatory pathways at different levels of the HPG axis, with distinct roles in the control of gonadal and gonadotrope maturation and function^21,22,23,24. More recently, specific miRNAs have been involved in the control of key hypothalamic factors for the regulation of puberty, such as GnRH and Makorin3^25,26. However, the putative physiological roles of miRNA-regulatory pathways in the control of the maturation and function of Kiss1 neurons in vivo have not been explored to date. By generation of a mouse line with conditional ablation of Dicer in Kiss1-expressing cells, named KiDKO, we provide herein conclusive evidence on the need for proper miRNA biosynthetic machinery in Kiss1 neurons for adult reproductive function, and surface also interesting differences, between sexes and Kiss1 neuronal subpopulations, in the roles of miRNA-regulatory pathways in Kiss1 neurons for the precise regulation of the brain networks governing reproduction.

Results

Selective ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 neurons: the KiDKO mouse

Mice with selective elimination of the miRNA maturing enzyme, Dicer, in Kiss1 cells, named KiDKO for Kiss1-specific Dicer KO, were generated using the Cre-LoxP strategy. KiDKO mice were born at a Mendelian ratio. Specific ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 neurons was assessed by PCR of the recombinant Dicer allele, in situ hybridization, and qPCR on FACS-isolated Kiss1 neurons. A recombinant Dicer allele was detected by PCR in peripubertal (PND28) KiDKO mice, on genomic DNA isolated from the hypothalamic regions containing Kiss1 neurons (namely, ARC and POA, the later including AVPV), while it was not detectable in the cortex (area without reported Kiss1 expression) of KiDKO mice, or in hypothalamic samples from control animals, used as negative control. This recombination event was detected as early as on PND1 in the hypothalamus of KiDKO but not of control mice (Fig. S1a). In addition, dual in situ hybridization, using BaseScope^TM probes for detection of mRNAs corresponding to Kiss1 and Dicer Exon 23 (i.e., the loxP-flanked region subjected to recombination), documented co-localization in controls but not in KiDKO mice, therefore confirming that Kiss1 neurons normally express Dicer, but this is ablated in KiDKO animals (Fig. S1b). Note that this proof-of-principle analysis was conducted in young-adult, ovariectomized KiDKO mice, as a means to enhance detection sensitivity. As an additional control, TaqMan qPCR analyses in ARC Kiss1 neurons isolated at puberty, using FACS in KiDKO mice expressing YFP in Kiss1 cells, demonstrated that the levels of an abundant miRNA, namely let-7b, were significantly blunted in KiDKO mice (Fig. S1c); effective isolation of Kiss1 neurons by our FACS protocol was confirmed by detectable expression of Kiss1 and Tac2, but not of Npy, in Kiss1 cells obtained from the ARC of KiDKO and control mice (Fig. 1c). In the same vein, expression analyses in FACS cells demonstrated a dramatic drop in the percentage of Kiss1 neurons expressing Dicer in peripubertal KiDKO mice (Fig. S1d). Accordingly, Dicer expression was significantly diminished in the ARC of KiDKO males and females at PND14 and PND28, and in the AVPV of peripubertal KiDKO females (Fig. S1e). Of note, mice engineered to lack Dicer in GnRH neurons, named GoDKO (for Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-specific Dicer KO), were generated also as described in detail elsewhere²⁵, and were analyzed in parallel for comparative purposes in selected phenotypic studies.

**Fig. 1: Profound hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in adult KiDKO mice.**

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and infertility in mature adult male and female KiDKO mice

Congenital ablation of Dicer in Kiss1-expressing cells caused a profound state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) in male and female KiDKO mice of 4–6 months of age, i.e., mature adult period, following the standard nomenclature of the Jackson Laboratory. This HH phenotype was denoted by a significant atrophy of the reproductive organs (Fig. 1a, f), with testis, uterus, and ovarian weights being clearly diminished in conditional null animals (Fig. 1c, i). Histological analysis of the gonads showed a decrease in the tubular diameter and absence of mature spermatids in the testes of adult KiDKO mice, while in conditional null females, the ovaries showed an absence of corpora lutea, denoting lack of ovulation (Fig. 1b, c, h). The latter was also confirmed by the absence of estrous cyclicity, with persistent diestrus in vaginal smears, and the presence of preantral follicles as the most advanced stage of healthy growing follicles (Fig. 1g, h). Hormonal analyses documented disturbed gonadotropin secretion and suppressed circulating sex steroid levels as proof of central hypogonadism in KiDKO mice. Thus, adult KiDKO male mice displayed diminished serum levels of LH and FSH in single time-point measurements (Fig. 1d), as well as significantly reduced serum testosterone concentrations (Table 1). Likewise, time-course analyses of LH pulsatility, assayed by ultrasensitive ELISA on serial blood samples, documented suppressed basal LH levels in KiDKO male mice (Control: 0.14 ± 0.02 ng/mL vs. KiDKO: 0.07 ± 0.01; p = 0.01) and absence of normal LH peaks (Fig. 1e). Interestingly, although adult KiDKO female mice did not show significantly suppressed gonadotropin levels in single time-point measurements (Fig. 1j), or basal LH levels in pulsatility analyses (Control: 0.09 ± 0.02 ng/mL vs KiDKO: 0.07 ± 0.01; p = 0.44), LH peaks were also significantly blunted in female KiDKO mice (Fig. 1k). Yet, although the amplitude of LH peaks in KiDKO animals of both sexes was significantly reduced, peak frequency (#LH peaks/h) was not statistically different from controls (Males: Control: 0.85 ± 0.31 LH peaks/h vs KiDKO: 1.33 ± 0.46; p = 0.39; Females: Control: 2.12 ± 0.58 vs KiDKO: 0.85 ± 0.45; p = 0.11). In addition, adult KiDKO females displayed significantly reduced serum estradiol and progesterone levels, further attesting their hypogonadal state (Table 1).

Table 1 Circulating sex steroid levels in KiDKO and GoDKO male and female mice at two age windows: peripubertal (4-week-old) and adult (>2-month-old)

Full size table

The KiDKO phenotype largely recapitulated the features found in adult mice with congenital ablation of Dicer in GnRH neurons (Fig. S2). GoDKO mice displayed a state of HH, denoted by atrophy of gonadal structures in both sexes, and accompanied by the absence of any sign of ovulation in females and lack of mature spermatids in males (Fig. S2a–c, e–h). Basal LH and FSH levels, as well as circulating sex steroids, were significantly reduced in both males and females at adulthood (Fig. S2d, i, and Table 1).

Comparative analyses were conducted in KiDKO and GoDKO mice to assess the differential impact of Dicer ablation in these two key neuronal populations in terms of neuropeptide gene expression and neuroendocrine responses to major stimuli. In line with a discrete pattern of Dicer elimination in both lines, adult KiDKO mice displayed a preserved number of GnRH-expressing neurons in POA (Fig. S3a, c), but undetectable Kiss1 expression in the ARC of male and female mice, and in the AVPV of females; areas where Kiss1-expressing neurons were abundantly detected in control animals (Fig. S3b, d). On the contrary, GoDKO mice showed undetectable levels of GnRH expression vs. controls (Fig. S3e, g), whereas the expression of Kiss1 was not only preserved but even enhanced in the ARC of male and female mice, due to suppression of negative feedback control caused by the hypogonadal state of GoDKO animals (Fig. S3f). In turn, Kiss1 expression in the AVPV of GoDKO females was markedly reduced (Fig. S3h), as ovarian steroids are known to enhance Kiss1 mRNA levels selectively at this site²⁷.

In terms of neuroendocrine responses, KiDKO and GoDKO mice presented preserved responses to effective doses of GnRH, whose primary target is the pituitary, with significant increases in serum LH levels. Admittedly, the magnitude of these responses was smaller than in controls, but this is probably due to the diminished priming activity of endogenous GnRH at the pituitary of these animals rather than a primary major pituitary defect. In contrast, the expected rise of circulating LH following removal of negative feedback of gonadal secretions by gonadectomy did not occur in any of the two genotypes (Fig. S4a, b); similarly, no post-castration rise of FSH was detected in either KiDKO or GoDKO mice. However, disparate patterns of LH responses to kisspeptin-10 (Kp-10) and the glutamate receptor agonist, NMDA, were found between KiDKO and GoDKO mice. Thus, while KiDKO mice retained their capacity to respond to Kp-10 and NMDA (Fig. S4a), albeit with modest increases in LH secretion after NMDA, GoDKO mice displayed a complete ablation of LH responses to Kp-10 and NMDA (Fig. S4b).

Late-onset HH in KiDKO mice: sexually different impact on puberty onset and attainment of fertility

The presence of a complete HH phenotype in mature adult KiDKO mice prompted us to explore earlier maturational (infantile, peripubertal) stages and compare with features in the GoDKO model. Male and female KiDKO mice displayed normal body weight gain during the infantile-juvenile period, as well as fully preserved phenotypic signs of pubertal onset, namely balano-preputial separation (BPS) in males and vaginal opening (VO) in females (Fig. S5a, c). Likewise, LH and FSH levels were similar in control and KiDKO mice of both sexes, at the infantile (2-week-old) and peripubertal (4-week-old) periods, except for a slight elevation of LH levels in KiDKO female mice at 4 weeks (Fig. 2a, c). In the same vein, no differences were detected in serum sex steroid levels between peripubertal KiDKO and control mice (Table 1). In contrast, GoDKO mice of both sexes displayed a profound hypogonadotropic state, with significantly lower LH and FSH levels (Fig. 2b, d), at 4 weeks of age, which was preceded by trends of reduced LH and FSH secretion already at 2 weeks, which reached statistical significance for FSH in 2-week-old GoDKO females (Fig. 2d). Yet, no significant changes were detected in circulating sex steroid levels in peripubertal GoDKO mice, except for a significant reduction in serum progesterone levels in males (Table 1), although estradiol concentrations were in the limit of detection also in control mice at this age. Body weight gain was preserved in GoDKO mice of both sexes during the prepubertal transition (Fig. S5b, d), with normal VO in pubertal GoDKO females (Fig. S5d). In contrast, GoDKO males did not display BPS (Fig. S5b), linked to incomplete penis development (micro-penis).

**Fig. 2: Reproductive indices in KiDKO and GoDKO mice during the infantile-pubertal transition.**

Testis weight gain during the prepubertal transition was not grossly affected in KiDKO male mice (Fig. 2e), although seminiferous tubule diameter was reduced at 4 weeks of age (Fig. 2f), which was associated with a lower percentage of elongated spermatids (Fig. S5e), without increased number of apoptotic germ cells (Fig. S5f). In turn, GoDKO males showed significantly decreased testis weight at 4 weeks of age (Fig. 2g), when the tubular diameter was also suppressed (Fig. 2h). In addition, the number of elongated spermatids was reduced and the percentage of tubules with apoptotic germ cells tended to be higher in GoDKO males than in controls, although the latter difference did not reach statistically significance (Fig. S5g, h).

In female KiDKO mice, ovarian weight gain during the prepubertal transition was not affected; yet, the uterus weight in 4-week-old KiDKO females was significantly suppressed (Fig. 2i, j). Anyhow, no morphometric alterations were detected in the postnatal ovary of KiDKO animals, with preserved numbers of resting, primary, secondary and antral follicles at 2- and 4 weeks of age and similar percentages of atretic follicles to control mice (Fig. S5i, j). Despite such features of preserved follicular maturation during the prepubertal transition, pubertal KiDKO females did not reach an ovulatory stage, as evidenced by the lack of first estrus and absence of corpora lutea (see also Fig. 1g, h). In GoDKO female mice, ovarian and uterus weights were preserved at 2 weeks of age, but these were significantly suppressed in 4-week-old females (Fig. 2k, l), so that the increase of uterus and ovarian weights, observed during the infantile-pubertal transition in control and KiDKO mice, was abolished in GoDKO females (Fig. 2i, l). In addition, although no differences were found in the number of resting and growing follicles during the infantile and peripubertal period, the percentage of atretic follicles was significantly higher in the ovaries of GoDKO mice at 4 weeks of age (Fig. S5k, l), and they failed also to reach an ovulatory stage.

Finally, fertility tests were conducted in male and female mice of both genotypes. At two months of age, KiDKO males were proven fertile, with 7 out 11 virgin control females being impregnated (Fig. 2m). However, none of the KiDKO males were fertile at 4 months of age (0 out 11), while all of control males produced offspring when mated with virgin females, at both ages (Fig. 2n). Conversely, in line with signs of lack of spontaneous first ovulation, KiDKO females were infertile at 2–4 months of age, as shown by the lack of any successful pregnancy after matting with male mice of proven fertility (Fig. 2o). Interestingly, however, prepubertal KiDKO females could be primed to ovulate, with ovulatory responses that were grossly similar to those of controls after a standard priming protocol with gonadotropins (Fig. 2p). Yet, KiDKO females failed to display LH surges in response to an effective protocol of sex steroid priming in ovariectomized mice (Fig. 2q). On the other hand, both male and female GoDKO mice were infertile, but prepubertal GoDKO females could be forced to ovulate after gonadotropin priming, in line with our previous data²⁵; yet, the number of released oocytes was significantly lower than in control mice (Fig. S5m).

Differential impact of Dicer ablation on Kiss1 expression in ARC and AVPV along postnatal maturation

The neuronal basis for the reproductive phenotype of KiDKO mice during postnatal maturation was explored by expression analyses conducted in control and conditional null animals of both sexes, at 2 weeks and 4 weeks of age, and in adulthood. In situ hybridization allowed detection of numbers of Kiss1-expressing neurons in the ARC (in both males and females) and AVPV (only in females), together with relative Kiss1 expression per neuron (Fig. S6). In parallel, we took advantage of the fact that our Kiss1-Cre line express also GFP (tagged to Cre protein) under the endogenous Kiss1 promoter to detect the presence of GFP-positive neurons, as marker of viable Kiss1 neurons, in KiDKO and control mice (Fig. 3); since CreGFP is a non-secreted protein, GFP labeling is expected to be more robust than Kiss1/kisspeptin, therefore increasing the window of detection of Kiss1-expressing neurons.

**Fig. 3: Number of GFP-labeled, Kiss1-expressing neurons in KiDKO mice along postnatal maturation.**

Kiss1 neuronal populations, denoted by GFP labeling, were fully preserved in the ARC of KiDKO mice of both sexes, and the AVPV of females, during the infantile period (2 weeks of age; Fig. 3a, d, g), with conserved numbers of Kiss1-expressing cells (Fig. S6a, d, g), except for a moderate decline detected in the ARC of infantile KiDKO males (Fig. S6a). Yet, Kiss1 mRNA expression per neuron was fully conserved (Fig. S6a; inset). In contrast, the number of Kiss1 neurons (Fig. 3b, h), Kiss1-expressing cells, and relative Kiss1 mRNA levels per neuron (Fig. S6b, h) in the ARC were significantly suppressed in 4-week-old male and female KiDKO mice. However, none of these parameters was affected in the AVPV of pubertal KiDKO females (Fig. 3e and Fig. S6e). Finally, the number of GFP-labeled Kiss1 neurons (Fig. 3c, f, i), and Kiss1 expression (Fig. S6c, f, i), dropped to (nearly) undetectable levels in the ARC and AVPV populations of adult KiDKO of both sexes.

Differential impact of Dicer ablation on Kisspeptin levels in ARC and AVPV along postnatal maturation

Given the proven role of miRNAs in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression, kisspeptin protein levels were assessed in KiDKO mice at similar ages and at hypothalamic sites. Kiss1-specific Dicer ablation resulted in a massive drop in kisspeptin-immunoreactivity in the ARC of both males and females, which was observed already at 2 weeks of age, when protein levels were already nearly undetectable (Fig. 4a, b, g, h). In contrast, no significant differences in kisspeptin content/kisspeptin-positive cells were detected in the AVPV of KiDKO and control mice at 2- and 4-weeks of age (Fig. 4d, e). Of note, despite the massive suppression of kisspeptin content in the ARC, the infantile-pubertal transition was associated with an increase in kisspeptin-immunoreactivity at this nucleus in KiDKO mice of both sexes, which was accompanied by a significant rise in the number of kisspeptin-positive cells also in the AVPV (Fig. S7). Finally, kisspeptin-immunoreactivity was massively suppressed in adult KiDKO mice of both sexes, not only at the ARC (Fig. 4c, i) but also at the AVPV (Fig. 4f).

**Fig. 4: Hypothalamic kisspeptin-immunoreactivity in KiDKO mice along postnatal maturation.**

Differential impact of Dicer ablation on NKB vs. Kisspeptin expression in ARC KNDy neurons

NKB immunoreactivity in the ARC was also affected by Dicer ablation in Kiss1-expressing cells. Yet, the profiles of protein content clearly differed from those of kisspeptin. Thus, while kisspeptin-immunoreactivity was markedly suppressed in the ARC of KiDKO mice of both sexes at the infantile period, no statistical differences in the density of NKB fibers were detected in the ARC between KiDKO and control male and female mice, at this age (2 weeks; Fig. 5a, d). In contrast, NKB protein levels were significantly diminished in the ARC of KiDKO males and females at the peripubertal period (4 weeks; Fig. 5b, e). However, the relative magnitude of such suppression was substantially milder than that of kisspeptin. Thus, while ARC kisspeptin-immunoreactivity was reduced by >160- and 10-fold in pubertal male and female KiDKO mice, respectively, the decrease in NKB protein levels was only five- and two-fold in KiDKO males and females, respectively (Fig. 5b, e). In addition, while NKB-immunoreactivity augmented during the infantile-pubertal transition in KiDKO males, this effect was not detected in conditional null females (Fig. S7). Finally, the drop in NKB immunoreactivity was maximal in adult KiDKO mice of both sexes, in which only a few NKB fibers were detected (Fig. 5c, f). This decrease in the level of NKB protein content appears to be specific to KNDy neurons, since NKB immunoreactivity was preserved in other brain regions (Fig. S8), known to harbor NKB neurons²⁸.

**Fig. 5: Hypothalamic NKB immunoreactivity in KiDKO mice along postnatal maturation.**

Impact of Dicer ablation on Kiss1 neuronal survival

To track Kiss1 neuronal survival following congenital Dicer ablation, a triple transgenic mouse line, expressing the Cre-dependent reporter (ROSA26)-YFP in Kiss1 neurons was generated on the KiDKO background. This approach permits persistent labeling of any cell ever expressing Kiss1, even if Kiss1 expression is no longer active. Analyses in this reporter mouse line were conducted at 4 weeks, 2 months, and 4 months of age (Fig. 6); namely, the developmental window in which kisspeptin (and NKB) content substantially decrease. Kiss1-YFP neurons in the ARC of KiDKO male mice were diminished already at the peripubertal period (4 weeks; Fig. 6a); yet, such a decline was substantially milder than that of kisspeptin-immunoreactivity and Kiss1 mRNA expression, which dropped to nearly negligible levels at this age (see Fig. 4b), therefore suggesting that such a decline in neuronal survival is not driven by the loss of kisspeptin per se. The decrease in the number of Kiss1-YFP cells progressed during the adult stage, with a substantial reduction in 4-month-old KiDKO males (Fig. 6b, c), which nonetheless was less pronounced than the suppression of kisspeptin content and Kiss1 expression.

**Fig. 6: Kiss1 neuronal survival in the hypothalamus of KiDKO mice along postnatal maturation.**

In KiDKO female mice, the number of Kiss1-YFP cells in the ARC of peripubertal (4-week-old) animals was fully preserved (Fig. 6g), despite a marked reduction of kisspeptin and NKB content and Kiss1 expression, at this age. In turn, the number of Kiss1-YFP neurons was diminished in the ARC of adult KiDKO females at 2- and 4-months of age (Fig. 6h, i). However, KiDKO females retained a substantial number of Kiss1-YFP neurons at the ARC, both at 2 months (1110 ± 116) and 4 months (579 ± 45) of age, which is in contrast with the massive suppression of kisspeptin and NKB content, and Kiss1 levels, in the ARC of adult KiDKO females, in which the expression of these neuropeptides was almost null. Notably, the number of Kiss1-YFP was totally conserved in the AVPV of KiDKO female mice, at least up to the age of 2 months, it being reduced only in 4-month-old animals (Fig. 6d–f).

Dicer ablation induces upregulation of repressor expression in ARC Kiss1 neurons

To assess the molecular mechanisms involved in the disruption of Kiss1 neuronal function and Kiss1 expression after conditional elimination of Dicer in Kiss1 cells, we performed expression analyses of different regulators of Kiss1 promoter activity in Kiss1 neurons isolated by FACS from the ARC and AVPV of peripubertal (PND28) control and KiDKO mice of both sexes. To this end, we selected a number of genes previously identified as repressors of the Kiss1 promoter, i.e., Mkrn3, Sirt1, Eap1, Cux1, and the Polycomb group (PcG) members, Eed Cbx7 and Yy1, with demonstrated inhibitory actions on pubertal progression^{14,26,29,30,31}. For comparative purposes, we measured also the expression levels of two reported Kiss1 transcriptional activators, Ttf1 and the Trithorax group member, Mll1^29,32.

Quantitative RT-PCR analyses demonstrated a significant increase in the expression of Kiss1 transcriptional repressors, Mkn3, Cbx7, and Eap1, in ARC Kiss1 neurons from both male and female KiDKO mice (Fig. 7a), which is compatible with the decrease of Kiss1 expression detected during this time-window (Fig. 3b, h and Fig. S6b, h). Interestingly, this effect was not detected in AVPV Kiss1 neurons (Fig. 7c), where Kiss1 expression was not affected at this age point (Fig. 3e and Fig. S6e). Moreover, Yy1 expression was modestly, but significantly reduced in AVPV Kiss1 neurons from KiDKO females (Fig. 7c). On the other hand, expression of the Kiss1 transcriptional activator, Mll1, tended to be (non-significantly) increased in ARC, but not AVPV, Kiss1 neurons of KiDKO animals, while no changes were detected in the expression of the other activator, Ttf1, in either ARC or AVPV Kiss1 neurons (Fig. 7b, d).

**Fig. 7: Molecular mechanisms underlying Kiss1 neuronal alterations in KiDKO mice.**

A graphical summary of the major neuroendocrine and phenotypic alterations induced by conditional ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 cells is shown in Fig. 8.

**Fig. 8: Major neuroendocrine and phenotypic alterations after conditional ablation of Dicer in Kiss1.**

Discussion

In the last decades, miRNAs have emerged as key regulatory elements of a large number of biological processes, acting mainly as post-transcriptional repressors of target genes, via interfering protein translation or promoting RNA degradation^16,17. We show here that congenital ablation of Dicer, the key enzyme for mature miRNA synthesis, in Kiss1 neurons caused a state of profound hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in mature adult mice of both sexes, with complete infertility. This phenotype occurred despite the preserved expression of GnRH in the POA and conserved functionality of GnRH neurons, denoted by detectable LH responses to central kisspeptin administration in KiDKO mice, and was seemingly caused by almost complete elimination of Kiss1 expression and kisspeptin content in the AVPV and ARC in adult animals. While fragmentary data have very recently suggested putative roles of specific miRNAs in the control of Kiss1 in other cellular contexts, ranging from ectopic pregnancy³³ to brain cancer metastasis³⁴ and immortalized GT1-7 cells³⁵, our data provide conclusive in vivo evidence for an essential role of miRNA biogenesis in Kiss1 neurons for proper functioning of the reproductive axis in adulthood, and further illustrate the indispensable role of kisspeptin input onto GnRH neurons for adult fertility. Interestingly, defective Kiss1/kisspeptin expression in our model of conditional ablation of Dicer was not primarily caused by an early massive loss of Kiss1 neurons, due to compromised survival linked to impairment of miRNA biosynthesis, since a significant proportion of these neurons remained present in young-adult KiDKO mice. In contrast, prevention of mature miRNA generation seemingly halted kisspeptin production in Kiss1 neurons.

In order to assess the mechanism underlying such molecular phenotype, we did not search for differentially-expressed miRNAs in our KiDKO mice, as we presumed mature miRNA biogenesis was largely blunted following congenital elimination of Dicer. In fact, despite evidence for non-canonical, Dicer-independent synthesis of certain miRNAs, such as miR-451, in vertebrates^36,37, the expected alteration of a very high number of miRNAs in Kiss1 neurons from KiDKO mice, due to the conditional ablation of the canonical pathway, would have prevented us from pinpointing specific miRNAs responsible for the phenotype. Likewise, we assumed that ablation of miRNAs from Kiss1 neurons is unlikely to cause repression of Kiss1 expression directly, given the proposed role of miRNA as gene silencers¹⁷. In turn, we hypothesized that global suppression of the miRNA landscape in Kiss1 neurons might have lifted the expression of Kiss1 repressors, thereby inhibiting Kiss1, as has been previously proposed for miRNA regulation of GnRH and its suppression in GoDKO mice²⁵. To test this possibility, expression analyses of a panel of seven repressors and two activators of Kiss1, selected on the basis of previous studies^{14,29,30,31,32}, were conducted in FACS-isolated Kiss1 neurons, obtained from pubertal KiDKO mice of both sexes. In line with our working hypothesis, three reported repressors of Kiss1, namely Mkrn3³¹, Cbx7³⁰, and Eap1²⁹, were upregulated in ARC Kiss1 cells congenitally devoid of mature miRNA biogenesis, strongly suggesting that this is a major mechanism for the observed suppression of Kiss1 in our conditional null model.

Mkrn3 is a puberty-suppressing factor, which has been recently shown to be expressed and operate in ARC Kiss1 neurons to repress Kiss1 expression³¹. In a recent study, we have independently shown that Mkrn3 has three highly conserved seed regions for members of the miR-30 family in its 3′-UTR and that miR-30 represses Mkrn3 to modulate pubertal timing²⁶. Intriguingly, our bioinformatic analyses indicate that the nuclear isoform of Cbx7, a member of the Polycomb group (PcG) of silencers that has been shown to epigenetically repress Kiss1 expression³⁰, is also a potential target of miR-30. Thus, it is tenable that elimination of miR-30 by congenital ablation of Dicer has a dominant role in the observed upregulation of Mkrn3 and Cbx7, and thereby suppresses Kiss1 expression in KiDKO mice. Admittedly, however, ablation of other miRNAs is likely to contribute to this molecular phenotype, as bioinformatic predictions failed to identify seed regions of miR-30 among the putative miRNA regulators of the 3’-UTR of Eap1. In any event, our data highlights a relevant miRNA-regulatory node, selectively targeting key transcriptional repressors, that operates in ARC Kiss1 neurons to precisely control Kiss1 expression and is essential for reproductive function. This system seems to be functional in both sexes, but apparently not in AVPV Kiss1 cells, at least at the age-window analyzed, in line with the divergent impact of Dicer ablation in ARC vs. AVPV Kiss1 neurons. Collectively, our data substantiate the physiological relevance of a system of “repressors-of-repressors” in Kiss1 neurons, which seems to operate also, albeit with different players, in GnRH neurons²⁵, and plays a fundamental role in the precise control of reproductive function.

Our study, which included parallel assessment of key neuroendocrine features in models of congenital ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 or GnRH neurons, allowed us to delineate also the specific roles of these key factors in the control of the reproductive axis in vivo. Notably, KiDKO and GoDKO mice displayed selective, compartmentalized alteration of the Kiss1 and GnRH systems, respectively. Thus, abolished ARC and AVPV Kiss1 expression, but fully preserved GnRH expression was observed in KiDKO animals; such conserved expression is compatible with a predominant post-transcriptional control of GnRH neurons by kisspeptin³⁸. In contrast, in GoDKO mice, GnRH expression was totally absent, but Kiss1 neurons retained their capacity to respond to sex steroid feedback, with enhanced Kiss1 expression in the ARC, compatible with the hypogonadal state of GoDKO mice. Despite these differences, KiDKO and GoDKO mice displayed notable similarities in terms of phenotypic presentation in adulthood, with overt central hypogonadism in both models, which could be reversed (in terms of ovulatory induction) by proper gonadotropin priming. This is compatible with a primary impact of Dicer ablation at central levels, while the putative effects of Dicer elimination in peripheral reproductive tissues, where modest Kiss1 or GnRH expression has been reported previously¹, seem to negligibly contribute to this phenotype.

Anyhow, compatible with a more distal role of GnRH neurons as final output pathway for the brain control of the reproductive axis², GoDKO animals displayed signs of more profound suppression of gonadal (denoted by sex steroid levels) and gonadotropic function, as well as abolished gonadotropin responses to central activators, such as kisspeptin and NMDA, which were preserved in KiDKO mice. Notwithstanding, adult male mice with congenital ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 neurons not only presented diminished basal gonadotropin and sex steroid levels but also failed to show the expected gonadotropin rise after gonadectomy, therefore supporting the notion that functional Kiss1 neurons are indispensable for mediating the negative feedback effects of sex steroids and gonadotropin responses to their withdrawal. In the same vein, KiDKO females did not display preovulatory-like LH surges in response to proper sex steroid priming, suggesting a central defect of positive feedback mechanisms. In addition, KiDKO mice showed alterations in tonic LH secretory profiles, as a surrogate marker of pulsatile GnRH neuro-secretion, in line with recent evidence supporting a master role of Kiss1 neurons in the control of the GnRH pulse generator⁴. Interestingly, these alterations consisted in a significant decrease in the amplitude of LH peaks, whereas pulse frequency was not altered, suggesting the persistence of pacemaker mechanisms even in the presence of diminished or absent kisspeptin inputs. All in all, our data conclusively demonstrate that both Kiss1 and GnRH neurons are compulsory for the maintenance of reproductive function in adulthood since neither of these populations, separately, was sufficient to sustain reproduction, and further stress the essential role of central kisspeptin input in the control of adult GnRH neurons and reproductive function. Admittedly, analogous observations had been previously made in models of genetic inactivation of Gpr54 or Kiss1 genes^39,40. Yet, in those previous models, congenital ablation of these factors resulted in early disruption of kisspeptin signaling, which caused maturational alterations and lack of pubertal activation prior to infertility. Our current models add an interesting chronological perspective to the analysis of the developmental roles of kisspeptin signaling, as defined by the progressive suppression of Kiss1 expression in our KiDKO model, which manifested as diminished levels along pubertal progression and became null at the adult stage. This is analogous to the timeline of GnRH suppression previously reported in our GoDKO model²⁵, and strongly suggests that early maturational defects are not seemingly major contributing factors for the adult hypogonadal state that was observed in KiDKO (or GoDKO) mice.

In search of the neuroendocrine substrate for the progressive central hypogonadism seen in KiDKO mice, we analyzed changes in Kiss1 neurons, Kiss1 expression, and kisspeptin content in the ARC and AVPV of male and female mice during the infantile-pubertal transition. Due to the inherent features of the hypothalamic Kiss1 system in the mouse, Kiss1/kisspeptin analyses in the AVPV were restricted to females, whereas ARC expression analyses in both sexes included also assessment of NKB, as major co-transmitter of KNDy neurons at this hypothalamic site. Our analyses targeted two key maturational periods, namely mini-puberty (2 weeks of age) and the early pubertal transition (4 weeks of age). Notably, mini-puberty has been defined as a key developmental stage of initial activation of the gonadotropic axis, occurring both in humans and rodents, which is crucial for shaping later activation of reproductive function at puberty⁴¹. Indeed, recent evidence has suggested that major changes in miRNA regulation of GnRH neurons occur around mini-puberty in mice²⁵. Our data conclusively document that congenital Kiss1-specific ablation of Dicer failed to diminish the number of Kiss1 neurons, either in the ARC or AVPV, of male and female mice at this period, with largely conserved Kiss1 expression, except for a moderate (<30%) drop in infantile males, and totally conserved NKB content in the ARC at both sexes. In clear contrast, ARC kisspeptin content, as measured by immunohistochemistry, was markedly suppressed in male and female KiDKO mice at 2 weeks of age, while AVPV levels in females were not altered. Considering that indices of pubertal onset were grossly preserved in KiDKO animals of both sexes, these findings suggest that conservation of Kiss1 neuronal populations at mini-puberty, despite congenital Dicer ablation, is sufficient to activate the neuroendocrine pathways leading to puberty onset, even in the presence of substantially diminished kisspeptin content in the ARC. The later occurred in face of largely preserved Kiss1 expression, which might be indicative of a compensatory response of enhanced secretion of kisspeptin from ARC Kiss1 neurons, which is compatible with the early signs of pubertal onset. In any event, the fact that the AVPV kisspeptin content, as well as ARC NKB levels, were fully preserved in infantile KiDKO mice may contribute also to preserved pubertal activation, and further stress that, rather than an unspecific impact on Kiss1 survival or function, ablation of mature miRNA biosynthesis evokes quite distinct functional alterations of Kiss1 neurons, with a massive depletion (or release) of kisspeptin being detected only in the ARC of both sexes.

Similar analyses at early stages of the pubertal transition revealed a sex-biased progressive impact of Dicer ablation on Kiss1 neurons and the attainment of fertility. Thus, while the total numbers of Kiss1 neurons were grossly preserved in the ARC of KiDKO female mice, they drop to nearly 60% of control values in conditional null males. Likewise, Kiss1 expression and NKB content was more severely suppressed in the ARC of KiDKO male mice, with values ranging 20–35% of control levels, while in females, expression levels were only half of the control values. In any event, kisspeptin content in the ARC was almost negligible in both male and female conditional null mice. In clear contrast, neither Kiss1 expression nor kisspeptin content were significantly altered in the AVPV of female KiDKO mice, further emphasizing the differential impact of Dicer ablation between these two hypothalamic nuclei. Strikingly, while the effect of congenital elimination of Dicer on ARC Kiss1 neurons was more dramatic in males, attainment of fertility was detected in a majority of young (2-month-old) KiDKO male mice, while none of the females ever became fertile. These observations further substantiate the previous contention, based on models of congenital ablation, that male puberty is less sensitive to suppression of Kiss1, as denoted by the fact that preservation of just a marginal fraction (∼5%) of Kiss1 expression appeared sufficient for the achievement of male fertility⁴², although compensatory mechanisms, of as yet unknown nature, were alluded to play a role in such phenomenon. Our current data, based on a model of progressive loss of Kiss1 expression, refine those previous findings, suggesting that preservation of a minute part of kisspeptin/NKB input during the pubertal transition is sufficient to complete puberty and attain fertility in the male, with development of an infertile phenotype later in adulthood, along with a more profound perturbation of the Kiss1 system with age. In clear contrast, completion of puberty and attainment of fertility in the female requires more robust preservation of the hypothalamic Kiss1 system, as denoted by the lack of first ovulation despite a less severe impact of Dicer ablation on ARC Kiss1 neurons and the apparently preserved AVPV Kiss1 component in pubertal KiDKO females. Since AVPV Kiss1 neurons have been shown to play an important role in the control of female puberty, as partial knockdown (<40%) of AVPV kisspeptin expression delayed pubertal maturation⁴³, and are essential for ovulatory induction⁴⁴, our data suggest the integral conservation of the Kiss1 neuronal system, including also the ARC, is relevant for the completion of puberty and attainment of fertility. In this context, partial knockdown of ARC kisspeptin has been shown recently to diminish the amplitude of the preovulatory LH surge, responsible for ovulation⁴³; findings that are well aligned with our current data on the lack of LH surge induction in KiDKO female mice after sex steroid priming. Hence, the suppression of Kiss1/Kisspeptin in the ARC of pubertal KiDKO female mice may contribute also to the lack of first ovulation and persistent infertility in these animals.

In sum, we present herein evidence for an essential role of miRNA biogenesis in Kiss1 neurons for the completion of female puberty and maintenance of adult fertility in both sexes. In contrast, early stages of sexual maturation, the onset of puberty, and survival of Kiss1 neurons were fully preserved in mice with congenital ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 cells, denoting the dispensable (or compensable) role of miRNA-regulatory pathways and/or Kiss1 function in these phenomena. Intriguingly, congenital ablation of miRNA biosynthesis in Kiss1 neurons evoked consistent upregulation of key Kiss1 repressors, therefore supporting the importance of miRNA-mediated inhibition of repressive signals as a major mechanism for the precise control of Kiss1 expression and, thereby, reproductive function. Our data open up the possibility that alterations in miRNA biogenesis in Kiss1 neurons might be causative of late-onset forms of central hypogonadism, either spontaneous or associated with other co-morbidities, such as obesity or diabetes⁴⁵. In addition, the differential impact of Dicer ablation between sexes and Kiss1 neuronal subpopulations highlights genuine differences in the roles of Kiss1 miRNA-machinery in the precise control of male and female reproduction.

Methods

Animals

Genetically modified C57Bl6 mice, engineered for conditional ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 and GnRH cells (KiDKO and GoDKO mice, respectively; see below) were bred in the vivarium of the University of Cordoba. The animals were housed under constant conditions of light (12-h light/dark cycles) and temperature (22 ± 2 °C). The day the litters were born was considered day 1 of age (PND1). Animals were weaned at PND-21 and provided with free access to tap water and fed ad libitum with a standard soy-free diet. The experiments and animal protocols included in this study were approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Cordoba; all experiments were conducted in accordance with European Union (EU) normative for the use and care of experimental animals (EU Directive 2010/63/UE, September 2010).

Generation of KiDKO and GoDKO mouse lines

Conditional elimination of Dicer enzyme in Kiss1 cells was accomplished by crossing mice driving Cre recombinase protein expression under the endogenous promoter of Kiss1 gene⁴⁶ with mice containing loxP sites flanking the exon 23 of the Dicer gene⁴⁷; the resulting mouse line was named KiDKO, for Kiss1-specific Dicer KO, and lacks functional Dicer enzyme in Kiss1-expressing cells, therefore causing the absence of Dicer-dependent mature miRNAs specifically in these cells. A similar strategy was implemented for ablation of Dicer in GnRH cells: the Dicer-loxP mouse line was crossed with mice expressing Cre recombinase protein under the endogenous promoter of GnRH gene⁴⁸, thereby producing the GoDKO mouse line (for Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-specific Dicer KO).

In detail, heterozygous Kiss1^Cre/− and positive GnRH-Cre^pos mice were initially mated with Dicer^loxP/loxP animals. The resulting genotypes, Kiss1^Cre/−::Dicer^loxP/− or GnRH-Cre^pos::Dicer^loxP/−, were self-crossed to generate all the possible genotypic combinations. For the experiments, only Kiss1^Cre/−::Dicer^loxP/loxP (referred as KiDKO mouse) and GnRH-Cre^pos::Dicer^loxP/loxP (termed as GoDKO mouse) were used. In addition, Kiss1^−/−::Dicer^loxP/loxP and GnRH-Cre^neg::Dicer^loxP/loxP mice were used as controls of each line. Of note, for some immunohistochemical experiments in which CreGFP expression was required for the detection of Kiss1 neurons, Kiss1^Cre/−::Dicer ^loxP/− mice were used as controls.

In addition, for the experiments of tracking Kiss1 neuronal survival and for isolation of Kiss1 neurons by FACS, a triple transgenic mouse line, expressing the Cre-dependent reporter (ROSA26)-YFP (Strain #006148; The Jackson Laboratory; Bar Harbor, ME) in Kiss1 neurons, was generated on the KiDKO background.

Genotyping of KiDKO and GoDKO mouse lines

PCR analysis on isolated genomic DNA from ear biopsies was used to screen genotypes. Primers used to detect the presence or absence of Dicer-loxP allele were: DicerF1 5′-CCTGACAGTGACGGTCCAAAG-3′ and DicerR1 5′-CATGACTCTTCAACTCAAACT-3′. The loxP allele produces a 420-bp PCR product, whereas the wild-type allele results in a 351-bp band. An additional pair of primers, DicerF2 5′-ACTGAGGTAACTGAAAACCC-3′ and DicerDel2 5′-ATGTAGGTTAAAGCTGTTTG-3′ was used in order to detect the null allele, resulting from the recombination of loxP sites and, consequently, Dicer allele loss of function. Using this pair of primers, the recombinant (deleted) allele produces a 700-bp PCR product, whereas the wild-type allele results in an 820-bp band, whose identities were confirmed by direct sequencing (SCAI-Genomic Unit; University of Córdoba).

To detect the presence or absence of Cre recombinase under the Kiss1 promoter, a combination of three primers was used: 1614 5′-GACCTAGGCTCTGGTGAAG-3′, 1326 5′-GGCAAATTTTGGTGTACGGTCAG-3′, and WTRP 5′-GAGCCTCCAGTGCTCACAGC-3′. This primer combination amplifies a band of 337bp for the wild-type allele and 250 bp for the Cre gene. Primers for detection of Cre expression under the GnRH promoter were: CreF1 5′-CCTGGAAAATGCTTCTGTCCG-3′ and CreR1 5′-CAGGGTGTTATAAGCAATCCC-3′. A 400 bp PCR product denotes the presence of the Cre allele.

Amplification was carried out using the following protocol: denaturing for 5 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles, consisting of denaturing at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing (at 53 °C for Dicer-loxP, 60 °C for Kiss1-Cre, and 55 °C for GnRH-Cre) during 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 mine, using an iCycler iQ®5 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Samples were subsequently analyzed on 2% agarose gels.

Validation of the KiDKO mouse line

While the GoDKO line has been previously characterized by our group²⁵, the KiDKO mouse line is newly-generated and had not been reported. To validate the specificity of conditional ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 cells in this line, three different approaches were used. First, PCR analyses at the hypothalamic regions containing Kiss1 neurons (namely, ARC and POA, the later including AVPV, or whole hypothalamus) and cortex were done to validate the presence of the recombined Dicer allele, therefore denoting ablation of the exon 23 of Dicer. The hypothalamus was dissected immediately upon euthanasia of the animals, and dissection of the indicated hypothalamic regions was conducted, following previous protocols⁴⁹. In addition, samples of the cerebral cortex were obtained from the same animals and used as a negative control due to the absence of Kiss1 neurons in this area. Samples from KiDKO and control mice were included in PCR analyses (Fig. S1a).

Although the sensitivity of PCR assays described above is very high, this procedure does not provide cellular resolution to document the ablation of Dicer, specifically in Kiss1 neurons. To solve this, two additional techniques were implemented. First, double in situ hybridization for Kiss1 and Dicer exon 23 was carried out in the ARC region of young-adult (PND54), ovariectomized (OVX) KiDKO female mice and their respective OVX controls. To this end, BaseScope^TM Duplex Assay was used in 20 µm frozen brain slices from KiDKO and control mice following manufacturer guidelines (BaseScope™ Detection Reagent Kit; ACDBio Cat No. 323800). Probes used for detection of Kiss1 and Dicer exon 23 were BA-Mm-Kiss1-4zz-st (ACDBio custom made No. 715701) and BA-Mm-Dicer1-4z-C2 (ACDBio custom made No. 718101-C2). Brain slices were counter-stained with hematoxylin and 0,02% ammonium hydroxide, air-dried, and cover-slipped after the addition of Vectamount mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Co-expression of both mRNA species was assessed by visualization in a Leica DM2500 microscope (Fig. S1b).

In addition, functional ablation of Dicer activity was evaluated by qPCR detection of Dicer mRNA (Fig. S1e) and the mature miRNA, let-7b-5p (Fig. S1c), in isolated Kiss1 neurons from KiDKO mice obtained by FACS (see below). In our validation analyses, let-7b-5p was chosen based on previous studies showing changes in hypothalamic expression of the let-7b/Lin28 system during pubertal maturation⁵⁰ and the abundant expression of members of the let-7 family of miRNAs in hypothalamic nuclei, including the ARC⁵¹. To this end, AVPV and ARC Kiss1 neurons populations were isolated separately from control and KiDKO mice by FACS, following an improved version of our previously validated protocol²⁶, as described below in the section Isolation of Kiss1 neurons by fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS). Verification of ARC Kiss1 neurons was conducted by qPCR analysis of the expression of Kiss1 and Tac2 mRNAs. In addition, contamination with other ARC neuronal populations, such as NPY/AgRP neurons, was discarded by confirmation of the absence of Npy expression in the isolated Kiss1 cells (Fig. S1c). Furthermore, to quantify the extent of Dicer ablation with single-cell resolution, ARC Kiss1 neurons from control and KiDKO mice were isolated individually by FACS and single-cell qPCR analyses of Kiss1, Dicer, and Gapdh were performed; the latter serving as a control to confirm cell collection in each well. In addition, the percentage of Dicer-expressing Kiss1 cells were calculated (Fig. S1d).

For mRNA expression analysis from isolated cells, RNA was reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA RT Kit (4368814, Applied Biosystems), while for miRNA expression study, TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (4366596; Applied Biosystems) was applied, including the RT primer for let-7b (Assay ID: 000378), following the manufacturer instructions. Then, 2 μl of each RT product were amplified using the TaqMan Universal Master Mix II, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). qPCR was carried out on CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using the following TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Thermo Fisher): Kiss1 (Assay ID: Mm03058560_m1), Tac2 (Assay ID: Mm01160362_m1), Dicer (Assay ID: Mm00521731_m1), Npy (Assay ID: Mm01410146_m1), let-7b (Assay ID: 000378), and Gapdh (Assay ID: Mm99999915_g1); the later served as a housekeeping gene. The PCR conditions used were 1 cycle of polymerase activation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles for group-isolated Kiss1 neurons, or 50 cycles, for single-cell expression analysis, denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing at 60 °C for 1 min. Relative expression of each gene respecting the housekeeping was calculated using the 2^−∆∆Ct method.

Physiological measurements

Pubertal maturation

For phenotypic evaluation of pubertal maturation, somatic and reproductive indexes of pubertal development were monitored daily after weaning (at postnatal day 21; PND-21). These included body weight monitoring, and assessment of balano-preputial separation (BPS) in males, and vaginal opening (VO), in females, both considered external signs of puberty onset.

Fertility index

To evaluate fertility in control and KiDKO animals, male and female mice were crossed with wild-type mice of the opposite sex of proven fertility, and the percentage of animals being able to generate offspring was calculated.

Estrous cyclicity

Estrous cycles were monitored by daily vaginal cytology in adult female mice during 3–4 weeks. To this end, cells were collected by vaginal smears and deposited on a glass slide. After drying, cells were stained with toluidine blue and visualized in a light microscope for evaluation of the cycle stage, according to the presence of cell types characteristic of each phase of the estrous cycle⁵².

Evaluation of gonadal maturation

To evaluate the status of the reproductive organs, different histological parameters of male and female gonads were assessed in control and conditional null animals.

Tissue processing

After tissue collection, testes and ovaries, together with the oviduct and the tip of the uterine horn, were fixed for at least 24 h in Bouin solution and processed for paraffin embedding. The gonads were serially sectioned (10 μm-thick), stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and viewed under an Elipse 400 microscope for evaluation.

Ovarian parameters

Differences between control and conditional null mice in the maturation of the ovaries were assessed by morphometric analyses of the number of follicles at the different stages of development and the presence of corpora lutea; the latter being taken as an index of ovulation. Follicles were classified, according to the degree of development in resting follicles (RF), primary follicles (P1), secondary follicles (Sc), antral follicles, and atretic follicles, following published protocols for dating of ovarian maturation⁵³.

Testicular parameters

Testicular maturation was assessed according to the number of germs cells at the different stages of the spermatogenic cycle and the diameter of the seminiferous tubules; the latter being an indicator of the progression of spermatogenesis. The types of germ cells considered at the different stages of the spermatogenic process (from less to more differentiated) were: primary (pachytene) spermatocytes, round spermatids, considered as spermatids up to step 9 of the spermatogenic process, and elongated spermatids, from the step-10 onward. In addition, the proportion of tubules with dying germ cells was quantified as an index of atrophic seminiferous tubules with spermatogenic arrest. This classification was made attending to previous reference⁵⁴.

Ovulatory capability

To evaluate the ovulatory response in control and conditional null animals, a standard gonadotropic priming protocol was carried out, following a modified protocol from Jackson Lab. for superovulation. To avoid the possible confounding factor of normal ovulatory events in cycling females, immature animals were used. In brief, control and KiDKO female mice were injected at 1:00-4:00 pm of PND22 with PMSG (5 U/100 μl saline; Sigma-Aldrich Co.) followed by a second injection with hMG-Lepori (5 U/100 μl saline; Angelini Pharma España, S.L.), 2 days after the first injection, at 11:00–12:00 a.m. Animals were euthanized 24 h later by an overdose of ketamine-xylazine and ovaries were collected and fixed in Bouin for histological processing. The number of oocytes released to the oviduct was quantified.

Preovulatory surge induction protocol

To evaluate the capability of KiDKO females to response to the positive feedback of gonadal steroids with a preovulatory-like LH surge, attributed mainly to AVPV Kiss1 neurons^1,27, a previously validated sex steroid-induction protocol was applied⁵⁵. In brief, young females of 6–8 weeks old were bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX) and implanted with silastic capsules containing 5 μg/mL of estradiol, dissolved in sesame oil, to reproduce the estradiol levels exerting a central negative feedback. Then, daily vaginal smears were obtained to monitor the estrus cycle and ~9 days after, when all females were in diestrus, a subcutaneous injection of estradiol benzoate were given between 10–11 a.m., at a dose of 1 μg per 20 g BW to reproduce the positive feedback levels of estradiol. This protocol induces a preovulatory surge in the afternoon of the following day. For monitoring of LH changes, blood samples were obtained from tail-tip bleeding in the morning (10:00 and 10:30 a.m.) and during the afternoon—before and after the lights turn off (at 19:00 p.m.)—from 18:00 to 21:00 p.m. in intervals of 30 min. LH levels were measured by ELISA, as described below in the section Hormone Measurements.

Pharmacological and gonadectomy tests

To evaluate central responsiveness to different activators of the reproductive axis, pharmacological and gonadectomy tests were carried out in adult control and KiDKO animals. Pharmacological tests were done specifically in male mice in order to avoid the confounding factor of variations in gonadal hormones occurring in cycling females along the cycle.

Gonadotropin responses were studied after intracerebroventricular (icv) injection of Kisspeptin-10 (1 nmol/5 μl; Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc) and NMDA (1 nmol/5 μl; Merck KGaA, Germany). In addition, to test the pituitary responsiveness to GnRH, GnRH (0.25 μg/100 μl; Merck KGaA, Germany) was injected intraperitoneally. For evaluation of the changes in gonadotropin release, blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture, before cannulation of the animals, for evaluation of basal levels and after injection of the different drugs (15 min for Kp-10 and NMDA, and 30 min for GnRH). The different tests were carried out in the same mice, after washout periods of 5–7 days between tests for recovery of the animals. Doses and routes of administration were selected based on previous references^56,57. Central (icv) administration of the compounds was done following standard procedures of cannulation⁵⁸. In brief, cannulas (Intra-medic polyethylene tubing; Becton Dickinson) were inserted to a depth of 2 mm beneath the surface of the skull, with an insert point at 1 mm posterior and 1.2 mm lateral to Bregma, according to a mouse brain atlas. Drugs were dissolved in 0.9% saline.

For evaluation of gonadotropin response to gonadectomy, blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture in male mice before and 2 weeks after bilateral orchidectomy, as described elsewhere³⁹.

Hormone measurements

For hormone assays, three different protocols were carried out. For evaluation of gonadotropin levels in single-point determinations, serum samples were measured by Radioimmunoassay (RIA), while continuous evaluation of LH pulsatility was analyzed by a high-sensitive ELISA. Finally, steroids levels were assessed in serum samples from single-point determinations by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RIA assay

Blood samples for LH and FSH measurements were obtained by cardiac puncture in infantile and pubertal animals after overdose of ketamine-xylazine or jugular venipuncture in adults. After blood collection, serum was separated by centrifugation at 1620 g for 30 min and maintained at −20 °C until used for hormone assays.

Serum LH and FSH levels were determined in a volume of 25–50 μl using a double-antibody method and RIA kits supplied by the National Institutes of Health (A. F. Parlow, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Hormone and Peptide Program -NIDDK-NHPP; Torrance, CA) following previously validated protocols⁵⁹. In brief, Rat LH-I-10 and FSH-I-9 were labeled with 125I using Iodo-gen tubes, following the instructions of the manufacturer (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Hormone concentrations were expressed using reference preparations, LH-RP-3 and FSH-RP-2, as standards. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were, respectively, <8 and 10% for LH and <6 and 9% for FSH. The sensitivity of the assay was 5 pg/tube for LH and 20 pg/tube for FSH. The accuracy of hormone determinations was confirmed by the assessment of mouse serum samples of known hormone concentrations used as external controls.

Pulsatile LH measurement

For evaluation of LH pulsatility, mice were habituated to daily handling for a period of minimum 3 weeks. Four microliters of blood were collected by tail-tip bleeding every 5 min for 3 h. The blood was directly diluted in 46 μl of PBS-Tween0.05%, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C. The LH content of the blood sample was measured by a sensitive LH sandwich ELISA⁶⁰. A 96-well high-affinity binding microplate (Corning) was coated with 50 μl of the monoclonal antibody, anti-bovine LHβ subunit, 518B7 (L. Sibley; University of California, UC Davis) at a dilution of 1:1000 (in PBS: Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄/NaCl 0.1 M, pH 7.4) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the plate was firstly incubated with 200 μl of a blocking buffer (milk powder (5%) in PBS-Tween0.05%) for 2 h at room temperature (RT), then 50 μl of the blood samples and the LH standard curve were incubated for 2 h at RT. Standards were made from rLH-RP3 (supplied by Dr. A.F. Parlow) and used at twofold serial dilutions starting at 1 ng/ml to 0.0078125 ng/ml in PBS-Tween. Fifty microliters of the detection antibody (rabbit LH antiserum, AFP240580Rb; provided by NIDDK-NHPP) diluted at 1:10000 (in the blocking buffer) were incubated for 1.5 h at RT, followed by incubation of 50 μl of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (goat anti-rabbit; Vector Laboratories) at a dilution of 1:1000 in 50% blocking buffer and 50% PBS during 1.5 h at RT. Finally 100 μl of o-Phenylenediamine, diluted in citrate buffer (pH 6) with 0,1% H₂O₂, were added for 30 min at RT. The reaction was stopped with 50 μl of HCl (3 M), and the plate was read at a wavelength of 490 nm (and at 650 to detect the background). The LH concentrations were measured by interpolating the OD values of unknown samples against a nonlinear regression of the LH standard curve. The assay sensitivity was 0.002 ng/ml.

An LH pulse was identified for each point, presenting an increased value of a minimum of 125% from the baseline nadir to peak. The basal level was determined as the mean of the 5 lowest values recorded in 3 h. This criterion is based on recent evidence demonstrating a correlation between synchronized episodes of calcium activity in ARC Kiss1 neurons with pulsatile LH secretion⁶¹.

Sex steroid measurements

Blood samples for sex steroid measurements were obtained by cardiac puncture in peripubertal (4-week-old) and adult (>2-month-old) mice of control, KiDKO, and GoDKO phenotypes, after overdose of ketamine-xylazine; serum samples were separated by centrifugation. For pubertal animals, due to the reduced volume of serum obtained, samples were pooled at a volume of 200 μl to improve the detection sensibility in this age-window of reduced steroid levels. In contrast, in adult mice, individual measures were taken in 150–200 μl of serum samples. Protocols of LC-MS/MS for accurate measurement of testosterone (in males), estradiol (in females) and progesterone (in both sexes) were applied to serum samples, as described in detail recently⁶².

Brain histological analyses

For the detection of the number of Kiss1 neurons, in situ Kiss1 expression and kisspeptins and NKB contents, different histological protocols were carried out.

Tissue processing

For immunohistochemical analyses, mice were euthanized with an overdose of ketamine-xylazine and perfused intracardially with saline (0.9% NaCl) followed by 4% PFA in PBS (pH 7.4). Fixed brains were collected and immersed in 30% sucrose and 0.01% sodium azide in PBS at 4 °C for 2–4 days. Next, three sets of coronal (30-mm-thick) sections were cut in a freezing microtome (Leica CM1850 UV) and stored at −20 °C in cryo-protectant. For immunodetection of the different proteins, one set of sections encompassing the whole hypothalamus was used for each animal, and standard procedures for single-label immunohistochemistry were performed (see below).

For in situ hybridization (ISH) analyses, fresh brains were collected and frozen in dry ice following previous protocols⁶³. Five sets of coronal (20-mm-thick) sections were generated and mounted on Super-Frost Plus slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Standard procedures of tissue collection were applied, starting on a fixed coordinate in the rostral hypothalamic area, to encompass equivalent areas of the anterior (including the POA and AVPV) and medio-basal (including the ARC) hypothalamus, where GnRH and Kiss1 neurons are abundantly located. The samples were stored at −80 °C until ISH analyses.

Immunohistochemistry

For protein detection in brain slices, one set of the free-floating section was washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.6) at RT with gentle agitation to eliminate the cryo-protectant. Next, endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation with H₂O₂-methanol-TBS, and the sections were washed in TBS and incubated for 72 h at 4 °C with the primary antibody for kisspeptin (primary rabbit anti-rat/mouse kisspeptin antibody 1:20000; AC#566; a gift from Dr. Alain Caraty, PRC-INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France), NKB (primary rabbit anti-pro-NKB 1:5000; IS39; a gift from Dr. Philippe Ciofi, INSERM U 1215, 33077 Bordeaux, France) or CreGFP and YFP (primary chicken anti-GFP antibody 1:40000; Abcam; Cat. Ab13970) detection. After this step, brain sections were washed again in TBS and incubated 90 min at RT with the corresponding secondary antibody (Biotinylated Donkey anti-rabbit 1:500; Code 711-066-152 or Biotinylated Donkey anti-chicken, 1:500; Code 703-066-155; Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe Ltd., UK). Next, brain slices were washed in TBS and incubated for 90 min at RT with Vectastain Elite ABC-HRP Kit (Vector Laboratories). Finally, brain sections were washed and protein detection was revealed using glucose‐oxidase plus nickel‐enhanced diaminobenzidine hydrochloride method⁶⁴. Brain slices were mounted in glass slides, air-dried and cover-slipped, after processing with ascending concentrations of alcohol, xylene, and the addition of Eukitt mounting medium (Merck KGaA, Germany).

The total number of YFP and CreGFP of AVPV Kisspeptin-positive cells were counted by visualization under a Leica DM2500 microscope. Kisspeptin and pro-NKB-immunoreactivity was quantified by densitometry using ImageJ (NIH). In brief, pictures containing the complete ARC were binarized. The area containing kisspeptin and pro-NKB immunoreactivity was quantified in pixels and converted to mm² using the reference of a Microscope Glass Stage Micrometer Calibration Slide.

In situ hybridization

Brain expression of Kiss1 and GnRH mRNA was assessed by in situ hybridization using P³³-riboprobes following a well-validated protocol⁶⁵. A specific antisense riboprobe for the detection of mouse Kiss1 or GnRH mRNA was generated according to a validated protocol⁶⁵. Primer sequences for riboprobes generation are detailed in Suppl. Table 1. A single set of sections was used for ISH (adjacent sections 100-μm apart). These tissue sections were fixed in 4% PFA, acetylated in triethanolamine buffer, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, and delipidated with chloroform. After these steps, hybridization with Kiss1 or GnRH riboprobes was performed for 16 h at 55 °C. Riboprobes were diluted in hybridization buffer to a final concentration of 0.03 pmol/ml along with yeast tRNA. After hybridization, slides were washed, treated with RNase-A, and dehydrated in increasing ethanol series⁶⁵. Finally, slides were dipped in Kodak Autoradiography Emulsion type NTB (Eastman Kodak; Rochester, NY) and exposed for 2–3 weeks at 4 °C in dark. After this period, the sections were developed and fixed following the manufacturer's instructions (Kodak; Rochester, NY). Then, slices were cover-slipped with Sub-X mounting medium (Leica). For analysis, 30–36 sections from each animal (5–6 slides; 6 sections/slide) were evaluated. Slides were read under dark-field illumination with custom-designed software, enabled to count the total number of cells (grain clusters) as well as the number of silver grains/cell. Cells were counted as positive when the number of silver grains in a cluster exceeded that of the background.

Isolation of Kiss1 neurons by fluorescent-activated cell sorting

To isolate Kiss1 neurons, a triple transgenic mouse line expressing (ROSA26-YFP) Cre-dependently in the KiDKO background was used. For experiments, Kiss1^Cre/−::Dicer^loxP/loxP::YFP^loxP/−, namely KiDKO-YFP mice, and Kiss1^Cre/−::Dicer^loxP/−::YFP^loxP/−, namely control-YFP mice, were used. Kiss1 neurons populations from the AVPV and ARC were isolated separately from hypothalamic tissue blocks containing the POA and the medio-basal hypothalamus (MBH), respectively. After microdissection, POA and MBH tissue blocks were enzymatically dissociated using a Papain Dissociation System (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ) to obtain single-cell suspensions. FACS was performed on these suspensions with a FACS Aria III Sorter (BD Biosciences), using FACSDiva 8.0 software (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using the Kaluza 2.0 software (Beckman Coulter). First, cellular debris was excluded by gating cells for forward scatter (FSC) area and side scatter (SSC) area, and later, aggregated cells were excluded by selecting singlets by plotting FSC area vs FSC height. Finally, the sort decision was based on measurements of YFP fluorescence (excitation: 488 nm; detection: YFP bandpass 530/30 nm, autofluorescence bandpass 780/60 nm) by comparison with cell suspensions from cortex, which does not harbor YFP-positive neurons. A total of 229 ± 37 AVPV and 574 ± 43 ARC YFP-positive neurons were collected per animal on 10 µL of lysis buffer (0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.4 unit/μl RNAsin, Promega). For the individual isolation of ARC Kiss1 neurons, 17 ± 1 individual neurons per animal were individually sorted on 96-well plates containing 10 µL of lysis buffer per well.

Quantitative qPCR analyses of Kiss1 transcriptional repressors and activators

To evaluate gene expression levels of previously reported Kiss1 promoter repressors and activators, qPCR assays were performed in FACS-isolated AVPV and ARC Kiss1 neurons from peripubertal control and KiDKO mice (PND28). Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems) used were: Mkrn3 (Mm00844003_s1), Sirt1 (Mm01168521_m1), Eed (Mm00469660_m1), Cbx7 (Mm00520006_m1), Yy1 (Mm00456392_m1), Eap1 (Mm07300240_s1), Cux1 (Mm01195598_m1), Ttf1 (Mm00657018_m1), and Mll1 (Mm01179235_m1). Gapdh (Mm99999915_g1) was used as housekeeping gene. First, RNA from isolated Kiss1 neurons was DNAse-treated following the manufacturer’s protocol (M6101; RQ1 RNase-Free DNase; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) and reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA RT Kit (4368814, Applied Biosystems). Prior to qPCR, cDNA was linearly pre-amplified using the manufacturer’s protocol of 14 cycles for the Taqman PreAmp Master Mix Kit (4391127, Applied Biosystems), and then, qPCRs were performed and analyzed as described in previous sections.

Statistics and biostatistics analyses

Data were expressed, as the mean ± SEM. A normalization test was carried out in the groups of data and two-sided Student t-test for parametric or a two-sided Mann–Whitney for nonparametric was applied, consequently. For analysis of sex steroid levels, Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test were carried out for comparisons between control, KiDKO and GoDKO mice. Results were analyzed using Prism GraphPad 9.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05 and asterisks indicate statistical significance. As a general rule, sample sizes were selected based on our previous experience with studies addressing neuroendocrine regulation of puberty and the reproductive axis, assisted by power analyses performed using values of standard deviation that we usually obtain when measuring parameters analogous to those examined in this study. Based on those calculations, minimal group sizes of n = 6 animals per group were established, unless otherwise indicated due to operational reasons, as analyses using these sample size should provide at least 80% power to detect effect sizes using the tests indicated above, with a significance level of 0.05. In general, for physiological experiments, group sizes largely exceeded this threshold. However, based on standard procedures, while phenotypic and hormonal analyses were applied to all available samples, more complex molecular/histological analyses in these experiments were conducted in a representative subset of randomly assigned samples from each group. Details on actual sample sizes for all determinations are provided in the corresponding figure legends. As general procedure, the investigators directly performing the experimentation involving physiological/molecular determinations were not blinded to the group allocation, but primary data analyses conducted by senior authors were conducted independently to avoid any potential bias.

Finally, bioinformatic analyses were applied to seek for putative seed regions of miRNA regulators in the 3′-UTR of Mkrn3, Cbx7 and Eap1 genes, since these transcripts were upregulated in Kiss1 cells from our KiDKO mice. To this end, the tools provided by TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/) and TarBase v8 (http://www.microrna.gr/tarbase) were used. As most salient findings, the 3′-UTR of Mkrn3 and Cbx7 were found to possess predicted seed regions for members of the miR-30 family.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the conclusions of this study are included in this published article and its supplementary files (including source data files). Any additional data are available from the corresponding authors, upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Pinilla, L., Aguilar, E., Dieguez, C., Millar, R. P. & Tena-Sempere, M. Kisspeptins and reproduction: physiological roles and regulatory mechanisms. Physiol. Rev. 92, 1235–1316 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Herbison, A. E. Control of puberty onset and fertility by gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 12, 452–466 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Krsmanovic, L. Z., Hu, L., Leung, P. K., Feng, H. & Catt, K. J. The hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator: multiple regulatory mechanisms. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 20, 402–408 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Clarkson, J. et al. Definition of the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10216–E10223 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roa, J., Aguilar, E., Dieguez, C., Pinilla, L. & Tena-Sempere, M. New frontiers in kisspeptin/GPR54 physiology as fundamental gatekeepers of reproductive function. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 29, 48–69 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lehman, M. N., Hileman, S. M. & Goodman, R. L. Neuroanatomy of the kisspeptin signaling system in mammals: comparative and developmental aspects. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 784, 27–62 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dungan, H. M. et al. The role of kisspeptin-GPR54 signaling in the tonic regulation and surge release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinizing hormone. J. Neurosci. 27, 12088–12095 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Navarro, V. M. et al. Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion by kisspeptin/ dynorphin/neurokinin B neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the mouse. J. Neurosci. 29, 11859–11866 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, Y. et al. Neurokinin B and dynorphin A in kisspeptin neurons of the arcuate nucleus participate in generation of periodic oscillation of neural activity driving pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the goat. J. Neurosci. 30, 3124–3132 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qiu, J. et al. High-frequency stimulation-induced peptide release synchronizes arcuate kisspeptin neurons and excites GnRH neurons. Elife 5, e16246 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roa, J. et al. Metabolic regulation of female puberty via hypothalamic AMPK-kisspeptin signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E10758–E10767 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ruiz-Pino, F. et al. Environmentally relevant perinatal exposures to bisphenol A disrupt postnatal Kiss1/NKB neuronal maturation and puberty onset in female mice. Environ. Health Perspect. 127, 107011 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manfredi-Lozano, M., Roa, J. & Tena-Sempere, M. Connecting metabolism and gonadal function: novel central neuropeptide pathways involved in the metabolic control of puberty and fertility. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 48, 37–49 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vazquez, M. J. et al. SIRT1 mediates obesity- and nutrient-dependent perturbation of pubertal timing by epigenetically controlling Kiss1 expression. Nat. Commun. 9, 4194 (2018).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tomikawa, J. et al. Epigenetic regulation of Kiss1 gene expression mediating estrogen-positive feedback action in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1294–E1301 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Friedman, R. C., Farh, K. K., Burge, C. B. & Bartel, D. P. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 19, 92–105 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gebert, L. F. R. & MacRae, I. J. Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 21–37 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hammond, S. M. Dicing and slicing: the core machinery of the RNA interference pathway. FEBS Lett. 579, 5822–5829 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reinhart, B. J. et al. The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 403, 901–906 (2000).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Visone, R. & Croce, C. M. MiRNAs and cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 174, 1131–1138 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Murchison, E. P. et al. Critical roles for Dicer in the female germline. Genes Dev. 21, 682–693 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gonzalez, G. & Behringer, R. R. Dicer is required for female reproductive tract development and fertility in the mouse. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76, 678–688 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Gonadotrope-specific deletion of Dicer results in severely suppressed gonadotropins and fertility defects. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 2699–2714 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Luense, L. J., Carletti, M. Z. & Christenson, L. K. Role of Dicer in female fertility. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 20, 265–272 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Messina, A. et al. A microRNA switch regulates the rise in hypothalamic GnRH production before puberty. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 835–844 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Heras, V. et al. Hypothalamic miR-30 regulates puberty onset via repression of the puberty-suppressing factor, Mkrn3. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000532 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Garcia-Galiano, D., Pinilla, L. & Tena-Sempere, M. Sex steroids and the control of the Kiss1 system: developmental roles and major regulatory actions. J. Neuroendocrinol. 24, 22–33 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Duarte, C. R., Schutz, B. & Zimmer, A. Incongruent pattern of neurokinin B expression in rat and mouse brains. Cell Tissue Res. 323, 43–51 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mueller, J. K. et al. Transcriptional regulation of the human KiSS1 gene. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 342, 8–19 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lomniczi, A. et al. Epigenetic control of female puberty. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 281–289 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abreu, A. P. et al. MKRN3 inhibits the reproductive axis through actions in kisspeptin-expressing neurons. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 4486–4500 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Toro, C. A., Wright, H., Aylwin, C. F., Ojeda, S. R. & Lomniczi, A. Trithorax dependent changes in chromatin landscape at enhancer and promoter regions drive female puberty. Nat. Commun. 9, 57 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Romero-Ruiz, A. et al. Deregulation of miR-324/KISS1/kisspeptin in early ectopic pregnancy: mechanistic findings with clinical and diagnostic implications. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 220, 480 e481–480 e417 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ulasov, I. et al. MicroRNA 345 (miR345) regulates KISS1-E-cadherin functional interaction in breast cancer brain metastases. Cancer Lett. 481, 24–31 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, X., Xiao, J., Li, K. & Zhou, Y. MiR-199-3p modulates the onset of puberty in rodents probably by regulating the expression of Kiss1 via the p38 MAPK pathway. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 518, 110994 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Y. P. et al. Mechanistic insights on the Dicer-independent AGO2-mediated processing of AgoshRNAs. RNA Biol. 12, 92–100 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang, J. S. & Lai, E. C. Dicer-independent, Ago2-mediated microRNA biogenesis in vertebrates. Cell Cycle 9, 4455–4460 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Navarro, V. M. et al. Characterization of the potent luteinizing hormone-releasing activity of KiSS-1 peptide, the natural ligand of GPR54. Endocrinology 146, 156–163 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Garcia-Galiano, D. et al. Kisspeptin signaling is indispensable for neurokinin B, but not glutamate, stimulation of gonadotropin secretion in mice. Endocrinology 153, 316–328 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Colledge, W. H., Doran, J. & Mei, H. Model systems for studying kisspeptin signalling: mice and cells. Adv. Exp. Med Biol. 784, 481–503 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Prevot, V. In Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction Ch. 30 (Academic Press, 2015).
Popa, S. M. et al. Redundancy in Kiss1 expression safeguards reproduction in the mouse. Endocrinology 154, 2784–2794 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu, M. H. et al. Relative importance of the arcuate and anteroventralperiventricular kisspeptin neurons in control of puberty and reproductive function in female rats. Endocrinology 156, 2619–2631 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Adachi, S. et al. Involvement of anteroventral periventricular metastin/kisspeptin neurons in estrogen positive feedback action on luteinizing hormone release in female rats. J. Reprod. Dev. 53, 367–378 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saboor Aftab, S. A., Kumar, S. & Barber, T. M. The role of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the development of male obesity-associated secondary hypogonadism. Clin. Endocrinol. 78, 330–337 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gottsch, M. L. et al. Molecular properties of Kiss1 neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the mouse. Endocrinology 152, 4298–4309 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Harfe, B. D., McManus, M. T., Mansfield, J. H., Hornstein, E. & Tabin, C. J. The RNaseIII enzyme Dicer is required for morphogenesis but not patterning of the vertebrate limb. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10898–10903 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yoon, H., Enquist, L. W. & Dulac, C. Olfactory inputs to hypothalamic neurons controlling reproduction and fertility. Cell 123, 669–682 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Quennell, J. H. et al. Leptin deficiency and diet-induced obesity reduce hypothalamic kisspeptin expression in mice. Endocrinology 152, 1541–1550 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sangiao-Alvarellos, S. et al. Changes in hypothalamic expression of the Lin28/let-7 system and related microRNAs during postnatal maturation and after experimental manipulations of puberty. Endocrinology 154, 942–955 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Amar, L. et al. MicroRNA expression profiling of hypothalamic arcuate and paraventricular nuclei from single rats using Illumina sequencing technology. J. Neurosci. Methods 209, 134–143 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pantier, L. K., Li, J. & Christian, C. A. Estrous cycle monitoring in mice with rapid data visualization and analysis. Bio Protoc. 9, e3354 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gaytan, F. et al. Development and validation of a method for precise dating of female puberty in laboratory rodents: The puberty ovarian maturation score (Pub-Score). Sci. Rep. 7, 46381 (2017).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Endo, T., Freinkman, E., de Rooij, D. G. & Page, D. C. Periodic production of retinoic acid by meiotic and somatic cells coordinates four transitions in mouse spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10132–E10141 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leon, S. et al. Tachykinin signaling is required for induction of the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and normal luteinizing hormone pulses. Neuroendocrinology 111, 542–554 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leon, S. et al. Direct actions of kisspeptins on GnRH neurons permit attainment of fertility but are insufficient to fully preserve gonadotropic axis activity. Sci. Rep. 6, 19206 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roa, J. et al. Hypothalamic expression of KiSS-1 system and gonadotropin-releasing effects of kisspeptin in different reproductive states of the female Rat. Endocrinology 147, 2864–2878 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Franssen, D. et al. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling in GnRH neurons links energy status and reproduction. Metabolism 115, 154460 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Roa, J. et al. Desensitization of gonadotropin responses to kisspeptin in the female rat: analyses of LH and FSH secretion at different developmental and metabolic states. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 294, E1088–E1096 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Steyn, F. J. et al. Development of a methodology for and assessment of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in juvenile and adult male mice. Endocrinology 154, 4939–4945 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McQuillan, H. J., Han, S. Y., Cheong, I. & Herbison, A. E. GnRH pulse generator activity across the estrous cycle of female mice. Endocrinology 160, 1480–1491 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ohlsson, C. et al. Low progesterone and low estradiol levels associate with abdominal aortic aneurysms in men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 107, e1413–e1425 (2021).
Roa, J. et al. The mammalian target of rapamycin as novel central regulator of puberty onset via modulation of hypothalamic Kiss1 system. Endocrinology 150, 5016–5026 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoffman, G.E., Le, W.W. & Sita, L.V. The importance of titrating antibodies for immunocytochemical methods. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. Chapter 2, Unit 2 12 (2008).
Manfredi-Lozano, M. et al. Defining a novel leptin-melanocortin-kisspeptin pathway involved in the metabolic control of puberty. Mol. Metab. 5, 844–857 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants BFU2014-57581-P, BFU2017-83934-P, and PID2020-118660GB-I00 (to M.T.-S.—Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain; co-funded with EU funds from FEDER Program); Project PIE-00005 (to M.T.-S) and grants PI16/01243 and PI19/00257 (to J.R.—Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad, Spain; co-funded with EU funds from FEDER Program); Project P12-FQM-01943 (to M.T.-S.—Junta de Andalucía, Spain); Project REP-655232 (ReprObesity; to M.T.-S.–European Union); and COST Action BM1105 (to M.T.-S. and V.P.–European Union). CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición is an initiative of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain. The authors are indebted to Dr. Esther Peralbo, Head of the Cytometry Unit of IMIBIC, for her superb assistance in the optimization and implementation of protocols of FACS for Kiss1 neuronal isolation. The assistance of Profs. Catherine Dulac and Robert A. Steiner for providing the parental Kiss1^Cre/− and GnRH-Cre^pos mouse lines is cordially appreciated.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Juan Roa, Miguel Ruiz-Cruz.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Juan Roa, Manuel Tena-Sempere.

Authors and Affiliations

Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
Juan Roa, Miguel Ruiz-Cruz, Francisco Ruiz-Pino, Rocio Onieva, Maria J. Vazquez, Maria J. Sanchez-Tapia, Jose M. Ruiz-Rodriguez, Veronica Sobrino, Alexia Barroso, Violeta Heras, Inmaculada Velasco, Cecilia Perdices-Lopez, Maria Soledad Avendaño, Leonor Pinilla, Francisco Gaytan & Manuel Tena-Sempere
Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
Juan Roa, Miguel Ruiz-Cruz, Francisco Ruiz-Pino, Rocio Onieva, Maria J. Vazquez, Maria J. Sanchez-Tapia, Jose M. Ruiz-Rodriguez, Veronica Sobrino, Alexia Barroso, Violeta Heras, Inmaculada Velasco, Cecilia Perdices-Lopez, Maria Soledad Avendaño, Leonor Pinilla, Francisco Gaytan & Manuel Tena-Sempere
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
Juan Roa, Miguel Ruiz-Cruz, Francisco Ruiz-Pino, Rocio Onieva, Maria J. Vazquez, Maria J. Sanchez-Tapia, Jose M. Ruiz-Rodriguez, Veronica Sobrino, Alexia Barroso, Violeta Heras, Inmaculada Velasco, Cecilia Perdices-Lopez, Maria Soledad Avendaño, Leonor Pinilla, Francisco Gaytan & Manuel Tena-Sempere
CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 14004, Córdoba, Spain
Juan Roa, Miguel Ruiz-Cruz, Francisco Ruiz-Pino, Rocio Onieva, Maria J. Vazquez, Maria J. Sanchez-Tapia, Jose M. Ruiz-Rodriguez, Veronica Sobrino, Alexia Barroso, Violeta Heras, Inmaculada Velasco, Cecilia Perdices-Lopez, Maria Soledad Avendaño, Leonor Pinilla, Francisco Gaytan & Manuel Tena-Sempere
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden
Claes Ohlsson & Matti Poutanen
Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Laboratory of Development and Plasticity of the Neuroendocrine Brain, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, UMR-S1172, 59000, Lille, France
Vincent Prevot
Institute of Biomedicine, Research Centre for Integrative Physiology and Pharmacology, and Turku Center for Disease Modeling, University of Turku, 20520, Turku, Finland
Matti Poutanen & Manuel Tena-Sempere

Authors

Juan Roa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Miguel Ruiz-Cruz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Francisco Ruiz-Pino
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rocio Onieva
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maria J. Vazquez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maria J. Sanchez-Tapia
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jose M. Ruiz-Rodriguez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Veronica Sobrino
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alexia Barroso
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Violeta Heras
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Inmaculada Velasco
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cecilia Perdices-Lopez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Claes Ohlsson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maria Soledad Avendaño
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Vincent Prevot
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Matti Poutanen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Leonor Pinilla
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Francisco Gaytan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Manuel Tena-Sempere
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.R. was co-responsible for study design, conducted and coordinated the physiological experiments and analytical procedures, evaluated and discussed the data, was responsible for figure preparation, and initial drafting of the manuscript; M.R.-C. assisted in data generation and analysis, and was actively involved in data representation and analysis; F.R.-P. actively participated in the conduction of the various experimental studies, including prominently ISH and histochemical studies, as well analytical procedures, with the support and assistance of R.O., M.J.S.-P., J.M.R.-R., A.B., V.H., I.V., and C.P.-L., who all discussed the data; V.S. actively contributed to the optimization of Kiss1-cell isolation using FACS, while M.J.V. and M.S.A. actively participated in the generation, discussion, and interpretation of experimental results; C.O., V.P., and M.P. provided essential reagents (V.P. and M.P.) and sex steroid hormone measurements (C.O.), participated in study design and actively discussed the data; L.P. and F.G. participated in study design and analytical procedures, including hormonal analyses (LP) and histological studies (FG), and actively discussed the data; MTS designed and co-supervised the study, and contributed also to analyze and discuss the data. J.R. and M.T.-S. wrote the manuscript, which was initially reviewed by all senior authors, and later by the rest of authors. All the authors take full responsibility for the work. J.R. and M.T.-S. are both senior and corresponding authors of this study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juan Roa or Manuel Tena-Sempere.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks T. Rajendra Kumar and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roa, J., Ruiz-Cruz, M., Ruiz-Pino, F. et al. Dicer ablation in Kiss1 neurons impairs puberty and fertility preferentially in female mice. Nat Commun 13, 4663 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32347-4

Download citation

Received: 07 April 2021
Accepted: 26 July 2022
Published: 09 August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32347-4

This article is cited by

Metabolic control of puberty: 60 years in the footsteps of Kennedy and Mitra’s seminal work
- Greg M. Anderson
- Jennifer W. Hill
- Carol F. Elias
Nature Reviews Endocrinology (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Results

Selective ablation of Dicer in Kiss1 neurons: the KiDKO mouse

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and infertility in mature adult male and female KiDKO mice

Late-onset HH in KiDKO mice: sexually different impact on puberty onset and attainment of fertility

Differential impact of Dicer ablation on Kiss1 expression in ARC and AVPV along postnatal maturation

Differential impact of Dicer ablation on Kisspeptin levels in ARC and AVPV along postnatal maturation

Differential impact of Dicer ablation on NKB vs. Kisspeptin expression in ARC KNDy neurons

Impact of Dicer ablation on Kiss1 neuronal survival

Dicer ablation induces upregulation of repressor expression in ARC Kiss1 neurons

Discussion

Methods

Animals

Generation of KiDKO and GoDKO mouse lines

Genotyping of KiDKO and GoDKO mouse lines

Validation of the KiDKO mouse line

Physiological measurements

Pubertal maturation

Fertility index

Estrous cyclicity

Evaluation of gonadal maturation

Tissue processing

Ovarian parameters

Testicular parameters

Ovulatory capability

Preovulatory surge induction protocol

Pharmacological and gonadectomy tests

Hormone measurements

RIA assay

Pulsatile LH measurement

Sex steroid measurements

Brain histological analyses

Tissue processing

Immunohistochemistry

In situ hybridization

Isolation of Kiss1 neurons by fluorescent-activated cell sorting

Quantitative qPCR analyses of Kiss1 transcriptional repressors and activators

Statistics and biostatistics analyses

Reporting summary

Data availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Additional information

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Comments

Search

Quick links