Circular RNA circTmem241 drives group III innate lymphoid cell differentiation via initiation of Elk3 transcription

Liu, Nian; He, Jiacheng; Fan, Dongdong; Gu, Yang; Wang, Jianyi; Li, Huimu; Zhu, Xiaoxiao; Du, Ying; Tian, Yong; Liu, Benyu; Fan, Zusen

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32322-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 11 August 2022

Circular RNA circTmem241 drives group III innate lymphoid cell differentiation via initiation of Elk3 transcription

Nian Liu^1,2^na1,
Jiacheng He^1,2^na1,
Dongdong Fan³^na1,
Yang Gu^1,2,
Jianyi Wang^1,2,
Huimu Li^1,2,
Xiaoxiao Zhu³,
Ying Du¹,
Yong Tian ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8790-1148^2,3,
Benyu Liu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-7221⁴ &
…
Zusen Fan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-8217^1,2

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 4711 (2022) Cite this article

3109 Accesses
11 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) exert important roles in host defense, tissue repair and inflammatory diseases. However, how ILC lineage specification is regulated remains largely elusive. Here we identify that circular RNA circTmem241 is highly expressed in group III innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) and their progenitor cells. CircTmem241 deficiency impairs ILC3 commitment and attenuates anti-bacterial immunity. Mechanistically, circTmem241 interacts with Nono protein to recruit histone methyltransferase Ash1l onto Elk3 promoter in ILC progenitor cells (ILCPs). Ash1l-mediated histone modifications on Elk3 promoter enhance chromatin accessibility to initiate Elk3 transcription. Of note, circTmem241^−/−, Nono^−/− and Ash1l^−/− ILCPs display impaired ILC3 differentiation, while Elk3 overexpression rescues ILC3 commitment ability. Finally, circTmem241^−/−Elk3^−/− mice show lower numbers of ILC3s and are more susceptible to bacterial infection. We reveal that the circTmem241-Nono-Ash1l-Elk3 axis is required for the ILCP differentiation into ILC3P and ILC3 maturation, which is important to manipulate this axis for ILC development on treatment of infectious diseases.

Circular RNA circZbtb20 maintains ILC3 homeostasis and function via Alkbh5-dependent m6A demethylation of Nr4a1 mRNA

Article 28 April 2021

Benyu Liu, Nian Liu, … Zusen Fan

LNCGM1082-mediated NLRC4 activation drives resistance to bacterial infection

Article 20 March 2023

Yunhuan Gao, Yazheng Yang, … Rongcun Yang

m6A RNA modification regulates innate lymphoid cell responses in a lineage-specific manner

Article 03 July 2023

Yingyu Zhang, Wanwei Zhang, … Yuefeng Huang

Introduction

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are heterogeneous populations of lymphocytes that react rapidly to environmental cues and exert critical roles in regulating mucosal immunity, lymphoid organogenesis, and tissue homeostasis¹. ILC subsets mirror T helper (Th) cells based on transcription factors (TFs) and secreted cytokines. ILC1s express T-bet and secret IFN-γ to function in the immune response against intracellular pathogens². ILC2s express Gata3 and secret Th2-like cytokines such as IL-5 and IL-13, which play an important role in allergic response and innate immunity to helminth³. ILC3s express RORγt and mainly produce IL-22 and/or IL-17 after activation⁴. All ILC subsets are developed from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs), which give rise to common innate lymphoid progenitors (CILPs), then diverge into common helper innate lymphoid progenitors (CHILPs) and NK cell precursors (NKPs). CHILPs can then differentiate into lymphoid tissue inducer progenitors (LTiPs) and innate lymphoid cell precursors (ILCPs), which finally produce all groups of ILCs^5,6. The commitment of ILCs is finely modulated by fate-decision TFs. Expression of inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (Id2) is required for establishing ILC cell fate from CLPs by repressing E-box protein activity^7,8. Id2⁺ CHILPs give rise to more restricted ILCPs via expression of transcription factor PLZF (encoded by Zbtb16 gene) and possess the ability to produce all ILC subsets^7,8. Recent studies have identified specific precursors of each ILC subsets^9,10. ILC1 precursors (ILC1Ps, Lin⁻CD127⁺Eomes⁻CD49a⁺NK1.1⁺NKp46⁺) require T-bet, Nifl3 and Gata3 for ILC1 differentiation¹¹. Transcription factors such as Bcl11b and Gata3 are involved in ILC2 commitment from ILC2 precursors (ILC2Ps, Lin⁻CD127⁺CD45⁺Flt3⁻CD117⁻Sca-1⁺CD25⁺Gata3⁺) to mature ILC2s^9,12,13. Whereas ILC3 precursors (ILC3Ps, Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺α₄β₇^intGata3^loBcl11b⁺Id2⁺RORγt⁺) drive ILC3-restricted lineage specification¹⁴. ILC3 commitment and function are finely regulated by various aspects. Extrinsic clues and TFs like Gata3 and Rorc are directly involved in ILC3 fate decision^15,16,17. We previously showed that lncKdm2b activates Zfp292 expression to promote the maintenance and effector functions of ILC3s¹⁸. We also found that IL-7Rα glutamylation is required for ILC3 specification¹⁹.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are generated from precursor mRNA through back-splicing events, which are characterized by a covalent bond linking the 3′- and 5′-ends²⁰. CircRNAs comprise exons, introns, or both. Compared to linear RNAs, circRNAs have a longer half-life and resist exonuclease degradation^21,22. CircRNAs exist in various types of tissues and cells and exert critical roles in many biological processes, including development, stemness maintenance, and tumorigenesis. For example, circRNA Cdr1as regulates brain function via sponging miR-7 and miR-671²³. Fusion circRNAs derived from transcribed exons of some genes promote tumorigenesis and enhance resistance against therapy²⁴. A recent report showed that endogenous circRNAs may form imperfect RNA duplexes to suppress activation of PKR, resulting in inhibition of innate immunity²⁵. We previously demonstrated that circRNA cia-cGAS is highly expressed in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and maintains HSC homeostasis via blocking nuclear cGAS enzymatic activity²⁶. We also showed that circRNA circKcnt2 facilitates colitis resolution by inhibiting ILC3 activation²⁷. However, how circRNAs regulate ILC differentiation still remains elusive.

ETS domain-containing protein Elk3 (Elk3) belongs to the ETS-domain transcription factor family and the ternary complex factor (TCF) subfamily. Elk3 is well known to regulate the early response to growth factor stimulation in quiescent cells²⁸. Elk3 is a strong transcriptional repressor and is involved in several biological processes such as angiogenesis and tumorigenesis²⁹. A previous study showed that phosphorylation of Elk3 switches it to a transcriptional activator, leading to induction of VEGF expression and angiogenesis²⁸. Elk3 can regulate chromatin landscape and initiate the progression of squamous cell carcinomas³⁰. Importantly, Elk3 also plays an essential role in the development of neural cells³¹. Moreover, several studies revealed that Elk3 is a potential regulator of immune response^32,33. Elk3 inhibits HO-1 and NOS2 expression under LPS or cytokine stimulation and regulates HO-1-mediated inflammatory response in macrophages^32,34. In addition, Elk3 displays different expression patterns in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells that regulate immune response mediating tumorigenesis of colon cancer³⁵. However, the role of Elk3 in ILC biology is still unclear. Here we identified an undefined circular RNA circTmem241 (derived from Tmem241 gene transcript, mmu_circ_0007131 in circBase) that is highly expressed in ILC3s and their progenitor cells CHILPs and ILCPs. CircTmem241 regulates ILC3 specification at the ILCP stage, and the circTmem241-Nono-Ash1l-Elk3 axis is required for ILC3 differentiation.

Results

CircTmem241 knockout reduces ILC3 numbers

We previously performed circRNA microarray analysis of ILC3s from Rag1^−/− mice and identified differentially expressed circRNAs in ILC3s related to innate colitis²⁷. To explore the role of circRNAs in ILC3 commitment, we selected the top 10 highly expressed circRNAs in Rag1^−/− ILC3s that were conserved between mice and humans, whose circular characteristics were validated by PCR (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b), and Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 1c). These ten circRNAs were resistant to RNase R digestion (Supplementary Fig. 1d). We next knocked them down in CHILPs using lentivirus (Supplementary Fig. 1e) and conducted in vitro differentiation assay. Knockdown of circRNAs did not affect their expression levels of their parental genes (Supplementary Fig. 1f). Of these ten circRNAs, circTmem241 (circBase ID: mmu_circ_0007131) knockdown most significantly impaired ILC3 differentiation (Fig. 1a). CircTmem241 is generated by back-splicing of Tmem241 transcript from exon 8 to exon 14 and conserved across various species (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Human ortholog circTMEM241 was validated in human ILC3 by DNA sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 2c), indicating circTmem241 was highly conserved between mice and humans. We observed that circTmem241 was highly expressed in some tissues, especially in the bone marrow and digestive track (Fig. 1b). Among lymphocyte progenitors and immune cells tested, circTmem241 was most highly expressed in CHILPs, ILCPs, and intestinal ILC3s (Fig. 1c), which was further confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay (Supplementary Fig. 2d). In addition, circTmem241 was mainly located in the nuclei of CHILPs, ILCPs, and ILC3s (Supplementary Fig. 2e).

**Fig. 1: *CircTmem241* knockout decreases ILC3 numbers.**

To further determine the physiological role of circTmem241 in the regulation of ILC3 commitment and function, we sought to generate circTmem241-deficient mice. The complementary elements flanking circRNA sequences are essential for their generation²¹. We screened out the complementary sequences in the introns flanking circTmem241 and constructed plasmids for minigene assay (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We next generated circTmem241 knockout (circTmem241^−/−) mice by deleting the downstream complementary element in the genome through CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Supplementary Fig. 3b). CircTmem241 deletion was validated in circTmem241^−/− mice via PCR and qPCR analyses (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). Of note, circTmem241 deletion did not affect the expression of its maternal gene Tmem241 (Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). We found that circTmem241^−/− mice displayed comparable numbers of ILC1s and ILC2s in isolated intestinal lamina propria lymphocytes compared to circTmem241^+/+ littermate control mice (Fig. 1d, e). However, circTmem241 deletion decreased intestinal ILC3 percentages and numbers (Fig. 1f, g), which was further verified by in situ immunofluorescence (IF) staining (Fig. 1h). Moreover, all three subsets of ILC3s displayed decreased numbers in circTmem241-deficient mice (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Consistently, circTmem241-deficient mice showed impaired development of gut-associated lymphoid tissues (Supplementary Fig. 3g). ILC3s are essential for gut homeostasis and bacterial defense via secreting IL-22¹. As expected, circTmem241 deletion decreased IL-22 positive ILC3s after Citrobacter rodentium infection and IL-22 production after IL-23 stimulation (Fig. 1i, j). Moreover, circTmem241^−/− mice were accompanied by greater feces bacteria load, more significant body weight loss, and severer Intestinal injury after C. rodentium infection than circTmem241^+/+ littermates (Fig. 1k–n). Taken together, circTmem241 is highly expressed in ILC3s and their progenitors and its deficiency reduces ILC3 numbers but not ILC1s or ILC2s.

CircTmem241 drives ILC3 specification from the ILCP progenitor stage

The reduced number of ILC3s might be caused by increased cell death and/or decreased development of cell populations. We then assessed the turnover rate of ILC3s in vivo. BrdU was intraperitoneally injected into mice at 100 mg/kg for 18 h, followed by detection of BrdU uptake by FACS. We found that ILC3s derived from circTmem241^−/− mice showed comparable BrdU uptake to those from littermate WT control mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Consistently, percentages of Ki67⁺ ILC3s in circTmem241^−/− mice displayed similar levels compared with those of circTmem241^+/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 4b). In addition, circTmem241 deficiency didn’t affect death rates of ILC3s (Supplementary Fig. 4c), indicating that circTmem241 does not affect cell proliferation and survival of ILC3s. To further determine the role of circTmem241 deficiency on ILC3 reduction in vivo, we compared hematopoietic progenitor cells by FACS in circTmem241^−/− mice versus circTmem241^+/+ littermate control mice. We noted that circTmem241 deficiency did not affect the percentage and number of ILC progenitors, including CLPs, α₄β₇⁺ CLPs, CHILPs, and ILCPs (Fig. 2a–d). ILCPs diversify into specific precursors of different ILC subsets before maturation^36,37. We observed that circTmem241 deficiency caused decreased percentages and numbers in ILC3Ps but not ILC1Ps or ILC2Ps (Fig. 2e–h). We next isolated CHILPs or ILCPs for in vitro differentiation assay and found that circTmem241 knockout impaired ILC3P and ILC3 differentiation but not ILC1 or ILC2 (Fig. 2i, j and Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). Ectopic expression of circTmem241 in circTmem241^−/− CHILPs or ILCPs was able to rescue the differentiation ability of CHILPs or ILCPs toward ILC3Ps and ILC3s (Fig. 2i, j). Altogether, circTmem241 is required for ILC lineage commitment from ILCPs to ILC3Ps.

**Fig. 2: *CircTmem241* drives ILC3 differentiation from the ILCP progenitor stage.**

CircTmem241 regulates ILC3 commitment in an intrinsic manner

To further determine whether the role of circTmem241 in ILC3 commitment is intrinsic or extrinsic, we conducted two groups of bone marrow transplantation experiments (Fig. 3a). For non-competitive bone marrow transplantation, we transplanted 5 × 10⁶ CD45.2⁺ circTmem241^−/− or circTmem241^+/+ mouse BM cells into lethally irradiated CD45.1⁺ recipients. After 8 weeks, we found that recipients reconstituted with CD45.2⁺ circTmem241^−/− BM cells decreased ILC3 numbers (Fig. 3b). For competitive bone marrow transplantation assays, we transferred 1:1 ratio mixture of CD45.1⁺ WT and CD45.2⁺ circTmem241^+/+ or circTmem241^−/− BM cells into lethally irradiated recipient mice for 8 weeks. Recipients reconstituted with circTmem241^−/− BM cells showed reduced ILC3 numbers compared to those reconstituted with circTmem241^+/+ BM cells (Fig. 3c). Consequently, circTmem241^−/− BM cell reconstituted recipients were also susceptible to C. rodentium infection (Fig. 3d–f). These data indicate that circTmem241 regulates ILC3 commitment and anti-bacterial immunity in an intrinsic manner.

CircTmem241 promotes Elk3 expression

To explore the molecular mechanism of circTmem241 in the regulation of ILC3 commitment, we crossed circTmem241^−/− mice with PLZF^GFP mice and isolated ILCPs from PLZF^GFP or PLZF^GFPcircTmem241^−/− mice for transcriptome analysis. We found that circTmem241 deletion caused downregulation of many TFs (Fig. 4a). Among the top 10 downregulated TFs, Elk3 was most downregulated (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, knockdown of Elk3 significantly decreased percentages of ILC3s by in vitro differentiation assay (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 4f). Elk3 downregulation in circTmem241^−/− ILCPs was also confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 4d). Elk3 overexpression could rescue the reduction of ILC3s by in vitro differentiation assay, indicating Elk3 played a critical role in circTmem241-mediated ILC3 commitment (Supplementary Fig. 4g, h). Through chromatin isolation by RNA purification (CHIRP) assay, we observed that circTmem241 was enriched on the promoter region (−200~0) of Elk3 (Fig. 4e). We also found that circTmem241 bound to the segment (−200~0) of Elk3 promoter via hybridization with biotinylated circTmem241 RNA probe (Fig. 4f). This result was further validated by luciferase assay (Fig. 4g). These data suggest that circTmem241 binds to Elk3 promoter to regulate its transcription.

**Fig. 4: *CircTmem241* enhances *Elk3* expression.**

Previous studies have revealed that circRNA loops are involved in the interaction of circular RNAs²⁰. We predicted the secondary structure of circTmem241 with a bioinformatics tool and identified four loop regions of circTmem241 transcript (Supplementary Fig. 5a). To determine which loop (HR1 (hairpin region #1, HR1), HR2, HR3, and HR4) was required for the association between circTmem241 transcript and Elk3 promoter, we constructed several circTmem241 mutations to abrogate loop structures (Supplementary Table 1). We found that HR1 was required for their interaction (Fig. 4h). Through sequence alignment, we noticed that pairing complementary bases existed in the Elk3 promoter (−200~0) versus the HR1 of circTmem241 (Supplementary Fig. 5b). We generated the mutations of circTmem241 transcript to delete their base pairing bases (circTmem241-mut), followed by a hybridization assay. We found that circTmem241-mut really abolished the interaction between circTmem241 transcript and Elk3 promoter (Fig. 4i). In addition, substitution mutation in Elk3 promoter pairing region failed to activate luciferase activity by circTmem241 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Through DNase I accessibility assay, we found that Elk3 promoter in circTmem241^−/− ILCPs was less susceptible to DNase I digestion (Fig. 4j). Consistently, circTmem241 deficiency caused attenuated transcription of Elk3 mRNA by nuclear run-on assay (Fig. 4k). To further confirm the important role of the pairing bases, we conducted in vitro differentiation assay using ILCPs from circTmem241^+/+ or circTmem241^−/− mice. We observed that only overexpression of circTmem241-WT was able to rescue ILC3 differentiation (Fig. 4l). Altogether, circTmem241 binds to Elk3 promoter to promote its expression, leading to the commitment of ILC3s.

CircTmem241 associates with Nono in ILCPs

To further explore how circTmem241 regulates Elk3 transcription in ILCPs, we conducted RNA-pulldown assay using biotin-labeled circTmem241 transcripts to pulldown their interacting components from bone marrow cells, followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), silver staining, and mass spectrometry. We found that circTmem241 bound to Nono from bone marrow lysates (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 5d). We further validated the interaction of circTmem241 with Nono via CHIRP assay and immunoblotting analysis (Fig. 5b, c). In addition, circTmem241 was enriched by anti-Nono antibody through RNA immunoprecipitation assay (Fig. 5d). Moreover, the interaction between circTmem241 and Nono was further validated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) assay (Fig. 5e). Consistently, circTmem241 was co-localized with Nono in ILCP cells (Fig. 5f).

**Fig. 5: *CircTmem241* directly interacts with Nono.**

To further determine which region of circTmem241 transcript was required for its interaction with Nono, we performed RNA-pulldown assay using biotin-labeled truncated circTmem241 transcripts. We observed that the 161–240 region truncation of circTmem241 transcript (Δ161–240) abolished the association between circTmem241 and Nono (Fig. 5g). In addition, the N-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM) of Nono protein was responsible for its interaction with circTmem241 (Fig. 5h). Nono overexpression significantly enhanced luciferase activity of Elk3 promoter (Fig. 5i). Moreover, Elk3 transcription was remarkably attenuated after Nono knockout (Fig. 5j and Supplementary Fig. 5e, f). Collectively, circTmem241 directly interacts with Nono protein in ILCPs.

CircTmen241 recruits histone methyltransferase Ash1l onto Elk3 promoter to trigger its transcription

We next sought to explore how circTmem241 regulated Elk3 transcription. We used anti-Nono antibody to go through bone marrow cell lysates for immunoprecipitation assay. Precipitated candidates were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining and mass spectrometry. A major differential band was identified to be the histone methyltransferase Ash1l (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 6a). The interaction of Nono with Ash1l was validated by co-IP assay (Fig. 6b). By RNA-pulldown assay, circTmem241 failed to pulldown Ash1l from Nono deleted bone marrow lysates (Fig. 6c). Consistently, circTmem241 didn’t interact with Ash1l directly by in vitro binding assay (Fig. 6d), suggesting that Nono acted as an adaptor protein for the association of circTmem241 with Ash1l. Of note, Nono co-localized with Elk3 promoter in WT ILCPs but not in circTmem241^−/− ILCPs (Fig. 6e). Moreover, with cross-linking treatment, Ash1l was co-eluted with Elk3 promoter in circTmem241^+/+ bone marrow cell lysates, but not in circTmem241^−/− cell lysates (Fig. 6f).

**Fig. 6: *CircTmem241* recruits Ash1l onto *Elk3* promoter to initiate its transcription.**

Ash1l is mainly responsible for H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 modifications that promote chromatin accessibility for gene transcription³⁸. Through Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay with indicated antibodies, Ash1l was enriched on Elk3 promoter region (−200~0) and circTmem241 knockout decreased H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 modification levels (Fig. 6g–i). These data suggest that circTmem241 recruits Ash1l onto Elk3 promoter that facilitates its histone methylation modifications in ILCPs. To further test whether Nono and Ash1l regulated Elk3 transcription, we deleted Ash1l via AAV delivery of guide RNAs in ILCPs from Vav-Cre;Cas9-KI mice (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). We found that Elk3 promoter was less enriched with H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 modifications in Nono^−/− and Nono^−/−circTmem241^−/− ILCPs (Fig. 6j and Supplementary Fig. 6d). In addition, Elk3 mRNA was less transcribed in Nono^−/− and Nono^−/−circTmem241^−/− ILCP cells by nuclear run-on assay (Fig. 6k). Consequently, Elk3 expression was remarkably inhibited in Nono^−/− and Nono^−/−circTmem241^−/− ILCPs (Fig. 6l, m). In parallel, Ash1l knockout also exhibited less enriched histone modifications and dramatically attenuated Elk3 expression (Fig. 6j–m and Supplementary Fig. 6d). Taken together, circTmem241 recruits the histone methyltransferase Ash1l to initiate Elk3 transcription in a Nono-dependent manner.

Elk3 deficiency impairs ILC3 specification and anti-bacterial immunity

We next established Elk3-deficient mice via a CRISPR/Cas9 approach (Supplementary Fig. 6e–g). We performed a series of in vitro differentiation assays to verify the circTmem241-Nono-Ash1l-Elk3 axis in ILC3 commitment. We found that Elk3^−/− ILCPs showed decreased ILC3P and ILC3 numbers (Fig. 7a, b). By contrast, Elk3 overexpression in Elk3^−/− ILCPs was able to rescue ILC3 numbers (Fig. 7b). Of note, deletion of Nono or Ash1l in ILCPs suppressed the differentiation of ILC3s, which could be rescued by Nono, Ash1l or Elk3 overexpression (Fig. 7c). Moreover, ILCPs of circTmem241^−/− or circTmem241^−/− Elk3^−/− mice showed significantly attenuated ability to differentiate into ILC3s, which could be partially rescued by Elk3 overexpression (Fig. 7d). Notably, circTmem241 overexpression in circTmem241^−/−Elk3^−/− ILCPs failed to restore ILC3 numbers, while overexpression of both circTmem241 and Elk3 almost fully rescued ILC3 differentiation ability (Fig. 7d). Taken together, the circTmem241-Nono-Ash1l-Elk3 axis is required for ILC3 differentiation.

**Fig. 7: *Elk3* knockout impairs ILC3 commitment and anti-bacterial immunity.**

As expected, Elk3 deletion markedly decreased ILC3 numbers but did not affect the numbers of ILC1s or ILC2s in vivo (Fig. 7e–h). In addition, the development of gut-associated lymphoid tissues was also impaired in Elk3-deficient mice (Supplementary Fig. 6h). Consistently, numbers of IL-22⁺ ILC3s were also dramatically reduced in Elk3^−/− mice (Fig. 7i). Importantly, circTmem241^−/−Elk3^−/− mice displayed much lower numbers of ILCPs and ILC3s (Fig. 7j) as well as were much more susceptible to bacterial infection than their littermate WT or Elk3^−/− mice (Fig. 7k–m). Collectively, Elk3 regulates circTmem241-mediated ILC3 differentiation that exerts anti-bacterial immunity.

Discussion

ILC3s play important roles in the early innate immune response against pathogens and maintaining tissue homeostasis⁴. Abnormity of ILC3 development causes severe intestinal diseases after infection. Here we identified an undefined circular RNA circTmem241 that is highly expressed in ILC3s and their progenitor cells. CircTmem241 deficiency impairs ILC3 commitment and consequently attenuates anti-bacterial immunity against C. rodentium infection. Mechanistically, circTmem241 interacts with Nono protein to recruit histone methyltransferase Ash1l onto Elk3 promoter in ILCP cells. Ash1l-mediated histone modifications on Elk3 promoter enhance chromatin accessibility to initiate Elk3 transcription. Of note, circTmem241^−/−, Nono^−/−, and Ash1l^−/− ILCPs display impaired ILC3 differentiation, while Elk3 overexpression rescues ILC3 commitment ability. Finally, circTmem241^−/−Elk3^−/− mice show much lower numbers of ILC3s and are much more susceptible to bacterial infection. Therefore, we conclude that the circTmem241-Nono-Ash1l-Elk3 axis is required for ILC3 differentiation.

Many circRNAs contain miRNA-binding elements that act as miRNA sponges to exert their functions²⁰. Instead, circRNAs without miRNA sponge potential utilize alternative mechanisms to exert their roles. Some circRNAs work as scaffolds for their interactions with proteins, DNAs, RNAs, or other molecules²⁶. For instance, circBIRC6 interacts with AGO2 to maintain stem cell pluripotency³⁹. We previously demonstrated that circKcnt2 associates with Mbd3 to inhibit Batf transcription, leading to ILC3 inactivation²⁷. CircPan3 binds Il13ra1 mRNA in the intestinal stem cells (ISCs) to increase its stability, which results in the expression of IL-13Rα1 in ISCs to sustain their self-renewal⁴⁰. cia-cGAS binds DNA sensor cGAS in the nucleus of HSCs to block its synthase activity, thereby protecting dormant HSCs from cGAS-mediated exhaustion²⁷. CircTmem241 is derived of Tmem241 transcripts from exon 8 to exon 14, whose formation depends on upstream and downstream complementary sequences of the Tmem241 transcripts. We show that circTmem241 is highly expressed in ILC progenitors and regulates ILC3 specification from the ILCP stage. CircTmem241 knockout does not affect the mRNA levels of its parental gene Tmem241 and other neighbor genes. CircTmem241 associates with Nono protein to recruit Ash1l to initiate Elk3 transcription, which drives ILC3 specification from the ILCP stage. We also found that circTmem241 was highly expressed in the intestine and mature ILC3s. Tmem241 is a predicted sugar transport protein, raising the possibility of nutrient component regulation on circTmem241 formation and function of ILC3s. Previous studies showed that ILC3s-mediated immune response can be modulated by nutrients-derived microenvironments^41,42,43. For instance, Vitamin A deficiency results in impaired ILC3 effector function and dramatic ILC2 amplification, which represents an adaption of local immune system against ongoing mucosal barrier challenges⁴². However, the formation and decay of circTmem241 in ILCPs and ILC3s needs to be further investigated.

Cell fate decision is a sophisticated process that is strictly regulated by both genetic and epigenetic factors^44,45. Histone modifications remodel chromatin status to modulate global genome accessibility for gene transcription initiation. Different kinds of histone modifications (called ‘histone code’), including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitylation, work separately or together to regulate gene expression^46,47. Accumulating evidence shows that epigenetic modifications play important roles in ILC commitment and functions^6,48,49. We previously showed that Yeats4 drives ILC lineage commitment via recruitment of Dot1l to activate Lmo4 expression⁵⁰. We also showed that lnckdm2b recruits Satb1 and the NURF complex to initiate Zfp292 transcription, contributing to the maintenance of ILC3 homeostasis¹⁸. In this study, we showed that circTmem241 directly interacts with Nono to recruit Ash1l onto Elk3 promoter in ILCPs. Ash1l as a histone methyltransferase catalyzes histone methylation modifications at H3K4 and H3K36 sites, which is tightly associated with active gene transcription³⁸. Ash1l contributes to the enrichment of H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 on Elk3 promoter, which triggers Elk3 transcription to drive ILC3 commitment. Thus, circTmem241-mediated ILC3 commitment is in an epigenetic manner.

ILC specification is a multi-step and finely controlled process. Several ILC progenitors, including EILPs, CHILPs, and ILCPs, have been identified and their major transcription factors regulating their downstream differentiation have also been defined. ILCPs are characterized by the expression of transcription factor PLZF, which drives differentiation of all groups of ILCs⁵¹. However, how the precursors downstream of ILCPs generate is still elusive. A recent scRNA-seq study defined several new subpopulations of ILC progenitors in bone marrow¹⁴. They clustered one subpopulation as the ILC3P cells that harbor the potential to specifically differentiate into ILC3s. However, how ILCPs differentiate into ILC3Ps and ILC3s remains unclear. Herein we identified an undefined circular RNA circTmem241 highly expressed in ILCPs that drives ILC3 specification from the ILCP to ILC3P stage. We reveal that the circTmem241-Nono-Ash1l-Elk3 axis is required for the ILCP differentiation into ILC3P and ILC3 maturation, which is important to manipulate this axis for ILC development on treatment of infectious diseases.

Methods

All experiments in this article comply with all relevant ethical regulations and are approved by the Institutional Committee of Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The animal experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Antibodies and reagents

Anti-Nono (Cat# 11058-1-AP and 66361-1-Ig) was from Proteintech. Anti-Elk3 (Cat# NBP1-83960) was from Novus Biologicals. Anti-Tmem241 (Cat# 203644-T32) was from Sinobiological. Anti-Lineage cocktail (Cat# 88-7772-72), Anti-CD127 (A7R34), anti-Sca-1 (D7), anti-Flt3 (A2F10), anti-α₄β₇ (DATK32), anti-Id2 (ILCID2), anti-PLZF (Mags.21F7), anti-Eomes (Dan11mag), anti-NKp46 (29A1.4), anti-NK1.1 (PK136), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD25 (PC61.5), anti-Gata3 (TWAJ), anti-RORγt (AFKJS-9), anti-Bcl11b (1F8H9), anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-CD19 (1D3), anti-KLRG1 (2F1), anti-CD90 (HIS51), anti-IL-22 (IL22JOP), anti-Ki67 (SolA15), anti-CD45.2 (104), anti-BrdU (BU20A), anti-PD-1 (J43) and anti-CD45.1 (A20) were purchased from eBiosciences (San Diego, USA). Anti-c-Kit (2B8), anti-CD150 (TC15-12F12.2), anti-CD48 (HM48-1), and anti-CD49a (HMα1) were purchased from Biolegend (California, USA). Anti-β-actin (Cat# RM2001) was purchased from Beijing Ray Antibody Biotech. Paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were from Sigma. IL-22 ELISA kit was purchased from Neobioscience.

Generation of knockout mice and cells by CRISPR/Cas9 technology

For a generation of circTmem241^−/− and Elk3^−/− mice, CRISPR-mediated single-stranded oligodecxynucleotides donors were synthesized as previously described⁵². Zygotes from C57BL/6 mice were injected with sgRNAs and subsequently transferred to the uterus of pseudo-pregnant females from which viable founder mice were obtained. For a generation of Nono^−/− and Ash1l^−/− cells, sgRNAs targeting Nono or Ash1l were synthesized and cloned into AAV-delivering vectors and infected CHILPs or ILCPs isolated from Vav-Cre;Cas9-KI mice. Genomic DNA mutation was identified by PCR screening and DNA sequencing, followed by Western blotting or Northern blotting. sgRNA sequences were listed in Supplementary Table 2. Vav-Cre, Cas9-KI, and PLZF^GFPcre mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. All the mouse strains were C57BL/6 background and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions with approval by the Institutional Committee of the Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. This study is compliant with all relevant ethical regulations regarding animal research.

In vitro differentiation assay

ILC in vitro differentiation assay was performed as previously described⁵³. Briefly, cells from femurs were flushed out using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% FBS and filtered through 70 μm strainers. Collected cells were treated with RBC lysis buffer (Tiangen, Beijing) to exclude red cells. CHILPs (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺Flt3⁻α4β7⁺) or ILCPs (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺ Flt3⁻α4β7⁺c-Kit⁺ PD-1⁺) were sorted by FACSAria III instrument. OP9-DL1 cells were maintained in complete αMEM medium (supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% streptomycin, 1% penicillin). Before seeding of progenitor cells, OP9-DL1 cells were treated with 4 μg/ml mitomycin for 2 h to inhibit cell division. Then, cells were digested and plated at the density of 1 × 10⁶ cells per 24-well plate. After OP9-DL1 cells were adhered, indicated progenitor cells were inoculated on OP9-DL1 feeder cells in a complete RIPM1640 medium (Supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% streptomycin, 1% penicillin, 20 ng/ml IL-7, 20 ng/ml SCF). Progenitor cells were detected after culture for 7 days while differentiated ILCs were analyzed 14 days later by FACS.

Intestinal lymphocyte separation

Intestinal lymphocytes were separated as described before²⁷. Briefly, intestines were cut open longitudinally and washed using PBS several times to clean intestinal contents. Then, intestines were cut into 2–5 mm pieces, washed with a solution I buffer (10 mM HEPES and 5 mM EDTA in HBSS) five times to remove epithelial cells, followed by lamina propria digestion with solution II buffer (DNase I, 5% FBS, 0.5 mg/ml collagenase II and collagenase III) three times. Finally, the digested lamina propria lymphocytes (LPLs) were filtered through 70 μm strainers and used for downstream experiments.

Flow cytometry

For flow cytometric analysis, HSC (Lin⁻Sca-1⁺c-Kit⁺CD150⁺CD48⁻), MPP (Lin⁻Sca-1⁺c-Kit⁺CD150⁻CD48⁺), CLP (Lin⁻CD127⁺c-Kit^intSca-1^intFlt3⁺α₄β₇⁻), α₄β₇⁺ CLP (Lin⁻CD127⁺c-Kit^intSca-1^intFlt3⁺α₄β₇⁺), CHILP (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺Flt3⁻α4β7⁺Id2⁺), ILCP (Lin⁻CD127⁺Flt3⁻c-Kit⁺α4β7⁺PLZF^GFP), ILC1P (Lin⁻CD127⁺Eomes⁻CD49a⁺NK1.1⁺NKp46⁺), ILC2P (Lin⁻CD127⁺CD45⁺Flt3⁻CD117⁻Sca-1⁺CD25⁺Gata3⁺), ILC3P (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺α4β7^intGata3^loBcl11b⁺Id2⁺RORγt⁺), siILC1 (CD3⁻CD19⁻CD127⁺CD45⁺NK1.1⁺NKp46⁺), siILC2 (CD3⁻CD19⁻CD127⁺CD90⁺KLRG1⁺Sca-1⁺), siILC3 (Lin⁻CD127⁺CD45⁺RORγt⁺), NK1.1⁺ NK, CD19⁺ B and CD3⁺ T populations were analyzed or sorted with a FACSAria III instrument (BD Biosciences). PLZF^GFPcre mice were used for ILCP (Lin⁻CD127⁺α₄β₇⁺PLZF^GFP) isolation and Id2^+/GFP mice were used for CHILP (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺Flt3⁻α₄β₇⁺Id2^GFP) isolation by FACS. Data were collected with FACSAria IIIu instrument and analyzed by FlowJo Version 10.0 software.

IF staining

Intestine tissues were collected and fixed using 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich) for one day at room temperature followed by frozen sectioning. Intestine sections were further fixed in 4% PFA for 1 hour at room temperature and permeabilized with PBS containing 1% TritonX-100 for 1 hour, blocked with 10% donkey serum for 1 h at room temperature, incubated with appropriate primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, and then incubated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies. For ILC3 staining, anti- RORγt (host species: rat) was used at a dilution of 1:100, and Alexa-Flour 594 donkey anti-rat secondary antibody at 1:500. Anti-CD127/IL-7R (host species: rabbit) was used at 1:200 and Alexa-Flour 647 donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody at 1:500. FTIC-conjugated anti-CD3 was used at 1:300 directly. For ILCP staining, anti-Nono (host species: mouse) was used at a dilution of 1:200 and Alexa-Flour 594 donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody at 1:500. DAPI was used for nucleus staining. Sections were visualized with Nikon A1R+ confocal microscopy.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

CHILPs (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺Flt3⁻α4β7⁺), ILCPs (Lin⁻CD25⁻CD127⁺Flt3⁻α4β7⁺c-Kit⁺PD-1⁺) or ILC3s (Lin⁻CD127⁺CD90^highCD45^lo) were isolated and spread on high-adherent slides. Cells were fixed using 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min at room temperature, permeabilized with PBS containing 1% TritonX-100 for 20 min, prehybridized with hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5× SSC, 500 ng/μl yeast tRNA, 1× Dehardt’s solution, 500 ng/μl sperm DNA, 50 ng/μl Heparin, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Tween-20, 0.25% CHAPS) for 1 h at 45 °C, incubated with biotinylated or cy5-labeled probes at 45 °C for 2 hours, and then washed three times with SSC washing buffer. After blocking with 10% donkey serum, cells were subjected to IF staining and visualized with Nikon A1R + confocal microscopy.

DNA in situ hybridization

DNA in situ hybridization was conducted according to a previous study with minor modification⁵⁴. In Brief, ILCPs were spread on adherent slides and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich), and quenched in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). After premetallized with 0.1% TritonX-100, slides were incubated in PBS containing 20% glycerol for 20 min. Then slides were subjected to 3 freeze/thawing cycles in liquid nitrogen. after which cells were equilibrated in hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 2× SSC) for 10 min. Biotin-labeled probe against Elk3 promoter was pipetted onto slides and incubated at 78 °C for exact 2 min, followed by incubation at 37 °C overnight. Cells were subjected to IF staining with indicated antibodies the next day. DAPI was used for nucleus staining. Cells were visualized with Nikon A1R + confocal microscopy.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated through a RNA Miniprep Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using 5× All-In-one RT Mastermix (Abm, Vancouver, Canada) and analyzed on QuantStudio1 qPCR system using specific primer pairs listed in Supplementary Table 3. The relative expression level was calculated and normalized to endogenous 18 S or Gapdh. CircRNAs were analyzed using specific divergent and convergent primers (Supplementary Table 4).

CHIRP assay

CHIRP assay was performed according to previous research⁵⁵. ILCPs were cross-linked with 1% glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 10 min and quenched by 0.1 M glycine for 5 min. Then cells were washed twice with PBS, lysed with Lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris, supplemented with PMSF, proteinase inhibitor cocktails, and RNase inhibitor) and sonicated to produce 200~500 bp DNA fragments. Lysates were incubated with biotinylated antisense probes against circTmem241 junction site for 4 hours at 37 °C. Streptavidin agarose beads were then added to isolate probe binding complex. After washing steps, DNA, RNA, or proteins were eluted from beads and subjected to downstream analysis.

ChIP assay

ILCPs were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde at 37 °C for 10 min. Then cells were washed twice with PBS, lysed with SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris), and sonicated to make 200 to 500 bp DNA fragments. Lysates were pre-cleared with Protein A Agarose/Salmon Sperm DNA (50% Slurry) and then incubated with 4 μg indicated antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing steps, DNA was eluted from beads and purified. DNA fragments were analyzed using primer pairs listed in Supplementary Table 5.

Luciferase reporter assay

For luciferase reporter assay, the full-length promoter of Elk3 (from −2000 to 0 upstream from transcriptional start site) or truncated Elk3 promoter was cloned into pGL3 vector. For mutation of Elk3 promoter, the pairing region was substituted with mutated sequence (5’-AGAAGTTCCATAAT-3’) in full-length promoter. Exon region of circTmem241 with flanking complementary elements was constructed into pcDNA4 vector for overexpression. 293 T cells were seeded in 24-well plate one day before transfection. For transfection of each well, 100 ng pGL3 plasmid, 1 ng pRL-TK and 500 ng pcDNA4 plasmid were used. Cells were transferred to 96-well assay plate at 10000/well 24 h later. After cells were attached, luminescence signals were analyzed using ONE-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

C. rodentium infection

Mice were fasted for 8 h and then infected with 5 × 10⁹ C. rodentium by intragastric gavage. C. rodentium was a gift from B. Ge (Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences). After infection for seven days, mice were sacrificed and colons were collected for pathological analysis. Feces were analyzed for bacterial loads. LPLs were isolated for analyses of ILC3s and IL-22 production by FACS and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Histopathological analysis

Colons from indicated mice were cut open longitudinally and fixed in 4% PFA followed by paraffin sectioning and H&E staining. The histopathological score was evaluated and analyzed according to a previous study⁵⁶. Briefly, sections were assessed for epithelial hyperplasia (calculated based on percentage change above control, 0 for no change, 1 for 1–50%, 2 for 51-100%, 3 for more than 100%), epithelial integrity (0 for no change, 1 for <10 epithelia shedding per lesion, 2 for 11–20 shedding per lesion, 3 for epithelia ulceration, 4 for sever crypt destruction), granulocyte mononuclear cell infiltration (0 for none, 1 for mild, 2 for moderate, 3 for severe), depletion of goblet cells (goblet cells from ×400 magnification filed were calculated, 0 for >50, 1 for 25–50, 2 for 10–25, 3 for <10) and submucosal oedema (0 for no change, 1 for mild, 2 for moderate, 3 for severe).

Bone marrow transplantation

For non-competitive transplantation, 5 × 10⁶ CD45.2⁺ BM donor cells from indicated mice were injected into lethally irradiated CD45.1⁺ recipient mice. Eight weeks after transplantation, CD45.2⁺ ILC3s derived from donor cells were analyzed by cytometric analysis. For competitive transplantation, 1 × 10⁶ CD45.2⁺ BM cells from indicated mice and 1 × 10⁶ wild-type CD45.1⁺ BM cells were mixed and transplanted into lethally irradiated CD45.1⁺ recipient mice. Eight weeks after transplantation, the ratio of CD45.2⁺ ILC3s to CD45.1⁺ ILC3s were examined.

Plasmids construction and virus preparation

RNA interference was performed as previously described²⁷. And target sequences were listed in Supplementary Table 6. For circTmem241 overexpression, genomic exon region of circTmem241 was constructed into pcDNA4 vector flanked by the upstream and downstream complementary elements. Lentiviral vector (pSIN-EF2-GFP) was co-transfected with packaging plasmids pMD2G and psPAX2 into HEK293T cells for 48 h, followed by culture medium collection and ultracentrifugation at 25,000×g for 2 h. Pellets were resuspended in DMEM medium and viral titers were determined by infecting HEK293T cells with diluted viruses. Cells were incubated with lentiviruses and centrifuged at 500×g for 2 h in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene. Cells were cultured for 24 h to allow GFP expression, followed by sorting of GFP positive cells through a flow cytometer. HEK293T cells were from ATCC (CRL-11268) and tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.

RNA-pulldown assay

Bone marrow cells were lysed and supernatants were incubated with biotin-labeled circTmem241 or antisense control probe. Then precipitated components were separated with SDS-PAGE and silver staining. Differential bands enriched by circTmem241 were analyzed by mass spectrometry or western blot.

Transcriptome analysis

For transcriptome RNA-seq analysis, ILCPs were isolated from circTmem241^+/+ or circTmem241^−/− mice. Then RNAs were isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and subjected to RNA sequencing by Beijing Genomics Institute. Subsequent data analysis was conducted by R studio and GSEA software.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

For analysis of the interaction between circTmem241 and Nono, biotin-labeled linearized circTmem241 was synthesized by in vitro transcription and Nono was expressed and purified by GST-tag. CircTmem241 and Nono were incubated in EMSA reaction buffer and mobility shift assay was performed using a Light Shift Chemiluminescent RNA EMSA Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Nuclear run-on assay

Nuclear run-on assay was performed as previously described²⁷. ILCPs isolated from indicated mice were suspended in nuclear extraction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mMKCl, 4 mM MgOAc, pH 7.4), followed by centrifugation to collect cell pellets. Then, pellets were lysed by lysis buffer (nuclear extraction buffer supplemented with 0.5% NP-40), followed by sucrose density gradient centrifugation to prepare transcriptional active crude nuclei components. Crude nuclei were incubated with a biotin labeling mix (Roche, Basel, Swiss) and RNase inhibitor at 28 °C for 5 min. RNAs were extracted using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was digested by DNase I for 15 min at room temperature. RNA transcripts were enriched with streptavidin affinity beads, followed by reverse transcription and RT-PCR analysis.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

LPLs or ILC3s were isolated and cultured for 24 h with indicated cytokines. Then supernatants were collected and cytokines were detected using ELISA kit (Neobioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical and Reproducibility

For statistical evaluation, an unpaired Student’s t test was applied for calculating statistical probabilities in this study. For all panels, at least three independent experiments were performed with similar results, and representative experiments are shown. Data were analyzed by using Microsoft Excel 2016 or GraphPad Prism Version 8.3. P values ≤0.05 were regarded as statistical significance.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The source data for Figs. 1–7 and Supplementary Figs. 1–6 are provided as a Source Data file. The RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE201065. All other data are included in the supplemental information or available from the authors upon reasonable requests. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Artis, D. & Spits, H. The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature 517, 293–301 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. et al. Intraepithelial type 1 innate lymphoid cells are a unique subset of IL-12- and IL-15-responsive IFN-gamma-producing cells. Immunity 38, 769–781 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Price, A. E. et al. Systemically dispersed innate IL-13-expressing cells in type 2 immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11489–11494 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zeng, B. et al. ILC3 function as a double-edged sword in inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Death Dis. 10, 315 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaye, J. ILC development: TCF-1 reporting. Nat. Immunol. 16, 1011–1012 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seillet, C. et al. Deciphering the innate lymphoid cell transcriptional program. Cell Rep. 17, 436–447 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harly, C., Cam, M., Kaye, J. & Bhandoola, A. Development and differentiation of early innate lymphoid progenitors. J. Exp. Med. 215, 249–262 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Diefenbach, A., Colonna, M. & Koyasu, S. Development, differentiation, and diversity of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 41, 354–365 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, Y. et al. The transcription factor Bcl11b is specifically expressed in group 2 innate lymphoid cells and is essential for their development. J. Exp. Med. 212, 865–874 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Willinger, T. Metabolic control of innate lymphoid cell migration. Front. Immunol. 10, 2010 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klose, C. S. N. et al. Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell 157, 340–356 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoyler, T. et al. The transcription factor GATA-3 controls cell fate and maintenance of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 37, 634–648 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. TGF-beta induces ST2 and programs ILC2 development. Nat. Commun. 11, 35 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Walker, J. A. et al. Polychromic reporter mice reveal unappreciated innate lymphoid cell progenitor heterogeneity and elusive ILC3 progenitors in bone marrow. Immunity 51, 104–118.e107 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scoville, S. D. et al. A progenitor cell expressing transcription factor rorgammat generates all human innate lymphoid cell subsets. Immunity 44, 1140–1150 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pokrovskii, M. et al. Characterization of transcriptional regulatory networks that promote and restrict identities and functions of intestinal innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 51, 185-+ (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Serafini, N. et al. Gata3 drives development of RORgammat+ group 3 innate lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 211, 199–208 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. Long noncoding RNA lncKdm2b is required for ILC3 maintenance by initiation of Zfp292 expression. Nat. Immunol. 18, 499–508 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. IL-7Ralpha glutamylation and activation of transcription factor Sall3 promote group 3 ILC development. Nat. Commun. 8, 231 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Patop, I. L., Wust, S. & Kadener, S. Past, present, and future of circRNAs. EMBO J. 38, e100836 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Kristensen, L. S. et al. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 675–691 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, X., Yang, L. & Chen, L. L. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol. Cell 71, 428–442 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Piwecka, M. et al. Loss of a mammalian circular RNA locus causes miRNA deregulation and affects brain function. Science 357 eaam8526 (2017).
Guarnerio, J. et al. Oncogenic role of fusion-circRNAs derived from cancer-associated chromosomal translocations. Cell 165, 289–302 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, C. X. et al. Structure and degradation of circular RNAs regulate PKR activation in innate immunity. Cell 177, 865–880.e821 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xia, P. et al. A circular RNA protects dormant hematopoietic stem cells from DNA sensor cGAS-mediated exhaustion. Immunity 48, 688–701.e687 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. An inducible circular RNA circKcnt2 inhibits ILC3 activation to facilitate colitis resolution. Nat. Commun. 11, 4076 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zheng, H. et al. The transcription factor Net regulates the angiogenic switch. Genes Dev. 17, 2283–2297 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Criqui-Filipe, P., Ducret, C., Maira, S. M. & Wasylyk, B. Net, a negative Ras-switchable TCF, contains a second inhibition domain, the CID, that mediates repression through interactions with CtBP and de-acetylation. EMBO J. 18, 3392–3403 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. ETS family transcriptional regulators drive chromatin dynamics and malignancy in squamous cell carcinomas. Elife 4, e10870 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rogers, C. D., Phillips, J. L. & Bronner, M. E. Elk3 is essential for the progression from progenitor to definitive neural crest cell. Dev. Biol. 374, 255–263 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsoyi, K. et al. Elk-3 is a KLF4-regulated gene that modulates the phagocytosis of bacteria by macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 97, 171–180 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Meng, L., Xing, Z., Guo, Z. & Liu, Z. LINC01106 post-transcriptionally regulates ELK3 and HOXD8 to promote bladder cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 11, 1063 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, Y. H. et al. Elk-3 is a transcriptional repressor of nitric-oxide synthase 2. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 39572–39577 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, X. et al. Immune-related genes in tumor-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in colon cancer. BMC Cancer 20, 585 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Kim, M.H., Friesen, L. & Kim, C.H. BATF regulates innate lymphoid cell hematopoiesis and homeostasis. Sci. Immunol. 5 eaaz8154 (2020).
Xu, W. et al. An Id2(RFP)-reporter mouse redefines innate lymphoid cell precursor potentials. Immunity 50, 1054–1068.e1053 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Cooper, S. & Brockdorff, N. The interplay of histone modifications - writers that read. EMBO Rep. 16, 1467–1481 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, C. Y. et al. The circular RNA circBIRC6 participates in the molecular circuitry controlling human pluripotency. Nat. Commun. 8, 1149 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhu, P. et al. IL-13 secreted by ILC2s promotes the self-renewal of intestinal stem cells through circular RNA circPan3. Nat. Immunol. 20, 183–194 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shi, Z., Ohno, H. & Satoh-Takayama, N. Dietary derived micronutrients modulate immune responses through innate lymphoid cells. Front Immunol. 12, 670632 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Spencer, S. P. et al. Adaptation of innate lymphoid cells to a micronutrient deficiency promotes type 2 barrier immunity. Science 343, 432–437 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hou, Q., Huang, J., Xiong, X., Guo, Y. & Zhang, B. Role of nutrient-sensing receptor GPRC6A in regulating colonic group 3 innate lymphoid cells and inflamed mucosal healing. J. Crohns Colitis 3, jjac020 (2022).
Ding, Y., Liu, Z. & Liu, F. Transcriptional and epigenetic control of hematopoietic stem cell fate decisions in vertebrates. Dev. Biol. 475, 156–164 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moris, N., Pina, C. & Arias, A. M. Transition states and cell fate decisions in epigenetic landscapes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 693–703 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, V. W., Goren, A. & Bernstein, B. E. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 7–18 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bannister, A. J. & Kouzarides, T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 21, 381–395 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Verma, M. et al. The molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of innate lymphoid cell (ILC) memory and its relevance for asthma. J Exp Med. 218, e20201354 (2021).
Lim, A. I. et al. Systemic human ILC precursors provide a substrate for tissue ILC differentiation. Cell 168, 1086–1100.e1010 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, B. et al. Yeats4 drives ILC lineage commitment via activation of Lmo4 transcription. J. Exp. Med. 216, 2653–2668 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Constantinides, M. G., McDonald, B. D., Verhoef, P. A. & Bendelac, A. A committed precursor to innate lymphoid cells. Nature 508, 397–401 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, X. et al. An efficient genotyping method for genome-modified animals and human cells generated with CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 4, 6420 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Holmes, R. & Zuniga-Pflucker, J. C. The OP9-DL1 system: generation of T-lymphocytes from embryonic or hematopoietic stem cells in vitro. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, prot5156 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Bolland, D.J., King, M.R., Reik, W., Corcoran, A.E. & Krueger, C. Robust 3D DNA FISH using directly labeled probes. J. Vis. Exp. 15, 50587 (2013).
Chu, C., Quinn, J. & Chang, H.Y. Chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP). J. Vis. Exp. 25, 3912 (2012).
Gibson, D. L. et al. Toll-like receptor 2 plays a critical role in maintaining mucosal integrity during Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis. Cell Microbiol. 10, 388–403 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jiajia Hou, Zixin Zhao, Yihui Xu, and Junying Jia for technical support. We thank Jing Li (Cnkingbio Company Ltd, Beijing, China) for his technical support. We also thank professor Liu (Academy of Military Medical Sciences) for providing the OP9-DL1 cell line. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0508501, 2020YFA0803501, 2021YFA1302000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31930036, 82130088, 81921003, 92042302, 32070533, 91940305, 81772646, 32170874, 31870883), Strategic Priority Research Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB19030203).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Nian Liu, Jiacheng He, Dongdong Fan.

Authors and Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunity of CAS, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Nian Liu, Jiacheng He, Yang Gu, Jianyi Wang, Huimu Li, Ying Du & Zusen Fan
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Nian Liu, Jiacheng He, Yang Gu, Jianyi Wang, Huimu Li, Yong Tian & Zusen Fan
Key Laboratory of RNA Biology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Dongdong Fan, Xiaoxiao Zhu & Yong Tian
Research Center of Basic Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Benyu Liu

Authors

Nian Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jiacheng He
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dongdong Fan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yang Gu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jianyi Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Huimu Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaoxiao Zhu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ying Du
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yong Tian
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Benyu Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zusen Fan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.L., J.H., and D.F. performed experiments; N.L. designed the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper; D.F. and X.Z. constructed genetic mouse strains. N.L., J.H., Y.G., J.W., H.L., and Y.D. analyzed data; Y.T. generated animal models and analyzed data; Z.F. and B. L. initiated the study, organized, designed, and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Tian, Benyu Liu or Zusen Fan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Kyung-Soon Park and Tim Willinger for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, N., He, J., Fan, D. et al. Circular RNA circTmem241 drives group III innate lymphoid cell differentiation via initiation of Elk3 transcription. Nat Commun 13, 4711 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32322-z

Download citation

Received: 17 March 2022
Accepted: 25 July 2022
Published: 11 August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32322-z

This article is cited by

Regulation of noncoding RNAs in innate lymphoid cells
- Benyu Liu
- Lingwei Zhang
- Zusen Fan
Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.