Introduction

Stable isotope paleoaltimetry1 (following the stable isotopes’ altitude effect, i.e., δD or δ18O decreases with increasing altitude) has been widely applied to reconstruct paleoelevation in the Alps2, the Andes3, the Rockies4, and the Tibetan Plateau5,6. However, in some situations stable isotope paleoaltimetry has proven unreliable as the results do not match the findings from other independent proxies. For example, paleoaltimetry reconstructions indicate that the Tibetan Plateau (TP) achieved a near-present elevation by the Eocene5,7 while palaeobotanical8,9 and paleontological10,11 studies suggest that the TP did not reach its modern elevation until the Late Miocene. Similar discrepancies exist for data from the Sierra Nevada Mountain range, western United States of America (WUSA)12. The occurrence of such discrepancies is because stable isotope paleoaltimetry assumes that the climate conditions have not changed over millions of years13,14,15. Accounting for the effects of paleoclimate changes on stable isotope paleoaltimetry, Botsyun et al.15 re-estimated the Eocene elevation of the TP using a numerical model that coupled stable isotopes with atmospheric circulation. Their new approach avoided the flawed assumptions mentioned previously and yielded an elevation less than 3000 m, which agreed with the other independent proxies. Clearly, such flawed assumptions hinder the reliability of stable isotope paleoaltimetry and in part explain the discrepancies of the results between the paleoaltimetry method and the various proxies.

Another potential complication of the paleoaltimetry method relates to the findings that δD and δ18O values of surface isotopic carriers from some regions including meteoric water16,17,18,19, snow20,21, river water22,23,24, ice cores25, and some biomarkers26,27 undergo an “inverse altitude effect” (IAE) (i.e., δD and δ18O values increase with increasing altitude) (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1). Indeed, the simulated δ18O values in precipitation across the southern flank of the TP during the Eocene also show an IAE15. While the flawed assumptions in the paleoaltimetry method lead to increased uncertainties in paleoelevation reconstructions, the IAE directly contradicts the basic theory of stable isotope paleoaltimetry which dictates that δD and δ18O values are controlled by the altitude effect (AE)1. The IAE has been documented across both observations and simulations, which motivates the need to determine the spatial and temporal variability of the IAE, what causes the IAE to develop and to assess the uncertainty of stable isotope paleoaltimetry reconstructions where it is documented.

Fig. 1: Geographic distribution of the IAE in stable isotopes reported in meteoric water, snow, river water, ice cores, and biomarkers.
figure 1

Detailed information on these sites is provided in Supplementary Table 1. IAE, inverse altitude effect. This map was generated with The NCAR Command Language (Version 6.6.2) [Software]. (2019). Boulder, Colorado: UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD.

Previous studies applied a surface perspective to examine the causes of the IAE at local site scales which have produced diverse findings that are difficult to reconcile. Indeed, post-depositional processes in snow21,28, sub-cloud evaporation of precipitation17, local moisture recycling17, mixing between multiple moisture sources18, and convective instability16 have all been proposed to explain the causes of the IAE. A key limitation of these studies is that they mostly focus on a single event and it is unknown whether the IAE holds for the overall climate mean state (seasonal or annual) across these regions. In addition, these studies have focused on measurements from meteoric water or river water sources that contain mixed isotopic signals of water during evaporation, transport, and condensation as well as groundwater pathways and hence they cannot identify the specific hydrological process that controls the IAE29,30,31. These issues highlight the need to better understand the causes of the IAE, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales.

Satellite measurement of stable isotopes in water vapor (δDv or δ18Ov) provides the ability for more targeted examination of the atmospheric hydrological cycle to better quantify the influences on the IAE across larger spatial scales. In particular, the δDv and δ18Ov above the sub-cloud level are less affected by localized factors that may influence other IAE measurements reported from precipitation and snow records. As such, satellite measurements can be used to independently analyze the influence of large-scale atmospheric circulations on the IAE.

Under different environmental conditions at a specific site, δDv and δ18Ov generally follow the curves of isotopes in meteoric water32,33,34,35. The variations of δD are approximately eight times larger than δ18O. Therefore, we can apply satellite-derived δDv to identify the key processes responsible for the IAE identified in precipitation δ18O and other surface isotopic carriers that are rooted in precipitation. This study reveals the spatial locations and the seasonal variability of the IAE in δDv retrieved from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) at different atmospheric levels (between 910 and 510 hPa) from 60°S to 60°N. We demonstrate the influence of moisture sources (including the moisture source regions and moisture transport pathways) on the IAE in δDv over the WUSA and the Asian drylands where the IAE is prevalent from an atmospheric circulation perspective. We then determine the connection between the IAE in water vapor and precipitation and discuss implications of the IAE for stable isotope paleoaltimetry. Our results suggest that it is necessary to examine whether the IAE occurs under different topographic scenarios so that the impact of the IAE on stable isotope paleoaltimetry is excluded where otherwise, it will bring great uncertainty to the results of paleoelevation reconstructions.

Results and discussion

IAE across the lower and mid-latitudes

Our δDv analysis using TES retrievals from different atmospheric levels across the lower and mid-latitudes (60°S-60°N) found that the IAE mainly occurred across Asia, North Africa, and North America and displayed seasonal patterns with strongest development occurring in the boreal summer (June–July–August: JJA) (Supplementary Figs. 12). Hence, we first focus on the presence of the IAE at different atmospheric levels during summer for those regions.

Between the 750 and 825 hPa levels, the IAE mainly occurred in North Africa and the Asian drylands (from the Red Sea to the northern Tibetan Plateau) during the summer months (Fig. 2, a, e). Between the 681 and 750 hPa levels, the area of the IAE in the Asian drylands increased considerably (Fig. 2f). Although the IAE was almost nonexistent in the WUSA between the 750 and 825 hPa level, it appeared between the 681 and 750 hPa level (Fig. 2b). Between the 618 and 681 hPa levels, the area of the IAE further increased in the WUSA and the northern Tibetan Plateau (NTP) (Fig. 2c, g) while it almost completely disappeared between the 510 and 618 hPa level, with the exception of the NTP region (Fig. 2d, h).

Fig. 2: Spatial patterns of the IAE at different atmospheric levels in North America and Afro-Eurasia during the summer months.
figure 2

a-d IAE over North America and surroundings. e-h IAE over Afro-Eurasia and surroundings. The δDv value of the upper level minus the δDv value of the lower level was taken between the two adjacent atmospheric levels. A positive difference indicates that δDv increases with altitude, i.e., the IAE occurs. The black boxes on the left panels show the WUSA region (31° N–45° N, 118° W–106° W) while the black boxes on the right panels indicate the NTP (35° N–45° N, 66° E–106° E). Dark gray lines on the right panels outline the boundary of the Tibetan Plateau. Gray shading on the right panels indicates that no valid δDv data are available for the specific grid. IAE, inverse altitude effect. WUSA, western United States of America. NTP, northern Tibetan Plateau. This map was generated with The NCAR Command Language (Version 6.6.2) [Software]. (2019). Boulder, Colorado: UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD.

The IAE was weak in the WUSA during the spring (March-April-May: MAM) season (Supplementary Fig. 1b–e) and was not observed during the autumn (September–October–November: SON) and winter (December–January–February: DJF) seasons (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, the IAE persisted in North Africa and the Asian drylands during the spring (Supplementary Fig. 1b–e) and autumn (Supplementary Fig. 2b–e) seasons. In winter, the IAE diminished greatly over the Asian drylands (Supplementary Fig. 2g–h).

Causes of the IAE in the western United States of America

As far as we know neither paleoelevation research nor the study of the IAE have been conducted in North Africa. In contrast, the IAE in surface isotopic carriers such as meteoric water, snow, river water, ice cores, and biomarkers have been widely reported in both the WUSA and the Asian drylands regions. Moreover, these two regions are characterized by high mountains or plateaus such as the Rocky Mountains and the TP (Fig. 1) and provide ideal locations for paleoelevation reconstruction studies4,5,6. Hence, this study primarily focuses on the WUSA and the Asian drylands, although we also provide a brief explanation on the cause of the IAE in North Africa.

The data show that the IAE in the WUSA mainly occurs between the 681 and 618 hPa levels during the summer months but its presence is greatly reduced at the other atmospheric levels (Fig. 2a–d). The IAE in the WUSA over the other seasons becomes greatly diminished (Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). Previous studies showed that the δDv in the mid-troposphere deviates significantly from the Rayleigh fractionation curve due to mixing of multiple air parcels36,37. The summer δq plots for the 825 to 750 hPa level over the WUSA tend to follow the Rayleigh fractionation curve while the δq plots above the 750 hPa level are biased towards the mixing line (Fig. 3a). These results imply that the IAE may be related to the air mixing between multiple moisture sources in the mid-troposphere level.

Fig. 3: Scatter plots of δDv versus the water vapor volume mixing ratio q (parts per thousand by volume, p.p.t.).
figure 3

a Plots of the different atmospheric levels in the WUSA during summer. b Plots of the different seasons at the 618 hPa level in the WUSA. c Plots of the different atmospheric levels in the NTP during summer. d Plots of the different seasons at the 618 hPa level in the NTP. The solid blue curve in each panel represents the Rayleigh fractionation curve calculated for initial conditions of δDv = −80‰ at T = 25 oC. The solid orange curve in each panel represents the mixing line calculated for two isotopically distinctive air masses (δDv = −450‰ and δDv = −80‰) initializing at a water vapor volume mixing ratio of 0.1 p.p.t. WUSA, western United States of America. NTP, northern Tibetan Plateau. MAM, March–April–May (spring); JJA, June–July–August (summer); SON, September-October-November (autumn); DJF, December–January–February (winter).

To further support this inference, we analyzed summer moisture contributions from different atmospheric levels over the moisture source regions to the different atmospheric levels over the target region of the WUSA. Our results show that the moisture transported from the lower troposphere (below 825 hPa) contributes 89% moisture to the target 825 hPa level and 73% to the target 750 hPa level (Supplementary Table 2), which demonstrates that the main moisture transport pathway for the target 825 and 750 hPa levels is characterized by an “upslope” type (Fig. 4a). Under this process, the δDv decreases with increasing altitude due to decreasing air temperature and follows an “altitude effect”. Therefore, the δDv between the 825 and 750 hPa levels over the WUSA can be well described by the Rayleigh fractionation model. In contrast, the moisture transport pathways are relatively complex from the moisture source regions to the target 681 and 618 hPa levels over the WUSA. While the moisture on route from the lower troposphere contributes 49% and 32% to the target 681 and 618 hPa levels, respectively, the moisture contribution on route from the mid-troposphere becomes the largest (Supplementary Table 2); this finding indicates that the main moisture transport pathway for the target 681 and 618 hPa levels is characterized by an “advection” type (Fig. 4a). We note that the contribution of local vertical mixing on the IAE is very weak for the target 681 and 618 hPa levels (Fig. 4a). Little post-condensation fractionation occurs in the mid-troposphere due to its lower temperature (near or below 0 oC) and as a result, the δDv at this level is controlled by air mixing and the δD of transported vapor38. Previous studies show that mixing processes tend to enrich δDv in the mid-troposphere more than what would be expected from a Rayleigh distillation process30,37,39. Thus, we argue that air mixing is responsible for the IAE between the 681 and 618 hPa levels over the WUSA.

Fig. 4: Schematic diagrams of the mechanisms that cause the IAE during summer from an atmospheric circulation perspective.
figure 4

a WUSA, western United States of America. b NTP, northern Tibetan Plateau. Note the plus (minus) signs within the circles indicate the inverse altitude effect (altitude effect), and the sizes of the circles represent the strength of the IAE (AE), i.e., larger circles represent a more pronounced IAE (AE). The white arrows indicate the moisture contributions from the mid-troposphere (above 825 hPa) to the target region. The gray arrows indicate the moisture contributions from the lower troposphere (below 825 hPa) to the target region. The different sizes of the arrows represent the relative moisture contribution percentages. In each panel, red dashed ellipses mark the levels (or altitudes) where the IAE occurs. Seas include the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, and Caspian Sea. The gray dots in air masses represent the intensity of the lateral mixing, i.e., denser dots, stronger the lateral mixing. IAE, inverse altitude effect. AE, altitude effect. This figure was created with Adobe Photoshop CC 2019.

It should be noted that the IAE in the WUSA does not appear at the 510 hPa level in summer despite more intensive lateral mixing at that level (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Table 2). Similarly, the IAE is very weak or does not occur at the 681 and 618 hPa levels in the other seasons (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d; Supplementary Fig. 2c, d, h, i), even though the moisture source predominately remains from the mid-troposphere (Supplementary Table 3) and the δq plots are also biased towards the mixing line (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that lateral mixing is not the sole cause of the IAE in δDv.

The relatively high δDv values in the mid-troposphere over the WUSA that lead to the development of the IAE indicate that distant moisture with higher isotopic values is carried into this section of the atmosphere. Hence, we analyzed the seasonal moisture fluxes and δDv patterns from different atmospheric levels across a large spatial scale (Fig. 5; Supplementary Figs. 456). In the mid-troposphere, the moisture carried by the westerlies is unlikely to cause the IAE in δDv due to its relatively lower isotopic composition than the WUSA across all four seasons over the period from 2006 to 2009 (Fig. 5h, i; Supplementary Fig. 4h, i; Supplementary Fig. 5h, i; Supplementary Fig. 6h, i). However, another moisture channel derived from the Atlantic anticyclone emerges during summer at the 700 hPa (~681 hPa) and 600 hPa (~618 hPa) levels (Fig. 4a; Fig. 5c, d). The trajectory frequency analyses also confirm the existence of a tropical Atlantic-originated moisture channel that is operational during summer (Supplementary Fig. 7). The δDv in the mid-troposphere over the tropical Atlantic Ocean in summer is relatively high due to strong convection, which drives this high δDv moisture from the near-surface into the mid-troposphere over the tropical Atlantic (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. 8b, f). In summer, the oceanic moisture from the 700 and 600 hPa levels over the tropical Atlantic Ocean is laterally transported in a clockwise motion into Mexico through the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico and then carried northward into the WUSA (Fig. 4a; Fig. 5c, d). Local moisture at the 600 and 700 hPa levels over the WUSA mixes with this moisture from the distant oceanic region (Fig. 5h, i) and results in higher δDv values within these target atmospheric levels and hence leads to the development of the IAE at the 681 and 618 hPa levels over the WUSA (Figs. 2b,  4a).

Fig. 5: Atmospheric circulation patterns and δDv during summer (June–July–August: JJA) over North America and surroundings during 2006–2009.
figure 5

a–e Moisture fluxes (shading) and wind fields (vector) at different atmospheric levels based on ERA5 reanalysis. f–j δDv at the different atmospheric levels based on TES retrievals (right panels). The gray shading in a, b, c, and f indicates that no valid δDv data are available for the specific grid. Black box in each panel represents the WUSA (western United States of America). This map was generated with The NCAR Command Language (Version 6.6.2) [Software]. (2019). Boulder, Colorado: UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD.

The tropical Atlantic-originated moisture channel is relatively weak at the 500 hPa (~510 hPa) level during summer (Fig. 5e); moreover, the moisture from this distant source is characterized by relatively low δDv values (Fig. 5j). Therefore, the δDv values at the 510 hPa level compared to the lower sections of the atmosphere explains why the IAE does not occur at this higher level over the WUSA (Fig. 2d).

The anticyclone strength at the 700 and 600 hPa levels over the Atlantic Ocean is weaker (its northward and westward extension is also limited) during the spring and autumn months (Supplementary Figs. 4c, d5c, d). Hence, the moisture with higher δDv values from the tropical Atlantic Ocean (Supplementary Fig. 4h, i, Supplementary Fig. 5h, i) is less likely to be transported into the WUSA during spring and autumn, which results in the weakening or disappearance of the IAE at the 681 and 618 hPa levels over the WUSA (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d; 2c, d). In winter, the weak anticyclone strength (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d), coupled with relatively low δDv values over the tropical Atlantic Ocean (Supplementary Fig. 6h, i), explains the lack of IAE in δDv during this season (Supplementary Fig. 2h, i). We therefore conclude that, in addition to intense lateral mixing, the relatively higher isotopic composition of the transported moisture from distant source regions contributes to the development of the IAE over the WUSA.

Causes of the IAE in the Asian drylands

Unlike the WUSA, the IAE across the Asian drylands during summer occurs over a wider vertical range from the 750 to 618 hPa levels (Fig. 2e, f, g). Moreover, the IAE in δDv across the Asian drylands occurs not only in summer, but also during spring and autumn (Supplementary Figs. 12).

As the IAE has mainly been reported in the NTP (core region of the Asian drylands) (Fig. 1), we analyzed the δq plots for the different atmospheric levels over the NTP. The δq plots for the different levels over the NTP are all biased towards the mixing line (Fig. 3c) which indicate that air mixing is widespread throughout both the lower and mid-troposphere in this region; this finding is also confirmed by moisture transport pathway analysis (Supplementary Table 2). In the NTP, 26% of the moisture at the target 825 hPa level and 41% of the moisture at the target 750 hPa level is derived from the mid-troposphere over the moisture source regions with an “advection” type (above 825 hPa) (Supplementary Table 2; Fig. 4b). This result demonstrates that the moisture at the target 825 and 750 hPa levels over the NTP has already experienced clear lateral mixing within the mid-troposphere along the moisture transport pathway (Supplementary Table 2) and explains why the δq plots at these levels are biased towards the mixing line (Fig. 3c). Similar to the WUSA, the moisture for the 681 and 618 hPa levels over the NTP is mainly derived from the 700 hPa level over the moisture source regions (Supplementary Table 2). Therefore, the δq plots for the 681 and 618 hPa levels over the NTP are also biased towards the mixing line (Fig. 3c). Based on the δq plots and the moisture transport pathway analysis for the NTP, we argue that the wider vertical range of the IAE across the Asian drylands is the result of widespread lateral mixing.

We find that the IAE in the Asian drylands is greatly diminished at the 510 hPa level during summer (Fig. 2h) and is absent across all atmospheric levels in winter (Supplementary Fig. 2g–j). However, the δq plots remain biased towards the mixing line even during the winter months (Fig. 3c, d). Therefore, the occurrence of the IAE is not solely determined by intense lateral mixing. Similar to the findings from the WUSA, the relatively higher isotopic composition of transported moisture from moisture source regions may also be responsible for the development of the IAE in the NTP. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the seasonal moisture fluxes from different atmospheric levels across a large spatial scale (Supplementary Fig. 9a–e). The data show that the westerlies prevail throughout the year above the 700 hPa level across the region (Supplementary Figs. 9c–e;  10c–e;  11c–e;  12c–e), which is also confirmed by trajectory frequency analyses (Supplementary Fig. 13). During the summer months, several distinctive moisture flux centers develop between the 825 and 600 hPa levels over the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, and Caspian Sea (Supplementary Fig. 9a–d). Similar moisture flux centers are found during spring and autumn, albeit on a smaller spatial extent (Supplementary Figs. 10a–d; 11a–d). However, the moisture flux centers are not apparent at the 500 hPa level during summer (Supplementary Fig. 9e) and do not occur at any level during winter (Supplementary Fig. 12a–e). Hence, the data indicate that the absence of these moisture flux centers at the 500 hPa level are likely linked to the diminished IAE over the Asian drylands at this level during summer and the absence of the IAE at all levels during winter.

The moisture flux around these centers is very low (Supplementary Fig. 9a–d) which suggests that they are not formed by westerly-dominated moisture transport. In that regard, we contend that these moisture centers are formed by vertical moisture transport from the near surface. To provide support for our contention, we analyzed the vertical profiles of velocity and specific humidity in the Asian drylands and surroundings during 2006–2009 (Fig. 6a–d). Overall, the region is dominated by downward motion throughout the year. However, two distinct upward motion centers develop in the region during the summer months (the range framed by dashed lines in Fig. 6b), which also coincide with the locations of the moisture flux centers (Supplementary Fig. 9a–d). During summer, the near-surface moisture with higher δDv is transported upward into the mid-troposphere by updraft. This upward movement results in much higher δDv values within these two centers compared to the surrounding areas at the same atmospheric level (Figs. 4b; 6f). The moisture from those distant moisture flux centers is transported by the westerlies and horizontally mixed in the mid-troposphere with the moisture over the NTP which results in relatively higher δDv values at this target atmospheric level over the NTP (Fig. 2e–g; Fig. 4b). If the δDv values in the levels below the target mid-troposphere are lower, the IAE occurs. Indeed, the moisture with higher δDv over those centers can be directly transported into the NTP at the 600 hPa (~618 hPa) level compared to the lower 750 and 700 hPa levels as the 600 hPa path is less restricted by the presence of the Pamir–Tianshan Mountains (Supplementary Fig. 9d). As a result, the IAE in δDv in the NTP is strongest at the target 618 hPa level during summer (Fig. 2g).

Fig. 6: Seasonal vertical profiles of meridional average (15°N–45°N) vertical velocities (ω) and δDv over the Asian drylands and surroundings during 2006–2009.
figure 6

a–d Vertical velocities based on ERA5 reanalysis. e–h δDv based on TES retrievals. The dashed lines in each panel represent the longitudinal range of the area where the vertical upward movement is strongest in summer. The gray shading in each panel represents the highest elevation of the surface within a range of longitude, reflecting the complexity of the terrain in each area. MAM, March–April–May (spring); JJA, June-July-August (summer); SON, September–October–November (autumn); DJF, December–January–February (winter).

Similarly, in the West Asia and North Africa regions, the moisture with relatively higher δDv values over the distant moisture source regions has a more direct transport pathway at the 750 and 700 hPa (~681 hPa) levels compared to the lower atmospheric levels which can be blocked by plateaus and mountain ranges (Supplementary Fig. 9b, c). This allows the IAE in δDv to be more obvious at the 750 and 618 hPa levels in those regions (Fig. 2e, f). The same mechanism also explains the occurrence of the IAE during the spring (Fig. 6a, e) and autumn (Fig. 6c, g) months in these regions. In contrast, the weaker upward motion during winter hinders the upward transport of near-surface moisture into the mid-troposphere over those moisture flux centers (Fig. 6d, h) which results in the disappearance of the IAE.

Connection between the IAE in water vapor and precipitation

As water vapor acts as the “mass source” of precipitation, the stable isotopic composition of water vapor will directly influence the stable isotopic composition of precipitation. Our results indicated that, in the mountainous regions, the patterns of the stable isotopic composition of water vapor at different atmospheric pressure levels govern those of the corresponding precipitation, via advection (Fig. 4). Hence, the IAE in water vapor will be imprinted on precipitation (Fig. 4). Taking the WUSA as an example, at the 618 hPa level, air masses laterally mix with moisture containing higher isotope values along the moisture transport pathway and this signal is preserved through advection processes which results in higher isotope values in precipitation at the target 618 hPa level. In contrast, at the 681 hPa level, the relatively higher isotopic signal in water vapor becomes relatively depleted along the moisture transport pathway due to weak vertical mixing with the lower-troposphere (Supplementary Table 2). This process results in relatively depleted isotope values in precipitation at the 681 hPa level compared to the 618 hPa level, although isotope values in precipitation at the 681 hPa level are still higher than at the lower levels (Fig. 4a). As a consequence, the isotope values in water vapor increase with altitude in the atmosphere from the lower level to the upper level, which produces the IAE in water vapor. Similarly, the isotope values in corresponding precipitation will increase with altitude from the lower topography to the higher topography, and the IAE occurs in corresponding precipitation. Hence, precipitation inherits the IAE in water vapor. Similar processes can be used to explain the IAE in water vapor and precipitation in the NTP (Fig. 4b). The spatial distributions of the IAE reported in precipitation16,17,18 and other surface isotopic carriers20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 on the global scale (Fig. 1) are mostly consistent with the occurrence of the IAE in water vapor which further demonstrates the close coupling between the stable isotope signals of water vapor and precipitation. It is evident that the IAE in water vapor determines the IAE of precipitation before the influence of localized factors may take part.

Implications for stable isotope paleoaltimetry

Here we confirm that the IAE also exists in δDv, as well as in many surface isotopic carriers. Moreover, we found that in the WUSA and in the NTP, both the moisture supply with relatively higher isotopic values and intense lateral mixing along the moisture transport pathway are indispensable factors for the occurrence of the IAE in δDv. It indicates the coupled influence of moisture supply with high isotopic values and intense lateral mixing will disrupt the basic assumptions of stable isotope paleoaltimetry which require isotope values to decrease with increasing altitude. For a mountain range in a specific topographic scenario, where there is no supply of moisture with relatively high isotope values, or no intense lateral mixing between the lower and mid-troposphere along moisture transport pathway, stable isotope paleoaltimetry may still reliably reconstruct paleoelevation. Our study provides a new approach to exclude the adverse effect of the IAE on stable isotope paleoaltimetry. In addition, numerical models that reconstruct paleoelevation suffer from model biases14,15. Our results indicate that optimizing the mixing processes between the lower and mid-troposphere in numerical models helps to better constrain the uplift history of mountainous regions.

Conclusions

Unlike previous studies that attribute the IAE to localized factors17,21,28, our study takes advantage of the high vertical resolution of δDv. These data reveal that a combination of moisture with relatively higher isotopic values from the distant source regions and large-scale lateral mixing between the lower and mid- troposphere generates the IAE in δDv. We emphasize that the IAE has already appeared in water vapor before the precipitation event occurs and that the IAE in water vapor will be inherited in precipitation.

The gradual uplift of mountainous regions such as the Tibetan Plateau leads to changes in atmospheric circulation patterns within the broader region, which in turn alters moisture source regions and moisture transport pathways and their inherent patterns in isotopic values. These changes complicate the application of stable isotope paleoaltimetry for such regions. Therefore, it is necessary to verify whether stable isotope paleoaltimetry is valid in different regions under different topographic scenarios, and to exclude the possible influence of the IAE. In addition, climate modeling approaches can suffer from uncertainties in the parameterization of the mixing processes on route between the lower and mid-troposphere during moisture transport. Our results suggest that optimizing the mixing process between the lower and mid-troposphere may significantly improve the model-data agreement on past hydroclimate parameters and better constrain the uplift history of mountain belts like the Tibetan Plateau.

Finally, our study highlights the important roles of air mixing and moisture transport within the mid-troposphere in the isotopic water cycle, which may provide new insights for the research on the causes of the wetter trend in some arid regions40,41. We suggest that studying the moisture transport changes from a three-dimensional perspective, rather than from the lower troposphere or total column, may contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of water cycle changes, and a better appreciation of the wetting tendency in some arid regions.

Methods

The IAE

Here we focused on the relationships between δDv and the atmospheric pressure levels. Retrievals from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) for the period from 2006 to 2009 were used to analyze the IAE in δDv at the lower and mid-latitudes (60°S–60°N). Firstly, the seasonal averaged δDv for each atmospheric level was calculated separately, and then the δDv of the upper level (higher altitude) minus the δDv of the lower level (lower altitude) was taken between the two adjacent levels. A positive difference in the values between two levels of a grid point indicates that δDv increases with altitude, i.e., the IAE occurs. We note in this study, the definition of the IAE in water vapor is slightly different from the conventional IAE in precipitation or other surface isotopic carriers that traditionally focus on the relationship between isotopes and topography along a mountain range (different locations with increasing altitude). Here we define the IAE in water vapor to describe the relationships between δDv and different atmospheric pressure levels from the same location (same location with increasing altitude), i.e., the δDv increases with increasing altitude in the atmosphere from the lower level to the upper level. However, both terms are used to refer to the variations of isotope with altitude.

TES retrievals

The TES29,42, hosted by NASA’s Earth Observing System Aura Satellite, is an infrared high-resolution Fourier transform spectrometer with a spectral coverage of 650–3050 cm−1 and a spectral resolution of ~0.12 cm−1. Tropospheric trace gases, like water vapor and HDO, can be observed globally every 2 days by TES, with a horizontal footprint of 5.3 km × 8.4 km in the nadir viewing mode42. The retrieved δDv is most sensitive near the 700 hPa level42,43. Moreover, the accuracy of the retrieved δDv is related to temperature, cloud conditions, and water content, so retrievals tend to be more uncertain in the higher latitudes43,44. Data with degrees of freedom less than 1.5 and a retrieved quality of 0 were eliminated for data quality control. This filtering procedure is more stringent than previous studies29,45. Comparisons with measured data reveal that the overall deviation of retrieved δDv is around 5%42. A TES Level 2 lite product (version 7) was used in this study. The effective length of the retrieved δDv was 4 years, from 2006 to 2009, after which instrument degradation problems caused a decrease in sampling quality42.

Rayleigh fractionation model

The Rayleigh fractionation and mixing models were used to examine the transport history of moisture. When an air parcel is progressively transported from the moisture source region to the target region, the water vapor within the air parcel preferentially loses the heavier components due to its lower volatility. As a result, the isotopic ratios for the remaining water vapor progressively get further depleted. If we assume that the condensation is immediately removed from the air parcel without exchange with the remaining water vapor, we can define that the air parcel is in Rayleigh condition46. Under this condition, the isotopic ratio of the remaining water vapor (R) is given by

$$R={R}_{0}{f}^{(\alpha -1)}$$
(1)

where R0 is the initial isotopic ratio of the water vapor, f is the fraction of the remaining water vapor and α is the fractionation factor between phases. The α is a function of air temperature (T, in K)47 and can be calculated by

$${{{{\mathrm{ln}}}}}\,\alpha=\frac{24.844}{{T}^{2}}\times {10}^{3}-\frac{76.248}{T}+52.612\times {10}^{-3}$$
(2)

Mixing model

If two air parcels mix with different water vapor volume mixing ratios (q), the q of the mixed air parcel (qmix) is the weighted average of the q of the two air parcels30:

$${q}_{{{{{{\rm{mix}}}}}}}=f{q}_{1}+(1-f){q}_{2}$$
(3)

where f is the mixing fraction. According to the law of conservation of mass, the isotopic ratio of the mixed air parcel (Rmix) is given by

$${R}_{{{{{{\rm{mix}}}}}}}=\frac{f{[{{{{{\rm{HDO}}}}}}]}_{1}+(1-f){[{{{{{\rm{HDO}}}}}}]}_{2}}{f{[{{{{{\rm{H2O}}}}}}]}_{1}+(1-f){[{{{{{\rm{H2O}}}}}}]}_{2}}$$
(4)

where [HDO] and [H2O] is the isotopic abundance of HDO and H2O in the two air parcels, respectively.

HYSPLIT back trajectory and moisture source diagnosed methods

The Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model (HYSPLIT) was used to calculate air parcel trajectories48. The 240 h back trajectories with 6 h intervals for air parcels at different atmospheric levels (i.e., 825 hPa, 750 hPa, 681 hPa, 618 hPa and 510 hPa) relative to mean-sea-level were determined using ERA-Interim reanalysis49 with a resolution of 1° × 1°. The HYSPLIT model outputs, including the altitude, latitude, longitude, and specific humidity along the air parcel trajectories, were used for moisture source analysis for each target region. We applied a Lagrangian diagnostic to identify moisture sources50. Note in this study, we use the term moisture source as a relatively broad concept, which includes both the moisture source region and the moisture transport pathway. The changes in the specific humidity (qshum) of an air parcel along a trajectory are generally the net result of precipitation and evaporation. An increase of qshum for any 6 h interval, i.e., Δqshum = qshum (T) ‒ qshum (T-6) > 0 (T = 0 h for start point), indicates that external moisture enters into the air parcel and a moisture uptake event occurs. The location (height, latitude, longitude) at T h is then determined as a moisture source region for the air parcel and Δqshum is the initial moisture contribution at the location. When precipitation occurs after the moisture uptake event, moisture contributions from earlier moisture source regions to the target region will decrease proportionally50. In this study, we divided the moisture source into eight separate levels to analyze the moisture transport pathway, i.e., 1000 hPa, 900 hPa, 825 hPa, 750 hPa, 700 hPa, 600 hPa, 500 hPa, and 400 hPa, based on the altitude data from the HYSPLIT outputs to better understand the dominant moisture transport pathway to the target region. This study focuses on δD in water vapor rather than precipitation, so we present data for all trajectories regardless of whether they produced precipitation within 6 h of the endpoint.