DDX1 vesicles control calcium-dependent mitochondrial activity in mouse embryos

Wang, Yixiong; Yasmin, Lubna; Li, Lei; Gao, Pinzhang; Xu, Xia; Sun, Xuejun; Godbout, Roseline

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31497-9

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 01 July 2022

DDX1 vesicles control calcium-dependent mitochondrial activity in mouse embryos

Yixiong Wang¹,
Lubna Yasmin¹,
Lei Li¹,
Pinzhang Gao¹,
Xia Xu¹,
Xuejun Sun¹ &
…
Roseline Godbout ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-9265¹

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 3794 (2022) Cite this article

3132 Accesses
4 Citations
8 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The DEAD box protein DDX1, previously associated with 3’-end RNA processing and DNA repair, forms large aggregates in the cytoplasm of early mouse embryos. Ddx1 knockout causes stalling of embryos at the 2-4 cell stages. Here, we identify a DDX1-containing membrane-bound calcium-containing organelle with a nucleic acid core. We show that aggregates of these organelles form ring-like structures in early-stage embryos which we have named Membrane Associated RNA-containing Vesicles. We present evidence that DDX1 is required for the formation of Membrane Associated RNA-containing Vesicles which in turn regulate the spatial distribution of calcium in embryos. We find that Ddx1 knockout in early embryos disrupts calcium distribution, and increases mitochondria membrane potential, mitochondrial activity, and reactive oxygen species. Sequencing analysis of embryos from Ddx1 heterozygote crosses reveals downregulation of a subset of RNAs involved in developmental and mitochondrial processes in the embryos with low Ddx1 RNA. We propose a role for Membrane Associated RNA-containing Vesicles in calcium-controlled mitochondrial functions that are essential for embryonic development.

Fundc1 is necessary for proper body axis formation during embryogenesis in zebrafish

Article Open access 11 December 2019

Gongyu Xu, Hao Shen, … Haobin Zhao

Clueless/CLUH regulates mitochondrial fission by promoting recruitment of Drp1 to mitochondria

Article Open access 24 March 2022

Huan Yang, Caroline Sibilla, … Ming Guo

Autophagy in animal development

Article 27 January 2020

Elizabeth A. Allen & Eric H. Baehrecke

Introduction

There are two waves of zygotic genome activation during early-stage development: a minor wave at the 1-cell stage and a major wave at the 2-cell stage¹. The majority of the zygotic genome is activated after these two waves of zygotic genome activation². Tightly orchestrated regulation of maternal factors including RNAs, proteins and mitochondria, is critical for early embryonic development^2,3. Most embryonic arrests at the 2-cell stage are related to maternal factors. However, a few zygotic genes have also been associated with early embryonic lethality including Pp2cβ⁴, Ddx20⁵, Pfn1⁶, Ercc2⁷ and Ddx1⁸. DDX1 is an RNA binding/unwinding protein that is primarily found in the nucleus of somatic cells. However, in early-stage mouse embryos, DDX1 localizes to the cytoplasm where it forms large aggregates and co-compartmentalizes with the stress granule markers TIA-1 and TIAR⁸. Ddx1 knockout in Drosophila melanogaster suggests a role for DDX1 in RNA splicing and mitochondria function⁹.

Deregulation of RNA and mitochondrial function, both of which are controlled by calcium distribution^10,11,12, are major causes of early embryonic lethality. In oocytes, mitochondrial integrity has been shown to be key to fertilization and embryonic development. It is therefore important to identify potential causes and factors contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction^13,14,15. However, despite being an essential player in the control of mitochondrial activity during embryonic development^16,17, the exact function and location of calcium remains poorly characterized.

Here, we show that calcium is located in membrane-bound organelles loosely clustered into ring-like structures that we have named MARVs (Membrane Associated RNA-containing Vesicles). Each membrane-bound vesicle has a core of RNA and is enriched in the DEAD Box 1 (DDX1) protein. Ddx1 knockout in mice reduces MARV formation and causes nuclear and mitochondrial fragmentation in 2-cell embryos. We propose that MARVs represent a heretofore missing link in our understanding of calcium-dependent activation of early events in mammalian embryonic development particularly as related to mitochondria activity.

Results

DDX1 aggregates consist of large membrane-bound vesicles

We used STimulated Emission Depletion (STED) super-resolution microscopy combined with Atto 550-conjugated anti-DDX1 antibody to resolve the structure of DDX1 aggregates previously identified by confocal microscopy in 2-cell mouse embryos⁸. We discovered that each DDX1 aggregate consists of a ring-like cluster (Fig. 1a), with these clusters gradually becoming larger, denser, and less ring-like with embryonic development (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Interestingly, DDX1 aggregates are primarily found in the subplasmalemmal cytoplasm, spatially located immediately next to the plasma membrane (Supplementary Fig. 1b). It has previously been reported that mitochondria with high membrane potential (ΔΨ_m), generally associated with high levels of mitochondrial activity, also localize to the subplasmalemmal cytoplasm¹⁸. To further investigate the distribution of mitochondria with high ΔΨ_m in 2-cell embryos, we used a positively charged mitochondrial potential indicator ratiometric dye, JC-1. Mitochondrial ΔΨ_m is measured by comparing the fluorescence signal at 590 nm (JC-1 in J-aggregates in active mitochondria) versus 529 nm (JC-1 in monomeric form in inactive mitochondria). As previously published¹⁸, mitochondria with high ΔΨ_m (magenta) are located at the subplasmalemmal cytoplasm whereas the majority of mitochondria with low ΔΨ_m (green) are located at the inner cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Thus, both mitochondria with high ΔΨ_m and DDX1 aggregates are found in similar locations within 2-cell embryos.

**Fig. 1: DDX1 aggregates form ring-like structures with regionalized RNAs in 2-cell embryos.**

To examine the ultrastructure of DDX1 aggregates, we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with DDX1-immunogold-labelled 2-cell embryos. In agreement with our STED data, DDX1-containing aggregates localized to the subplasmalemmal cytoplasm, with many aggregates located next to mitochondria (Fig. 1b). Unexpectedly, we found that each DDX1 aggregate⁸ consists of several large previously uncharacterized membrane-bound vesicles (~200−400 nm) loosely structured in a ring (Fig. 1b, c). These ring-like structures are generally located 1.46 ± 0.55 µm (n = 24) from the plasma membrane.

Next, we used TEM to determine when membrane-bound DDX1 vesicles appear during development. Previous confocal microscopy analysis showed abundant small DDX1 granules/aggregates in MII oocytes⁸. TEM showed absence of membrane-bound DDX1 vesicles in MII oocytes (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Membrane-bound vesicles first appeared in 1-cell embryos (Supplementary Fig. 2a). In 1-cell embryos (E0.5), 40.0 ± 18.5% of DDX1-immunogold particles were detected in membrane-bound DDX1 vesicles (n = 20 images), compared to 83.7 ± 3.6% (n = 20), 83.2 ± 5.6% (n = 20) and 85.6 ± 3.2% (n = 19) in E1.5, E2.5 and E3.5 embryos, respectively. With regards to E3.5 embryos, DDX1 vesicles were observed in both trophectoderm and inner cell mass cells, as previously reported⁸ (Supplementary Fig. 2b). By late E4.5 blastocyst stage, membrane-bound DDX1 vesicles were no longer observed (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Our data indicate an abundance of DDX1 in vesicles compared to the rest of the embryo, suggesting that DDX1 can be used as a marker for these vesicles. Thus, a single DDX1 aggregate observed by confocal microscopy consists of multiple membrane-bound DDX1 vesicles that first appear in 1-cell embryos.

DDX1 is a member of the DEAD box family of RNA binding/unwinding/remodelling proteins¹⁹. We have previously shown that digestion of 2-cell embryos with RNase A causes disaggregation of DDX1⁸. To further investigate the relationship between RNA and DDX1 vesicles, we used electron microscopy and OsO₄/uranyl acetate staining which stabilizes nucleic acids and increases electron density²⁰. We observed intense staining in a distinct patch within each vesicle (Fig. 1c). We next used energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM) for elemental mapping of nitrogen (indicative of proteins) and phosphate (indicative of nucleic acids) in 2-cell embryos²¹. Similar to what was observed with OsO₄/uranyl acetate staining, phosphorus was enriched in a clear compartment within each vesicle of each DDX1 aggregate (Fig. 1d). Combined with our previous RNase A data, these results indicate that RNA occupies a distinct compartment within each vesicle, suggesting a requirement for compaction, organization and/or localization of RNAs at these sites (Fig. 1e). As these compartmentalized RNA-containing membrane–bound vesicles have not been described previously, we named the ring-like aggregates of DDX1 vesicles ‘Membrane Associated RNA-containing Vesicles’ (MARVs).

MARVs do not co-compartmentalize with ribosomes

Embryos undergoing rapid cell division require a continuous supply of energy. The total number of mitochondria per embryo remains unchanged from the 1-cell to early blastocyst stages, with numbers of mitochondria per cell halved at each cell division^22,23, suggesting a need for increased mitochondrial function to compensate for their reduced numbers. We therefore asked whether MARVs might be associated with translation of proteins required for mitochondrial function and/or early embryonic development. First, we co-immunostained 2-cell embryos with anti-DDX1 antibody and antibodies to cytoplasmic ribosomal protein (RPS6), or mitoribosomal proteins MRP-L42, MRP-L44 or MRP-S27. DDX1 did not co-compartmentalize with any of these ribosomal proteins (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). Next, we treated 1-cell embryos in culture with the global inhibitor of protein synthesis, cycloheximide, for 8 h. STED microscopy revealed decreased DDX1 aggregates (Supplementary Fig. 4), indicating that clustering of these vesicles is dependent on active translation. Conversely, treatment with chloramphenicol, an inhibitor of mitochondrial translation, for 8 h did not affect the DDX1 aggregates in the embryos, suggesting a link between MARVs and cytoplasmic, rather than mitochondrial, protein translation (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Ca²⁺ signal co-compartmentalizes with DDX1

Ca²⁺ signalling triggers the events required for embryonic development after fertilization including mitochondrial function^{10,11,13,24,25} and regulation of mRNA translation²⁶. Along with the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria control Ca²⁺ release shortly after fertilization²⁶. We used the Ca²⁺ indicator Fluo-4 AM to study the distribution of Ca²⁺ in 2-cell embryos in relation to that of mitochondria and DDX1 aggregates. As previously reported¹⁶, we found that Ca²⁺ was particularly abundant in subplasmalemmal cytoplasm with a similar distribution pattern to that of DDX1 aggregates (Fig. 2a). However, upon co-staining 2-cell embryos with Fluo-4 AM and MitoTracker Deep Red²⁷, we found no co-compartmentalization of Ca²⁺ with mitochondria located at the subplasmalemmal cytoplasm (Fig. 2b, e). As predicted, co-compartmentalization was observed when 2-cell embryos were co-stained with anti-DDX1 antibody and Fluo-4 AM (Fig. 2c, e). Furthermore, Fluo-4 AM did not co-compartmentalize with ER-Tracker in 2-cell embryos^28,29 (Fig. 2d, e), indicating that Ca²⁺/DDX1-containing vesicles are unlikely to be cortical ER, a reported location of Ca²⁺ in oocytes³⁰. Our combined results are thus in line with Ca²⁺/DDX1-containing vesicles serving as reservoirs for rapid mobilization of Ca²⁺ and RNAs required for early embryonic development. In further agreement with our thinking, treatment of 2-cell embryos with the protonophore FCCP which abolishes mitochondrial membrane potential, disrupted Ca²⁺ distribution as previously shown by others^16,17, indicating that these vesicles serve as Ca²⁺ reservoirs associated with mitochondrial function. Compared to ER which is the major Ca²⁺ reservoir in somatic cells, MARVs with their aggregates of membrane-bound vesicles may allow more precise control of Ca²⁺-dependent mitochondrial functions.

**Fig. 2: Co-compartmentalization of Ca²⁺ and DDX1 in MARVs but not ER or mitochondria.**

Ca²⁺ affects the size of MARVs

The above data indicate that Ca²⁺ localizes to MARVs in 2-cell embryos. To further examine the link between MARVs and Ca²⁺, we disrupted Ca²⁺ distribution by treating 2-cell embryos with FCCP for 2 h. We observed a small but statistically significant increase in the number of small DDX1 aggregates (<0.5 µm³) but not those >5 µm³ suggesting a limited impact on the formation/aggregation of DDX1 vesicles which may be due to the relatively short FCCP treatment time (Fig. 3a, b). As other researchers have shown that 2-cell embryos cultured in Ca²⁺-free media can develop to the 8-cell stage with failed compaction and blastocyst formation, we cultured 2-cell embryos in Ca²⁺-free media for 24 h (to the 4-cell stage). We then examined Ca²⁺ distribution and the size of DDX1 aggregates. Although no change in Ca²⁺ distribution was noted in 4-cell embryos, the intensity of Ca²⁺ microdomains was decreased by an average of ~40% compared to embryos cultured under regular Ca²⁺ conditions (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Moreover, in addition to an increase in small DDX1 aggregates (<0.5 µm³) (Fig. 3c, d), the average number of DDX1 aggregates increased by ~75%, whereas the overall size of DDX1 aggregates decreased by an average of ~34% (Fig. 3e) in embryos cultured in Ca²⁺ free media compared to regular Ca²⁺ containing media. We next stained 2-cell embryos cultured in Ca²⁺ free media for 24 h (to the 4-cell stage) with JC-1 to see whether they were still metabolically active. Although there was an average of ~18.4% reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential (J-aggregate/monomer) compared to control embryos, all embryos remained metabolically active (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d) indicating that they are still alive and can undergo development. Therefore, the effect on DDX1 aggregates observed under Ca²⁺ free culture conditions is unlikely to be due to non-viability of the embryos. In agreement with previous publications^31,32,33, embryos cultured in Ca²⁺ free media failed to compact after 48 h culture (Supplementary Fig. 5f). These data indicate that the size and numbers of MARVs are affected by Ca²⁺ distribution and mitochondrial membrane potential. However, these data do not eliminate the possibility that mitochondrial metabolic signalling plays a role in MARVs and Ca²⁺ localization. In order to address this possibility, we treated 2-cell embryos with EGTA-AM, a Ca²⁺ chelator, for 3 h. Similar to Ca²⁺ free culture, we observed an overall decrease in Ca²⁺ intensity when embryos were stained with Fluo-4 AM, with no obvious changes in Ca²⁺ distribution (Fig. 4a, b). We observed a significant increase in the number of small DDX1 aggregates (<0.5 µm³) and a decrease in the number of DDX1 aggregates >5 µm³ (Fig. 4c, d) suggesting a direct role for Ca²⁺ distribution/levels in DDX1 aggregates.

**Fig. 3: Sizes of MARVs are linked to mitochondrial potential and Ca²⁺ distribution/supply.**

**Fig. 4: Ca²⁺ chelator EGTA affects the size of MARVs whereas saponin treatment causes redistribution of Ca²⁺ to mitochondria.**

Ca²⁺ relocates to mitochondria upon saponin treatment

To further investigate the relationship between Ca²⁺ distribution and MARVs, we examined the Ca²⁺ distribution upon its release from membrane-bound structures. For these experiments, we used saponin, a mild detergent used for live cell permeabilization⁸. As saponin permeabilizes plasma membrane as well as organelle membranes, this treatment will result in the release of Ca²⁺ from all membrane-bound organelles including MARVs³⁴. Staining of saponin-permeabilized embryos with Fluo-4 AM showed disruption of Ca²⁺ subplasmalemmal distribution, with Ca²⁺ moving to the inner cytoplasm (Fig. 4e). Based on immunogold-labeling TEM, 78.5 ± 8.5% (n = 15) of DDX1 remained in MARVs after saponin-permeabilization of embryos (Fig. 4f). Interestingly, upon co-staining with Fluo-4 AM and MitoTracker Deep Red after saponin treatment, we found co-compartmentalization of Fluo-4 AM and MitoTracker Deep Red, suggesting that Ca²⁺ had migrated to inner cytoplasm mitochondria upon permeabilization of DDX1/Ca²⁺-containing vesicles (Fig. 4e, g). Even though saponin-permeabilization also permeabilizes the plasma membrane which will result in the leakage of Ca²⁺ to the outside of the embryos, relocation of the remaining Ca²⁺ inside the embryos to inner mitochondria points to a possible role for MARVs in regulating the spatial distribution of Ca²⁺ in 2-cell embryos.

Ddx1 ^−/− embryos have high levels of mitochondrial activity

We next cultured 1-cell embryos from Ddx1^+/− intercrosses to address the effect of Ddx1 knockout on Ca²⁺ distribution and embryonic development. Cultured 1-cell embryos from Ddx1^+/+ crosses were used for comparison. Ideally, the embryos from Ddx1^+/− intercrosses should be imaged at the 2- to 4-cell stages and then cultured so that they could later be categorised into stalled and normally developing embryos. However, due to the cytotoxicity of the dyes used for our experiments (MitoTracker Deep Red, MitoSOX, JC-1 and BioTracker ATP-red), and the phototoxicity of the laser scanning microscopy, we failed to obtain viable embryos after imaging 2- to 4-cell embryos in culture. We therefore had to first identify the stalled embryos after 72 h in culture before proceeding with these experiments. Analysis of 26 pairs of Ddx1^+/− intercrosses revealed the expected ~28% (52/186) stalled embryos (presumed Ddx1^−/−) at the 2- to 4-cell stages after 72 h⁸. Please note that although Ddx1^−/− embryos can be genotyped if taken directly from mice, we were not able to genotype stalled embryos, presumably because of the deterioration/modification in the DNA of stalled embryos. In our first set of experiments, we carried out single channel staining and quantification on stalled 2-cell embryos using Fluo-4 AM (5 embryos), JC-1 (13 embryos), and MitoSOX (7 embryos). We found little evidence of subplasmalemmal cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ microdomains in stalled 2-cell embryos (72 h in culture) compared to wild-type 2-cell embryos (24 h in culture) (Fig. 5a). To ensure that the lack of subplasmalemmal cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ microdomains was not the result of culturing embryos for 72 h, we also looked at cultured wild-type embryos at later developmental stages (4-cell, 16-cell and blastocyst, the latter cultured for 96 h). Similar to our previous results obtained upon DDX1 staining of blastocysts⁸ we observed no clear difference in the Ca²⁺ staining of ICM cells and trophectoderm cells. All wild-type embryos showed the expected immunostaining patterns based on in vivo DDX1 immunostaining patterns (Supplementary Fig. 1a). However, staining with JC-1 revealed higher mitochondrial membrane potential in stalled embryos compared to wild-type 2-cell embryos (Fig. 5b, c), with stalled embryos showing both mitochondria and nuclei fragmentation (Fig. 5d, e, f). Using MitoSOX, we also found increased levels of mtROS in stalled embryos compared to wild-type 2-cell embryos (Fig. 5g, h). As both JC-1 and MitoSOX staining suggest an increase in mitochondrial activity in stalled embryos, we next stained stalled embryos (15 embryos) with the ATP indicator dye, BioTracker ATP-red. In keeping with our JC-1 and MitoSOX results, increased ATP levels were observed in stalled embryos compared to the wild-type 2-cell embryos (Fig. 6a, b).

**Fig. 5: Loss of Ddx1 leads to increased mitochondrial membrane potential and mitochondrial ROS.**

**Fig. 6: Loss of Ddx1 leads to higher ATP levels and a higher fatality index.**

Single channel staining is optimal for generating quantification data as there is no channel-to-channel interference. However, to better document the relationship between mtROS, mitochondrial fragmentation and nuclear fragmentation, we also carried out triple staining with Hoechst 33342 (DNA), MitoSOX (mtROS) and MitoTracker Deep Red (mitochondria) on 12 stalled embryos and 12 wild-type 2-cell embryos (Fig. 6c). Using the following three parameters (nucleus number/cell, MitoSOX intensity and percentage of mitochondria with size <0.2 µm²) (Fig. 6d), we used weighted average index construction to generate an overall fatality index for stalled embryos versus wild-type embryo. The fatality index of stalled embryos was much higher than that of wild-type embryos (Fig. 6e).

Ddx1 ^−/− embryos show altered gene expression levels

We have previously shown that DDX1 binds to a subset of RNAs that are essential for embryonic development⁸. To further investigate the effect Ddx1 knockout on embryonic RNA levels, we performed single embryo RNA sequencing on eighteen 2-cell embryos collected from 2 pairs of Ddx1 heterozygous crosses. Using normalized Ddx1 transcripts per million (TPM), we identified 2 presumed Ddx1^−/− embryos, and 4 presumed wild-type embryos, with embryos with Ddx1 TPM levels ≤0.6 defined as low Ddx1 (or presumed Ddx1^−/−) and embryos with Ddx1 TPM levels >3 defined as high Ddx1 (or presumed wild-type). By comparing the sequencing data from the two low Ddx1 embryos with that of the four high Ddx1 embryos, we identified ~300 genes that were downregulated, and ~90 genes that were upregulated (FDR or false discovery rate <0.1), in low Ddx1 embryos compared to high Ddx1 embryos. Some of these genes play roles in embryonic development as well as mitochondrial function (Supplementary Dataset 1). A number of the identified RNAs were validated by RT-qPCR using independent biological samples [3 embryos with high levels of Ddx1 (or presumed wild-type) and 3 embryos with low levels of Ddx1 (or presumed Ddx1^−/−), see Methods]. Tardbp, Ucp2, Nme6, Ndufaf1, Runx1 showed differential expression levels similar to that of our sequencing data (Supplementary Fig. 6). We also tested different housekeeping genes for RT-qPCR normalization. Of the three housekeeping genes tested (Gapdh, Actb and H2az1), Gapdh produced the most consistent Ct values across 24 embryos tested (the standard deviation on Ct value of Gapdh, Actb and H2az1 is 1.11, 5.33 and 1.52, respectively). The fact that more transcripts are downregulated than upregulated upon Ddx1 knockout suggests that DDX1’s role is related to mRNA stability or biogenesis.

We were particularly intrigued by Tardbp being down-regulated by 5X Ddx1-low embryos as it encodes TDP-43 which is associated with alternative splicing and RNA processing³⁵. It will be interesting to see whether TDP-43, along with cytoplasmic polyadenylation factors CPSF2 and CPEB1³⁶ (Supplementary Fig. 7a–c), co-compartmentalize with DDX1 in early stage embryos. A possible role for MARVs in cytoplasmic splicing and/or polyadenylation will be the subject of future studies.

It is noteworthy that the appearance of MARVs changes dramatically as the embryos mature, becoming larger and denser, finally encircling the nuclei of blastocysts. Fluo-4 AM staining shows that Ca²⁺ forms larger microdomains as the embryos progress from 2-cell towards 16-cell compaction stages (Fig. 5a). We were not able to get valid data from direct Fluo-4 AM staining of the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in post-compaction embryos likely due to the surface trophectoderm absorbing most of the Fluo-4 AM dye. As an alternative approach, we first stained the embryos at the morula stage and cultured the embryos for an additional 24 h. The Ca²⁺ staining pattern using this approach generated similar results to those shown in Fig. 5a. As DDX1 is an RNA helicase that alters RNA structure in an ATP/ADP-dependent manner^37,38, and MARVs regulate Ca²⁺ which is required to stimulate the mitochondria TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation for ATP production^39,40, these development-dependent changes in MARVs may reflect the need for increased local concentration of Ca²⁺ to stimulate the production of ATP required for modulating DDX1 RNA binding/remodeling function.

Discussion

Early mouse embryonic development relies heavily on maternal RNAs and proteins, with only a few zygotic genes identified to date that cause embryonic lethality at the 1–4 cell stages. These early embryonic lethality genes include Ddx1, suggesting a key role for DDX1 in maternal RNA/protein-related events associated with early embryonic development. Here, we show that DDX1 in early-stage embryos is located in membrane-bound vesicles that cluster in ring-like structures that we have named MARVs. Electron microscopy of 2-cell embryos reveals a core of RNA within each membrane-bound vesicle. In addition to DDX1 and RNA, Ca²⁺ and cytoplasmic polyadenylation factors have been identified in MARVs. Cellular compartmentalization of RNA and RNA processing/modifying proteins within membrane-bound structures suggests a need for their localized concentration or protection. The fact that these membrane-bound vesicles cluster together further suggests the need for enhancement of processes associated with the membrane-bound vesicles.

Treatment of 2-cell embryos with the inhibitor of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, FCCP, has previously been shown to increase cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ and disrupt Ca²⁺ microdomains at the subplasmalemmal cytoplasm of 2-cell embryos¹⁶. Our results indicate that FCCP may cause the release of Ca²⁺ from MARVs. The latter is analogous to what has been observed in somatic cells, except that in somatic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the Ca²⁺ storage site instead of MARVs⁴¹. It is well known that ER-mitochondria interact with each other in somatic cells through the mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM) with multiple tethering complexes to ensure proper signal transduction between the two organelles⁴². Although both organelles play important roles in cellular Ca²⁺ homeostasis, mitochondria often rely on ER Ca²⁺ transfer through the MAM to stimulate oxidative phosphorylation and the TCA cycle for ATP production or to control cell death through autophagy or apoptosis⁴³. Ca²⁺ transfer between ER and mitochondria is mainly through the inositol triphosphate receptor located on the ER membrane and its interaction with VDAC, the voltage-dependent anion channel located in the mitochondrial outer membrane. After passing through the outer membrane, the Ca²⁺ is taken up by the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) located in the inner mitochondrial membrane⁴². Notably, the outer mitochondrial membrane is permeable to small molecules <10 kDa, in contrast to the inner membrane which is completely impermeable even to small molecules (except for O₂, H₂O and CO₂)⁴⁴. Therefore, Ca²⁺ can pass through the outer membrane while following an ion gradient without VDAC, but can only pass through the inner mitochondrial membrane via the MCU. Thus, proximity, along with an ion gradient, may be important factors in controlling Ca²⁺ transfer from ER to mitochondria. Unlike the close connection between ER and mitochondria which are typically located within 100 nm of each other in somatic cells⁴⁴, MARVs and mitochondria are much further apart (>200 nm) indicating that MARVs are unlikely to be close enough to mitochondria to form a complex for Ca²⁺ transfer through the VDAC tunnel. In agreement with this, a recent study has demonstrated that although MCU is present in oocyte mitochondria, VDAC appears to be absent from oocyte mitochondria⁴⁵. This property of oocyte mitochondria may be carried over to pre-blastocyst embryos. We propose that the local high concentration of Ca²⁺ in MARVs allows Ca²⁺ transfer from MARVs to mitochondria through the mitochondria outer membrane following an ion gradient.

Mitochondria from oocyte to pre-blastocyst stage have a distinct morphology compared to mitochondria found in somatic cells. These mitochondria have been described as “immature” as they are smaller in size, more electron dense, have fewer numbers of cristae, and consume less oxygen compared to regular mitochondria^11,46. Oocyte mitochondria are abundant but function suboptimally to control the production of toxic mtROS⁴⁵. In spite of their “immature” mitochondria, early embryos rely heavily on mitochondria for their metabolic needs^11,47. With Ca²⁺ being a main stimulator of the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation for energy production, Ca²⁺ distribution needs to be tightly controlled in order to regulate mitochondria function^39,40. Thus, the normal Ca²⁺ release from ER to mitochondria may not be suitable for early-stage embryos. Although more work needs to be done, we propose that MARVs provide localized and more precise release of Ca²⁺ for optimal mitochondria function during early embryonic development.

Consistent with our proposed role for MARVs in Ca²⁺ segregation, disruption of MARVs in Ddx1^−/− embryos results in stalled 2- to 4-cell stage embryos with disrupted Ca²⁺ distribution, upregulation of mitochondrial membrane potential, increased ATP levels and mtROS production, and nuclear and mitochondrial fragmentation. Although we do not know the sequence of these events, we postulate that disruption of Ca²⁺ is the root cause for this series of events. As mentioned above, Ca²⁺ is needed to stimulate mitochondrial ATP production which is accompanied by mtROS production. Therefore, a change in Ca²⁺ balance could have a profound effect on embryonic development. For example, although mtROS is essential for embryonic development⁴⁸, overproduction of mtROS can lead to oxidative stress and embryonic lethality^47,49. Thus, aggregates of individual vesicles in MARVs may be more advantageous for early embryonic functions than the interconnected ER, as they allow a more precise control of Ca²⁺ distribution in embryos. In summary, we propose that MARVs control the spatial distribution of Ca²⁺ within early-stage embryos such that mitochondria activity is precisely regulated to maximize ATP production while controlling ROS production and minimizing ROS-induced damage to the embryos.

In addition to Ca²⁺, electron microscopy reveals an RNA core in the membrane-bound vesicles that form the ring-like MARV structures. As RNA compartmentalization is often achieved by liquid-liquid phase separation, the need for a membrane-bound organelle to enclose the RNA cores is not clear. In this regard, it is important to note that the RNA cores themselves may form through liquid-liquid phase separation. Further segregation of these RNAs within membrane-bound vesicles may be important for protection of the RNAs and/or quick access to the RNAs when required. Proximity of the RNA core to proteins found in the membrane-bound vesicles may therefore optimize the utilization of these RNAs.

Oocytes store large quantities of maternal RNAs that are critical for early mouse development⁵⁰. RNA polyadenylation and deadenylation are processes by which translation is controlled in oocytes³⁶. mRNAs with short poly(A)-tail are not translated or only poorly translated, with polyadenylation increasing translation efficiency. Oocyte growth is accompanied by the appearance of subcortical aggregates in the cytoplasm. The presence of cytoplasmic polyadenylation factor CPEB1 in these subcortical aggregates suggest a role in cytoplasmic polyadenylation during oocyte growth and maturation⁵¹. However, subcortical aggregates have disappeared by the MII phase of oocyte maturation, so are no longer present during the third and last wave of cytoplasmic polyadenylation that takes place after fertilization⁵². We thus propose that the control of maternal RNA translation associated with the third wave of polyadenylation either occurs in MARVs or involves MARVs. Proximity of RNAs to the RNA binding/unwinding DDX1 may allow remodelling of RNAs, making them accessible to cytoplasmic polyadenylation factors CPSF2 and CPEB1, all of which are found in MARVs. Ca²⁺ may also be involved in polyadenylation as it’s been associated with activation and phosphorylation of CPEB1¹². RNA sequencing of single embryos from heterozygote crosses has revealed 300 down-regulated and 90 up-regulated genes in embryos with low levels of Ddx1 RNA compared to embryos with elevated levels of Ddx1 RNA. Some of the down-regulated genes are associated with developmental processes and mitochondrial function. Future work will involve determining whether the differentially expressed transcripts identified by RNA sequencing are indeed found in MARVs and whether there is interplay between these transcripts, Ca²⁺ signaling and mitochondrial function.

In summary, we have discovered a membrane-bound organelle within the cytoplasm of early-stage embryos that contains DDX1 and RNAs, as well as Ca²⁺. These organelles aggregate to form ring-like structures that we have called MARVs. We propose that MARVs have evolved to either allow retention of RNAs and Ca²⁺ to highly localized regions of the developing embryo or provide a barrier to entry of other molecules. Our results using stalled embryos from Ddx1 heterozygote crosses indicate that MARVs may be important for the timed release of Ca²⁺ required for mitochondrial energy production (Fig. 7). On the other hand, our single embryo RNA sequencing analysis indicates that DDX1 affects a subset of genes required for zygotic genome activation, cytoplasmic polyadenylation as well as RNA degradation (such as Mettl14 and Tent5a). As the major wave of zygotic genome activation is essential in 2-cell mouse embryos for proper embryonic development, it is possible that MARVs may also play essential roles in the maternal to zygotic transition process. On a practical level, and in consideration of their role in activating mitochondria, a better understanding of MARVs may lead to additional approaches to rescue aged oocytes with underperforming mitochondria which contributes to reduced fertility¹³.

**Fig. 7: Schematic depiction of DDX1 and MARV function.**

Methods

Embryo and oocyte collection

All embryos used in our experiments were obtained under natural-mating conditions. For embryo cultures, M16 medium (Sigma–Aldrich) was allowed to equilibrate overnight in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO₂. The generation of the Ddx1 mouse knockout line in the FVB/N background has been described previously⁵³. For timed pregnancies, females were tested for the presence of vaginal plugs, with plugged date labelled as embryonic day (E) 0.5. For collection of E0.5 to E2.5 embryos, oviducts were removed and placed in 35 mm tissue culture dishes where they were flushed with equilibrated (37 °C) M16 medium using blunt-ended needles. E0.5 embryos were treated with 300 μg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma–Aldrich H4272; 750–3000 unit/mg) for the removal of cumulus cells. For collection of E3.5 embryos, the uterus was removed and placed in 35 mm tissue culture dishes. Uterine horns were flushed with equilibrated (37 °C) M16 medium using 18 G needles. All embryo transfers and manipulations after flushing were done with capillary tubes (World Precision Instruments).

To obtain meiosis II arrested (MII-arrested) oocytes, FVB/N wild-type mice were injected with 5 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (MSD Animal Health) followed by 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (MSD Animal Health) 48 h later. The oviducts were then removed and flushed with M16 medium using blunt-ended needles. MII stage oocytes were treated with 300 μg/ml hyaluronidase for the removal of cumulus cells. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines of the Cross Cancer Institute Animal Care Committee (protocol #AC20253).

Culturing embryos

M16 medium was allowed to equilibrate overnight in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO₂. The humidified culture chamber is an adaption from Gasperin et al.⁵⁴. Briefly, all gaps between each well of 96-well plates were filled with 150 µl autoclaved ddH₂O and the centermost 3*3 wells were filled with 50 µl/well of equilibrated M16 medium. After the embryos were collected, they were washed three times in the first 3 wells of M16 medium and placed in the center well of the 3*3 matrix and cultured for the designated times in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO₂.

Primary antibody conjugation

The specificity of the anti-DDX1 antibody used for our experiments has been previously verified⁵⁵, and used for mouse embryo immunostaining^8,53. For direct conjugation of anti-DDX1 antibody to Atto 550, one ml of anti-DDX1 antibody was IgG-purified with a Melon Gel IgG Spin Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher) and concentrated to 1 mg/ml. The purified anti-DDX1 antibody was then conjugated to Atto 550 using the Atto 550 Protein Labeling Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat #51146) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Immunofluorescence staining

Embryos were flushed from oviducts using PBS or transferred from culture M16 medium to PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. The embryos were then washed three times with PBS + 0.01% Tween (PBST) and permeabilized with PBS + 0.5% Triton-X-100 for 15 min. Next, the embryos were washed three times in PBST and incubated in 0.5% fish gelatin blocking solution for 30 min, and then incubated for 1 h in PBST-diluted primary antibodies. The embryos were washed 3 times in PBST, followed by 1 h incubation with PBST-diluted secondary antibodies (if secondary antibodies were used). After washing three times in PBST, embryos were placed on a slide and mounted with Mowiol (Calbiochem) without 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). For CPEB1, the embryos were immunostained following a previously published protocol with slight modifications⁵⁶, including fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washes in 0.1% PBST and blocking in 10% BSA in PBS. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-DDX1 (1:800 batch 2910 made in house), mouse anti-RPS6 (1:50 Santa Cruz, Cat #sc-13007), mouse anti-MRPS27 (1:100 Santa Cruz, Cat #sc-390396), mouse anti-MRPL42 (1:100 Santa Cruz, Cat #sc-515820), mouse anti-MRPL44 (1:100 Santa Cruz, Cat #sc-515503), mouse anti-CPEB1 (1:50 Santa Cruz, Cat #sc-514688), and goat anti-CPSF2 (1:100 Santa Cruz, Cat #sc-26658). The secondary antibodies used were donkey anti-mouse Alexa 647 (1:400 Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher), donkey anti-rabbit 555 (1:400 Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher), and donkey anti-goat 647 (1:400 Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher).

For super resolution microscopy, embryos were imaged using a Leica TCS SP8 Falcon STED super resolution microscope with a 100X/NA1.4 oil lens to capture single sections. As whole mount embryos are relatively thick, the embryos were imaged at the sections that were the closest to the cover slip. For confocal Z-stacks, the embryos were imaged with a Leica TCS SP8 microscope and 100X/NA1.4 oil lens. The Leica TCS SP8 microscope was operated with Leica Application Suite X, version 3.5.

A subset of immunostained embryos was imaged using a Zeiss Laser Scanning Confocal microscope (LSM710) mounted on an inverted microscope (Axio Observer). The images taken with LSM710 were operated with Zeiss software suite (ZEN, Version 2011). Embryos were mounted with Mowiol (Calbiochem) containing DAPI. Images were taken with a 40X/NA1.3 oil lens⁸.

Inhibition of global and mitochondrial translation

M16 medium (50 µl) containing either 150 µg/ml cycloheximide (Sigma–Aldrich) or 200 µg/ml chloramphenicol (Sigma–Aldrich) was used for global or mitochondrial translation inhibition, respectively. Oviducts were flushed with equilibrated M16 medium on E0.5 (at 10:00) and embryos were treated with 300 μg/ml hyaluronidase to remove the cumulus cells. The embryos were then washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium and incubated at 37 °C until 16:00. The embryos were then transferred to M16 medium with cycloheximide or chloramphenicol and incubated at 37 °C for 8 h, followed by fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde and immunostaining. Control embryos were incubated in M16 medium without inhibitors.

Saponin treatment

E1.5 embryos were collected by oviduct flushing and washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium. Embryos were incubated in equilibrated M16 medium containing 0.1% saponin for 6 min at room temperature. Control embryos were incubated in equilibrated M16 medium without saponin (Sigma–Aldrich). The embryos were washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium and incubated in equilibrated M16 medium for an additional 30 min and processed for live cell imaging, immunofluorescence staining or immunogold labelling.

Live cell imaging

E0.5 or E1.5 embryos were washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium. E0.5 embryos were treated with 300 µg/ml hyaluronidase to remove the cumulus cells. For JC-1, MitoSOX, ER-Tracker, MitoTracker Deep Red and BioTracker ATP-red live cell staining, embryos were incubated for 30 min in equilibrated M16 medium containing 10 µg/ml JC-1 dye (Thermo Fisher), 2 µM MitoSOX (Thermo Fisher), 200 nM ER-Tracker Red (Thermo Fisher), 100 nM MitoTracker Deep Red (Cell Signaling Technology), or 15 min in 10 µM BioTracker ATP-red (Millipore). The embryos were washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium and transferred to ultrathin bottom 96-well plates (Grenier bio-one Cat. 6550900) containing 50 µl equilibrated M16 medium or chambered coverglass (Sigma–Aldrich) containing 400 µl equilibrated M16 medium, and processed for imaging using a LSM710 confocal microscope. For triple color staining of Hoechst 33342, MitoSOX and MitoTracker Deep Red, embryos were incubated in equilibrated M16 medium containing 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher), 2 µM MitoSOX (Thermo Fisher) and 100 nM MitoTracker Deep Red (Cell Signaling Technology) for 30 mins. The embryos were washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium and transferred to chambered coverglass (Sigma–Aldrich) containing 400 µl equilibrated M16 medium and processed for imaging using a LSM710 confocal microscope. For Ca²⁺ staining, the embryos were incubated for 30 min in equilibrated M16 medium containing 5 µM Fluo-4 AM dye. The embryos were washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium, followed by incubation in 50 µl of equilibrated M16 medium for 30 min to remove non-specifically-bound dye. For live cell co-staining with other dyes, the embryos were transferred to equilibrated M16 medium containing the dye of interest for 30 min and imaged in ultrathin bottom 96-well plates containing 50 µl equilibrated M16 medium. For saponin treatment, the embryos were incubated in equilibrated M16 medium with or without 0.1% saponin before incubation with MitoTracker Deep Red. Live cell imaging was carried out using a Zeiss LSM710 laser scanning microscope and a 20X/NA0.8 lens. All LSM710 images were taken with Zeiss software suite (ZEN 2011).

Treatment with the protonophore FCCP and Ca²⁺ chelator EGTA-AM

2-cell mouse embryos were collected by oviduct flushing at E1.5, followed by three washes in equilibrated M16 medium. Embryos were transferred to equilibrated M16 medium containing 5 µM FCCP (Sigma–Aldrich) for 2 h or 100 µM EGTA-AM (Millipore) for 3 h. An equal amount of DMSO was used as control. Embryos were then washed three times in equilibrated M16 medium and processed for immunofluorescence staining.

Calcium free embryo cultures

Ca²⁺ containing regular M16 medium and Ca²⁺ free M16 medium were prepared according to the CSH protocol⁵⁷. E1.5 embryos obtained from oviduct flushing were collected and washed three times in either equilibrated regular M16 or Ca²⁺ free M16 medium. Embryos were then transferred to their designated medium (Ca²⁺⁻ containing or Ca²⁺ free M16 medium) and cultured for 24 h. Embryos were then processed for Ca²⁺ live cell imaging using Fluo-4 AM or DDX1 immunofluorescence staining.

Co-staining of calcium and DDX1

Fluo-4 AM stained 2-cell mouse embryos were fixed and permeabilized using −20 °C methanol-acetone (1:1) for 5 min at 4 °C, followed by Triton-X 100. Methanol-acetone fixed embryos were then incubated in PBST (10 min X3) for rehydration followed by incubation with Atto 550-conjugated anti-DDX1 antibody. Stained embryos were placed in ultrathin bottom 96-well plates (Grenier bio-one Cat. 6550900) and imaged immediately using a Zeiss LSM710 microscope.

Single embryo RNA expression analysis

Eighteen embryos collected by oviduct flushing of two E0.5 heterozygous Ddx1 crosses obtained by natural mating. Embryos were then treated with Acidic Tyrode’s solution (Sigma–Aldrich) for zona removal and cultured in equilibrated M16 for 24 h. Individual embryos (n = 18) were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen until further use. A sequencing library for each embryo was prepared using the NEBNext Single Cell/Low Input RNA Library Prep Kit (E6420S) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The sequencing libraries were then submitted to MedGenome Labs Ltd. (Foster City, CA) for next generation sequencing. The raw sequencing data were then aligned with STAR aligner and counted by featurecounts R. Ddx1 high versus Ddx1 low embryos were determined based on the number of Ddx1 transcripts per million transcripts (TPM) where Ddx1 TPM levels ≤0.6 or >3 are defined as low or high levels of Ddx1, respectively. The mRNA profile of two separate groups of embryos (Ddx1 high vs Ddx1 low) were then analyzed by DESeq2 package in R. P-value of each gene was obtained by Wald test and corrected with Benjamini and Hochberg method. Genes with FDR < 0.1 were selected.

In order to validate our sequencing results, we extracted RNAs from an independent batch of 24 two-cell embryos generated from heterozygous Ddx1 crosses. The RNAs were reverse transcribed and amplified with the NEBNext Single Cell/Low Input cDNA Synthesis & Amplification Module (E6421S) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Three high Ddx1 and three low Ddx1 embryos were selected for validation based on their Ddx1 mRNA levels. The selected transcripts were quantified using RT-qPCR in these six embryos (high Ddx1 vs low Ddx1). Primers for selected transcripts (Supplementary Dataset 2) were used for RT-qPCR analysis using 1 µl of diluted cDNA per 10 µl reaction containing BrightGreen 2X-qPCR MasterMix-ROX (Applied Biological Materials). PCR was performed in 96-well plates using the QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The run method was customized as follows: Pre-PCR (Ramp rate 1.9 °C/s, 95 °C for 10 min), 40 cycles PCR (Ramp rate 1.9 °C/s, 95 °C 15 s, Ramp rate 1.9 °C/s, 58 °C 30 s, Ramp rate 1.6 °C/s, 72 °C 1 min). The mRNA levels were normalized to Gapdh levels with Excel and plotted with Prism (GraphPad). Log₁₀ scaled levels are shown (Supplementary Fig. 6). The multiple t-test with Holm-Sidak method was used to test for significance between low Ddx1 vs high Ddx1 embryos.

Imaging analysis

Images were imported and analysed in ImageJ. Mean intensity values of different channels were used for JC-1, MitoSOX and ATP statistical analysis. Coloc2 ImageJ colocalization analysis plugin was used for the analysis of mitochondria and Ca²⁺ with and without saponin treatment. Pearson correlations for each image were marked for statistical analysis with Prism (GraphPad). The unpaired t-test was carried out using Prism (GraphPad). JC-1, MitoSOX and ATP data were plotted with box-and-whisker plots. Their statistical significances were evaluated with Student’s t-test. For all box-and-whisker plots, elements are defined as below: center line, median; box limits, 25th and 75th quartiles; whiskers, min to max with all data points shown.

For nuclear fragmentation analysis, each nucleus was manually labelled. Data were then plotted with box-and-whisker plot in Prism (GraphPad). Students’ t-test was used for statistical significance calculation.

For mitochondria fragmentation analysis, Particle Analysis plug-in in ImageJ was used. The images were first thresholded with Auto Local Threshold. Particles with size of 10 pixel² and above were recorded. Counted particles within different size ranges were summarized and converted to µm². Data were then plotted with Prism (GraphPad) as interleaved symbols, with mean values shown as circles and error bars representing SD. The multiple t-test with Holm-Sidak method was used to test for significance.

For analysis of size of MARVs, 3D object counter on GPU plug-in⁵⁸ in ImageJ was used. The background of z-stack images was subtracted, and the images were thresholded with Auto Thresholding. 3D objects with sizes ≥10 voxels were recorded. Counted objects within different size ranges were summarized and converted to µm³. Data were then plotted with Prism (GraphPad) as described for mitochondrial fragmentation.

For co-staining with Hoechst 33342, MitoSOX and MitoTracker Deep Red, each channel was calculated individually as stated above. Only particles less than 0.2 µm² were used for MitoTracker channel. The z-scores of these 3 channels were averaged to construct a new index using weighted average index construction. The significance between the wild-type and the stalled embryos was calculated with Students’ t-test.

Immunogold labelling

Ultralow melt agarose (SeaPrep) (4%) was prepared and melted at 60 °C, then placed in a 37 °C water bath. Embryos at different developmental stages were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The embryos were transferred to a 250-μl tube and immersed in 5 µl of 4% agarose. The embryos were placed at 4 °C to allow the agarose to solidify.

The embryos were rinsed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.3. The embryos were dehydrated in series of pre-cooled (4 °C) ethanol solutions (30%, 50% and 70% 15 min each and 95% and 100% ETOH 10 min each). For embedding, the embryos were placed in LR white resin-100% ethanol (2:1) for 2 h at 4 °C and pure LR white resin overnight. LR white was polymerized under UV for 96 h at 4 °C. Samples were cut into 100 nm sections with a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome and the sections were collected on 400 mesh nickel grids.

For immunogold labeling, the grids were immersed in 50 mM NH₄Cl for 1 min at room temperature and then blocked with 0.5% fish gelatin in PBS for 45 min at room temperature. The grids were incubated with anti-DDX1 antibody (1:1,000 dilution) in PBS for 3 h at room temperature, followed by 10 washes in PBS. The grids were then incubated in 1:100 diluted goat anti-rabbit 10 nm nano-gold (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat #25109) in PBS for 1 h. The grids were washed in 0.05% fish gelatin in PBS, followed by PBS. The samples were fixed again in 2% paraformaldehyde +2.5% glutaraldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, rinsed in H₂O and treated with 1% OsO₄ for 10 min at room temperature. The samples were washed in H₂O and stained with 1% uranyl acetate for 25–30 min at room temperature and 1% lead citrate for 3 min at room temperature. Images were obtained with a JEOL JEM-2100 transmission electron microscope at 200 kV. TEM images were acquired with Gatan Microscope Suite Software.

OsO₄/uranyl acetate staining

The embryos were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde +2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 1 h at room temperature and placed in low melt agarose as described under immunogold labelling, washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.3, and post-fixed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer containing 1% OsO₄ for 35 min at room temperature. The embryos were then incubated in freshly made 1% carbohydrazide solution (in H₂O) at room temperature for 5 min and quickly rinsed with ddH₂O. The embryos were incubated again in 0.1 M phosphate buffer with 1% OsO₄ for 15 min and washed with ddH₂O.

The samples were dehydrated in 30% and 50% ethanol solutions (10 min each). The samples were then further dehydrated in 70% ethanol overnight at room temperature (if uranyl acetate was used, 1% uranyl acetate was added to the 70% ethanol), followed by 95% ethanol for 10 min and 3 × 100% ethanol (10–15 min each). A series of resin infiltrations were performed using Spurr’s resin [Spurr’s:100% ethanol (1:4) for 1 h and 40 min, Spurr’s:100% ethanol (1:1) for 1 h and 35 min, Spurr’s:100% ethanol (3:1) for 2 h]. The samples were then embedded in pure Spurr’s resin for 1 h, with two more changes into fresh pure Spurr’s resin overnight and then 2 h. The infiltrated embryos were polymerized in a 65 °C oven for 21 h. The samples were then cut into 100 nm sections. If uranyl acetate was used in the experiment, samples were final-stained in 1% uranyl acetate for 15 min followed by 1% lead citrate for 4 min. TEM images were acquired with Gatan Microscope Suite Software (Digital Micrograph, Version 3.23).

Energy filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM)

A Gatan energy filter system (Quantum) (Gatan, CA, USA) mounted on a JEOL TEM (JEM 2100) with a Lab6 filament was used for EFTEM elemental mapping of phosphate and nitrogen. For phosphate mapping, embryos were stained with OsO₄ (no uranyl acetate) to visualize the MARVs and analysed using three window EFTEM. Pre-edge images were obtained at 122 eV and 127 eV, and the post-edge image was obtained at 155 eV. The energy-selecting window was set at 5 eV. For nitrogen mapping, embryos were DDX1 immunogold-labelled to identify MARVs. No OsO₄/uranyl acetate was used in nitrogen mapping to avoid interference of osmium with nitrogen. Pre-edge images were obtained at 368 eV and 388 eV, and the post-edge image was obtained at 411 eV. The energy-selecting window was set at 20 eV. EFTEM images were acquired with Gatan Microscope Suite Software.

Statistics and reproducibility

Statistical analysis used for each experiment is described in each of the figure legends. Each datapoint represents an individual embryo. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size and no data were excluded from the analyses. The mice treated with different treatments or controls were allocated randomly. The intensity analyses and particle size analyses were calculated blindly to obtain the values for each sample. These values were then used for statistical analysis.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been uploaded to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and can be accessed under the accession numbers “SRR17058908”, “SRR17058907”, “SRR17058906”, “SRR17058905”, “SRR17058904”, “SRR17058903”. All other data needed to reproduce and evaluate the conclusions in this paper are present in the main text and supplementary data or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Original data of all figures presented in the main text and supplementary data are provided in the source data file. Ddx1 heterozygous mice are available upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Schultz, R. M. The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Hum. Reprod. Update 8, 323–331 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, L., Zheng, P. & Dean, J. Maternal control of early mouse development. Development 137, 859–870 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fernandes, R. et al. NLRP5 mediates mitochondrial function in mouse oocytes and embryos. Biol. Reprod. 86, 131–110 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. et al. Disruption of the mouse protein Ser/Thr phosphatase 2Cbeta gene leads to early pre-implantation lethality. Mech. Dev. 124, 489–499 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mouillet, J. F. et al. DEAD-box protein-103 (DP103, Ddx20) is essential for early embryonic development and modulates ovarian morphology and function. Endocrinology 149, 2168–2175 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Witke, W., Sutherland, J. D., Sharpe, A., Arai, M. & Kwiatkowski, D. J. Profilin I is essential for cell survival and cell division in early mouse development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3832–3836 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
de Boer, J., Donker, I., de Wit, J., Hoeijmakers, J. H. & Weeda, G. Disruption of the mouse xeroderma pigmentosum group D DNA repair/basal transcription gene results in preimplantation lethality. Cancer Res. 58, 89–94 (1998).
PubMed Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M. R. et al. Cytoplasmic aggregation of DDX1 in developing embryos: Early embryonic lethality associated with Ddx1 knockout. Dev. Biol. 455, 420–433 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Germain, D. R. et al. Loss of the Drosophila melanogaster DEAD box protein Ddx1 leads to reduced size and aberrant gametogenesis. Dev. Biol. 407, 232–245 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Campbell, K. & Swann, K. Ca²⁺ oscillations stimulate an ATP increase during fertilization of mouse eggs. Dev. Biol. 298, 225–233 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dumollard, R. et al. Sperm-triggered [Ca2+] oscillations and Ca²⁺ homeostasis in the mouse egg have an absolute requirement for mitochondrial ATP production. Development 131, 3057–3067 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Atkins, C. M., Nozaki, N., Shigeri, Y. & Soderling, T. R. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein-dependent protein synthesis is regulated by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Neurosci. 24, 5193–5201 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bentov, Y., Yavorska, T., Esfandiari, N., Jurisicova, A. & Casper, R. F. The contribution of mitochondrial function to reproductive aging. J. Assist Reprod. Genet. 28, 773–783 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schatten, H., Sun, Q. Y. & Prather, R. The impact of mitochondrial function/dysfunction on IVF and new treatment possibilities for infertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 12, 111 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Seli, E. Mitochondria as a biomarker for IVF outcome. Reproduction 157, R235–R242 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Manser, R. C. & Houghton, F. D. Ca²⁺-linked upregulation and mitochondrial production of nitric oxide in the mouse preimplantation embryo. J. Cell Sci. 119, 2048–2055 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nagaraj, R. et al. Nuclear localization of mitochondrial TCA cycle enzymes as a critical step in mammalian zygotic genome activation. Cell 168, 210–223 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Van Blerkom, J., Davis, P. & Alexander, S. Inner mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim), cytoplasmic ATP content and free Ca2+ levels in metaphase II mouse oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 18, 2429–2440 (2003).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Godbout, R. & Squire, J. Amplification of a DEAD box protein gene in retinoblastoma cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7578–7582 (1993).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brodie, D. A., Huie, P., Locke, M. & Ottensmeyer, F. P. The correlation between bismuth and uranyl staining and phosphorus content of intracellular structures as determined by electron spectroscopic imaging. Tissue Cell 14, 621–627 (1982).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Longo, P., Twesten, R. D. & Lin, W. High speed EELS and EFTEM analysis across the visual cortex. Microsc. Microanalysis 20, 1302–1303 (2014).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Piko, L. & Matsumoto, L. Number of mitochondria and some properties of mitochondrial DNA in the mouse egg. Dev. Biol. 49, 1–10 (1976).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Piko, L. & Taylor, K. D. Amounts of mitochondrial DNA and abundance of some mitochondrial gene transcripts in early mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 123, 364–374 (1987).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ashby, M. C. & Tepikin, A. V. ER calcium and the functions of intracellular organelles. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 11–17 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Benos, D. J. & Balaban, R. S. Energy metabolism of preimplantation mammalian blastocysts. Am. J. Physiol. 245, C40–C45 (1983).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miao, Y. L. & Williams, C. J. Calcium signaling in mammalian egg activation and embryo development: the influence of subcellular localization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 79, 742–756 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Giorgi, C., Marchi, S. & Pinton, P. The machineries, regulation and cellular functions of mitochondrial calcium. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 713–730 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Watanabe, T. et al. Characterisation of the dynamic behaviour of lipid droplets in the early mouse embryo using adaptive harmonic generation microscopy. BMC Cell Biol. 11, 38 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, C. H. et al. Maternal diabetes causes abnormal dynamic changes of endoplasmic reticulum during mouse oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 11, 31 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kline, D., Mehlmann, L., Fox, C. & Terasaki, M. The cortical endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of the mouse egg: localization of ER clusters in relation to the generation of repetitive calcium waves. Dev. Biol. 215, 431–442 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chi, F., Sharpley, M. S., Nagaraj, R., Roy, S. S. & Banerjee, U. Glycolysis-independent glucose metabolism distinguishes TE from ICM fate during mammalian embryogenesis. Dev. Cell 53, 9–26 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shirayoshi, Y., Okada, T. S. & Takeichi, M. The calcium-dependent cell–cell adhesion system regulates inner cell mass formation and cell surface polarization in early mouse development. Cell 35, 631–638 (1983).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wales, R. Effects of Ions on the development of the pre-implantation mouse embryo in vitro. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23, 421–430 (1970).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bangham, A. D., Horne, R. W., Glauert, A. M., Dingle, J. T. & Lucy, J. A. Action of saponin on biological cell membranes. Nature 196, 952–955 (1962).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Loganathan, S., Lehmkuhl, E. M., Eck, R. J. & Zarnescu, D. C. To be or not to be…toxic-Is RNA association with TDP-43 complexes deleterious or protective in neurodegeneration? Front Mol. Biosci. 6, 154 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Winata, C. L. & Korzh, V. The translational regulation of maternal mRNAs in time and space. FEBS Lett. 592, 3007–3023 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kellner, J. N., Reinstein, J. & Meinhart, A. Synergistic effects of ATP and RNA binding to human DEAD-box protein DDX1. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 2813–2828 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, L., Monckton, E. A. & Godbout, R. A role for DEAD box 1 at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 6413–6425 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brookes, P. S., Yoon, Y., Robotham, J. L., Anders, M. W. & Sheu, S. S. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287, C817–C833 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peng, T. I. & Jou, M. J. Oxidative stress caused by mitochondrial calcium overload. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 1201, 183–188 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eaddy, A. C. & Schnellmann, R. G. Visualization and quantification of endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ in renal cells using confocal microscopy and Fluo5F. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 404, 424–427 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, S. & Min, K. T. The interface between ER and mitochondria: molecular compositions and functions. Mol. Cells 41, 1000–1007 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaufman, R. J. & Malhotra, J. D. Calcium trafficking integrates endoplasmic reticulum function with mitochondrial bioenergetics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 2233–2239 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Patergnani, S. et al. Calcium signaling around Mitochondria Associated Membranes (MAMs). Cell Commun. Signal 9, 19 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, F. et al. Mitochondrial Ca(2 +) is related to mitochondrial activity and dynamic events in mouse oocytes. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 585932 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Reader, K. L., Stanton, J. L. & Juengel, J. L. The role of oocyte organelles in determining developmental competence. Biology (Basel) 6, https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6030035 (2017).
Dumollard, R., Duchen, M. & Carroll, J. The role of mitochondrial function in the oocyte and embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 77, 21–49 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Han, Y. et al. Ca(2+)-induced mitochondrial ROS regulate the early embryonic cell cycle. Cell Rep. 22, 218–231 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, L., Trimarchi, J. R. & Keefe, D. L. Involvement of mitochondria in oxidative stress-induced cell death in mouse zygotes. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1745–1753 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Olszanska, B. & Borgul, A. Maternal RNA content in oocytes of several mammalian and avian species. J. Exp. Zool. 265, 317–320 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Suh, N. et al. MicroRNA function is globally suppressed in mouse oocytes and early embryos. Curr. Biol. 20, 271–277 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Flemr, M., Ma, J., Schultz, R. M. & Svoboda, P. P-body loss is concomitant with formation of a messenger RNA storage domain in mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 82, 1008–1017 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M. R., Germain, D. R., Monckton, E. A., Brun, M. & Godbout, R. Ddx1 knockout results in transgenerational wild-type lethality in mice. Sci. Rep. 5, 9829 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gasperin, B. G. et al. Oil-free culture system for in vitro bovine embryo production. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 9, e32 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Bleoo, S. et al. Association of human DEAD box protein DDX1 with a cleavage stimulation factor involved in 3’-end processing of pre-MRNA. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3046–3059 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Paul, D., Sauvegarde, C., Rezsohazy, R. & Donnay, I. How to study HOX gene expression and function in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 1196, 19–36 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
M16 medium. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2006, pdb.rec10345, https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.rec10345 (2006).
Haase, R. et al. CLIJ: GPU-accelerated image processing for everyone. Nat. Methods 17, 5–6 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dan McGinn and Cheryl Santos for their help with the mouse experiments. We are also grateful for the support of Gerry Barron, Guobin Sun and the Cross Cancer Institute Cell Imaging Facility. This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research – grant number 162157 to R.G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada
Yixiong Wang, Lubna Yasmin, Lei Li, Pinzhang Gao, Xia Xu, Xuejun Sun & Roseline Godbout

Authors

Yixiong Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lubna Yasmin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lei Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pinzhang Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xia Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xuejun Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Roseline Godbout
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.W. and R.G. designed the study; Y.W. and L.Y. performed embryo collections and embryo cultures; Y.W. performed immunofluorescence staining; L.Y. carried out the breeding experiments for generation of embryos; L.L. performed RNA sequencing library preparation and RT-qPCR validation; Y.W. performed RNA sequencing data analysis; Y.W. and X.X. performed confocal and STED microscopy experiments; P.G., Y.W. and X.S. performed TEM sample preparation, electron microscopy observation and EFTEM; and Y.W. and R.G. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roseline Godbout.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Muniswamy Madesh and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer Review Reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of additional Supplementary File

Supplementary Dataset 1

Supplementary Dataset 2

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Yasmin, L., Li, L. et al. DDX1 vesicles control calcium-dependent mitochondrial activity in mouse embryos. Nat Commun 13, 3794 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31497-9

Download citation

Received: 14 April 2021
Accepted: 20 June 2022
Published: 01 July 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31497-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.