Compact IF2 allows initiator tRNA accommodation into the P site and gates the ribosome to elongation

Basu, Ritwika S.; Sherman, Michael B.; Gagnon, Matthieu G.

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31129-2

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 13 June 2022

Compact IF2 allows initiator tRNA accommodation into the P site and gates the ribosome to elongation

Ritwika S. Basu¹,
Michael B. Sherman^2,3 &
Matthieu G. Gagnon ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-604X^1,2,3,4

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 3388 (2022) Cite this article

3154 Accesses
10 Citations
13 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

During translation initiation, initiation factor 2 (IF2) holds initiator transfer RNA (fMet-tRNA_i^fMet) in a specific orientation in the peptidyl (P) site of the ribosome. Upon subunit joining IF2 hydrolyzes GTP and, concomitant with inorganic phosphate (P_i) release, changes conformation facilitating fMet-tRNA_i^fMet accommodation into the P site and transition of the 70 S ribosome initiation complex (70S-IC) to an elongation-competent ribosome. The mechanism by which IF2 separates from initiator tRNA at the end of translation initiation remains elusive. Here, we report cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the 70S-IC from Pseudomonas aeruginosa bound to compact IF2-GDP and initiator tRNA. Relative to GTP-bound IF2, rotation of the switch 2 α-helix in the G-domain bound to GDP unlocks a cascade of large-domain movements in IF2 that propagate to the distal tRNA-binding domain C2. The C2-domain relocates 35 angstroms away from tRNA, explaining how IF2 makes way for fMet-tRNA_i^fMet accommodation into the P site. Our findings provide the basis by which IF2 gates the ribosome to the elongation phase.

Interplay between an ATP-binding cassette F protein and the ribosome from Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Article Open access 21 January 2022

Zhicheng Cui, Xiaojun Li, … Junjie Zhang

Structures of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu–isoleucine tRNA elucidate the mechanism of AUG avoidance

Article 27 March 2024

Mariia Yu. Rybak & Matthieu G. Gagnon

Cryo-EM study of an archaeal 30S initiation complex gives insights into evolution of translation initiation

Article Open access 06 February 2020

Pierre-Damien Coureux, Christine Lazennec-Schurdevin, … Emmanuelle Schmitt

Introduction

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein biosynthesis¹. In bacteria, this fundamental step in gene expression is regulated by initiation factors 1 (IF1), 2 (IF2), and 3 (IF3). IF2 is the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) that guides the entry of the formyl-methionine initiator tRNA (fMet-tRNA_i^fMet) into the peptidyl (P) site of the ribosome. In the small subunit (30 S) initiation complex, IF2-GTP holds fMet-tRNA_i^fMet in a specific orientation and provides anchor points that accelerate joining of the large subunit (50 S), resulting in the formation of the 70 S initiation complex (70S-IC)^2,3,4,5,6. Ribosome-stimulated GTP hydrolysis in IF2 and inorganic phosphate (P_i) release is accompanied by a series of conformational changes in IF2 and the ribosome, leading to the accommodation of fMet-tRNA_i^fMet into the P site and IF2 dissociation from the ribosome^{7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16}. These events are essential for the maturation of the 70S-IC into an elongation competent ribosome⁵.

Initiation factor IF2 is the largest translation factor in Escherichia coli with an N-terminal region of variable length across bacterial species and a conserved C-terminal region that encompasses four domains (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Solution and crystal structures of IF2 suggest that the G-domain (domain I) and domain II together form a super-domain while domain III (C1) and the fMet-tRNA_i^fMet-binding domain IV (C2) appear to remain flexible^17,18,19,20. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstructions of initiation complexes have shown that GTP-bound IF2 adopts an extended conformation with its β-barrel distal domain C2 interacting with the A76-fMet moiety of initiator tRNA in the p/I state^{2,3,6,9,10,21} and that IF2 induces a rotated conformation of the 30 S subunit in the 70S-IC^2,9,10,21,22. Kinetic studies^8,12,14 and time-resolved cryo-EM¹⁰ revealed that upon GTP hydrolysis by IF2 in the 70S-IC after subunit association, initiator tRNA is released from the C2-domain, accommodates into the P site (p/P state), and the ribosome takes the non-rotated conformation. Single-molecule FRET studies suggest that the nucleotide-bound to the G-domain allosterically modulates the position of the terminal domain C2 relative to that of dI-dIII and initiator tRNA⁷. Thus, it is presumed that IF2 changes conformation during the last step of translation initiation, facilitating the accommodation of fMet-tRNA_i^fMet into the P site and dissociation of IF2 from the ribosome. However, IF2 bound to the ribosome has only been visualized in the extended conformation interacting with fMet-tRNA_i^fMet positioned in the p/I state, which fails to explain how domains in IF2 rearrange to grant access of initiator tRNA to the P site and commit the ribosome to elongation.

We report cryo-EM structures of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa 70S-IC bound to IF2, mRNA, and initiator fMet-tRNA_i^fMet. The structures reveal the hitherto unseen compact state of IF2-GDP bound to the ribosome. The large conformational changes in IF2 originate from the relatively small-scale rearrangement of the switch 2 (sw2) α-helix in the G-domain and propagate to the distal tRNA-binding domain C2, which collapses onto domain C1 allowing initiator tRNA accommodation into the P site. The structures visualize the interfaces between domains in compact IF2 and the ribosome, providing a detailed view of the IF2-mediated transition of the 70S-IC to a ribosome ready to begin the elongation phase.

Results

Cryo-EM structures of the 70 S ribosome initiation complex

To capture IF2 in different conformation bound to the 70S-IC, we used the fact that IF2 co-purifies with GDP (Supplementary Fig. 2) as observed previously¹⁹. We hypothesized that the addition of the non-hydrolysable GTP analog β,γ-methyleneguanosine 5’-triphosphate (GDPCP) to the complex could yield at least two populations of the 70S-IC, one bound to IF2-GDPCP and the other to IF2-GDP. Cryo-EM and three-dimensional (3D) classification revealed two main populations of ribosome complexes bound to IF2 and featuring the non-rotated (class average I) and rotated (class average II) 30 S subunit (Supplementary Fig. 3; Methods). The two class averages appear to be reminiscent of the low-resolution cryo-EM reconstructions of the Thermus thermophilus ribosome bound to IF2, in which the 30 S subunit is rotated in the 70S-IC bound to IF2-GDPCP and non-rotated upon binding IF2-GDP⁹. Non-rotated ribosomes from class average I feature initiator tRNA that is fully accommodated into the P site. Compared to the extended IF2 conformation featured in all of the previous ribosome initiation complex structures^{2,3,6,9,10,21,22,23}, IF2 has a globular and compact shape in the non-rotated 70S-IC with its distal C2-domain collapsed onto domain C1 (Fig. 1a, b). Rotated ribosomes from class average II contain extended IF2 with its C2-domain interacting with fMet-tRNA_i^fMet in the p/PI state (Fig. 1c, d), as previously reported in the E. coli ribosome initiation complexes (Supplementary Fig. 4)^{2,3,6,10,21,22}.

Despite the overall high-resolution of the reconstructions (2.6 – 2.9 Å) (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b), the EM density corresponding to domains C1 and C2 in compact IF2 was fragmented, possibly owing to high flexibility of this region in IF2^{7,17,18,22,23}. Similarly, the uL11-stalk comprising the GTP-activating center (GAC) in the 50 S subunit displays high flexibility in both the non-rotated (class average I) and rotated (class average II) ribosome (Supplementary Fig. 6). To resolve the conformational heterogeneity of IF2 and the ribosome, we further classified particles based on 3D variability analysis focused on IF2 and the uL11-stalk region (Supplementary Fig. 3). This approach, combined with focused refinement of IF2 and the surrounding ribosomal elements^24,25,26, allowed to visualize the long-sought compact IF2-GDP in the 70S-IC.

Compact IF2-GDP is bound to the non-rotated 70S-IC

The non-rotated ribosome particles were sorted on the basis of the presence of continuous EM density for compact IF2, which yielded a subset of 21,480 particles that resulted in the 2.9-Å reconstruction of the 70S-IC with solid density for P. aeruginosa IF2 (structure I-A). Focused refinement with signal subtraction produced a density map of compact IF2 with a nominal resolution of 3.4 Å, with several regions extending to ~3.0-Å resolution (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 5c; Supplementary Table 1). The quality of this map resolves most of the side chains in IF2, allows to trace the linkers between domains, and visualizes the GDP nucleotide bound in the G-domain (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 7).

**Fig. 2: Nucleotide-binding pocket in the G-domain of IF2.**

In structure I-A, the 30 S subunit is rotated by ~1.4° suggesting that compact IF2 exists in the 70S-IC that is essentially non-rotated. Correspondingly, the initiator tRNA is fully accommodated into the P site with its CCA-end base paired with the 23 S rRNA P-loop and the fMet residue positioned in the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) (Supplementary Fig. 8a), mimicking a ribosome complex ready to enter the elongation step. Compared to extended IF2, large-scale movements of domain C1 and the distal tRNA-binding domain C2 have occurred in compact IF2 (Fig. 3a). Domain C1 flips by 116° around the long axis of α-helix H8 of IF2 out of the inter-subunit cleft to relocate 29 Å away under the uL11-stalk of the 50 S subunit, losing all interactions with domain II (Fig. 3a, c, e; Supplementary Fig. 9). New interfaces form with the G- and C2-domains, and with the SRL and H43 of 23 S rRNA (Figs. 4a–c, e, 5a–b, e). Instead of α-helix H9 in domain C1 interacting with the G-domain in the extended conformation, it is α-helix H10 on the opposite side of C1 that does this in compact IF2 (Fig. 3e, f). The large movement and rotation of domain C1 pulls domain C2 away from initiator tRNA through the inter-domain linker encompassing residues 735–742 that is bent by 180° between H12 and the C2-domain (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Movie 1). Domain C2 retracts by 35 Å and rotates by 152° to relocate near 23 S rRNA helices H89-H91-H92, and the SRL (H95) (Figs. 3a, d, 5a–c). The C2-domain docks against domain C1 (Figs. 1b and 4b; Supplementary Fig. 7), and Arg⁷⁴² in the C1-C2 linker region engages in electrostatic interactions with a negative patch lining one side of helix H12 in domain C1 (Fig. 4c). The relocation of domain C1 in compact IF2 is facilitated by the flexible helix H8, which tilts by 25° and sharply bends by 90° at the apical region around Leu⁶²⁵ (Figs. 3b and 4d).

**Fig. 3: Structural rearrangements in IF2.**

**Fig. 4: Interactions between domains in compact IF2.**

**Fig. 5: Interactions between compact IF2 and the ribosome.**

The absence of density for the γ-phosphate or inorganic phosphate (P_i) in the nucleotide-binding pocket of compact IF2 is consistent with bound GDP (Fig. 2a). This is additionally supported by the observation that the sw1 region is disordered and sw2 rearranged, moving the catalytic His³⁹⁹ more than 8 Å away from the nucleotide binding pocket and 13 Å from the SRL (Figs. 2a and 3g). In the extended conformation of IF2-GDPCP, both switch regions contact domain C1 (Fig. 3f; Supplementary Fig. 10), contributing to its rigidity. Upon GTP hydrolysis and P_i release, sw1 becomes disordered and loses interactions with domain C1 while sw2 is remodeled. This releases structural restraints on domain C1 which is then free to relocate under the uL11-stalk in compact IF2 (Fig. 5a, e). In IF2-GDP, the sw2-α-helix in the G-domain rotates by 65° providing a stabilizing interface for helix H10 in the C1-domain (Figs. 3e, g and 4e). The position of the sw2-α-helix in IF2-GDPCP is not compatible with the location of domain C1 under the uL11-stalk in IF2-GDP (Fig. 3h), indicating that GTP hydrolysis and P_i release must occur for IF2 to transition to the compact conformation on the ribosome. In compact IF2, domains are held together mostly by stacking interactions, with domain C1 sandwiched between the G- and C2-domains, together surrounding the SRL of 23 S rRNA (Fig. 5a, b; Supplementary Fig. 7). The β-strand Val⁶⁷²-(Gly)₃-Val⁶⁷⁶ and helix H10 in domain C1 form the interface with the sw2-α-helix and H4 in the G-domain (Fig. 4e), while on the other side of domain C1, the flat surface formed by residues Asn⁶⁹⁸-Val⁶⁹⁹-Arg⁷⁰⁰ stacks with β-hairpin residues Leu⁷⁸², Asp⁷⁸⁵-Val⁷⁸⁶-Val⁷⁸⁷ in domain C2 (Fig. 4b).

The interactions between compact IF2 and the ribosome are different from those seen with extended IF2. Domain C2 resides in the vicinity of 23 S rRNA helices H89-H91-H92 and H95 (SRL), and of the C-terminal tip of r-protein uL6, together forming one side of the accommodation corridor for the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA (Fig. 5a). In this position, domain C2 interacts weakly with the ribosome. Residue Ser⁸¹⁸ is within hydrogen bonding distance from the 2’OH group of A2458 (E. coli A2471) and the ribose O4’ atom of G2459 (G2472) in H89, and no interaction is seen with H91-H92 and uL6 (Fig. 5c). The carboxyl group of Asp⁷⁸⁴, located in the apical loop of β-hairpin 781–788 of domain C2, interacts with the exocyclic amino group of G2648 (G2661) in the SRL (Fig. 5b). This is in contrast with the location of domain C2 in extended IF2-GDPCP on the rotated ribosome which, in addition to interacting with the CCA-end of fMet-tRNA_i^fMet, also contacts H89, H71 and ribosomal protein uL16 (Supplementary Fig. 11a, c–e). Similarly, the location of domain C1 in compact IF2 is strikingly different from that in extended IF2 on the rotated ribosome, in which the C1-domain locates in the inter-subunit cleft formed by 16 S rRNA helix h5, and r-proteins uS12 and uL14 (Supplementary Figs. 9 and 11a–b). Under the uL11-stalk, domain C1 in compact IF2 docks against the GTP-activating center (GAC) helix H43 and the SRL (Fig. 5a; Supplementary Fig. 9). The apical nucleotide A2647 (A2660) in the SRL stacks with Val⁶⁷⁶ and Gly⁶⁷⁷ in domain C1, while the conserved Tyr⁷²³ in H12 of domain C1, which in extended IF2 is within interaction distance with the catalytic His³⁹⁹ (Supplementary Fig. 10e), stacks with nucleotide A1057 (A1067) in H43 of GAC in compact IF2 (Fig. 5b, e). The interactions between domain II of compact IF2 and the 30 S subunit are preserved in structure I-A (Supplementary Fig. 12). The main chain of residues Gly⁵²⁸-Arg⁵²⁹ and the side chain of Arg⁵⁵⁸ stack with nucleotides A55 (A55) and U362 (U368), respectively, located in the body of the 30 S subunit, in keeping with the importance of A55 during protein synthesis (Fig. 5d)²⁷. Likewise, contacts between the G-domain and the ribosome are largely unchanged, except that the rotation of the sw2-helix in compact IF2 disrupts its interaction with the SRL (Fig. 2a).

Mechanism of IF2-GDP dissociation from the non-rotated ribosome

Variability analysis of the non-rotated ribosome particles also revealed structure I-B with a nominal resolution of 2.9 Å (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 5a). Focused refinement shows IF2-GDP bound in a noticeably different position in structure I-B (Fig. 6a, b). While the inter-domain contacts in IF2 remain largely unchanged, the G-domain rotates by ~20° inward around the SRL resulting in ~10 Å-displacement at the outskirt of the G-domain, ~7 Å for domain C1, and ~5 Å for domain II (Fig. 6a). The displacement of IF2 brings helix H6 in the G-domain proximal to the N-terminal domain of uL11 and domain C2 within interaction distance from H92 of 23 S rRNA (Fig. 6a, c, d). Helices H43 and H44 in the uL11-stalk shift by ~7 Å inward along with domain C1 (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Fig. 6b). The movement of compact IF2 in structure I-B increases the gap between the 50 S subunit and the G-domain by ~4 Å around the SRL, and the displacement of domain II away from the 30 S subunit combined with further back-rotation of the 30 S subunit, from ~1.4° in structure I-A to ~0.7° in structure I-B, eliminate interactions with the small subunit (Fig. 6a, b). Correspondingly, the total buried surface area by compact IF2-GDP is reduced from ~2616 Å² in structure I-A to ~2409 Å² in structure I-B, consistent with weaker interactions between ribosome I-B and IF2-GDP primed to dissociate from the 70S-IC^9,15. The absence of interaction between domain II and the 30 S subunit also explains the scattered low-resolution density attributable to domain II, indicating that it becomes highly dynamic in the inter-subunit space in structure I-B (Supplementary Fig. 5c). These observations provide insights into how IF2-GDP dissociates from the ribosome. As the 30 S subunit rotates back, compact IF2 releases its hold from the ribosome in a stepwise fashion; the G-domain peels off from the SRL and domain II dissociates from the ribosome before the other domains C1 and C2, similar to the proposed dissociation mechanism of EF-Tu and EF-G from the elongating ribosome^28,29.

**Fig. 6: Compact IF2 is loosely bound to the ribosome in structure I-B.**

Dynamics of the uL11-stalk in the rotated 70S-IC

In the rotated ribosome with extended IF2 (class average II), the density of the uL11-region is more scattered than that of the ribosome and IF2, suggesting that the uL11-stalk samples different conformations. Focused 3D variability analysis around extended IF2 and the uL11-stalk revealed structures II-A and II-B with global resolutions of 2.7 Å and 2.6 Å, respectively (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 5b). In II-A and II-B, the 30 S subunit is rotated by ~4°, representing a semi-rotated ribosome as previously reported^10,14,21. The 70S-IC in structures II-A and II-B displays well-defined density for extended IF2 and GDPCP in the G-domain (Fig. 2b), differing only by the position of the uL11-stalk. The tip of H43 is positioned 25 Å outward in structure II-A relative to that in II-B (Supplementary Fig. 6a), and despite the large movement of the uL11-stalk, it does not perturb the conformation of extended IF2-GDPCP stably bound to the ribosome. With the stalk in the outward position, the N-domain of uL11 interacts with the G-domain of IF2 (Supplementary Fig. 6a), which may assist in positioning protein bL12 such that it promotes rapid subunit association³⁰ and GTP hydrolysis by IF2³¹. The close proximity of the N-domain of uL11 and the G-domain of IF2 in structure II-A is in agreement with previous FRET studies reporting that upon 70S-IC formation, the G-domain of IF2 moves closer to the uL11-NTD both in the presence of GTP or a non-hydrolysable GTP analogue³².

In structures I-A and I-B with compact IF2-GDP, the uL11-stalk is in the inward position similar to that observed in structure II-B (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Fig. 6). This allows nucleotide A1057 (A1067) at the tip of H43 to form a stacking interaction with conserved Tyr⁷²³ in domain C1 that moved from the inter-subunit space in extended IF2 (Supplementary Fig. 11a–b) to its location under the uL11-stalk in compact IF2 (Fig. 6a, e; Supplementary Fig. 9).

The N2 sub-domain anchors extended IF2 on the rotated ribosome

The N-domain of IF2 is known to promote stable joining of the 30 S and 50 S subunits to form the 70S-IC²². IF2 in the extended conformation in the P. aeruginosa 70S-IC interacts with the ribosome and A76-fMet of p/PI-tRNA as seen in the E. coli 70S-IC (Supplementary Figs. 4, 6a, 8b and 11)^10,21. We observe additional density that emerges from the N-termini of the G-domain of extended IF2 and reaches the shoulder domain of the 30 S subunit (Figs. 1c, Fig. 7a), paralleling previous tethered cleavage data of rRNA³³ and cryo-EM reconstructions^2,21. The region of the N-domain of IF2 proximal to the G-domain that interacts with the 30 S subunit was previously called the N/G1 domain in T. thermophilus IF2^22,34, and shares high sequence similarity with the distal region of the N-domain of E. coli and P. aeruginosa IF2 (sub-domain N1) (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Correspondingly, the solution structure of the distal region of the E. coli IF2 N-domain (sub-domain N1) was shown to be highly similar to that of the N/G1 domain of ribosome-free T. thermophilus IF2²².

**Fig. 7: Structure of the N2 sub-domain of IF2 in the 70S-IC.**

It is interesting that the sequence encompassing the N1 sub-domain shares significant similarity with the region of the N-domain proximal to the G-domain (sub-domain N2), suggesting that sub-domain N2 may fold into a similar globular structure with the two repeats N1 and N2 connected by a linker forming the entire N-domain of IF2 (Supplementary Fig. 1a, c)^22,35. The high sequence similarity between the N-domain of IF2 in E. coli and P. aeruginosa suggests a similar sub-domain arrangement (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). In the 70S-IC, the additional interactions provided by the N2 sub-domain further anchor IF2 on the ribosome, explaining how this region of IF2 stabilizes the binding of fMet-tRNA_i^fMet to the P site of the 30S-IC and promotes joining of the 30 S and 50 S subunits^22,34,36. Local refinement of this region yielded a 2.8-Å resolution map of the N2-globular sub-domain of IF2 interacting with helix h16 of 16 S rRNA (Fig. 7b; Supplementary Figs. 3 and 5d). An initial model of the N2 sub-domain was generated with AlphaFold2³⁷, and then fit and refined into the density. Using this approach, we traced 85 additional residues (248 to 332), of which residues 266 to 312 form the three-helix bundle sub-domain N2 in IF2 not previously included in the E. coli 70S-IC structures^10,21. In the rotated 70S-IC (II-A), the buried surface area by extended IF2-GDPCP is ~5146 Å², of which ~1173 Å² is attributed to the N2 sub-domain.

While structure alignment of the three-helix bundle N2 sub-domain of ribosome-bound P. aeruginosa IF2 (residues 266 to 312) with the NMR structure of the E. coli sub-domain N1 (residues 2–50)³⁸ reveals reasonable homology with a root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) value of 4.9 Å, alignment with the N/G1 domain from the crystal structure of ribosome-free T. thermophilus IF2^19,39 shows an almost perfect fit with RMSD of 1 Å (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e). The overall shape of the N2-globular sub-domain complements that of helix h16 in the shoulder region of the 30 S subunit, with residues Ser²⁷⁷, Val²⁷⁸, Lys²⁷⁹ and Arg²⁵⁹ forming the main interface and the extension that emerges from the N2 sub-domain wrapping around the minor groove of h16 (Fig. 7c, d). In the non-rotated 70S-IC the N2 region of compact IF2-GDP is not visible (Fig. 1a), indicating that the N2 sub-domain disengages from the 30 S shoulder and becomes labile upon back-rotation of the small subunit in the 70S-IC.

Discussion

The compact conformation of IF2-GDP bound to the ribosome presented here suggests that IF2 undergoes large conformational changes during translation initiation. Structural and kinetic studies reported that IF2-GDP may remain bound to the 70S-IC^9,15,32,40, and our results show that IF2-GDP is primarily associated with the 70S-IC in the non-rotated state. Binding of translational GTPase factors to the ribosome is mutually exclusive and the persistence of ribosome-bound IF2-GDP at the end of initiation may account for the delay in binding of EF-Tu-GTP-aminoacyl-tRNA ternary complex to the ribosome^16,40. It has been suggested that binding of the EF-Tu ternary complex may be facilitated by a “ready-to-leave” conformation of IF2-GDP that progressively loses interactions with the ribosome, possibly shifting the reaction equilibrium from the IF2-GDP-70S-IC to the EF-Tu-bound 70 S ribosome elongation complex⁹. Such state of IF2-GDP may be represented by our structure I-B, in which IF2 has lost interactions with the 30 S subunit and the SRL in the 50 S subunit.

Our preparation of the 70S-IC complex for cryo-EM structure determination deviates from the native initiation pathway, in which the 30 S subunit first forms a complex with mRNA, initiation factors IF1, IF2, IF3 and fMet-tRNA_i^fMet, followed by joining of the 50 S subunit and GTP hydrolysis by IF2¹⁰. Here we used purified 70 S ribosomes and added mRNA, fMet-tRNA_i^fMet, and IF2 in the presence of an excess of the GDPCP nucleotide, as previously reported (see Methods)^2,9,21. Whether the IF2 conformations we observe on the 70S-IC represent on-pathway intermediates is a legitimate concern. Two arguments suggest that the major structures (I-A/B & II-A/B) may nevertheless represent on-pathway, rather than off-pathway intermediates: i) the fact that the dissociation/association of IF2-GDP from/to the ribosome is reversible^{9,12,15,32,40}, and ii) the similarity of ribosomes II-A/II-B harboring extended IF2-GDPCP with the previous IF2–70S-IC structure obtained under native conditions (Supplementary Fig. 4)¹⁰.

In the previous low-resolution cryo-EM structure of the T. thermophilus 70S-IC, IF2-GDP was observed in the extended conformation, which may seem at odd with the compact conformation of IF2-GDP reported here. A possible explanation could be attributed to the presence or absence of P_i in IF2-GDP. However, in our structures, it is clear that GDP is bound without P_i. Similarly, the previous T. th IF2-GDP-70S-IC was prepared using GDP⁹, and it is therefore unlikely that unreleased P_i is bound to IF2. Another possibility considers the ribosome as a Brownian nanomachine, exploiting thermal motions for many of the conformational changes during protein synthesis⁴¹. It is conceivable that thermal motions of the ribosome could play an active role in promoting conformational changes of IF2. Both the T. th IF2-GDP-70S-IC and our P. ae 70S-IC were prepared by incubating the complexes at 37 °C (see ref. ⁹. and Methods), which corresponds to the temperature at which P. aeruginosa ribosomes operate but is substantially lower than the optimum temperature for T. thermophilus (~75 °C). Therefore, a reduced flexibility at low temperature of the thermophilic ribosomes could have prevented IF2 from assuming the compact configuration.

In the crystal structures of ribosome-free GDP-bound and apo IF2, domain C1 occupies different positions relative to domains I-II, and domain C2 is not resolved likely due to intrinsic flexibility (Supplementary Fig. 13a)¹⁹. The sw2-helix in ribosome-free IF2-GDP is disordered probably because of the absence of interaction with domain C1. In the 70S-IC, the space restraints imposed by the uL11-stalk may facilitate the re-location of domain C1 in IF2-GDP such that it docks against the sw2-helix in the G-domain. The flexibility of helix H8 in IF2 allows it to bend and accommodate the new position of domain C1 under the uL11-stalk, a feature that was not observed in the ribosome-free crystal structures of IF2 (Supplementary Fig. 13b).

The flexibility of the domains in IF2 made it difficult to rationalize how the signal of GTP hydrolysis in the G-domain is propagated to the distal domain C2 leading to accommodation of initiator tRNA into the P site^19,22. Nevertheless, hydrolysis of GTP by IF2 is essential for separation of domain C2 from initiator tRNA¹² and for dissociation of the factor from the ribosome^11,12,13,15. Based on our structures, we propose the following model for IF2-mediated translation initiation regarding the final steps of the process until IF2 is released. Upon GTP hydrolysis and P_i release, the sw2-helix in the G-domain rotates and sw1 unfolds, releasing restraints on domain C1 and increasing its intrinsic flexibility. The unrestrained domain C1 loses interactions with the 30 S subunit, allowing the small ribosomal subunit to undergo reverse rotation. As the small subunit rotates back, the C1-domain swings around helix H8 of IF2 and relocates under the uL11-stalk of the 50 S subunit, forming a new interface with the G-domain bound to GDP. The large displacement and rotation of domain C1 pulls domain C2 away from fMet-tRNA_i^fMet, releasing initiator tRNA from IF2 into the P site and committing the ribosome to elongation (Supplementary Movie 1). In the rotated 70S-IC, the contact area between the ribosome and IF2-GDPCP is ~5146 Å². The transition of IF2 to the compact conformation combined with the reverse rotation of the ribosome drastically reduce the buried surface area by IF2-GDP in structures I-A (~2616 Å²) and I-B (~2409 Å²), providing the basis by which IF2-GDP eventually dissociates from the 70S-IC. To ensure we detected all conformational changes in IF2 and the ribosome that are present in the cryo-EM dataset reported here, we performed global 3D variability analysis using all ribosome particles, in both the rotated and non-rotated states. This analysis shows the same conformational changes in IF2 and the 70S-IC we describe using focused classification and refinement (see Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Fig. 15, and Supplementary Movie 2).

In summary, cryo-EM of the bacterial 70S-IC revealed the elusive compact state of IF2-GDP bound to the ribosome. The structures offer insights into how remodeling of the switch regions, which is dependent on the nucleotide-bound state of the G-domain, is amplified into a cascade of domain rearrangements that promote irreversible release of fMet-tRNA_i^fMet from IF2 and subsequent dissociation of IF2 from the ribosome. The model presented here illustrates how IF2 and the ribosome work hand-in-hand to guide the 70S-IC to an elongation competent complex.

Methods

Preparation of 70 S ribosomes, IF2, and initiator tRNA

The full-length IF2 sequence was PCR amplified from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 genomic DNA and cloned into the pET28a-SMT3 plasmid (derived from pET28a, Novagen) containing an N-terminal 6x His-SMT3 tag. Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Star (Invitrogen) cells transformed with this construct were grown in the LB medium supplemented with 50 µg/mL kanamycin (Gold Biotechnology) to an absorbance of 0.8 at 600 nm before inducing expression of His-SMT3-PaeIF2 with 0.5 mM isopropylthiol-β-D-galactoside (IPTG, Gold Biotechnology) for 4 h at 37 °C. The cells were collected by centrifugation, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C. To purify IF2, frozen cells were resuspended in lysis buffer at 4 °C (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol) with one EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablet (Pierce, Thermo Scientific). The resuspended cells were lysed by passing several times through an LM20 high-pressure homogenizer (Microfluidics) operated at 15,000 psi. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 16,000 rpm (29,000 × g) at 4 °C for 45 min and filtered through a 0.22-μm filter (Millipore). The lysate was then loaded onto a 5 ml HisTrap HP (GE Healthcare) column and washed with a high salt buffer (lysis buffer with 2 M NaCl) to remove bound nucleic acids and equilibrated back into lysis buffer. IF2 was eluted with a linear gradient of imidazole to 500 mM. Fractions containing His-SMT3-IF2 were pooled and incubated with the Ulp1 protease overnight at 4 °C to remove the SMT3-tag. The proteins were dialyzed into the lysis buffer and IF2 was separated from the SMT3-tag by passing through a reverse HisTrap column. IF2 was further purified by anion exchange on source Q (HR 16/10) and Superdex 200 16/60 (GE Healthcare) chromatography columns. Pure IF2 was concentrated to ~35 mg/ml, flash-frozen and stored at –80 °C.

The presence of nucleotide in purified IF2 was analyzed using a reverse-phase HPLC assay as described previously with minor modifications⁴². Briefly, 20 nmoles of purified IF2 or 3 nmoles of GTP or GDP (Millipore Sigma) in 70 µl of buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 140 mM KCl) was treated with 0.6 µl of 70% perchloric acid at 22 °C for 2 min to denature the protein. Then, the pH was adjusted by adding 4 µl of 3 M Na-acetate pH 5.1 and the mixture centrifuged to pellet the precipitated protein. The supernatant was diluted 1:1 with HPLC column buffer A (100 mM K-phosphate pH 6.5, 10 mM tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulphate) to 150 µl final volume. This sample was injected onto a PROTO 300 C4 HPLC column (10 × 250 mm) (Higgins Analytical) equilibrated in buffer A and eluted with a gradient of 0–50% buffer B containing 30% acetonitrile over 5 column volumes (Supplementary Fig. 2).

E. coli fMet-tRNA_i^fMet was purified using established procedures⁴³. Briefly, initiator tRNA_i^fMet was expressed overnight in E. coli HB101 under the constitutive lpp promoter, extracted from the cells using phenol-chloroform and precipitated in 100% ethanol. tRNA_i^fMet was purified by anion exchange source Q (HR 16/10) and reversed-phase chromatography PROTO 300 C4 HPLC (10 × 250 mm) (Higgins Analytical) columns. The deacylated tRNA_i^fMet was then aminoacylated with methionyl-tRNA synthetase, formylated with methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase, and finally purified by reversed-phase HPLC on the C4 column. The 24-mer mRNA, containing a Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the initiation codon in the P site, with the sequence 5’ GGC AAG GAG GUA AAA AUG UUC UAA 3’ (start codon in bold), was chemically synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA).

70 S ribosomes were purified from P. aeruginosa PAO1 as previously reported⁴⁴ with some modifications. Briefly, the cells were washed and lysed in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 10 mM MgCl₂, 100 mM NH₄Cl, 0.5 mM EDTA and 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol) using an Emulsiflex-C3 homogenizer (Avestin Inc.). The lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 18,000 rpm (36,000 × g) for 30 min at 4 °C and filter-sterilized through a 0.45 μm filter and stored at –80 °C. To isolate ribosomes, the lysate was layered on a 1.1 M sucrose cushion buffer (10 mM Hepes pH 7.6, 100 mM NH₄Cl, 14.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 mM EDTA, 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and spun at 43,000 rpm (214,000 × g) in a Type 45Ti rotor (Beckman) for 20 h at 4 °C. Ribosome pellets were resuspended in 10 mM Hepes pH 7.6, 100 mM NH₄Cl, 14.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 mM EDTA, 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol. Ribosomes were then purified through 10–50% sucrose density gradients in a SW32 rotor (Beckman) at 18,000 rpm (55,000 × g) at 4 °C for 19 h. The fractions containing 70 S ribosomes were collected, diluted to adjust Mg²⁺ concentration to 10 mM and concentrated by centrifugation at 43,000 rpm (214,000 × g) at 4 °C. Pure 70 S ribosomes were resuspended and brought to the final buffer 10 mM Hepes pH 7.6, 60 mM NH₄Cl, 15 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C.

Sample preparation, cryo-electron microscopy and data acquisition

Translation initiation complex was programmed using 2 μM P. aeruginosa 70 S ribosome, 25 μM mRNA, 10 μM fMet-tRNA_i^fMet and incubated in final 70 S buffer (10 mM Hepes 7.6, 60 mM NH₄Cl, 15 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol) at 37 °C for 15 min. The ternary complex was then incubated with 30 μM IF2 and 2 mM GDPCP (Millipore Sigma) at room temperature for 15 min. The mixture containing 2 μM P. aeruginosa 70S-IC (4 μl) was applied to Quantifoil R2/1 gold 200 mesh grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) which were pre-cleaned in a Solarus 950 plasma cleaner (Gatan). The grids were plunged-frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled ethane using a Leica EM GP2 cryo-plunger. Grids were transferred into a Titan Krios G3i electron microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific) operating at 300 keV and equipped with a GIF Quantum LS energy filter (Gatan) and a K3 direct electron detector camera (Gatan). The image stacks (movies) were acquired in super-resolution mode with pixel size of 0.425 Å/pixel. Data collection was done in the EPU software (ThermoFisher Scientific) setup to record movies with 31 fractions with a total accumulated dose of ~31 e^-/Å²/movie. A total of 8056 image stacks were collected with a defocus ranging between –0.2 and –2.1 µm. The statistics of data acquisition are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.

Cryo-EM data processing

Data processing was done in cryoSPARC 3.1.0⁴⁵. The image stacks were imported into cryoSPARC and gain-corrected. Image frames (fractions) were motion-corrected with dose-weighting and binned twice by Fourier cropping to the final pixel size of 0.85 Å/pixel. Patch contrast transfer function (CTF) estimation was performed on the motion-corrected micrographs. Based on relative ice thickness, CTF fit, and length and curvature of motion trajectories, 7259 micrographs were selected for further processing (Supplementary Fig. 3).

1,022,603 particles were picked using the circular “blob” picker in cryoSPARC and were filtered based on defocus adjusted power and pick scores to 878,576 particles. Particles were subjected to two rounds of reference-free two-dimensional (2D) classification. After discarding bad particles, 494,268 particles were selected from 2D classification and used to generate ab-initio volumes with five groups. Two of the five groups containing 417,757 particles generated maps resembling the 70 S ribosome. The remaining three groups did not yield anything meaningful and were considered to contain not specimen-related particles which were discarded from further processing. Using ‘heterogeneous refinement’ in cryoSPARC these particles were further classified into three ribosome class averages. 180,951 particles were non-rotated 70 S (class average I) and 219,664 particles were rotated 70 S (class average II), with both class averages containing IF2 and P-site fMet-tRNA_i^fMet. The third class average comprising 17,142 particles gave a low-resolution reconstruction of the 70 S ribosome without IF2 and was therefore discarded. Focused 3D variability analysis performed on class average I with a mask around IF2 and the uL11-stalk showed large variability in the conformation of IF2 spanning both extended and compact conformation. Further classification of the non-rotated 70 S class average I particles based on variability focused in this region allowed to remove 32,939 particles with extended IF2, yielding 148,013 particles containing compact IF2. The best density for compact IF2 was observed in two sets of particles (I-A and I-B) that differ in the position of compact IF2 relative to 70 S and the degree of 30 S rotation. Similar focused 3D variability analysis around extended IF2 and the uL11-stalk on rotated 70 S ribosomes in class average II showed conformational variability of the uL11-stalk, sampling the outward and inward position, and the particles were accordingly classified into structures II-A (outward) and II-B (inward). Particles from structures I-A, I-B, II-A, and II-B were re-extracted to full-size (512 × 512 pixel box) and non-uniform and CTF refinement in cryoSPARC yielded reconstructions with overall resolutions ranging between 2.6 – 2.9 Å (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b).

For structures I-A and I-B, local refinement with signal subtraction using a soft mask around IF2 was performed, improving the overall resolution of compact IF2 to 3.4 Å (I-A) and 3.6 Å (I-B) (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Several regions of compact IF2 in structure I-A extend to a resolution of ~3.0 Å (Supplementary Fig. 5c). To improve the local resolution of the N2 sub-domain in the extended IF2, local refinement was performed using a mask around the N2 sub-domain and neighboring ribosomal elements of the 30 S shoulder. The best resolution map at 2.8 Å was obtained from local refinement of particles from both class averages I and II (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 5d). To optimally visualize features of different regions with varying local resolution, maps were locally sharpened using PHENIX.auto_sharpen in PHENIX 1.19.2 (Supplementary Table 1)⁴⁶.

Model building and refinement

As a starting model, the 30 S and 50 S subunits were taken from the structure of the P. aeruginosa 70 S ribosome [PDB 6SPG⁴⁴] and rigid-body docked into the 2.7-Å cryo-EM map of structure II-A using UCSF Chimera 1.14⁴⁷. The fMet-tRNA_i^fMet in the p/PI state was taken from 3JCJ²¹, rigid-body fit into the EM density, and adjusted in Coot⁴⁸. The uL11-stalk region was adjusted and modeled into the density. The sequence of several ribosomal proteins and ribosomal RNA was revised according to the wild-type P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 and these regions were correspondingly remodeled. Model-to-map fit of each nucleotide in the 16 S, 23 S, and 5 S rRNAs was inspected visually and showed that several purines were modeled in the wrong syn conformation and were therefore remodeled into the anti conformation for a better fit into the EM density map. The high-resolution and quality of the EM map of structure II-A allowed building several Mg²⁺ ions and water molecules, as well as the Zn²⁺ ions in ribosomal proteins bL31 and bL36. Methylated nucleotides were modeled in the 16 S and 23 S rRNAs based on the E. coli high-resolution cryo-EM 70 S structure⁴⁹ and the corresponding conservation of RNA methyltransferases between E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Supplementary Table 2; Supplementary Fig. 14). Model of the P.ae 70 S ribosome was then rigid-body fit into the maps of structures I-A, I-B, and II-B by rotating the 30 S subunit by variable degrees and adjusting the uL11-stalk region into the density. In structures I-A and I-B, the initiator tRNA was rigid-body fit and adjusted in the p/P state.

For structures II-A and II-B, the initial model of extended P. aeruginosa IF2 was generated by homology modeling based on the ribosome-bound E. coli IF2 [PDB 3JCJ²¹] using MODELLER⁵⁰, rigid-body fit into the map, and then real-space refined in Coot. Complete models of 70 S, p/PI-tRNA, and extended IF2 with ordered solvent were real-space refined into EM maps of II-A and II-B for five cycles in PHENIX 1.19.2⁴⁶ including global energy minimization and group ADP refinement strategies along with base pair restraints for rRNA and initiator tRNA, together with Ramachandran and secondary structure restraints. The initial model for the N2 sub-domain residues 248–332 was generated using AlphaFold2³⁷, fit into the EM map and real-space refined in Coot and PHENIX. The model of the N2 sub-domain has real space correlation coefficient (RSCC) of 0.84 (Supplementary Fig. 5d; Supplementary Table 1), indicating excellent agreement with the density map⁵¹.

The 70 S ribosome structures I-A and I-B were real-space refined for five cycles in PHENIX as described above. Separately, maps generated from a combination of signal subtraction and local refinement were used to model compact IF2 from structures I-A and I-B. Individual domains of IF2 were rigid body fit and manually adjusted into the density. Domain linkers and regions of visible discrepancies were manually built in Coot guided by the sequence and density. The complete model of compact IF2 containing residues 337–835 was real-space refined in PHENIX (with energy minimization, ADP refinement together with Ramachandran and secondary structure restraints) into the respective EM density maps obtained after focused refinement. The final models of compact IF2-GDP have RSCC of 0.82 (I-A) and 0.75 (I-B) (Supplementary Fig. 5c; Supplementary Table 1), indicating good agreement with the EM maps⁵¹. The lower RSCC for IF2-GDP in structure I-B is attributed to domain II which fits poorly into the EM density map (Supplementary Fig. 5c), consistent with the observation that IF2-GDP loses ribosome interactions in structure I-B upon the 30 S subunit back-rotation. A composite map combining the EM maps obtained after focused refinement of compact IF2 and the 70 S ribosome was generated for structures I-A and I-B, into which the complete model of 70S-IC bound to compact IF2-GDP was real-space refined in PHENIX. Resulting models were validated using the comprehensive validation tool for cryo-EM in PHENIX (Supplementary Table 1)⁵¹.

The 30 S subunit rotation was calculated in PyMOL by aligning the 50 S subunit, excluding flexible regions (23 S rRNA residues 2090–2174 of the uL1-stalk, residues 1045–1099 of the uL11-stalk, and ribosomal proteins uL10 and uL11), of the four 70S-IC structures (I-A, I-B, II-A, II-B) with that of the non-rotated P. aeruginosa 70 S ribosome [PDB 6SPG⁴⁴] and the angle measured between phosphate atoms of C1478 located in helix h44 of 16 S rRNA (considered the center of rotation) and U81 located in the foot region of the small subunit. The solvent accessible area between IF2 and the ribosome was calculated in PyMOL using the refined IF2 structures (I-A, I-B, II-A) with generated hydrogen atoms in the absence and presence of the ribosomal components within a radius of 30 Å around IF2. The numbering of helices in IF2 is according to Roll-Mecak et al.⁵².

Global 3D variability analysis of the 70S-IC cryo-EM dataset

To visualize the conformational heterogeneity that is present within the 70S-IC in this cryo-EM dataset, we included all ribosome particles from class averages I and II and performed global 3D variability analysis in cryoSPARC 3.1.0⁴⁵. The major variability component showed the 30 S subunit rotation relative to the 50 S subunit, coupled with IF2 domain rearrangements and fMet-tRNA_i^fMet accommodation from the p/PI state to the p/P position. Particles were sorted into 20 clusters along this 3D conformational trajectory, and based on the extent of the 30 S rotation, clusters were ordered to reflect the transition from the rotated to the non-rotated 70S-IC. Clusters containing ribosomes with similar 30 S rotation were merged into distinct groups followed with non-uniform refinement⁵³, which yielded nine 70S-IC reconstructions with a global resolution ranging between 2.8 and 2.9 Å (Supplementary Fig. 15) (EM maps not provided). The reconstructions range from the ribosome with the most rotated 30 S subunit (~4.7°) containing extended IF2-GDPCP and fMet-tRNA_i^fMet bound in the p/PI state, followed by structures that appear to represent intermediate transitions with one or more elements in IF2 and/or initiator tRNA with scattered density, and ending with a ribosome that is essentially non-rotated (~0.3°) bound to compact IF2-GDP and a well-ordered fMet-tRNA_i^fMet accommodated into the P site. To visualize the conformational coupling that appears to exist between the ribosome, IF2 and initiator tRNA within the 70S-IC, the nine EM reconstructions were morphed together into a movie (Supplementary Movie 2).

Figure and movie generation

All figures showing atomic models were generated using PyMOL (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.1.0 Schrödinger, LLC) or UCSF Chimera 1.14⁴⁷ and assembled with Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Inc.). Movies were made in UCSF ChimeraX 1.2⁵⁴.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The atomic coordinates were deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession codes 7UNQ (compact IF2-GDP, I-A), 7UNR (70S-IF2-GDP composite, I-A), 7UNT (compact IF2-GDP, I-B), 7UNU (70S-IF2-GDP composite, I-B), 7UNV (70S-IF2-GDPCP, II-A), 7UNW (70S-IF2-GDPCP, II-B), and 7UIU (IF2 N2 sub-domain). The cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes EMD-26628 (70 S, I-A), EMD-26629 (compact IF2-GDP from focused refinement, I-A), EMD-26630 (70S-IF2-GDP composite, I-A), EMD-26631 (70 S, I-B), EMD-26632 (compact IF2-GDP from focused refinement, I-B), EMD-26633 (70S-IF2-GDP composite, I-B), EMD-26634 [(70S-IF2-GDPCP, II-A), EMD-26635 (70S-IF2-GDPCP, II-B), and EMD-26553 (IF2 N2 sub-domain from focused refinement). The unaligned multi-frame cryo-EM micrographs have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Public Image Archive (EMPIAR) with the accession code EMPIAR-11012.

References

Laursen, B. S., Sorensen, H. P., Mortensen, K. K. & Sperling-Petersen, H. U. Initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69, 101–123 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Allen, G. S., Zavialov, A., Gursky, R., Ehrenberg, M. & Frank, J. The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli. Cell 121, 703–712 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Simonetti, A. et al. Structure of the 30S translation initiation complex. Nature 455, 416–420 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Simonetti, A. et al. A structural view of translation initiation in bacteria. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 66, 423–436 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gualerzi, C. O. & Pon, C. L. Initiation of mRNA translation in bacteria: structural and dynamic aspects. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 72, 4341–4367 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Julian, P. et al. The Cryo-EM structure of a complete 30S translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001095 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Caban, K., Pavlov, M., Ehrenberg, M. & Gonzalez, R. L. Jr. A conformational switch in initiation factor 2 controls the fidelity of translation initiation in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 8, 1475 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Marshall, R. A., Aitken, C. E. & Puglisi, J. D. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 guides progression of the ribosome into elongation. Mol. Cell 35, 37–47 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Myasnikov, A. G. et al. Conformational transition of initiation factor 2 from the GTP- to GDP-bound state visualized on the ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 1145–1149 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaledhonkar, S. et al. Late steps in bacterial translation initiation visualized using time-resolved cryo-EM. Nature 570, 400–404 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Antoun, A., Pavlov, M. Y., Andersson, K., Tenson, T. & Ehrenberg, M. The roles of initiation factor 2 and guanosine triphosphate in initiation of protein synthesis. EMBO. J. 22, 5593–5601 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goyal, A., Belardinelli, R., Maracci, C., Milon, P. & Rodnina, M. V. Directional transition from initiation to elongation in bacterial translation. Nucl. Acids Res. 43, 10700–10712 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tomsic, J., Caserta, E., Pon, C. L. & Gualerzi, C. O. Weakening the IF2-fMet-tRNA interaction suppresses the lethal phenotype caused by GTPase inactivation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 13238 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ling, C. & Ermolenko, D. N. Initiation factor 2 stabilizes the ribosome in a semirotated conformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15874–15879 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Grigoriadou, C., Marzi, S., Kirillov, S., Gualerzi, C. O. & Cooperman, B. S. A quantitative kinetic scheme for 70 S translation initiation complex formation. J. Mol. Biol. 373, 562–572 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tomsic, J. et al. Late events of translation initiation in bacteria: A kinetic analysis. EMBO J. 19, 2127–2136 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rasmussen, L. C. et al. Solution structure of C-terminal Escherichia coli translation initiation factor IF2 by small-angle X-ray scattering. Biochemistry 47, 5590–5598 (2008).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Vohlander Rasmussen, L. C., Oliveira, C. L., Pedersen, J. S., Sperling-Petersen, H. U. & Mortensen, K. K. Structural transitions of translation initiation factor IF2 upon GDPNP and GDP binding in solution. Biochemistry 50, 9779–9787 (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Eiler, D., Lin, J., Simonetti, A., Klaholz, B. P. & Steitz, T. A. Initiation factor 2 crystal structure reveals a different domain organization from eukaryotic initiation factor 5B and mechanism among translational GTPases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15662–15667 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Wienk, H. et al. Structural dynamics of bacterial translation initiation factor IF2. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 10922–10932 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sprink, T. et al. Structures of ribosome-bound initiation factor 2 reveal the mechanism of subunit association. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501502 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Simonetti, A. et al. Involvement of protein IF2 N domain in ribosomal subunit joining revealed from architecture and function of the full-length initiation factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15656–15661 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Hussain, T., Llacer, J. L., Wimberly, B. T., Kieft, J. S. & Ramakrishnan, V. Large-scale movements of IF3 and tRNA during bacterial translation initiation. Cell 167, 133–144 e13 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
von Loeffelholz, O. et al. Focused classification and refinement in high-resolution cryo-EM structural analysis of ribosome complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 46, 140–148 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Serna, M. Hands on methods for high resolution cryo-electron microscopy structures of heterogeneous macromolecular complexes. Front. Mol. Biosci. 6, 33 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3D variability analysis: Resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107702 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sahu, B., Khade, P. K. & Joseph, S. Highly conserved base A55 of 16S ribosomal RNA is important for the elongation cycle of protein synthesis. Biochemistry 52, 6695–6701 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Loveland, A. B., Demo, G. & Korostelev, A. A. Cryo-EM of elongating ribosome with EF-Tu*GTP elucidates tRNA proofreading. Nature 584, 640–645 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Carbone, C. E. et al. Time-resolved cryo-EM visualizes ribosomal translocation with EF-G and GTP. Nat. Commun. 12, 7236 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Ge, X., Mandava, C. S., Lind, C., Aqvist, J. & Sanyal, S. Complementary charge-based interaction between the ribosomal-stalk protein L7/12 and IF2 is the key to rapid subunit association. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4649–4654 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Carlson, M. A. et al. Ribosomal protein L7/L12 is required for GTPase translation factors EF-G, RF3, and IF2 to bind in their GTP state to 70S ribosomes. FEBS J. 284, 1631–1643 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qin, H., Grigoriadou, C. & Cooperman, B. S. Interaction of IF2 with the ribosomal GTPase-associated center during 70S initiation complex formation. Biochemistry 48, 4699–4706 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marzi, S. et al. Ribosomal localization of translation initiation factor IF2. RNA 9, 958–969 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Caserta, E. et al. Translation initiation factor IF2 interacts with the 30 S ribosomal subunit via two separate binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 362, 787–799 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Laursen, B. S., Kjaergaard, A. C., Mortensen, K. K., Hoffman, D. W. & Sperling-Petersen, H. U. The N-terminal domain (IF2N) of bacterial translation initiation factor IF2 is connected to the conserved C-terminal domains by a flexible linker. Protein Sci. 13, 230–239 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moreno, J. M., Drskjotersen, L., Kristensen, J. E., Mortensen, K. K. & Sperling-Petersen, H. U. Characterization of the domains of E. coli initiation factor IF2 responsible for recognition of the ribosome. FEBS Lett. 455, 130–134 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Laursen, B. S., Mortensen, K. K., Sperling-Petersen, H. U. & Hoffman, D. W. A conserved structural motif at the N terminus of bacterial translation initiation factor IF2. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 16320–16328 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Simonetti, A. et al. Structure of the protein core of translation initiation factor 2 in apo, GTP-bound and GDP-bound forms. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 925–933 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsai, A. et al. Heterogeneous pathways and timing of factor departure during translation initiation. Nature 487, 390–393 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Dashti, A. et al. Trajectories of the ribosome as a Brownian nanomachine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17492–17497 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Koutmou, K. S., McDonald, M. E., Brunelle, J. L. & Green, R. RF3:GTP promotes rapid dissociation of the class 1 termination factor. RNA 20, 609–620 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Junemann, R. et al. In vivo deuteration of transfer RNAs: Overexpression and large-scale purification of deuterated specific tRNAs. Nucl. Acids Res. 24, 907–913 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Halfon, Y. et al. Structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ribosomes from an aminoglycoside-resistant clinical isolate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22275–22281 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: Algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: Recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Watson, Z. L. et al. Structure of the bacterial ribosome at 2 A resolution. Elife 9, e60482 (2020).
Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 54, 5 6 1–5 6 37 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 74, 814–840 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roll-Mecak, A., Cao, C., Dever, T. E. & Burley, S. K. X-Ray structures of the universal translation initiation factor IF2/eIF5B: conformational changes on GDP and GTP binding. Cell 103, 781–792 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Gagnon laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript and suggestions. We are thankful to A. Miller for providing genomic DNA of the bacterium P. aeruginosa; J. Miller and P. Leiman for their assistance with culturing and cell lysis of P. aeruginosa PAO1; the Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics of The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston for providing critical infrastructure and expertise; K.-Y. Wong and J. Perkyns for computational support, N. Prokhorov for help and advice with the RELION 3 software package, and Y. Polikanov for sharing his custom-made Python scripts. This work was supported by NIH grant R01GM136936 (to M.G.G.), The Welch Foundation grant H-2032-20200401 (to M.G.G.), startup funds from The University of Texas Medical Branch (to M.G.G.), Rising Science and Technology Acquisition and Retention Program award from the University of Texas system (to M.G.G.), Pilot Grant from the Institute for Human Infections and Immunity at The University of Texas Medical Branch (to M.G.G.), and NIH grant P41GM103311 (to the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco) for developing UCSF Chimera.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
Ritwika S. Basu & Matthieu G. Gagnon
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
Michael B. Sherman & Matthieu G. Gagnon
Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
Michael B. Sherman & Matthieu G. Gagnon
Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
Matthieu G. Gagnon

Authors

Ritwika S. Basu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael B. Sherman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Matthieu G. Gagnon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.S.B. and M.G.G. designed the project. R.S.B. performed experiments. R.S.B. and M.B.S. prepared the sample for cryo-EM. M.B.S. collected the cryo-EM data. R.S.B. and M.G.G. processed the cryo-EM data. R.S.B. and M.G.G. built the models and made the figures. R.S.B. and M.G.G. wrote the paper with contributions from M.B.S. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu G. Gagnon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Niels Fischer, Claudio Gualerzi, Bruno Klaholz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basu, R.S., Sherman, M.B. & Gagnon, M.G. Compact IF2 allows initiator tRNA accommodation into the P site and gates the ribosome to elongation. Nat Commun 13, 3388 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31129-2

Download citation

Received: 27 December 2021
Accepted: 02 June 2022
Published: 13 June 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31129-2

This article is cited by

A new family of bacterial ribosome hibernation factors
- Karla Helena-Bueno
- Mariia Yu. Rybak
- Sergey V. Melnikov
Nature (2024)
Structures of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu–isoleucine tRNA elucidate the mechanism of AUG avoidance
- Mariia Yu. Rybak
- Matthieu G. Gagnon
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2024)
Antibiotic thermorubin tethers ribosomal subunits and impedes A-site interactions to perturb protein synthesis in bacteria
- Narayan Prasad Parajuli
- Andrew Emmerich
- Suparna Sanyal
Nature Communications (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.