Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20664-5, published online 18 January 2021.

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 7. In Fig. 7a panels “alphaDll1” and “IMD” were inadvertently duplicated. The correct version of Fig. 7a is shown below.

The incorrect version of Fig. 7a is shown below.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the legend of Fig. 7. The sentence “The alone doxorubicin group was used for both the experiments in Fig. 7a–b and 8 d, e (n = 6 Dox, n = 4 αDll1 ab+Dox, n = 4 αDll1 ab+IMD, n = 6 αDll1 ab+Dox+IMD tumors)” was replaced with “The alone doxorubicin and αDll1+Dox groups were used for both the experiments in Fig. 6a–b and 7d,e (n = 6 Dox, n = 4 αDll1 ab+Dox, n = 4 αDll1 ab+IMD, n = 6 αDll1 ab+Dox+IMD tumors)”.

In the original source data file of Fig. 7b, the value for cell 4f contained a wrong number.

These errors been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article and the source data has been replaced.