Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Serotonin and dopamine modulate aging in response to food odor and availability

Abstract

An organism’s ability to perceive and respond to changes in its environment is crucial for its health and survival. Here we reveal how the most well-studied longevity intervention, dietary restriction, acts in-part through a cell non-autonomous signaling pathway that is inhibited by the presence of attractive smells. Using an intestinal reporter for a key gene induced by dietary restriction but suppressed by attractive smells, we identify three compounds that block food odor effects in C. elegans, thereby increasing longevity as dietary restriction mimetics. These compounds clearly implicate serotonin and dopamine in limiting lifespan in response to food odor. We further identify a chemosensory neuron that likely perceives food odor, an enteric neuron that signals through the serotonin receptor 5-HT1A/SER-4, and a dopaminergic neuron that signals through the dopamine receptor DRD2/DOP-3. Aspects of this pathway are conserved in D. melanogaster. Thus, blocking food odor signaling through antagonism of serotonin or dopamine receptors is a plausible approach to mimic the benefits of dietary restriction.

Introduction

Rapid advances in aging research have identified several conserved signaling pathways that influence aging in organisms across taxa1. Recent work shows that many of these “longevity pathways” act through cell non-autonomous signaling mechanisms2,3. These pathways utilize sensory cells—frequently neurons—to signal to peripheral tissues and promote survival during the presence of external stress. Importantly, this neuronal activation of stress response pathways, through either genetic modification or exposure to environmental stress, is often sufficient to improve health and longevity. Despite mounting evidence that neuronal signaling can influence multiple longevity pathways, less is known about the cells and molecules that propagate these signals.

Biogenic amines are among the most well-studied and conserved neuronal signaling molecules4,5. Specifically, serotonin and dopamine play well-defined roles in behavior and physiology. However, their role in aging is less well understood. Several recent studies implicate serotonin as an important signal in multiple C. elegans longevity pathways including the response to heat shock6, hypoxia7 and dietary restriction (DR)8,9. tph-1 (WormBase, ZK1290.2), the rate-limiting enzyme for serotonin synthesis, is involved in food abundance sensing and regulates food deprivation-mediated longevity through both the ADF and NSM neurons8. Perception of food smell dampens the longevity benefit of DR10,11,12. A recent report also shows that tph-1 knockout mutants do not respond to the food smell suppression of DR-mediated longevity, and ADF neuron activity is involved in response to food smell9. Dopaminergic signaling is associated with physical activity in humans and loss of this signaling decreases lifespan in mice13 and blocks lifespan extension in nematodes14. Serotonin and dopamine levels both decrease with age across species15,16, consistent with these signaling pathways promoting healthy aging. A pharmacological screen for extending C. elegans lifespan has identified that compounds modulating serotonin and dopamine signaling promote longevity17. Despite rigorous study and clinical use of drugs that modify serotonin and dopamine signaling, our understanding of their complex actions and potential interaction is far from complete.

Dietary restriction (DR) is the most well-studied and consistent intervention known to improve health and longevity in organisms ranging from single-celled yeast to primates18. DR leads to improved cell survival and stress resistance, complex intracellular signaling events, metabolic changes, and increased activity in multiple organisms. Nematode flavin-containing monooxygenase-2 (encoded by fmo-2, WormBase, K08C7.5) is necessary and sufficient to increase health and longevity downstream of DR7. FMOs are highly conserved proteins that are also induced in multiple mammalian models with increased lifespan, including DR19,20. Having previously identified a role for fmo-2 in aging, we wondered whether DR cell non-autonomously regulates fmo-2 induction and whether perception of food through biogenic amines could be involved in the subsequent signaling pathway.

In this work, we use fmo-2 induction to interrogate the cell non-autonomous DR signaling pathway and how it is affected by food odor. We find that DR induces fmo-2 cell non-autonomously to increase longevity through a pathway that involves decreased serotonin signaling from NSM serotonergic neurons and decreased dopamine signaling from dopaminergic neurons. This process is abrogated by food odor sensed by AWC chemosensory neurons and can be mimicked through small molecules that antagonize biogenic amine signaling. Lastly, we find that some of these processes are conserved in fruit flies, suggesting that blocking the perception of food is a plausible approach to mimicking DR.

Results

Attractant food odor represses fmo-2 to limit longevity

We developed an integrated single-copy mCherry reporter driven by the fmo-2 promoter to measure fmo-2 induction. The reporter is primarily expressed in the intestine and responds to stimuli previously reported to induce fmo-2, including DR. As an intestinal protein21, we expected that fmo-2 would likely be induced cell autonomously by the change in nutrient intake under DR. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether the perception of food smell by worms in the absence of eating can abrogate the induction of fmo-2. Using a “sandwich plate” assay as described in Fig. 1a, we were surprised to find a significant reduction in fmo-2 induction when worms could smell but not eat food (Fig. 1b, c, C. elegans strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 1). This reduction is consistent with a model in which increased fmo-2 mediates the increase in longevity from DR, as food smell significantly abrogates lifespan extension by DR, (Fig. 1d, all lifespan replicates in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 2) similar to previous findings9,10,11,12. We also find that live bacteria are required to abrogate fmo-2 induction, as the presence of bacteria killed with 0.5% paraformaldehyde22 does not prevent DR from inducing fmo-2 expression (Supplementary Fig. S1a, b). Since intestinal cells are not known to perceive external environmental cues such as smell, these results suggest that fmo-2 expression is suppressed when live food is present through cell non-autonomous signaling.

Fig. 1: Attractive food smell blocks dietary restriction-mediated fmo-2 induction and longevity.
figure 1

Diagram of “smell plates” (a). Images (b) and quantification (c) of individual fmo-2p::mCherry worms on fed (pink), DR (blue) and DR + food smell (OP50) (purple). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 12 (fed), 13 (DR), 10 (DR + food smell) biologically independent animals. p-value = 2.95e-09 (DR vs. fed), 2.14e-06 (DR + food smell vs. fed). Survival curves (d) of N2 (WT) animals fed (pink) or DR (blue) under normal conditions (solid lines) or subjected to the smell of bacteria (dotted line). Images (e) and quantification (f) of individual fmo-2p::mCherry worms on DR plates exposed to food smell (HB101) (pink) or attractive (2-butanone in blue), neutral (ethyl acetate in purple), or repellant (1-nonanol in orange) odorants. Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 28 (DR), 23 (DR + food smell), 22 (DR + 2-butanone), 25 (DR + ethyl acetate), 22 (DR + 1-nonanol) biologically independent animals. p-value = 0.000374 (DR vs. DR + food smell), 1.12e-05 (DR vs. DR + 2-butanone), 0.442 (DR vs. DR + ethyl acetate), 0.9993 (DR vs. DR + 1-nonanone). g Summary of the effects of 26 odorants on fmo-2 induction during DR. Survival curves (h) of N2 (WT) animals fed (pink) or DR (blue) under normal conditions (solid lines) or subjected to attractive odorants (dotted line). ***P < .001, ****P < .0001 when compared to fed (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). The box plots display the median by the middle line of the box. The upper boundary of the box indicates the 75% interquartile range, and the lower boundary indicates the 25% interquartile range.

We next wondered what types of odorants worms sense in this pathway. Bacteria secrete hundreds of volatile compounds that are classified in three categories based on how they promote chemotaxis: attractants, repellants, and neutral compounds23,24,25. We tested whether exposure to any volatile compound secreted from bacteria is sufficient to block the lifespan-promoting effects of DR or whether compounds identified as attractants and repellants oppositely regulate fmo-2 induction. Using compounds derived from studies of the E. coli strain HB101 in a range of concentrations (Supplementary Data 3), we find that attractants are more likely to suppress DR-mediated induction of fmo-2 (Fig. 1e, f) whereas some neutral and repellant compounds can induce fmo-2 under fed conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1c–h). We also find that many attractive compounds suppress fmo-2 expression, consistent with the hypothesis that this pathway is not acting through a single receptor (Fig. 1g, all results in Supplementary Fig. 2a–z). These results support a model in which perception of attractive odorants secreted by E. coli abrogates the induction of the pro-longevity gene fmo-2. To test whether these odors also affect longevity, we exposed worms to one odorant from each category and measured lifespans +/− DR. Our results show that the attractant shortened DR lifespan only, recapitulating the effect of food smell on DR mediated lifespan; the neutral odorant did not affect lifespans of fed or DR worms; while the repellant shortened fed and DR lifespans (Fig. 1h, Supplementary Fig. 1i–j). This is consistent with attractive smells preventing the lifespan-promoting effects of DR, possibly through a neural response to external stimuli that leads to physiological changes in peripheral tissues.

Serotonin and dopamine antagonists induce fmo-2 to mimic DR longevity

Biogenic amines can regulate pro-longevity pathways and are involved in behavioral changes in response to food6,7,26,27,28. Some biogenic amines have previously been reported to regulate DR mediated longevity8,9,17,29. We next asked whether neurotransmitters are involved in the fmo-2-mediated food odor pathway. Using a targeted approach focusing on neurotransmitters and their antagonists, we tested for compounds sufficient to prevent the abrogation of fmo-2 induction in the presence of food smell (Supplementary Fig. 3a–d). The biogenic amine neurotransmitter antagonists mianserin (for serotonin) and thioridazine and trifluoperazine (for dopamine) consistently and significantly restore fmo-2 induction to DR levels in the presence of food smell (Fig. 2a–c, Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). Mianserin is a tetracyclic serotonin antagonist that is thought to competitively bind to serotonergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)30 while thioridazine and trifluoperazine’s mechanism of action involves blocking dopamine receptors31. Importantly, while each compound induces fmo-2 to a different extent (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 3g, i), when combined with DR, no antagonist further induced fmo-2, suggesting they act in the same pathway (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Fig. 3h). Diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI), an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase, which we identified in an unpublished screen to robustly induce fmo-2 additively with DR, acts as a positive control, and further induces fmo-2 when combined with DR (Fig. 2e). Because thioridazine and trifluoperazine act through similar mechanisms and the effects of thioridazine were more consistent in our studies, we focused further experiments on dopamine antagonism through thioridazine. Together, these results support antagonism of serotonin or dopamine as partial mimetics of DR in their induction of fmo-2.

Fig. 2: Serotonin and dopamine antagonists induce fmo-2 and extend lifespan.
figure 2

Images (a) and quantification of fmo-2p::mCherry given 100 µM of mianserin (b) or thioridazine (c) (blue) in combination with DR and food smell (pink) compared to DR alone (purple). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 16 (fed), 14 (fed + mianserin), 11 (DR), 16 (DR + food smell), 13 (DR + food smell + mianserin), 11 (fed + thioridazine), 10 (DR + food smell + thioridazine) biologically independent animals. p-value = 3.45e-09 (fed vs. fed + mianserin), 9.77e-10 (DR vs. DR + food smell), 3.34e-10 (DR + food smell vs. DR + food smell + mianserin), 0.0533 (DR vs. DR + food smell + mianserin), 6.42e-12 (fed vs. fed + thioridazine), 2.01e-06 (DR + food smell vs. DR + food smell + thioridazine), 0.0515 (DR vs. DR + food smell + thioridazine). Quantification of Fed, DR, and DR + food smell in b and c are identical as data in b and c were acquired concurrently. Quantification (d) of fmo-2p::mCherry exposed to water (pink), DR (blue), 100 µM mianserin (purple), thioridazine (orange), or trifluoperazine (yellow). n = 18 (fed), 22 (DR), 17 (fed + mianserin), 24 (fed + thioridazine), 24 (fed + trifluoperazine) biologically independent animals. p-value = 1.82e-19 (fed vs. DR), 2.29e-13 (fed vs. fed mianserin), 0.000345 (fed vs. fed thioridazine), 1.73e-10 (fed vs. fed trifluoperazine). Quantification (e) of fmo-2p::mCherry exposed to water (pink) or DR (blue) in combination with 500 µM DPI (purple), 100 µM mianserin (orange), 100 µM thioridazine (yellow), or 100 µM trifluoperazine (dark purple). n = 8 (fed), 15 (DR), 13 (DR + DPI), 13 (DR + mianserin), 14 (DR + thioridazine), 9 (DR + trifluoperazine) biologically independent animals. p-value = 1.69e-06 (DR vs. DR + DPI), 0.0955 (DR vs. DR + mianserin), 0.633 (DR vs. DR + thioridazine), 0.136 (DR vs. DR + trifluoperazine). Survival curves (f) of N2 (WT) animals treated with 0 μM (water; pink), 10 µM (blue), 25 µM (purple), 50 µM (orange), or 100 µM (yellow) mianserin. Survival curves (g) of WT animals treated with 0 μM (water; pink), 10 µM (blue), 25 µM (purple), 50 µM (orange), or 100 µM (yellow) thioridazine. Survival curves (h) of WT animals (pink) and fmo-2 KO animals (blue) on water (solid lines) or 50 µM mianserin (dotted lines). Survival curves (i) of WT animals (pink) and fmo-2 KO animals (blue) on water (solid lines) or 25 µM thioridazine (dotted lines). ***P < .001, ****P < .0001 when compared to fed (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). ####P < .0001 when compared to DR or DR + food smell (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). The box plots display the median by the middle line of the box. The upper boundary of the box indicates the 75% interquartile range, and the lower boundary indicates the 25% interquartile range.

To validate that the induction of fmo-2 through biogenic amine antagonism is beneficial for longevity, we next asked whether these compounds extend lifespan. We find that both mianserin and thioridazine extend lifespan on agar plates in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2f–g). Previous studies report that mianserin also extends lifespan in liquid culture29, but were not replicated on solid agar plates32. We also confirmed that fmo-2 is induced at 25 µM mianserin or 25 µM thioridazine (Supplementary Fig. 3j–k). Since we identified mianserin and thioridazine through their induction of fmo-2, and previously found that fmo-2 is necessary for DR-mediated lifespan extension, we next asked whether fmo-2 was necessary for the beneficial longevity effects of mianserin or thioridazine. Our results show that the fmo-2 loss of function completely blocks the lifespan effect of mianserin (Fig. 2h) and thioridazine (Fig. 2i). Importantly, we also see that mianserin treatment combined with DR does not further extend lifespan (Supplementary Fig. 3l). These results are consistent with these compounds mimicking some aspects of DR-signaling, recapitulating part of the DR lifespan extension effect. Collectively, this supports a model where DR induces fmo-2 because of decreased biogenic amine signaling and establishes neuromodulators as a useful tool to decipher where in the signaling pathway a cell, signal, or receptor plays a role in DR-mediated longevity.

Odor sensing AWC neurons modulate food smell response

Our initial results establish that antagonizing serotonin and dopamine signaling leads to induction of the longevity promoting fmo-2 gene and rescue of the negative effects of food smell. Based on this, we hypothesized that the relative lack of food smell during DR leads to increased longevity through induction of intestinal fmo-2. Using this framework, we next sought to better understand how the sensing of bacteria (or lack thereof) is communicated to intestinal cells during DR. Our initial results, knocking down unc-13, a gene required for both synaptic vesicle33 and dense core vesicle exocytosis34, support short-range neurotransmitters and/or long-range neuropeptides as necessary for fmo-2 induction (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b).

In C. elegans, perception of the external environment is largely regulated by a specialized organ known as the amphid. A previous report using a solid-liquid DR approach suggested a pathway originating in the ASI amphid neurons35. DAF-7/TGFβ produced by the ASI neurons modulates DR longevity8,36,37. We first asked whether these cells are required to modulate fmo-2 activity during DR. We find that loss of daf-3 (WormBase, F25E2.5) or daf-7 (WormBase, B0412.2), each necessary for chemoreceptor signaling in the ASI neurons, did not affect the food odor-mediated reduction in fmo-2 expression (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). Similarly, proper formation of the amphid (daf-6, WormBase, F31F6.5) is also not required (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). However, it is reported that daf-6 mutants can still respond to volatile odorants23. Three sensory neuron pairs, the AWA/B/C, do not possess the ciliated projections lacking in the daf-6 mutant23. To test the necessity of these sensory neurons, we created individual genetic ablation strains by expressing the pro-apoptotic caspase-3 gene (NCBI Gene, 836) under promoters of genes specifically expressed in AWA, AWB, or AWC neurons and crossed them into our fmo-2p::mCherry reporter. We find that loss of AWC neurons prevents fmo-2 suppression in the presence of food smell during DR (Fig. 3a, b) while AWA and AWB knockouts still respond to food odor (Supplementary Fig. 4g–j). This result is consistent with AWC neurons perceiving food odor and with the known role of the AWA/B/C neurons in perception of external stimuli23,38,39.

Fig. 3: Food signals requires the AWC, NSM, and CEP neurons.
figure 3

Images (a) and quantification (b) of fmo-2p::mCherry in a WT (control) and AWC genetic ablation background on fed (pink), DR (blue), or DR exposed to food smell (purple). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 36 (WT fed), 40 (WT DR), 28 (WT DR + food smell), 41 (AWC(-) fed), 40 (AWC(-) DR), 38 (AWC(-) DR + food smell) biologically independent animals. p-value = 0.0203 (WT DR vs. WT DR + food smell), 0.926 (AWC(-) DR vs AWC(-) DR + food smell). Survival curves (c) of WT animals (black) and tph-1 KO animals on fed (pink) and DR (purple) conditions exposed to food smell (dotted lines). Images (d) and quantification (e) of fmo-2p::mCherry exposed to tph-1 RNAi on fed (blue) or DR (pink). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 12 (vector fed), 9 (vector DR), 10 (tph-1 fed), 11 (tph-1 DR) biologically independent animals. p-value = 5.87e-10 (vector fed vs. vector DR), 0.108 (vector fed vs. tph-1 fed), 0.221 (vector fed vs. tph-1 DR). Survival curves (f) comparing control (black), tph-1 KO (pink), and tph-1 NSM-specific rescue (purple) animals on fed (solid line) and DR (dotted lines). Control (black) survival curve is also displayed in Supplementary Fig. 5F. Data in f and Supplementary Fig. 5f were acquired concurrently. Images (g) and quantification (h) of fmo-2p::mCherry in a WT (control) and del-3 KO background on fed (blue) and DR (pink) exposed to food smell (purple and orange, respectively). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 11 (WT fed), 13 (WT fed + food smell), 13 (WT DR), 15 (WT DR + food smell), 10 (del-3 fed), 12 (del-3 fed + food smell), 14 (del-3 DR), 11 (del-3 DR + food smell) biologically independent animals. p-value = 1.32e-06 (WT DR vs. WT DR + food smell), 0.212 (del-3 DR vs. del-3 DR + food smell). Survival curves of conditions comparing WT (black) to del-3 (i) on fed (pink) and DR (purple) conditions in combination with food smell (dotted lines). WT control (black) survival curve is also displayed in Supplementary Fig. 6a. Data in i and Supplementary Fig. 6a were acquired concurrently. Images (j) and quantification (k) of fmo-2p::mCherry in a WT, cat-2 KO, or cat-2 KO with cat-2 CEP neuron rescue on DR (pink) and DR + food smell (purple). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 25 (WT DR), 14 (WT DR + food smell), 8 (cat-2(-) DR), 16 (cat-2(-) DR + food smell), 43 (cat-2(-) + CEP rescue DR), 19 (cat-2(-) + CEP rescue DR + food smell) biologically independent animals. p-value = 0.0103 (WT DR vs. WT DR + food smell), 0.0922 (cat-2 (-) DR vs. cat-2 (-) DR + food smell), 0.000114 (cat-2 (-) + CEP rescue DR vs. cat-2 (-) + CEP rescue DR + food smell). *P < .05, ***P < .001 and ****P < .0001 (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). The box plots display the median by the middle line of the box. The upper boundary of the box indicates the 75% interquartile range, and the lower boundary indicates the 25% interquartile range.

DR signaling acts through a pair of enteric neurons

Previous studies report that serotonin regulates DR and mianserin mediated longevity in liquid culture17,29. To further map this pathway that involves the serotonin antagonist mianserin, we first verified that the biogenic amine serotonin is involved in the DR-mediated longevity pathway. We subjected animals lacking tph-1, the rate-limiting enzyme necessary to produce serotonin, to DR and mianserin. tph-1 animals are long-lived compared to wild-type40 and are not further extended by our DR protocol (Fig. 3c) or mianserin treatment (Supplementary Fig. 5a). These data are supported by the abatement of fmo-2 induction on DR (Fig. 3d, e) and mianserin (Supplementary Fig. 5b, c) when animals are subjected to tph-1 (RNAi). As post-mitotic animals, C. elegans have a finite number of neurons with discrete connectivity and functions. Three neuronal pairs normally express tph-141. The hermaphrodite specific motor neurons (HSN) are located along the ventral tail and regulate egg-laying42 whereas two head neuron pairs, the amphid neurons with dual sensory endings (ADF) and the neurosecretory motor (NSM) neurons, are involved in modifying behavioral states26,43,44. ADF and NSM neurons are also reported to regulate food abundance sensing and food deprivation-mediated longevity8,9. To investigate the role of these neuron pairs, we utilized tph-1 cell-specific knockouts and found that NSM (Supplementary Fig. 5e) but not ADF (Supplementary Fig. 5d) neurons are necessary for DR-mediated longevity. Cell-specific rescue of tph-1 in a tph-1 knockout animal suggests that tph-1 expression in NSM (Fig. 3f), but not ADF (Supplementary Fig. 5f) neurons, is sufficient to promote DR-mediated longevity. Moreover, we find rescuing tph-1 expression in NSM neurons recapitulates lifespan suppression under food smell (Supplementary Fig. 5h) and blunts its effects when knocked out in the NSM neurons (Supplementary Fig. 5j). However, tph-1 rescue in ADF neurons does not rescue lifespan suppression by food smell under DR (Supplementary Fig. 5g) but slightly blunts food smell effects when knocked out in ADF (Supplementary Fig. 5i). These results suggest that NSM neurons are the primary serotonergic neurons in modulating fmo-2 induction and longevity in DR +/− food odor, while ADF neurons may play a smaller role in this pathway as well.

A recent study posits that NSM neurons function similar to enteric neurons with neural projections that directly communicate with the pharynx through a pair of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), DEL-3 (WormBase, F26A3.6) and DEL-7 (WormBase, C46A5.2). Signaling through these channels informs the worm to slow locomotion upon contact with food43. These data led us to wonder whether the longevity effects of DR also require the ASICs to extend lifespan. We find that del-7 mutants look phenotypically wild type in their induction of fmo-2 and lifespan extension, in either DR or DR + food smell (Supplementary Fig. 6a–c). Interestingly, del-3 mutant worms show abrogated induction of fmo-2 under DR and did not diminish fmo-2 induction in response to the smell of food (Fig. 3g–h). These del-3 mutant animals still exhibit lifespan extension under DR, despite the decreased induction of fmo-2, which is not abrogated by the smell of food (Fig. 3i). Together, these data support a model whereby the enteric NSM neurons release serotonin in response to food odor and the lack of this release extends longevity. In addition, the ASIC DEL-3 plays a role in the NSM to both behaviorally43 and physiologically respond to food odor and other food signals.

Dopaminergic CEP neurons are likely involved in odor signaling

Dopamine synthesis is limited to three neuronal pairs (CEP, ADE, and PDE) in hermaphodites45. All three dopaminergic neurons are required for slow movement when encountering a bacteria lawn46. To test which dopaminergic neurons respond to food odor, we expressed cat-2 (WormBase, B0432.5) in CEP, ADE or PDE neurons in the cat-2 KO strain lacking dopamine production. We find that dopamine synthesis is required for fmo-2 induction to be suppressed by food odor under DR (Fig. 3j–k) and that rescuing dopamine production using a promotor expressed in CEP neurons and some additional cells47 restores the suppression of fmo-2 induction by food odor (Fig. 3j–k). However, cat-2 rescue in ADE or PDE neurons does not consistently restore the food odor blunting of fmo-2 induction (Supplementary Fig. 6d–g). These results suggest dopamine produced from CEP neurons is most likely necessary for food odor response.

Mianserin mimics DR in fmo-2-mediated longevity by antagonizing SER-4

Prior reports suggest that serotonin receptor orthologs ser-1 (WormBase, F59C12.2) and ser-4 (WormBase, Y22D7AR.13) are necessary for the lifespan benefits of mianserin in C. elegans48. We hypothesized that a subset of the serotonin receptor orthologs will also be necessary for mianserin and DR-mediated fmo-2 induction. After two generations of RNAi treatment, ser-1 and ser-4 were the only two receptors that were necessary for fmo-2 induction on mianserin (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 7a–c) whereas ser-4 knockdown most robustly abrogated DR-mediated fmo-2 induction (Supplementary Fig. 7d, e). Further, we find that ser-4 RNAi slightly but significantly increases fed lifespan and prevents DR from extending lifespan (Fig. 4b), supporting the hypothesis that mianserin acts as a DR mimetic by antagonizing serotonin signaling that occurs during feeding. We confirmed these knockdown results and find that ser-4 knockout animals do not respond to the suppression of DR-mediated fmo-2 induction by food smell (Fig. 4e, f). Next, to investigate whether this effect is mediated by neuronal signaling or intestinal expression, we rescued ser-4 in ser-4 knockout animals with tissue-specific promoters and found that only neuronal unc-119p::ser-4 is sufficient to rescue full induction of fmo-2 under DR (Fig. 4c, d). This is consistent with serotonergic signaling within the nervous system, and not directly to the intestine, regulating the response to food and food smell.

Fig. 4: 5-HT1A receptor ser-4 and DRD2 receptor dop-3 act downstream of food odor.
figure 4

Quantification (a) of individual fmo-2p::mCherry worms on fed (pink), and DR (blue) treated with 100 µM mianserin (purple), 100 µM thioridazine (orange), or combined (yellow) worms fed vector or ser-4 RNAi. n = 18 (vector fed), 23 (vector DR), 25 (vector fed + mianserin), 15 (vector fed + thioridazine), 19 (vector fed + mianserin + thioridazine), 16 (ser-4 RNAi fed), 16 (ser-4 RNAi DR), 11 (ser-4 RNAi fed + mianserin), 13 (ser-4 RNAi fed + thioridazine), 10 (ser-4 RNAi fed + mianserin + thioridazine) biologically independent animals. p-value = 3.47e-07 (vector fed vs. vector DR), 8.12e-19 (vector fed vs. vector fed + mianserin), 5.91e-08 (vector fed vs. vector fed + thioridazine), 1.30e-06 (vector fed vs. vector fed + mianserin + thioridazine), 5.16e-10 (ser-4 RNAi fed vs. ser-4 RNAi DR), 0.04998 (ser-4 RNAi fed vs. ser-4 RNAi fed + mianserin), 0.126 (ser-4 RNAi fed vs. ser-4 RNAi fed + thioridazine), 0.0165 (ser-4 RNAi fed vs. ser-4 RNAi fed + mianserin + thioridazine). Survival curves (b) of WT animals on vector RNAi in pink and ser-4 RNAi in purple on fed (solid lines) or DR (dotted lines) conditions. Images (c) and quantification (d) of fmo-2p::mCherry or ser-4 + /- tissue-specific rescue on fed (pink) and DR (blue). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 10 (control fed), 14 (control DR), 14 (ser-4(-) fed), 8 (ser-4(-) DR), 10 (ser-4(-) + intestinal fed), 12 (ser-4(-) + intestinal DR), 9 (ser-4(-) + neuronal fed), 17 (ser-4(-) + neuronal DR) biologically independent animals. p-value = 3.10e-08 (control DR vs. ser-4 (-) DR), 5.19e-10 (control DR vs. ser-4 (-) + intestinal DR), 0.131 (control DR vs. ser-4 (-) + neuronal DR). Images (e) and quantification (f) of fmo-2p::mCherry or ser-4 KO + /- GABAergic rescue on fed (pink), DR (blue) and DR + food smell (purple). Scale bar, 1 mm. n = 14 (WT fed), 21 (WT DR), 18 (WT DR + food smell), 22 (ser-4(-) fed), 17 (ser-4(-) DR), 21 (ser-4(-) DR + food smell), 11 (ser-4(-) + GABA rescue fed), 31 (ser-4(-) + GABA rescue DR), 23 (ser-4(-) + GABA rescue DR + food smell) biologically independent animals. p-value = 1.72e-05 (WT DR vs. WT DR + food smell), 0.849 (ser-4(-) DR vs. ser-4(-) DR + food smell), 4.00e-08 (ser-4(-) + GABA rescue DR vs. ser-4(-) + GABA rescue DR + food smell). Quantification (g) of individual fmo-2p::mCherry worms on fed (pink), and DR (blue) treated with 100 µM mianserin (purple), 100 µM thioridazine (orange), or combined (yellow) worms fed vector or dop-3 RNAi. n = 23 (vector fed), 29 (vector DR), 6 (vector fed + mianserin), 14 (vector fed + thioridazine), 34 (vector fed + mianserin + thioridazine), 24 (dop-3 RNAi fed), 23 (dop-3 RNAi DR), 26 (dop-3 RNAi fed + mianserin), 15 (dop-3 RNAi fed + thioridazine), 21 (dop-3 RNAi fed + mianserin + thioridazine) biologically independent animals. p-value = 1.69e-16 (vector fed vs. vector DR), 0.0268 (vector fed vs. vector fed + mianserin), 8.34e-07 (vector fed vs. vector fed + thioridazine), 1.03e-07 (vector fed vs. vector fed + mianserin + thioridazine), 1.88e-08 (dop-3 RNAi fed vs. dop-3 RNAi DR), 0.542 (dop-3 RNAi fed vs. dop-3 RNAi fed + mianserin), 0.166 (dop-3 RNAi fed vs. dop-3 RNAi fed + thioridazine), 0.00648 (dop-3 RNAi fed vs. dop-3 RNAi fed + mianserin + thioridazine). Survival curves (h) of WT animals on vector RNAi in pink and dop-3 RNAi in purple on fed (solid lines) or DR (dotted lines) conditions. ****P < .0001 (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). ###P < 0.001 when compared to ser-4 (-) or ser-4 (-) + intestinal fed (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided); #P < 0.05, ####P < 0.0001 when compared to ser-4/dop-3 RNAi fed (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). The box plots display the median by the middle line of the box. The upper boundary of the box indicates the 75% interquartile range, and the lower boundary indicates the 25% interquartile range.

Single-cell RNA-seq data show ser-4 is broadly expressed throughout the nervous system49. To narrow down the list of potential neurons acting in our pathway, we rescued ser-4 expression in distinct neuronal populations (promoters used in Supplementary Data 1). We find ser-4 expressed exclusively in GABAergic neurons is sufficient to rescue food smell suppression of DR-mediated fmo-2 induction (Fig. 4e, f). Importantly, rescuing ser-4 expression in neurons producing biogenic amines (Supplementary Fig. 7f, g) or glutamate (Supplementary Fig. 7h, i) does not change fmo-2 induction compared to the ser-4 KO. These results suggest one or more GABAergic neurons known to transcribe ser-4 is responding to serotonin release when food odor is present.

Thioridazine induces fmo-2 and extends lifespan through DOP-3/DRD2

Thioridazine is a compound that antagonizes dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) in mammals50,51,52, and mimics DR by inducing fmo-2 to increase longevity in nematodes (Fig. 2). Based on its role in mammals, we tested whether nematode DRD2 is involved in DR and mianserin-related fmo-2 induction and longevity. When the DRD2 ortholog dop-3 (WormBase, T14E8.3) is knocked down by RNAi, fmo-2 induction is not affected in fed conditions but its induction by DR is diminished, while its induction by thioridazine is completely abrogated (Fig. 4g, Supplementary Fig. 8a). This result is consistent with dop-3 being required for dopaminergic induction of fmo-2. To demonstrate the epistasis of dop-3 and ser-4 in the signaling pathway, we combined ser-4 RNAi with mianserin and thioridazine treatment. The results show that ser-4 depletion blocks fmo-2 induction by thioridazine as well as suppresses fmo-2 induction by mianserin, as expected (Fig. 4a). Similarly, depletion of dop-3 blocks both mianserin and thioridazine from inducing fmo-2 (Fig. 4g; Supplementary Fig. 8a). dop-3 knockouts show similar results to dop-3 RNAi depletion (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). These results support a model where both serotonin and dopamine signaling are epistatic to each other and are each required for full induction of fmo-2 under DR.

To test whether DOP-3/DRD2 is necessary for lifespan extension by DR and mianserin, we depleted dop-3 with RNAi under DR and found that dop-3 depletion increases lifespan but is not further extended by DR (Fig. 4h). Similar to ser-4 (Fig. 4e–f), we also confirmed that dop-3 knockout worms do not respond to the suppression of fmo-2 induction by food odor under DR (Supplementary Fig. 8c, d). Two dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) orthologs, dop-1 (WormBase, F15A8.5) and dop-4 (WormBase, C52B11.3), may also play a role in food odor response (Supplementary Fig. 8c, d). Since DRD1 is not a primary target of thioridazine50,51,52, and DRD1 (a Gαs-coupled D1-like receptor inducing cAMP53,54) has antagonistic effects of DRD2 (a Gαi/o-coupled D2-like receptor inhibiting cAMP53,54) on behaviors in mammals55 and C. elegans56, dop-1 and dop-4 might be acting in a parallel pathway in food perception. Together, these results suggest that dopamine and serotonin signaling interactively suppress fmo-2 expression to limit lifespan when food and/or odor are present.

To further test the target specificity of mianserin and thioridazine in C. elegans, we measured the induction of fmo-2 by mianserin or thioridazine in ser-4 or dop-3 knockout worms (Supplementary Fig. 8E, F). The results show that fmo-2 induction by mianserin or thioridazine is decreased in ser-4 or dop-3 knockout worms. This further suggests that induction of fmo-2 by mianserin and thioridazine requires both ser-4 and dop-3.

In addition to ser-4, the octopamine receptor ser-3 (WormBase, K02F2.6) is also antagonized by mianserin and is required for lifespan extension by mianserin29. Thus we asked whether ser-3 is involved in this pathway by testing whether mianserin or thioridazine induces fmo-2 through ser-3. The results show that fmo-2 induction by mianserin or thioridazine is decreased but not blocked in ser-3 knockouts compared to wild type worms (Supplementary Fig. 8e, f). This is consistent with ser-3 playing a role in fmo-2 induction by mianserin and thioridazine. We interpret this as ser-3 acting downstream of both drugs but not as the primary/only downstream receptor. This result agrees with previous reports that suggest octopamine signaling is downstream of dopamine in the food availability response57,58 and interacts with serotonin in regulating body fat59 and aversive behaviors60. Based on this, we tested whether octopamine signaling is involved in sensing food odor. We found that the octopamine synthesizing enzyme tbh-1 (WormBase, H13N06.6) and to a lesser extent ser-3 knockout animals lack suppression of DR-mediated fmo-2 induction in the presence of food odor. This suggests that octopamine is involved in this pathway but plausibly through multiple octopamine receptors (Supplementary Fig. 8g, h).

Mianserin extends D. melanogaster lifespan

Having identified serotonin and dopamine antagonism upstream of fmo-2 induction under DR, we were curious whether these relationships might be conserved. Similar to data in worms, recent data in the vinegar fly D. melanogaster show that altered serotonin signaling can change the ability to assess caloric quality and modulate lifespan27. As we found a narrow range of effective doses in worms (Fig. 2f), we tested a higher dose of mianserin in vinegar flies (2 mM) for its effect on Fmo2 induction. The resulting data show that both mianserin and fasting (DR) increase expression of fly fmo-2 (NCBI Gene 35561) expression (Fig. 5a), but not fmo-1 (NCBI Gene 37814) (Supplementary Fig. 9a). We then asked whether mianserin could also extend lifespan in flies. Using several concentrations, we find a positive correlation between mianserin dosage and increased lifespan until reaching a detrimental level of serotonin antagonism (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 9b–d). We also find a comparable dose response among male and female flies. We note that mianserin treatment does not significantly alter food consumption (Supplementary Fig. 9e, f), as measured by the Fly Liquid-Food Interaction Counter (FLIC) assay61. Together, these results are consistent with conserved induction of fmos by mianserin and DR, in addition to conserved lifespan extension.

Fig. 5: Serotonin antagonist mianserin induces FMO and improves health in Drosophila.
figure 5

Fmo-2 mRNA levels (a) after eight hours of 2 mM mianserin (blue) or starvation (orange) compared to water controls (pink and purple, respectively). n = 3 (fed, mianserin, fed, DR) biologically independent experiments. p-value = 0.0365 (fed vs. mianserin), 0.00914 (fed vs. DR). Survival curves of male flies treated with water (solid line) or 50 µM (dotted line) mianserin (b). Panels c and d depict the current model for the cell non-autonomous DR/food odor signaling pathway. “DA” stands for dopaminergic neuron. *P < .05, **P < .01 when compared to control or fed (Welch Two Sample t-test, two-sided). The box plots display the median by the middle line of the box. The upper boundary of the box indicates the 75% interquartile range, and the lower boundary indicates the 25% interquartile range.

Discussion

Our experimental data in C. elegans support a model where dietary restriction (sDR) leads to decreased serotonin release from the enteric NSM neurons and decreased dopamine release, likely from the CEP neurons. These decreases lead to reduced serotonin binding to the SER-4/5-HT1A receptor and a reduction in dopamine signaling to downstream DOP-3/DRD2 receptors. Subsequently, the loss of binding to SER-4 and DOP-3 causes a downstream induction of fmo-2 and extension of lifespan.

It is notable that both SER-4 and DOP-3 receptors are known to dampen adenylyl cyclase activity when bound, thus the lack of signal will increase the probability of excitement of the cell expressing these receptors. In our working model, we hypothesize that the presence of food odor acts as a signal sensed by AWC neurons, which signal upstream, downstream, or in parallel with NSM and CEP neurons that release serotonin and dopamine, respectively (Fig. 5c). The released serotonin and dopamine bind to the serotonin receptor SER-4 on one or more GABAergic neurons and the dopamine receptor DOP-3 respectively to suppress fmo-2 induction and longevity (Fig. 5c). We note that the GABAergic neuron, RIS, expresses more ser-4 than any other neuron and thus is a good candidate for a role in this signaling pathway62. In contrast, under sDR, food signals are likely decreased to a level insufficient to excite the neural circuits involving AWC, NSM, and CEP neurons. Decreased serotonin and dopamine release under DR can be mimicked by serotonin and dopamine antagonists that induce fmo-2 and promote longevity (Fig. 5d). Critically, these data highlight that understanding how the nervous system evaluates and appropriately integrates large amounts of external stimuli, like the availability of food, allows us to target the sensory-integration processes to mimic key aspects of pro-longevity pathways.

A previous report finds that mianserin antagonizes octopamine and serotonin to increase lifespan and that its mechanism overlaps with DR29. Our results reinforce this previous finding and further identify key neurons, neurotransmitters and receptors that respond to food availability. We also demonstrate FMO-2, a monooxygenase that is sufficient to extend lifespan in worms7, as a converging downstream effector of serotonin and dopamine signaling for longevity benefits.

Our findings suggest that NSM is important for both DR and food odor effects on lifespans and ADF may play a smaller role as well (Fig. 3f; Supplementary Fig. 5d–j). It is notable that a recent report shows that ADF neuron activity is responsible for food smell effects on longevity9. This discrepancy may be due to the difference in methodology. We tested the role of serotonin produced by NSM or ADF by both adding the serotonin synthetase TPH-1 (tph-1 cell-specific rescue) and subtracting TPH-1 (tph-1 cell-specific knockout) in these neurons to specifically target serotonin production in NSM or ADF neurons. In comparison, the other study ablated the output of serotonergic neurons using tetanus toxin. Tetanus toxin is a broad signaling inhibitor that will likely affect all signals from serotonergic neurons. It is also interesting to note that both the NSM neurons and the NSM enriched acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) DEL-3 are involved in both sensing food odor for longevity (Fig. 3) and food ingestion in behavioral changes as previously reported43. DEL-3 and DEL-7 are required for NSM activation of post-food encounter slowing, however may not be involved in the behavioral changes from food odor43.

It is intriguing that dopamine and serotonin signaling interactively induce fmo-2 and extend lifespan in a common dietary restriction-mediated pathway. In nematodes, slowing locomotion in the presence of food is thought to be distinctly regulated by mechanosensation leading to dopamine release while dwelling behavior is potentiated by serotonin46. Significant scientific effort has identified much of the circuitry these neurotransmitters use to promote changes in chemotaxis and egg-laying26,43,63,64,65. Those data suggest worms can interpret and implement a diverse set of responses to their changing environment. In mammals, SER-4/5-HT1A receptor activation increases dopamine release throughout the brain66,67. Similarly, recent work shows release of serotonin and dopamine in the human brain influence non-reward-based aspects of cognition and behaviors like decision making68. These findings support a conserved link between these two neurotransmitters in regulating complex phenotypes like aging.

Interestingly, dopamine may have a more complex role in aging. Knockout of dopamine reuptake receptor dat-1, which leads to increased dopamine signaling, and knockout of cat-2 that decreases dopamine synthesis, both can shorten lifespans in worms69. Dopamine antagonists are found to extend worms lifespan in a pharmacological screen17. Our data also show that dopamine antagonists can promote longevity by inducing fmo-2 (Fig. 2). It is possible that dopamine has both positive and negative effects on lifespan depending on the context.

We note that although antagonists of dopamine and serotonin signaling induce fmo-2 in worms, decreasing this signaling by tph-1, ser-4, dop-3 or del-3 knock down or even AWC ablation is not sufficient to induce fmo-2 under fed conditions (Figs. 3d, e, g, h; 4a, g, Supplementary Fig. 10). While not directly tested here, we hypothesize that two potentially overlapping possibilities could explain this: 1) Because there are multiple sensory inputs for food perception, loss of just the food smell pathway is not sufficient to produce a meaningful output, and 2) when cells or genes are absent or highly knocked down throughout development, the signaling networks they regulate undergo rewiring to respond to cues through different pathways. These hypotheses could both play some role in our observed results, and we plan future research to test them.

It is also intriguing that one of these drugs, mianserin, induces Fmo genes in flies. This leads to increased lifespan. Since mianserin treatment extends fly lifespan, we suspect it acts through a similar mechanism, serotonin antagonism, to mimic DR. This hypothesis is bolstered by fmo-2 induction under acute mianserin exposure and fasting, analogous to what we see in C. elegans. We note that in combination with DR, mianserin does not increase longevity of worms any further. It is not known whether FMOs or 5-HT1A receptors are necessary for mianserin or DR-mediated longevity in flies, but 5-HT2A receptors are necessary for proper food valuation27, suggesting that altering serotonin signaling may prove fruitful in future studies.

Mammals and C. elegans share a single common ancestral Fmo21 and mammalian Fmos share similar homology to C. elegans fmo-2, with Fmo5 (NCBI Gene 14263) having the highest % identity. It will be interesting to investigate whether mianserin is beneficial for health and longevity in mammals. To achieve this goal, it is imperative that we understand the causative changes of pro-longevity drugs, such as atypical serotonin antagonists, that are known to have pleiotropic effects in humans. In addition to providing the potential for long-term health benefits, this knowledge will benefit our understanding of serotonin and dopamine signaling networks that affect many human processes and diseases outside of aging.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

Standard procedures for C. elegans strain maintenance70 were used. In detail, strains were kept at 20 °C in a temperature-controlled incubator and were fed on Escherichia coli (OP50) seeded on solid nematode growth medium (NGM). Worms were picked or transferred gently by a platinum wire. Additionally, worms were exposed to the smell of OP50 or HB101 when indicated in the experiments. Supplementary Data 1 includes a list of the strains and RNAi conditions used in this study. All genotypes were confirmed using PCR.

fmo-2p::mCherry construct

We PCR amplified mCherry from pHG8 and the fmo-2 promoter from the worm gDNA under the fmo-2 promoter and cloned them into pdonr221 and P4-P1r, respectively. From here, they were combined using Gateway LR cloning (Invitrogen) to create fmo-2p::mCherry::unc-54 3’UTR on PCFJ150.

AWA/B/C ablation constructs

We purchased donor plasmid Pmec-18::caspase-3 (p12)::nz [TU#813] from Addgene (Plasmid #16082) and Pmec-18 cz::caspase-3 (p17) [TU#814] from Addgene (Plasmid #16083), and used Gibson cloning (NEB) to replace Pmec-18 with Podr-7. Three constructs Podr-7::caspase-3(p12)::nz, Podr-7::cz::caspase-3(p17), and Podr-7::GFP were co-injected with fluorescent co-injection marker myo-3p::GFP (20 ng/µL) into the fmo-2p::mCherry transcriptional reporter strain to generate AWA genetic ablation strains. Similarly, Pstr-1 was constructed into TU#813 and TU#814 to replace Pmec-18. Three constructs Pstr-1::caspase-3(p12)::nz, Pstr-1::cz::caspase-3(p17), and Pstr-1::GFP were co-injected with fluorescent co-injection marker myo-3p::GFP (20 ng/µL) into the fmo-2p::mCherry transcriptional reporter strain to generate AWB genetic ablation strains. The AWC genetic ablation strain (oyIs85 [ceh-36p::TU#813 + ceh-36p::TU#814 + srtx-1p::GFP + unc-122p::DsRed]) is from CGC, PY7502. AWC genetic ablation strain was crossed with fmo-2p::mCherry. All plasmids were verified via restriction digest and sanger sequencing. ApE files available upon request.

SER-4 and CAT-2 rescue constructs

We purchased donor plasmid pPD117.01 from Addgene and used Gibson cloning (NEB) to swap out promoters driving cDNA of SER-4::SL2::GFP (on backbone) expression. We used the unc-119 promoter to target all neurons and the vha-6 promoter to target the intestine. We used unc-47, vglu-2, and cat-1 promoters to target SER-4 expression in GABAergic, glutamatergic, and biogenic amine neurons, respectively. Similarly, we constructed promoters driving cDNA of CAT-2::SL2::GFP expression. We used swip-10, trpa-1 and tax-2 promoters to target CAT-2 expression in CEP, ADE, and PDE neurons, respectively. We used cat-1 promoter to rescue CAT-2 expression in all three dopaminergic neurons (CEP, ADE, and PDE). All plasmids were verified via restriction digest and sanger sequencing. ApE files available upon request.

Microinjection

Single-copy integration of fmo-2p::mCherry::unc-54 3’UTR on PCFJ150 using the ttTi5605 (EG6699) Mos allele was performed as previously described71. Overexpression transgenic animals were generated by injecting PureLink (Invitrogen) miniprepped DNA clones (~50 ng/µL) with fluorescent co-injection marker myo-2p::mNeonGreen (15 ng/µL) or sur-5p::sur-5::NLSGFP (20 ng/µL) and junk DNA (up to 100 ng/µL) into gonads of day 1 gravid adult hermaphrodites. Standard protocols were followed to isolate and obtain stable over-expression mutants72. Because transgene expression can vary substantially, we typically characterized 2–4 independent transgenic lines per experiment.

Lifespan measurements

Lifespans were carried out as previously described with minor modifications73. Briefly, 20–30 gravid adult animals were placed on NGM plates for a timed egg-lay. After 12–16 h, these animals were removed. Once their progeny reached late L4/early adult stage, animals were transferred to plates with 33 µL of 150 mM fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) and 100 µL of 50 mg/mL Ampicillin per 100 mL NGM to prevent the development of progeny and growth of bacteria. Roughly 75 worms were placed on each NGM + FUdR plate seeded with concentrated bacteria (×5). A minimum of two plates per strain per condition were used per replicate. Lifespan plates were transferred periodically during early adulthood to prevent starvation and avoid contamination. Animals were scored as dead and removed from the experiment when they did not move in response to prodding under a dissection microscope. It is notable that FUdR can extend lifespan and is a confounding factor contributing to lifespan extension74, however, to avoid matricide under DR, we include FUdR in the lifespan plates in this study. This factor should be considered when interpreting the results.

RNAi knockdown

The RNAi feeding bacteria were obtained from the Ahringer C. elegans RNAi feeding library. All RNAi plasmids were sequenced to verify the correct target sequence. Animals were exposed to RNAi plates from egg on plates consisting of NGM supplemented with 1 mM β-D-isothiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 25 μg/ml carbenicillin. At late L4 stage of development the animals were transferred to plates containing freshly seeded RNAi bacteria plus FUdR. RNAi efficiency of genes expressed in neurons is not validated by qPCR but RNAi phenotypes are recapitulated by gene knockouts. It is notable that RNAi feeding bacteria are HT115 and are reported to modify lifespan compared to OP5075,76. This should be taken into consideration when comparing the lifespan data of RNAi feeding for gene knock down with the lifespan data of gene mutants fed on OP50.

PFA treatment

In order to metabolically kill OP50 in food smell assays, bacteria cultures were treated with 0.5% PFA. After 16 h of shaking, 50 mL of the bacteria were aliquoted into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. 32% PFA was added to the flasks to get the desired final PFA concentration (e.g., 781 µL of PFA was added to get the final concentration of 0.5% PFA). PFA-treated bacteria were shaken at 37 °C for 1 h and then transferred to 50 mL conical tubes, centrifuged and washed with LB five times to remove residual PFA before seeding.

Drug treatments

Recent reports show improved health outcomes and longevity in nematodes treated with mianserin48, but only in liquid culture32. As our studies are on agar plates, we modified previous protocols by adding mianserin, thioridazine or trifluoperazine before pouring NGM agar plates. Without proper dosing, these neurotransmitter antagonists can cause off-target effects like fleeing, especially when combined with DR. All subsequent C. elegans experiments were performed at 50 µM of mianserin and 25 µM of thioridazine unless otherwise noted. All drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and were initially dissolved in milliQ water at 2 mM (mianserin) or 100 mM concentration (DRD2 antagonists), aliquoted, and stored at −20 °C.

Dietary restriction (DR) lifespan treatments

Lifespan DR assays were performed like other lifespans until day two of adulthood when the worms were transferred to plates with 109 cfu/ml seeded lawns and transferred every other day four times. This form of DR is termed solid DR (sDR)77. For short-term DR assays, worms were starved for 8 (real-time PCR) or 20 h (slide microscopy). We added 100 µL of 10 mM palmitic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 100% EtOH to the outer rim of the plate to prevent fleeing.

Attractant, repellant, and neutral smell treatments

Fed and DR plates were prepared using NGM plates with palmitic acid. Odorants were chosen from previously published work isolating secreted compounds from the E. coli strain HB10123,24. All concentrations of attractant, repellant, and neutral chemicals were dissolved in 100% ethanol (more details in Supplementary Data 3). A small pad of NGM agar (2 mL) was poured on the lid of each plate and allowed to solidify before 100 µL of each smell concentration was added to the agar pads. Plates were prepared the day prior to use to allow the ethanol solutions to dry. Young adult fmo-2p::mCherry worms were placed on fed and DR plates and exposed to each smell for 20 h before fluorescent microscopy images were taken.

Slide microscopy

All images in this study were acquired using Leica Application Suite X software and Leica scope with >15 worms/treatment at x6.3 magnification. Worms were paralyzed in 0.5 M sodium azide (NaN3). Fluorescence mean comparisons were quantified in ImageJ bundled with 64-bit Java 1.8.0 using the polygon tool and saved as macros. Data were plotted by R version 4.1.0, Microsoft Excel 365, Adobe Photoshop 2021, and Adobe Illustrator 2021.

Real-time PCR

500 N2 worms per biological replicate were transferred at young adulthood, 2.5 days post-hatch, to FuDR plates either seeded with OP50 of fed or DR condition or poured with the addition of 50 µM mianserin or thioridazine. Alternatively, N2 worms were exposed to RNAi plates from egg on plates consisting of NGM supplemented with 1 mM β-D-isothiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 25 μg/ml carbenicillin for two generations. Worms were harvested in 50 µL of M9 and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen after 8 hours of exposure. Samples were freeze-thawed three times in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted following standard phenol-chloroform protocols from the manufacturer. Superscript reverse transcriptase II (Invitrogen) was used to synthesize cDNA. 600 ng of cDNA/sample were used with PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used in the quantitation with fmo-2 forward primer ACGAAACGAATGAGTCGTCAGT and reverse primer AGAGCAGACAAGAACGCCAT.

Canton-S flies were mated and reared on standard food for 2 weeks before separating the flies by sex onto SY10 food with 20 flies/vial. Flies were acclimated to the vials for 24 h before being transferred to SY10 vials coated with 2 mM mianserin or water (control) or vials containing 2% agar to mimic dietary restriction. After 8 h on these treatments, flies were frozen at −80 °C overnight. Fly heads and bodies were then separated by vortexing and dissection by forceps (all samples and materials were kept on dry ice throughout). Each treatment contained 3 biological replicates composed of 10 bodies each. Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) was used in the RNA extraction, the MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase kit (Applied Biosystems) was used to synthesize the cDNA, and the real-time PCR analysis used PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and a StepOne Plus Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) primers of fmo-1 (forward primer GCGATAGGATGGGCAAACTG and reverse primer CCCGGAAGTGGAGCAAATTC) and fmo-2 (forward primer CGCAACCAGAAGAAAGCACA and reverse primer TGCTCCTGTACGTGTCCAAT).

Fly husbandry

The laboratory stock Canton-S was used in the lifespan and molecular experiments. Flies were maintained on standard food and housed at 25 °C and 60% relative humidity in a 12:12 h light-dark cycle.

Fly survival assays

For lifespan measurements, flies were reared under controlled larval density and collected onto standard food within 24 h of eclosion. Flies were mated for 2–3 days then sorted by sex under light CO2 onto vials containing standard food used in lifespan experiments (10% sucrose/10% yeast, or SY10), according to well-establish lifespan protocols78. Flies were transferred to fresh food every 2–3 days. At the beginning of the lifespan, mianserin was dissolved in water at a 1 mM stock concentration and stored at −20 °C. Weekly aliquots were prepared and diluted with water to yield the final concentrations of 20–80 µM. 100 µL of the drug solution (or water for the control) was added to the top of each vial and kept at room temperature to dry for approximately 2 h before transferring the flies.

Statistical analyses

All box plots show individual data points while the box represents SEM (centered on the mean), and whiskers represent 10%/90%. Comparisons between more than two groups were done using ANOVA. For multiple comparisons, Welch’s Two Sample t-test (two-sided) was used, and p values are *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. For lifespan assays, the statistical groupwise and pairwise comparisons among survivorship curves were performed by Online application for survival analysis (OASIS 2)79. P values were obtained using the log-rank analysis (select pairwise comparisons and group comparisons or interaction studies) as noted. Summary lifespan data, sample size (n), and statistics are included in Supplementary Data 2. Measurements were taken from distinct samples. The box plots display the median by the middle line of the box. The upper boundary of the box indicates the 75% interquartile range, and the lower boundary indicates the 25% interquartile range.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files). Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Medkour, Y., Svistkova, V. & Titorenko, V. I. Cell-Nonautonomous Mechanisms Underlying Cellular and Organismal Aging. Int Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 321, 259–297 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller H. A., Dean E. S., Pletcher, S. D. & Leiser S. F. Cell non-autonomous regulation of health and longevity. Elife. Dec 2020;9 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62659

  4. Berger, M., Gray, J. A. & Roth, B. L. The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu Rev. Med 60, 355–366 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Arias-Carrión, O., Stamelou, M., Murillo-Rodríguez, E., Menéndez-González, M. & Pöppel, E. Dopaminergic reward system: a short integrative review. Int Arch. Med 3, 24 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tatum, M. C. et al. Neuronal serotonin release triggers the heat shock response in C. elegans in the absence of temperature increase. Curr. Biol. 25, 163–174 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leiser, S. F. et al. Cell nonautonomous activation of flavin-containing monooxygenase promotes longevity and health span. Science. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9257

  8. Entchev, E. V. et al. A gene-expression-based neural code for food abundance that modulates lifespan. Elife 4, e06259 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, B., Jun, H., Wu, J., Liu, J. & Xu, X. Z. S. Olfactory perception of food abundance regulates dietary restriction-mediated longevity via a brain-to-gut signal. Nat. Aging. 1, 255–268 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Libert, S. et al. Regulation of Drosophila life span by olfaction and food-derived odors. Science 315, 1133–1137 (2007).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, E. D. et al. Age- and calorie-independent life span extension from dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 49 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaeberlein, T. L. et al. Lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans by complete removal of food. Aging Cell 5, 487–494 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grady, D. L. et al. DRD4 genotype predicts longevity in mouse and human. J. Neurosci. 33, 286–291 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Saharia, K., Kumar, R., Gupta, K., Mishra, S. & Subramaniam, J. R. Reserpine requires the D2-type receptor, dop-3, and the exoribonuclease, eri-1, to extend the lifespan in C. elegans. J. Biosci. 41, 689–695 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yin, J. A., Liu, X. J., Yuan, J., Jiang, J. & Cai, S. Q. Longevity manipulations differentially affect serotonin/dopamine level and behavioral deterioration in aging Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 34, 3947–3958 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peters, R. Ageing and the brain. Postgrad. Med J. 82, 84–88 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye, X., Linton, J. M., Schork, N. J., Buck, L. B. & Petrascheck, M. A pharmacological network for lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 13, 206–215 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fontana, L., Partridge, L. & Longo, V. D. Extending Healthy Life Span–From Yeast to Humans. Science 328, 321–326 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinbaugh, M. J., Sun, L. Y., Bartke, A. & Miller, R. A. Activation of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism is a shared signature of mouse models with extended lifespan. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 303, E488–E495 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Swindell, W. R. Genes and gene expression modules associated with caloric restriction and aging in the laboratory mouse. BMC Genomics. 10, 585 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Petalcorin, M. I., Joshua, G. W., Agapow, P. M. & Dolphin, C. T. The fmo genes of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae: characterisation, gene expression and comparative genomic analysis. Gene 346, 83–96 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beydoun, S. et al. An alternative food source for metabolism and longevity studies in Caenorhabditis elegans. Commun Biol. 4, 258 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01764-4 (2021).

  23. Bargmann, C. I., Hartwieg, E. & Horvitz, H. R. Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell 74, 515–527 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Worthy, S. E. et al. Identification of attractive odorants released by preferred bacterial food found in the natural habitats of C. elegans. PLoS One 13, e0201158 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nuttley, W. M., Atkinson-Leadbeater, K. P. & Van Der Kooy, D. Serotonin mediates food-odor associative learning in the nematode Caenorhabditiselegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 99, 12449–12454 (2002).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Flavell, S. W. et al. Serotonin and the neuropeptide PDF initiate and extend opposing behavioral states in C. elegans. Cell 154, 1023–1035 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ro, J. et al. Serotonin signaling mediates protein valuation and aging. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16843 (2016)

  28. Linford, N. J., Ro, J., Chung, B. Y. & Pletcher, S. D. Gustatory and metabolic perception of nutrient stress in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 112, 2587–2592 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Petrascheck, M., Ye, X. & Buck, L. B. An antidepressant that extends lifespan in adult Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 450, 553–556 (2007).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marshall, R. J. The pharmacology of mianserin-an update. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 15, 263S–268S (1983).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Feinberg, S. M., Fariba, K. A. & Saadabadi, A. Thioridazine. In: StatPearls (StatPearls, 2020).

  32. Zarse, K. & Ristow, M. Antidepressants of the serotonin-antagonist type increase body fat and decrease lifespan of adult Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 3, e4062 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Richmond, J. E., Davis, W. S. & Jorgensen, E. M. UNC-13 is required for synaptic vesicle fusion in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 959–964 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sieburth, D., Madison, J. M. & Kaplan, J. M. PKC-1 regulates secretion of neuropeptides. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 49–57 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bishop, N. A. & Guarente, L. Two neurons mediate diet-restriction-induced longevity in C. elegans. Nature 447, 545–549 (2007).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaw, W. M., Luo, S., Landis, J., Ashraf, J. & Murphy, C. T. The C. elegans TGF-beta Dauer pathway regulates longevity via insulin signaling. Curr. Biol. 17, 1635–1645 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fletcher, M. & Kim, D. H. Age-Dependent Neuroendocrine Signaling from Sensory Neurons Modulates the Effect of Dietary Restriction on Longevity of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006544 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wes, P. D. & Bargmann, C. I. C. elegans odour discrimination requires asymmetric diversity in olfactory neurons. Nature 410, 698–701 (2001).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Troemel, E. R., Kimmel, B. E. & Bargmann, C. I. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91, 161–169 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murakami, H. & Murakami, S. Serotonin receptors antagonistically modulate Caenorhabditis elegans longevity. Aging Cell. 6, 483–488 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sze, J. Y., Victor, M., Loer, C., Shi, Y. & Ruvkun, G. Food and metabolic signalling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature 403, 560–564 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Trent, C., Tsung, N. & Horvitz, H. R. Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caeenorhabditis Elegans. Genetics 104, 619–647 (1983).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rhoades, J. L. et al. ASICs Mediate Food Responses in an Enteric Serotonergic Neuron that Controls Foraging Behaviors. Cell 176, 85–97.e14 (2019). 01.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Churgin, M. A., McCloskey, R. J., Peters, E. & Fang-Yen, C. Antagonistic Serotonergic and Octopaminergic Neural Circuits Mediate Food-Dependent Locomotory Behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 37, 7811–7823 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sulston, J., Dew, M. & Brenner, S. Dopaminergic neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 163, 215–226 (1975).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sawin, E. R., Ranganathan, R. & Horvitz, H. R. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron 26, 619–631 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hardaway, J. A. et al. Glial Expression of the Caenorhabditis elegans Gene swip-10 Supports Glutamate Dependent Control of Extrasynaptic Dopamine Signaling. J. Neurosci. 35, 9409–9423 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Petrascheck, M., Ye, X. & Buck, L. B. A high-throughput screen for chemicals that increase the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 1170, 698–701 (2009).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lorenzo, R., Onizuka, M., Defrance, M. & Laurent, P. Combining single-cell RNA-sequencing with a molecular atlas unveils new markers for Caenorhabditis elegans neuron classes. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 7119–7134 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Svendsen, C. N. et al. Receptor affinity, neurochemistry and behavioral characteristics of the enantiomers of thioridazine: evidence for different stereoselectivities at D1 and D2 receptors in rat brain. Neuropharmacology 27, 1117–1124 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tegowski, M., Fan, C. & Baldwin, A. S. Thioridazine inhibits self-renewal in breast cancer cells via DRD2-dependent STAT3 inhibition, but induces a G. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 15977–15990 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yong, M. et al. DR2 blocker thioridazine: A promising drug for ovarian cancer therapy. Oncol. Lett. 14, 8171–8177 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Beaulieu, J. M. & Gainetdinov, R. R. The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharm. Rev. 63, 182–217 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Missale, C., Nash, S. R., Robinson, S. W., Jaber, M. & Caron, M. G. Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 78, 189–225 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gong, W., Neill, D. B., Lynn, M. & Justice, J. B. Dopamine D1/D2 agonists injected into nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum differentially affect locomotor activity depending on site. Neuroscience 93, 1349–1358 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, D., Yu, Y., Li, Y. & Wang, Y. Dopamine receptors antagonistically regulate behavioral choice between conflicting alternatives in C. elegans. PLoS One. 9, e115985 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Suo, S., Culotti, J. G. & Van Tol, H. H. Dopamine counteracts octopamine signalling in a neural circuit mediating food response in C. elegans. EMBO J. 28, 2437–2448 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Suo, S. & Ishiura, S. Dopamine modulates acetylcholine release via octopamine and CREB signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 8, e72578 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Noble, T., Stieglitz, J. & Srinivasan, S. An integrated serotonin and octopamine neuronal circuit directs the release of an endocrine signal to control C. elegans body fat. Cell Metab. 18, 672–684 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wragg, R. T. et al. Tyramine and octopamine independently inhibit serotonin-stimulated aversive behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans through two novel amine receptors. J. Neurosci. 27, 13402–13412 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ro, J., Harvanek, Z. M. & Pletcher, S. D. FLIC: high-throughput, continuous analysis of feeding behaviors in Drosophila. PLoS One. 9, e101107 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Cao, J. et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667 (2017). 08.

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Cermak, N. et al. Whole-organism behavioral profiling reveals a role for dopamine in state-dependent motor program coupling in. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57093 (2020)

  64. Hills, T., Brockie, P. J. & Maricq, A. V. Dopamine and glutamate control area-restricted search behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 24, 1217–1225 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee, K. S. et al. Serotonin-dependent kinetics of feeding bursts underlie a graded response to food availability in C. elegans. Nat. Commun. 8, 14221 (2017). 02.

    CAS  Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Li, Z., Ichikawa, J., Dai, J. & Meltzer, H. Y. Aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic drug, preferentially increases dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in rat brain. Eur. J. Pharm. 493, 75–83 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Bantick, R. A., De Vries, M. H. & Grasby, P. M. The effect of a 5-HT1A receptor agonist on striatal dopamine release. Synapse 57, 67–75 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bang D., et al. Sub-second Dopamine and Serotonin Signaling in Human Striatum during Perceptual Decision-Making. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.015 (2020)

  69. Benedetto A., Au C., Avila D. S., Milatovic, D. & Aschner M. Extracellular dopamine potentiates mn-induced oxidative stress, lifespan reduction, and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a BLI-3-dependent manner in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001084 (2010)

  70. Fitch DHA. Introduction to nematode evolution and ecology. WormBook, ed. The C.elegans Research Community: Wormbook; 2005.

  71. Frokjaer-Jensen, C. et al. Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. 10.1038/ng.248. Nat. Genet 40, 1375–1383, https://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v40/n11/suppinfo/ng.248_S1.html (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Berkowitz L. A., Knight A. L., Caldwell, G. A. & Caldwell K. A. Generation of stable transgenic C. elegans using microinjection. J Vis Exp. 2008;https://doi.org/10.3791/833

  73. Sutphin, G. L. & Kaeberlein M. Measuring Caenorhabditis elegans life span on solid media. J Vis Exp. 2009;1152[pii]10.3791/1152

  74. Anderson, E. N. et al. C. elegans lifespan extension by osmotic stress requires FUdR, base excision repair, FOXO, and sirtuins. Mech. Ageing Dev. 154(Mar), 30–42 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Maier, W., Adilov, B., Regenass, M. & Alcedo, J. A neuromedin U receptor acts with the sensory system to modulate food type-dependent effects on C. elegans lifespan. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000376 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Pang, S. & Curran, S. P. Adaptive capacity to bacterial diet modulates aging in C. elegans. Cell Metab. 19, 221–231 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Greer, E. L. & Brunet, A. Different dietary restriction regimens extend lifespan by both independent and overlapping genetic pathways in C. elegans. Aging Cell 8, 113–127 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Linford, N. J., Bilgir, C., Ro, J. & Pletcher, S. D. Measurement of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. J Vis Exp. 2013;https://doi.org/10.3791/50068

  79. Han, S. K. et al. OASIS 2: online application for survival analysis 2 with features for the analysis of maximal lifespan and healthspan in aging research. Oncotarget 7, 56147–56152 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Cori Bargmann for providing the tph-1 cell specific knockout strains in ADF or NSM neurons. We thank Dr. Kaveh Ashrafi for providing pKA805[srh-142p::TPH-1] and pKA807[ceh-2p::TPH-1] constructs for injections. We thank SunyBiotech for generating some strains by injections for this study. We thank all members of the Leiser laboratory for suggestions and discussions. Research reported in this publication was supported by NIA R01 AG059583 and the Paul F. Glenn Foundation for Aging Research to S.F.L., and NIA F31060663 and the Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship from the University of Michigan to H.A.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.A.M., S.H., and S.F.L. developed the conceptual framework and wrote the manuscript. H.A.M., S.H., E.S.D., M.L.S., A.M.T., A.S.M., S.B., and S.F.L. contributed to data collection and analysis. S.D.P contributed to the data interpretation and discussion. H.A.M., S.H., and E.S.D. prepared the figures and tables. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott F. Leiser.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Arnab Mukhopadhyay and the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, H.A., Huang, S., Dean, E.S. et al. Serotonin and dopamine modulate aging in response to food odor and availability. Nat Commun 13, 3271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30869-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30869-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing