Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Spindle motility skews division site determination during asymmetric cell division in Physcomitrella


Asymmetric cell division (ACD) underlies the development of multicellular organisms. In animal ACD, the cell division site is determined by active spindle-positioning mechanisms. In contrast, it is considered that the division site in plants is determined prior to mitosis by the microtubule-actin belt known as the preprophase band (PPB) and that the localization of the mitotic spindle is typically static and does not govern the division plane. However, in some plant species, ACD occurs in the absence of PPB. Here, we isolate a hypomorphic mutant of the conserved microtubule-associated protein TPX2 in the moss Physcomitrium patens (Physcomitrella) and observe spindle motility during PPB-independent cell division. This defect compromises the position of the division site and produces inverted daughter cell sizes in the first ACD of gametophore (leafy shoot) development. The phenotype is rescued by restoring endogenous TPX2 function and, unexpectedly, by depolymerizing actin filaments. Thus, we identify an active spindle-positioning mechanism that, reminiscent of acentrosomal ACD in animals, involves microtubules and actin filaments, and sets the division site in plants.


Chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis is driven by a complex microtubule (MT)-based apparatus known as the spindle. Animal spindles are known to be mobile and their final position corresponds to the future cytokinesis site, which in turn could determine daughter cell fate after asymmetric division. The mechanism by which the spindle is positioned and spatially controls the assembly of the cytokinetic machinery has been well studied in animals, and the critical roles of force-generating machinery, such as dynamic MTs, actin, and motor proteins, have been elucidated1,2. However, in plants, it is believed that the preprophase band (PPB), a plant-specific MT-actin belt formed prior to mitotic entry, determines the future cell division site3,4,5. The mitotic spindle always forms perpendicular to and at the site of the PPB, perhaps by the action of bridging MTs that connect the spindle to the former PPB site6.

The spindle position in plant cells is considered to be static, unless a strong force (1600–3350 × g) is applied through centrifugation, which also causes other cytoplasmic components to translocate7,8. The static nature of spindles is consistent with the fact that plants lack centrosomes, which play key roles in spindle translocation in animal somatic cells1,2. Multiple proteins co-localized to the PPB are required to establish and maintain the cortical division zone (CDZ), towards which the cytoskeleton-based cytokinetic machinery, known as the phragmoplast, expands while recruiting cell plate components9,10. However, the essential role of PPB in determining the cell division site has been challenged by a study that characterized cell divisions in the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana trm678 mutants lacking PPB. The findings showed that PPB is not essential for division plane determination11. In addition, global tissue organization and plant development, although more variable, were comparable to wild-type plants, implying that ACDs are executable without PPBs.

The moss Physcomitrella (Physcomitrium patens, formerly called Physcomitrella patens) is an attractive model plant for studying PPB-independent division plane determination, as most cell types naturally lack PPBs, but are capable of oriented cell division and patterning into complex 3D structures, such as gametophores (leafy shoots)12,13. We have previously shown that the MT structure, called the gametosome, appears in the cytoplasm transiently at prophase and acts as a determinant of spindle orientation13. However, gametosomes are dispensable for spindle MT generation and spindle positioning.

In animal cells, the mitotic spindle is assembled through rapid MT nucleation and amplification aided by multiple proteins, including γ-tubulin, augmin, and TPX2 (targeting factor for Xklp2)14. A previous study in A. thaliana, using a combination of knockout and cross-species antibody injection, suggested that TPX2 is an essential gene15. However, these results were recently questioned when several viable AtTPX2 t-DNA insertion mutants were obtained16. In addition to canonical TPX2, several TPX2-like genes lacking one or more functional domains have been identified in A. thaliana. Among them, TPX2L3 lacks a C-terminal kinesin-binding motif but is strongly associated with Aurora kinases and is essential for embryogenesis16. However, the mechanism by which TPX2 contributes to spindle formation and MT amplification in plant cells remains unknown.

In this study, we aimed to characterize TPX2 function in the spindle assembly of P. patens, wherein many research tools, including inducible RNAi, endogenous gene tagging, and highly efficient CRISPR, are easily applicable17,18. In addition to TPX2’s role in MT amplification during early mitosis, we found an unexpected function of TPX2 in maintaining spindle position during asymmetric cell division in gametophores.


P. patens TPX2 phylogeny and localization during mitosis

We identified five genes homologous to TPX2 in the P. patens genome using a BLAST search and named them TPX2-1 to -5 (Fig. 1a). TPX2-1 to -4 proteins showed higher similarity to canonical TPX2 in seed plants (e.g., A. thaliana and Oryza sativa), whereas TPX2-5 appears to have lost the N-terminal Aurora-binding motif16,19,20, but retained the highly conserved C-terminal domains and, to a certain extent, γ-tubulin activation motifs21 (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1: TPX2 homologs in P. patens.
figure 1

a Phylogenetic analysis revealed two distinct groups of TPX2 proteins in P. patens: Pp TPX2-1 to −4 (blue), which are more similar to TPX2 genes from seed plants, and atypical TPX2-5 (magenta). Asterisks mark predicted proteins, numbers show bootstrap values. Bar, 0.5 amino acid substitutions per site. Note that AtTPX2L3 and AtTPX2L2 were not added to this tree, since they lack the C-terminal region that is conserved in canonical TPX2 proteins. Hs: Homo sapiens, Gg: Gallus gallus, Xl: Xenopus laevis, At: Arabidopsis thaliana, Os: Oryza sativa, Pp: Physcomitrium patens, Mp: Marchantia polymorpha. b Alignment of TPX2 proteins. Conserved residues are boxed, whereas similar amino acids are hatched.

To observe the localization of TPX2s in the cell, we fused fluorophores (Citrine (Cit), mNeonGreen (NG), or SunTag (ST)) in-frame at the C- or N-terminus of each endogenous TPX2 gene (Fig. 2). We did not observe any fluorescence from NG-TPX2-3, which is consistent with the PEATmoss database, indicating extremely low expression of TPX2-3 in protonema (tissue comprised of frequently dividing tip-growing cells) and gametophores22. Various levels of fluorescence were detected for the other TPX2 proteins. In prophase, prior to nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD), endogenous TPX2-1, −2, and −4 localized to the MT cap formed at the apical side of the nucleus (Fig. 2a–d). During mitosis, endogenous TPX2-1 was enriched in the spindle poles and at the edges of the phragmoplast, suggesting preferential binding to MT minus ends. The TPX2-1 signals gradually diminished during cytokinesis (Fig. 2a, b). TPX2-2 and TPX2-4 decorated the whole spindle, excluding the midzone (Fig. 2c, d). During anaphase, the midzone that was devoid of TPX2-2 and TPX2-4 expanded, suggesting a low affinity for anti-parallel MTs that bridge two halves of the spindle/phragmoplast. Both TPX2-2 and TPX2-4 localized to the early phragmoplast devoid of the midzone, but their signals decreased as cytokinesis progressed (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Movie 1). Similar localization has been reported for Arabidopsis TPX216. TPX2-5, similar to TPX2-2 and TPX2-4, was detected in the spindle except in the midzone; however, the signal was much weaker, particularly in the polar region, and could be seen only when contrast/brightness was adjusted (Fig. 2e, max intensity panel). Unlike other TPX2s, TPX2-5 was strongly upregulated in anaphase and decorated the phragmoplast (except for the midzone) throughout cytokinesis (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Movie 1).

Fig. 2: Localization of TPX2 proteins during mitosis.
figure 2

Live-cell imaging was performed in caulonemal apical cells of P. patens, expressing mCherry-tubulin and one of the following TPX2 proteins endogenously tagged with a fluorophore: a TPX2-1-Citrine; b SunTag-TPX2-1; c TPX2-2-mNeonGreen; d mNeonGreen-TPX2-4; e TPX2-5-mNeonGreen. The SunTag-TPX2-1 line also expressed scFv-GCN-sfGFP under a β-estradiol-inducible promoter. Localization was observed in 2 independent experiments with similar results. Arrowheads indicate the fluorescent tag-based signals, whereas other ellipsoidal signals outside the spindle/nucleus represent autofluorescent chloroplasts. Bars, 10 µm.

Generation of hypomorphic mutants of TPX2

The similarity in amino acid sequences suggested that TPX2-1 to −4 have redundant functions. Therefore, we simultaneously targeted these genes using a previously established CRISPR/Cas9 protocol23. We isolated a line, named TPX2 1-4Δ, in which frameshifts were introduced to all four TPX2 genes in the exons present in all transcript variants identified in the Phytozome database (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The TPX2 1-4Δ line developed protonema and gametophores in a similar manner to the parental “GH” line (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 2). We then attempted to knock out the TPX2-5 gene in the TPX2 1-4Δ background by means of homologous recombination. However, we could not isolate a knockout line after multiple attempts.

Fig. 3: Abnormal gametophore and leaf development in the TPX2-5 HM1 mutant.
figure 3

a Representative images of gametophores after 4 weeks of culture of GH (control), TPX2 1-4Δ, and TPX2-5 HM1 lines. Brightness/contrast have been linearly adjusted. An extended version is presented in Supplementary Fig. 3. Experiment was repeated three times with similar results. Bar, 2 mm. b Representative images of gametophore leaves of GH, TPX2 1-4Δ, and TPX2-5 HM1 lines. The magenta arrowhead indicates abnormally large cell occasionally observed in the TPX2-5 HM1 line. Bar, 200 µm. c Gametophore leaf size (mm2), d number of cells per leaf, e cell density (number of cells per mm2), f cell area (µm2) of the apical and basal sides of the gametophore, measured in gametophore leaves collected after 3 weeks of culture with n = 13, 12, and 19 for GH, TPX2 1-4Δ, and TPX2-5 HM1 lines, respectively (mean ± SEM, ****p = 0.0001 by one way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test against GH). Apical and basal sides correspond to 1/3 of leaf length at the tip and at the base, respectively. g Quantification of the nuclear DNA content in the interphase nucleus of gametophore leaf cells (from apical and basal sides). DNA amounts were measured as fluorescence intensity (arbitrary unit) of the DAPI-stained nuclei per cell without background subtraction. GH and TPX2 1-4Δ lines have two ploidy peaks corresponding to apical and basal sides of gametophore leaves; In the TPX2-5 HM1 line, the difference in ploidy is less pronounced.

Nonetheless, in our attempt to knockout the TPX2-5 gene, we isolated three lines with defective gametophore development after two independent transformations (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 2). In these lines, the original TPX2-5 gene was replaced with a hygromycin cassette, as confirmed by PCR and sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). However, DNA was amplified by PCR using TPX2-5 “internal” primers, and we confirmed by sequencing that all exons of the TPX2-5 gene remained (Supplementary Fig. 1d). These data suggested that the TPX2-5 gene removed from the original locus was re-inserted into another genomic locus, possibly through micro-homology recombination. In all three mutants we isolated, the expression of TPX2-5 mRNA was strongly reduced (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Hereafter, these hypomorphic lines are referred to as “TPX2-5 HM1,” “TPX2-5 HM2” and “TPX2-5 HM3”.

To test possible redundancy between TPX2-5 and other TPX2s, we performed a rescue experiment in which full-length TPX2-4 (with Cerulean tag) was expressed at the native locus in the TPX2-5 HM1 line (Supplementary Fig. 3). These lines no longer showed a mitotic delay or dwarf gametophore phenotype (Supplementary Figs. 2b and  3b–d). In addition, we attempted to knockout the TPX2-5 gene in the wild-type background (i.e., other TPX2 genes were intact). Once again, we isolated a TPX2-5 translocation line termed TPX2-5 M (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, in the wild-type background, relocation of the TPX2-5 did not yield any noticeable phenotypes, which is consistent with the result of the rescue experiment (Supplementary Fig. 2). Next, we tried to isolate a frameshift or a mutant with a large gene deletion in the wild-type background using CRISPR. gRNAs that simultaneously targeted the first and fifth exons of TPX2-5 were transformed (Supplementary Fig. 4a). We isolated two colonies, named TPX2-5 Cr#30 and TPX2-5 Cr#33, that had a large portion of TPX2-5 gene eliminated (Supplementary Fig. 4b). However, these lines also did not have any observable defects during cell division in protonema (n = 15) or gametophores (n = 21) (Supplementary Fig. 4c–e). These results suggest that five TPX2 genes in P. patens are, at least partially, redundant for moss development during the protonema and gametophore stages.

Spindle motility and division plane shift in the TPX2 mutant gametophore

Next, we aimed to characterize the dwarf gametophore phenotype in more detail (Fig. 3a). The TPX2-5 HM1 line had smaller gametophore phyllids (hereafter called leaves), fewer cells per leaf, and reduced cell density (Fig. 3b–e), suggesting that cell proliferation decreased during leaf development. In 14 out of 23 leaves, the specialized central conducting cells of the midrib or more narrow cells on the edge of the leaf could not be visually distinguished (Fig. 3b). The cell size was analyzed separately in the apical and basal sides of the gametophore leaves (Fig. 3f). The apical side of the leaf contains dividing cells of a smaller size, which later undergo expansion and become larger cells at the basal side24. We observed that TPX2-5 HM1 leaves had abnormally larger cells on the apical side, but not on the basal side of the gametophore, compared to controls (Fig. 3f). Occasionally, we observed extremely large cells in the leaves of the TPX2-5 HM1 line. These cells were 3–4 times larger than the surrounding cells (Fig. 3b, arrowhead). The increase in cell size on the basal side of the leaf appeared to correlate with higher ploidy levels in GH and TPX2 1-4Δ lines, as revealed by DNA staining with the fluorescent dye DAPI (Fig. 3f, g). However, the difference in cellular DNA content between the apical and basal sides was less pronounced in the TPX2-5 HM1 line. These data suggest that TPX2-5 HM1 has fewer cell divisions during gametophore development and may have defects in ploidy control.

Next, we investigated whether TPX2 plays a role in mitosis of gametophore cells. Dwarf organ development in plants is sometimes associated with defective cytokinesis25. Thus, we used the lipophilic dye FM4-64 to visualize cell plates in gametophore initials (stem cells) after the first cell division. We observed that the position of the cell plate shifted to the basal side of the gametophore initial in multiple cells in all three TPX2-5 mutants, dramatically skewing the size ratio between apical and basal daughter cells (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Movie 2). This was due to an overall reduced level of TPX2, as the cell plate positioning was normal in the aforementioned TPX2-4 rescue lines and TPX2-5 M line (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Movie 2). To investigate what caused defects in the cell division site in the TPX2-5 HM1,2,3 lines, we next performed live-cell imaging of the first cell division in the gametophore initial.

Fig. 4: Abnormal cell plate positioning in the gametophore initials of the TPX2-5 hypomorphic mutants.
figure 4

a Gametophore initial at the 2-cell stage stained with FM4-64 dye. Bar, 10 µm. b The apical/basal cell volume ratio was estimated as the apical cell volume divided by the basal cell volume, measured during the 2-cell stage (mean ± SEM, ****p = 0.0001 by one way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test against GH). n = 22, 15, 18, 18, 17, 10, 18, and 8 for GH, TPX2 1-4Δ, TPX2-5 HM1, TPX2-5 HM2, TPX2-5 HM3, TPX2-4 rescue#16, TPX2-4 rescue#19 and TPX2-5 M.

To observe mitotic MTs in gametophore initial cells, we introduced another marker, mCherry-tubulin, to TPX2-5 HM1, TPX2 1-4Δ, and control GH lines (note that histone and tubulin were labeled with the same color). The majority of gametophore initial cells in the TPX2-5 HM1 line formed a bipolar spindle (90%; n = 19; Fig. 5a, b), although slightly smaller than the spindle in the control or TPX2 1-4Δ lines (Fig. 5c). Strikingly, we observed that the bipolar metaphase spindle moved unidirectionally over 5 µm to the basal side in 73% (n = 14) of TPX2-5 HM1 cells (Fig. 5a, d and Supplementary Movie 3). Consequently, the phragmoplast formed close to the basal edge. We also monitored the two- and four-cell stages of the gametophore, in which the first division plane was observed at the normal position. We observed spindle motility in six of ten cell divisions (Supplementary Movie 4). We concluded that defective spindle positioning after NEBD causes abnormal cell plate position during gametophore formation in the TPX2-5 HM1 line.

Fig. 5: Spindle position is actively maintained through the interplay between microtubules and F-actin.
figure 5

a Live-cell imaging of the first asymmetric division in the gametophore initial. The positions of the nucleus and gametosome (prophase MTOC appeared in the apical cytoplasm) are indicated with yellow circles and red arrowheads, respectively. Cyan lines show the position and orientation of the phragmoplast. Cell borders are outlined with white lines. Live-cell imagining was repeated three times with similar results. Bar, 10 µm. b The frequency and type of spindle defects in gametophore initial mitosis observed in GH (control), TPX2 1-4Δ, and TPX2-5 HM1 lines. Numbers within the columns indicate number of cells with corresponding phenotypes. c Area occupied by the metaphase spindle (spindle size) in gametophore initials measured by manually tracking spindle borders from Z-projection, n = 9, 12, and 15 for GH, TPX2 1-4Δ and TPX2-5 HM1 lines, respectively. (mean ± SEM; **p = 0.0029, two-tailed Student’s t-test). d Tracking of the spindle center position from NEBD to anaphase onset. We assigned the starting position as Y = 0 and different X positions for each sample group. Note, that after 5 µM latrunculin A treatment, spindles never showed motility towards the basal end of the cell, i.e., negative Y-values. Each line represents spindle movement in a single cell. More than 12 cells were observed for each sample group in three or more independent experiments. e Maximum spindle speed (µm/min), f average spindle speed (µm/min), and g distance traveled by the spindle (µm) in the TPX2-5 HM1 cell line under various treatments. Total number of cells observed, including those without spindle motility: n = 23 (10 µM taxol), 16 (200 nM oryzalin), and 20 (control DMSO, with which the stock solution of taxol, oryzalin, and latrunculin A were prepared). Only spindle motility towards the basal end of the cell was analyzed. Bars represent mean ± SEM.

Spindle motility in the TPX2 mutant is actin-dependent

In animals, spindle motility relies on MTs and actin. To test the involvement of the cytoskeleton in spindle motility, we first partially depolymerized MTs in the TPX2-5 HM1 line using low-dosage oryzalin (200 nM), a MT-destabilizing drug. Upon treatment, the spindle behaviors were more variable and showed overall differences from the untreated cells. Most notably, in 5 of 16 cells, we observed that the spindle had shifted towards the apical side of the cells, which was not observed in untreated cells (Fig. 5d). In addition, the maximum spindle speed was decreased (Fig. 5e). In the presence of oryzalin, 9 out of 11 spindles moved slower than 1 µm/min (maximum speed), whereas only 2 out of 13 did so in control cells (DMSO). These data suggest that MTs contribute to spindle motility to a certain extent.

We also tested the effect on spindle motility of the MT-stabilizing drug taxol at a final concentration of 10 µM. The frequency of cells showing spindle motility did not decrease (18 of 23 cells). However, the motility was slower and the traveling distance was shorter than that of the control cells (Fig. 5e–g). The difference was not statistically significant, possibly because the spindle motility phenotype showed high variability in the TPX2-5 HM1 line. This positive but mild effect might be due to the low sensitivity of P. patens to taxol26. For example, we never observed mitotic arrest after taxol treatment, which is expected after high-dose taxol treatment of animal cells27.

Next, we investigated the effect of actin depolymerization with latrunculin A on the spindle motility of TPX2-5 HM1 cells. Strikingly, the high-dose latrunculin A treatment (5 µM) completely suppressed the basal motility of the spindle in the TPX2-5 HM1 line (20 of 20 cells, Fig. 5a, d, Supplementary Movie 3). Low-dosage treatment (50 nM) was also effective; only 2 out of 18 cells exhibited spindle translocation. Notably, actin depolymerization by latrunculin did not affect spindle morphology, orientation, or positioning in wild-type cells13. Thus, actin is the driving force of basal spindle motility in the TPX2 mutant.

Next, we attempted to visualize actin distribution during spindle movement. We introduced Citrine-F-tractin (actin marker) in the wild-type and TPX2-5 HM1 background, expressing mCherry-tubulin or mCherry-tubulin/Histone-RFP, respectively (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Movie 5). Cortical actin was observed as cables in both lines and was distributed evenly around the gametophore initial cell (Fig. 6, Z-projection). We did not detect any difference in the cortical actin networks between the control and TPX2-5 HM1 lines. Citrine-F-tractin signals were broadly distributed in the cytoplasm. Unlike the cortical actin network, we only occasionally observed prominent actin cables and bright speckles in the cytoplasm, suggesting that the cytoplasmic actin network comprised less structured filaments (Fig. 6a, indicated by arrowheads). It is also possible that some of the cytoplasmic signals originated from Citrine-F-tractin not bound to the actin filaments. Cytoplasmic actin remained after NEBD in both the control and TPX2-5 HM1 lines. Some areas, mostly on the basal side of the cells, were devoid of Citrine-F-tractin signals; they were most likely occupied by vacuoles. In the TPX2-5 HM1 mutant undergoing spindle motility, cytoplasmic actin signals moved with the spindle (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Movie 5). Since cytoplasmic streaming is absent in P. patens28, we interpret that the apparent movement of the cytoplasm is passive, following spindle motility. When the Citrine-F-tractin signal intensity was compared between the apical and basal poles of the spindle, we did not observe a significant difference in either the wild-type or TPX2 mutant (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6: Actin is present in the cytoplasm and cortex during spindle motility in the TPX2-5 HM1 line.
figure 6

a Live-cell imaging of Citrine-F-tractin (actin, green) during the first asymmetric division in the gametophore initial cells also expressing mCherry-tubulin (magenta, MTs). TPX2-5 HM1 cells additionally expressed mCherry-tubulin/H2B-RFP (magenta, chromosomes), which was brighter than mCherry-tubulin. Maximum intensity projection of Citrine-F-tractin (20 µm with 2.5 µm steps) and single focal frame of mCherry-tubulin were merged in the “Z-projection” panels. Three Z frames are also presented (z = 3, 5, and 7). Yellow arrowheads indicate filamentous or punctate signals of cytoplasmic actin. Time 0 (min) was set at NEBD. Bar, 10 µm. b Relative actin fluorescent intensity (basal/apical poles). Mean gray values of Citrine-f-tractin were measured at the apical and basal pole of the spindle in a square of a fixed size (8 × 4 µm) for each of the Z-slices and summed to get intensity at each pole. Dots of the same color represent measurements obtained from the same cell at different time points (n = 6 and 8 for wild-type and TPX2-5 HM1, respectively).

We also tested whether the overall gametophore development could be restored by mild actin disruption. TPX2-5 mutant lines were grown for 4 weeks on agar plates and a range of latrunculin A was supplied (50 pM–100 nM). Although protonema growth was inhibited at higher concentrations of latrunculin A, the gametophore phenotype was not rescued under any condition (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Roles of TPX2-5 in spindle assembly in protonema

The Physcomitrella protonema consists of tip-growing chloronemal and caulonemal cells. ACD occurs also in this tissue. The apical, tip-growing cells frequently divide, while subapical cells occasionally form a bulge and divide asymmetrically, producing a new apical tip cell, in a process known as “branching”29. We did not observe spindle motility in the protonema of the TPX2-5 HM1 line (n = 85, including caulonemal/chloronemal apical cells and branching cells). The identified differences from the wild-type were the cell plate orientation and apical cell growth speed in caulonemal cells, which might reflect a slight alteration in MT dynamics in the mutant (Supplementary Fig. 6). However, it is unlikely that these protonema defects have a significant impact on gametophore development.

A rare spindle phenotype observed in both protonema (n = 1 of 85) and gametophore initial cells (n = 2 of 19) was spindle collapse, which led to chromosome missegregation, cytokinesis failure, and multinucleation (Supplementary Movie 6). In an earlier study, we showed that a certain percentage of protonema cells of P. patens were able to recover after cytokinesis failure and re-enter the cell cycle, resulting in whole genome duplication30. In the context of gametophore development, diploid P. patens have fewer gametophores for unknown reasons31. To exclude the possibility that HM mutants have a high number of diploid protonema cells, compromising gametophore development, we conducted an analysis of ploidy levels by measuring fluorescence intensity of DAPI-stained nuclei in the protonema cells of control (GH), TPX2 1-4Δ, and TPX2-5 HM1,2,3 lines. We detected no additional peaks that would indicate higher ploidy in any of these lines (Supplementary Fig. 7).

To gain insights into the essential mitotic function of TPX2, we performed a detailed analysis of cell division phenotypes in the mutant with the greatest effect. To this end, we selected an inducible TPX2-5 RNAi line in the TPX2 1-4Δ background. Since RNAi induction almost completely inhibited cell growth and gametophore development, we focused on the division of the protonemal apical stem cells that appear earlier than gametophores. Using time-lapse imaging of MTs and chromosomes, we observed severe MT phenotypes during the early stages of mitosis (Fig. 7a–d). During prophase, we detected a reduction in the signals of perinuclear MTs (Fig. 7e), which was also observed with a γ-tubulin RNAi32, and abnormal nuclear shape, which is unique to the TPX2 1-4Δ mutant (elongated nucleus prior to NEBD, Fig. 7c). The nuclear elongation was not actin-dependent, as the length in prophase was not significantly changed by latruculin A treatment (17.8 ± 2.8 and 17.6 ± 2.5 µm before and after treatment, respectively [5 µM, 10 min]). After NEBD, 3 out of 52 cells in the RNAi lines failed to form bipolar spindles, followed by metaphase arrest and chromosome missegregation, which was never observed in the control lines (Fig. 7d). Other cells formed bipolar spindles; however, the MT signals in the prometaphase spindle was greatly reduced (Fig. 7f, blue). This was no longer the case at metaphase, where the intensity of MT signals was similar to control spindles, indicating the recovery of MT numbers during prometaphase (Fig. 7f, green). Other phenotypes observed upon TPX2-5 depletion include chromosome missegregation (29%, n = 15) and spindle misposition/orientation (33%, n = 17, Fig. 7d and Supplementary Movie 7).

Fig. 7: TPX2 contributes to microtubule amplification in early mitosis.
figure 7

a Representative images of the mitosis of protonemal apical cells in GH (control), TPX2 1-4Δ, TPX2-55’UTR RNAi, and TPX2-5exon RNAi lines. Time 0 (min) was set at NEBD. Green, GFP-tubulin; Magenta, histoneH2B-mRFP. Bar, 10 µm. b Mitotic duration calculated from NEBD to anaphase onset (mean ± SEM; ****p < 0.0001, two-tailed Student’s t-test). Live-cell imagining was repeated three times with similar results. c Nucleus shape prior to NEBD, measured as a ratio of nucleus length to nucleus width (mean ± SEM; ****p < 0.0001, two-tailed Student’s t-test). d Frequency and type of mitotic defects observed. Numbers within the columns indicate number of cells with corresponding phenotypes. Bar, 10 µm. e Fluorescence intensity of perinuclear MTs (mean ± SEM; **p = 0.0011, ***p = 0.0002; two-tailed Student’s t-test). A.U. stands for Arbitrary Units. f Fluorescence intensity of MTs in the prometaphase spindle (4 min after NEBD) and metaphase spindle (2 min before anaphase onset), measured from a single focal plane, with the cytoplasmic background subtracted. A decrease in fluorescence intensity was detected in prometaphase, but not in metaphase spindles (mean ± SEM **p = 0.0018, ****p = 0.00002, ***p = 0.0008; two-tailed Student’s t-test). For graphs bf, number of independent cells observed n = 20 for GH and TPX2 1-4Δ lines, n = 21 for TPX2-55’UTR, and n = 22 for TPX2-5exon RNAi lines.


This study of the moss, Physcomitrella, aimed to functionally characterize TPX2, one of the most well-known spindle MT-associated proteins in animals, taking advantage of the available genetic and cell biological tools33 to comprehensively examine highly duplicated mitotic genes in plants. We identified defects in spindle morphology and chromosome segregation associated with TPX2 depletion and observed unexpected spindle motility during ACD in the TPX2-5 mutant.

Our functional characterization suggests that, despite certain differences in localization, the five TPX2 proteins of P. patens are partially redundant. Frameshift mutations could be introduced into individual TPX2 genes. Furthermore, the expression of TPX2-4 protein fully rescued the phenotype of the TPX2-5 HM1 mutant, in which TPX2 1-4 genes had frameshift mutations and TPX2-5 expression was reduced. Our results in protonemal cells suggest the functional conservation of moss TPX2 with well-studied animal orthologs, namely assisting in MT formation through nucleation and/or stabilization during spindle assembly. Since the γ-tubulin activation motif 21 is partially conserved in all moss TPX2 proteins (Fig. 1b), TPX2 may be required for γ-tubulin-dependent MT nucleation. For the cells that assembled bipolar spindles after TPX2 depletion, phragmoplast formation and expansion were similar to those in control cells. During cytokinesis in protonemal cells, branching MT nucleation takes place, which depends on γ-tubulin and augmin complexes32. We speculate that this mechanism nucleates a sufficient number of MTs, even when TPX2 is reduced. However, our results do not yet suggest a clear role for TPX2 in post-anaphase. Severe spindle phenotypes, such as spindle collapse or multipolar formation, were observed upon TPX2-5 RNAi, and the post-anaphase function could not be assessed. Whether and which TPX2 genes are critical in later developmental stages also remains to be determined.

Gametophores were small in TPX2-5 mutants and the leaf cells showed multiple abnormalities in morphology and ploidy. Defects in cell expansion could be a possible explanation for the dwarfism, as gametophore cells grow by expansion, controlled by turgor pressure and cytoskeleton dynamics. However, it does not appear to be the cause of smaller gametophores in the TPX2 mutant, since leaf cells were not overall smaller than controls. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that non-mitotic functions of TPX2 might be required for proper gametophore development, our data are consistent with the notion that defective cell division underlies this phenotype. In the mutant there were fewer cells per leaf, suggesting that fewer cell divisions occurred during gametophore development. Cell division defects were not exclusive to the first division of the gametophore initial; they were sometimes observed in the second and subsequent divisions (Supplemental Movie 4). Therefore, it is plausible that division plane mispositioning occasionally occurs later during gametophore development. We propose that spindle motility and, as a consequence, skewed daughter cell ratio and/or misplaced cell plates have a long-reaching and cumulative effect on gametophore development. For example, an extremely asymmetric division due to spindle translocation would give rise to a giant cell with abnormal DNA/cytoplasm ratio, which might affect its cell cycle or DNA replication control, and an overly small cell, that may not be able to divide again. Additionally, we observed spindle collapse followed by cytokinesis failure in ~10% of gametophore cells. In the context of organ development, these cells would have a higher ploidy and might overexpress certain genes34, affecting surrounding cells, as well.

In plants, defective division sites have been mostly attributed to defects in PPB formation11,35, phragmoplast guidance errors (CDZ deficiency)10,36, or abnormal positioning of the nucleus in prophase37,38. The current study identified an independent and hitherto unappreciated cause of division site abnormality: spindle motility after NEBD. Spindle-specific positioning defects in meiosis II have been observed in jas and ps1 mutants of Arabidopsis due to abnormal organelle distribution39. However, meiosis II is a unique system in which two spindles share a cytoplasm and may be partially fused in the absence of an organelle barrier. Therefore, there is unlikely to be a mechanistic analogy to moss gametophores. The spindle motility was observed in the gametophore initial in Physcomitrella TPX2 mutants. A recent study using neural stem cells of the embryonic developing mouse neocortex showed that TPX2 knockdown not only affects spindle MT generation but also spindle orientation, implicating a conserved TPX2-dependent mechanism of spindle positioning40. However, the mechanism by which TPX2 functions in spindle positioning remains unclear at a mechanistic level. We also observed unstable spindle position in protonemal cells upon TPX2 depletion with RNAi (Fig. 7d and Supplementary Movie 7). In RNAi lines, the spindle positioning defect was almost always accompanied by chromosome missegregation or other phenotypes, complicating the interpretation of the results. Nonetheless, active spindle positioning may not be unique to gametophores.

In addition to TPX2, we here uncover the involvement of actin in spindle positioning. This was also an unexpected observation, as the function of actin in plant cell division has been mostly attributed to phragmoplast guidance during cytokinesis4,41. Actin is known to play an important role in spindle positioning in animal cells42. Of particular interest are animal oocytes, as they lack centrosomes, like plant cells do. In mouse oocytes, spindle migration and symmetry breaking are driven by changes in the stability of the actin meshwork, the formation of which depends on actin nucleators, such as formin-2, and myosin II motor42,43. We observed cytoplasmic and cortical actin in the gametophore initial cell. Thus, an analogous mechanism might transmit actin-dependent force to transport spindles in oocytes and moss. However, it should be noted that the actin role emerged only in the background of a reduced TPX2 function. We suggest that there is “tug-of-war” between spindle and actin-dependent forces (Fig. 8). In wild-type moss cells, sufficient numbers of spindle MTs may predominate in the tug-of-war against actin-dependent forces. Conversely, when the overall levels of TPX2 decreased, fewer and/or less stable MTs may be insufficient to hold the spindle in place. This model is supported by the observation that a less severe spindle motility phenotype was observed in the mutant after taxol treatment, which partially stabilized MTs44. In contrast, oryzalin might further attenuate the interaction between actin and MTs, resulting in misoriented and slow spindle movement. The exact mechanism that transmits the force from the actin network to the acentrosomal spindle and whether this phenomenon is conserved in other plant species remains an open question for future investigation.

Fig. 8: Schematic representation of the spindle impact on phragmoplast position and orientation in the gametophore initial cells of P. patens.
figure 8

The upper panel shows the first asymmetric division of gametophore initial in wild-type cells. Spindle, consisting of microtubules, drives chromosome segregation and cell plate expansion. Cytoplasmic actin surrounds the nucleus before nuclear envelope breakdown and the spindle in early mitosis. During cytokinesis, cytoplasmic actin localizes to the phragmoplast. The bottom panel summarizes the findings of the present study and the role of the microtubule-associated protein TPX2 in spindle positioning. In the scenario where TPX2 function is reduced, the spindle can be transported to the bottom of the gametophore initial cell, compromising the cell plate position and daughter cell ratios in asymmetric cell division. The cytoplasm changes its position together with the moving spindle, and spindle motility is completely inhibited by depolymerizing actin filaments with latrunculin A (Lat A). Stabilizing microtubules with taxol could partially counteract spindle transport, suggesting that under normal conditions, microtubules are able to fix the spindle position against actin force.


P. patens culture and transformation

P. patens culture and transformation protocols have been described in detail in17. In brief, BCDAT agar medium (BCDAT stands for stock solutions B, C, D, and ammonium tartrate) was used for regular P. patens culture at 25 °C under continuous light. Transformation was performed using protoplasts. To prepare protoplasts, the protonema tissue, collected after 7 days of culture, was incubated in the solution containing 2% driselase and 8% (w/v) mannitol for 30 min at room temperature with gentle rocking. The solution was filtered using 50 μm nylon-mesh and centrifuged at 180 × g for 2 min to collect protoplasts. The supernatant was discarded, and protoplasts were washed twice in 20 ml 8% mannitol. Protoplast concentration before transformation was adjusted to 1.6 × 106 ml−1 by adding MMM solution (0.1 % MES pH 5.6, 15 mM MgCl2, 9.1% (w/v) mannitol). Next, 300 µL of protoplast solution were mixed with 30 µL of plasmid (30 µg) and 300 µL of 40% (w/v) polyethylene glycol solution (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM Ca(NO3)2, 8% mannitol) and incubated first for 5 min at 45 °C, then for 10 min at 20 °C, followed by incubation in the dark at 25 °C overnight. Protoplasts were then spread onto PRM agar plate on which sterile cellophane was placed. After three days of culture, the cellophane with regenerated protoplasts was transferred to the BCDAT medium that contained appropriate antibiotics for selection. After another round of passage onto drug-free and drug-containing BCD media, the target integration was confirmed by genotyping PCR and/or sequencing in the case of CRISPR-generated lines. The plasmid containing drug-resistant cassette was eliminated from the cell during CIRSPR line selection. The GH line, expressing histone H2B-mRFP and GFP-α-tubulin, was used for transformation in the CRISPR and knockout experiments, while the mCherry-α-tubulin #52 line was used for Citrine, mNeonGreen endogenous tagging, and for Citrine-F-tractin transformation as a control. The transgenic lines generated in this study are listed in the Supplementary Data 1.

Molecular cloning

Plasmids for Citrine or mNeon-Green endogenous tagging were assembled using In-Fusion (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), in which Citrine or mNeonGreen genes, a G418 resistance cassette (only C-terminal tagging), and homologous recombination regions (500–800 bp of the respective genes) were connected. A similar strategy was used to assemble the knockout plasmid for TPX2-5, wherein a hygromycin resistance cassette was flanked by the 5′ and 3′UTR regions of the TPX2-5 gene. A detailed protocol for endogenous gene tagging and knockouts in P. patens has been previously published17. The CRISPR protocol has been described in detail in23. In brief, CRISPR gRNAs targeting one of the exons were designed using the online tool, CRISPOR (, based on target gene specificity (off-target score) and predicted frameshift efficiency. Individual gRNAs were ligated into pCasGuide/pUC18 vector pre-digested with BsaI. Next, individual gRNAs together with the U6 promoter and gRNA scaffold region were amplified by PCR and assembled into a single multi-gRNA plasmid, also containing a hygromycin resistance cassette for transient plant selection. RNAi vectors were cloned using the Gateway system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), with pGG624 as the destination vector. Two independent, non-overlapping RNAi constructs were prepared for each gene. The full list of plasmids and primers used in this study are shown in Supplementary Data 2.

Gene expression analysis with quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

To determine the expression levels of TPX2-5 and TPX2-4 genes, total RNA was extracted from 7-day-old protonema tissue using the innuPREP Plant RNA kit (Analytik Jena GmbH, Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was treated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 1 h to remove genomic DNA contamination, and RNA quality was checked by gel electrophoresis. For cDNA synthesis, we used TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with random hexamers, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Primers were designed using the Universal Probe Library (Roche, and selected according to the lowest amount of off-target hits identified in the P. patens transcriptome in Phytozome ( The efficiency of each primer pair was confirmed prior to analysis with a qPCR run using a series of cDNA dilutions (1:2) and a control without cDNA. Melting curves were analyzed to exclude primer pairs with off-target amplification. The primer pairs used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Data 2. Samples using a cDNA equivalent to 50 ng of total RNA from corresponding lines were prepared in triplicate or, alternatively, two sets of triplicates for TPX2-5 in the TPX2-5 HM1, HM2, and HM3 lines, with the SensiMix Kit and SYBR Green (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany). Negative controls without template addition, as well as reverse transcription controls (reverse transcription reaction carried out without MultiscribeTM RT), were performed for each primer pair and each line. Amplification was performed in 40 cycles at a melting temperature of 60 °C. qRT-PCR data were analyzed using LightCycler R 480 software (Roche). The relative expression levels of the gene of interest (GOI), TPX2-5, and TPX2-4, were compared to those of the control (ctrl), internal housekeeping genes EF1α (Pp3c2_10310V3.1), and the ribosomal protein L21 (Pp3c13_2360V3.1), and was calculated as 2(−ΔCT), wherein ΔCT = CT(GOI) − CT(ctrl) and primer efficiency was assumed to be 2. CT was defined as the cycle number at which each sample reached an arbitrary threshold45.

Sample preparation for live-cell imaging

The sample preparation method for live cell imaging has been described in detail in a previous study17. In brief, a glass-bottom dish coated with a thin layer of BCD agar medium was inoculated with moss protonema and cultured under continuous light at 25 °C prior to observation (BCD stands for stock solutions B, C, and D. Each recipe can be found in ref. 17). For gametophore induction, 1 µM of the synthetic cytokinin, benzylaminopurine, or 1 µM 2iP (2-isopentenyladenine), diluted in 1 mL of distilled water, was added to the 6–7-day-old colony and incubated for 10 min. Next, the remaining liquid was aspirated with a pipette, the dish was sealed, and the sample was cultured as described above for 20–24 h prior to gametophore imaging. Latrunculin A, taxol, or oryzalin was diluted in 1 mL of distilled water to final concentrations. Prior to drug treatment, most of the agar pad from the glass-bottom dish was cut and removed to minimize dilution. For RNAi induction, 400 µL of 5 µM β-estradiol, diluted in distilled water, was added to the pre-cultured protonema 4 d prior to observation. Although β-estradiol was previously supplemented directly to the agar medium46,47, we found that it almost entirely inhibited cell growth in TPX2-5 RNAi lines; hence, the protocol was modified.

Microscopy and data analysis

Sample preparation is described above. Localization, RNAi, and most of the gametophore images were acquired using a Nikon Ti microscope (60 × 1.30-NA lens; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a CSU-X1 spinning-disk confocal unit (Yokogawa, Tokyo, Japan) and an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device camera (ImagEM; Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu, Japan). The microscope was controlled using the NIS-Elements software (Nikon). Imaging after FM4-64 staining, 10 µM taxol treatment, and low-dosage latrunculin A treatment (50 nM, 5 nM, and 500 pM) and imaging of actin using Citrine-F-tractin probe were performed using a ZEISS inverted microscope (25 × 0.8-NA lens or 63 × 1.4-NA lens, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) equipped with a CSU-X1 spinning-disk confocal unit (Yokogawa, Tokyo, Japan) and CCD camera (Photometrics Prime sCMOS). All imaging was performed at 22–24 °C in the dark, except for the first division of the gametophore initial, since gametophore development requires light (3 min light/2 min dark cycle). Imaging was performed at least twice for localization and at least three times for phenotypic characterization. To obtain quantitative values, the data from multiple experiments were combined because of insufficient sample numbers in a single experiment.

For single-leaf imaging (Supplementary Fig. 3d), we dissected gametophores using syringe needles and scissors to isolate single leaves. Leaves were mounted in a drop of water between two coverslips, and images were acquired with a Nikon Ti microscope (10 × 0.30-NA lens) in bright-field mode. Gametophore and moss colony images were acquired after 4 weeks of culture using a stereoscopic microscope (SZ2-ILST, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera (Axiocam ICc1; Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) or a Canon EOS 400 camera, respectively. Image data were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Prism software was used to plot the graphs and perform statistical analyses (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

Cell volume analysis

Cell volume was analyzed in gametophore initial cells stained with FM4-64 dye diluted in distilled water to a final concentration of 10 µM. The dye was added to the live-imaging dish before acquisition, without cutting the agar. Imaging was performed immediately after FM4-64 application. Images were acquired as a Z-stack (40 µm, 0.97 µm step) using a ZEISS inverted microscope (25 × 0.8-NA lens) equipped with a CSU-X1 spinning-disk confocal unit (Yokogawa, Tokyo, Japan) and a CCD camera (Photometrics Prime sCMOS). Cell boundary predictions and segmentation were performed using PlantSeg software48. Default conditions of PlantSeg were used with the following modifications: images were rescaled using in-build function (for our images voxel size was 0.26 μm on the XY dimensions and 0.97 μm on the Z dimension) and cell minimum size was set at 400,000 voxels. The accuracy of the cell predictions was confirmed by comparing PlantSeg output files to raw images for each cell. In some cases, when cell boundaries were not predicted accurately, images were deconvolved using Huygens Professional version 19.04 (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, Netherlands) and again run through PlantSeg with a minimum cell size of 300,000 voxels. If this did not improve the cell boundary predictions, images were excluded from the analysis. Cell volume was extracted from PlantSeg output tiff files using a threshold function and the Voxel counter plugin in ImageJ. 3D projections in Supplementary Movie 2 were created with Imaris software (Bitplane) version 9.7.0.

DAPI staining and imaging of gametophore leaves

We collected 8–9 gametophores per line after 3 weeks of culture on KNOP medium supplemented with microelements49 and 5 mM ammonium tartrate. Gametophores were fixed for 1.5 h in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1 × PBS buffer, washed twice in 1 × PBS, incubated for 30 min in 4% driselase in 1 × PBS buffer, washed twice in 1 × PBS, incubated for 30 min in 0.1% Tween in 1 × PBS buffer, washed twice in 1 × PBS and incubated in 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution (0.01 mg/L DAPI, 1.07 g/L MgCl2·6H2O, 5 g/L NaCl, 21.11 g/L TRIS in 1 mL Triton) overnight at 4 °C. Individual leaves (typically 3–6 leaves from each gametophore) were separated from the gametophore stem using a razor blade and mounted in 1 × PBS buffer for imaging. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope (5 × 0.15-NA lens; Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (Axiocam Mrc5, Carl Zeiss) and operated with AxioVision software. Imaging data were analyzed using ImageJ software. Gametophore and cell sizes were measured manually, and fluorescence intensity from nuclei stained with DAPI was measured using a “Threshold” function. Specialized conducting cells of the midrib and narrow cells of the leaf edge were excluded from cell area measurements, and conductive cells were excluded from DAPI fluorescence intensity measurements. Prism (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to plot the graphs, and to perform statistical analyses.

Analysis of protonema ploidy

Moss protonema was homogenized in 5 mL of distilled water and cultured on BCDAT agar plates covered with cellophane for 6 days before measurement. Next, small portion of protonema was chopped with a blade in 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution (0.01 mg/L DAPI, 1.07 g/L MgCl2·6H2O, 5 g/L NaCl, 21.11 g/L TRIS in 1 ml Triton) and filtered through a 30 µm sieve. Fluorescence of the nuclei was determined with a PAS flow cytometer (Partec, Munster, Germany) using a 100 W high-pressure mercury lamp50.

Sequence analysis

We used MAFFT ver. 7.043 ( to align the amino acid sequences of the selected full-length proteins, and then manually revised them with MacClade ver. 4.08 OSX ( to remove gaps. The Jones–Taylor–Thornton model was used to construct maximum-likelihood trees using MEGA5 software ( Statistical support for internal branches by bootstrap analysis was obtained using 1000 replications. The gene sequence information discussed in this article is available under the following accession numbers in Phytozome ( AtTPX2 (AT1G03780.3); OsTPX2 (LOC_Os07g32390.1); PpTPX2-1 (Pp3c17_11160V3.1); PpTPX2-2 (Pp3c1_25950V3.1); PpTPX2-3 (Pp3c24_8590V3.2); PpTPX2-4 (Pp3c23_4540V3.1); PpTPX2-5 (Pp3c5_10270V3.1); MpTPX2-1 (Mapoly0016s0083.1); MpTPX2-2 (Mapoly0105s0040.1) or in UNIPROT ( HsTPX2 (Q9ULW0); GgTPX2 (F1NW64); XlTPX2 (Q6NUF4).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors confirm that all relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary files. Plant lines used in this study are available upon request from corresponding authors (E.K. and G.G.).


  1. Kiyomitsu, T. The cortical force-generating machinery: How cortical spindle-pulling forces are generated. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 60, 1–8 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstralh, D. T., Dawney, N. S. & Johnston, D. S. Spindle orientation: A question of complex positioning. Development 5, 1137–1145 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma, D. P. S. Cytokinesis and building the cell wall in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 52, 751–784 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rasmussen, C. G. & Bellinger, M. An overview of plant division-plane orientation. N. Phytol. 219, 505–512 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buschmann, H. & Müller, S. Update on plant cytokinesis: Rule and divide. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 52, 97–105 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambrose, J. C. & Cyr, R. Mitotic spindle organization by the preprophase band. Mol. Plant 1, 950–960 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ôta, T. The role of cytoplasm in cytokinesis of plant cells. Cytologia 26, 428–447 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arima, K. et al. Displacement of the mitotic apparatuses by centrifugation reveals cortical actin organization during cytokinesis in cultured tobacco BY-2 cells. J. Plant Res. 131, 803–815 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smertenko, A. et al. Plant Cytokinesis: Terminology for structures and processes. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 885–894 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Müller, S. Plant cell division—defining and finding the sweet spot for cell plate insertion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 60, 9–18 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaefer, E. et al. The preprophase band of microtubules controls the robustness of division orientation in plants. Science 356, 186–189 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moody, L. A., Kelly, S., Rabbinowitsch, E. & Langdale, J. A. Genetic regulation of the 2D to 3D growth transition in the Moss Physcomitrella patens. Curr. Biol. 28, 473–478e5 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosetsu, K. et al. Cytoplasmic MTOCs control spindle orientation for asymmetric cell division in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E8847–E8854 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petry, S. Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 659–683 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Evrard, J.-L., Pieuchot, L., Vos, J. W., Vernos, I. & Schmit, A.-C. Plant TPX2 and related proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 69–72 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boruc, J. et al. The TPX2-LIKE PROTEIN 3 is the primary activator of α Aurora kinases and is essential for embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. (2019).

  17. Yamada, M., Miki, T. & Goshima, G. Imaging mitosis in the Moss Physcomitrella patens. Methods Mol. Biol. 1413, 293–326 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez-Obando, M. et al. Simple and efficient targeting of multiple genes through CRISPR-Cas9 in Physcomitrella patens. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genet. 6, 3647–3653 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vos, J. W. et al. The plant TPX2 protein regulates prospindle assembly before nuclear envelope breakdown. Plant Cell 20, 2783–2797 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomaštíková, E. et al. TPX2 protein of Arabidopsis activates Aurora kinase 1, but not Aurora kinase 3 in vitro. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 33, 1988–1995 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alfaro-Aco, R., Thawani, A. & Petry, S. Structural analysis of the role of TPX2 in branching microtubule nucleation. J. Cell Biol. 177, 7–11 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fernandez-Pozo, N. et al. PEATmoss (Physcomitrella Expression Atlas Tool): A unified gene expression atlas for the model plant Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 102, 165–177 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leong, S. Y., Yamada, M., Yanagisawa, N. & Goshima, G. SPIRAL2 stabilises endoplasmic microtubule minus ends in the Moss Physcomitrella patens. Cell Struct. Funct. 43, 53–60 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dennis, R. J., Whitewoods, C. D. & Harrison, C. J. Quantitative methods in like-for-like comparative analyses of Aphanorrhegma (Physcomitrella) patens phyllid development. J. Bryol. 41, 314–321 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez, P., Luo, A., Sylvester, A. & Rasmussen, C. G. Proper division plane orientation and mitotic progression together allow normal growth of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2759–2764 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Doonan, J. H., Cove, D. J. & Lloyd, C. W. Microtubules and microfilaments in tip growth: Evidence that microtubules impose polarity on protonemal growth in Physcomitrella patens. J. Cell Sci. 89, 533–540 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jordan, M. A. N. N., Toso, R. J., Thrower, D. & Wilson, L. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9552–9556 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pressel, S., Ligrone, R. & Duckett, J. G. Cellular differentiation in moss protonemata: A morphological and experimental study. Ann. Bot. 102, 227–245 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reski, R. Development, genetics and molecular biology of mosses. Bot. Acta 111, 1–15 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kozgunova, E., Nishina, M. & Goshima, G. Kinetochore protein depletion underlies cytokinesis failure and somatic polyploidization in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Elife 8, 1–16 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schween, G., Schulte, J. & Reski, R. Effect of ploidy level on growth, differentiation, and morphology in Physcomitrella patens. Bryologist 108, 27–35 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakaoka, Y. et al. An inducible RNA interference system in Physcomitrella patens reveals a dominant role of Augmin in phragmoplast microtubule generation. Plant Cell 24, 1478–1493 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reski, R. Quantitative moss cell biology. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 46, 39–47 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rempfer, C. et al. Autopolyploidization affects transcript patterns and gene targeting frequencies in Physcomitrella. Plant Cell Rep. (2021).

  35. Yoneda, A., Akatsuka, M., Hoshino, H., Kumagai, F. & Hasezawa, S. Decision of spindle poles and division plane by double preprophase bands in a BY-2 cell line expressing GFP-tubulin. Plant Cell Physiol. 46, 531–538 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lipka, E. et al. The phragmoplast-orienting kinesin-12 class proteins translate the positional information of the preprophase band to establish the cortical division zone in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 26, 2617–2632 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kimata, Y. et al. Polar vacuolar distribution is essential for accurate asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2338–2343 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamada, M. & Goshima, G. The KCH kinesin drives nuclear transport and cytoskeletal coalescence to promote tip cell growth in Physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell 30, 1496–1510 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brownfield, L. et al. Organelles maintain spindle position in plant meiosis. Nat. Commun. 6, 6492 (2015).

  40. Vargas-Hurtado, D. et al. Differences in mitotic spindle architecture in mammalian neural stem cells influence mitotic accuracy during brain development. Curr. Biol. 29, 2993–3005 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Livanos, P. & Müller, S. Division plane establishment and cytokinesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 239–267 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Almonacid, M., Terret, M. É. & Verlhac, M. H. Actin-based spindle positioning: New insights from female gametes. J. Cell Sci. 127, 477–483 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Duan, X. et al. Dynamic organelle distribution initiates actin-based spindle migration in mouse oocytes. Nat. Commun. 11, 277 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xiao, H. et al. Insights into the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10166–10173 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Miki, T., Nakaoka, Y. & Goshima, G. Live cell microscopy-based RNAi screening in the Moss Physcomitrella patens. Methods Mol. Biol. 1470, 225–246 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sato, Y. et al. System for stable β-estradiol-inducible gene expression in the Moss Physcomitrella patens. PLoS One 8, e77356 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wolny, A. et al. Accurate and versatile 3D segmentation of plant tissues at cellular resolution. Elife 9, 1–34 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Egener, T. et al. High frequency of phenotypic deviations in Physcomitrella patens plants transformed with a gene-disruption library. BMC Plant Biol. 2, 1–9 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schween, G., Gorr, G., Hohe, A. & Reski, R. Unique tissue-specific cell cycle in Physcomitrella. Plant Biol. 5, 50–58 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Maya Hakozaki, Momoko Nishina, and Yuki Nakaoka for assistance with this project, Sebastian Hoernstein for help and advice on RNA extraction, Lennard Bohlender for help with qRT-PCR, Julian Knerr for providing vector with F-tractin for cloning, Raymundo Alfaro-Aco for comments on the TPX2 functional motifs, Peishan Yi and Mariana Costa for helpful comments on the manuscript, and the Life Imaging Center at the University of Freiburg for microscopic use. This work was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (17H06471, 22H02644, 22H04717), JSPS Joint Research Projects with UK Research and Innovation (to G.G.), and an Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (to E.K.). Additional support came from the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CIBSS – EXC‐2189 – Project ID 390939984 to R.R.).


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



E.K. and G.G. designed the research project; G.G. and R.R supervised the project; E.K. and M.W.Y. performed experiments; E.K. analyzed the data; E.K., G.G., and R.R. wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elena Kozgunova or Gohta Goshima.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozgunova, E., Yoshida, M.W., Reski, R. et al. Spindle motility skews division site determination during asymmetric cell division in Physcomitrella. Nat Commun 13, 2488 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing