Abstract
Atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) present a promising platform for numerous photonic applications due to excitonic spectral features, possibility to tune their constants by external gating, doping, or light, and mechanical stability. Utilization of such materials for sensing or optical modulation purposes would require a clever optical design, as by itself the 2D materials can offer only a small optical phase delay – consequence of the atomic thickness. To address this issue, we combine films of 2D semiconductors which exhibit excitonic lines with the FabryPerot resonators of the standard commercial SiO_{2}/Si substrate, in order to realize topological phase singularities in reflection. Around these singularities, reflection spectra demonstrate rapid phase changes while the structure behaves as a perfect absorber. Furthermore, we demonstrate that such topological phase singularities are ubiquitous for the entire class of atomically thin TMDCs and other highrefractiveindex materials, making it a powerful tool for phase engineering in flat optics. As a practical demonstration, we employ PdSe_{2} topological phase singularities for a refractive index sensor and demonstrate its superior phase sensitivity compared to typical surface plasmon resonance sensors.
Introduction
Optical waves carry energy and information encoded in their electric field amplitude, phase, and polarization. While light field amplitude is still used the most in various applications, optical phase manipulation could lie in the core of nextgeneration information technologies^{1,2,3}. Generally, the phase acquired by light upon reflection, scattering, or transmission varies rapidly when the amplitude of the light (reflected, scattered, or transmitted, respectively) goes to zero^{4,5,6,7}. Reflection zeros can be encountered in the effect of plasmonic blackbody^{8}, perfect absorption^{9,10}, coherent perfect absorption^{11}, Brewster angle^{12,13} or more sophisticated examples of zeroreflection modes^{5,14}. Such zeros of response function always reveal phase singularities^{4,5,15,16} which are accompanied by a nontrivial topological charge \(C=\frac{1}{2\pi }\mathop{\oint }\nolimits_{\gamma }\,{{{{{{\rm{grad}}}}}}}(\varphi ){{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}s}\), where \(\varphi\) is the response function phase while the integration is performed along a path \(\gamma\) enclosing the singular point (zero response point) in twodimensional parameter space^{5,15,16}.
To demonstrate how phase singularities associated with zeroreflection can be topologically protected, let us consider light reflection from a planar structure shown in Fig. 1a, where an atomically thin layer of a highrefractive index material (HRIM) is placed on top of SiO_{2}/Si substrate. For a given thickness of HRIM film, an angle of incidence (\(\phi\)), the photon energy (E), and polarization, reflection from the structure can be made exactly zero by calculating appropriate values for the dielectric permittivity of the HRIM film (Re(ε) and Im(ε)), which can be always found by the nature of Fresnel coefficients for the structure^{17}. When we change an angle of incidence and a photon energy in some range, a zeroreflection surface will appear, see the blue surface in Fig. 1b. Any point on the zeroreflection surface corresponds to zeroreflection (at some angle of incidence and light wavelength) for the studied structure. Now we plot an actual dependence of the dielectric constants HRIM on the photon energy on the same graph (the socalled material dispersion curve), see the red line in Fig. 1b. In the presence of a reasonably large resonance feature, this curve would look like a spiral in the space of (E, Re(ε) and Im(ε)) and hence will inevitably cross the surface of zeroreflection as shown in Fig. 1b. For a Lorentz resonance feature^{17}, there will be two intersection points between the material dispersion curve and the zeroreflection point resulting in two zeros of reflection from the structure in Fig. 1a. It is necessary to stress that these intersection points are protected by the Jordan theorem^{5,6}. Indeed, minor variations of the material dispersion curve caused by material imperfections will not change the relative alignment of the curve and the zeroreflection surface and cannot lead to the disappearance of the zeroreflection points which lead to the idea of topological darkness^{5,6}. Our structure relies on the atomic flatness of the interfaces and on the sharp changes of the refractive indexes, which offer a nontrivial possibility to realize zeroreflection and topological singularities for atomically thin layers in this structure at visible light, which was never achieved before.
Zeroreflection implies perfect absorption of the light that falls onto the discussed structure (as transmission through the silicon substrate should be zero). Zeroreflection entails phase singularity due to the singular nature of light phase at zero light amplitude (where the phase of light is not defined). Figure 1c represents the map of the ppolarized wave reflection phase in space of E and \(\phi\), which contains two phase singularities corresponding to the zeroreflection points with topological charges equal to \(\)1 and +1 (the topological points of Fig. 1b). Of immediate interest is a bifurcation behavior of optical phase in the vicinity of topological point (Fig. 1d). In other words, phase reveals abrupt ±πjumps near a zeroreflection when plotted as a function of wavelength for a fixed incidence angle close to a phase singularity. It gives an indispensable degree of freedom for efficient phase manipulation.
The most exciting consequence of such optical phase control is the realization of “flat optics” paradigm—flexible manipulation of the optical wavefront by an arrangement of subwavelength planar objects to shape the desired phase pattern^{1,18,19,20}. Such “flat optics” paradigm enables miniaturized metalenses^{21,22,23} and metaholograms^{24,25,26}, and twodimensional (2D) materials^{27} such as graphene^{28}, transition metal dichalcogenides^{29}, and organic semiconductors^{30} provide an excellent platform for the implementation of these components. Although these works constitute an important step towards truly flat optics with electrically controlled properties, the efficiency of current devices is limited by the fundamental constraints: the majority of optical devices require a sufficient phase accumulation, while for atomically thin layers, this value is naturally low^{31}. Indeed, the typical wavefront manipulation applications require that the phase accumulated by a light wave upon interaction with such a device can be tuned at least within the range of \(\pi\). However, in the monolayer limit (t ∼ 0.65 nm and n ∼ 4) for visible light (λ ∼ 60 nm), the resulting phase delay, which is approximately determined by the optical thickness of the 2D material layer, is only about 0.01\(\pi\). Consequently, finding new ways to induce strong optical phase variations in atomically thin structures is vital for flat optics.
Here, we demonstrate a platform for efficient optical phase manipulation presented by atomically thin highrefractiveindex materials (HRIMs) that often possess excitonic resonances. We experimentally observe zeroreflection, phase singularities, and rapid phase variation of reflected light in extremely thin layers (down to single monolayer!) of PdSe_{2}, graphene, MoS_{2}, and WS_{2} films placed on SiO_{2}/Si substrate. Combined theoretical and experimental analysis indicates that the zeroreflection points are accompanied by a nontrivial topological charge. We derive an analytical condition for such points to occur in layered structures containing optically thin films and predict the occurrence of these points in structures containing a broader family of atomically thin HRIMs and substrates. The observed effect is highly robust and does not require complicated fabrication steps guaranteeing its reproducibility and reliability. In contrast to optical darkness observed for dielectric materials and multilayers which disappear with layer irregularities (e.g., at Brewster angle conditions) the effect is topologically protected. It can be used in numerous applications, including labelfree bio and chemical sensing, photodetection and photoharvesting, perfect light absorption in 2D monolayers, quantum communication, and security. As a practical application of this platform, we demonstrate a refractive index sensor that can rival modern plasmon resonancebased counterparts^{32}. Therefore, our phase engineering approach as a whole offers an advanced tool for current and nextgeneration 2D flat optics.
Results
Phase singularities in reflection
To examine the topological properties of the light reflectance from thin HRIM films placed on SiO_{2}/Si substrates, we utilized spectroscopic ellipsometry (Methods). The unique advantage of this technique is the simultaneous determination of reflection amplitude and phase in terms of the ellipsometric parameters \(\varPsi\) and \(\varDelta\), which are defined through the complex reflection ratio ρ:^{33}
where \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}}}\) and \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}\) are the amplitude reflection coefficients of p and spolarized plane waves. Therefore, ellipsometry provides us with the information not only about the reflected light amplitude, but also about the light phase.
Unexpectedly, we found that light reflection measured from 5.1 nm thick PdSe_{2} as well as for monolayers of graphene, MoS_{2}, and WS_{2} on SiO_{2}/Si substrate showed a number of zeroreflection points as explained in Fig. 2. Remarkably, the measured amplitude parameter \(\varPsi\) in Fig. 2a is in excellent agreement with the simulated spectrum in Fig. 2b calculated using the transfermatrix method^{34}. However, the spectra of \(\varPsi\) alone do not definitively indicate if an exact zero was attained in reflection at the position of any of \(\varPsi\) dips. This can be deduced from the behavior of relevant phase which was measured using spectroscopic ellipsometry (phase \(\varDelta\)). The angledependent spectrum of the measured ellipsometric phase \(\varDelta\) in Fig. 2c, d clearly indicates that the reflected phase is undefined in the vicinity of certain points in the energyincidence angle parameter space and possesses nontrivial topological charge C. Therefore, for the first time we experimentally proved that these points are phase singularities, which can occur if and only if the response function (reflection in our case) takes zero magnitude at that point. Figure 2 reveals three such phase singularities for PdSe_{2}, two for graphene, and one for MoS_{2} and WS_{2} monolayers. Interestingly, PdSe_{2} has the largest number of topological phase singularities (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Note 1): while two of them are associated with substrate phase singularities of the substrate^{35}, three of them are a direct consequence of a unique material properties of PdSe_{2} (see the section Morphological and optical study of PdSe_{2}). It is worth mention that these phase singularities do not originate from Brewster or interference effect^{36,37,38}. Indeed, the Brewster effect requires a lossless dielectric while the interference effect needs a substantial phase accumulation, which is negligible for atomically thin PdSe_{2}. Hence, our concept of topological phase singularities (Fig. 1) generalizes the phase effects of zeroreflection points. Most of these phase singularities are associated with \(\varPsi =0^\circ\) (equivalently \(\rho =0\) and, hence, \({r}_{p}=0\)), whereas one for graphene has \(\varPsi =90^\circ\) (equivalently \(\rho =\infty\) or \({r}_{s}=0\)). Simulated angledependent spectrum of \(\varDelta\) in Fig. 2 again demonstrates remarkable agreement with the experimental data, correctly predicting spectral positions of all phase singularities. Close examination of Fig. 2a reveals that although the exact zeroreflection around 4 eV and 30° is not attained owing to experimental nonidealities (roughness, finite coherence of light source, etc.), the phase singularity is almost unchanged compared to theoretical predictions (Fig. 2c, d) thanks to topological protection (Supplementary Note 2).
Previous works^{4,5,6} realized these topological phase singularities only in metallic nanostructures through careful engineering of optical properties of nanostructured materials. Later, singular phase behavior was achieved in simple plasmonic heterostructures^{39} where thin layers of metals (~20 nm) and dielectric were used to generate zero reflection and phase singularities. Figure 2 proves that the heterostructure approach is quite general and could be realized even for 2D materials with ultimate atomic thickness in the simplest structure—2D material/SiO_{2}/Si. The reason for this counterintuitive result is a rapid dielectric function variation (for example, due to excitons in TMDCs) in atomically thin HRIM. This rapid variation guarantees intersection with the zeroreflection surface (Fig. 1b). Note that a thick layer is unsuitable for this purpose because absorption in that layer will prohibit interaction with the substrate’s FabryPerot resonances.
To predict the position zeroreflection points for p and spolarized reflection in our structure shown in Fig. 1a, we derived analytical expressions for the permittivities \({\varepsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}}}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}\) of a thin film placed on a dielectric substrate which would result in the absence of the reflection for p and spolarized light, respectively (Supplementary Note 3):
where \(t\) and \(d\) are thicknesses of the highrefractiveindex material and dielectric layer respectively; \({\varepsilon }_{1}\), \({\varepsilon }_{2}\), and \({\varepsilon }_{3}\) are the dielectric permittivity of top halfspace, dielectric layer and bottom halfspace, in our case, that is air, SiO_{2}, and Si, respectively; \({q}_{{iz}}={k}_{{iz}}/{k}_{0}=\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{i}{\varepsilon }_{1}{{{\sin }}}^{2}(\phi )}\) is the normalized zcomponent (perpendicular to layers) of the wavevector in medium number i, \({k}_{0}=\omega /c\), \(\omega\) is the frequency, \(c\) is the speed of light, and \(\phi\) is the angle of incidence. If the bottom halfspace is filled with a perfect electric conductor, the expressions can be simplified greatly to:
where \({\varepsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}},{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{{\prime} }\) and \({\varepsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}},{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{{\prime} {\prime} }\) are the real and imaginary parts of dielectric permittivity \({\varepsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}},{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}\).
Equations (2) and (3) define a zeroreflection surface in the parameter space of wavelength, real and imaginary parts of the permittivity (\(\lambda\), Re[\(\varepsilon\)] and Im[\(\varepsilon\)], respectively). Intersections of the material dispersion curve in this parameter space with the zeroreflection surface of the system (thin film of HRIM/SiO_{2}/Si) define zeroreflection points for the particular material of the film, as shown in Fig. 1b. The topology of mutual arrangement of the curve and the surface underlies the robustness of the zeroreflection effect to external perturbations (roughness, temperature change, etc.). If a perturbation is introduced to the thin film, a displacement of the material dispersion curve and/or the zeroreflection surface will only result in a shift of the zeroreflection point in the parameter space, but will not lead to its disappearance (Fig. 1b). This argument is in line with nontrivial topological charges of the observed phase singularities: small changes in the parameters of the system cannot lead to a change in the phase roundtrip around a point, since it is an integer of 2\(\pi\), thus making the zeroreflection point topologically protected^{40}.
Spectral positions of topological phase singularities can be controlled by either the thickness or the dielectric permittivity of the material. The derived analytical expressions allow us to generalize the effect of phase singularities to other highrefractiveindex materials (Supplementary Note 1). Hence, the effect of rapid phase change is universal for all atomically thin materials and substrates. It allows us hereafter to focus on PdSe_{2}, which demonstrates rich \(\varPsi\) and \(\varDelta\) spectra with a series of peaks and dips in Fig. 2a, b. We begin with a detailed characterization of PdSe_{2} film, and then switch to unique applications and features of topological phase gradient.
Morphological and optical study of PdSe_{2}
PdSe_{2} thin films were prepared through chemical vapor deposition (CVD)^{41} resulted in a uniform sample as confirmed by representative optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images in Fig. 3b, c. Xray diffraction (XRD) spectrum showed pronounced peak in Fig. 3b validating the high crystallinity of the film^{42}. Next, we validated the material’s purity by Xray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) in Fig. 3g–h. It shows that Se:Pd atomic concentration ratio equals 1.92, close to the expected value of 2. Additionally, Raman spectra in Fig. 3e–f have characteristic phonon modes \({A}_{{{{{{\rm{g}}}}}}}^{1}\), \({A}_{{{{{{\rm{g}}}}}}}^{2}\), \({B}_{1{{{{{\rm{g}}}}}}}^{2}\), and \({A}_{{{{{{\rm{g}}}}}}}^{3}\) inherent to PdSe_{2} with puckered pentagonal crystal structure presented in Fig. 3a^{43}. This crystal configuration naturally has high geometrical and, therefore, high optical anisotropy (see Supplementary Note 4)^{44,45}.
To investigate anisotropic optical response, we measured Mueller matrices (Methods), which nonzero offdiagonal elements relate to sample anisotropy (see Supplementary Note 4). Interestingly, Mueller matrix’ elements vary from point to point, as seen from Fig. 3i, j. Conceivably, it comes from the random growth during the CVD synthesis since Mueller matrices’ values in Fig. 3i follow Gaussian law for random numbers. A similar random local anisotropic response is observed by polarized optical microscopy and Raman spectroscopy (Supplementary Note 4). Hence, at a macroscopic scale, our PdSe_{2} layer exhibits an isotropic dielectric response. It allowed us to investigate optical constants by classical ellipsometric and reflectance measurements (see Supplementary Note 4) using the isotropic model for PdSe_{2} with 5.1 nm thickness obtained by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in Fig. 3d. The resulting broadband dielectric function is presented in Fig. 3k. As expected, PdSe_{2} has pronounced excitonic peaks^{46} and a metallic Drude response caused by pdoping revealed by XPS (see Supplementary Note 5). Note that excitonic peaks of PdSe_{2} align with FabryPerot resonances of the standard SiO_{2} (280 nm)/Si substrate, making system PdSe_{2}/SiO_{2}(280 nm)/Si promising for enhancement of the PdSe_{2} optical response.
Applications of topological zeros: sensing
Simple planar structures studied here are easy to incorporate and leverage in industrial and scientific devices where the optical phase plays a critical role^{5,24,25,32,47}. The most prominent practical examples are holography^{24,25,47}, image processing^{48,49}, labelfree bio or chemical sensing^{50,51,52,53}, gas sensors^{35} and quantum key distribution^{54,55}. To validate the concept, we demonstrated that the liquid/PdSe_{2}/SiO_{2}/Si system is already an ultrahigh sensitive sensor owing to rapid phase change around the topological point. Note that for sensing measurements we used ellipsometer in the most accurate nulling mode (Methods) and 7.1 nm PdSe_{2} thin film to have topological zero in the operation range of our device since liquid changes zero’s spectral and angle position according to Eqs. (2–3).
For demonstration, we used water with 0, 2.5, 5, 15, and 20% volume concentration of isopropanol. Notably, the measured \(\varPsi\) and \(\varDelta\) in water are in agreement with the predicted values (see Supplementary Note 6) whereby confirming the water stability of PdSe_{2} in addition to its recently shown air stability^{43}. Then, to alter the refractive index (RI), we injected isopropanol into the solution and recorded \(\varPsi\) and \(\varDelta\) (Fig. 4a, b) for each water solution. As predicted, the change in amplitude response, \(\varPsi\), (Fig. 4a, c) is relatively small due to the resonance’s topological nature, whereas \(\varDelta\) (Fig. 4b, d) shows a dramatic dependence on RI of liquid. Noteworthy, the phase sensitivity in our device of 7.5 × 10^{4 }degrees per refractive index unit (deg/RIU) exceeds that of the cuttingedge sensor based on plasmonic surface lattice resonance with 5.7 × 10^{4} deg/RIU (for other sensor characteristics, see Supplementary Note 7)^{32}. Therefore, our biosensor design can greatly help in dealing with the current coronavirus situation since the investigated system PdSe_{2}/SiO_{2}/Si is already a readytouse scalable, cheap, easytouse and fabricate, robust device with outstanding performance thanks to the pronounced phase effect in topological points.
Evolution of phase singularities
So far we have considered and observed reflection phase singularities with unitary topological charge, wherein the argument makes a \(\pm\)2\(\pi\) roundtrip around the singularity. These points, however, are not stationary and evolve with the material parameters, as Eqs. (2–3) suggest. When two points with opposite charges (+1 and −1) meet in the parameter space, they annihilate leaving no phase singularity. We theoretically observe such annihilation with variation of the PdSe_{2} film thickness, \(t\), when two phase singularities with opposite topological charges meet at around \(t\approx\) 3.2 nm (Fig. 5a). This case happens when the material dispersion curve in Fig. 5b becomes tangent to zeroreflection surface. The corresponding angleresolved spectrum of \(\varDelta\) shown in Fig. 5b plotted for \(t=\) 3.2 nm reveals the absence of any phase singularities. Therefore, by varying the thickness one is able to control the position and amount of phase singularities, which appear or disappear in pairs, so that the total topological charge preserves.
Next, we examine the possibility of phase singularities with higher topological charges, \({C} > \) 1. One potential opportunity for the emergence of a nonunitary topological charge is when a phase singularity either in \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}}}\) or \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}\) exhibits a nonunitary charge. Unfortunately, for nonmagnetic materials in a planar system, zeros in \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}}}\) or \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}\) are essentially nondegenerate (Supplementary Note 8).
However, since \(\rho\) is the ratio of two reflection coefficients, another possibility is when a \(C=\pm\)1 phase singularity of \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}\) coincides in the parameter space with a \(C=\mp\)1 phase singularity of \({r}_{{{{{{\rm{p}}}}}}}\). This gives rise to a \(C=\pm\)2 phase singularity of \(\rho\), which can be detected by spectroscopic ellipsometry. Equating the righthand sides of Eqs. (2) and (3), we obtain an equation that determines, for a given substrate, the position of the point at which the zeroreflection conditions for both polarizations coincide; then we can immediately calculate the dielectric constant of the film that satisfies this condition. The charge of a point is determined by the derivative of the material dispersion curve, so the last step is to choose the direction of the material dispersion curve near the zeroreflection point. By using the set of parameters satisfying these conditions (Supplementary Note 9), we observe a \(C=+\)2 phase singularity in the spectrum of \(\rho\), Fig. 5c. The use of inplane anisotropy can significantly assist in the design of nonunitary charged points of \(\rho\). Suppose the main optical axis of the film is oriented along with the inplane component of the wavevector, then the ppolarization is affected by only the longitudinal component of the permittivity and the spolarization only by the transverse one. In that case, it is possible to select zeroreflection conditions for different polarizations entirely independently. Therefore, in contrast to isotropic materials, for which the position of points with a topological double charge depends on the properties of the substrate, in the case of inplane anisotropic materials, it is potentially possible to obtain a point with \(C=\pm\)2 at any point in the space of angles and frequencies (see Supplementary Note 9). One of such cases is shown in Fig. 5d.
For \(C=\pm\)2 singularities demonstrated in Fig. 5c, d, the phase makes a \(\pm\)4\(\pi\) roundtrip around such a singularity, thus increasing the local phase gradient approximately by a factor of two, which could significantly improve phase applications. For instance, the sensitivity of the corresponding refractive index sensor may increase approximately twofold. However, similar to highorder optical vortices^{56,57}, highorder topological charges are structurally unstable as a small perturbation can deform its singular region, reducing them to a collection of stable unitary singularities.
Noteworthy, in our study, the topological points appear in the dependence of the reflection amplitude on the angle of incidence and the wavelength, in contrast to topology in the spatial distribution of electric field^{58,59,60}. Quite surprisingly, the properties of such different topological charges and experimental manifestation are very similar. Those include the conservation of the topological charge under perturbations, birth and annihilation in pairs of opposite charges. The analogy of topological properties between our work and spatial singularities gives an opportunity for the future development of zeroreflection points with a variety of topological effects such as fractional topological charges^{56,57}.
The scenario of nonunitary phase singularities is somewhat reminiscent of exceptional points in nonHermitian optical systems^{61}. Such points, which correspond to coalescent eigenstates of a nonHermitian Hamiltonian, feature a strong \({(\epsilon {\epsilon }_{0})}^{1/(N+1)}\) dependence of the eigenenergies of the optical system on a perturbation parameter \(\epsilon\) in the vicinity of the exceptional point \({\epsilon }_{0}\) (with \(N\) being the order of the exceptional point), which has been used for boost the sensitivity.
Additionally, upon appropriate engineering of the system the same concept of topological phase manipulation could also be applied in the transmission regime, thus bridging our phase engineering approach with metasurfaces.
Discussion
Flat optics enable the design of optical components into thin, planar, and CMOScompatible structures. Coupled with 2D materials, it evolves into 2D flat optics with ultracompact and tunable devices. Nevertheless, atomically thin optical elements suffer from low efficiency of phase manipulation. To lift this limitation and achieve phase control with 2D materials, we utilized topologically protected zeros of a simple heterostructure. We showed both experimentally and theoretically that a whole set of highindex 2D materials could provide rapid phase variations revealed by spectroscopic ellipsometry. In addition, we demonstrate that topological approach leads to highperformance devices on the sensing example and propose the future direction of topological phase effects such as annihilation and highorder charges. From a broader perspective, our results open new avenues for effective application of atomically thin highrefractiveindex materials as phase materials in photonics.
Methods
Ellipsometry measurements
For visualization of topological charge in phase, we used a variableangle spectroscopic ellipsometer (VASE, J.A. Woollam Co.) since it measures amplitude and phase of complex reflection ratio simultaneously. Measurements were done over a wide wavelength range from 248 to 1240 nm (1 – 5 eV) in steps of 1 nm and multiple angles of incidence in the range 15°–80° with 0.5° step. Ellipsometer has a single chamber monochromator with two gratings: 1200 g/mm for visible light (248 – 1040 nm) with 4.6 nm bandwidth and 600 g/mm for nearinfrared interval (1040–1240 nm) with 9.2 nm bandwidth.
For accurate refractive index sensing, we performed the nulling ellipsometry with Accurion nanofilm_ep4 ellipsometer. During the measurement light was initially directed through the polarizer then through the compensator, whose settings were adjusted until the reflection from the sample became linearly polarized. Afterward, the analyzer was set to achieve the minimum in the signal at the photodetector. The final positions of polarizer and analyzer at signal’s minimum uniquely define ellipsometric parameters \(\varPsi\) and \(\varDelta\). Measurements were done over a wavelength range from 300 to 360 nm in steps of 0.1 nm with 4 nm bandwidth and at 49.4° incident angle corresponding to the singular point of PdSe_{2} in water.
To probe anisotropic response, we also measured 11 elements of Mueller Matrix (m_{12}, m_{13}, m_{21}, m_{22}, m_{23}, m_{24}, m_{31}, m_{32}, m_{33}, m_{34}) on Accurion nanofilm_ep4 ellipsometer over 400–1000 nm wavelength range in 5 nm step with 4 nm bandwidth at 50° incident angle in a rotation compensator mode to get access to Stokes parameters in the input branch of ellipsometer.
Optical visualization
The surface images (2400 × 2400 pixels) of PdSe_{2} were captured by an optical microscope (Nikon LV150L) with a digital camera DSFi3.
Atomic force microscopy
The thickness and surface morphology of the PdSe_{2} film were accurately characterized by an atomic force microscope (AFM, NTMDT Spectrum Instruments “Ntegra”) using AFM in a peakforce mode at ambient conditions. AFM measurements were carried out using cantilever tips from NTMDT (ETALON, HA_NC) with a spring constant of 3.5 N/m, a tip radius < 10 nm and a resonant frequency of 140 kHz. Images of the PdSe_{2} surface were taken with 512 × 512 pixels and scan rate of 0.5 Hz, after that data were analyzed by Gwyddion software.
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM7001F) with a Schottky emitter in secondary electron imaging mode with a voltage of 30 kV and current of 67 µA, and a working distance of ~6.3 mm was applied to study in detail surface features and homogeneity of the PdSe_{2} film surface within different areas using 1960 × 1280 pixel scan.
XPS characterization
The chemical states of the elements in the film, as well as the valence band were analyzed by Xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in Theta Probe tool (Thermo Scientific) under ultrahigh vacuum conditions (base pressure < 10^{−9} mBar) with a monochromatic AlK_{α} Xray source (1486.6 eV). Photoelectron spectra were acquired using fixed analyzer transmission (FAT) mode with 50 eV pass energy. The spectrometer energy scale was calibrated on the Au 4f_{7/2} line (84.0 eV).
Xray diffraction
Xray powder diffractometrer (XRD, Thermo ARL X’TRA) equipped with Cu Kα radiation λ = 0.154 nm was used to characterize the crystalline structure and phase of PdSe_{2} film. The XRD pattern was taken at ambient conditions by 2\(\theta\)scan over the range of 20°–75° with a step of 0.05° and accumulation time of 2 s.
Reflectance measurements
Fouriertransform spectrometer Bruker Vertex 80 v has been used to measure the reflection coefficient at the normal incident at room temperature in the frequency range from 1000 to 24,000 cm^{−1}, as the reference was used the reflection from the gold mirror.
Raman characterization
The experimental setup used for Raman measurements was a confocal scanning Raman microscope Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution (HORIBA Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). All measurements were carried out using linearly polarized excitation at wavelengths 532 and 632.8 nm,1800 lines/mm diffraction grating, and ×100 objective (N.A. = 0.90), whereas we used unpolarized detection to have a significant signaltonoise ratio. The spot size was approximately 0.43 μm. The Raman images were recorded by mapping the spatial dependence of Raman intensity integrated at the main Raman peaks within the shift range 136–156 cm^{−1}, for each of the 45 × 45 points in the scan, with an integration time of 500 ms at each point and incident power P = 1.7 mW.
References
Yu, N. et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333–337 (2011).
Deng, Z.L. & Li, G. Metasurface optical holography. Mater. Today Phys. 3, 16–32 (2017).
Jung, C. et al. Nearzero reflection of alldielectric structural coloration enabling polarizationsensitive optical encryption with enhanced switchability. Nanophotonics 10, 919–926 (2020).
Grigorenko, A. N., Nikitin, P. I. & Kabashin, A. V. Phase jumps and interferometric surface plasmon resonance imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3917–3919 (1999).
Kravets, V. G. et al. Singular phase nanooptics in plasmonic metamaterials for labelfree singlemolecule detection. Nat. Mater. 12, 304–309 (2013).
Malassis, L. et al. Topological darkness in selfassembled plasmonic metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 26, 324–330 (2014).
Hein, S. M. & Giessen, H. Retardationinduced phase singularities in coupled plasmonic oscillators. Phys. Rev. B 91, 205402 (2015).
Kravets, V. G., Schedin, F. & Grigorenko, A. N. Plasmonic blackbody: almost complete absorption of light in nanostructured metallic coatings. Phys. Rev. B 78, 205405 (2008).
Kim, S. et al. Electronically tunable perfect absorption in graphene. Nano Lett. 18, 971–979 (2018).
Zhu, L. et al. Angleselective perfect absorption with twodimensional materials. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16052–e16052 (2016).
Pichler, K. et al. Random antilasing through coherent perfect absorption in a disordered medium. Nature 567, 351–355 (2019).
Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 1998).
Baranov, D. G., Edgar, J. H., Hoffman, T., Bassim, N. & Caldwell, J. D. Perfect interferenceless absorption at infrared frequencies by a van der Waals crystal. Phys. Rev. B 92, 1–6 (2015).
Sweeney, W. R., Hsu, C. W. & Stone, A. D. Theory of reflectionless scattering modes. Phys. Rev. A 102, 1–20 (2020).
Yan, C., Raziman, T. V. & Martin, O. J. F. Phase bifurcation and zero reflection in planar plasmonic metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 4, 852–860 (2017).
Berkhout, A. & Koenderink, A. F. Perfect absorption and phase singularities in plasmon antenna array etalons. ACS Photonics 6, 2917–2925 (2019).
Born, M. et al. Principles of Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Kildishev, A. V., Boltasseva, A. & Shalaev, V. M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009–1232009 (2013).
Yu, N. & Capasso, F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 13, 139–150 (2014).
GomezDiaz, J. S. & Alù, A. Flatland optics with hyperbolic metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 3, 2211–2224 (2016).
Wang, S. et al. A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 227–232 (2018).
Chen, W. T. et al. A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 220–226 (2018).
Lin, H. et al. Diffractionlimited imaging with monolayer 2D materialbased ultrathin flat lenses. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 137 (2020).
Zheng, G. et al. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 308–312 (2015).
Ni, X., Kildishev, A. V. & Shalaev, V. M. Metasurface holograms for visible light. Nat. Commun. 4, 2807 (2013).
Yue, Z., Xue, G., Liu, J., Wang, Y. & Gu, M. Nanometric holograms based on a topological insulator material. Nat. Commun. 8, 15354 (2017).
Xia, F., Wang, H., Xiao, D., Dubey, M. & Ramasubramaniam, A. Twodimensional material nanophotonics. Nat. Photonics 8, 899–907 (2014).
Li, Z. et al. Graphene plasmonic metasurfaces to steer infrared light. Sci. Rep. 5, 12423 (2015).
Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 10, 216–226 (2016).
Shi, Y.L., Zhuo, M.P., Wang, X.D. & Liao, L.S. Twodimensional organic semiconductor crystals for photonics applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 1080–1097 (2020).
Krasnok, A. Metalenses go atomically thick and tunable. Nat. Photonics 14, 409–410 (2020).
Danilov, A. et al. Ultranarrow surface lattice resonances in plasmonic metamaterial arrays for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 104, 102–112 (2018).
Tompkins, H. G. & Hilfiker J. N. Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Practical Application to Thin Film Characterization. (Momentum Press, 2016).
Passler, N. C. & Paarmann, A. Generalized 4 × 4 matrix formalism for light propagation in anisotropic stratified media: study of surface phonon polaritons in polar dielectric heterostructures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34, 2128 (2017).
Sreekanth, K. V. et al. Generalized brewster angle effect in thinfilm optical absorbers and its application for graphene hydrogen sensing. ACS Photonics 6, 1610–1617 (2019).
RuizUrbieta, M. & Sparrow, E. M. Reflection polarization by a transparentfilm–absorbingsubstrate system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 1188 (1972).
Azzam, R. M. A. Singlelayer antireflection coatings on absorbing substrates for the parallel and perpendicular polarizations at oblique incidence. Appl. Opt. 24, 513 (1985).
Azzam, R. M. A. Extinction of the p and s polarizations of a wave on reflection at the same angle from a transparent film on an absorbing substrate: applications to parallelmirror crossed polarizers and a novel integrated polarimeter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 189 (1985).
Sreekanth, K. V. et al. Biosensing with the singular phase of an ultrathin metaldielectric nanophotonic cavity. Nat. Commun. 9, 369 (2018).
Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Topological photonics. Nat. Photonics 8, 821–829 (2014).
Zeng, L. H. et al. Controlled synthesis of 2D palladium diselenide for sensitive photodetector applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1–9 (2019).
Zhang, G. et al. Optical and electrical properties of twodimensional palladium diselenide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 253102 (2019).
Oyedele, A. D. et al. PdSe2: pentagonal twodimensional layers with high air stability for electronics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14090–14097 (2017).
Yu, J. et al. Direct observation of the linear dichroism transition in twodimensional palladium diselenide. Nano Lett. 20, 1172–1182 (2020).
Ermolaev, G. A. et al. Giant optical anisotropy in transition metal dichalcogenides for nextgeneration photonics. Nat. Commun. 12, 854 (2021).
Kuklin, A. V. & Ågren, H. Quasiparticle electronic structure and optical spectra of singlelayer and bilayer PdSe_{2}: Proximity and defectinduced band gap renormalization. Phys. Rev. B 99, 245114 (2019).
Wang, Y. et al. Atomically thin noble metal dichalcogenides for phaseregulated metaoptics. Nano Lett. 20, 7811–7818 (2020).
Zhu, T. et al. Topological optical differentiator. Nat. Commun. 12, 680 (2021).
Huo, P. et al. Photonic spinmultiplexing metasurface for switchable spiral phase contrast imaging. Nano Lett. 20, 2791–2798 (2020).
Grigorenko, A. et al. Darkfield surface plasmon resonance microscopy. Opt. Commun. 174, 151–155 (2000).
Kravets, V. G., Schedin, F., Kabashin, A. V. & Grigorenko, A. N. Sensitivity of collective plasmon modes of gold nanoresonators to local environment. Opt. Lett. 35, 956 (2010).
Wu, F. et al. Layered material platform for surface plasmon resonance biosensing. Sci. Rep. 9, 20286 (2019).
Kabashin, A. V. et al. Phase‐responsive fourier nanotransducers for probing 2d materials and functional interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1902692 (2019).
Hiskett, P. A. et al. Longdistance quantum key distribution in optical fibre. N. J. Phys. 8, 193–193 (2006).
Takesue, H. et al. Quantum key distribution over a 40dB channel loss using superconducting singlephoton detectors. Nat. Photonics 1, 343–348 (2007).
Gbur, G. Fractional vortex Hilbert’s Hotel. Optica 3, 222 (2016).
Götte, J. B. et al. Light beams with fractional orbital angular momentum and their vortex structure. Opt. Express 16, 993 (2008).
Yuan, G. H. & Zheludev, N. I. Detecting nanometric displacements with optical ruler metrology. Science 364, 771–775 (2019).
Lim, S. W. D., Park, J.S., Meretska, M. L., Dorrah, A. H. & Capasso, F. Engineering phase and polarization singularity sheets. Nat. Commun. 12, 4190 (2021).
Wang, H., Guo, C., Jin, W., Song, A. Y. & Fan, S. Engineering arbitrarily oriented spatiotemporal optical vortices using transmission nodal lines. Optica 8, 966 (2021).
Özdemir, Ş. K., Rotter, S., Nori, F. & Yang, L. Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics. Nat. Mater. 18, 783–798 (2019).
ElSayed, M. A. et al. Optical constants of chemical vapor deposited graphene for photonic applications. Nanomaterials 11, 1230 (2021).
Ermolaev, G. A., Yakubovsky, D. I., Stebunov, Y. V., Arsenin, A. V. & Volkov, V. S. Spectral ellipsometry of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: analysis of excitonic peaks in dispersion. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 38, 014002 (2020).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Agreement No. 075152021606). A.N.G. acknowledges EU Graphene Flagship, Core 3 (881603). A.V. acknowledges the support from Russian Science Foundation (RSF) under grant number 207900349. G.E. acknowledges the support of Council for Grants of the President of the Russian Federation (SP2627.2021.5). K.S.N. acknowledges support from the Ministry of Education (Singapore) through the Research Centre of Excellence program (Award EDUN C3318279V12, Institute for Functional Intelligent Materials).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.E. and K.V. contributed equally. A.N.G., V.V., K.S.N., V.K., and A.A. suggested and directed the project. G.E., V.K., G.T., Y.S., D.Y., S.N., S.Z., R.R., and A.M.M. performed the measurements and analyzed the data. K.V., D.G.B., G.E., A.M., I.K., and A.V. provided theoretical support. G.A.E., K.V., and D.G.B. wrote the original manuscript. G.E., K.V., D.G.B., A.N.G., K.S.N., V.V., and A.A. reviewed and edited the paper. All authors contributed to the discussions and commented on the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Ranjan Singh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ermolaev, G., Voronin, K., Baranov, D.G. et al. Topological phase singularities in atomically thin highrefractiveindex materials. Nat Commun 13, 2049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467022297164
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467022297164
This article is cited by

Anomalous optical response of graphene on hexagonal boron nitride substrates
Communications Physics (2023)

Deep learning enabled topological design of exceptional points for multiopticalparameter control
Communications Physics (2023)

Topological bound state in the continuum induced unidirectional acoustic perfect absorption
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2023)

Frustrations of supported catalytic clusters under operando conditions predicted by a simple lattice model
Scientific Reports (2022)

Highrefractive index and mechanically cleavable nonvan der Waals InGaS3
npj 2D Materials and Applications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.