Dissecting extracellular and intracellular distribution of nanoparticles and their contribution to therapeutic response by monochromatic ratiometric imaging

Efficient delivery of payload to intracellular targets has been identified as the central principle for nanomedicine development, while the extracellular targets are equally important for cancer treatment. Notably, the contribution of extracellularly distributed nanoparticles to therapeutic outcome is far from being understood. Herein, we develop a pH/light dual-responsive monochromatic ratiometric imaging nanoparticle (MRIN), which functions through sequentially lighting up the intracellular and extracellular fluorescence signals by acidic endocytic pH and near-infrared light. Enabled by MRIN nanotechnology, we accurately quantify the extracellular and intracellular distribution of nanoparticles in several tumor models, which account for 65–80% and 20–35% of total tumor exposure, respectively. Given that the majority of nanoparticles are trapped in extracellular regions, we successfully dissect the contribution of extracellularly distributed nanophotosensitizer to therapeutic efficacy, thereby maximize the treatment outcome. Our study provides key strategies to precisely quantify nanocarrier microdistribtion and engineer multifunctional nanomedicines for efficient theranostics.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection NIS-Elements AR 4.20.00 was used for A1R confocal microscope (Nikon); CytExpert 2.3 was used for CytoFLEX LX (Beckman); Living Image 4.3.1 was used for IVIS Spectrum Imaging System (Perkinelmer); Phenochart 1.0.8 for Vectra-Polaris Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Perkinelmer);

Data analysis
Statistical analyses were performed on Graphpad Prism 7.0, flow cytometry data were analyzed on FlowJo software package (Flowjo V10), curves were fitted with Origin 2018, images were processed with Image-J 1.47 software (NIH).
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of any restrictions on data availability -For clinical datasets or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to our policy The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article source data, and its Supplementary Information. The source data underlying Figs. 2,3,4,5,6,Supplementary figs. 2,4,6,13,14,15,16,17, and western bot are provided with this paper. Other raw and relevant data during nature portfolio | reporting summary

March 2021
the study are available for research purposes from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sample size
Sample size was chosen to assure reproducibility of the experiments in accordance with the replacement, reduction and refinement principles of animal ethics regulation.
Data exclusions No data were excluded.

Replication
All experimental findings were reliably reproduced. The in vitro data were performed at least three times biologically independently. For the in vivo imaging, ≥ 3 mice per tumor model were used. In the therapeutic efficacy studies, 6-8 mice per group were used.Details of experimental replicates are given in the figure legends. Randomization All experimental samples or models including in vitro cells and in vivo mice were randomly allocated to each group.

Blinding
No blinding was used throughout experiments. The investigators should keep careful track of protocols because that most of the experiments needed multiple treatments (including formulation, cells or mouse tumor treatment, sample collection, and so on). Hence, it would be difficult to blind the investigators to group allocation during data collection and analysis.

Behavioural & social sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Study description
Briefly describe the study type including whether data are quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods (e.g. qualitative cross-sectional, quantitative experimental, mixed-methods case study).

Research sample
State the research sample (e.g. Harvard university undergraduates, villagers in rural India) and provide relevant demographic information (e.g. age, sex) and indicate whether the sample is representative. Provide a rationale for the study sample chosen. For studies involving existing datasets, please describe the dataset and source.

Sampling strategy
Describe the sampling procedure (e.g. random, snowball, stratified, convenience). Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient. For qualitative data, please indicate whether data saturation was considered, and what criteria were used to decide that no further sampling was needed.

Data collection
Provide details about the data collection procedure, including the instruments or devices used to record the data (e.g. pen and paper, computer, eye tracker, video or audio equipment) whether anyone was present besides the participant(s) and the researcher, and whether the researcher was blind to experimental condition and/or the study hypothesis during data collection.

Timing
Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection. If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort.

Data exclusions
If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, provide the exact number of exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.

Non-participation
State how many participants dropped out/declined participation and the reason(s) given OR provide response rate OR state that no participants dropped out/declined participation.

Randomization
If participants were not allocated into experimental groups, state so OR describe how participants were allocated to groups, and if allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled.

Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sampling strategy
Note the sampling procedure. Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.

Data collection
Describe the data collection procedure, including who recorded the data and how.

Location
State the location of the sampling or experiment, providing relevant parameters (e.g. latitude and longitude, elevation, water depth).

Access & import/export Describe the efforts you have made to access habitats and to collect and import/export your samples in a responsible manner and in
compliance with local, national and international laws, noting any permits that were obtained (give the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information).

Disturbance
Describe any disturbance caused by the study and how it was minimized.

Reporting for specific materials, systems and methods
We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies. Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study. If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response.

Eukaryotic cell lines Policy information about cell lines
Cell line source(s) The murine 4T1 breast carcinoma, CT26 colon carcinoma, and human MCF-7 breast carcinoma cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Murine Panc02 and human BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell lines were purchased from National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource.

Authentication
None of the cell lines used were authenticated.

Mycoplasma contamination
All cell lines were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination. Negative status for contamination was verified byMycAwayTM-Color One-Step Mycoplasma Detection Kit from Yeasen.

Commonly misidentified lines (See ICLAC register)
No commonly misidentified cell lines are used in this study.

Specimen provenance
Provide provenance information for specimens and describe permits that were obtained for the work (including the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information). Permits should encompass collection and, where applicable, export.

Specimen deposition
Indicate where the specimens have been deposited to permit free access by other researchers.

Dating methods
If new dates are provided, describe how they were obtained (e.g. collection, storage, sample pretreatment and measurement), where they were obtained (i.e. lab name), the calibration program and the protocol for quality assurance OR state that no new dates are provided.
Tick this box to confirm that the raw and calibrated dates are available in the paper or in Supplementary Information.

Ethics oversight
Identify the organization(s) that approved or provided guidance on the study protocol, OR state that no ethical approval or guidance was required and explain why not.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Animals and other organisms
Policy information about studies involving animals; ARRIVE guidelines recommended for reporting animal research

Laboratory animals
Female nu/nu nude mice (18-21 g) were obtained from Vital River Laboratory Animal Center (Beijing, China) and Female BALB/c mice of 18-20 g were obtained from Peking University Health Science Center (Beijing, China). Animals were housed under SPF conditions in groups of 4-5 mice per cage, and maintained at a temperature of ~25 °C in a humidity-controlled environment with a 12 h light/dark cycle, with free access to standard food and water.

Wild animals
No wild animal was used in this study.
Field-collected samples No field collected samples were involved in this study.

Ethics oversight
All care and handling of animals were performed with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Peking University.

nature portfolio | reporting summary
March 2021 Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Recruitment
Describe how participants were recruited. Outline any potential self-selection bias or other biases that may be present and how these are likely to impact results.

Ethics oversight
Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Clinical data
Policy information about clinical studies All manuscripts should comply with the ICMJE guidelines for publication of clinical research and a completed CONSORT checklist must be included with all submissions.
Clinical trial registration Provide the trial registration number from ClinicalTrials.gov or an equivalent agency.

Study protocol
Note where the full trial protocol can be accessed OR if not available, explain why.

Data collection
Describe the settings and locales of data collection, noting the time periods of recruitment and data collection.

Outcomes
Describe how you pre-defined primary and secondary outcome measures and how you assessed these measures.

Dual use research of concern
Policy information about dual use research of concern

Hazards
Could the accidental, deliberate or reckless misuse of agents or technologies generated in the work, or the application of information presented in the manuscript, pose a threat to:

Experiments of concern
Does the work involve any of these experiments of concern: No Yes ChIP-seq Data deposition Confirm that both raw and final processed data have been deposited in a public database such as GEO.
Confirm that you have deposited or provided access to graph files (e.g. BED files) for the called peaks.

Data access links
May remain private before publication.
For "Initial submission" or "Revised version" documents, provide reviewer access links. For your "Final submission" document, provide a link to the deposited data.