Targeting CD123 in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm using allogeneic anti-CD123 CAR T cells

Cai, Tianyu; Gouble, Agnès; Black, Kathryn L.; Skwarska, Anna; Naqvi, Ammar S.; Taylor, Deanne; Zhao, Ming; Yuan, Qi; Sugita, Mayumi; Zhang, Qi; Galetto, Roman; Filipe, Stéphanie; Cavazos, Antonio; Han, Lina; Kuruvilla, Vinitha; Ma, Helen; Weng, Connie; Liu, Chang-Gong; Liu, Xiuping; Konoplev, Sergej; Gu, Jun; Tang, Guilin; Su, Xiaoping; Al-Atrash, Gheath; Ciurea, Stefan; Neelapu, Sattva S.; Lane, Andrew A.; Kantarjian, Hagop; Guzman, Monica L.; Pemmaraju, Naveen; Smith, Julianne; Thomas-Tikhonenko, Andrei; Konopleva, Marina

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29669-8

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 28 April 2022

Targeting CD123 in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm using allogeneic anti-CD123 CAR T cells

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 2228 (2022) Cite this article

7739 Accesses
22 Citations
376 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy with poor outcomes with conventional therapy. Nearly 100% of BPDCNs overexpress interleukin 3 receptor subunit alpha (CD123). Given that CD123 is differentially expressed on the surface of BPDCN cells, it has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target. UCART123 is an investigational product consisting of allogeneic T cells expressing an anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), edited with TALEN^® nucleases. In this study, we examine the antitumor activity of UCART123 in preclinical models of BPDCN. We report that UCART123 have selective antitumor activity against CD123-positive primary BPDCN samples (while sparing normal hematopoietic progenitor cells) in the in vitro cytotoxicity and T cell degranulation assays; supported by the increased secretion of IFNγ by UCART123 cells when cultured in the presence of BPDCN cells. UCART123 eradicate BPDCN and result in long-term disease-free survival in a subset of primary patient-derived BPDCN xenograft mouse models. One potential challenge of CD123 targeting therapies is the loss of CD123 antigen through diverse genetic mechanisms, an event observed in one of three BPDCN PDX studied. In summary, these results provide a preclinical proof-of-principle that allogeneic UCART123 cells have potent anti-BPDCN activity.

CD28/4-1BB CD123 CAR T cells in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm

Article 28 February 2020

Third-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase 1/2 study

Article Open access 27 August 2024

Preclinical development of 1B7/CD3, a novel anti-TSLPR bispecific antibody that targets CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like B-ALL

Article Open access 26 August 2023

Introduction

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare, aggressive hematologic malignancy that originates from the precursors of plasmacytoid dendritic cells^1,2. Presenting signs of BPDCN include skin nodules and tumors, lymph node and splenic enlargement, central nervous system involvement, and circulating leukemia and/or bone marrow infiltration³. The biology of BPDCN is not completely understood; patient outcomes have historically been poor and no standard of care has been established⁴. Median survival has been reported to be approximately one to one and a half years, or even shorter in patients who have disseminated disease^5,6. Novel therapies are therefore urgently needed for patients with BPDCN.

CD123, the interleukin 3 receptor alpha chain (IL3RA), is the primary low-affinity subunit of the interleukin 3 receptor. CD123 is normally expressed on some endothelial cells, monocytes, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, basophils, and myeloid progenitors. However, one of the major early breakthroughs in BPDCN was the discovery that CD123 is overexpressed in essentially all cases^7,8,9. CD123 has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target given its differential expression on BPDCN cells^10,11,12,13, as it is expressed at markedly higher levels on BPDCN blasts than on cells in the normal hematopoietic stem cell compartment^14,15. The first CD123-targeted therapy tagraxofusp (SL-401, a diphtheria toxin interleukin-3 fusion protein) was recently approved by the FDA specifically for treatment of this rare disease¹⁶. Last year, an antibody-drug conjugate IMGN632 has received from FDA a fast-track designation for BPDCN therapy, further highlighting the feasibility, importance, acceptable safety, and clinical impact of targeting CD123.

UCART123 is a genetically modified allogeneic T cell product manufactured from healthy donor cells. These modified T cells (CD123CAR+_TCRαβ-_T cells) express (i) a second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR; CD123 scFv-4-1BB-CD3ζ) directed against CD123 and (ii) the “safety switch” RQR8 depletion ligand, combining epitopes from both CD34 and CD20 antigens, which confers susceptibility to rituximab^17,18 (Supplementary Fig. 1). CD123CAR and RQR8 are encoded by the same lentiviral vector (Fig. 1a). Expression of the T cell receptor (TCR) αβ on these cells is abolished through inactivation of the TCRα constant (TRAC) gene using TALEN^® gene editing technology. We have previously reported that the TRAC KO has no impact on CAR T-cell activity however was able to eliminate the potential for graft versus host reactions¹⁷.

**Fig. 1: Cytotoxicity of UCART123 against CAL-1 BPDCN cells in vitro.**

In this study, we demonstrate that allogeneic UCART123 therapy resulted in eradication of BPDCN in vitro and in long-term disease-free survival in a subset of primary BPDCN PDX experiments.

Results

UCART123 cells result in specific killing of CAL-1 BPDCN cells

To test the in vitro activity of UCART123 against BPDCN cells, we first used BPDCN cell line CAL-1. The antitumor activity of UCART123 on these tumor cells was assessed in vitro using the cytotoxicity, degranulation, and IFNγ release assays.

The cytotoxic activity of UCART123 was evaluated by co-culturing UCART123 cells with CAL-1 cells at different effector to target (E:T) ratios, followed by flow cytometry analysis to identify viable target cells. Percentage of cell viability was compared to that after co-culture with TCRαβ KO T cells (non-transduced (CAR-), TCRαβ- T-cells), and the percentage of specific cell lysis was calculated. In this assay, UCART123 cells targeted CAL-1 cells in a dose-dependent fashion, reaching high levels of specific lysis (80.3 ± 5.5%) at 10:1 E:T ratio (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2a).

The cytotoxic capacity and activation of UCART123 against CAL-1 cells was confirmed by the expression of CD107α as a marker of T cell degranulation (Fig. 1c). CD107α was expressed by UCART123 cells in the presence of BPDCN cells in the same range as observed with nonspecific stimulation (PMA/Ionomycin).

The secretion of cytokines, specifically IFNγ, by UCART123 cells in response to specific stimulation by BPDCN cells was quantified. The results show that UCART123 cells, when co-cultured with CAL-1 cells, secrete high levels of IFNγ, IL-2, IL-5, IL-13, and TNFα (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 2b–f).

To analyze relationship between UCART123 efficacy and CD123 cell surface expression, we used a series of (non-BPDCN) cell lines with varying levels of CD123, with Daudi cell line not expressing the target. No cytotoxic activity of UCART123 was elicited against Daudi cells, while there was a clear trend towards increasing degranulation, cytotoxic activity and IFNγ release by CART cells against AML cell lines with low, medium and high CD123 levels (Supplementary Fig. 3).

UCART123 cells result in specific killing of BPDCN primary samples

To verify the clinical relevance of CD123 as a target for immunotherapy in BPDCN, we first analyzed the bone marrow (BM) of 8 patients with newly diagnosed BPDCN to determine CD123 expression in comparison to BM blasts of 28 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 13 AML patients in remission. CD123 expression levels were significantly higher in BPDCN (gated on CD45 + cells, mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] range 3,484–17,937) than in remission marrows (gated on CD34 + cells, MFI range 232–845; p ≤ 0.01) and in AML blasts (gated on CD45 + cells, MFI range 360–5073; p ≤ 0.01) (Supplementary Fig. 4). Its ubiquitous and high expression in BPDCN samples suggests that CD123 represents a rational target for therapeutic development in BPDCN.

Additional BPDCN samples freshly procured from patients or viably stored at MDACC Leukemia sample bank were obtained for in vitro analysis (Table 1). All samples expressed CD123 although at various levels (MFI range, 1863–136,399) (Fig. 2a). Cytotoxicity assay results showed UCART123 activity against BPDCN samples with high level of specific cytotoxicity against 5 of the 8 samples evaluated (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 5). In a degranulation assay, CD107α was detected at the surface of UCART123 cells in the presence of BPDCN samples, in the same range as observed with nonspecific stimulation (PMA/ionomycin, Fig. 2c). UCART123 cells, when co-cultured with BPDCN cells, secreted significantly higher levels of IFNγ than when co-cultured with negative control Jurkat cells (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, UCART123 was shown to have minimal toxicity against normal hematopoietic cells in vitro in both a cytotoxicity and a colony formation assay (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Table 1 Characteristics of primary BPDCN patients’ samples.

Full size table

**Fig. 2: Antitumor activity of UCART123 against primary BPDCN samples in vitro.**

In vivo activity of UCART123 cells against BPDCN in PDX experiments

To evaluate the antitumor activity of UCART123 cells in vivo, we established patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in NSG and NSG-SGM3 (NSGS) mice using cells from BPDCN patients (BPDCN-1 to -3 in Table 1). In the first PDX experiment (PDX-1, using sample BPDCN-1), mice were randomized upon tumor engraftment into 4 treatment groups: vehicle, 10 × 10⁶ TCRαβ KO T cells, 3 × 10⁶ or 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 cells; each treatment administered as a single tail vein injection (Fig. 3a). All mice from the control groups (vehicle or TCRαβ KO T cells) died by day 53 post BPDCN injection, while UCART123 treatment prolonged mice survival. Furthermore, a significant fraction of the mice treated with UCART123, at both doses, remained alive at the end of the study (day 300) (Fig. 3b). Measurement of the percentage of BPDCN cell engraftment by flow cytometry indicated that both doses of UCART123 allowed control of tumor progression, and that the circulating tumor burden was reduced from day 34 after UCART123 injection (Fig. 3c). The presence of circulating tumor cells was evaluated in the long-term surviving mice (i.e., the UCART123 treatment groups) on days 267 and 279 post BPDCN cell injection (Table 2), showing efficient and durable control of tumor progression in surviving mice. In a mouse from the 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 treatment group expiring on Day 150, no BPDCN cells (hCD123/hCD56 double positive cells) were detected in the BM or spleen (Supplementary Fig. 7), indicating that the cause of death was not likely due to BPDCN progression.

**Fig. 3: UCART123 treatment results in long-term survival of primary BPDCN PDX.**

Table 2 Circulating tumor (BPDCN) burden in mice after treatment with UCART123.

Full size table

The presence of UCART123 cells was assessed in the blood, spleen, and BM of one mouse from the 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 treatment group sacrificed on day 78 (57 days after UCART123 cell injection). UCART123 cells could be detected in the spleen (16.4% CAR⁺ cells among viable cells; Supplementary Fig. 8) and in the bone marrow (1.1% CAR⁺ cells; Supplementary Fig. 8), indicating long-term persistence.

These results indicate that UCART123 treatment led to long-term survival and elimination of BPDCN in this primary BPDCN xenograft model.

Elevated cytokine levels correlate with tumor burden

In a second PDX experiment (PDX-2, using sample BPDCN-3), mice were similarly randomized upon tumor engraftment into four treatment groups: vehicle, 10 × 10⁶ TCRαβ KO T cells, 3 × 10⁶ or 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 cells, each treatment administered as a single tail vein injection (Fig. 4a). All mice treated with UCART123 unexpectedly died 5–7 days after UCART123 injection (day 28 after BPDCN cell injection), while the mice in the vehicle group survived slightly longer (Fig. 4a, b). Circulating hCD123 + cells indicating high tumor burden were found in all cohorts (Fig. 4c) by day 23. A high level of IFNγ and IL-2 was detected in peripheral blood samples from the mice treated with UCART123 cells 2 days following UCART123 injection (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 9a). These results suggest that a cytokine surge from activated UCART123 and/or tumor lysis syndrome after UCART123 administration may have contributed to the premature death of mice treated with UCART123.

**Fig. 4: Evidence of severe cytokine release at high tumor burden in the PDX-2 BPDCN experiment.**

We therefore repeated the experiment, this time administering the treatment at an earlier time point, day 14 after BPDCN cell injection (Fig. 4e). All mice in the control groups (treated with vehicle or TCRαβ KO T cells) experienced tumor progression by day 34 after primary BPDCN cell injection and were sacrificed. In contrast, the cohorts of mice treated with UCART123 had extended survival, with those treated with the highest dose (10 × 10⁶) of UCART123 cells all alive at the end of the study (day 210), with no detectable circulating tumor cells (Fig. 4f, g). Mice treated with UCART123 experienced cytokine release 2 days after UCART123 injection, but the concentrations of IFNγ and IL2 in the peripheral blood were at least 10-fold lower than that measured in the preceding experiment with the same PDX-2 experiment (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 9b). This supports the hypothesis that cytokine release syndrome contributed to the premature deaths of the UCART123-treated PDX-2 mice.

To further evaluate if the RQR8 targeting could lead to CAR elimination in vivo and dampen the cytokine release syndrome, we administered rituximab 10 mg/kg i.p. 2 days after UCART injections (day 19) during 5 days (Supplementary Fig. 10a). Rituximab administration post CAR-T therapy decreased the amount of CAR-T cells in the murine spleens and bone marrow (Supplementary Fig. 10b), supporting the functionality of the safety switch in vivo. IFNγ levels were similarly reduced in peripheral blood from the mice treated with Rituximab post CAR-T therapy (Supplementary Fig. 10c). These results confirm that RQR8 targeting by rituximab leads to CAR-T elimination in vivo associated with abrogation of cytokine production.

Loss of CD123 leading to escape from UCART123 therapy and early relapse in one of the PDX experiments

In the PDX-3 experiment (sample BPDCN-2), which received treatments similar to those administered to PDX-1 and PDX-2 experiments, all vehicle-treated mice succumbed to BPDCN by day 49 after primary BPDCN cell injection, because of high tumor burden. hCD45⁺/CD123⁺CD56⁺ BPDCN cells were detected in the spleen and BM. Mice treated with UCART123 displayed significantly extended survival, as in the PDX-1 and PDX-2 experiments, to days 104–241 (Fig. 5a, b). IFNγ was detected in peripheral blood samples from the mice treated with UCART123 cells 2 days following T cell injection (Supplementary Fig. 11). However, all UCART123-treated mice experienced BPDCN relapse at days 90–155. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the relapses (in all 3 mice tested/cohort) from 3 × 10⁶ UCART123 and 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 cohorts were associated with emergence of CD123-negative circulating BPDCN clones (95–96% CD123 negative) (Fig. 5c). To determine if UCART123 were present at the time of relapse, we performed digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Spleen cells were collected from vehicle or UCART123-treated mice (1 × 10⁶ UCART123 and 10×10⁶ UCART123) at death. UCART123 cells were readily detectable in several of the mice that died from CD123 negative relapsed tumor (Sample 13, Sample 16 from 1 × 10⁶ UCART123 group, and sample 5 from 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 group, Supplementary Table 1), consistent with relapse due to the loss of the target and not because of lack of persistence of UCART123 cells.

**Fig. 5: Loss of CD123 leads to escape from UCART123 therapy and causes early relapses.**

Since relapses at a low UCART123 dose level were associated with CD123 + disease recurrence, we injected secondary recipient mice with 2 × 10⁶ relapsed BPDCN tumor cells (CD123⁺ tumor cells collected from the spleen of a mouse from the group treated with 1 × 10⁶ UCART123 in the initial PDX-3 experiment), and randomized upon engraftment into vehicle or 1 × 10⁶ UCART123 treatment cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 12a). On day 38 after BPDCN cell injection, all the mice in the vehicle group were sacrificed because of tumor progression. The mice in the UCART123 treatment group died on days 78–99; thus, UCART123 treatment extended survival in mice engrafted with relapsed BPDCN cells (Supplementary Fig. 12b). However, similar to the study with original PDX-3 in cohorts receiving high doses of UCART123, tumor progression and death in all mice of the UCART123 low dose treatment group was now associated with emergence of CD123 negative BPDCN clones (Supplementary Fig. 12c).

Molecular analysis of CD123 loss following UCART123 treatment

To understand the molecular basis for loss of CD123 surface expression in PDX-3 BPDCN cells, we isolated RNA from CD123⁺ blasts from 2 of the vehicle-treated mice and CD123^- blasts from 4 of the UCART123 treated mice, and performed RT-PCR and total RNA-sequencing. The cells from all samples were hCD45+ and hCD56+ , indicating they were leukemia cells. These analyses detected the presence of full-length transcripts containing exons 2–12 in both CD123⁺ samples (#1 and #2 in Fig. 6a). In 2 of the 4 CD123^- samples, CD123 transcripts were completely absent, as were transcripts of neighboring genes (#3 and #9 in Fig. 6a). RNA-sequencing reads aligned to Genome Browser tracks for CD123 and housekeeping gene GPI showed no reads present for CD123 but reads present for GPI in the 2 samples with CD123 loss (Supplementary Fig. 13a). The Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) results showed that, compared to sample 1 (CD123⁺), samples 3 and 9 (CD123^-) had large regional deletions on chromosome X, which includes the CD123 gene (Fig. 6b). In another CD123^- sample (sample 5), the splicing analysis algorithm MAJIQ^19,20 detected CD123 transcripts containing only exons 2–9, indicating premature transcription termination. Interestingly, if translated, this truncated transcript would produce a protein isoform lacking the transmembrane domain in exon 10 (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig 13b). Finally, MAJIQ also revealed canonical splicing of exon 2 to exon 3 in all CD123⁺ samples but a sharp increase in skipping from exon 2 to exon 5 in sample 16 (Fig. 6d, e). This exon-skipping event preserves the open-reading frame and yields the previously reported transcript variant 2 (NM_001267713). Per UniProt²¹ the resultant protein will retain the ligand-binding domain but lacks several glycosylation sites and two beta sheets in the extracellular domain, potentially compromising recognition by UCART123. The aCGH and FISH results further showed that this patient sample harbored TP53 deletion (Supplementary Fig. 14). Gene set enrichment analysis showed that CD123 loss was associated with reduction of expression of genes in SRC/STAT3 pathway, consistent with inability of CD123 receptor to transmit signals from IL-3 ligand (Supplementary Fig. 15). These results indicate that the BPDCN relapses could develop CD123 loss through different genetic mechanisms.

Discussion

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) gene therapy from autologous T cells is a breakthrough technology in treating refractory hematologic malignancies^22,23. However, there are limitations, including inability to manufacture CAR-T cells from the patient’s T cells, or disease progression prior to completion of cell production and release of the engineered autologous product^24,25. T cell dysfunction is known to occur in cancer patients, and several groups have recently described differences in CAR-T cells generated from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients compared with those from a healthy donor^26,27. This is thought to contribute to the low response rates observed in this disease group. Allogeneic gene-edited CART products, which do not require human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching, and minimize the risk of graft versus host disease, offer the potential advantages of healthy donor-derived CAR-T cells as an “off the shelf” product, which overcomes the manufacturing difficulties of producing CAR-T cells for each individual patient¹⁷.

The cell surface antigen CD123 is highly expressed and is a hallmark of BPDCN, highlighting the role of CD123 as a therapeutic target in BPDCN. In this study, the antitumor activity of allogeneic off-the-shelf CD123 CAR T cells (UCART123) was demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo assays, with both a BPDCN cell line and primary BPDCN samples. Albeit no correlation between CD123 expression in primary BPDCN and in vitro cell lysis could be demonstrated (not shown), the specificity was confirmed by the lack of cytotoxic activity of UCART123 against CD123-negative Daudi cells and a trend towards increasing degranulation, cytotoxic activity and IFNγ release by CART cells against AML cell lines with higher CD123 levels (Supplementary Fig. 3). Treatment with UCART123 cells markedly prolonged survival of the UCART123 treated PDX-mice and eliminated detectable BPDCN cells. Of importance, we have demonstrated long-term persistence of UCART123 in bone marrow and spleen of mice injected with PDX-1 and PDX-3 models (by flow or ddPCR, Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Table 1). It should be noted that the persistence in humans is expected to be limited by the rejection of the allogenic product upon recovery from lymphodepletion, which cannot be tested in the immunodeficient mouse models. Encouragingly, according to recent reports in relapsed/refractory B-ALL treated with UCART19²⁸ and in NHL patients treated with ALLO-501²⁹, both products bearing TRAC knock-out generated using TALEN^® technology, showed high response rates and allogenic CAR-T cell expansion, supporting the notion that even limited CAR-T cell in vivo persistence is sufficient to produce meaningful responses.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), resulting from rapid immune activation induced by CAR-T cells, is the most frequent treatment-related toxicity seen in clinical trials^30,31. Similar to other immunotherapy products, UCART123 can potentially induce cytokine release syndrome or tumor lysis syndrome. In the PDX-2 experiment, administration of UCART123 to mice with high tumor burden caused a burst of IFNγ secretion and rapid demise of animals, possibly from cytokine release and/or tumor lysis syndromes. This was supported by a second experiment whereby administration of UCART123 cells in mice harboring the same PDX at a lower tumor burden, was associated with drastically lower IFNγ levels and translated into long-term survival of UCART123-treated animals. The lentiviral construct of UCART123 allows expression of the safety switch RQR8, permitting the cells to be eliminated by rituximab (RTX) through Complement-dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) and Antibody Dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Our in vivo data confirm that RQR8 targeting by rituximab leads to CAR-T elimination associated with abrogation of cytokine production (Supplementary Fig. 10). The safety switch should allow elimination of UCART cells in the setting of severe CRS in patients, as confirmed by the efficacy of Rituximab in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 1) and by the efficient depletion in vivo of RQR8-expressing T-cells by rituximab reengineered to mouse IgG2a, reported by Pule et al.¹⁸.

With respect to on-target off-tumor toxicity of CD123-targeting CART, we have shown minimal toxicity of UCART123 against normal hematopoietic cells in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 6). While the toxicity against endothelial and other normal cells was not addressed in this study, preliminary results from autologous CD123 CART clinical trial at the City of Hope³² indicated lack of bone marrow or other organ toxicity, and no evidence for capillary leak syndrome. Similarly, in an ongoing clinical trial with anti-CD123 antibody-drug conjugate IMGN632, no endothelial or marrow toxicity was seen^33,34 in AML or BPDCN patients, supporting acceptable safety targeting CD123. Treatment with CAR T-cells targeting the CD19 antigen (CART-19) has yielded very high response rates in patients with B-ALL. However, 30–60% of patients relapse after CAR treatment, and among those, 10–20% are CD19-negative relapses³⁵. The main underlying mechanism is the selection for preexisting alternatively spliced CD19 isoforms with the compromised CART-19 epitope^36,37,38. In one (PDX-3) out of three PDX studies, mice treated with UCART123 experienced CD123-negative relapse. Unexpectedly, we identified not a single, but three diverse mechanisms of CD123 loss amongst mice that relapsed with CD123^- disease: genomic loss of CD123 DNA; a truncated transcript containing only exons 2–9; and predominant alternative splicing (skipping from exon 2 to exon 5) which is reminiscent of CD19 epitope loss in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia³⁶. The most plausible explanation is the selection of a small pre-existing population of clones lacking CD123, that were enriched upon the selective pressure of UCART123 therapy. It is worth noting that this PDX experiment was derived from a patient whose tumor harbored a TP53 mutation, which could have contributed to genomic instability observed here in different mice engrafted with the same tumor cells. To our knowledge, this is the first reported observation of genomic CD123 loss in an animal study causing early relapses post CD123 targeted CART therapy. While relapses on the tagraxofusp or IMGN632 clinical trials are generally not associated with CD123 loss in BPDCN^34,39, this observation could be highly relevant for monitoring strategies targeting CD123, including autologous CART^40,41, CD123-ADCs⁴², BiTes^43,44, and DARTs^45,46.

In summary, allogeneic UCART123 therapy resulted in eradication of BPDCN in vitro and in long-term disease-free survival in a subset of primary BPDCN PDX experiments. Our findings in one of the PDX experiments cautioned that CD123 loss could compromise efficacy of this approach with competitive survival of CD123 negative clone(s). Still, these results provide preclinical proof-of-principle that allogeneic UCART123 cells have potent anti-BPDCN activity.

Methods

Study approval and ethics statements

Primary BPDCN cells and AML cells were collected from patients who had consented to research protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (PA14-0157, A Study to Evaluate Patient Samples with Blastic Plasma Cytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm). This animal study was performing under Animal Care and Use Protocol (Immunotherapy approaches in leukemia, 00001446-RN00). The production of R&D grade batches of UCART123 was done using commercially available NHPBMC cells ordered from ALLCELLS or HEMACARE. These are normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from an apheresis collection. Donors have been screened for viral status and the collection protocols and donor-informed consent are approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), with strict oversight. HIPAA compliance and approved protocols are also followed. The commercially available NHPBMC cells used to generate the UCART cells described in the manuscript are for Research Purposes Only and were used according to local licenses and regulations (French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation – French Biotechnology Council).

Cell lines

The BPDCN CAL-1 cells⁴⁷ were obtained from Takahiro Maeda (Nagasaki University). MOLM13 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and Jurkat T cell leukemia cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA) or Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig, Germany). All cells were validated by short-tandem repeat profiling prior to their use in these experiments, and underwent mycoplasma testing every 6 months. All three cell types were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were cultured at 37 °C with a 5% CO₂-in-air atmosphere.

Patient samples

Primary BPDCN cells and AML cells were collected from patients who had consented to research protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for analysis of hematologic malignancies (PA14-0157, A Study to Evaluate Patient Samples with Blastic Plasma Cytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm). Bone marrow aspirate mononuclear cells from patients with BPDCN were purified by Ficoll density centrifugation using standard procedures. Lymphocytes were isolated by using Lymphocyte Separation Medium. Cells were frozen in FBS and dimethyl sulfoxide and stored in liquid nitrogen until use.

CAR construct

The CAR construct used is described in patent EP3119807B1 (“CD123 specific chimeric antigen receptors for cancer immunotherapy”). We used the scFv derived from the monoclonal antibody Klon43 fused to CD8a hinge and transmembrane domains, the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain, and the CD3zeta signaling domain.

UCART123 production

R&D grade UCART123 cells were produced by Cellectis using a large-scale manufacturing process. UCART123 cells were derived from a single donor. Two large scale batches (derived from the same donor) were used for in vitro testing, while a single batch was used in all the in vivo experiments. For the data presented in Supplementary Fig 3, three small scale batches were used, from three independent donors. Non-transduced TCRαβ-deficient T-cells (TCRαβ KO T-cells) were produced from the same donor and in the same conditions, to be used as control cells. Briefly, PBMCs from healthy donors were thawed and T-cells were activated using CD3/CD28 magnetic beads the day after thawing. Cultures were performed at 37 °C in 5% CO₂ in X-vivo15 media, supplemented with 5% Human AB Serum and 20 ng/ml of human IL-2. Cells were transduced with a recombinant lentiviral vector encoding the CD123-targeting CAR, at MOI 5, three days after activation. Two days later the cells were transfected with TALEN® mRNA (using the Pulse Agile® electroporation system) to knockout the TRAC gene and disrupt TCRαβ expression. Cells are then expanded at 37 °C in 5% CO₂ within a WAVE bioreactor Cellbag of 2 L or 10 L on the Xuri™ Cell Expansion System W25 for 10 days. At the end of the expansion phase, TCRαβ negative cells are isolated by negative selection using a TCRαβ biotin and anti-biotin magnetic bead system from Miltenyi, using the CliniMACS device. The purified TCRαβ^- cell population was then resuspended in cryopreservation media, aliquoted in cryovials and stored at below −135 °C.

Cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxic activity of UCART123 towards the BPDCN cells (CAL-1 cell line or primary samples) was assessed by measuring the survival of tumor cells when co-cultured with UCART123 cells. The CD123⁺ MOLM13 cell line was used as a positive control. MOLM13 and CAL-1 cells were stained with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester, co-incubated with UCART123 cells at a 1:1, 3:1, or 10:1 effector-to-target (E:T) ratio for 16 h, and the viability of the target cells was determined by flow cytometry using eFluor 780 fixable viability dye. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using by Flowjo V10. The viability of UCART123-treated cells was compared to that of samples co-cultured with non-transduced TCRαβ-deficient (TCRαβ KO) T cells to determine the percentage of specific cell lysis.

%Lysis = (1−viability of UCART123-treated cells / viability of TCRαβ KO T cells-treated cells) × 100%

T cell degranulation assay

UCART123 cells were co-incubated with BPDCN samples, or with CD123^- Jurkat cells as a negative control, at a ratio of 1:1 with an anti-CD107α antibody for 6 h. Co-activator reagents (monensin and anti-CD49d and antiCD28 antibodies) were added to the mixture. UCART123 cells incubated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)/ionomycin were used as a positive control of T cell activation. Cells were analyzed for CD107α signal by flow cytometry, gating on viable and CD8⁺ cells. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using by Flowjo V10.

IFNγ release assay

The release of IFNγ by activated T cells was analyzed by using a BioLegend LEGENDplex assay. Briefly, TCRαβ KO T cells or UCART123 cells were co-cultured for 25 h at a 1:1 (E:T) ratio with CD123^- (Jurkat), CD123⁺ (MOLM13 or CAL-1), or primary BPDCN cells. The quantity of IFNγ released into the culture supernatants was measured. PMA/ionomycin was used as a positive control. The same BioLegend LEGENDplex assay was used to evaluate IFNγ and IL-2 release levels in the PDX experiments.

Animals

The animal study was performing under Animal Care and Use Protocol at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Immunotherapy approaches in leukemia, 00001446-RN00). NSGS mice (NOD-scid IL2Rgnull-3/GM/SF, NSG-SGM3) and NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice were used in this study. The mice were female, 8–12 weeks old. The standard area cages were used with a maximum of 5 mice per cage (from the same group) according to MD Anderson internal standard operating procedures. The mice were given bactrim-containing food and acidified water. Animals were identified with different markers on tail. Animals were maintained in rooms under controlled conditions of temperature (22 ± 2 °C), humidity (55 ± 10%), photoperiod (12 h light/12 h dark) and air exchange. Animals were maintained in SPF conditions. Room temperature and humidity were continuously monitored. Mice were monitored at least once daily, and up to twice daily including weekend/holidays to follow eventual morbid signs: hunched posture, rapid weight loss (more than 20% of body weight from baseline), ruffled fur, impaired mobility (difficulty reaching food and water), limb paresis etc. Animals that exhibited one of these morbid signs were immediately euthanized by compressed CO₂.

Patient-derived xenografts

After being quickly thawed in a 37 °C water bath, cryopreserved primary BPDCN cells were resuspended in 10 mL of MEM, Alpha 1X (Corning) supplemented with 20% FBS (Invitrogen), and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in mixture of 10 mL of MEM, Alpha 1X containing 20% FBS, 0.1 mg/ml heparin, 10 units/mL DNase (Thermo Scientific), and 10 mM MgSO4 (Sigma). Cells were incubated for 15 min in 37 °C incubator in the above mixture and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min. After centrifugation, BPDCN cells were resuspended in the injection medium (serum-free RPMI 1640 medium) at a concentration of 2 × 10⁶ BPDCN cells/100 µL. Cells were kept on ice until injection into immunodeficient NSG or NSGS mice via the tail vein (100 µL/mouse). Mice were monitored weekly for evidence of human BPDCN in the peripheral blood. When circulating human CD56⁺CD123⁺ cells (i.e., BPDCN cells) were detected, mice were randomized into treatment groups ranging from 7 to 12 mice per group. Treatments comprised a single tail vein injection of vehicle; 10 × 10⁶ non-transduced TCRαβ KO T cells; 1 × 10⁶ UCART123 cells; 3 × 10⁶ UCART123 cells; or 10 × 10⁶ UCART123 cells. Rituximab (Genentech, USA) was given i.p. at 10 mg/kg dose for 5 days.

Human tumor cell analysis by flow cytometry

The presence of human tumor cells in viable (DAPI⁻) cells isolated from mouse blood or spleen was identified by analyzing cell surface expression of hCD123 and hCD56. The percentage of engraftment was calculated as indicated below:

Engraftment % = CD123⁺CD56⁺ cells/DAPI⁻ cells × 100%

For the analysis of CD marker expression, the red blood cells were subjected to lysis in ammonium chloride solution. Samples were incubated with a mixed solution of anti-CD123 antibody and anti-CD56 antibody. After DAPI staining, viable cells (DAPI^-) were analyzed with a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). The acquisition was stopped after 5,000 DAPI^- viable cells (if achievable) for each sample. All the events were saved during acquisition. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using by Flowjo V10.

Detection of UCART123 cells by flow cytometry

The presence of UCART123 cells in blood was analyzed using cell surface immunostaining for hCD5 (human T cells, Cat#555352, BD Pharmingen) and for anti-CD123 CAR, using a synthetic protein comprising the extracellular portion of hCD123, fused to a mouse Fc (custom made, LakePharma, Inc). The peripheral blood, spleen, and bone marrow were collected from each mouse and were subjected to lysis in ammonium chloride solution. The red blood cells were subjected to lysis in ammonium chloride solution. Samples were incubated with Fc block master mix at room temperature for 10 min. Then samples were incubated with the CD123-Fc protein (150 ng protein/300,000 cells) for 15 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed and then resuspended in 50 µL of hCD5 and anti-Fc secondary antibody (Cat#115-115-164, Jackson ImmunoResearch). After DAPI staining, viable cells (DAPI^-) were analyzed by flow cytometry. The acquisition was stopped after 5000 DAPI^- viable cells (if achievable) were collected for each sample. All the events were saved during acquisition. Where indicated, cells were stained with hCD45 (Cat#304014, BioLegend), mCD45 (Cat#103111, BioLegend), hCD5, anti-TCRαβ (Cat#130-098-782, Miltenyi Biotec), and anti-CAR123-Fc antibody followed by anti-Fc secondary antibody. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using by Flowjo V10.

Detection of CD123 expression level in AML, AML remission, and BPDCN patient samples

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) analysis of CD123 expression in neoplastic cells of patients with BPDCN or AML or AML remission was performed on FACS Canto II analyzers (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) using bone marrow aspirate material collected in EDTA. Details of the MFC panel and gating strategies used at MD Anderson Cancer Center were described by our group previously^48,49. The blast gate was defined on the basis of CD45dim expression (CD34 for patients with AML remission) and side-scatter characteristics and quantified as a percentage of total gated events. CD123 expression was measured using an allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD123 (IL-3 receptor α chain) antibody (clone 7G3; BD Pharmingen, BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. At least 100,000 events per sample were acquired. Data were analyzed using FCS Express software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). CD123 expression was reported as percentage of positive blasts and as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on leukemic blasts.

Digital droplet PCR

UCART123 transcripts in spleen were evaluated with digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) at the timepoint of euthanasia due to sickness or disease progression. RNA was extracted by Qiagen RNeasy Kit and 25–50 ng of tRNA was converted into cDNA with SuperScript VILO (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Ten million droplets were generated from cDNA samples (step1) and single molecule in droplets were amplified by PCR reaction (step2) followed by counting the absolute number of fluorescent droplets (step3). Step 1 and step 3 were performed and analyzed with RainDrop and RainDrop Analyst II software (RainDance Technologies/Bio-Rad Technologies). Copy numbers of UCART123 transcript relative to 1.0 × 10⁴ ABL1 transcripts (reference) were calculated.

aGCH assay

The genomic DNA was extracted from CD123- cells from UCART123 treated mice in PDX-3 experiment. The quality of genomic DNA was tested by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). 1.0 µg genomic DNA from CD123 + cells from vehicle-treated mice, which is used as reference, was labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent dyes, respectively, by using CytoSure^TM HT Genomic DNA Labelling Kit (Cat# 500040, Oxford Gene Technology, UK). Labeled DNA was further purified with Clean-up columns (Cat# 500020, Oxford Gene Technology, UK) to remove unincorporated fluorescent dyes. Labeled DNA was measured the absorbance at 260 nm, 55 nm and 650 nm by NanoDrop 2000. Equal amount of labeled DNA from CD123- cells and CD123 + cells were mixed in hybridization buffer, loaded on 8x60K CytoSure ISCA + SNP array (Cat#20052, Oxford Gene Technology, UK) and hybridize at 65 °C for 22 h in the hybridization oven. After post washing, the array slide was scanned by InnoScan 710 Microarray Scanner (Innopsys, France) and further analyzed using CytoSure Interpret software version 4.8.32 (Oxford Gene Technology, UK).

RT-PCR

RNA was isolated using Qiagen RNeasy Kit and used for RT-PCR or RNA Sequencing. For RT-PCR, cDNAs were prepared with random hexamers using the High Capacity cDNA RT Kit (Life Technologies). CD123 was amplified by semi-quantitative PCR for 30 cycles with primer pairs spanning the coding exons (exon 2F, exon 6R; exon 5F, exon 9R; exon 9F, exon 12R, Supplementary Table 2). Amplicons were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel. Band identities were confirmed by gel extraction and Sanger Sequencing.

RNA sequencing analysis

Prior to sequencing, RNA integrity and concentration were determined using Eukaryote Total RNA Nano assay on BioAnalyzer. RNA-seq was performed on 10 ng to 1 µg of total RNA according to the GeneWiz Illumina Hi-seq protocol for poly(A) selected samples (2 × 150 bp pair-end sequencing, 350 M raw reads per lane). Fastq files of RNA-seq obtained from GeneWiz were mapped using STAR aligner. STAR was run with the option ‘alignSJoverhangMin 8’. We generated STAR genome reference based on the hg19 build. Alignments were then quantified for each mRNA transcript using HTSeq with the Ensembl-based GFF file and with the option ‘-m intersection-strict’. Normalization of the raw reads was performed using the trimmed mean of M-values (TMM). In order to generate splice-graphs, the MAJIQ tool (version 1.03) was used. MAJIQ was run on the Ensembl-based GFF annotations, disallowing de novo calls. The VIOLA visualization package was used to plot the resulting splice graph, the alternative splicing variants and the violin plots representing the PSI values.

Pathway analysis

Pathway analysis was carried out using the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) method⁵⁰. Gene level RNASeq data were used as input. Samples were divided into CD123 + and CD123- classes. GSEA-R program was used to search against the entire gene set collection of Molecular Signatures Database v6.1.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Excel 2013, GraphPad Prism V8. Statistical tests was done using the two-tailed unpaired t-test. The statistical test used for each Figure is described in the corresponding Figure legend.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The RNA sequencing data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE198471. The remaining data are available within the Article, Supplementary Information or Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Montero, J. et al. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm is dependent on BCL2 and sensitive to venetoclax. Cancer Discov. 7, 156–164 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. et al. Clinicopathological analysis of 46 cases with CD4(+) and/or CD56(+) immature haematolymphoid malignancy: reappraisal of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell and related neoplasms. Histopathology 71, 972–984 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Sapienza, M. R. et al. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: state of the art and prospects. Cancers 11, 595 (2019).
Pemmaraju, N. et al. Tagraxofusp in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic-cell neoplasm. New Engl. J. Med. 380, 1628–1637 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guru Murthy, G. S., Pemmaraju, N. & Atallah, E. Epidemiology and survival of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Leuk. Res. 73, 21–23 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pagano, L. et al. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with leukemic presentation: an Italian multicenter study. Haematologica 98, 239–246 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun, W. et al. First pediatric experience of SL-401, a CD123-targeted therapy, in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: report of three cases. J. Hematol. Oncol. 11, 61 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Frankel, A. E. et al. Activity of SL-401, a targeted therapy directed to interleukin-3 receptor, in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm patients. Blood 124, 385–392 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guzman, M. L. & Allan, J. N. Concise review: Leukemia stem cells in personalized medicine. Stem Cells 32, 844–851 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pardanani, A. et al. Aberrant expression of CD123 (interleukin-3 receptor-alpha) on neoplastic mast cells. Leukemia 29, 1605–1608 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jordan, C. T. et al. The interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain is a unique marker for human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells. Leukemia 14, 1777–1784 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Testa, U., Pelosi, E. & Frankel, A. CD 123 is a membrane biomarker and a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies. Biomark. Res. 2, 4 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bole-Richard E., et al. CD28/4-1BB CD123 CAR T cells in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Leukemia 34, 3228–3241 (2020).
Pemmaraju, N. Novel pathways and potential therapeutic strategies for blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN): CD123 and beyond. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 12, 510–512 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Deotare, U. et al. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with leukemic presentation: 10-Color flow cytometry diagnosis and HyperCVAD therapy. Am. J. Hematol. 91, 283–286 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Syed, Y. Y. Tagraxofusp: first global approval. Drugs 79, 579–583 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Poirot, L. et al. Multiplex genome-edited T-cell manufacturing platform for “off-the-shelf” adoptive T-cell immunotherapies. Cancer Res. 75, 3853–3864 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Philip, B. et al. A highly compact epitope-based marker/suicide gene for easier and safer T-cell therapy. Blood 124, 1277–1287 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Black, K. L. et al. Aberrant splicing in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 11357–11369 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vaquero-Garcia, J. et al. A new view of transcriptome complexity and regulation through the lens of local splicing variations. Elife 5, e11752 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pundir, S., Martin, M. J. & O’Donovan, C. UniProt protein knowledgebase. Methods Mol. Biol. 1558, 41–55 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davila, M. L. & Sadelain, M. Biology and clinical application of CAR T cells for B cell malignancies. Int. J. Hematol. 104, 6–17 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lichtman, E. I. & Dotti, G. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells for B-cell malignancies. Transl. Res. 187, 59–82 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Graham C., Jozwik A., Pepper A. & Benjamin R. Allogeneic CAR-T cells: more than ease of access? Cells 7, 155 (2018).
Leick, M. & Maus, M. V. Wishing on a CAR: understanding the scope of intrinsic T-cell deficits in patients with cancer. Cancer Discov. 9, 466–468 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schietinger, A. et al. Tumor-specific T cell dysfunction is a dynamic antigen-driven differentiation program initiated early during tumorigenesis. Immunity 45, 389–401 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Bruggen J. A. C. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells impair mitochondrial fitness in CD8+ T cells and impede CAR T cell efficacy. Blood, 134, 44–58 (2019).
Benjamin, R. et al. Genome-edited, donor-derived allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in paediatric and adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of two phase 1 studies. Lancet 396, 1885–1894 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Neelapu, S. S. et al. First-in-human data of ALLO-501 and ALLO-647 in relapsed/refractory large B-cell or follicular lymphoma (R/R LBCL/FL): ALPHA study. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 8002–8002 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Giavridis, T. et al. T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade. Nat. Med. 24, 731–738 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Frey, N. Cytokine release syndrome: Who is at risk and how to treat. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 30, 336–340 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Budde, L. E. et al. Abstract PR14: CD123CAR displays clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN): Safety and efficacy results from a phase 1 study. Cancer Immunol. Res. 8, PR14–PR14 (2020).
Google Scholar
Daver, N. G. et al. Clinical profile of IMGN632, a novel CD123-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). Blood 134, 734–734 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Pemmaraju, N. et al. Clinical profile of IMGN632, a novel CD123-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). Blood 136, 11–13 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Xu, X. et al. Mechanisms of relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its prevention and treatment strategies. Front. Immunol. 10, 2664 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sotillo, E. et al. Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 5, 1282–1295 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bagashev A., et al. CD19 Alterations emerging after CD19-directed immunotherapy cause retention of the misfolded protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell. Biol. 38, e00383-18 (2018).
Orlando, E. J. et al. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Med. 24, 1504–1506 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Togami, K. et al. DNA methyltransferase inhibition overcomes diphthamide pathway deficiencies underlying CD123-targeted treatment resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 5005–5019 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cummins, K. D. & Gill, S. Anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART): an evolving treatment strategy for hematological malignancies, and a potential ace-in-the-hole against antigen-negative relapse. Leuk. Lymphoma 59, 1539–1553 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mardiros, A. et al. T cells expressing CD123-specific chimeric antigen receptors exhibit specific cytolytic effector functions and antitumor effects against human acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 122, 3138–3148 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kovtun, Y. et al. A CD123-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, IMGN632, designed to eradicate AML while sparing normal bone marrow cells. Blood Adv. 2, 848–858 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Campagne, O. et al. Integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of a bispecific CD3xCD123 DART molecule in nonhuman primates: evaluation of activity and impact of immunogenicity. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 2631–2641 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guy, D. G. & Uy, G. L. Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 13, 417–425 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Root A. R., et al. Development of PF-06671008, a highly potent anti-P-cadherin/Anti-CD3 bispecific DART molecule with extended half-life for the treatment of cancer. Antibodies 5, 6 (2016).
Chichili, G. R. et al. A CD3xCD123 bispecific DART for redirecting host T cells to myelogenous leukemia: preclinical activity and safety in nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 289ra282 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Maeda, T. et al. A novel plasmacytoid dendritic cell line, CAL-1, established from a patient with blastic natural killer cell lymphoma. Int. J. Hematol. 81, 148–154 (2005).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Usefulness of CD11a and CD18 in flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis for diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 138, 744–750 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Angelova, E. et al. CD123 expression patterns and selective targeting with a CD123-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (IMGN632) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 104, 749–755 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was in part supported by Cellectis. This study used the Flow Cytometry and Cellular Imaging Core Facility at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and was supported by the National Institutes of Health/NCI under award number P30CA016672.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Tianyu Cai, Anna Skwarska, Qi Zhang, Antonio Cavazos, Lina Han, Vinitha Kuruvilla, Helen Ma, Connie Weng, Hagop Kantarjian, Naveen Pemmaraju & Marina Konopleva
Cellectis SA, Paris, France
Agnès Gouble, Roman Galetto, Stéphanie Filipe & Julianne Smith
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Kathryn L. Black, Ammar S. Naqvi & Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko
Department of Biomedical & Health Informatics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Deanne Taylor
School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Ming Zhao & Jun Gu
Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Qi Yuan & Xiaoping Su
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Mayumi Sugita & Monica L. Guzman
Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Chang-Gong Liu & Xiuping Liu
Department of Hematopathology, The University of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Sergej Konoplev & Guilin Tang
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Gheath Al-Atrash & Stefan Ciurea
Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Sattva S. Neelapu
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
Andrew A. Lane

Authors

Tianyu Cai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Agnès Gouble
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kathryn L. Black
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anna Skwarska
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ammar S. Naqvi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Deanne Taylor
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ming Zhao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qi Yuan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mayumi Sugita
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qi Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Roman Galetto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stéphanie Filipe
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Antonio Cavazos
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lina Han
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Vinitha Kuruvilla
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Helen Ma
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Connie Weng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chang-Gong Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiuping Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sergej Konoplev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jun Gu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guilin Tang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaoping Su
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gheath Al-Atrash
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stefan Ciurea
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sattva S. Neelapu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Andrew A. Lane
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hagop Kantarjian
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Monica L. Guzman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Naveen Pemmaraju
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Julianne Smith
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marina Konopleva
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.C. and M.K. conceived the study. T.C., A.G., R.G., M.G., J.S., and M.K. designed and conducted the main analyses and interpreted the results. T.C., M.Z., A.S., C.W., M.S., A.C., L.H., Q.Z., V.K., H.M., C.L., X.L., S.K., G.A., and S.C. conducted the laboratory experiments. T.C., A.G., K.B., A.S., A.N., D.T., Q.Y., R.G., S.F., S.K., J.G., G.T., X.S., G.A., S.C., S.N., A.L., H.K., M.G., N.P., J.S., and A.T. contributed data and/or analysis advice to the study. T.C., A.G., K.B., R.G., J.S., and M.K. wrote the manuscript, with contributions and review by all other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Konopleva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.G., R.G., S.F., and J.S. are Cellectis employees. S.S.N., M.L.G., N.P., and M.K. received research funding from Cellectis. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, T., Gouble, A., Black, K.L. et al. Targeting CD123 in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm using allogeneic anti-CD123 CAR T cells. Nat Commun 13, 2228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29669-8

Download citation

Received: 22 July 2020
Accepted: 21 March 2022
Published: 28 April 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29669-8

This article is cited by

Engineering immune-evasive allogeneic cellular immunotherapies
- Karen E. Martin
- Quirin Hammer
- Karl-Johan Malmberg
Nature Reviews Immunology (2024)
Ulcerating skin lesions from blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm responding to low-dose radiotherapy—a case report and literature review
- Elgin Hoffmann
- Simon Böke
- Cihan Gani
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.