Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Microscale carbon distribution around pores and particulate organic matter varies with soil moisture regime


Soil carbon sequestration arises from the interplay of carbon input and stabilization, which vary in space and time. Assessing the resulting microscale carbon distribution in an intact pore space, however, has so far eluded methodological accessibility. Here, we explore the role of soil moisture regimes in shaping microscale carbon gradients by a novel mapping protocol for particulate organic matter and carbon in the soil matrix based on a combination of Osmium staining, X-ray computed tomography, and machine learning. With three different soil types we show that the moisture regime governs C losses from particulate organic matter and the microscale carbon redistribution and stabilization patterns in the soil matrix. Carbon depletion around pores (aperture > 10 µm) occurs in a much larger soil volume (19–74%) than carbon enrichment around particulate organic matter (1%). Thus, interacting microscale processes shaped by the moisture regime are a decisive factor for overall soil carbon persistence.


Long-term storage of carbon (C) in the soil is an important contribution to the global C reservoir1,2 and is at the same time crucial for sustaining essential ecosystem functions3. C storage in soil depends on the amount and quality of C inputs and their subsequent stabilization by various mechanisms which vary in time and space4,5. The belowground C input by plants through particulate organic matter (POM), especially through fine roots, provides large amounts of biodegradable C that are either immediately lost through microbial respiration or assimilated and subsequently stabilized in the surrounding soil matrix6, where it fosters the formation of mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM)7. Physical protection of organic matter against mineralization by occlusion within pores and organic matter interactions with minerals have been identified as key processes for increasing the persistence of C in soil8,9,10. The soil moisture regime has a strong impact on both processes as high soil moisture levels limit oxygen availability to microorganisms and thus protect soil C from mineralization in anoxic microsites11,12,13. At the same time, high water contents facilitate leaching and diffusive transport of C from POM towards mineral sorption sites14,15. At the soil profile to landscape-scale, the strong influence of moisture on C storage manifests itself by the slow organic matter decomposition in permanently wet soils16,17 and the fast C mineralization with increasing O2 availability18,19,20. Laboratory incubation experiments underpinned the impact of water saturation and oxygen availability on C mineralization21,22,23. They further demonstrated the coexistence of different microbial communities in different pore size classes under different soil moistures and how this impacts mineralization rates24,25,26. However, there is a striking paucity of data about in-situ microscale patterns of C distribution that might arise from different soil moisture regimes.

Based on these macroscopic observations, we hypothesize that soil moisture regimes shape characteristic C distribution patterns at the pore scale. Until recently this hypothesis was impossible to address experimentally as conventional organic matter fractionation methods rely on disrupting the intact soil structure27. Mapping of organic matter fractions in intact soil, in turn, is typically restricted to microscopic or spectroscopic techniques on two-dimensional soil sections, a procedure too laborious to represent larger soil volumes28,29.

Here we introduce a novel combination of C staining using osmium tetroxide (OsO4), three-dimensional Os mapping with polychromatic X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT), and detection of different organic matter fractions in undisturbed soil samples using machine learning. We show that these image-derived organic matter fractions accurately reflect C fractions obtained by conventional physical soil fractionation, such as POM, water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC), and to a lesser degree also MAOM, with the added benefit of quantifying their position relative to the undisturbed pore space. This, for the first time, allows for the exact mapping of C concentration gradients in the direct vicinity of pores and POM particles. In line with classical 2D micro-morphological observations on soil sections30 and validated by independent determination of conventional soil fractions and short-term soil incubations, POM was differentiated into fibrous and compact POM based on 3D morphological properties. Fibrous, elongated shapes, represent fresh litter and roots that are mostly located inside the intact pore system. Compact POM, with a sizeable share of biochar, has a lower surface-to-volume ratio with fewer internal voids and more rounded shapes, as a result of repeated fragmentation and translocation. Using incubations of soil aggregates under different oxygen and moisture conditions we show that C mineralization related well to the image-derived amount of C stored in these POM types. While the estimation of C stored in POM is accurate, we demonstrate with correlative microscopy employing microscale X-ray fluorescence microscopy (µXRF) and nanoscale secondary ion mass spectroscopy (NanoSIMS) that MAOM contents cannot be reliably assessed, because OsO4 also sorbs to reactive soil minerals. Relative changes in average Os sorption as a function of pore or POM distances can still be interpreted as spatial gradients in sorption to organic matter assuming that Os sorption to mineral surfaces is random with respect to these distances. Based on these methodological advancements we demonstrate that three soils with contrasting soil moisture regimes, a well-aerated regime under dry climatic conditions (Haplic Chernozem), an alternating-wet, slowly draining regime (Stagnic Luvisol), and a permanently wet, groundwater-affected regime (Fluvic Gleysol), are all depleted in C in the direct vicinity of pores, presumably due to more fluctuating microenvironmental conditions that promote C mineralization by locally enhanced oxygen availability and enhanced C desorption due to equilibration with the more frequently exchanged soil solution. We also show that C enrichment occurs in the soil matrix around fibrous and compact POM in well-aerated and stagnant soils (Chernozem and Luvisol), but not in a groundwater-affected Gleysol. Consequently, these POM types encounter completely different microenvironments and leaching histories under differing soil moisture regimes, with immediate consequences for C turnover as well as MAOM formation in the surrounding soil matrix.


C mapping in soil with correlative imaging

Fine-textured topsoils were sampled at three sites in Germany managed either as long-term grassland or cropland. The soils are characterized by different mineralogy, pedogenesis, and soil moisture regimes. They vary strongly in organic C contents as well as in proportions of POM and MAOM (Supplementary Table 1) due to different parent materials and land use. Therefore, each soil is supposed to feature a different contribution to governing C stabilization mechanisms. Large soil aggregates (4–8 mm) were collected by sieving and then subjected to C staining by OsO4 vapor in a dry state. Osmium is reported to selectively bind to olefinic double bonds present in organic compounds such as lipids, amino, and fatty acids31,32. For the first time, Os intensity was not mapped by synchrotron-based X-ray CT dual-energy scanning, but by subtracting spatially aligned, consecutive scans acquired with a commercial, polychromatic X-ray CT scanner before and after Os staining (Supplementary Fig. 1). With 3D image processing involving machine learning-based image segmentation, the microstructure was classified as pores, POM, matrix, and dense areas, such as sand grains and iron (Fe) nodules (Fig. 1a, b, 5 µm voxel resolution). In addition, POM was further segmented into fibrous and compact POM as described above (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 1: Microscale characterization of soil structure.
figure 1

a Two-dimensional slices of X-ray tomograms for selected soil aggregates of the Stagnic Luvisol, Haplic Chernozem, and Fluvic Gleysol prior to Os staining. b Segmented images showing the spatial distribution of pores, POM, soil matrix, and dense areas, including rock fragments and Fe-rich nodules. Particulate organic matter is segmented into compact POM (C) and fibrous POM (F) for which one example is shown for each soil. c Difference images of the same slices displaying organic matter stained by Os. The Os concentration (OsCT) is normalized by reference materials and has arbitrary units. d The average Os concentration in each C and F example is shown as 2D maximum intensity projection through the 3D object. Scale bar represents 1 mm.

All soils exhibited a rather uniform spatial distribution of Os in the matrix of soil aggregates (Fig. 1c, displayed for all 24 soil aggregates in Supplementary Fig. 3), with the expected difference in magnitude, reflecting the different MAOM levels of the studied soils (Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, characteristic differences between the soils emerged with respect to Os concentrations in areas classified as POM and dense areas. In soil aggregates of the Chernozem and Gleysol, these dense areas were mainly composed of solid particles impermeable to OsO4 vapor and therefore remained unstained. In soil aggregates of the Luvisol, dense areas constituted porous and highly Os-enriched nodules rich in Fe that formed under hydromorphic conditions33,34. POM occasionally had the highest Os intensities of all material classes (Fig. 1c) but Os enrichment in individual POM areas varied tremendously with the chemical composition and inner surface area of the POM (Fig. 1d).

The quantification of C via Os mapping with polychromatic X-ray CT was in line with total organic C contents (TOC) and organic C fractions (MAOM, POM, WEOC) independently determined on separate sets of aggregates and also with registered Os maps acquired with µXRF on several soil sections per aggregate (Fig. 2). The agreement between the average Os intensity detected with µXRF (OsXRF) and TOC was excellent (R = 1.00, p = 0.042, Fig. 2a). Correlative microscopy revealed the congruency of spatial Os patterns detected with X-ray CT and µXRF with only minor differences due to different depth resolutions (Supplementary Fig. 4). Yet, only X-ray CT allowed for morphological separation into POM and matrix-bound organic matter. The accordance of X-ray CT-derived amounts of matrix-bound Os (OsCT intensity in matrix \(\times\) volume fraction of matrix) and conventionally determined MAOM contents were somewhat weaker (R = 0.91, p = 0.28) than for TOC, likely due to unresolved POM with high OsCT intensity in the Chernozem soil matrix (Fig. 2b). The image-derived POM amount, i.e., the amount of Os bound to resolved POM (OsCT intensity in POM \(\times\) volume fraction of POM), correlated well (R = 0.98, p = 0.11) with the independently determined POM content (Fig. 2c). The share of C in fibrous POM, i.e., the ratio of Os bound to fibrous POM over Os in all resolved POM, adequately reflected (R = 1.00, p < 0.001) the share of organic C that was extracted from soil aggregates by water (Fig. 2d). No such well-matching relationship could be obtained for organic matter fractions from conventional density separation (Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 2: Comparison of C in organic matter fractions derived from the novel imaging protocol and conventional methods.
figure 2

a Average Os intensity detected with µXRF (OsXRF) on soil sections as related to total organic C content (TOC). b Image-derived mount of mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) derived from the product of average Os intensity of matrix voxels and the volume fraction of matrix voxels over all soil voxels as related to the soils’ contents of C within MAOM. c Same comparison as in b but for C in particulate organic matter (POM). d Image-derived share of C bound to fibrous POM over C bound to total POM as related to the fraction of water-extractable organic C (WEOC/TOC) in soil aggregates. Arbitrary units in Os intensity arise from normalization with different references materials. Error bars correspond to two standard errors in each direction with n = 8 for image-derived data (y axis) and n = 3 for conventional analyses (x axis). All linear regressions are based on n = 3.

Noteworthy, regressions for MAOM and TOC vs. image-derived Os amounts had non-zero intercepts (Fig. 2a, b), suggesting that there was some adsorption of Os to mineral surfaces. The sorption to minerals was confirmed by Os intensities in independently scanned reference materials that were subjected to the same staining protocol (Fig. 3). Although there was no Os adsorption to non-porous materials and to quartz silt with unresolved pores, the adsorption to goethite (α-FeOOH) and illite (2:1 clay mineral) was similar to some reference char and plant materials within inherent porosity. The variability in Os sorption to POM references (Fig. 3) was also in line with the observed variability in Os sorption to POM within the studied soils (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 3: Normalized Osmium concentrations (OsCT) in some reference materials in arbitrary units.
figure 3

Some materials are solid and cannot be penetrated by Os vapor. The divergence from zero Os intensity for solid materials can therefore only be explained by polychromatic X-ray artifacts. Other materials are porous, i.e. powders with grain size smaller than the image resolution or biological material within inherent porosity. The boxplots show the 0%, 25%, 50%, 75, and 100% percentiles of varying sample numbers (n) after outlier detection. The two images show representative slices through X-ray tomograms of char and plant samples.

Elemental mapping with µXRF revealed co-localization of Os with other elements, e.g., phosphorus (P) or Fe that may indicate Os-binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 5). Yet, the technique was unsuitable to distinguish whether Os was sorbed to minerals or organic molecules. This was better achieved with NanoSIMS imaging of selected spots within different microenvironments previously identified by X-ray CT and µXRF (Fig. 4). NanoSIMS analysis demonstrated that the highest Os occurrences were co-localized with 12C14N ions in the cell walls of plant residues (Fig. 4, spot 7−9). In the soil matrix (Fig. 4, spot 4−6) and Fe-rich nodules (Fig. 4, spot 1−3), the spatial distribution of Os suggested binding to Fe-bearing minerals (56Fe16O ions) and clay minerals (27Al16O ions) in addition to sorption to organic matter patches, and thus, confirmed the findings for Os sorption to reference materials (Fig. 3). Regression analysis showed that variation in 192Os intensities were best explained by 12C14N ions in plant residues, whereas 27Al16O ions were a better predictor in nodules and both perform equally in the soil matrix (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Fig. 4: Correlative microscopy reveals Osmium sorption mechanisms.
figure 4

Two-dimensional cross-sections through tomograms (X-ray CT) of aggregates from a Stagnic Luvisol and a Fluvic Gleysol scanned after Os staining. Nine out of 15 spots mapped with secondary ion mass spectroscopy (NanoSIMS) across both soil sections were selected to depict the spatial distribution of organic C (12C14N/all) and Os (192Os/all) and its co-localization with Fe (56Fe16O/all) and Al (27Al16O/all) in different microenvironments (Fe-rich nodules (red), mineral matrix (blue), plant residues (gold)).

Our correlative imaging approach implies that absolute values of local Os concentrations cannot reliably be used for quantification of MAOM in the soil matrix, as there is always some contribution of Os adsorbed to reactive minerals and unresolved POM. In the following, we will therefore designate the matrix Os signals generally as “matrix-bound organic matter” and “C in the soil matrix”. We will discuss below how far average matrix-bound C contents can still be investigated with respect to pore or POM distances.

Microscale C distribution in different soil types

Individual aggregates from the same soil varied considerably in their average Os concentration due to the variability of organic C contents in the field (Supplementary Fig. 3). Interestingly, there was a linear relationship between increasing matrix Os contents detected by X-ray CT (OsCT) and decreasing matrix gray values prior to Os staining (Fig. 5a). The average OsCT intensity of POM seemed much lower in the alternating-wet Stagnic Luvisol and permanently wet Fluvic Gleysol than in the dry Haplic Chernozem (Fig. 5b). The non-zero OsCT in the dense material class of all soils was partly due to shortcomings of image processing (matrix wrongly assigned to dense material) and partly due to minerals and nodules that adsorbed Os, in particular in the Stagnic Luvisol.

Fig. 5: Osmium concentrations (OsCT) with respect to material classes and pore distances.
figure 5

a Linear relationship between Os concentration in the soil matrix as a proxy for mineral-associated organic matter and the soil matrix gray value prior to Os staining as proxy for bulk density. Both properties are given in arbitrary units resulting from grayscale normalization. b Average Os concentration in different material classes of each soil. The boxplots show the 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% percentiles after outlier detection (n = 8). Osmium concentrations in the soil matrix c and in POM d decline towards pore boundaries. Shaded areas represent two standard errors in each direction (n = 8).

So far only differences in average Os concentrations between soil types and material classes have been assessed. Deeper insights into the role of microenvironments as drivers for C sequestration can only be achieved by quantifying the spatial Os distribution. Pore distances had a dominant effect on OsCT intensity gradients within the soil matrix, as they decreased markedly towards pore boundaries (Fig. 5c). Even in the well-aerated Chernozem there was a 30 µm thick OsCT depletion zone around visible pores. The spatial extent of the depletion zone was similar in the poorly drained Luvisol. The spatial extent of the depletion zone was largest in the Gleysol, amounting to 60−80 µm and gradually extending beyond >100 µm. The volume fraction of the soil matrix affected by Os depletion around visible pores amounted to 19% (Luvisol), 65% (Chernozem), and 74% (Gleysol), respectively, because of different visible porosities and internal pore surface area densities (Supplementary Table 1).

Also, the Os concentration in POM was reduced in close vicinity to pores (<20 µm) for all three soils (Fig. 5d). At greater distances to pores (>20 µm), the Os concentration was either increasing (Chernozem), constant (Luvisol), or decreasing (Gleysol) because the proportion, average pore distances, and susceptibility to Os staining of fibrous and compact POM differed between soils.

All segmented POM particles large enough for shape assessment (5149 individual particles) were assigned to either compact or fibrous POM (depicted for all 24 samples in Supplementary Fig. 2). Every POM particle was then attributed with an average Os concentration and an average distance to the next visible pore (Fig. 6b). This pore distance was surprisingly short irrespective of aggregate density and visible porosity and amounted to 21 µm when averaged across all soils and POM types (Supplementary Table 1). It was substantially shorter than the average pore distance in the soil matrix, which was in the range of 45–106 µm depending on visible porosity (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Table 1). The distance between POM and pores increased to 120 µm when only connected pores were considered for distance estimation (Supplementary Fig. 7), i.e., neglecting isolated pores and only considering pores with continuous access to aggregate boundaries. This is a situation more likely to be encountered for air-filled pores, when soil is drained from full saturation to field capacity.

Fig. 6: Characterization of fibrous and compact particulate organic matter in different soils.
figure 6

b Average Os concentration (OsCT) and average pore distance for individual, fibrous, or compact POM objects. a and c Violin plots represent marginal distributions of individual POM objects. Boxplots represent the 0%, 25%, 50%, 75, and 100% percentiles of averages for individual aggregates (n = 8) with small letters reflecting significant differences tested at p < 0.05 (n.s. not significant). d and e Average Os concentration in the soil matrix around compact and fibrous POM. Shaded areas represent two standard errors in each direction (n = 8).

Moreover, compact POM had a significantly (p < 0.001) larger pore distance than fibrous POM (Fig. 6a) in all three soils. Surprisingly, the average pore distance of both POM types did not depend on soil type. Only when the filling of pores by air and water is explicitly considered at field capacity, did the higher aggregate density and lower visible porosity (Supplementary Table 1) also entail significantly higher POM distances to air-filled pores in the Luvisol (p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 7). Osmium intensities in POM differed significantly between soil types (p < 0.001), but there was no consistent pattern as to whether fibrous or compact POM featured higher Os intensities (Fig. 6b). The interaction term between soil type and POM type was significant (p < 0.01). That is, in the well-aerated Chernozem, compact POM was stained more intensively, whereas fibrous POM was stained more intensively in the hydromorphic Gleysol and Luvisol.

The soil matrix around POM was enriched in Os with a spatial extent of 30−40 µm for the Luvisol and Chernozem soil, irrespective of POM type (Fig. 6b, c). The volume fraction affected by the enrichment amounted to 1.3% in both soils, which was much smaller than the volume fraction affected by Os depletion around pores (Chernozem: 65%, Luvisol: 19%, Supplementary Table 1). A remarkable exception was the groundwater-affected Gleysol, where Os enrichment around POM was completely absent. Strikingly, the soil matrix around fibrous POM embedded in a well-connected, aerated pore network was even depleted in Os (Fig. 6e), whereas there was less Os depletion around compact POM (Fig. 6d) that is on average farther away from pores (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 7). The volume fraction of the soil matrix affected by Os depletion around fresh POM in the Gleysol was again much smaller (2.8%) and mainly included in the matrix volume affected by Os depletion around pores (74%, Supplementary Table 1).

C turnover under different moisture regimes

We speculate that these insights from microscale imaging do not only reflect the long-term fate of organic C in soil, but have also implications for short-term C turnover. To test this hypothesis, sets of individual aggregates were brought to different moisture levels (partially wet vs. fully saturated) and incubated under different oxygen availabilities (20% O2 vs. 0% O2) to measure CO2 efflux rates for 3 days.

The order of C mineralization rates was the same for all boundary conditions (Chernozem<Luvisol<Gleysol, Fig. 7a), but different from the order of TOC contents. This is because the Chernozem evoked exceptionally low CO2 efflux despite the highest POM content (Supplementary Table 1). Under completely anoxic conditions without local differences in metabolic pathways by varying oxygen availability, the different order and even the magnitude of mineralized C was well related (R = 0.99, p = 0.087) to the fraction of C stored in fibrous POM as analyzed by X-ray CT (Fig. 7b). Consequently, the small fraction of mineralized C in the Chernozem resulted from the high proportion of C stored in compact POM, also comprising biochar.

Fig. 7: Soil respiration results from short-term incubations.
figure 7

a Absolute CO2 efflux rates under oxic (20% O2) and anoxic (0% O2) conditions at different moisture levels (WFPS, water-filled pore space). b Relative CO2 efflux rates, i.e. as a fraction of total organic C, scale linearly with the share of image-derived C in fibrous particulate organic matter (POM) to that in total POM. c The increase in CO2 efflux rates through the presence of oxygen (at 100% WFPS) scales linearly with the water-extractable organic C (WEOC) leached from POM. Bars represent two standard errors in each direction with n = 3 for CO2 and WEOC data and n = 8 for image-derived POM data.

The highest C mineralization rates occurred at fully water-saturated, oxic conditions in all soils (Fig. 7a), and dropped by a factor of 3–4 under anoxic conditions. The magnitude of CO2 efflux reduction under fully anoxic conditions is closely related (R = 1.00, p = 0.028, Fig. 7c) to the WEOC content of POM. In other words, readily soluble C from POM seemed to fuel oxic respiration and evoke microbial activity more than other organic matter fractions, but its biodegradability under anoxic conditions also suffered more relative to other fractions.

The reduction in C mineralization towards drier, oxic conditions indicated that with decreasing water content the decreasing diffusion of C to decomposers outweighed the gradual improvement in oxygen availability. That relative CO2 efflux reduction towards drier conditions scaled linearly with the image-derived volume fraction of fibrous POM in soil aggregates (R = 0.98, p = 0.12, Supplementary Fig. 8).


The good agreement between image-derived POM amount and conventional POM contents (Fig. 2c) confirmed that Os staining is very accurate in detecting C in organic soil residues35. However, a thorough validation of our protocol for microscale C mapping in the soil matrix revealed mixed results as to whether Os intensities can be interpreted towards MAOM. On the one hand, the order of average matrix Os intensities was the same as the order of conventionally determined MAOM contents for all three soils (Fig. 2b). Moreover, the inverse relationship between matrix Os intensities and matrix gray values prior to Os staining (Fig. 5a) is in line with the well-known decrease in bulk density36, increase in field capacity37, and more specifically the increase in the sub-resolution porosity38 with increasing C contents. On the other hand, matrix Os intensities were modulated by varying contents and staining intensities of unresolved POM particles (Fig. 2b). In addition, as shown by regression analysis (Fig. 2a, b), staining of reference materials (Fig. 3), and NanoSIMS imaging (Fig. 4), there was a substantial contribution of reactive minerals to Os sorption in the soil matrix. Such Os sorption to the mineral matrix, though smaller than to POM, was also reported for an allophanic Andosol39. Therefore, the current assertions of Os selectively binding to double bonds in organic matter35,38,39,40,41 and therefore only staining organic molecules without adsorption to mineral surfaces need to be reconsidered. A range of bonding mechanisms to reactive surfaces was suggested in the past42, including hydrogen bonds43. For these reasons, matrix Os intensities should not be equated to MAOM contents, especially considering comparisons across soils with different parent materials, unless some correction is employed that has yet to be developed. However, relative changes in average matrix-bound organic matter contents with respect to pore or POM distances can still be investigated assuming that mineralogy does not change systematically at these distances.

Violations of the assumed indifference to pore distances can be easily imagined, especially in redoximorphic soils, where the mobility of Fe depends on the local oxidation state33,34,44. In fact, µXRF maps demonstrated that there is indeed a decrease in Al and Fe as proxies for adsorbing minerals towards pores in hydromorphic soils (Supplementary Fig. 9). The depletion of Al around pores may hint toward dispersive clay mobilization around pores. Yet, the spatial extent of both the Fe and Al depletion zone was much larger, amounting to ~200 µm and 600 µm in the Stagnic Luvisol and Fluvial Gleysol, respectively. Moreover, there was no Al and Fe depletion around pores in the Haplic Chernozem despite the Os depletion detected with X-ray CT. Also, sub-resolution porosity gradients were ruled out previously as an explanation for lower OsCT around pores in a similar study employing synchrotron X-ray CT scans at two resolutions (13 µm vs. 2 µm)38. This leaves a decrease in MAOM content or less efficient Os staining of MAOM due to altered chemical composition around pores as most likely explanations for the observed pattern that cannot be disentangled by the applied methods.

In summary, Os mapping with polychromatic X-ray CT is a viable alternative to synchrotron X-ray CT since both the magnitude and spatial distribution of Os are well in line with conventional physical organic matter fractions and µXRF analyses. Our novel image processing protocol opens up new opportunities to analyze more and larger samples unconstrained by the limited field of view and limited access to synchrotron-based CT.

Our findings indicate that soil moisture regimes and the position of organic matter within the pore space shape the C distribution at the microscale through the interplay between C losses from POM and C redistribution and stabilization in the soil matrix imposed by the pore network as conceptualized in Fig. 8. POM within the pore network is an important source for the formation of MAOM, either in its immediate vicinity or even in the distant soil matrix, depending on the soil moisture regime. The magnitude and range of POM leaching, i.e., the translocation of soluble C compounds from POM into its surrounding, varied with soil moisture regime. In the well-aerated Chernozem under dry climate conditions, C loss from POM was low (Fig. 5b and Fig. 6c) and resulted in a thin layer (30–40 µm) of C enrichment in the adjacent soil matrix (Fig. 6d, e), corroborating the notion of POM as a functional component for MAOM formation by releasing sorptive compounds7. Active C translocation by fungal growth rather than diffusion might be the dominant process for this C enrichment especially in well-aerated soils15,45,46. The layer is thinner than the 100−130 µm zone of Os enrichment reported previously for a small number (n = 6) of POM-bearing pores in a well-drained, loamy soil38. In the alternating-wet Luvisol with twice the annual precipitation, POM was more effectively leached (Figs. 5b and 6c), but the released C did not become stabilized farther in the soil matrix (Fig. 6d, e), presumably due to periodic dry spells that prevented diffusive or convective migration of C from POM into the soil matrix. In the groundwater-affected Gleysol, C leached from POM might have migrated farther into the soil matrix and reached more distant sorption sites. The enhanced transport into and stabilization at distant locations prevented the formation of distinct MAOM layers around POM as observed for the other two soils (Fig. 6d, e). The soil moisture regime may not only govern the magnitude of POM leaching, but also the magnitude of POM mineralization, as the C mineralization is impaired by dryness21,22 that is more common in the Haplic Chernozem. Different degrees of C losses from POM due to leaching or mineralization in the different soil types also manifested themselves in the interaction effect of soil type and POM type (Fig. 6c). In hydromorphic soils compact POM had lower C contents than fibrous POM due to greater cumulative exposure to soil moisture. This difference in cumulative C depletion and the different degrees of occlusion support previous findings30 that a morphological POM classification into fibrous and compact can be interpreted towards decomposition stages like “fresh” and “decomposed” (Fig. 8). In the well-aerated Haplic Chernozem the order was reversed. Here, recalcitrant biochar made up a large fraction of decomposed POM. Though being more occluded and likely residing in soil for much longer it featured high Os intensities, indicating that it was less affected by exposure to soil moisture than decomposed POM in hydromorphic soils.

Fig. 8: Synoptic overview on which properties varied with the soil moisture regime.
figure 8

C loss from particulate organic matter (POM) and the redistribution of C in the soil matrix at the µm scale were mainly (but not exclusively) governed by soil moisture regime. The remaining properties (macroporosity, mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) and POM content, POM distribution at the mm scale, bioavailability, and biodegradability) were influenced by other factors, among them mineralogy, land use, and productivity. The size of gray circles represents the magnitude of macroscale properties. Morphological POM types are interpreted towards the decomposition stage (fresh, decomposed). Different shades of brown and gray represent C contents in MAOM and POM, respectively. The microscopy icon, \({{{{{\boldsymbol{\propto }}}}}}\), and \({{{{{\boldsymbol{\approx }}}}}}\) represents image-derived properties, “proportional” and “approximately”, respectively.

In contrast to strongly differing C patterns in the soil matrix around POM in response to different soil moisture regimes, we observed depletion of matrix-bound organic matter around pores irrespective of the soil moisture regime (Fig. 5c). The spatial extent of the depletion zone in the Chernozem and Luvisol was similar to a 30−50 µm depletion zone reported for a well-drained loamy soil38. In the Gleysol, it mostly ranged between 60 and 80 µm and gradually extended beyond 100 µm, as unresolved pores remained predominantly water-filled throughout the year and aeration patterns were tied stronger to the visible pore space. The C depletion around pores suggests that matrix-bound organic matter in close contact with visible pores (aperture >10 µm), either becomes more easily desorbed due to equilibration with the more frequently exchanged soil solution, encounters less reactive minerals as potential sorption sites, or is more susceptible to microbial processing due to better aeration which may also alter the chemical composition resulting in less olefinic double bonds. Especially in the hydromorphic soils, all of these processes could be interlinked, since C mobilization is not only promoted by Mn and Fe dissolution at low redox potential47, but even more so by the concomitant pH increase which favors C desorption from mineral surfaces48. In intact hydromorphic soils, microbial processing of labile C along pores might therefore induce anoxic microsites49 during wet periods and promote C desorption locally, whereas microbial processing along pores promotes C mineralization when they fall dry. Consequently, C stabilized in micro- or mesopores (aperture <10 µm) of the distant soil matrix will possess a higher likelihood to survive for longer time than MAOM or POM located around or in larger pores, respectively. The volume fraction of the distant soil matrix, in which C can potentially be stabilized for centuries to millennia50,51, ranged from 26% (Gleysol) to 81% (Luvisol) and was mainly governed by bulk density and the soil moisture regime. Our data provide a hitherto unavailable quantitative assessment of the resulting C accumulation pattern, and thus, strengthen the view that various C (de)stabilization mechanisms follow a spatial pattern depending on the structure of the pore network.

Our findings reconcile the contrasting views on whether POM-bearing pores predominantly foster C mineralization49 or C sequestration6. Pores bearing POM, in particular those formed around fine roots (30–150 µm diameter), may act as entry paths for C into the soil matrix and trigger C accrual in its surrounding, especially in well-aerated soils, as posited by ref. 6. However, only a small fraction of pores in that size range is actually filled with fresh plant residues52, amounting to fractions of 5–13% of all visible pores (aperture >10 µm) in the present study. Also, the moisture exposure will govern the spatial extent and probably also the longevity of MAOM enrichment in the soil matrix surrounding pores that contain POM. At the same time, all pores, including those occupied by plant residues, serve as entry paths for oxygen, probably promoting mineralization instead of stabilization of C49. In addition, other processes, such as the absence of sorbing minerals, frequent MAOM desorption, and migration of soluble C into the soil matrix, may contribute to C depletion around larger pores. Overall, our data suggest that visible pores holding organic residues may support C formation in the surrounding soil matrix, while empty pores promote C depletion. However, the volume of influence of C depletion around pores is always greater (19–74%) than that of MAOM enrichment around POM (1%), simply because of vastly different volume fractions of pores and POM.

Interestingly, the spatial extent of C enrichment around POM and C depletion around pores was very similar, irrespective of the soil moisture regime. It was 30–40 µm and only extended to 80 µm around pores in the Gleysol, probably because the investigated topsoils had been exposed to repeated tillage (Chernozem, Luvisol) or bioturbation (Gleysol). Soils with slower structure turnover, and thus more static pore networks, such as subsoils, are expected to exhibit different MAOM gradient extents around pores and POM. In addition, we cannot completely rule out confounding effects of soil moisture regime and land use at the selected sampling sites. The two tilled cropland soils were more similar with respect to Os gradients around pores and POM than the non-tilled grassland soil. It is conceivable that soil aggregates remaining intact during aggregate fractionation also remain intact during plowing. Pores bearing POM in such aggregates may therefore have experienced many cycles of C enrichment. Bioturbation in the non-tilled grassland might in turn have led to a more effective homogenization of the soil structure so that POM-bearing pores are younger. In the future, such interactions between soil type and land use can be scrutinized with a full factorial experimental design comprising all combinations of soil moisture regimes and land uses in controlled long-term trials. The presented C mapping technique paves the way for a comprehensive assessment of these microscale patterns in different pedogenetic settings.

The soil moisture regime exerted a strong influence on the C losses from POM and on the microscale distribution of matrix-bound organic matter. However, the fate of organic C in the soil is not only governed by spatially varying redistribution and stabilization mechanisms but also by how new C enters the soil in the first place6,53. Litter and root residues are the main sources of fresh POM, which in turn provides most of the C that become stabilized in the soil matrix. The amount and quality of POM input into the soil are controlled by other factors than soil moisture regime, such as nutrient availability, crop productivity, plant species, and soil management.

Such diverse C inputs have ramifications for the abundance, quality, and spatial distribution of POM at the mm scale and eventually how effectively C is mineralized under different boundary conditions as conceptualized in Fig. 8. We tested the bioavailability and biodegradability at different oxygen and water saturation levels. Bioavailability describes the potential of microorganisms to interact with organic compounds, which may be restricted by sorption, pore size, or dryness54. Biodegradability is a measure of the utilization of organic compounds and varies with the intrinsic quality and soil conditions54. The biodegradation in terms of the fraction of TOC mineralized per day was not controlled by TOC or the total POM amount, but linked to the image-derived share of C within fibrous POM (Fig. 7b), which in turn was in excellent agreement with the water-extractable fraction of TOC (WEOC/TOC, Fig. 2d). This resulted in the lowest biodegradation of C in the Haplic Chernozem having the highest share of C in recalcitrant biochar. This is in line with previous findings of the vastly different effects of litter and char amendments on soil respiration irrespective of the oxygen availability55. It also straightly points at fresh POM as a major source of WEOC. The gain in biodegradation from anoxic to oxic conditions indicated how much more efficiently organic compounds can be mineralized along optimal metabolic pathways than along less favorable ones. This biodegradability was in good agreement with WEOC contents (Fig. 7c).

POM is not only a C input to soil, but also enhances oxygen supply due to incomplete contact with the surrounding soil and volume loss during decay. The large majority of POM particles were in direct contact with visible pores (aperture>10 µm, Fig. 6b). Seemingly, the internal porosity and small gaps around POM promote better aeration of POM than of the soil matrix. In addition, decomposed POM was more fragmented and occluded due to longer exposure to soil-structure turnover, than fresh POM residing in a well-connected network of elongated pores with low capillarity (Fig. 6a). This network is bound to fall dry under partially wet conditions. This loss in bioavailability was assessed by testing the mineralization under oxic, fully wet conditions (100% water-filled pore space (WFPS)) and oxic, partially wet (50% WFPS) conditions. The reduction scaled linearly with the volume fraction of fibrous POM and was most dominant in the Gleysol with the highest abundance of fresh litter and roots located in pores with low capillarity where hydraulic connection to the surrounding soil matrix is lost under dry conditions23,26. This was also reflected by the shortest distance of fibrous POM to air-filled pores at field capacity among the investigated soils (Supplementary Fig. 7). It was suggested recently that decomposing plant tissue may absorb water from the adjacent soil matrix56,57 and thereby maintain high microbial activity even under partially wet conditions. However, the capacity for water absorption is reduced by water repellency, which in turn is modulated by the quantity and quality of organic matter58. More incubation experiments under well-controlled conditions with plant residues embedded in their intact structure and with more soil types than presented here are required to assess the water absorption effect.

In summary, the morphological approach of estimating the volume of (and C stored in) fibrous and compact POM can be interpreted towards decomposition stages as it yields accurate predictions of the bioavailability and biodegradability under various standardized conditions in short-term incubations in line with the previous studies23,24,25,26. In addition, it provides microscopic clues to long-term C turnover under different moisture regimes.


Soils characteristics

Topsoil material from fine-textured soil was collected from three sites in Germany, either managed as grassland or agricultural soil for several decades. Plant compositions and crop rotations are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. A Stagnic Luvisol derived from Loess was sampled from long-term cropland at Rotthalmünster at the foothills of the Alps (360 m a.s.l., 856 mm, 8.2 °C). It was low in total organic C (12.0 mg C g−1 soil) and contained mottling features induced by slow drainage. A Haplic Chernozem developed from Loessian deposits under dry, continental climate (116 m a.s.l., 484 mm, 8.8 °C) was sampled from long-term cropland at Bad Lauchstädt. It had a higher organic C content (22.1 mg C g−1 soil) and a sizable amount of fossil C due to atmospheric deposition59. The Fluvic Gleysol on sandy clay loam was sampled from long-term grassland in a flood plain near Gießen (172 m a.s.l., 600 mm, 9.3 °C) and had by far the highest organic C content (39.5 mg C g−1 soil), yet with the lowest content of occluded POM and the largest amount of WEOC in the mineral matrix (Supplementary Table 1). The soils were characterized with respect to texture, clay mineralogy, cation exchange capacity, extractable Fe and Al contents, organic matter fractions, soil respiration, and denitrification in associated experiments (Supplementary Table 1)12,60,61. In brief, bulk soils were fractionated according to density using sodium polytungstate solution adjusted to 1.6 g cm−3 to separate POM (< 1.6 g cm−3) from MAOM (> 1.6 g cm−3). The MAOM fractions were analyzed for TOC using a Vario Max Cube; analyses of POM were carried out with a Vario EL cube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany). Since density fractionation might release soluble C from plant residues, the electrostatic attraction was used62 to remove loosely bound POM material. This POM material was ground to <1 mm for WEOC analysis of POM from bulk soil, which was determined by suspending 500 mg of POM in 25 ml ultrapure water and shaking for 1 h. After centrifugation at 3000 × g for 10 min (Cryofuge 8500i, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States), the supernatants were passed through 0.45-μm membrane filters (Supor-450, Pall Cooperation, New York, NY, USA) and analyzed for dissolved organic C with a multi N/C 3100 instrument (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). Soils were dry-sieved and eight soil aggregates in the size fraction of 4−8 mm were collected from each soil for image analysis. The mean aggregate diameter was 6.5 mm (assuming a sphere with equivalent volume, min: 5.9 mm, max: 7.3 mm) across all soils. Additional soil aggregates were analyzed for TOC and total nitrogen (TN) using a Euro EA Elemental Analyzer (HEKAtech GmbH, Wegberg, Germany) with a nondispersive infrared sensor. Likewise, 5 g of soil aggregates were suspended in 25 ml ultrapure water and subjected to the same workflow as described for WEOC analysis of POM in order to determine WEOC of soil aggregates.

X-ray computed tomography

A total of 24 samples (eight samples per soil) were scanned with X-ray CT (X-tek XTH 225, Nikon Metrology, 80 kV, 75 µA, 1 s exposure time, no filter, 2400 projections, two frames per projection) and reconstructed in 16-bit at a voxel resolution of 5 µm with the X-tek CT pro software (Nikon Metrology). The smallest detectable pore diameter is in the range of 10–15 µm due to image processing. Scans of the same sample were acquired before and after Os staining to map the spatial Os distribution.

Osmium staining

The soil aggregates were placed between two glass Petri dishes together with solid OsO4 (ReagentPlus 99.8%, Sigma Aldrich) at a concentration of 0.06 g OsO4 g−1 soil. The soil aggregates were exposed to the OsO4 vapor for 2 days in a sealed desiccator under a fume hood, which was enough for the entire OsO4 to vaporize and diffuse into the soil. Complete penetration of the aggregates with Os was later confirmed with X-ray CT. The total amount of C stained by Os varies between >1% for fresh root material and 2−3% for organic matter in soils35.

In addition to the soil aggregates, eight reference materials were used to determine Os sorption to typical soil components: three solid materials (1. aluminum, 2. quartz sand (0.4−0.8 mm, Roth, Germany), 3. polyvinyl chloride fragments), three fine-grained minerals (1. silica fine flour (SIKRON SH 200, Quarzwerke, Germany), 2. illite (green shale, Ward’s Science, USA), 3. goethite), and two porous organic materials (1. milled maize straw, 2. commercial hardwood char (Favorit, Alschu GmbH, Germany)). Goethite was prepared by raising the pH of 1 M FeCl3 • 6 H2O solution to pH 12, followed by the aging of the precipitates at 55 °C for 24–48 hours until the color had changed completely to ocher (the modified procedure by Atkinson, Posner63). The reference materials were filled into aluminum rings and exposed to 0.5 g OsO4 (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Germany) vapor for three weeks. X-ray CT imaging was done before and after Os staining at a resolution of 19 µm (130 kV, 150 µA, 0.708 s exposure time, 1 mm copper filter, 2000 projections, two frames per projection).

Soil sections

Four soil aggregates of each soil were impregnated with a series of Araldite 502: acetone mixtures (1:3, 1:1 (vol:vol)) and finally with 100% Araldite 502 (Araldite kit 502, electron microscope sciences, Hatfield, USA)64,65 and the blocks were cured at 60 °C for 48 h. X-ray CT scans of the embedded samples were acquired after resin impregnation and prior to sectioning to check for internal deformations during Araldite application. The impregnated soils were cut with a low-speed saw (Struers Discoplan TS) in equidistant, parallel sections. The resulting 3–4 soil sections per aggregate were glued onto a quartz glass sample holder. The fixed aggregate slices were ground down and subsequently polished to obtain thin sections with a surface of low topography to allow for high-resolution imaging using µXRF and NanoSIMS. In order to determine the average thickness of soil sections, the discs were stacked and scanned jointly with X-ray CT at a spatial resolution of 15 µm.

X-ray fluorescence microscopy

A total of 36 soil sections (Luvisol: 11, Chernozem: 11, Gleysol: 14) were mapped with µXRF (Micro-XRF Spektrometer M4 TORNADO, Bruker) at 50 kV, 500 µA, 15–20 ms pixel−1 map time, 20 µm spot size, 8 µm pixel size). The raw counts were stored in 16-bit and normalized to a map time of 100 ms per pixel. Maps of various elements (Al, Ba, Ca, Cl, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Os, P, Rb, Si, S, Sr, Ti, Zr) were extracted. The higher the atomic number, the larger the depth from which excited electrons still emit photons. This resulted in different average Os counts for soil sections with different depths. This was accounted for by normalizing Os counts in soil with average Os counts in reference areas placed in exterior resin. This is feasible because sample preparation for resin embedding after Os staining inevitably leads to some Os remobilization32. Note that this approach is more accurate than normalization by the section thickness measured with X-ray CT, since the relationship between thickness and cumulative photon emission from all depths of the section is non-linear. The X-ray CT images obtained after resin impregnation were registered into the microscopy plane mapped with µXRF by employing a landmark-based registration protocol66 for the elastix image registration software67. The Si map was used for registration as it correlated best with the structure information of the X-ray CT. Aluminum and Fe intensities were normalized by Si intensities (Al/(Al+Si) and Fe/(Fe+Si)) to a range of 0–1 and average normalized intensities were calculated as a function of Euclidean pore distance after pore segmentation of the registered X-ray CT image via Otsu thresholding68 in Fiji/ImageJ69 (more information on image registration given below).

Secondary ion mass spectroscopy

Two selected soil sections of aggregates from Stagnic Luvisol and Fluvic Gleysol were investigated using a NanoSIMS 50 L instrument (CAMECA, Gennevilliers, France). Briefly, the Cs+ primary ion beam hitting the sample with an impact energy of 16 keV induces releasing of secondary ions from the surface. To avoid charging during the NanoSIMS analysis on non-conductive material, the samples were coated with an Au/Pd layer of ca. 30 nm (Sputter-Coater Polaron Emitech SC7640). Prior to NanoSIMS measurements, contaminants and the Au/Pd coating layer were locally sputtered away using a high primary beam current (pre-sputtering/implantation), while the reactive Cs+ ions were implanted into the sample until the secondary ions reached an equilibrium steady state. In addition to the conductive coating Au/Pd layer, the electron flood gun of the NanoSIMS was used for charge compensation at the measurement time. The primary beam focused at a spot size of ~150 nm (ca. 2 pA) was scanned over the sample on areas of 30 µm × 30 µm, and 16O, 12C2, 12C14N, 27Al16O, and 56Fe16O and 192Os secondary ions escaping the sample surface were collected on electron multipliers with an electronic dead time fixed at 44 ns. The secondary ions 12C2, 12C14N are a proxy for organic matter, 16O and 27Al16O are indicative of mineral matrix, 56Fe16O reveal Fe-rich areas, and 192Os trace the incorporated Os.

In all, 15 selected spots across both soil sections were measured in distinct microenvironments previously registered as nodules (n = 4), mineral matrix (n = 6), or plant residues (n = 5). Further parameters were: dwell time of 1 ms pixel−1, 256 × 256 pixels for a 30 × 30 μm field of view with 40 planes per measurement. All planes were accumulated in a single plane after drift correction using the OpenMIMS plugin in Fiji/ImageJ. Absolute counts of a specific ion were normalized by the sum of all seven ion maps in each pixel29 in Fiji/ImageJ in order to ensure comparability among the 15 selected spots. Co-localized ion intensities (192Os ~12C14N, 192Os ~27Al16O, 192Os ~56Fe16O) were evaluated after downscaling the pixel size to 0.6 µm in Fiji/ImageJ in order to reduce high-frequency noise. Co-localization in individual spots was quantified as the variability in Os intensity explained by the variability of the other ion intensity (R² of the ion pair).

3D Image processing

X-ray CT images of the same sample before and after Os staining as well as after resin impregnation was registered onto each other with elastix67 employing a landmark assisted similarity transform70. The spatial distribution of Os was determined by subtracting the image acquired before Os staining from the image acquired after Os staining followed by a Median filter to remove noise in the difference image (Supplementary Fig. 1) with Fiji/ImageJ. Prior to this subtraction, the grayscales were normalized by linear rescaling with a fixed gray value of 40 and 120 for the plastic sample holder and quartz grains, respectively. A small number of areas in each reference material were selected by the ROI Manager in Fiji/ImageJ. The resulting arbitrary unit for OsCT in the difference image would thus be 80, if the presence of Os would increase the gray value from that of plastic in the image prior to Os staining to that of quartz after Os staining.

Supervised classification of the normalized raw images into pores, POM, soil matrix, and dense areas including rocks and Fe-rich concretions was carried out with the ilastik software71. A parallel random forest classifier was used in multi-dimensional feature space that included the original gray values as well as gradient (1st derivative of gray values) and texture information (2nd derivative of gray values) after Gaussian smoothing with a strength of \(\sigma =\left[0.3,0.7,1.0\right]\). In this way, characteristic traits of each material like the aperture of cracks, the inherent heterogeneity of the organic fabric, or the homogeneity of quartz grains were harnessed for material detection. The classifier was trained with a few test lines for each material class. The outcome of image classification was denoised with a majority filter implemented in the QuantIm image processing library72. The aggregate boundaries were determined with the Adaptive rectangle tool on the grayscale data in VG Studio Max 3.4 (Visual Graphics) in order to impose the exterior as an additional material onto the segmented images. The POM material class was labeled with ‘Connected Components Labeling’ in the MorphoLibJ plugin73 for Fiji/ImageJ. POM clusters >6.25 × 105 µm³ (5000 voxels) were analyzed with respect to different morphological traits using Analyze Regions 3D in MorpholibJ and stored in data tables. From these traits four different properties were derived to distinguish decomposed from fresh POM: elongation, compactness, plateness, and mean Os intensity (Supplementary Table 2). These morphological properties reflect the increasing fragmentation and shape evolution of POM from non-decomposed plant residues characterized by conserved cells structure to sub-rounded nodules of ~40 µm that is gradually mixed with the soil matrix as previously reported based on soil micromorphology30. Out of 5149 POM objects, 463 were manually assigned to fibrous or compact POM after visual inspection. The remaining objects were assigned with a random forest classifier in R74 as follows: The pre-assigned objects were split into a training (n = 324) and validation (n = 139) data set. A classifier was trained on the training data set with 500 trees and two variables were tried at each split. Employing the classifier on the validation data set led to a prediction accuracy of 92%. Then a new classifier was trained on all available data (n = 463) resulting in an OOB (Out-of-bag) estimate of an error rate of 8%. This classifier was applied to the entire data set. The final assignment was imposed on the label image via the ‘Assign Measure to Label’ method in MorpholibJ. The Os amount bound to matrix-bound organic matter and POM was calculated as the product of average Os intensity in and the volume fraction of this material class. Likewise, the share of C in fibrous POM was calculated as the ratio between Os amount in fibrous POM and the sum of Os amounts in fibrous and compact POM. Euclidean distance maps were calculated on binary images in Fiji. These represent the Euclidean distance to the closest foreground voxel, e.g. pores or POM, in all background voxels. Finally, Os intensity in the difference image, OsCT, was averaged for different material classes as well as for different distances in certain material classes. The spatial extent of Os depletion or enrichment in the soil matrix was determined as the Euclidean distance at which the Os intensity reaches the arithmetic mean ±1 standard deviation of the bulk soil.

Short-term soil incubation

For oxic incubations, 3.5 g of air-dried soil aggregates (diameter 2−8 mm, 15−20 aggregates per bottle) were loosely placed on the bottom of 100-ml injection bottles (Chroma Globe, Kreuzau, Germany) to assure that gaseous oxygen can reach aggregates without constraints induced by touching aggregates. The dry aggregates were carefully rewetted to 50% WFPS by dripping water with a syringe. After pre-incubation for seven days under aerobic conditions at 20 °C to stimulate microbial growth, soil aggregates were brought to different saturations (50% WFPS—partially wet, 100% WFPS—fully saturated) with a syringe. Subsequently, incubation bottles were sealed with a chlorobutyl rubber stopper and crimped with an aluminum cap. After evacuating (<250 mbar) and flushing the bottles three times with synthetic air (Air Liquide, Düsseldorf, Germany), soil aggregates were incubated at 25 °C in the dark. Gas samples were taken after 0, 24, and 72 h, and analyzed for CO2 with gas chromatography (Agilent HP 7890B). Gas emissions under anoxic conditions were carried out in a slightly different spatial setup to concur with a precursor study. Here, macroaggregates (2–8 mm) were embedded in quartz silt (<125 µm) and rewetted to 40% WFPS with ultrapure water and pre-incubated for seven days under aerobic conditions at 25 °C in the dark. Subsequently, WFPS was set to 60%, which is considered optimal for substrate availability in the aggregates and gas diffusion in the silt matrix. The actual water saturation in aggregates might be higher in aggregates due to the stronger capillarity induced by the clay fraction. Then, the macroaggregates were incubated anoxically at 25 °C in the dark. Preparation of anoxic atmosphere in the incubation bottles, gas sampling, and gas analysis are described in75. Rates are reported for the period from 24 to 72 h. All incubations were carried out in triplicate. The spatial proximity of soil aggregates and gas diffusion through the quartz silt matrix is assumed to be irrelevant for respiration under anoxic conditions. If the presence of the silt matrix would have had an effect on anaerobic respiration, it had been the same for all three soils and therefore without an effect on the relative differences in respiration ratios between soils.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in combination with Tukey’s Post-hoc tests was carried out in R76 in order to test for significant differences in OsCT intensities between soils. For comparisons of OsCT intensities in POM particles and pore distances of POM particles, two-way ANOVA was carried out with POM type as the second factor in addition to soil type. Comparisons were done at the level of individual aggregates (n = 8 per soil type), i.e. after averaging across all POM particles per soil aggregate. Significance was tested at p < 0.05 unless reported otherwise (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, .p < 0.1, n.s. p > 0.1). The normality of the residuals was checked with Shapiro-Welch tests and equality of variances with Levene’s test. If necessary, values were log-transformed in order to ensure the normality of residuals.

Data availability

The source data underlying Figs. 27, as well as Supplementary Figs. 69 generated in this study are provided in the Source Data fileSource data are provided in this paper.

Code availability

Segmented X-ray CT data will be uploaded to the Soil-Structure Library hosted by the UFZ ( Additional image data, as well as image analysis codes, are available from the authors upon request.


  1. Minasny, B. et al. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292, 59–86 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann, J., Bossio, D. A., Kögel-Knabner, I. & Rillig, M. C. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 544–553 (2020).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann, J. et al. Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity. Nat. Geosci. 13, 529–534 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L. & Cotrufo, M. F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 261–273 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kravchenko, A. N. et al. Microbial spatial footprint as a driver of soil carbon stabilization. Nat. Commun. 10, 3121 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Witzgall, K. et al. Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 12, 4115 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S. & Whitmore, A. P. Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1781–1796 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehmann, J. & Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528, 60 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt, M. W. I. et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478, 49–56 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Kleber, M. & Fendorf, S. Are oxygen limitations under recognized regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils? Biogeochemistry 127, 157–171 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rohe, L. et al. Denitrification in soil as a function of oxygen availability at the microscale. Biogeosciences 18, 1185–1201 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall, S. J. & Silver, W. L. Reducing conditions, reactive metals, and their interactions can explain spatial patterns of surface soil carbon in a humid tropical forest. Biogeochemistry 125, 149–165 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagedorn, F., Bruderhofer, N., Ferrari, A. & Niklaus, P. A. Tracking litter-derived dissolved organic matter along a soil chronosequence using 14C imaging: Biodegradation, physico-chemical retention or preferential flow? Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 333–343 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Védère, C., Vieublé Gonod, L., Pouteau, V., Girardin, C. & Chenu, C. Spatial and temporal evolution of detritusphere hotspots at different soil moistures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 150, 107975 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silver, W. L., Lugo, A. E. & Keller, M. Soil oxygen availability and biogeochemistry along rainfall and topographic gradients in upland wet tropical forest soils. Biogeochemistry 44, 301–328 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schuur, E. A. G., Chadwick, O. A. & Matson, P. A. Carbon cycling and soil carbon storage in mesic to wet hawaiian montane forests. Ecology 82, 3182–3196 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiemeyer, B. et al. High emissions of greenhouse gases from grasslands on peat and other organic soils. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 4134–4149 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hooijer, A. et al. Subsidence and carbon loss in drained tropical peatlands. Biogeosciences 9, 1053–1071 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cleveland, C. C., Wieder, W. R., Reed, S. C. & Townsend, A. R. Experimental drought in a tropical rain forest increases soil carbon dioxide losses to the atmosphere. Ecology 91, 2313–2323 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moyano, F. E., Manzoni, S. & Chenu, C. Responses of soil heterotrophic respiration to moisture availability: an exploration of processes and models. Soil Biol. Biochem. 59, 72–85 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Franzluebbers, A. J. Microbial activity in response to water-filled pore space of variably eroded southern Piedmont soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 11, 91–101 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomsen, I. K., Schjønning, P., Jensen, B., Kristensen, K. & Christensen, B. T. Turnover of organic matter in differently textured soils: II. Microbial activity as influenced by soil water regimes. Geoderma 89, 199–218 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nunan, N., Leloup, J., Ruamps, L. S., Pouteau, V. & Chenu, C. Effects of habitat constraints on soil microbial community function. Sci. Rep. 7, 4280 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruamps, L. S., Nunan, N. & Chenu, C. Microbial biogeography at the soil pore scale. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 280–286 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Strong, D. T., Wever, H. D., Merckx, R. & Recous, S. Spatial location of carbon decomposition in the soil pore system. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 55, 739–750 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vogel, H.-J. et al. A holistic perspective on soil architecture is needed as a key to soil functions. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 73, e13152 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehmann, J. et al. Spatial complexity of soil organic matter forms at nanometre scales. Nat. Geosci. 1, 238–242 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Steffens, M. et al. Identification of distinct functional microstructural domains controlling C storage in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 12182–12189 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elyeznasni, N. et al. Exploration of soil micromorphology to identify coarse-sized OM assemblages in X-ray CT images of undisturbed cultivated soil cores. Geoderma 179-180, 38–45 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hayes, T. L., Lindgren, F. T. & Gofman, J. W. A quantitative determination of the Osmium tetroxide-lipoprotein interaction. J. Cell Biol. 19, 251–255 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Belazi, D., Solé-Domènech, S., Johansson, B., Schalling, M. & Sjövall, P. Chemical analysis of osmium tetroxide staining in adipose tissue using imaging ToF-SIMS. Histochem. Cell Biol. 132, 105–115 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schulz M., et al. Structured heterogeneity in a marine terrace chronosequence: upland mottling. Vadose Zone J. 15, vzj2015.07.0102 (2016).

  34. Fimmen et al. Fe–C redox cycling: a hypothetical biogeochemical mechanism that drives crustal weathering in upland soils. Biogeochemistry 87, 127–141 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng, H., Kim, K., Kravchenko, A., Rivers, M. & Guber, A. Testing Os staining approach for visualizing soil organic matter patterns in intact samples via X-ray dual-energy tomography scanning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8980–8989 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Périé, C. & Ouimet, R. Organic carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationships in boreal forest soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88, 315–325 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rawls, W. J., Pachepsky, Y. A., Ritchie, J. C., Sobecki, T. M. & Bloodworth, H. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116, 61–76 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quigley M. Y., Rivers M. L. & Kravchenko A. N. Patterns and sources of spatial heterogeneity in soil matrix from contrasting long term management practices. Front. Environ. Sci. 6 (2018).

  39. Arai, M. et al. An improved method to identify osmium-stained organic matter within soil aggregate structure by electron microscopy and synchrotron X-ray micro-computed tomography. Soil Tillage Res. 191, 275–281 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peth, S. et al. Localization of soil organic matter in soil aggregates using synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography. Soil Biol. Biochem. 78, 189–194 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rawlins, B. G. et al. Three-dimensional soil organic matter distribution, accessibility and microbial respiration in macroaggregates using osmium staining and synchrotron X-ray computed tomography. Soil 2, 659–671 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Plattner H. & Zingsheim H. P. Electron Microscopic Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology. In: Subcellular Biochemistry (ed. Roodyn D. B.). (Plenum Press, 1983).

  43. Litman, R. B. & Barrnett, R. J. The mechanism of the fixation of tissue components by osmium tetroxide via hydrogen bonding. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 38, 63–86 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vepraskas M. & Lindbo D. Redoximorphic features as related to soil hydrology and hydric soils. In: Hydropedology: Synergistic Integration of Soil Science and Hydrology (ed. Lin H.). Academic Press (2012).

  45. See C. R., et al. Hyphae move matter and microbes to mineral microsites: integrating the hyphosphere into conceptual models of soil organic matter stabilization. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2527–2540 (2022).

  46. Vidal, A. et al. Visualizing the transfer of organic matter from decaying plant residues to soil mineral surfaces controlled by microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 160, 108347 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hagedorn, F., Kaiser, K., Feyen, H. & Schleppi, P. Effects of redox conditions and flow processes on the mobility of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in a forest soil. J. Environ. Qual. 29, 288–297 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Grybos, M., Davranche, M., Gruau, G., Petitjean, P. & Pédrot, M. Increasing pH drives organic matter solubilization from wetland soils under reducing conditions. Geoderma 154, 13–19 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Keiluweit, M., Wanzek, T., Kleber, M., Nico, P. & Fendorf, S. Anaerobic microsites have an unaccounted role in soil carbon stabilization. Nat. Commun. 8, 1771 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Eusterhues, K., Rumpel, C. & Kögel-Knabner, I. Stabilization of soil organic matter isolated via oxidative degradation. Org. Geochem. 36, 1567–1575 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Torn, M. S., Trumbore, S. E., Chadwick, O. A., Vitousek, P. M. & Hendricks, D. M. Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389, 170–173 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lucas, M., Schlüter, S., Vogel, H.-J. & Vetterlein, D. Soil structure formation along an agricultural chronosequence. Geoderma 350, 61–72 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sokol, N. W., Sanderman, J. & Bradford, M. A. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 12–24 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Marschner, B. & Kalbitz, K. Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma 113, 211–235 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Stirling, E., Smernik, R. J., Macdonald, L. M. & Cavagnaro, T. R. The effect of fire affected Pinus radiata litter and char addition on soil nitrogen cycling. Sci. Total Environ. 664, 276–282 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kravchenko, A. N. et al. Hotspots of soil N2O emission enhanced through water absorption by plant residue. Nat. Geosci. 10, 496 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim, K., Guber, A., Rivers, M. & Kravchenko, A. Contribution of decomposing plant roots to N2O emissions by water absorption. Geoderma 375, 114506 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Goebel, M. O., Bachmann, J., Reichstein, M., Janssens, I. A. & Guggenberger, G. Soil water repellency and its implications for organic matter decomposition – is there a link to extreme climatic events? Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2640–2656 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Brodowski, S., Amelung, W., Haumaier, L., Abetz, C. & Zech, W. Morphological and chemical properties of black carbon in physical soil fractions as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Geoderma 128, 116–129 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Diel, J., Vogel, H.-J. & Schlüter, S. Impact of wetting and drying cycles on soil structure dynamics. Geoderma 345, 63–71 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Surey R., et al. Contribution of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter to potential denitrification of agricultural soils. Front. Environ. Sci. 9 (2021).

  62. Kaiser, M., Ellerbrock, R. H. & Sommer, M. Separation of coarse organic particles from bulk surface soil samples by electrostatic attraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73, 2118–2130 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Atkinson, R., Posner, A. & Quirk, J. P. Adsorption of potential-determining ions at the ferric oxide-aqueous electrolyte interface. J. Phys. Chem. 71, 550–558 (1967).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mueller, C. W. et al. Submicron scale imaging of soil organic matter dynamics using NanoSIMS – from single particles to intact aggregates. Org. Geochem. 42, 1476–1488 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Herrmann, A. M. et al. Nano-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry—a new analytical tool in biogeochemistry and soil ecology: A review article. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1835–1850 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Schlüter, S., Eickhorst, T. & Mueller, C. W. Correlative imaging reveals holistic view of soil microenvironments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 829–837 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M. A. & Pluim, J. P. W. elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. Med. Imaging, IEEE Trans. 29, 196–205 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11, 23–27 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Schlüter, S., Leuther, F., Vogler, S. & Vogel, H.-J. X-ray microtomography analysis of soil structure deformation caused by centrifugation. Solid Earth 7, 129–140 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., Brown, K. & Wildenschild, D. Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: a review. Water Resour. Res. 50, 3615–3639 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Legland, D., Arganda-Carreras, I. & Andrey, P. MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics 32, 3532–3534 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R. N. 2, 18–22 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Surey, R. et al. Differences in labile soil organic matter explain potential denitrification and denitrifying communities in a long-term fertilization experiment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 153, 103630 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2020).

Download references


This research was funded by the German Research Foundation through two research grants (416883305, 290269257). We thank Claudia Stehr at the Fraunhofer Institute for Microstructure of Materials and Systems IMWS in Halle for Osmium staining and the Höhere Landbauschule Rotthalmünster for access to field sites.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



This work was originally conceived by S.S. and H.V. with additional input from C.W.M., R.M., R.S., and K.K. Laboratory experiments were conducted by S.S., F.L., and R.S. Imaging was carried out by S.S., C.H., R.K., and C.W.M, and image data were analyzed by S.S., F.L., L.A., C.H. The manuscript and supporting information were written by S.S. with input from all coauthors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Schlüter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Alexandra Kravchenko and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlüter, S., Leuther, F., Albrecht, L. et al. Microscale carbon distribution around pores and particulate organic matter varies with soil moisture regime. Nat Commun 13, 2098 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing