Reprogrammed tracrRNAs enable repurposing of RNAs as crRNAs and sequence-specific RNA biosensors

In type II CRISPR systems, the guide RNA (gRNA) comprises a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) and a hybridized trans-acting CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA), both being essential in guided DNA targeting functions. Although tracrRNAs are diverse in sequence and structure across type II CRISPR systems, the programmability of crRNA-tracrRNA hybridization for Cas9 is not fully understood. Here, we reveal the programmability of crRNA-tracrRNA hybridization for Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9, and in doing so, redefine the capabilities of Cas9 proteins and the sources of crRNAs, providing new biosensing applications for type II CRISPR systems. By reprogramming the crRNA-tracrRNA hybridized sequence, we show that engineered crRNA-tracrRNA interactions can not only enable the design of orthogonal cellular computing devices but also facilitate the hijacking of endogenous small RNAs/mRNAs as crRNAs. We subsequently describe how these re-engineered gRNA pairings can be implemented as RNA sensors, capable of monitoring the transcriptional activity of various environment-responsive genomic genes, or detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in vitro, as an Atypical gRNA-activated Transcription Halting Alarm (AGATHA) biosensor.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors/reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability The axis labels state the marker and fluorochrome used (e.g. CD4-FITC).
The axis scales are clearly visible. Include numbers along axes only for bottom left plot of group (a 'group' is an analysis of identical markers).
All plots are contour plots with outliers or pseudocolor plots.
A numerical value for number of cells or percentage (with statistics) is provided.
Sample sizes in terms of number of replicates are standard in the field, and are described along with Figures. No statistical methods were used to determine the sample sizes. At least 3 biological replicates adhered for all the experiments, which matches the common practices in the field and were such that standard deviations were small enough to allow the determination of significant effects and trends.
Data that showed aberrant results due to mistakes in experiments executions were excluded. In those cases, experiments were repeated to ensure there were at least three repeats.
All experiments were performed in three or more replicates. In addition to high-throughput characterization and cell-free experiments, all experiments were biological repeats. For high-throughput characterization and cell-free experiments (Figure 1e, h, i, Figure 2e, f, g and Figure  5), the transformed products or cell-free systems were treated separately for technical repeats. The details are described in the Methods. All attempts at replication were successful.
Each biological replicate was inoculated from a single colony, which was randomly chosen from an agar plate. On a single plate, each transformant acquires the same gene circuit. Except for experiments involving high-throughput transformation, the samples used in each set of experiments were independently inoculated with bacteria from a set of plates, and colonies were randomly chosen from each plate. For high-throughput transformation experiments, transformants obtained from the same plasmid sample were distributed equally to parallel liquid culture. In cell-free experiments, the samples to be tested (such as DNA or RNA molecules) are distributed into independent reaction systems.
No blinding was involved as it was not necessary in this study. We did not seek to prove or reject any particular claims or hypothesis and so blinding was irrelevant. Additionally, the subject in this study is not humans or animals, which the blinding is not applicable. The experimental conditions were set in parallel, and the bacteria carrying the same circuits generated colonies on agar surface then were randomly selected without subjective factors contributing to bias during this process.