## Introduction

During a Raman scattering process, phonons are coupled to photo-excited electrons that relax to the ground state by the emission of scattered photons1,2,3. The frequency of a Raman mode is given by the energy difference between the incident and scattered photons4, and reveals structural information of materials5,6. On the other hand, the intensity is more sophisticated to estimate, and is majorly determined by the electron–photon and electron–phonon interactions7,8. More importantly, quantum interference can occur between different elementary pathways of Raman scattering, resulting in the modulation of inelastic scattering efficiencies9,10,11. So far, the quantum interference effect in Raman scattering have only been reported for few two-dimensional (2D) layered materials, such as electrostatically doped graphene12 and few-layer MoTe213,14. The observation of the quantum interference is challenging, yet essential for understanding the fundamental light-matter interaction, and for possible manipulation of light scattering in materials.

Rhenium dichalcogenide (ReX2, X = S or Se) is a layered transitional metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) material with triclinic symmetry15. The Re atoms in ReX2 (X = S, Se) crystals move away from metal sites in 2H phase to form Re4 parallelograms, leading to a distorted crystal structure and giving rise to anisotropic in-plane properties, such as anisotropic carrier mobility16,17,18, photoluminescence7,19,20 and Raman scattering21,22. It has been reported that chiral Raman scattering arose in ReS2 flakes of tens of nanometers in thickness, where the anisotropic optical effects play a prominent role23. However, the underlying fundamental interactions between photons/electrons/phonons during the chiral Raman scattering process, apart from the optical effects, have remained unexplored.

Herein, we report that chiral Raman scattering can be observed in monolayer ReS2 and ReSe2 excited by circularly polarized light, and large circular intensity difference (CID) is induced by the quantum interference between first-order Raman processes occurred at different k-points in the Brillouin zone. Our calculations show that although the amplitudes of induced electric dipoles are the same at each k-point, a phase difference exists for left- and right-handed circular polarization excitations, which results in the circular polarization differentiated Raman scattered intensities for all Raman modes due to quantum interference effect. The calculated chiral Raman spectra based on the quantum interference effect agree well with the experimental ones.

## Results

### Circular intensity difference in 2D ReS2 enantiomers

The optical setup for chiral Raman scattering measurements is shown in Fig. 1a. A quarter wave plate (QWP) is used to produce right-handed (RCP) or left-handed (LCP) circular polarization for excitation. The scattered light passes through the same QWP, and is collected without any analyzer. Single-layer (1L) ReS2 was mechanically exfoliated on a fused silica substrate (170 μm in thickness). The optical and atomic force microscopy (AFM) images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. The thickness of monolayer ReS2 was measured to be 1.1 nm.

The eigenvectors of the Raman-active vibrational modes (marked as mode I–VI) were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) and are shown in Fig. 1b24,25. In Fig. 1c, d, we show the experimental Raman spectra of 1L ReS2 below 250 cm1, excited by RCP and LCP of 1.96 eV and 2.33 eV, respectively. The helicity-dependent Raman intensities of 1L ReS2 can be clearly seen, and the intensity differences (IR − IL) are depicted in the insets. When excited by 1.96 eV photon energy, both mode III (153 cm1) and mode VI (235 cm−1) exhibit obvious chiral response but with opposite signs. For 2.33 eV excitation photon energy, the Raman scattering efficiencies by RCP are higher than that by LCP for I (132 cm1), II (143 cm1), III (153 cm1), and V (212 cm1) Raman modes, while mode IV at 162 cm1 and mode VI at 235 cm1 show opposite chiral Raman response. The circular intensity differential (CID, ) values, defined as (IR − IL)/(IR + IL), are obtained to be 0.49, 0.33, 0.18, −0.05, 0.27 and −0.16 for modes I–VI, respectively, for 2.33 eV excitation. While with 1.96 eV excitation photon energy, the CID values are −0.43 for 153 cm1 mode and 0.34 for 235 cm1 mode. The CID values are distinctly correlated to the phonon modes with certain excitation photon energy. This indicates that the helicity-dependence does not originate from circular dichroism26. It should also be noted that owing to the monolayer thickness (~1 nm), the optical birefringence can be negligible27.

Owing to the triclinic symmetry, layered ReX2 has two vertical orientations23,28. The chiral Raman scattering spectra of monolayer ReS2 with two different orientations were also measured and depicted in Fig. 2. To distinguish the two orientations, the atomic structures of 1L ReS2 were characterized by annular dark-field (ADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and the results are shown in Fig. 2a, e, where the Re4 parallelograms are highlighted. The vertical orientation in Fig. 2a is defined as ReS2 (+), and the angle between the a-axis ([100]) and b-axis ([010]) is 119.8° (anticlockwise), while for ReS2 (−) in Fig. 2e, the angle is −119.8° (clockwise).

To further investigate the chiral Raman scattering, the scattering efficiencies of ReS2 (+) and ReS2 (−) were measured as a function of rotation angle of the QWP. The Jones matrix of the electric field can be described as $$\left(\begin{array}{cc}1-{{{{{\rm{icos}}}}}}2\theta & -{{{{{\rm{isin}}}}}}2\theta \\ -{{{{{\rm{isin}}}}}}2\theta & 1+{{{{{\rm{icos}}}}}}2\theta \end{array}\right)$$. The Raman scattering intensities excited by 1.96 eV (Fig. 2b) and 2.33 eV (Fig. 2c) photon energy vary periodically. The intensities of all the Raman modes with different rotation angles θ are extracted and the polar plots are depicted in Supplementary Tables 3, 4. Figure 2d shows the polar plots of mode 132 cm−1. For 1.96 eV excitation, the Raman scattering intensity of RCP (IR) is almost identical to that of LCP (IL). While for 2.33 eV excitation, the 132 cm−1 Raman peak shows the maximum IR and the minimum IL. These results imply that the chiral Raman response is dependent on the excitation photon energy. For ReS2 (−), the intensity maps (Fig. 2f, g) and the polar plots of the 132 cm−1 mode in Fig. 2h show opposite trends to that of 1L ReS2 (+).

It has been reported that chirality in two-dimensions arises when distinct enantiomers are confined to a plane, that can be interconverted by space inversion but owing to the inaccessible third dimension, can not be interconverted by any rotation about the axis perpendicular to the plane29,30. Considering the spatial operation in three dimensions, ReS2 is an achiral material. However, layered ReS2 confined to a substrate exhibits planer chirality, owing to that the mirror reflection of Re4 parallelogram can not be superposed on its original one by rotation (Supplementary Fig. 1). Indeed, the lack of inversion center in the 2D plane leads to the two distinct 2D ReS2 enantiomers. However, it is still not clear how the chiral Raman response arises from the microcosmic view of electron/photon and electron/phonon interactions.

### Theoretical calculations

In order to understand the physical origin of large CID observed in 1L ReS2, the intensity of the first-order Raman scattering is calculated by third-order perturbation theory. The Raman intensity and Raman tensor can be both calculated according to the electronic band structure and the phonon dispersion (Supplementary Fig. 3) of 1L ReS2, and the expressions are given in Eqs. (1) and (2) in the Method section, respectively. The calculated band gap (~1.50 eV) is indirect in the vicinity of Brillouin zone center and the direct one is around 1.55 eV, which is almost coincident with the experimental fundamental optical absorption edge in literature31. The calculated phonon dispersion relation shows dispersive phonon bands below 250 cm−1 and relatively flat bands above 250 cm1. The phonon modes of interest here lie below 250 cm−1, as marked in yellow. There are 9 optical phonon modes in this region in which all the 6 gerade modes (Ag) are Raman-active while the other 3 ungerade modes (Au) are infrared-active according to the character table of Ci point group. Raman frequencies of the 6 Raman modes agree quantitatively between the experiment and calculation. More importantly, the calculated Raman spectra reveals that the chiral Raman scattering of 1L ReS2 arises from the interference effect between all possible quantum pathways of elementary transitions as discussed below.

Figure 3 shows the dependence of the calculated Raman spectra on laser energy and helicity. In Fig. 3a, b, the Raman spectra within three different interference patterns excited by both RCP and LCP at two laser energies are given. The three interference patterns include no interference, intra-k interference, and full interference, as demonstrated in Fig. 3c. In the simplest scenario, 4 electrons at two k-points are assumed to be involved in the Raman scattering process, for each scattering channel Tn = es*Rn*ei, in which Rn is the Raman tensor, ei and es is Jones vector of incident and scattering polarization, respectively. No interference refers to the case that Raman intensity consists of simple superposition of each independent Raman process, namely, |T1|2 + |T2|2 + |T3|2 + |T4|2; intra-k interference to |T1 + T2|2 + |T3 + T4|2, and full interference to |T1 + T2 + T3 + T4|2 (consistent with the third-order perturbation theory in Eq. (1)). From top to bottom panel of Fig. 3a, b, Raman spectra excited by two circularly polarized lasers show no difference between RCP and LCP for no interference case; the intra-k interference shows very slight difference but CID values do not agree with the experimental data; when the full interference effect is concerned, not only the CID sign but also the relative values agree well with experimental observations. The calculated CID spectra for 1.96 eV and 2.33 eV lasers are given in Fig. 3d, e. To have a direct impression, the calculated values of CID for the 6 Raman modes at two photon energies in the three interference patterns are listed in Fig. 3f. The agreement between the calculated CID spectra in Fig. 3d, e and our experimental measurement in Fig. 1c, d reveals the essential role played by the full interference between all possible quantum pathways of elementary transitions. The microscopic picture of the full interference effect and its relevance to the phase coherent dipole vector D are discussed in more details in Supplementary Material 4. Briefly, the amplitudes of induced dipole vectors are the same for LCP and RCP excitations, so that the optical absorption is helicity-independent (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). This confirms that no circular dichroism is expected in ReS2. Further, the phase angles of Raman tensors $${{{{{{\bf{R}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}},{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}},{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}},{{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}}^{\prime}} ({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}})$$ involving one electron are found to be either parallel or antiparallel to each other (Supplementary Fig. 5), indicating that the Raman intensity would not depend on helicity if no inter-k interference effect considered. However, the k-resolved phase distribution of complex $${{{{{{\bf{T}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)={{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{s}}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{\bf{R}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{(}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{)}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}$$ is different between LCP and RCP excitations, leading to different interference between k points, and hence distinctive Raman intensities as observed in Fig. 1c, d and calculated in Fig. 3d, e.

The Raman tensor of ReS2 for a given excitation photon energy, defined as $$\left(\begin{array}{cc}{a{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{a}} & {b{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{b}}\\ {b{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{b}} & {c{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{c}}\end{array}\right)$$ for 2D ReS2 (+), is the result of the quantum interference between all k-points. The tensor elements are calculated by considering full interference and are listed in Supplementary Tables 1, 2. The 2D ReS2 (−) is the mirror reflection of ReS2 (+), and the first Brillouin zone is the primitive cell of the reciprocal lattice, hence it can not be interconverted with its mirror reflection, resulting in enantiomorphous electronic band structure and phonon dispersion. Therefore, the Raman tensor for ReS2 (−) is represented as $$\left(\begin{array}{cc}{a{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{a}} & -{b{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{b}}\\ -{b{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{b}} & {c{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{c}}\end{array}\right)$$. The Raman intensity of 2D ReS2 (+) for LCP and RCP excitations can be evaluated by the Raman selection rules as:

$${I}_{L}\propto {{{{{\rm{\pi }}}}}}\left({a}^{2}+{2b}^{2}+{c}^{2}\right)-2{{{{{\rm{\pi }}}}}}\left({ab}\,{{\sin }}\left({\varphi }_{b}-{\varphi }_{a}\right)-{bc}\,{{\sin }}\left({\varphi }_{c}-{\varphi }_{b}\right)\right),$$
$${I}_{R}\propto {{{{{\rm{\pi }}}}}}\left({a}^{2}+{2b}^{2}+{c}^{2}\right)+2{{{{{\rm{\pi }}}}}}\left({ab}\,{{\sin }}\left({\varphi }_{b}-{\varphi }_{a}\right)-{bc}\,{{\sin }}\left({\varphi }_{c}-{\varphi }_{b}\right)\right).$$

However, for ReS2 (−), $$b{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{b}}$$ is replaced by $$-b{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}{\varphi }_{b}}$$, leading to opposite chiral Raman responses Δ(+) = −Δ(−).

### Chiral Raman response of ReSe2

Although the quantum interference effect in Raman scattering has been reported in other 2D materials11,12,13,14, this is the first observation of quantum interference leading to pronounced chiral Raman response. Furthermore, it can be expected that quantum interference exists in Raman scattering of a broader frame of materials. Here, we show that the chiral Raman scattering can also be observed in other triclinic 2D layered materials such as ReSe2. The crystal structure of ReSe2 is similar to ReS2, and there are 18 Raman active modes (Ag modes) in the center of Brillouin zone32. The optical and AFM images of mechanically exfoliated 1L ReSe2(±) samples are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2e–h. Figure 4a show the chiral Raman scattering spectra (EL = 2.33 eV) of mechanically exfoliated 1L ReSe2 (+). The corresponding ADF-STEM image is given in Fig. 4b, where the Re4 structure is indicated by white parallelogram. The Raman intensities of the four modes at 110 cm−1, 119 cm−1, 125 cm−1, and 162 cm−1 are extracted for different excitation photon energies and plotted in Supplementary Tables 5, 6, respectively. The modes at 119 cm−1 and 162 cm−1 are shown in Fig. 4c, d with 2.33 eV in blue and 1.96 eV in red color. From Fig. 4c, it can be seen that for 2.33 eV excitation, IR of 119 cm−1 mode is larger than IL, while for 1.96 eV, IL is larger than IR. These results also indicate the occurrence of quantum interference in Raman scattering. For the 162 cm−1 mode shown in Fig. 4d, IR is larger than IL for 2.33 eV, but almost the same for 1.96 eV. The results for ReSe2(−) are given in Fig. 4e–h. The 119 cm1 mode (Fig. 4g) shows larger IL for 2.33 eV, and larger IR for 1.96 eV, and the fitting profiles of the polar plots are opposite to that of ReSe2 (+). As for the 162 cm−1 mode, the chiral Raman response is also orientation-dependent (Fig. 4h). For 2.33 eV excitation, the 162 cm−1 mode has the lowest IR and significantly larger IL, but IR is larger than IL.

## Discussions

In summary, we reported that the quantum interference in Raman scattering can result in strong chiral response in 2D enantiomers of single-layer triclinic ReX2. The Raman scattering efficiencies for LCP and RCP excitations are observed to be clearly different and depend on the Raman modes and excitation photon energies. Our calculations reveal that the optical absorption intensities are exactly the same in the whole k-space for photons of LCP and RCP, however, the k-resolved phases of complex $${{{{{{\bf{T}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)={{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{s}}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{\bf{R}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{,}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{(}}}}}}{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{)}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}$$ show different patterns, resulting in distinct Raman scattering intensities as a result of different quantum interference.

Our findings reveal that quantum interference can lead to pronounced chiral response of Raman scattering in materials and indicate that quantum interference can be a generic effect in inelastic optical scattering, which becomes evident when either constructive or destructive interference between all the inelastic scattering pathways dominates, in the condition that the excitation photon energy is larger than the band gap of the materials. This effect is also applicable to the bulk triclinic crystals (ReS2 and ReSe2), but additional anisotropic optical environment should be taken into consideration for a complete analysis of chiral response.

## Methods

### Specimen preparation and Raman scattering measurement

The ReS2 and ReSe2 flakes were mechanically exfoliated on fused silica substrates. Single-layer ReS2 and ReSe2 were located by an optical microscope (Olympus BX51), and the thicknesses were measured by atomic force microscope (AFM, Bruker ICON). Raman spectra were measured using JY Horiba HR800 with 2.33 eV and 1.96 eV excitation energy at room temperature. A 100× objective lens (NA0.9) and 1800 lines/mm grating were chosen for spectra acquisition.

### STEM measurement

A PPC/PDMS stamp was used to pick the ReS2 flakes from the substrates, and was covered onto the SiNx grids using a transfer stage. The temperature was raised to 110 °C until the stamps and the grids were well contacted, and then the grids and the stamps were placed in acetone for 24 h at room temperature to remove the PPC. STEM-ADF images were taken using FEI Titan Cubed Themis G2 300 operated at 300 kV. The convergence semi-angle was 21.3 mrad while the collection angle of ADF detector was 39–200 mrad. While acquiring images, the probe current was ~8 pA, and the dwell time was 2 μs/pixel. For this condition, the radiation damages can be avoided and images with high signal-to-noise ratio were obtained.

### Computation method

First-order Raman intensity and Raman tensor as a function of phonon energy $${\hslash \omega }_{\nu }$$ and of the incident laser energy EL can be described by third-order perturbation theory as

$${I}^{\nu }\left({E}_{L}\right)\propto {\left|\mathop{\sum}\limits_{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{i=f,m,{m}^{{\prime} }}\frac{{{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{opt}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{s}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right){\cdot {{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{ep}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\upsilon }}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right){\cdot {{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{opt}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{mi}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)}{\left({E}_{L}-{\Delta E}_{{mi}}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)\left({E}_{L}-{{\hslash }}{\omega }_{\nu }-{\Delta E}_{{m}^{{\prime} }i}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)}\right|}^{2}$$
(1)
$$R\left(\nu \right)=\mathop{\sum}\limits_{{{{{{\rm{k}}}}}}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{i=f,\,m,{m}^{{\prime} }}\frac{{{{{{{\bf{D}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)\cdot {{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{ep}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\upsilon }}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)\cdot {{{{{{{\bf{D}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{mi}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)}^{* }}{\left({E}_{L}-{\Delta E}_{{mi}}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)\left({E}_{L}-{{\hslash }}{\omega }_{\nu }-{\Delta E}_{{m}^{{\prime} }i}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)}$$
(2)

where $${{{{{{\bf{D}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{fm}}}}}}{{{\prime} }}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)$$ and $${{{{{{{\bf{D}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{mi}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)}^{{{{{{\boldsymbol{* }}}}}}}$$ are the dipole vectors for photon emission and absorption in the electron-photon interactions, respectively.

To single out the interference effect, we use Eq. (1) for the full interferences between all possible quantum pathways. To compare, Eq. (3), is used for considering the interference only between different excited states at the same k point not between different k points, and Eq. (4) for the case of no interference at all.

$${I}^{\nu }\left({E}_{L}\right)\propto \mathop{\sum}\limits_{k}{\left|\mathop{\sum}\limits_{i=f,m,{m}^{{\prime} }}\frac{{{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{opt}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{s}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right){\cdot {{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{ep}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\upsilon }}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right){\cdot {{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{opt}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{mi}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)}{\left({E}_{L}-{\Delta E}_{{mi}}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)\left({E}_{L}-{{{\hslash }}\omega }_{\nu }-{\Delta E}_{{m}^{{\prime} }i}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)}\right|}^{2}$$
(3)
$${I}^{\nu }\left({E}_{L}\right)\propto \mathop{\sum}\limits_{k}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{i=f,\,m,{m}^{{\prime} }}{\left|\frac{{{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{opt}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{f}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{\prime}}{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{s}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right){{{\cdot }}{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{ep}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}^{{{{\prime} }}}{{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\upsilon }}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right){{{\cdot }}{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{opt}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\bf{mi}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}\right)}{\left({E}_{L}-{\Delta E}_{{mi}}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)\left({E}_{L}-{{{\hslash }}\omega }_{\nu }-{\Delta E}_{{m}^{{\prime} }i}-{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\gamma \right)}\right|}^{2}$$
(4)

All the required matrix elements are calculated by using a modified version of the QUANTUM-ESPRESSO code, and especially, the electron-phonon coupling is computed by means of the Wannier interpolation schemes in the standard Electron–Phonon Wannier (EPW) package as implemented in QUANTUM-ESPRESSO. The electron and phonon bands are calculated in the local density approximation with norm-conserving pseudopotentials. A fine Monkhorst-Pack grid of 9 × 9 × 1 and 5 × 5 × 1 is used to sample the first Brillouin zone, respectively. We use the energy cut-off of 150 Ry to expand the wave functions with 10−13 Ry energy convergence threshold for self-consistency. A vacuum region of 20 Angstroms in the z-direction is used to avoid spurious interactions between two monolayers. The geometry is optimized using the quasi-newton algorithm, until none of the residual Hellmann–Feynman forces exceeds 10−5 Ry/Bohr and all components of stress tensor are less than 0.01 kbar. At last, we get the matrix elements on a much fine grid of 45 × 45 × 1 which is dense enough to achieve satisfactory results.

### Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.