Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Overlooked and widespread pennate diatom-diazotroph symbioses in the sea

Abstract

Persistent nitrogen depletion in sunlit open ocean waters provides a favorable ecological niche for nitrogen-fixing (diazotrophic) cyanobacteria, some of which associate symbiotically with eukaryotic algae. All known marine examples of these symbioses have involved either centric diatom or haptophyte hosts. We report here the discovery and characterization of two distinct marine pennate diatom-diazotroph symbioses, which until now had only been observed in freshwater environments. Rhopalodiaceae diatoms Epithemia pelagica sp. nov. and Epithemia catenata sp. nov. were isolated repeatedly from the subtropical North Pacific Ocean, and analysis of sequence libraries reveals a global distribution. These symbioses likely escaped attention because the endosymbionts lack fluorescent photopigments, have nifH gene sequences similar to those of free-living unicellular cyanobacteria, and are lost in nitrogen-replete medium. Marine Rhopalodiaceae-diazotroph symbioses are a previously overlooked but widespread source of bioavailable nitrogen in marine habitats and provide new, easily cultured model organisms for the study of organelle evolution.

Introduction

Biological dinitrogen (N2) fixation is a globally important process supporting primary production in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems1. In the nitrogen (N)-depleted surface waters of open ocean biomes, up to ~50% of new production can be supported by N2 fixation2. Identifying the spectrum of N2-fixing plankton and their diverse physiologies is essential for predicting the effects of future ocean warming on biological productivity3. Although the intrinsic biochemical capacity to fix N2 is restricted to bacteria and archaea, some eukaryotes have adapted to low-nitrogen concentrations in the oligotrophic ocean by establishing mutualistic symbioses with diazotrophic bacteria4. The two most prominent types of marine diazotroph symbioses described thus far are the facultative associations between heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria and centric diatoms5,6 and the association between unicellular cyanobacteria and haptophytes7,8.

An endosymbiotic relationship between unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacteria and pennate diatoms in the family Rhopalodiaceae has been identified in freshwater and brackish environments but has never been reported in the ocean9. Freshwater species in the genera Epithemia Kützing and Rhopalodia O. Müller host obligate, N2-fixing endosymbionts of cyanobacterial origin, also referred to as ‘spheroid bodies’10,11,12. Epithemia-spheroid body symbiosis is a valuable model system for studying the transformation of endosymbionts into organelles13,14. For example, endosymbionts in different species of freshwater Rhopalodiaceae differ in the genes and pathways retained after reductive evolution, reflecting differences in the trajectories of their organellogenesis15.

In this work, we report the discovery of two species of oceanic, endosymbiont-bearing, rhopalodiacean diatoms, Epithemia pelagica Schvarcz, Stancheva & Steward sp. nov. and Epithemia catenata Schvarcz, Stancheva & Steward sp. nov. We show that Epithemia symbionts are globally distributed in the marine environment and that E. pelagica and E. catenata symbioses exhibit unique daily patterns of N2 fixation.

Results and discussion

The Epithemia strains were isolated from seawater samples collected from the subtropical North Pacific Ocean at Station ALOHA (22°45' N, 158°00' W)16. Samples were collected throughout the year and from multiple depths extending through the euphotic zone (Supplementary Table 1). Overall, seven strains were isolated that represent two morphologically and genetically distinct species. E. pelagica is characterized by small solitary cells, asymmetrical along the apical axis (Fig. 1a–c, n), while E. catenata cells are larger, nearly symmetric along the apical axis, hyaline, and chain-forming (Fig. 1d–g, o). Both species typically foster 1–2 unicellular endosymbionts per cell, which have average cell dimensions of 2.9 × 2.4 μm for E. pelagica (Fig. 1c, h, n) and 4.0 × 2.5 μm for E. catenata (Fig. 1f, k, o) and tend to be centrally located next to the host cell’s nucleus (Fig. 1n, o). Similar to freshwater Rhopalodiaceae17, the endosymbionts of E. pelagica (EpSB) and E. catenata (EcSB) lack detectable chlorophyll and phycoerythrin (Fig. 1h–m), implying that these endosymbionts may have lost their ability to photosynthesize and therefore have an obligate requirement for fixed carbon from their host. The endosymbionts were never observed growing outside of host cells and the host cultures lost their endosymbionts after being propagated for extended periods on N-replete medium (K medium18, with 5 × 10−5 M NH4+, 8.82 × 10−4 M NO3; Supplementary Fig. 20). Furthermore, the hosts showed little to no growth when subsequently returned to low-N medium (5 × 10−8 M NH4+).

Fig. 1: Characterization of marine Epithemia and their endosymbionts.
figure 1

a, b, c Micrographs of E. pelagica UHM3200 in valve view, including visualization by a scanning electron microscopy, and light microscopy for b live cells and c cells osmotically shocked to display the endosymbionts, as indicated by the black arrow. The osmotic shock treatment (c, f) disrupts host cell contents and displaces the endosymbionts. The natural intracellular location of endosymbionts is illustrated in n and o. d, e, f, g Micrographs of E. catenata UHM3210 in girdle view, including visualization by d scanning electron microscopy, light microscopy for e live cells and f osmotically shocked cells with two endosymbionts highlighted by black arrowheads, and g undisturbed live cells growing in long chains. Micrographs of EpSB (h, i, j) and EcSB (k, l, m) released from crushed UHM3200 and UHM3210 host cells, respectively, as seen under brightfield (h, k), phycoerythrin fluorescence (i, l), and chlorophyll fluorescence (j, m). Arrowheads point to the endosymbiont cells, and a single Synechococcus WH7803 cell is present in each field to serve as a positive control for fluorescence. n, o Fluorescence micrographs of fixed E. pelagica and E. catenata cells, respectively, where endosymbionts (white arrows) and nuclei (red arrows) have been stained with nucleic acid-binding SYBR Gold dye (green). In n, the fluorescence channel has been overlaid on a brightfield micrograph. Micrograph scale bars are 5 μm (ac, n), 10 μm (df, o), 100 μm (g), and 3 μm (hm). The experiment assessing the autofluorescence of released endosymbionts (hm) was performed once, while all other micrographs represent results that were consistently reproduced in multiple experiments.

Phylogenetic analyses support the hypothesis that the endosymbionts are obligate and are coevolving with their Epithemia host. The endosymbiont SSU (encoding 16S rRNA) and nifH (encoding nitrogenase iron protein) gene sequences cluster by host species and are highly conserved among different strains of the same host (99.5–100% nucleotide sequence identity). Such partner fidelity is expected for obligate symbionts and is similarly observed in marine prymnesiophyte-UCYN-A symbioses19,20. The endosymbionts EpSB and EcSB reside on distinct phylogenetic branches, forming a monophyletic clade with the spheroid bodies of freshwater species E. turgida (Ehrenberg) Kützing (EtSB) and Rhopalodia gibberula (Ehrenberg) O. Müller (RgSB) (Fig. 2b). The diatom host phylogeny places E. pelagica and E. catenata on separate branches of the revised Epithemia lineage21, with their nearest neighbors being Rhopalodia sp. 13vi08.2B (GCCT21) and Rhopalodia sp. 21IV14-4D (voucher HK433), respectively (Fig. 2a). Both of these Rhopalodia spp. were isolated from coastal marine environments but were not noted to contain endosymbionts21,22. E. catenata’s cell morphology differs significantly from the rest of Rhopalodiales21 but shares many characteristics with the tentatively classified Nitzschia nienhuisii F.A.S. Sterrenburg & F.J.G. Sterrenburg23, for which no molecular data exist. Spheroid body-like structures are visible in a previously captured photomicrograph of N. nienhuisii (Figure 89 in Lobban24), suggesting that this diatom species, which has been observed in the Pacific24 and Atlantic23 Oceans and Caribbean Sea25,26, may also harbor endosymbionts.

Fig. 2: Phylogenetic analyses.
figure 2

a Multigene phylogeny of the E. pelagica and E. catenata diatom hosts, based on the SSU (18S rRNA; 1322 nt), psbC (986 nt), and rbcL (1341 nt) genes. b Multigene phylogeny of the Epithemia endosymbionts, based on the SSU (16S rRNA; 420 nt) and nifH (760 nt) genes. The phylogenies are Bayesian majority consensus trees, and support values are provided for Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods (Bayesian posterior probabilities/ML bootstrap percent). Bold branches indicate complete support (posterior probability of 1 and bootstrap percent of 100), and the phylogeny scales are in units of nt substitutions per site. Labels for the new isolates (highlighted and bolded) include the dates and depths of collection. Accession numbers for all sequences are provided in the Source Data file.

E. pelagica-like symbioses have a global distribution throughout tropical and subtropical oceans (Fig. 3). Nucleotide sequences 100% identical to the nifH gene of EpSB were observed in samples from the North Pacific Ocean, North and South Atlantic Oceans, Indian Ocean, and the seas surrounding China, Philippines, and Japan. These include amplified nifH sequences from NCBI’s non-redundant nucleotide (nt) and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) databases (n = 81,023; ave. length = 272 bp), as well as unamplified sequences from Tara Oceans metagenomes and metatranscriptomes corresponding to an assembled transcript (unigene MATOU-v1_93255274) that covers the entire length of our EpSB nifH sequences (760 bp). MATOU-v1_93255274 was most frequently found in metagenomes and metatranscriptomes generated from eukaryote-associated size fractions (2, 10, 8, and 2 samples corresponding to the 0.8–5 μm, 5–20 μm, 20–180 μm, and 180–2000 μm size fractions, respectively). Epithemia symbioses may be even more abundant and widespread, because lowering the threshold of nucleotide identity from 100% to 98% expands the global distribution of EpSB-like nifH sequences to include the Gulf of Mexico, Coral Sea, and the Arctic Ocean (Supplementary Fig. 21a). EcSB-like nifH sequences were rarer and only found in samples from the North Pacific Ocean and Coral Sea (Supplementary Fig. 21b). At Station ALOHA, where the isolates were obtained, quantitative PCR measurements of E. pelagica symbioses indicated host LSU and EpSB nifH gene copies as high as 18 ± 8 × 103 L−1 and 0.7 ± 0.2 × 103 L−1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 22a). Identical EpSB nifH sequences were also detected in metagenomes constructed from sinking particles collected at 4000 m depth at Station ALOHA over a 3-year period (Supplementary Fig. 22b)27,28. The recurring presence of EpSB sequences in sinking particles collected in the bathypelagic zone of the water column is strong evidence for a sustained population in the surface waters of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre.

Fig. 3: Global map of environmental sequences that share 100% nucleotide identity with an E. pelagica nifH phylotype.
figure 3

Datasets screened include the Marine Atlas of Tara Oceans Unigenes (MATOU) and the representation of unigene MATOU-v1_93255274 in Tara Oceans metagenomes and metatranscriptomes, as well as nifH amplicons published in NCBI’s non-redundant nucleotide (nt) and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) databases. Black dots indicate the location of Tara Oceans stations analyzed in MATOU. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

The daily patterns of N2 fixation in E. pelagica and E. catenata endosymbionts are distinct from other pelagic diazotrophs. In general, N2 fixation by marine cyanobacteria occurs during either the day or the night29. For both EpSB and EcSB, N2 fixation occurred during the day and night (Fig. 4). During the day, N2 fixation ceases either a few hours prior to the end of the light period (E. pelagica; Fig. 4a) or in conjunction with the lights being switched off (E. catenata; Fig. 4b). For both strains, N2 fixation was subsequently undetected for the first 6 h of the dark period and resumed just after midnight. Overall, EpSB and EcSB are able to fix N2 for a much longer period of time during a day-night cycle than other marine diazotrophs, especially the unicellular cyanobacterium Crocosphaera subtropica Mareš & J.R. Johansen30,31, which is the closest free-living relative of rhopalodiacean endosymbionts (Fig. 2b). C. subtropica synthesizes its carbohydrates during the day and respires them at night to fuel N2 fixation, while the evolutionary transition to an endosymbiont has enabled the EpSB and EcSB spheroid bodies to perform N2 fixation during the day which is most likely fueled by metabolism of the host cell14. A similar evolutionary transition is hypothesized to have occurred for UCYN-A which fixes N2 during the daytime32.

Fig. 4: Daily patterns of N2 fixation for Epithemia.
figure 4

a Dihydrogen (H2) production, ethylene (C2H4) production from acetylene (C2H2), and 15N2 assimilation for E. pelagica UHM3200. b H2 production, C2H4 production from C2H2, and 15N2 assimilation for E. catenata UHM3210. Sampling resolution was 10 min for H2 and C2H4 production and 2 h for the 15N2 assimilation with the values represented by average ± standard deviation (n = 3). The 15N2 assimilation beginning at 20:30 had rates of 0.1 fmol N cell−1 d−1 for E. pelagica. The night period is represented by gray shading in both plots. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

Analysis of marine Epithemia endosymbiont nifH sequences suggests that these endosymbionts have been commonly misidentified in oceanic samples as free-living unicellular cyanobacteria within the UCYN-C group (Supplementary Fig. 23). UCYN-C is considered to represent free-living unicellular cyanobacteria closely related to Crocosphaera Zehr, Rachel A. Foster, Waterbury & E. Webb (including strains formerly identified as Cyanothece Komárek33), but published reports of UCYN-C have employed nifH primers and probes with an identical match to E. pelagica (Supplementary Fig. 24)34,35,36. Other studies have detected the presence of spheroid body-like sequences in marine metatranscriptomes37 and Tara Oceans samples38, but until now there were no characterized marine rhopalodiacean symbioses to support these observations. With the observed distribution of EpSB- and EcSB-like sequences throughout tropical and subtropical oceans, Epithemia symbioses may be the most geographically widespread eukaryote–diazotroph association on the planet, occurring in freshwater, brackish, and marine environments. Establishing the spatial-temporal patterns of marine Epithemia will be essential for determining their contribution to the marine N cycle and the biological carbon pump2. Furthermore, the repeated isolation of endosymbiont-bearing Epithemia species demonstrates their ease of cultivation compared to other marine diazotroph-eukaryote symbioses, which are either uncultivated or difficult to maintain long-term in culture4. Thus, marine Epithemia are valuable new model systems for genomic and experimental investigations, because they can be used to unravel the interplay of host-symbiont physiologies and the genetic adaptations that maintain these relationships39.

Systematic biology

Phylum Bacillariophyta Karsten

Class Bacillariophyceae Haeckel

Order Rhopalodiales D. G. Mann

Family Rhopalodiaceae (Karsten) Topachevs’kyj & Oksiyuk

Genus Epithemia Kützing

Epithemia pelagica Schvarcz, Stancheva & Steward sp. nov.

Figure 1a–c, n; Supplementary Figs. 1a–n, 2a–h, 610.

Holotype

Slide UC2085162 from Epithemia pelagica UHM3201 deposited in the University and Jepson Herbaria at the University of California, Berkeley. Holotype specimen is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1b.

Etymology

The epithet refers to the pelagic habitat of this species, collected from the open Pacific Ocean.

Type locality

This species was isolated from seawater collected from a depth of 25 m in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (22°45' N, 158°00’ W), Station ALOHA (water depth ca. 4800 m) on October 14, 2014 (Epithemia pelagica UHM3200) and February 21, 2019 (Epithemia pelagica UHM3201).

Diagnosis

This species is characterized by solitary, strongly dorsiventral, small cells, 6.7–17.8 µm long, 5–9.8 µm wide. Valves are lunate with rounded apices, convex dorsal margin, and concave ventral margin. Raphe-bearing keel is eccentric, positioned on the dorsal margin, slightly bent down towards the dorsal margin at the center of the valve. Transapical costae are fine and resolved only near the raphe keel, where they are internally thickened and function as fibulae beneath the raphe. Striae are not resolvable with light microscopy (LM). E. pelagica possesses all structural features of genus Rhopalodia (now Epithemia), but differs from other species by its minute size, weakly silicified frustules with delicate costae and very fine striae not resolvable with LM.

Note

This species also shares some morphological similarities with Protokeelia C.W. Reimer & J.J. Lee, such as minute size, lunate valve with undulate valve face, and protuberant raphe sternum.

Description

See Supplementary Note 1.

Epithemia catenata Schvarcz, Stancheva & Steward sp. nov

Figure 1d–g, o; Supplementary Figs. 3a–c, 4a–k, 5a–f, 11, 12.

Holotype

Slide UC2085161 from Epithemia catenata UHM3210 deposited in the University and Jepson Herbaria at University of California, Berkeley. Holotype specimen is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3a.

Etymology

The epithet refers to the colonial habit of this diatom, which forms long chains.

Type locality

This species was isolated from seawater collected from a depth of 25 m in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (22°45' N, 158°00' W), Station ALOHA (water depth ca. 4,800 m) on February 21, 2019 (Epithemia catenata UHM3210) and from a depth of 75 m on May 4th, 2019 (Epithemia catenata UHM3211).

Diagnosis

This species is characterized by cells joined together in chains. Frustules are delicate, translucent without visible striation, with wide, slightly rhomboidal girdles and narrower elliptical valves. The raphe keel is central or nearly so on valve face, continuing from pole to pole, slightly sigmoid, and fibulate, involved in cell-cell interlock. Frustules are 17.2–28.8 µm along apical axis, 8.2–13.7 µm along transapical axis, 11.7–16.9 µm along pervalvar axis, fibulae are 8–12 in 10 µm, 2–3 µm long. This species differs morphologically from all known Epithemia/Rhopalodia taxa by its colonial habit, raphe position, and frustular ultrastructure.

Note

The generic placement of E. catenata is based on current molecular phylogenetics data (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Figs. 1319) and the presence of cyanobacterial endosymbionts. SH and AU tests of constrained phylogenetic topologies (Supplementary Table 3) show greater support for the inclusion of E. catenata within the genus Epithemia, while showing weaker support for the exclusion of E. catenata from either the genus Epithemia or family Rhopalodiaceae. E. catenata shares more morphological characteristics with Nitzschia nienhuisii than with other Epithemia/Rhopalodia species, such as gross frustule symmetry, keel structure and position, chain-formation, and hyaline frustules (LM Figs. 2–4 in Sterrenburg & Sterrenburg23; LM Figs. 89–92, SEM Figs. 93, 94 in Lobban24; SEM Fig. 2a, b, LM Fig. 2c, d in Lópes-Fuerte et al.26), suggesting that these two species may be congeneric. The initial description of N. nienhuisii acknowledges there is doubt with respect to N. nienhuisii’s generic ranking23, and a later study employing SEM noted the baffling structure of N. nienhuisii, which does not appear to possess fibulae on the keel typical of Nitzschia Hassall24.

Description

See Supplementary Note 2.

Methods

Epithemia isolation and culture

The Epithemia cells were isolated from 0.5 L of seawater collected from depths of 25, 75, and 100 m in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (22°45' N, 158°00' W). Seawater was collected during the near-monthly Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT) expeditions to the long-term monitoring site Station ALOHA (water depth ca. 4800 m) in October 2014 (HOT cruise #266) and February–July 2019 (HOT cruises #310–313). Serial dilution (unialgal strains UHM3202, UHM3203, UHM3204) or micropipette isolation of single cells (clonal strains UHM3200, UHM3201, UHM3210, UHM3211) were used to establish the Epithemia cultures, which were grown in a seawater-based, low-nitrogen medium. Filtered (0.2 µm) and autoclaved, undiluted Station ALOHA seawater was amended with 2 μM EDTA, 50 nM ferric ammonium citrate, 7.5 μM phosphoric acid, trace metals (100 nM MnSO4, 10 nM ZnCl2, 10 nM Na2MoO4, 1 nM CoCl2, 1 nM NiCl2, 1 nM Na2SeO3), vitamins (50 μg/L inositol, 10 μg/L calcium pantothenate, 10 μg/L thiamin, 5 μg/L pyridoxine HCl, 5 μg/L nicotinic acid, 0.5 μg/L para-aminobenzoic acid, 0.1 μg/L folic acid, 0.05 μg/L biotin, 0.05 μg/L vitamin B12), and 106 μM Na2SiO3. Although not tested here, simpler formulations of diazotroph media such as PMP40 or RMP41 may also be suitable for growing Epithemia, when made with 100% seawater and adding Na2SiO3. The cultures were subsequently incubated at 24 °C on a 12:12 h light:dark cycle with 50–100 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 using cool white fluorescent bulbs. All E. pelagica and E. catenata symbioses were stable under these medium and incubation conditions. E. pelagica was successfully isolated from at least one of the three depths that were targeted during each sampling occasion.

Morphological observations

Epithemia living and fixed cells were imaged by light and epifluorescence microscopy using a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope at 40×–60× magnification. Diatom cell sizes were determined using >60 live, exponentially growing cells, imaged in either valve view (E. pelagica) or girdle view (E. catenata). Endosymbiont (spheroid body) cell sizes were averaged from DNA-stained cells for E. pelagica UHM3200 (n = 78) and E. catenata UHM3210 (n = 91), imaged by epifluorescence microscopy after preparing samples as follows: Epithemia cells were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for 30 min, pelleted at 1000 × g for 1 min, the supernatant was exchanged with 0.5% Triton X-100 (in autoclaved filtered seawater), samples were incubated for 10 min with gentle agitation, cells were then pelleted at 4000 × g for 1 min, supernatant was exchanged with autoclaved filtered seawater and fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde, and samples were stained with 1× final concentration of SYBR Gold nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen, cat. # S11494) for 2 h. For routine observations of endosymbionts (e.g., determining presence/absence and number per host cell), osmotic shock was used to disrupt the cell contents of diatom host cells and improve visualization of the endosymbionts. This was achieved by gently pelleting cells and exchanging the medium with either ultrapure water or 2–3 M NaCl solution, followed by immediate observation. While this is a simple technique for detecting and visualizing endosymbionts (Fig. 1c, f), it does not accurately represent the natural location of endosymbionts within the host cells, as seen when compared to fixed cell preparations for epifluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1n, o). To assess the presence of fluorescent photopigments in endosymbiont cells, live host cells were pelleted at 4000 × g for 5 min and crushed using a microcentrifuge tube pestle (SP Bel-Art, cat. # F19923-0000) to release the endosymbionts. The crushed pellet was resuspended in 75% glycerol containing live Synechococcus WH7803 cells (positive control for fluorescence), and samples were observed by epifluorescence microscopy using filter cubes appropriate for observing phycoerythrin (EX: 551/10, BS: 560, EM: 595/30) and chlorophyll (EX: 480/30, BS: 505, EM: 600LP).

The loss of endosymbionts from Epithemia cultures (UHM3200 and UHM3210) was observed after propagating cells for four months in nitrogen-replete medium (K)18, where approximately 5–10% of the culture was transferred to fresh medium about every two weeks. Observations were only made at the end of the four-month period. Endosymbionts were not observed growing freely in these cultures, and the absence of endosymbionts within host cells was confirmed by the failure to observe spheroid bodies by light microscopy after osmotic shock of the diatoms, as well as a failure to amplify the endosymbiont SSU (16S rRNA) and nifH genes from cellular DNA extracts. PCR reactions were performed in parallel with DNA extracts from control cultures (grown in low-nitrogen medium), using the same template DNA amount (10 ng) and PCR conditions (see methods for Marker gene sequencing and phylogenetics).

Ultrastructural observations by electron microscopy (EM) were conducted for E. pelagica UHM3200 and E. catenata UHM3210. EM preparations of diatoms typically involve the oxidative removal of organic matter to uncover the fine details of frustule ultrastructure. However, in the case of E. catenata, oxidatively cleaned cells lacked structural integrity, leading to collapsed frustules when dried and viewed by scanning EM (SEM). For this reason, both species were prepared for SEM with and without (Fig. 1a, d) the oxidative removal of organic matter, and cleaned E. catenata frustules were further analyzed by transmission EM (TEM). To remove organic matter, 100 mL of exponentially growing culture was pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 min and resuspended in 30% H2O2. Cells were boiled in H2O2 for 1–2 h, followed by rinsing cells six times in ultrapure water by sequential centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 min and resuspension of cell pellets. Suspensions of the cleaned cells were dried on aluminum foil and mounted on aluminum stubs with double-sided copper tape. For some E. catenata SEM preparations, the cleaned frustules were dehydrated in an ethanol dilution series and exchanged into hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) prior to drying on aluminum foil; this was to minimize the collapse of frustules resulting from drying. To prepare cells with organic matter intact, 25 mL of exponentially growing culture was mixed with an equal volume of fixative solution (5% glutaraldehyde, 0.2 M sodium cacodylate pH 7.2, 0.35 M sucrose, 10 mM CaCl2) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Cells were gently filtered onto a 13 mm diameter 1.2 μm pore size polycarbonate membrane filter (Isopore, Millipore Sigma), washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.35 M sucrose), fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.4), dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and critical point dried. Filters were mounted on aluminum stubs with double-sided conductive carbon tape. All SEM stubs were sputter coated with Au/Pd, prior to observing on a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope at the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa (UHM) Biological Electron Microscope Facility (BEMF). Cleaned E. catenata cells were prepared for TEM by drying a drop of sample on a formvar/carbon-coated grid and observing on a Hitachi HT7700 transmission electron microscope at UHM BEMF.

Additional light microscopy of hydrogen-peroxide cleaned frustules was conducted for E. pelagica UHM3201 and E. catenata UHM3210. Samples were mounted in Naphrax (PhycoTech, Inc., cat. # P-Naphrax200) and observed at 100× using an Olympus BX41 Photomicroscope (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, Pennsylvania) with differential interference contrast optics and an Olympus SC30 Digital Camera at California State University San Marcos.

A key to the strains used in each micrograph is provided in Supplementary Table 2.

Marker gene sequencing and phylogenetics

For each Epithemia strain, 25–50 mL of culture was pelleted at 4000 × g for 10 min, and DNA was extracted from the pellet using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, cat. # D4300). Marker genes were amplified with the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche, cat. # 4743733001), using conditions previously described for genes SSU encoding 18S rRNA (Euk328f/Euk329r)42, LSU encoding 28S rRNA (D1R/D2C)43, rbcL (rbcL66+/dp7−)44,45, psbC (psbC+/psbC−)44, and cob (Cob1f/Cob2r)21. For the endosymbionts, a partial sequence for the SSU (16S rRNA) gene was amplified using a primer set targeting unicellular cyanobacterial diazotrophs, CYA359F/Nitro821R46,47, and the nifH gene was amplified using new primers specific to the nifH of Cyanothece-like organisms, ESB-nifH-F (5'-TACGGAAAAGGCGGTATCGG-3') and ESB-nifH-R (5'-CACCACCAAGRATACCGAAGTC-3'), with a 55 °C annealing temperature and 75 s extension time. All primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). Amplified products were cloned and transformed into E. coli using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen, cat. # K457501), and plated colonies were picked and grown in Circlegrow medium (MP Biomedicals, cat. # 113000132). Plasmids were extracted with the Zyppy Plasmid Miniprep kit (Zymo Research, cat. # D4019) and sequenced from the M13 vector primers using Sanger technology at GENEWIZ (South Plainfield, NJ). For the diatom SSU (18S rRNA) gene, sequencing reactions were also performed using the 502f and 1174r primers48.

Phylogenetic trees (Fig. 2) were inferred using concatenated alignments for both diatom host genes (SSU encoding 18S rRNA, psbC, rbcL) and endosymbiont genes (SSU encoding 16S rRNA, nifH). For each gene, nucleotide sequences were aligned using MAFFT v7.45349 (L-INS-i method), and sites with gaps or missing data were removed. An appropriate nucleotide substitution model was selected for each gene alignment using jModelTest v2.1.1050. Bayesian majority consensus trees were inferred from the concatenated alignments using MrBayes v3.2.751 with two runs of 4–8 chains, until the average standard deviation of split frequencies dropped below 0.01. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values were generated for the Bayesian tree using RAxML v8.2.1252, implemented with 1000 iterations of rapid bootstrapping. To further analyze the phylogenetic position of the new Epithemia species in the broader context of Surirellales and Rhopalodiales diatoms, individual gene trees (SSU encoding 18S rRNA, LSU, rbcL, psbC, and cob; Supplementary Figs. 1319) were constructed from sequences aligned using MAFFT (automatic detection method) and trimmed using trimAl v1.253 (gappyout method). rRNA gene phylogenies were also inferred using sequences aligned according to the global SILVA alignment for SSU and LSU genes using SINA54, which were either left untrimmed in the case of the LSU gene or trimmed to remove highly variable positions (SINA’s “012345” positional variability filter) and gappy positions (trimAL v1.2, gappyout method) in the case of the SSU gene. These trimming strategies were selected based on their ability to maximize the monophyly of the previously described Rhopalodiales clade and minimize the separation of known conspecific strains, such as the strains of E. pelagica described here. All gene phylogenies were inferred using the Bayesian methods described above. To investigate the level of support for constrained tree topologies placing E. catenata within or outside of the genus Epithemia and family Rhopalodiaceae, SH55 and AU56 statistical tests were performed in IQ-TREE 257 (implementing ModelFinder58) using all alignments from the individual gene trees (Supplementary Table 3).

Given E. catenata’s unusual morphology, test trees were inferred with the inclusion of diatom sequences from orders Bacillariales (Nitzschia, Pseudo-nitzschia), Cymbellales (Didymosphenia), Naviculales (Amphiprora, Navicula, Pinnularia), and Thalassiophysales (Amphora, Halamphora, Thalassiophysa); however, E. catenata was consistently placed within Rhopalodiales, and these trees were not pursued further.

An additional nifH phylogeny was constructed using all environmental sequences from NCBI’s non-redundant nucleotide (nt) database >300 bp and sharing >95% nucleotide sequence identity with EpSB and EcSB nifH sequences (Supplementary Fig. 23), including 51 environmental sequences from prior studies investigating marine diazotrophs34,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66. Environmental nifH sequences were aligned to the previously generated nifH sequence alignment using MAFFT (automatic method detection and addfragments options), and the best-scoring maximum likelihood phylogeny was inferred using RAxML with 1000 iterations of rapid bootstrapping. NCBI accession numbers for all tree sequences are in the Source Data file.

Analysis of Epithemia endosymbiont nifH sequences in environmental datasets

Nucleotide sequences for EpSB and EcSB nifH were queried against NCBI’s non-redundant nucleotide (nt) database using webBLAST67 (megablast; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and SRA databases for nifH amplicon sequencing projects from the marine environment using the SRA Toolkit68 (dc-megablast, with database validation using vdb-validate; https://github.com/ncbi/sra-tools). Database hits with 98–100% nucleotide identity over an alignment of the entire subject sequence (BLAST alignment length = subject sequence length) were identified, and the associated sample’s latitude and longitude coordinates (where available) were mapped. Coordinates were also mapped for metagenome and metatranscriptome samples containing matches to unigene MATOU-v1_93255274 from the Marine Atlas of Tara Oceans Unigenes69, a unigene that shares 100% identity over the entire length of the EpSB UHM3202 nifH sequence and >99.4% identity with all other EpSB nifH sequences.

The presence of EpSB and EcSB nifH sequences was examined in metagenomes prepared from sinking particles collected at 4000 m depth at Station ALOHA27,28. The sinking particles were collected during intervals of 12, 10, and 8 days during 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively, using a McLane sediment trap equipped with a 21-sample bottle carousel. The presence of EpSB and EcSB nifH sequences in the metagenomes was assessed by blastn70, after first removing low quality bases from metagenomic reads using Trimmomatic v0.3971 (parameters: LEADING:20 TRAILING:20 MINLEN:100). For each sediment trap metagenome, the total number of reads matching EpSB or EcSB nifH nucleotide sequences with 100% identity were tallied and normalized to the total number of reads in the database. Only EpSB-matching reads were detected in this analysis.

Quantitative PCR

Specific PCR primers were designed targeting a 102 bp region of E. pelagica’s LSU gene (Epel-LSU-F, 5'-GAAACCAGTGCAAGCCAAC-3'; Epel-LSU-R, 5'-AGGCCATTATCATCCCTTGTC-3') and an 85 bp region EpSB’s nifH gene (EpSB-nifH-F, 5'-CACACTAAAGCACAAACTACC-3'; EpSB-nifH-R, 5'-CAAGTAGTACTTCGTCTAGCTC-3') and were synthesized by IDT. Gene copy concentrations were quantified for Station ALOHA water samples (~2 L) collected by Niskin bottles at 5, 25, 45, 75, 100, 125, 150, and 175 m on January 16 and July 1 (except 5 m), 2014, during HOT cruises #259 and #264. Samples were filtered onto 25 mm diameter, 0.02 μm pore size aluminum oxide filters (Anotop; Whatman, cat. # WHA68092102) and stored at −80 °C until extracting DNA using the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit (Epicentre, cat. # MC85200) according to Mueller et al.72. Briefly, a 3-mL syringe filled with 1 mL of tissue and cell lysis solution (MasterPure) containing 100 μg mL−1 proteinase K was attached to the outlet of the filter, and the filter inlet was sealed with a second 3-mL syringe. The lysis solution was pulled halfway through to saturate the filter membrane, and the entire assembly was incubated at 65 °C for 15 min while attached to a rotisserie in a hybridization oven rotating at ca. 16 rpm. The lysis buffer was then drawn fully into the inlet syringe, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and placed on ice. The remaining steps for protein precipitation and removal and nucleic acid precipitation were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, DNA was resuspended in a final volume of 100 μL. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using the PowerTrack SYBR Green Master Mix system (Applied Biosystems, cat. # A46109) and run on an Eppendorf Mastercycler epgradient S realplex2 real-time PCR machine. Reactions (20 µL total volume) were prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocol, containing 500 nM of each primer. Sample reactions (four replicates) contained 2 μL of environmental DNA extract (24–76 ng DNA), while standards (three replicates) contained 2 μL of gBlocks Gene Fragments (IDT) that were prepared at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 log gene copies/μL. The gBlocks Gene Fragments were 500 bp in length and encompassed the entire E. pelagica UHM3201 LSU sequence and positions 1–500 of the EpSB UHM3201 nifH sequence, respectively. The main cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation and enzyme activation step of 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 57 °C or 55 °C for 30 s for the LSU and nifH genes, respectively. Melting curves were analyzed to verify the specificity of the amplifications, and reactions containing Epithemia catenata DNA extract were included as negative controls. Reaction efficiencies were 104.23% and 95.15% for the LSU and nifH genes, respectively. The limit of detection for these assays was not empirically determined. gBlocks sequences, qPCR threshold cycle values, and conversion equations are provided in the Source Data file.

Physiology experiments

The daily patterns of N2 fixation were quantified for E. pelagica UHM3200 and E. catenata UHM3210 using two techniques: acetylene (C2H2) reduction to ethylene (C2H4) and argon induced dihydrogen (H2) production (AIHP). Both analyses were conducted using a gaseous flow-through system that quantified the relevant trace gas on the sample outlet line with a temporal resolution of 10 min73. To conduct the measurements, a 10-mL subsample of each Epithemia culture was placed in a 20-mL borosilicate vial and closed using gas-tight rubber stoppers and crimp seals. Separate bottles were used for H2 production and C2H2 reduction. During the experimental period, the temperature was maintained at 25 ± 0.2 °C using a benchtop incubator (Incu-Shaker; Benchmark Scientific) and light exposure was 200 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at wavelengths of 380–780 nm with a 12:12 h square light:dark cycle (Prime HD+; Aqua Illumination). To conduct the AIHP method, the sample vial containing the culture was flushed with a high purity gas mixture consisting of argon (makeup gas; 80%), oxygen (20%), and carbon dioxide (0.04%). In the absence of N2, all of the electrons that would have been used to reduce N2 to NH3 are diverted to H2 production, thereby providing a measure of Total Nitrogenase Activity (TNA). The C2H2 reduction assay also represents a measure of TNA. Our analytical set-up introduced C2H2 at a 1% addition (vol/vol) to the high purity air with a total flow rate (13 mL min−1) identical to the AIHP method. The gas emissions were analyzed using separate reductive trace gas analyzers that were optimized for the quantification of H2 and C2H4. To verify the observed daily patterns in N2 fixation, 15N2 assimilation measurements were conducted on triplicate samples of Epithemia cultures at targeted time points. Five milliliters of 15N-enriched seawater was added to the subsamples, which were subsequently crimp sealed and incubated for a 2 h period with the same light and temperature conditions as the daily gas measurements. At the end of the incubation, the contents of each vial were filtered onto a pre-combusted glass fiber filter. The concentration and isotopic composition (δ15N) of particulate nitrogen for incubated and non-incubated (i.e., natural abundance) samples was measured using an elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Carlo-Erba EA NC2500 coupled with a ThermoFinnigan Delta Plus XP). For each of the described analyses, cell-specific rates were calculated based on the average of triplicate cell concentration measurements, obtained from cell samples preserved at 4 °C with Lugol’s iodine solution and quantified within a week using a Sedgwick-Rafter counting chamber (Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat. # 68050-52). All rate measurement data is provided in the Source Data file.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Sequences produced for this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MW562846MW562894. Analyses were also conducted using data from NCBI’s non-redundant nucleotide (nt) and protein (nr) databases and the following SRA run database accessions: DRR075654DRR075675, DRR090493DRR090512, DRR119299DRR119318, SRR11748760SRR11748769, SRR11784070SRR11784101, SRR1994968SRR1994982, SRR2846720, SRR2846725, SRR2848263SRR2848264, SRR2848267, SRR2849323, SRR2849339, SRR2849358, SRR2849373, SRR2849384, SRR2849398, SRR2976582SRR2976583, SRR2988260, SRR3225470SRR3225471, SRR3275263SRR3275264, SRR3502230, SRR3502520SRR3502528, SRR3898627SRR3898675, SRR3924383SRR3924409, SRR5083564SRR5083575, SRR5693565SRR5693584, SRR5693645SRR5693657, SRR576444, SRR576446, SRR576451, SRR576453SRR576469, SRR5814033SRR5814187, SRR6057892SRR6057916, SRR6299285SRR6299287, SRR6334371SRR6334373, SRR7142301SRR7142368, SRR7239923SRR7239946, SRR7527146SRR7527159, SRR7632639SRR7632648, SRR7632653, SRR7632671SRR7632680, SRR7648270, SRR7648273SRR7648274, SRR7648284SRR7648299, SRR7648310, SRR7648320SRR7648321, SRR7648326SRR7648327, SRR7648331SRR7648339, SRR7648341, SRR7648343, SRR7648345SRR7648350, SRR7668191, SRR7699187SRR7699216, SRR8104593SRR8104721, SRR8247196SRR8247211, SRR8468235SRR8468237, SRR8468246SRR8468261, SRR8844064SRR8844199, SRR9675236. Source data for Figs. 24 and Supplementary Figs. 1317, 18e, 20, and 21 are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Zehr, J. P. & Capone, D. G. Changing perspectives in marine nitrogen fixation. Science 368, eaay9514 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karl, D. et al. The role of nitrogen fixation in biogeochemical cycling in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature 388, 533–538 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wrightson, L. & Tagliabue, A. Quantifying the impact of climate change on marine diazotrophy: Insights from earth system models. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 952 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster, R. A. & Zehr, J. P. Diversity, genomics, and distribution of phytoplankton-cyanobacterium single-cell symbiotic associations. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 435–456 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Villareal, T. A. Marine nitrogen-fixing diatom-cyanobacteria symbioses. in Marine pelagic cyanobacteria: Trichodesmium and other diazotrophs (eds Carpenter, E. J., Capone, D. G., & Rueter, J. G.) 163–175 (Springer, 1992).

  6. Harke, M. J. et al. Periodic and coordinated gene expression between a diazotroph and its diatom host. ISME J. 13, 118–131 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zehr, J. P. et al. Unicellular cyanobacteria fix N2 in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature 412, 635–638 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, A. W. et al. Unicellular cyanobacterium symbiotic with a single-celled eukaryotic alga. Science 337, 1546–1550 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stancheva, R. & Lowe, R. Diatom symbioses with other photoautotroph. in Diatoms: Fundamentals and Applications (eds Seckbach, J. & Gordon, R.) 225–244 (Wiley-Scrivener, 2019).

  10. Prechtl, J., Kneip, C., Lockhart, P., Wenderoth, K. & Maier, U.-G. Intracellular spheroid bodies of Rhopalodia gibba have nitrogen-fixing apparatus of cyanobacterial origin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1477–1481 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kneip, C., Voss, C., Lockhart, P. J. & Maier, U.-G. The cyanobacterial endosymbiont of the unicellular algae Rhopalodia gibba shows reductive genome evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 30 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama, T. et al. Spheroid bodies in rhopalodiacean diatoms were derived from a single endosymbiotic cyanobacterium. J. Plant Res. 124, 93–97 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kneip, C., Lockhart, P., Voss, C. & Maier, U.-G. Nitrogen fixation in eukaryotes—new models for symbiosis. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 55 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakayama, T. et al. Complete genome of a nonphotosynthetic cyanobacterium in a diatom reveals recent adaptations to an intracellular lifestyle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11407–11412 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakayama, T. & Inagaki, Y. Genomic divergence within non-photosynthetic cyanobacterial endosymbionts in rhopalodiacean diatoms. Sci. Rep. 7, 13075 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karl, D. M. & Lukas, R. The Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT) program: Background, rationale and field implementation. Deep-Sea Res. Part 2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr 43, 129–156 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adler, S., Trapp, E. M., Dede, C., Maier, U.-G. & Zauner, S. Rhopalodia gibba: The first steps in the birth of a novel organelle?. in Endosymbiosis (ed. Löffelhardt, W.) 167–179 (Springer Vienna, 2013).

  18. Keller, M. D., Selvin, R. C., Claus, W. & Guillard, R. R. L. Media for the culture of oceanic ultraphytoplankton. J. Phycol 23, 633–638 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson, A. et al. Genetic diversity of the unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria UCYN-A and its prymnesiophyte host. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 3238–3249 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cornejo-Castillo, F. M. et al. Cyanobacterial symbionts diverged in the late Cretaceous towards lineage-specific nitrogen fixation factories in single-celled phytoplankton. Nat. Commun. 7, 11071 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruck, E. C., Nakov, T., Alverson, A. J. & Theriot, E. C. Phylogeny, ecology, morphological evolution, and reclassification of the diatom orders Surirellales and Rhopalodiales. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 103, 155–171 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ashworth, M. P. et al. Molecular and morphological investigations of the stauros-bearing, raphid pennate diatoms (Bacillariophyceae): Craspedostauros E.J. Cox, and Staurotropis T.B.B. Paddock, and their relationship to the rest of the Mastogloiales. Protist 168, 48–70 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterrenburg, F. A. S. & Sterrenburg, F. J. G. An outline of the marine littoral diatom biocoenosis of the Banc d’Arguin, Mauritania, West Africa. Botanica Marina 33, 459–465 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lobban, C. S. Benthic marine diatom flora of Guam: new records, redescription of Psammodictyon pustulatum n. comb., n. stat., and three new species (Colliculoamphora gabgabensis, Lauderia excentrica, and Rhoiconeis pagoensis). Micronesica 2015-02, 1–49 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hein, M. K., Winsborough, B. M. & Sullivan, M. J. Iconographia Diatomologica Vol. 19 (Gantner Verlag, 2008).

  26. López-Fuerte, F. O. et al. Primeros registros de Nanofrustulum shiloi (Lee, Reimer & McEnery) Round, Hallsteinsen & Paasche y Nitzschia nienhuisii Sterrenburg & Sterrenburg (Bacillariophyceae; Ochrophyta) en aguas Mexicanas. CICIMAR Oceánides 31, 35–41 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boeuf, D. et al. Biological composition and microbial dynamics of sinking particulate organic matter at abyssal depths in the oligotrophic open ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11824–11832 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poff, K. E., Leu, A. O., Eppley, J. M., Karl, D. M. & DeLong, E. F. Microbial dynamics of elevated carbon flux in the open ocean’s abyss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018269118 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Berman-Frank, I., Quigg, A., Finkel, Z. V., Irwin, A. J. & Haramaty, L. Nitrogen-fixation strategies and Fe requirements in cyanobacteria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 2260–2269 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohr, W., Intermaggio, M. P. & LaRoche, J. Diel rhythm of nitrogen and carbon metabolism in the unicellular, diazotrophic cyanobacterium Crocosphaera watsonii WH8501. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 412–421 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson, S. T. et al. Coordinated regulation of growth, activity and transcription in natural populations of the unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Crocosphaera. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17118 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muñoz-Marín, M. D. C. et al. The transcriptional cycle is suited to daytime N2 fixation in the unicellular cyanobacterium ‘Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa’ (UCYN-A). mBio 10, 1027 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mareš, J. et al. Taxonomic resolution of the genus Cyanothece (Chroococcales, Cyanobacteria), with a treatment on Gloeothece and three new genera, Crocosphaera, Rippkaea, and Zehria. J. Phycol. 55, 578–610 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Foster, R. A. et al. Influence of the Amazon River plume on distributions of free‐living and symbiotic cyanobacteria in the western tropical North Atlantic Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 517–532 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Langlois, R. J., Hümmer, D. & LaRoche, J. Abundances and distributions of the dominant nifH phylotypes in the Northern Atlantic Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microb. 74, 1922–1931 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hashimoto, R., Watai, H., Miyahara, K., Sako, Y. & Yoshida, T. Spatial and temporal variability of unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the eastern Seto Inland Sea. Fish. Sci. 82, 459–471 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pfreundt, U., Spungin, D., Bonnet, S., Berman-Frank, I. & Hess, W. R. Global analysis of gene expression dynamics within the marine microbial community during the VAHINE mesocosm experiment in the southwest Pacific. Biogeosciences 13, 4135–4149 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pierella Karlusich, J. J. et al. Global distribution patterns of marine nitrogen-fixers by imaging and molecular methods. Nat. Commun. 12, 4160 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nowack, E. C. M. & Weber, A. P. M. Genomics-informed insights into endosymbiotic organelle evolution in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 69, 51–84 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Webb, E. A., Moffett, J. W. & Waterbury, J. B. Iron stress in open-ocean cyanobacteria (Synechococcus, Trichodesmium, and Crocosphaera spp.): Identification of the IdiA protein. Appl. Environ. Microb. 67, 5444–5452 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hynes, A. M., Webb, E. A., Doney, S. C. & Waterbury, J. B. Comparison of cultured Trichodesmium (Cyanophyceae) with species characterized from the field. J. Phycol 48, 196–210 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Moon-van der Staay, S. Y., De Wachter, R. & Vaulot, D. Oceanic 18S rDNA sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity. Nature 409, 607–610 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Scholin, C. A., Herzog, M., Sogin, M. & Anderson, D. M. Identification of group- and strain-specific genetic markers for globally distributed Alexandrium (Dinophyceae). II. Sequence analysis of a fragment of the LSU rRNA gene1. J. Phycol. 30, 999–1011 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alverson, A. J., Jansen, R. K. & Theriot, E. C. Bridging the rubicon: phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonizations of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45, 193–210 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Daugbjerg, N. & Andersen, R. A. Phylogenetic analyses of the rbcL sequences from haptophytes and heterokont algae suggest their chloroplasts are unrelated. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 1242–1251 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nübel, U., Garcia-Pichel, F. & Muyzer, G. PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microb. 63, 3327–3332 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mazard, S. L., Fuller, N. J., Orcutt, K. M., Bridle, O. & Scanlan, D. J. PCR analysis of the distribution of unicellular cyanobacterial diazotrophs in the Arabian Sea. Appl. Environ. Microb. 70, 7355–7364 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Worden, A. Z. Picoeukaryote diversity in coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 43, 165–175 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Meth. 9, 772–772 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pruesse, E., Peplies, J. & Glöckner, F. O. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28, 1823–1829 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1114–1114 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shimodaira, H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51, 492–508 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kalyaanamoorthy, S. et al. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Meth. 14, 587–589 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Langlois, R. J., LaRoche, J. & Raab, P. A. Diazotrophic diversity and distribution in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microb. 71, 7910–7919 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Moisander, P. H., Beinart, R. A., Voss, M. & Zehr, J. P. Diversity and abundance of diazotrophic microorganisms in the South China Sea during intermonsoon. ISME J. 2, 954–967 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kong, L., Jing, H., Kataoka, T., Sun, J. & Liu, H. Phylogenetic diversity and spatio-temporal ­distribution of nitrogenase genes (nifH) in the northern South China Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 65, 15–27 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bird, C. & Wyman, M. Transcriptionally active heterotrophic diazotrophs are widespread in the upper water column of the Arabian Sea. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 84, 189–200 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bombar, D., Kubo, K. A. T., Robidart, J., Carter, B. J. & Zehr, J. P. Non‐cyanobacterial nifH phylotypes in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre detected by flow‐cytometry cell sorting. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5, 705–715 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Martínez-Pérez, C. et al. The small unicellular diazotrophic symbiont, UCYN-A, is a key player in the marine nitrogen cycle. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 1–7 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen, M. et al. Biogeographic drivers of diazotrophs in the western Pacific Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 1403–1421 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu, J. et al. Effect of mesoscale eddies on diazotroph community structure and nitrogen fixation rates in the South China Sea. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 35, 101106 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Johnson, M. et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W5–W9 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Leinonen, R., Sugawara, H. & Shumway, M., International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D19–D21 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Villar, E. et al. The Ocean Gene Atlas: exploring the biogeography of plankton genes online. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W289–W295 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Mueller, J. A., Culley, A. I. & Steward, G. F. Variables influencing extraction of nucleic acids from microbial plankton (viruses, bacteria, and protists) collected on nanoporous aluminum oxide filters. Appl. Environ. Microb. 80, 3930–3942 (2014).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Wilson, S. T., Caffin, M., White, A. E. & Karl, D. M. Evaluation of argon induced hydrogen production as a method to measure nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria. J. Phycol. 57, 863–873 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Science Foundation awards (OIA 1736030 and OCE 15-59356 to G.F.S.; OCE 1756524 to S.T.W) and the Simons Foundation (#329108 to D.M.K. and A.E.W. and #811977 to S.T.W.). We thank Tina M. Weatherby and Marilyn F. Dunlap at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Biological Electron Microscopy Facility for their assistance with transmission and scanning electron microscopy, Natalie Wallsgrove at the Stable Isotope Facility for her support, and the Hawaii Ocean Time-series program for their assistance with sample collection at Station ALOHA (NSF OCE 1756517 to D.M.K. and A.E.W.). The technical support and advanced computing resources from the University of Hawaiʻi Information Technology Services – Cyberinfrastructure, funded in part by NSF MRI 1920304, are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.R.S., S.T.W., M.C., Q.L., and G.F.S. contributed to experimental design. C.R.S. isolated and maintained both strains of Epithemia and conducted the light and electron microscopy analysis and phylogenetic analysis. C.R.S. and Q.L. conducted gene sequencing and qPCR. C.R.S. with input from K.A.T.-K. conducted the metagenomic analysis. S.T.W. and M.C. conducted the N2 fixation measurements. R.S. contributed species descriptions and light microscopy imaging of cleaned diatom frustules. All authors, including C.R.S., S.T.W., M.C., R.S., Q.L., K.A.T.-K., A.E.W., D.M.K., J.P.Z., and G.F.S., contributed to the interpretation of results. C.R.S wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher R. Schvarcz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Lucas Stal, Matt Ashworth, Rosalina Stancheva Hristova and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schvarcz, C.R., Wilson, S.T., Caffin, M. et al. Overlooked and widespread pennate diatom-diazotroph symbioses in the sea. Nat Commun 13, 799 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28065-6

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing