Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Shared features and reciprocal complementation of the Chlamydomonas and Arabidopsis microbiota

Abstract

Microscopic algae release organic compounds to the region immediately surrounding their cells, known as the phycosphere, constituting a niche for colonization by heterotrophic bacteria. These bacteria take up algal photoassimilates and provide beneficial functions to their host, in a process that resembles the establishment of microbial communities associated with the roots and rhizospheres of land plants. Here, we characterize the microbiota of the model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and reveal extensive taxonomic and functional overlap with the root microbiota of land plants. Using synthetic communities derived from C. reinhardtii and Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that phycosphere and root bacteria assemble into taxonomically similar communities on either host. We show that provision of diffusible metabolites is not sufficient for phycosphere community establishment, which additionally requires physical proximity to the host. Our data suggest the existence of shared ecological principles driving the assembly of the A. thaliana root and C. reinhardtii phycosphere microbiota, despite the vast evolutionary distance between these two photosynthetic organisms.

Introduction

Plants associate with diverse microbes in their aerial and belowground tissues which are recruited from the surrounding environment. These microbial communities, known as the plant microbiota, provide the host with beneficial functions, such as the alleviation of abiotic stresses1,2,3,4, nutrient mobilization5,6,7, or protection against pathogens8,9. Characterization of the microbiota associated with a wide range of plant species including liverworts10, lycopods, ferns11, gymnosperms12,13, and angiosperms14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 shows a strong influence of host phylogeny as well as conserved and possibly ancestral community features. Furthermore, it has been speculated that the ability to form associations with members of these communities, such as mycorrhizal fungi, was a trait required for the colonization of land by plants 450 Mya, possibly inherited from their algal ancestor22,23. In aquatic environments, algae are also known to associate with complex bacterial communities termed phycosphere microbiota24,25,26,27, where exchange of metabolites, including organic carbon28,29,30,31, soluble micronutrients32, vitamins33,34,35, and other molecular currencies36,37 influence algal growth and development. These features are analogous to those found in the rhizosphere of vascular plants, where secreted diffusible compounds alter soil pH, oxygen availability, the concentration of antimicrobials, and organic carbon, and thus support distinct microbial communities by favoring the growth of certain bacteria while restricting the proliferation of others25,38,39,40,41. However, it is not known whether the ability to assemble a complex microbiota from the surrounding soil is specific of embryophytes or if extends to other terrestrial green lineages such as chlorophyte and streptophyte algae.

To address this question, we characterized the microbiota of a selection of taxonomically diverse subaerial green algae, including the model organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Cr), and show significant taxonomic overlap between the root and phycosphere microbiota. To elucidate whether these similarities in community composition also correspond to the functional equivalence between root and phycosphere bacteria, we generated a culture collection of phycosphere bacteria derived from Cr and performed cross-inoculation experiments using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and its associated bacterial culture collection42. Using synthetic communities (SynComs) we show that the At root and Cr phycosphere microbiota can be reciprocally complemented with bacteria derived from the other host. Finally, we show that physical proximity between Cr and its microbiota is required for the establishment of phycosphere communities, suggesting that this process is not merely a consequence of the provision of diffusible photosynthates by the host.

Results

Cr assembles a distinct microbiota from the surrounding soil

To determine whether Cr shapes soil-derived bacterial communities similarly to land plants, we designed an experiment where At and Cr were grown in parallel in natural soil in the greenhouse (experiment A; Supplementary Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1). Briefly, pots containing Cologne Agricultural Soil (CAS) were inoculated with axenic Cr (CC1690) cultures or sowed with surface-sterilized At (Col-0) seeds. We then collected samples from unplanted controls and from the surface of Cr-inoculated pots (phycosphere fraction) at 7-day intervals, and harvested the root and rhizosphere of At plants after 36 days (Methods). Bacterial communities from all compartments were characterized by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Analysis of community profiles showed a decrease in α-diversity in the phycosphere and root compartments compared to the more complex soil and rhizosphere communities (Fig. 1a). In addition, analysis of β-diversity revealed a significant separation by compartment, where phycosphere and root samples formed distinct clusters that were also separated from those consisting of soil and rhizosphere samples (Fig. 1b; 22.4% of variance; P < 0.001). Further inspection of amplicon profiles showed overlap between root- and phycosphere-associated communities along the second and third components (Fig. 1c), suggesting similarities between the bacterial communities that associate with Cr phycospheres and At roots. Furthermore, an analysis where we simulated the process of recruitment of bacterial species from the starting soil microbiota by Cr using the hypergeometric distribution shows that the observed overlap between the Cr phycosphere and At root communities (Fig. 1c, d) is highly significant (P = 3.06 × 10−33) and cannot be explained by a random process of microbial recruitment from the same starting soil community.

Fig. 1: Comparison of bacterial community structures associated with At roots and the Cr phycosphere in natural soil.
figure 1

a Alpha diversity estimates of bacterial communities from soil (n = 14), rhizosphere (n = 21), root (n = 18), and phycosphere (n = 24) samples from At and Cr grown in CAS soil in the greenhouse. A Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s post hoc was used to assess significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). b, c PCoA of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities (ASV-level) constrained by compartment (22.4% of variance explained; P < 0.001). d Phylogeny of partial 16S rRNA sequences of the most abundant bacterial OTUs found in At roots (n = 120), and Cr phycosphere (n = 141) community profiles. Leaf nodes are colored by taxonomic affiliation (phylum level). The two innermost rings (colored squares) represent abundant OTUs in each compartment. Squares highlighted with a black contour correspond to OTUs for which at least one representative bacterial strain exists in the IRL or IPL culture collections. The two outermost rings (barplots) represent log-transformed relative abundances of each OTU in At root or Cr phycosphere samples. Corresponds to experiment A (Supplementary Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1).

To characterize the dynamics of these microbiota assembly processes, we analyzed the time-series data from soil and phycosphere and end-point community profiles from At roots. This revealed gradual recruitment of bacterial taxa from the soil, leading to the formation of distinct phycosphere communities that become significantly differentiated 21 days after inoculation, which is comparable to that observed in At root-associated communities at day 36 (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Subsequent enrichment analysis of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in each compartment, compared to unplanted soil, showed an increase in the relative abundance of Cr- and At-enriched ASVs in phycosphere and root samples, respectively. In contrast, the total relative abundance of soil-enriched ASVs progressively decreased in host-associated compartments, while remaining stable in unplanted soil (Supplementary Fig. 2b–d). Although the magnitude of the changes in bacterial community composition in the phycosphere diminishes over time, it remains unclear whether these communities reach a steady state over the duration of the experiment. Taken together, these results indicate that, similarly to At, Cr is able to recruit a subset of bacterial taxa from the surrounding soil and assemble a distinct microbiota.

To test whether the assembly of phycosphere communities from soil could also be observed as a result of the proliferation of naturally occurring subaerial microalgae, we characterized the eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbial communities from natural soil. Briefly, CAS soil was irrigated and placed in sterile microboxes in growth chambers with a day/dark-light cycle (L/D 12/12) and incubated for 7 weeks. At the end of the experiment, we obtained samples from the soil surface, measured chlorophyll content, and performed eukaryotic 18S and bacterial 16S rRNA profiling. As negative controls, we obtained samples from the initial soil, as well as from soil that was kept in the dark but otherwise under the same conditions throughout the duration of the experiment (experiment B; Supplementary Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1). We observed a significant increase of chlorophyll fluorescence in the soil surface exposed to light compared to the negative controls, which was concomitant with a significant increase in the relative abundance of chlorophyte algae in the soil surface when exposed to light (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). While fungi were the most abundant eukaryotes in the initial soil samples, chlorophytes dominated the soil surface communities at the end of the experiment and were significantly more abundant in the light-treated samples compared to the dark controls. Interestingly, we observed that Chlamydomonas was one of the most abundant eukaryotic genera in the light-exposed soil, and included several ASVs assigned to Cr. Together with this significant proliferation of green algae, we observed differentiation of the bacterial communities of light-exposed soil surface samples compared to those from the initial soil and negative controls, which clustered together (Supplementary Fig. 3d). A comparison with 16S profiles obtained from the greenhouse experiment (Fig. 1) revealed that the communities found in the light-exposed soil surface resembled those from the Cr phycosphere and, together with samples from the rhizosphere and root of At, separated from the initial soil and dark soil surface samples along the second principal component (Supplementary Fig. 3c).

The Cr phycosphere and the plant root share a core microbiota

Given the observed similarities between phycosphere and root communities (Fig. 1c), we compared the most abundant taxonomic groups found in association with the two photosynthetic hosts. We found a significant overlap between Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) with the highest relative abundances in either phycosphere or root samples (Fig. 1d; >0.1% relative abundance; 32% shared; P < 0.001), which included members of every bacterial order except Myxococcales, which were only found in large relative abundances in At root samples (Supplementary Data 1). In line with previous descriptions of the At root microbiota, we observed that these host-associated communities were dominated by Proteobacteria, and also included members of the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes phyla. At this taxonomic level, the major difference between the two photosynthetic hosts was given by a lower contribution of Actinobacteria and a larger relative abundance of Firmicutes in the Cr phycosphere compared to the At root compartment (Fig. 1d). Given that this latter phylum is most abundant in soil, this difference may be due to the difficulty of fully separating soil particles from the phycosphere fraction during sample collection.

Next, we sought to assess whether the observed overlap in community structures between Cr and At could be extended to other land plant lineages. We performed a meta-analysis, broadening our study to include samples from phylogenetically diverse plant species found in a natural site, including lycopods, ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms11, as well as the model legume Lotus japonicus (Lj) grown in CAS soil in the greenhouse7,43. First, we determined which taxonomic groups were present in each plant species (≥80% occupancy and ≥0.1% average relative abundance) and identified a total of six bacterial orders that consistently colonize plant roots (i.e., found in every host species). These taxa include Caulobacterales, Rhizobiales, Sphingomonadales, Burkholderiales, Xanthomonadales (Proteobacteria), and Chitinophagales (Bacteroidetes). We observed that the aggregated relative abundance of these six bacterial orders accounted for 39% of their respective communities on average (Fig. 2). Interestingly, these taxa were also found among the most abundant in the phycosphere of Cr (45% aggregated relative abundance), as well as in association with the native CAS soil algae (33%; Supplementary Fig. 3c). These results indicate that members of the core microbiota of land plants also associate with subaerial chlorophyte algae and form part of phycosphere communities in terrestrial environments.

Fig. 2: Conservation of bacterial orders of the root and phycosphere microbiota across photosynthetic organisms.
figure 2

Phylogeny was inferred from a multiple sequence alignment of the ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase gene (rbcL) of 35 plant species and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The bar plots represent the average aggregated relative abundance of the six bacterial orders found to be present in the root microbiota of each plant species (80% occupancy and ≥0.1% average relative abundance). Leaf nodes depicted with a star symbol denote community profiles of plants grown in CAS soil in the greenhouse7,43, whereas those marked with a circle were obtained from plants sampled at the Cooloola natural site chronosequence11. Includes data for At and Cr from experiment A (Supplementary Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1).

Reconstitution of phycosphere communities using reductionist approaches

After the characterization of phycosphere-associated bacterial communities in natural soil, we sought to develop systems of reduced complexity that would allow controlled perturbation of environmental parameters, and targeted manipulation of microbial community composition. First, we established a mesocosm system using soil-derived microbial communities as start inocula (experiment C; Supplementary Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). We co-inoculated axenic Cr (CC1690) cultures with microbial extracts from two soil types (CAS and Golm) in two different carbon-free media (TP and B&D), which ensures that the only source of organic carbon to sustain bacterial growth is derived from Cr photosynthetic activity. These phycosphere mesocosms were then incubated under continuous light for 11 days, during which we assessed Cr growth using cell counts, and profiled bacterial communities via 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. In this system, Cr was able to steadily grow without a detrimental impact from co-inoculation with soil-derived bacterial extracts (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Analysis of diversity showed that Cr was able to shape soil-derived bacterial communities within the first 4 days, compared to the starting inocula, and that these phycosphere communities remained stable until the end of the experiment (Fig. 3). Interestingly, cultivation of soil-derived bacteria in the absence of organic carbon or supplemented with artificial photosynthates (AP) led to significantly differentiated bacterial communities (Fig. 3a; 17.9% of the variance; P < 0.001). In addition, inoculation of soil-derived bacteria with heat-killed Cr cultures was not sufficient to recapitulate this community shift (Supplementary Fig. 4b), suggesting that the presence of live and metabolically active Cr is required for the establishment of synthetic phycospheres. A separate experiment where microbial inocula were filtered through a 5 μm pore-size membrane showed similar bacterial community shifts compared to non-filtered extracts (Supplementary Fig. 4c), suggesting that the presence of larger eukaryotic microorganisms in the soil microbial extracts did not contribute to the observed changes in bacterial composition. Similar to the results obtained using natural soil, the aggregated relative abundance of Cr-associated ASVs in the synthetic phycosphere samples increased over time, whereas ASVs enriched in the bacteria-only control samples consistently decreased (Fig. 3b). At the end of the experiment (day 11), the relative abundance of Cr-enriched ASVs accounted for 94% of the entire phycosphere community, in contrast to a lower contribution observed in the natural soil system (Supplementary Fig. 2b; 60% relative abundance at day 36). This pattern could be a consequence of the unintended depletion of bacteria that are not capable of metabolizing Cr-secreted photoassimilates in a liquid environment, and in these specific culture media. Finally, an independent mesocosm experiment using day/night light cycles showed delayed but similar patterns to those using continuous light, indicating that phycosphere community establishment may be independent of Cr culture synchronization (Supplementary Fig. 4d).

Fig. 3: Mesocosm experiments recapitulate the establishment of phycosphere communities by Cr across soil types and growth media.
figure 3

a PCoA analysis of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of bacterial community profiles (ASV-level), constrained by condition (17.9% of the variance; P < 0.001), showing a significant separation between start inocula (soil washes, depicted in brown; n = 12), phycosphere communities (green; n = 158), and soil washes incubated in minimal media (blue; n = 112), or media supplemented with artificial photoassimilates (APs, depicted in orange; n = 144). b Dynamic changes in the phycosphere community composition in terms of the aggregated relative abundances of ASVs enriched in each condition (n = 158) with respect to the start inocula (n = 12). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the data. Corresponds to experiment C (Supplementary Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1).

To test whether the process of phycosphere microbiota assembly is also found in other taxonomic lineages of green algae besides the chlorophyte Cr, we performed a similar mesocosm experiment (experiment D; Supplementary Fig. 1d and Supplementary Table 1) where we characterized the soil-derived phycosphere microbiota of a selection of subaerial algal strains isolated from the same terrestrial environment. This group of algae includes chlorophytes from the classes Trebouxiophyceae (Microthamnion), and Chlorophyceae (Chlamydomonas), as well as streptophytes belonging to the Klebsormidiophyceae (Klebsormidium), and Zygnematophyceae (Spiroglea) classes, the latter of which belongs to the genus that likely represents the closest extant relative to the most recent common ancestor of streptophyte algae and embryophytes44. Analysis of 16S rRNA amplicon profiles shows that these microalgae can assemble distinct soil-derived microbial communities, in a pattern of diversification that relates to the host phylogeny (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Interestingly, the phycosphere community of the Cr strain CC1690 was closest to that of the Chlamydomonas sp. environmental isolate (MEL 1030 B), indicating that this laboratory strain interacts with soil-derived communities in a similar manner as an environmental strain adapted to living within these complex communities. Furthermore, the phycospheres of all characterized algal strains were dominated by members of the core bacterial taxa shared with the root microbiota of land plants (Supplementary Fig. 5c). The results from this experiment indicate that the assembly of distinct phycosphere communities from the soil is not specific for Cr but can be also observed for other subaerial green algae from diverse taxonomic groups.

Next, we aimed to control community composition in this reductionist system by establishing a Cr-associated bacterial culture collection following a similar approach as reported in previous studies with land plants42,45,46,47,48,49. We employed a limiting dilution approach using 7 day-old Cr phycospheres derived from CAS soil bacteria incubated in two minimal media (TP and B&D; Supplementary Fig. 1e). The resulting sequence-indexed phycosphere bacterial library (Cr-IPL) contained a total of 1645 colony-forming units, which were taxonomically characterized by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Comparison of these sequencing data with the community profiling of soil phycospheres revealed that we were able to recover 62% of the most abundant bacterial OTUs found in natural communities (Supplementary Fig. 6a and Data 2). Recovered OTUs accounted for up to 63% of the cumulative relative abundance of the entire culture-independent community, indicating that our collection is taxonomically representative of Cr phycosphere microbiota. These results are comparable to the recovery rates observed in previously reported culture collections from different plant species (e.g., 57% for A. thaliana42; 69% for rice6; 53% for L. japonicus48).

To establish a core collection of phycosphere bacteria, we selected a taxonomically representative set of strains from the Cr-IPL covering all major taxonomic groups found in the culture-independent community profiles and subjected them to whole-genome sequencing. In total, we sequenced the genomes of 185 bacterial isolates, classified into 42 phylogroups (97% average nucleotide identity), belonging to 5 phyla and 15 families (Supplementary Data 3). Next, we performed comparative analyses of the genomes from the phycosphere core collection (Cr-SPHERE) with those established from the soil, roots of A. thaliana, and roots and nodules of L. japonicus (At- and Lj-SPHERE) grown in the same soil (CAS). The whole-genome phylogeny of these bacterial strains showed that all major taxonomic groups that included root-derived isolates were also represented in the Cr-SPHERE collection, but not in the soil collection (Supplementary Fig. 6b). Importantly, the phycosphere collection also included multiple representatives of each of the six bacterial orders that were found to consistently colonize plant roots in natural environments (Fig. 2). Next, we assessed the functional potential encoded in the genomes of the sequenced phycosphere bacteria using the KEGG orthology database as a reference50. Principal coordinates analysis of functional distances showed that bacterial taxonomy accounted for most of the variance of the data (58.63%; P < 0.001), compared to a much smaller impact of the host of origin of the genomes (4.22% of the variance; P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 6c).

Next, we tested whether synthetic communities formed by isolates from the Cr-SPHERE collection could recapitulate assembly patterns of natural phycospheres under laboratory conditions. Axenic Cr cultures (CC1690) were inoculated with a bacterial SynCom composed of 26 strains that could be distinguished at the 16S level and contained representative members of all major phycosphere taxonomic groups (experiment F; Supplementary Fig. 1f, Table 1 and Data 4). Assessment of Cr growth using chlorophyll fluorescence and cell counts showed that the presence of the bacterial SynCom had no consistent beneficial or detrimental impact on Cr proliferation in this system (Fig. 4a, b), similarly to what we observed in mesocosms (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Analysis of time-course amplicon profiles showed that Cr assembled a characteristic phycosphere community within the first 4 days of co-inoculation which was significantly separated from both start inocula and bacterial SynComs alone (Fig. 4c, d). Together, these results demonstrate that we can recapitulate the Cr assembly of distinct phycosphere communities in natural soils using culture-dependent and -independent gnotobiotic systems.

Fig. 4: Phycosphere reconstitution using bacterial SynComs derived from the Cr-SPHERE core culture collection.
figure 4

Cr growth in the gnotobiotic system axenically (n = 36) or in co-inoculation with the bacterial SynCom (n = 36), measured as algal cell densities (a), and chlorophyll fluorescence (b). A Mann–Whitney test was used to assess significant differences among groups (FDR-corrected; P < 0.05). c Strain-level beta-diversity analysis (CPCoA of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities; 40.4% of the variance; P < 0.001) of bacterial communities from samples obtained from a liquid-based gnotobiotic system. Samples are color-coded based on the experimental condition: input SynCom samples (black; n = 9), synthetic phycospheres (light green; n = 27), and SynCom only controls (blue; n = 25). d Bar charts showing relative abundances of individual SynCom members across conditions and time points. Corresponds to experiment F (Supplementary Fig. 1f and Supplementary Table 1).

Cr- and At-derived SynComs form taxonomically similar communities on either host

Given the similarity between phycosphere and root communities observed in natural soils (Fig. 1), and the taxonomic and functional overlap across genomes from their corresponding core collections (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c), we hypothesized that SynComs with the same taxonomic composition would assemble into similar communities, regardless of their origin. To test this hypothesis, we used a soil-based gnotobiotic system in which we could grow Cr and At in parallel, in addition to the previously described liquid-based system. We designed taxonomically-paired SynComs composed of strains from either the IPL (Cr-SPHERE) or IRL (At-SPHERE) bacterial culture collections. In these SynComs we included one representative strain from each bacterial family shared between the two collections (n = 9), ensuring that they could be differentiated by their 16S rRNA sequences (Supplementary Data 4). We then inoculated axenic Cr cultures and At seeds with either IPL, IRL, or mixed (IPL + IRL) SynComs and allowed them to colonize either host for five weeks (experiment G; Supplementary Fig. 1g and Supplementary Table 1). Next, we harvested the root, soil, and phycosphere fractions, measured host growth, and performed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Assessment of growth parameters (cell counts for bacteria and Cr, chlorophyll content for Cr, and shoot fresh weight for At) showed no significant differences across SynCom treatments (Supplementary Fig. 7). However, analysis of community profiles of the mixed SynComs showed that Cr and At assemble distinct communities that could also be clearly separated from unplanted soil (Fig. 5a). Similar to what we observed in natural soil (Fig. 1c), there was an overlap between phycosphere and root samples, which clustered together along the second and third components (Fig. 5b). Interestingly, analysis of community composition at the family level showed that all SynComs (Cr-, At-derived, and mixed) formed taxonomically indistinguishable root or phycosphere communities, independently of their host of origin (Fig. 5b). These results indicate that the root and rhizosphere microbiota of axenic At or Cr, respectively, can be reciprocally complemented with bacterial SynComs derived from either host. Furthermore, analysis of aggregated relative abundances from mixed communities showed that phycosphere-derived strains could successfully colonize At roots (48.32% relative abundance), and root-derived strains established associations with Cr in both soil and liquid systems (42.94% and 25.70% relative abundance, respectively; Fig. 5c, d). Despite this capacity for ectopic colonization, we observed significant signatures of host preference in SynComs from the two culture collections, indicated by the fact that Cr-derived strains reached higher aggregated relative abundances in the phycosphere compared to the root, while the opposite pattern was identified for At-derived bacteria (Fig. 5c). This tendency was accentuated in the liquid system, where Cr bacteria outcompeted At strains in the presence of the algae but not when they have incubated alone (Fig. 5d). Taken together, these results suggest the presence of conserved features in bacterial members of the Cr and At microbiota at a high taxonomic level, with signatures of host preference at the strain level.

Fig. 5: Root and phycosphere bacteria colonize At and Cr and assemble into taxonomically equivalent communities.
figure 5

a Strain-level beta diversity analysis of soil (n = 26), root (n = 57), and phycosphere (n = 66) bacterial community profiles, from gnotobiotic At and Cr, inoculated with bacterial SynComs derived from At roots (At-SPHERE), Cr (Cr-SPHERE), or mixed (At- and Cr-SPHERE), grown in the FlowPot system. b CPCoA of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of the same samples, aggregated at the bacterial family level (6.4% of the variance; P < 0.001). c, d Aggregated relative abundances of At- and Cr-derived strains in the mixed SynCom in a soil-derived (n = 149, c), and liquid-based (n = 18, d) gnotobiotic system. A Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s post hoc was used to assess significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). Corresponds to experiment G (Supplementary Fig. 1g and Supplementary Table 1).

Physical proximity is required for the assembly of phycosphere communities and promotion of Cr growth

Next, we sought to investigate whether the observed formation of distinct phycosphere communities is driven by the secretion of diffusible photoassimilates and to what extent physical proximity to bacteria is required to establish other forms of interactions. To test this hypothesis, we developed a gnotobiotic split co-cultivation system where synthetic phycospheres could be grown photoautotrophically (experiment H; Supplementary Fig. 1h and Supplementary Table 1). In this system, two growth chambers were connected through a 0.22 μm-pore polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane that allows diffusion of compounds but not the passage of bacterial or algal cells (Methods). We co-cultivated axenic Cr cultures (C), bacterial SynComs (SC), and synthetic phycospheres (C + SC) in these split chambers containing minimal carbon-free media (TP) in multiple pair-wise combinations (Supplementary Data 4). Analysis of 16S rRNA amplicon profiles after 7 days of incubation revealed that SC and C + SC samples were distinguishable from the input bacterial SynComs (Fig. 6a). In addition, samples clustered according to the presence of Cr in the same compartment, causing SC and C + SC samples to be significantly separated, independently of the community present in the neighboring chamber (Fig. 6a, indicated by colors; 21.4% of the variance; P < 0.001). We observed that differences between the C + SC|– and SC|C communities in the split system were mainly explained by a significant enrichment of Sphingomonadaceae and Comamonadaceae when the SynCom was growing in the same compartment as Cr (C + SC|–), and depletion of Pseudomonadaceae. Despite differences among experimental systems, these patterns mirror the results from the natural soil, mesocosm, and SynCom flask experiments (Figs. 14), where Sphingomonadaceae was one of the most abundant taxa in the Cr phycosphere and Pseudomonadaceae dominated the bacterial communities in the absence of Cr.

Fig. 6: Physical proximity to Cr is required for the establishment of phycosphere bacterial communities.
figure 6

Strain-level beta-diversity analyses of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of bacterial SynComs (SC, n = 37), and synthetic phycospheres (SC + C, n = 46), grown in a split gnotobiotic system. Constrained PCoA is shown for all samples (21% of variance; P < 0.001, a), or a subset of samples, depending on the content of the vessel (39.4–39.5% of variance; P < 0.001, b, c). d, e Cr growth across conditions measured using relative chlorophyll fluorescence (n = 60, d) and algal cell densities (n = 15, e). A Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s post hoc was used to assess significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). Corresponds to experiment H (Supplementary Fig. 1h and Supplementary Table 1).

Comparison of amplicon profiles of samples taken from chambers containing C + SC further showed a significant impact of the content of the neighboring compartment on community structures (Fig. 6b, indicated by shapes; 39.5% of the variance; P < 0.001). Interestingly, we also observed that the presence of Cr in the neighboring compartment was sufficient to change SC communities where the bacterial SynCom was incubated alone (Fig. 6c; SC|C or SC|C + SC vs. SC|–; P = 0.001), possibly by secreting diffusible compounds or inducing changes in the composition of the culture medium (e.g., minerals and pH). Furthermore, SC communities where Cr was present in the neighboring compartment could be differentiated depending on whether Cr was in direct contact with bacteria or grown axenically (Fig. 6c; SC|C vs. SC|C + SC). These community shifts could be explained by competition for diffusible metabolites with the neighboring compartment containing the SynCom together with the algae (C + SC), or by physiological changes in Cr induced by physical proximity with bacteria.

In parallel to bacterial community profiles, we assessed Cr growth by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence and algal cell counts in all vessels. We observed significant differences in the growth of axenic Cr cultures depending on the contents of the neighboring chamber, where the bacterial SynCom alone (C|SC) had a positive impact on the microalgae compared to the control (C|–; Fig. 6d, e). Remarkably, the presence of a synthetic phycosphere in the neighboring compartment had the strongest positive impact on axenic Cr cultures (C|C + SC; Fig. 6d, e), suggesting that changes in bacterial community composition driven by physical proximity to Cr lead to a beneficial impact on algal growth. In addition, chlorophyll fluorescence and cell counts of synthetic phycospheres (C + SC) were higher when no other microorganisms were incubated in the neighboring chamber (C + SC | – versus C + SC | C or C + SC | SC; Fig. 6d, e), possibly due to competition for diffusible compounds. An additional full-factorial replicate experiment using a modified version of this split co-cultivation system showed consistent results both in community structures and Cr growth parameters (Supplementary Fig. 8), despite a large technical variation in cell density measurements (Fig. 6d). Together, these results indicate that the physical proximity of bacteria to Cr is required for assembly and growth of phycosphere communities, which in turn may benefit host growth by providing metabolites and/or other compounds including carbon dioxide, which in this experimental setup is likely limiting autotrophic growth of Cr. Future experimentation with synthetic phycospheres composed by SynComs designed using combinatorial approaches, coupled with metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling, will be needed to decipher the molecular and genetic mechanisms driving these interactions, and how they compare to the interactions between land plants and their microbiota.

Discussion

Microscopic algae release photoassimilated carbon to the diffusible layer immediately surrounding their cells, which constitutes a niche for heterotrophic bacteria. Microbes from the surrounding environment compete for colonization of this niche and assemble into complex communities that play important roles in global carbon and nutrient fluxes. These ecological interactions have been well studied in aquatic environments, where each year approximately 20 Gt of organic carbon fixed by phytoplankton are consumed by heterotrophic bacteria28, which can account for up to 82% of all algal-derived organic matter51. For multiple species of green algae, optimal growth, in turn, requires interactions with their associated phycosphere bacteria, which can provide beneficial services to their hosts, such as mobilization of non-soluble iron32, or exogenous biosynthesis of organic compounds such as vitamins33,35. Despite the known importance of these interactions in marine environments, the role of algae-bacterial associations in terrestrial ecosystems remains understudied. This gap in our understanding could be explained by the fact that aquatic phytoplankton is more readily noticed and more amenable to systematic study compared to edaphic microalgae. However, exploring the role of soil-borne unicellular photosynthetic organisms as hosts of complex microbial communities could expand our understanding of carbon and energy fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.

The results from our culture-independent and gnotobiotic experiments using the model alga Cr, which was originally isolated from soil52, illustrate that this chlorophyte alga can recruit and sustain the growth of heterotrophic, soil-borne bacteria. By characterizing interactions with soil bacterial communities using a panel of subaerial algae isolated from a natural site (Supplementary Fig. 5), we show that this process of recruitment can be also found in other chlorophyte and streptophyte algae. Our in-depth characterization of the Cr microbiota reveals clear differences as well as striking similarities in the taxonomic affiliation of abundant root and phycosphere community members (Fig. 1d). Notably, these similarities are found despite fundamental differences between At and Cr, such as in cell wall composition, (e.g., complex polysaccharides such as cellulose in plant roots, or (glycol)proteins in Cr53), or the fact that Cr secretes a range of fermentation products at night54. Among the bacterial lineages shared between the root and phycosphere microbiota, we found groups that are known to establish intimate interactions with multicellular plants, ranging from symbiotic to pathogenic, such as Rhizobia, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, or Xanthomonas47,55,56,57. Meta-analyses of available data from multiple studies further confirm this pattern by revealing the presence of a set of six bacterial orders, found as abundant members not only in the root communities of all analyzed embryophytes, but also in the phycospheres of several chlorophyte and streptophyte algae, including Cr (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 5), and in associations with naturally occurring microalgal communities (Supplementary Fig. 3). These findings suggest that the capacity to associate with a wide range of photosynthetic organisms is a common trait of these core bacterial taxa, which might predate the emergence of more specialized forms of interaction with their host. This hypothesis was implicitly tested in our cross-inoculation gnotobiotic experiments, where bacterial strains originally isolated from the roots of At or the phycosphere of Cr competed for colonization of either host (Supplementary Fig. 1g). The observation that Cr-derived strains could colonize At roots in a competition setup, and At-derived bacterial SynComs also populated Cr phycospheres (Fig. 5c) supports the existence of shared bacterial traits for establishing general associations with photosynthetic hosts. Despite these patterns of ectopic colonization, we also detected significant signatures of host preference, illustrated by the observation that native bacterial SynComs outcompeted non-native strains in the presence of either host, but not in their absence (Fig. 5c). These findings are in line with a recent comparative microbiota study where similar results were observed for bacterial commensals from two species of land plants (A. thaliana and L. japonicus48). In addition, SynComs composed of strains exclusively derived from the At- or the Cr-SPHERE collections assembled into taxonomically similar communities on either host, which were indistinguishable at the family level (Fig. 5b). Thus, we show the microbiota of axenic At or Cr can be reciprocally complemented with bacterial SynComs derived from either host. These data indicate that elements of the mechanism by which the microbiota of photosynthetic organisms are assembled are likely shared between the chlorophyte alga Cr, and the embryophyte At, despite their vast evolutionary distance.

Organic carbon is assumed to be the main factor limiting bacterial growth in soil58. Thus, secretion of organic carbon compounds by photosynthetic organisms constitutes a strong cue for the assembly of soil-derived microbial communities39,59,60. The observed similarities between the At root and Cr phycosphere microbiota at a high taxonomic level, and the fact that, unlike flowering plants, unicellular algae most likely lack a complex immune system, suggest that the release of photoassimilates acts as a first organizing principle driving the formation of these communities. This hypothesis is also supported by a recent study with marine bacterial mesocosms where community composition could be partially predicted by the addition of phytoplankton metabolites30. However, the results from our split system (Supplementary Fig. 1h and Fig. 6), where bacterial SynComs formed distinct communities and had a beneficial effect on Cr growth depending on their physical proximity, indicate that the provision of diffusible carbon compounds is not sufficient to explain the observed patterns of microbial diversity. In addition, diffusibility gradients or macromolecular shedding (e.g., of Cr cell wall components), which may not be diffusible through the 0.22 μm-pore membrane, could also be involved. The importance of proximity to the algal cells could also be a consequence of gradients in concentrations and variations in the diffusivity of different compounds, which in aquatic environments are predicted to cause highly chemotactic, copiotrophic bacterial populations to outcompete low-motility oligotrophic ones61. Together with the algal growth data, the observed variations in SynCom structures suggest that, in addition to physical proximity, bi-directional exchange of metabolic currencies and/or molecular signals may be required for the assembly and sustained growth of a phycosphere microbiota capable of providing beneficial functions to their host. Future research will be aimed at exploring how green algae alter soil bacterial communities in terrestrial ecosystems, as well as elucidating molecular and ecological principles of microbiota establishment that might be shared with land plants.

Methods

Cr culture conditions

Cr CC1690 cells were grown photoautotrophically in TP62, TP10, or B&D medium63 at 25 °C, and the illumination of 125 μmol m−2 s−1 under continuous light conditions. Cultures were kept in a rotatory shaker at 70 RPM. Cells in the mid-logarithmic phase were used as inocula for the different experiments. Cell growth was determined either by measuring samples in a Multisizer 4e Coulter counter (Beckman Coulter Inc., California, USA) particle counter with the Beckman Coulter Multisizer software (v4.03) or using an Infinite M200Pro (TECAN Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria) plate reader with the TECAN i-control software (v2.0.10.0), to determine either absorbance at 750 nm or chlorophyll fluorescence (excitation 440/9 nm, emission 680/20 nm).

Isolation of subaerial microalgae

Diverse subaerial algae (Supplementary Fig. 5), were isolated from a natural sample collected in July 2020 from a wet rock surface near Dreistegen, Monschau, Germany (50.550693N, 6.222094E). Enrichment of algae was achieved by the transfer of the natural sample into a general-purpose algal culture medium (modified Synthetic Freshwater Medium [SFM NH4 pH6]; Supplementary Table 2). After several weeks under growth conditions (5 µmol photons m−2 s−1 with white LED illumination in a 14/10 h light/dark cycle at 20 °C), single cells/filaments were removed with a micropipette, washed several times in a sterile culture medium, and transferred to SFM NH4 pH6 in 24-well microtiter plates. Single cell-derived, unialgal cultures have been deposited in the MEL algal research collection and are available upon request.

Greenhouse experiment

A. thaliana Col-0 seeds were surface-sterilized in 70% ethanol for 10 min followed by a brief wash with 100% ethanol (1 min), a wash with 3% NaClO (1 min), and five subsequent washes with sterile water. Seeds imbibed in sterile water were stratified for four days at 4 °C in the dark. Five seeds were then directly sown onto the surface of pots containing CAS by pipetting one seed at a time.

After 36 days plants were harvested similarly to previously reported protocols21. Briefly, plant roots were manually separated from the surrounding soil, until only tightly adhered soil particles were left. Then, roots were separated from their shoot and placed in a Falcon tube with 10 mL of deionized sterile water. After ten inversions, the roots were transferred to another Falcon tube and further processed, while leftover wash-off was centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended and transferred to a new 2-mL screw-cap tube. This tube was centrifuged at 31,000 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored for further processing (rhizosphere compartment). Root systems were then washed successively in 80% EtOH and 3% NaOCl to further clean the root surfaces from living microorganisms and subsequently washed three times (1 min each) in sterile water. These microbe-enriched root fractions were transferred to 2-mL screw-cap tubes for further processing (experiment A; Supplementary Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1).

Liquid TP cultures of 7-day old Cr (CC1690) were washed by sequential centrifugation at 1,900 × g for 5 min and resuspended in 50 mL of MgCl2, to an average of 1.4 × 106 cells/mL across biological replicates, to be used as inocula for CAS pots. Samples from the surface of the Cr-inoculated pots were collected using an ethanol-washed metal spatula at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 36 days post-inoculation. Unplanted pots containing CAS were used to collect surface samples as mock-treatment control right after inoculation (day 0) and at the same time points as Cr-inoculated pots. The position of the pots in the trays was shuffled periodically to minimize edge and location effects. Sterile Petri dishes were placed at the bottom of each pot, which was then watered from the top at inoculation time with 50 mL of MgCl2, and then by adding sterile MilliQ water every 2–3 days in the Petri dishes, and kept in the greenhouse under long-day conditions (16/8 h light/dark). Collected samples were snap-frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further processing.

To analyze the bacterial communities associated with native algae communities (experiment B; Supplementary Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1), CAS soil was placed in sterile “TP750 + TPD750” plastic boxes with filter lids (SacO2, Deinze, Belgium), at a depth of 3 cm, irrigated with sterile water, and incubated in a growth cabinet for 7 weeks with either a 12/12 h cycle at 19/21 °C. Negative controls were set up with a 0/24 h light/dark cycle and otherwise under the same conditions. At the end of the experiment, samples were obtained by harvesting the soil surface for DNA extraction and microbial community profiling. In addition, surface soil samples were obtained for chlorophyll extraction as a proxy for the growth of native and photosynthetically active algae.

Microbial soil wash preparation

Soil samples (5 g) from CAS or GOLM soil were collected in Falcon tubes and manually resuspended onto 30 mL of sterile 1× Tris-EDTA (TE) supplemented with 0.1% of Triton X-100 (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The solution was then homogenized by inversion at 40 RPM rpm for 30 min in a rotary mixer and centrifuged for 1 min at 450 ×g to remove bigger soil particles. Afterward, the supernatant was transferred to a new Falcon tube and centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 50 mL of the final medium. Cell concentration was then determined using either a hemocytometer or the Multisizer 4e.

Mesocosm experiments

Cr cells from an axenic culture were inoculated to a density of 105 cells/mL into 50 mL of TP or B&D medium in triplicate in 200 mL flasks. An estimate of 109 cells from the microbial soil wash was added to the same flasks and incubated for 11 days as described above. Controls consisted in flasks, wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent the pass of light, containing the same growth media as the one used for the Cr cultures with 0.1× AP64 and without AP. Samples were collected for DNA extraction and cell counts determination at 0, 1, 4, 7, and 11 days post inoculation (experiment C, Supplementary Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). These experiments were repeated in three biologically independent experiments, per soil type and growth media.

Subaerial algae (Microthamion sp., MEL B 1108; Chlamydomonas sp. MEL 1030 B, Spiroglea muscicola MEL 1126 B, Klebsormidium sp. MEL1121 B, and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CC1690) were inoculated to a similar chlorophyll fluorescence to that of the equivalent of 105 cells/mL for Cr into 50 mL of SFM medium without supplemented vitamins (Supplementary Table 2). An estimate of 109 cells from the microbial soil wash was added to the same flasks and incubated for 35 days under 12/12 h light/dark cycle without shaking. Samples were collected for DNA extraction and chlorophyll fluorescence determination at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 35 days post inoculation (experiment D; Supplementary Fig 1d and Supplementary Table 1).

DNA extraction from soil samples

Total DNA was extracted from the aforementioned samples using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil following instructions from the manufacturer (MP Biomedicals, Solon, USA). DNA samples were eluted in 50 μL nuclease-free water and used for microbial community profiling.

DNA extraction from liquid samples

DNA from liquid samples was extracted using alkaline lysis42. Briefly, 12 μL of the sample were diluted in 20 μL of Buffer I (NaOH 25 mM, EDTA(Na) 0.2 mM, pH 12), mixed by pipetting, and incubated at 94 °C for 30 min. Next, 20 μL of Buffer II (Tris-HCl 40 mM, pH 7.46) was added to the mixture and stored at −20 °C.

Chlorophyll extraction from soil samples

Soil samples were oven-dried (60 °C) in 15 mL-falcon tubes for several days and chlorophyll extraction was performed by solvent extraction and shaking65. Briefly, a spatula tip of CaCO3 (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) was added to each soil sample as well as 6 mL of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). Samples were boiled for 90 min in a water bath and then shaken for 20 min on a horizontal shaker. After placing the tubes in an upright position and allowing the soil to settle, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and the procedure was repeated once more with the rest of the soil. Merged supernatants were used to measure chlorophyll fluorescence (excitation 440/9 nm, emission 680/20 nm).

Isolation and genome sequencing of Chlamydomonas-associated bacteria

Soil bacteria associated with Cr after co-cultivation were isolated from mesocosm cultures using a dilution-to-extinction approach42,48. Briefly, cultures containing Cr and bacteria from CAS soil washes as described above were incubated in TP or B&D media. After 7 days of co-cultivation, mesocosm samples were fractionated by sequential centrifugation and sonication24 (Supplementary Fig. 1e) prior to dilution. For fractionation, cultures were centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min to recover the supernatant. The pellet was washed with 1× TE buffer followed by sonication in a water bath at room temperature for 10 min and centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant from the first and second centrifugation was pooled together and diluted at either 1:10,000 or 1:50,000. Diluted supernatants were then distributed into 96-well microtiter plates containing 20% TSB media. After 3 weeks of incubation in the dark at room temperature, plates that showed visible bacterial growth were chosen for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. For identification of the bacterial isolates, a two-step barcoded polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol was used as previously described48. Briefly, DNA extracted from the isolates was used to amplify the v5–v7 fragments of the 16S rRNA gene by PCR using the primers 799F (AACMGGATTAGATACCCKG) and 1192R (ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC), followed by indexing of the PCR products using Illumina-barcoded primers. The indexed 16S rRNA amplicons were subsequently pooled, purified, and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Next, cross-referencing of IPL sequences with mesocosm profiles allowed us to identify candidate strains for further characterization, purification, and whole-genome sequencing. Two main criteria were used for this selection: first, we aimed at obtaining maximum taxonomic coverage and selected candidates from as many taxa as possible; second, we gave priority to strains whose 16S sequences were highly abundant in the natural communities. Whenever multiple candidates from the same phylogroup were identified, we aimed at obtaining multiple independent strains, if possible, coming from separate biological replicates to ensure they represented independent isolation events. After validation of selected strains, 185 were successfully subjected to whole-genome sequencing. Liquid cultures or swabs from agar plates from selected bacterial strains (Supplementary Data 3) were used to extract DNA using the QiAmp Micro DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The extracted DNA was treated with RNase and purified. Quality control, library preparation, and sequencing (2 ×150 bp; Illumina HiSeq3000) at a 4–5 million reads per sample were performed by the Max Planck-Genome Centre, Cologne, Germany (https://mpgc.mpipz.mpg.de/home/).

Multi-species microbiota reconstitution experiments

The gnotobiotic FlowPot66 system was used to grow Cr or A. thaliana plants with and without bacterial SynComs (experiment G; Supplementary Fig. 1g and Supplementary Table 1). This system allows for even inoculation of each FlowPot with microbes by flushing the pots with the help of a syringe attached to the bottom opening. After FlowPot assemblage, sterilization and microbial inoculation sterilized seeds were placed on the matrix (peat and vermiculite, 2:1 ratio), and pots were incubated under short-day conditions (10 h light, 21 °C; 14 h dark, 19 °C), standing in customized plastic racks in sterile “TP1600 + TPD1200” plastic boxes with filter lids (SacO2, Deinze, Belgium). For SynCom preparation, bacterial strains from either Cr- or At-SPHERE were grown separately in liquid culture for 2–5 days in 50% TSB media and then centrifuged at 4000×g for 10 min and re-suspended in 10 mM MgCl2 to remove residual media and bacteria-derived metabolites. Equivalent ratios of each strain, determined by optical density (OD600) were combined to yield the desired SynComs (Supplementary Data 4). An aliquot of the SynComs as reference samples for the experiment microbial inputs was stored at −80 °C for further processing. SynCom bacterial cells (107) were added to either 50 mL of TP10 or ½ MS (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, Netherlands), which were then inoculated into the FlowPots using a 60 mL syringe. For Cr-inoculated pots, 105 washed Cr cells were added to the 50 mL of media with or without microbes to be inoculated into the FlowPots.

Chlamydomonas or Arabidopsis FlowPots were grown side-by-side in gnotobiotic boxes, with six pots in total per box. This experiment was repeated in three independent biological replicates. After five weeks of growth, roots were harvested and cleaned thoroughly from attached soil using sterile water and forceps. The surface of Chlamydomonas pots was used as phycosphere samples (cells were harvested from visibly green surface areas, topsoil samples). In addition, to remove any possible background effect from carry-over soil particles, the surface-harvested samples were washed in sterile TE supplemented with 0.1% of Triton X-100 by manually shaking in 2-mL Eppendorf tubes. Then, the tubes rested for a few minutes and the supernatant was used as “cell fraction” samples. Finally, soil from unplanted pots was collected as soil samples and treated similarly to Chlamydomonas-inoculated pots for microbial community comparison. All phycosphere, root (comprising both the epiphytic, and endophytic compartments), and soil (soil from unplanted pots) samples were transferred to Lysing Matrix E tubes (MP Biomedicals, Solon, USA), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for further processing. DNA was isolated from those samples using the MP Biomedicals FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil, and from the input SynCom by alkaline lysis, and subjected to bacterial community profiling.

To ensure sufficient surface for phycosphere harvesting, we set up an additional experiment based on sterile peat without FlowPots. Experiments with the mixed SynCom of Cr- and At-SPHERE strains were conducted using sterile “TP750 + TPD750” plastic boxes (SacO2, Deinze, Belgium). Sterile soil and vermiculite were mixed in a 2:1 ratio and added to each box. Next, the boxes were inoculated by adding 95 mL of TP10 or ½ MS, for the Chlamydomonas or Arabidopsis boxes respectively, containing 2 × 107 bacterial cells.

Samples for chlorophyll extraction were collected from the different Chlamydomonas containing gnotobiotic systems by harvesting the green surface of the peat and extracting the cells as described above. Then, 1 mL of these extracts were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 1 min at 4 °C with 2.5 μl 2% (v/v) Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) to promote the aggregation into a pellet. Then, the supernatant was completely removed and the pellets stored at −80 °C until extraction.

Chlorophyll extraction from algae-containing samples

From each extracted cell sample from the gnotobiotic soil system, 1 mL was collected and mixed with 2.5 μL of 2% (v/v) Tween 20 in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. The samples were centrifuged for 1 min at 3,000 × g and 4 °C, then the supernatant was removed and the pellet stored at −80 °C. Frozen samples were thawed on ice for 2 min and 1 mL of HPLC grade methanol (Sigma, 34860-4L-R) was added to the pellets. The tubes were covered from the light using aluminum foil and mixed using the vortex for 1 min. After vortexing, the cells were incubated in the dark at 4 °C for 5 min. Next, the pigments were obtained by centrifuging the cells for 5 min at 3,000 × g and 4 °C and recovering the supernatant. The pigments absorbance at 652 and 665 nm was measured in a plate reader Infinite M200Pro using methanol as blank. The absorbance values were then substituted in the following equation Chl a + Chl b = 22.12 × Abs652 + 2.71 × Abs66567.

Split co-cultivation system

Co-cultivation devices were built by adapting 150 mL Stericup-GV filtration devices (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) harboring a 0.22 µm filter membrane68. Each co-cultivation device was assembled inside a clean hood 150 mL and 100 mL of TP10 were added into the big and small chamber of the filtration device, respectively. Chambers were inoculated at different cell concentrations depending on the content of the chamber (experiment H; Supplementary Fig 1h and Supplementary Table 1). The concentrations used were 105 and 107 cells/mL for Chlamydomonas and SynCom respectively. For the C + SC condition, the inoculum concentration was the same as for individual content chambers. After inoculation, the devices were transferred to a shaking platform and incubated under the same conditions used for Cr liquid cultures described above. Four samples per chamber were harvested for DNA extraction, fluorescence, and cell growth at the start of the incubation and 7 days after inoculation. These experiments were repeated in three independent biological replicates, containing one technical replicates each.

Additionally, a full-factorial replicate of the experiment (experiment H; Supplementary Fig. 1h and Supplementary Table 1) was carried out using a custom-made co-cultivation device (Cat. #0250 045 25, WLB Laborbedarf, Möckmühl, Germany). Briefly, two 250 mL borosilicate glass bottles were modified by adding on the sidewall of each bottle a glass neck with an NW25 flange. The flange holds a disposable 0.22 μm-pore PVDF Durapore filtration membrane (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and is kept in place by an adjustable metal clamp. In this device, each bottle holds 150 mL of TP10, and the initial cell concentrations were the same as the ones used in the previously described co-cultivation device. Similar to the Stericup system, four samples per chamber were harvested for DNA extraction. Chlorophyll fluorescence and cell growth measurements were collected at the start of the incubation and 7 days after inoculation. These experiments were repeated in three independent biological replicates, containing one technical replicates each.

Preparation of SynCom inocula

Bacterial cultures from the strains selected for the different SynComs (Supplementary Data 4) were started from glycerol stocks which were used to streak agar plates containing TSA 50% media. Plates were cultured at 25 °C for five days and later used to inoculate culture tubes with 1 mL of 50% TSB media. The tubes were incubated for six days at 25 °C and 180 RPM. After 6 days, the cultures were washed three times by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 5 min, the supernatant discarded, and the pellet resuspended into 2 mL of TP or TP10 media. The washed cultures were further incubated with shaking at 25 °C for an additional day. Bacterial concentration in washed cultures was determined by measuring OD600 and, subsequently pooled in equal ratios. Cell counts of the pooled SynCom were measured using the Multisizer 4e and adjusted to 106, to inoculate together with 104 cells of Cr (prepared as described above) in 50 mL of TP10 in 200-mL flasks. These flasks were inoculated in triplicate and three biological replicates were prepared for both bacteria and Cr start inocula. As controls, Cr-only cultures and SynCom-only cultures were incubated in parallel, and samples were taken at 0, 1, 4, 7 for community profiling, and at 0, 4, 7, 14 days for Cr cell counts.

Culture-independent bacterial 16S and 18S rRNA sequencing

DNA samples were used in a two-step PCR amplification protocol. In the first step, V2–V4 (341F: CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG; 806R: GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT), V4-V7 (799F: AACMGGATTAGATACCCKG; 1192R: ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC) of the bacterial 16S rRNA, or V9 (F1422: ATAACAGGTCTGTGATGCCC; R1797: TGATCCTTCTGCAGGTTCACCTAC) of the eukaryotic 18S rRNA were amplified. Under a sterile hood, each sample was amplified in triplicate in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 2 U DFS-Taq DNA polymerase, 1× incomplete buffer (Bioron GmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.3% BSA, 0.2 mM dNTPs (Life technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.3 μM forward and reverse primers. PCR was performed using the same parameters for all primer pairs (94 °C/2 min, 94 °C/30 s, 55 °C/30 s, 72 °C/30 s, 72 °C/10 min for 25 cycles). Afterwards, single-stranded DNA and proteins were digested by adding 1 μL of Antarctic phosphatase, 1 μL Exonuclease I, and 2.44 μL Antarctic Phosphatase buffer (New England BioLabs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) to 20 μl of the pooled PCR product. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and enzymes were deactivated at 85 °C for 15 min. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 3,000 × g and 3 μL of this reaction were used for a second PCR, prepared in the same way as described above using the same protocol but with cycles reduced to 10 and with primers including barcodes and Illumina adapters. PCR quality was controlled by loading 5 μL of each reaction on a 1% agarose gel and affirming that no band was detected within the negative control. A were loaded on a 1.5% agarose gel and run for 2 h at 80 V. Subsequently, bands with a size of 500 bp were cut out and purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentration was determined from fluorescently measurements, and 30 ng DNA of each of the barcoded amplicons were pooled in one library. The library was then purified and re-concentrated twice with Agencourt AMPure XP beads, and pooled in similar ratios for sequencing. Paired-end Illumina sequencing was performed in-house using the MiSeq sequencer and custom sequencing primers.

Analysis of culture-independent bacterial 16 S rRNA profiling

Amplicon sequencing data from Cr or At roots grown in CAS soil in the greenhouse, along with unplanted controls, were demultiplexed according to their barcode sequence using the QIIME pipeline69. Afterward, DADA270 (v1.16) was used to process the raw sequencing reads of each sample. Unique amplicon sequencing variants (ASVs) were inferred from error-corrected reads, followed by chimera filtering, also using the DADA2 pipeline. Next, ASVs were aligned to the SILVA database71 (v138) for a taxonomic assignment using the naïve Bayesian classifier implemented by DADA2. Raw reads were mapped to the inferred ASVs to generate an abundance table, which was subsequently employed for analyses of diversity and differential abundance using R (v4.0.3) and the R package vegan72(v2.5–6).

Amplicon sequencing reads from the Cr IPL and from the corresponding mesocosm culture-independent community profiling were quality-filtered and demultiplexed according to their two-barcode (well and plate) identifiers using custom scripts and a combination of tools included in the QIIME (v1.9.1) and USEARCH (v8.0.1517)73 pipelines. Next, sequences were clustered into OTUs with a 97% sequence identity similarity using the UPARSE algorithm, followed by identification of chimeras using UCHIME74,75. We performed this analysis at the OTU level to be able to directly compare with earlier data from42, where the A. thaliana culture collection was described. Samples from wells with fewer than 100 good quality reads were removed from the data set as well as OTUs were not found in a well with at least ten reads. Recovery rates (Supplementary Fig. 6a). were estimated by calculating the percentage of the top 100 most abundant OTUs found in natural communities (greenhouse experiment) that had at least one isolate in the culture collection (62%), and the total aggregated relative abundances of recovered OTUs (63%). We identified IPL samples matching OTUs found in the culture-independent root samples and selected a set of 185 representative strains maximizing taxonomic coverage for subsequent validation and whole-genome sequencing, forming the basis of the Cr-SPHERE collection.

Finally, to test whether the observed overlap between the At root and Cr phycosphere communities could be explained by a random process of recruitment from the same starting soil microbiota using the hypergeometric distribution. Briefly, we assumed that abundant members of the Cr phycosphere (141 ASVs) were randomly drawn from the starting soil community (3537 ASVs) and then tested whether the observed overlap (43 out of 120 ASVs) could be explained by chance.

Analysis of culture-independent eukaryotic 18S rRNA profiling

Amplicon sequencing data from soil surface samples collected at the start and end of the soil native algae community experiment (experiment B, Supplementary Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1) were demultiplexed according to their barcode sequence using the QIIME pipeline69 (v1.9.1). Afterward, DADA270 (v1.16) was used to process the raw sequencing reads of each sample. Unique ASVs were inferred from error-corrected reads, followed by chimera filtering, also using the DADA2 pipeline. Next, ASVs were aligned to the Protist Ribosomal Reference (PR2 v4.14.0) database76 for a taxonomic assignment using the ‘assign_taxonomy.py’ script from QIIME. Raw reads were mapped to the inferred ASVs to generate an abundance table, which was subsequently employed for analyses of diversity and differential abundance in R (v4.0.3) using the R package vegan72 (v2.5–6).

Meta-analysis of phycosphere and root microbiota profiles

For the meta-analysis of root microbiota samples across plant species, data from previous studies of Arabidopsis and Lotus grown in CAS soil7,43 (ENA accessions: PRJEB38663, and PRJEB34100, respectively) were processed using the pipeline described above and merged with samples obtained from the Cooloola natural site chronosequence11. Sequencing reads from this latter study (ENA accession: PRJNA328519; Roche 454) were quality filtered and trimmed after the removal of primer sequences. Given that these studies employed non-overlapping sequencing primers, all datasets were combined after aggregating relative abundances at the bacterial order taxonomic level. The core taxa of the root microbiota were determined by identifying bacterial orders present in every plant species with an occupancy of at least 80% (i.e., found in at least 80% of the root samples of a given species) with a relative abundance above 0.1%. To infer the phylogenetic relationship between the different hosts, protein sequences of the ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) gene for Cr and the 35 analyzed plant species were recovered from GenBank. The sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega77 (v1.2.0) with default parameters, and the alignment was used to infer a maximum likelihood phylogeny using FastTree78. (v2.1.3).

Analysis of culture-dependent amplicon sequencing data

Sequencing data from SynCom experiments was pre-processed similarly as natural community 16S rRNA data. Quality-filtered merged paired-end reads were then aligned to a reference set of sequences extracted from the whole-genome assemblies of every strain included in a given SynCom, using Rbec79 (v1.0.0). We then checked that the fraction of unmapped reads did not significantly differ between compartment, experiment, or host species. Next, we generated a count table that was employed for downstream analyses of diversity in R (v4.0.3) with the R package vegan (v2.5–6). Finally, we visualized amplicon data from all experimental systems using the ggplot2 R package80 (v3.3.2).

Genome assembly and annotation

Paired-end Illumina reads were first trimmed and quality-filtered using Trimmomatic81(v0.32). QC reads were assembled using the IDBA (v1.1.3) assembler82 within the A5 pipeline83 (v20160825). Assembly statistics and metadata from the assembled genomes can be found in Supplementary Data 3. Genome assemblies with either multi-modal k-mer and G + C content distributions or multiple cases of marker genes from diverse taxonomic groups were flagged as not originating from clonal cultures. Such assemblies were then processed using a metagenome binning approach84. Briefly, contigs from each of these samples were clustered using METABAT285 (v2.2.13) to obtain metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Each MAG was analyzed to assess completeness and contamination using CheckM86 (v1.1.2). Only bins with completeness scores larger than 75% and contamination rates lower than 5% were retained and added to the collection (Supplementary Data 3; designated MAG in the column “type”). Classification of the bacterial genomes into phylogroups was performed by calculating pair-wise average nucleotide identities using FastANI87 (v1.32) and clustering at a 97% similarity threshold. Functional annotation of the genomes was conducted using Prokka88 (v1.12-beta) with a custom database based on KEGG Orthologue (KO) groups50 downloaded from the KEGG FTP server in November 2019. Hits to sequences in the database were filtered using an E-value threshold of 10 × 10−9 and minimum coverage of 80% of the length of the query sequence.

Comparative genome analyses of the Cr-, At- and Lj-SPHERE culture collections

The genomes from the Cr-, At-, and Lj-SPHERE culture collections42,48 were queried for the presence of 31 conserved, single-copy marker genes, known as AMPHORA genes89. Next, sequences of each gene were aligned using Clustal Omega77 (v1.2.0) with default parameters. Using a concatenated alignment of each gene, we inferred a maximum likelihood phylogeny using FastTree78 (v2.1.3). This tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life web tool90. Finally, genomes from the three collections (Cr-SPHERE, At-SPHERE, and Lj-SPHERE) were clustered into phylogroups, roughly corresponding to a species designation91 using FastANI87 (v1.32) and a threshold of average nucleotide identity at the whole genome level of at least 97%. Functional comparison among the genomes from the Cr-, Lj-, and At-SPHERE collections were performed by comparing their annotations. KO groups were gathered from the genome annotations and aggregated into a single table. Lastly, functional distances between genomes based on Pearson correlations were used for principal coordinate analysis using the cmdscale function in R (v4.0.3).

Statistics and reproducibility

All experiments were performed with full factorial (biological and technical) replication. In each case, the number of samples (n), distributed across at least three independent biological replicates, is indicated in the corresponding figure captions. Whenever microbial abundances or plant growth parameters were compared, we used a two-sided, non-parametric Mann–Whitney test or, in the case of multiple comparisons, a Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by a Dunn’s post hoc. When appropriate, P values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method (α  =  0.05). Statistical tests on beta-diversity analyses were performed using a PERMANOVA test with 5000 random permutations. Whenever boxplots were used in figures, data were represented as median values (horizontal line), Q1 − 1.5× interquartile range (boxes), and Q3 + 1.5× interquartile range (whiskers).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Raw sequencing data have been deposited into the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the accession number PRJEB43117. Source data are also provided with this paper. In addition, sequencing data, intermediate results, and metadata tables can be downloaded as a bundle from the At-SPHERE website (http://www.at-sphere.com/cr.tar.gz). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The scripts used for the computational analyses described in this study are available at GitHub (http://www.github.com/garridoo/crsphere; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5767307) to ensure the replicability and reproducibility of these results.

References

  1. Xu, L. et al. Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4284–E4293 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Berens, M. L. et al. Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2364–2373 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simmons, T. et al. Drought drives spatial variation in the millet root microbiome. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 599 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Zélicourt, A. et al. Ethylene induced plant stress tolerance by Enterobacter sp. SA187 is mediated by 2‐keto‐4‐methylthiobutyric acid production. PLOS Genet. 14, e1007273 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Castrillo, G. et al. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 543, 513–518 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, J. et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harbort, C. J. et al. Root-secreted Coumarins and the microbiota interact to improve iron nutrition in Arabidopsis. Cell Host Microbe 28, 825–837.e6 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durán, P. et al. Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote arabidopsis survival. Cell 175, 973–983.e14 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrión, V. J. et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science 366, 606–612 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alcaraz, L. D. et al. Marchantia liverworts as a proxy to plants’ basal microbiomes. Sci. Rep. 8, 12712 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeoh, Y. K. et al. Evolutionary conservation of a core root microbiome across plant phyla along a tropical soil chronosequence. Nat. Commun. 8, 215 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beckers, B., Op De Beeck, M., Weyens, N., Boerjan, W. & Vangronsveld, J. Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees. Microbiome 5, 25 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cregger, M. A. et al. The Populus holobiont: dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome. Microbiome 6, 31 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bulgarelli, D. et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488, 91–95 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards, J. et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E911–E920 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlaeppi, K., Dombrowski, N., Oter, R. G., Ver Loren van Themaat, E. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Quantitative divergence of the bacterial root microbiota in Arabidopsis thaliana relatives. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 585–592 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bulgarelli, D. et al. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 17, 392–403 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zgadzaj, R. et al. Root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus drives the establishment of distinctive rhizosphere, root, and nodule bacterial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7996–E8005 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Walters, W. A. et al. Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7368–7373 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thiergart, T. et al. Root microbiota assembly and adaptive differentiation among European Arabidopsis populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 122–131 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delaux, P.-M. et al. Algal ancestor of land plants was preadapted for symbiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13390–13395 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knack, J. J. et al. Microbiomes of streptophyte algae and bryophytes suggest that a functional suite of microbiota fostered plant colonization of land. Int. J. Plant Sci. 176, 405–420 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, B.-H., Ramanan, R., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M. & Kim, H.-S. Role of Rhizobium, a plant growth promoting bacterium, in enhancing algal biomass through mutualistic interaction. Biomass Bioenergy 69, 95–105 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amin, S. A. et al. Interaction and signalling between a cosmopolitan phytoplankton and associated bacteria. Nature 522, 98–101 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seymour, J. R., Amin, S. A., Raina, J.-B. & Stocker, R. Zooming in on the phycosphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton–bacteria relationships. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17065 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cirri, E. & Pohnert, G. Algae−bacteria interactions that balance the planktonic microbiome. New Phytol. 223, 100–106 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moran, M. A. et al. Deciphering ocean carbon in a changing world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3143–3151 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wienhausen, G., Noriega-Ortega, B. E., Niggemann, J., Dittmar, T. & Simon, M. The exometabolome of two model strains of the roseobacter group: a marketplace of microbial metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1985 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fu, H., Uchimiya, M., Gore, J. & Moran, M. A. Ecological drivers of bacterial community assembly in synthetic phycospheres. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3656–3662 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Toyama, T. et al. Growth promotion of three microalgae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella vulgaris and Euglena gracilis, by in situ indigenous bacteria in wastewater effluent. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11, 176 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Amin, S. A. et al. Photolysis of iron-siderophore chelates promotes bacterial-algal mutualism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17071–17076 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Croft, M. T., Lawrence, A. D., Raux-Deery, E., Warren, M. J. & Smith, A. G. Algae acquire vitamin B12 through a symbiotic relationship with bacteria. Nature 438, 90–93 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grant, M. A. A., Kazamia, E., Cicuta, P. & Smith, A. G. Direct exchange of vitamin B12 is demonstrated by modelling the growth dynamics of algal–bacterial cocultures. ISME J. 8, 1418–1427 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paerl, R. W. et al. Use of plankton-derived vitamin B1 precursors, especially thiazole-related precursor, by key marine picoeukaryotic phytoplankton. ISME J. 11, 753–765 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Teplitski, M. et al. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii secretes compounds that mimic bacterial signals and interfere with quorum sensing regulation in bacteria. Plant Physiol. 134, 137–146 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wichard, T. et al. The green seaweed Ulva: a model system to study morphogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 72 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bell, W. & Mitchell, R. Chemotactic and growth responses of marine bacteria to algal extracellular products. Biol. Bull. 143, 265–277 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807–838 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Krohn-Molt, I. et al. Insights into microalga and bacteria interactions of selected phycosphere biofilms using metagenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic approaches. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1941 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shibl, A. A. et al. Diatom modulation of select bacteria through use of two unique secondary metabolites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 27445–27455 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bai, Y. et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528, 364–369 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Thiergart, T. et al. Lotus japonicus symbiosis genes impact microbial interactions between symbionts and multikingdom commensal communities. MBio 10, 1833–1852 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng, S. et al. Genomes of subaerial zygnematophyceae provide insights into land plant evolution. Cell 179, 1057–1067 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lebeis, S. L. et al. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa. Science. 349, 860–864 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Eida, A. A. et al. Desert plant bacteria reveal host influence and beneficial plant growth properties. PLoS ONE 13, e0208223 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Garrido-Oter, R. et al. Modular traits of the rhizobiales root microbiota and their evolutionary relationship with symbiotic rhizobia. Cell Host Microbe 24, 155–167.e5 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wippel, K. et al. Host preference and invasiveness of commensal bacteria in the Lotus and Arabidopsis root microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1150–1162 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, J. et al. High-throughput cultivation and identification of bacteria from the plant root microbiota. Nat. Protoc. 16, 988–1012 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kanehisa, M. et al. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D199–D205 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Horňák, K., Kasalický, V., Šimek, K. & Grossart, H.-P. Strain-specific consumption and transformation of alga-derived dissolved organic matter by members of the Limnohabitans -C and Polynucleobacter -B clusters of Betaproteobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 4519–4535 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sasso, S., Stibor, H., Mittag, M. & Grossman, A. R. From molecular manipulation of domesticated Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to survival in nature. Elife 7, e39233 (2018).

  53. Harris, E. H. The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook. (Academic Press, 2009).

  54. Yang, W. et al. Alternative acetate production pathways in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii during dark anoxia and the dominant role of chloroplasts in fermentative acetate production. Plant Cell 26, 4499–4518 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Suárez-Moreno, Z. R. et al. Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated burkholderia. Microb. Ecol. 63, 249–266 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Karasov, T. L. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana and pseudomonas pathogens exhibit stable associations over evolutionary timescales. Cell Host Microbe 24, 168–179.e4 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Timilsina, S. et al. Xanthomonas diversity, virulence and plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 415–427 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Demoling, F., Figueroa, D. & Bååth, E. Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2485–2495 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhalnina, K. et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 470–480 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Huang, A. C. et al. A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science 364, eaau6389 (2019).

  61. Smriga, S., Fernandez, V. I., Mitchell, J. G. & Stocker, R. Chemotaxis toward phytoplankton drives organic matter partitioning among marine bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1576–1581 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kropat, J. et al. A revised mineral nutrient supplement increases biomass and growth rate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 66, 770–780 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Broughton, W. J. & Dilworth, M. J. Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans. Biochem. J. 125, 1075–1080 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Baudoin, E., Benizri, E. & Guckert, A. Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 1183–1192 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Caesar, J. et al. Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts—methodology for determination of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll a + b as compared to previous methods. Biogeosciences 15, 1415–1424 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kremer, J. M. et al. Peat-based gnotobiotic plant growth systems for Arabidopsis microbiome research. Nat. Protoc. 16, 2450–2470 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Porra, R. J., Thompson, W. A. & Kriedemann, P. E. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 975, 384–394 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Alvarez, L., Aliashkevich, A., de Pedro, M. A. & Cava, F. Bacterial secretion of D-arginine controls environmental microbial biodiversity. ISME J. 12, 438–450 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-2. Community Ecology Package (2019).

  73. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Guillou, L. et al. The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D597–D604 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang, P., Spaepen, S., Bai, Y., Hacquard, S. & Garrido-Oter, R. Reference-based error correction of amplicon sequencing data from synthetic communities. ISME Commun. 1, 73 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wickham, H. ggplot2. (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4.

  81. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Peng, Y., Leung, H. C. M., Yiu, S. M. & Chin, F. Y. L. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28, 1420–1428 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tritt, A., Eisen, J. A., Facciotti, M. T. & Darling, A. E. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS ONE 7, e42304 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Pasolli, E. et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176, 649–662.e20 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5114 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Wu, M. & Eisen, J. A. A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference. Genome Biol. 9, R151 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W256–W259 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Olm, M. R. et al. Consistent metagenome-derived metrics verify and delineate bacterial species boundaries. mSystems 5, e00731–19 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Paul Schulze-Lefert for his support and advice throughout the duration of this project. We would also like to thank Dr. Stephane Hacquard, Dr. Thomas Nakano, Dr. Oliver Ebenhöh, and Dr. Andreas Weber for their critical comments on this manuscript. We thank Dr. Ralph Bock, Dr. Juliane Neupert, and Dr. Ru Zhang for their advice and assistance during the early stages of this research project. Finally, we thank Rozina Kardarakis for the grammatical and style corrections of the manuscript. This research was funded by the Max Planck Society and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—EXC-Nummer 2048/1—project 390686111, and the “2125 DECRyPT” Priority Program.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.D., J.F.-U., K.W., B.M., M.M., and R.G.-O. designed the experiments. P.D. and J.F.-U. conducted the greenhouse and soil native algae community experiments. P.D. and K.W. performed the mesocosm experiments. P.D., J.F.-U., and K.W. established the IPL bacterial library and characterized the Cr-SPHERE core culture collection. B.M. and M.M. isolated the environmental algal strains. P.D. conducted the experiment with the environmental algal strains. P.D. and J.F.-U. performed the synthetic community experiments. P.Z., J.F.-U., and R.G.-O. analyzed whole-genome sequencing data. P.D., J.F.-U., P.Z., R.G., and R.G.-O. analyzed the amplicon data. P.D., J.F.-U., K.W., B.M., M.M., and R.G.-O interpreted the results. P.D., J.F.-U., and R.G.-O wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Garrido-Oter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Sebastian Pfeilmeier, Alison Smith, and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durán, P., Flores-Uribe, J., Wippel, K. et al. Shared features and reciprocal complementation of the Chlamydomonas and Arabidopsis microbiota. Nat Commun 13, 406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28055-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28055-8

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing