Abstract
Twodimensional topological insulators, and in particular quantum Hall states, are characterized by an insulating bulk and a conducting edge. Fractional states may host both downstream (dictated by the magnetic field) and upstream propagating edge modes, which leads to complex transport behavior. Here, we combine two measurement techniques, local noise thermometry and thermal conductance, to study thermal properties of states with counterpropagating edge modes. We find that, while charge equilibration between counterpropagating edge modes is very fast, the equilibration of heat is extremely inefficient, leading to an almost ballistic heat transport over macroscopic distances. Moreover, we observe an emergent quantization of the heat conductance associated with a strong interaction fixed point of the edge modes. Such understanding of the thermal equilibration on edges with counterpropagating modes is a natural route towards extracting the topological order of the exotic 5/2 state.
Introduction
The quantum Hall effect (QHE) is perhaps the most studied twodimensional topological phenomenon. Whereas excitations in the sample bulk are localized, gapless excitations flow in onedimensional chiral modes along the edge^{1}. The integer quantum Hall effect—emerging from quantization of electron cyclotron orbits and an integer occupation of Landau levels—is well understood within a single electron picture. By contrast, the richer fractional quantum Hall effect arises from strong electron–electron interactions. Among fractional states, particularly peculiar are the holeconjugate states (at fillings \(\nu =\frac{p}{2p1},\) with integer \(p \, > \, 1,\) i.e., 2/3, 3/5, 4/7,…) since they host upstream propagating edge modes. Such modes have been observed for various filling factors and devices^{2,3,4,5}.
Topological properties of the bulk are reflected in the edge structure, allowing edgetransport coefficients to be quantized. In particular, with full charge equilibration (e.g., by impurity scattering) between counterpropagating modes, the twoterminal electrical conductance is given by \({G}_{2T}=\frac{{e}^{2}}{h}\nu\), where \({{{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}}\) is the filling factor. Likewise, for thermally equilibrated edges, the twoterminal heat conductance is quantized^{6,7} as \({G}_{2T}^{Q}={\kappa }_{2T}T={\nu }_{Q}{\kappa }_{0}T\), where \({\kappa }_{0}={\pi }^{2}\frac{{k}_{B}^{2}}{3h}\), with \({k}_{B}\) the Boltzmann constant, \(T\) the temperature, and \({\nu }_{Q}\) is an integer (or a fraction for nonAbelian states^{8}). Importantly, the value of \({\nu }_{Q}\) is an inherent property of the bulk topological order. Specifically, for Abelian states, \({\nu }_{Q}\) is given by the net number of edge modes, \({\nu }_{Q}={n}_{d}{n}_{u}\), with \({n}_{d}({n}_{u})\) being the number of downstream (upstream) modes. In holeconjugate states, \({\nu }_{Q}\) can be zero or negative, implying transport of heat in the direction opposite to the charge flow. In recent years, thermal conductance measurements were successfully performed in GaAs and in graphene^{9,10,11,12}, manifesting the quantization of thermal conductance for both integer and thermally equilibrated fractional states. Nonetheless, a detailed understanding of thermal equilibration on the edge is crucial for interpreting^{13,14,15,16,17} the recent observation^{11} of \({\kappa }_{2T}\approx 2.5{\kappa }_{0}\) at filling \(\nu =\frac{5}{2}\). As both the topological order and the extent of thermal equilibration are not known, two contradicting explanations were proposed: (i) full thermal equilibration^{11}, which implies \({\nu }_{Q}=2.5\), indicating a topological order known as the PHPfaffian, which is further supported by a recent experiment^{18}, (ii) partial thermal equilibration^{15} and \({\nu }_{Q}=1.5\), indicating the antiPfaffian order, which is supported by numerical simulations^{19,20}. Our present work paves the way towards the solution, by combining local thermometry with thermal conductance measurements to study thermal equilibration in Abelian fractional states, for which the topological order is known.
The interplay between topology and equilibration also determines the temperature profile along the edge. Consider an edge with two contacts attached at \(x=\;\)0 and \(x=L\), and upstream modes sourced at an elevated temperature \({T}_{u}\left(0\right)={T}_{m}\), while downstream modes emerge from a cold drain contact (for simplicity assumed to be at zero temperature: \({T}_{d}\left(L\right)=0\)). With efficient thermal equilibration (thermal equilibration length \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}\ll L\)), the temperature of the upstream modes after propagation, \({T}_{u}\left(L\right),\) is expected to be qualitatively different for three topologically distinct classes^{21} determined by the sign of \({\nu }_{Q}\): (i) for \({\nu }_{Q} \, > \, 0\) (e.g., in \(\nu =5/3\)), upstream modes lose energy propagating upstream and arrive cold at the drain up to exponential corrections: \({T}_{u}\left(L\right) \sim {T}_{m}{e}^{\frac{L}{{l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}}}\), (ii) for \({\nu }_{Q} \, < \, 0\, (\nu =3/5)\), the injected heat propagates ballistically to the drain up to exponential corrections: \({T}_{u}(L) \sim {T}_{m}({{{{{\rm{const}}}}}}+{e}^{\frac{L}{l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}})\), (iii) for \({\nu_{Q}}=0\) \((\nu =2/3)\), the thermal transport is diffusive rather than ballistic, resulting in \({T}_{u}\left(L\right) \sim {T}_{m}{(\frac{{l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}}{L})}^{\frac{1}{2}}\).
A competing process along the edge is energy dissipation (loss to the environment). Heat, unlike charge, can escape from edge modes to phonons, photons (due to stray capacitances), or neutral excitations in the bulk (localized states coupled by Coulomb interaction). These processes cause an exponential decay in the upstream temperature, \({T}_{u}\left(L\right)={T}_{m}{e}^{\frac{L}{{l}_{{{{{{\rm{dis}}}}}}}}}\), with \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{dis}}}}}}}\) a characteristic dissipation length. Such dissipation is a compelling explanation to recent observations of relaxation of heat flow in particlelike states (with \({n}_{u}=0\))^{22}. If the thermal equilibration is weak compared to the energy dissipation (\({l}_{{{{{{\rm{dis}}}}}}}\ll {l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}\)), energy backscattering is of no importance, and an exponentially decaying profile of \({T}_{u}\) is expected regardless of the state’s topology^{23}.
Results
Neutral mode thermometry
In order to measure the local temperature of upstream modes, we fabricated devices based on a highmobility twodimensional electron gas (2DEG), embedded in a GaAsAlGaAs heterostructure, with density \(8.2\times {10}^{10}\;{{{{{\mathrm{c{m}}}}}}}^{2}\) and mobility \(4.4\times {10}^{6}\;{{{{{\mathrm{c{m}}}}}}}^{2}{{{{{\mathrm{{V}}}}}}}^{1}{{{{{\mathrm{{s}}}}}}}^{1}\). Device A consists of three Ohmic contacts: source (S), an upstream located amplifier contact (A), and a ground contact (G) (see Fig. 1). The propagation length \(L\), between S and A, could be varied using three metallic gates, which, when negatively charged, force the edge modes to take a detour, thus elongating the propagation length. When bias is applied to the source, power is dissipated at the back of the contact, leading to a hotspot^{24} (depicted as a red fire) with an elevated temperature \({T}_{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}.\)
The temperature of the upstream modes reaching A was determined from current fluctuations measured in A. This upstream noise is a smokinggun signature of the presence of upstream modes^{3,4}, as studied theoretically recently^{21,25}. The noise is generated in a noise spot (depicted as a white bolt sign in Fig. 1), a region with size of the charge equilibration length outside A. The existence of this noise spot is a consequence of counterpropagating edge modes and efficient charge equilibration^{21,25}. The elevated temperature of upstream modes at the noise spot excites particlehole pairs. If a particle (or hole) is absorbed by the amplifier contact while the hole (or particle) flows downstream, recombination does not take place and current fluctuations are detected in contact A. Thus, the local temperature of the upstream modes \({T}_{u}\left(L\right)\) is encoded in the excess noise
where \({T}_{0}\) is the base temperature at A (we measured \({T}_{0}\) =11 mK at \(\nu =3/5\) and \({T}_{0}\) =14 mK at \(\nu =2/3\)). The proportionality factor in Eq. (1) can depend on microscopic details of the edge modes, but importantly, it does not depend on \(L\) (see Methods).
The measured noise is plotted in Fig. 2 at \(\nu =\frac{2}{3},\frac{3}{5},1+\frac{2}{3},1+\frac{3}{5}\), for \(L\) in the range \(30210\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\). In Fig. 2a, the excess upstream noise is plotted as function of the voltage bias \(V\) for three different \(L\). Figure 2b displays the noise measured at the fixed voltage \(13\;\mu V,\) plotted as a function of \(L\) for several states from distinct topological classes: at \(\nu =\frac{3}{5},{\nu }_{Q} \, < \, 0\); at \(\nu =\frac{2}{3},1+\frac{3}{5},\) \({\nu }_{Q}=0\); and at \(\nu =1+\frac{2}{3}\), \({\nu }_{Q} \, > \, 0\). Remarkably, we find that all noise profiles are similar. The noise strength vs \(L\) fits nicely to a decaying exponent with a characteristic decay length of \(200\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\). This suggests an unequilibrated regime: \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}} \, > \, {l}_{{{{{{\rm{dis}}}}}}}\approx 200\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\).
Twoterminal thermal conductance
Next, we studied the thermal conductance, which supplements the upstream thermometry, as it is sensitive only to the heat returning to the source contact (and not to dissipation). We used two devices, B1 and B2, where a floating Ohmic contact was employed as the heat source (Fig. 3a). The floating contact, with area of a few tens of \({{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}^{2}\), was connected to three separate arms of 2DEG. Simultaneously sourcing currents \(+I\) and \(I\) from contacts \({S}_{1}\) and \({S}_{2}\), respectively, leads to a dissipation of power \(P={I}^{2}/{G}_{2T}\) in the Ohmic contact, while its potential remains zero. Upstream and downstream noise was measured (Fig. 3b) at contacts (depicted as amp DS and amp US) located in the upstream and downstream direction. Similar to device A, the length between the Ohmic contact and the upstream amplifier contact could be varied. Devices B1 and B2 were designed for short \((1585\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}})\) and long (\(35315\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\)) upstream distances \(L\), respectively.
The downstream current fluctuations further allow extraction of the Ohmic contact temperature \({T}_{m}\) (the downstream noise, unlike the upstream noise, is independent of the local temperature of upstream modes at the downstream amplifier), which in turn determines the thermal conductance via a heat balance equation (see Methods). The normalized thermal conductance vs \(L\) is plotted in Fig. 3c. Remarkably, the thermal conductance is lengthindependent for both \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}\) up to lengths of \(315\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\). On the other hand, the upstreamnoise decays by as much as 85% compared to the shortest length.
All measurements point to a lack of thermal equilibration, and instead to dissipationdominated heat transport. As shown in Figs. 2b and 3c, the upstreamnoise decays exponentially with \(L\) independently of \(\nu\). If the edges were equilibrated, one would expect distinct behavior of upstream noise depending on the topological class due to different heat transport characteristics. Hence, the upstreamnoise data show that the thermal equilibration in the edge is not operative, and the noise decay is due to dissipation of energy to the environment. This is further supported by the lengthindependent thermal conductance at \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\), which is incompatible with diffusive transport in the thermally equilibrated regime. Note that dissipation does not affect the thermal conductance in our measurement scheme since the dissipated heat does not return back to the Ohmic contact^{13}.
Quantitative analysis of the thermal conductance and upstream noise
In the unequilibrated regime, the classical JohnsonNyquist (JN) formula, used in similar experiments^{10,11,12,26} should be corrected due to the mismatch between the upstream and downstream modes’ temperature. The strength of the current fluctuations propagating downstream from a reservoir heated to a temperature \({T}_{m}\) is generally given by
where \(\alpha\) is a prefactor that depends on microscopic details of the edge modes. The classical JN noise is restored (\(\alpha =1\)) for a thermally equilibrated state with \({n}_{d}\ge {n}_{u}\), and in particular for any integer or particlelike fractional state (where \({n}_{u}=0\)). For unequilibrated \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}\) edges we find \(\alpha =\frac{3}{4}\) and \(\alpha =\frac{7}{10}\), respectively (see Methods).
At this point we can quantitively determine the thermal conductance. We plot the power \(P\) dissipated at the Ohmic contact vs \({T}_{m}^{2}{T}_{0}^{2}\). A linear fit to the energybalance equation \(P=\frac{{I}^{2}}{{G}_{2T}}=3\frac{{\kappa }_{2T}}{2}({T}_{m}^{2}{T}_{0}^{2})\) yields \({\kappa }_{2T}\) (see Methods). Note that \({\kappa }_{2T}\) determines the twoterminal thermal conductance of each individual arm, assuming that each arm contributes equally (which is the case in the absence of equilibration). For three integer states \(\nu ={{{{\mathrm{1,2,3}}}}}\), the extracted thermal conductance agrees well with the expected values \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}={n}_{d}\) (see Supplementary Note 3). Here, the absence of upstream modes in these states makes thermal equilibration irrelevant. For the holeconjugate states \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}\), we find \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=1.00\pm 0.03\,{{{{{\rm{and}}}}}\,}{\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=1.45\pm 0.03\), respectively (see Fig. 4a). For completeness, we point out that if one derives \({T}_{m}\) with the classical JN formula (\(\alpha =1\))^{10,11,12,26}, a significantly higher thermal conductance value is obtained: \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=1.5\) and \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=2.5\) for \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}\), respectively.
How can we understand the measured values of \({\kappa }_{2T}\)? As shown in ref. ^{27} for \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) (see Supplementary Note 11 for derivation and generalization to \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}\)), an emerging quantization of \({\kappa }_{2T}\) is expected as
in an intermediate transport regime \({L}_{T}\ll L\ll {l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}\), where \({L}_{T}\) is the thermal length. The first term in Eq. (3) is the expected value in the absence of the thermal equilibration, but it is lowered by the parameter \({2\kappa }_{12}/{\kappa }_{0}\) due to backscattering of plasmon modes at boundaries between contacts and the edge. Generally, \({\kappa }_{12}\) depends on interactions on the edge. When the system is close to a lowenergy fixed point^{28,29,30} at which a charge mode is decoupled from neutral modes, we find \({\kappa }_{12}/{\kappa }_{0}=2(1\nu )/(2\nu )\). Then, \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=1\) for \(\nu =2/3\) with \({n}_{u}=1,{n}_{d}=1\), and \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=13/7\) for \(\nu =3/5\) with \({n}_{u}=2,{n}_{d}=1.\) For \(\nu =2/3\), our measured value agrees very well with the prediction^{27} \({\kappa }_{2T}/{\kappa }_{0}=1\). For \(\nu =3/5\), the measured value is slightly lower than \(13/7\), which might be related to a deviation of the system from the infrared fixed point. Interestingly, for \(\nu =2/3\), it was recently calculated that at the fixed point, the thermal equilibration length diverges^{26}.
We turn now to a quantitative analysis of the upstream noise. With vanishing thermal equilibration, we can write:
with \({T}_{u}(L)\) replaced by \({T}_{m}\) in comparison to Eq. (1). We denote the proportionality constant, \({f}_{T}\) as the thermal Fano factor. In Fig. 4b we plot the measured upstream excess noise as a function of \(\Delta T\) for different lengths. All curves are linearly proportional to \(\Delta T\), in agreement with Eq. (4). When \(L\) decreases (and thus dissipation becomes less important), \({f}_{T}\) increases, but even at the shortest available length of \(15\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\) it is \(\sim\)2 times smaller than predicted by our microscopic calculations (Supplementary Note 9). The reason for this discrepancy remains to be understood.
Discussion
In summary, we demonstrated that counterpropagating modes efficiently exchange charge, but not energy. While we estimate the charge equilibration length to be shorter than \(5\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\) (see Methods), our observations set a lower bound on the thermal equilibration length \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}} \, > \, {l}_{{{{{{\rm{dis}}}}}}}\approx 200\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\). These observations seem to agree (at least qualitatively) with recent measurements in short (edge length \(\approx 5\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\)) graphene samples^{26}, but disagree with previous measurements in GaAs^{10}. We believe that the difference in equilibration efficiency between our finding and those reported in ref. ^{10} is due to microscopic differences between the measured devices. Such apparently important details include disorder, edge mode velocities, and intermode interaction. More research is required in order to fully understand the effect of such details. We also note that for copropagating integer modes, the thermal equilibration has been reported to be much faster than charge equilibration^{31}. Our observation of a thermally nonequilibrated transport regime for edges with counterpropagating modes provides important insights into the physics of holeconjugate states.
Methods
Sample preparation
The Ohmic contacts and gates were patterned using standard ebeam lithographyliftoff techniques. The Ohmic contact consists of Ni (7 nm), Au(200 nm), Ge(100 nm), Ni (75 nm), Au(150 nm) alloyed at \(440^\circ C\) for 50 seconds. To minimize straininduced reflection from the gates, the surface was covered by 7 nm \({{{{{\rm{Hf}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}}_{2}\) deposited at \(200^\circ C\). After deposition, we etched the \({{{{{\rm{Hf}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}}_{2}\), (except under the gates) using buffered oxide etch. The gate electrode consists of 5 nm Ti and 15 nm Au.
Extraction of \({T_{m}}\) from downstream noise
The excess downstream noise \({{S}_{{{{{{\mathrm{excess}}}}}}}^{{{{{\mathrm{D}}}}}}}\) in the threearm devices B1 and B2 (Fig. 3a) is given by
where the numerical factors come from the devices’ geometry (see Supplementary Note 6 for details). Here, \(\overline{{({\Delta} {I}_{m})}^{2}}\) is the noise from the current fluctuations emanating from the central floating contact and are thus related to the temperature \({T}_{m}\) of the central contact, while \({S}_{{{{{{\rm{excess}}}}}}}^{{S}_{1}}\) and \({S}_{{{{{{\rm{excess}}}}}}}^{{S}_{2}}\) are the excess noises generated at noise spots (Supplementary Fig. 6) near sources \({S}_{1}\) and \({S}_{2}\). Since \({S}_{{{{{{\rm{excess}}}}}}}^{{S}_{1}}\) and \({S}_{{{{{{\rm{excess}}}}}}}^{{S}_{2}}\) are analogous to the upstream noise, they can be taken into account by using measurements of \({S}_{{{{{{\rm{excess}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{U}}}}}}}\) at upstream distances 30 \({{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\) (corresponding to the distance between \({S}_{1}\) and the central contact) and 150 \({{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\) (the distance between \({S}_{2}\) and the central contact), respectively.
The generated noise \(\overline{{({\Delta} {I}_{m})}^{2}}\) on an edge segment is generally given by^{21}
where \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}^{C}\) is the charge equilibration length and \({\nu }_{+}\)(\({\nu }_{}\)) is the total filling factor of the downstream (upstream) modes (e.g., \({\nu }_{+}=1\), \({\nu }_{}=1/3\) for \(\nu =2/3\) and \({\nu }_{+}=1\), \({\nu }_{}=2/5\) for \(\nu =3/5\)). The noise \(\overline{{({\Delta} {I}_{m})}^{2}}\) is the local noise generated by interchannel electron tunneling, which is encoded in the noise kernel \(\Lambda \left(x\right)\). Assuming absence of thermal equilibration, \(\Lambda \left(x\right)\) becomes independent of position \(x\) [i.e., \(\Lambda \left(x\right)={\Lambda }_{0}({T}_{m},{T}_{0})\)], and thus Eq. (M2) is simplified as
The simplified noise kernel \({\Lambda }_{0}({T}_{m},{T}_{0})\) can be computed within a microscopic model (see Supplementary Note 7 for details). Specifically, we divide the edge segment into three regions: the left contact region, a central region, and the right contact region. The interchannel interaction is taken to change sharply from zero in the contact regions to a finite value in the central region. The left and right contacts are taken at different temperatures \({T}_{m}\) and \({T}_{0}\), respectively. Within this model, we derive the formula \({\Lambda }_{0}\left({T}_{m},{T}_{0}\right)\simeq 2{T}_{0}+0.5({T}_{m}{T}_{0})\), assuming strong interactions. The downstream excess noise \({S}_{{{{{{\rm{excess}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{D}}}}}}}\) then reads
Comparing to Eq. (2) and identifying \({S}_{{JN}}=\overline{{({\Delta} {I}_{m})}^{2}}2{k}_{B}{G}_{2T}{T}_{0}\), we find \(\alpha =\frac{4{\nu }_{+}3{\nu }_{}}{4{\nu }_{+}}\). The central Ohmic contact temperature \({T}_{m}\) can be extracted from Eq. (M4). Ultimately, \({T}_{m}\) is used for the determination of both the thermal conductance \({\kappa }_{2T}\) and in plotting the upstream noise vs \({{\Delta} T=T}_{m}{T}_{0}\).
Extraction of \(\kappa_{2T}\)
The thermal conductance \({\kappa }_{2T}\) is obtained from the heat balance equation
which, in the steady state, equates the dissipated power and the emanating heat currents in the central contact. Here, we neglected all other mechanisms evacuating heat from the contact. The major correction to Eq, (M5) comes from the lattice phonons, which at low temperatures evacuate power proportional to \({T}_{m}^{5}\)^{32}. Radiative losses are completely negligible. In our device, the phonon contribution becomes important only at \({T}_{m} \sim 30{mK}\). Thus we fitted our data only up to \(25{mK}\), where Eq. (M5) holds well. Moreover, we assume that all injected electrical power is dissipated in the central contact and raises its temperature (see Supplementary Note 10 for more details). The temperature \({T}_{m}\) in Eq. (M5) is extracted from downstream noise, Eq. (M4) as described above.
Upstreamnoise theory
With the same model as for the downstream noise, the upstream excess noise is computed as
The derivation of Eq. (M6) is given in the Supplementary Notes 7,9. In comparison to Eq. (4), we have \({f}_{T}=\frac{3}{4}\frac{{\nu }_{}}{{\nu }_{+}}.\) Eq. (M6) is used for the theoretical plots in Fig. 4b.
Estimation of charge equilibration length
A slightly unequilibrated charge conductance was reported at \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) for very short edge distances^{33}. In order to test the equilibration of charge we sourced from \({S}_{1}\) AC voltage at the resonance frequency of the upstream amplifier (not DC current like the main measurements) and measured the voltage in the upstream amplifier. Given the sourced voltage \({V}_{s}\), we find by using the standard LandauerBüttiker formalism,
where \({G}_{U}\left(L\right)\) is the upstream conductance from the floating Ohmic contact to the upstream amplifier (the factor of \(3\) comes from the three arms of the B1 and B2 devices). In deriving Eq. (M7), we assumed \({G}_{U}\ll {G}_{2T}\). We see (Supplementary Fig. 5) that only at \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \(\nu = \frac{3}{5}\), and only when the propagation length is short, one would observe a finite \({G}_{U},\) which would indicate a not fully charge equilibrated edge. At the shortest available length \(L=15\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\), we found \(\frac{{G}_{U}}{{G}_{2T}}=7\times {10}^{3}\) for \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \(\frac{{G}_{U}}{{G}_{2T}}=3\times {10}^{4}\) for \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}\) . To rule out the possibility that the upstream current is a result of bulk currents due to finite longitudinal conductance, we repeated the measurement at a higher temperature. We observed that \({G}_{U}\) decreases at \(21{mK}\), as apparently the charge equilibration is faster. This behavior is inconsistent with bulk currents, since the longitudinal conductance is expected to increase with temperature. In a simple model for charge equilibration, we can write
where \({G}_{U,0}=\frac{{e}^{2}}{h}{\nu }_{}\) is the zero length upstream conductance. From our data, we find \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}^{C}\approx 4\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\) for \(\nu =\frac{2}{3}\) and \({l}_{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}^{C}\approx 2\;{{{{{\rm{\mu}}}}}} {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}\) for \(\nu =\frac{3}{5}.\) This charge equilibration length stands in sharp contrast to our observed thermal equilibration lengths, which are two orders of magnitude larger.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Wen, X.G. Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states. Adv. Phys. 44, 405–473 (1995).
Bid, A. et al. Observation of neutral modes in the fractional quantum Hall regime. Nature 466, 585–590 (2010).
Gross, Y., Dolev, M., Heiblum, M., Umansky, V. & Mahalu, D. Upstream neutral modes in the fractional quantum Hall effect regime: heat waves or coherent dipoles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 226801 (2012).
Dolev, M. et al. Characterizing neutral modes of fractional states in the second Landau level. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036805 (2011).
Venkatachalam, V., Hart, S., Pfeiffer, L., West, K. & Yacoby, A. Local thermometry of neutral modes on the quantum Hall edge. Nat. Phys. 8, 676–681 (2012).
Kane, C. L. & Fisher, M. P. A. Quantized thermal transport in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832–15837 (1997).
Cappelli, A., Huerta, M. & Zemba, G. R. Thermal transport in chiral conformal theories and hierarchical quantum Hall states. Nucl. Phys. B 636, 568–582 (2002).
Read, N. & Green, D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and timereversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267–10297 (2000).
Jezouin, S. et al. Quantum limit of heat flow across a single electronic channel. Science 342, 601–604 (2013).
Banerjee, M. et al. Observed quantization of anyonic heat flow. Nature 545, 75–79 (2017).
Banerjee, M. et al. Observation of halfinteger thermal Hall conductance. Nature 559, 205–210 (2018).
Srivastav, S. K. et al. Universal quantized thermal conductance in graphene. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5798 (2019).
Ma, K. K. W. & Feldman, D. E. Partial equilibration of integer and fractional edge channels in the thermal quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 99, 085309 (2019).
Ma, K. K. W. & Feldman, D. E. Thermal equilibration on the edges of topological liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 016801 (2020).
Simon, S. H. & Rosenow, B. Partial equilibration of the antiPfaffian edge due to Majorana disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 126801 (2020).
Park, J., Spånslätt, C., Gefen, Y. & Mirlin, A. D. Noise on the nonAbelian ν = 5/2 fractional quantum Hall edge. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 157702 (2020).
Asasi, H. & Mulligan, M. Partial equilibration of antiPfaffian edge modes at ν = 5/2. Phys. Rev. B 102, 205104 (2020).
Dutta, B. et al. Distinguishing between nonabelian topological orders in a Quantum Hall system. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg6116 (2021).
Zaletel, M. P., Mong, R. S. K., Pollmann, F. & Rezayi, E. H. Infinite density matrix renormalization group for multicomponent quantum Hall systems. Phys. Rev. B 91, 045115 (2015).
Rezayi, E. H. Landau level mixing and the ground state of the ν = 5/2 quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 026801 (2017).
Spånslätt, C., Park, J., Gefen, Y. & Mirlin, A. D. Topological classification of shot noise on fractional quantum Hall edges. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 137701 (2019).
Rosenblatt, A. et al. Energy relaxation in edge modes in the quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 256803 (2020).
AharonSteinberg, A., Oreg, Y. & Stern, A. Phenomenological theory of heat transport in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 99, 041302 (2019).
Klaß, U., Dietsche, W., Klitzing, K. & Ploog, K. Imaging of the dissipation in quantumHalleffect experiments. Zeitschrift fur Physik B Condens. Matter 82, 351–354 (1991).
Park, J., Mirlin, A. D., Rosenow, B. & Gefen, Y. Noise on complex quantum Hall edges: chiral anomaly and heat diffusion. Phys. Rev. B 99, 161302 (2019).
Srivastav, S. K. et al. Vanishing thermal equilibration for holeconjugate fractional quantum Hall states in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216803 (2021).
Protopopov, I. V., Gefen, Y. & Mirlin, A. D. Transport in a disordered ν=2∕3 fractional quantum Hall junction. Ann. Phys. 385, 287–327 (2017).
Kane, C. L., Fisher, M. P. A. & Polchinski, J. Randomness at the edge: theory of quantum Hall transport at filling ν = 2/3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4129–4132 (1994).
Kane, C. L. & Fisher, M. P. A. Impurity scattering and transport of fractional quantum Hall edge states. Phys. Rev. B 51, 13449–13466 (1995).
Moore, J. E. & Wen, X.G. Classification of disordered phases of quantum Hall edge states. Phys. Rev. B 57, 10138–10156 (1998).
le Sueur, H. et al. Energy relaxation in the integer quantum Hall regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 056803 (2010).
Wellstood, F. C., Urbina, C. & Clarke, J. Hotelectron effects in metals. Phys. Rev. B 49, 5942–5955 (1994).
Lafont, F., Rosenblatt, A., Heiblum, M. & Umansky, V. Counterpropagating charge transport in the quantum Hall effect regime. Science 363, 54–57 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Heiblum for his essential guidance and support throughout this project. We also thank Y. Gefen for many stimulating discussions in the course of this work. We acknowledge the help of Diana Mahalu with ebeam lithography. We acknowledge illuminating discussions with K. Snizhko. C.S. acknowledges funding from the Excellence Initiative Nano at Chalmers University of Technology. J.P. acknowledges funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Projektnummer 277101999—TRR 183 (project A01). C.S. and A.D.M. acknowledge support by DFG Grants No. MI 658/101 and MI 658/102, and by the GermanIsraeli Foundation Grant No. I1505303.10/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.A.M. and B.D. fabricated the devices and performed the measurements. R.A.M. analyzed the data with inputs from B.D., C.S., J.P., and A.D.M. C.S., J.P., and A.D.M. developed the theoretical model. V.U. grew the GaAs heterostructures. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Melcer, R.A., Dutta, B., Spånslätt, C. et al. Absent thermal equilibration on fractional quantum Hall edges over macroscopic scale. Nat Commun 13, 376 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467022280090
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467022280090
This article is cited by

Direct determination of the topological thermal conductance via local power measurement
Nature Physics (2023)

Determination of topological edge quantum numbers of fractional quantum Hall phases by thermal conductance measurements
Nature Communications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.