Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A general fruit acid chelation route for eco-friendly and ambient 3D printing of metals


Recent advances in metal additive manufacturing (AM) have provided new opportunities for prompt designs of prototypes and facile personalization of products befitting the fourth industrial revolution. In this regard, its feasibility of becoming a green technology, which is not an inherent aspect of AM, is gaining more interests. A particular interest in adapting and understanding of eco-friendly ingredients can set its important groundworks. Here, we demonstrate a water-based solid-phase binding agent suitable for binder jetting 3D printing of metals. Sodium salts of common fruit acid chelators form stable metal-chelate bridges between metal particles, enabling elaborate 3D printing of metals with improved strengths. Even further reductions in the porosity between the metal particles are possible through post-treatments. A compatibility of this chelation chemistry with variety of metals is also demonstrated. The proposed mechanism for metal 3D printing can open up new avenues for consumer-level personalized 3D printing of metals.


Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, is one of the most important technologies in the fourth industrial revolution because it can enable the personalization of products and rapid prototyping. In an attempt to expand the boundaries of AM, numerous researchers have focused on developing printable materials1,2,3 and corresponding techniques for 3D printing4,5,6,7. Consequently developed advanced and sophisticated printable materials and 3D printing techniques have accelerated the utilization of AM in various industries, such as aerospace8,9, biomedicine10,11,12, and the food industry13,14. Research on metal AM that can facilitate its application to various industrial fields has also been actively conducted15,16,17,18. However, unlike polymer AM, metal AM still has applicability only at the industrial and academic scales because of the demanding conditions of the printing environment, which hinder realization of consumer-level desktop applications. Selective laser melting and electron beam melting have been proposed as breakthrough technologies19,20,21, but printing processes requiring high-power energy sources, inert gas atmospheres, and high-temperature preheating have limited their application range22.

Binder jetting metal 3D printing (BJM3DP) is a promising AM technique that selectively jets a liquid binding agent onto metal powder, which results in bond formation between particles23,24,25. The technological challenges for the commercial adaptation of BJM3DP still involve overcoming demanding conditions of metal AM processes including materials handling, post-treatments, and quality control. However, BJM3DP has particular advantages over other metal 3DPs, stemming from its high feasibility toward operationally low-cost, simple, and safe 3DP processes26. The ambient conditions of initial printing process27,28,29,30, as well as the possible use of commercially available ink cartridges constitute high accessibility to this technology than others, which can potentially facilitate consumer-level desktop applications. Moreover, as a groundwork for BJM3DP to become a more accessible green technology adequate for both industrial and personalized uses such as rapid prototyping, one of the important aspects to be explored is adapting and understanding of environmentally friendly ingredients including binder materials. The two most commonly used hazardous binding agents, 2-butoxyethanol-based solution and 2-pyrrolidone-based solution, have been specifically considered to be responsible for such issues31,32. Additionally, the recently developed metal-organic dispersion ink composed of cupric formate and octylamine has also been found to have an adverse environmental impact33,34. In the field of ceramic BJ3DPs, especially for biomedical applications, there already are various investigations regarding the use of non-hazardous binder materials such as green-solvent-soluble polymers, maltodextrin, sugar, and corn starch35,36,37. However, only a few candidates for metal BJ3DP have been explored so far, and the reported characteristics of printed objects such as the porosity and mechanical strengths are far below the ones based on the aforementioned common binder materials38. Therefore, it is now imperative to broaden the technological horizon thorough developing new green binding agents for metals that can be eco-friendly as well as non-hazardous24,39,40,41, with prospects of simultaneously achieving the desired properties of printed objects.

Here, we introduce a binding mechanism for BJ3MDP that is based on the use of a chelator composed of salts of naturally available fruit acids as an eco-friendly binding agent. Metal-chelate bridges between metal particles are successfully formed via ink-jetting of water onto a powder composed of a uniform mixture of the metal particles and chelator. This metal-organic complexing mechanism is thoroughly analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Then, compression tests are performed on the metal 3D-printed object to confirm the dependence of its mechanical strength on the type of chelator. Subsequently, the mechanical strength is further improved by post-treatments as well as optimizing the distribution of particle sizes and compositions. Finally, objects of various shapes are printed using various metals, which demonstrates that the proposed chelator-assisted BJM3DP technique is not only useful for the realization of complex and sophisticated architectures but also applicable to a wide range of metal powders. The environmentally friendly chelator presented herein is expected to promote greener metal 3D printers adequate for both industrial and consumer-level scale applications.


Eco-friendly BJM3DP

Figure 1a shows the 3D scheme of the BJM3DP system, which has four main components: an inkjet cartridge, powder gantry boxes, a roller, and x- and y-axes stages. Prior to the 3D printing process, the powder and inkjet cartridge were prepared as follows (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for photographic images of each component). First, the metal powder was mixed with the chelator. Here, the nozzle clogging issue from the precipitation of binding agents inside inkjet cartridge was avoided since the chelator functions as a solid-phase binding agent pre-mixed with metal particles, which also is one of the commonly adopted approaches in biomedical fields35,36,37,42. Next, two gantry boxes were filled with the mixture of the metal powder and chelator; for the purpose of this work, Al powder was utilized. Each of these gantry boxes has a different purpose. One is the builder gantry box in which objects are 3D-printed, and the other is the feeder gantry box that stores and supplies the powder to the builder gantry box. Then, the inkjet cartridge was filled with deionized (DI) water, which activated the chelation reaction. After the preparation process, the printing cycle was initiated through the deposition of a powder layer on top of the builder gantry box. During the printing process, the builder platform moved one step downward to provide space for one powder layer and the feeder platform simultaneously moved one step upward to push up the powder. Then, the roller module positioned at the feeder gantry box moved toward the builder gantry box to supply powder and flatten powder protruding on top of the latter box, as shown in Fig. 1b. Once a powder layer was deposited, the module returned to its original position. Subsequently, DI water was jetted from the inkjet cartridge onto the powder layer deposited on top of the builder gantry box at programmed positions (Fig. 1c). This cyclic process was repeated until the uppermost layer of the designed 3D object was deposited. Upon completion of the printing cycle, the 3D-printed object was removed from the pile of metal powder and the unchelated powder was subsequently removed through air blowing. Photographic images of the overall metal 3D printing process are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. As a safety disclaimer, the Al powder is classified with ST3 explosive ratings, which can pose a potential danger for Al powder-based systems. Furthermore, a plausible reaction between water and Al could also generate combustible hydrogen during the process, thus a proper ventilation and an equipment of hydrogen detectors are required for the safe operation. In our experimental system (capable of jetting 250 ml of water over 6 h), 193 ppm/hour of hydrogen generation was observed, which would indeed pose danger over 200 h of continuous printing in a completely closed system by reaching the lower explosive limit of the hydrogen (41,000 ppm)43.

Fig. 1: Eco-friendly BJM3DP.
figure 1

a Schematic illustration of BJM3DP system. b Powder layer deposition on builder gantry box. c Programmed water ink-jetting onto powder layer. d Chemical structures of naturally available eco-friendly fruit acid (top) and its sodium salt (bottom). e Schematic description of as-prepared mixture of metal powder and chelator (left) and metal-chelate bridge formation after metal chelation (right). f Chemical structure of metal-chelate bridges on metal particle surface. g Photographic image of 3D-printed ammonite-shell-shaped object (scale bar: 10 mm).

As binding agents, nature-based chelators, which are crucial to ensure eco-friendliness of metal 3D printing, were used. Unlike polymer binding agents, which are hazardous, the chelators utilized here are food-grade organic materials because they are salts of nature-based fruit acids (e.g., of fruits such as lemons, cherries, and grapes)44. For example, citric acid derived from citrus fruits has three carboxyl groups, and it transforms into sodium citrate upon replacement of the hydrogens in these groups with sodium ions through a salt-formation reaction (Fig. 1d)45. Here, the carboxyl group of sodium citrate plays an important role in the metal chelation reaction. Upon wetting of the uniform mixture of the metal powder and chelator (Fig. 1e), metal chelation occurs on the surface of the metal particles, which induces the formation of metal-chelate bridges between the particles. Figure 1f and Supplementary Fig. 3 show the chemical structure of metal-chelate bridges formed on metal particle surface and the change in the microstructure of Al powder. Successful chelation imparts structural integrity to the 3D-printed object and its architecture is consequently maintained, as a result of which the object has a precise and sophisticated shape, as shown in Fig. 1g.

Formation of metal-chelate bridges between metal particles

Figure 2a shows the mechanism of chelate complex formation between Al particles and the underlying chemical reaction. When water droplets are jetted onto Al powder, water permeates between the particles and gradually dissolves the chelator. Then, the ionized chelator solution preferentially attacks intrinsic defects in the Al particles, consequently producing Al-chelate compounds, which results in the bridging of the Al particles. Figure 2b shows FT-IR spectra of Al objects printed using the following proposed chelators: sodium salts of citrate (NaCit), tartrate (NaTar), succinate (NaSuc), and ascorbate (NaAsc). These four chelators have three, two, two, and one coordinate donor sites, respectively, and the difference in the number of coordination sites affects the formation of metal-chelate bridges. In the spectra of the carboxyl-based chelators (NaCit, NaTar, and NaSuc), two major bands, which originate from the asymmetric stretching vibration (νas(COO)) and symmetric stretching vibration (νs(COO)) of the carboxylate group (COO), are present in the frequency ranges of 1540–1720 cm−1 and 1320–1470 cm−1, respectively46. In the spectra of NaCit, νas(COO) at 1592 cm−1 and νs(COO) at 1393 cm−1 are blue-shifted by 4 cm−1 and red-shifted by 11 cm−1, respectively, after chelation. The increase in the molecular mass due to the chelation of the carboxylate group and Al causes a change in the vibration frequency, which results in a band shift47. The peak shifts of νas(COO) and νs(COO) thereby indicate the formation of the chelate complex on the Al particle surface (the FT-IR spectrum of pristine Al powder in the same frequency range is shown in Supplementary Fig. 4). The separation of peaks (∆ν = νas − νs) was further analyzed to identify the difference in the types of coordination between Al and the carboxyl-based chelators48. Because NaCit, NaTar, and NaSuc chelated with Al have a lower value of ∆ν(COO) than do the chelators themselves (Supplementary Table 1), these chelators coordinate with Al in the bidentate chelating form, which enables a single metal atom to have two bonds with a carboxylate group, as illustrated in the left panel of Fig. 2b. Unlike with these carboxylate-based chelators, NaAsc forms only a single bond with the Al atom, as indicated by the non-split νC=O, the band broadening of νC−O, and the decreased intensity of the hydroxyl group after chelation49.

Fig. 2: Formation of metal-chelate bridges between metal particles.
figure 2

a Schematic illustration of mechanism of metal chelation on metal particle surface. b Chemical structures of chelators and their coordination with metal particle surface (left) and FT-IR analysis with identified vibration peaks (right). c Deconvoluted XPS peaks (left) and cross-sectional SEM images of chelated metal particle surface (right) (scale bar: 100 μm). d Al–O/Al–Al atomic ratio (integrated areas of peaks in Al 2p spectra) and O–Al/O atomic ratio (integrated areas of peaks in O 1s spectra) for various chelators. e Compressive strength and modulus of objects 3D-printed by BJM3DP using various chelators. Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations. The inset shows a photographic image of compression testing of the 3D-printed object.

The XPS spectra of chelated Al provide information about the extents of chelate complex formation when the different chelators are used. The left panel of Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 5 show the Al 2p and O 1s spectra of the chelated and pristine Al powders, respectively. The deconvoluted Al 2p spectra have three distinct components: Al 2p3/2 (71.6 eV), Al 2p1/2 (72.0 eV), and Al‒O (74.2 eV). The Al‒O peak originates from the oxides and hydroxides formed on the Al surface50. As depicted in Fig. 2d, the four types of chelated Al show a larger Al‒O/Al‒Al atomic ratio than the pristine Al particles. Furthermore, the atomic ratio increases as the number of coordination bonds increases. These results indicate that the chelators play a pivotal role in Al‒O formation, and greater the number of coordination bonds, higher is the thickness of the Al‒O layers formed on the Al particle surface, as observed in the SEM images (right panel of Fig. 2c). This tendency of formation of a thicker Al‒O layer is also confirmed from the O 1s spectra. The O 1s peak has three components, which correspond to O‒Al, HO‒Al, and the chemisorbed water and are positioned at 530.7, 531.8, and 532.4 eV, respectively51. As can be seen from the plot in Fig. 2d, the relative amount of O‒Al increases as the number of coordination bonds increases; this trend reveals that a chelator with more coordination sites is favorable for the formation of the Al-chelate complex. The promoted chelation results in stronger bonding between the metal particles, and therefore, increases the mechanical strength of the 3D-printed objects (Fig. 2e). The object printed using NaCit has the highest compressive strength (0.88 MPa) and compressive modulus (40.66 MPa). The improved mechanical properties of 3D-printed object based on NaCit than other chelators in our study can be explained by the fact that coordinate donor sites contribute to the strength of the 3D-printed object. Changes in the atomic ratio and mechanical properties with the type of chelator because of the difference in the number of coordination groups are depicted in Supplementary Fig. 6. NaCl was subsequently added to release more metal ions from the intrinsic defects in the Al particles and increase the binding strength of the printed object. Upon the addition of NaCl, the chloride ions attacked the Al defects to form Al ions, which, in turn, promoted chelation on the surface of the metal particles in an aqueous environment (Supplementary Fig. 7)52. The enhancement of chelation through NaCl addition was also confirmed by SEM, FT-IR spectroscopy, and XPS (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9), all of which revealed numerous metal-chelate bridges. The increase in the density of metal-chelate bridges, in turn, led to an increase in the compressive modulus to 68.36 MPa; this is a 1.7-fold increase compared to that of the 3D-printed object not treated with the NaCl additive, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 10. Further enhancements in the mechanical strengths can very well be acquired through post-treatments as well as optimizing the distribution of particle sizes and compositions (Supplementary Fig. 11), which are described in the following section.

Applicability of NaCit chelator for 3DP of metal objects

To demonstrate the capability of our developed BJM3DP system in producing elaborate objects, we designed and 3D-printed various 3D structures, as shown in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 12. For the industrial applications of BJM3DPs, various aspects should be taken into accounts, including the bleeding effect, stair-stepping effect, liquid-powder imbibition effect, as well as sensitive processing parameters such as powder size distribution, powder layer consistency, and layer shifting during drying53,54. Those aspects critically determine the resolution and mechanical strengths of 3DP objects. As a first step, testing and securing the microstructural integrity of 3D printed objects were considered in the fabrication of objects with sophisticated geometries, such as a gyroid cell, an impeller, an ammonite shell, and a skull. In addition, the bleeding issue—a phenomenon in which the binding agent solution adversely flows out of the printed object due to the capillary forces—was addressed to ensure high printing quality24. The use of water as a jetting fluid for the initial printing process as well as a for the post-treatment enabled a partial mitigation of this issue: it has higher vapor pressure than conventional binding agent solutions, because of which it evaporates faster and therefore reduces the solution from flowing out of the prescribed structure, especially at elevated printing temperatures used in our study (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 14). A post-treatment step of the humidification then ensures the completion of the remnant chelation reaction between metal particles without causing adversary bleeding (discussed in the following section). Consequently, the dimensional accuracy of the 3D-printed objects as shown in Fig. 3c can be acquired. Figure 3d and Supplementary Fig. 15 show the rendered images and extracted void ratios of the printed object from computed 3D X-ray microtomography (3D µCT) analyses. A good packing density (defect volume ratio of 4.92%) of the green body based on coarse Al powder (<355 μm) by itself not only enables the 3D object to retain its shape but also promotes the solidification of the structure during the subsequent post-treatment process, thereby providing structural integrity. On the other hand, to illustrate prospects of further enhancing the mechanical strengths of BJM3DP objects, we optimized the distribution of the powder sizes and compositions55,56. In regards to overcoming the low intrinsic porosity of BJM3DP objects (30–60% in general) and reducing microscopic void ratios, we used a bimodal powder distribution based on 10 and 75 μm metal particles (Supplementary Fig. 16). The improved packing of the metal powders from the filling of interstitial voids with fine particles (Supplementary Figs. 15 and 17) thus led defect volume ratios to be critically reduced (1.55 and 0.30% for green and sintered body, respectively). As a result, greatly improved mechanical strengths and compressive modulus of green body up to 6.06 MPa and 218.43 MPa, respectively, were obtained. After completing thermal debinding and sintering processes for printed green bodies (Fig. 4a), the values could further be improved to 29.59 MPa and 1.49 GPa, respectively (Fig. 4b). These results are indeed much superior than the values acquired in previous reports on green-solvent-soluble binders, and are even comparable to the Al (or Al alloy)-based metal objects printed by other much more sophisticated 3DP methods based on high powered lasers (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 18).

Fig. 3: Various objects 3D-printed using NaCit chelator.
figure 3

Photographic images of a 3D-printed Al objects having various shapes. b Demonstration of the minimization process for bleeding effects by using different initial printing conditions. The temperature of builder was gradually increased from 10 to 80 °C. c Photographic images of representative 3D-printed objects, which depict their high dimensional accuracy. d Rendered image and defect volume ratio from µCT analyses for green body based on metal particles with a bimodal powder distribution based on 10 and 75 μm metal particles. The scale bar on the images is 10 mm. Three-dimensional model data for the ammonite shell (thing: 1611970), moai statue (thing: 3905999), octopus (thing: 159217), gyroid cube (thing: 757884), skull (thing: 11953), hexagon stair sculpture (thing: 46966), and faceted cup (thing: 414252) were acquired from the open-source website Other 3D models were designed by the authors using Fusion 360 software.

Fig. 4: Post-treatment process and several 3D-printable metals.
figure 4

a Cross-sectional SEM images of powder (left), as-printed 3D object (middle) and sintered 3D object (right) (scale bar: 100 μm). b Comparison of compressive strength and modulus of as-printed 3D object and sintered 3D object. Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations. c The recent technological progress in BJM3DP techniques, with respect to the mechanical strengths of printed green bodies based on various binder materials. d Photographic images of objects 3D-printed using Cu (left), Fe (middle), and Ti–6Al–4 V alloy (right) (scale bar: 10 mm). e The FTIR spectra and corresponding peak separation (Δν(COO)) of 3D printed Cu, Fe, and Ti−6Al−4V objects compared to the one for pure NaCit.

Post-treatment process and several 3D-printable metals

The post-treatment process performed for strength improvement in the standard metal BJM3DP technique can also be applied to the chelation-based metal 3D printing technique proposed herein. The post-treatment consists of a two-step process: humidification followed by thermal sintering. First, the unreacted chelator between particles was fully reacted through humidification (see Supplementary Fig. 19 for the SEM image of the humidified 3D-printed object). Since we chose to use a marginal water droplet size (33 pL) at elevated evaporation conditions (builder/nozzle temperature of 70 °C) to minimize the bleeding effect (see Supplementary Fig. 14 for details), an additional step of the humidification can complete the reaction between surplus chelator and particles, and indeed boosts the strengths of the printed objects without sacrificing the printing resolution. Subsequent thermal debinding and sintering (see Supplementary Fig. 20 for detailed procedure) caused solid-state diffusion of metal particles, which led to a decrease in the interparticle porosity, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 21. In other words, the metal particles came into closer contact with their neighboring particles, as shown in Fig. 4a. Consequently, the compressive strength and compressive modulus of the thermally sintered 3D-printed objects are greatly improved, compared to those in the as-printed state (Fig. 4b).

These strategies are expected to contribute to improvement in the mechanical properties of printed objects through minimization of the void ratios and porosity in final products. Figure 4d shows objects 3D-printed using copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and a titanium–aluminum–vanadium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V). The printed objects showed structural integrity that cannot be acquired through jetting of water alone without our solid-phase binder mixed with metal particles (Supplementary Fig. 22). Furthermore, FT-IR spectra of all printed metal objects exhibit noticeable shifts in Δν(COO) (188 cm−1 for Cu, 187 cm−1 for Fe and 189 cm−1 for Ti−6Al−4V) compared to pure NaCit (198 cm−1), which agree with the trend we observed in Al-based printed objects (Fig. 4e). Changes in ionic compositions between pure and BJM3DP-printed metals were also observed, wherein Cu2+, Fe3+, and Al3+ can preferentially chelate with COO of citrate ions (Supplementary Fig. 23). These results demonstrate that our chelator is feasible for forming chelation bridges between metal particles of other metals, and thus can be applied as a binder for BJM3DPs of various metals and alloys than just Al alone.


An eco-friendly chelator-based binding mechanism for BJM3DP was proposed and the feasibility of achieving an effective 3D printing system was demonstrated in this study. In the field of BJM3DPs, a few candidates for green-solvent-soluble binders have been reported so far, such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)37,42,57, polyacryl amide (PAM)58, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP)59, and maltodextrin37, some of which were adopted from successful demonstrations in the field of ceramic BJ3DPs for biomedical applications58. However, the mechanical properties of the printed metal objects based on them, even with highly tough Ti−6Al−4V alloy, were mostly rather less competitive for broad applications compared to the ones based on common binder materials developed without considerations for eco-friendliness. Among them, dextrin, a liquid-based binder, has shown promises that can provide meaningful mechanical properties to the printed green bodies of Al/alumina (Fig. 4c). As a solid-phase binder, PVA has been adopted but the mechanical properties achieved was abysmal57 contrary to previous demonstrations of reasonable binding properties in ceramic (hydroxyapatite)37 BJ3DPs. In comparison, results in this work demonstrated that the citric acid, as an another solid-phase green binder that only requires the jetting of pure water for the structural formation, can endorse prospects of simultaneously achieving desired mechanical properties of printed objects as well as the eco-friendly and facile printing processing. By using citric acids as binders, the structural integrity of the 3D-printed objects can be achieved through the efficient formation of metal-chelate bridges between metal particles. A combination of optimized powder size distribution and the efficient binding properties of citric acid, therefore, enabled high packing densities for both green and sintered body of printed Al (1.55 and 0.30% defect volume ratios, respectively). The optimized packing then led to the achieved good mechanical strengths (~30 MPa in compressive strength) for Al objects, which were comparable to or even higher than the ones printed by other sophisticated metal 3DPs based on high powered lasers (Supplementary Fig. 18). The porosity of the green body, on the other hand, still has a room for enhancements, even though the value (41%) itself is well within the previous reports (30–60%)60,61,62. Furthermore, the resolution of the 3D printed objects, which is another important aspect along with mechanical strengths, can be enhanced by controlling the evaporation of jetted water. The inevitable liquid-powder imbibition could be reduced by elevating the builder temperature near evaporation point (70 °C) of water, of which the plausible insufficiency in the metal bridging from the fast evaporation was compensated by using an additional step of the humification that completes the remnant chelation process between metal particles and citrates (Supplementary Fig. 19). The whole printing process based on citric-acid-based BJM3DP can be completed through the thermal treatments of green bodies, where the debinding and sintering result in the merging of metal particles and thus provides an abrupt enhancement in the mechanical strengths. In order to minimize the rapid shrinkage and maintain the structural integrity during the initial debinding process, the optimization of debinding temperature and duration is required to remove an appropriate amount of chelation bridges at mild rate. Since the citric acid thermally decomposes above 175 °C, which is far lower than that of other water-soluble polymeric binders such as PVP, it is necessary to choose lower debinding temperature. A fine adjustments and optimizations are out-of-scope for this work and would require further study, but our choice of conditions (350 °C for 3 h) did not sacrifice the structural integrity. This work also demonstrated that, the chelation chemistry of citric acid observed in Al could be expanded to various metals such as Cu, Fe, and Ti−Al6−4V alloy. Based on these aspects, the proposed facile approach of using environmentally friendly chelators is expected be a cornerstone for promoting the development of the highly approachable, low-cost, and safe consumer-level desktop metal 3D printing systems.



The four chelator powders were prepared by grinding sodium ascorbate (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium succinate (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium tartrate (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich), and sodium citrate (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich). Al powder was purchased from Henan Yuanyang Powder Technology Co., Ltd (FLPN10 for 10 µm), from Korea Powder Co.,(CAS#: 7429-90-5 for 75 µm powders) and from Changsung (≤40 mesh, 355 µm). The size distribution was confirmed by using ISO 13320 laser diffraction method (Beckman Coulter LS-13-320), as presented in Supplementary Fig. 16. Then, each chelator powder was uniformly mixed at a concentration of 20% (w/w) with Al powder (≤40 mesh, Changsung) and then sieved through a mesh. Sodium chloride (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich) with a concentration of 5% (w/w) was used as an additive. The preparation procedure of the other three metal powders (Cu (≤40 mesh, Sigma-Aldrich), Fe (≤325 mesh, Duksan), and Ti–6Al–4 V (≤325 mesh, Grade 5, Korea Powder)) was the same as that of the metal chelator mixture.

BJM3DP process

The desktop printer for BJM3DP was assembled using a fusion deposition modeling 3D printer kit (Geeetech I3 Pro, Shenzhen Getech Co., Ltd.). An acrylic gantry box add-on set (Colorpod, Spitstec, Netherlands) was mounted on the assembled metal 3D printer. BJM3DP was performed in an environment in which room temperature (~25 °C) and 20% relative humidity were maintained. An inkjet cartridge (HP45, Hewlett-Packard) was filled with 30 mL of DI water. The printing speeds was fixed at 2000 mm min−1. The temperature of both the builder platform and the inkjet nozzle was maintained at 70 °C to control the evaporation rate of water during the 3D printing process. The process parameters are summarized in the Supplementary Table 2. After the 3D printing process, the printed object was humidified by exposing it to a humidifier spraying water at a rate of 35 mL h−1 in a cylindrical chamber for 30 min. Subsequently, the printed object was thermally sintered in a tube furnace (LHA-12/300, Lenton) under vacuum (0.03 torr). The heat treatment profiles are shown in Supplementary Fig. 20. 3 cycles of the following heat treatment profile are conducted: (Debinding) Heating from RT to 350 °C by 10 °C/min followed by 350 °C treatment for 3 h. (Sintering) Heating from 350 to 620 °C by 10 °C/min followed by 620 °C treatment for 15 h. (Cooling) Cooling from 620 °C to RT by −10 °C/min.


The formation of a metal-chelate complex between the Al particles in the 3D-printed objects was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy (VERTEX 70, Bruker Corporation, Germany) and XPS analysis (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo-Scientific, USA). The 3D-printed objects were visualized by SEM (JEOL-7800F, JEOL, Ltd., Japan). For compression tests, objects were 3D-printed according to the ASTM E9 standard. Compression tests were performed using a universal testing machine (QC-506M2F, Cometech) with a compression rate of 8 mm s−1. Data are presented with mean values ± standard deviations (s.d.). The bulk density and porosity of printed objects were acquired by using 3D computed tomography (µCT, Nikon XTH 320) with the voxel size of 1 µm at X-ray beam energy of 210 kV. Voxel analysis and 3D visualization were performed by using VGSTUDIO MAX (Volume Graphics Pte. Ltd). The interparticle porosity of the 3D-printed objects was measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry (PM33GT, Quantachrome).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).


  1. Kim, S. H. et al. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat. Commun. 9, 1620 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge, Q. et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable hydrogel with diverse UV curable polymers. Sci. Adv. 7, eaba4261 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Giachini, P. A. G. S. et al. Additive manufacturing of cellulose-based materials with continuous, multidirectional stiffness gradients. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay0929 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Darkes-Burkey, C. & Shepherd, R. F. High-resolution 3D printing in seconds. Nature 588, 594–595 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Regehly, M. et al. Xolography for linear volumetric 3D printing. Nature 588, 620–624 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deore, B. et al. Direct printing of functional 3D objects using polymerization-induced phase separation. Nat. Commun. 12, 55 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kenel, C., Casati, N. P. M. & Dunand, D. C. 3D ink-extrusion additive manufacturing of CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy micro-lattices. Nat. Commun. 10, 904 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, D. et al. Additive manufacturing of ultrafine-grained high-strength titanium alloys. Nature 576, 91–95 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollock, T. M. Alloy design for aircraft engines. Nat. Mater. 15, 809–815 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daly, A. C., Davidson, M. D. & Burdick, J. A. 3D bioprinting of high cell-density heterogeneous tissue models through spheroid fusion within self-healing hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 12, 753 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang, K., Carmone, S., Brambilla, D. & Leroux, J.-C. 3D printing of a wearable personalized oral delivery device: A first-in-human study. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2544 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson, S. S. et al. Patient-specific design of a soft occluder for the left atrial appendage. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 8–16 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho, D. H. et al. 3D-printed sugar scaffold for high-precision and highly sensitive active and passive wearable sensors. Adv. Sci. 7, 1902521 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gervasoni, S. et al. CANDYBOTS: A new generation of 3D-printed sugar-based transient small-scale robots. Adv. Mater. 32, 2005652 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jakus, A. E., Taylor, S. L., Geisendorfer, N. R., Dunand, D. C. & Shah, R. N. Metallic architectures from 3D-printed powder-based liquid inks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 6985–6995 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, S. L., Jakus, A. E., Shah, R. N. & Dunand, D. C. Iron and nickel cellular structures by sintering of 3D-printed oxide or metallic particle inks. Adv. Eng. Mater. 19, 1600365 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reiser, A. et al. Multi-metal electrohydrodynamic redox 3D printing at the submicron scale. Nat. Commun. 10, 1853 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vyatskikh, A. et al. Additive manufacturing of 3D nano-architected metals. Nat. Commun. 9, 593 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gustmann, T. et al. Influence of processing parameters on the fabrication of a Cu−Al−Ni−Mn shape-memory alloy by selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 11, 23–31 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, B. C., Dembinski, L. & Coddet, C. The study of the laser parameters and environment variables effect on mechanical properties of high compact parts elaborated by selective laser melting 316L powder. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 584, 21–31 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karlsson, J., Snis, A., Engqvist, H. & Lausmaa, J. Characterization and comparison of materials produced by electron beam melting (EBM) of two different Ti–6Al–4V powder fractions. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213, 2109–2118 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gokuldoss, P. K., Kolla, S. & Eckert, J. Additive manufacturing processes: selective laser melting, electron beam melting and binder jetting—selection guidelines. Materials 10, 672 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sachs, E., Cima, M. & Cornie, J. Three-dimensional printing: Rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 39, 201–204 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mostafaei, A. et al. Binder jet 3D printing—process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges. Prog. Mater. Sci. 24, 100707 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM. F2792-12a. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (ASTM International, 2012).

  26. Ni, J. et al. Three-dimensional printing of metals for biomedical applications. Mater. Today Bio 3, 100024 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai, Y. & Williams, C. B. An exploration of binder jetting of copper. Rapid Prototyp. J. 21, 177–185 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gilmer, D. et al. An in-situ crosslinking binder for binder jet additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 35, 101341 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Levy, A., Miriyev, A., Elliott, A., Babu, S. S. & Frage, N. Additive manufacturing of complex-shaped graded TiC/steel composites. Mater. Des. 118, 198–203 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Michaels, S., Sachs, E. M. & Cima, M. J. Metal parts generation by three dimensional printing. In 1992 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas at Austin, 1992).

  31. Hughes, K., Meek, M. E., Walker, M., Turner, L. & Moir, D. 2-Butoxyethanol: Hazard characterization and exposure-response analysis. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part C: Toxicol. Carcinog. 19, 77–104 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harreus, A. L. et al. 2-Pyrrolidone. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley, 2011).

  33. Toxic pollutants (40 CFR 401.15), Title 40 - Protection of Environment (AE 2.106/3:40/), Code of Federal Regulations (2011).

  34. Schafer, E. W., Bowles, W. A. & Hurlbut, J. The acute oral toxicity, repellency, and hazard potential of 998 chemicals to one or more species of wild and domestic birds. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 12, 355–382 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rabinskiy, L., Ripetsky, A., Sitnikov, S., Solyaev, Y. & Kahramanov, R. Fabrication of porous silicon nitride ceramics using binder jetting technology. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 140, 012023 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. El-Ghannam, A., Cunningham, L. Jr., Pienkowski, D. & Hart, A. Bone engineering of the rabbit ulna. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 65, 1495–1502 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou, Z., Lennon, A., Buchanan, F., McCarthy, H. O. & Dunne, N. Binder jetting additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite powders: Effects of adhesives on geometrical accuracy and green compressive strength. Addit. Manuf. 36, 101645 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lv, X., Ye, F., Cheng, L., Fan, S. & Liu, Y. Binder jetting of ceramics: Powders, binders, printing parameters, equipment, and post-treatment. Ceram. Int. 45, 12609–12624 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Afshar-Mohajer, N., Wu, C.-Y., Ladun, T., Rajon, D. A. & Huang, Y. Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build. Environ. 93, 293–301 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zontek, T. L., Ogle, B. R., Jankovic, J. T. & Hollenbeck, S. M. An exposure assessment of desktop 3D printing. J. Chem. Health Saf. 24, 15–25 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, R. et al. Exposure, assessment and health hazards of particulate matter in metal additive manufacturing: A review. Chemosphere 259, 127452 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Maleksaeedi, S., Meenashisundaram, G. K., Lu, S., Salehi, M. & Jun, W. Hybrid binder to mitigate feed powder segregation in the inkjet 3D printing of titanium metal parts. Metals 8, 322 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Keçebaş, A. & Kayfeci, M. Chapter 1 - Hydrogen Properties. Solar Hydrogen Production (Academic Press, 2019).

  44. Asemave, K. Greener chelators for recovery of metals and other applications. Org. Medicinal Chem. Ij. 6, 555694 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sekhara Varma, T. N. & Ramakrishnan, C. V. Biosynthesis of citric acid in citrus fruits. Nature 178, 1358–1359 (1956).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fraga, A. K. et al. Synthesis and characterization of aluminum citrate compounds and evaluation of their influence on the formation of hydrogels based on polyacrylamide. Iran. Polym. J. 29, 649–657 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Papageorgiou, S. K. et al. Metal-carboxylate interactions in metal-alginate complexes studied with FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 345, 469–473 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakamoto, K. in Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy (Wiley, 2006).

  49. Tajmirriahi, H. A. Coordination chemistry of vitamin-C. Part III. Interaction of L-ascorbic-acid with Al(III), La(III), and Pb(II) ions - Evidence for metal chelate formation in the solid and aqueous-solution. J. Inorg. Biochem. 44, 39–45 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sherwood, P. M. A. Introduction to studies of aluminum and its compounds by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 5, 1–3 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wysocka, J., Krakowiak, S. & Ryl, J. Evaluation of citric acid corrosion inhibition efficiency and passivation kinetics for aluminium alloys in alkaline media by means of dynamic impedance monitoring. Electrochim. Acta 258, 1463–1475 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Li, W., Cochell, T. & Manthiram, A. Activation of aluminum as an effective reducing agent by pitting corrosion for wet-chemical synthesis. Sci. Rep. 3, 1229 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li, M., Du, W., Elwany, A., Pei, Z. & Ma, C. Metal binder jetting additive manufacturing: A literature review. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 142, 090801 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ziaee, M. & Crane, N. B. Binder jetting: A review of process, materials, and methods. Addit. Manuf. 28, 781–801 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Bai, Y., Wagner, G. & Williams, C. B. Effect of particle size distribution on powder packing and sintering in binder jetting additive manufacturing of metals. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139, 081019 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Du, W. et al. Binder jetting additive manufacturing: Effect of particle size distribution on density. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 143, 091002 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kunchala, P. & Kappagantula, K. 3D printing high density ceramics using binder jetting with nanoparticle densifiers. Mater. Des. 155, 443–450 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chai, W. et al. The printability of three water based polymeric binders and their effects on the properties of 3D printed hydroxyapatite bone scaffold. Ceram. Int. 46, 6663–6671 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Tang, Y., Huang, Z., Yang, J. & Xie, Y. Enhancing the capillary force of binder-jetting printing Ti6Al4V and mechanical properties under high temperature sintering by mixing fine powder. Metals 10, 1354 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Miyanaji, H. et al. Binder jetting additive manufacturing of copper foam structures. Addit. Manuf. 32, 100960 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Williams, C. B., Cochran, J. K. & Rosen, D. W. Additive manufacturing of metallic cellular materials via three-dimensional printing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 53, 231–239 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Meenashisundaram, G. K. et al. Fabrication of Ti + Mg composites by three-dimensional printing of porous Ti and subsequent pressureless infiltration of biodegradable Mg. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 108, 110478 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


J.H.C. was supported by the Creative Materials Discovery Program (2019M3D1A1078299) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, the Basic Science Program through the NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea (2020R1A4A2002806), and the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: KMDF_PR_20200901_0093, 9991006766). J.H.C. was partially supported by the Yonsei Signature Research Cluster Program of 2021 (2021-22-0004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



J.H.C. conceived the concept, designed all the experiments, and supervised the work. S.Y.C. and D.H.H. carried out most of the experimental work and data analysis. Y.Y.C. assisted the data analysis with all other authors. S.Li, S.Le, and J.W.S. performed the mechanical property analysis of 3D printed object. S.B.J. led and supervised the whole revision process, including designing experiments, reorganizing the rationale, and editing the manuscript. All authors discussed the progress of research and contributed to editing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sae Byeok Jo or Jeong Ho Cho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, S.Y., Ho, D.H., Choi, Y.Y. et al. A general fruit acid chelation route for eco-friendly and ambient 3D printing of metals. Nat Commun 13, 104 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing