STAT3 is critical for skeletal development and bone homeostasis by regulating osteogenesis

Zhou, Siru; Dai, Qinggang; Huang, Xiangru; Jin, Anting; Yang, Yiling; Gong, Xinyi; Xu, Hongyuan; Gao, Xin; Jiang, Lingyong

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27273-w

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 25 November 2021

STAT3 is critical for skeletal development and bone homeostasis by regulating osteogenesis

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 6891 (2021) Cite this article

8494 Accesses
32 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Skeletal deformities are typical AD-HIES manifestations, which are mainly caused by heterozygous and loss-of-function mutations in Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). However, the mechanism is still unclear and the treatment strategy is limited. Herein, we reported that the mice with Stat3 deletion in osteoblasts, but not in osteoclasts, induced AD-HIES-like skeletal defects, including craniofacial malformation, osteoporosis, and spontaneous bone fracture. Mechanistic analyses revealed that STAT3 in cooperation with Msh homeobox 1(MSX1) drove osteoblast differentiation by promoting Distal-less homeobox 5(Dlx5) transcription. Furthermore, pharmacological activation of STAT3 partially rescued skeletal deformities in heterozygous knockout mice, while inhibition of STAT3 aggravated bone loss. Taken together, these data show that STAT3 is critical for modulating skeletal development and maintaining bone homeostasis through STAT3-indcued osteogenesis and suggest it may be a potential target for treatments.

Human skeletal muscle aging atlas

Article Open access 15 April 2024

On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes

Article Open access 28 February 2024

Trigonelline is an NAD+ precursor that improves muscle function during ageing and is reduced in human sarcopenia

Article Open access 19 March 2024

Introduction

Autosomal dominant hyper-immunoglobulin E syndrome (AD-HIES), also known as Job’s syndrome, is a rare multisystem disease that is characterized by pathologically elevated serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunological disorders, such as recurrent staphylococcal skin abscesses and cyst-forming pneumonia^1,2. These immunological disorders of AD-HIES have received lots of attention in previous studies. Nevertheless, although a series of clinical studies have reported that skeletal deformities such as anomalies in craniofacial bone, severe osteoporosis, and recurrent minimal trauma fractures are typical and common manifestations of AD-HIES, limited research is available that addresses them^3,4,5. In a clinical report from the USA and Central Europe, 89.4% (34/38) of AD-HIES patients exhibit skeletal deformities, such as characteristic facial features, and pathologic fractures⁶. The incidence of distinctive facial features of AD-HIES patients in a French study was 95% (57/60) and 90.6% (58/64) in an international study^7,8. In China, a cohort study showed that all 17 AD-HIES patients exhibited characteristic facial features⁹. Although the bone deformities are characteristic and harmful for the health and beauty of AD-HIES patients, clinical treatment is limited. Hence, clarifying the underlying mechanisms of AD-HIES-related bone defects is important.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3) is well known to play an important role in the development of AD-HIES^{5,10,11,12,13}. As a member of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) family of proteins, STAT3 responds to growth factors and multiple cytokines, and plays a critical role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, apoptosis, and survival^14,15,16. STAT3 has six domains, including the N-terminal domain (NTD), coiled-coil domain (CC), DNA-binding domain (DBD), linker domain (linker), the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, and the transactivation domain (TD). Previous research has shown that the STAT3 mutations in AD-HIES patients are located in the DNA-binding domain (DBD), the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, and the transactivation domain (TAD), and these mutations induced STAT3 loss-of-function mainly through the mechanism of negative dominance^9,17. The previous studies have focused on the immune system abnormalities induced by the inactivation of STAT3 in AD-HIES patients^{18,19,20,21,22}, but the bone abnormalities have been less studied^23,24,25.

Skeletal development and bone homeostasis depend on the balance of the resorption of old or damaged bone by osteoclasts and formation of new bone by osteoblasts. Imbalance of this tightly coupled process may induce diseases such as osteoporosis and spontaneous fracture²⁶. Bone deformity and decreased bone mass can be the result of decreased bone formation, increased bone resorption, or a combination of both effects. Several lines of data suggested that the osteoporosis induced by STAT3 inactivation may be relevant to incremented osteoclast activity^27,28,29. Therefore, bisphosphonates, which could inhibit osteoclast activity and bone resorption, was be leveraged to treat secondary osteoporosis that caused by STAT3 mutations³⁰. However, clinical studies have shown that although bisphosphonates increase bone mineral density, and bisphosphonates do not effectively reduce the incidence of pathological fractures in patients^31,32. Furthermore, the treatment strategy of anomalies in the craniofacial bone of AD-HIES patients has been rarely reported³³. To solve this clinical difficulty and develop new treatment insights and methods, the pathogenesis of bone development malformation caused by STAT3 inactivation and the underlying mechanisms must be furthermore elucidated.

Here we show the evidence that STAT3 deficiency in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) or pre-osteoblasts, but not in osteoclasts, induces craniofacial deformity, osteoporosis, and spontaneous bone fractures, resembling the cranial bone phenotypes of AD-HIES patients. Furthermore, the bone defects in osteoblast-specific Stat3-deficient mice indicate that the impaired bone formation but not the increased bone resorption is the contributor for this phenotype, which may provide potential insights for the treatment of bone abnormalities in AD-HIES patients.

Results

Deletion of Stat3 in osteoclasts did not induce AD-HIES-like skeletal deformity

Bone development and remodeling depend on the balance between bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. If this balance is broken, both developmental and metabolic bone diseases could be induced. Previous reports have indicated that AD-HIES-related osteoporosis may be related to abnormal bone resorption^27,28. Hence, we first generated an osteoclast-specific Stat3 knockout mouse model (Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice) by crossing Stat3^fl/fl mice with cathepsin K-Cre (Ctsk^Cre) mice, a line in which Cre expression is primarily restricted to osteoclasts (Fig. 1a). Decreased expression of STAT3 in bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) from Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice was confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 1b). The physical size of the Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice was similar to their Stat3^fl/fl littermates (Fig. 1c). Alcian blue and alizarin red S staining did not show any developmental bone deformity in the Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice (Fig. 1d–f). Furthermore, our previous study indicated that Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice exhibited increased bone mass³⁴. All these results validated that deleting Stat3 in osteoclasts could not induce the AD-HIES-like skeletal deformities.

**Fig. 1: Deletion of *Stat3* in osteoclasts did not cause AD-HIES-like bone deformities.**

Deletion of Stat3 in pre-osteoblasts induced AD-HIES-related skeletal deformities

To further determine whether the inactivation of STAT3 in osteoblast lineage cells was the cause of the AD-HIES-related skeletal deformities, we generated a pre-osteoblast-specific Stat3 deletion mouse model (Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice) by crossing Stat3^fl/fl mice with Osterix-Cre (Osx^Cre) mice, a line in which Cre expression is primarily restricted to osteoblast precursors (Fig. 2a). We made a comparison between Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and Osx-Cre control (Osx^Cre) littermates that were both in the context of Osx-Cre to exclude the effects of Osx-Cre^35,36. Western blot confirmed the deletion of STAT3 in BMSCs of the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice (Fig. 2b). The physical size analysis showed that 8-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice were dwarfed relative to their control littermates (Fig. 2c). Alcian blue and alizarin red S staining displayed defects in the skeleton of the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl newborns, including hypomineralization of the cranial bones and hypoplasia of the clavicle (Fig. 2d–f). Further, micro-CT was used to analyze the skulls of 4-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and control littermates. The skulls of the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice exhibited not only morphological deformity, including craniosynostosis and circular shape, but also hypo-ossification, indicated by obvious porosity when compared with the Osx^Cre littermates (Fig. 2g). To further determine the function of STAT3 in the skeletal system, we utilized micro-CT to analyze the skeletal elements isolated from the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice with corresponding control littermate Osx^Cre mice. As shown in Fig. 2h–m, 4-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice had osteoporosis with a reduced bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) in the femoral trabecular bone relative to the age-matched control littermates. Further analysis showed that the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice displayed a decrease in trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.) and trabecular number (Tb.N.) but an increase in trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.). Also, Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice displayed a dramatic reduction in the cortical thickness (Ct.Th.) compared with the control Osx^Cre littermates. Taken together, the deletion of Stat3 in pre-osteoblasts induced AD-HIES-related skeletal deformities, such as craniofacial deformities and osteoporosis.

**Fig. 2: Deletion of *Stat3* in pre-osteoblasts induced skeletal deformities.**

Ablation of Stat3 in BMSCs resulted in skeletal deformities

To further explore the role of STAT3 in the commitment of BMSCs to an osteoblast fate, we generated osteoblast lineage-specific Stat3-deficient mice (Prx1^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice) by crossing Stat3^fl/fl mice with Prx1-Cre (Prx1^Cre) mice (Fig. 3a). The latter is a transgenic line that has Cre expression in a subset of craniofacial mesenchyme and throughout the early limb bud mesenchyme³⁷. Western blot analysis verified that STAT3 decremented in BMSCs (Fig. 3b). The 8-week-old Prx1^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice were dwarfed relative to their control littermates (Stat3^fl/fl) (Fig. 3c, g). Alcian blue and alizarin red S staining showed defects and malformation in the skeleton of newborns, 2- and 8-week-old Prx1^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice compared with Stat3^fl/fl control littermates (Fig. 3d, e, Supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, Prx1^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice had spontaneous fractures (Fig. 3e, f, Supplementary Fig. 1b, d), similar to the spontaneous bone fractures observed in AD-HIES patients. Thus, both Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl and Prx1^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice, but not Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice, reproduced the bone phenotype of AD-HIES patients, including craniofacial dysplasia, osteoporosis, and spontaneous bone fractures. This indicated that inactivation of STAT3 in osteoblasts, but not osteoclasts, induced the AD-HIES-related bone defects.

**Fig. 3: Ablation of *Stat3* in BMSCs induced bone defects in mice.**

Ablation of Stat3 in pre-osteoblasts impaired osteogenesis by inhibiting osteoblast differentiation

Throughout life, bone is continuously modeled and remodeled by the functions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts³⁸. Bone deformity and decreased bone mass can be the result of decreased bone formation, increased bone resorption, or a combination of both effects. To understand how Stat3 deletion caused the bone abnormity, we first analyzed femurs from 4-week-old mice for the presence of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts. Compared with Osx^Cre littermates, Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice displayed a decrease in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts, excluding the possibility that the bone loss in osteoblast-specific Stat3-deficient mice was induced by an increase in bone resorption (Fig. 4a). Next, we analyzed the bone formation ability in Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice using calcein-alizarin red S double labeling. We found that bone formation activity was lower in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice than the Osx^Cre mice (Fig. 4b). Consistent with the reduced ossification and bone formation rate, the in situ hybridization analysis showed that the expression of the osteoblast-specific marker genes collagen1α1 (Col1α1) and osteocalcin (Ocn) were reduced in osteoblasts in vivo from Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice (Fig. 4c). Consistent with this, the number of the mature osteopontin (OPN)-positive osteoblasts was reduced in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice (Fig. 4d). All these results suggested that the bone deformities and decreased bone mass of the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice were resulted from decreased bone formation rather than increased bone resorption.

**Fig. 4: STAT3-driven osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.**

Osteoblasts are derived from BMSCs^38,39,40. Hence, we wondered whether Stat3 deficiency would affect the osteogenic potential of BMSCs. Primary BMSCs were isolated from the bone marrow of Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and control littermates. Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl BMSCs displayed impaired osteoblast differentiation ability as indicated by the markedly decreased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and lower mineralization by alizarin red S staining (Fig. 4e). This was consistent with a decrease in the mRNA level of osteogenic genes, such as Runx2, Alp, Col1a1, Ocn, and Bsp (Fig. 4f). Since Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice had grossly deformed bones, to exclude the developmental differences, we infected Stat3^fl/fl primary BMSCs with adenovirus expressing either Cre-EGFP targeting Stat3 or control EGFP. Consistent with BMSCs from Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice, the deletion of Stat3 in BMSCs in vitro also resulted in decreased osteoblast differentiation, as indicated by decreased ALP activity and mineralization, as well as deregulated expression of osteogenic marker genes (Fig. 4g–h). Collectively, these results demonstrated that STAT3 was required for osteoblast differentiation in a cell-autonomous manner.

STAT3 activity was required for osteogenic gene transcription

To analyze the global effects of deleting Stat3 on the gene expression in osteoblasts, we performed RNA-seq with total RNA extracted from the calvarias of newborn Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl and Osx^Cre littermates. Overall, 2459 genes were downregulated >1.5-fold in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl set compared with the corresponding control, and 231 genes were upregulated >1.5-fold in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl set compared with the control (Fig. 5a). Then, we performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis on the set of 1.5-fold significantly downregulated genes from the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl samples (Fig. 5b). The results showed that these genes were enriched for associations with ossification, osteoblast differentiation, and skeletal system development, which were consistent with the skeletal deformities in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice, such as delayed closure of the fontanelles and decreased bone density. A heatmap further revealed that osteoblast-related gene expression, such as Dlx5, Sp7, Fgf9, Cbfb, Ibsp, and Pth1r was downregulated (Fig. 5c).

**Fig. 5: STAT3 regulated the gene network of osteoblast differentiation.**

Osteoblast differentiation is achieved by activating a transcriptional network in which Dlx5, Runx2, and Sp7 have essential roles⁴¹. Among them, Dlx5^−/− mice present with craniofacial abnormalities, delayed ossification of the roof of the skull, and abnormal osteogenesis⁴², which was similar to the craniofacial deformities of the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice. Hence, we firstly confirmed Dlx5 downregulation expression in the calvaria from Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl and Osx^Cre newborns by real-time PCR (Fig. 5d), which was consisted with the results in the Stat3 deleted BMSCs in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Then we performed immunohistochemistry for Dlx5 in the distal femurs from 1- and 4-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice. As shown in Fig. 5E, DLX5-positive osteoblasts were decreased in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice compared with that in the control group. To further verify whether decreased DLX5 expression contributed to the impaired osteoblast differentiation and ossification caused by STAT3 deficiency, we isolated BMSCs from Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and control littermates. Then, DLX5 was overexpressed in Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl BMSCs using lentivirus (Lv-DLX5) (Fig. 5g). As shown in Fig. 5f, the impaired osteoblast differentiation and ossification of the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl BMSCs were partially restored by DLX5 overexpression, as determined by the increased ALP activity and calcified nodules. This was consistent with the increased expression of the osteoblast marker genes, such as Runx2, Alp, Col1a1, and Ocn (Fig. 5g). All these results implied that STAT3 participated in osteoblast differentiation and ossification by controlling DLX5 expression.

Next, we investigated the mechanisms by which STAT3 regulates DLX5 expression. We first analyzed the promoter of Dlx5 and found two potential STAT3 binding sites (Fig. 6a), which suggested that STAT3 might directly regulate the transcription of Dlx5. Our data conformed that STAT3 was bound to the promoter of Dlx5 when the antibody against STAT3 was utilized for immunoprecipitation comparing with control IgG (Fig. 6b), advising that STAT3 bound directly to Dlx5 promoter. Then, we cloned the promoter of Dlx5 into the PGL3-basic vector to drive the expression of the luciferase reporter. We transfected a vector of STAT3, a constitutively-active STAT3 (STAT3-C, a gift from Dr. Feng⁴³), and a dominant-negative STAT3 mutation (STAT3-DN, from Dr. Feng⁴³) separately with Dlx5 promoter-driven luciferase reporter. As illustrated in Fig. 6c, both STAT3 and the constitutively-active STAT3 could promote the activity of the Dlx5 promoter. However, the dominant-negative mutation of STAT3 barely affected the activity of the Dlx5 promoter, indicating that STAT3 activity is critical to promote the transcription of Dlx5. Furthermore, we constructed a mutant Dlx5 promoter in which the two predicted STAT3 binding sites were deleted in the PGL3-basic vector (DLX5-mu). As shown in Fig. 6d, mutations in the STAT3 binding sites abrogated the activity of STAT3 on the Dlx5 promoter activity, indicating that the two STAT3 binding sites on the Dlx5 promoter were essential for its transcription. All these results demonstrated that STAT3 drove Dlx5 transcription by directly regulating its promoter activity.

**Fig. 6: STAT3 regulated *Dlx5* transcription by promoting the activity of its promoter.**

Craniofacial development depends on the regulation of specific transcription networks, which include the mammalian Msx homeobox genes (Msx1 and Msx2) and distal-less (Dlx) gene family⁴⁴. Previous studies have shown that Msx1 and Dlx5 function synergistically to regulate craniofacial development and that Msx is crucial for Dlx5 transcription through binding to its promoter⁴⁵. However, whether STAT3 participates in the functional complex between Msx and Dlx5 has remained unknown. We transfected 293T cells with Myc-MSX1 and HA-MSX2 plasmids separately and with Flag-STAT3 and performed a co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay, which revealed that STAT3 physically associated with MSX1 (Fig. 6e) but not MSX2 (Fig. 6f). The transcription of Msx1 was unchanged due to Stat3 deletion in vivo (Fig. 5d) and in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Next, we co-transfected STAT3-C and STAT3-DN vectors separately with MSX1 vectors into 293T cells and examined their effect on the Dlx5 reporter activity. We found that MSX1 increased the Dlx5 promoter activity, and that STAT3-C, but not STAT3-DN, could further promote MSX1-driven Dlx5 promoter activity (Fig. 6g). Furthermore, mutations in the STAT3 binding sites blocked the synergistic effects of STAT3 and MSX1 on the Dlx5 promoter activity (Fig. 6h). These data inferred that STAT3 cooperated with MSX1 to drive Dlx5 transcription and that this was dependent on the STAT3 activity.

Former study has reported that most of the HIES mutations were located in the DBD (42%) and SH2 domain (40%), of which the most frequent mutations are R382Q/W of exon 13 and V637M of exon 21, respectively⁴⁶. In healthy individuals, alternative splicing of exon 23 leads to two major STAT3 isoforms: STAT3 alpha and STAT3 beta. The splice site mutation on exon 22 such as T714A may cause frame shift, which could possibly affect tyrosine and serine phosporylation sites of STAT3 alpha⁷. To analyze if these STAT3 mutations in AD-HIES patients could affect Dlx5 promoter activity, we synthesized STAT3 WT (NM_001369512.1), R382W, R382Q, V637M, T714A mutation plasmids and tested their effect on the transcriptional activity of Dlx5 promoter. As demonstrated in Fig. 6j, the Dlx5 promoter activity in STAT3 mutation groups decremented comparing with WT group. Although STAT3 WT combined with MSX1 could synergistically promote Dlx5 promoter activity, however, this synergistic effect with MSX1 was observed in STAT3 mutant group (Fig. 6k). These data implied that mutants found in AD-HIES patients may affect Dlx5 transcription.

Inducible osteoblastic deletion of Stat3 impaired bone remodeling and reduced bone mass in adult mice

In the above experiments using the Prx1^Cre and Osx^Cre mice, we revealed the role of STAT3 in osteoblast and bone development. We then wondered whether STAT3 played a role in bone remodeling and bone metabolism in adult mice. We used tamoxifen-inducible osteoblast lineage cells expressing Cre (Col1^{Cre ERT2}) to induce deletion of Stat3 in 5-week-old mice for 7 days (Fig. 7a, b). To determine the in vivo effects of Stat3 deletion in this system, we preformed micro-CT analysis on the femurs from Col1^{Cre ERT2};Stat3^fl/fl mice and the corresponding control Stat3^fl/fl mice. We found that the trabecular bone in the Col1^{Cre ERT2};Stat3^fl/fl mice had dramatic osteoporosis compared to the Stat3^fl/fl mice, as indicated by decreased BV/TV, Tb.Th., Tb.N., and increased Tb.Sp. (Fig. 7c–g). Meanwhile, Ct.Th. was also decreased in the Col1^{Cre ERT2};Stat3^fl/fl mice (Fig. 7c, h). Consistent with our previous findings in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice, bone formation in the Col1^{Cre ERT2};Stat3^fl/fl mice was decreased compared with Stat3^fl/fl mice (Fig. 7i), which was accompanied with decreased bone resorption (Supplementary Fig. 3a). The data illustrated that STAT3 was critical for modulating bone development and maintaining bone homeostasis, and the STAT3 activity may function as a target to regulate bone metabolism.

**Fig. 7: Inducible osteoblastic deletion of *Stat3* impaired bone formation and reduced bone mass in adult mice.**

STAT3 may act as a suitable pharmacological target to regulate bone homeostasis

STAT3 has been considered as a potential target in a series of diseases, including cancer and immune disorders; therefore, we wondered whether STAT3 could be a suitable pharmacological target to regulate bone metabolism and bone homeostasis.

The classical JAK2–STAT3 inhibitor, AG490, has been reported to inhibit the phosphorylation and activity of STAT3. First, we confirmed that AG490 could inhibit STAT3 activity in BMSCs, which was indicated by decreased phosphorylation levels of STAT3 at concentrations of 50 μM (Fig. 8b). Next, we found that the osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs compared with the control group could be impaired by AG490, as indicated by remarkably decreased ALP activity and matrix mineralization (Fig. 8a). In addition, the mRNA levels of osteogenic genes such as Runx2, Dlx5, Col1a1, Ocn, and Bsp were reduced in the AG490 treated groups (Fig. 8c). To further explore the in vivo effects of the pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 activity, we performed intraperitoneal injection of AG490 at a concentration of 5 mg/kg every day in 4-week-old mice for 5 weeks. With micro-CT analysis, we found that trabecular bone was reduced in the AG490 group compared with the control group, indicated by decreased BV/TV and Tb.Th. (Fig. 8d–h), although Ct.Th. was comparable (Fig. 8i, n). Similar to the gene deletion model, AG490 reduced the bone formation (Fig. 8j) and bone resorption in mice (Supplementary Fig. 3b).

**Fig. 8: Pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 activity inhibited osteoblast differentiation and induced bone loss by impairing osteogenesis.**

AD-HIES was caused by heterozygous, and loss-of-function mutation of STAT3, which could induce residual activity and the non-transcriptional functions of STAT3 in the AD-HIES patients⁴⁶. Hence, the heterozygous conditional Stat3 deletion mice (Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+) may be suitable to functionally mimic the status of Stat3 mutation in AD-HIES patients and to carry out pharmacological study. We analyzed the skeletal phenotype of the Stat3 heterozygous mice. The decreased expression of STAT3 in BMSCs from Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice was confirmed by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. 4a). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 4b, heterozygous mice did not show obvious dwarf phenotype. While alcian blue and alizarin red S staining displayed defects of the cranial bones and hypoplasia of the clavicle in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ newborns (Supplementary Fig. 4c–e). Four-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice exhibited osteoporosis phenotype, which were indicated by reduced BV/TV, Tb.Th., Tb.N., and Ct.Th., as well as increased Tb.Sp. comparing with the control Osx^Cre littermates (Supplementary Fig. 4f–g). Similar to Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice, the bone formation (Supplementary Fig. 4i) and bone resorption (Supplementary Fig. 4h) decreased in the STAT3 heterozygous mice also. Hence, we raised the question whether pharmacological activation of STAT3 activity by colivelin (MCE, HY-P1061A) could be applied for therapy regarding skeletal deformities in the STAT3 heterozygous mice⁴⁷. Firstly, we isolated BMSCs from 4-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice and littermate Osx^Cre, which were treated with colivelin at concentrations of 1 nM to induce osteogenic differentiation. Western blotting analysis confirmed the increased the phosphorylation level of STAT3 in both colivelin groups in comparison with corresponding control group (Fig. 9b). Colivelin could promote osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs from Osx^Cre as well as rescued the impaired osteoblast differentiation ability of Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ BMSCs, which was indicated by ALP activity and alizarin red S staining (Fig. 9a). This was consistent with the mRNA level of osteogenic genes, such as Dlx5, Runx2, Alp, Col1a1, and Bsp (Fig. 9c). Next, we treated 1-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice with colivelin by intraperitoneal administration every other day for 3 weeks. As shown in Fig. 9d, e, the trabecular bone mass decreased of Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice was partially rescued, indicated by increased BV/TV, Tb.Th., Tb.N., and decreased Tb.Sp., while Ct.th. was comparable. Furthermore, calcein-alizarin red S double labeling assay informed that colivelin promoted trabecular bone formation in Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice (Fig. 9f). Colivelin exhibited limited influence on bone resorption, which was demonstrated by comparable numbers of TRAP⁺ osteoclasts (Supplementary Fig. 5a). All the data suggested that colivelin could promote osteoblast differentiation and partially rescued bone loss in heterozygous conditional Stat3 deletion mice.

**Fig. 9: Administration of colivelin promoted osteoblast differentiation and partially rescued bone loss in heterozygous pre-osteoblast-specific *Stat3* deletion mice.**

Furthermore, we performed a tail suspension model (TS) to mimic bone loss due to microgravity or disuse^48,49,50. This was done in both the presence and absence of colivelin to analyze the effects of colivelin on bone metabolism in vivo. Using micro-CT analysis, we found that tail suspension induced bone loss in the femur as indicated by reduced BV/TV, Tb.N., and Ct.Th. and increased Tb.Sp. (Fig. 10a–f). Bone loss due to tail suspension was partially rescued by colivelin as indicated by increased BV/TV and Tb.N. in the colivelin group (Fig. 10a–f). Further analysis using calcein-alizarin red S double labeling indicated that colivelin promoted bone formation in the tail suspension mice (Fig. 10g), but without any influence on bone resorption as indicated by comparable numbers of TRAP⁺ osteoclasts (Supplementary Fig. 5b).

**Fig. 10: Pharmacological activation of STAT3 activity promoted osteoblast differentiation and partially prevented bone mass loss induced by tail suspension by promoting osteogenesis.**

All these data validated that pharmacological regulation of STAT3 activity could regulate osteoblast differentiation in vitro and modulate bone metabolism in vivo, suggesting that STAT3 may act as a suitable pharmacological target for treatment of AD-HIES-related skeletal defects and other bone disorders by regulating osteogenesis.

Discussion

Skeletal deformities are typical clinical manifestations of AD-HIES, which are caused mainly by heterozygous, dominant mutations of STAT3⁵¹. However, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure, which limits the treatment of the AD-HIES-related bone disorders^52,53. In the present study, we revealed that inactivation of STAT3 in osteoblast lineage cells, but not osteoclasts, induced a series of remarkable bone developmental dysplasia, including dwarfism with short limbs, craniofacial malformations, osteoporosis, and bone fragility, which were similar to the bone defects in AD-HIES. More importantly, these skeletal deformities due to STAT3 deletion in osteoblasts resulted from impaired bone remodeling that was characterized by reduced bone formation. This observation indicated that promoting bone formation, but not inhibiting bone resorption, may be used to treat AD-HIES-related bone disorders such as osteoporosis and recurrent minimal trauma fractures.

Although a series of gene mutations are related to AD-HIES, such as DOCK8, IL-6R, IL6ST, CARD11, gp130, PGM3, ZNF241^{5,10,11,12,13,54}, AD-HIES is mainly caused by the heterozygous, dominant mutations of STAT3². There were more than 140 STAT3 gene mutations reported in AD-HIES patients^7,17. Furthermore, Flanagan et al. revealed that all STAT3 mutations that caused AD-HIES were loss-of-function⁵⁵. We examined the activity of Stat3 gene mutations which were common in AD-HIES patients (R382W, R382Q, V637M, T714A)⁷ and found that these mutations lead to STAT3 loss of function, functionally similar to the effect we observed with Stat3 knockout model. To further mimic the residual activity induced by the heterozygous, dominant-negative mutation of STAT3 in AD-HIES patients, we analyzed the skeletal phenotype of heterozygous conditional Stat3 knockout mice. Indeed, as demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 4, the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice did not show obvious dwarf phenotype which was the main phenotypic difference between AD-HIES patients and the conditional Stat3 knockout mice, but exhibited AD-HIES-like skeletal defects, including craniofacial malformation and osteoporosis. These results indicate that Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice were useful for mimicking the skeletal deformity of AD-HIES patients as well as investigating the pharmacological treatment potential of STAT3 activation by colivelin (Fig. 9).

Although early reports suggested an increased bone resorption activity in the AD-HIES patients^27,28,29, clinical treatment of patients with bisphosphonates to inhibit osteoclast activity and bone resorption failed to effectively reduce the incidence of pathological fractures in patients in spite of its effect of increased bone mineral density^31,32. More importantly, in these studies, there were no data examining the correlation between the osteoclast activity change due to STAT3 inactivation and the typical AD-HIES skeletal deformity, such as craniofacial malformation and spontaneous bone fracture. Herein, on one hand, Stat3 knockout in the mature osteoclast by Ctsk^Cre displayed increased bone mass³⁴ rather than any typical AD-HIES skeletal deformities. On the other hand, deletion of Stat3 either in BMSCs or pre-osteoblasts induced exhibited a series of AD-HIES-like skeletal defects, such as craniofacial malformations, osteoporosis, and bone fragility through impaired osteogenesis as well as reduced osteoblast differentiation. Hence, inactivation of STAT3 in osteoblasts, but not in osteoclasts, induced AD-HIES-related bone deformities.

The head is anatomically the most sophisticated. Craniofacial development depends on the regulation of specific transcription networks and signaling pathways⁵⁶. Transcription factor Dlx5 plays a critical role in regulating the patterning of craniofacial structures^57,58. Loss of Dlx5 resulted in defects in the craniofacial structures. Computed tomography scans showed parietal foramina in the Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and morphological deformities including a circular shape and craniosynostosis that were similar to the phenotype of the Msx1 and Dlx5 deletion mice. Importantly, RNA-seq revealed that Dlx5 was significantly downregulated and that overexpression of DLX5 could partially rescue the impaired osteoblast differentiation of the Stat3-deficient BMSCs. The activity of the luciferase reporter driven by the Dlx5 promoter promoted by STAT3 expression and the ChIP assay indicated that STAT3 could bind to the Dlx5 promoter and regulate the transcription of Dlx5. Transcription-regulating Msx genes are expressed at multiple sites of tissue-tissue interactions during vertebrate embryonic development⁵⁹. Msx1 is a key factor in the development of the craniofacial skeleton and has been proven to play an important role in terminal cell differentiation⁶⁰. In addition, previous studies have shown that Msx1 and Dlx5 function synergistically to regulate craniofacial development and that Msx is crucial for Dlx5 transcription through binding to its promoter. Here, we have provided evidence that STAT3 cooperated with MSX1 to drive Dlx5 transcription. Co-IP assays revealed that STAT3 physically associated with MSX1. We discovered that STAT3 could further promote MSX1-driven Dlx5 promoter activity. More importantly, the synergistic effects of STAT3 and MSX1 on Dlx5 promoter activity were dependent on both the activity of both STAT3 and the STAT3 binding sites on the Dlx5 promoter. Last, the mutations of highest frequency in STAT3 of AD-HIES could affect the Dlx5 promoter activity as well as the synergistic effect with MSX1. Taken together, STAT3 may regulate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by directly promoting osteogenic gene transcription.

The skeleton is not static after being modeled during development, but undergoes lifelong active metabolism called bone remodeling that consists of bone formation by osteoblasts and bone resorption. The balance in bone remodeling is critical for maintaining bone homeostasis, and how to regulate this balance may be the key to the treatment of a series of bone disorders. Here, we have provided evidence that STAT3 in osteoblasts is critical for the regulation of bone metabolism. Firstly, with an inducible osteoblastic Stat3 deletion mouse, we found that inactivation of STAT3 in osteoblasts impaired bone formation and induced bone loss in adult mice. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 impaired bone formation and induced bone loss in adult mice. Also, pharmacological activation of STAT3 promoted bone formation and reduced bone loss partially due to heterozygous deletion of Stat3 in pre-osteoblast and tail suspension assay. Hence, we proposed STAT3 to be a suitable pharmacological target for the treatment of AD-HIES-like skeletal defects and other bone metabolism disorders through regulating bone homeostasis.

AD-HIES are mainly caused by heterozygous and dominant-negative mutations in STAT3, resulting in a complicated situation of STAT3 state in patients due to including not only the residual activity of the intact allele but also the dominant-negative functions of the mutant STAT3¹⁷. There were two germline mouse models of AD-HIES reported previously. One model carried the deletion of SH2 domain of STAT3, displayed early embryonic lethality, and the other model carried a 185 kb bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) that encoded a common mutation identified in multiple patient cohorts. However, neither of the two models could be employed to study the specific role of STAT3 in bone development and metabolism because of the complexity of whole-body gene mutation. In the current study, we used osteoblast-specific deletion strategy, which we believe would be more appreciate to study STAT3 function in skeletal formation. Although the conditional Stat3 knockout model could not be genetically resemble the STAT3 mutations, it could functionally mimic the skeleton defects in patients. There are more than 140 STAT3 gene mutations reported in AD-HIES patients, with single or combinational mutation^7,17. In the future, it is promising to establish mouse models with AD-HIES patient-originated STAT3 mutations or with tissue-specific gain-of-function approach to mimic the authentically status of STAT3 in the patients and reveal their functions in the disease.

In conclusion, our research has clarified a critical role of STAT3 in craniomaxillofacial development and the maintenance of bone homeostasis, as well as revealed its underlying mechanisms. Inactivation of STAT3 in osteoblasts, yet not in osteoclasts, induced AD-HIES-related bone deformities by impairing osteogenesis, which provided potential insights for the treatment of skeletal disorders of AD-HIES patients via the regulation of osteogenesis, though further clinical investigations are needed in the future.

Methods

Ethics statement

We have complied with all relevant ethical regulations for animal testing and research. All experimental animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee of the Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University and according to the protocol (approval number: HKDL[2018]386) authorized by the Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital affiliated to shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine.

Mice

Stat3^fl/fl mice bearing loxP sites flanking exons 18–20 of the Stat3 gene were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (No. 016923). Ctsk^Cre strain were provided by S. Kato, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan⁶¹. Osx^Cre (No. 006361) and Prx1^Cre (No. 005584) strain were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory, and Col1^{cre ERT2} strain were a gift from Bin Zhou, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences⁶². All these mice were maintained on the C57BL/6 background. Stat3^fl/fl mice were crossed with Ctsk^Cre mice, Osx^Cre mice, Prx1^Cre mice, or Col1^{Cre ERT2} mice to generate Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl, Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+, Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl, Prx1^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl, or Col1^{Cre ERT2}; Stat3^fl/fl mice. All mice were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions.

Mice treated with STAT3 inhibitor

Ten 4-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Shanghai JSJ Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., which were randomly divided into two groups. Vehicle group: mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of DPBS (Corning, 21-031-CMR) for 5 weeks. AG490 group: mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of AG490 (5 mg/kg; Selleck, S1143) for 5 weeks. The femurs of the 9-week-old mice were then used for micro-CT or histological analysis.

Mice treated with STAT3 agonist colivelin

12 one-week-old male Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice were randomly divided into two groups: ‘Osx^Cre;stat3^fl/+ + Vehicle group’ and ‘Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ + Colivelin group’.6 littermate Osx^Cre mice were treated as control. In control group, 1-week-old Osx^Cre mice received intraperitoneal administration of PBS every other day for 3 weeks. Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ + Vehicle group and Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ + Colivelin group were referred to as 1-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/+ mice that received intraperitoneal administration of PBS and 1.5 mg/kg colivelin (MCE, HY-P1061A), respectively, every other day for 3 weeks. The femurs of the 4-week-old mice were employed for micro-CT and histological analysis.

Tail suspension model and STAT3 agonist colivelin treatment

15 four-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Shanghai JSJ Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. Which were randomly divided into 3 groups, including ‘Vehicle group’, ‘TS + vehicle group’ and ‘TS + colivelin group’. In Vehicle group, mice received intraperitoneal administration of PBS for 7 days without tail suspension. In TS + vehicle group, mice were suspended in individual plastic cages for 7 days at 30 degrees head-down tilt simultaneously intraperitoneal administration of PBS. The angle of suspension was adjusted to make sure that mouse hind limbs were unable to touch the ground when it was fully stretching⁶³. In TS + colivelin group, mice were suspended in individual plastic cages for 7 days and with intraperitoneal administration of 1 mg/kg colivelin (MCE, HY-P1061A) for each day.

Analysis of bone phenotypes

For alcian blue and alizarin red S staining of the skeleton, briefly, newborn mice were eviscerated and the skin was removed. After fixation with 95% ethanol for 1 day, the newborns were stained for 42 h in alcian blue solution. Then, they were fixed and cleared with 95% ethanol two times, each for 1 h, and then treated with 2% KOH for 3–4 h. After staining with ARS solution for 3–4 h, the skeletons were cleared with 1% KOH in 20% glycerol. For 2-week-old mice, ARS staining needed 6–8 h, and then the skeletons were cleared with 1% KOH in 20% glycerol. For 8-week-old mice, 2% KOH digestion for 6–8 h and ARS staining for 12 h. The skeletons were then cleared with 1% KOH in 20% glycerol.

For histological analysis, bone tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 48 h, incubated in 15% DEPC-EDTA for decalcification, and then embedded in paraffin. For embryonic mice, 4-mm tissue sections were used for DIG-labeled in situ hybridization (Roche, No. 11207733910). For postnatal mice, bone tissues were fixed in 4% PFA and decalcified for 2 weeks prior to paraffin embedding. Tissue sections (6 mm) were used for TRAP staining according to the standard protocol (Sigma, 387A-1KT). For safranin O staining, slides were deparaffinized and hydrated to distilled water, then stained with 0.05% fast green (FCF) solution for 1.5 min. Next, they were rinsed quickly with 1% acetic acid solution for no more than 10 s, stained in 0.5% safranin O solution for 1 min, and differentiated with 95% ethanol. Last, they were washed in running water and cleared with xylene. Finally, they were mounted using a resinous medium.

Immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence

Bone tissues were fixed in 4% PFA for 48 h and incubated in 15% EDTA for decalcification. Then, specimens were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 6 μm. For immunohistochemical staining, sections were de-waxed and rehydrated. A solution of 3% H₂O₂ was used to block the activity of endogenous peroxidase. Antigen retrieval was performed with protease K at 37 °C for 15 min. The antibody to DLX5 (Abcam, EPR4488, Rabbit monoclonal, 1:1000) was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Anti-rabbit secondary antibody was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature, followed by color development with an ABC kit (Vector Labs, PK-4000). For immunofluorescence, sections were blocked in PBS with 10% horse serum for 1 h and then stained overnight with anti-OPN (R&D System, #AF808, Goat Polyclonal, 1:200). Donkey anti-goat Cy3 (Absin, abs20028A, Donkey polyclonal, 1:200) was used as the secondary antibody. DAPI (Sigma, D8417) was used for nuclear staining.

Calcein-alizarin red S labeling

Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 20 mg/kg calcein (Sigma, C0875-5G, 1 mg/ml in 2% NaHCO₃ solution) and 40 mg/kg alizarin red S (Sigma, A5533-25G, 2 mg/ml in H₂O) on day 0 and day 4 separately. On day 7, the mice were euthanized, and the bones were fixed and dehydrated and embedded with Embed-812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Samples were cut into 5 μm with a hard tissue cutter (RM2265, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), and fluorescence-labeled images were captured using a microscope (BX51, Olympus).

Micro-CT analysis

Mouse hind limbs and skulls were harvested, soft tissues were removed, and the remaining tissues were stored in 70% ethanol. The femurs of 4-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and control littermates were scanned with a SkyScan1176 (Bruker, Kartuizersweg, Belgium) at a 8.96 μm resolution for quantitative analysis. The turn on voltage was 65 kV and current density was 300 μA. The region from −40 to −240 slices below the growth plate was analyzed for BV/TV, Tb.Th., Tb.N., and Tb.Sp. The region from −400 to −456 slices below the growth plate was analyzed for Ct.Th. Skulls of 4-week-old Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice and control littermates were used for Micro-CT analysis (SkyScan 1176, Bruker, Kartuizersweg, Belgium) with 9 μm voxel size. The turn on voltage was 60 kV and current density was 280 μA Micro-CT analysis of the femurs of 6-week-old Col1^{cre ERT2};Stat3^fl/fl and 9-week-old mice that had been injected with AG490 for 5 weeks, 5-week-old tail-suspended mice injected with colivelin or PBS and their corresponding WT littermates were scanned with a Quantum GX2 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA) instrument. The turn on voltage was 80 kV and current density was 88 μA, and 101 slices (9 μm each) immediately below the growth plate in the distal metaphysis of the femur were used for quantification of the bone parameters.

Cell culture

BMSCs were isolated from the femora and tibiae of 4-week-old mice and cultured in Minimum Essential Medium-α (α-MEM, Corning, 10-022-CVR) containing 10% FBS (Ausbian, WS500T) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, No. 15140122). We changed half of the culture medium after 3 days of cultivation, and replaced all the culture medium on the 5th day of cultivation, which were counted and plated on the 7th day of culture. For in vitro osteoblast differentiation, 2 × 10⁵ BMSCs were seeded in 12-well plates and cultured in osteogenic medium (Cyagen, MUBMD-90021) and subjected to ALP staining (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, P0321S) on day 7 and alizarin red S staining (Cyagen, MUBMD-90021) on day 14.

BMMs were washed out of the femora and tibiae of 4-week-old Stat3^fl/fl and Ctsk^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice. After centrifugation (900 × g, 3 min), cells were resuspended as a single-cell suspension and cultured in 10 cm dishes with α-MEM containing 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin for 24 h. Non-adherent cells were collected, centrifuged (900 × g, 3 min), and resuspended in α-MEM supplemented with 10 ng/ml M-CSF (Sigma, AF-315-02). Cells were then seeded into 24-well plates with density of 2 × 10⁶ cells/ml. Three days after seeding, BMMs were cultured in osteoclast differentiation medium consisting of α-MEM supplemented with 20 ng/ml M-CSF and 20 ng/ml RANKL (R&D, Minneapolis, MN, 462-TEC-010). The culture medium was replaced after 2 days and every day thereafter until mature multinuclear osteoclasts were formed (5–7 days). Cells were prepared for protein assay.

293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Corning, 10-013-CVR) containing 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. C3H10T1/2 cells were maintained in α-MEM containing 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. All the cells were cultured in a 5% CO₂ humidified incubator at 37 °C.

Adenoviruses and lentivirus

Cre-EGFP and EGFP adenovirus and DLX5 and EGFP lentivirus were purchased from Hanbio Biotechnology Co. Ltd (Shanghai). For adenoviruses, 2 × 10⁵ BMSCs were seeded in 12-well plates in α-MEM for 24 h, then BMSCs were infected with adenovirus expressing either Cre-EGFP recombinase or EGFP at a multiplicity of infection of 30. After 4–6 h, BMSCs were cultured in osteogenic medium (Cyagen, MUBMD-90021). For lentivirus, 2 × 10⁵ BMSCs were seeded in 12-well plates in α-MEM for 24 h, then BMSCs were infected with lentivirus expressing either DLX5 recombinase or EGFP at a multiplicity of 20. After 24 h, BMSCs were cultured in osteogenic medium (Cyagen, MUBMD-90021).

Plasmid

The cDNA of STAT3, MSX1, and MSX2 were cloned into a phage-based plasmid. The Dlx5 promoter was synthesized and cloned into PGL3-based luciferase reporter (DLX5-Luc). The mutant Dlx5 promoter with deletion of the two predicted STAT3 binding sites (One binding site is in the promoter -980 to -971 region, and one binding site is in the promoter -933 to -918 region) that predicted was synthesized and cloned into PGL3-based luciferase reporter (DLX5-mu-Luc). Constitutively-active STAT3 (STAT3-C) and dominant-negative mutation of STAT3 (STAT3-DN) were provided by Dr. Feng⁴³. STAT3 WT(NM_001369512.1), four Hyper-IgE mutants that previously described^3,7 (R382W, R382Q, V637M, T714A) was synthesized and cloned into pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-GFP + Puro (CD513B-1) (NheI/NotI).

RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from osteoclasts using TRIzol (Sigma, T9424) and was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the Prime Script RT master kit (TakaRa Bio Inc., RR036A). Real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using the Bio-Rad CFX96 system. The primer sets used were as follows:

mouse-HPRT-F: GTTAAGCAGTACAGCCCCAAA

mouse-HPRT-R: AGGGCATATCCAACAACAAACTT

mouse-Stat3-F: CTTGGCCCTTTGGAATGAAG

mouse-Stat3-R: CAAGTGAAAGTGACCCCTCC

mouse-Runx2-F: CCAACCGAGTCATTTAAG

mouse-Runx2-R: GCTCACGTCGCTCATCTTG

mouse-Osteocalcin-F: CTTGGTGCACACCTAGCAGA

mouse-Osteocalcin-R: CTCCCTCATGTGTTGTCCCT

mouse-Alp-F: CGGGACTGGTACTCGGATAA

mouse-Alp-R: ATTCCACGTCGGTTCTGTTC

mouse-Col1a1-F: GCTCCTCTTAGGGGCCACT

mouse-Col1a1-R: CCACGTCTCACCATTGGGG

mouse-Bsp-F: CGAAGAAGCAGAAGTGGATG

mouse-Bsp-R: GCTTCTTCTCCGTTGTCTCC

mouse-Dlx5-F: TCTCTAGGACTGACGCAAACA

mouse-Dlx5-R: GTTACACGCCATAGGGTCGC

mouse-Msx1-F: TCATGGCCGATCACAGGAAG

mouse-Msx1-R: GGAGTCCTCCGACTGAGAAATG.

RNA-Seq and GO analysis

Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol from the parietal bone of Osx^Cre mice (n = 3) and Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl mice (n = 3) littermates. Complementary DNA library preparation and sequencing were performed according to the Illumina standard protocol. Raw reads were mapped to mm9 using the TopHat version 1.4.1 program. We assigned fragment per kilo base per million (FPKM) as an expression value for each gene using Cufflinks version 1.3.0 software. Then, Cuffdiff software was used to identify differentially expressed genes between Osx^Cre;Stat3^fl/fl and control Osx^Cre samples. Differentially expressed gene heat maps were clustered by k-means clustering using the Euclidean distance as the distance and visualized using Java TreeView software. GO analysis was performed with the DAVID online tool. Top GO categories were selected according to the P values.

Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation

For western blot analysis of parietal bone, total protein was obtained from P0 mice with SDS buffer (TaKaRa, No. 9173). For western blot analysis of BMSCs, total protein was obtained from BMSCs after 7 days of differentiation in osteogenic medium. For western blotting analysis of BMSCs treated with AG490, 5 × 10⁵ BMSCs were seeded in 6-well plates in α-MEM for 48 h and then treated with AG490 for 12 h. Total cells were then used for western blotting. For western blot analysis of BMSCs treated with colivelin, 5 × 10⁵ BMSCs were seeded in 6-well plates in α-MEM for 48 h, then changed to medium supplemented with 1 nM colivelin for 1 h. Total cells were then used for western blotting. Proteins (60 μg of parietal bone protein or 30 μg of cells) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting according to the standard protocols. Antibodies used were STAT3 (Santa Cruz, sc-482, Rabbit polyclonal, 1:500), p-STAT3 (CST, #9138, Mouse monoclonal, 1:1000), GAPDH (CST, #2118, Rabbit monoclonal, 1:1000), and β-Actin (CST, #4970, Rabbit monoclonal, 1:1000).

Co-IP was performed according to a method previously described⁶⁴. Briefly, 293T cells were seeded at 6 × 10⁶ cells per 10 cm dish and cultured overnight. Afterward, we transfected 293T cells with Flag-STAT3 with Myc-MSX1 or HA-MSX2, 36–48 h after transfection, the cells were lysed. Whole-cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody (Sigma, F3165, Mouse monoclonal, 1:10,000) at 4 °C overnight. Western blot assay was performed with the indicated antibodies (anti-HA, Sigma, H9658, Mouse monoclonal, 1:1000 and anti-Myc, Sigma, SAB4501941, Rabbit polyclonal, 1:2000).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and qPCR

ChIP analysis in C3H10T1/2 cells was performed using an enzymatic chromatin immunoprecipitation kit (MILLIPORE, Catalog #17-371) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, C3H10T1/2 cells at 80–90% confluence in 10 cm dishes were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature followed by quenching with glycine. Chromatin digestion was performed to obtain DNA fragments from 250 to 500 bp by micrococcal nuclease (BioruptorTM, Diagenode, Belgium). Immunoprecipitation was performed with STAT3 (CST, #12640, Rabbit monoclonal, 1:50), and IgG (MILLIPORE, No. 12-371B) was used as a negative control. Precipitated DNA was detected by qPCR with specific primers (Fig. 6a). Primers for Dlx5 promoter F: TGCCTACTTTTCGGTCTTCA; Dlx5 promoter R: CTCGACTACTTGGAAGCTTC.

Luciferase reporter assay

We assessed DLX5 or DLX5-mu transcriptional activity via DLX5 or mutant DLX5 responsive Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System. 293T cells were plated at a density of 2 × 10⁵ cells/well in a 24-well plate for 18–24 h and transfected by Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, Inc. 11668019) leveraging luciferase reporter plasmid (DLX5-Luc or DLX5-mu-Luc) and renilla along with STAT3, MSX1, STAT3 WT or various STAT3 mutants (STAT3-C, STAT3-DN, R382W, R382Q, V637M, T714A) according to a previously reported protocol⁶⁵. All wells were supplemented with control empty expression vector plasmids to make the total amount of DNA constant. At 48 h after transfection, the luciferase activity was assayed in cell extract supernatants using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega, Madison, WI. E1910).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 6.01 software (GraphPad Software). Cell-based experiments were performed at least twice. Animals were randomized into different groups and at least 3 mice were used for each group, unless otherwise stated. All quantitative data are presented as the mean ± s.d. Student’s t-test was used for statistical evaluations of two group comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE173711. All data and genetic material utilized for this paper are available upon requests to the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Grimbacher, B., Holland, S. M. & Puck, J. M. Hyper-IgE syndromes. Immunological Rev. 203, 244–250 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Minegishi, Y. et al. Dominant-negative mutations in the DNA-binding domain of STAT3 cause hyper-IgE syndrome. Nature 448, 1058–1062 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. et al. STAT3 mutations in the hyper-IgE syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1608–1619 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grimbacher, B. et al. Hyper-IgE syndrome with recurrent infections—an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 692–702 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schwerd, T. et al. A biallelic mutation in IL6ST encoding the GP130 co-receptor causes immunodeficiency and craniosynostosis. J. Exp. Med. 214, 2547–2562 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Renner, E. D. et al. Novel signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) mutations, reduced T(H)17 cell numbers, and variably defective STAT3 phosphorylation in hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 122, 181–187 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Woellner, C. et al. Mutations in STAT3 and diagnostic guidelines for hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125, 424–432.e428 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chandesris, M. O. et al. Autosomal dominant STAT3 deficiency and hyper-IgE syndrome: molecular, cellular, and clinical features from a French national survey. Medicine 91, e1–e19 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wu, J. et al. Clinical manifestations and genetic analysis of 17 patients with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome in Mainland China: new reports and a literature review. J. Clin. Immunol. 37, 166–179 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Spencer, S. et al. Loss of the interleukin-6 receptor causes immunodeficiency, atopy, and abnormal inflammatory responses. J. Exp. Med. 216, 1986–1998 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sassi, A. et al. Hypomorphic homozygous mutations in phosphoglucomutase 3 (PGM3) impair immunity and increase serum IgE levels. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 133, 1410–1419 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Béziat, V. et al. A recessive form of hyper-IgE syndrome by disruption of ZNF341-dependent STAT3 transcription and activity. Sci. Immunol. 3, eaat4956 (2018).
Zhang, Q. et al. Combined immunodeficiency associated with DOCK8 mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 2046–2055 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Weber-Nordt, R. M., Mertelsmann, R. & Finke, J. The JAK-STAT pathway: signal transduction involved in proliferation, differentiation and transformation. Leuk. Lymphoma 28, 459–467 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
O’Shea, J. J., Gadina, M. & Schreiber, R. D. Cytokine signaling in 2002: new surprises in the Jak/Stat pathway. Cell 109, S121–S131 (2002). Suppl.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E., O’Keefe, R. A. & Grandis, J. R. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 234–248 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Asano, T. et al. Human STAT3 variants underlie autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome by negative dominance. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20202592 (2021).
Myles, I. A. et al. TNF overproduction impairs epithelial staphylococcal response in hyper IgE syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 128, 3595–3604 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Keles, S. et al. Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 regulates signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation and promotes T(H)17 cell differentiation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138, 1384–1394.e1382 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kreins, A. Y. et al. Human TYK2 deficiency: mycobacterial and viral infections without hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 212, 1641–1662 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Steward-Tharp, S. M. et al. A mouse model of HIES reveals pro- and anti-inflammatory functions of STAT3. Blood 123, 2978–2987 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. et al. CD4+ regulatory T cells control TH17 responses in a Stat3-dependent manner. Science 326, 986–991 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, H. et al. Osteoblast/osteocyte-specific inactivation of Stat3 decreases load-driven bone formation and accumulates reactive oxygen species. Bone 49, 404–411 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Corry, K. A. et al. Stat3 in osteocytes mediates osteogenic response to loading. Bone Rep. 11, 100218 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ziros, P. G., Georgakopoulos, T., Habeos, I., Basdra, E. K. & Papavassiliou, A. G. Growth hormone attenuates the transcriptional activity of Runx2 by facilitating its physical association with Stat3beta. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19, 1892–1904 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Feng, X. & McDonald, J. M. Disorders of bone remodeling. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6, 121–145 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cohen-Solal, M. et al. Cytokine-mediated bone resorption in patients with the hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 76, 75–81 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Osteoporosis with increased osteoclastogenesis in hematopoietic cell-specific STAT3-deficient mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 328, 800–807 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leung, D. Y. et al. Increased in vitro bone resorption by monocytes in the hyper-immunoglobulin E syndrome. J. Immunol. 140, 84–88 (1988).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Staines Boone, A. T. et al. Zoledronate as effective treatment for minimal trauma fractures in a child with STAT3 deficiency and osteonecrosis of the hip. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 63, 2054–2057 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sowerwine, K. J. et al. Bone density and fractures in autosomal dominant hyper IgE syndrome. J. Clin. Immunol. 34, 260–264 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scheuerman, O. et al. Reduced bone density in patients with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Clin. Immunol. 33, 903–908 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dibbs, R., Raghuram, A., Roy, M. G., Kaufman, M. G. & Monson, L. A. Orthognathic Surgical Treatment in a Patient With Hyperimmunoglobulin E Syndrome. J. Craniofacial Surg. 31, e251–e254 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. STAT3 controls osteoclast differentiation and bone homeostasis by regulating NFATc1 transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 15395–15407 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davey, R. A. et al. Decreased body weight in young Osterix-Cre transgenic mice results in delayed cortical bone expansion and accrual. Transgenic Res. 21, 885–893 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, W. & Olsen, B. R. Skeletal defects in Osterix-Cre transgenic mice. Transgenic Res. 24, 167–172 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Logan, M. et al. Expression of Cre Recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer. Genes 33, 77–80 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dirckx, N., Moorer, M. C., Clemens, T. L. & Riddle, R. C. The role of osteoblasts in energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15, 651–665 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manolagas, S. C. & Jilka, R. L. Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling. Emerging insights into the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 332, 305–311 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marie, P. J. Targeting integrins to promote bone formation and repair. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 9, 288–295 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Artigas, N. et al. p53 inhibits SP7/Osterix activity in the transcriptional program of osteoblast differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 24, 2022–2031 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Acampora, D. et al. Craniofacial, vestibular and bone defects in mice lacking the Distal-less-related gene Dlx5. Development 126, 3795–3809 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, G. et al. STAT3 selectively interacts with Smad3 to antagonize TGF-β signalling. Oncogene 35, 4422 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sugii, H. et al. The Dlx5-FGF10 signaling cascade controls cranial neural crest and myoblast interaction during oropharyngeal patterning and development. Development 144, 4037–4045 (2017).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chung, I. H., Han, J., Iwata, J. & Chai, Y. Msx1 and Dlx5 function synergistically to regulate frontal bone development. Genes 48, 645–655 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vogel, T. P., Milner, J. D. & Cooper, M. A. The ying and yang of STAT3 in human disease. J. Clin. Immunol. 35, 615–623 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. A potential nutraceutical candidate lactucin inhibits adipogenesis through downregulation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway-mediated mitotic clonal expansion. Cells 9, 331 (2020).
Aguirre, J. I. et al. Osteocyte apoptosis is induced by weightlessness in mice and precedes osteoclast recruitment and bone loss. J. Bone Miner. Res. 21, 605–615 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kodama, Y. et al. Inhibition of bone resorption by pamidronate cannot restore normal gain in cortical bone mass and strength in tail-suspended rapidly growing rats. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12, 1058–1067 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. et al. Interdependence of muscle atrophy and bone loss induced by mechanical unloading. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 1118–1130 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Béziat, V. et al. Dominant-negative mutations in human IL6ST underlie hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20191804 (2020).
Dmitrieva, N. I. et al. Impaired angiogenesis and extracellular matrix metabolism in autosomal-dominant hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 130, 4167–4181 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bocchini, C. E. et al. Protein stabilization improves STAT3 function in autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome. Blood 128, 3061–3072 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shahin, T. et al. Selective loss of function variants in IL6ST cause Hyper-IgE syndrome with distinct impairments of T-cell phenotype and function. Haematologica 104, 609–621 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Flanagan, S. E. et al. Activating germline mutations in STAT3 cause early-onset multi-organ autoimmune disease. Nat. Genet. 46, 812–814 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wilkie, A. O. & Morriss-Kay, G. M. Genetics of craniofacial development and malformation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 458–468 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Depew, M. J. et al. Dlx5 regulates regional development of the branchial arches and sensory capsules. Development 126, 3831–3846 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Han, J. et al. Indirect modulation of Shh signaling by Dlx5 affects the oral-nasal patterning of palate and rescues cleft palate in Msx1-null mice. Development 136, 4225–4233 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alappat, S., Zhang, Z. Y. & Chen, Y. P. Msx homeobox gene family and craniofacial development. Cell Res. 13, 429–442 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Blin-Wakkach, C. et al. Endogenous Msx1 antisense transcript: in vivo and in vitro evidences, structure, and potential involvement in skeleton development in mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7336–7341 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. et al. Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts. Cell 130, 811–823 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
He, L. et al. Preexisting endothelial cells mediate cardiac neovascularization after injury. J. Clin. Investig. 127, 2968–2981 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chowdhury, P., Long, A., Harris, G., Soulsby, M. E. & Dobretsov, M. Animal model of simulated microgravity: a comparative study of hindlimb unloading via tail versus pelvic suspension. Physiological Rep. 1, e00012 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Dai, Q. et al. mTOR/Raptor signaling is critical for skeletogenesis in mice through the regulation of Runx2 expression. Cell Death Differ. 24, 1886–1899 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. Mediator MED23 cooperates with RUNX2 to drive osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Nat. Commun. 7, 11149 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Weiguo Zou and Prof. Jinsong Li, State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, for reagents, mice and helpful discussion. We thank Prof. Xinhua Feng for reagents. We thank Dr. Qian Bian from the Shanghai Institute of Precision Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital for useful discussion. We also thank the Cell Biology Core Facility and the Animal Core Facility of Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and the Laboratory for Digitized Stomatology and Research Center for Craniofacial Anomalies of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital for assistance. Thanks for the support of bioimaging facility, Shanghai Institute of Precision Medicine. This work was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81870740, 81570950, 82071083 81800949, 81371121], the Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (20XD1422300), Shanghai “Rising Stars of Medical Talent” Youth Development Program-Outstanding Youth Medical Talents (SHWJRS2019-72), the Cross-disciplinary Research Fund of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JYJC201902), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR4084), the Project of Biobank of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (YBKB201909), the Clinical Research Program of Ninth People’s Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [JYLJ201807], the National Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1436900), the SHIPM-mu Fund from the Shanghai Institute of Precision Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JC201809), the Innovation Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai (SSMU-ZLCX20180501).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Siru Zhou, Qinggang Dai, Xiangru Huang, Anting Jin.

Authors and Affiliations

Center of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200011, China
Siru Zhou, Xiangru Huang, Anting Jin, Yiling Yang, Xinyi Gong, Hongyuan Xu, Xin Gao & Lingyong Jiang
2nd Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200011, China
Qinggang Dai

Authors

Siru Zhou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qinggang Dai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiangru Huang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anting Jin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yiling Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xinyi Gong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hongyuan Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xin Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lingyong Jiang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.Z. and Q.D. designed and performed most of the research, S.Z. created Fig. 7a, b. and the mouse icon was purchased from https://www.shutterstock.com. X.H. and A.J. helped perform the research, Y.Y. and H.X. contributed to Micro-CT data collection. X. Gong and X. Gao performed the tail suspension model. L.J. conceived the study and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingyong Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, S., Dai, Q., Huang, X. et al. STAT3 is critical for skeletal development and bone homeostasis by regulating osteogenesis. Nat Commun 12, 6891 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27273-w

Download citation

Received: 10 December 2020
Accepted: 19 October 2021
Published: 25 November 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27273-w

This article is cited by

Methotrexate inhibits BMP4 and abrogates the hypertrophic chondrocyte phenotype of synovial fibroblasts in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
- Megan M. Simonds
- Samuel T. Freer
- Anne Marie C. Brescia
Pediatric Rheumatology (2024)
Transcriptomic Analysis of the Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion After Fracture
- Xinyi Gu
- Chen Huang
- Xiaofeng Yin
Molecular Neurobiology (2024)
Bone–fat linkage via interleukin-11 in response to mechanical loading
- Masahiro Hiasa
- Itsuro Endo
- Toshio Matsumoto
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (2024)
Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of the temporomandibular joint condyle in 3 and 4-month-old human embryos
- Qianqi Zhu
- Miaoying Tan
- Xingmei Feng
Cell & Bioscience (2023)
Comparative- and network-based proteomic analysis of bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis lesions in broiler’s proximal tibiae identifies new molecular signatures of lameness
- Jennifer Cook
- Elizabeth S. Greene
- Sami Dridi
Scientific Reports (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.