Abstract
C–O–H–N–S-bearing fluids are known as one of the most challenging geochemical systems due to scarcity of available experimental data. H2S-rich fluid systems were recognized in a wide array of world-class mineral deposits and hydrocarbon reservoirs. Here we report on a nature of low-temperature (T ≥ −192 °C) phase transitions observed in natural CH4–H2S–CO2–N2–H2O fluid inclusions, which are modeled as closed thermodynamic systems and thus serve as natural micro-laboratories representative of the C–O–H–N–S system. For the first time, we document solid–solid H2S (α ↔ β ↔ γ) transitions, complex clathrates and structural transformations of solid state H2S in natural inclusion gas mixtures. The new data on Raman spectroscopic features and a complete sequence of phase transition temperatures in the gas mixtures contribute to scientific advancements in fluid geochemistry. Enhanced understanding of the phase equilibria in the C–O–H–N–S system is a prerequisite for conscientious estimation of P-T-V-X properties, necessary to model the geologic evolution of hydrocarbon and mineral systems. Our findings are a driver for the future research expeditions to extraterrestrial H2S-rich planetary systems owing to their low temperature environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a natural gas of organic or inorganic origin. At shallow crustal levels, it is produced in anaerobic environments by degradation of biomass1. As biological mediator H2S plays an important role in the global sulfur cycle and the evolution of life on Earth2. Recent research has shown that H2S-bearing gaseous fluid inclusions carry information imperative to understanding the building blocks of early Archean life3. Inorganic H2S is a common constituent in volcanic gases4, active black smoker vents5, and carbonate-hosted hydrocarbon reservoirs6,7,8. Dissolved in water, H2S or its dissociation products are indispensable for the formation of precious9 and base metal deposits10. Recent discoveries of H2S-ice on Uranus and Neptune at temperatures ranging between −22011 and −153.7 °C12,13, reveal that the low-temperature conditions, which this study focuses on, find clear analogs in the Solar System. Hence, the processes investigated here are of essential importance for understanding the natural terrestrial as well as extraterrestrial environments. In materials science, H2S is utilized to synthesize superconductive materials in the form of sulfur hydrides, e.g., H3S, which displays superconductive properties at transition pressure of 155 GPa and temperature of −70.15 °C14. This finding was an important breakthrough in the development of room-temperature CSH8 superconductor15.
Determining fluid properties and understanding the phase relations in the P-T-Vm space are paramount in fluid geochemistry and geological sciences16,17. Mineral-hosted natural fluid inclusions, which preserve fluids from various geological records in micrometer-scale cavities, are a powerful tool to characterize fluid properties. Fluid inclusions are modeled as “closed” systems, meaning that they permit heat exchange, whereas their molar volumes (Vm) and compositions (Xi) remain constant throughout the geological evolution. Consequently, the P–T conditions of fluid inclusion trapping are deduced from the isochoric trajectories18, which are constructed from bulk Vm-Xi parameters. Microthermometry allows observation of fluid inclusion phase transition temperatures, which can be converted into Vm and Xi by applying equations of state (EoS) or/and quantitative phase diagrams19. Laser Raman spectroscopy allows to determine molecular compositions of complex C–O–H–N–S inclusion gas mixtures8,10,20,21,22,23. Combined microthermometric and Raman spectroscopic analyses coupled with phase diagrams/EoS provide means to reconstruct the spatial and temporal P–T evolution in mineralizing systems10,24 and gas reservoirs8,21,22,25. The latter are often characterized by multiple episodes of coinciding mineralization and gas/oil re-charge. P–T estimates in such systems rely on the construction of isochores for gaseous and/or aqueous fluid inclusions26. This is challenging for CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 inclusions, which contain elevated H2S concentrations27,28 since the properties of the C–O–H–N–S gas mixtures are poorly constrained by experimental and thermodynamic data29.
Natural H2S-bearing fluid inclusions representing binary CH4–H2S and CO2–H2S systems have been characterized in terms of molecular compositions and phase changes30 as phase equilibria of these two systems are well constrained by experimental studies31,32,33,34,35. In contrast, experimental data for ternary system CH4–CO2–H2S are scarce and cover only very limited P–T–X ranges with a focus on the near-critical region of the system36,37,38. An influence of subordinate amounts of CO2 on phase equilibria in the CH4–H2S system in the low-temperature region remains unclear30,32. Experimental studies on purified H2S gas have shown that three structurally distinct solid H2S phases (I-α, II-β, and III-γ) form at low temperatures below −85.5 °C39. Crystal symmetry of the H2S-γ phase, which forms at the lowest temperatures below −169.6 °C, has been under debate39,40,41,42. Laser Raman spectroscopy is one of the most effective techniques in distinguishing structurally distinct solid H2S molecules39,42,43. The structure of H2S solid phases and solid–solid phase transitions have not been recognized in natural fluid inclusions up to date.
In this study, we investigate fluorite-hosted H2S-bearing fluid inclusions representing the natural CH4–H2S–CO2–N2–H2O system. We use combined microthermometric and Raman spectroscopic analyses to record the complete sequence of phase transition temperatures as well as compositions and spectral features of individual phases at low temperatures.
Results and discussion
Fluid inclusion assemblages
Fluid inclusions were analyzed in line with the classic concept of a fluid inclusion assemblage (FIA)44. Both selected FIA’s (Fig. 1), consisting of low-density gas-rich (V) and aqueous 2-phase inclusions (L + V), evidence precipitation of fluorite in the presence of methane, inorganic gases (H2S, CO2, N2) as well as small proportions of a high salinity brine. The molecular compositions of gas phases in the gas-rich inclusions are shown in Table 1, Supplementary Table 1, and Source Data.
The two biggest gas-rich inclusions (P1-fi1A, P1a-fi10) in FIA1 contain a visible aqueous film surrounding the gas phase, whereas in the smaller inclusions the aqueous phase is optically invisible. The bimodal distribution, lack of intermediate aqueous fluid/gas ratios, and gas-saturation (in respect of CH4, CO2, and H2S) of the vapor phases of co-existing aqueous brine inclusions imply contemporaneous trapping of immiscible fluids. Fluorite growth from aqueous brine was obstructed by the gas bubbles, which were wet by traces of the aqueous medium during the fluid entrapment. Thus, it is very unlikely to form water-free, pure gas inclusions in such hydrothermal systems. When heating the inclusions to temperatures up to 170 °C, Raman spectroscopic analyses of the homogenized inclusion fluid45 point to the presence of 3 mol% H2O in all gas-rich inclusions (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1 and Source Data). The volume fractions of the aqueous phase (φH2O)46 in two inclusions with optically visible aqueous rim, indicate very similar water contents of 2.2 and 3.5 wt.%. The water vapor or dissolved H2O was not detected in the gas phase of the gas-rich inclusions at room temperature (Fig. 1a). The gas compositions of six measured inclusions within a single FIA1 (Table 1) are very similar as indicated by very low standard deviation values (σ < 0.02). Median gas compositions for FIA1 are 59 mol% CH4, 24 mol% H2S, 10 mol% CO2, 3 mol% N2, whereas FIA2 shows a slightly higher H2S content of 27 mol% (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The aqueous rims of the gas-rich inclusions are H2S saturated as indicated by the broader Raman peak at 2584 cm−1, which is typical of H2S dissolved in water at room temperature (Fig. 1b). The origin of low-intensity gas peaks in the latter spectrum is ambiguous, they may be derived from gas species dissolved in water and/or may constitute peak overlaps from a much larger gas phase. The steep band between 3000 and 3700 cm−1, corresponding to the stretching vibrations of H2O, confirms the high salinity47 of the aqueous solution coating the gas inclusion (Fig. 1b).
Low-temperature phase transitions—freezing runs
Eight phase transitions were recognized in the studied gas-rich inclusions during freezing (Fig. 2a–i) and heating runs (Fig. 2j–p). The complete temperature sequence of the phase changes is shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2. Two gas-rich inclusions P1-fi1A and P4-fi1B (hereinafter labeled inclusion A and B) of different molecular compositions (Table 1) were used to document in detail the phase transition sequences (Figs. 2 and 3).
When cooling the inclusion to temperatures from −17 to −28.7 °C, the first solid phase that nucleates at the corners of the inclusion cavities is H2S-rich clathrate (Figs. 2b and 3b), which is manifested by two Raman bands at 2593 and 2604 cm−1 (Fig. 4). In inclusions, containing a visible water film, the formation of H2S–CH4–CO2–N2 clathrates is observed (Fig. 4). Raman peaks of 1276 and 1380 cm−1 are typical for CO2-clathrate, bands at 2903 and 2913 cm−1 are assigned to CH4-clathrate, whereas peak splitting to 2324 and 2323 cm−1 is attributed to N2-gas hydrate48 (Fig. 4a).
During further cooling below −29.9 °C/−32.6 °C (inclusions A/B) the H2S–CH4–CO2–N2 gas phase begins to shrink due to volume reduction (Figs. 2c and 3c) and partial separation of H2S-rich liquid. At temperatures of −58.6 °C/−58.5 °C (A/B) CH4-rich liquid starts to separate from the gas phase (Fig. 2d). The presence of H2S- and CH4-rich liquids is indicated by the broadening and shift of the Raman bands to 2593 and 2908 cm−1, respectively. Raman analyses of the three resulting phases reveal that H2S-rich liquid partitions into the outermost phase, liquid CH4–CO2 into the middle phase, whilst CH4–N2 gases remain in the innermost bubble (Fig. 3d). At −100 °C, vibrational bands of CH4–N2 gases from the innermost phase show a shift to higher wavenumbers (2915 cm−1, 2328 cm−1) compared with the gas phase at room temperature (2911 cm−1, 2326 cm−1) (Fig. 5). Similar peak shifts are observed for CO2 and H2S in the middle and the outermost phases, respectively.
At temperatures of −125.1 °C/−117.4 °C (A/B) both H2S and CO2 simultaneously freeze and form a fine-grained mass of bright white (CO2) and yellow-greenish solids (H2S-α) of high reflectance (Figs. 2e and 3e, f). In order to investigate the composition and phase behavior of the nucleated solids a cycling heating/freezing method is applied44. After melting of solid H2S, the inclusion is heated further on until only one CO2 crystal remains. Subsequent rapid cooling results in crystallization of a pure octahedral CO2 crystal at −100 °C (Figs. 2f and 3g), which shows Raman peaks at 1280 and 1384 cm−1. When cooling the inclusion to about −112 °C numerous oval solids of H2S-α crystallize. Applying the cycling heating/freezing procedure on H2S-α is difficult due to the very unstable “jelly-like” behavior of solids and rapid melting of the last solid upon approaching the final Tm(H2S-α). However, when using slow heating rates (4 °C/min) until only some solids remain in the inclusion and then keeping the temperature constant for several minutes, involuntary re-organization of the leftover solids and formation of a single H2S-α solid phase is observed (Figs. 3h and 5d). At −110 °C solid H2S-α shows a single peak at 2558 cm−1 (Fig. 6h). Below −184 °C solidification of CH4 commences (Fig. 2h, i) and is completed at about −185.3 °C/−186.3 °C (A/B). The resulting CH4 solid is characterized by a broad band at a vibrational frequency of 2904.5 cm−1. At −190 °C, Raman peaks of CH4 and N2 in the remaining squeezed gas phase are shifted towards the highest wavenumbers of 2917 and 2329 cm−1, respectively.
The last optically visible phase change is structural re-configuration of H2S at about −191 °C. Smooth solids rearrange into very fine-grained polycrystalline aggregates (Fig. 3i, j) over a prolonged period of time, meaning the transition is not instantaneous but requires a few minutes of maintaining the temperature constant. Notable is a prismatic H2S-γ crystal, tagged with white arrow in Fig. 3i, visible among the fine-grained crystals. This behavior marks the solid H2S (β → γ) transition, which actually commences at a higher temperature, however, it is not instantly visible under the optical microscope. The median temperature range for the H2S (β → γ) transition is between −175.1 and −176.1 °C, which gives an overall median of −175.6 °C and σ = 1.27 (Supplementary Table 2). The transformation to H2S-γ in the studied inclusion is reflected by the appearance of six characteristic peaks at the following wavenumbers: 2523, 2541, 2545, 2547, 2552, and 2556 cm−1 (Figs. 6 and 7). The lower intensity five peaks on the high-frequency side of the Raman spectrum (Fig. 7) develop in an expense of the major H2S-β peak by decrease in its intensity (Fig. 6). These results are reproducible as H2S (γ ↔ β) transitions have been observed multiple times during real-time Raman spectroscopic analyses (Supplementary Table 2).
Low-temperature phase transitions—heating runs
When heating the inclusion from −192 °C, eutectic melting of solid CH4 is observed at about −185.5 °C until the final Tm of −184.5 °C/−185 °C (A/B) is reached (Fig. 2j-k). At about −168.1 °C (B), a rapid decrease in a band number of the H2S solid in the Raman spectrum is observed (Fig. 6). This sharp spectrum change reflects the transition of ordered H2S-γ into the disordered H2S-β phase. This conversion is detectable using the Raman technique only as the textural change is not instantly optically visible. The latter proceeds gradually over time (Fig. 6) and commences at temperature as low as −177 °C (Supplementary Table 2). The median temperature range for the H2S (γ → β) transition lies between −168.9 and −167.5 °C, whereas the median from all measurements is −168.1°C (σ = 1.62, Supplementary Table 2). Upon further heating solid H2S (β → α) transition at about −146.4°C (B) is marked by a very slight Raman peak shift from 2549 to 2554 cm−1 and disappearance of the tail at the higher wavenumber side. During heating runs the structure of solid H2S phases re-organizes itself by compartmentalization of fine-grained crystals into coarser aggregates (e.g., Fig 3k, l) in order to attain back the disordered form. Solid H2S-α dissolves at −98.8 °C/−99.2 °C (A/B), whereas CO2 solid remaining in the inclusion does not preserve its octahedral habit but a rounded shape (Fig. 2l) and melts at temperatures of −91.2 °C/−92.6 °C (A/B). After CO2 melting the inner CH4–N2 gas phase begins to expand continuously (Fig. 2m) and partially homogenizes into a vapor phase at Th1(L1L2V → L2V) = −58.4 °C/−57.8 °C (A/B, Fig. 2n). The bubble expansion lasts until total homogenization at Th2(L2V → V) = −28.6 °C/−31 °C (A/B, Fig. 2o) is reached. The last observed change is the melting of H2S-rich gas hydrate (clathrate) at positive temperatures of 21.8 °C/27.5 °C (A/B, Fig. 2p).
Gas hydrates
Gas hydrate crystallizes from the aqueous film containing dissolved H2S (Fig. 1b) and it forms a shell surrounding the gas phase (Fig. 2b). As a result, the H2S molecules become encased by the hydrogen-bonded cages in the first place and clathrate cavities are dominated by H2S. This is evidenced by the highest intensity of the 2592 and 2604 cm−1 Raman peaks, which are assigned to the symmetric H–S stretching vibrations (ν1) within large cages (LC) and small cages (SC), respectively, of type I cubic lattice structure (sI)49. The characteristic clathrate solid (Fig. 4) is achieved by using a heating/freezing cycling technique, which is applied routinely in the experimental studies of gas hydrates50. The H2S-dominated clathrate (Fig. 4) dissociates at temperatures between +21.8 and +27.5 °C (Table 1), which are lower compared to the quadruple point of the H2O–H2S system (Q2 = + 29.55 °C51). The Raman technique has also been used to identify the H2S-clathrate in synthetic H2O–H2S inclusions at −100 °C52, in natural CO2–H2S–H2O–S inclusions53 and at −140 °C in natural H2S-bearing brine inclusions54.
A single measurement of one individual, well-isolated clathrate crystal reveals the presence of CH4 and minor concentrations of CO2 and N2 besides H2S molecules (Fig. 4). This observation suggests crystallization of H2S–CH4–CO2–N2 mixed gas hydrate. The average cage occupancy ratios – θSC/θLC of CH4- and H2S-hydrates49, calculated from deconvoluted Raman spectra, are: 0.81 (σ = 0.08) and 0.87 (σ = 0.05), respectively. These values deviate from ratios typical of pure CH4 and H2S gas hydrates49,55, probably due to incorporation of minor CO2 and/or N2, which affects relative cage occupancy in the clathrate lattice. The studied clathrate crystal is most likely composed of two clusters of mixed gas hydrates, i.e., the H2S-dominated clathrate, which grew within the aqueous rim, and CH4-dominated, which developed at the water–gas interface. The N2 molecules may occupy both small and large cavities in sI gas hydrates, as indicated by the Raman band splitting (Fig. 4a), whereas CO2 can occupy only large cages due to the absence of a similar peak splitting (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, the distribution of CO2 and N2 molecules between the clathrates remains ambiguous.
Clathrate crystallization from the aqueous phase, containing the dissolved gas, as well as at the water–gas interface leads to depletion of available water molecules. The nucleation of gas hydrates is known to influence phase equilibria in fluid inclusions, e.g., it may decrease Tm of gas components17. Due to the absence of dissolved/vapor H2O in the gas phase, the only process that may affect the gas phase density is the scavenging of gas molecules into the clathrate lattice at the water–gas interface. The water film likely has a negligible impact on the gas phase transitions as they are very consistent within FIA1 (Table 1), e.g., Tm’s of H2S (σ = 0.05) or CH4 (σ = 0.3). The interaction at the aqueous film-gas phase interface has also some more limitations, e.g., the presence of dissolved H2S and high salinity of an aqueous solution (Fig. 1b), which decreases the chemical potential of H2O resulting in a “salting out” effect17,56. Based on the above, it is apparent that only very low amounts of CO2 and CH4 from the gas phase have been incorporated into the clathrate lattice at low temperatures, and thus the gas phase experienced only a very minor volume change. Thereby the studied CH4–H2S–CO2–N2–H2O system behaves as a gas sub-system below nucleation temperature of clathrate and is interpreted as such in the following section. Applying the isochoric behavior of H2O-free systems to aqueous-multivolatile inclusions at low temperatures is justified as the LCEP (lower critical end-point) coincides with the critical point of the gas mixture17. Median compositions of the gas phase in the presence of stable clathrate at −10 °C are: 58.9 mol% CH4, 25.5 mol% H2S, 12.6 mol% CO2, 2.9 mol% N2, (FIA1), and 57.1 mol% CH4, 28.2 mol% H2S, 11.9 mol% CO2, 2.9 mol% N2 (FIA2) (Supplementary Table 1 and Source Data).
The CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 gas system
A phase diagram defining phase transitions in the multicomponent CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 system has neither been experimentally nor numerically developed so far. The behavior of CH4–H2S–CO2 mixtures, previously observed in fluid inclusions30,57, was interpreted in the frame of the CH4–H2S system31 under the assumption that 10–20 mol% CO2 should not significantly affect the phase boundaries. In our study the available P–T projections of phase boundaries of the CH4–H2S–CO2, CH4–H2S, and H2S systems are used to discuss the phase transitions in natural fluid inclusions. The CH4–H2S binary diagram31 is utilized to interpret the phase behavior to −100 °C, whereas for lower temperatures, the numerically derived CH4–H2S phase diagram35 and the phase boundaries for pure H2S system in the low-pressure region40 are used (Fig. 8). Fluid inclusion behavior above −60 °C cannot be explained by the CH4–H2S system alone, therefore for this temperature region we use partial ternary CH4–H2S–CO2 phase diagram58. Experimentally derived phase boundaries for a CH4–H2S–CO2 system were defined only for a gas mixture with H2S content of 40.2 mol%58, which is higher than that in studied inclusions (25–28 mol%, Table 1 and Source Data), and CO2 content of 9.87 mol%, which is close to CO2 concentrations in the inclusions (11.9–13.3 mol%, Supplementary Table 1). This P–T phase diagram, based on the experimentally studied gas mixture, is, therefore, the best available approximation of the studied system at T > −83°C. Notable are three critical points in the CH4–H2S–CO2 system: C1 and C2 lying along the 2-phase boundary curves, and C3 situated on the 3-phase envelope58. The presence of additional gases, e.g., N2 or CH4, is well known to depress the melting points in fluid inclusion gas mixtures59, however, we assume that N2 quantities as low as 3 mol% would likely have a negligible effect on the phase equilibria. The trajectories followed by studied fluid inclusions (blue) during heating are shown schematically in the P–T space, in the considered diagrams (Fig. 8). The phase transition points (9–15) are indicated by black circles and correspond to numbers given in Table 1.
Cooling of fluid inclusions triggers separation of two phases at temperatures between −33 and −29.5 °C (σ = 1.22), therefore they follow the trajectory intersecting the dew-point locus and thus enter the L2V 2-phase field (L2—liquid H2S, Fig. 8a). This phase behavior is characteristic for the retrograde system as with decreasing pressure exsolution of the liquid phase takes place instead of the vapor phase. The first appearance of the liquid droplet is difficult to spot meaning that the temperature of condensation may be slightly underestimated. The P–T pathway should intersect the dew curve above the critical point C1, however, the temperature of the V → L2V transition is located below this point in the diagram. This discrepancy stems from the fact that the used phase boundaries were constructed for 40.2 mol% H2S. For lower H2S contents, alike in the studied inclusions (25–28 mol%), the dew curve would extend to lower temperatures.
At temperatures between −59.6 and −57.8 °C (σ = 0.63), closely below the critical point C3 (−57.5 °C, where V = L1), the fluid inclusion trajectory intersects the 3-phase L1L2V boundary emanating from the C3 point (L1—liquid CH4, Fig. 8a). It is manifested by the separation of a third phase in the inclusion and marks the exsolution of a first drop of methane condensate. Under the optical microscope the newly formed phase appears vapor-like (Figs. 2d and 3d), probably due to the very close proximity of the C3. Since fluid inclusions contain two immiscible liquid phases and a vapor they follow the path along the L1L2V phase boundary and at about −122 °C reach the invariant point: QP1 (Fig. 8a). At the QP1, in the CH4–H2S system four phases co-exist: solid H2S-α, liquid H2S, liquid CH4 and a vapor31. In the analyzed system, the simultaneous and instant solidification of H2S and CO2 (Figs. 2e and 3e) is observed, thus in the 3-component CH4–H2S–CO2 system five phases co-exist in equilibrium at the invariant quintuple point-QP1: H2S solid, CO2 solid, CH4 liquid, H2S + CO2 liquid, and a vapor. If N2 component is considered the number of phases at equilibrium remains the same, however, the QP1 is converted into a univariant curve in the P–T space. The solidification of H2S–CO2 is subject to metastability as the measurements of the same inclusion yield a range of temperatures, and similar variability is also reflected by measured FIA1 (σ = 4.58, Table 1). The freezing temperatures (Tn) are relatively lower compared to melting temperatures (Tm) of H2S or CO2 (Table 1), which requires supercooling to nucleate solids. Precipitation of pure solid H2S-α in the presence of pure solid CO2 increases the temperature of the QP1 to between −107 and −104 °C (Table 1), when the cycling technique is applied.
Contemporaneous freezing of H2S and CO2 is typically observed in binary H2S–CO2 systems at an eutectic temperature of −95.6 °C, where the SCO2LV and SH2SLV triple-point loci converge at the quadruple point32. The phase behavior, observed in the studied fluid inclusions, can thus be explained by an overlap of quadruple points of the binary CH4–H2S and H2S–CO2 systems. Moreover, the H2S-CO2 freezing point temperatures between −125.9 and −114.9 °C (Table 1), measured in the CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 inclusion gas phase with 11.9–13.3 mol% CO2 (in the presence of clathrate, Source Data), are much lower compared to the eutectic temperature for binary H2S–CO2 gas mixtures. According to experimental studies, the latter gas mixtures with <12.5 mol% CO2, follow triple point equilibria with solid H2S in the binary systems and do not represent eutectic mixtures32. Therefore, our study shows that the presence of CH4 gas has a significant impact on the phase behavior of H2S–CO2 gases in studied natural fluid inclusions.
From the QP1 point onwards fluid inclusions follow the S2L1V phase boundary and after intersecting the second quintuple point-QP2 at temperatures between −188 and −185.3 °C (σ = 0.97), the S1S2V curve becomes a path (Fig. 8b). At the QP2 two solids: CH4 (S1) and H2S (S2), liquid CH4 and vapor phases are co-existing in equilibrium in the CH4–H2S system. The position of the QP2 point in this binary system is determined by SLV equation of state since experimental data are lacking35. In the CH4–H2S–CO2 system, five phases co-exist at QP2: H2S solid, CO2 solid, CH4 solid, CH4 liquid, and a vapor. Our study shows that both solidification and melting of methane progress gradually over a temperature interval as the liquid/solid methane phase boundary has been clearly observed (Fig. 2h, j). During the latter phase transition five phases: S1S2L1V, where S2 stands for both H2S and CO2 solids, are co-existing (Fig. 2h, j). Comparison of Tn and Tm values of CH4, measured in the inclusion gas mixtures (Table 1), reveals that only slight supercooling is required to nucleate solid CH4 and it is achievable using liquid N2 coolant during microthermometry runs.
Melting of methane (point 9 in Fig. 8b) occurs at Tm between −186.3 and −184.1 °C, which are very consistent (σ = 0.3, Table 1) and lie slightly below the triple point of a pure CH4 system (−182.48 °C) and a quadruple point-QP2 of the CH4–H2S system (−182.4 °C35). The melting temperatures of H2S-α solid (point 12 in Fig. 8a) within FIA1 (from −98.9 to -98.8 °C) show extremely low variability (σ = 0.05), which corresponds to stable H2S contents in the inclusions (Table 1). Solid CO2 melts (point 13 in Fig. 8a) at temperatures −91.2°C/−92.6 °C (A/B). Elevated standard deviation (σ = 1.14) for Tm(CO2) may be due to slight compositional variation in the inclusions (11.9–13.3 mol% CO2) or due to difficulties in Tm observations, which stem from a small difference in refractive indices between the liquid phase and very small CO2 crystals. Melting of all three solids: CH4, H2S, and CO2 proceeds over temperature intervals, which is characteristic of multicomponent gas systems17,60. The median Tm values (FIA1): −184.3 °C (CH4), −98.9 °C (H2S) and −91.9 °C (CO2) are depressed compared to temperatures of melting points of the relative unary systems, i.e., −182.5 °C (CH4), −85.5 °C (H2S), and −56.6 °C (CO2). This implies that such melting behavior is not only typical for multivolatile H2S-free systems17, but also for H2S-rich gas mixtures.
At the point, where the last solid-phase melts, the fluid inclusions follow back the L1L2V curve (point 13 in Fig. 8a). The first partial homogenization Th1(L1L2V → L2V) takes place in a similar temperature interval from −59.8 to −57.6 °C (σ = 0.78, point 14 in Fig. 8a) as the relative opposite phase transition during cooling (no. 3 in Table 1). This enforces the inclusions to enter the 2-phase L2V field (Fig. 8a) until the homogenization to the vapor (L2V → V), through a dew-point transition, takes place at temperatures between −32.5 and −28.6 °C (σ = 1.31). During the latter transition 2-phase fluid inclusions (L2V) follow back the trajectory intersecting the dew-point locus (point 15 in Fig. 8) and enter the vapor 1-phase field (Fig. 8a).
H2S solid–solid transitions in fluid inclusions
The observation of low-temperature H2S solid–solid transitions (α ↔ β ↔ γ) in natural fluid inclusions requires consideration of new phase boundaries: S2αS2βL1V and S2βS2γL1V, and their influence on the CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 system. The experimentally determined solid–solid transitions of pure H2S occur at temperatures of −169.55 and −146.95 °C40,42,61, which are above the QP2 point of the CH4–H2S system (Fig. 8b). The temperature range of the H2S (β → γ) transformations measured in the studied inclusions indicate that the above expected equilibrium temperatures are not sustained along the cooling pathway. In order to nucleate H2S-γ undercooling or maintaining a constant temperature for a period of time is required, which indicates metastable behavior or kinetics problems. The measured temperatures of the H2S(γ → β) transition in the studied inclusion are oscillating around an average of −168.1 °C (point 10 in Fig. 8b, Supplementary Table 2), which is slightly higher compared to the corresponding value for a pure H2S system (−169.55 °C). This may be related to pressure as the P–T diagram for phase transitions of pure (99.5%) solid H2S, at low pressures, shows that temperatures of solid–solid transitions increase with increasing pressures40 (Fig. 8b). The H2S (γ → β) transition is peculiar as after commencement it gradually proceeds even without temperature increase (on hold) with only the laser on, irrespectively of the laser power used. The temperatures of −147 and −146.4 °C for the solid H2S(β → α) transitions in the studied fluid inclusion (point 11 in Fig. 8b) are in a very good agreement with the experimentally derived temperature of −146.95 °C (Fig. 8b). According to numerical modeling35 allotropic behavior of solid H2S does not affect significantly the overall solid-fluid equilibria of the CH4–H2S mixture. Instead, the modeling has shown that in the CH4–H2S system the temperatures of solid–solid H2S transitions are depressed relative to corresponding temperatures in pure H2S system35. This hypothesis is not consistent with H2S(γ ↔ β ↔ α) transitions temperatures in the natural fluid inclusions studied here and shows that the presence of CH4–CO2 gas affects solid–solid H2S phase equilibria in gas mixtures.
Experimental studies of laboratory-grown H2S crystals has shown that the solid H2S(γ → β) transition is attributed to a decrease in the dielectric constant, whereas the H2S(β → α) transition is ascribed to orientational ordering relative to the rotational vibrations of the hydrogen atoms61. During the higher temperature transition, the crystal structure of both phases (α, β) of fluid inclusion H2S remains disordered, which is expressed by broad bands observed in the stretching region of the Raman spectrum (Fig. 6) and “blobby” appearance under the optical microscope (Figs. 2g and 3e, f, h, l). The number of peaks and their bandwidths shifts, at the point of the lowest temperature transformation (Fig. 6), imply structural modifications of solid H2S (Fig. 3i). The crystalline H2S-γ solid, which nucleates in natural fluid inclusions, shows peaks at wavenumbers (Fig. 7) very similar to those detected by an experimental study of purified H2S gas39. Microscopic observations during low-temperature runs unambiguously show a structural change to a polycrystalline aggregate with in-situ growing prismatic crystals (Fig. 3i) and confirm the crystalline nature of the studied H2S-γ phase. Two crystal systems, orthorhombic or tetragonal, were proposed for solid H2S-γ phase39,41. Our study clearly shows that the protracted structural transformations do not immediately follow up the low-temperature phase transitions detected by Raman spectroscopic analyses.
Spectral features of complex gas mixtures
Systematic shifts of Raman peak positions are observed for all inclusion gas species during the measurements. They are most pronounced for H2S and CH4 due to their high concentrations in the studied gas-rich inclusions (Figs. 5 and 6). Experimental studies have shown that changes in pressure, temperature and density of a single gas component as well as CH4–CO2 gas mixtures have an influence on the Raman peak positions62,63,64. Modifications of gas peak positions in H2S-bearing ternary, as well as any more complex gas mixtures, have not been studied so far.
Our results show that the Raman band positions are shifted to higher wavenumbers for more volatile components and to lower wavenumbers for less volatile components, relative to the original peak positions of the gas mixture at room temperature (Fig. 5). This tendency is also marked by systematic trends in diagrams illustrating H2S and CH4 band positions (cm−1) versus temperature (Fig. 9 and Source Data). It is observed that the FWHM (full width at half maximum) of the peaks of gaseous, liquid, and solid CH4 phases, which exsolved from the CH4-H2S-CO2-N2 gas mixture, consistently decrease with decreasing temperatures (Fig. 5). The above-mentioned features reflect well differential partitioning between the co-existing phases in an individual inclusion upon cooling, which is the strongest at the lowest recorded temperatures of about −190 °C (Fig. 9). The observations also reveal that gases of the highest volatility, i.e., N2 and CH4, partition into the inner vapor phase, whereas CO2 and H2S partition into the outer liquid phases. Similar distribution of gaseous components between the phases has been described for binary gas mixtures17. Our study shows that the composition of the gas mixture affects the wavenumbers of its gas components, e.g., CH4 peak measured in the gas mixture at room temperature is positioned at 2911 cm−1, whereas at −190 °C it shifts to 2917 cm−1 (Fig. 9), which is the wavenumber typical of pure CH4 gas. The band position downshifts can also be indirectly related to the density difference between gas, liquid, and solid physical states of the inclusion components, i.e., solid H2S or CH4 show shifts to the lowest wavenumbers: 2522 and 2904 cm−1, respectively (Fig. 9).
Applications
Experimental models and databases
We report on new fluid inclusion-derived temperature, compositional and spectroscopic data on a multicomponent CH4–H2S–CO2–N2–H2O system. The results of our study are helpful not only for the interpretation of phase equilibria observed in fluid inclusion gas mixtures but also can be used as a guide for future experimental studies of fluids utilizing, e.g., synthetic fluid inclusions, fused-silica optical cells, or silica capillary tubes. Such studies are necessary to construct the unified complete topology of the C–O–H–N–S chemical system, which is required to improve understanding of the phase equilibria29. Such purely experimental results cannot ideally reproduce natural systems, hence data from natural fluid inclusion gas–H2O mixtures are complementary and can be used for validation and models refinement. Detailed characterization of phase transition (α ↔ β ↔ γ) temperatures, structural transformations and spectral features of different solid H2S phases, in natural fluid inclusions, contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge about the nature of the H2S solid–solid-phase equilibria.
Our study shows that the band wavenumbers of gas components in the natural CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 gas mixtures differ from the standard Raman shifts (Δν in cm−1) known from the Raman databases, and thus have a substantial impact on interpretation of literature data. It has been shown here that gas peak modifications in ternary H2S-bearing and more complex gas mixtures depend on their compositions as well as on relative density differences arising from differential partitioning of the gas mixture components in a closed system. These findings constitute new and valuable insights into the behavior of individual gases in multi-gas mixtures in natural fluid systems.
Hydrocarbon and mineral systems
The improved understanding of complex gas–H2O systems is a prerequisite for more accurate reconstruction of the P–T conditions in hydrocarbon and mineralizing fluid systems in the geological record. The P–T information obtained from studies of fluid inclusions hosted in cements and facture-filling minerals provide means for the reconstruction of multiple fluid and gas migration events in hydrocarbon reservoirs and contribute, e.g., to enhancement of gas accumulation models22. The migration of geological fluids, carrying reduced sulfur species (e.g. H2S, HS−), has a paramount control on the deposition of hydrothermal ore deposits. In evaporitic diagenetic environments of sedimentary basins, hydrocarbon and ore mineral systems are often closely linked10. In cases where the circulating basinal brines or formation waters are devoid of sufficient metal content to form sulfide ores, by mixing with H2S-rich fluids, the latter may accumulate in gas/petroleum traps within sedimentary sequences and may pose risks for hydrocarbon exploration and environmental hazards. Constraining the geological time frames and depth intervals of thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR)8 is also of high importance as it produces H2S and CO2, which contaminate hydrocarbon reservoirs6,65,66.
Microthermometric studies of CH4–H2S–CO2–N2 fluid inclusion gas mixtures allow the prediction of freezing points of H2S and CO2. Our study indicates that at low temperatures of about −122 °C (Table 1), the H2S-CO2 gases in analyzed gas inclusions show very unique behavior of contemporaneous freezing, which is likely linked to the subordinate amounts of CO2 (11.9–13.3 mol%). Therefore, CH4-rich gas mixtures have a potential for relatively efficient purification to commercial quality grades by using, e.g., low-temperature distillation process38. However, the disposal of resulting by-products (H2S, CO2) rises substantial environmental concerns as geochemical behavior of these gases in various deep geological formations is not yet well constrained67.
Our study demonstrates that gas-rich CH4–H2S–CO2–N2–H2O fluid inclusions offer an excellent opportunity to study the formation of complex natural gas hydrates in a closed system. Due to global warming, there is an increasing interest in understanding the behavior of natural gas hydrates that were discovered in deep-sea environments and permafrost regions49. The formation mechanisms, as well as structural and compositional heterogeneities of the complex/mixed natural clathrate crystals, are not yet fully understood50,51. Comparison of experimental simulations of synthetic gas hydrates with systematic studies of natural gas–H2O inclusions mixtures provides means for a better understanding of the kinetics and thermodynamics of clathrates formation and dissociation. Such knowledge is relevant to investigations of synergies between CH4-gas hydrates and climate change on a global scale68.
Extraterrestrial systems
Low-temperature systems, which are a prerequisite for solid–solid H2S transitions do not exist in terrestrial environments, but they persist on ice planets such as Uranus and Neptune12,13. Recent studies evidenced the presence of gaseous H2S above the cloud deck of Uranus, which led to the conclusion that H2S ice is a major constituent of main clouds at 1.2–3 bar12. Similarly, the H2S ice is considered to be a prime constituent of Neptune’s main clouds at pressures of 2.5-3.5 bar13. At extremely low temperatures (from ca. −220 °C11 to −153.7 °C12), at various depth levels in the ice giants atmosphere’s, there is thus a high likelihood that H2S ice cloud decks exist in different temperature-dependent solid states. This, in turn, may potentially have an influence on the atmospheric dynamics of the ice planets. Recent studies point also towards differences in the distribution of H2S ice and CH4, between polar and equatorial regions of the Uranus’s atmosphere, which yet require explanation12. The latter could provide valuable insights into the atmospheric dynamics of the enigmatic ice giants69. Possible future exploratory missions to the ice planets would benefit from having a Raman spectrometer on board, which allows identification of possible perturbations caused by distinct H2S solid states and constraining distribution of H2S ice and associated gases at low temperatures. A miniaturized Raman spectrometer has been used, e.g., in a mission to Mars70.
Methods
Microthermometry
For this study, we used fracture-filling fluorite mineralization, hosted by Upper Permian Zechstein Ca2 carbonate from the Southern Permian Basin, Germany. The drill core sample originates from a depth of ca. 3.8 km from well PB-20 situated at the border of the Pompeckj Block and the northern flank of the Lower Saxony Basin8. The translucent coarse fluorite crystals, selected for analyses, host abundant CH4–H2S–CO2–N2–H2O fluid inclusions (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Doubly-polished fluorite chips (~8 × 8 mm) with a thickness of 180 μm were used for analyses.
Microthermometric and laser Raman spectroscopic measurements were performed at the GFZ Potsdam, Germany. Microthermometry and observations of phase changes in gas-rich inclusions were conducted using a Linkam heating/freezing stage (THMS600 system) that allows observations of phase transitions in fluid inclusions in the temperature range between −195 and 600 °C. The heating/freezing system was calibrated using SynFlinc synthetic fluid inclusion standards: CO2 and pure H2O for melting temperatures of CO2 and ice, respectively as well as critical homogenization temperature of pure H2O. Temperatures were recorded using Linksys 32 software with reproducibility of ±0.1 °C. Imaging during the microthermometry runs was performed using a digital QICAM FAST1394 camera attached to an Olympus BX53M microscope and the Q-Capture Pro 7 software was used for image acquisition.
Raman spectroscopy combined with microthermometry
Laser Raman spectroscopy coupled with microthermometric experiments was utilized to examine phase changes and solid phases formed at low temperatures. Measurements were performed using the Linkam THMS600 system equipped with LNP95 nitrogen cooling pump, T95 temperature controller, and a stage with a silver heating/freezing block and a PT100 platinum sensor. The Linkam heating-freezing stage was calibrated using the synthetic CO2 and H2O fluid inclusion standards, provided by SynFlinc, prior to Raman spectroscopic analyses. The temperatures were recorded, in a range between −192 and +35°C, using a Linksys 32 software with reproducibility of ±0.1 °C. Heating/freezing rates during measurements of the phase transitions were 4 °C/min or/and 10 °C/min, whereas in between the phase transitions the rates were 20–30 °C/min.
The vibrational spectra of phases in gas-rich inclusions during freezing-heating runs were measured using a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman micro-probe supplied by Horiba Scientific. The system is equipped with a dispersive Raman spectrometer with focal length of 800 mm, the frequency-doubled Nd:YAG solid-state green laser source with an excitation radiation of 532 nm and output power of 100 mW (max. ~48 mW at the sample surface), edge filters, and a CCD detector. A grating of 1800 grooves/mm and confocal hole of 100 µm were used, and the spectral resolution was 1 cm−1. Most measurements (when not indicated otherwise) were performed using a neutral density filter, which reduces the output laser power at the sample to 50% (~24 mW) to avoid frequent “out of range” high intensity CH4 peaks with artificially cut tops. Internal calibration has been performed using a silicon standard (520 cm−1). A neon lamp attached to the Linkam stage was used for a wavenumber calibration. The spectra of Ne emission lines were collected simultaneously with each peak position measurement. The reference Ne emission lines used for the wavenumber calibration of H2S were: 2389, 2708 cm−1, and of CH4: 2835, 3006 cm−1. The peak positions, corrected for instrumental drift, were calculated using the measured wavenumbers of H2S, CH4 (symmetric stretching ν1 vibrational modes), Ne lines, and applying the linear interpolation equation71. The average standard error for peak position measurements at room temperature, based on 8 measurements (2 inclusions measured 4×), was 0.02 cm−1 for CH4 and 0.01 cm−1 for H2S. The uncertainty of the peak wavenumber measurements was ±1 cm−1 for all gas components64.
The Raman spectrometer is adapted to an Olympus BXFM optical microscope, which is equipped with 50× (NA = 0.5) long working distance objective, reflected and transmitted light sources, and a VIS Camera. This setup enables optical investigation of phase transitions in fluid inclusions as well as photographic documentation during the combined experiments. The Raman spectra were acquired by focusing the laser beam on analyzed phases, in the spectral range between 250 and 4500 cm−1 and with 2 × 20s acquisition time. The spectra were processed using LabSpec software (ver. 6.4.4.16). The linear baseline correction and the Gaussian–Lorentzian peak-fitting function were used for processing and deconvolution of the Raman spectra. The concentrations of the aqueous solution (molar fractions) were measured in homogenized inclusion fluid in a temperature range between 160 and 170 °C45. Molar fractions of gases in the gas mixtures trapped in inclusions were derived from the ratios of the Raman peak areas and applying the formula based on Placzek’s polarizability theory23,29,62. The average standard error for estimation of mole fractions, based on 14 measurements (2 inclusions measured 7×), was 0.001 cm−1 for each gas component.
Data availability
All relevant data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper. The Raman spectroscopy and microthermometry data generated in this study are provided in the Supplementary Information and Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Machel, H. G. Bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction in diagenetic settings - old and new insights. Sediment. Geol. 140, 143–175 (2001).
Olson, K. R. & Straub, K. D. The role of hydrogen sulfide in evolution and the evolution of hydrogen sulfide in metabolism and signaling. Physiology 31, 60–72 (2016).
Mißbach, H. et al. Ingredients for microbial life preserved in 3.5 billion-year-old fluid inclusions. Nat. Commun. 12, 1101 (2021).
Berresheim, H. & Jaeschke, W. The contribution of volcanoes to the global atmospheric sulfur budget. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 88, 3732–3740 (1983).
Von Damm, K. L. Seafloor hydrothermal activity: black smoker chemistry and chimneys. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 18, 173–204 (1990).
Worden, R. H. & Smalley, P. C. H2S-producing reactions in deep carbonate gas reservoirs: Khuff Formation, Abu Dhabi. Chem. Geol. 133, 157–171 (1996).
Yang, C., Hutcheon, I. & Krouse, H. R. Fluid inclusion and stable isotopic studies of thermochemical sulphate reduction from Burnt Timber and Crossfield East gas fields in Alberta, Canada. Bull. Can. Pet. Geol. 49, 149–164 (2001).
Sośnicka, M. & Lüders, V. Fluid inclusion evidence for low-temperature thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) of dry coal gas in Upper Permian carbonate reservoirs (Zechstein, Ca2) in the North German Basin. Chem. Geol. 534, 119453 (2020).
Mernagh, T. P. & Bastrakov, E. N. An evaluation of hydrogen sulfide in orogenic gold fluids and the uncertainties associated with vapor-rich inclusions. Geofluids 13, 494–505 (2013).
Sośnicka, M. & Lüders, V. Super-deep, TSR-controlled Phanerozoic MVT type Zn-Pb deposits hosted by Zechstein-2 gas reservoir carbonate (Ca2), Lower Saxony Basin, Germany. Chem. Geol. 508, 62–77 (2019).
Helled, R., Nettelmann, N. & Guillot, T. Uranus and Neptune: origin, evolution and internal structure. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 38 (2020).
Irwin, P. G. J. et al. Detection of hydrogen sulfide above the clouds in Uranus’s atmosphere. Nat. Astron 2, 420–427 (2018).
Irwin, P. G. J. et al. Probable detection of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in Neptune’s atmosphere. Icarus 321, 550–563 (2019).
Drozdov, A. P., Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. I. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 525, 73–76 (2015).
Snider, E. et al. Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Nature 586, 373–377 (2020).
Roedder, E. Fluid Inclusions. Reviews in Mineralogy Vol. 12 (Mineralogical Society of Amer, 1984).
Diamond, L. W. in Fluid Inclusions: Analysis and Interpretation. Mineralogical Association Canada, Short Course 32 (eds. Samson, I., Anderson, A. & Marshall, D.) Vol. 32, 101–158 (2003).
Diamond, L. W. in Fluid Inclusions: Analysis and Interpretation. Mineralogical Association Canada, Short Course 32 (eds. Samson, I., Anderson, A. & Marshall, D.) Vol. 32 55–79 (2003).
Thiery, R., van den Kerkhof, A. M. & Dubessy, J. vX-properties of CH4-CO2 and CO2-N2 fluid inclusions modelling for T<31°C and P<400 bars. Eur. J. Mineral. 6, 753–771 (1994).
Burruss, R. C., Cercone, K. R. & Harris, P. M. in Carbonate Cements (eds. Schneidermann, N. & Harris, P. M.) 277–289 (Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1985).
Lüders, V. et al. Fluid and gas migration in the North German Basin: fluid inclusion and stable isotope constraints. Int J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 94, 990–1009 (2005).
Fall, A. et al. Testing the basin-centered gas accumulation model using fluid inclusion observations: Southern Piceance Basin, Colorado. AAPG Bull. 96, 2297–2318 (2012).
Burke, E. A. J. Raman microspectrometry of fluid inclusions. Lithos 55, 139–158 (2001).
Klemd, R., Hirdes, W., Olesch, M. & Oberthür, T. Fluid inclusions in quartz-pebbles of the gold-bearing Tarkwaian conglomerates of Ghana as guides to their provenance area. Mineral. Depos. 28, 334–343 (1993).
Zwahlen, C. et al. Constraining the fluid history of a CO2-H2S reservoir: insights from stable isotopes, REE, and fluid inclusion microthermometry. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 20, 359–382 (2019).
Roedder, E. & Bodnar, R. J. Geologic pressure determinations from fluid inclusion studies. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 8, 263–301 (1980).
Duan, Z., Møller, N. & Weare, J. H. A general equation of state for supercritical fluid mixtures and molecular dynamics simulation of mixture PVTX properties. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 1209–1216 (1996).
Bakker, R. J. Package FLUIDS. Part 3: correlations between equations of state, thermodynamics and fluid inclusions. Geofluids 9, 63–74 (2009).
Dubessy, J., Poty, B. & Ramboz, C. Advances in C-O-H-N-S fluid geochemistry based on micro-Raman spectrometric analysis of fluid inclusions. Eur. J. Miner. 1, 517–534 (1989).
Touray, J.-C. & Guilhaumou, N. Characterization of H2S bearing fluid inclusions. Bull. Minéral. 107, 181–188 (1984).
Kohn, J. P. & Kurata, F. Heterogeneous phase equilibria of the methane—hydrogen sulfide system. AIChE J. 4, 211–217 (1958).
Sobocinski, D. P. & Kurata, F. Heterogeneous phase equilibria of the hydrogen sulfide–carbon dioxide system. AIChE J. 5, 545–551 (1959).
Sakoda, N. & Uematsu, M. A thermodynamic property model for the binary mixture of methane and hydrogen sulfide. Int J. Thermophys. 26, 1303–1325 (2005).
Coquelet, C. et al. Phase equilibrium data for the hydrogen sulphide+methane system at temperatures from 186 to 313K and pressures up to about 14MPa. Fluid Phase Equilibria 383, 94–99 (2014).
Langè, S., Campestrini, M. & Stringari, P. Phase behavior of system methane + hydrogen sulfide. AIChE J. 62, 4090–4108 (2016).
Hensel, W. E. & Massoth, F. E. Phase equilibria for the ternary system: CH4-CO2-H2S. J. Chem. Eng. Data 9, 352–356 (1964).
Morris, J. S. & Byers, C. H. Near-critical-region equilibria of the CH4-CO2-H2S system. Fluid Phase Equilib. 66, 291–308 (1991).
Langé, S., Pellegrini, L. A., Stringari, P. & Coquelet, C. Experimental determination of the solid-liquid-vapor locus for the CH4-CO2-H2S system and application to the design of a new low-temperature distillation process for the purification of natural gas. AIChE J. hal-01250866, 1–32 (2015).
Miller, R. E. & Leroi, G. E. Raman spectra of polycrystalline H2S and D2S. J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2789–2797 (1968).
Stewart, J. W. Compression and phase transitions of solid NH3, SiF4, H2S, and CF4. J. Chem. Phys. 33, 128–133 (1960).
Sándor, E. & Ogunade, S. O. Structure and phase transition in solid hydrogen and deuterium sulphides. Nature 224, 905–907 (1969).
Shimizu, H. et al. Pressure-temperature phase diagram of solid hydrogen sulfide determined by Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 51, 9391–9394 (1995).
Murphy, G. M. & Vance, J. E. Raman spectra of hydrogen and deuterium sulfides in the gas, liquid and solid states. J. Chem. Phys. 6, 426–429 (1938).
Goldstein, R. H. & Reynolds, T. J. Systematics of Fluid Inclusions in Diagenetic Minerals Short Course. Vol. 31 (Society for Sedimentary Geology SEPM, 1994).
Berkesi, M. et al. Detection of small amounts of H2O in CO2-rich fluid inclusions using Raman spectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 40, 1461–1463 (2009).
Bakker, R. J. & Diamond, L. W. Estimation of volume fractions of liquid and vapor phases in fluid inclusions, and definition of inclusion shapes. Am. Mineral. 91, 635–657 (2006).
Dubessy, J., Lhomme, T., Boiron, M.-C. & Rull, F. Determination of chlorinity in aqueous fluids using raman spectroscopy of the stretching band of water at room temperature: application to fluid inclusions. Appl. Spectrosc. 56, 99–106 (2002).
Liu, C., Lu, H. & Ye, Y. Raman spectroscopy of nitrogen clathrate hydrates. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 22, 353–358 (2009).
Chazallon, B., Focsa, C., Charlou, J.-L., Bourry, C. & Donval, J.-P. A comparative Raman spectroscopic study of natural gas hydrates collected at different geological sites. Chem. Geol. 244, 175–185 (2007).
Schicks, J. M. et al. A new high-pressure cell for systematic in situ investigations of micro-scale processes in gas hydrates using confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 115103 (2020).
Sloan, E. D. & Koh, C. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases (CRC Press, 2008).
Dubessy, J., Boiron, M.-C., Moissette, A., Monnin, C. & Sretenskaya, N. Determinations of water, hydrates and pH in fluid inclusions by micro-Raman spectrometry. Eur. J. Miner. 4, 885–894 (1992).
Bény, C., Guilhaumou, N. & Touray, J.-C. Native sulphur-bearing fluid inclusions in the CO2-H2S-H2O-S system—microthermometry and Raman microprobe (MOLE) analysis - thermochemical interpretations. Chem. Geol. 37, 113–127 (1982).
Zwart, E. W. & Touret, J. L. R. Melting behaviour and composition of aqueous fluid inclusions in fluorite and calcite: applications within the system H2O-CaCl2-NaCl. Eur. J. Mineral. 773–786 (1994).
Sum, A. K., Burruss, R. C. & Sloan, E. D. Measurement of clathrate hydrates via Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7371–7377 (1997).
Suleimenov, O. M. & Krupp, R. E. Solubility of hydrogen sulfide in pure water and in NaCl solutions, from 20 to 320°C and at saturation pressures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, 2433–2444 (1994).
Guilhaumou, N., Velde, B. & Beny, C. Raman microprobe analysis of gaseous inclusion in diagenetically recrystallized calcites. Bull. Minéral. 107, 193–202 (1984).
Ng, H.-J., B. Robinson, D. & Leu, A.-D. Critical phenomena in a mixture of methane, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide. Fluid Phase Equilib. 19, 273–286 (1985).
Burruss, R. C. Analysis of fluid inclusions; phase equilibria at constant volume. Am. J. Sci. 281, 1104–1126 (1981).
Van den Kerkhof, A. M. Isochoric phase diagrams in the systems CO2-CH4 and CO2-N2: application to fluid inclusions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac 54, 621–629 (1990).
Giauque, W. F. & Blue, R. W. Hydrogen sulfide. The heat capacity and vapor pressure of solid and liquid. the heat of vaporization. A comparison of thermodynamic and spectroscopic values of the entropy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 831–837 (1936).
Seitz, J. C., Pasteris, J. D. & Chou, I.-M. Raman spectroscopic characterization of gas mixtures. II. Quantitative composition and pressure determination of the CO2-CH4 system. Am. J. Sci. 296, 577–600 (1996).
Jiang, L., Xin, Y., Chou, I.-M. & Chen, Y. Raman spectroscopic measurements of ν1 band of hydrogen sulfide over a wide range of temperature and density in fused-silica optical cells. J. Raman Spectrosc. 49, 343–350 (2017).
Bakker, R. J. The perfection of Raman spectroscopic gas densimeters. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.6245 (2021).
Machel, H. Geological and hydrogeological evaluation of the Nisku Q-Pool in Alberta, Canada, for H2S and/or CO2 storage. Oil Gas. Sci. Technol. 60, 51–65 (2005).
Cai, C. et al. Methane-dominated thermochemical sulphate reduction in the Triassic Feixianguan formation East Sichuan Basin, China: towards prediction of fatal H2S concentrations. Mar. Pet. Geol. 21, 1265–1279 (2004).
Pironon, J., Jacquemet, N., Lhomme, T. & Teinturier, S. Fluid inclusions as micro-samplers in batch experiments: a study of the system C-O-H-S-cement for the potential geological storage of industrial acid gas. Chem. Geol. 237, 264–273 (2007).
Ruppel, C. D. & Kessler, J. D. The interaction of climate change and methane hydrates. Rev. Geophys. 55, 126–168 (2017).
Tollefson, J., Pater, I., de, Luszcz-Cook, S. & DeBoer, D. Neptune’s latitudinal variations as viewed with ALMA. Astron. J 157, 251 (2019).
Brolly, C., Parnell, J. & Bowden, S. Raman spectroscopy: caution when interpreting organic carbon from oxidising environments. Planet. Space Sci. 121, 53–59 (2016).
Lin, F., Bodnar, R. J. & Becker, S. P. Experimental determination of the Raman CH4 symmetric stretching (ν1) band position from 1–650bar and 0.3–22 °C: application to fluid inclusion studies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 3746–3756 (2007).
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the MinNoBeck joint research project no. 033R165B (V.L.) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the frame of the BMBF program r4 “Innovative Technologien für Ressourceneffizienz—Forschung zur Bereitstellung wirtschaftlicher Rohstoffe”. ExxonMobil Production Germany is thanked for providing drill core samples. We are indebted to Peter Möller, Christian Schmidt, Mengdi Pan from GFZ Potsdam and Robert Bodnar (Virginia Tech) for fruitful discussions. We also thank G. Nolze (BAM) and A. Massanek (TU Bergakademie Freiberg) for discussion on H2S crystallography.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.L. studied phase transitions in numerous C–O–H–N–S fluid inclusions microscopically for a pre-selection of fluid inclusions used in this study. M.S. carried out microthermometry and Raman spectroscopy of selected fluid inclusions, interpreted the results, and wrote the manuscript. V.L. contributed to writing and the discussion of the results. Both authors contributed to the concept and design of the experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Ronald Bakker, David Sublett and the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sośnicka, M., Lüders, V. Phase transitions in natural C-O-H-N-S fluid inclusions - implications for gas mixtures and the behavior of solid H2S at low temperatures. Nat Commun 12, 6975 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27269-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27269-6
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.