Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24419-8, published online 05 July 2021.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the ‘Methods’, which incorrectly read ‘The error of the standard compared to itself throughout the four sessions is ±0.05‰ and is considered a conservative estimation of error as duplicate analyses of the same solutions and complete procedural duplicates of the USGS BVHO-2 rock standard (+0.01 ±0.03‰, 2σ, n = 8, overlapping values found in) are significantly less.’ The correct version states ‘(+0.28 ±0.03‰, 2σ, n = 8, overlapping values found in)’ in place of ‘(+0.01 ±0.03‰, 2σ, n = 8, overlapping values found in)’.

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.