Phase separation of Nur77 mediates celastrol-induced mitophagy by promoting the liquidity of p62/SQSTM1 condensates

Peng, Shuang-zhou; Chen, Xiao-hui; Chen, Si-jie; Zhang, Jie; Wang, Chuan-ying; Liu, Wei-rong; Zhang, Duo; Su, Ying; Zhang, Xiao-kun

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26295-8

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 13 October 2021

Phase separation of Nur77 mediates celastrol-induced mitophagy by promoting the liquidity of p62/SQSTM1 condensates

Shuang-zhou Peng¹^na1,
Xiao-hui Chen¹^na1,
Si-jie Chen¹,
Jie Zhang¹,
Chuan-ying Wang¹,
Wei-rong Liu¹,
Duo Zhang¹,
Ying Su^1,2 &
…
Xiao-kun Zhang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-6222¹

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 5989 (2021) Cite this article

7858 Accesses
37 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Liquid-liquid phase separation promotes the formation of membraneless condensates that mediate diverse cellular functions, including autophagy of misfolded proteins. However, how phase separation participates in autophagy of dysfunctional mitochondria (mitophagy) remains obscure. We previously discovered that nuclear receptor Nur77 (also called TR3, NGFI-B, or NR4A1) translocates from the nucleus to mitochondria to mediate celastrol-induced mitophagy through interaction with p62/SQSTM1. Here, we show that the ubiquitinated mitochondrial Nur77 forms membraneless condensates capable of sequestrating damaged mitochondria by interacting with the UBA domain of p62/SQSTM1. However, tethering clustered mitochondria to the autophagy machinery requires an additional interaction mediated by the N-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR) of Nur77 and the N-terminal PB1 domain of p62/SQSTM1, which confers Nur77-p62/SQSTM1 condensates with the magnitude and liquidity. Our results demonstrate how composite multivalent interaction between Nur77 and p62/SQSTM1 coordinates to sequester damaged mitochondria and to connect targeted cargo mitochondria for autophagy, providing mechanistic insight into mitophagy.

STX17 dynamically regulated by Fis1 induces mitophagy via hierarchical macroautophagic mechanism

Article Open access 03 May 2019

Cytoplasmic DAXX drives SQSTM1/p62 phase condensation to activate Nrf2-mediated stress response

Article Open access 21 August 2019

HUWE1 controls MCL1 stability to unleash AMBRA1-induced mitophagy

Article 21 August 2019

Introduction

Mitophagy, special selective autophagy with an evolutionarily conserved process that eliminates impaired mitochondria through autophagy, is important for cellular homeostasis and prevention of diseases and cancer^1,2,3,4. The mechanism by which dysfunctional mitochondria are recognized and engulfed by autophagosomes involves ubiquitination of mitochondrial proteins followed by their interaction with cargo receptors connecting targeted cargo to the autophagosomal membrane via LC3/ATG8. Several cargo receptors including OPTN, NDP52, p62/SQSTM1 (hereafter referred to as p62), NBR1, and TAXBP1, are known to interact with both ubiquitin chains attached to damaged mitochondria and with LC3/ATG8 proteins anchored to the inner surface of the autophagosome membrane^5,6. Different types of autophagy receptors are likely required for mitophagy depending on different physiological and pathological situations³.

p62, one of the best characterized selective autophagy receptors, participates in different types of selective autophagy^7,8,9,10,11. Like other cargo receptors, p62 contains a ubiquitin-associating (UBA) domain responsible for binding ubiquitinated proteins, and an LC3-interacting region (LIR), thus acting as a cargo receptor by simultaneously binding to the cargo and LC3¹². In addition, p62 harbors a Phor and Bem1p (PB1) domain at its NH₂-terminal region, which mediates p62 oligomerization essential for its function as a selective autophagy receptor^13,14,15,16. PB1-directed organization of p62 filamentous assemblies is a critical determinant of the diverse functions of p62. While p62 was initially shown to be required for PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy¹⁷, later studies revealed that the recruitment of p62 by ubiquitination of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins only serves to aggregate/cluster dysfunctional mitochondria through polymerization via its PB1 domain^18,19, in a manner analogous to its aggregation of polyubiquitinated proteins^8,9. This suggested that p62 fails to function as a full autophagy receptor in Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Interestingly, p62 is essential for inflammasome NLRP3 agonist-induced mitophagy²⁰ and the elimination of damaged mitochondria through autophagy in leukemia cells²¹, demonstrating that p62 is fully functional in mediating mitophagy under different cellular contexts. However, how p62-mediated sequestration of dysfunctional mitochondria and the recruitment of the autophagy machinery are coupled and regulated remains unclear.

Nur77 (also called TR3, NGFIB, or NR4A1), a nuclear receptor superfamily member and an immediate-early response gene, plays an integral role in a plethora of cellular processes including survival, apoptosis, autophagy, immunity, and inflammation in response to diverse stimuli^22,23,24. Like other nuclear receptors, Nur77 comprises an NH₂-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR) with a poorly defined function, a central DNA-binding domain (DBD), and a COOH-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD). Although nuclear receptors are conventionally considered as transcription factors, we reported that Nur77 could translocate from the nucleus to mitochondria to modulate mitochondrial activities^25,26,27. Recently, we discovered that celastrol could bind Nur77 to induce Nur77 translocation from the nucleus to damaged mitochondria, where it mediates their elimination through autophagy by interacting with p62²⁸. Celastrol is a potent anti-inflammatory triterpenoid quinine-methide isolated from the root of a traditional Chinese medicinal herb Tripterygium wilfordii commonly known as “Thunder God Vine” that has been widely and successfully used for treating a number of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and lupus^28,29,30. We showed that the elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria by celastrol-induced mitophagy alleviates chronic inflammation in several disease models, revealing a critical role of Nur77/p62-mediated mitophagy in controlling mitochondrial homeostasis. However, how Nur77 interaction with p62 promotes the autophagy of dysfunctional mitochondria remains unknown.

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is an important mechanism of how cells rapidly and reversibly compartmentalize their components into membraneless organelles to mediate diverse biological processes^{31,32,33,34,35,36}. Recent studies have revealed an important role that phase separation plays in the condensation of misfolded and ubiquitin-positive proteins and their degradation by autophagy^37,38. p62 undergoes phase separation upon binding to polyubiquitin chain, driving misfolded and ubiquitinated protein aggregates into larger condensates in a PB1-dependent manner and their subsequent tethering to the autophagosomal membrane via its interaction with LC3 proteins^16,39,40. However, little is known about the role of phase separation in the sequestering and tethering of larger intracellular organelles such as dysfunctional mitochondria.

In this work, we show that Nur77 and p62 assemble condensates to mediate celastrol-induced mitophagy. Celastrol-induced ubiquitination in the C-terminal LBD of Nur77 and its interaction with p62 results in the formation of Nur77-LBD/p62 condensates capable of sequestering damaged mitochondria. However, such condensates are insufficient to tether the clustered mitochondria to the autophagosomal membrane. The Nur77/p62 condensates require an additional interaction mediated by the N-terminal IDR of Nur77 with the PB1 of p62, which confers the condensates with liquidity. These results reveal a critical role of coordinated multivalent interaction between Nur77 and p62 in celastrol-induced mitophagy and provide mechanistic insight into nuclear receptor action.

Results

Nur77 and p62 form condensates in celastrol-induced mitophagy

To study the role of phase separation in celastrol-induced mitophagy, we first used a sensitive fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based dual-color fluorescence-quenching assay with an EGFP-mCherry-COX8 reporter localized to the mitochondrial matrix to monitor celastrol-induced mitophagy^41,42. Normal mitochondria are yellow, having both green and red fluorescence in the matrix, whereas mitochondria engulfed into acidic lysosomes environment show red-only fluorescence due to the selective sensitivity of EGFP fluorescence to low pH. One advantage of such analysis allows the detection of mitochondrial proteins in lysosomes during mitophagy. Mitochondria are susceptible to inflammatory signaling, which can result in the accumulation of inflammatory mediators including tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) at dysfunctional mitochondria²⁸. We showed previously that celastrol can induce Nur77 translocation from the nucleus to damaged mitochondria where it interacts with TRAF2 to initiate mitophagy for eliminating dysfunctional mitochonria²⁸. Thus, cells were treated with TNFα and celastrol to evaluate celastrol-mediated mitophagy throughout the study. Upon treatment with celastrol and TNFα, significant amounts of mitochondria were engulfed by lysosomes as indicated by their red fluorescence (Fig. 1a). Quantification of red-only autophagic mitochondria by flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b) revealed a temporal effect of celastrol on the autophagy of dysfunctional mitochondria, which peaked between 3 to 6 h of treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1c). The celastrol-induced appearance of red-only mitochondria and degradation of cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COXII), a mitochondrial inner membrane protein, was attenuated in cells transfected with Atg7 siRNA, which inhibited the expression of Atg7 protein (Supplementary Fig. 1d), thereby confirming the mitophagic effect of celastrol and the feasibility of using FACS-based EGFP-mCherry-COX8 mitophagy assay.

**Fig. 1: Nur77 and p62 are required for celastrol-induced mitophagy.**

The role of Nur77 in celastrol-induced mitophagy was illustrated by reduction of autophagic mitochondria (from 12.20 to 0.02%) and diminished COXII degradation in HeLa cells depleted with Nur77 (Nur77^−/−HeLa) (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1e). In addition, transfecting Myc-tagged Nur77 (Myc-Nur77) into Nur77^−/−HeLa rescued the effect of celastrol on inducing mitophagy (from 0.02 to 11.91%). Interestingly, Myc-Nur77 expressed in Nur77^−/−HeLa cells formed droplet-like condensates colocalizing with mitochondria undergoing autophagy in autolysosome (Fig. 1a), suggesting that Nur77 is directly involved in both sequestering dysfunctional mitochondria and directing cargo mitochondria for autophagy.

When the role of p62 was examined, we found that the mitophagic effect of celastrol was almost completely abolished in p62^−/−MEF cells, which could be restored by reexpressing Flag-tagged p62 (Flag-p62) (Fig. 1b). Knocking down p62 from HeLa cells also impaired the mitophagic effect of celastrol (Supplementary Fig. 1f). Thus, p62 is also essential for celastrol-induced mitophagy. Interestingly, transfected Flag-p62, like Nur77 (Fig. 1a), was found in autolysosomes as droplet-like condensates colocalizing with autophagic mitochondria (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the condensates of Nur77 and p62 colocalized not only with each other but also with mitochondria in cells treated with celastrol (Supplementary Fig. 1g). The role of p62 in celastrol-induced mitophagy differs from Parkin-mediated mitophagy, in which p62 failed to translocate to autolysosome in oligomycin/antimycin A (OA)-induced mitophagy (Supplementary Fig. 1h), in agreement with previous observations^18,19. Thus, p62 acts as a full selective autophagy cargo receptor for Nur77- but not Parkin-mediated mitophagy.

We also conducted immunogold electron microscopy (EM)⁴³ to examine the localization of Nur77 and p62 condensates. Dual immunogold staining revealed no detectable Nur77 or p62 on healthy mitochondria in control cells. When cells were treated with celastrol, damaged mitochondria were densely decorated at their outer membrane with anti-p62 (10 nm) and anti-Nur77 (15 nm) immunogold labels, which could be found within mitophagosome or autolysosome (Fig. 1c). LC3 (15 nm) and p62 (10 nm) immunogold particles were also colocalized near the mitochondrial outer membrane, which again were engulfed by the mitophagosome or autolysosome. These results support the notion that Nur77/p62 condensates are capable of directing cargo mitochondria to the autophagy machinery for degradation.

Nur77-mediated mitophagy in aging

The physiological significance of Nur77/p62-mediated mitophagy was examined during the aging process of the liver, in which the autophagy of damaged mitochondria plays a critical role in counterbalancing age-related pathological conditions⁴⁴. Confocal microscopy analysis revealed that the size of mitochondria in the liver of aged mice significantly increased (Fig. 1d, e), in agreement with the enlargement of mitochondria termed megamitochondria in aged liver⁴⁵. The increase in the size of mitochondria in aged mice was accompanied with liver enlargement (Supplementary Fig. 1i, j) and increased hepatic inflammation (Supplementary Fig. 1k). The role of Nur77 was revealed by enlarged hepatic mitochondria in both young and aged Nur77^−/−mice compared to wild-type mice (Fig. 1d, e) and decreased expression of Nur77 during aging (Fig. 1f). Alteration of p62-mediated Parkin-independent mitophagy is responsible for the formation of megamitochondria in the liver⁴⁶. We, therefore, studied whether Nur77 and p62 could mediate mitophagy during aging, and found their colocalization with mitochondria and LC3 in the liver of young mice, which decreased in the liver of aged mice (Supplementary Fig. 1l–p). Thus, Nur77 and p62 are involved in mitophagy of the liver, which declines during aging. This was confirmed by our data showing that knocking out Nur77 caused defective mitophagy in the liver of both young and aged mice (Supplementary Fig. 1o, p). To provide more direct evidence supporting the role of Nur77 in mitophagy during aging, we injected adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV-9) plasmid that expresses the mitophagy biosensor EGFP-mCherry-COX8⁴² into the livers of young and aged mice. Two weeks after injection, mCherry-COX8 exposure was detected in the liver of young mice but not young Nur77^−/−mice (Fig. 1g, h, and Supplementary Fig. 1q), demonstrating that Nur77 is required for hepatic mitophagy of young mice. Hepatic mitophagy declined during aging as the mCherry-COX8 exposure was not detected in the liver of aged wild-type and Nur77^−/−mice. Thus, Nur77/p62-mediated mitophagy plays a role in maintaining mitochondria homeostasis in the liver.

Celastrol promotes phase separation of Nur77/p62

p62 is known to phase separate ubiquitinated proteins into condensates that become substrates for autophagy^16,40. The fact that not only Nur77 but also p62 displayed punctate structures colocalizing with damaged mitochondria undergoing autophagy in autolysosome (Fig. 1) suggested that the phase separation of Nur77 and p62 are involved in celastrol-induced mitophagy. To test our hypothesis, HeLa cells ectopically expressing Nur77 fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP-Nur77) and mCherry-fused p62 (mCherry-p62) were examined for their phase separation in the absence or presence of celastrol. Transfected GFP-Nur77 resided exclusively in the nucleus, while mCherry-p62 was diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm. However, when cells were treated with celastrol, GFP-Nur77 formed cytoplasmic droplets colocalizing extensively with mCherry-p62 in a time dependent manner (Fig. 2a). To understand how GFP-Nur77/mCherry-p62 condensates are formed in the cytoplasm upon celastrol treatment, cells were treated with celastrol for 1 h and subjected to real-time microscopy visualization of the formation of the GFP-Nur77/mCherry-p62 condensates. We found that transfected GFP-Nur77 and mCherry-p62 rapidly formed large cytoplasmic bodies through the fusion of undetectable micro-sized droplets or detectable droplets in response to celastrol treatment (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b, and Supplementary Movies 1–3). Thus, celastrol induces the formation of Nur77/p62 bodies by triggering their phase separation. The autophagosome marker LC3 is recruited to p62 bodies after p62 undergoes phase separation through ubiquitin-induced oligomerization^16,40, which serves as a mechanism for linking p62-containing protein aggregates to the autophagy machinery. However, whether LC3 can be recruited to phase-separated p62 bodies during mitophagy is unknown. We found that both LC3 and p62 localized at the outer membrane of mitochondria undergoing autophagy in the mitophagosome (Fig. 1c). Transfected Nur77 and p62 also formed condensates with LC3 and mitochondria in cells treated with celastrol (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). These results confirmed the capability of Nur77/p62 condensates in mediating celastrol-induced mitophagy.

**Fig. 2: Celastrol promotes phase separation and liquidity of p62.**

Celastrol-induced phase separation of p62 depends on Nur77

To determine the role of Nur77 in p62 phase separation, we studied the formation of p62 condensates in HeLa and Nur77^−/−HeLa cells. In response to celastrol, p62 rapidly formed condensates colocalizing with Nur77 in HeLa cells (Fig. 2c). However, the ability of p62 to assemble condensates was impaired in Nur77^−/−HeLa cells, which was restored by reexpressing GFP-Nur77. Thus, celastrol-induced formation of p62 condensates is dependent on Nur77 expression. As the liquidity of condensate is a critical determinant for its selective autophagy^47,48, we studied the effect of celastrol on the liquidity of Nur77/p62 condensates. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis of co-transfected GFP-Nur77 and mCherry-p62 revealed that the fluorescence of GFP-Nur77 after photobleaching was recovered rapidly and significantly (T_{2 min} = 58%), while the fluorescence of p62 was only slightly recovered (T_{2 min} = 11%) and remained static (Fig. 2d), indicating a more liquid-like property of GFP-Nur77 than mCherry-p62. This is consistent with previous studies showing low mobility of p62 body^16,40. However, when cells were treated with celastrol, which induces the formation of Nur77/p62 bodies, the recovery rate of the p62 signal (T_{2 min} = 34%) was much improved, while the recovery of Nur77 in Nur77/p62 bodies remained almost the same. These results demonstrated that Nur77 is a critical determinant of the liquidity and mobility of the Nur77/p62 condensates.

Nur77 forms liquid-like condensate through phase separation

The above FRAP data suggested that Nur77 might itself undergo phase separation. Thus, GFP-Nur77 was expressed and purified to study its phase separation. When added to droplet formation buffer containing a crowding agent (10% PEG-3.35 K) to simulate the densely crowded environment of the nucleus, GFP-Nur77 but not GFP formed micro-sized droplets in solution with markedly increased size (Fig. 3a). FRAP analysis demonstrated that GFP-Nur77 redistributed rapidly from the unbleached area to the bleached area (Fig. 3b). GFP-Nur77 droplets also fused to form larger droplets, revealing droplet coalescence (Fig. 3c). The formation of Nur77 droplets was a general result of macromolecular crowding rather than a specific effect of PEG, as Nur77 assembled into spherical droplets in the presence of Dextran, Ficoll-400, or in a highly concentrated solution of lysozyme (2 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 3a). It was dependent on the molecular weight of the crowding agent, illustrated by its assembling into spherical droplets only in solutions containing >1 kDa PEG. The size of mCherry-Nur77 droplets in solution became bigger by increasing PEG molecular mass with the efficiency of condensate formation peaked in 8 kDa PEG (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Analysis of the biophysical properties of Nur77 droplets revealed a shift of the distributions and opacity of the droplets toward greater droplets with increasing PEG concentration (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Phase-separated droplets typically scale in size according to the concentration of components in the system⁴⁹. Indeed, the size distribution and turbidity of Nur77 droplets increased in a Nur77 concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 3d). We also tested whether the droplets were irreversible aggregates or reversible phase-separated condensates. To this end, GFP-Nur77 was allowed to form droplets in an initial solution, and then diluted sequentially by five times in equimolar protein concentration and crowding agent. The preformed GFP-Nur77 droplets were reduced in size and turbidity with dilution, demonstrating that the droplet formation was reversible (Supplementary Fig. 3e). Taken together, these results demonstrated that Nur77 exhibits liquid-like properties in vitro.

**Fig. 3: Nur77 phase separates into a liquid-like condensate.**

To test whether Nur77 undergoes LLPS in vivo, we ectopically expressed GFP-Nur77 in HeLa cells. Transfected GFP-Nur77 formed punctum structures in the nucleus of cells (Fig. 3d), in which GFP-Nur77 diffused rapidly within the puncta (Fig. 3e). 3D-reconstruction of the GFP-Nur77 images revealed that it exhibited as a single particle (Fig. 3f). Myc-Nur77 (Fig. 3g) and endogenous Nur77 (Fig. 3h) also formed puncta in the nucleus. Thus, the Nur77 phase separates into condensates via LLPS.

Nur77 phase separation is dependent on its N-terminal IDR domain

Proteins containing large IDRs often phase separate under physiologic conditions⁵⁰. Using the prediction program PONDR (VSL2) (http://www.pondr.com/)⁵¹, we found that the N-terminal region of Nur77 displays the highest structural disorder propensity (Fig. 4a). To determine if the IDR of Nur77 is required for its phase separation, GFP-tagged IDR (GFP-Nur77-IDR) or LBD of Nur77 (GFP-Nur77-LBD) (Fig. 4b) was purified and subjected to droplet formation in vitro. GFP-Nur77-IDR formed numerous spherical droplets in a buffer containing 10% PEG-3.35 K (Fig. 4c). For comparison, GFP-Nur77-LBD exhibited amorphous condensates rather than spherical droplets. GFP-Nur77-IDR also formed phase-separated droplets in cells (Fig. 4d, e). Removing IDR from Nur77 (GFP-Nur77-ΔIDR) significantly attenuated its ability to form nuclear droplets, while deleting DBD (GFP-Nur77-ΔDBD) altered the morphology Nur77 bodies. GFP-Nur77-LBD also failed to assemble droplets in cells. Thus, the N-terminal IDR of Nur77 is responsible for Nur77 phase separation.

**Fig. 4: Nur77 phase separation is dependent on N-terminal IDR domain.**

The N-terminal IDR of Nur77 is involved in an intramolecular interaction with its carboxyl-terminal LBD⁵². We then asked whether GFP-Nur77-IDR could modulate the phase separation of mCherry-Nur77-LBD through the intramolecular interaction. Nur77-LBD alone exhibited amorphous condensates rather than spherical droplets (Fig. 4c). However, when mCherry-Nur77-LBD was mixed with GFP-Nur77-IDR, mCherry-Nur77-LBD formed spherical droplets together with GFP-Nur77-IDR (Supplementary Fig. 4a). For comparison, GFP-Nur77-IDR had no effect on droplet formation of mCherry and mCherry-DBD (Supplementary Fig. 4b). These studies revealed the potency of Nur77-IDR in LLPS.

Nuclear receptor superfamily members are characterized by the presence of IDRs in their N-terminal regions, whose function remains poorly defined. To address whether IDRs in other nuclear receptor family members could also mediate phase separation, we studied Nur77 subfamily members NOR1 and Nurr1. Similar to Nur77, NOR1, and Nurr1 contain a large IDR in their N-terminal region (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). We then tested whether Nurr1 and NOR1 underwent LLPS in vivo and found that ectopically expressed GFP-Nurr1 and GFP-NOR1 also formed punctate structures in the nucleus (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). Removal of IDR from Nurr1 (GFP-Nurr1-ΔIDR) or NOR1 (GFP-NOR1-ΔIDR) greatly reduced their ability to form nuclear droplets. GFP-Nurr1-LBD and GFP-NOR1-LBD also failed to form droplets. Thus, the N-terminal IDR of Nurr1 and NOR1 also mediates their formation of phase-separated droplets, suggesting that the IDR in the nuclear receptor superfamily members plays an important role in regulating nuclear receptor action through phase separation.

Celastrol regulation of Nur77 phase separation

We next studied how celastrol binding to Nur77 regulates its phase separation. Transfected GFP-Nur77 exclusively resided in the nucleus of control cells (Figs. 1a and 2a). Figure 4f showed stills of movie taken after GFP-Nur77-transfected cells were treated with celastrol for 1 h (Supplementary Movie 4). There was a significant amount of cytoplasmic GFP-Nur77 bodies in cells with new bodies continuously emerging from the nuclear membrane. Thus, celastrol promotes GFP-Nur77 nuclear export as we reported before²⁶, although we could not exclude the possibility that celastrol may also promote the retention of cytoplasmic Nur77. Our data also showed the growth of Nur77 droplets in the cytoplasm via fusion, revealing a role of phase separation in celastrol-induced growth of cytoplasmic Nur77 bodies. When the effect of celastrol on phase separation of Nur77 mutants was analyzed (Fig. 4g), we found that celastrol could also facilitate the conversion of Nur77 mutants, Nur77-ΔIDR, and Nur77-LBD, from diffusely status to spherical particle structures in the nucleus, suggesting a ligand-dependent phase separation in the nucleus. The effect of celastrol is likely due to its binding to Nur77 as BI1071, another Nur77 ligand⁵³, also promoted Nur77 phase separation, while K-80003, a RXRα ligand^54,55, had no effect. We also used FRAP analysis to study the mobility and liquidity of GFP-Nur77 and mutants and found that the fluorescence recovery of GFP-Nur77 and GFP-Nur77-ΔDBD was much quicker than that of GFP-Nur77-ΔIDR and GFP-Nur77-LBD (Supplementary Fig. 4g), revealing a critical role of Nur77-IDR in promoting the mobility and liquidity of celastrol-induced Nur77 condensates.

Nur77 ubiquitination-induced p62 phase separation sequesters mitochondria

Ubiquitinated substrates can trigger p62-mediated phase separation and segregation of the substrates into autophagic degradation^16,39,40. We previously reported²⁸ that celastrol binding to Nur77 induces Nur77 translocation to mitochondria where it is ubiquitinated at Lys536 located in its C-terminal LBD by TRAF2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase⁵⁶, through interaction. The ubiquitinated mitochondrial Nur77 then interacts with the UBA of p62, leading to autophagy of Nur77-primed dysfunctional mitochondria²⁸. To study the molecular detail of phase separation in mediating the mitophagic effect of Nur77 and p62, we examined the role of Nur77 ubiquitination in p62 phase separation. Consistent with our previous results²⁸, TRAF2 was recruited to the surface of Nur77 condensates in cells treated with celastrol, displaying spherical shell structure (Supplementary Fig. 5a). TRAF2-mediated Nur77 ubiquitination likely plays a role in p62 body formation as celastrol-induced Nur77 condensates colocalized not only with p62 but also with ubiquitin (Fig. 5a). To confirm the role of Nur77 ubiquitination, we mutated its ubiquitination site and tested its effect on p62 body formation. Mutating Lys536 in Nur77 (Nur77-K536R) (Fig. 5b) or Nur77-LBD (Nur77-LBD-K536R) (Fig. 5c) impaired the effect of celastrol on inducing their interaction with p62. To our surprise, mutating Lys536 in Nur77 did not show an apparent inhibitory effect on the celastrol-induced assembly of Nur77/p62 condensates (Fig. 5d). We suspected that this might be due to celastrol-independent interaction between Nur77 and p62, which was not affected by Lys536 mutation (Fig. 5b). Notably, mutating Lys536 in Nur77-LBD completely impaired its ability to interact with p62 even in the presence of celastrol (Fig. 5c), indicating that Nur77-LBD is not involved in celastrol-independent interaction between Nur77 and p62. Thus, we used Nur77-LBD to study the effect of Nur77 ubiquitination on p62 body formation. Nur77-LBD could assemble condensates with p62 in the presence of celastrol. However, such an effect of Nur77-LBD was completely abolished when Lys536 was mutated (Fig. 5e). These results, therefore, revealed not only a critical role of celastrol-induced Nur77 ubiquitination in promoting p62 phase separation but also the existence of the celastrol-independent interaction between Nur77 and p62.

**Fig. 5: Ubiquitinated Nur77 interacts with p62 to sequester damaged mitochondria.**

We next studied the role of Nur77 ubiquitination-mediated p62 phase separation in celastrol-induced mitophagy. Mitophagy involves sequestering/clustering dysfunctional mitochondria and subsequently directing cargo mitochondria for degradation by the autolysosome system⁵⁷. We first studied its effect on sequestering dysfunctional mitochondria. Upon celastrol treatment, condensates formed by GFP-Nur77 and mCherry-p62 colocalized with mitochondria (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 5b). By contrast, the condensates assembled by Nur77-K536R and p62 did not. Thus, p62 recruitment by ubiquitinated Nur77 could mediate celastrol-induced sequestering of dysfunctional mitochondria, in a manner analogous to its aggregation of misfolded proteins^16,40 or dysfunctional mitochondria during Parkin-mediated mitophagy^18,19. This is further confirmed by data showing that celastrol-induced Nur77-LBD/p62 but not Nur77-LBD-K536R/p62 condensates colocalized with mitochondria. As deleting IDR from Nur77 (Nur77-ΔIDR) did not affect its ability to aggregate mitochondria, the C-terminal LBD of Nur77 is sufficient to sequester damaged mitochondria in a ubiquitination dependent manner (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 5b). Notably, the IDR of Nur77 could also assemble condensates with mCherry-p62 even though it is not required for clustering mitochondria.

Nur77 ubiquitination-mediated p62 phase separation is insufficient to complete mitophagy

We next asked whether Nur77 ubiquitination-induced p62 phase separation is sufficient to complete the mitophagic process, in analogous to its effect on misfolded proteins⁹. We reasoned that if it was sufficient, Nur77-LBD, which promotes p62 phase separation through ubiquitination, should also act to tether clustered mitochondria to autolysosome for degradation. Bodies assembled by cotransfected GFP-Nur77 and mCherry-p62 were found in lysosome as indicated by their colocalization with Lyso-Tracker (Fig. 6a, b). GFP-Nur77 also colocalized with both mitochondria and lysosome (Fig. 6c, d). Thus, condensates containing Nur77, p62, and mitochondria were engulfed by autolysosome. The role of Myc-Nur77 to support the mitophagic effect of celastrol was confirmed by EGFP-mCherry-COX8 mitophagy assay and its reduction of COXII expression (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). However, when GFP-Nur77-LBD was evaluated, we found that the condensates formed by GFP-Nur77-LBD and p62 were not detected in lysosome (Fig. 6a, b), even though GFP-Nur77-LBD colocalized extensively with mitochondria (Fig. 6c, d). Unlike Myc-Nur77, transfected Myc-Nur77-LBD also failed to mediate the mitophagic effect of celastrol (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). This is reminiscent of the role of p62 in Parkin-mediated mitophagy, in which it serves only to cluster damaged mitochondria but not their autophagy^18,19. Collectively, these results showed that Nur77 ubiquitination-mediated p62 phase separation is insufficient to direct targeted cargo to autophagosome and that the structural integrity of Nur77 is required to confer p62 with full autophagy receptor activity.

**Fig. 6: Nur77-LBD is insufficient to mediate celastrol-induced mitophagy.**

Our finding that p62 is required for Nur77-dependent mitophagy is interesting as p62 serves to sequester dysfunctional mitochondria but not their connection to the autophagy machinery in Parkin-dependent mitophagy¹⁸. To confirm the mitophagic role of p62 in Nur77-dependent mitophagy, we examined the colocalization of Nur77- and p62-positive condensates with core ATG proteins essential for autophagosome formation (Supplementary Fig. 6c–f). Our results showed that ULK1 and FIP200 failed to colocalize with celastrol-induced p62 condensates formed with Nur77 or Nur77-mutants (Nur77-ΔIDR and Nur77-K536R). In contrast, WIPI2 and ATG16L1 exhibited extensive colocalization with p62 condensates formed with Nur77 but not Nur77 mutants (Nur77-ΔIDR and Nur77-K536R). These results demonstrated that Nur77/p62-mediated mitophagy is independent on the ULK1/FIP200 complex but requires early autophagy proteins WIPI2 and ATG16L1 for autophagosome formation.

When p62 functions as a full autophagy receptor for protein aggregates, ubiquitin-induced p62 phase separation generates high avidity interaction with LC3 on the inner surface of the autophagosomal membrane, which is responsible for tethering of targeted cargo to autolysosome for autophagy⁴⁰. Thus, we examined whether the lack of connecting Nur77-LBD/p62 condensates to the autophagy machinery was due to their inability to interact with LC3. Co-IP experiments demonstrated that p62 interacted with LC3 in the presence of Nur77 but not Nur77-K536R when cells were treated with celastrol (Fig. 6e), revealing a high-affinity interaction of Nur77/p62 complex with LC3, which is dependent on Nur77 ubiquitination. By contrast, cotransfection of Nur77-LBD, which binds p62 in a ubiquitination-dependent manner, could not induce p62 interaction with LC3 (Fig. 6f). Thus, p62 condensates induced by Nur77 ubiquitination alone is insufficient to direct cargo mitochondria to the autophagosome.

The IDR of Nur77 interacts with PB1 of p62

Our observation that ubiquitin-induced p62 phase separation is insufficient to complete mitophagy prompted us to study the role of Nur77-IDR in modulating the cargo activity of p62. To this end, we found that Nur77-IDR could form condensates with p62 in the absence of celastrol, even though the resulting Nur77-IDR/p62 condensates were not found either at mitochondria or in the lysosome (Fig. 6a–d). We first asked whether Nur77-IDR is involved in celastrol-independent interaction between Nur77 and p62 observed (Fig. 5b). Mutational analysis of p62 (Fig. 7a) demonstrated that deleting TB or ZZ domain from p62 had no effect on celastrol-dependent and -independent interaction between Nur77 and p62 (Fig. 7b), excluding their involvement. Removing the UBA domain impaired celastrol-dependent but not -independent interaction, in agreement with its role in binding ubiquitinated Nur77 (Fig. 5b). When PB1 was deleted, however, both celastrol-dependent and -independent interactions were lost, revealing a critical role of PB1 in p62 high-affinity interaction with Nur77. The importance of UBA and PB1 was also illustrated by confocal microscopy analysis showing that celastrol-induced p62 colocalization with Nur77 was impaired by their deletion (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Mutational analysis of Nur77 demonstrated that DBD of Nur77 (Nur77-ΔDBD) is dispensable for celastrol-dependent and -independent interactions (Supplementary Fig. 7b). When GFP-Nur77-IDR was analyzed, we found that it strongly interacted with Flag-p62 but not Flag-p62 lacking PB1 (Flag-p62-ΔPB1) in a celastrol-independent manner (Fig. 7c). It also interacted with p62-PB1 but not p62-UBA (Fig. 7d). For comparison, Nur77-LBD interacted with p62-UBA but not p62-PB1 in a celastrol-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Taken together, these data demonstrated that celastrol-induced formation of Nur77-p62 condensates is mediated by their unique celastrol-dependent and -independent interactions involving their C-terminal and N-terminal regions in a “head-to-head” and “tail-to-tail” manner (Fig. 7e).

**Fig. 7: IDR interaction with PB1 promotes liquidity of p62 condensates.**

Role of IDR of Nur77 in celastrol-induced mitophagy

PB1 is known to mediate p62 oligomerization^15,58, which is critical for not only sequestering ubiquitinated cargo but also their connection to the autophagosome^14,15. Given the above observation that Nur77-IDR could directly interact with p62-PB1, we suspected that the interaction might play a crucial role in celastrol-induced mitophagy. Nur77-IDR interacted with p62, resulting in the formation of Nur77-IDR/p62 condensates (Fig. 7f), which however were not found either on mitochondria (Fig. 5f) or in the lysosome (Fig. 6a). This suggested that the interaction is not directly involved in sequestering and tethering dysfunctional mitochondria, raising an intriguing question that the interaction might play a modulatory role in directing engulfed mitochondria to the autophagy machinery. Thus, we studied how IDR-dependent phase separations could confer Nur77-p62 condensates with the ability to connect targeted mitochondria to the autophagy machinery. We found that Nur77-IDR contributed significantly to the increase in the sizes and number of p62 body (Supplementary Fig. 7d), features that are important for effective autophagy⁵⁹. The flexibility in the size of condensates allows the sequestration of different sizes and amounts of cargo for autophagy. In case of mitophagy, removing large organelle such as mitochondrion may depend on the size of the sequestering compartment, which is essential to maintain high-avidity interaction of p62 with ubiquitin and LC3. The liquidity of protein condensates is another critical determinant for their selective membrane sequestration, and a receptor with floatability is essential for selective autophagy⁴⁷. Our FRAP analysis also revealed that the liquidity of p62 was largely dependent on Nur77-IDR but not Nur77-LBD, as Nur77-IDR increased significantly the mobility of p62 condensates with ~38% fluorescence recovery within 120 s (Fig. 7g). For comparison, Nur77-LBD and p62 showed ~8.5% fluorescence recovery, reflecting their lower fluidity. Incubation of purified mCherry-p62-PB1 with GFP-Nur77-IDR but not control GFP protein resulted in a change of mCherry-p62-PB1 from elongated filamentous to puncta structure (Fig. 7h), accompanied with increased liquidity (Fig. 7i). Taken together, our data demonstrated that Nur77 through its IDR drives mitophagy by increasing the size and fluidity of p62 condensates.

Discussion

Phase separation plays a critical role in the condensation of misfolded and ubiquitin-positive proteins and their degradation by autophagy^37,38,60. We present evidence here that coordinated phase separations of Nur77 and p62 through their unique “head-to-head” and “tail-to-tail” interactions assemble membraneless Nur77-p62 condensates capable of driving celastrol-induced mitophagy. During the celastrol-induced formation of Nur77-p62 condensates, the ubiquitination-dependent “tail-to-tail” interaction of Nur77 with p62 promotes p62 phase separation, which serves to prime and sequester dysfunctional mitochondria, whereas the “head-to-head” interaction involving IDR of Nur77 and PB1 of p62 confers the Nur77-p62 condensates with liquidity, which is necessary to connect targeted cargo mitochondria to the autophagic machinery (Fig. 8). These results reveal a spatiotemporal control of Nur77/p62 phase separation for both clustering dysfunctional mitochondria and tethering them to autolysosome for degradation.

**Fig. 8: Graphic summary of Nur77 phase separation and its role in celastrol-induced mitophagy by promoting the liquidity of p62 condensates.**

Our data demonstrated that the sequestration of dysfunctional mitochondria by p62 is analogous to its clustering of ubiquitinated proteins, both of which require the formation of p62-ubiquitin condensates. Although ubiquitin-induced p62 phase separation is sufficient to condensate ubiquitinated proteins and connect them to autophagosome^16,40, it is insufficient to direct clustered mitochondria to the autophagic machinery. This is illustrated by our data that the phase separation of p62 by ubiquitinated Nur77-LBD could sequester damaged mitochondria but failed to connect cargo mitochondria to autolysosome (Fig. 6a, c). The mechanistic basis for such a difference appears to rely on the ability of phase separated p62 condensates to interact with LC3, which is essential for connecting cargo to the autophagosome membrane¹². p62–ubiquitin condensates sequestering misfolded proteins are able to interact with LC3 when engaged in phase separation^16,40, while p62–ubiquitin condensates clustering damaged mitochondria fail to connect cargo mitochondria to the autophagosome membrane (Fig. 6e, f). Thus, ubiquitin-induced p62 bodies is insufficient to direct cargo mitochondria to the autophagic machinery, reminiscent of the role of p62 in PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy^18,19. Selective autophagy in general requires a high density of receptors on the cargo surface in order to form tight and extensive contacts between the cargo and the autophagic membrane¹³. p62 employs oligomerization via its PB1 domain to generate high avidity interaction with LC3 and ubiquitin tags¹⁴. As LIR activity is subject to regulation by p62 oligomerization¹³, it is possible that p62 oligomerization required to sequester ubiquitinated mitochondria may allosterically impair its LIR activity. Indeed, we showed that an additional interaction mediated by p62-PB1 and Nur77-IDR is required for efficient delivery of cargo mitochondria to autolysosome. Zaffagnini et al. also found that NBR1 interaction with the PB1 domain has a direct stimulatory effect on substrate condensation and autophagy through its promotion of p62-mediated phase separation⁴⁰.

Recently, IDRs, especially those containing a low-complexity domain, have been shown to drive the formation of intracellular membraneless organelles for compartmentalized biochemical reactions by LLPS^61,62. The N-terminal IDR of Nur77 exhibits liquid-like property, which is necessary not only for phase separation of Nur77 but also for promoting the expansion and migration of Nur77/p62 condensates. In the case of PGL granules in C. elegans embryos, cargo mobility is associated with increased PGL granule degradation by selective autophagy⁴⁸. The liquidity of Ape1 droplets further strengthens the concept that the fluidity of biomolecular condensates determines their susceptibility to selective autophagy⁴⁷. It is likely that there is optimal liquidity for biomolecular condensates to be an ideal cargo for selective autophagy of mitochondria. The p62 body, as a specific receptor protein, has been reported to be liquid-like in its droplet state, but with low mobility^16,40. The behavior of condensates may depend on the physicochemical properties of the ubiquitinated substrates, and damaged mitochondria are likely to show less mobility than misfolded proteins. Thus, the liquid-like properties of Nur77-IDR could confer cargo mitochondria with fluidity for the high-avidity interaction of p62 with ATG proteins anchored on the autophagosomal membrane. How substrate sequestration and autophagosome formation are coordinated during mitophagy remains poorly understood. p62 has been implicated in the formation of autophagosome by driving the bending of the membrane around cargo^13,63. The liquidity of p62 may also afford cargo with flexibility for tight and extensive contact with the nascent autophagosomal membrane through LC3 binding, a mechanism that was recently proposed to utilize cargo as a template for membrane formation⁴⁷. Interestingly, Nur77/p62 bodies could colocalize with early autophagy proteins WIPI2 and ATG16L1 in an IDR-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 6e, f), raising the possibility that the fluidity of Nur77/p62 bodies may have a role in the initiation of autophagosome formation. Although inconclusive, we found that the interaction of Nur77-IDR with p62-PB1 could shorten p62-PB1 filaments (Fig. 7h), reminiscent of the binding of the autophagy receptor NBR1 to the PB1 of p62, which leads to shortening and solubilization of filamentous p62 structure¹⁴. The fact that overexpression of NBR1 can block the autophagic turnover of p62 bodies⁶⁴ suggests a potential regulatory role of NBR1 in Nur77-mediated mitophagy, which remains to be investigated.

Nur77 shares similar structural domains with other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Compared to LBD and DBD, the N-terminal IDR region is most variable among nuclear receptor family members but accounts for a large portion of nuclear receptor activities in a cell- and context-dependent manner⁶⁵. Moreover, numerous nuclear receptor subtypes differing in their N-terminal A/B region are generated through alternative splicing and translation initiation⁶⁶ as well as proteolytic cleavage⁵⁴, providing the complexity of nuclear receptor regulatory networks and cell/tissue-specific signaling. As LLPS-mediated formation of membraneless organelles have emerged as important platforms to mediate diverse biological processes, our finding that the IDRs of Nur77 and its subfamily members could act by phase separation suggests that IDR-mediated phase separation may represent an important mechanism utilized by nuclear receptor family members to regulate diverse biological activities.

Membraneless condensates resulting from the interaction between Nur77 and p62 may also serve as an important signaling hub for diverse cellular events that two proteins are known to play, such as cell survival, apoptosis, metabolism, and amino acid sensing and the oxidative stress response^67,68. Mitophagy is important for mitochondrial quality control, thereby contributing to cellular homeostasis and potentially preventing aggregation-induced diseases such as metabolic⁶⁹ or neurodegenerative diseases⁷⁰ and cancer⁷¹. The Nur77/p62-mediated mitophagy likely plays a crucial role in physiological and pathological conditions such as aging and inflammatory disease as well as cancer^2,72. Our discovery that the IDR of Nur77 could promote the autophagy of aggregated mitochondria in a ligand-dependent manner offers an opportunity for developing new therapeutics for treating aggregation-associated diseases and cancer.

Methods

Plasmids and reagents

Plasmids GFP-Nur77, GFP-Nur77-IDR, GFP-Nur77-ΔIDR, GFP-Nur77-LBD, GFP-Nur77-ΔDBD, GFP-Nur77-K536R, GFP-Nur77-LBD-K536R, mCherry-LC3, GFP-LC3, mCherry-p62, mCherry-p62-ΔPB1, mCherry-p62-PB1, mCherry-p62-UBA, mCherry-TRAF2, Myc-Nur77-ΔDBD,Myc-Nur77, Myc-Nur77-K536R, 3*Flag-Nur77-LBD, Flag-Nur77-LBD-K536R, Myc-p62, Flag-p62, Flag-p62-ΔPB1, Flag-p62-ΔTB, Flag-p62-ΔZZ, Flag-p62-ΔUBA, and HA-Ub were described previously²⁸. Plasmid EGFP-mCherry-COX8 was from Addgene (Plasmid #78520)⁴², and AAV-9-EGFP-mCherry-COX8 plasmids was subcloned by Genomeditech. Plasmids His-GFP-Nur77, His-GFP-Nur77-IDR, His-GFP-Nur77-LBD, His-mCherry-p62-PB1, His-mCherry-Nur77, His-mCherry-Nur77-IDR, and His-mCherry-Nur77-LBD, were generated with the pET-21a-mCherry or pET-28a-GFP vector using Hind III and Xho I restriction sites, respectively (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nur77 (NM_002135, siRNA ID: SASI_Hs02_00333289, SASI_Hs02_00333290, and SASI_Hs02_00333291), SQSTM1/p62 (NM_003900, siRNA ID: SASI_Hs01_00118616, SASI_Hs01_00118618, and SASI_Hs01_00118620), Atg7 (NM_006395, siRNA ID: SASI_Hs01_00077648, SASI_Hs01_00077649, and SASI_Hs02_00341471) and control siRNAs from Sigma-Aldrich. siRNA was transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11668019) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Control siRNA served as a negative control.

Antibodies

For Western blot, the following antibodies were used: Myc (9E10) (Santa Cruz, sc-40, dilution: 1:1000), FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804, dilution: 1:1000), GFP (Santa Cruz, sc-9996, dilution: 1:1000), COXII (Abclonal, A3843, dilution: 1:1000), LC3 (Abcam, AB51520, dilution: 1:5000), Nur77 for HeLa cell study (CST, 3960S, dilution: 1:500), Nur77 for mouse study (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14-5965-82, dilution: 1:1000), SQSTM1/p62 (Abcam, AB56416, dilution: 1:5000), Atg7 (HUABIO, SC06-30, dilution: 1:1000), β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, A5441, dilution: 1:10,000), GAPDH (Proteintech, 60004, dilution: 1:10,000). The goat anti-mouse IgG F(ab′)2 secondary antibody (#31436, dilution: 1:10,000) and the goat anti-rabbit IgG F(ab′)2 secondary antibody (#31461, dilution: 1:10,000) were from Pierce Chemical. For immunoprecipitation, FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804, dilution: 1:100) was used. For immunostaining, the following antibodies were used: Nur77 for HeLa cell study (CST, 3960S, dilution: 1:100), Nur77 (M-210) (Santa Cruz, sc-5569, dilution: 1:50), Nur77 for mouse study (Affinity, DF7850, dilution:1:200), CD68 (Abcam, AB955, dilution: 1:200), SQSTM1/p62 (Abcam, AB56416, dilution: 1:400), Myc (9E10) (Santa Cruz, sc-40, dilution: 1:100), FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804, dilution: 1:400), HA (Santa Cruz, sc-7392, dilution: 1:100), LC3 (MBL, PM036, dilution: 1:200), Hsp60 (Santa Cruz, sc-13115, dilution: 1:100), FIP200 (CST, 12436, dilution: 1:100), ATG16L1 (Proteintech, 19812, dilution: 1:100), WIPI2 (Proteintech, 15432, dilution: 1:100), ULK1 (Santa Cruz, Sc-390904, dilution: 1:50), MitoTracker Red FM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, M22425, dilution: 1:20000), MitoTracker Deep Red FM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, M22426, dilution: 1:20000), LysoTracker Deep Red FM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, L12492, dilution: 1:20,000), Goat anti-Rabbit (A10523) and anti-Mouse (A10524) IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Cy5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, dilution: 1:200), Cy3-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit (111-165-003) and Anti-Mouse (115-165-003) IgG (H+L) (Jackson, dilution: 1:200), FITC-AffiniPure Rabbit Anti-Goat IgG (H+L) FITC (Yeasen, 33707ES60, dilution: 1:200). For Immunogold EM, the following antibodies were used: Nur77 (CST, 3960S, dilution: 1:100), SQSTM1/p62 (Abcam, AB56416, dilution: 1:100), LC3 (MBL, PM036, dilution: 1:200), Goat Anti-rabbit IgG/Gold (AB-0295G-Gold, 15 nm), Goat Anti-mouse IgG/Gold (AB-0296R-Gold, 10 nm), (Leading Biology Inc., California, USA), dilution: 1:100).

Cell culture

Human cervical cancer cell line HeLa and Nur77^−/−HeLa⁵³ were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% FBS and grown under standard tissue-culture conditions (37 °C, 5.0% CO₂). Primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and p62^−/−MEFs were obtained from M.T.D.-M and J.M.’s lab⁷³. Transfection was performed using lipofectamine 2000 or PEI reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

CRISPR genome editing

Nur77 knockout cells were generated using CRISPR-Cas9 methods. Briefly, the design of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) was based on recommendations from the Zhang laboratory website (http://crispr.mit.edu/). gRNA targeting sequence of Nur77 (5′-ACCTTCATGGACGGCTACAC-3′) was cloned into gRNA cloning vector Px330 (Addgene, 71707) and confirmed by sequencing. To screen for cells lacking Nur77, HeLa cells were transfected with control vector and gRNA expression vectors, followed by G418 selection (0.5 mg/ml). Single colonies were subjected to Western blotting using anti-Nur77 antibody to select knockout cells, which were validated by STR typing (Genetic testing biotechnology, Suzhou, China).

Mice

Wild-type (C57BL/6 J, Stock No.: 000664) and Nur77^−/−mice (Nur77 C57BL/6 J, Stock No: 006187) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). All experiments were performed on female cohorts at 2 months of age (young mice) and 2 years of age (aging mice). All mice were housed in pathogen-free facilities, in a 12 h dark/light cycle with temperatures of 22.5 °C and 50–55% humidity. The protocols for animal studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xiamen University, and all mice were handled in accordance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” and the “Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals”.

Protein expression and purification

Human Nur77 and mutants were cloned into a modified version of a T7-promoter-pET expression vector. The base vector was engineered to include a 6×His tag followed by either GFP or mCherry. The resulting expression constructs were confirmed by sequencing. The N-terminal 6xHis tagged GFP, GFP-Nur77, GFP-Nur77-IDR, and GFP-Nur77-LBD and C-terminal 6xHis tagged mCherry, mCherry-Nur77, mCherry-Nur77-IDR, and mCherry-Nur77-LBD were overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Novagen) using pET-28a-GFP or pET-21a-mCherry vectors. Proteins were induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 16 h at 16 °C. Cells were collected, pelleted, and then resuspended in the following buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 400 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then lysed by sonication and centrifuged at 7000xg for 30 min. The supernatants were first purified with Ni-NTA resin (GenScript), followed by purification on a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 column (SD200) (GE healthcare). All proteins were stored in storage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) at −80 °C. All protein purification steps were performed at 4 °C. Purified protein was quantified using a ND-2000C NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies) with OD 280 and verified by Coomassie staining.

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Western blot (WB)

Cells transfected with indicated expression vectors in 10-cm dishes were treated with celastrol (2 μM) for 1 h and analyzed by Co-IP using anti-Flag antibody. Cells were harvested in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and protease inhibitors). The lysate was incubated with 1 mg antibody at 4 °C for 2 h. Immunocomplexes were then precipitated with 30 μl of protein A/G-Sepharose. After extensive washing with lysis buffer, the beads were boiled in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample loading buffer, analyzed by 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE), and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were blocked in 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 (TBST; 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing twice with TBST, the membranes were incubated with appropriate primary antibodies in TBST for 1 h, washed twice, and then probed with horseradish peroxide-linked anti-immunoglobulin (1:5000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes with TBST, immunoreactive products were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents and autoradiography.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were grown in 24-well plates with 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm glass slides and then permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1 mol/L glycine for 15 min, and blocked with 1% bovine serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, followed with incubation with various primary antibodies at room temperature for 3 h, and detected by FITC-labeled anti-IgG, anti-goat IgG conjugated with Cy3, or Cy5-labeled antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Cells were costained with 40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1:10,000 dilution) to visualize nuclei. The images were taken under a fluorescent microscope Zeiss LSM 880 (Zeiss, Germany) or Leica TCS SP8 (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) confocal laser scanning microscope system. HeLa, Nur77^−/−HeLa, MEFs, and p62^−/−MEFs were treated with 2 μM celastrol or plus TNFα (20 ng/mL) for the indicated time. Mitochondria and lysosome were marked by Mito-tracker and lyso-tracker for 30 min before being fixed by 4% buffered formalin/PBS.

Immunostaining on cryosections

Livers were dissected, cut into small pieces, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight. After washes, sink the samples in 10% sucrose solution for 4 h, 15% sucrose solution for 4 h, and 20% sucrose solution overnight at 4 °C. The next day, samples were embedded in OCT (optimum cutting temperature compound). Samples were sliced into 4-μm sections and incubated with anti-LC3B antibody, anti-Nur77, anti-Hsp60, anti-p62, or anti-CD68 antibody. In the in vivo mitophagy assay, 2 × 10^11 VG/ml of AAV-9-EGFP-mCherry-COX8 plasmids were injected into young and old mice by intravenous injection. Two weeks after injection, the liver tissues were fixed and frozen with the above steps. Sections were mounted on slide glasses. The section slips were examined and analyzed by the Leica TCS SP8 system.

Immunogold EM

HeLa cells were transfected with Myc-Nur77 and Flag-p62 plasmids for 24 h, and then treated with 2 μM celastrol and 20 ng/ml TNF-α for 0.5 h. HeLa cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) in 4 °C overnight. After dehydration using 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% ethanol and infiltration in LR resin. Ultrathin sections of 90–100 nm were obtained. Sections were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 10 min in room temperature, and then incubated with monoclonal anti-p62 and anti-Nur77, or anti-p62 and anti-LC3 in 4 °C overnight. Cells were washed three times with ddH₂O, followed incubation with 10 nm gold-conjugated goat antibodies to mouse IgG and 15 nm gold-conjugated goat antibodies to rabbit IgG for 3 h at room temperature. After washing five times with ddH₂O, cells were further fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and washed three times with ddH₂O. Immunogold-labeled samples were stained with uranium and lead citrate before imaging with a Hitachi HT-7800 electron microscope.

Imaging and quantification of mitophagy

All images were acquired with Leica TCS SP8 (Leica) confocal microscope with a Plan-Apochromat 63x oil objective. The 488 and 561 nm laser lines were used to excite EGFP-mCherry-COX8 and imaging was done in line mode to minimize movement of mitochondria between the acquisition of each channel. The 633 nm laser line was used to excite Alexa 633-conjugated dyes. Cells were transiently transfected with EGFP-mCherry-COX8 plasmid to examine the formation of fluorescent puncta of autophagosomes. After transfection, the cells were treated with DMSO or 2 μM celastrol and 20 ng/ml TNFα for 3 h, and then examined by immunostaining. For rescue experiments, Nur77^−/−HeLa cells were cotransfected with Nur77 or mutants together with EGFP-mCherry-COX8 and then treated with celastrol and TNFα. Quantitative analysis of mitophagy was assessed by the cytoFLEX Flow Cytometry System (Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). Flow cytometry scatter illustrate the gating strategy (Supplementary Fig. 1a) used to detect the mCherry-COX8 exposure cells. EGFP-mCherry-COX8 positive cells were first gated (gate: P1) based on forward scatter area (FSC-A) and side scatter area (SSC-A), followed by doublet discrimination based on FSC height (FSC-H) by FSC-A (gate: Single Cells). EGFP-mCherry-COX8 positive cells were determined using untransfected controls (gate: FITC). Measurements EGFP-mCherry-COX8 were made using dual-excitation ratiometric pH measurements at FITC (488 nm, pH 7) and PE (561 nm, pH 4) lasers. For each sample, 10,000 events of FITC positive cells were collected and subsequently gated with appropriate controls to detect mCherry-COX8 exposure cells but not EGFP-mCherry-COX8 double-positive cells. Three independent experiments were conducted and one of three similar experiments is shown.

Live cell imaging

Live cell imaging was carried out in a normal culture medium. For HeLa cells, imaging was performed using Zeiss 880 LSM with Airyscan, plan-apochromatic 63x oil objective, and processed with Airyscan processing in ZEN software (Zeiss). GFP-Nur77 trafficking imaging was performed using a Nikon spinning disk equipped with a 63x oil objective lens. Time-lapse movies of GFP-Nur77 and mCherry-p62 were then acquired at 100 ms/frame for 30 s and displayed in kymograph format.

Intrinsic disorder tendency analysis

Intrinsic disorder tendency of Nur77, NOR1, and Nurr1 was analyzed using Predictor of Natural Disordered Regions (PONDR) (http://www.pondr.com/) version SVL2 across the entire Nur77. The scores were assigned between 0 and 1, and a score above 0.5 indicates disorder.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis

For in vitro experiments, FRAP was carried out with samples in 96-well microscopy plates using Zeiss LSM 880 microscope equipped with 63× oil immersion objectives. Droplets were bleached with a 488-nm laser pulse (three repeats, 80% intensity, dwell time 1 s). The recovery from photobleaching was recorded for the indicated time. For in vivo experiments, FRAP of GFP-Nur77, mCherry-p62, and their mutants was performed on the same fluorescent microscope mentioned above using 63× oil immersion objectives. Bleaching was performed using 80% laser power (488 or 561 nm laser) with 120/180 s, and images were collected every 1 s. Fluorescence intensity at the bleached spot, a control unbleached spot, and background was measured using the FIJI plugin FRAP Profiler. Background intensity was subtracted, and values are reported relative to the unbleached spot to control for photobleaching during image acquisition. Each data point is representative of the mean and standard deviation of fluorescence intensities in three unbleached (control) or three bleached (experimental) granules.

In vitro phase separation assay

Recombinant GFP or mCherry fusion proteins were concentrated and desalted to an appropriate protein concentration which contain 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4 and 150 mM NaCl by Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (10 K MWCO, Millipore). In vitro droplet assembly for GFP-Nur77, GFP-Nur77-IDR, GFP-Nur77-LBD, or mCherry-Nur77 was mixed with 10% (w/v) final concentration of PEG-3.35 K (Sigma-Aldrich, 25322-68-3) or other crowding reagents (Sigma-Aldrich). Co-phase separations between GFP-Nur77-IDR and mCherry-Nur77, mCherry-Nur77-IDR or mCherry-Nur77-LBD were done by mixing in the droplet-formation buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 10%PEG-3.35 K. All droplets were loaded onto a glass slide, covered with a coverslip, and imaged with Leica TCS SP8 microscope equipped with 63× or 100× oil immersion objectives.

Turbidity and size of droplet assembly

The size of the droplet was determined using a Malvern zetasizer (Malvern instrument, Worcestershire, UK) apparatus. After measuring the turbidity of the protein phase-separated solution by absorbance at 600 nm using BioTek Instruments (Winooski, VT, USA). All experiments were performed at least three times with similar results.

Statistical analysis and reproducibility

All data were presented as the mean values ± SEM of at least three technical replicates. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test were used for statistical analysis using the GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. Significance was defined as any statistical outcome that resulted in a P value of < 0.05 unless otherwise indicated. Each experiment was independently repeated at least three times with similar results.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All other relevant data supporting the key findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Palikaras, K., Lionaki, E. & Tavernarakis, N. Mechanisms of mitophagy in cellular homeostasis, physiology and pathology. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1013–1022 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Green, D. R., Galluzzi, L. & Kroemer, G. Mitochondria and the autophagy-inflammation-cell death axis in organismal aging. Science 333, 1109–1112 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Villa, E., Marchetti, S. & Ricci, J. E. No parkin zone: mitophagy without parkin. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 882–895 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, N., Youle, R. J. & Finkel, T. The mitochondrial basis of aging. Mol. Cell 61, 654–666 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johansen, T. & Lamark, T. Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy 7, 279–296 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kirkin, V., McEwan, D. G., Novak, I. & Dikic, I. A role for ubiquitin in selective autophagy. Mol. Cell 34, 259–269 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moscat, J. & Diaz-Meco, M. T. p62 at the crossroads of autophagy, apoptosis, and cancer. Cell 137, 1001–1004 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pohl, C. & Dikic, I. Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Science 366, 818–822 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Danieli, A. & Martens, S. p62-mediated phase separation at the intersection of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs214304 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bjorkoy, G. et al. p62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J. Cell Biol. 171, 603–614 (2005).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Komatsu, M. et al. Homeostatic levels of p62 control cytoplasmic inclusion body formation in autophagy-deficient mice. Cell 131, 1149–1163 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pankiv, S. et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24131–24145 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wurzer, B. et al. Oligomerization of p62 allows for selection of ubiquitinated cargo and isolation membrane during selective autophagy. Elife 4, e08941 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jakobi, A. J. et al. Structural basis of p62/SQSTM1 helical filaments and their role in cellular cargo uptake. Nat. Commun. 11, 440 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Ciuffa, R. et al. The selective autophagy receptor p62 forms a flexible filamentous helical scaffold. Cell Rep. 11, 748–758 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, D. X., Wu, R. B., Zheng, J. X., Li, P. L. & Yu, L. Polyubiquitin chain-induced p62 phase separation drives autophagic cargo segregation. Cell Res. 28, 405–415 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Geisler, S. et al. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is dependent on VDAC1 and p62/SQSTM1. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 119–131 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Narendra, D., Kane, L. A., Hauser, D. N., Fearnley, I. M. & Youle, R. J. p62/SQSTM1 is required for Parkin-induced mitochondrial clustering but not mitophagy; VDAC1 is dispensable for both. Autophagy 6, 1090–1106 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Okatsu, K. et al. p62/SQSTM1 cooperates with Parkin for perinuclear clustering of depolarized mitochondria. Genes. Cell 15, 887–900 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhong, Z. et al. NF-kappaB restricts inflammasome activation via elimination of damaged mitochondria. Cell 164, 896–910 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. D. et al. Loss of the selective autophagy receptor p62 impairs murine myeloid leukemia progression and mitophagy. Blood 133, 168–179 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Calvo, R., Tajes, M. & Vazquez-Carrera, M. The NR4A subfamily of nuclear receptors: potential new therapeutic targets for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 21, 291–304 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Safe, S., Jin, U. H., Hedrick, E., Reeder, A. & Lee, S. O. Minireview: role of orphan nuclear receptors in cancer and potential as drug targets. Mol. Endocrinol. 28, 157–172 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, X. K. Targeting Nur77 translocation. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 11, 69–79 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kolluri, S. K. et al. A short Nur77-derived peptide converts Bcl-2 from a protector to a killer. Cancer Cell 14, 285–298 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Cytochrome c release and apoptosis induced by mitochondrial targeting of nuclear orphan receptor TR3. Science 289, 1159–1164 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Lin, B. Z. et al. Conversion of Bcl-2 from protector to killer by interaction with nuclear orphan receptor Nur77/TR3. Cell 116, 527–540 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, M. et al. Celastrol-induced Nur77 interaction with TRAF2 alleviates inflammation by promoting mitochondrial ubiquitination and autophagy. Mol. Cell 66, 141–153 e146 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Corson, T. W. & Crews, C. M. Molecular understanding and modern application of traditional medicines: triumphs and trials. Cell 130, 769–774 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, J., Lee, J., Salazar Hernandez, M. A., Mazitschek, R. & Ozcan, U. Treatment of obesity with celastrol. Cell 161, 999–1011 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang, W. Y. C. et al. A molecular assembly phase transition and kinetic proofreading modulate Ras activation by SOS. Science 363, 1098–1103 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Case, L. B., Zhang, X., Ditlev, J. A. & Rosen, M. K. Stoichiometry controls activity of phase-separated clusters of actin signaling proteins. Science 363, 1093–1097 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Gallego, L. D. et al. Phase separation directs ubiquitination of gene-body nucleosomes. Nature 579, 592 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Su, X. L. et al. Phase separation of signaling molecules promotes T cell receptor signal transduction. Science 352, 595–599 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Cho, W. K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science 361, 412–415 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Boija, A. et al. Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell 175, 1842–1855 e1816 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Z. & Zhang, H. Phase separation, transition, and autophagic degradation of proteins in development and pathogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 417–427 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. et al. Stress- and ubiquitylation-dependent phase separation of the proteasome. Nature 578, 296–300 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Stolz, A., Ernst, A. & Dikic, I. Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 495–501 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zaffagnini, G. et al. p62 filaments capture and present ubiquitinated cargos for autophagy. EMBO J. 37, e98308 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lazarou, M. et al. The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524, 309–314 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Rojansky, R., Cha, M. Y. & Chan, D. C. Elimination of paternal mitochondria in mouse embryos occurs through autophagic degradation dependent on PARKIN and MUL1. Elife 5, e17896 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Liou, W., Geuze, H. J., Geelen, M. J. & Slot, J. W. The autophagic and endocytic pathways converge at the nascent autophagic vacuoles. J. Cell Biol. 136, 61–70 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, G., Kroemer, G. & Kepp, O. Mitophagy: an emerging role in aging and age-associated diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 200 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, T. Megamitochondria formation - physiology and pathology. J. Cell Mol. Med. 6, 497–538 (2002).
Article MathSciNet CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamada, T. et al. Mitochondrial stasis reveals p62-mediated ubiquitination in Parkin-independent mitophagy and mitigates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 28, 588–604 e585 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamasaki, A. et al. Liquidity is a critical determinant for selective autophagy of protein condensates. Mol. Cell 77, 1163–1175 e1169 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Du, Z. & Zhang, H. mTOR regulates phase separation of PGL granules to modulate their autophagic degradation. Cell 174, 1492–1506 e1422 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brangwynne, C. P. Phase transitions and size scaling of membrane-less organelles. J. Cell Biol. 203, 875–881 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A. & Young, R. A. Biomolecular condensates in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 961–977 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xue, B., Dunbrack, R. L., Williams, R. W., Dunker, A. K. & Uversky, V. N. PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 996–1010 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wansa, K. D. S. A., Harris, J. M. & Muscat, G. E. O. The activation function-1 domain of Nur77/NR4A1 mediates trans-activation, cell specificity, and coactivator recruitment. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33001–33011 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, X. H. et al. BI1071, a novel Nur77 modulator, induces apoptosis of cancer cells by activating the Nur77-Bcl-2 apoptotic pathway. Mol. Cancer Ther. 18, 886–899 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, H. et al. NSAID sulindac and its analog bind RXRalpha and inhibit RXRalpha-dependent AKT signaling. Cancer Cell 17, 560–573 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Modulation of nongenomic activation of PI3K signalling by tetramerization of N-terminally-cleaved RXRalpha. Nat. Commun. 8, 16066 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Bradley, J. R. & Pober, J. S. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs). Oncogene 20, 6482–6491 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Youle, R. J. & Narendra, D. P. Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 9–14 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lamark, T. et al. Interaction codes within the family of mammalian Phox and Bem1p domain-containing proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 34568–34581 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jin, M. Y. & Klionsky, D. J. Regulation of autophagy: modulation of the size and number of autophagosomes. FEBS Lett. 588, 2457–2463 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fujioka, Y. et al. Phase separation organizes the site of autophagosome formation. Nature 578, 301–305 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Boeynaems, S. et al. Protein phase separation: a new phase in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 420–435 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Turco, E. et al. FIP200 claw domain binding to p62 promotes autophagosome formation at ubiquitin condensates. Mol. Cell 74, 330–346 e311 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanchez-Martin, P. et al. NBR1-mediated p62-liquid droplets enhance the Keap1-Nrf2 system. EMBO Rep. 21, e48902 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kumar, R. & Thompson, E. B. Role of phosphorylation in the modulation of the glucocorticoid receptor’s intrinsically disordered domain. Biomolecules 9, 95 (2019).
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lu, N. Z. & Cidlowski, J. A. Translational regulatory mechanisms generate N-terminal glucocorticoid receptor isoforms with unique transcriptional target genes. Mol. Cell 18, 331–342 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Herring, J. A., Elison, W. S. & Tessem, J. S. Function of Nr4a orphan nuclear receptors in proliferation, apoptosis and fuel utilization across tissues. Cells 8, 1373 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katsuragi, Y., Ichimura, Y. & Komatsu, M. p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. FEBS J. 282, 4672–4678 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Egan, D. F. et al. Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. Science 331, 456–461 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Martinez-Vicente, M. Neuronal mitophagy in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10, 64 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Pinton, P. & Kroemer, G. Cancer therapy: altering mitochondrial properties. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 89–90 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kauppila, T. E. S., Kauppila, J. H. K. & Larsson, N. G. Mammalian mitochondria and aging: an update. Cell Metab. 25, 57–71 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Duran, A. et al. p62 is a key regulator of nutrient sensing in the mTORC1 pathway. Mol. Cell 44, 134–146 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M.T.D.-M and J.M. for providing primary MEFs and p62^−/−MEFs⁷³. This work was partially supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (81672749, U1405229, 81741171, and 91429306), Regional Demonstration of Marine Economy Innovative Development Project (16PYY007SF17), Fujian Provincial Science & Technology Department (2017YZ0002), Xiamen Bureau of Science & Technology (3502Z20193004 and 3502Z20150007), and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2020M671945).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Shuang-zhou Peng, Xiao-hui Chen.

Authors and Affiliations

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China
Shuang-zhou Peng, Xiao-hui Chen, Si-jie Chen, Jie Zhang, Chuan-ying Wang, Wei-rong Liu, Duo Zhang, Ying Su & Xiao-kun Zhang
NucMito Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Xiamen, 361101, China
Ying Su

Authors

Shuang-zhou Peng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao-hui Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Si-jie Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jie Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chuan-ying Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wei-rong Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Duo Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ying Su
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao-kun Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.-z.P. and X.-h.C. conducted cellular and molecular experiments; S.-j.C., J.Z., D.Z., W.-r.L., and C.-y.W. provide technical assistance; S.-z.P., X.-h.C., Y.S., and X.-k.Z. analyzed data; S.-z.P., X.-h.C., Y.S., and X.-k.Z. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-kun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Masaaki Komatsu, Wen-Xing Ding and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 4

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, Sz., Chen, Xh., Chen, Sj. et al. Phase separation of Nur77 mediates celastrol-induced mitophagy by promoting the liquidity of p62/SQSTM1 condensates. Nat Commun 12, 5989 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26295-8

Download citation

Received: 20 September 2020
Accepted: 29 September 2021
Published: 13 October 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26295-8

This article is cited by

Hyperinsulinemia impairs decidualization via AKT-NR4A1 signaling: new insight into polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)-related infertility
- Nan-Xing Jiang
- Wei-Jie Zhao
- Xue-Lian Li
Journal of Ovarian Research (2024)
Biosynthesis and biotechnological production of the anti-obesity agent celastrol
- Yong Zhao
- Nikolaj L. Hansen
- Sotirios C. Kampranis
Nature Chemistry (2023)
Mitophagy for cardioprotection
- Allen Sam Titus
- Eun-Ah Sung
- Junichi Sadoshima
Basic Research in Cardiology (2023)
NR4A1 Aggravates Myocardial Ischaemia–Reperfusion Injury by Inhibiting OPA1-Mediated Mitochondrial Fusion
- Muding Li
- Yingyun Hu
- Yundai Chen
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research (2023)
NEMO reshapes the α-Synuclein aggregate interface and acts as an autophagy adapter by co-condensation with p62
- Nikolas Furthmann
- Verian Bader
- Konstanze F. Winklhofer
Nature Communications (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Results

Nur77 and p62 form condensates in celastrol-induced mitophagy

Nur77-mediated mitophagy in aging

Celastrol promotes phase separation of Nur77/p62

Celastrol-induced phase separation of p62 depends on Nur77

Nur77 forms liquid-like condensate through phase separation

Nur77 phase separation is dependent on its N-terminal IDR domain

Celastrol regulation of Nur77 phase separation

Nur77 ubiquitination-induced p62 phase separation sequesters mitochondria

Nur77 ubiquitination-mediated p62 phase separation is insufficient to complete mitophagy

The IDR of Nur77 interacts with PB1 of p62

Role of IDR of Nur77 in celastrol-induced mitophagy

Discussion

Methods

Plasmids and reagents

Antibodies

Cell culture

CRISPR genome editing

Mice

Protein expression and purification

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Western blot (WB)

Immunofluorescence

Immunostaining on cryosections

Immunogold EM

Imaging and quantification of mitophagy

Live cell imaging

Intrinsic disorder tendency analysis

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis

In vitro phase separation assay

Turbidity and size of droplet assembly

Statistical analysis and reproducibility

Reporting Summary

Data availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Additional information

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Comments

Search

Quick links