Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ultra-coherent nanomechanical resonators based on inverse design


Engineered micro- and nanomechanical resonators with ultra-low dissipation constitute a promising platform for various quantum technologies and foundational research. Traditionally, the improvement of the resonator’s performance through nanomechanical structural engineering has been driven by human intuition and insight. Such an approach is inefficient and leaves aside a plethora of unexplored mechanical designs that potentially achieve better performance. Here, we use a computer-aided inverse design approach known as topology optimization to structurally design mechanical resonators with optimized performance of the fundamental mechanical mode. Using the outcomes of this approach, we fabricate and characterize ultra-coherent nanomechanical resonators with, to the best of our knowledge, record-high Qf products for their fundamental mode (where Q is the quality factor and f is the frequency). The proposed approach - which can also be used to improve phononic crystals and coupled-mode resonators - opens up a new paradigm for designing ultra-coherent micro- and nanomechanical resonators, enabling e.g. novel experiments in fundamental physics and extreme sensing.


Topology optimization is a computational morphogenesis procedure widely applied in engineering to determine the best possible structural design and material distributions within a prescribed design domain by maximizing a set of performance targets1. Examples include the maximization of the structural stiffness of an object under certain design and manufacturing constraints to determine the optimal design of a full-scale aeroplane wing2 or a girder of a suspension bridge3, and the maximization of light concentration to develop the optimal design of nanophotonic resonators4.

The basic strategy of topology optimization is to define a design domain in which material can be distributed. Material is being added to or removed from this domain, and founded on a physical model for the system, a gradient-based computational method is used to optimize the figure-of-merit. Through iterations, material is gradually redistributed towards the optimal design for which the figure of merit is either maximized or minimized, depending on the problem to be solved.

We use topology optimization to design a nanomechanical resonator towards maximizing its Qf (Qf) product5,6,7. Previously, improving the resonator’s performance has been done through a combination of human intuition and trial-and-error based on experience and approximative analytical expression for the different dissipation mechanisms of the resonator8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Such an intuition-based approach has recently led to impressive progress in increasing the Qf product of mechanical resonators by using a combination of dissipation dilution11, soft-clamping15, thin-clamping18, and strain engineering16. Despite these recent successes, the approach inevitably leaves out many, possibly counter-intuitive, designs that might exhibit superior behavior. Topology optimization counteracts this problem as it directly develops the optimized structure under given initial design constraints and loss models with no geometrical pre-assumptions.


Model and topology optimization

Aiming at maximizing the Qf product of the fundamental mode of a nanomechanical resonator suitable for opto-mechanical experiments, we consider the initial structure illustrated in Fig. 1a. It comprises an area of 700 × 700 μm2 and a thickness of 50 nm with a single central pad of size 100 × 100 μm2 made of pre-stressed silicon nitride (that allows for the interaction with light via radiation pressure force19,20) and a narrow frame of 5 μm to ease fabrication. The remaining space is free to evolve through topology optimization. The pre-stressed resonator is numerically discretized with 200 × 200 quadrilateral shell elements using the finite element method. In the topology optimization procedure, a design variable is assigned to each element to control the material occupation in the element which is to be iteratively updated. Design robustness with respect to manufacturing errors is enforced by simultaneously considering three design realizations (eroded, normal, and dilated, corresponding to over-etched, nominal, and under-etched realizations of the design) which are maximized for their minimum Qf product. Meanwhile, the fundamental frequency is constrained to be equal or above a prescribed value to ensure structural connectivity, and a volume fraction is used to constrain the resonator weight and regularize the optimized resonator shape. The deterministic, adjoint-based optimizations are initiated by a uniform design variable distribution, satisfying the volume constraint and typically require a total of 2000 finite element evaluations to converge. Detailed descriptions of the topology optimization procedure are included in the Methods section.

Fig. 1: Topology optimization model.

a Illustration of the model used in topology optimization. Note the springs illustrate a continuous distribution of springs. b Illustration of the two damping mechanisms: intrinsic losses in the form of bending and phonon tunneling losses. c Illustration of the optimization procedure of resonator D1 with snapshots of the design evolution. The degree of transparency indicates the material density.

Two damping mechanisms associated with intrinsic losses and phonon tunneling losses have been included in the model (Fig. 1b). The intrinsic losses are modeled as bending losses in the form of hysteretic damping, i.e. using a lossy Young’s modulus. The phonon tunneling loss (PTL) associated with radiation of the phonons into the substrate was modeled by coupling the boundary out-of-plane displacements to continuously distributed lossy springs (illustrated in Fig. 1a) while keeping all the other degrees of freedom fixed. Since the loss mechanisms are not yet completely understood, we perform optimizations for five different ratios of intrinsic and PTL losses, with loss values estimated from the physically realized reference design [8] such that the reference resonator under the five loss models exhibits a similar Q-value as the experimental result. The optimized designs based on the five different loss models are denoted as D1–D5. For D1 and D5 the system is purely limited by intrinsic loss and by phonon tunneling loss, respectively, while for D2–D4 the ratio is gradually changed. The exact ratios can be found in the Methods section. To illustrate the iterative procedure of the topology optimization, in Fig. 1c we show the evolution of the design of resonator D1. The final topology optimized designs for all five cases are illustrated in Fig. 2. The images have been slightly filtered in post-processing with the aim of removing buckling-prone features and smoothing sharp features to prevent high tensile stresses at the boundaries (see Methods section).

Fig. 2: Designs overview.

Overview of topology optimized structures and the mode shape of their respective fundamental mode. Design D1 and D5 are optimized assuming only bending losses or phonon tunneling losses, respectively. Design D2–D4 assume different weighted combinations of the two damping mechanisms.

Interestingly, the optimized design of D1 is similar to the membrane design suggested and experimentally tested in Beccari et al.21 but using a completely different approach. They arrive at this geometry based on considerations on soft-clamping using a hierarchical design concept17.

Fabrication and characterization

The post-processed designs were patterned on high-stress (σ0 ≤ 1.2 GPa) silicon nitride with a thickness of 12–50 nm grown by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition on a silicon wafer. We release the resonators by back-etching the silicon substrate in a window of 1.4 × 1.4 mm2. The fabricated structures are shown in Fig. 3a. To measure the mechanical frequency and quality of the fundamental mode, ring-down measurements were carried out in vacuum (pressure <10−7 mbar) at room temperature using high-sensitivity fiber-based homodyne detection (see Methods section). An example of a ring-down measurement of a fundamental mode of frequency 240 kHz exhibiting an amplitude ring-down time of ~160 s is illustrated in Fig. 4a. This corresponds to a Q factor of 1.18 ± 0.01 × 108 and a Qf product of 2.83 × 1013 Hz. We also present an example of a thermal noise spectrum including some higher-order modes in Fig. 4b.

Fig. 3: Results overview.

a Overview of the measured frequencies and quality factors across all designs and thicknesses together with selected microscope images. Solid lines correspond to theory fitted to the measured frequencies and best attained quality factors. Dotted and dashed lines are associated with the phonon tunneling and intrinsic loss contributions, respectively. For some designs, the theory curves for the phonon tunneling loss is not visible on the plots. b Quality factor plotted against frequency for the five best samples for each design. The shaded area marks the parameter regime in which the resonator may undergo quantum coherent oscillations at room temperature. The inset is the nominal trampoline design fabricated in this work and used as a reference13. The large spread in the Q factors is due to the uncontrollable coupling of the fundamental mode to the substrate mode. In the Qf plot, we only include measurements of membranes for which the Q factor was above 107 but all measurement data are included in the plots for the frequency and Q factor.

Fig. 4: Resonator result.

a Mechanical ring-down measurement of the best measured sample corresponding to design D4. b Spectrum of a D1 sample.

We performed ring-down measurements of the fundamental mode of 967 devices that include all the topologically optimized resonators, D1–D5, as well as the conventional non-optimized trampoline resonator13,14 which is used as reference structure. A collection of our measurements on frequency, quality factor, and Qf product is presented in Fig. 3. It is clear from these measurements that the topologically optimized resonators are superior to the reference trampolines and that they are all deeply into the regime where the resonator is able to undergo coherent oscillations (corresponding to Qf > 6 × 1012 Hz) as required for quantum coherent experiments19.

To understand the limitations of their performance, we fit our best attained results to a theory for the intrinsic and phonon tunneling losses. As the intrinsic loss ΔW is mainly dominated by the clamping losses near the boundaries, we directly estimate these losses from the expression

$${{\Delta }}W=\int \frac{\pi \phi }{12}\frac{E{h}^{3}}{1-{\nu }^{2}}{\left(\frac{{\partial }^{2}u}{\partial {x}^{2}}+\frac{{\partial }^{2}u}{\partial {y}^{2}}\right)}^{2}\ {{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}}}x{{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}}}y$$

where h, E, ν are the thickness, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the resonator material15. u(x, y) is the mode shape and the loss angle is modeled as ϕ = 1/(hβ) where β is related to the intrinsic damping at the surface. The mode profiles of all designs are simulated using the COMSOL Multiphysics package with the results shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5: Design analysis.

a Bending loss distribution of D1 on a logarithmic scale. The inset highlights the high bending losses at the boundary. b Static von Mises distribution. The bars indicate the direction of the first principal stress component. c Numerically predicted intrinsic quality factor Qint partitioned into boundary (Qbound) and distributed (Qdist) bending losses with \({Q}_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}^{-1}={Q}_{{{{{{{{\rm{bound}}}}}}}}}^{-1}+{Q}_{{{{{{{{\rm{dist}}}}}}}}}^{-1}\).

Phonon tunneling losses are simulated by placing a distribution of independent lossy springs along the outer boundary with only one degree of freedom in the out-of-plane direction defined by a lossy imaginary stiffness per unit length \(k^{\prime}\). These two loss contributions (intrinisic and phonon tunneling losses) are then adjusted to match the best experimental data using the loss-dependent factors β and \(k^{\prime}\) as fitting parameters. We find β = (2.93 ± 0.19) × 1011 m−1 and \(k^{\prime} =(4.09\pm 1.36)\times 1{0}^{12}\ {{{{{{{\rm{N}}}}}}}}/{{{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}}}^{2}\), and the resulting theory curves for all designs are shown in Fig. 3a where dotted (dashed) lines correspond to phonon tunneling (intrinsic) losses while the total contribution is represented by solid lines. It is clear that the best performing resonators of all five designs are mainly dominated by intrinsic losses. However, for some resonators we observe markedly lower performance (with Q factors below 107) which we attribute to a near-resonant coupling to the substrate modes, consequently leading to significantly higher phonon tunneling losses which eventually become the dominating loss factor. This randomized coupling to the substrate modes can be circumvented by inserting a damping shield encapsulating the resonator22.

The fitting of the loss models to the results of the best performing membranes yields a guidance to the appropriateness of the calibration parameter used to develop the five designs. For example, design D5 was developed under the assumption that phonon tunneling loss dominates which contradicts the result of the fitting procedure as it concludes that intrinsic losses are dominating. It is thus more likely that the calibration parameters used for designs D1–D2 are more appropriately describing the physical system as the assumed loss ratios for these designs are qualitatively reminiscent of those attained via the fitting procedure.

We highlight the source of intrinsic losses by plotting the bending loss distribution of design D1 in Fig. 5a. First we note that there is a significant amount of bending loss near the boundaries (as highlighted by the inset) and near the intersection between the circular frame and the tethers. The latter dilutes the bending loss of the former (resulting from the strong mode confinement) and is likely the origin of the quality enhancement . It is similar to the effect observed in resonators based on fractal structures21. The observed bending loss at the central pad is due to its low stress leading to a locally reduced stiffness and consequently, sharper bending. In Fig. 5b we illustrate the stress distribution from which we observe a large stress component on the circular frame perpendicular to the tether. The wavelength predicted by the stress and frequency is ~2 mm which is larger than the dimensions of the resonator. Therefore, it cannot exist on the circular frame resulting in mode confinement and dilution of losses. Finally, we compared the amount of boundary bending losses (localized along the outer boundary) to the estimated amount of distributed bending losses (far away from the boundary) as shown in Fig. 5c. It is clear that the resonator is limited by the boundary losses.


Micromechanical oscillators with a Qf product of >1013 Hz for the fundamental mode will have a number of intriguing applications in quantum optomechanics and precision sensing. One of the main requirements in quantum optomechanics, e.g. for cooling the oscillator to the quantum ground state, interrogating macroscopic quantum superpositions, and entangling different systems, is that the decoherence time exceeds the mechanical oscillation period. This translates into the requirement that Qf > kBT/ = 6 × 1012 Hz at room temperature (where kB is Boltzman’s constant, is the reduced Planck’s constant, and the temperature is T = 300 K)19,20. While most of the resonators fulfill this requirement, our best performing device yields around 4 coherent oscillations which is the largest number ever reported for the fundamental mode of a membrane at room temperature. Our devices will also exhibit exceptional performance in force sensing measurement as for example used in magnetic resonance force microscopy of electron and nuclear spins23. In such measurements the sensitivity is limited by the thermal noise (\(\sqrt{4m{k}_{{{{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}}}T\frac{2\pi f}{Q}}\) where m is the mass) which we find to be at 10 \({{{{{{{\rm{aN}}}}}}}}/\sqrt{{{{{{{{\rm{Hz}}}}}}}}}\) for the best devices which is significantly beyond what is attainable with currently available room temperature force microscopes.

The topology optimization method, that we have here employed to maximize the Qf product of the fundamental mode of a membrane, is applicable to many other similar morphogenesis problems in engineering of high-performance micro- and nanomechanical resonators. It can for example be applied to finding the optimal structure for maximizing the dissipation dilution effect - and thus the Qf product – in phononic crystal resonators where Q factors of nearly one billion and Qf products of >1015 have already been achieved without topology optimization15,16,24. This can be achieved by running the optimization algorithm over the higher-order modes (rather than the fundamental modes as done in this work). Another interesting avenue for new studies using our methodology is to optimize other application-specific parameters instead of the Qf product. An example is the optimization of the co-operativity parameter associated with the coupling of a specifically functionalized mechanical oscillator to spins25, light26 or charges27 with the aim of significantly enhancing quantum transduction or sensing. Finally, it is also possible to optimize structures with additional constraints, either structural constraints enabling certain applications or parameter constraints, e.g. fixing the mass to a large value with the aim of maximizing the coupling to gravity as required for example for interrogating the quantum nature of gravity28,29. Our methodology thus has the potential to revolutionize the way nano- and micro-mechanical systems are being designed enabling radically new applications and fundamental explorations.


We employed a density-based topology optimization approach1 to design ultrahigh coherent resonators. The basic methodology and the detailed optimization formulation are described in the following.

Pre-stressed membrane resonators are simulated using finite element methods with the 4-node MITC (Mixed Interpolation of Tensorial Components) quadrilateral shell element30. The mechanical dynamic problem is solved in two steps: (1) Establish static equilibrium of a pre-stressed membrane resonator under prescribed stress; (2) Identify resonating modes using linear eigenvalue analysis. The FE equations are stated in discrete form as,

$$\left({{{{{{{{\bf{K}}}}}}}}}_{0}+{{{{{{{{\bf{K}}}}}}}}}_{\sigma }\left({{{{{{{{\bf{U}}}}}}}}}_{0}\right)+i{{{{{{{\bf{C}}}}}}}}-{\omega }_{j}^{2}{{{{{{{\bf{M}}}}}}}}\right){{{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\phi }}}}}}}}}_{j}={{{{{{{\bf{0}}}}}}}}.$$

Here F0 is the equivalent force vector resulting from a prestress σ0, K0 represents the linear stiffness matrix and \({{{{{{{{\bf{K}}}}}}}}}_{\sigma }\left({{{{{{{{\bf{U}}}}}}}}}_{0}\right)\) represents the initial stress stiffness matrix that depends on the displacement U0 of the prestress problem in Eq. (2). C and M denote damping and mass matrices, ωj and ϕj are the angular frequency and modal profile of the j-th resonating mode and \(i=\sqrt{-1}\) is the imaginary unit.

The damping matrix, C, covers intrinsic and phonon tunneling losses. The intrinsic losses are considered via a relaxation mechanism described by a complex-valued Young’s modulus \(\tilde{E}=\left(1+i{\eta }_{s}\right)E\). The phonon tunneling losses are modeled using damped springs distributed along the boundary with a total stiffness of \({\bar{k}}_{b}=\left(1+i{\eta }_{b}\right){k}_{b}\) and kb = 8.315 × 107 kN/m2. The detailed calculation formulations of quantities in Eqs. (2) and (3) can be found in Gao et al.7. The quality factor and frequency of the j-th resonating mode are calculated by

$${Q}_{j}=\frac{\Re \left({\omega }_{j}\right)}{2\Im \left({\omega }_{j}\right)},\quad {f}_{j}=\frac{\Re \left({\omega }_{j}\right)}{2\pi }.$$

In the density-based topology optimization approach, an element-wise design variable, \({x}_{e}\in \left[0,\,1\right]\), is introduced to indicate the material occupation in element e. To avoid checkerboard pattern and mesh dependence1 and enhance design discreteness, the design variables are first filtered using a density filter31 and then smoothly projected using a hyperbolic tangent threshold function32, given as

$${\tilde{x}}_{e}=\frac{\mathop{\sum}\nolimits_{k\in {N}_{e}}{w}_{e}({{{{{{{{\bf{y}}}}}}}}}_{k}){v}_{k}{x}_{k}}{\mathop{\sum}\nolimits_{k\in {N}_{e}}{w}_{e}({{{{{{{{\bf{y}}}}}}}}}_{k}){v}_{k}}$$
$${\bar{x}}_{e}=\frac{\tanh \left({\beta }_{1}\eta \right)+\tanh \left({\beta }_{1}\left({\tilde{x}}_{e}-\eta \right)\right)}{\tanh \left({\beta }_{1}\eta \right)+\tanh \left({\beta }_{1}\left(1-\eta \right)\right)}.$$

Here, \({\tilde{x}}_{e}\) is the filtered design variable, yk are the center coordinates of element k. vk and xk are the corresponding volume and design variable of element k, respectively. Ne is the neighborhood of element e within a certain filter radius specified by \({N}_{e}=\left\{k| \ \parallel {{{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}}}_{k}-{{{{{{{{\bf{y}}}}}}}}}_{e}\parallel \le r\right\}\), and we(yk) = r − yk − ye. \({\bar{x}}_{e}\) is the projected design variable of element, e. When β1 is large, \({\bar{x}}_{e}\approx 1\) if \({\tilde{x}}_{e} \, > \, \eta\) representing Si3N4, and \({\bar{x}}_{e}\approx 0\) if \({\tilde{x}}_{e} \, < \, \eta\) indicating void. The projection suppresses gray element density regions induced by the density filter when β1 is sufficiently large and ensures black-white designs when the optimization converges. Moreover, it mimics the manufacturing process and the manufacturing errors can be taken into accounts in the optimization by choosing different thresholds, η, as discussed later.

The Young’s modulus of element e is directly related to the projected design variable using the Rational Approximation of Material Properties (RAMP)33 and the mass density is linearly interpolated as

$${E}_{e}=\frac{{\bar{x}}_{e}}{1+q\left(1-{\bar{x}}_{e}\right)}(E-{E}_{0})+{E}_{0},\quad q=3$$
$${\rho }_{e}={\bar{x}}_{e}\left(\rho -{\rho }_{0}\right)+{\rho }_{0}.$$

Spurious modes caused by inappropriate stiffness-to-mass ratios in low-density regions are suppressed by setting E0 = 10−6E and ρ0 = 10−7ρ to represent void in this study. Wrinkling-like instabilities in low-density regions are alleviated using a displacement interpolation with detailed formulations presented in Gao et al.7.

To enhance the design robustness with respect to manufacturing errors and impose a minimal length scale in the nominal design, a three-case robust formulation is employed32. Three design realizations are generated to mimic an eroded, normal, and dilated manufacturing processes. The optimization problem for designing ultrahigh coherent resonators is formulated to maximize the Qf product of the fundamental mode for the worst case of the three design realizations, subjected to frequency constraints and a volume fraction constraint, given as

$$\begin{array}{ll}\mathop{\max }\limits_{{{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}}}&\mathop{\min }\limits_{\eta }\qquad {{{{{{\mathrm{ln}}}}}}}\,\left({Q}_{1}\left({{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}},\eta \right){f}_{1}\left({{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}},\eta \right)\right)\\ s.t.&{f}_{1}\left({{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}},\eta \right) \, > \,{f}^{* }\\ &\frac{{{{{{{{{\bf{v}}}}}}}}}^{T}\bar{{{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}}}\left({{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}},{\eta }_{d}\right)}{\mathop{\sum}\limits_{e}{v}_{e}}\le {v}^{* }\\ &{{{{{{{\bf{0}}}}}}}}\le {{{{{{{\bf{x}}}}}}}}\le {{{{{{{\bf{1}}}}}}}}\\ &\eta \in \left\{{\eta }_{e},{\eta }_{i},{\eta }_{d}\right\}\end{array}$$

The three design realizations are generated using \(\eta \in \left\{0.55,\,0.5,\,0.45\right\}\) with a filter radius of r = 15 μm. This corresponds to a minimal feature size of 6.7 μm in both solid and void regions of the nominal design. The prescribed frequency lower bound and volume fraction upper bound are f* = 240 kHz and v* = 0.5.

Gradients of the objective and constraint functions are calculated using the adjoint sensitivity analysis and the chain rules7,31,32. The design variables are iteratively updated using the deterministic mathematical programming approach, Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA)34 based on the gradients of the objective and constraints. β1 is updated until the convergence criterion is satisfied by \({\beta }_{1}^{(n+1)}=1.1{\beta }_{1}^{(n)}\) reaching a maximum value of 120.

The loss parameters used in the five design cases, (D1, D2, D3, D4, D5), are ηs = (2.500; 1.790; 1.120; 0.515; 0.000) × 10−4 and ηb = (0.000; 0.095; 0.190; 0.285; 0.380) calibrated against the reference trampoline design.

The design outputs of the optimization algorithm have some irregular shape features caused by the particular density-based topology optimization approach that we are applying. As mentioned above, in this approach, an elemental density variable (taking values between 0 and 1) indicates the material occupation in the finite elements (0 for void and 1 for silicon nitride) of the design, thereby producing a gray-scaled evolution design that ideally converges towards a white/black design (corresponding to the density variable being 0 or 1). Due to finite element discretization using quadrilateral shell elements, the final designs possess stair-cases and a very small amount of gray values. This may lead to local tensile stress, and would eventually result in breakage during fabrication. To avoid this, we spatially filtered the designs in post-processing by removing convex features followed by low-pass filtering using a rectangular window with a 5 μm width, thereby smoothing the edges as illustrated in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6: Design post-processing.

Comparison of the generated topology optimized design (blue) and the subsequent post-processed design (red) overlaid on top used in experiments for design D1.

We deposit stoichiometric silicon nitride onto a 100 mm single-crystal silicon wafer of 500 μm thickness using low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. This is followed by spincoating photoresist onto the wafer and transfer of the different resonator designs using UV-lithography. The photoresist is developed and the silicon nitride is etched in these regions by means of reactive ion etching. Residual photoresist is removed using oxide plasma, and finally, the trampolines are released in potassium hydroxide at 80 °C followed by cleaning in hydrochloric acid and sulfiric acid mixed with ammonium persulfate.

Measurements of the frequency and quality factor of the resonators are performed using optical interferometry driven by a laser with a wavelength of 1550 nm. The laser beam is reflected off the vibrating membrane (located inside a vacuum chamber at low pressure < 10−7 mBar), and the resulting phase shift is detected with high-sensitivity using a phase-locked homodyne detector and recorded with a spectrum analyzer. Excitation of the mechanical oscillator is done by modulating the intensity of the laser at the resonance frequency. Once excited, the modulation is switched off and the amplitude decay is subsequently measured. We ruled out the potential effect of photothermal-induced modifications of the Q factor by conducting the Q value measurements with a variety of different power levels without observing any changes.

To model the frequency dependency of the silicon nitride thickness in Fig. 3a, the tensile prestress dependency of the thickness is needed. The stress-thickness dependency is believed to be caused by the oxidization layer which introduces a compressive stress contribution onto the silicon nitride film dependent on its thickness35. Assuming that the oxidized layer is much smaller than the total film thickness, we model the effect by the expression σ(h) = σ0 − βσ/h where σ0 is the asymptotic prestress parameter and βσ is a coefficient that determines how fast the prestress changes with thickness. We fit these two parameters against data attained from the measurement of tensile prestress from 2573 samples of different thicknesses as shown in Fig. 7. The tensile stress was derived by measuring the resonance frequency and comparing to predicted values from finite element simulations noting the \(f\propto \sqrt{\sigma }\) dependency. This approach has some inherent uncertainties related to fabrication and the assumptions of the material parameters of silicon nitride. We find σ0 = 1.235 ± 0.002 GPa and βσ = 4.52 ± 0.06Pa m.

Fig. 7: Stress versus thickness.

Extraction of the stress-thickness relation of stoichiometric silicon nitride based on frequency measurements of 2573 samples.

Data availability

The data generated in this study have been deposited in the figshare data repository database


  1. 1.

    Bendsøe, M. P. & Sigmund, O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications (Springer, 2003).

  2. 2.

    Aage, N., Andreasen, E., Lazarov, B. S. & Sigmund, O. Giga-voxel computational morphogenesis for structural design. Nature 550, 84–86 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baandrup, M., Sigmund, O., Polk, H. & Aage, N. Closing the gap towards super-long suspension bridges using computational morphogenesis. Nat. Commun. 11, 2735 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang, F., Christiansen, R., Yu, Y., Mørk, J. & Sigmund, O. Maximizing the quality factor to mode volume ratio for ultra-small photonic crystal cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 241101 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gerrard, D. D. et al. Topology optimization for reduction of thermo-elastic dissipation in MEMS resonators. In 2017 19th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS) pp. 794–797 (IEEE, Kaohsiung, 2017).

  6. 6.

    Fu, Y., Li, L. & Hu, Y. Enlarging quality factor in microbeam resonators by topology optimization. J. Therm. Stresses 42, 341–360 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gao, W., Wang, F. & Sigmund, O. Systematic design of high-q prestressed micro membrane resonators. Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng. 361, 112692 (2020).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Verbridge, S. S., Ilic, R., Craighead, H. G. & Parpia, J. M. Size and frequency dependent gas damping of nanomechanical resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 013101 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zwickl, B. M. et al. High quality mechanical and optical properties of commercial silicon nitride membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 103125 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Unterreithmeier, Q. P., Faust, T. & Kotthaus, J. P. Damping of nanomechanical resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027205 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schmid, S., Jensen, K. D., Nielsen, K. H. & Boisen, A. Damping mechanisms in high-Q micro and nanomechanical string resonators. Phys. Rev. B 84, 165307 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yu, P. L., Purdy, T. P. & Regal, C. A. Control of material damping in high-Q membrane microresonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 083603 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Norte, R. A., Moura, J. P. & Gröblacher, S. Mechanical resonators for quantum optomechanics experiments at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 147202 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Reinhardt, C., Müller, T., Bourassa, A. & Sankey, J. C. Ultralow-noise SiN trampoline resonators for sensing and optomechanics. Phys. Rev. X 6, 021001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tsaturyan, Y., Barg, A., Polzik, E. S. & Schliesser, A. Ultracoherent nanomechanical resonators via soft clamping and dissipation dilution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 776–783 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ghadimi, A. H. et al. Elastic strain engineering for ultralow mechanical dissipation. Science 360, 764–768 (2018).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fedorov, S. A., Beccari, A., Engelsen, N. J. & Kippenberg, T. J. Fractal-like mechanical resonators with a soft-clamped fundamental mode. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 025502 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bereyhi, M. J. et al. Clamp-tapering increases the quality factor of stressed nanobeams. Nano Lett. 19, 2329–2333 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bowen, W. P. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum Optomechanics. 1st edn (CRC Press, 2016).

  21. 21.

    Beccari, A. et al. Hierarchical tensile structures with ultralow mechanical dissipation. Preprint at (2021).

  22. 22.

    Borrielli, A. et al. Control of recoil losses in nanomechanical SiN membrane resonators. Phys. Rev. B 94, 121403(R) (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fischer, R. et al. Spin detection with a micromechanical trampoline: towards magnetic resonance microscopy harnessing cavity optomechanics. New J. Phys. 21, 043049 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rossi, M., Mason, D., Chen, J., Tsaturyan, Y. & Schliesser, A. Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion. Nature 563, 53–58 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Arcizet, O. et al. A single nitrogen-vacancy defect coupled to a nanomechanical oscillator. Nat. Phys. 7, 879–883 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Verhagen, E., Deléglise, S., Weis, S., Schliesser, A. & Kippenberg, T. J. Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechanical oscillator to an optical cavity mode. Nature 482, 63–67 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    LaHaye, M. D., Suh, J., Echternach, P. M., Schwab, K. C. & Roukes, M. L. Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit. Nature 459, 960–964 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bose, S. et al. Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Marletto, C. & Vedral, V. Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dvorkin, E. N. & Bathe, K. A continuum mechanics based four node shell element for general non linear analysis. Eng. Comput. 1, 77–88 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bourdin, B. Filters in topology optimization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng 50, 2143–2158 (2001).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang, F., Lazarov, B. S. & Sigmund, O. On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 43, 767–784 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stolpe, M. & Svanberg, K. An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 22, 116–124 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Svanberg, K. The method of moving asymptotes–a new method for structural optimization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng 24, 359–373 (1987).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Raider, S. I., Flitsch, R., Aboaf, J. A. & Pliskin, W. A. Surface oxidation of silicon nitride films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 123, 560 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work has received funding from Villum foundation (through grant no. 13300 and Villum Investigator Project InnoTop) and the Danish National Research Foundation (bigQ DNRF142).

Author information




Micromechenical fabrication and characterization as well detailed numerical analysis of the designs performed by D.H. Theoretical study on relevant mechanical damping mechanisms and modeling performed by D.H. and W.G. Topology optimization performed by W.G. and later refined by F.W.; U.B.H., F.W., O.S., and U.L.A. supervised the work. All authors have contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dennis Høj or Ulrik Lund Andersen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review informationNature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Høj, D., Wang, F., Gao, W. et al. Ultra-coherent nanomechanical resonators based on inverse design. Nat Commun 12, 5766 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links