Abstract
Topological complex transient electromagnetic fields give access to nontrivial lightmatter interactions and provide additional degrees of freedom for information transfer. An important example of such electromagnetic excitations are spacetime nonseparable singlecycle pulses of toroidal topology, the exact solutions of Maxwell’s equations described by Hellwarth and Nouchi in 1996 and recently observed experimentally. Here we introduce an extended family of electromagnetic excitation, the supertoroidal electromagnetic pulses, in which the HellwarthNouchi pulse is just the simplest member. The supertoroidal pulses exhibit skyrmionic structure of the electromagnetic fields, multiple singularities in the Poynting vector maps and fractallike distributions of energy backflow. They are of interest for transient lightmatter interactions, ultrafast optics, spectroscopy, and toroidal electrodynamics.
Introduction
Topology of complex electromagnetic fields is attracting growing interest of the photonics and electromagnetics communities^{1,2,3,4,5}, while topologically structured light fields find applications in superresolution microscopy^{6}, metrology^{7,8}, and beyond^{9,10}. For example, the vortex beam with twisted phase, akin to a Mobius strips in phase domain, can carry orbital angular momentum with tunable topological charges enabling advanced applications of optical tweezers, machining, and communications^{9,10,11,12}. The complex electromagnetic topological strips, knots, and caustic structures were also proposed as novel information carriers^{13,14,15,16}. Recently, skyrmions, as topologically protected quasiparticles in highenergy physics and magnetic materials^{17}, were also studied in optical electromagnetic fields. Optical skyrmionic fields were first demonstrated in the evanescent field of a plasmonic surface^{18,19}, followed by the spin field of confined freespace waves^{20,21}, Stokes vectors of paraxial vector beams^{22,23,24,25}, polarizations in momentumspace^{26}, and pseudospins in photonic crystals^{27}. The sophisticated vector topology of optical skyrmions holds potential for applications in ultrafast nanometric metrology^{28}, deeply subwavelength microscopy^{20}, and topological Hall devices^{27}.
While a large body of work on topological properties of structured continuous light beams may be found in literatures, works on the topology of the timedependent electromagnetic excitations and pulses only start to appear. For instance, the “Flying Doughnut” pulses, or toroidal light pulses (TLPs) first described in 1996 by Hellwarth and Nouchi^{29}, with unique spatiotemporal topology predicted recently^{30}, have only very recently observed experimentally^{31}. Fueled by a combination of advances in ultrafast lasers and metamaterials in our ability to control the spatiotemporal structure of light^{32,33} together with the introduction of experimental and theoretical pulse characterization methods^{34,35,36,37}, TLPs are attracting growing attention. Indeed, TLPs exhibit their complex topological structure with vector singularities and interact with matter through coupling to toroidal and anapole localized modes^{38,39,40,41}. However, while higher order, supertoroidal modes in matter have been introduced in the form of the fractal iterations of solenoidal currents^{42,43,44,45,46,47}, generalizations of freespace propagating toroidal pulses have not been considered to date.
In this paper, we report that the Hellwarth and Nouchi pulses, are, in fact, the simplest example of an extended family of pulses that we will call supertoroidal light pulses (STLPs). We will show that supertoroidal light pulses introduced here exhibit complex topological structures that can be controlled by a single numerical parameter. The STLP display skyrmionlike arrangements of the transient electromagnetic fields organized in a fractallike, selfaffine manner, while the Poynting vector of the pulses feature singularities linked to the multiple energy backflow zones.
Results
Supertoroidal electromagnetic pulses
Following Ziolkowski, localized finiteenergy pulses can be obtained as superpositions of “electromagnetic directedenergy pulse trains”^{48}. A special case of the localized finiteenergy pulses was investigated by Hellwarth and Nouchi^{29}, who found the closedform expression describing a singlecycle finite energy electromagnetic excitation with toroidal topology obtained from a scalar generating function f(r, t) that satisfies the wave equation \(({\nabla }^{2}\frac{1}{{c}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {t}^{2}})f\left({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t\right)=0\), where r = (r, θ, z) are cylindrical coordinates, t is time, \(c=1/\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{0}{\mu }_{0}}\) is the speed of light, and the ε_{0} and μ_{0} are the permittivity and permeability of medium. Then, the exact solution of f(r, t) can be given by the modified power spectrum method^{29,48}, as \(f({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)={f}_{0}/\left[({q}_{1}+i\tau ){(s+{q}_{2})}^{\alpha }\right]\), where f_{0} is a normalizing constant, s = r^{2}/(q_{1} + iτ) − iσ, τ = z − ct, σ = z + ct, q_{1} and q_{2} are parameters with dimensions of length and act as effective wavelength and Rayleigh range under the paraxial limit, while α is a real dimensionless parameter that must satisfy α ≥ 1 to ensure finite energy solutions. In particular, the parameter α is related to the energy confinement of the pulse with α < 1 resulting in pulses of infinite energy, such as planar waves and cylindrical waves, while α ≥ 1 leads to finiteenergy pulses. Next, transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) solutions are readily obtained by using Hertz potentials. The electromagnetic fields for the TE solution can be derived by the potential \({{{{{\bf{A}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)={\mu }_{0}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}}\times \widehat{{{{{{\bf{z}}}}}}}f({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)\) as \({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)={\mu }_{0}\frac{\partial }{\partial t}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{A}}}}}}\) and H(r, t) = ∇ × (∇ × A)^{29,48}. Finally assuming α = 1, the electromagnetic fields of the TLP are described by^{29}:
where E_{θ} represents the azimuthally directed component of electric field, and H_{r} and H_{z} are the radially and longitudinally directed components of magnetic field, respectively. Note that the TE mode field does not possess other kinds of components except the three, and the TM mode is expressed by exchanging the electric and magnetic fields. Equations (1)–(3) derived by Hellwarth and Nouchi for α = 1 show the simplest example of TLPs. Here we explore the general solution for values of α ≥ 1. In the TE case, electric and magnetic fields are given by (see detailed derivation in Supplementary Notes 1–3):
For α = 1, the electromagnetic fields in Eqs. (4)–(6) are reduced to that of the fundamental TLP Eqs. (1)–(3). Moreover, the real and imaginary parts of Eqs. (4)–(6), simultaneity fulfill Maxwell equations and therefore represent real electromagnetic pulses.
While propagating in free space, toroidal and supertoroidal pulses exhibit selffocusing. Figure 1 shows the evolution of the fundamental (α = 1) TLP and STLP (α = 5) upon propagation through the focal point. In the former case, the pulse is singlecycle at focus (z = 0) becoming \(1\frac{1}{2}\)cycle at the boundaries of Rayleigh range z = ±q_{2}/2 (Fig. 1a). On the other hand, STLPs with α > 1 (Fig. 1b, α = 5) exhibit a substantially more complex spatiotemporal evolution where the pulse is being reshaped multiple times upon propagation. The STLP also possesses a more complex singular vector field configuration than the fundamental TLP. For instance, the magnetic vector distribution (see insets to Fig. 1a, b) exhibits vortextype singularities (gray lines) and saddle points (full circles), resulting in skyrmions structures in the transverse plane (colored arrows). See Supplementary Videos 1 and 2 for dynamic evolutions upon propagation of the fundamental TLP and STLP, and Supplementary Video 3 for the evolution of TLP and STLP with different focused degrees versus values of q_{2}/q_{1}.
Electric field singularities
Figure 2 comparatively shows the instantaneous electric fields for the TE singlecycle fundamental TLP and STLP (α = 5) with q_{2} = 20q_{1} at the focus (t = 0). In all cases, there are always central singularities on zaxis (r = 0; see vertical solid black lines in Fig. 2a, b) owing to the azimuthal polarization. For the fundamental TLP, the electric field possesses two shelllike singular surfaces symmetrically distributed along axis. The singular shells divide the parts with opposite chiralities of azimuthal polarization, as shown in Fig. 2a. Thus, the electric field forms counterclockwise vortices around the z axis at z = q_{1} and z = 35q_{1} (Fig. 2a1, a3). On the other hand, at z = 5q_{1} (Fig. 2a2) the electric field vanishes on a singular shell, while it changes its orientation from clockwise close to the zaxis to counterclockwise away from the axis. For the STLP case, a more complex matryoshkalike structure emerges with multiple nested singularity shells, replacing the single shell of the fundamental TLP, as Fig. 2b shows. The electric field configuration close to the singularity shells can be examined in detail at transverse planes at z = q_{1}, 5q_{1}, 35q_{1} (Fig. 2b1–b3). In this case, at transverse planes close to z = 0, the electric field changes orientation from counterclockwise close to r = 0 to clockwise away from the zaxis (see Fig. 2b1). On the other hand, on transverse planes close to z = 5q_{1} (see Fig. 2b2), two singular rings (corresponding to the two singular shells) emerge as a crosssection of the multilayer singularity shell structure, separating space in three different regions, in which the electric field direction alternates between counterclockwise (r/q_{1} < 7), to clockwise (7 < r/q_{1} < 15), and again to counterclockwise (r/q_{1} > 15).
In general, the pulse of higher order of α is accompanied by a more complex multilayer singularshell structure, see the dynamic evolution versus the order index in Supplementary Video 4. Although the above results of electric fields are instantaneous at t = 0, we note that the multilayer shall structure propagation of supertoroidal light pulse is retained during propagation, see such dynamic process in Supplementary Video 5.
Magnetic field singularities
The magnetic field of STLPs has both radial and longitudinal components, \({{{{{\bf{H}}}}}}={H}_{r}\widehat{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}+{H}_{z}\widehat{{{{{{\bf{z}}}}}}}\), which lead to a topological structure more complex than the one exhibited by the electric field. Figure 3 comparatively shows the instantaneous magnetic fields for the TLP and the STLP of α = 5. For the fundamental TLP (Fig. 3a), the magnetic field has ten different vector singularities on the x–z plane, including four saddle points on zaxis and six vortex rings (the surrounding vector distribution forming a vortex loop) away from the zaxis. We note that we only consider the singularities existed at an area containing 99.9% of the energy of the pulse. While the singularity existed at the region far away from the pulse center with nearly zero energy can be neglected. The magnetic field distribution in the vicinity of the singularities is shown in more detail in Fig. 3a1. Due to the axial symmetry of the pulse, the three singularities away from the zaxis correspond to three rings with vortices rotating clockwise (z = 0) or counterclockwse (z > 0 and z < 0). For instance, Fig. 3a2 presents the magnetic field distribution in the z = 0 plane, where the orientation of the magnetic field changes from parallel to the zaxis within the vortex ring to antiparallel outside the singularity ring. For the STLP (Fig. 3b), more vector singularities are unveiled in the magnetic field with six saddle points on zaxis and six offaxis singularities. The singularity structure of the STLP is presented in Fig. 3b1. The orientation of the magnetic field around the onaxis saddle points is alternating between “longitudinaltoward radialoutward point” and “radialtoward longitudinaloutward”, similarly to the onaxis singularities of the TLP. Moreover, the offaxis singularities at z = 0 become now saddle points contributing to the singularity ring in the z = 0 plane. The remaining offaxis singularities are accompanied by clockwise and counterclockwise magnetic field configurations at x > 0 and x < 0, respectively as shown Fig. 3b2.
Skyrmionic structure in magnetic field
An intriguing feature of the topology of STLPs involves the presence of skyrmionic quasiparticle configurations, which can be observed in the magnetic field topology of STLPs. The skyrmion is a topologically protected quasiparticle with a hedgehoglike vectorial field, that gradually changes orientation as one moves away from the skyrmion center^{49,50,51}. Recently skyrmionlike configurations have been reported in electromagnetism, including skyrmion modes in surface plasmon polaritons^{18} and the spin field of focused beams^{20,22}. Here we observe the skyrmion field configurations in the electromagnetic field of propagating STLPs.
The topological properties of a skyrmionic configuration can be characterized by the skyrmion number s, which can be separated into a polarity p and vorticity number m^{51}. The polarity represents the direction of the vector field, down (up) at r = 0 and up (down) at r → ∞ for p = 1 (p = −1), the vorticity controls the distribution of the transverse field components, and another initial phase γ should be added for determining the helical vector distribution, see “Methods” for details. For the m = 1 skyrmion, the cases of γ = 0 and γ = π are classified as Néeltype, and the cases of γ = ±π/2 are classified as Blochtype. The case for m = −1 is classified as antiskyrmion.
Here the vector forming skyrmionic structure is defined by the normalized magnetic field H/∣H∣ of the STLP. Two examples of two skyrmionic structures in the fundamental TLP are shown in Fig. 3c1 (p = m = 1, γ = π) and 3c2 (p = m = 1, γ = 0) occurre at the two transverse planes marked by purple dashed lines c1 and c2, which are both Néeltype skyrmionic structures, where the vector changes its direction from “down” at the center to “up” away from the center. In the case of the STLPs with more complex topology, it is possible to observe more skyrmionic structures. The STLP pulse (α = 5) exhibits not only the clockwise (p = m = 1, γ = π) and counterclockwise (p = m = 1, γ = 0) Néeltype skyrmionic structures (Fig. 3c3, c4), but also those with p = −1, m = 1, γ = π and p = −1, m = 1, γ = 0, in Fig. 3c5, c6.
In general, as the value of α increases, toroidal pulses show an increasingly complex magnetic field pattern with skyrmionic structures of multiple types, see Supplementary Video 4. We also note that the topology of the STLP is maintained during propagation, see Supplementary Video 5.
Energy backflow and Poynting vector singularities
The topological features of electromagnetic fields in supertoroidal pulses are linked to anomalous behavior of energy flow as represented by the Poynting vector S = E × H. An interesting effect for the fundamental TLP is the presence of energy backflow: the Poynting vector at certain regions is oriented against the prorogation direction (blue arrows in Fig. 4a)^{30}. Such energy backflow effects have been predicted and discussed in the context of singular superpositions of waves^{52,53}, superoscillatory light fields^{7,54}, and plasmonic nanostructures^{55}. The Poynting vector map reveals a complex multilayer energy backflow structure, as shown in Fig. 4b. The energy flow vanishes at the positions of the electric and magnetic singularities and inherits their multilayer matryoshkalike structure. Poynting vector vanishes at z = 0 plane, along the zaxis, and on the duallayer matryoshkalike singular shells (marked by the black bold lines in Fig. 4b). Importantly, energy backflow occurs at areas of relatively low energy density, and, hence, STLP as a whole still propagates forward. For the temporal evolution of the energy flow of the pulse see Supplementary Videos 4 and 5.
Fractal patterns hidden in electromagnetic fields
As the order α of the pulse increases (see Supplementary Video 4), the topological features of the STLP appear to be organized in a hierarchical, fractallike fashion. A characteristic case of the STLP of α = 20 is presented in Fig. 5. For the electric field, the matryoshkalike singular shells involve an increasing number of layers as one examines the pulse at finer length scales, forming a selfsimilar pattern that seems infinitely repeated. For the magnetic field, the saddle and vortex points are distributed along the propagation axis and in two planes crossing the pulse center, respectively. The distribution of singularities becomes increasingly dense as one approaches the center of the pulse, resulting in a selfsimilar pattern. A similar pattern can be seen for the Poynting vector map (see Supplementary Videos 4 and 5).
Deepsubwavelength features of skyrmionic structures
The fractallike pattern of vectorial magnetic field of a highorder STLPs results in skyrmionic configurations with features changing much faster than the effective wavelength q_{1}. Figures 5c1–c4 show the four skyrmionic structures of the highorder STLP (α = 20) at the four transverse planes marked by the dashed lines in Fig. 5b1 at positions of z/q_{1} = 14, 10, 6, 3.5, correspondingly. Here the observed skyrmionic structure is similar to the photonic skyrmion observed in ref. ^{20}. However, in contrast to the latter case, where skyrmionic structures were observed in the evanescent plasmonic field, here skyrmionic field configurations are observed in freespace propagating fields. Moreover, similarly to the “spin reversal” effect observed in deeply subwavelength scales in plasmonic skyrmionic fields^{20}, here we demonstrate “subwavelength” features in propagating skyrmionic fields at scales much smaller than the effective wavelength (cycle length) of the STLPs. The four skyrmionic structures we obtained Fig. 5c1–c4 have two different topologies with topological numbers of (p, m, γ) = (1, 1, π), for c1 and c3, and (−1, 1, 0), for c2 and c4. In addition, they exhibit an effect of “spin reversal”, where the number reversals is given by \(\bar{p}=\frac{1}{2\pi }{[\beta (r)]}_{r = 0}^{r = \infty }\) (β is defined as the radiallyvariant angle, see details in Method), e.g., \(\bar{p}=1,2,3,4\) for the skyrmionic structures in Fig. 5c1–c4, respectively. Each reversal corresponds to a sign change of H_{z}, which takes place over areas much smaller than the effective wavelength of the pulse (q_{1}). The full width at half maximum of these areas for the four skyrmionic structures is 1/6, 1/10, 1/30, 1/50 of the effective wavelength, respectively. Conclusively, the sign reversals become increasingly rapid in transverse planes closer to the pulse center (z = 0), see Fig. 5d1–d4. Similarly, increasing the value of α leads to increasingly sharper singularities. Notably, in contrast to the fundamental TLP, the skyrmionic configurations in STLP occur at areas of higher energy density, and thus we expect that they could be observed experimentally.
The topological structure of the STLP is directly related to the distribution of onaxis saddle points in its magnetic field. Indeed, the latter mark the intersection of the Efield singular shells with the zaxis, which in turn results in the emergence of different skyrmionic magnetic field patterns (see Fig. 5 and Videos 4 and 5). The number and position of onaxis magnetic field saddle points are defined by the supertoroidal parameter α. This is illustrated in Fig. 6a, where we plot the number of onaxis Hfield singularities as a function of alpha for a STLP with q_{2} = 20q_{1}. The number of singularities is generally increasing with increasing α apart for values around α = 5.6 (marked by blue dashed line in Fig. 6). Moreover, the number of singularities increases in a ladderlike fashion, where only specific values of alpha lead to additional singularities. The origin of this behavior can be traced to changes in the pulse structure as α increases (see Fig. 6b). For specific values of α, additional singularities appear away from the pulse center (z = 0) and then move slowly towards it. On the other hand, the irregular behavior at α = 5.6 is a result of two singularities disappearing (see blue dashed line in Fig. 6b). The topological structure of the STLP can be tuned also by the degree of focusing, which is quantified by the ratio q_{2}/q_{1}. In particular, tightly focused pulses exhibit a more complex topological structure at finer scales as opposed to collimated pulses (see Supplementary Video 6).
Discussion
STLPs exhibit complex and unique topological structure. The electric field exhibits a matryoshkalike configuration of singularity shells, which divide the STLP into “nested” regions with opposite azimuthal polarization. The magnetic field exhibits skyrmionic structures with multiple topological textures at various transverse planes of a single pulse, related to the distribution of multiple saddle and vortex singularities. The electric and magnetic fields can be exchanged respecting to the difference of TE and TM modes. The instantaneous Poynting vector field exhibits multiple singularities with regions of energy backflow. The singularities of the STLP appear to be hierarchically organized resulting in selfsimilar, fractallike patterns for higherorder pulses.
The main challenges for the generation of supertoroidal pulses involve its toroidal topology, broad bandwidth (singlecycle duration), and complex spatiallydependent spectral structure (see Supplementary Note 5). We argue that supertoroidal pulses can be generated similarly to the generation of fundamental toroidal pulses^{31,32}, i.e., by conversion of ultrashort linearly polarized pulses in a twostage process. This process shall involve the lineartoradial polarization conversion of an ultrashort laser pulse, followed by the spatiospectral modification of the pulse in a multilayered gradient metasurface. We anticipate that the requirement for the singlecycle temporal profile will be possible to be met if we use attosecond laser pulses as input. Alternatively, in the THz range, singlecycle pulses can be routinely generated by optical rectification of femtosecond optical pulses.
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, STLPs are so far the only known example of freespace propagating skyrmions in electromagnetic field. Indeed, higherorder STLPs exhibit a range of different skyrmionic field configurations, which will be of interest in probing the topology of electromagnetic excitations in matter. Moreover, information can be encoded in the increasingly complex topological structure of the propagating pulses, which could be of interest for optical communications. Finally, the subwavelength features of the singular structures of the STLPs may lead to advanced approaches of superresolution imaging and nanoscale metrology.
Methods
Solving the supertoroidal pulses
The first step is to solve the scalar generating function f(r, t) that satisfies the wave equation \(({\nabla }^{2}\frac{1}{{c}^{2}}\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {t}^{2}})f\left({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t\right)=0\), where r = (r, θ, z) are cylindrical coordinates, t is time, \(c=1/\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{0}{\mu }_{0}}\) is the speed of light, and the ε_{0} and μ_{0} are the permittivity and permeability of medium. The exact solution of f(r, t) can be given by the modified power spectrum method as \(f({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)={f}_{0}/\left[({q}_{1}+i\tau ){(s+{q}_{2})}^{\alpha }\right]\), where f_{0} is a normalizing constant, s = r^{2}/(q_{1} + iτ) − iσ, τ = z − ct, σ = z + ct, q_{1} and q_{2} are parameters with dimensions of length and act as effective wavelength and Rayleigh range under the paraxial limit, while α is a real dimensionless parameter that must satisfy α ≥ 1 to ensure finite energy solutions. The next step is constructing the Hertz potential. For fulfilling the toroidal symmetric and azimuthally polarized structure, the Hertz potential should be constructed as \({{{{{\bf{A}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)={\mu }_{0}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}}\, \times\, \widehat{{{{{{\bf{z}}}}}}}f({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)\). Then, the exact solutions of transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes are readily obtained by using Hertz potential. The electromagnetic fields for the TE solution can be derived by the potential as \({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}({{{{{\bf{r}}}}}},t)={\mu }_{0}\frac{\partial }{\partial t}{{{{{\boldsymbol{\nabla }}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{A}}}}}}\) and H(r, t) = ∇ × (∇ × A)^{29,48}, see Supplementary Notes 1–3 for more detailed derivations.
Characterizing topology of skyrmions
A skyrmion is a topologically stable 3D vector field confined within a 2D domain, noted as n(x, y), which can be represented as the vector distribution unwrapped from the vectors on a spiny sphere parametrized by longitude and latitude angles, α and β. The topological properties of a skyrmionic configuration can be characterized by the skyrmion number defined by^{24,51}:
that is an integer counting how many times the vector \({{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}(x,y)={{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}(r\cos \theta ,r\sin \theta )\) wraps around the unit sphere. For mapping to the unit sphere, the vector can be given by \({{{{{\bf{n}}}}}}=(\cos \alpha (\theta )\sin \beta (r),\sin \alpha (\theta )\sin \beta (r),\cos \beta (r))\). Also, The skyrmion number can be separated into two integers:
the polarity, \(p=\frac{1}{2}{[\cos \beta (r)]}_{r = 0}^{r = \infty }\), represents the direction of the vector field, down (up) at r = 0 and up (down) at r → ∞ for p = 1 (p = −1). The vorticity number, \(m=\frac{1}{2\pi }{[\alpha (\theta )]}_{\theta = 0}^{\theta = 2\pi }\), controls the distribution of the transverse field components. In the case of a helical distribution, an initial phase γ should be added, α(θ) = mθ + γ. For the m = 1 skyrmion, the cases of γ = 0 and γ = π are classified as Néeltype, and the cases of γ = ±π/2 are classified as Blochtype. The case for m = −1 is classified as antiskyrmion. See Supplementary Note 6 for some theoretically simulated results of skyrmions with various topological indices.
Data availability
The data from this paper can be obtained from the University of Southampton ePrints research repository https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D1901.
Code availability
The code from this paper and details on the code used can be obtained from the University of Southampton ePrints research repository https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D1901.
References
Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Topological photonics. Nat. Photonics. 8, 821–829 (2014).
Soskin, M., Boriskina, S. V., Chong, Y., Dennis, M. R. & Desyatnikov, A. Singular optics and topological photonics. J. Optics 19, 010401 (2016).
Ozawa, T. et al. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019).
Mortensen, N. A., Bozhevolnyi, S. I. & Alù, A. Topological nanophotonics. Nanophotonics 8, 1315–1317 (2019).
Lustig, E. & Segev, M. Topological photonics in synthetic dimensions. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 426–461 (2021).
Pu, T. et al. Unlabeled farfield deeply subwavelength topological microscopy (DSTM). Ad. Sci. 8, 2002886 (2021).
Yuan, G. H. & Zheludev, N. I. Detecting nanometric displacements with optical ruler metrology. Science 364, 771–775 (2019).
Sederberg, S. et al. Vectorized optoelectronic control and metrology in a semiconductor. Nat. Photonics 14, 680–685 (2020).
Shen, Y. et al. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 1–29 (2019).
Yao, A. M. & Padgett, M. J. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photonics 3, 161–204 (2011).
Chong, A., Wan, C., Chen, J. & Zhan, Q. Generation of spatiotemporal optical vortices with controllable transverse orbital angular momentum. Nat. Photonics 14, 350–354 (2020).
Zhang, Z. et al. Tunable topological charge vortex microlaser. Science 368, 760–763 (2020).
Bauer, T. et al. Observation of optical polarization Möbius strips. Science 347, 964–966 (2015).
Bauer, T., Neugebauer, M., Leuchs, G. & Banzer, P. Optical polarization Möbius strips and points of purely transverse spin density. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 013601 (2016).
Larocque, H. et al. Optical framed knots as information carriers. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–8 (2020).
Shen, Y. et al. Creation and control of highdimensional multipartite classically entangled light. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 1–10 (2021).
Göbel, B., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Beyond skyrmions: review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles. Physics Reports 895, 1–28 (2021).
Tsesses, S. et al. Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields. Science 361, 993–996 (2018).
Davis, T. J. et al. Ultrafast vector imaging of plasmonic skyrmion dynamics with deep subwavelength resolution. Science 368, eaba6415 (2020).
Du, L., Yang, A., Zayats, A. V. & Yuan, X. Deepsubwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Phys. 15, 650–654 (2019).
GutiérrezCuevas, R. & Pisanty, E. Optical polarization skyrmionic fields in free space. J. Opt. 23, 024004 (2021).
Gao, S. et al. Paraxial skyrmionic beams. Phys. Rev. A 102, 053513 (2020).
Lin, W., Ota, Y., Arakawa, Y. & Iwamoto, S. Microcavitybased generation of full poincaré beams with arbitrary skyrmion numbers. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023055 (2021).
Shen, Y. Topological bimeronic beams. Opt. Lett. 46, 3737–3740 (2021).
Shen, Y., Martínez, E. C. & RosalesGuzmán, C. Generation of tunable optical skyrmions on skyrmepoincaré sphere. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04394 (2021).
Guo, C., Xiao, M., Guo, Y., Yuan, L. & Fan, S. Meron spin textures in momentum space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 106103 (2020).
Karnieli, A., Tsesses, S., Bartal, G. & Arie, A. Emulating spin transport with nonlinear optics, from highorder skyrmions to the topological hall effect. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–9 (2021).
Dai, Y. et al. Plasmonic topological quasiparticle on the nanometre and femtosecond scales. Nature 588, 616–619 (2020).
Hellwarth, R. W. & Nouchi, P. Focused onecycle electromagnetic pulses. Phys. Rev. E 54, 889 (1996).
Zdagkas, A., Papasimakis, N., Savinov, V., Dennis, M. R. & Zheludev, N. I. Singularities in the flying electromagnetic doughnuts. Nanophotonics 8, 1379–1385 (2019).
Zdagkas, A. et al. Observation of toroidal pulses of light. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03636 (2021).
Papasimakis, N. et al. Pulse generation scheme for flying electromagnetic doughnuts. Phys. Rev. B 97, 201409 (2018).
McDonnell, C., Deng, J., Sideris, S., Ellenbogen, T. & Li, G. Functional THz emitters based on PancharatnamBerry phase nonlinear metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–8 (2021).
Zdagkas, A., Nalla, V., Papasimakis, N. & Zheludev, N. I. Spatiotemporal characterization of ultrashort vector pulses. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11651 (2021).
Shen, Y., Zdagkas, A., Papasimakis, N. & Zheludev, N. I. Measures of spacetime nonseparability of electromagnetic pulses. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013236 (2021).
Jolly, S. W. Focused fields of ultrashort radially polarized laser pulses having loworder spatiotemporal couplings. Phys. Rev. A 103, 033512 (2021).
Alonso, B. et al. Complete spatiotemporal and polarization characterization of ultrafast vector beams. Commun. Phys. 3, 1–10 (2020).
Papasimakis, N., Fedotov, V. A., Savinov, V., Raybould, T. A. & Zheludev, N. I. Electromagnetic toroidal excitations in matter and free space. Nat. Mater. 15, 263–271 (2016).
Raybould, T., Fedotov, V. A., Papasimakis, N., Youngs, I. & Zheludev, N. I. Exciting dynamic anapoles with electromagnetic doughnut pulses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 081104 (2017).
Talebi, N., Guo, S. & van Aken, P. A. Theory and applications of toroidal moments in electrodynamics: their emergence, characteristics, and technological relevance. Nanophotonics 7, 93–110 (2018).
Ahmadivand, A., Gerislioglu, B., Ahuja, R. & Mishra, Y. K. Toroidal metaphotonics and metadevices. Laser Photon. Rev. 14, 1900326 (2020).
Afanasiev, G. N. & Stepanovsky, Y. P. The electromagnetic field of elementary timedependent toroidal sources. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28, 4565 (1995).
Afanasiev, G. N. & Dubovik, V. M. Some remarkable chargecurrent configurations. Phys. Part. Nucl. 29, 891–945 (1998).
Afanasiev, G. N. Simplest sources of electromagnetic fields as a tool for testing the reciprocitylike theorems. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34, 539 (2001).
Boardman, A. D., Marinov, K., Zheludev, N. & Fedotov, V. A. In Metamaterials Vol. 5955, 595504 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2005).
Gurvitz, E. A. et al. The highorder toroidal moments and anapole states in alldielectric photonics. Laser Photon. Rev. 13, 1800266 (2019).
Nemkov, N. A., Basharin, A. A. & Fedotov, V. A. Electromagnetic sources beyond common multipoles. Phys. Rev. A 98, 023858 (2018).
Ziolkowski, R. W. Localized transmission of electromagnetic energy. Phys. Rev. A 39, 2005 (1989).
Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–15 (2017).
Yu, X. Z. et al. Realspace observation of a twodimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010).
Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013).
Berry, M. Making waves in physics. Nature 403, 21–21 (2000).
Berry, M. V. Quantum backflow, negative kinetic energy, and optical retropropagation. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 43, 415302 (2010).
Yuan, G., Rogers, E. T. F. & Zheludev, N. I. “Plasmonics” in free space: observation of giant wavevectors, vortices, and energy backflow in superoscillatory optical fields. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 1–9 (2019).
Bashevoy, M. V., Fedotov, V. A. & Zheludev, N. I. Optical whirlpool on an absorbing metallic nanoparticle. Opt. Express 13, 8372–8379 (2005).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Janne Ruostekoski for discussions and acknowledge the supports of the MOE Singapore (MOE2016T31006), the UKs Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grant EP/M009122/1, Funder Id: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000266), the European Research Council (advanced grant FLEET786851, Funder Id: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000781), and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the Nascent Light Matter Interactions program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.S. performed the theoretical modeling and numerical simulations and written the manuscript, Y.S., Y.H., N.P., and N.I.Z. contributed to data analysis and manuscript revision, and the project was supervised by N.I.Z.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, Y., Hou, Y., Papasimakis, N. et al. Supertoroidal light pulses as electromagnetic skyrmions propagating in free space. Nat Commun 12, 5891 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146702126037w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146702126037w
This article is cited by

Towards higherdimensional structured light
Light: Science & Applications (2022)

Observation of localized magnetic plasmon skyrmions
Nature Communications (2022)

Observation of Localized Magnetic Plasmon Skyrmion Utilizing Stability and Interference Effect
Plasmonics (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.