Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Near 100% ethene selectivity achieved by tailoring dual active sites to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation

Abstract

Prohibiting deep oxidation remains a challenging task in oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkane since the targeted alkene is more reactive than parent substrate. Here we tailor dual active sites to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation instead of homogeneously active sites responsible for these two steps leading to consecutive oxidation of alkene. The introduction of HY zeolite with acid sites, three-dimensional pore structure and supercages gives rise to Ni2+ Lewis acid sites (LAS) and NiO nanoclusters confined in framework wherein catalytic dehydrogenation of ethane occurs on Ni2+ LAS resulting in the formation of ethene and hydrogen while NiO nanoclusters with decreased oxygen reactivity are responsible for selective oxidation of hydrogen rather than over-oxidizing ethene. Such tailored strategy achieves near 100% ethene selectivity and constitutes a promising basis for highly selective oxidation catalysis beyond oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkane.

Introduction

Oxidation catalysis plays a pivotal role in establishing green and sustainable chemical applications and contributes approximately 30% of total production in the chemical industry, such as selective oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde, propene to acrolein, butane to maleic anhydride, and ethene to ethylene epoxide, as well as the production of key pharmaceutical intermediates1. Unfortunately, a general and long-standing scientific conundrum is over-oxidation of desired product which is more reactive than parent substrate, impeding the industrialization process of numerous oxidation reactions with game-changing industrial value and economic benefits. Hence, selectively oxidative heterogeneous catalysis to restrain over-oxidation is significant but challenging whether for fundamental studies or practical applications2,3,4,5.

The oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes to olefins (ODH) which are important building blocks for a handful of industrial processes is a well-known example of such a challenging reaction that is a promising alternative to the current industrial practice of steam cracking with no thermodynamic limitation, coke formation, and large CO2 emission but difficult to realize commercialized utilization impeded by the liable deep oxidation6,7,8,9. This was because alkene is facile to be further oxidized before its desorption or re-adsorbed on the active sites of dehydrogenation (usually oxygen species) according to the Mars–van Krevelen mechanism1,10,11 which resulted from its higher affinity and reactivity than alkane to most surfaces particularly for those of V- and Ni-based catalysts which have been studied most for ODH12,13,14,15,16,17. Extensive studies have contributed to manipulating the chemical environment of active oxygen species to decrease its insertion as large extent as possible concurrently with activation for C−H bond in alkane. It was reported that supporting V2O5 and NiO with smaller clusters on the inert oxides such as SiO2 and Al2O3 led to the decrease in the reactivity of active lattice oxygen species to alkene thereby its further oxidation was alleviated, which stemmed from increased metal−oxygen bond strength. However, the activation for alkane declined18,19,20. Multiple metals doped vanadium oxide, e.g. Mo−V−Te−Nb mixed oxides were also reported to exhibit high ethene selectivity, which could be attributed to the V=O sites or redox-active O radical sites generated by the reduction of Te4+ to Te0 with low reactivity to ethene7,8,21. Recently, hexagonal boron nitride (BN) attracted continuous interest thanks to its unexpected olefin selectivity, which originated from the stabilization of propyl species by the nitroxyl radical in the active sites of >B−O−O−N< rather than highly reactive propyl radicals thus suppressing over-oxidation22,23. In addition, decreasing the number and restricting the local availability of active but nonselective such as electrophilic oxygen species O could also increase alkene selectivity induced by the decrease in the probability of continuous oxidation for various metals with higher valence doped NiO materials24,25,26,27,28,29. It was further clarified that isolated electrophilic oxygen species played a positive role for high ethene selectivity resulted from its effective breakage of C−H bonds of ethane to selectively produce ethylene with easy desorption30,31. Although great effort has been made, over-oxidation remains not to be completely avoided probably due to the difficulty to manipulate identical active sites such as oxygen species responsible for both dehydrogenation and oxidation resulting in facile further oxidation of alkene on it particularly when conversion increases. Consequently, it can be feasible to avert over-oxidation that dehydrogenation and oxidation occur on different active sites.

Herein, strategically tailoring dual Ni active sites is proposed by utilizing the acid sites, three-dimensional pore structure, and supercages of HY zeolite to anchor Ni2+ Lewis acid sites (LAS) and confine NiO clusters to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation by lattice oxygen, respectively2,32,33,34,35,36. As a result, this strategy avoids consecutive oxidation and achieves near 100% C2H4 selectivity at a wider range of conversion compared with those reported in the previous work37,38,39,40. Experiments and theory studies indicate that such tailored dual active sites realizing isolated dehydrogenation and oxidation play a crucial role in avoiding over-oxidation of ethene.

Results

Catalysts preparation and characterization

The xNi/HY were prepared with succinct and effective wet impregnation to create dual active sites to satisfy the need of isolating dehydrogenation and oxidation. A series of characterization was carried out to verify if HY introduced gave rise to dual Ni active sites. Firstly, high-angle annular dark-filed scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) combined with energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) mappings showed that Ni species with the exclusive valence state of +2 proved by Ni k-edge X-ray absorption near-edge spectrum (XANES) (Supplementary Fig. 2) were highly dispersed and well distributed with Si, Al and O elements with particle size ranging from 0.6 to 1.7 nm in xNi/HY, which indicated that they entered the framework of HY for xNi/HY (Supplementary Figs. 1, 3a−c). Aberration-corrected transmission electron microscope (AC-TEM) indicated the presence of two kinds of Ni species including the isolated cationic Ni2+ and NiO nanoclusters confined in HY framework in 3Ni/HY (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 4). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) presented that a peak at higher binding energy of about 857 eV attributed to isolated Ni2+ cations in HY with electron transferring to zeolite framework41 was also observed besides a peak at around 854 eV ascribed to NiO42 (Fig. 1b). It was reported that the introduction of metal species into zeolites would induce the generation of LAS by the substitution of Brønsted acid sites (BAS)43. Thus, the Ni species in the form of cations might be associated with Ni2+ LAS in HY. Pyridine adsorption FTIR spectra was performed to study Ni2+ LAS in HY. Three peaks of 1547, 1490, and 1455 cm−1 were seen (Fig. 1c) for HY, which corresponded to pyridine adsorption on BAS, BAS, and LAS, and LAS44. Significant increase of LAS and concurrent decrease of BAS content was observed for xNi/HY and the variation extent becomes more prominent with Ni loadings, which suggested that Ni2+ LAS was generated by the substitution of protons of BAS in HY. This could be further supported by in situ FTIR wherein hydroxyl species associated with BAS in zeolites (3602 cm−1) was remarkably dropped for xNi/HY samples compared with HY45 (Supplementary Fig. 5). UV−vis-NIR spectroscopy was employed to investigate the coordination environment of Ni cations in 3Ni/HY. A peak at around 425 nm attributed to dd transition band of NiO had a visible blue shift for xNi/HY in Supplementary Fig. 6, which indicated the decrease of coordination number of confined Ni species in HY compared with 6-coordinated octahedron structure within the NiO11,41. Density functional theory (DFT) calculation was then performed to determine the structure of Ni cations in HY. We compared several different local structures and found that Ni preferred sitting inside a six-member ring with two Al atoms and was four-coordinated by framework oxygen atoms (Supplementary Fig. 7). Other structures such as Ni sitting in different six-member or larger rings were less stable. Taken together, we successfully fabricated dual Ni active sites by HY introduced as presented in Fig. 1d, which might isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation thus avoiding over-oxidation. This was different from traditional ODH catalysts in which these two steps usually occurred on identical active sites leading to consecutive oxidation10,46,47,48. Considering the critical role of oxygen reactivity for the selectivity of alkene2,10,49, we calculated the energy of oxygen vacancy formation (EOV) of NiO nanoclusters confined in HY framework and bulky ones as a reference and the results indicated that Ni−O bond energy of NiO nanoclusters in HY framework was significantly higher than those of bulky NiO resulted from larger EOV (Fig. 1e, f, and Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). This could be supported by the result of H2 temperature program surface reduction (H2-TPSR) on 3Ni/HY and a reference sample of 0.7Ni/silicalite-1 (0.7Ni/S-1) with NiO nanoclusters outside the framework of zeolite with a similar amount (Supplementary Table 1) and particle size (Supplementary Fig. 9) where reduction temperature for NiO nanoclusters in 3Ni/HY was significantly higher than those in 0.7Ni/S-1 (Supplementary Fig. 10). The design of dual Ni active sites with decreased oxygen reactivity of NiO nanoclusters confined in HY framework would be favorable for high selectivity to alkene likely resulted from the suppression of further oxidation of alkene.

Fig. 1: Characterizations of the xNi/HY.
figure 1

a AC-TEM image of 3Ni/HY sample. b XPS spectra of fresh xNi/HY. c Pyridine adsorption FT-IR spectra of xNi/HY, where Brønsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid sites are observed at around 1540 and 1450 cm−1, respectively. d Scheme of the proposed local structure of Ni-modified HY. DFT calculation models and results of e 1 nm NiO cluster and f that confined inside zeolite. (Ov stands for oxygen vacancy).

Performance of xNi/HY with dual Ni active sites

The performance test was carried out under oxidative dehydrogenation and regeneration cycles without co-feeding O2. Figure 2a and Supplementary Fig. 11 show the evolution of gas product composition over xNi/HY at 600 °C. Only C2H4 could be observed with a negligible amount of CO2 and CO (COx) which accounted for C2H4 selectivity of 99% with the highest C2H6 conversion of 18% for 3Ni/HY during the overall oxidative dehydrogenation step. This indicated that our xNi/HY catalysts with dual Ni active sites successfully prevented consecutive oxidation at a relatively wide range of conversion. Comparatively, 0.7Ni/S-1 with only NiO nanoclusters with a similar amount (Supplementary Table 1) and particle size (Supplementary Fig. 9) without Ni2+ LAS (Supplementary Fig. 12) exhibited completely overoxidation even at a lower conversion of about 10% (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 11), presenting that identical active site undertaking both dehydrogenation and oxidation in 0.7Ni/S-1 were facile to further oxidation of ethene on it. Moreover, 3Ni/HY outperformed most conventional oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane (ODHE) catalysts (Fig. 2d), indicating that the design of dual Ni active sites in xNi/HY was beneficial to shun over-oxidation. It was worthwhile to note that oxygen consumption of xNi/HY exceeded 30% (Supplementary Table 2), suggesting that lattice oxygen of NiO nanoclusters participated in the reaction and exhibited inferior activity for C2H4 oxidation probably due to its high bond strength (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 10). A long-term stability test was performed over 3Ni/HY for 75 (Fig. 2c) and 108 cycles (Supplementary Fig. 13). As shown in Fig. 2c, C2H6 conversion of about 18% and C2H4 selectivity of around 97% were almost identical during 75 cycles, indicating that the stability of performance of Ni confined HY catalysts for anaerobic ODHE. The characterization results of 3Ni/HY after reduction and long-term stability test (108 cycles) were provided in the Supplementary Figs. 1416. It could be concluded that an identical amount of Ni2+ LAS and small NiO nanoclusters still residing in HY framework, i.e. unchanged dual Ni active sites, were responsible for the long-term stable performance of 3Ni/HY.

Fig. 2: Performance evaluation of xNi/HY for ethane ODH.
figure 2

a The conversion and selectivity vs. time for 3Ni/HY sample. b The performance of xNi/HY and 0.7Ni/S-1. c Long-term stability test of 3Ni/HY during 75 cycles. d Performance comparisons10, 31, 55,56,57,58. It should be noted that Ni species were in the form of metallic Ni in Ni/HY of ref. 47, which was distinct from the dual active sites of Ni species in the present work.

Isolating dehydrogenation and oxidation

In order to understand the superior selectivity of xNi/HY, specific responsibility undertaken by Ni2+ LAS and NiO nanoclusters would be revealed. For this purpose, a reference sample of 0.7Ni@NaY was prepared (see the “Methods” section for details of its preparation) wherein the lack of BAS in NaY induced that Ni2+ LAS could not be generated by substituting BAS (Supplementary Fig. 17) thereby Ni species were present in the form of NiO nanoclusters confined in the framework of zeolite with a similar amount of 0.1 mmol/g and the average size of 1.2 nm (Supplementary Table 1 and Figs. 17, 18). Figure 3a, b shows ethane TPSR of 0.7Ni@NaY and 3Ni/HY. For 0.7Ni@NaY without Ni2+ LAS, C2H6 consumption could hardly be observed even the temperature reached 700 oC accompanied with the formation of negligible C2H4 and no obvious COx, indicating that NiO nanoclusters confined in NaY exhibited low activity for ODH of ethane. In comparison, C2H4 formed at a temperature of 580 °C without COx with consumption of C2H6 for 3Ni/HY, which strongly verified that Ni2+ LAS was responsible for the catalytic dehydrogenation of C2H6 to C2H4. This could be further confirmed by inferior C2H6 conversion of only 0.6% for 0.7Ni@NaY without Ni2+ LAS (Supplementary Fig. 20). The role of NiO nanoclusters in xNi/HY for this reaction was then uncovered. XPS of reduced xNi/HY showed that Ni0 with peak at around 852 eV42 formed (Fig. 4a) and the amount of lattice oxygen in O 1s XPS decreased (Supplementary Fig. 21 and Supplementary Table 3). Moreover, the comparison of performance between 3Ni/HY-IE with only Ni2+ LAS (Supplementary Fig. 22, see the “Methods” section for details of its preparation and Ni2+ LAS amount in Supplementary Table 1) and 3Ni/HY with dual Ni active sites presented that 3Ni/HY exhibited remarkably higher C2H6 conversion than 3Ni/HY-IE did (Supplementary Fig. 23a) thus accounting for its larger C2H4 yield in spite of a slight decrease in C2H4 selectivity with an increase in C2H6 conversion (Supplementary Fig. 23b). Combining with the role of Ni2+ LAS, it could be inferred that lattice oxygen of NiO nanoclusters confined in the HY framework should be responsible for the improvement of selective conversion of ethane to ethene by oxidizing H2 rather than C2H4 formed from catalytic dehydrogenation of C2H6 on Ni2+ LAS. In order to confirm this, 3Ni/HY was subjected to C2H4 and H2 atmosphere under reaction temperature to study their oxidation. It could be seen that almost no consumption of C2H4 as well without COx signals were observed while H2 signals decreased remarkably with its consumption amount of 90 times to that of C2H4 (Supplementary Fig. 24). Moreover, Ni0 formed after H2 reduction but did not after C2H4 reduction (Fig. 4b), indicating that lattice oxygen of NiO nanoclusters selectively oxidized H2 instead of C2H4 formed. DFT calculations further demonstrated that the activation barrier of C2H4 dissociation into −C2H3 and −H was larger than that of H2 into −H on NiO nanoclusters (0.38 vs. 0.13 eV) with lower exothermic reaction energy (0.46 vs. 1.27 eV) in spite of its slightly larger adsorption energy (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 25), implying that NiO nanoclusters confined in HY framework were more tendentious to oxidize H2 than C2H4. This is considerably persuasive from the point of thermodynamics because of the increased Ni−O bond strength of NiO nanoclusters confined in HY framework (Fig. 1f). To verify it, we compared the performance of two double bed catalysts, namely one composed of 2.3Ni/HY-IE with only Ni2+ LAS (See the “Methods” section for details of its preparation and Ni2+ LAS amount in Supplementary Table 1) plus 0.7Ni/S-1 with only NiO nanoclusters outside S-1 zeolite and the other consisted of 2.3Ni/HY-IE plus 0.7Ni@NaY with only NiO nanoclusters confined inside Y zeolite. It could be seen that the double bed catalyst with 2.3Ni/HY-IE and 0.7Ni/S-1 suffered from complete over-oxidation whereas that with 2.3Ni/HY-IE and 0.7Ni@NaY exhibited nearly 100% C2H4 selectivity (Supplementary Figs. 26, 27), indicating that NiO nanoclusters confined in the framework with larger Ni−O bond strength than those outsides (Fig. 1e, f) was favorable for high selectivity to ethene resulted from the suppression of further oxidation of ethene formed on the Ni2+ LAS of 2.3Ni/HY-IE. This was supported by TPSR of ethene and H2 (co-feeding) on 0.7Ni/S-1 in which the consumption of large amount of ethene and conspicuous co-production of COx were observed (Supplementary Fig. 28). It was noted that the increase of H2 signals should be attributed to C2H4 cracking accompanied with CH4 formation. As a result, the fabrication of dual Ni active sites with reduced oxygen activity by HY introduced in the present work isolated dehydrogenation and oxidation, which prevented ethylene from successive oxidation at a wider range of conversion in turn achieving near 100% C2H4 selectivity at 18% C2H6 conversion for ODHE under anaerobic mode. The potential reaction pathway was depicted in Fig. 4d. Firstly, C2H6 adsorbed and activated on Ni2+ LAS by breaking C−H bonding of the methyl group leading to the formation of ethylnickel (Ni-CH2CH3) and BAS (Si−OH−Al). Subsequently, C2H4 desorbed by the β-hydrogen elimination to form metal hydride (Ni−H) and then Ni2+ LAS active sites restored inducing the formation of hydrogen50. Finally, lattice oxygen in NiO nanoclusters with increased Ni−O bond energy selectively removed hydrogen without over-oxidizing C2H4 (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 21) bringing about Ni0 species (Fig. 4a) which could be re-oxidized and regenerate to NiO nanoclusters by oxygen.

Fig. 3: Ethane TPSR.
figure 3

a 0.7Ni@NaY and b 3Ni/HY, respectively.

Fig. 4: Reaction mechanism.
figure 4

Ni 2p3/2 XPS spectra of a reduced xNi/HY samples in reaction condition, and b 1%H2 and 1%C2H4 reduced 3Ni/HY. c Potential energies profiles for C2H4 and H2 dissociation pathways on 1 nm NiO cluster. Color index: Ni, blue, O, red, C, black, H, white. d Reaction mechanism proposed for anaerobic ODHE over Ni-modified HY.

Discussion

In summary, this work proposed and confirmed an efficient approach to prohibit over-oxidation, thus achieving superior ethylene selectivity for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane in a redox manner. The high selectivity was contributed by the tailoring of dual Ni active sites to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation in which Ni2+ LAS undertook the catalytic dehydrogenation of ethane to ethene, while NiO nanoclusters embedded in HY framework with enhanced Ni−O bond energy was capable to selectively transform hydrogen without over-oxidizing ethylene generated. Although this work is still plain only verified by oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and a lot of work including more sufficient experiment validation, rational catalyst design, and process optimization needs to be done, such tailoring strategy to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation on dual active sites toward avoiding consecutive oxidation opens a new avenue for selectively oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes and could be extended to multiple oxidation reactions that tendentiously suffer from the plaguing of overoxidation.

Methods

Preparation of Ni/HY with dual active sites

All the Ni modified HY samples (denoted as xNi/HY, x indicated theoretical mass fraction of NiO) were synthesized by equal volume wetness impregnation method. For example, to prepare 3Ni/HY, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.467 g) was dissolved in ultrapure water (3 mL) and then mixed with HY zeolite with SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio of 5.4 (Nankai University). The resulting slurry was evenly dispersed by the aid of ultrasonic and then dried overnight at room temperature. After dried at 60 and 120 °C for 12 h, respectively, the samples were calcined at 600 °C for 4 h. Then they were ground and sieved into 40−60 mesh for reactivity evaluation.

Synthesis of silicalite-1

Silicalite-1 (S-1, a MFI-type purely siliceous zeolite) was synthesized with a molar composition of 1.0 SiO2:0.2 TPAOH:46 H2O under conventional hydrothermal conditions at 443 K for 72 h51. Afterwards, the as-synthesized solids were centrifuged and washed several times with deionized water, then dried at 373 K for 12 h and calcined at 823 K for 6 h in air with heating rate 2 °C min−1 to remove the organics.

Preparation of 0.7Ni/S-1

0.7Ni/S-1 was also prepared by the above impregnation procedure with Ni(NO3)2·6H2O.

Synthesis of 2.3Ni/HY-IE and 3Ni/HY-IE

The 2.3Ni/HY-IE and 3Ni/HY-IE samples were synthesized by nickel exchange of the HY support using a template ion-exchange procedure52. Nickel exchange was performed at 348 K for 16 h using 200 ml of aqueous 0.007 and 0.01 M Ni(NO3)2 solution with 4 g solid support, respectively. The exchanged product was collected by filtration and washed with ultrapure water. The obtained catalyst was dried at 353 K for 12 h and then calcined at 773 K for 4 h.

Synthesis of 0.7Ni@NaY

0.7Ni@NaY samples with confined NiO clusters within FAU zeolites were synthesized by the hydrothermal method in the absence of organic template agents and modified with the addition of base metal cations and protecting ligands to form confined NiO clusters53. Concretely, synthesis gels were prepared by first dissolving 0.65 g N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine (TPE; 98%, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.2 g Ni(NO3)2·6H2O into ultrapure H2O (26.5 ml). NaAlO2 (2.34 g) and NaOH (3.77 g) were added sequentially while stirring (20 min). Colloidal silica (28.6 g; Ludox AS-30) was then added to this solution at ambient temperature and stirred for 2 h to prepare homogeneous synthesis gels (10 SiO2/1.0 Al2O3/4.3 Na2O/180 H2O/0.050 metal/0.20 ligand, molar ratios). The gels were sealed within 100 ml PTFE-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 393 K for 24 h without stirring to form Ni@NaY solids. The products were collected by filtration and washed by ultrapure water until to PH of 7−8, then dried at 373 K for 8 h and heated in flowing dry air to 623 K (at 2 °C min−1) and held for 3 h. The as-synthesized samples with well-defined FAU structure and about 1−2 nm confined NiO clusters without obviously NiO diffraction peaks and aggregation of Ni species outside zeolite frameworks (Supplementary Figs. 18, 19).

Characterization of materials

The crystalline structure of samples was measured by PANalytical X’Pert-Pro powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα monochromatized radiation (λ = 0.1541 nm, 40 kV, 40 mA). The scanned 2θ range was 10−80°. The NiO particle size and element distribution of samples before and after cycling were studied by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), respectively, using a field-emission transmission electron microscope (JEOL JEM-2100F). The AC-HAADF-STEM analysis was performed on a JEOL JEM-ARM200F equipped with a CEOS probe corrector, with a guaranteed resolution of 0.08 nm. Before microscopy examination, the sample was ultrasonically dispersed in ethanol for 15–20 min, and then a drop of the suspension was dropped on a copper TEM grid coated with a thin holey carbon film. XPS measurement of the fresh and reduced samples was performed with a VG ESCALAB210 spectrometer equipped with an Al Ka (hm = 1486.6 eV) X-ray source. The binding energies were calibrated using the C 1s peak at 284.3 eV as a reference. The Brønsted and Lewis acid sites (BAS and LAS) of samples were quantified by pyridine adsorption IR measurement. The content of BAS and LAS were obtained using molar extinction coefficients54. Actual NiO loadings were measured by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) on an IRIS Intrepid II XSP instrument (Thermo Electron Corporation). The dd transition of xNiO/HY (x = 1−3%) and bulky NiO were obtained by Ultraviolet–visible (UV−vis) absorption spectroscopy on a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 spectrometer. In situ IR spectra of dehydrated xNiO/HY (x = 0, 1, 3, 6) were analyzed by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analyzer (Bruker, TENSOR27) at a transmission mode, equipped with a liquid N2-cooled mercury−cadmium−telluride detector. Dehydration was performed under vacuum at 773 K for 1 h. After cooling to 393 K, the −OH group signals of the samples were collected. The X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) at the K-edge of Ni was measured on beam line BL14W1 of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), China. A double Si (111)-crystal monochromator was used for energy selection. The energy was calibrated by the Ni foil. The spectra were collected at room temperature under the transmission mode. The data were analyzed by the Athena software package.

TPSR experiment

Ethane TPSR was performed in a fixed bed reactor loaded with 200 mg samples. The reaction temperature was monotonously increased to 700 °C from 100 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1 in 1% C2H6/He (150 mL/min) and the outlet gas was detected by an on-line FTIR (Bruker, MATRIX-MG(HR)-01). H2 TPSR was performed in a fixed bed reactor loaded with 200 mg samples. The reaction temperature was monotonously increased to 900 °C from 100 °C at a rate of 10 °C min1 in 10% H2/He (30 mL/min) and the outlet gas was detected by an on-line quadrupole MS (IPI, Model GAM200).

H2 and C2H4 co-feeding experiment

The NiO cluster oxidation for H2 and C2H4 was studied in a fixed bed reactor with H2 and C2H4 co-feeding. The reaction temperature increased to 600 °C keeping 20 min in an inert atmosphere. Then, 1% H2-1% C2H4/He (30 mL/min) was forced into a reactor and kept that until no obvious consumption of H2 and C2H4. The consumption of hydrogen and ethene was quantified by an on-line quadrupole MS (IPI, Model GAM200).

Reactive performance tests

Activity tests were performed in a quartz fixed-bed reactor with an inner diameter (ID) of 7.5 mm loaded with 1.0 g samples (40−60 mesh) under atmospheric pressure. The operation reaction temperature is typically 600 °C, monitored by using a K-type thermocouple. The whole reaction process is divided into two steps, which include isolated reduction and oxidation step. The reduction step was performed with a space velocity of 5100 h−1 in 10% ethane balanced in helium for 30 s. The samples were re-oxidized in the oxidation step by using 5% oxygen in helium with the flow rate of 30 mL/min for 5 min. In order to prevent the mixing between ethane and oxygen, the reactor is purged with helium (150 mL/min) for 2 min between the reduction and re-oxidation step. Detailed methodologies for IR quantification and oxygen consumption calculations were described in supplementary Materials.

DFT calculations

All the oxygen vacancy formation energy was performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) with projector augmented-wave (PAW) method. For the relaxations of model structures of NiO clusters in vacuum and Zeolite, the exchange-correlation functional of general gradient approximation (GGA) type in the parameterization by Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) was adapt. The forces felt by each of the atoms were well converged below 0.02 eV·Å1, and the energy convergence was set as 105 eV. The relaxation of NiO clusters in a vacuum was done in a cubic cell of 30 Å × 30 Å × 30 Å. For all calculations, Hubbard U type correction was adopted to address the electron correlation for the 3d electrons of Ni with an effective U value of 5 eV, the cutoffs of the wave function is 500 eV, and A k-mesh with the density of one point per ~0.03 Å3 was generated using the Monkhorst−Pack method. The climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method was employed to locate the transition states.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Grant, J. T., Venegas, J. M., McDermott, W. P. & Hermans, I. Aerobic oxidations of light alkanes over solid metal oxide catalysts. Chem. Rev. 118, 2769–2815 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chen, S. et al. Modulating lattice oxygen in dual-functional Mo−V−O mixed oxides for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 18653–18657 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu, Y. et al. Near 100% CO selectivity in nanoscaled iron-based oxygen carriers for chemical looping methane partial oxidation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5503 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sushkevich, V. L., Palagin, D., Ranocchiari, M. & van Bokhoven, J. A. Selective anaerobic oxidation of methane enables direct synthesis of methanol. Science 356, 523–527 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gao, Y. F. et al. Recent advances in intensified ethylene production—a review. ACS Catal. 9, 8592–8621 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Melzer, D. et al. Atomic-scale determination of active facets on the MoVTeNb oxide M1 phase and their intrinsic catalytic activity for ethane oxidative dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 55, 8873–8877 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cheng, M. J. & Goddard, W. A. In silico design of highly selective Mo−V−Te−Nb−O mixed metal oxide catalysts for ammoxidation and oxidative dehydrogenation of propane and ethane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13224–13227 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhu, Y. Y. et al. Formation of oxygen radical sites on MoVNbTeOx by cooperative electron redistribution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 12342–12345 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gärtner, C. A., van Veen, A. C. & Lercher, J. A. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane on dynamically rearranging supported chloride catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12691–12701 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gärtner, C. A., van Veen, A. C. & Lercher, J. A. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane: common principles and mechanistic aspects. ChemCatChem 5, 3196–3217 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sun, M. et al. Catalytic oxidation of light alkanes (C1−C4) by heteropoly compounds. Chem. Rev. 114, 981–1019 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rozanska, X., Fortrie, R. & Sauer, J. Size-dependent catalytic activity of supported vanadium oxide species: oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 7751–7761 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ballarini, N., Cavani, F., Ferrari, M., Catani, R. & Cornaro, U. Oxydehydrogenation of propane catalyzed by V−Si−O cogels: enhancement of the selectivity to propylene by operation under cyclic conditions. J. Catal. 213, 95–102 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fu, T., Wang, Y. Q., Wernbacher, A., Schlögl, R. & Trunschke, A. Single-site vanadyl species isolated within molybdenum oxide monolayers in propane oxidation. ACS Catal. 9, 4875–4886 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    He, Y., Song, Y. J. & Laursen, S. The origin of the special surface and catalytic chemistry of Ga-rich Ni3Ga in the direct dehydrogenation of ethane. ACS Catal. 9, 10464–10468 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ivan, Ş.-B. et al. The effect of phosphorus on the catalytic performance of nickel oxide in ethane oxidative dehydrogenation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 6953–6964 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Skoufa, Z., Heracleous, E. & Lemonidou, A. A. On ethane ODH mechanism and nature of active sites over NiO-based catalysts via isotopic labeling and methanol sorption studies. J. Catal. 322, 118–129 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bortolozzi, J. P., Gutierrez, L. B. & Ulla, M. A. Synthesis of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni–Co/Al2O3 coatings onto AISI 314 foams and their catalytic application for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Appl Catal. A 452, 179–188 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Heracleous, E., Lee, A. F., Wilson, K. & Lemonidou, A. A. Investigation of Ni-based alumina-supported catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene: structural characterization and reactivity studies. J. Catal. 231, 159–171 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nakamura, K. I., Miyake, T., Konishi, T. & Suzuki, T. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene over NiO loaded on high surface area MgO. J. Mol. Catal. A 260, 144–151 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Aouine, M., Epicier, T. & Millet, J.-M. M. In situ environmental STEM study of the MoVTe Oxide M1 phase catalysts for ethane oxidative dehydrogenation. ACS Catal. 6, 4775–4781 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhou, Y. L. et al. Enhanced performance of boron nitride catalysts with induction period for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. J. Catal. 365, 14–23 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Grant, J. T. et al. Selective oxidative dehydrogenation ofpropane to propene using boron nitride catalysts. Science 354, 1570–1573 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Solsona, B. et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over Ni–W–O mixed metal oxide catalysts. J. Catal. 280, 28–39 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heracleous, E. & Lemonidou, A. A. Ni–Me–O mixed metal oxides for the effective oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene-effect of promoting metal Me. J. Catal. 270, 67–75 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Solsona, B., Concepción, P., Hernández, S., Demicol, B. & Nieto, J. M. L. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over NiO–CeO2 mixed oxides catalysts. Catal. Today 180, 51–58 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhu, H. B. et al. Metal oxides modified NiO catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. Catal. Today 228, 58–64 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Heracleous, E. & Lemonidou, A. Ni–Nb–O mixed oxides as highly active and selective catalysts for ethene production via ethane oxidative dehydrogenation. Part I: Characterization and catalytic performance. J. Catal. 237, 162–174 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Heracleous, E. & Lemonidou, A. A. Ni–Nb–O mixed oxides as highly active and selective catalysts for ethene production via ethane oxidative dehydrogenation. Part II: Mechanistic aspects and kinetic modeling. J. Catal. 237, 175–189 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhou, Y. L. et al. Sulfate-modified NiAl mixed oxides as effective C–H bond-breaking agents for the sole production of ethylene from ethane. ACS Catal. 10, 7619–7629 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhou, Y. L. et al. Improving the selectivity of Ni−Al mixed oxides with isolated oxygen species for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane with nitrous oxide. J. Catal. 377, 438–448 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chung, E. Y. et al. Catalytic oxygen carriers and process systems for oxidative coupling of methane using the chemical looping technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 12750–12764 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Neal, L. M., Yusuf, S., Sofranko, J. A. & Li, F. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane: a chemical looping approach. Energy Technol. 4, 1200–1208 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gao, Y. F., Haeri, F., He, F. & Li, F. X. Alkali metal-promoted LaxSr2–xFeO4−δ redox catalysts for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. ACS Catal. 8, 1757–1766 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zeng, L., Cheng, Z., Fan, J. A., Fan, L.-S. & Gong, J. L. Metal oxide redox chemistry for chemical looping processes. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 349–364 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhu, X., Imtiaz, Q., Donat, F., Müller, C. R. & Li, F. X. Chemical looping beyond combustion—a perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 772–804 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Solsona, B. et al. Selective oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over SnO2-promoted NiO catalysts. J. Catal. 295, 104–114 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhu, H. B. et al. Ni–Ta–O mixed oxide catalysts for the low temperature oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. J. Catal. 329, 291–306 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhu, H. B. et al. Ni−M−O (M = Sn, Ti, W) catalysts prepared by a dry mixing method for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. ACS Catal. 6, 2852–2866 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Popescu, I., Heracleous, E., Skoufa, Z., Lemonidou, A. & Marcu, I.-C. Study by electrical conductivity measurements of semiconductive and redox properties of M-doped NiO (M = Li, Mg, Al, Ga, Ti, Nb) catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 4962–4970 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chai, Y. C. et al. Acetylene-selective hydrogenation catalyzed by cationic nickel confined in zeolite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 9920–9927 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Crist, B. V. Handbook of Monochromatic XPS Spectra (Wiley, 2011).

  43. 43.

    Xu, J., Wang, Q. & Deng, F. Metal active sites and their catalytic functions in zeolites: insights from solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2179–2189 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kolyagin, Y. G. et al. Initial stages of propane activation over Zn/MFI catalyst studied by in situ NMR and IR spectroscopic techniques. J. Catal. 238, 122–133 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kazansky, V. B. & Pidko, E. A. Intensities of IR stretching bands as a criterion of polarization and initial chemical activation of adsorbed molecules in acid catalysis. ethane adsorption and dehydrogenation by zinc ions in ZnZSM-5 zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 2103–2108 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sanchis, R. et al. NiO diluted in high surface area TiO2 as an efficient catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Appl Catal. A 536, 18–26 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lin, X., Hoel, C. A., Sachtler, W. M. H., Poeppelmeier, K. R. & Weitz, E. Oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane with O2 as oxidant on selected transition metal-loaded zeolites. J. Catal. 265, 54–62 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, X., Liu, J., Jing, Y. & Xie, Y. Support effects on the catalytic behavior of NiO/Al2O3 for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. Appl Catal. A 240, 143–150 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kang, Y. et al. Improving syngas selectivity of Fe2O3/Al2O3 with yttrium modification in chemical looping methane conversion. ACS Catal. 9, 8373–8382 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Liu, J. et al. Highly-dispersed zinc species on zeolites for the continuous and selective dehydrogenation of ethane with CO2 as a Soft Oxidant. ACS Catal. 11, 2819–2830 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wang, C., Zheng, M., Li, X., Li, X. & Zhang, T. Catalytic conversion of ethanol into butadiene over high performance LiZnHf-MFI zeolite nanosheets. Green. Chem. 21, 1006–1010 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Joshi, R., Zhang, G., Miller, J. T. & Gounder, R. Evidence for the coordination–insertion mechanism of ethene dimerization at nickel cations exchanged onto beta molecular sieves. ACS Catal. 8, 11407–11422 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Otto, T., Zones, S. I. & Iglesia, E. Synthetic strategies for the encapsulation of nanoparticles of Ni, Co, and Fe oxides within crystalline microporous aluminosilicates. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 270, 10–23 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Emieis, C. A. Determination of integrated molar extinction coefficients for infrared absorption bands of pyridine adsorbed on solid acid catalysts. J. Catal. 141, 347–354 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Elbadawi, A. H., Ba-Shammakh, M. S., Al-Ghamdi, S., Razzak, S. A. & Hossain, M. M. Reduction kinetics and catalytic activity of VOx/γ-Al2O3-ZrO2 for gas phase oxygen free ODH of ethane. Chem. Eng. J. 284, 448–457 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Botella, P., Nieto, J. M. L., Dejoz, A., Vazquez, M. I. & Martinez-Arias, A. Mo−V−Nb mixed oxides as catalysts in the selective oxidation of ethane. Catal. Today 78, 507–512 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Usachev, N. Y. et al. Oxidative conversion of ethane involving lattice oxygen of molybdenum systems modified with aluminum, gallium, or yttrium oxide. Pet. Chem. 56, 841–845 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Novotný, P., Yusuf, S., Li, F. & Lamb, H. H. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane using MoO3/Fe2O3 catalysts in a cyclic redox mode. Catal. Today 317, 50–55 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants (22178337, and 21706254), National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0202-801), and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS (DICP I201916). We thank X.D. and H.W. at the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP) for their helps to set up performance evaluation apparatus.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.W. performed the catalyst preparation, characterizations, and catalytic tests. B.Y. and Q.G. did the AC-TEM characterization. Y.H. carried out the DFT simulations and analysis. Y.S. and X.P. conducted the STEM examination. Y.K., C.H., and L.L. helped with the catalyst characterizations and the data analysis. H.L. and X.L. conducted the XANES examination and analysis. M.T. and X.W. conceived the idea, designed the study, analyzed the data, and co-wrote the paper. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ming Tian or Xiaodong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Yang, B., Gu, Q. et al. Near 100% ethene selectivity achieved by tailoring dual active sites to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation. Nat Commun 12, 5447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25782-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25782-2

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing