Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

PERM1 interacts with the MICOS-MIB complex to connect the mitochondria and sarcolemma via ankyrin B

Abstract

Skeletal muscle subsarcolemmal mitochondria (SSM) and intermyofibrillar mitochondria subpopulations have distinct metabolic activity and sensitivity, though the mechanisms that localize SSM to peripheral areas of muscle fibers are poorly understood. A protein interaction study and complexome profiling identifies PERM1 interacts with the MICOS-MIB complex. Ablation of Perm1 in mice reduces muscle force, decreases mitochondrial membrane potential and complex I activity, and reduces the numbers of SSM in skeletal muscle. We demonstrate PERM1 interacts with the intracellular adaptor protein ankyrin B (ANKB) that connects the cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane. Moreover, we identify a C-terminal transmembrane helix that anchors PERM1 into the outer mitochondrial membrane. We conclude PERM1 functions in the MICOS-MIB complex and acts as an adapter to connect the mitochondria with the sarcolemma via ANKB.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle possesses remarkable plasticity and can rapidly adapt to environmental factors such as workload, nutrient supply and neuronal stimulation1. For example, physical activity increases the number of mitochondria and their oxidative capacity. Moreover, muscle activity improves the regeneration of damaged muscles and promotes vascularization of the skeletal muscles2. Previous studies revealed two mitochondrial subpopulations: subsarcolemmal mitochondria (SSM), located below the sarcolemmal membrane, and interfibrillar mitochondria (IFM), situated between myofibrils3. IFM are smaller and have a more compact shape, while SSM are larger and own a lamellar structure. High-resolution electron microscopy revealed the existence of additional mitochondrial subpopulations4, which may also differ in their protein composition, respiration, and sensitivity to metabolic changes5. Studies of cardiac mitochondria demonstrated that SSM are more susceptible to cellular stress, such as ischemic injury and calcium overload, than IFM6. However, the mechanisms that determine the position and regulate the activity of different mitochondrial subpopulations remain largely unknown.

Activation of mitochondrial gene expression depends on the key transcriptional coactivators peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1a (PGC-1α) and the estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα)7. Enhanced muscle workload upregulates PGC-1α activity and promotes mitochondrial biogenesis8. Conversely, loss of function of PGC-1α results in defects in cardiac and skeletal muscle energetics and causes cardiomyopathy9. Similarly, muscle workload increases the intracellular calcium ion concentration and activates the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and protein kinase p38. Activation of this cascade increases PGC-1α protein expression and mitochondrial biogenesis10. Additionally, PGC-1α-dependent transcription factors, such as CREB and MEF2, are activated via a feed-forward loop11. PGC-1- and ERR-induced regulator in muscle 1 (PERM1) was recently identified to regulate the expression of PGC-1α and ERRα targets to enhance mitochondrial biogenesis and adaptive oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle12. PERM1 protein expression is mainly restricted to heart and skeletal muscle, indicating PERM1 functions as a tissue-specific regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis in response to exercise. Perm1 loss- and gain-of-function experiments in cell culture12 and adenoviral-mediated overexpression in mouse muscles revealed that PERM1 regulates muscle-related pathways modulating muscle contraction, vascularization and metabolic activity13.

PERM1 has been detected in the nucleus and the cytosol12 but also in the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM)14. Casein kinase (CK2)-mediated phosphorylation of the PEST motif leads to degradation of PERM114. However, little is known about the mechanisms by which PERM1 increases oxidative capacity and mitochondrial biogenesis. A previous study showed that PERM1 interacts with CaMKII and induced phosphorylation of p3815. In addition, PERM1 regulates Gadd45g and Nr4A3, possibly also through CaMKII, which are involved in the control of exercise-responsive gene expression and oxidative capacity.

The mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) complex is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial metabolic activity16 and plays an important role for the organization of the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) and cristae formation. It is composed of MIC10 (MINOS1), MIC13 (QIL1), MIC19 (CHCHD3), MIC25 (CHCHD6), MIC26 (APOO), MIC27 (APOOL) and MIC60 (Mitofilin; IMMT)17,18,19,20. The MICOS core complex localizes to the inner mitochondrial membrane and closely interacts with the proteins that form the mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging (MIB) complex, which connects the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane. The MIB complex partially localizes in the OMM, thereby constituting the sorting and assembly machinery (SAM), which associates with other OMM proteins, such as channel proteins, components of the protein translocases, and mitochondrial fusion machines. Notably, MIC60, a central subunit of the MICOS complex, interacts with all known MICOS and MIB members. Depletion of MIC60 leads to a severe loss of cristae structures and reduced oxidative capacity21. Moreover, the stability of the MICOS–MIB complex is directly connected to biogenesis and assembly of respiratory chain complexes. For example, SAM50 is a critical stabilizing protein of the MIB complex responsible for protein transport, assembly of respiratory chain complexes and regulation of cristae integrity22.

In this study, we demonstrate that genetic ablation of Perm1 in mice reduces the number of mitochondria in peripheral areas of muscle fibers, which compromises running capacity and skeletal muscle force production. Comprehensive mass spectrometry-based mapping of protein-protein interactions revealed that PERM1 interacts with several members of the MICOS–MIB complex and cytoskeletal adaptor proteins such as vimentin and ankyrin B. Native gel electrophoresis in combination with mass spectrometry demonstrated PERM1 co-migrated with the mature MICOS–MIB complex at 2.2 MDa. Moreover, deletion of a predicted transmembrane helix in the C-terminus of PERM1 led to specific loss of the interaction with MICOS-MIB proteins.

Results

Deletion of Perm1 reduces muscle force without morphometric changes in skeletal muscle architecture

To gain further insight into the physiological role of PERM1, we ablated Perm1 in the mouse by replacing the coding region of exon 2 with a GFP cassette as described in14. Successful deletion of Perm1 was confirmed by immunoblotting (Fig. 1a). Perm1−/− mice are viable and fertile without obvious changes in body and muscle weight. Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed no obvious changes in Perm1−/− muscle fibers (SI Fig. 1a). Immunostaining using antibodies directed against PERM1 and the heavy myosin chains (Myh7, Myh2) demonstrated that PERM1 is enriched within the subsarcolemmal regions in type IIa fibers, which contain higher numbers of mitochondria compared to slow type I and fast type IIb fibers. (SI Fig. 1b). Notably, the abundance of PERM1 correlated with the abundance of PCG-1α, which is highest in type IIa muscle fibers23. Detailed morphometric analysis of various fiber types in tibialis anterior (TA), extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and soleus muscle revealed no obvious fiber-type switches or changes in fiber diameter (SI Fig. 1c). Immunohistochemical staining using a CD31/PECAM1 antibody did not reveal any obvious alterations in the vascularization of Perm1−/− skeletal muscles (SI Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1: Deletion of Perm1 reduces muscle force and alters the localization of subsarcolemmal mitochondria.
figure1

a Western blot depicting successful depletion of Perm1 in Perm1−/− TA muscle. Correct genotype was confirmed by western blotting for each mouse used in the whole study (n > 20 mice per group). b, c Forced running experiments with metabolic respiratory exchange ratio (RER) measurements. b Percentage of wild-type and Perm1−/− mice that succeeded or failed to run at the indicated speed for two minutes each (n = 9 mice per group). c RER (VCO2/VO2) of wild-type and Perm1−/− mice running at the indicated speed (n = 9 mice per group). d Inverted screen test; the time Perm1−/− and wild-type mice held their body weight on an inverted grid is shown (n = 9 mice per group). e Weight test; the time Perm1−/− and wild-type mice grasped increasing weights is shown (n = 9 mice per group). f Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) of soleus muscle from Perm1−/− mice indicated an altered overall distribution of mitochondria compared to wild-type control. Scale 25 µm. g qPCR analysis showed decreased in mtDNA copy number in Perm1−/− soleus muscle compared to wild-type controls (n = 3 mice per group). h Left: Electron microscopic inspection of TA muscle showed decreased mitochondrial density at capillaries in Perm1−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. Scale 1 µm. Right: Number of mitochondria per capillary in Perm1−/− and wild-type mice (n = 2 mice per group, 10 quantified capillaries). i Immunohistochemical staining of soleus muscle indicated co-localization of PERM1 (red) with TOM20 (green). Scale 50 µm. Schematic visualization of bin scaling of a single muscle fiber for TOM20 intensity quantification. j Mean fractional intensity of TOM20 signals in bins 1–6 from Perm1−/− and wild-type soleus muscle fibers. Intensity is reduced at subsarcolemmal sites and increased within interfibrillar mitochondria in Perm1−/− muscles compared to wild-type control (n = 2 mice per group, 507 quantified fibers). Data (c, e) are presented as mean values ±0.95 CI. Box plots (d, g, h, j) represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles, maximum and minimum are connected through whiskers, and individual data points are added on top (d, g, h). Outliers are defined as Q1− 1.8 interquartile range (IQR) and Q3+1.8 IQR. (ce, g, h) unpaired two-sided Student’s t test, (j) unpaired two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test. Source data are provided as Source Data file.

Next, we subjected Perm1−/− and wild-type control littermates to forced running experiments and tested muscle strength. Treadmill exercise with increasing speed revealed no differences between mutants and wild-type controls up to moderate velocity of 12 m/min (Fig. 1b). However, Perm1−/− mutants did not withstand 16 m/min for two minutes, while 70% of control mice endured this stress for two minutes. The respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was not altered between Perm1−/− and control animals, indicating no significant changes in fuel sources (Fig. 1c). Assessment of limb muscle performance using an inverted screen test revealed a significantly shorter hold time for Perm1−/− mutants compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 1d). In another muscle strength test, mice were lifted by the tail and given a fine-meshed net supplemented with a range of weights. Perm1−/− mice had significantly reduced ability to carry weights from 59 g upwards compared to controls (Fig. 1e). Next, we measured the force generated by the gastrocnemius muscle in living animals after electrical stimulation. Perm1−/− exhibited reduced strength compared to controls at all stimulation frequencies, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (p-value 0.09; SI Fig. S1e). Overall, the running performance, muscle strength and in vivo muscle stimulation experiments demonstrated that loss of PERM1 leads to reduced muscle strength and endurance. Thus, it will be interesting to investigate effects of Perm1 deletion on force development in individual muscle groups with different fiber types and explore how PERM1 affects mitochondrial activity under normal and exercise conditions.

Loss of Perm1 reduces formation of SSM

Next, we visualized the enzymatic activity of the mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) in soleus muscle cross-sections. SDH signals were mainly detected in subsarcolemmal areas, reflecting the higher density of mitochondria at the periphery where the diffusion distances for oxygen and metabolites are shorter24. Importantly, we observed decreased SDH signal intensities at subsarcolemmal areas in Perm1−/− fibers and a shift towards increased intensity in central areas (Fig. 1f). mtDNA copy number was lower in Perm1−/− compared to wild-type control soleus muscle, suggesting a reduced mitochondrial content (Fig. 1g). Electron microscopy (EM) analysis of mitochondrial morphology revealed no changes in mitochondrial size and cristae formation (Fig. 1h, SI Fig. S2a). Consistent with the SDH staining, we observed the reduced formation of SSM in Perm1−/− mutants, particularly close to capillaries (Fig. 1h).

To quantify mitochondrial distribution more precisely, we stained for TOM20, which co-localized with PERM1 at the periphery of muscle fibers, and determined the staining intensity from the periphery to the center of the muscle fibers. (Fig. 1i). We divided the cross-sectional area of single muscle fibers into six scaled bins and quantified the mean fractional TOM20 intensity for more than 500 fibers (n = 2). Since we observed a significant reduction in TOM20 in the first bin, next to the sarcolemma, in Perm1−/− mutants compared to wild-type control sections (Fig. 1j), we hypothesize that inactivation of Perm1 specifically reduces SSM, without affecting the IFM population.

Loss of Perm1 reduces the abundance of the MICOS/MIB complex in SSM

Since Perm1 ablation affected the localization of SSM, we investigated whether PERM1 protein expression is more abundant in SSM than IFM in wild-type TA muscles. Consistent with the immunohistochemistry, we observed a higher PERM1 protein expression in SSM than IFM, while the majority of mitochondrial proteins, including OMM and MICOS–MIB members, were evenly distributed (Supplementary Data 1; Fig. 2a, b). We next compared SSM and IFM populations from Perm1−/− and wild-type control mice. While we observed almost no protein changes in the IFM population (Fig. 2c), analysis of SSM mitochondria identified 62 regulated proteins, including several OMM and MICOS–MIB complex members (Fig. 2d–f). It should be noted that more sarcomeric proteins were detected in the Perm1−/− SSM population compared to wild-type SSM, indicating altered associations of Perm1-deficient SSM with cytoskeletal and sarcomeric structures (Fig. 2f, blue circles).

Fig. 2: PERM1 is specifically enriched in SSM, and SSM are altered in Perm1−/− muscles.
figure2

a, b Volcano plot (a) and boxplot (b) depicting the regulation of PERM1, MitoCarta-annotated, OMM, and MICOS–MIB proteins in isolated IFM and SSM from wild-type TA muscle. Mitochondrial and OMM proteins are enriched in IFM. Inversely, PERM1 is clearly more abundant in the SSM fraction (n = 3 mice per group). c, d Comparison of log2 differences in MitoCarta 2.0 proteins compared to the complete dataset revealed no changes in the overall regulation of mitochondrial proteins in (c) isolated IFM of Perm1−/− TA muscle compared to wild-type control, though MitoCarta-annotated proteins were significantly reduced in (d) isolated SSM from Perm1−/− TA muscle compared to wild-type control (n = 3 mice per group). e, f) Volcano plots highlighting the regulation of sarcomeric proteins and proteins of the MICOS–MIB complex in (e) isolated IFM from Perm1−/− TA compared to wild-type control and in (f) isolated SSM from Perm1−/− TA compared to wild-type control (n = 3 mice per group). Box plots (b, c, d, e) represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles, maximum and minimum are connected through whiskers. Outliers are defined as Q1–1.8 IQR and Q3+1.8 IQR. bd unpaired two-sided Mann-Whitney U-test. Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 1.

Overall, the quantitative proteomics demonstrated that SSM are significantly more affected by Perm1 ablation than IFM and that loss of PERM1 affects the protein expression of members of the MICOS–MIB complex.

Inactivation of Perm1 affects mitochondrial proteins related to transportation and breakdown of reactive oxygen species in skeletal muscle tissue

In a previous quantitative proteomic analysis of Perm1−/− heart tissue, we showed that PERM1 has a stronger effect on protein expression during nocturnal activities than under daytime resting conditions14. To quantify circadian PERM1 protein expression, we isolated skeletal muscle tissues from wild-type mice every six hours and performed immunoblot analysis. Densitometric analysis revealed upregulation of PERM1 during the night when the physical activity of mice is at its peak (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3: Inactivation of Perm1 affects mitochondrial proteins related to transportation and breakdown of ROS.
figure3

a Protein levels of PERM1 at different timepoints in TA muscle determined by western blotting. Normalized protein levels are expressed relative to the mean levels of each protein in the stain-free control (n = 3 mice per time point). b Comparison of the log2 differences in MitoCarta 2.0 proteins compared to the complete dataset revealed overall downregulation of mitochondrial proteins in TA muscle isolated from Perm1−/− mice compared to wild-type controls (n = 2 mice per group). c Western blot and quantification of TOM20 in Perm1−/− TA muscle and wild-type controls, substantiating the reduced mitochondrial content (n = 3 mice per group). d, e Volcano plots depicting significantly regulated proteins in Perm1−/− TA muscle (d) and isolated TA muscle mitochondria (e) at 11 pm compared to wild-type controls (n = 2 mice per group). Cut-off was defined as p < 0.05 with a fold change >1.5. Darker colors indicate the MitoCarta 2.0 annotations. f Western blot and quantification, depicting downregulation of BNIP3 in TA muscle and isolated TA muscle mitochondria from Perm1−/− mice. BNIP3 levels are expressed relative to the mean levels in wild-type control samples (n = 2 mice per group). Box plot (b) represents the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles, maximum and minimum are connected through whiskers. Outliers are defined as Q1–1.8 IQR and Q3+1.8 IQR. a, d, e Unpaired two-sided Student’s t test, S0=0.1, (c) unpaired two-sided Student’s t test, (b) unpaired two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test. Source data are provided as Source Data file and in Supplementary Data 2.

To identify proteins that directly depend on PERM1, we measured the proteome of muscles during active nighttime and during daytime when PERM1 levels decrease. In total, we quantified 4686 proteins and observed 129 significantly regulated proteins (Fig. 3b–e, SI Fig. 2b–f; Supplementary Data 2); 18% of the quantified proteins in the nighttime proteomic dataset represent mitochondrial proteins. Interestingly, the overall fold-changes in mitochondrial proteins were significantly lower in Perm1−/− mice compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 3b), while the fold-changes for all proteins were similar between the genotypes. This result was substantiated by immunoblotting with the mitochondrial marker protein TOM20 (Fig. 3c). Collectively, this finding suggests an overall reduction in the mitochondrial content of Perm1−/− skeletal muscle, which is in line with the reduction of mtDNA. Downregulated mitochondrial proteins included proteins associated with OXPHOS function and OXPHOS assembly, namely SCO2 and NDUFAF3, surfeit locus protein 1 (SURF1), and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 (COX3; Fig. 3d).

Next, we isolated mitochondria from Perm1−/− and wild-type TA muscles and mass spectrometric analysis identified 2884 proteins, including 453 mitochondrial proteins (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Data 2). We observed 58 significantly regulated proteins, of which 28 were increased and 30 decreased. Knockdown of Perm1 in C2C12 cells downregulated mRNA expression of the OMM carnitine palmitoyltransferase CPT1B after PGC-1α induction12. Similarly, we observed reduced CPT1B protein expression in Perm1−/− mitochondria during the night, suggesting attenuated transport of acylcarnitine.

Another essential transport protein, sorting and assembly factor SAM50 is a member of the MIB complex involved in sorting beta-barrel proteins at the OMM after import by the TOM complex. We observed a 1.5-fold reduction (p-value 0.03) in SAM50 in Perm1−/− mitochondria compared to controls. In addition, FAM120A, another protein downregulated in Perm1−/− mitochondria, is related to oxidative stress signaling and has been linked to the family of constitutive coactivators of the PPARγ family due to its sequence similarity. A recent study that named FAM120 oxidative stress-associated Src activator (OSSA) reported the protein functions as an activator of PI3K-AKT signaling and antiapoptotic pathways25. PERM1 is required for activation of selective PGC-1α target genes. Depletion of Perm1 in PGC-1α-stimulated cells reduced the expression of several genes related to mitochondrial energy metabolism, including the DNA-directed RNA polymerase POLRMT and mitochondrial dimethyladenosine transferase 1 and 2 (TFB1M, TFB2M)13. Accordingly, we observed significant downregulation of POLRMT in Perm1−/− skeletal muscle tissue during the night. In contrast, the mitochondrial replication factor TFAM and POLRMT interactors TFB1M and TFB2M were not altered in Perm1−/− mutants. Enhanced degradation of mitochondria could also reduce the amount of mtDNA and mitochondrial proteins. However, markers of mitochondrial fusion/fission and mitophagy, such as mitofusin-1/2, OPA1, sequestosome (p62), and several autophagy-related proteins (ATG5, ATG7, ATGl1) were not altered in Perm1−/− mutants (Supplementary Data 2). Additionally, the apoptosis-inducing protein BNIP3 was severely reduced in both Perm1−/− whole muscle tissues and isolated mitochondria26. We substantiated the downregulation of BNIP3 by immunoblotting (Fig. 3f).

Besides diurnal changes of PERM1, we were also interested in PERM1 regulation during aging. We could not observe obvious changes in PERM1 protein expression levels between 3-month-old (young) and 24-month-old (aged) in TA and soleus muscles of wild-type mice (SI Fig. S2f). However, comparison of TA and soleus muscles of 2-year-old Perm1−/− mutants and aged-matched wild-type control animals (n = 3; SI Fig. S2b, c) revealed significant differences in expression of 60 out of 3522 proteins, including 17 mitochondrial proteins (Supplementary Data 2), including prohibitin (PHB) and SIRT3, which were decreased in aged Perm1−/− muscles.

In summary, ablation of Perm1 leads to dysregulation of several proteins related to membrane transport and inactivation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Since mitochondria are the main source of oxidative stress, this dysregulation could lead to cellular damage and reduced mitochondrial function. However, it remains unclear whether ablation of Perm1 directly regulates the expression of these proteins or reflects a secondary adaptation.

Perm1-deficient muscles exhibit reduced OXPHOS activity and higher turnover of mitochondrial proteins

Since muscle strength data and proteomic analyses indicated reduced mitochondrial function, we examined the activity of the electron transport chain in mitochondria isolated from a mixture of several mouse leg muscles by high-resolution respirometry (Oroboros, O2k). Notably, oxygen flux was lower at all stages in Perm1−/− samples compared to the wild-type controls (n = 3; Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4: Perm1-deficient muscles show reduced oxygen flux and faster turnover of mitochondrial proteins.
figure4

a High-resolution respirometry of isolated muscle mitochondria showing decreased specific oxygen flux in isolated Perm1−/− mitochondria compared to wild-type controls (n = 3 mice per group). b FDB muscle fibers were loaded with 2.5 nM TMRM. Arrows indicate the addition of 5 µM oligomycin and 4 µM FCCP (n = 10 fibers in wild-type, n = 20 fibers in Perm1−/−). c Comparison of the Lys6-incorporation rates of all proteins, mitochondrial proteins, OMM proteins, IMM proteins, and proteins of the MICOS–MIB complex in wild-type mice fed a SILAC diet for 14 days (n = 3 mice per group). DNAJC11 and PERM1 had higher incorporation rates than other MICOS–MIB proteins. d Ratios of Perm1−/− to wild-type control Lys6-incorporation rates for MitoCarta 2.0 proteins and MICOS–MIB proteins in comparison to the complete TA muscle dataset after feeding with a SILAC diet for 14 days. Enhanced labeling of mitochondrial proteins and MICOS–MIB proteins was observed in Perm1−/− mice (n = 3 mice per group). e, f Density plots of the ratios of Perm1−/− to wild-type control Lys6-incorporation for non-MitoCarta 2.0 and MitoCarta 2.0-annotated proteins, showing enhanced labeling of mitochondrial proteins in Perm1−/− (e) TA but not in (f) Perm1−/− brain. Data (a) are presented as mean values ± 0.95 CI. Box plots (c, d) represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles, maximum and minimum are connected through whiskers. Outliers are defined as Q1–1.8 IQR and Q3+1.8 IQR. (a) paired two-sided Student’s t test, (d, e, f) unpaired two-sided Mann-Whitney U-test. Source data are provided as Source Data file and in Supplementary Data 3. PMG (pyruvate, malate, glutamate), S (succinate), ETS (electron transfer system), ROX (residual oxygen consumption), Olm (oligomycin).

In addition to impairing oxidative phosphorylation, imbalanced mitochondrial metabolism may induce rapid depolarization of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential. Therefore, we isolated single muscle fibers from Perm1−/− flexor digitorum brevis (FDB) and quantified mitochondrial membrane potential. Mitochondria from Perm1−/− fibers showed higher depolarization when ATP synthase was inhibited by oligomycin, indicating that Perm1−/− fibers are partially dependent on the reverse activity of ATP synthase to maintain membrane potential due to proton leakage-consuming proton-motive force (Fig. 4b).

To explore whether the turnover of mitochondria is affected, we used pulsed-SILAC labeling of living animals to monitor newly synthesized proteins via incorporation of the isotope-labeled amino acid 13C6-lysine (Lys6) by LC-MS/MS. A diet containing Lys6 was administrated to Perm1−/− and wild-type control littermates for 14 days (n = 3). Skeletal muscle tissue was isolated and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis to measure incorporation of stable isotopes (Supplementary Data 3). Brain tissue, which does not express Perm1, from the same animals was used as a control. In accordance with previous labeling studies27, we observed a Lys6-labeling rate of 29 ± 14% for mitochondria, substantially lower than the total proteome rate of 45 ± 18% (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, MICOS–MIB complex members had even lower Lys6-labeling rates of 20 ± 6% and thus are among the mitochondrial proteins with the lowest turnover. Conversely, PERM1 had a high Lys6-labeling rate of 58% (Fig. 4c, blue circle), followed by DNAJC11 (39%; Fig. 4c, green circle). We observed similar patterns by calculating the half-lives of these proteins in a dataset of soleus muscles of mice fed with a Lys6 diet for 1–4 weeks (S1 Fig. S3a; Supplementary Data 5). This finding might indicate that PERM1 and DNAJC11 have distinct stability and function compared to other OMM proteins or MICOS–MIB complex members. Similarly, OXPHOS complex assembly factors showed comparably high Lys6-labeling rates of 48 ± 12%.

Next, we compared the Lys6-incorporation rates of Perm1−/− and wild-type controls. No differences in Lys6-incorporation rates were observed in brain tissue (SI Fig. S3b). In contrast, analysis of skeletal muscle tissue revealed enhanced Lys6-incorporation rates for Perm1−/− mitochondrial proteins compared to controls. This effect was even more pronounced for MICOS–MIB complex members (Fig. 4d). Selected MS spectra of MIC60 and SAM50 are shown in SI Fig. S3c, d. The density and scatter plots illustrate the shift to higher Lys6-incorporation rates in the TA muscle, but not brain, of Perm1−/− mutants compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 4e, f, SI Fig. S3e, h). This effect was most pronounced for MIC13, with a ~1.4-fold higher Lys6-labeling in Perm1−/− mutants than wild-type (SI Fig. 3e, f). We concluded that Perm1−/− mitochondria, particularly MICOS–MIB members, have a higher turnover compared to mitochondria from wild-type control muscles. Overall, loss of PERM1 significantly impaired oxidative phosphorylation and enhanced membrane depolarization, which may increase protein synthesis, especially of MIB complex members.

PERM1 interacts with components of the mitochondrial intermembrane bridging complex

To clarify which proteins interact with PERM1, we performed affinity enrichment mass spectrometry in TREx-293 cells stably overexpressing Perm1-FLAG and C2C12 cells transiently overexpressing Perm1-FLAG. A PERM1 antibody was employed to identify endogenous PERM1 interactors in skeletal muscle and heart (Supplementary Data 4, Fig. 5a, SI Fig. S4a–c). A volcano plot was used to visualize PERM1 interactors (Fig. 5a) and the frequency with which these candidates were found is shown in Fig. 5b. Interestingly, we found that PERM1 interacts with several MICOS–MIB complex members, including MIC60, MIC19, SAM50 and MTX2. The interaction of PERM1 with SLC25A5 might explain the reduced protein abundance of this transporter in Perm1−/− mitochondria (SI Fig. S4a, b). Detection of ankyrin B (ANKB or ANK2) and the intermediate filament proteins vimentin and nestin suggest that PERM1 connects the OMM to cytoskeletal structures. Reverse immunoprecipitations confirmed that MIC60 and MIC19 interact with PERM1 (SI Fig. S4d). Immunoblotting revealed similar levels of PERM1, MIC60 and MTX2 expression between different muscle groups, suggesting a similar structure of the MICOS–MIB complex (SI Fig. S4e).

Fig. 5: PERM1 interacts with components of the mitochondrial intermembrane bridging complex.
figure5

a Volcano plot depicting significantly enriched proteins after immunoprecipitation of endogenous PERM1 in TA muscle (n = 3 mice per group). Cut-off was set to p < 0.05 with a fold change >1.5. Dark circles indicate MitoCarta 2.0 annotation. b Bar diagram showing the number of significantly enriched proteins (same cut-off as in volcano plot) identified in one, two, three, or all four immunoprecipitation approaches highlighting the most frequently found proteins. cf Complexome profiling of muscle mitochondria; iBAQ-values were maximum normalized. Arrows indicate the three main complex assemblies. c Single profiles of the MICOS complex proteins MIC60, MIC19, and MIC27. d Summary plot of all MICOS complex members detected (MIC10, MIC19, MIC26, MIC27, and MIC60). e Single profiles of the SAM complex proteins SAM50 and MTX2, as well PERM1. f Summary plot of all detected MICOS complex members (red line), SAM components (green line; SAM50, MTX2), and PERM1 (blue line). g Deletion of the transmembrane helix in PERM1 resulted in loss of PERM1 in the mitochondrial fraction, as visualized by immunoblotting of cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions obtained from HEK-293T cells transfected with FLAG-tagged wild-type Perm1 and FLAG-tagged ΔTM mutant. h Volcano plot depicting significantly enriched proteins after immunoprecipitation of PERM1 in HEK-293T cells transfected with FLAG-tagged wild-type Perm1 and FLAG-tagged ΔTM mutant (n = 3 samples per group). The cut-off was an FDR < 0.05; dark circles indicate MitoCarta 2.0 annotations. MICOS proteins MIC60 and MIC19 were only found in wild-type immunoprecipitates, while ANKB and PERM1 were similarly enriched in wild-type and ΔTM immunoprecipitates. a unpaired two-sided Student’s t test, S0 = 0.1, h unpaired two-sided Student’s t test, S0=0.1, permutation-based FDR=0.05, 500 randomizations. Source data are provided as Source Data file and in Supplementary Data 4.

To further investigate the interaction between PERM1 and the MICOS–MIB complex, we performed complexome profiling of mitochondria isolated from skeletal muscle by blue-native gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) and mass spectrometry. Each BN-PAGE lane was sliced into 70 sections and subjected to MS analysis. Intensity-Based Absolute Quantification (iBAQ) was used to quantify the proteins. All protein intensities were normalized and the profiles of selected MICOS (Fig. 5c, d, SI Fig. S4f) and MIB (Fig. 5e, f) complex members were plotted28. To assign protein intensities according to their size in Dalton (Da), respiratory chain complex standards of known sizes were used for normalization. The MICOS–MIB complex appears in different forms, depending on its maturation stage: (i) the 500–700 kDa IMM/intermembrane space (IMS) complex, which contains all MICOS subunits; (ii) the 800 and 1400 kDa SAM complex (SAM50, MTX1 + 2) that associates with the OMM; and (iii) the mature MICOS–MIB complex with a molecular weight between 2.2 and 2.8 MDa.

The 85 kDa protein PERM1 was mainly detected at a molecular weight of ~2.2 MDa in isolated mitochondria from muscle tissue (Fig. 5e). The core MICOS complex protein MIC60 was identified in all three maturing forms of the complex, whereas the MIB complex proteins SAM50 and MTX2 had similar migration profiles to PERM1 with a signal at ~2.2 MDa. Thus, we conclude PERM1 is a member of the mature MICOS–MIB complex in skeletal muscle tissue.

PERM1 anchors to the OMM via a conserved transmembrane helix

Next, we examined the PERM1 amino acid sequence to identify domains that potentially interact with proteins of the MICOS–MIB complex. Although most of the PERM1 protein is intrinsically disordered, a secondary structure and topology prediction of all-helix integral membrane proteins using MEMSAT329 predicted a hydrophobic transmembrane helix from amino acids 740–755 at the carboxyl-terminus of PERM1, which is followed by a 52 amino acids long tail. Furthermore, the C-terminal segment (732–803) shows high sequence conservation between human, mouse and bovine PERM1, while the overall amino acid sequence identity is lower than 50%. This may indicate that PERM1 anchors into the outer mitochondrial membrane via its C-terminal domain.

To test this hypothesis, we deleted amino acids 736–759 in the PERM1-FLAG construct. Strikingly, separation of the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions of HEK-293T cells transfected with the mutant PERM1 (hereafter referred to as ΔTM mutant) resulted in the loss of PERM1 in the mitochondrial fractions, while overexpressed wild-type PERM1 was present in both mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions (Fig. 5g). Furthermore, deletion of the hydrophobic transmembrane helix prevented interactions between PERM1 and MIC60, MIC19, and MIC25 in immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 5h, Supplementary Data 4). In contrast, no differences were observed in the interaction of ΔTM PERM1 with ANKB compared to wild-type PERM1. We concluded that the C-terminal helical structure is responsible for mitochondrial localization of PERM1 and its interaction with the MICOS–MIB complex.

Altered localization of the adaptor protein ankyrin B in Perm1 −/− muscles

We found that PERM1 does not only interact with members of the MICOS–MIB complex, but also with several proteins associated with membrane and cytoskeletal structures including ANKB, an adaptor protein that interacts with the cytoskeleton and connects transmembrane proteins with the sarcolemma30 (Fig. 5a). The PERM1-ANKB interaction was verified by co-immunoprecipitating FLAG-tagged Perm1 and HA-tagged AnkB in TREx-293 cells (Fig. 6a). Immunostaining confirmed co-localization of PERM1 and ANKB in the periphery of soleus muscle fibers (Fig. 6b). Interestingly, we also observed a reduction in the ANKB signals at the periphery of Perm1−/− mutant muscles. This finding was similar to the results of immunostaining with the TOM20 antibody (Fig. 1j). To quantify the reduction in ANKB, we separated each fiber into six bins (as shown in Fig. 1i) and measured the intensity of ANKB in Perm1−/− and wild-type muscle sections (n = 4). ANKB signal intensity was significantly lower at subsarcolemmal sites and higher within interfibrillar regions in Perm1−/− mutants (Fig. 6c, 2299 quantified fibers). These results validate the interaction of PERM1 with ANKB and suggest this interaction could be responsible for the localization of mitochondria at the sarcolemma.

Fig. 6: PERM1 associates with ankyrin B and the interaction with the MICOS–MIB complex is dependent on the transmembrane helix.
figure6

a PERM1 interacts with ANKB, as indicated by immunoprecipitation of FLAG-tagged Perm1 and HA-tagged ankyrin-B in TREx-293 cells stably expressing Perm1-FLAG. Protein lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG beads and anti-HA beads and immunoblotted with anti-FLAG and anti-HA antibodies. b Immunohistochemical staining of soleus muscle revealed co-localization of PERM1 (red) with ANKB (green). Scale, 50 µm. c Mean fractional intensity of ANKB signals in bins 1–6 from Perm1−/− and wild-type soleus muscle fibers. ANKB staining intensity was reduced at subsarcolemmal sites and increased within interfibrillar mitochondria in Perm1−/− muscles compared to wild-type controls (n = 4 mice per group, 2299 quantified fibers). Box plot (c) represents the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles, maximum and minimum are connected through whiskers. Outliers are defined as Q1–1.8 IQR and Q3+1.8 IQR. (c) unpaired two-sided Mann-Whitney U-test. Source data are provided as Source Data file.

Discussion

We here demonstrate that PERM1 interacts with the MICOS–MIB complex in mitochondria and with the intracellular adaptor protein ankyrin B to tether a subpopulation of skeletal muscle mitochondria to the sarcolemma. We show that PERM1 is required for mitochondria, providing the energy to achieve full muscle strength. So far, detailed knowledge about the physiological role of PERM1 was missing. PERM1, which rapidly upregulated when human skeletal muscle tissue becomes physically active, was recently described as a tissue-specific regulator of oxidative capacity in cultured muscle cells12, 31, 32. In addition, a previous study suggested that PERM1 is required for expression of PGC-1α/ERR target genes in C2C12 myotubes, for PGC-1α-induced mitochondrial biogenesis, and maximal oxidative capacity during physical activity13. Although PERM1 was reported to localize to the cytosol and the nucleus, we recently showed that PERM1 associates with the OMM14, suggesting that PERM1 might shuttle between mitochondria and the nucleus. Quantitative interactome screenings demonstrated that PERM1 physically interacts with MICOS–MIB subunits, which was confirmed by BN-PAGE analysis indicating that PERM1 co-migrates with the mature MICOS–MIB complex (Fig. 5). We hypothesize that the C-terminal transmembrane helix anchors PERM1 in the OMM, while the most C-terminal, 52 amino acid sequence, may extend into the IMS to allow interaction with MIC60 and MIC19. Further experiments are required to investigate the mechanisms that integrate PERM1 into the membrane and to answer the question whether PERM1 is involved in mitochondrial transport processes.

Previous studies demonstrated that SSM and IFM have distinct biochemical properties, capacities for respiration, and sensitivities to metabolic stress. Since PERM1 is enriched in SSM and loss of PERM1 results in a strong reduction in SSM, we hypothesize that PERM1 is critical for the specific functions of SSM and IFM. Several mitochondrial inner and outer membrane transporters were downregulated in Perm1 mutant skeletal muscles. We assume that PERM1 stabilizes the MICOS–MIB complex and prevents degradation of its subunits, since in vivo labeling with the stable isotope Lys6 demonstrated increased synthesis of several MICOS–MIB members including SAM50, MTX2 and MIC13 in Perm1−/− mutants (Fig. 4f).

Circadian rhythm regulates numerous transcriptional and translational processes that influence cellular metabolism and mitochondrial activity. We recently showed that CK2-dependent phosphorylation promotes rapid breakdown of PERM1 by ubiquitination. Interestingly, CK2 is involved in the control of the mammalian circadian clock, since inhibition of CK2 activity decreases the amplitude and increases the period of circadian gene expression oscillations33. Moreover, the activity of CK2 regulation of the carbohydrate metabolism is modulated by insulin34, indicating a central role for CK2 in regulating insulin-sensitivity, energy homeostasis and tissue remodeling. In contrast to CK2, which is upregulated in skeletal muscle of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, PERM1 is decreased, further supporting a close association with insulin-dependent metabolism and mitochondrial activity35. The lower CK2 levels during the night, when mice are more active, coincide with reduced phosphorylation and degradation of PERM1, which increases mitochondrial activity. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that CK2-dependent PERM1 phosphorylation determines the circadian rhythm of PERM1 and thereby contributes to the circadian regulation of mitochondrial activity. We recently described more than 30 phosphorylation sites on PERM1 in cardiomyocytes. Thus, it seems likely that in addition to CK2 other kinases, including PKC, CDC2 and p38, phosphorylate and regulate PERM1. Phosphoproteomics profiling of Perm1−/− and wild-type muscles under sedentary and activated conditions might help to decipher the mechanisms by which kinases regulate PERM1 and mitochondrial activity. In particular, analysis of mouse models of insulin resistance, such as the db/db mouse or administration of high caloric diets, may shed further light on this interplay.

Our data suggest that PERM1 is not a central structural component of the MICOS–MIB complex, but rather functions as a modulator of its activity or a sensor for energy requirements. The formation of cristae junctions and contact sites is a dynamic process that, depending on energy demands, involves continuous remodeling. The changes in PERM1 protein expression, its short half-life of ~4 days (SI Fig. S3a), and rapid degradation by CK2-dependent phosphorylation of the PEST domain14 might potentially contribute to remodeling processes in mitochondria and thereby control mitochondrial energy production.

Interestingly, we observed a reduction in oxygen flow in all measured stages and mitochondrial dysfunction in Perm1-deficient muscles as indicated by enhanced mitochondrial membrane depolarization while no signs of apoptosis and mitophagy were apparent. In fact, we detected a strong downregulation of the proapoptotic factor BNIP3 and a reduction of the voltage-dependent anion channel VDAC2, which is part of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore facilitating cytochrome c release and induction of apoptosis. These observations make it not only unlikely that removal of SSM in Perm1−/− muscles is mediated by mitophagy, but also suggest that absence of Perm1, together with the loss of BNIP3, leads to accumulation of damaged mitochondria. Genetic inactivation of Bnip3 results in changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential and reduced oxygen consumption in the liver36, which was also seen in Perm1−/− mutants.

In Drosophila, the MICOS component MIC60 controls mitochondrial motility by regulating protein levels of the OMM protein and Rho GTPase Miro, which anchors mitochondria to microtubule motors37. Mammalian skeletal muscle mitochondria display a similar subcellular distribution as the microtubular network and there is a close connection between the structural organization of mitochondria and energy flux38. Mitochondria accumulate at the periphery of muscles, and in particular, close to capillaries39, which reduces the distance for the diffusion of oxygen and metabolites from the capillaries to mitochondria. Moreover, SSM are thought to be primarily involved in the generation of the mitochondrial proton-motive force near capillaries, whereas IFM, which need to be close to myofibrils for efficient supply of ATP or other high-energy phosphates, use the generated proton-motive force to produce ATP4. Disruption of the finely balanced mitochondrial network by removal of components linking mitochondria to the microtubular and intermediate filament networks or breakdown of the intermediate filament network, will disrupt division of labor within mitochondrial subpopulations and reduce muscle strength38.

Our protein-protein interaction screening also identified the intermediate filament proteins vimentin and nestin, as well as ankyrin B (ANKB) as potential interactors of PERM1 (Fig. 3a). Vimentin co-localizes with mitochondria, regulates mitochondrial distribution, and influences the rate of ATP synthesis and mitochondrial membrane potential40. Heteropolymeric intermediate filaments consisting of nestin and vimentin are responsible for the connection of myofibrillary Z-lines via interactions with α-actinin to ANKB-containing costameres at sarcolemma41, 42. ANKB is one of three members of the ankyrin family of plasma membrane adaptor proteins involved in the organization and anchoring of integral membrane complexes to the spectrin- and actin-based cytoskeleton. Moreover, ANKB functions as an adaptor protein for dystrophin and dynactin and ankyrin-dependent organization of those proteins are required to maintain sarcolemmal integrity during physical exercise43. Loss of ANKB leads to the intracellular distribution of dystrophin and destabilization of costamere-associated microtubules and muscle fragility42. As ANKB also exhibits an intracellular localization44 and regulates the axonal transport of several organelles, including mitochondria, ANKB is assumed to serve as a core protein involved in intracellular organelle transport45. We demonstrated that ANKB co-localizes with PERM1 and mitochondria at the sarcolemma of skeletal muscles. Interestingly, Perm1 ablation led to a reduction in ANKB at sarcolemma (Fig. 6). We reason that PERM1 and ANKB mediate the anchorage of the mitochondria-associated cytoskeleton to the sarcolemma, albeit it seems also possible that impaired mitochondrial transport along microtubules is responsible for the loss of SSM in Perm1−/− mutants.

The characterized PERM1-ANKB interaction may reflect a novel mechanism of how mitochondria are recruited and connected to the sarcolemma in skeletal muscle tissue. Numerous structural and functional interactions have been associated with the integration of the mitochondria and the cytoskeleton, which influences the localization and modulates the activity and turnover of mitochondria. The dual interaction of PERM1 with the MICOS–MIB complex and intermediate filaments represents an unknown mechanism of how mitochondria are connected to the cytoskeleton and indicates that PERM1 is instrumental for the formation of the spatially organized, functional mitochondrial network that makes skeletal muscles strong.

Methods

Antibodies

The antibodies used for immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation and immunohistochemistry were: PERM1 (Sigma, #HPA031711), diluted 1:1,000 for immunoblotting, 1:100 for immunohistochemistry; BNIP3 (Cell Signaling, #3769), diluted 1:1,000; TOM20 (Abcam, #ab56783), diluted 1:100 for immunohistochemistry; TOM20 (Sigma, #HPA011562), diluted 1:5,000 for immunoblotting, 1:100 for immunohistochemistry; GAPDH (Invitrogen, #AM4300), diluted 1:10,000 for immunoblotting; Ankyrin B (Invitrogen, #33-3700), diluted 1:1000 for immunoblotting, 1:100 for immunohistochemistry; MYH7 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank [DSHB], BA-F8), MYH2 (DSHB, SC-71), MYH4 (DSHB, BF-F3), CD31/PECAM (BD Pharmingen, #553370), all diluted 1:100 for immunohistochemistry; anti-FLAG M2-HRP (Sigma, #A8592), anti-HA-HRP (Miltenyi, #130-091-972), Alexa Fluor 350 anti-mouse IgG2b (Life Technologies, #A-21140), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse IgG1 (Life Technologies, #A-21121), Alexa Fluor 546 anti-mouse IgM (Life Technologies, #A-21045), Alexa Fluor 546 anti-rabbit (H+L) (Life Technologies, #A-11010), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rat (Life Technologies, #A-11006), anti-mouse HRP (Sigma, #A9044) and anti-rabbit HRP (Sigma, #A0545), all diluted 1:4,000 for immunoblotting and 1:200 for immunohistochemistry.

Generation of Perm1−/− mice

Perm1−/− mice were generated in the mouse facility of the Max-Planck-Institute in Bad Nauheim and transferred to the CECAD mouse facility via embryo transfer, as previously described14. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with national and institutional guidelines and procedures were approved by the responsible local authorities in Germany (Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany). Mice were housed at 22 ± 2 °C, with a humidity of 55 ± 10%, and an air exchange rate of 15 times per hour on a 12 h light-dark cycle with free access to food and water.

Plasmids

The mouse PERM1 coding sequence was cloned into the pcDNA5/TO vector containing a C-terminal FLAG tag, as previously described14. AnkyrinB-2XHA was a gift from Vann Bennett (Addgene plasmid #31057; http://n2t.net/addgene:31057; RRID: Addgene_31057)42.

To generate the transmembrane mutant, amino acids 736-759 were deleted from the Perm1-FLAG plasmid using the In-Fusion cloning technique (TaKaRa Bio Inc.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 10 ng Perm1-FLAG plasmid was amplified using PrimeSTAR GXL DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc.). The PCR product was isolated by gel extraction and incubated with DpnI (Thermo Fisher) at 37 °C for 1 h. The In-Fusion cloning reaction was performed as recommended, and the reaction mixture was transformed into competent DH5α cells. Primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Treadmill and weight experiments

Treadmill and weights experiments were performed in collaboration with the group of Prof. Dr. Bloch at German Sport University, Cologne. After the experiments, the mice were placed back in their cage and returned to the mouse room with free access to water and food.

Treadmill running

Mice (n = 9) were placed individually on a treadmill (Columbus Instruments). The speed was started at 8 m/min and increased by 2 m/min every two minutes up to 18 m/min. Mice were gently placed back at the correct position if they stopped running. The session was terminated when the mouse met either of the exhaustion criteria: if the mouse was replaced on the treadmill for the third time or stopped running for more than 10 s.

Inverted screen

The strength of the Perm1−/− and wild-type mice was measured as previously described46. The inverted screen test was performed following the Kondziella protocol47. The screen is a 43 cm square of wire mesh consisting of 12 mm squares of 1 mm diameter with a 4 cm-deep wooden surround. Mice (n = 9) were placed individually in the center of the wire mesh and the screen was rotated to an inverted position and held steadily 40–50 cm above a padded surface. The time until the mouse could not hold on to the screen anymore was recorded; the test was terminated after 12 min.

Weight test

Weight tests were conducted using a series of six weights ranging from 20 and 85 g; the lightest weight was offered first. The weights were attached to wires that can be grabbed by the claws of the mouse. The mice (n = 9) were held by the middle of the tail and lowered so they could grasp the weight on the laboratory bench. A maximal holding time of 3 s was allowed; if the mouse dropped the weight in less than 3 s, the time was recorded. If the weight was dropped, the mouse was rested for about 10 s and offered the same weight again; failing three times was the termination criteria.

Skeletal muscle force measurements

Skeletal muscle force in vivo was determined as described previously48. Briefly, mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (Xilor; 20 mg/kg) and Zoletil (10 mg/kg). Z small incision was made from the knee to the hip, to expose the sciatic nerve. Before the branch of the sciatic nerve, Teflon-coated 7 multi-stranded steel wires (AS 632; Cooner Sales, Chatsworth, CA, USA) were implanted with sutures on either side of the sciatic nerve. To avoid recruitment of the ankle dorsal flexors, the common peroneal nerve was cut. Torque production of the plantar flexors after nerve stimulation was measured using a muscle lever system (Model 305 C; Aurora Scientific, Aurora, ON, Canada). Normalized muscle force was determined by dividing absolute force by muscle mass.

Cell culture

All cell lines were cultivated as an adherent fibroblastoid monolayers in 10 cm dishes in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1× Penicillin-Streptavidin-Glutamine mix at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS, harvested in 500 µL RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors, incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with rotating, and DNA was sheared by sonification. Lysates were centrifuged at 18,000 g for 10 min and 4 °C to pellet cell debris.

Immunohistochemistry

Cross-sections of soleus and TA (10 µm) were prepared by snap-freezing whole muscles in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane. Sections were fixed in −20 °C cold acetone for 8 min, blocked in 0.1% Triton, 5% goat serum and 2% BSA in TBS for 1 h at RT, incubated with the primary antibody in 1:10 blocking solution in a humidified chamber at 4 °C overnight, mounted with Aqua Poly mount (Polysciences) and imaged using a DMi8A inverse microscope (Leica).

Quantitative image analysis was done using the cell image analysis software CellProfiler™ (version 3.1.9)49 to quantify the intensity of the TOM20 and ANKB signals across the muscle fibers. Two pipelines were generated: The first pipeline was created to identify single muscle fibers in an entire muscle cross-section to generate a binary image mask for further analysis. To identify the fiber outlines, the cross-sections were additionally stained with antibodies against type I (BA-F8) and type IIa (SC-71) fibers. Here, a combination of the images of the type I and type IIa fiber staining and an enhanced image of the TOM20/ANKB staining was used for mask generation. In the second pipeline, the generated binary image mask was used to measure the object intensity distribution of the TOM20/ANKB staining in six scaled bins per muscle fiber. Fibers that were not correctly recognized with the image mask were manually excluded from the analysis. The mean fractional intensity for each bin calculated as the fraction of total intensity normalized by the fraction of pixels for each bin was used for statistical analysis (unpaired two-sided Mann-Whitney U-test).

Pulsed SILAC labeling of Perm1−/− mice

Time-dependent Lys6-incorporation assays were conducted to monitor protein synthesis in vivo. In the first study, three mice of each genotype (Perm1−/− and wild-type control) were voluntarily fed a Lys6-containing SILAC diet for two weeks (3.0 g of 13C6-lysine containing diet; Silantes GmbH, Lys(6)-SILAC-Mouse Diet, purity > 97%). In the second study, wild-type mice were labeled for 7–28 days (n = 3 mice per time point) with the Lys6-containing SILAC diet. Several organs and tissues were prepared for LC/MS-MS analysis. Briefly, the tissues were lyophilized overnight, homogenized with a PrecellysTM tissue homogenizer, and a small amount of powder was lysed with modified RIPA buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 2% Nonidet P40, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate), and protein samples were subsequently in-gel digested with the protease LysC overnight to generate peptides that contain at least one lysine.

Tissue lysis

Mouse tissues were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle, and resuspended in modified RIPA buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 2% Nonidet P40, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors at a buffer to tissue ratio of 15:1 Lysates was then incubated with rotation for 30 min at 4 °C, sonicated for 10 min at 30 s intervals at 4 °C using a Bioruptor® Pico (Diagenode). Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 18,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C.

Protein concentration determination

Protein concentrations were determined using the Pierce Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher). BSA standard solutions (0.05 mg/mL to 1.0 mg/mL) were generated by diluting 2 mg/mL BSA solution (Thermo Fisher). Protein samples were diluted 1:10 in modified RIPA buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 2% Nonidet P40, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate). Absorption was measured at 660 nm using an EnSpire® Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer). To enable measurement of protein samples diluted in SDS-containing buffer, Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay Reagent was supplemented with Ionic Detergent Compatibility Reagent (Thermo Fisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunoprecipitations

To immunoprecipitate PERM1 in TREx-293 cells, cells stably expressing Perm1-FLAG or the control To5-STOP-FLAG vector were cultivated to 70-80% confluency as described above, treated with 10 µg/mL doxycycline for approximately 15 h, and lysed as described above. After removing cell debris, the supernatants were transferred into new precooled tubes and 40 µL anti-FLAG (Miltenyi) beads were added. The mixtures were incubated for 60 min at 4 °C with rotation and. separated using the magnetic µMACS system (Miltenyi) at 4 °C. The µColumns were equilibrated with lysis buffer, loaded with the lysate-bead-suspension, washed thrice with 200 µL lysis buffer, and washed thrice with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC). Elution was performed at RT by applying 20 µL urea buffer (6 M Urea, 2 M Thiourea) for 10 min and collecting the eluate with 50 µL urea buffer. Finally, samples were prepared for MS analysis by in-solution/on-bead digestion.

To immunoprecipitate PERM1 in C2C12 cells, 6 × 105 cells were seeded on day 1. On day 2, the cells were transfected with Perm1-FLAG or the control vector TO5-FLAG-STOP using GeneJuice® Transfection Reagent (Novagen). Cells were harvested 24 h after transfection, as described above and immunoprecipitated as described for TREx-293 cells. To mimic the natural environment of PERM1 in the body, 100 µL of whole muscle and heart lysates prepared from wild-type mice were added with the anti-FLAG beads.

To immunoprecipitate endogenous PERM1 from tissue, 40 mg samples TA muscles and hearts from wild-type mice were lysed as described above. Protein concentrations were determined using Pierce Protein Assay. Two aliquots of 800 µg protein per sample were diluted to 500 µL with modified RIPA buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 2% Nonidet P40, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate): 40 µL Protein A beads and 0.9 µg PERM1 antibody was added to one aliquot; only 40 µL Protein A beads were added to the control sample. Immunoprecipitation steps were performed as described above.

To immunoprecipitate AnkB, cells stably expressing Perm1-FLAG were cultivated to 60-70% confluency prior to transfection with AnkyrinB-2XHA or control empty HA vector using the calcium phosphate method. In brief, 8 µg of DNA was incubated with 37 µg of 2 M CaCl2 and 300 µg 2× HBS (50 mM HEPES, 280 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.0) for 30 min. Next, the mixture was added to the cultured cells and incubated for 24 h. After 9-10 h, the media was exchanged by fresh media containing 10 µg/mL doxycycline. Cells were harvested and lysed as described above. Immunoprecipitation was performed using the magnetic µMACS system (Miltenyi) as described above using anti-HA beads (Miltenyi).

Immunoprecipitation of the ΔTM mutant of PERM1 in HEK-293T cells was performed using the calcium phosphate transfection method, as described above.

Isolation of mitochondria from tissue

Freshly collected heart or muscle samples were washed once in cold PBS, incubated on ice in 4 mL Mito buffer A (220 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES/KOH, 0.5 mM PMSF, 2 mg/mL BSA, 1 mM EDTA/Tris pH 7.4) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors, homogenized in a motor-driven potter (20 strokes, 1000 rpm) and cell debris was pelleted at 800 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected, the pellet was homogenized again (20 strokes, 1000 rpm), centrifuged at 800 g for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was combined with the supernatant from the first homogenization, and centrifuged at 8000 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL Mito buffer B (220 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES/KOH, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1 mM EDTA/Tris pH 7.4), centrifuged twice at 8000 g for 5 min at 4 °C and the mitochondrial pellet was resuspended in 1 mL buffer B. Finally, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 5 min at 4 °C and the mitochondria were resuspended in 300–500 µL Mito buffer B.

To investigate the localization of the ΔTM mutant, the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions of cultured cells were separated, as described above. After homogenization at 8000 g and centrifugation, the resulting supernatant was designated as the cytosolic fraction and cleared twice by centrifugation at 8000 g for 5 min at 4 °C.

Isolation of SSM and IFM

Dissected muscles from the mouse hind limb were washed in 2 mL of Isolation buffer (180 mM KCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) on ice. After drying the tissue, it was weighed and cut into smaller pieces with sharp scissors. Depending on the muscle weight, the samples were supplied with four volumes of KEA buffer (180 mM KCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% BSA pH 7.4) compared to the muscle weight (1 mg tissue/4 µl KEA) and homogenized in a motor-driven potter (10 strokes, 2000 rpm). Subsequently, after carefully transferring the homogenate to a tube, it was centrifuged at 100 g for 10 min. The supernatant containing the SSM was placed on ice in a new tube while the pellet was weighed and resuspended with two volumes of KEA buffer compared to the pellet weight. For the collection of the IFM, Nagase (Protease XXIV, Sigma P-8038, 0.1 mg/mL) was added in a 5 µl Nagase/1 mL resuspended pellet ratio for 35 sec with immediate centrifugation at 5900 g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended with one volume of KEA buffer and centrifuged at 100 g for 10 min. Afterwards, the supernatant containing the IFM and the SSM containing tube were centrifuged at 5900 g for 10 min. The pellets were washed three times with one volume of KME buffer (100 mM KCL, 0.5 mM EGTA, pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 5900 g for 10 min. After the final washing step, the SSM and IFM were resuspended in 0.5 volumes of KME buffer.

In-gel digestion and sample purification

Proteomic samples of TA muscle tissue and isolated TA muscle mitochondria were prepared using a modified version of the in-gel digestion protocol by50. Briefly, lysates were precipitated overnight in four volumes (v:v) of ice-cold acetone. Protein pellets were extracted by centrifugation at 13,000 g for 10 min and dissolved in Bolt LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen). Dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to a final concentration of 10 mM. The mixtures were heated at 70 °C for 10 min, cooled to room temperature, iodoacetamide (IAA) was added to a final concentration of 55 mM and incubated in the dark for 20 min. Proteins were separated using Bolt 4–12% Bis–Tris Plus gels (Invitrogen), Coomassie-stained, and each lane was cut into six to ten slices. Each slice was chopped into 1 mm cubes, destained with 50% ACN and dehydrated with 100% ACN, digested with 3 ng/µL trypsin/LysC solution (90% trypsin/10% LysC) for 30 min at 4 °C, 50 mM ABC was added to the swollen gel pieces, incubated overnight at 37 °C and digestion was stopped by acidifying the samples with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Tryptic peptides were extracted with increasing concentrations of ACN and organic compounds were evaporated using a SpeedVac concentrator Plus (Eppendorf). Acidified samples were desalted using Stop and Go extraction tips51.

In-solution/on-bead digestion

Eluates from immunoprecipitation experiments were prepared for MS analysis by in-solution/on-bead digestion. Urea-containing samples were reduced by applying DTT at a final concentration of 5 mM for 1 h at RT, alkylated with a final concentration of 40 mM IAA for 30 min in the dark at RT, digested with 1 µL LysC for 2-3 h at RT, diluted with 50 mM ABC to a urea concentration of 2 M, incubated with 1 µL 0.5 mg/mL trypsin overnight at RT, acidified to 1% FA and purified using StageTips.

MS-based proteome analysis

Proteome samples were analyzed using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry set up in a Q-Exactive™ Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ (Thermo Fisher). Chromatographic peptide separation was achieved on PoroShell 120 packed 50 cm analytical columns coupled to an EASY-nLC 1000 HPLC system and a binary buffer system consisting of buffer A (0.1% FA) and buffer B (80% ACN, 0.1% FA). In-gel digested samples were analyzed over a 150 min gradient, raising the content of buffer B from 9 to 29% over 119 min, from 29 to 68% over 5 min, and from 68% to 95% over 16 min. The column was washed with 95% buffer B, buffer B was reduced to 5% over 5 min and the column was re-equilibrated with 5% buffer B for 5 min. Full MS spectra (300–1,750 m/z) were recorded at a resolution (R) of 70,000, maximum injection time (max. IT) of 20 ms and AGC target of 3e6. The ten most abundant ion peptides in each full MS scan were selected for HCD fragmentation at nominal collisional energy (NCE) of 25. MS2 spectra were recorded at R = 17,500, maximum IT of 60 ms, and AGC target of 5e5 (Xcalibur version 3.1).

Samples derived from immunoprecipitations and subsequent in-solution/on-bead digestion were measured over a 100-min gradient. The content of buffer B was increased from 13 to 48% within 75 min, increased to 75% over 5 min, washed with 95% buffer B for 10 min, reduced to 5% within 5 min and re-equilibrated with 5% buffer B for 5 min.

MS data processing and analysis

Raw MS data were analyzed using MaxQuant analysis software and the implemented Andromeda software (1.5.3.8)52, 53. Peptides and proteins were identified using the mouse UniProt database with common contaminants (FASTA file downloaded on 16/6/2017, size: 16,890 entries). All MaxQuant parameters were set to default values. Trypsin was selected as the digestion enzyme; a maximum of two missed cleavages was allowed. For SILAC, peptide pairs were quantified by setting Lys6 as the heavy label. Enzyme specificity was set to LysC with an additional allowance of cleavage N-terminal to proline.

Methionine oxidation and N-terminal acetylation were set as variable modifications; carbamidomethylation of cysteines was chosen as a fixed modification. Except for the SILAC-labeled samples, the label-free quantification (LFQ) algorithm was used to quantify the measured peptides and the match between runs option was enabled to quantify peptides with a missing MS2 spectrum. A minimum ratio count of 2 was used for SILAC quantification.

Statistical analysis was performed using Perseus (1.5.5.3-1.6.5.0) software. Potential contaminants and reverse peptides were excluded, and values were log2 transformed. Two-sided t-tests were used to identify differentially expressed proteins between genotypes (Perm1−/− or wild type) or conditions (immunoprecipitation or control). Identified peptides were annotated with the following Gene Ontology terms: Biological Process, Molecular Function, Cellular Compartment, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes terms. Graphical visualizations were achieved using Instant Clue software54.

Western blot analysis

Protein lysates (10–20 µg) were incubated with 4x Laemmli buffer and 50 mM DTT for 10 min at 70 °C and SDS-PAGE was performed according to standard procedures using stain-free casting solutions from Bio-Rad. Proteins were electroblotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes using a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). Unblotted gels were developed using the ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad) with the stain-free option. Blotted membranes were developed using Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad). The intensities of the bands were quantified and normalized to the stain-free image using ImageJ software (version 1.8.0)55.

Complexome profiling of mitochondria

Complexome profiling of mitochondria isolated from heart and muscle tissue was performed as previously described56. Freshly isolated mitochondria were lysed under non-denaturing conditions with 1% digitonin, 100 µg protein samples were loaded onto native gradient gels to separate the intact proteins complexes using a buffer containing Coomassie, as previously described57. Each gel lane was cut into 70 pieces and prepared for mass spectrometry analysis by in-gel digestion. Raw data were analyzed using iBAQ and individual profiles were analyzed with the NOVA tool (version 0.5.7)28.

Oxygen consumption measurements

Oxygraphic measurements were performed on 40 µg of isolated muscle mitochondria as previously described14. The Oxygraph-2k (Oroboros Instruments) was used to measure oxygen consumption rate. The mitochondria were added after air equilibration of the mitochondrial respiration buffer. First, the OXPHOS state for complex I was determined by adding 5 mM pyruvate, 2 mM malate, 10 mM glutamate, and 2 mM ADP. Convergent electron flow through complexes I and II was measured by adding 10 mM succinate. Next, LEAK respiration was assessed by inhibition of the ATP synthase with oligomycin (1.5 µg/mL). Carbonyl cyanide-p- trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP, 0.5 µM) was titrated to determine maximal electron transfer system (ETS) capacity. Subsequently, complex I was inhibited by the addition of 0.5 µM rotenone to determine the maximal ETS capacity with electron flow through complex II only. Finally, residual oxygen consumption (ROX) was measured by inhibiting complex III using 2.5 µM antimycin A. Analysis was performed using the DatLab software (version 7.4.0.4; Oroboros Instruments.

Determination of relative mtDNA copy number

DNA was extracted from tissue lysates and qPCR was performed as previously described14 to determine the relative mtDNA content of the soleus muscle tissues of Perm1−/− mice. DNA was extracted from tissue lysates by incubation at 55 °C overnight in 350 µl DNA extraction buffer (0.5% SDS, 0.1 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA) supplemented with proteinase K. 350 µL phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol was added to the samples, mixed gently, and centrifuged for 5 min at 500 g and 4 °C. The upper phase was transferred to a new tube and 350 µL phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol was added, mixed gently, and centrifuged as before. The upper phase was transferred to a new tube, mixed with 650 µL of 100% ethanol and 65 µL of 7.5 mM ammonium acetate, incubated at −20 °C for 1 h. centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.5.

The extracted DNA (25 ng) was subsequently used for qPCR with two technical replicates. The expression of the cytochrome B gene (primers: GCTTTCCACTTCATCTTACCATTT and TGTTGGGTTGTTTGATCCTG) was normalized to the nuclear beta-actin gene (primers: GGAAAAGAGCCTCAGGGCAT and GAAGAGCTATGAGCTGCCTGA). The qPCR reactions were performed using KiCqStart® SYBR® Green qPCR ReadyMix™ (Sigma) on a CFX connect real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) at 95 °C for 7 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Data were collected using the CFX Manager™ Software for Bio-Rad CFX Real-Time PCR systems (version 3.0). Primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Determination of mitochondrial membrane potential in FDB fibers

Mitochondrial membrane potential was measured in isolated fibers FDB muscles as previously described58. FDB myofibers were placed in 1 mL Tyrode’s buffer and loaded with 2.5 nM TMRM supplemented with 1 µM cyclosporine H (a P-glycoprotein inhibitor) for 30 min at 37 °C. Sequential images of TMRM fluorescence were acquired every 60 s using a 20× magnification 0.5 numerical aperture UPLANSL objective (Olympus). Oligomycin (Olm, 5 µM) was added after 3 min and the protonophore carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP, 4 µM) was added after 50 min. Images of TMRM fluorescence were acquired, stored, and analyzed over mitochondrial regions of interest using ImageJ software (1.8.0).

Electron microscopy

Electron microscopy studies were performed with the assistance of the CECAD imaging facility. Tissues were dissected, fixed overnight in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, dehydrated in an ascending acetone series, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned using an ultramicrotome, mounted on a grid and examined using a JEOL JEM2100PLUS electron microscope.

Statistics and reproducibility

Statistical tests used for the individual experiments are provided in the figure legends of the respective figure. If not stated differently, immunoblottings, immunoprecipitations, immunohistochemical staining experiments, and in-vitro studies were conducted at least two times independently. All attempts of replication were successful.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository59 with the dataset identifier PXD025745. All unique materials generated are readily available from the authors. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Schiaffino, S. & Reggiani, C. Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol. Rev. 91, 1447–1531 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hawley, J. A., Hargreaves, M., Joyner, M. J. & Zierath, J. R. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell 159, 738–749 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Riva, A., Tandler, B., Loffredo, F., Vazquez, E. & Hoppel, C. Structural differences in two biochemically defined populations of cardiac mitochondria. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 289, H868–H872 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Glancy, B. et al. Mitochondrial reticulum for cellular energy distribution in muscle. Nature 523, 617–620 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Koves, T. R. et al. Subsarcolemmal and intermyofibrillar mitochondria play distinct roles in regulating skeletal muscle fatty acid metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 288, C1074–C1082 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Palmer, J. W., Tandler, B. & Hoppel, C. L. Heterogeneous response of subsarcolemmal heart mitochondria to calcium. Am. J. Physiol. 250, H741–H748 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lin, J., Handschin, C. & Spiegelman, B. M. Metabolic control through the PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators. Cell Metab. 1, 361–370 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lin, J. et al. Transcriptional co-activator PGC-1 alpha drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibres. Nature 418, 797–801 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rowe et al. coactivators in cardiac development and disease. Circ. Res. 107, 825–838 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ojuka, E. O., Jones, T. E., Han, D. H., Chen, M. & Holloszy, J. O. Raising Ca2+ in L6 myotubes mimics effects of exercise on mitochondrial biogenesis in muscle. FASEB J. 17, 675–681 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Handschin, C., Rhee, J., Lin, J., Tarr, P. T. & Spiegelman, B. M. An autoregulatory loop controls peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha expression in muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7111–7116 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cho, Y., Hazen, B. C., Russell, A. P. & Kralli, A. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 (PGC-1)- and estrogen-related receptor (ERR)-induced regulator in muscle 1 (Perm1) is a tissue-specific regulator of oxidative capacity in skeletal muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 25207–25218 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cho, Y. et al. Perm1 enhances mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative capacity, and fatigue resistance in adult skeletal muscle. FASEB J. 30, 674–687 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Aravamudhan, S. et al. Phosphoproteomics of the developing heart identifies PERM1 - An outer mitochondrial membrane protein. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 154, 41–59 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cho, Y. et al. Perm1 regulates CaMKII activation and shapes skeletal muscle responses to endurance exercise training. Mol. Metab. 23, 88–97 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zerbes, R. M. et al. Mitofilin complexes: conserved organizers of mitochondrial membrane architecture. Biol. Chem. 393, 1247–1261 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pfanner, N. et al. Uniform nomenclature for the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system. J. Cell Biol. 204, 1083–1086 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huynen, M. A., Muhlmeister, M., Gotthardt, K., Guerrero-Castillo, S. & Brandt, U. Evolution and structural organization of the mitochondrial contact site (MICOS) complex and the mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging (MIB) complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 91–101 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guarani, V. et al. QIL1 is a novel mitochondrial protein required for MICOS complex stability and cristae morphology. Elife 4, e06265 (2015).

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rampelt, H. et al. Assembly of the mitochondrial cristae organizer Mic10 is regulated by Mic26-Mic27 antagonism and cardiolipin. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 1883–1890 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    John, G. B. et al. The mitochondrial inner membrane protein mitofilin controls cristae morphology. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1543–1554 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ott, C. et al. Sam50 functions in mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging and biogenesis of respiratory complexes. Mol. Cell Biol. 32, 1173–1188 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gouspillou, G. et al. The relationship between muscle fiber type-specific PGC-1α content and mitochondrial content varies between rodent models and humans. PloS ONE 9, e103044–e103044 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kayar, S. R., Claassen, H., Hoppeler, H. & Weibel, E. R. Mitochondrial distribution in relation to changes in muscle metabolism in rat soleus. Respir. Physiol. 64, 1–11 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tanaka, M. et al. A novel RNA-binding protein, Ossa/C9orf10, regulates activity of Src kinases to protect cells from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 402–413 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gustafsson, A. B. Bnip3 as a dual regulator of mitochondrial turnover and cell death in the myocardium. Pediatr. Cardiol. 32, 267–274 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kallabis, S. et al. High-throughput proteomics fiber typing (ProFiT) for comprehensive characterization of single skeletal muscle fibers. Skelet. Muscle 10, 7 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Giese, H. et al. NOVA: a software to analyze complexome profiling data. Bioinformatics 31, 440–441 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jones, D. T. Improving the accuracy of transmembrane protein topology prediction using evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 23, 538–544 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bennett, V. & Healy, J. Organizing the fluid membrane bilayer: diseases linked to spectrin and ankyrin. Trends Mol. Med 14, 28–36 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schild, M. et al. Basal and exercise induced label-free quantitative protein profiling of m. vastus lateralis in trained and untrained individuals. J. Proteom. 122, 119–132 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Brinkmann, C. et al. Endurance training alters YKL40, PERM1, and HSP70 skeletal muscle protein contents in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr. Res. 44, 1–8 (2019).

    MathSciNet  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tsuchiya, Y. et al. Involvement of the protein kinase CK2 in the regulation of mammalian circadian rhythms. Sci. Signal 2, ra26 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Al Quobaili, F. & Montenarh, M. CK2 and the regulation of the carbohydrate metabolism. Metabolism 61, 1512–1517 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wu, C., Xu, G., Tsai, S. A., Freed, W. J. & Lee, C. T. Transcriptional profiles of type 2 diabetes in human skeletal muscle reveal insulin resistance, metabolic defects, apoptosis, and molecular signatures of immune activation in response to infections. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 482, 282–288 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Glick, D. et al. BNip3 regulates mitochondrial function and lipid metabolism in the liver. Mol. Cell Biol. 32, 2570–2584 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tsai, P. I., Papakyrikos, A. M., Hsieh, C. H. & Wang, X. Drosophila MIC60/mitofilin conducts dual roles in mitochondrial motility and crista structure. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 3471–3479 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mado, K. et al. On the role of tubulin, plectin, desmin, and vimentin in the regulation of mitochondrial energy fluxes in muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 316, C657–C667 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kayar, S. R., Conley, K. E., Claassen, H. & Hoppeler, H. Capillarity and mitochondrial distribution in rat myocardium following exercise training. J. Exp. Biol. 120, 189–199 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nekrasova, O. E. et al. Vimentin intermediate filaments modulate the motility of mitochondria. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2282–2289 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bellin, R. M., Huiatt, T. W., Critchley, D. R. & Robson, R. M. Synemin may function to directly link muscle cell intermediate filaments to both myofibrillar Z-lines and costameres. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32330–32337 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ayalon, G., Davis, J. Q., Scotland, P. B. & Bennett, V. An ankyrin-based mechanism for functional organization of dystrophin and dystroglycan. Cell 135, 1189–1200 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bennett, V. & Baines, A. J. Spectrin and ankyrin-based pathways: metazoan inventions for integrating cells into tissues. Physiol. Rev. 81, 1353–1392 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    He, M., Tseng, W. C. & Bennett, V. A single divergent exon inhibits ankyrin-B association with the plasma membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 14769–14779 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lorenzo, D. N. et al. A PIK3C3-ankyrin-B-dynactin pathway promotes axonal growth and multiorganelle transport. J. Cell Biol. 207, 735–752 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Deacon, R. M. Measuring the strength of mice. J. Vis. Exp. (2013).

  47. 47.

    Kondziella, W. A new method for the measurement of muscle relaxation in white mice. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 152, 277–284 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Baraldo, M. et al. Skeletal muscle mTORC1 regulates neuromuscular junction stability. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11, 208–225 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lamprecht, M. R., Sabatini, D. M. & Carpenter, A. E. CellProfiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. Biotechniques 42, 71–75 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havlis, J., Olsen, J. V. & Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2856–2860 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896–1906 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1794–1805 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Nolte, H., MacVicar, T. D., Tellkamp, F. & Kruger, M. Instant clue: a software suite for interactive data visualization and analysis. Sci. Rep. 8, 12648 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Heide, H. et al. Complexome profiling identifies TMEM126B as a component of the mitochondrial complex I assembly complex. Cell Metab. 16, 538–549 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wittig, I. & Schagger, H. Structural organization of mitochondrial ATP synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1777, 592–598 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mammucari, C. et al. FoxO3 controls autophagy in skeletal muscle in vivo. Cell Metab. 6, 458–471 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Lena Abraham for technical assistance and Kerstin Selbach for helpful comments on this manuscript. We thank the CECAD Proteomics and Imaging Facility (and Janine Klask) for their support in mass spectrometry and electron microscopy. This work was supported by the Cologne Cluster of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD) EXC 299/2, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Fundation) SFB 1218 under project number 269925409 and the Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.B., C.T., S.A., M.K. designed the experiments and analyzed results. L.K. performed Lys6 incorporation analysis and calculated absolute half-lives. W.B. performed running experiments and weight tests. V.R., L.N., and B.B. performed skeletal muscle force and mitochondrial membrane potential measurements. D.H.R. performed oxygraphic measurements. Th.Br. and A.T. provided guidance throughout the study. M.K. wrote the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Krüger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bock, T., Türk, C., Aravamudhan, S. et al. PERM1 interacts with the MICOS-MIB complex to connect the mitochondria and sarcolemma via ankyrin B. Nat Commun 12, 4900 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25185-3

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing