Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Nuclear condensates of p300 formed though the structured catalytic core can act as a storage pool of p300 with reduced HAT activity

Abstract

The transcriptional co-activator and acetyltransferase p300 is required for fundamental cellular processes, including differentiation and growth. Here, we report that p300 forms phase separated condensates in the cell nucleus. The phase separation ability of p300 is regulated by autoacetylation and relies on its catalytic core components, including the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain, the autoinhibition loop, and bromodomain. p300 condensates sequester chromatin components, such as histone H3 tail and DNA, and are amplified through binding of p300 to the nucleosome. The catalytic HAT activity of p300 is decreased due to occlusion of the active site in the phase separated droplets, a large portion of which co-localizes with chromatin regions enriched in H3K27me3. Our findings suggest a model in which p300 condensates can act as a storage pool of the protein with reduced HAT activity, allowing p300 to be compartmentalized and concentrated at poised or repressed chromatin regions.

Introduction

Formation of condensates in the cell nucleus has been shown to drive the assembly of nuclear bodies, Cajal bodies, nucleoli, and speckles1,2. These membraneless compartments are produced via the liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) mechanisms and depend on weak, multivalent interactions involving intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of biomolecules3,4,5. Several nuclear proteins and chromatin regulators, including HP1, BRD4, CBX, and MORC3, have been shown to form condensates with their phase separation ability being necessary for biological functions and subnuclear localization of these proteins6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16.

The transcriptional co-activator p300 is an acetyltransferase that is frequently dysregulated in disease, particularly cancer. p300 associates with over 400 binding partners, including transcription factors, DNA-binding proteins and subunits of the RNA polymerase II complex, to form activation complexes and facilitate transcription17,18,19,20,21. p300 acetylates histones and a number of essential nonhistone proteins, notably p53, E2F1, and androgen and estrogen receptors22,23,24. The highly selective acetylation of the H3K27 and H3K18 sites by p300 requires a cooperative action of its two functional domains: acetyllysine-binding bromodomain (BD) and the H3 tail-binding ZZ domain25.

p300 and its close homolog CBP share the same domain architecture, consisting of several conserved modules, including the catalytic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain. Located in the middle of the protein, the HAT domain is surrounded by BD, a RING finger, and a plant homeodomain finger (PHD) from one side and the ZZ domain from another side that together comprise the catalytic core of p300 (Fig. 1a). The p300 catalytic activity is regulated through acetylation/deacetylation of a long loop in the HAT domain, termed the autoinhibitory loop (AIL), which in a hypoacetylated form impedes the acetyltransferase activity of p300 but releases the inhibition upon hyper autoacetylation17,26. Structural studies of the p300 region encompassing BD, RING, PHD and the HAT domain suggest an additional layer of p300 regulation through the RING finger that contributes to the inhibition by occluding the HAT active site27. Furthermore, the BD–RING–PHD–HAT region of p300 has been shown to form a dimer, in which the hypoacetylated form of AIL of one molecule inserts in the active site of the HAT domain from another molecule and thus undergoes ‘in trans’ autoacetylation, a reaction that is controlled by signal-dependent transcription factor dimerization28. Genome-wide-mapping analysis reveals that p300/CBP generally occupies transcriptionally active chromatin marked by the active H3K27ac modification, however a large number of silent or poised genes marked by the repressive H3K27me3 modification and bound by p300/CBP has also been identified25,29,30,31,32,33. In cells, p300/CBP is ubiquitously expressed and can form discrete foci in the nucleus and localize to PML nuclear bodies34,35,36,37.

Fig. 1: p300 phase separates to condensates in living cells.
figure1

a Schematic of p300FL and p300BRPHZ. b Representative images of HeLa cells expressing YFP-p300FL. Scale bar, 5 µm. c FRAP curve of YFP-p300FL was obtained from averaging data from six HeLa cells. Error bars represent SEM. n = 6 cells examined over three independent experiments. d Representative FRAP images of YFP-p300FL expressed in HeLa cells. The images were taken before and after photobleaching at indicated time points. The bleached condensate is indicated by a white arrowhead. Scale bar, 5 µm. e FRAP curve of YFP-p300BRPHZT condensates in HeLa cells. The FRAP curve was obtained from averaging data from four cells. Error bars represent SEM. f A representative image of a sample (from at least three replicates) containing 13 µM p300BRPHZ and 12% PEG3350 (PEG) in a 100 µm × 100 µm square region under a microscope.

In this study, we show that the structured catalytic core of p300 undergoes phase separation and forms liquid condensates in cells and in vitro. The acetylation state of p300 modulates its ability to phase separate through attenuating intermolecular interactions involving the autoinhibition loop, the HAT domain, and BD. Our data suggest a model for compartmentalization and concentration of a pool of p300 with reduced catalytic activity at poised or repressed chromatin regions through the formation of phase-separated condensates.

Results and discussion

p300 forms dynamic condensates in cells

p300 is highly abundant in the cell nucleus and can shuttle between the nucleoplasmic and cytoplasmic fractions38,39,40. To characterize the distribution of p300, we transfected HeLa cells with YFP-tagged full-length p300 (YFP-p300FL) and monitored the localization of YFP-p300FL in live cells by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1b–d). In the majority of cells assayed, YFP-p300FL was somewhat diffusely distributed throughout the nucleus, but 15–30% of cells displayed nuclear speckles various in size (Fig. 1b). These data indicate the presence of discrete YFP-p300FL compartments with elevated protein concentration and are in line with previous reports showing that both endogenous and expressed p300 (and its homolog CBP) form dynamic nuclear bodies34,35,36,37.

To determine whether p300 is mobile in the speckles, we measured the diffusion kinetics of selected p300 puncta by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments. For each selected region, the laser beam was applied after two initial scans, and cell images were collected at 10 s intervals for a duration of 280 s (Fig. 1c, d). The experiments were performed on seven cells, and changes in the fluorescence signal of each bleached region were analyzed. The averaged signal intensity, which was normalized and plotted (Fig. 1c), showed a ~60% recovery of the bleached regions’ fluorescence with a half-life (t1/2) of 59 s. Because the photobleaching irreversibly abolishes fluorescence, the recovery of the signal implies that YFP-p300FL readily moves from unbleached regions to the bleached region. The fast signal recovery, and therefore the fast diffusion of p300, suggest that YFP-p300FL speckles are viscous liquid droplets characterized by rapid protein exchange with the surrounding environment. Collectively, these results demonstrate that full length p300 forms dynamic nuclear condensates with liquid/gel-like properties.

The catalytic core of p300 phase separates into liquid droplets in cells and in vitro

The middle part of p300, consisting of the BD followed by the RING, PHD, HAT, and ZZ domains, comprises the catalytic core that we postulated might be involved in the phase separation process. To test this idea, we generated YFP-tagged truncated p300 construct (aa 1024–1830 of p300), which in addition to the catalytic core contains a TAZ2 domain and is referred to as p300BRPHZT. We have previously shown that p300BRPHZT associates with chromatin in vitro and in vivo comparably to full-length p30025. The YFP-p300BRPHZT protein was produced using a doxycycline (DOX) inducible pTripZ vector, and expression of p300BRPHZT was visualized in live HeLa cells. Much like the full-length protein, YFP-p300BRPHZT localized primarily to the nucleus and formed foci of various sizes (Supplementary Fig. 1). Furthermore, FRAP experiments showed a ~80% fluorescence recovery with t1/2 = 29 s, indicating that YFP-p300BRPHZT and full length YFP-p300 have similar capabilities to form dynamic condensates in cells (Fig. 1e).

The cell nucleus is a highly crowded and viscous compartment packed with DNA, histones, and a multitude of nuclear proteins. To mimic molecular crowding, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is frequently used in vitro. Addition of PEG (PEG3350) to a solution containing the purified catalytic core, p300BRPHZ (aa 1035–1720 of p300), rapidly induced cloudiness in the originally clear solution, indicative of the conversion to a heterogenous suspension (described in detail below). Under a microscope, we observed spherical droplets of various sizes, suggesting the formation of liquid–liquid phase-separated condensates of the catalytic core of p300 (Fig. 1f). About 35% of p300BRPHZ remained in the supernatant after removing the droplets by centrifugation (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Self-acetylation of p300 impairs its ability to phase separate

We found that different batches of purified p300BRPHZ showed variable ability to form droplets under otherwise identical conditions (Figs. 1f and 2a, b). Recombinantly expressed p300 is auto-acetylated to varying degrees26,41. We, therefore, assessed the self-acetylation levels of two different batches of purified p300BRPHZ by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Acetylation levels of p300BRPHZ were highly heterogeneous, containing a series of species with discrete molecular mass. For example, purification 1 contained p300BRPHZ with molecular mass ranging from ~81 to 81.7 kDa (Fig. 2a, c, and d). The increment of each mass peak was ~42 Da, the mass of one acetyl group. Compared with its theoretical mass of 80,548.5 Da, recombinantly expressed p300BRPHZ from purification 1 was acetylated on 13–25 lysine residues, with a median of 16 acetylated lysines (Fig. 2c, d). The sequence of p300BRPHZ contains 60 lysine residues, indicating that ~20–40% of lysine residues were acetylated. The p300BRPHZ protein from purification 2 had on average 26 acetylated lysines. p300BRPHZ with the lower acetylation level (purification 1) visibly formed condensates in the presence of PEG (Fig. 2a), while p300BRPHZ with the higher acetylation level (purification 2) showed almost no droplet formation (Fig. 2b). Together, these results suggest a negative correlation between the acetylation level of p300 and its ability to form condensates in vitro.

Fig. 2: p300BRPHZ is heterogeneously acetylated and SIRT2-induced deacetylation promotes phase separation of p300BRPHZ.
figure2

a, b Representative images of two independently expressed and purified p300BRPHZ samples containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under a microscope. c, d Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis of p300BRPHZ shown in (a). A table of peak mass and the corresponding number of acetylated lysine residues identified by mass spectrometry analysis are shown in (c) and (d). e, f Representative images of p300BRPHZ samples shown in (a) and (b) were treated with the deacetylase SIRT2. g, h LC–MS analysis of p300BRPHZ shown in (e). A table of peak mass and the corresponding number of acetylated lysine residues identified by mass spectrometry analysis are shown in (g) and (h). i Quantification of droplets counted in images acquired for the samples in (a, b, e, f). The number of droplets was counted in five non-overlapping 50 µm × 50 µm square regions and the mean value was plotted. Error bars represent SD. j Acetylated sites in p300BRPHZ identified by LC–MS/MS. Vertical bars indicate differences in signal intensities of identical tryptic peptides derived from untreated vs. SIRT2-treated samples on the log2 scale. The highest intensities exceeding the plot were essentially qualitative, as they were only present in the untreated sample. A schematic representation of p300BRPHZ is shown above. Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

We further examined whether acetylation levels modulate the condensation behavior of p300BRPHZ. The NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase SIRT2 has been shown to selectively and uniquely deacetylate p300 in cells and in vitro42. We incubated p300BRPHZ with SIRT2 and NAD+ and then purified the protein by size-exclusion chromatography. This reduced the number of acetylated lysines in p300BRPHZ (purification 1) from a median of 16 to a median of 4 (Fig. 2c, d, g, h). The same treatment of p300BRPHZ (purification 2) reduced the acetylation level from a median of 26 to 12 acetylated lysines. Generally, lower acetylation levels were correlated with an increased propensity to form droplets (Fig. 2i).

To identify regions in p300 affected by SIRT2 treatment, we analyzed tryptic peptides derived from untreated and SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). 49 out of 60 lysine residues were acetylated in untreated p300BRPHZ. Comparison of the signal intensities of peptides revealed substantial differences in acetylation levels of untreated and SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ (Fig. 2j). The most notable changes were observed for K1551, K1554, K1555, K1557, and K1560 located in the AIL, as acetylation of these lysine residues was not detectable in the SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ sample. Another AIL residue, K1568, also displayed a considerable reduction in signal intensity upon SIRT2 treatment. In contrast, signal intensity for lysine residues located in other regions of p300BRPHZ was reduced to a substantially lesser degree. These data corroborate the idea that p300 self-acetylates a wide range of lysine residues spanning the catalytic BD–RING–PHD–HAT–ZZ core, and that the auto-inhibitory loop undergoes fast deacetylation, whereas deacetylation of other regions of p300BRPHZ occurs much slower.

Because our data suggest that acetylation of p300 negatively regulates its ability to phase separate, we reasoned that acetylation should decrease or even eliminate the PEG-induced p300BRPHZ droplet formation. To test this, we first measured the HAT activity of untreated and SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ in the presence of acetyl-CoA by monitoring the release of the CoA product over time. As expected, SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ produced more CoA than untreated p300BRPHZ, due to the higher number of unmodified lysine residues (substrates) present in SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ (Fig. 3a). The acetylation reaction was fast and completed before 20 min, in keeping with the previously reported activity of the p300 HAT domain41. Adding acetyl-CoA to a SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ/PEG suspension led to a decrease in the cloudiness of the sample within 1 min (Fig. 3b), and liquid droplets were no longer visible under the microscope (Fig. 3c, d, and Supplementary Fig. 3a), indicating a disruption of LLPS due to the HAT reaction. Collectively, these data suggest that auto-acetylation of the AIL decreases the formation of p300BRPHZ condensates.

Fig. 3: p300BRPHZ phase separation requires both AIL and BD.
figure3

a HAT activity of untreated p300BRPHZ (blue) and SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ (orange) measured by a fluorometric assay. Reactions were started by the addition of acetyl-CoA and quenched by flash-freeze at indicated time points. Data are presented as mean values ± SD; error bars represent SD from triplicate measurements. b Phase separation of SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ. The reaction mixture contained 10 μM p300BRPHZ and 12% PEG. Addition of Acetyl-CoA led to the disassembly of the p300BRPHZ droplets. c Representative images of p300BRPHZ samples from (k) after incubation for 2 min under a microscope. d Quantification of droplets counted in images acquired for the sample in (c). The number of droplets was counted in five non-overlapping 50 µm × 50 µm square regions and the mean value was plotted. Error bar represents SD. e Schematics of the p300BRPHZ phase separation mechanisms that can occur simultaneously. Multivalent ‘in trans’ interactions between HAT and deacetylated AIL and/or BD and acetylated lysines outside AIL can promote the formation of condensates. f, g Representative images of WT p300BRPHZ (f) and N1132A mutant (g) samples (from at least three replicates) containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under a microscope. h LC–MS analysis of N1132A p300BRPHZ shown in (g). i, j Representative images of WT p300BRPHZ (i) and ΔAIL mutant (j) samples (from at least three replicates) containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under a microscope. k LC–MS analysis of ΔAIL p300BRPHZ shown in (j). Source data are provided in the Source Data file.

Phase separation of p300 relies on both BD and AIL

Weak and often nonspecific multivalent interactions are believed to drive phase separation1,4,7,8. The p300 HAT domain has been reported to associate with the hypoacetylated AIL from another p300 molecule28 and BD of CBP was shown to bind the AIL peptide acetylated at K159643. Accordingly, we envisage two distinct mechanisms for the transition of the hyperacetylated p300 catalytic core (incapable of phase separation) to the hypoacetylated p300 catalytic core (capable of phase separation), which rely on intermolecular ‘in trans’ HAT-AIL or BD–acetyl–lysine (Kac) interactions (Fig. 3e). To test these possibilities, we examined the role of the BD and AIL in the formation of condensates. We used a deletion of the entire autoinhibitory loop (ΔAIL) in p300BRPHZ or a mutation N1132A, which was previously shown to abrogate acetyllysine binding of the BD27.

Compared to the WT p300BRPHZ protein that contained on average ~12 Kac sites and readily underwent phase separation (Fig. 3f), the N1132A mutant did not form PEG-induced droplets, despite having a similar acetylation level (~14 Kac sites) (Fig. 3f–h). Likewise, the ΔAIL p300BRPHZ mutant with ~7 Kac sites formed less visible condensates than the WT protein with ~4 Kac sites (Fig. 3i–k). We note that although the entire AIL was deleted, the ΔAIL p300BRPHZ mutant was still acetylated at 7 lysine residues located outside this loop in the BD–RING–PHD–HAT–ZZ region. These data suggest that both HAT–AIL and BD–Kac-binding mechanisms contribute to p300BRPHZ phase separation. In a hyper-acetylated form where both the AIL and other regions of p300BRPHZ are acetylated, BD may favor intramolecular ‘in cis’ contacts with the acetylated AIL, limiting the probability of intermolecular interactions and leading to a diffused distribution of p300BRPHZ. Upon SIRT2-treatment of WT p300BRPHZ, deacetylation of the AIL results in the release of BD, allowing intermolecular ‘in trans’ BD–Kac interactions and both intra- and intermolecular HAT–AIL interactions (Fig. 3e).

In support of this model, SIRT2 treatment of N1132A p300BRPHZ, which did not originally phase separate (Fig. 4a, left panel), led to the condensate formation (Fig. 4a, right panel, and Fig. 4b), suggesting that deacetylation of AIL promotes phase separation through the HAT–AIL interaction (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, both SIRT2-treated or untreated ΔAIL p300BRPHZ formed droplets, although to a lesser degree compared to the WT protein, reinforcing the role of the BD–Kac interaction in promoting phase separation (Fig. 4d–f). Moreover, the catalytically impaired mutant D1399A p300BRPHZ showed the formation of the droplets through the HAT–AIL interaction, since no self-acetylation occurred in this mutant (Fig. 4g, h, and Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). The SIRT2-dependent phase separation was also observed in the p300HZ construct containing only the HAT and ZZ domains (Fig. 4i, j), whereas further deletion of AIL completely abolished droplet formation, regardless of the SIRT2 treatment (Fig. 4k, l). Lastly, both N1132A and ΔAIL mutants of YFP-p300FL formed droplets in HeLa cells, confirming that full-length p300 can phase separate through either HAT–AIL interaction in N1132A YFP–p300FL or BD–acetyl–lysine interaction in ΔAIL YFP–p300FL (Fig. 4m).

Fig. 4: The molecular mechanisms of p300BRPHZ phase separation.
figure4

a Representative images of untreated or SIRT2-deacetylated N1132A p300BRPHZ samples containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under the microscope. b Quantification of droplets counted in images acquired for the sample in (a). The number of droplets was counted in five non-overlapping 50 µm × 50 µm square regions and the mean value was plotted. Error bar represents SD. c Schematic of the N1132A p300BRPHZ phase separation via the intermolecular interaction between the HAT domain and deacetylated AIL. d Representative images of untreated or SIRT2-deacetylated ΔAIL p300BRPHZ samples containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under a microscope. e Quantification of droplets counted in images acquired for the sample in (d). The number of droplets was counted in five non-overlapping 50 µm × 50 µm square regions and the mean value was plotted. Error bar represents SD. f Schematic of the ΔAIL p300BRPHZ phase separation via the intermolecular interaction between BD and acetylated lysines outside AIL. g A representative image of purified D1399A p300BRPHZ sample (from at least three replicates) containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under the microscope. h Schematic of the catalytically inactive D1399A p300BRPHZ phase separation via the intermolecular interaction between the HAT domain and unmodified AIL. i Representative images of untreated or SIRT2-deacetylated WT p300HZ samples containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under the microscope. j Schematic of the p300HZ phase separation via the intermolecular interaction between the HAT domain and deacetylated AIL. k Representative images of untreated or SIRT2-deacetylated ΔAIL p300HZ samples containing 13 µM protein and 12% PEG in a 50 µm × 50 µm square region on cover slides under the microscope. l Quantification of droplets counted in images acquired for the samples in (i, k). The number of droplets was counted in five non-overlapping 50 µm × 50 µm square regions and the mean value was plotted. Data are presented as mean values ± SD; the error bar represents SD. m Representative images of HeLa cells (from at least three replicates) expressing N1132A and ΔAIL mutants of YFP-p300FL. Scale bar, 5 µm.

To further confirm our model, we performed small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments on purified WT p300340–2094 and ΔAIL p300340–2094 proteins at various time points before and after incubating with acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5a). SAXS experiments provide information about the protein’s size and shape in solution. For WT p300340–2094, autoacetylation led to little changes in the SAXS profile: the Rg value remained unchanged at ~10 nm, in agreement with monomeric p300, possibly because the acetylated AIL engages the BD ‘in cis’ (Fig. 5b, top panel). In contrast, for ΔAIL p300340–2094, the Rg value increased over time (to ~35 nm) after autoacetylation for 1.5 h resulting in spherical droplets with a maximum dimension of ~125 nm (Fig. 5a, bottom panel). These droplets likely arise through ‘in trans’ engagement of the BD with acetylated lysine residues outside AIL (Fig. 5b, bottom panel).

Fig. 5: ΔAIL p300340–2094 interacts ‘in trans’ in solution.
figure5

a Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data collected for WT (upper panel) and ΔAIL (lower panel) p300340–2094 upon addition of acetyl-CoA at indicated time points including 0 min (blue) and 90 min (orange). SAXS intensity (left), Rg plots (middle), and P(r) functions (right) determined from the experimental scattering data were shown. b Schematics of the WT and ΔAIL p300BRPH intramolecular and intermolecular interactions between BD and acetylated lysines.

p300 condensates sequester nucleosomal substrates

Besides auto-acetylation, p300 catalyzes acetylation of lysine residues of histone proteins in nucleosomes, particularly at H3K18 and H3K27 sites22,23,25. We, therefore, tested whether p300 droplets could concentrate nucleosomal components, such as DNA and histone tails. We monitored the recruitment of fluorescein (FAM)-labeled histone H3 tail (FAM-H3, residues 1–12 of H3) and FAM-labeled 37 bp double-stranded DNA (FAM-DNA) to p300BRPHZ droplets using confocal microscopy (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 3b). The p300 condensates exhibited bright fluorescence when incubated with FAM-DNA or FAM-H3, but not when incubated with the control FAM. The recruitment of histone H3 tail to condensates was due to binding of the ZZ domain of p300 to the unmodified H3 tail25, however, p300 and CBP were thought to not contact DNA themselves34. We noticed lower background fluorescence when p300 condensates were incubated with FAM-DNA compared to FAM-H3, which suggests that p300BRPHZ concentrates better and therefore binds stronger to DNA than to the histone H31–12 peptide. Overall, these results demonstrate that p300BRPHZ condensates can sequester nucleosomal components like histone H3 tail and DNA from the surrounding environment.

Fig. 6: Acetylation regulates the association of p300 with DNA and the nucleosome.
figure6

a Representative confocal images of phase-separated SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ condensates with FAM control (left), FAM-labeled H31–12 peptide (middle), and FAM-labeled DNA (right). A 50 µm × 50 µm square region is shown for each sample. b, c EMSA of 147-bp 601 DNA incubated with increasing amounts of SIRT2-treated (b) and untreated (c) p300BRPHZ. DNA and protein concentrations are shown above the gel image. d, e EMSA of the reconstituted nucleosome incubated with increasing amounts of SIRT2-treated (d) and untreated (e) p300BRPHZ. Nucleosome core particle (NCP) and protein concentrations are shown above the gel image. f Phase separation of SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ alone (left), p300BRPHZ incubated with NCP (middle) and NCP alone (right) in a buffer containing 12% PEG. A 50 µm × 50 µm square region is shown for each sample. Experiments in af were performed in at least two replicates. g HAT activity of diluted (0.2 μM) (g) and concentrated (10 μM) (h) SIRT2-deacetylated p300BRPHZ ± PEG was measured by a fluorometric assay. i HAT activity of SIRT2-deacetylated p300BRPHZ in supernatant measured by a fluorometric assay. Droplets in the phase-separated p300BRPHZ sample were spun down for 10 min, and the supernatant was transferred to another tube. For all experiments in (gi), reactions were quenched by adding 6 M guanidine hydrochloride. The relative reaction rates (slope values) are 0.020 (−PEG) and 0.027 (+PEG) in (g), 0.27 (−PEG) and 0.09 (+PEG) in (h), and 0.035 in (i). Data in g, h are presented as mean values ± SD; error bars represent SD from triplicate measurements. j HAT activity of untreated p300BRPHZ (blue), SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ (orange), and SIRT2-treated phase-separated p300BRPHZ droplet suspension (gray) on NCP measured by a fluorometric assay. Data are presented as mean values from duplicate measurements.

Can p300 bind DNA and is this reaction mediated by p300 self-acetylation? We tested the association of untreated and SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ with 601 DNA (147 bp) by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ, containing on average 4 Kac outside the AIL, strongly bound to 601 DNA with an apparent Kd of ~0.3 μM (Fig. 6b). In contrast, untreated p300BRPHZ, which contains on average ~16 Kac including in the AIL, showed much weaker binding to 601 DNA in the same condition (Fig. 6c). DNA binding of p300BRPHZ, therefore, is directly regulated by its acetylation level, as acetylation neutralizes the positive charge of the unmodified lysine side chain, leading to a decrease in binding to the negatively charged DNA. We also found that auto-acetylation regulates p300BRPHZ association with nucleosomes. While SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ bound to the reconstituted nucleosome core particle (NCP) with a low micromolar Kd in EMSA assays (Fig. 6d), the association of untreated p300BRPHZ with NCP was notably compromised (Fig. 6e). Collectively, these data suggest that the phase transition and nucleosome binding functions of p300BRPHZ are linked to and regulated by its auto-acetylation.

The results described above may suggest that DNA and the HAT domain compete for the same hypoacetylated AIL, which could lead to a decrease in phase separation ability of p300BRPHZ. However, the addition of an equimolar amount of NCP to p300BRPHZ stimulated the formation of more and larger droplets, whereas NCPs alone did not phase separate under the same condition (Fig. 6f). These data imply that even when the AIL binds to DNA and is, therefore, less available to contribute to the droplet formation through the HAT–AIL mechanism, the intramolecular association through the BD–Kac mechanism is sufficient to maintain phase separation.

Catalytic HAT activity of p300 is decreased in condensates

We examined the effect of phase separation on enzymatic activity and histone substrate selectivity of p300BRPHZ. Because phase separation conditions can promote enzymatic reactions owing to higher local concentrations of both the enzyme and substrate44, we initially thought that p300 HAT activity would also be elevated due to increased local concentration of p300BRPHZ and the substrate, either p300BRPHZ and/or NCP inside the droplets. On the other hand, the intermolecular AIL–HAT interaction, which leads to the formation of p300 condensates, physically blocks the active site of the HAT domain and thus would lead to a reduction in the enzymatic activity, similar to what was observed for the TOR kinase45. In addition to sterically occluding the substrate–enzyme complex formation, the crowed viscous environment in condensates slows diffusion of substrates and products, which results in the reduced catalytic activity of enzymes46,47.

To compare the HAT activity in solution and phase-separated droplets, we first monitored the self-acetylation of p300BRPHZ. As shown in Fig. 6g, the addition of PEG to the SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ, which does not phase separate because of low protein concentration (0.2 μM), had essentially no effect on the change in the fluorescence signal (due to CoA release) over time, suggesting that the presence of PEG did not alter the catalytic activity of p300BRPHZ (Fig. 6g). In contrast, the change in fluorescence was slower in the PEG-induced phase-separated suspension (Fig. 6h, red line) or in the supernatant after the droplets were spun down (Fig. 6i) compared to the change in fluorescence in the solution without droplets (Fig. 6h, blue line). These data indicate that autoacetylation is inhibited when p300BRPHZ forms condensates.

We next measured the acetyltransferase activity of p300BRPHZ on reconstituted nucleosomes in homogenous solutions and under the phase separation condition. SIRT2-treated (containing ~12 Kac) p300BRPHZ and untreated (containing ~26 Kac) p300BRPHZ were mixed with NCP at a 1:1 ratio, and after the addition of acetyl-CoA, the CoA release was monitored at indicated time points. The reactions with NCP as a substrate (Fig. 6j, blue and orange bars, and Supplementary Fig. 4a) were completed within 2 min for both SIRT2-treated and untreated p300BRPHZ and were much faster than p300BRPHZ autoacetylation (Fig. 3a). The HAT reaction was also carried out in a suspension of PEG-induced droplets of SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ and NCP. Again, as in the case of autoacetylation (Supplementary Fig. 4b, gray bars), the apparent HAT activity of p300BRPHZ in the phase-separated condensates was decreased compared to the HAT activity of p300BRPHZ in solution (Fig. 6j, gray bars).

To assess the histone substrate selectivity of p300BRPHZ, we monitored acetylation of NCP by western blot using antibodies against H3K27ac, H3K9ac, and H3K4ac (Fig. 7a–d and Supplementary Fig. 5). We found that either SIRT2-treated or untreated p300BRPHZ robustly acetylates H3K27 in NCP but produces H3K9ac and H3K4ac to a lesser degree, which is in agreement with our previous findings25 and with the data shown in Fig. 6j—the reaction was fast and completed in 2 min. The selectivity of p300BRPHZ toward the H3K27 site was conserved in the suspension of SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ droplets, however, again, the rate of NCP acetylation was decreased (Fig. 7b, d, yellow line). These data further substantiate a reduction in the catalytic activity of p300BRPHZ upon formation of the condensates.

Fig. 7: A pool of p300 co-localizes with H3K27me3.
figure7

ad H3K27ac and H3K9ac western blot analysis of the reaction mixtures containing p300BRPHZ and an equimolar amount of NCP as a substrate. Reactions were quenched by rapid freezing and the addition of SDS-loading buffer at indicated time points. The intensity of bands is quantified, normalized to the +SIRT2/+PEG band at 2 min, and shown in (b) and (d). e Heatmaps of H3K4me3, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, H3K18ac, and Flag-p300BRPHZT, ChIP-seq signals centered on p300-H3K4me3 and p300-H3K27me3 binding sites in a ±20 kb window in H1299 cells stably expressing FLAG-p300BRPHZT. Heatmaps are ranked by H3K4me3 (upper panel) or H3K27me3 (lower panel). The color keys represent ChIP-seq densities normalized to total reads.

p300 condensates preferably localize to chromatin regions marked by H3K27me3

p300 often binds to enhancers and promoters enriched in active mono- and trimethylated H3K4 (H3K4me1 and H3K4me3, respectively) marks, acetylating histones, and stimulating gene transcription. However, a pool of p300/CBP with a suppressed HAT activity has been shown to associate with poised and silent genomic regions marked by the repressive modification H3K27me325,29,30,31,48,49. Indeed, ChIP-seq analysis of the H1299 cells expressing Flag-tagged WT p300BRPHZT identified 679 p300BRPHZT binding sites, and of these, 117 p300BRPHZT binding sites were also enriched in H3K27ac and H3K18ac—the primary products of acetylation by p300 (Fig. 7e). 76 p300BRPHZT binding sites however were enriched in H3K27me3. The notable absence of acetylation of H3K18 at these sites suggests that the HAT activity of p300BRPHZT is decreased when p300 colocalizes with H3K27me3.

Because the HAT activity of p300 is decreased in the phase-separated condensates, we examined whether the condensates could select for chromatin modifications in HeLa cells using immunofluorescence. As shown in Fig. 8, the YFP-p300FL condensates co-localize to a higher degree with the regions enriched in H3K27me3 with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Pearson’s R) of 0.45 ± 0.09, but co-localization with H3K4me3 was less pronounced (Pearson’s R of 0.37 ± 0.09), and even lower level of co-localization was observed with H3K9me3 (Pearson’s R of 0.25 ± 0.05). Together, these data suggest that a pool of p300 condensates has a preference to localize to the chromatin regions containing transcriptionally repressive H3K27me3 modification as compared to the regions containing transcriptionally active modification H3K4me3 or the heterochromatin mark H3K9me3.

Fig. 8: p300 condensates show preference for co-localization with H3K27me3.
figure8

af Nuclear localization of the YFP-p300FL condensates with indicated posttranslational histone modifications (PTMs) in HeLa cells were examined by immunofluorescence. The cells were fixed and probed with anti-H3K27me3 (a), anti-H3K4me3 (c), and anti-H3K9me3 (e) antibodies. Representative images are shown in the left panels: green, YFP-p300FL; red, PTMs; yellow, overlap of fluorescence signals of YFP-p300FL and PTMs. The ImageJ software was used to plot fluorescence signal intensities of YFP-p300FL and PTMs in the nuclei along the line (from left to right) indicated by white arrowheads (b, d, f). Scale bar, 5 µm. g A table of Pearson’s R values calculated using the entire cell nuclei (n = 3 cells examined for each mark). Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Pearson’s R values range between +1 (perfect positive correlation) and −1 (inverse correlation).

It is becoming increasingly clear that the LLPS phenomenon and the assembly of membraneless condensates by biological macromolecules in the nucleus play a crucial role in numerous cellular processes. Formation of condensates allows for efficient separation of the nuclear compartments in a spatiotemporal manner and/or concentration of the macromolecules to regulate, activate or reduce their functions. Although the phase separation mechanisms in the nucleus are currently a subject of intense studies, multivalent weak contacts involving IDRs of macromolecules have been widely acknowledged as a driving force for the formation of biomolecular condensates. In this work, we show that the major human acetyltransferase p300 forms liquid condensates in the nucleus and this function depends rather on the structured catalytic core of p300, including the HAT domain and its AIL, and BD. We demonstrate that hyperacetylation of the p300 catalytic core, particularly of AIL, decreases the phase separation ability, and that p300 utilizes two distinct molecular mechanisms to assemble the condensates, which rely on intermolecular ‘in trans’ HAT–AIL and BD–(Kac outside AIL) interactions. Furthermore, we found that the catalytic HAT activity of p300 is decreased in the phase-separated droplets, which is likely due to steric blocking of the HAT active site.

Our data suggest a model for compartmentalization and concentration of p300 with reduced catalytic activity. p300/CBP is often associated with transcriptional activation and occupies gene promoters and enhancer elements but has also been reported to localize to the repressive sites, particularly those enriched in H3K27me329,30. These sites are characterized by overall low acetylation of histones, and since H3K27me3 does not preclude binding of p300/CBP to the H3 tail, it was proposed that the HAT activity is blocked at such sites31,49. The mechanism of this blockage remains unclear. A few concepts have been put forth to explain the decrease in the p300/CBP catalytic activity, especially on histone lysine residues other than H3K27, as methylation of H3K27 obviously prevents its acetylation. These include regulation through phosphorylation or SUMOylation of p300/CBP34,50 and rapid degradation of p300. Our finding that a large portion of p300 condensates co-localizes with chromatin regions enriched in H3K27me3 suggests an alternative mechanism. The p300 condensates can act as a storage pool of the protein with reduced HAT activity, allowing p300 and possibly other elements of the transcriptional machinery to be compartmentalized and concentrated at the repressed chromatin sites. The formation of p300 condensates through blocking the catalytic site of the HAT domain provides a mechanism by which the enzymatic activity of p300 can be downregulated. Similar downregulation of the enzymatic activity through phase transition has been reported for the target of rapamycin (TOR) serine/threonine protein kinase in the TORC1 complex45. The formation of the TORC1 foci results in steric occlusion of the TOR active site, subsequently leading to the inhibition of the catalytic activity45. To better understand the p300-dependent activation of gene transcription, it will be essential in future studies to delineate and visualize by single-molecule imaging51 the precise contacts between p300 and the repressed chromatin regions.

Methods

Cell culture, transfection, and imaging

WT full-length YFP-p300 plasmids were transfected into HeLa cells in a 3.5-cm-diameter tissue culture dish by Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technology, L3000-075) using manufacturer instructions. The cells were cultured in DMEM (company) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (company, need double-check) for 36 h. The cell culture medium was replaced with the live-cell imaging medium and maintained at 37 °C using a heater controller. The p300 BD–Ring–PHD–HAT–ZZ_TAZ2 region (BRPHZT, aa 1024–1830) was cloned into a pTripZ-YFP vector. To establish a stable cell line, viral titer harvested from HEK293T cells was used to infect HeLa cells with fusion gene. HEK293T cells were seeded in a 10-cm dish to reach 90–100% confluency the following day. The cells were then transfected using calcium phosphate precipitation (21.0 µg psPAX2, 10.5, 21.0 µg of pTripZ-YFP-p300, 250 mM CaCl2, and 1×Hank’s balanced salt solution) and incubated for 12 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were washed twice with culture medium and then incubated in culture medium for 48 h. Viral titer was harvested from HEK293T cell culture medium and was spun at 1000 × g for 5 min to remove any cell debris. This was added to a single-cell suspension of HeLa cells supplemented with 8 µg/mL Polybrene (SIGMA, H9268) and was mixed. Solution of virus and HeLa cells was plated evenly into a 10-cm dish and incubated for 12 h. Culture medium of infected cells was then replaced, and cells were maintained.

FRAP experiments

FRAP imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM 700 Observer as described previously16. Briefly, two images were taken before photobleaching, and 15–30 images were taken with 10 s intervals immediately after photobleaching. The images were analyzed using ImageJ. Fluorescence intensities were normalized to the signal before photobleaching to obtain the fluorescence recovery.

Protein expression and purification

The construct of human full-length p300 protein-containing BD–RING–PHD–HAT–ZZ region (BRPHZ, amino acids 1035–1720) was cloned in the pGEX-6P-1 vector and expressed in BL21 (RIL) cells as previously described25. Protein production was induced with 0.1 mM IPTG and cultured overnight at 16 °C in Luria broth (LB) medium. The GST-tagged proteins were purified on Pierce glutathione agarose beads (Thermo-Fisher) in 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl, and 3 mM DTT. The GST tag was cleaved overnight at 4 °C with PreScission proteases. The SIRT2 (38–356) construct fused with His6x-SUMO was obtained from Addgene (addgene ID:102622). SIRT2 protein was expressed and purified using a standard protocol. In brief, the cells were disrupted by sonication, and the cell lysate was spun down to remove the debris. The supernatant was loaded to a nickel column (Histrap, GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with a buffer containing 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 and 500 mM NaCl. The SIRT2 protein was eluted with a 0–500 mM linear gradient of imidazole. The deacetylation reaction was carried out by incubating purified p300 WT and mutant proteins with SIRT2 overnight in the cold room in a buffer containing 20–50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM NAD, and 2 mM DTT. Deacetylated p300 proteins were further purified by size-exclusion chromatography and concentrated in Millipore concentrators.

Trypsin digestion of acetylated p300 proteins

Purified p300BRPHZ (40–50 µg) with or without SIRT2 treatment was denatured, reduced, and alkylated in 5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 10 mM tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP–HCl), 40 mM 2-chloroacetamide, 50 mM Tris pH 8.5 and boiled at 95 °C for 10 min. Samples were prepared for mass spectrometry analyses using the SP3 method52. Carboxylate-functionalized speedbeads (GE Life Sciences) were added to protein samples. Acetonitrile was added to 80% (v/v) to precipitate protein and bind it to the beads. The protein-bound beads were washed twice with 80% (v/v) ethanol and twice with 100% acetonitrile. Lys-C/Trypsin mix (Promega) was added for 1:50 protease to protein ratio in 50 mM Tris pH 8.5 and incubated rotating at 37 °C overnight. To clean up tryptic peptides, acetonitrile was added to 95% (v/v) to precipitate and bind peptides to the beads. One wash with 100% acetonitrile was performed and tryptic peptides were eluted twice with 1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 3% (v/v) acetonitrile in water. Eluate was dried using a speed-vac rotatory evaporator.

Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis

For estimations of intact protein masses, untreated and SIRT2-treated WT and mutant p300 protein samples were resolved using a Waters AQCUITY UPLC. Proteins were diluted to final concentration of 0.3 µg/µL using Buffer A (0.1% formic acid in water), of which 3 µg of protein was loaded onto a Waters ACQUITY UPLC Protein BEH C4 Column (300 Å, 1.7 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm). Salts were removed with 3% Buffer B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at 0.2 mL/min for 3 min and proteins were eluted using a linear gradient of Buffer B from 3% to 80% in 4 min at 0.2 mL/min. The UPLC was coupled directly with a Synapt G2 HDMS qTOF mass spectrometer scanning 400–2500m/z. Charge deconvolution was performed using Waters MaxEnt software.

For acetylation sites analysis, the trypsinized peptides were resuspended in 0.1% TFA, 3% acetonitrile in water, of which 1 picomole of the peptides for each sample was directly injected onto a Waters M-class column (1.7 µm, 120 A, rpC18, 75 µm × 250 mm) and gradient eluted from 2% to 40% acetonitrile over 40 min at 0.3 μL/min using a Thermo Ultimate 3000 UPLC (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were detected with a Thermo Q-Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) scanning MS1 spectra at 120,000 resolution from 380 to 1580m/z with a 45 ms fill time and 3E6 AGC target. The top 12 most intense peaks were isolated with a 1.4m/z window with a 100 ms fill time and 1E6 AGC target and 27% HCD collision energy for MS2 spectra collected at 15,000 resolution. Dynamic exclusion was enabled for 5 s. MS data raw files were searched against the single Uniprot sequence for EP300 (Uniprot accession number Q09472) using Maxquant 1.6.14.0 with cysteine carbamidomethylation as a fixed modification, while methionine oxidation and protein N-terminal and lysine side chain acetylation were set as variable modifications. The mass tolerances for the database search were 4.5 ppm for the precursors and 20 ppm for the MS2 fragment ions, the minimum peptide length was 7 residues with no additional applied score cutoffs. Peptide and protein level FDR was set at 0.01. An intensity cut-off of 50 million counts was applied to the untreated sample prior to plotting the change in intensity in Fig. 2j.

In vitro condensate formation

All in vitro condensate formation assays were performed in a buffer containing 15 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl and 2 mM DTT unless otherwise stated. All samples were prepared on ice and incubated for ~5 min before imaging on siliconized glass cover slides (Hampton). For WT and mutant p300BRPHZ and p300HZ alone, 13 μM protein samples were parallelly prepared with or without 12% (w/v) PEG 3350. For the condensate formation assay with reconstituted nucleosomes, 6.4 μM SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ and an equal amount of NCP were incubated in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris 7.5, 60 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, and 12% (w/v) PEG350. Microscopy of the droplets was done using an M150C-I microscope (AmScope) equipped with a ×10 objective and an MD35 digital camera (AmScope). A microscope camera calibration slide (OMAX, 0.01 mm) was used to determine the scale. A 50 μm × 50 μm square area was selected as a representative image for each sample. The number of condensates was also counted in a 50 μm × 50 μm square area. Five non-overlapping square regions were counted for each sample and plotted. Experiments were repeated in at least three batches of purified and SIRT2-treated p300 proteins.

To prepare p300 condensates that concentrate DNA or H3, 13 μM SIRT2-treated p300 was mixed with either 6 μM FAM, 6 μM FAM-labeled 37 bp dsDNA, or 6 μM FAM-labeled histone H3 tail (aa 1–12). Confocal images were acquired on a Zeiss Observer.Z1 inverted microscope using a ×40 oil objective and digitally captured. For the excitation of FAM, a 488 nm laser was used. Images were processed and presented using ImageJ and Photoshop.

Nucleosome reconstitution

The poly-cistronic vector of Xenopus laevis Histone octamers was obtained from the Jean-Francois Couture lab. A His-tag and a TEV cleavage site were introduced before histone H3 by mutagenesis. Expression and purification of histone octamers were performed as reported previously53. The His-tag before histone H3 was cleaved to expose the Ala1 residue using TEV protease. 601 DNA was prepared as previously described54. NCPs were reconstituted by combining octamer with 1.1× excess DNA and performing slow salt dialysis. Reconstituted nucleosomes were further purified by size-exclusion chromatography and concentrated in Millipore concentrators.

Acetyltransferase assays

Purified untreated and SIRT2-treated p300BRPHZ proteins were buffer exchanged into reaction buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) and 60 mM NaCl. For auto-acetylation experiments in Fig. 3a–c, 10 μM p300 protein was incubated in HAT reaction buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5 and 60 mM NaCl) in the absence or presence of 12% (w/v) PEG 3350. For histone acetyl-transferase assays in Fig. 6j, 6.4 μM p300 protein, and 6.4 μM reconstituted NCP were incubated in HAT reaction buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5 and 60 mM NaCl). Reactions were started by adding 0.5 mM acetyl-CoA at room temperature and quenched by flash-freeze at indicated time points. For each time point, 8 μl reaction mixture was diluted to 200 μl assay buffer and immediately heated to 95 °C for 5 min to inactivate p300. The samples were then applied to an ultrafiltration device (10k cut-off) to collect flow-through for CoA quantification by the fluorometric assay kit (Abcam, 138889). The kit utilizes a fluorogenic green indicator that became strongly fluorescent upon reacting with the –SH group in CoA. The fluorescence signals in samples collected from the reactions were measured according to the product manual using a 96-well microplate reader. For measuring the HAT activity of p300 (Fig. 6g–i) in the diluted solution, droplet mixture, and supernatant, reactions were quenched by mixing with a denaturing buffer containing 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl and 6 M guanidine–HCl at indicated points. All experiments were performed in triplicates.

To detect histone H3 acetylation at specific lysine sites, reactions were quenched by flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen and then analyzed by SDS–PAGE and western blot analysis. Western blot results were quantified by LI-COR Odyssey System using the following antibodies: anti-H3K4ac (ab176799, 1:1000), anti-H3K9ac (ab4441, 1:1000), and anti-H3K27ac (ab177178, 1:1000) from Abcam, and anti-H3K18ac (39755, 1:1000) from Active Motif.

SAXS analysis

X-ray scattering data were collected at the Bio-SAXS beamline (BM29) of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Data were collected with a photon-counting Pilatus 1 M detector at a sample-detector distance of 2.86 m, a wavelength of λ = 0.991 Å, and an exposure time of 1 second/frame. A momentum transfer range of 0.008–0.47 Å−1 was covered (q = 4πsin θ/λ, where θ is the scattering angle and λ the X-ray wavelength). A time-resolved SAXS experiment was performed with the p300 (aa 324–2094) and ΔAIL p300 constructs, produced as described55, during auto-acetylation. 150 µL of the reaction mixtures in buffer (20 mM HEPES pH7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5 µM ZnCl2, 0.5 mM TCEP) were prepared and pipetted in the thermostated sample holder tube already adjusted to 30 °C. 2 mM acetyl-CoA was added to each reaction tube and in the background, buffer to start the reaction. Four scattering curves were recorded on each sample at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min. Rg and I(0) values were obtained from the Guinier approximation Rg < 1.3 using Primus56. Distance distribution functions p(r) were computed from the entire scattering curve using GNOM56.

EMSA with DNA and nucleosomes

EMSA experiments were performed essentially as described57. Briefly, increasing amounts of p300 were incubated with 147 bp 601 DNA (50 nM) in a DNA binding buffer containing 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, and 2 mM DTT for 5 min. The reaction mixtures were loaded on 5% polyacrylamide gels, and electrophoresis was performed in 0.2 × TBE buffer at 100 V for 1.5 h on ice. For EMSA experiments with reconstituted nucleosomes (100 nM), the NaCl concentration in binding buffer was increased to 75 mM, and electrophoresis was performed in 0.2 × TB buffer. Gels were stained with SYBR Gold (Invitrogen).

ChIP-seq analysis

Flag-p300BRPHZT, H3K18ac, and H3K27ac ChIP-seq reads were obtained from GSE109591; H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 ChIP-seq reads were from GSE81322. ChIP-seq raw reads were mapped to the hg38 genome by hisat2 (v2.1.0) with no-spliced-alignment, -k 1. H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 peaks were called by macs2 callpeak (v2.1.2) with broad parameter. Flag-p300BRPHZT peaks were converted to hg38 by UCSC liftOver. Heatmaps were generated by danpos (v2.2.2) with 200 bp bin size and visualized by TreeView (v1.1.6).

Immunofluorescence

HeLa cells were cultured in a six-well plate with 22-mm coverslips. YFP-p300 plasmids were transfected into HeLa cells by Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technology, L3000-075) according to manufacturer instructions. One day after transfection, cells were fixed by 1% paraformaldehyde and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. After blocking with 3% goat serum and 3% BSA, cells were incubated, respectively, with pairs of primary antibodies: anti-GFP (Life Technologies; A-11120; 1:400 dilution) and anti-H3K27me3 (Millipore; 07-449; 1:200 dilution), anti-GFP (Life Technologies; A-11120; 1:400 dilution) and anti-H3K9me3 (Upstate; 07-442; 1:200 dilution), and anti-GFP (Life Technologies; A-11120; 1:400 dilution) and anti-H3K4me3 (Novus; NB21-1023B; 1:200 dilution), for two hours. After washing, cells were incubated with a pair of secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-mouse and Alexa Fluor 568-labeled goat anti-rabbit, for two hours, and then were mounted by using ProLong Antifade reagents (Life Technologies; P7481). Line plots were made using the plot profile feature of ImageJ. Pearson coefficient correlation for each pair of immunofluorescence images was calculated using the Coloc 2 plugin in ImageJ after the selection of the entire cell nuclei as the regions of specific interest.

Data availability

All relevant data supporting the key findings of this study are provided in the Supplementary Information and Source Data files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The mass spec data generated in this study have been deposited to the PRIDE database under the accession number PXD026898. The publicly available ChIP-seq data analyzed in this study are available from Gene Expression Omnibus under accession codes GSE109591 and GSE81322Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Shin, Y. et al. Liquid nuclear condensates mechanically sense and restructure the genome. Cell 175, 1481–1491 (2018). e1413.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brangwynne, C. P., Mitchison, T. J. & Hyman, A. A. Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4334–4339 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li, P. et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature 483, 336–340 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gibson, B. A. et al. Organization of chromatin by intrinsic and regulated phase separation. Cell 179, 470–484 (2019). e421.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science 361, eaar3958 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Larson, A. G. et al. Liquid droplet formation by HP1alpha suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin. Nature 547, 236–240 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Strom, A. R. et al. Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation. Nature 547, 241–245 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hnisz, D., Shrinivas, K., Young, R. A., Chakraborty, A. K. & Sharp, P. A. A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell 169, 13–23 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Boija, A. et al. Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell 175, 1842–1855e1816 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang, Y. et al. MORC3 forms nuclear condensates through phase separation. iScience 17, 182–189 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Plys, A. J. et al. Phase separation of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 is governed by a charged disordered region of CBX2. Genes Dev. 33, 799–813 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cho, W. K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science 361, 412–415 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nair, S. J. et al. Phase separation of ligand-activated enhancers licenses cooperative chromosomal enhancer assembly. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 193–203 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Boehning, M. et al. RNA polymerase II clustering through carboxy-terminal domain phase separation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 833–840 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tatavosian, R. et al. Nuclear condensates of the Polycomb protein chromobox 2 (CBX2) assemble through phase separation. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 1451–1463 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu, X. et al. The structural basis of protein acetylation by the p300/CBP transcriptional coactivator. Nature 451, 846–850 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ogryzko, V. V., Schiltz, R. L., Russanova, V., Howard, B. H. & Nakatani, Y. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell 87, 953–959 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, Z. et al. Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell 138, 1019–1031 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dancy, B. M. & Cole, P. A. Protein lysine acetylation by p300/CBP. Chem. Rev. 115, 2419–2452 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Goodman, R. H. & Smolik, S. CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development. Genes Dev. 14, 1553–1577 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jin, Q. et al. Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF-mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300-mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation. EMBO J. 30, 249–262 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tang, Z. et al. SET1 and p300 act synergistically, through coupled histone modifications, in transcriptional activation by p53. Cell 154, 297–310 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gu, W. & Roeder, R. G. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell 90, 595–606 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang, Y. et al. The ZZ domain of p300 mediates specificity of the adjacent HAT domain for histone H3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 841–849 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Thompson, P. R. et al. Regulation of the p300 HAT domain via a novel activation loop. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 308–315 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Delvecchio, M., Gaucher, J., Aguilar-Gurrieri, C., Ortega, E. & Panne, D. Structure of the p300 catalytic core and implications for chromatin targeting and HAT regulation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1040–1046 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ortega, E. et al. Transcription factor dimerization activates the p300 acetyltransferase. Nature 562, 538–544 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279–283 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zentner, G. E., Tesar, P. J. & Scacheri, P. C. Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. Genome Res. 21, 1273–1283 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Holmqvist, P. H. & Mannervik, M. Genomic occupancy of the transcriptional co-activators p300 and CBP. Transcription 4, 18–23 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bedford, D. C., Kasper, L. H., Fukuyama, T. & Brindle, P. K. Target gene context influences the transcriptional requirement for the KAT3 family of CBP and p300 histone acetyltransferases. Epigenetics 5, 9–15 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kasper, L. H., Qu, C., Obenauer, J. C., McGoldrick, D. J. & Brindle, P. K. Genome-wide and single-cell analyses reveal a context dependent relationship between CBP recruitment and gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 11363–11382 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Girdwood, D. et al. P300 transcriptional repression is mediated by SUMO modification. Mol. Cell 11, 1043–1054 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Boisvert, F. M., Kruhlak, M. J., Box, A. K., Hendzel, M. J. & Bazett-Jones, D. P. The transcription coactivator CBP is a dynamic component of the promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body. J. Cell Biol. 152, 1099–1106 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    LaMorte, V. J., Dyck, J. A., Ochs, R. L. & Evans, R. M. Localization of nascent RNA and CREB binding protein with the PML-containing nuclear body. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4991–4996 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    McManus, K. J. & Hendzel, M. J. Quantitative analysis of CBP- and P300-induced histone acetylations in vivo using native chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7611–7627 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sabari, B. R. et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation. Mol. Cell 58, 203–215 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, Y. et al. p300 Acetyltransferase is a cytoplasm-to-nucleus shuttle for SMAD2/3 and TAZ nuclear transport in transforming growth factor beta-stimulated hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 70, 1409–1423 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bandobashi, K. et al. Intranuclear localization of the transcription coadaptor CBP/p300 and the transcription factor RBP-Jk in relation to EBNA-2 and -5 in B lymphocytes. Virology 288, 275–282 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Karanam, B., Jiang, L., Wang, L., Kelleher, N. L. & Cole, P. A. Kinetic and mass spectrometric analysis of p300 histone acetyltransferase domain autoacetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 40292–40301 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Black, J. C., Mosley, A., Kitada, T., Washburn, M. & Carey, M. The SIRT2 deacetylase regulates autoacetylation of p300. Mol. cell 32, 449–455 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Park, S. et al. Role of the CBP catalytic core in intramolecular SUMOylation and control of histone H3 acetylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E5335–E5342 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zhang, Y., Narlikar, G. J. & Kutateladze, T. G. Enzymatic reactions inside biological condensates. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166624, (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Prouteau, M. et al. TORC1 organized in inhibited domains (TOROIDs) regulate TORC1 activity. Nature 550, 265–269 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Drobot, B. et al. Compartmentalised RNA catalysis in membrane-free coacervate protocells. Nat. Commun. 9, 3643 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schutz, S., Noldeke, E. R. & Sprangers, R. A synergistic network of interactions promotes the formation of in vitro processing bodies and protects mRNA against decapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 6911–6922 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Buecker, C. & Wysocka, J. Enhancers as information integration hubs in development: lessons from genomics. Trends Genet. 28, 276–284 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Holmqvist, P. H. et al. Preferential genome targeting of the CBP co-activator by Rel and Smad proteins in early Drosophila melanogaster embryos. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002769 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chen, J. & Li, Q. Life and death of transcriptional co-activator p300. Epigenetics 6, 957–961 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chong, S. et al. Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription. Science 361, eaar2555 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hughes, C. S. et al. Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 757 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Shim, Y., Duan, M. R., Chen, X., Smerdon, M. J. & Min, J. H. Polycistronic coexpression and nondenaturing purification of histone octamers. Anal. Biochem. 427, 190–192 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Klein, B. J. et al. Histone H3K23-specific acetylation by MORF is coupled to H3K14 acylation. Nat. Commun. 10, 4724 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kaczmarska, Z. et al. Structure of p300 in complex with acyl-CoA variants. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 21–29 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Petoukhov, M. V. et al. New developments in the ATSAS program package for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 342–350 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Klein, B. J. et al. Bivalent interaction of the PZP domain of BRPF1 with the nucleosome impacts chromatin dynamics and acetylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 472–484 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Berk for providing cDNA of YFP-p300. The authors thank Cole Michel at the University of Colorado School of Pharmacy Mass Spectrometry Facility for help with collecting and analyzing samples. This work was supported by grants from NIH GM125195, GM135671, HL151334, CA252707, and AG067664 to T.G.K., R01GM135286 to X.R. and CA204020 to X.S. Y.Z. is supported by NIH K99CA241301.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z., K.B., Y.Y., Z.I., M.Z., H.X., S.I., T.L., C.C.E., and J.L. performed experiments and together with D.P., X.S., X.R., and T.G.K. analyzed the data. Y.Z. and T.G.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana G. Kutateladze.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Dong Wang and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Brown, K., Yu, Y. et al. Nuclear condensates of p300 formed though the structured catalytic core can act as a storage pool of p300 with reduced HAT activity. Nat Commun 12, 4618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24950-8

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing