Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Valley-selective optical Stark effect of exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor

Abstract

Selective breaking of degenerate energy levels is a well-known tool for coherent manipulation of spin states. Though most simply achieved with magnetic fields, polarization-sensitive optical methods provide high-speed alternatives. Exploiting the optical selection rules of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, the optical Stark effect allows for ultrafast manipulation of valley-coherent excitons. Compared to excitons in these materials, microcavity exciton-polaritons offer a promising alternative for valley manipulation, with longer lifetimes, enhanced valley coherence, and operation across wider temperature ranges. Here, we show valley-selective control of polariton energies in WS2 using the optical Stark effect, extending coherent valley manipulation to the hybrid light-matter regime. Ultrafast pump-probe measurements reveal polariton spectra with strong polarization contrast originating from valley-selective energy shifts. This demonstration of valley degeneracy breaking at picosecond timescales establishes a method for coherent control of valley phenomena in exciton-polaritons.

Introduction

Breaking spin degeneracy with light enables high-speed control of coherent states and forms the basis of emerging quantum technologies1,2. Degeneracy breaking enables coherent manipulation of spin by providing control over the relative phase in a quantum superposition. A classic example relies on Zeeman splitting of spin states in a magnetic field, but this approach is generally ill-suited for high-speed and spatially localized operations. Using circularly-polarized laser pulses, the optical Stark effect (OSE) can provide large effective magnetic fields for breaking spin degeneracy on sub-picosecond timescales, offering an all-optical alternative that enables more precise control of quantum states1,2.

The OSE is also a powerful tool for manipulating valley pseudospin in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). In monolayer TMDs, a pseudospin arises from the K and K′ valleys in the band structure, which are degenerate in energy but separate in momentum space3. Because optical transitions in each valley are governed by polarization-sensitive selection rules, ultrafast optical Stark shifts can be used to break valley degeneracy4,5 and control valley pseudospin in excitons6, suggesting applications in quantum information. At the very least, polarization-sensitive Stark effects have continued to provide insights into valley exciton physics7,8,9, while opening broader possibilities for dynamic band engineering through valley-dependent control of energy levels.

Despite their potential, valley excitons suffer from limitations due to their small sizes10, short diffusion lengths11,12, and fast valley depolarization13,14. When TMDs are embedded in microcavities, strong light-matter coupling yields hybrid exciton-polaritons that preserve the valley pseudospin of the material, while also incorporating properties of light that can overcome many limitations of excitons. Exciton-polaritons exhibit reduced effective masses and faster propagation speeds favorable for long-distance information transfer15, as well as modified relaxation dynamics16,17,18,19,20 that enhance valley coherence21,22. Demonstrations of the optical valley Hall effect15, room-temperature valley coherence22,23 and valley-coherent manipulation23 in TMD polaritons further highlight how these hybrid quasiparticles enable valley phenomena that cannot be achieved with excitons alone. For many future applications, high-fidelity control of pseudospin in TMD polaritons requires ultrafast degeneracy-breaking of cavity-coupled valley states. Valley-selective optical Stark shifts in TMD polaritons could enable pseudospin state control in a regime that can access the desirable light-like properties of polaritons.

While the optical Stark effects of excitons have been measured in a variety of semiconductors, optical Stark effects in exciton-polaritons have so far only been measured in GaAs quantum wells24,25,26,27. Even in GaAs quantum wells, polarization-selective optical Stark shifts of polaritons have not yet been demonstrated. Expanding these observations to polaritons in different materials like TMDs is in itself an important step in verifying that polariton OSE physics can be broadly applied to describe the effect in polaritons with larger Rabi splitting, faster decay rates, and larger inhomogeneous broadening. Even more importantly, the different electronic and optical properties of TMDs can enable additional features of polariton optical Stark effects, like the previously unobserved polarization-selective polariton Stark shift.

In this report, we show how the optical selection rules of TMDs can enable optical Stark shifts of polaritons with valley-selectivity. Using ultrafast circularly-polarized transient reflectance, we demonstrate a valley-selective optical Stark effect in WS2 exciton-polaritons (Fig. 1a). A sub-picosecond blueshift of both upper and lower polariton branches when the pump and probe pulses are co-circularly polarized, with no appreciable shift when they are cross-circularly polarized, provides a signature of the effect. Valley-dependent energy shifts persist over a range of experimental conditions that enhance the light-like properties of polaritons, and the shifts are well-understood using a transfer matrix model of the coupled exciton-cavity structure. This robust, valley-selective control over the energy levels of TMD polaritons establishes a powerful approach for coherent manipulation of hybrid light-matter states with valley sensitivity.

Fig. 1: The valley-selective optical Stark effect in TMD microcavity exciton-polaritons.
figure1

a Cartoon of the polarization-dependent transient reflectance measurement of WS2 polaritons in a monolithic cavity. b Schematic of valley-selective optical Stark shift for polariton energy dispersions. Polaritons at the K and K′ valleys couple to left-handed (σ) and right-handed (σ+) circularly-polarized light, respectively. The σ+ polarized, below-bandgap pump only couples to polaritons in the K′ valley, inducing an optical Stark shift of both the upper (ΔEUP) and lower (ΔELP) polariton energies in just this one valley. c Calculated change in microcavity reflectance R for polaritons in the K′ valley due to σ+-polarized pump pulse. The K valley polaritons should experience no change in reflectance. d Expected differential reflectance spectrum ΔR/R induced by the pump, showing the characteristic lineshape of the polaritonic optical Stark effect. e Momentum-space reflectance spectrum obtained by angle-resolved spectroscopy showing an avoided crossing when the cavity mode energy EC is resonant with the TMD exciton energy EX. f Cross sectional reflectance data from e at various angles (offset for clarity). Both e and f show UP and LP branch dispersions in blue and red coinciding with the spectral peak energies.

Results

Optical Stark effect in WS2 exciton-polaritons

The polaritonic OSE results from an interaction between an exciton with energy EX and two distinct optical fields: a near-resonant cavity photon mode with energy EC ≈ EX, and sub-resonant light with energy EP < EX. Strong coupling between the exciton and the cavity photon results in highly mixed polariton eigenstates that split into an upper and lower branch. Weaker coupling to the sub-resonant light results in an intensity-dependent Stark shift of both polariton branches25. Since TMD polaritons inherit the polarization-dependent selection rules from their excitonic component16,17,18, a circularly-polarized pump will induce a Stark shift of polaritons in only one valley, leaving polaritons in the opposite valley unperturbed (Fig. 1b). This valley-selective shift manifests as a change in the polariton reflectance spectrum: while the subresonant light is present, the upper polariton (UP) and lower polariton (LP) peaks shift to higher energy and change amplitude (Fig. 1c). Transient reflectance spectroscopy measures the difference between the shifted and unshifted reflectance spectra ΔR, normalized by the unshifted reflectance R. The expected ΔR/R signal shown in Fig. 1d has the “double Lorentzian-derivative” shape that characterizes the experimental signature of the polaritonic optical Stark effect25,26. For a valley-selective polaritonic OSE, this ΔR/R spectrum only occurs when the pump and probe are co-polarized.

To observe this phenomenon, planar microcavities supporting WS2 exciton-polaritons are fabricated using established procedures28 (see Supplementary Information). The monolithic microcavities consist of two SiO2/Si3N4 distributed Bragg reflectors, with a monolayer of WS2 embedded in the center. Using angle-resolved reflectance measurements of the momentum-space polariton dispersion, an avoided crossing is observed as the cavity energy (EC) is tuned through the exciton resonance (EX), indicating polariton formation (Fig. 1e, f). From the reflectance spectrum at zero cavity-exciton detuning (Δ = EC − EX = 0) we extract a typical Rabi splitting ΩR = 26 meV between the LP and UP, comparable to previous reports of TMD exciton-polaritons21,22,28,29.

The valley-selective exciton-polariton OSE is demonstrated using polarization-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy. A sub-picosecond, 1.493 eV pump pulse induces a change ΔR/R in the microcavity reflectance spectrum measured by a low-intensity energy-tunable probe pulse. Both pump and probe are circularly-polarized and normally incident on the sample. Figure 2a, b shows ΔR/R as a function of pump-probe delay time t. Since EX is temperature-dependent, the detuning Δ can be minimized near T = 200 K. At this temperature, UP and LP reflectance features have roughly equal spectral weight with Rabi splitting ΩR = 24 meV (Supplementary Fig. 8). When the pulses are co-circularly polarized, a sharp signal is observed at t = 0 for the duration of the pump-probe temporal overlap. The spectral response is characteristic of the anticipated polaritonic optical Stark shift (Fig. 1c, d), and the pulsewidth-limited signal indicates that the shift only occurs when the pump pulse is present. The lack of coherent oscillations before t = 0 confirms that the measurement is in the adiabatic limit of the Stark shift, which avoids additional ΔR/R spectral broadening26. When the pump and probe are cross-circularly polarized there is no significant signal near t = 0. This dramatic polarization contrast suggests that for a particular circular polarization of the off-resonant pump, the Stark shift is isolated to polaritons in a single valley.

Fig. 2: Pump-probe measurement of valley-selective optical Stark shift.
figure2

a Pump-induced differential reflectance when pump and probe are co-circularly polarized. The sharp signal at t = 0 is attributed to a optical Stark shift of both upper and lower polaritons. b Differential reflectance when pump and probe are cross-polarized, lacking sharp signal at t = 0. c Background-subtracted ΔR/R signal at zero delay for increasing pump intensities (dots) and fits (solid) to a transfer matrix model. d Stark shift magnitude extracted from fits to data in c showing expected linear trend. Error bars in pump intensity represent uncertainty in the measured pump power and spot size. Error bars in Stark shift magnitude represent uncertainty from the fit procedure (see Supplementary Information).

The long-timescale background signal present for t > 0 in both polarization configurations is attributed to the generation of real carriers by two-photon absorption of the pump pulse4,26,30. Since the OSE signal here is polarization-selective, the background is removed for subsequent analysis by subtracting the cross-polarized signal from the co-polarized signal. This subtracted ΔR/R spectrum is used as a proxy for the underlying circular dichroism caused by the valley-selective shift.

We model the Stark shift of the polaritons by only considering the energy shift of the neutral exciton ΔE relative to the fixed cavity energy. For the small energy shifts measured in this report, this perturbative approach is an accurate description of the polaritonic OSE25. An in-depth discussion of the perturbative regime in relation to the full Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian is provided in the Supplementary Information. However, most of the quantities reported in this manuscript do not explicitly rely on the Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian; our analysis only considers pump-induced changes to the exciton energy, and models the associated change in cavity reflectance. The Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian is only used to interpret the measured spectral parameters as UP and LP shifts vs. temperature. Additionally, for the sample temperatures above 120 K measured in this report, the impact of the trion is expected to be small28, and is not included in our simple model. The potential influence of the trion on the polariton spectra at lower temperatures is also discussed in the Supplementary Information.

The magnitude of the Stark shift ΔE is proportional to the ratio of the peak pump intensity IP and the pump detuning ΔP = EP − EX as \({{\Delta }}E\propto \frac{{I}_{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}{{{{\Delta }}}_{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}\)30. We confirm the expected linear dependence on IP by repeating the experiment at pump intensities spanning an order of magnitude (Fig. 2c). ΔE is extracted by fitting the pump-induced ΔR/R spectra at t = 0 to a transfer-matrix model of the exciton-cavity system. In this model, the dielectric function of WS2 is represented by a single oscillator at the A exciton that is allowed to shift in energy (see “Methods” section for additional details). The Stark shifts extracted from the fits are shown as a function of pump intensity in Fig. 2d. ΔE shows a clear linear trend, with a maximum shift of 161 μ eV for a 1.47 GW/cm2 pump. We emphasize that the linear trend is seen for the exciton shift parameter ΔE extracted from a fit to the ΔR/R spectrum, which goes beyond the simple observation of a change in spectral amplitude due to increased laser power. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7, the μeV-scale Stark shift causes only a small change in the photon and exciton fractions of the polariton (given by the Hopfield coefficients). Still, we can clearly measure and fit the spectral signature of the polaritonic Stark shift, highlighting that even small changes in polariton composition lead to spectral changes that can be detected using our approach of pump-probe spectroscopy and reflectance modeling of the cavity structure.

Valley-selective shifts of detuned polaritons

The key advantage of polaritons over excitons is that they share the valley selectivity of excitons and the coupling to traveling photons provided by their half-light nature. The relative mixture of photon and exciton in a polariton depends on the exciton-photon detuning Δ, allowing tailored polariton characteristics for different applications. The Hopfield coefficients are calculated as a function of detuning in Supplementary Fig. 7. At large detuning, one of the polariton branches can exhibit markedly more photon-like properties, such as drastically reduced linewidths, longer coherence lengths, and faster relaxation rates that have advantages for long-distance information transfer31. However, the reduced exciton proportion of such off-resonant polaritons could restrict the ability for optical manipulation through the Stark effect.

Because the exciton energy of the TMD shifts with temperature but the microcavity photon resonance is nearly constant, it is possible to explore the valley-sensitive OSE in different polariton detuning regimes in the same sample. Changing detuning with sample temperature, rather than by changing the probe angle, allows us to hold the spot size and location constant, which minimizes the impact of sample inhomogeneity (see Supplementary Fig. 8). Temperature tuning provides continuous variation of detuning Δ from a photon-like UP at room temperature to a photon-like LP at T = 90 K (Fig. 3a). We repeat the polarization-dependent transient reflectance measurement over this range of sample temperatures to investigate retention of OSE valley selectivity across polariton detunings (Fig. 3b). For all temperatures, we observe a pump-induced signal with strong circular-polarization contrast, showing that the valley OSE enables polarization-selective control of polaritons even in regimes of moderate detuning. The ΔR/R spectra are again well-described by the polariton model that accounts for temperature-dependent EX (Fig. 3c). Allowing for variation in the exciton oscillator parameters caused by their temperature dependence further improves the fit to the data (Supplementary Fig. 8). The excellent agreement between the modeled and measured spectra clearly establishes that the valley Stark shift is the dominant effect governing the observed features across temperatures.

Fig. 3: Valley-sensitive Stark shift over wide range of detunings.
figure3

a Polariton doublet as a function of temperature offset by 30% intervals. Varying temperature tunes polaritons from positive to negative detuning regime, where UP is more photon-like at high temperatures and LP is more photon-like at low-temperatures. The spectra are normalized to reflectivity of the bare cavity, resulting in a small artifact near the 2.037 eV resonant energy of the bare cavity. b ΔR/R spectra at various Δ induced by 1.47 GW/cm2 pump, offset by 0.015 intervals. The spectra are well-described by the Stark shift model, indicating that the valley-selective polariton OSE persists across detunings. c Model of polariton energies as exciton tunes with temperature. Valley-selective Stark shift measured at cavity-exciton detunings Δ indicated by gray circles. d Stark shift of the upper and lower polariton branches inferred from analysis using Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian. The magnitude of the Stark shift tracks the excitonic Hopfield coefficient.

We estimate the shift of each individual polariton branch by inputting the measured Rabi splitting, induced exciton Stark shift magnitude, and cavity-exciton detuning into a modified Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian (see Supplementary Information). The calculated Stark shifts for the UP and LP at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 3d, showing how the magnitude of the shift of a given polariton branch increases with increasing exciton character. This feature is not immediately obvious from the differential reflectance spectra because the polariton linewidths are wide and the energy shifts are small. Additional discussion of the relationship between the spectral features and the Jaynes–Cummings analysis can be found in the Supplementary Information.

We next extend the OSE detuning dependence to a limit in which only a single photon-like polariton is observable. We use a different sample, where the cavity photon resonance is designed to have a larger detuning from the exciton energy. The observable polariton in this highly-detuned regime is similar to the bare cavity mode, but it maintains a small excitonic fraction typical of a weakly coupled light-matter dressed state. Although this excitonic component is small, it can provide a means to manipulate the cavity response using the unique features of the TMD material. Rapid modulation of a single cavity resonance has important applications in telecommunications and information processing32. The valley selection rules of TMD polaritons provide an additional polarization degree of freedom for such cavity modulation, with relevance for spin-based photonics33. As a proof of principle, we demonstrate how the optical Stark effect remains valley-selective for TMD polaritons even in this highly-detuned limit. A detailed analysis of detuning and estimations of the Stark shift magnitude in these measurements are provided in Supplementary Fig. 9. Figure 4a shows the response of a detuned polariton sample at room temperature, where the UP feature is barely visible in reflectance and the Stark shift signal is dominated by the LP. Here the excitonic fraction is ~17% (see Supplementary Fig. 7 for Hopfield analysis). Lowering the sample temperature to 170 K increases the detuning so only a single, highly-photonic LP resonance is visible, with an excitonic fraction of ~5% (Fig. 4b). The pump-induced ΔR/R signal is isolated to the LP and maintains high polarization contrast. This highlights how the small excitonic fraction of the LP still imparts useful optical selection rules on highly-photonic polariton states, and demonstrates how the valley polariton Stark effect can be used to induce polarization-selective shifts in a single cavity resonance on sub-picosecond timescales.

Fig. 4: Valley-selective shift of highly-detuned polaritons.
figure4

a Reflectance spectrum (top) of a photon-like lower polariton at room temperature. The small UP feature is barely discernible near 2.01 eV. Pump-induced shift of the LP dominates the polarization-dependent response of the ΔR/R spectrum (bottom). b Same sample at 170 K, where the exciton is further detuned from the cavity. The LP reflectance feature is narrower and deeper due to its more photon-like character and UP is no longer visible. The pump-induced ΔR/R spectrum continues to exhibit strong polarization contrast in this regime, demonstrating how the optical Stark shift of a highly photonic WS2 polariton still maintains valley selectivity due to its small excitonic character.

Discussion

Combining ultrafast optics with 2D material polaritonics, our work establishes an approach for state manipulation in hybrid light-matter systems by demonstrating how the optical Stark effect can break valley degeneracy in exciton-polaritons. The effect remains valley-selective over a wide range of cavity-exciton detunings, paving the way towards coherent control of valley in regimes that accentuate the light-like properties of polaritons. In bare TMD excitons, circularly-polarized pump fields tuned above34, below8,35, and on-resonance9 with various exciton transitions have revealed valley-dependent couplings between optical fields and different exciton species. Similarly, the valley-sensitivity of the polaritonic Stark shift established in this work should extend to alternative pumping regimes, creating rich opportunities to explore additional valley-dependent couplings in 2D polaritons.

In this report, we are limited to a perturbative regime of the Stark shift due to our highly-detuned pump. By tuning the pump closer to the polariton energies, significantly larger Stark shifts can be expected in which the magnitude of the shift exceeds the Rabi splitting, and the system can no longer be described perturbatively27. When pumping near-resonance, many-body interactions between virtual excitons created by the driving field can also begin to dominate the observed Stark shifts, manifesting as an anomalous blue-shift when the pump is tuned slightly above resonance34. In polaritons with larger spatial size, the more significant overlap of polariton wavefunctions could lead to stronger repulsive Coulombic interactions between particles. This could cause many-body interactions to become dominant over a wider range of detunings, potentially yielding even larger anomalous blue-shifts when pumping above resonance. Additionally, there have been exciting theoretical predictions for spectral signatures of quantum many-body correlations in microcavity polaritons, when the driving field is resonant with the lower polariton branch36. Future experiments eliminating the pump energy constraint could determine the role of many-body interactions between valley polaritons in these currently unmeasured near-resonance pumping regimes. In this way, the valley-selective optical Stark effect in exciton-polaritons lays the groundwork for a broad exploration of coherent valley phenomena in 2D material polaritons and their technological implications.

Methods

Angle-resolved reflectance

Angle-resolved reflectance measurements are used to characterize the momentum-space dispersion of the exciton-polaritons. These measurements are performed by imaging the back focal plane (Fourier plane) of a 50 × 0.6 NA microscope objective onto the entrance slit of a spectrometer that is equipped with a CCD. This allows us to measure both the spectral (CCD x-axis) and angular (CCD y-axis) dependence of the cavity sample simultaneously in a single measurement. Our approach follows that of ref. 28.

Time-resolved measurement

For the transient reflectance measurements, pump pulses are produced by a Ti-sapphire laser (Coherent MIRA-900F) that emits sub-ps pulses at 1.493 eV with a repetition rate of 76 MHz. Part of this beam is picked off to drive a passive optical parametric oscillator (MIRA-OPO), which generates probe pulses that are tuned over the polariton energies from 1.95 to 2.06 eV. This probe source uses a nonlinear optical crystal that is optimized for the 1.493 eV energy of the synchronous pump pulses. As such, the pump laser must be fixed at 1.493 eV for all measurements. The circular polarization of the pump and probe are controlled independently to establish the polarization-dependence of the Stark shift response.

For all measurements, the 1.493 eV pump is detuned from the polariton resonance by ~520 meV. This significant detuning puts the pump outside of the stop band of the cavity, enabling pumping at normal incidence without losing a significant amount of pump power due to reflection off of the top DBR. The pump and probe beams are co-linear and are focused on the sample with an f50 achromatic doublet lens to a spot size of 13 μm and 10 μm, respectively. The pump has a peak intensity of 1.47 GW/cm2 and the probe has a much lower peak intensity of 0.3 MW/cm2. The bandwith of the probe pulse is ~9 meV. In order to better resolve the spectral features of the Stark shift signal, we use a monochromator (Edmund Mini-Chrom) with 100 μm slits to spectrally filter the reflected probe pulses down to a bandwidth of ~3 meV before collecting the signal on an avalanche photodiode. The pump is chopped at 100 kHz using a photoelastic modulator while the probe is modulated at 1033 Hz with a mechanical chopper. We measure ΔR/R using two lock-in amplifiers to extract the pump-induced signal ΔR at 100 kHz and the reflectance of the probe R at 1033 Hz. Additional details on the measurement can be found in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Model of Stark shift

To fit the ΔR/R spectra induced by the optical Stark effect, the dielectric function of WS2 is represented by a single oscillator at the A exciton. We insert this dielectric function into a transfer-matrix model of the cavity reflectance. With other oscillator parameters determined beforehand, the only free parameter allowed is the energy shift of the A exciton resonance. This simple, one-parameter model effectively captures the salient features of the polaritonic Stark shift and provides excellent agreement with the measured ΔR/R data.

For the temperature-dependent ΔR/R spectra, we model the exciton oscillator using the best-fit parameters found from the fits at 200 K, and model the shift of the exciton center energy at different temperatures using the slope of a linear fit to the temperature-dependent PL of WS2. Since the pump energy is constant in our experiments, the pump-exciton detuning ΔP also changes slightly (<10%) with temperature. To account for the change in ΔP, the magnitude of the Stark shift used to calculate the ΔR/R spectra is changed from ΔE = 154 μeV at 90 K to ΔE = 167 μeV at 290 K in accordance with the 1/ΔP scaling of the Stark shift. Additional details on the model, fitting procedures, and a discussion of error are provided in Supplementary Information.

Data availability

All data relevant to this work are available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. 1.

    Press, D., Ladd, T. D., Zhang, B. & Yamamoto, Y. Complete quantum control of a single quantum dot spin using ultrafast optical pulses. Nature 456, 218–221 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Berezovsky, J., Mikkelsen, M. H., Stoltz, N. G., Coldren, L. A. & Awschalom, D. D. Picosecond coherent optical manipulation of a single electron spin in a quantum dot. Science 320, 349–352 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sie, E. J., McIver, J. W., Lee, Y., Fu, L., Kong, J. & Gedik, N. Valley-selective optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Mater. 14, 290–294 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim, J. et al. Ultrafast generation of pseudo-magnetic field for valley excitons in WSe2 monolayers. Science 346, 1205–1208 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ye, Z., Sun, D. & Heinz, T. F. Optical manipulation of valley pseudospin. Nat. Phys. 13, 26 EP (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sie, E. J., Lui, C. H., Lee, Y., Kong, J. & Gedik, N. Observation of intervalley biexcitonic optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nano Lett. 16, 7421–7426 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yong, C. et al. Biexcitonic optical stark effects in monolayer molybdenum diselenide. Nat. Phys. 14, 1092 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yong, C. et al. Valley-dependent exciton fine structure and Autler–Townes doublets from Berry phases in monolayer MoSe2. Nat. Mater. 18, 1065–1070 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yu, Y. et al. Exciton-dominated dielectric function of atomically thin MoS2 films. Sci. Rep. 5, 16996 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cadiz, F. et al. Exciton diffusion in WSe2 monolayers embedded in a Van der Waals heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 152106 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kulig, M. et al. Exciton diffusion and halo effects in monolayer semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 207401 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mai, C., Barrette, A., Yu, Y., Semenov, Y. G., Kim, K. W., Cao, l. & Gundogdu, K. Many-body effects in valleytronics: direct measurement of valley lifetimes in single-layer MoS2. Nano Lett. 14, 202–206 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhu, C. R. et al. Exciton valley dynamics probed by Kerr rotation in WSe2 monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 90, 161302 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lundt, N. et al. Optical valley Hall effect for highly valley-coherent exciton-polaritons in an atomically thin semiconductor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 770–775 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen, Y. J., Cain, J. D., Stanev, T. K., Dravid, V. P. & Stern, N. P. Valley-polarized exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nat. Photonics 11, 431–435 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dufferwiel, S. et al. Valley-addressable polaritons in atomically thin semiconductors. Nat. Photonics 11, 497–501 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lundt, N. et al. Observation of macroscopic valley-polarized monolayer exciton-polaritons at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 96, 241403 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sun, Z. et al. Optical control of room-temperature valley polaritons. Nat. Photonics 11, 491–496 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bleu, O., Solnyshkov, D. D. & Malpuech, G. Optical valley Hall effect based on transitional metal dichalcogenide cavity polaritons. Phys. Rev. B 96, 165432 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dufferwiel, S. et al. Valley coherent exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 9, 4797 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Qiu, L., Chakraborty, C., Dhara, S. & Vamivakas, A. N. Room-temperature valley coherence in a polaritonic system. Nat. Commun. 10, 1513 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rupprecht, C. et al. Manipulation of room-temperature valley-coherent exciton-polaritons in atomically thin crystals by real and artificial magnetic fields. 2D Mater. 7, 035025 (2020).

  24. 24.

    Quochi, F. et al. Strongly driven semiconductor microcavities: from the polariton doublet to an AC Stark triplet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4733 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hayat, A. et al. Dynamic Stark effect in strongly coupled microcavity exciton polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 033605 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lange, C. et al. Ultrafast control of strong light-matter coupling. N. J. Phys. 20, 013032 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Panna, D. et al. Ultrafast manipulation of a strongly coupled light-matter system by a giant ac Stark effect. ACS Photonics 6, 3076–3081 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu, X., Bao, W., Li, Q., Ropp, C., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. Control of coherently coupled exciton polaritons in monolayer tungsten disulphide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 027403 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dhara, S. et al. Anomalous dispersion of microcavity trion-polaritons. Nat. Phys. 14, 130 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    LaMountain, T.,Bergeron, H., Balla, I., Stanev, T. K., Hersam, M. C.& Stern, N. P. Valley-selective optical Stark effect probed by Kerr rotation. Phys. Rev. B 97, 045307 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Leyder, C. et al. Observation of the optical spin Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 3, 628–631 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ctistis, G. et al. Ultimate fast optical switching of a planar microcavity in the telecom wavelength range. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 161114 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Amo, A. et al. Exciton–polariton spin switches. Nat. Photonics 4, 361–366 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cunningham, P. D., Hanbicki, A. T., Reinecke, T. L., McCreary, K. M. & Jonker, B. T. Resonant optical stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–8 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sie, E. J., Lui, C. H., Lee, Y. H., Fu, L., Kong, J. & Gedik, N. Large, valley-exclusive Bloch-Siegert shift in monolayer WS2. Science 355, 1066–1069 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Levinsen, J., Marchetti, F. M., Keeling, J. & Parish, M. M. Spectroscopic signatures of quantum many-body correlations in polariton microcavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 266401 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has primarily been supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under Award No. DE-SC0012130 (cavity exciton-polaritons) and the Office of Naval Research under grant number N00014-16-1-3055 (ultrafast valley manipulation). This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR-1929356 (2D materials synthesis). S.H.A., T.J.M., and M.C.H. acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) under Grant No. DMR-1720139. This work made use of the Keck-II facility and the NUFAB facility of the Northwestern University NUANCE Center, which has received support from the SHyNE Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205), the IIN, and the Northwestern University MRSEC program (NSF DMR-1720139). J.N. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1842165. S.H.A. acknowledges support from the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program. A.A.M. gratefully acknowledges support from the Ryan Fellowship and the IIN at Northwestern University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.L. conceived the research. T.L., E.J.L., A.A.M., S.H.A., and H.Z. fabricated the samples under the guidance of N.P.S., V.P.D., T.J.M., and M.C.H. T.L. and J.N. conducted the measurements. T.L. and N.P.S. devised and implemented the fitting model. N.P.S. oversaw progress of the project. All authors discussed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel P. Stern.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Aubrey Hanbicki and Chaw-Keong Yong for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

LaMountain, T., Nelson, J., Lenferink, E.J. et al. Valley-selective optical Stark effect of exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nat Commun 12, 4530 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24764-8

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing