Abstract
Refraction between isotropic media is characterized by light bending towards the normal to the boundary when passing from a low to a highrefractiveindex medium. However, refraction between anisotropic media is a more exotic phenomenon which remains barely investigated, particularly at the nanoscale. Here, we visualize and comprehensively study the general case of refraction of electromagnetic waves between two strongly anisotropic (hyperbolic) media, and we do it with the use of nanoscaleconfined polaritons in a natural medium: αMoO_{3}. The refracted polaritons exhibit nonintuitive directions of propagation as they traverse planar nanoprisms, enabling to unveil an exotic optical effect: bendingfree refraction. Furthermore, we develop an inplane refractive hyperlens, yielding foci as small as λ_{p}/6, being λ_{p} the polariton wavelength (λ_{0}/50 compared to the wavelength of freespace light). Our results set the grounds for planar nanooptics in strongly anisotropic media, with potential for effective control of the flow of energy at the nanoscale.
Introduction
Hyperbolic electromagnetic waves arise as a consequence of the intrinsic anisotropy of the crystal lattice in natural media^{1,2,3} and of the artificially engineered anisotropic dielectric environment in metamaterials^{4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}, which leads to a metalliclike response (negative permittivity) along one (two) of the principal axes in such media and a dielectriclike response (positive permittivity) along the other two (one). Despite their fundamental interest and their potential for the development of new optical applications, these exotic waves are still scarcely explored. In particular, refraction of hyperbolic waves has only been studied for the case in which the incident beam comes from an isotropic medium, typically free space^{5,6,7}. As such, the general case of refraction, involving hyperbolic waves in which both the incident and the refracted waves exhibit noncollinear wavevector k and energy flux S, remains experimentally unexplored, particularly at the nanoscale, where the specific case of negative refraction of highly confined polaritons has only recently been theoretically proposed^{13,14}. The study of the general case of refraction could extend our capabilities to control the flow of light.
Importantly, the recent discoveries of phonon polaritons (PhPs) in van der Waals crystals^{15,16} with hyperbolic dispersion, such as hBN^{17,18,19}, αMoO_{3}^{20,21,22,23,24,25}, and αV_{2}O_{5}^{26}, have provided unique material platforms to study optical phenomena^{27,28} within strongly anisotropic natural media. In particular, PhPs in αMoO_{3} feature inplane hyperbolic propagation, ultralow losses, and strong confinement, offering the possibility to visualize refraction directly on the crystal surface and at the nanoscale, which can open new routes in planar nanooptics^{29}.
Here, we theoretically and experimentally demonstrate the general case of refraction at the interface between two strongly anisotropic (hyperbolic) media. Importantly, we do it at the nanoscale and in a lowloss natural medium by visualizing the propagation of polaritons as they traverse planar nanoprisms tailored on the surface of αMoO_{3}. Our images show nonintuitive directions of propagation and strong confinement of the refracted waves, enabling to unveil an exotic optical effect: bendingfree refraction, which extends the current capabilities to control the propagation of light at the nanoscale. Furthermore, we develop an inplane refractive hyperlens, yielding foci as small as λ_{p}/6, being λ_{p} the polariton wavelength (λ_{0}/50 with respect to the wavelength of light in free space). Our findings provide fundamental knowledge and an effective strategy for the manipulation of polaritons in anisotropic media, paving the way for integrated flat subwavelength optics.
Results and Discussion
Theory of refraction between hyperbolic media
The unique properties of polaritons in hyperbolic media can be better understood by analyzing their isofrequency curve (IFC), a slice of the polariton dispersion surface in momentumfrequency space (\({k}_{x}\), \({k}_{y},\omega\)) by a plane of constant frequency \({\omega }_{0}\). The IFCs of polaritons in two different hyperbolic media are illustrated in Fig. 1a, b. For convenience, we consider these two media to be defined by the same hyperbolic slab (with representative permittivity \({\varepsilon }_{x}\) = −5, \({\varepsilon }_{y}\) = 1, \({\varepsilon }_{z}\) = 5, see ‘Methods’) placed on two different dielectric substrates (with permittivities \({\varepsilon }_{{\rm{sub}}}\,\)= 1 and \({\varepsilon }_{{\rm{sub}}}\,\)= 5). In both cases, the IFCs describe open hyperbolas (black and gray curves, respectively). As a result, not all wavevectors \({\bf{k}}\) are allowed in these media, which implies that polaritons cannot propagate along all inplane directions in real space. In fact, propagation is only allowed within the sectors \({\rm{tan }}({k}_{x}/{k}_{y}) < \sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{y}/{\varepsilon }_{x}}\) limited by the asymptotes of the hyperbola in the \(({k}_{x},{k}_{y})\) plane (see Fig. 1a, b). Additionally, the Poynting vector \({\bf{S}}\)—which determines the propagation direction of the polariton and is normal to the IFC^{30,31}—is not in general collinear with \({\bf{k}}\), as indicated in Fig. 1a (they are collinear only along the xaxis in Fig. 1a). As such, the properties of propagating polaritons in hyperbolic media are different to those in isotropic media, where the IFCs are circular (see dashed cyan curve in Fig. 1a) and polaritons, as is wellknown, are allowed to propagate along all inplane directions in real space with the same absolute value of the wavevector, \({\bf{k}}\), which is always collinear to \({\bf{S}}\). Importantly, such properties of polaritons propagating in hyperbolic media have a dramatic effect when they refract at a boundary between two different hyperbolic media. Particularly, momentum conservation at the boundary implies that the projection \({{\bf{k}}}_{\parallel }\) of the incident and refracted wavevectors (\(\,{{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\), respectively) must be conserved (with \({{\rm{k}}}_{\parallel }={{\rm{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\bullet {\rm{sin }}\varphi\), where \(\varphi\) is the angle of the boundary as shown in Fig. 1a), giving rise to the generalized Snell’s law^{32}:
where \({\theta }_{{\rm{in}}{{k}}}\) and \({\theta }_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{k}}}\) are the angles that \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) form with the normal to the boundary, respectively (see Fig. 1c, d). The propagation directions of the incident and refracted waves are then given by \(\,{{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\), respectively, i.e. the directions normal to the hyperbolic IFCs for each case, which are in general noncollinear with \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) (Fig. 1b–d), and thus refraction can occur at angles \({\theta }_{{\rm{out}}S}\) that can be different from \({\theta }_{{\rm{out}}k}\). This behavior is in stark contrast to that in isotropic media, in which momentum conservation at the boundary implies that refraction occurs always at \({\theta }_{{\rm{out}}k}\)=\({\theta }_{{\rm{out}}S}\).
A particular case of refraction between hyperbolic media for an incident wave with collinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) is shown in Fig. 1a. We observe that the refracted wave (\({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\)) bends away from the direction of \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) towards the boundary (Fig. 1c), in contrast to what is expected in isotropic media for a wave passing from a low refractive index to a high refractive index, where \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) bends towards the normal to the boundary (see Supplementary Fig. 8). Also, the modulus of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) is much larger than that of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\), showing a strong wavelength reduction.
The general case of refraction occurs when \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) of the incident wave are not collinear. This case, which has not been tackled experimentally to date, is sketched in Fig. 1d, where a wave impinges at a tilting angle \({\theta }_{{\rm{in}}S}\) on the boundary between two hyperbolic media. The boundary is also tilted a given angle with respect to the crystal axes. Interestingly, due to the similar shapes of the IFCs in the considered hyperbolic media (αMoO_{3}/air and αMoO_{3}/SiO_{2}, black and gray curves in Fig. 1b, respectively), the Poynting vectors of the incident and refracted waves are parallel for almost any \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and boundary angle \(\varphi\), especially in the region where the arms of both hyperbolic IFCs are straight. Hence, the refracted wave propagates almost parallel to the incident wave (i.e. \({\theta }_{{\rm{in}}S}\approx {\theta }_{{\rm{out}}S}\)), as if the incident wave had been transmitted directly without any change in its propagation direction (black and blue arrows in Fig. 1d). This feature opens the door to the realization of bendingfree refraction at arbitrary incident angles in anisotropic media, which is not possible in isotropic media. Note, however, that the modulus and direction of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) is very different from the modulus and direction of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\), which opens the door to direct engineering of the wavelength and wavefront without modifying the direction of propagation of the wave.
Nanoimaging of refraction of inplane hyperbolic polaritons
We experimentally demonstrate and comprehensively study the characteristics of refraction of polaritons propagating in hyperbolic media. This provides the demonstration of these effects at the nanoscale and/or in a natural medium. To do so, we design and fabricate planar prisms (“Methods”) in a slab of the naturally hyperbolic van der Waals crystal αMoO_{3}. We then visualize the propagation of hyperbolic phonon polaritons (HPhPs) passing through them by polariton wavefront mapping using a scatteringtype scanning nearfield optical microscope (sSNOM, see “Methods”). To define the prisms, we etch away triangular regions in a silica (SiO_{2}) substrate on top of which we place a 160nmthick αMoO_{3} slab, thus forming a region αMoO_{3}/air with a different refractive index, and thus different polaritonic dispersion, with respect to the region αMoO_{3}/SiO_{2}. The different polaritonic dispersions in these two regions are clearly corroborated by the nearfield image of Fig. 2a, taken at an incident wavelength \({\lambda }_{0}\) = 11.3 μm. Specifically, we observe HPhPs launched inside the prism (highlighted by white dashed lines) by the flake edge (see “Methods” and Supplementary Fig. 4), which propagate with collinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and longer wavelength \({{\rm{\lambda }}}_{{\mathrm{{in}}}}\) (white arrow), i.e. smaller wavevector \(\left{{\rm{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\right\) = 2π/\({\lambda }_{{\rm{in}}}\) (black arrow), than outside the prism (\({{\rm{\lambda }}}_{\mathrm{p}}\), red arrow), thus revealing the lower refractive index of the prisms. We also observe in the same nearfield image that when the HPhPs reach a boundary of the prism tilted at an angle \({\theta }_{{\rm{in}}}\)~ 55°, they refract into the αMoO_{3}/SiO_{2} region (note that reflection is expected to be very weak, see Supplementary Note 8) along a different direction (\({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\), blue arrows) with respect to which their wavefronts are tilted (\({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\), green arrows). Thus, the refracted energy flux and wavevector are not collinear, in agreement with our predictions for hyperbolic refraction in Fig.1a. Importantly, while the wavevector, \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\), refracts towards the normal (note that polariton launching by the prism boundary can be ruled out, see Supplementary Note 3), the energy flux, \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\), bends away from it. This is in stark contrast to what is expected for a wave propagating from a lower refractive index region to a higher refractive index region in isotropic media. In addition, the modulus of the refracted wavevector \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\) (~6.48 μm^{−1}) is considerably larger than that of the incident wavevector \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) (~2.09 μm^{−1}) and that of the polariton wavevector along the xdirection outside the prism \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{p}}}\) (~4.08 μm^{−1}), revealing a strong wavelength reduction resulting from refraction in hyperbolic media. These findings are in perfect agreement with the case predicted in Figs. 1a–c for hyperbolic refraction considering collinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\).
To unambiguously verify the features of refraction between hyperbolic media, we carry out fullwave numerical simulations which mimic our experiments^{33} (see “Methods”). The resulting spatial distribution of the outofplane component of the electric field, \({\rm{Re}}\left({E}_{z}\left(x,y\right)\right),\) is plotted in Fig. 2b, clearly showing refraction of both the energy flux (\({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\)) and the wavevector (\({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\)), in excellent qualitative and quantitative agreement (\(\left{{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\right\) ~6.35μm^{−1}) with the experimental image in Fig. 2a. In addition to numerical simulations, we also validate our experimental results by performing analytical calculations^{34} (Fig. 2c) analogous to those shown in Fig. 1. Namely, we calculate the IFCs of HPhPs in αMoO_{3}/air (gray curve), and αMoO_{3}/SiO_{2} (black curve) regions at \({\lambda }_{0}\) = 11.3 μm, and, applying the condition of momentum (wavevector) conservation at the boundary (orange line), we extract the Poynting vector and wavevector of the refracted polaritons. Again, we observe refraction of the energy flux (\({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\), blue arrow) with a tilted wavevector (\({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\), green arrow) in excellent agreement with the experiment, as well as with the fullwave numerical simulations.
To further analyze refraction in hyperbolic media, we also perform experiments at a different illuminating wavelength \({\lambda }_{0}\) (different tilting angles of the prism boundary \(\theta\) are also shown in Supplementary Fig. 2), as shown in Fig. 2d–f for \({\lambda }_{0}\) = 11.1 μm. Interestingly, we observe that, in this case, both the angular separation between \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\) and the confinement effect are larger, being the refracted wave (\({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\)) almost parallel to the prism boundary and the modulus of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\) (12.47 μm^{−1}) about four times larger than that of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) (~3.14 μm^{−1}) and 2.1 times larger than that of \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{p}}}\) (~5.92 μm^{−1}).
Altogether, these results demonstrate the efficient refractive nature of our planar prisms, enabling us to visualize in realspace three important features of highly confined polaritons refracted at the boundary between two hyperbolic media: (i) large tilting of their wavefronts (given by \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\)) with respect to their propagation direction (given by \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}{\rm{exp }}}\)), (ii) counterintuitive directions of propagation, and (iii) subwavelength confinement (with respect to polaritons along the same crystal axis in the same medium).
Subdiffractional planar lensing of hyperbolic polaritons
Such unique features of refracted polaritons in naturally inplane hyperbolic media open the door to focus ultraconfined polaritons in a planar geometry. To demonstrate this possibility, we design and fabricate a planar lens in αMoO_{3} (Fig. 3a). As noted above (Fig. 2), when HPhPs with collinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) (red arrow in Fig. 3b) refract at a boundary with another hyperbolic medium with higher refractive index (such as when passing from αMoO_{3}/air to αMoO_{3}/SiO_{2}), they bend away from the normal to the boundary (blue arrow in Fig. 3b). This means that, in the case of considering a prism of triangular shape, as that shown in Fig. 3a, all the refracted polaritons (blue arrows) can converge into a single spot, and thus the prism acts as a focusing lens for highly confined polaritons (see Supplementary Note 9 for the analytical description of general shapes of lenses focusing hyperbolic waves). More importantly, as such a lens is based on refraction of HPhPs, the refracted waves can potentially feature infinitely large wavevectors when the boundary is perpendicular to the asymptote of the hyperbolic IFC, which would yield deeply subdiffractional foci sizes. However, as HPhPs decay exponentially, the intensity at a distant focus can be weak due to propagation losses, which would be more notable for large wavevectors approaching the asymptote of the hyperbolic IFC. Consequently, we designed our triangular lens looking for a compromise between a large refracted wavevector and a long propagation length of the refracted polaritons. According to our theoretical calculations (Supplementary Fig. 7), this compromise is obtained for an angle of the inplane wavevector of about 62°. Therefore, we fabricate a triangular prism with boundaries perpendicular to this angle (Fig. 3a). The experimental and simulated nearfield images for this lens design upon illumination at 11.16 μm are shown in Figs. 3c, d, respectively. In both images, we observe refraction of incident HPhPs with collinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) (red arrows) at the lens boundaries (black dashed contour) resulting in HPhPs with noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) (green and blue arrows, respectively) propagating along directions almost parallel to the boundaries (blue arrows), which eventually converge, resulting in a focus. This result is in stark contrast to that observed in a similar lens based on refraction of highly confined polaritons in an isotropic material, such as hBN, in which refracted polaritons bend towards the normal (Supplementary Fig. 8), making all them to diverge (Fig. 3e). The nearfield images of our hyperbolic lens reveal that the wavevector \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\,\) of the refracted HPhPs is much larger than the wavevector \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) of the incident HPhPs (note that in the experimental image there is a contribution of tiplaunched HPhPs with two different \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) wavevectors). More importantly, the wavevector \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) is also much larger than the wavevector \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{p}}}\,\) of HPhPs propagating along the xdirection in the flake on top of SiO_{2} (black arrows). In order to avoid the influence from the permittivity of substrate, we evaluate the focusing resolution by comparing the fullwidth at halfmaximum (FWHM) with the wavelength of polaritons propagating in MoO_{3}/SiO_{2} (\({\lambda }_{{\rm{p}}}=2\pi /{{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{p}}}\)). Since the focus shows a FWHM of ~240 nm (red dots and gray curve in Fig. 3f, for experimental and simulated line profiles, respectively), we obtain a focus that is much smaller than the polariton wavelength (\({\lambda }_{{\rm{p}}}\)) along the xdirection, or the freespace illumination (\({\lambda }_{0}\)), namely of ~\({{\rm{\lambda }}}_{{\rm{p}}}/6\), or \({\lambda }_{0}/50\). This resolution reveals that a diffractionlimited optical system in hyperbolic media can show a focus that is much smaller than the incident polaritonic wavelength, which again reflects the unique behavior of electromagnetic waves in hyperbolic media. Moreover, this result confirms our planar lens based on refraction of HPhPs as a nanooptical element that greatly exceeds the focusing resolution of any lens based on refraction of highly confined polaritons in isotropic media^{35,36,37,38}.
Visualization of the general case of refraction
So far, we have visualized refraction in hyperbolic media for the case in which collinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) refract into polaritons with noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\). However, the general phenomenon of refraction involves the incident polaritons exhibiting noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) (as sketched in Fig. 1b, d). In the following, we study this fundamental phenomenon in hyperbolic media (Fig. 4). To do this, we again fabricate prisms in αMoO_{3} (following the same structure design as in Fig. 2) and visualize (by sSNOM) the propagation of HPhPs refracting upon them. As shown in the nearfield image of Fig. 4a, we observe that HPhPs launched by the edge of the flake (black arrows) refract at boundary1 (Fig. 4c), and the outcoming HPhPs propagate with noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{R}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{R}}}\) inside the prism (orange arrows). As such, these polaritons can now be used to visualize the general case of refraction at another boundary of the prism. However, to carry out this experiment successfully, we need to ensure that: (i) the angle of the boundary allows refraction of polaritons according to momentum conservation, and (ii) the HPhPs can reach this boundary within a reasonable propagation distance. We fulfill these conditions by considering a horizontal boundary (boundary2) followed by a vertical boundary (boundary3) in the triangular prism, as shown in the nearfield image of Fig. 4a. In particular, we observe that HPhPs with noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{R}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{R}}}\,\) are reflected at boundary2 (Fig. 4d), yielding polaritons with noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) (green arrows) propagating directly towards boundary3, and reaching it within a reasonably short distance. Consequently, these polaritons refract at boundary3, which results in polaritons with noncollinear \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) (violet arrows), as predicted by momentum conservation (Fig. 4e), and in good agreement with numerical simulations mimicking the experiment (Fig. 4b). This result unambiguously demonstrates refraction of waves whose energy flux and wavevector directions are noncollinear, and thus constitutes the realspace visualization of the general case of refraction between two hyperbolic media, which, in addition, we demonstrate at the nanoscale and in a natural medium. Furthermore, we highlight that, since \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{k}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) are close to the asymptotes of the IFCs, where the tangents to both hyperbolas are parallel, \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({{\bf{S}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\) are almost parallel after refraction at boundary3. As a result, polaritons refract upon boundary3 behave as if they had been directly transmitted without any change in their direction of propagation, despite the wavevector does change upon this refraction phenomenon. Therefore, refraction upon this prism is bendingfree, in excellent agreement with our theoretical prediction shown in Fig. 1d. Such bendingfree refractive prism showed in our work will open possibilities to engineer polaritonic wavefronts at the nanoscale without the need of changing their direction of propagation.
Conclusions
In summary, our work explores the character of refraction between two strongly anisotropic media, which, despite its fundamental importance, has remained elusive up to now. Our observations of refraction of strongly confined polaritons in a hyperbolic biaxial van der Waals crystal reveal an exotic optical effect: bendingfree refraction, which opens the door to ondemand steering of light at the nanoscale and in natural media. Furthermore, our demonstration of a subwavelength planar lens at the nanoscale based on hyperbolic refraction paves the way for the development of planar nanooptical elements in anisotropic media. Altogether, our results open new avenues for integrated flat optics, directional energy transfer, and heat management applications, as well as for midinfrared (bio) sensing.
Methods
Sample fabrication and characterization
The αMoO_{3} and hBN nanometerthick flakes were obtained by mechanical exfoliation using a Nitto tape (Nitto Denko Co., SPV 224P) from commercial αMoO_{3} bulk crystals and isotopically enriched hBN (^{10}B) crystals grown via the atmospheric pressure flux growth method^{19}. First, the bulk crystals were thinned down employing the Nitto tape and transferred on an optically transparent polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp. Second, selected flakes with sharp edges were identified by an optical microscope and transferred on the target substrate by the drytransfer technique, which allows a precise positioning and alignment of the flakes on top of the triangular air regions (2D prisms) fabricated on a 500nmthick SiO_{2} layer grown by wet oxidation on a Si substrate. For an efficient transfer, the substrate was heated up to 200 °C^{39}.
The triangular air regions were fabricated in a twosteps process: (i) the air structured patterns were defined using a direct writing system (MLA 100, Heidelberg Instrument) equipped with a 365 nm LED light source on a 1.5µmthick positive tone photoresist (AZ MiR 701, MicroChemicals) previously deposited on the SiO_{2}/Si substrate; (ii) part of the SiO_{2} layer was etched away by a fluorinebased plasma using an inductively coupled plasma system (Advanced Oxide Etcher, SPTS), generating gaps with a depth of around 350 nm into the SiO_{2} layer. To get rid of photoresist residues and contaminants, the etched substrates were cleaned with a plasma ashing system (PVA TePla 300, PVA TePla AG) before transferring αMoO_{3} and hBN flakes.
Infrared nearfield nanoimaging
Infrared nanoimaging was performed with a commercial scatteringtype scanning nearfield optical microscope (sSNOM)^{40,41} from Neaspec GmbH. A tunable DRS Daylight Solutions quantum cascade laser (from 880 to 1100 cm^{−1}) was used as excitation source by focusing the light onto a metalcoated (Pt/Ir) AFM (atomic force microscope) tip oscillating at a tapping frequency of ∼280 kHz with a tapping amplitude ∼100 nm. We illuminate the αMoO_{3} flakes with spolarized infrared light and keep the polarization direction of the incident electric field (E_{inc}) perpendicular to the flake edges to launch HPhPs. The flakes were raster scanned and the tipscattered field E_{sca} was recorded with a pseudoheterodyne Michelson interferometer^{35} and detected using a liquid nitrogen cooled HgCdTe (MCT) detector. To suppress farfield background signals, the detected signal was demodulated at the \({n}{{\mathrm{{th}}}}\) harmonics of the tip oscillating frequency (\(n=3\) in our work), yielding the complexvalued nearfield signals \({{\rm{\sigma }}}_{n}={s}_{n}{\mathrm{e}}^{i{\varphi }_{n}}\), with \({s}_{n}\) being the nearfield amplitude and \({\varphi }_{n}\) being the nearfield phase. Throughout the manuscript, we show the real part of the nearfield signal, Re(\({\sigma }_{3}(x,y)\)), as a function of the tip position \((x,y)\). Edgelaunched polaritons yield fringes with spacing \({\lambda }_{\mathrm{p}}\), where \({\lambda }_{\mathrm{p}}\) is the polaritonic wavelength, while tiplaunched polaritons produce fringes with period of \({\lambda }_{\mathrm{p}}/2\), existing close to the flake edges (see Figs. 2 and 3 in the main text).
Fullwave numerical simulations using finiteelement methods
We simulated sSNOM nearfield images using the finiteelementmethod numerical software Comsol Multiphysics. αMoO_{3} slabs were placed on top of SiO_{2} substrates where we defined the same geometry of the air structures as in the experiments. The thickness of the slabs was set to the value extracted from AFM measurements of the αMoO_{3} flakes in the corresponding experimental sSNOM images. The whole system was illuminated with plane waves with spolarization perpendicular to the flake edges. Given that the sSNOM signal can be approximated by the vertical component of the electric field^{42}, we calculated the real part of \(z\) component the of the nearfield signal at 50 nm above the slab surface, \({\rm{Re}}\left({E}_{z}\left(x,y\right)\right)\). Meshing types and sizes were optimized to ensure a good convergence of simulated results. The experimental sSNOM images were well reproduced by our simulated images (see Figs. 2–4 in the main text). Yet, since our numerical simulations do not consider the influence of the tip, only the wavefront of edgelaunched polaritons is seen (note the difference with the measurements close to the flake edges, where dense fringes appear due to tiplaunched polaritons). The dielectric permittivity for αMoO_{3} and isotopically enriched hBN were taken from references^{19,33}. The real part of the dielectric function of SiO_{2} used throughout this work was extracted by fitting the values reported in references^{43,44,45} to experimental HPhPs dispersions with a Lorentzian model.
HPhPs dispersion and IFC from analytical calculations
The analytically calculated dispersion for polaritons in a biaxial slab embedded between two semiinfinite media^{34} is given by
where \(k\) is the inplane momentum, i.e. \(k=\sqrt{{k}_{x}^{2}+{k}_{y}^{2}}\), \({\varepsilon }_{1}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{3}\) are the permittivity of the superstrate and substrate, respectively, \(d\) is the thickness of biaxial slab, \(\rho =i\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{{{z}}}/({\varepsilon }_{{{x}}}{{{\cos }}}^{2}\alpha +{\varepsilon }_{{{y}}}{{{\sin }}}^{2}\alpha )}\), and where \(\alpha\) is the angle between the \(x\)axis and \({\bf{k}}\). Based on the equation above, we calculate the IFC of HPhPs by varying \(\alpha\) from 0° to 360° for a fixed incident frequency \(\omega\). In all cases we show propagating modes, i.e. those for which \({\rm{Re}}\left(k\right) > \)Im\(\left(k\right)\). In addition, since the polaritonic wavevector depends on \({\varepsilon }_{3}\) (\({\varepsilon }_{1}\) = 1 all throughout this work as the superstrate is air), different substrate permittivities can give rise to different effective hyperbolic media.
For the general case discussed in Fig. 1 in the main text, we select representative permittivity values: \({\varepsilon }_{x}={\varepsilon }_{y}={\varepsilon }_{z}=\)−3 for the isotropic slab and \({\varepsilon}_{x}=5,\;{\varepsilon}_{y}=1, {\varepsilon}_{z}=5\) for the hyperbolic slab, respectively, since at least one negative component is necessary for the existence of polaritons. The slab thickness is set to 100 nm in both cases. The permittivity of the substrates \({\varepsilon }_{3}\) are set to 1 and 5, for the medium in which polaritons are incident and refracted, respectively (white and gray regions in Fig. 1c, d).
For the specific case discussed in Figs. 2–4 we calculate the ICFs in αMoO_{3} slabs on top of air and SiO_{2} using the permittivity values described in the section “Fullwave numerical simulations using finiteelement methods”. The thickness of αMoO_{3} flakes was set to the value extracted from topography measurements.
Data availability
All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
References
Landau, L. D. et al. Electrodynamics of continuous media. Vol. 8 (elsevier, 2013).
Sun, J., Litchinitser, N. M. & Zhou, J. Indefinite by nature: from ultraviolet to terahertz. ACS Photon. 1, 293–303 (2014).
Korzeb, K., Gajc, M. & Pawlak, D. A. Compendium of natural hyperbolic materials. Opt. Exp. 23, 25406–25424 (2015).
Poddubny, A., Iorsh, I., Belov, P. & Kivshar, Y. Hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat. Photon. 7, 948–957 (2013).
Xu, T., Agrawal, A., Abashin, M., Chau, K. J. & Lezec, H. J. Allangle negative refraction and active flat lensing of ultraviolet light. Nature 497, 470–474 (2013).
Hoffman, A. J. et al. Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 6, 946–950 (2007).
Yao, J. et al. Optical negative refraction in bulk metamaterials of nanowires. Science 321, 930–930 (2008).
GomezDiaz, J. & Alu, A. Flatland optics with hyperbolic metasurfaces. ACS Photon. 3, 2211–2224 (2016).
Shalaev, V. M. Optical negativeindex metamaterials. Nat. Photon. 1, 41–48 (2007).
Lu, D. & Liu, Z. Hyperlenses and metalenses for farfield superresolution imaging. Nat. Commun. 3, 1205 (2012).
Krishnamoorthy, H. N., Jacob, Z., Narimanov, E., Kretzschmar, I. & Menon, V. M. Topological transitions in metamaterials. Science 336, 205–209 (2012).
Cortes, C., Newman, W., Molesky, S. & Jacob, Z. Quantum nanophotonics using hyperbolic metamaterials. J. Opt. 14, 063001 (2012).
Lin, X. et al. Allangle negative refraction of highly squeezed plasmon and phonon polaritons in graphene–boron nitride heterostructures. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 26, 6717–6721 (2017).
Jiang, J. et al. Broadband negative refraction of highly squeezed hyperbolic polaritons in 2D materials. Research 2532819 (2018).
Low, T. et al. Polaritons in layered twodimensional materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 182–194 (2017).
Basov, D., Fogler, M. & De Abajo, F.G. Polaritons in van der Waals materials. Science 354 (2016).
Dai, S. et al. Tunable phonon polaritons in atomically thin van der Waals crystals of boron nitride. Science 343, 1125–1129 (2014).
Caldwell, J. D. et al. Photonics with hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 552–567 (2019).
Giles, A. J. et al. Ultralowloss polaritons in isotopically pure boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 17, 134–139 (2018).
Ma, W. et al. Inplane anisotropic and ultralowloss polaritons in a natural van der Waals crystal. Nature 562, 557–562 (2018).
Zheng, Z. et al. A midinfrared biaxial hyperbolic van der Waals crystal. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav8690 (2019).
Duan, J. et al. Twisted Nanooptics: Manipulating Light at the Nanoscale with Twisted Phonon Polaritonic Slabs. Nano. Lett. 20, 5323–5329 (2020).
Zheng, Z. et al. Phonon polaritons in twisted doublelayers of hyperbolic van der Waals crystals. Nano. Lett. 20, 5301–5308 (2020).
Hu, G. et al. Topological polaritons and photonic magic angles in twisted αMoO3 bilayers. Nature 582, 209–213 (2020).
Chen, M. et al. Configurable phonon polaritons in twisted αMoO3. Nat. Mater. 19, 1307–1311 (2020).
TaboadaGutiérrez, J. et al. Broad spectral tuning of ultralowloss polaritons in a van der Waals crystal by intercalation. Nat. Mater. 19, 964–968 (2020).
Peining, L. et al. Hyperbolic phononpolaritons in boron nitride for nearfield optical imaging and focusing. Nat. Commun. 6, 7507 (2015).
Dai, S. et al. Subdiffractional focusing and guiding of polaritonic rays in a natural hyperbolic material. Nat. Commun. 6, 6963 (2015).
Kildishev, A. V., Boltasseva, A. & Shalaev, V. M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 6125 (2013). 1232009.
Macêdo, R., Dumelow, T. & Stamps, R. L. Tunable focusing in natural hyperbolic magnetic media. ACS Photon. 3, 1670–1677 (2016).
Guo, Z., Jiang, H. & Chen, H. Hyperbolic metamaterials: From dispersion manipulation to applications. J. Appl. Phys. 127, 071101 (2020).
Yu, N. et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333–337 (2011).
Álvarez‐Pérez, G. et al. Infrared Permittivity of the Biaxial van der Waals Semiconductor αMoO3 from Near and FarField Correlative Studies. Adv. Mater. 32, 1908176 (2020).
ÁlvarezPérez, G., Voronin, K. V., Volkov, V. S., AlonsoGonzález, P. & Nikitin, A. Y. Analytical approximations for the dispersion of electromagnetic modes in slabs of biaxial crystals. Phys. Rev. B 100, 235408 (2019).
AlonsoGonzález, P. et al. Controlling graphene plasmons with resonant metal antennas and spatial conductivity patterns. Science 344, 1369–1373 (2014).
Chaudhary, K. et al. Polariton nanophotonics using phasechange materials. Nat. Commun. 10, 4487 (2019).
Huber, A., Deutsch, B., Novotny, L. & Hillenbrand, R. Focusing of surface phonon polaritons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 203104 (2008).
Zhao, C., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Fang, N. & Huang, T. J. A reconfigurable plasmofluidic lens. Nat. Commun. 4, 2305 (2013).
CastellanosGomez, A. et al. Deterministic transfer of twodimensional materials by alldry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Mater. 1, 011002 (2014).
Fei, Z. et al. Gatetuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nanoimaging. Nature 487, 82–85 (2012).
Chen, J. et al. Optical nanoimaging of gatetunable graphene plasmons. Nature 487, 77–81 (2012).
Nikitin, A. et al. Realspace mapping of tailored sheet and edge plasmons in graphene nanoresonators. Nat. Photon. 10, 239–243 (2016).
Palik, Edward D., ed. Handbook of optical constants of solids. Vol. 3. Academic press, 1998.
Kitamura, R., Laurent, P. & Jonasz, M. Optical constants of silica glass from extreme ultraviolet to far infrared at near room temperature. Appl. Opt. 46, 33 (2007).
Kischkat, J. et al. Midinfrared optical properties of thin films of aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, aluminum nitride, and silicon nitride. Appl. Opt. 51, 28 (2012).
Acknowledgements
G.Á.P. and J.T.G. acknowledge support through the Severo Ochoa Program from the Government of the Principality of Asturias (nos. PA20PFBP19053 and PA18PFBP17126, respectively). S.X. acknowledges the support from Independent Research Fund Denmark (Project No. 904100333B). B.C. acknowledges the support from VILLUM FONDEN (No. 00027987). The Center for Nanostructured Graphene is sponsored by the Danish National Research Foundation (Project No. DNRF103.) K.V.V. and V.S.V. gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Agreement No. 075152021606). J.M.S. acknowledges financial support through the Ramón y Cajal Program from the Government of Spain (RYC2018026196I). A.Y.N. and J.I.M. acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (national projects MAT201788358C33R and PID2019104604RB/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). R.H. acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (national project RTI2018094830B100 and the project MDM20160618 of the Marie de Maeztu Units of Excellence Program) and the Basque Government (grant No. IT116419). A.Y.N. also acknowledges the Basque Department of Education (grant no. PIBA202010014). P.A.G. acknowledges support from the European Research Council under starting grant no. 715496, 2DNANOPTICA and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation grant number PID2019111156GBI00).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.A.G. and J.D. conceived the study. P.A.G. supervised the project. J.D. carried out the nearfield imaging measurements with the help of A.B. J.D., A.I.F.T.M., S.X., B.C., and J.I.M. contributed to sample fabrication. S.L. and J.H.E. provided the isotopically enriched boron nitride. G.Á.P. and K.V.V. carried out the analytical calculations and A.I.F.T.M. performed the numerical simulations with the help of G.ÁP. and supervised by J.M.S. and A.Y.N. P.A.G., J.D., G.Á.P., J.T.G., V.S.V., A.Y.N., R.H., and J.M.S. participated in data analysis. P.A.G., J.D., and G.Á.P. wrote the manuscript with input from the rest of authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.H. is cofounder of Neaspec GmbH, a company producing scatteringtype nearfield scanning optical microscope systems, such as the one used in this study. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Duan, J., ÁlvarezPérez, G., TresguerresMata, A.I.F. et al. Planar refraction and lensing of highly confined polaritons in anisotropic media. Nat Commun 12, 4325 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021245993
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021245993
This article is cited by

Inplane hyperbolic polariton tuners in terahertz and longwave infrared regimes
Nature Communications (2023)

Giant quarticphonon decay in PVDgrown αMoO3 flakes
Nano Research (2023)

Hyperbolic metamaterials: fusing artificial structures to natural 2D materials
eLight (2022)

Manipulating polaritons at the extreme scale in van der Waals materials
Nature Reviews Physics (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.