Arginine methylation promotes siRNA-binding specificity for a spermatogenesis-specific isoform of the Argonaute protein CSR-1

Nguyen, Dieu An H.; Phillips, Carolyn M.

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24526-6

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 09 July 2021

Arginine methylation promotes siRNA-binding specificity for a spermatogenesis-specific isoform of the Argonaute protein CSR-1

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 4212 (2021) Cite this article

3862 Accesses
11 Citations
7 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

CSR-1 is an essential Argonaute protein that binds to a subclass of 22G-RNAs targeting most germline-expressed genes. Here we show that the two isoforms of CSR-1 have distinct expression patterns; CSR-1B is ubiquitously expressed throughout the germline and during all stages of development while CSR-1A expression is restricted to germ cells undergoing spermatogenesis. Furthermore, CSR-1A associates preferentially with 22G-RNAs mapping to spermatogenesis-specific genes whereas CSR-1B-bound small RNAs map predominantly to oogenesis-specific genes. Interestingly, the exon unique to CSR-1A contains multiple dimethylarginine modifications, which are necessary for the preferential binding of CSR-1A to spermatogenesis-specific 22G-RNAs. Thus, we have discovered a regulatory mechanism for C. elegans Argonaute proteins that allows for specificity of small RNA binding between similar Argonaute proteins with overlapping temporal and spatial localization.

Small RNA pathways in the nematode Ascaris in the absence of piRNAs

Article Open access 11 February 2022

Maxim V. Zagoskin, Jianbin Wang, … Richard E. Davis

Translation and codon usage regulate Argonaute slicer activity to trigger small RNA biogenesis

Article Open access 09 June 2021

Meetali Singh, Eric Cornes, … Germano Cecere

HRDE-2 drives small RNA specificity for the nuclear Argonaute protein HRDE-1

Article Open access 01 February 2024

Shihui Chen & Carolyn M. Phillips

Introduction

In the race for evolutionary fitness, sexual selection is a strong selective force. Multicellular eukaryotes have long favored sexual divergence of the male and female genders to increase genetic diversity, often resulting in sexual dimorphism. In C. elegans, a protandrous nematode, sexual reproduction can occur in a single germline where spermatogenesis and oogenesis take place sequentially. Both eggs and sperm are derived from the same pool of mitotically replicating nuclei at the distal tip of each gonad arm, which subsequently undergo meiosis as they progress through the germline toward the proximal end. During the last larval stage (L4), ~40 meiotic nuclei in each gonad arm begin the process of spermatogenesis, where they differentiate into mature sperm¹. Subsequently, oogenesis begins as the animal enters the adult stage, and the germline continues to produce oocytes for the rest of the reproductive cycle².

Any given germ cell has the potential to differentiate into either spermatocytes or oocytes, though once committed to a sexual fate, the cells undergo distinct meiotic programs that vary remarkably in rate and mechanics³. Regardless of these differences, meiosis occurs exclusively in germ cells, which are surrounded by an environment inducive to the expression of germline-specific transcripts and suppression of somatic transcripts. One mechanism by which C. elegans germ cells promote this selective environment is by way of a perinuclear structure called the P granule⁴. These germline granules, which help to ensure pluripotency and germ cell identity, form a phase-separated condensate outside of the nucleus and contiguous with nuclear pores, where they regulate newly synthesized germline transcripts^4,5,6,7. One key regulator of P granule morphology and C. elegans germline development is the Argonaute protein, CSR-1 (Chromosome Segregation and RNAi deficient)^8,9.

Argonaute proteins are the core effectors of all small RNA-related pathways. These proteins bind small guide RNAs and regulate complementary transcripts by either directly cleaving target RNAs or recruiting cofactors that promote transcriptional or posttranscriptional gene regulation^10,11. Of the ~27 Argonaute proteins annotated in the C. elegans genome, only CSR-1 is essential for fertility, and it is reported to regulate over 4000 germline-expressed genes^8,12. CSR-1 binds to a class of antisense 22-nucleotide small interfering RNAs with a 5′ guanosine (22G-RNAs) whose target transcripts are thought to be protected from silencing by other small RNA-mediated pathways, and are thus “licensed” for germline expression^8,13,14. In contrast, foreign DNA such as transposons and transgenes containing non-C. elegans sequences are recognized by piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs, also known as 21U-RNAs in C. elegans), which, along with their Argonaute cofactor PRG-1, can initiate a multigenerational epigenetic silencing signal that depends on chromatin factors and 22G-RNAs bound by the worm-specific Argonaute proteins (WAGOs)^15,16,17. The balance of gene licensing and gene silencing by CSR-1 and the WAGO proteins, respectively, is critical to promote expression of essential germline genes; and a disrupted balance severely compromises germline development and fertility^18,19.

Studies of CSR-1 have reported several severe phenotypes that lead to defects in viability and fertility. In csr-1 mutant embryos, chromosomes fail to properly align on the metaphase plate, resulting in aberrant mitotic division and anaphase bridging^8,12,20. In the adult germline, loss of CSR-1 leads to fewer germ cells, defects in meiotic progression, and a delayed spermatogenesis to oogenesis switch²¹. Additionally, CSR-1 has been implicated in a myriad of other cellular processes, including maturation of core histone mRNAs, promotion of sense-oriented RNA polymerase II transcription, attenuation of translation elongation, prevention of premature activation of embryonic transcripts in oocytes, alternative splicing, and paternal inheritance^{22,23,24,25,26,27}. Yet how one Argonaute protein can regulate so many seemingly distinct processes remains unanswered.

Here we demonstrate that CSR-1 has two isoforms—CSR-1B, which is present throughout the germline and CSR-1A, which is specific to spermatogenic germ cells. CSR-1A and CSR-1B associate with distinct subsets of small RNAs to regulate spermatogenic or oogenic transcripts, respectively. The specificity of the two CSR-1 isoforms is interesting, considering they share nearly complete sequence homology and co-localize at the P granule in L4 larval and male germlines. We found that the first exon of CSR-1A is modified at arginine/glycine (RG) motifs by dimethylarginine. Here we show that loss of the dimethylarginine results in the loss of CSR-1A specificity for its preferred spermatogenic small RNA partners, resulting in CSR-1A indiscriminately binding to both spermatogenic and oogenic siRNAs. Thus, in this study, we have identified the first instance of methylarginine modification of a C. elegans Argonaute protein and demonstrated a previously unappreciated mechanism by which Argonaute proteins can acquire small RNA specificity.

Results

The long isoform of CSR-1 is selectively expressed during spermatogenesis

The Argonaute protein, CSR-1, has two isoforms, though previously little was known about their distinct functions. The longer isoform, referred to as CSR-1A, and the shorter isoform, CSR-1B, share complete sequence homology, except for a unique exon at the 5′ end of CSR-1A (Fig. 1a). Both isoforms are expressed, though at differential levels (Fig. 1b)^8,20. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis suggests that CSR-1A is expressed in spermatogenic gonads, but excluded from oogenic gonads²⁸. To explore the distinct functions of the two CSR-1 isoforms, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to endogenously tag CSR-1A at its N-terminus with a 2xHA/mCherry tag. We also tagged both CSR-1A and CSR-1B in the same strain by adding a 3xFLAG/GFP tag to the N-terminus of CSR-1B (Fig. 1a). When both isoforms are tagged, CSR-1A + B is strongly expressed throughout the germline during both the fourth larval (L4) and adult stages, in agreement with previous studies (Fig. 1a)⁸. Interestingly, when only CSR-1A is tagged, expression is restricted to the spermatogenesis region of the germline in L4 hermaphrodites and males (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We confirmed this observation by western blot analysis of all larval stage and adult animals, detecting CSR-1A expression robustly during the L4 stage and very weakly in gravid adults, coinciding temporally with spermatogenesis in C. elegans (Fig. 1c). Taken together, these results demonstrate that though both CSR-1 isoforms are expressed in the germline, CSR-1A expression is limited to germ cells undergoing spermatogenesis while CSR-1B is expressed throughout the germline in larval and adult animals.

**Fig. 1: CSR-1 isoforms have distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns.**

CSR-1A and CSR-1B are expressed from independent promoters

To address how CSR-1A and CSR-1B have such distinct expression patterns, we sought to determine whether they are expressed from independent promoters. We first fused ~1.5 kb of DNA preceding the csr-1a start codon to an mCherry reporter and exogenously expressed it in the germline using the MosSCI system (Fig. 1d)²⁹. The region preceding the csr-1a start codon, the putative csr-1a promoter, drives mCherry expression only during the L4 stage and, during this time, expression is restricted to the spermatogenesis region of the germline. In gravid adults, residual mCherry expression can be detected inside the spermatheca, but is completely absent from the rest of the germline (Fig. 1d). To determine whether any regulatory sequences reside in the intron between the unique csr-1a exon and the start codon for csr-1b, we fused ~0.5 kb of DNA from this intron to a GFP reporter and expressed it in the germline using the MosSCI system (Fig. 1d). This region, the putative csr-1b promoter, drives GFP expression throughout the germline cytoplasm, in all developmental stages. The GFP expression can be observed in oocytes and fertilized embryos but is excluded from the spermatheca (Fig. 1d). These promoter fusion experiments corroborate our western blot analysis and indicate that CSR-1A is expressed predominantly during spermatogenesis, hinting at a unique role for CSR-1A during this developmental time point. Furthermore, the promoter fusion transgenes were able to recapitulate the expression pattern of the isoform-specific translation fusion proteins (Fig. 1a), indicating that the promoters are sufficient to drive the distinct expression patterns. Together, these data indicate that the intronic region that sits between the first csr-1a exon and the start codon for csr-1b contains the promoter sequence for CSR-1B, and that their distinct promoters independently establish the differential expression patterns of CSR-1A and CSR-1B.

CSR-1A localizes to the P granules during spermatogenesis

To further characterize the expression pattern of CSR-1A, we immunostained for CSR-1A and DAPI-stained for germline nuclei in dissected L4 hermaphrodite gonads. As the germline progresses towards the proximal end, germ cells undergo early stages of meiosis up until pachytene in a non-sex-specific manner³. In post-pachytene, however, spermatocytes and oocytes commit to their respective sexual fates, and spermatocyte chromosomes exhibit an extensive condensation phase³. During L4, when spermatogenesis begins, CSR-1A expression is first observed in cells that are exiting pachytene, namely cells transitioning into diplotene and karyosome, indicating that CSR-1A is selectively present in spermatocytes (Fig. 2a). This expression is reminiscent of the sperm-specific Argonaute protein ALG-3, which is also present in spermatocytes during spermatogenesis²⁶. To further investigate the role of CSR-1A during spermatogenesis, we carefully examined protein localization at different time points. As ALG-3 is another Argonaute protein that is expressed during spermatogenesis and is required for proper sperm development, we created a double-transgenic strain labeling both CSR-1A and ALG-3, using CRISPR. At early L4, or 45 h post hatching, both CSR-1A and ALG-3 form perinuclear foci in the spermatogenesis region that colocalize with the P granule marker PGL-1 (Fig. 2b, c). In contrast, CSR-1A + B forms perinuclear foci throughout the germline (Supplementary Fig. 2a). As the animals reach the L4 to adult transition, 52 h post hatching, CSR-1A and ALG-3 still colocalize during early spermatogenesis. However, by the time germ cells reach the secondary spermatocyte stage, CSR-1A expression becomes undetectable, while ALG-3 expression persists (Fig. 2b, lower panel, Supplementary Fig. 2b). PGL-1 similarly disappears from P granules in primary spermatocytes and is subsequently cleared from secondary spermatocytes³⁰. Together, these data demonstrate that like ALG-3, CSR-1A localizes to P granules during spermatogenesis, but unlike ALG-3, CSR-1A expression is restricted to the early stages of spermatogenesis and is not found in secondary spermatocytes.

**Fig. 2: CSR-1A is expressed in the spermatogenesis region of the germline.**

CSR-1A is required for optimal sperm fertility

We next sought to determine the role of CSR-1A in fertility. We first created two mutant alleles of csr-1a using CRISPR (Fig. 3a). csr-1a(cmp135) removes the first seven amino acids including the start codon and csr-1a(cmp143) removes the same region plus ~500 bp of the csr-1a promoter region. We confirmed that the mutants have severely reduced csr-1a expression via RT-qPCR and western blot analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). We first examined the fertility of csr-1a mutants by comparing the brood size of csr-1a(cmp135) hermaphrodites to wild-type hermaphrodites at 20 and 25 °C. We did not observe a significant reduction in brood size in csr-1a(cmp135) mutants compared to wild-type animals at 20 °C. However, at 25 °C, the brood size of csr-1a(cmp135) mutant animals was significantly reduced compared to wild-type animals (Fig. 3b). Because CSR-1A is expressed during spermatogenesis, we next sought to determine if CSR-1A is required for optimal male fertility.

**Fig. 3: CSR-1 isoforms function independently of one another.**

One aspect of sperm quality that can be tested in vitro is sperm activation. Sperm activation is the process by which round spermatids are transformed into mature and motile spermatozoa³¹. This process can be recapitulated in vitro using Pronase E, a cocktail of proteases that induces sperm maturation and pseudopod formation³². Because C. elegans fertility is reduced at 25 °C, we raised wild-type and csr-1a mutant males at 25 °C to assess sperm activation under compromised conditions. Wild-type spermatids from males that were raised at 25 °C for one generation were activated at a rate of 97%, and after two generations at 25 °C, they were activated at a rate of 96% (Fig. 3c). In csr-1a males, we saw a modest reduction in the percentage of activated spermatids after one and two generations at 25 °C (69% for cmp135 and 70% for cmp143 after one generation, and 64% for cmp135 and 66% for cmp143 after two generations) (Fig. 3c). Because the effects we observed on sperm activation were modest yet significant, we generated two additional alleles of csr-1a to confirm our results. These new alleles remove the majority of the unique csr-1a exon (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Similar to what we observed with csr-1a(cmp135) and csr-1a(cmp143), the two new alleles, csr-1a(cmp253) and csr-1a(cmp254) reduced the percentage of activated spermatids by ~25–30% (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Together, these data suggest that CSR-1A contributes to optimizing fertility and is necessary to promote sperm activation.

CSR-1A and CSR-1B are expressed independently of one another

Disruption of CSR-1 expression results in severe infertility and embryonic lethality^8,12. To determine if our csr-1a alleles also affect the expression of CSR-1B protein, we introduced a 2xFLAG tag immediately following the start codon of CSR-1B in the csr-1a(cmp135) mutant background using CRISPR (Fig. 3d). Similar to wild-type, CSR-1B in the csr-1a(cmp135) mutant localized to perinuclear foci associated with the P granule marker, PGL-1 (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, by western blot, the CSR-1B protein was expressed in wild-type and csr-1a(cmp135) mutant animals, whereas the CSR-1A was undetectable in the csr-1a(cmp135) mutant but present in the wild-type strain (Fig. 3f). Interestingly, we observed that CSR-1B appears to accumulate at a modestly higher level in the csr-1a(cmp135) mutant, but not in the csr-1a(cmp143) mutant (Supplementary Fig. 3b). To determine if CSR-1B is required for CSR-1A expression, we generated an effectively null allele of csr-1b, where we mutated the csr-1b start codon to isoleucine, in the mCherry::CSR-1A strain using CRISPR (Fig. 3g). In this csr-1b(cmp258) mutant, mCherry::CSR-1A is expressed at perinuclear foci in the spermatogenesis region of L4 animals, similar to wild-type expression of CSR-1A (Fig. 3h). These animals, however, are sterile and need to be maintained over a balancer, a phenotype previously associated with csr-1 mutants¹².

Because CSR-1B is expressed during spermatogenesis and, like ALG-3, is present in the secondary spermatocytes, (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b), we next asked if CSR-1B contributes to optimizing sperm health. To this end, we performed in vitro sperm activation on csr-1b(cmp258) mutants at 25 °C_. We observed that 39% of csr-1b mutant sperm are activated after one generation raised at 25 °C, in contrast with 97% activation rate in the control animals (Fig. 3c). This rate of spermatid activation drops further to 22% after two generations at 25 °C while the rate remains at 97% in the control animals. Furthermore, among the population of activated sperm in the csr-1b mutant, we occasionally observed a striking phenotype of spiky pseudopods, reminiscent of the compromised sperm of the alg-3/4 mutants (Supplementary Fig. 3e)³³. This phenotype was never observed in wild-type or csr-1a mutants. Thus, these data demonstrate that both CSR-1 isoforms are required for robust sperm activation.

Together, these data demonstrate that CSR-1A and CSR-1B do not depend on one another for localization or expression, and thus they behave as independent proteins with seemingly specialized functions in the C. elegans germline. More importantly, the data suggest that both CSR-1 isoforms are intimately involved in optimizing sperm health, though the mechanism used by each isoform to achieve this end still needs to be determined.

CSR-1A and CSR-1B target distinct groups of genes

To investigate the small RNAs bound by each CSR-1 isoform and thus determine whether CSR-1A and CSR-1B have distinct small RNA partners, we immunoprecipitated CSR-1A (from the 2xHA::csr-1a strain), CSR-1B (from the csr-1a(cmp135); 2xFLAG::csr-1b strain), and CSR-1A + B (from the 2xFLAG::csr-1b strain), and sequenced the associated small RNAs. CSR-1A, CSR-1B, and CSR-1A + B were immunoprecipitated from L4 stage animals, and CSR-1B and CSR-1A + B were additionally immunoprecipitated from the adult stage, for comparison. We found that the small RNAs that immunoprecipitate with CSR-1A, CSR-1B, and CSR-1A + B are enriched for germline genes³⁴ at both L4 and adult stages (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4a). However, CSR-1A preferentially associates with small RNAs mapping to spermatogenic genes³⁴ at the L4 stage while CSR-1B preferentially associates with small RNAs mapping to oogenic genes³⁴ both at L4 and adult stages (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4a). CSR-1B is expressed at much higher levels than CSR-1A at the L4 stage (Figs. 1b, 3f), therefore we would expect that when we tag both isoforms together (CSR-1A + B) the majority of the small RNAs immunoprecipitated would associate with CSR-1B. Indeed, we observed that the majority of the small RNAs immunoprecipitated with CSR-1A + B map to oogenic genes at both L4 and adult stages (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4a). Regardless of isoform, the majority of the small RNAs associated with CSR-1 are 22-nucleotide long with a strong bias for guanine as the 5′ nucleotide (Supplementary Fig. 4b–d). These data indicate that, while both isoforms of CSR-1 bind 22G-RNAs mapping to germline genes, CSR-1A is enriched for siRNAs mapping to spermatogenesis-specific genes and CSR-1B is enriched for siRNAs mapping to oogenesis-specific genes.

We next sought to define a list of genes targeted by CSR-1A and CSR-1B. We defined the CSR-1A, CSR-1B, and CSR-1A + B target genes at both L4 and adult stages as those with complementary small RNAs at least twofold enriched in the IP compared to input, with at least 10 RPM in the IP samples and a DESeq2 adjusted p value of ≤0.05 (Supplementary Data 1). Comparing these gene lists with one another, we found that the majority of CSR-1B target genes are also CSR-1A + B target genes at both L4 (94.5% overlap) and adult stages (81.4% overlap) (Fig. 4b, c). Furthermore, the CSR-1B target genes at L4 stage overlap significantly with the CSR-1B target genes at adult stage (94.0% overlap), and similarly the CSR-1A + B target genes at L4 stage overlap significantly with the CSR-1A + B target genes at adult stage (78.0% overlap) (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). In contrast, only 28.8% of CSR-1A target genes at L4 stage overlap with CSR-1B target genes at L4 stage, and only 46.6% of CSR-1A target genes at L4 stage overlap with CSR-1A + B target genes at L4 stage, despite the CSR-1A + B IP at L4 stage immunoprecipitating both isoforms (Fig. 4b). Thus, these data demonstrate that CSR-1A targets a distinct set of genes and that due to the much higher expression of CSR-1B, immunoprecipitation of the two isoforms together at the L4 stage enriches for small RNAs that predominantly map to CSR-1B target genes.

To further our understanding of which genes are targeted by CSR-1A and CSR-1B, we compared the CSR-1A, CSR-1B, and CSR-1A + B target gene lists to previously described target gene lists for other small RNA pathways^{28,33,34,35,36,37,38,39}. As expected, CSR-1B and CSR-1A + B are strongly enriched for hermaphrodite and male CSR-1 target genes, and more modestly enriched for ALG-3/4 target genes (Fig. 4d). In contrast, CSR-1A is only modestly enriched for hermaphrodite CSR-1 target genes, and strongly enriched for ALG-3/4 target genes and male CSR-1 target genes (Fig. 4d). It has previously been shown that male CSR-1 target genes, identified by immunoprecipitating both isoforms of CSR-1 in males, include both oogenesis-specific genes identified as CSR-1 targets in hermaphrodites, and male-specific genes that are also ALG-3/4 targets³³. Thus, it is not surprising that both CSR-1B, which preferentially binds hermaphrodite CSR-1 target genes, and CSR-1A, which preferentially binds ALG-3/4 target genes, are enriched for male CSR-1 target genes (Fig. 4d). In further agreement with these data, the CSR-1A target gene list is strongly enriched for spermatogenic genes, and the CSR-1B and CSR-1A + B target gene lists are strongly enriched for oogenic genes (Fig. 4d). In contrast, neither CSR-1A, CSR-1B, nor CSR-1A + B are enriched for mutator target genes, which include pseudogenes, repetitive elements, transposons, and other germline-repressed genes (Fig. 4d). Together, these data further show that CSR-1A and CSR-1B bind small RNAs targeting germline genes associated with distinct small RNA pathways, with CSR-1A preferentially targeting spermatogenic genes and ALG-3/4 targets and CSR-1B preferentially targeting oogenic genes and hermaphrodite CSR-1 targets.

CSR-1A does not require ALG-3/4 to bind spermatogenic small RNAs

Because CSR-1A shares a similar expression pattern to ALG-3 and targets spermatogenic genes, we next sought to determine whether the small RNAs bound to CSR-1A require ALG-3/4 for their production. To this end, we immunoprecipitated CSR-1A in an alg-3/4 mutant background and sequenced the associated small RNAs. Interestingly, in the absence of alg-3 and alg-4, CSR-1A was still preferentially loaded with small RNAs targeting spermatogenic genes (Fig. 4a, d). In addition, 82.4% of CSR-1A target genes in the wild-type background were also defined as targets of CSR-1A in the alg-3; alg-4 double mutant background (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, CSR-1A target genes in the alg-3; alg-4 double mutant background were strongly enriched for ALG-3/4 target genes and male CSR-1 target genes, and modestly enriched for hermaphrodite CSR-1 target genes, similar to CSR-1A target genes in a wild-type background (Fig. 4d). Thus, these data show, despite CSR-1A and ALG-3/4 targeting many of the same genes, CSR-1A is not directly downstream of ALG-3/4 in regulating spermatogenic gene expression and ALG-3 and ALG-4 are dispensable for the production of CSR-1A-bound spermatogenic small RNAs.

CSR-1A expression is positively correlated with the expression of CSR-1A target genes

It is well-established that CSR-1 targets germline-expressed genes, and that CSR-1 can either license and protect these transcripts from silencing by the piRNA pathway in the adult germline or can modestly tune the transcript level in developing oocytes and embryos^8,14,20. To determine whether CSR-1A is similarly protecting or tuning its target transcripts, we generated mRNA high-throughput sequencing libraries from wild-type, csr-1a(cmp135) mutants, and csr-1a(cmp143) mutants at 20 °C (Supplementary Data 2). In both csr-1a mutant alleles, CSR-1A targets are modestly, but significantly, downregulated compared to wild-type (Fig. 5a). Similarly, spermatogenic genes²⁸ are significantly downregulated in both csr-1a mutants compared to wild-type (Fig. 5a). In contrast, mutator target genes⁴⁰ were unchanged in both csr-1a mutants (Fig. 5a). It is worth noting, however, that only 10.5% of CSR-1A targets are significantly downregulated (DESeq2 adjusted p value of ≤0.05) in csr-1a(cmp143) mutants, while 9.7% of CSR-1A targets are significantly upregulated (DESeq2 adjusted p value of ≤0.05) in csr-1a(cmp143) mutants (Fig. 5b). Of the downregulated CSR-1A targets, 82.6% are also spermatogenic genes²⁸, while the upregulated CSR-1A targets only include 23.3% spermatogenic genes (Fig. 5b). To confirm that some CSR-1A target transcripts are indeed reduced in the csr-1a mutants, we performed RT-qPCR on three spermatogenic genes that were strongly enriched for mapped small RNAs in the CSR-1A immunoprecipitation. We determined that all three genes showed a consistent and significant decrease in transcript levels in both csr-1a mutants compared to wild-type animals (Fig. 5c). In contrast, the csr-1a mutants had no effect on morc-1, a germline gene that was only enriched in CSR-1B and CSR1A + B immunoprecipitation, and not in CSR-1A (Fig. 5c). Therefore, CSR-1A appears to have modest but significant positive effects on some of its target transcripts, such that in its absence, these genes have reduced expression.

**Fig. 5: CSR-1A targets spermatogenesis-expressed genes.**

Recent studies have examined the relationship between the levels of siRNAs targeting each transcript in correlation with mRNA expression^20,41. In general, mRNAs expression tends to be lower for genes with very high levels of siRNAs and for genes that are targets of the Argonaute protein, WAGO-1⁴¹. In contrast, mRNA expression tends to be higher for genes that are targets of CSR-1⁴¹. To determine whether this trend holds true for CSR-1A target genes, for comparison, we generated a list of WAGO-1 target genes at the L4 stage by immunoprecipitating WAGO-1 and defining targets as those at least twofold enriched in a WAGO-1 IP compared to input, with at least 10 RPM in the IP samples, and a DESeq2 adjusted p value of ≤0.05. Then using mRNA and small RNA sequencing libraries from wild-type animals at L4 stage, we found that WAGO-1 targets have significantly higher levels of mapping complementary small RNAs compared to CSR-1A and CSR-1B targets (Fig. 5d–f). Moreover, mRNA expression of WAGO-1 targets is significantly lower than mRNA expression of CSR-1A and CSR-1B target genes (Fig. 5d–f). Therefore, the CSR-1A bound small RNAs and target mRNAs are more similar in expression level to those of CSR-1B compared to WAGO-1, further supporting the argument that CSR-1A may function similarly to CSR-1B to promote expression of its target genes. We next grouped the CSR-1A target genes into seven bins based on their small RNA expression in wild-type animals. We found that higher levels of CSR-1A siRNAs (>20 RPM in wild-type animals) correlates with reduced mRNA expression in csr-1a mutants, while the expression of genes with lower levels of CSR-1A siRNAs tends to be unchanged in csr-1a mutants (Fig. 5g). This result is consistent with both the very modest effect of the csr-1a mutants on transcript level of all CSR-1A target genes (Fig. 5a) and the much more significant effect of the csr-1a mutants on the transcript level of the three CSR-1A target genes tested by qPCR (Fig. 5c), which were selected based on the strong enrichment for their mapped small RNAs in the CSR-1A immunoprecipitation. Together, these data suggest that CSR-1A may share a similar licensing mechanism to what has been previously proposed for CSR-1, and that in csr-1a mutants, the spermatogenic transcripts licensed by CSR-1A are no longer protected and may be subjected to degradation.

The first exon of CSR-1A is unstructured and contains RG motifs

CSR-1A differs from its shorter counterpart by a single N-terminal exon. The exon is arginine/glycine-rich (containing RG motifs), and we sought to determine whether this unique exon is conserved across the Caenorhabditis genus. We first identified CSR-1 orthologs in several closely related nematode species, including C. brenneri, C. briggsae, C. japonica, C. latens, C. nigoni, C. remanei, C. sinica, and C. tropicalis. The first exon of CSR-1 in each species is the least conserved portion of the protein; however, like C. elegans CSR-1A, each ortholog had enrichment of arginines and glycines in this region (Supplementary Fig. 5). Furthermore, while only a single isoform is annotated in most of the species, all orthologs possessed a conserved methionine at the position of the C. elegans CSR-1B start codon (Supplementary Fig. 5). Additionally, all eight orthologs have a large intron between the first exon and the rest of the protein, with a median size of 617 bp and the smallest being 503 bp in C. tropicalis. These data suggest that the regulatory elements driving CSR-1B expression in C. elegans, which are found in this intron, may also be conserved.

Because of the repetitive nature of the RG motif region and the lack of otherwise strong sequence conservation, we next asked whether the first exon of CSR-1 contains regions of intrinsic disorder. Using IUPred2^42,43, we determined that the first exon of CSR-1A in C. elegans is highly disordered while the rest of the protein is predicted to be structured (Supplementary Fig. 6a). We then examined the CSR-1 orthologs in related Caenorhabditis species and found that, like in C. elegans, the first exon of CSR-1 is highly disordered in all related nematode species (Supplementary Fig. 6b), demonstrating that the disordered nature of the first exon is a conserved feature of the CSR-1 protein.

The RG motifs in the first exon of CSR-1A are dimethylated

It has been shown previously that RG motifs are often targets of Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs), which catalyze the methylation of arginine residues^44,45,46,47. To determine whether CSR-1A contains methylated arginines, we immunoprecipitated 2xHA::CSR-1A and subjected the sample to mass spectrometry analysis. We identified six dimethylated arginines in the first exon of CSR-1A, which constituted 100% of the RG motifs captured by mass spectrometry (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Data 3). The remaining RG motifs were not captured, methylated or unmethylated, by our mass spectrometry experiment. We did not identify any dimethylarginines in the portion of the CSR-1 protein found in both CSR-1A and CSR-1B isoforms, however the conserved RGRG sequence found near the N-terminus of CSR-1B, a good candidate region for dimethylation, was also not captured by our mass spectrometry experiment. We were also unable to determine whether these arginines were symmetrically or asymmetrically dimethylated, which will be an important distinction for future studies. Together, these data indicate that the first exon of CSR-1A is heavily methylated, and, given the conservation of RG motifs in this region across Caenorhabditis species, this methylation is likely also conserved.

**Fig. 6: Methylation of CSR-1A N-terminal exon promotes binding preference for spermatogenic siRNAs.**

We next sought to study the function of the dimethylarginine modification. To this end, we mutated all arginines found in RG motifs within the first exon of CSR-1A to alanine using CRISPR, thus rendering the exon unmethylatable. Because we generated the mutations sequentially from the N-terminus of the protein, three-to-four arginines at a time, we created a series of proteins with four, seven, 11 or all 15 RG motifs mutated to AG— hereafter referred to as CSR-1A[4xAG], CSR-1A[7xAG], CSR-1A[11xAG], and CSR-1A[15xAG] (Fig. 6b). We first asked if dimethylation of arginines affects the expression or stability of the CSR-1A protein. By western blot, we determined that the CSR-1A[4xAG], CSR-1A[7xAG], and CSR-1A[15xAG] proteins are expressed at levels comparable to wild-type (Fig. 6c). Because dimethylation has been shown previously to contribute to Argonaute protein localization⁴⁸, we next tested whether dimethylation is necessary for CSR-1A localization to P granules. We performed immunostaining on CSR-1A[wild-type], CSR-1A[4xAG], and CSR-1A[15xAG] L4 stage hermaphrodites and detected no discernable differences in localization in the RG-to-AG mutant strains (Supplementary Fig. 6c). Finally, to determine whether the dimethylated RG motifs are required for fertility, we performed brood size assays on CSR-1A[wild-type], CSR-1A[7xAG], and CSR-1A[15xAG] animals. We found that CSR-1A[7xAG] and CSR-1A[15xAG] animals have a modest but significant reduction in brood size compared to the control strain, indicating that csr-1a RG motif mutants phenocopy a null csr-1a mutant (Supplementary Fig. 6d). Therefore, our data demonstrates that the first exon of CSR-1A contains the dimethylarginine modification, however this modification is not required for expression or localization of the CSR-1A protein. Furthermore, since the brood sizes were similar between CSR-1A[7xAG] and CSR-1A[15xAG], this data may suggest that the seven most N-terminal RG sites are more crucial or that a minimum number of methylated sites is required for optimal CSR-1A function.

The RG motifs in CSR-1A promote specificity for binding small RNAs targeting spermatogenic genes

CSR-1A and CSR-1B both localize to P granules in the spermatogenesis region of the germline in L4 stage hermaphrodites and males, yet each isoform has distinct small RNA targets (Figs. 1a and 4a, b). Because the isoforms only differ by the presence of the RG motif-containing exon in CSR-1A, we asked if the RG motifs and the dimethylarginine modification could be a mechanism by which CSR-1A preferentially associates with spermatogenic small RNAs. To test this hypothesis, we immunoprecipitated 2xHA::CSR-1A[15xAG] from L4 stage animals and subjected the associated small RNAs to high-throughput sequencing. We found that the small RNAs that immunoprecipitate with CSR-1A[15xAG] map to both spermatogenic and oogenic genes, with no discernable preference for either (Fig. 6d). We next defined the list of genes targeted by CSR-1A[15xAG] as those at least twofold enriched in the IP compared to input, with at least 10 RPM in the IP samples and a DESeq2 adjusted p value of ≤0.05 (Supplementary Data 1). Comparing this gene list to the wild-type CSR-1A and CSR-1B target gene lists at L4 stage, we found that 34.9% (978 genes) of the genes in the CSR-1A[15xAG] list overlapped with the wild-type CSR-1A gene list and 55.5% (1555 genes) of the genes in the CSR-1A[15xAG] list overlapped with the CSR-1B gene list (Fig. 6e). Furthermore, when we compared the CSR-1A[15xAG] target gene list to previously described target genes lists for other small RNA pathways^{28,33,34,35,36,37,38,39}, we found that the CSR-1A[15xAG] target gene list is strongly enriched for hermaphrodite and male CSR-1 target genes, and for ALG-3/4 target genes (Fig. 6f). Additionally, the CSR-1A[15xAG] target gene list is strongly enriched for both spermatogenic and oogenic genes (Fig. 6f). These results are in contrast to the wild-type CSR-1A target gene list, which is strongly enriched for spermatogenic genes but not oogenic genes, and to the CSR-1B target gene list, which is strongly enriched for oogenic genes but not spermatogenic genes (Fig. 6f). However, like wild-type CSR-1A and CSR-1B, CSR-1A[15xAG] is not enriched for mutator target genes (Fig. 6f). Together, these data indicate that loss of the RG motifs, and therefore loss of the dimethylarginine modification, is associated with a reduced specificity of CSR-1A for small RNAs targeting spermatogenesis genes and an increased binding of oogenic small RNAs.

Discussion

The Argonaute protein CSR-1 is critical to promote germline gene expression and fertility. Here we demonstrate that, in addition to the short isoform CSR-1B which is expressed throughout germline development and during gametogenesis of both sexes, a longer isoform, CSR-1A, is selectively expressed during spermatogenesis. During L4, where both isoforms are expressed in the spermatogenesis region, CSR-1A and CSR-1B co-localize at P granules. Yet despite localizing to the same subcellular structure and sharing nearly complete sequence and presumably structural identity, CSR-1A and CSR-1B associate with distinct subsets of small RNAs targeting germline-expressed genes—CSR-1A preferentially binds to small RNAs targeting spermatogenic genes, whereas CSR-1B binds to small RNAs targeting oogenic genes. The single exon unique to CSR-1A contains RG motifs that are modified with dimethylarginine and these methylated RG motifs are critical to CSR-1A specificity for spermatogenic small RNA substrates.

CSR-1A promotes spermatogenic gene expression

Previous work has shown that CSR-1 can license targeted transcripts for expression in the adult germline, while its catalytic domain is necessary to tune embryonic gene expression and clear maternal transcripts^13,14,20,49. Though these studies did not make a distinction between CSR-1A and CSR-1B, based on the expression of only CSR-1B in the adult germline and embryos, we can attribute these CSR-1 activities to the CSR-1B isoform. Here we show that CSR-1A similarly does not downregulate its target genes during spermatogenesis and in fact, seems to modestly promote the expression of some spermatogenic genes. RNAi of CSR-1 has also been demonstrated to trigger mis-expression of spermatogenic mRNAs in the germlines of adult-stage animals, which, under normal conditions, should be undergoing oogenesis⁵⁰. This study also did not distinguish between CSR-1A and CSR-1B isoforms, therefore it remains to be determined which CSR-1 isoform is required for suppressing spermatogenic transcription during oogenesis.

The Argonaute proteins ALG-3 and ALG-4 similarly promote the expression of many spermatogenic genes, and trigger the biogenesis of ALG-3/4-dependent 22G-RNAs as part of a feed-forward loop to promote paternal inheritance^26,33. With ALG-3 and CSR-1A sharing nearly identical expression patterns and CSR-1A being a spermatogenic Argonaute with a preference for spermatogenic 22G-RNAs, an obvious hypothesis would be that CSR-1A acts downstream of ALG-3 and ALG-4. However, the CSR-1A spermatogenic 22G-RNAs are produced independently of ALG-3/4 indicating that CSR-1A is likely part of a distinct pathway that targets the same spermatogenic genes as ALG-3/4 and another still-unidentified Argonaute binds the ALG-3/4-dependent 22G-RNAs. Importantly, these findings do not exclude the possibility of CSR-1B being an essential player in paternal epigenetic inheritance and acting downstream of ALG-3/4, as CSR-1B is still present in secondary spermatocytes with ALG-3³³, when CSR-1A has already disappeared. At the L4 stage, when both isoforms are expressed, our immunoprecipitation and sequencing of CSR-1B-bound small RNAs indicate that CSR-1B targets gender-neutral and oogenic mRNAs. It is important to note that, during the L4 stage, CSR-1B is expressed throughout the germline while CSR-1A and ALG-3 are restricted to the spermatogenic region (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. S2a)²⁶. Thus, when sequencing small RNAs immunoprecipitated from whole animals, we are unable to determine whether CSR-1B is binding oogenic siRNAs throughout the germline or in specific germline regions, and whether CSR-1B could bind low levels of spermatogenic siRNAs during spermatogenesis that fall below our cutoff for enrichment. Furthermore, since the majority of CSR-1 studies have examined adults or embryos^8,13,14,20, it is unclear whether, during the L4 stage, CSR-1B is licensing or repressing its target mRNAs, or even protecting them from ALG-3/4 or CSR-1A targeting. Or perhaps oogenic mRNAs are at such low levels throughout development that most CSR-1B Argonaute proteins remain unassociated with mRNA until the transition to adulthood and the onset of oogenesis.

If CSR-1A does not act downstream of ALG-3/4 for paternal inheritance, then how might it function to promote spermatogenic gene expression? If we look to CSR-1B as a guide, then perhaps CSR-1A acts to license spermatogenic transcripts for expression only in the L4 and male germlines by protecting them from targeting by piRNAs and the WAGO clade of Argonaute proteins. CSR-1A could further tune spermatogenic gene expression or clear spermatogenic transcripts at the spermatogenesis to oogenesis transition. Alternatively, the role for CSR-1A may be to sequester the abundant sperm transcripts and spermatogenic small RNAs away from CSR-1B, so that the dominant isoform can appropriately bind to its oogenic small RNA targets. Through this lens, CSR-1A serves almost exclusively to titrate CSR-1B siRNA levels targeting oogenic genes and might explain the modest effect on the sperm transcripts upon removing CSR-1A. Further experiments will be needed to sort out these possibilities.

Dimethylarginine promotes isoform-specific small RNA loading

Posttranslational modification has been shown to play a key role for Argonaute function in C. elegans and in other systems. The C. elegans miRNA Argonaute protein, ALG-1, contains a cluster of phosphorylation sites that is conserved in human Argonaute Ago2, demonstrating that these modification sites are highly conserved between species. The function of this phosphorylation also appears to be conserved—the phosphorylated Argonaute proteins cannot associate with mRNAs, suggesting the role of the modification may be in mediating release of mRNA-Argonaute complexes for recycling⁵¹. PIWI proteins from mouse, Xenopus laevis, and Drosophila melanogaster contain symmetrical dimethylarginines (sDMA), and in Drosophila this modification is mediated by protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5^44,46,52. The dimethylarginine modification allows the Argonaute protein to interact with members of the Tudor domain protein family^{46,47,48,52,53}. Tudor domains, which are protein–protein interaction modules, recognize methylated arginines and thus can mediate protein–protein interactions in a methylation-specific manner. Furthermore, for some PIWI proteins, subcellular localization to nuage is dependent on its interaction with Tudor proteins^46,48,52.

Here, we have found the first exon of CSR-1A to be highly modified with dimethylarginine. Interestingly, dimethylarginine is not required for CSR-1A localization to the P granule, but instead for small RNA specificity of CSR-1A, and thus recognition of the correct target transcripts. We hypothesize that CSR-1A interacts with an unknown Tudor domain protein through its dimethylated RG motifs, to promote engagement with a distinct small RNA biogenesis complex. In this scenario, dimethylarginine provides a new binding platform for proteins that cannot associate with CSR-1B, allowing CSR-1A to make distinct protein–protein interactions and ultimately to target a unique subset of genes. It is interesting to note that the majority of the RG motifs, including all methylated sites captured in our mass spectrometry experiment, are found in the exon unique to CSR-1A and absent from CSR-1B, making this highly modified region isoform-specific. There are several other C. elegans Argonaute proteins with multiple splice variants, including the miRNA Argonaute proteins ALG-1 and ALG-2, the oogenesis-specific primary Argonaute protein ERGO-1, and the WAGO-clade Argonaute protein PPW-1. It is currently unknown whether the isoforms of any of these genes have distinct functions or unique protein modifications, or if CSR-1 is unique in this regard.

Methods

C. elegans strains

Strains were maintained at 20 °C on NGM plates seeded with OP50 E. coli according to standard conditions unless otherwise stated⁵⁴. All strains used in this project are listed in Supplementary Data 4.

Plasmid and strain construction

Plasmid-based CRISPR

All fluorescent and epitope tags were integrated at the endogenous loci by CRISPR genome editing^{55,56,57,58,59}. For all CRISPR insertions of fluorescent tags, we generated homologous repair templates using the primers listed in Supplementary Data 5. Design of the 2xHA::mCherry plasmid was described previously⁶⁰. The 2xHA::mCherry[w/internal Floxed Cbr-unc-119(+)] was amplified by PCR and assembled by isothermal cloning with ~1.5 kb of sequence from either side of the csr-1a start codon⁶¹. gfp::3xFLAG::wago-1, gfp::3xFLAG::csr-1a + b and gfp::3xFLAG::alg-3 were assembled into pDD282 (Addgene #66823) by isothermal assembly according to published protocols^57,61. To protect the repair template from cleavage, we introduced silent mutations at the site of guide RNA targeting by incorporating these mutations into one of the homology arm primers or, if necessary, by performing site-directed mutagenesis⁵⁶. All guide RNA plasmids were generated by ligating oligos containing the guide RNA sequence into BsaI-digested pRB1017 (Addgene #59936)⁵⁹. Guide RNA sequences are provided in Supplementary Data 5. GFP/mcherry CRISPR injection mixes included 25–50 ng/μl repair template, 50 ng/μl guide RNA plasmid, 50 ng/μl eft-3p::cas9-SV40_NLS::tbb-2 3′UTR (Addgene #46168), 2.5–10 ng/μl GFP or mCherry co-injection markers. The 2xHA::mCherry::csr-1a construct was injected into USC868 (mut-16(cmp3[mut-16::gfp + loxP]) I; unc-119(ed3) III), the gfp::3xFLAG::wago-1 construct was injected into USC896 (mut-16(cmp41[mut-16::mCherry::2xHA + loxP]) I), the gfp::3xFLAG::csr-1a + b construct was injected into the wild-type strain, and the gfp::3xFLAG::alg-3 construct was injected into both the wild-type strain and USC1066 (csr-1a(cmp90[(2xHA + mCherry + loxP Cbr-unc-119(+) loxP)::csr-1a]) IV)^56,57. For csr-1a deletions (cmp135 and cmp143), 2xHA::csr-1a, and 2xFLAG::csr-1a + b, the injection mixes included 50 ng/μl repair oligo, 25 ng/μl guide RNA plasmid, 50 ng/μl pha-1 repair template, and eft-3p::Cas9 + pha-1 guide (pJW1285, Addgene #61252). GE24 (pha-1(e2123) III) mutant animals were injected and subsequently shifted to restrictive temperature (25 °C). Surviving F1 progeny were genotyped by PCR to identify the deletions and insertions of interest⁵⁸. For 2xFLAG::csr-1b, the injection mix included 50 ng/μl csr-1b repair oligo, 25 ng/μl csr-1b guide RNA plasmid, 20 ng/μl dpy-10 repair template, 25 ng/μl dpy-10 guide RNA (pJA58, Addgene #59933), and 50 ng/μl eft-3p::Cas9 (pJW1259, Addgene #61251). Mixture was injected into USC1065 (csr-1a(cmp135) IV) mutant animals. F1 animals with the Rol phenotype were isolated and genotyped by PCR to identify animals with the 2xFLAG insertion⁵⁹. The csr-1a RG-to-AG mutants were created sequentially, starting with csr-1a[7xAG]. csr-1a[4xAG] was an incomplete repair event identified from the csr-1a[7xAG] injections. csr-1a[11xAG] was injected into the csr-1a[7xAG] mutant and csr-1a[15xAG] was subsequently injected into the csr-1a[11xAG] mutant. The csr-1a RGG injection mixes include 50 ng/μl repair template, 25 ng/μl each of two guide RNA plasmids, 25 ng/μl rol-6 guide RNA (pJA42, Addgene #59930), 20 ng/μl rol-6 repair template, and 50 ng/μl eft-3p::Cas9 (pJW1259, Addgene #61251). F1 animals with the Rol phenotype were isolated and genotyped by PCR to identify animals with the RG-to-AG mutations⁵⁹. All repair template sequences are provided in Supplementary Data 5.

Protein-based CRISPR

For csr-1a deletions (cmp253 and cmp254), csr-1b(cmp258), and 2xHA::csr-1a in the alg-3; alg-4 mutant, we used an oligo repair template and RNA guide (Supplementary Data 5). The injection mixes for csr-1b(cmp258) and 2xHA::csr-1a included 0.25 μg/μl Cas9 protein (IDT), 100 ng/μl tracrRNA (IDT), 14 ng/μl dpy-10 crRNA, 42 ng/μl gene-specific crRNA, and 110 ng/μl of each repair template, and were injected into USC1066 (csr-1a(cmp90[(2xHA + mCherry + loxP Cbr-unc-119(+) loxP)::csr-1a]) IV) and WM200 (alg-4(ok1041) III; alg-3(tm1155) IV), respectively. The injection mix for csr-1a(cmp253) and csr-1a(cmp254) included 0.25 μg/μl Cas9 protein (IDT), 100 ng/μl tracrRNA (IDT), 14 ng/μl dpy-10 crRNA, 21 ng/μl each gene-specific crRNA, and 110 ng/μl of each repair template, and was injected into the wild-type strain. The repair template was designed to create the cmp254 mutation; the larger cmp253 deletion was an incorrect repair event. Following injection, F1 animals with the Rol phenotype were isolated and genotyped by PCR to identify animals with the insertions and deletions of interest^62,63.

MosSCI

csr-1 mCherry and GFP promoter fusions were integrated by Mos-mediated single-copy transgene insertion (MosSCI)²⁹. For the MosSCI insertions of promoter-fused GFP and mCherry, we amplified csr-1a and csr-1b endogenous promoters, the mCherry and GFP genes, and the csr-1 3′UTR using the primers listed in Supplementary Data 5. Plasmids were assembled by isothermal cloning⁶¹. For MosSCI injections, we integrated transgenes into the ttTi5605 MosI site in strain EG4322 (Ch. II) following a published MosSCI protocol²⁹. Injection mixes contained 50 ng/μl MosSCI-targeting vector, 50 ng/μl eft-3p::Mos1 transposase (pCFJ601, Addgene #34874), 10 ng/μl rab-3p::mCherry (pGH8, Addgene #19359), 2.5 ng/μl myo-2p::mCherry (pCFJ90, Addgene #19327), 5 ng/μl myo-3p::mCherry (pCFJ104, Addgene #19328), and 10 ng/μl hsp-16.1::peel-1negative selection (pMA122, Addgene #34873)²⁹.

Antibody staining and imaging

Live imaging of C. elegans was performed in M9 buffer containing sodium azide to prevent movement. For immunofluorescence, C. elegans were dissected in egg buffer containing 0.1% Tween-20 and fixed in 1% formaldehyde in egg buffer as described⁶⁴. Samples were immunostained with mouse anti-FLAG 1:500 (Sigma Aldrich, F1804), mouse anti-PGL-1 1:100 (DSHB K76)⁶⁵, and rat anti-HA 1:500 (Roche, 11867423001). Alexa-Fluor secondary antibodies were purchased from Thermo Fisher. Animals were dissected at the L4 (48 h post hatching) or young adult stage (52 h post hatching). Imaging was performed on a DeltaVision Elite microscope (GE Healthcare) using a 60x N.A. 1.42 oil-immersion objective. When data stacks were collected, three-dimensional images are presented as maximum intensity projections. Images were pseudocolored using the SoftWoRx package or Adobe Photoshop.

Western blots

C. elegans were synchronized at 20 °C by bleaching gravid adult animals and maintaining starved L1 larvae for at least 24 h before plating on OP50. For sample collection, animals were harvested after 2 h (L1), 12 h (L2), 32 h (L3), 50 h (L4), and 72 h (gravid adult) on OP50. Number of animals loaded per lane was normalized for actin—~1000 L1s, 800 L2s, 600 L3s, 400 L4s, and 200 gravid adults. Proteins were resolved on 4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Thermo Fisher), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Thermo Fisher), and probed with rat anti-HA-peroxidase 1:1000 (Roche 12013819001), mouse anti-FLAG 1:1000 (Sigma, F1804), mouse anti-actin 1:10,000 (Abcam ab3280), or rabbit anti-CSR-1 1:2000 antibodies⁸. Secondary HRP antibodies were purchased from Thermo Fisher. Unedited western blots provided in the Source Data File.

RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

Synchronized L4 stage animals (~48 h at 20 °C after L1 arrest) were collected. RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher), followed by chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. RNA samples were normalized to 10 μg/μL prior to DNase treatment (TURBO DNA-free kit, Thermo Fisher AM1907) and reverse transcribed with SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher 18080-051). All Real-time PCR reactions were performed using the 2x iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad 1725121), following the manufacturer’s protocols, and run in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad 1855195). Samples were run with three technical replicates and three biological replicates, and normalized to rpl-32. Primer sequences are available in Supplementary Data 5.

Brood size analysis

Wild-type and mutant C. elegans strains were maintained at 20 °C prior to temperature-shift experiments. Animals were either maintained at 20 °C or shifted to 25 °C as L4 larvae and ten of their progeny were picked to individual plates for 25 °C brood size analysis. To score the complete brood, each animal was moved to a fresh plate every day until egg-laying was complete. After allowing the progeny 2–3 days to develop, the total number of animals on each plate was counted.

In vitro sperm activation assay

Virgin L4 males were isolated 24 h before assay. About 10–15 males were dissected in 30 uL of 500 μg/mL Pronase E (Millipore Sigma), which was dissolved in sperm medium (50 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 5 mM CaCl₂, 1 mM MgSO₄, 1 mg/ml BSA), as described previously^32,66. Spermatids were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in a humid chamber before mounting and imaging on a DeltaVision Elite microscope (GE Healthcare) using a 60x N.A. 1.42 oil-immersion objective.

Immunoprecipitations and mass spectrometry

For immunoprecipitation experiments followed by small RNA library preparation, ~100,000 synchronized L4 animals (~49 h at 20 °C after L1 arrest) or adult animals ~68 h at 20 °C after L1 arrest) were collected in IP Buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.1% Igapal CA-630, 0.5 mM PMSF, cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche 04693159001), and RNaseOUT Ribonuclease Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher 10777019)), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and homogenized using a mortar and pestle. After further dilution into IP buffer (1:10 packed worms:buffer), insoluble particulate was removed by centrifugation and 10% of sample was taken as “input.” The remaining lysate was used for the immunoprecipitation. Immunoprecipitation was performed at 4 °C for 1 h with pre-conjugated anti-HA affinity matrix (Roche 11815016001) or anti-FLAG affinity matrix (Sigma Aldrich A22220), then washed at least three times in immunoprecipitation buffer. A fraction of each sample was analyzed by western blot to confirm efficacy of immunoprecipitation. Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher) was added to the remainder of each sample, followed by chloroform extraction, isopropanol precipitation, and small RNA library preparation.

For mass spectrometry experiments to identify posttranslational modifications, immunoprecipitation was performed as described above, starting with ~1.25 million synchronized USC1110 (csr-1a(cmp165[2xHA::csr-1a])) L4 stage animals (~48 h at 20 °C after L1 arrest). Wild-type animals were prepped alongside as a negative control. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-HA affinity matrix (Roche 11815016001). After immunoprecipitation, a fraction of each sample was analyzed by western blot to confirm efficacy of immunoprecipitation. 2x sample buffer was added to the remainder of each sample, followed by gel electrophoresis (4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels, Thermo Fisher) and overnight colloidal Coomassie staining.

Bands containing immunoprecipitated protein were excised from gel and cut into ~1 mm³ pieces. Gel pieces were then subjected to a modified in-gel chymotrypsin digestion procedure⁶⁷. Gel pieces were washed and dehydrated with acetonitrile for 10 min. followed by removal of acetonitrile. Pieces were then completely dried in a speed-vac. Rehydration of the gel pieces was with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution containing 12.5 ng/µl modified sequencing-grade chymotrypsin (Promega) at 4 °C. After 45 min, the excess chymotrypsin solution was removed and replaced with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution to just cover the gel pieces. Samples were then incubated at room temperature overnight. Peptides were later extracted by removing the ammonium bicarbonate solution, followed by one wash with a solution containing 50% acetonitrile and 1% formic acid. The extracts were dried in a speed-vac (~1 h) and stored at 4 °C until analysis.

On the day of analysis, the samples were reconstituted in 5–10 µl of HPLC solvent A (2.5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). A nano-scale reverse-phase HPLC capillary column was created by packing 2.6 µm C18 spherical silica beads into a fused silica capillary (100 µm inner diameter x ~30 cm length) with a flame-drawn tip⁶⁸. After equilibrating the column each sample was loaded via a Famos auto sampler (LC Packings) onto the column. A gradient was formed and peptides were eluted with increasing concentrations of solvent B (97.5% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid).

As peptides eluted, they were subjected to electrospray ionization and then entered into an LTQ Orbitrap Velos Pro ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). Peptides were detected, isolated, and fragmented by collision-induced dissociation to produce a tandem mass spectrum of specific fragment ions for each peptide. Peptide sequences (and hence protein identity) were determined by matching protein databases with the acquired fragmentation pattern by the software program, Sequest (Thermo Fisher)⁶⁹. All databases include a reversed version of all the sequences and the data was filtered to between a one and two percent peptide false discovery rate.

Small and mRNA library preparation

Small RNAs (18 to 30-nt) were size selected on denaturing 15% polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad 3450091) from total RNA samples. Small RNAs were treated with 5′ RNA polyphosphatase (Epicenter RP8092H) and ligated to 3′ pre-adenylated adapter with Truncated T4 RNA ligase (NEB M0373L). Small RNAs were then hybridized to the reverse transcription primer, ligated to the 5′ adapter with T4 RNA ligase (NEB M0204L), and reverse transcribed with Superscript III (Thermo Fisher 18080-051). Small RNA libraries were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB M0491L) and size selected on a 10% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad 3450051).

Library concentration was determined using the Qubit 1X dsDNA HS Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Q33231) and quality was assessed using the Agilent BioAnalyzer. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq500 (SE 75-bp reads) platform. For mRNA sequencing, total RNA samples were submitted in triplicate to Novogene Genome Sequencing Company for library preparation. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina (PE 150-bp reads) platform.

Clustal Omega alignments and IUPred disorder prediction

Clustal Omega alignment was performed using protein sequences for CSR-1 orthologs available on Wormbase (www.wormbase.org)⁷⁰. When more than one CSR-1 ortholog was present in a given species, a single protein sequence was selected for analysis. Proteins are C. brenneri CBN29996 (WBGene00191961), C. briggsae CSR-1 (WBGene00037276), C. elegans CSR-1, isoform a (WBGene00017641), C. japonica CSR-1 (WBGene00126657), C. latens PRJNA248912_FL83_15994, C. nigoni CSR-1 (PRJNA384657_Cni-csr-1), C. sinica PRJNA194557_Csp5_scaffold_00781.g15416.t2, C. remanei PRJNA248911_FL82_23103, and C. tropicalis PRJNA53597_Csp11.Scaffold629.g12789.t1. For C. japonica, exon 1 of CSR-1A was manually annotated from the CJA07453.1 transcript. For disorder prediction, we used IUPred2A (https://iupred2a.elte.hu/) with long disorder parameters and the same protein sequences as were used for Clustal Omega alignment.

Bioinformatic analysis

For small RNA libraries, sequences were parsed from adapters using FASTQ/A Clipper (options: -Q33 -l 17 -c -n -a TGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG) and quality filtered using the FASTQ Quality Filter (options: -Q33 -q 27 -p 65) from the FASTX-Toolkit v. 0.0.13 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/), mapped to the C. elegans genome WS258 using Bowtie2 v. 2.2.2 (default parameters)⁷¹, and reads were assigned to genomic features using featureCounts (options: -t exon -g gene_id -O --fraction --largestOverlap) which is part of the Subread v. 1.5.1 package^72,73. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 v. 1.22.2⁷⁴. To define gene lists from IP experiments, a twofold-change cutoff, a DESeq2 adjusted p value of ≤0.05, and at least 10 RPM in the IP libraries were required to identify genes with significant changes in small RNA levels. Additionally, any genes identified as having differentially enriched small RNAs from control samples (HA or FLAG immunoprecipitations from wild-type animals), were removed from further analysis.

For mRNA libraries, sequences were parsed from adapters using Trimmomatic v. 0.36 (options: PE -phred33 ILLUMINACLIP: < fasta with adapter sequences > :2:30:10 LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:30 MINLEN:30)⁷⁵ and mapped to the C. elegans genome WS258 using HISAT2 v. 2.1.0 (options: --dta-cufflinks --known-splicesite-infile <path to file of known splice sites > )⁷⁶. Reads were assigned to transcripts using featureCounts (options: -t exon -g gene_id -p) which is part of the Subread v. 1.5.1 package^72,73. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 v. 1.22.2⁷⁴.

CSR-1 target genes, male CSR-1 target genes, ALG-3/4 target genes, mutator target genes, germline-enriched genes, spermatogenesis-enriched genes, and oogenesis-enriched genes were previously described^{28,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40}. Additional data analysis was done using R, Excel, and Python. Venn diagrams were generated using BioVenn⁷⁷ and modified in Adobe Illustrator. Sequencing data is summarized in Supplementary Data 6.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The RNA sequencing data generated in this study are available through Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession code GSE151828. The mass spectrometry proteomics data generated in this study are available through the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository⁷⁸ with the dataset identifier PXD021227. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Klass, M., Wolf, N. & Hirsh, D. Development of the male reproductive system and sexual transformation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 52, 1–18 (1976).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Riddle, D. L., Blumenthal, T., Meyer, B. J. & Priess, J. R. C. elegans II (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997).
Shakes, D. C. et al. Spermatogenesis-specific features of the meiotic program in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000611 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Knutson, A. K., Egelhofer, T., Rechtsteiner, A. & Strome, S. Germ granules prevent accumulation of somatic transcripts in the adult Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Genetics 206, 163–178 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brangwynne, C. P. et al. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science 324, 1729–1732 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pitt, J. N., Schisa, J. A. & Priess, J. R. P granules in the germ cells of Caenorhabditis elegans adults are associated with clusters of nuclear pores and contain RNA. Dev. Biol. 219, 315–333 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sheth, U., Pitt, J., Dennis, S. & Priess, J. R. Perinuclear P granules are the principal sites of mRNA export in adult C. elegans germ cells. Development 137, 1305–1314 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Claycomb, J. M. et al. The Argonaute CSR-1 and its 22G-RNA cofactors are required for holocentric chromosome segregation. Cell 139, 123–134 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Updike, D. L. & Strome, S. A genomewide RNAi screen for genes that affect the stability, distribution and function of P granules in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 183, 1397–1419 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hutvagner, G. & Simard, M. J. Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 22–32 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ghildiyal, M. & Zamore, P. D. Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 94–108 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yigit, E. et al. Analysis of the C. elegans Argonaute family reveals that distinct Argonautes act sequentially during RNAi. Cell 127, 747–757 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wedeles, C. J., Wu, M. Z. & Claycomb, J. M. Protection of germline gene expression by the C. elegans Argonaute CSR-1. Dev. Cell 27, 664–671 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seth, M. et al. The C. elegans CSR-1 argonaute pathway counteracts epigenetic silencing to promote germline gene expression. Dev. Cell 27, 656–663 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shirayama, M. et al. piRNAs initiate an epigenetic memory of nonself RNA in the C. elegans germline. Cell 150, 65–77 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ashe, A. et al. piRNAs can trigger a multigenerational epigenetic memory in the germline of C. elegans. Cell 150, 88–99 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bagijn, M. P. et al. Function, targets, and evolution of Caenorhabditis elegans piRNAs. Science 337, 574–578 (2012).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Phillips, C. M., Brown, K. C., Montgomery, B. E., Ruvkun, G. & Montgomery, T. A. piRNAs and piRNA-dependent siRNAs protect conserved and essential C. elegans genes from misrouting into the RNAi pathway. Dev. Cell 34, 457–465 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
de Albuquerque, B. F. M., Placentino, M. & Ketting, R. F. Maternal piRNAs are essential for germline development following de novo establishment of endo-siRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Cell 34, 448–456 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gerson-Gurwitz, A. et al. A small RNA-catalytic Argonaute pathway tunes germline transcript levels to ensure embryonic divisions. Cell 165, 396–409 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
She, X., Xu, X., Fedotov, A., Kelly, W. G. & Maine, E. M. Regulation of heterochromatin assembly on unpaired chromosomes during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis by components of a small RNA-mediated pathway. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000624 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Avgousti, D. C., Palani, S., Sherman, Y. & Grishok, A. CSR-1 RNAi pathway positively regulates histone expression in C. elegans. EMBO J. 31, 3821–3832 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Friend, K. et al. A conserved PUF-Ago-eEF1A complex attenuates translation elongation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 176–183 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fassnacht, C. et al. The CSR-1 endogenous RNAi pathway ensures accurate transcriptional reprogramming during the oocyte-to-embryo transition in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007252 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Barberán-Soler, S. et al. Co-option of the piRNA pathway for germline-specific alternative splicing of C. elegans TOR. Cell Rep. 8, 1609–1616 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Conine, C. C. et al. Argonautes ALG-3 and ALG-4 are required for spermatogenesis-specific 26G-RNAs and thermotolerant sperm in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3588–3593 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cecere, G., Hoersch, S., O’Keeffe, S., Sachidanandam, R. & Grishok, A. Global effects of the CSR-1 RNA interference pathway on the transcriptional landscape. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 358–365 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ortiz, M. A., Noble, D., Sorokin, E. P. & Kimble, J. A new dataset of spermatogenic vs. oogenic transcriptomes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. G3 4, 1765–1772 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Frøkjaer-Jensen, C. et al. Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 40, 1375–1383 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Amiri, A. et al. An isoform of eIF4E is a component of germ granules and is required for spermatogenesis in C. elegans. Development 128, 3899–3912 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Smith, H. E. In WormBook (ed. The C. elegans Research Community.) 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.68.2
Ward, S., Hogan, E. & Nelson, G. A. The initiation of spermiogenesis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 98, 70–79 (1983).
Conine, C. C. et al. Argonautes promote male fertility and provide a paternal memory of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Cell 155, 1532–1544 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Reinke, V., Gil, I. S., Ward, S. & Kazmer, K. Genome-wide germline-enriched and sex-biased expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 131, 311–323 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, H.-C. et al. C. elegans piRNAs mediate the genome-wide surveillance of germline transcripts. Cell 150, 78–87 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu, W. et al. Distinct argonaute-mediated 22G-RNA pathways direct genome surveillance in the C. elegans germline. Mol. Cell 36, 231–244 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Phillips, C. M. et al. MUT-14 and SMUT-1 DEAD box RNA helicases have overlapping roles in germline RNAi and endogenous siRNA formation. Curr. Biol. 24, 839–844 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, C. et al. mut-16 and other mutator class genes modulate 22G and 26G siRNA pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1201–1208 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsai, H.-Y. et al. A ribonuclease coordinates siRNA amplification and mRNA cleavage during RNAi. Cell 160, 407–419 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manage, K. I. et al. A tudor domain protein, SIMR-1, promotes siRNA production at piRNA-targeted mRNAs in C. elegans. Elife 9, e56731 (2020).
Bezler, A. et al. Tissue- and sex-specific small RNAomes reveal sex differences in response to the environment. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007905 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mészáros, B., Erdos, G. & Dosztányi, Z. IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W329–W337 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Dosztányi, Z., Csizmok, V., Tompa, P. & Simon, I. The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 347, 827–839 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kirino, Y. et al. Arginine methylation of Piwi proteins catalysed by dPRMT5 is required for Ago3 and Aub stability. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 652–658 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kirino, Y. et al. Arginine methylation of vasa protein is conserved across phyla. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 8148–8154 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vagin, V. V. et al. Proteomic analysis of murine Piwi proteins reveals a role for arginine methylation in specifying interaction with Tudor family members. Genes Dev. 23, 1749–1762 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nishida, K. M. et al. Functional involvement of Tudor and dPRMT5 in the piRNA processing pathway in Drosophila germlines. EMBO J. 28, 3820–3831 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Webster, A. et al. Aub and Ago3 are recruited to nuage through two mechanisms to form a ping-pong complex assembled by Krimper. Mol. Cell 59, 564–575 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Quarato, P. et al. Germline inherited small RNAs facilitate the clearance of untranslated maternal mRNAs in C. elegans embryos. Nat Commun. 12, 1441 (2021).
Campbell, A. C. & Updike, D. L. CSR-1 and P granules suppress sperm-specific transcription in the C. elegans germline. Development 142, 1745–1755 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Quévillon Huberdeau, M. et al. Phosphorylation of Argonaute proteins affects mRNA binding and is essential for microRNA-guided gene silencing in vivo. EMBO J. 36, 2088–2106 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Reuter, M. et al. Loss of the Mili-interacting Tudor domain-containing protein-1 activates transposons and alters the Mili-associated small RNA profile. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 639–646 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Structural basis for methylarginine-dependent recognition of Aubergine by Tudor. Genes Dev. 24, 1876–1881 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Friedland, A. E. et al. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Methods 10, 741–743 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. J., Ward, J. D., Reiner, D. J. & Goldstein, B. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat. Methods 10, 1028–1034 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. J., Pani, A. M., Heppert, J. K., Higgins, C. D. & Goldstein, B. Streamlined genome engineering with a self-excising drug selection cassette. Genetics 200, 1035–1049 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ward, J. D. Rapid and precise engineering of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome with lethal mutation co-conversion and inactivation of NHEJ repair. Genetics 199, 363–377 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Arribere, J. A. et al. Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 198, 837–846 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Uebel, C. J. et al. Distinct regions of the intrinsically disordered protein MUT-16 mediate assembly of a small RNA amplification complex and promote phase separation of Mutator foci. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007542 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Paix, A., Folkmann, A., Rasoloson, D. & Seydoux, G. High efficiency, homology-directed genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Genetics 201, 47–54 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dokshin, G. A., Ghanta, K. S., Piscopo, K. M. & Mello, C. C. Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 210, 781–787 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Phillips, C. M., McDonald, K. L. & Dernburg, A. F. Cytological analysis of meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Mol. Biol. 558, 171–195 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Strome, S. & Wood, W. B. Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 35, 15–25 (1983).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yen, C.-A., Ruter, D. L., Turner, C. D., Pang, S. & Curran, S. P. Loss of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) impairs sperm function and male reproductive advantage in C. elegans. Elife 9, e52899 (2020).
Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68, 850–858 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peng, J. & Gygi, S. P. Proteomics: the move to mixtures. J. Mass Spectrom. 36, 1083–1091 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L. & Yates, J. R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e108 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hulsen, T., de Vlieg, J. & Alkema, W. BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics 9, 488 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Phillips lab for helpful discussions and feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institute of Health grants K22 CA177897 (to C.M.P.), R35 GM119656 (to C.M.P.), and T32 GM118289 (to D.A.H.N.). C.M.P. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.pewtrusts.org). Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). Next generation sequencing was performed by the USC Molecular Genomics Core, which is supported by award number P30 CA014089 from the National Cancer Institute and mass spectrometry was performed by the Taplin Biological Mass Spectrometry facility at Harvard Medical School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Dieu An H. Nguyen & Carolyn M. Phillips

Authors

Dieu An H. Nguyen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carolyn M. Phillips
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.H.N. and C.M.P.; Investigation, D.A.H.N.; Formal analysis—D.A.H.N. and C.M.P.; Writing—original draft, D.A.H.N. and C.M.P.; Writing— reviewing and editing, D.A.H.N. and C.M.P.; Supervision—C.M.P.; Funding acquisition—D.A.H.N. and C.M.P.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn M. Phillips.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, D.A.H., Phillips, C.M. Arginine methylation promotes siRNA-binding specificity for a spermatogenesis-specific isoform of the Argonaute protein CSR-1. Nat Commun 12, 4212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24526-6

Download citation

Received: 11 August 2020
Accepted: 23 June 2021
Published: 09 July 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24526-6

This article is cited by

HRDE-2 drives small RNA specificity for the nuclear Argonaute protein HRDE-1
- Shihui Chen
- Carolyn M. Phillips
Nature Communications (2024)
Systematic characterization of small RNAs associated with C. elegans Argonautes
- Lei Liu
- Xiaolin Wang
- Ge Shan
Science China Life Sciences (2023)
Accumulation dynamics of ARGONAUTE proteins during meiosis in Arabidopsis
- Cecilia Oliver
- German Martinez
Plant Reproduction (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.