Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A curved host and second guest cooperatively inhibit the dynamic motion of corannulene

Abstract

Biomolecular systems show how host–guest binding can induce changes in molecular behavior, which in turn impact the functions of the system. Here we report an artificial host–guest system where dynamic adaptation during guest binding alters both host conformation and guest dynamics. The self-assembled cage host employed here possesses concave walls and a chirotopic cavity. Complementarity between the curved surfaces of fullerenes and the inner surface of the host cavity leads the host to reconfigure stereochemically in order to bind these guests optimally. The curved molecule corannulene undergoes rapid bowl-to-bowl inversion at room temperature. Its inversion barrier is increased upon binding, however, and increased further upon formation of a ternary complex, where corannulene and a cycloalkane are both bound together. The chiral nature of the host also leads to clear differences in the NMR spectra of ternary complexes involving corannulene and one or the other enantiomer of a chiral guest, which enables the determination of enantiomeric excess by NMR.

Introduction

Recognition and binding processes involving biomolecules, such as enzyme–substrate, antibody–antigen, and protein–protein, are integral to living systems. In many cases, the conformations and shapes of biomacromolecules can change to fit the target substrate, in a process known as induced fit1, or an auxiliary substance may bind to a host–guest complex to form a ternary complex, thus regulating or modulating the initial interaction2. Artificial molecular systems that mimic the sophisticated processes of induced fit and property regulation via ternary complex formation are challenging to design, but important in producing complex and functional systems of molecules3,4,5, and in understanding the molecular basis of binding in relevant biological processes.

Curved aromatic molecules are well-suited to investigations into complex host–guest phenomena, as their interactions principally involve dispersion forces. These include fullerenes6, which have promising applications as light-harvesting materials7, and corannulene, a bowl-shaped hydrocarbon that can be considered a sub-unit of a fullerene. Corannulene undergoes rapid bowl inversion at room temperature, with an energy barrier calculated to be 11.5 kcal mol−18,9. Stabilization of the planar transition state to corannulene inversion has been achieved by threading this molecule through a cationic macrocycle10, and through compression within an anthracene-walled host11. Manipulation of corannulene to slow its inversion rate, in contrast, is a harder goal, having only been achieved through chemical modifications12.

Metal-organic cages provide confined inner phases that are usefully distinct from the outside environment13. These cavities can be used for the stabilization of labile species14,15, separations16,17,18, and catalysis19,20,21,22,23,24. Principles have been developed to enable the selective binding of specific guests, or classes of guests, from among many chemically similar prospective guests in solution25,26,27,28,29,30. These principles guide the design of artificial hosts to maximize host–guest interactions, with greater shape complementarity often leading to additional selectivity and affinity31,32.

In this work, we employ these ideas to prepare a host with curved walls, designed to interact with the curved π-conjugated surfaces of fullerenes and corannulene. Fullerenes induce a configurational change in the host, highlighting the impact of the guest on the host. The dynamic inversion of corannulene is restricted inside the host, demonstrating host impact on the guest. Further, co-guests form ternary complexes, resulting in further modulation of the behavior of both guests inside the cage. The corannulene guest also reports on the stereochemistry of a chiral co-guest.

Results

Synthesis and characterization of 1

Subcomponent A was designed around a phosphangulene core (Fig. 1a), which was selected due to its chirality, large concave surface, and bowl-shaped conformation that does not invert at room temperature33,34,35. Cage 1, with a spherical interior cavity, was obtained via the subcomponent self-assembly of A with 2-formylpyridine and zinc(II) bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (Zn(NTf2)2) in acetonitrile.

Fig. 1: Synthesis of cage 1 and induced fit of C60 and C70 guests.
figure 1

a The self-sorting preparation of cage 1 from chiral subcomponent A as a single pair of enantiomers. b The conversion of cage diastereomer T1 into T2 upon fullerene binding. c 1H NMR spectra of 1 and its C70 and C60 adducts, showing the evolution of the C60 adduct from the T1 configuration (green triangles) into the T2 (violet circles) over 7 days; residual 2-formylpyridine signals are labeled with asterisks. d CD spectra of 0.03 mM acetonitrile solutions of the host and host–guest complexes prepared with enantiopure subcomponent M-A (spectra for assemblies with subcomponent P-A are shown in Supplementary Fig. 84). g X-ray crystal structures showing 1 in its preferred T1 configuration (e) in the absence of a fullerene guest; and the T2 configuration it adopts when binding (f) C60 or (g) C70, respectively.

The self-assembly of cage 1 from racemic A gives rise to a large set of stereochemical possibilities, as each metal center may adopt Δ or Λ handedness, each ligand may possess M or P helicity. The observation of only one set of ligand proton signals in the 1H NMR spectrum of 1 allows us to infer that self-assembly occurred stereoselectively in two ways. First, the two ligand enantiomers narcissistically self-sorted (Fig. 1a, c), such that each cage incorporated either only M ligands or only P ligands. Second, the M or P chirality of the ligands within a cage dictated the Δ or Λ configuration of all of its metal centers. Thus, out of the two possible diastereomeric pairs of enantiomers of cage 1, labeled T1 (M4Δ4, P4Λ4) and T2 (M4Λ4, P4Δ4)36, only one was observed. The X-ray crystal structure of 1 showed that 1 adopted exclusively the T1 configuration (Fig. 1e).

Impact of guests on the host

Cage 1 was anticipated to bind C60 and C70 through the curved π surfaces of its A residues34, in a similar fashion to Sygula’s “buckycatcher”37. When 1 was prepared in the presence of C70 or C60, new 1H NMR signals were observed, corresponding to the host–guest complex. Only one such set of signals was observed in the case of C70, whereas two sets of signals were observed for C60, suggesting the presence of two diastereomeric host configurations (Fig. 1c). After heating the reaction mixture at 70 °C for one week, the initial major set of signals disappeared, and the minor set increased to become the only product. X-ray crystallography revealed that 1 bound both C60 and C70 in the T2 configuration (Fig. 1f, g).

Based upon X-ray data, the VOIDOO program38 was used to calculate the volume of 1 in the absence of a fullerene guest (Fig. 1e), and as its C60 (Fig. 1f) and C70 (Fig. 1g) adducts, providing volumes of 490 Å3, 718 Å3 and 925 Å3, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 85). The cavity size of 1 in the T1 configuration is much smaller than that of the T2 configuration adopted for the fullerene adducts. Larger C70 appears only to fit in the T2 diastereomer, whereas smaller C60 can be accommodated in both configurations. We infer that the T1 diastereomer of C601 is kinetically favored, but that the T2 adduct is favored thermodynamically, based upon the initial formation of the former, and its transformation into the latter upon heating (Fig. 1c). Intriguingly, within the chirotopic39 cavity of 1, the local symmetry of encapsulated C70 is broken from D5h to D5, resulting in the splitting of its two highest-intensity 13C NMR peaks into two sets of signals (Supplementary Fig. 26)40.

Racemic triamine A was resolved into two enantiomers by chiral HPLC (Supplementary Section 8), enabling the construction of enantiopure (P4Λ4)1 and (M4Δ4)1. The transformation of 1 from its T1 configuration to T2 following guest uptake was confirmed by CD studies of enantiopure 1 and its corresponding fullerene host–guest complexes (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 84). The CD signals around 240–320 nm, corresponding to π–π* transitions, are correlated with the handedness of the metal vertices41,42. The signals of C601 and C701 at this region are similar in magnitude, but with opposite signs to those of fullerene-free 1 for complexes prepared from a given enantiomer of A (Fig. 1d). The differences in size and chirality between the empty host and host–guest complexes illustrate that the cages can reconfigure stereochemically to adapt to large guests with curved surfaces.

Impact of the host on guests

Its concave ligands also enable 1 to encapsulate the bowl-shaped molecule corannulene selectively from among a series of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (Supplementary Section 2.5). Corannulene also experienced the chirotopic environment inside the cage, with its single-peak 1H NMR spectrum splitting into two coupled signals. This observation is consistent with a local desymmetrization from the C5v point symmetry of free corannulene to the C5 symmetry imposed by a chiral environment (Fig. 2a)43. NMR integration indicated that only one corannulene was encapsulated. We infer 1 to remain in its T1 configuration upon corannulene binding, based upon the NMR similarity to the free cage and crystallographic evidence, as noted below. The binding constant for corannulene within 1 was determined to be Ka = (1.1 ± 0.1) × 103 M−1 (Supplementary Section 3.1).

Fig. 2: Encapsulation of corannulene and its dynamic inversion.
figure 2

a 1H NMR spectrum (CD3CN, 400 MHz, 298 K) of 1 mixed with excess corannulene. Green circles correspond to 1 and light-blue triangles to corannulene1. b Schematic illustration of the exchange of adjacent protons Hq and Hq′ during corannulene inversion, signals of encapsulated corannulene in variable temperature 1H NMR spectra (CD3CN, 500 MHz) of cage 1 with corannulene guests, and the corresponding simulated spectra obtained by line-shape analysis. After inversion, Hq (red) has exchanged with Hq′ (white) relative to the host. The rolling of the corannulene without inversion within the four ligand walls will not exchange protons Hq and Hq′. c Eyring plot for the inversion of corannulene inside of 1.

Cage 1 was also observed to bind pyrene, in a strongly cooperative fashion, such that only free 1 and (pyrene)21 were observed by 1H NMR. Competitive binding experiments indicated a higher affinity of 1 for corannulene over pyrene, which may result from the better fit of the bowl-shaped corannulene to the concave ligands (Supplementary Fig. 42). Planar coronene, which is structurally similar to curved corannulene, was not encapsulated. The slightly larger size may not be a decisive factor for the non-encapsulation of coronene here since 1 can adjust its configuration for large guests such as C70. As other cages that encapsulate corannulene were also observed to bind coronene11,16,44,45, the binding of corannulene but not coronene within 1 highlights the key role of shape complementarity in its binding preferences.

The chirotopic cavity of 1 enables the study of guest dynamics that would otherwise be concealed by symmetry46. The inversion of free corannulene in the solution cannot be studied by NMR, as its hydrogen atoms are all symmetry-equivalent9. Within 1, however, corannulene shows two sets of proton signals, because the adjacent protons Hq and Hq′ (Fig. 2b) are diastereotopic in a chiral space. When corannulene inversion occurs, Hq and Hq′ exchange, as observed by EXSY NMR (Supplementary Fig. 82). VT 1H NMR showed that the signals of the encapsulated corannulene broaden with increased temperature while the signals for the host remain sharp, indicating bowl-to-bowl inversion becomes faster at higher temperatures (Fig. 2b). The exchange rate constants k were obtained through line-shape analyzes (Supplementary Section 4). Based on an Eyring plot (Fig. 2c), the activation energy ΔG (298 K) was determined to be 17.9 ± 0.3 kcal mol−1, which is notably higher than the experimentally-determined value for a monosubstituted corannulene (10.3 kcal mol−1 at 206 K)8 and the extrapolated value for free corannulene (11.5 kcal mol−1 at 298 K)9.

Macrocyclic ExBox4+ was found to accelerate the bowl-to-bowl inversion of corannulene bound within it, by stabilizing the planar transition state10. We infer that cage 1, in contrast, acted to stabilize the ground state of curved corannulene through binding to the curved inner surface of the cage. Thus, encapsulation inside 1 raises the barrier to corannulene inversion, provided the transition state is not also stabilized.

Heterotropic guest interactions inside the cage

Corannulene may be considered an elementary subunit of a fullerene, albeit with reduced curvature and size. Since corannulene only forms a 1:1 host–guest complex with 1, we infer that space remains to accommodate a second guest. Cycloalkanes (CnH2n) with five to eight carbons were found to be suitable second guests, forming ternary complexes. The encapsulation of a second guest was signaled by shifts in the 1H NMR spectra (Supplementary Section 2.6).

Ternary complexes were observed to form for guests that did not bind in the absence of corannulene, such as cyclohexane. Upon addition of excess cyclohexane to a solution of 1 containing corannulene, a new singlet was observed at −3.58 ppm for encapsulated cyclohexane, upfield shifted by 5.05 ppm compared to the free guest (Fig. 3a). The encapsulated corannulene was also shifted further upfield, and host signals shifted downfield, as compared with corannulene1. DOSY NMR indicated the same diffusion coefficient for cage 1 and its corannulene and C6H12 guests (Fig. 3a). A 1H NOESY experiment indicated spatial proximity between the second guest and the encapsulated corannulene (Supplementary Fig. 49). The formation of C6H12•corannulene1 was also evidenced by ESI-MS. The binding constants Ka1 (for corannulene) and Ka2 (for cycloalkanes) are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Fig. 3: Ternary complex formation.
figure 3

a Scheme of the binding of corannulene and cyclohexane within 1, and comparison of the 1H NMR spectra (CD3CN, 400 MHz, 298 K) of corannulene1 and C6H12•corannulene1, together with the 1H DOSY spectrum of C6H12•corannulene1. b Two views of the cationic part of the crystal structure of C6H12•corannulene1, showing cyclohexane in purple and corannulene in green.

The X-ray crystal structure of C6H12•corannulene1 (Fig. 3b) further verified the formation of the ternary complex, with the host in the smaller T1 configuration. Although the guests exhibited evidence of thermal motion, the positions and orientations of both guests were clear, with cyclohexane nestled inside the concavity of corannulene, which in turn stacked with the concave cage ligand.

In the presence of a co-encapsulated cycloalkane, corannulene inversion was no longer observed by signal coalescence in the NMR even at 348 K (Supplementary Figs. 7780). Line shape analysis (Supplementary Fig. 81) indicated an energetic barrier (ΔG) to corannulene inversion at least 3.7 kcal mol−1 greater for C8H16•corannulene1 than for corannulene1 at 348 K, cumulative with the 6 kcal mol−1 barrier increase due to encapsulation within 1 (Fig. 2b). The second guest within the corannulene bowl takes up space, further inhibiting inversion and reinforcing the effect of the concave ligands of 1 in stabilizing the bowl state of corannulene.

The inversion of cyclohexane from one chair conformation to the other was also suppressed in C6H12•corannulene1. Upon lowering the temperature to 243 K, two separate broad peaks for the equatorial and axial protons of encapsulated cyclohexane were observed, which collapsed into a single peak and sharpened above 253 K (Supplementary Fig. 76). A ring-flip barrier of 9.70 kcal mol−1 for cyclohexane was reported at 206.5 K47, whereas its ΔG of inversion inside C6H12•corannulene1 was extrapolated to be 10.65 ± 0.03 kcal mol−1 at this temperature47. Co-encapsulation within a single host thus slows down the dynamic motion of both guests, with each guest having an influence upon the dynamics of the other within the host–guest–guest system.

Stereochemical communication between guests

Enantiopure R-3-methyl-2-butanol (R-MB) also bound within 1 together with corannulene, requiring this co-guest to bind (Supplementary Section 2.7). The signals of encapsulated corannulene are sensitive to the stereochemistry of the second guest, splitting into two sets due to the formation of the diastereomers R-MB•corannulene(M4Δ4)1 and R-MB•corannulene(P4Λ4)1 (Supplementary Fig. 64). Two well-separated sets of signals of equal intensity were observed for the encapsulated R-MB, with upfield guest shifts together with a DOSY NMR spectrum providing evidence of encapsulation (Supplementary Fig. 65). No difference in the integrated intensities of the host–guest complexes were observed, indicating that the two enantiomeric complexes corannulene(M4Δ4)1 and corannulene(P4Λ4)1 do not discriminate when binding the enantiomers of MB.

Enantiopure cage (P4Λ4)1 together with corannulene and racemic MB produced similar 1H NMR spectra, corroborating non-enantioselective guest binding (Fig. 4). The aromatic shielding effects of corannulene1 shift the proton signals of the bound guests upfield by more than 5 ppm, into the spectral region below 0 ppm, without interfering signals. The ratio between R-MB and S-MB bound inside corannulene1 is inferred to reflect the ratio between these enantiomers in solution, due to the lack of enantioselectivity in binding. These two factors enable corannulene1 to be used as an NMR spectroscopic probe for the direct determination of the enantiomeric excess (ee) of chiral MB.

Fig. 4: Stereochemical information reported by corannulene and 3-methyl-2-butanol enantiomeric excess (ee) determinations by NMR.
figure 4

Partial 1H NMR spectra (CD3CN, 500 MHz, 298 K) of solutions of enantiopure cage (P4Λ4)1 together with corannulene and different ratios of R/S-3-methyl-2-butanol (R/S-MB) showing the bound guest signals. The peaks of corannulene(P4Λ4)1, R-MB•corannulene(P4Λ4)1 and S-MB•corannulene(P4Λ4)1 are marked in light blue, orange, and violet, respectively.

To support this hypothesis, MB mixtures with different degrees of ee were combined with (P4Λ4)1 and corannulene (Supplementary Section 5). The integrations of the proton signals of encapsulated MB reflected well the ratios between the R and S enantiomers of the guest (Supplementary Table 2). The R/S ratios were also reflected in the integrals of the signals of the encapsulated corannulene (Fig. 4). All three elements of the system—the two guests and the host—thus collectively constructed and reported upon the chirotopic cavity environment.

The concave panels of host 1 enabled it to bind fullerenes well, reconfiguring stereochemically in order to optimize host–guest contact. The chirotopic space within 1 enabled the exploration of its stabilization of the bowl-shaped ground state of corannulene, which in turn served to “pad” the cavity in order to optimize the binding of cycloalkanes in ternary complexes. Ternary complexes involving chiral guests can report upon the guest’s stereochemistry. The ability of the guests to influence each other’s dynamics suggests novel applications where guest motions might be geared together—for example, the ring-flipping of corannulene might compress a second guest, thus accelerating a reaction with an unfavorable volume of activation, such as an intramolecular cycloaddition.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article and its Supplementary Information, and are also available from the authors upon request. Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this paper have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, under the deposition numbers 2068668 (1), 2068666 (C601), 2068667 (C701), and 2068665 (C6H12•corannulene1). Copies of these data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

References

  1. Koshland, D. E. Jr. The key–lock theory and the induced fit theory. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 33, 2375–2378 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, W., Johnson, D. J. D., Esmon, C. T. & Huntington, J. A. Structure of the antithrombin–thrombin–heparin ternary complex reveals the antithrombotic mechanism of heparin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 857–862 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray, D., Foy, J. T., Hughes, R. P. & Aprahamian, I. A switching cascade of hydrazone-based rotary switches through coordination-coupled proton relays. Nat. Chem. 4, 757–762 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miljanić, O. Š. Small-molecule systems. Chem. Chem. 2, 502–524 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lubbe, A. S., van Leeuwen, T., Wezenberg, S. J. & Feringa, B. L. Designing dynamic functional molecular systems. Tetrahedron 73, 4837–4848 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch A., Brettreich M. Fullerenes: Chemistry and Reactions. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.

  7. Lai, Y.-Y., Cheng, Y.-J. & Hsu, C.-S. Applications of functional fullerene materials in polymer solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1866–1883 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott, L. T., Hashemi, M. M. & Bratcher, M. S. Corannulene bowl-to-bowl inversion is rapid at room temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 1920–1921 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seiders, T. J., Baldridge, K. K., Grube, G. H. & Siegel, J. S. Structure/energy correlation of bowl depth and inversion barrier in corannulene derivatives: combined experimental and quantum mechanical analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 517–525 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Juricek, M. et al. Induced-fit catalysis of corannulene bowl-to-bowl inversion. Nat. Chem. 6, 222–228 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kishida, N. et al. Anisotropic contraction of a polyaromatic capsule and its cavity-induced compression effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9599–9603 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdourazak, A. H., Sygula, A. & Rabideau, P. W. “Locking” the bowl-shaped geometry of corannulene: cyclopentacorannulene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 3010–3011 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook, T. R., Zheng, Y.-R. & Stang, P. J. Metal–organic frameworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal–organic materials. Chem. Rev. 113, 734–777 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mal, P., Breiner, B., Rissanen, K. & Nitschke, J. R. White phosphorus is air-stable within a self-assembled tetrahedral capsule. Science 324, 1697–1699 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwasawa, T., Hooley, R. J. & Rebek, J. Stabilization of labile carbonyl addition intermediates by a synthetic receptor. Science 317, 493–496 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, D., Ronson, T. K., Lavendomme, R. & Nitschke, J. R. Selective separation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by phase transfer of coordination cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 18949–18953 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuertes-Espinosa, C. et al. Purification of uranium-based endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) by selective supramolecular encapsulation and release. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 11294–11299 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, M. et al. Barely porous organic cages for hydrogen isotope separation. Science 366, 613–620 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fang, Y. et al. Catalytic reactions within the cavity of coordination cages. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 4707–4730 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Q., Rinkel, J., Goldfuss, B., Dickschat, J. S. & Tiefenbacher, K. Sesquiterpene cyclizations catalysed inside the resorcinarene capsule and application in the short synthesis of isolongifolene and isolongifolenone. Nat. Catal. 1, 609–615 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koo, J. et al. Gigantic porphyrinic cages. Chem 6, 3374–3384 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuertes-Espinosa, C. et al. Supramolecular fullerene sponges as catalytic masks for regioselective functionalization of C60. Chem 6, 169–186 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martí-Centelles, V., Lawrence, A. L. & Lusby, P. J. High activity and efficient turnover by a simple, self-assembled “artificial diels–alderase”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2862–2868 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Takezawa, H., Shitozawa, K. & Fujita, M. Enhanced reactivity of twisted amides inside a molecular cage. Nat. Chem. 12, 574–578 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Santacroce, P. V. et al. Conformational control of transmembrane Cl-transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 1886–1887 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pandurangan, K. et al. Unexpected self-sorting self-assembly formation of a [4:4] sulfate:ligand cage from a preorganized tripodal urea ligand. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 4566–4570 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, R.-J., Holstein, J. J., Hiller, W. G., Andréasson, J. & Clever, G. H. Mechanistic interplay between light switching and guest binding in photochromic [Pd2dithienylethene4] coordination cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2097–2103 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cullen, W., Misuraca, M. C., Hunter, C. A., Williams, N. H. & Ward, M. D. Highly efficient catalysis of the Kemp elimination in the cavity of a cubic coordination cage. Nat. Chem. 8, 231–236 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jia, F. et al. Redox-responsive host–guest chemistry of a flexible cage with naphthalene walls. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 3306–3310 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Omoto, K., Tashiro, S., Kuritani, M. & Shionoya, M. Multipoint recognition of ditopic aromatic guest molecules via Ag−π interactions within a dimetal macrocycle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17946–17949 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, B., Holstein, J. J., Horiuchi, S., Hiller, W. G. & Clever, G. H. Pd(II) coordination sphere engineering: pyridine cages, quinoline bowls, and heteroleptic pills binding one or two fullerenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 8907–8913 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lister, F. G. A., Le Bailly, B. A. F., Webb, S. J. & Clayden, J. Ligand-modulated conformational switching in a fully synthetic membrane-bound receptor. Nat. Chem. 9, 420–425 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heskia, A., Maris, T. & Wuest, J. D. Phosphangulene: a molecule for all chemists. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 2472–2482 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamamura, M., Saito, T. & Nabeshima, T. Phosphorus-containing chiral molecule for fullerene recognition based on concave/convex interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14299–14306 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Krebs, F. C. et al. Synthesis, structure, and properties of 4,8,12-trioxa-12c-phospha-4,8,12,12c-tetrahydrodibenzo[cd,mn]pyrene, a molecular pyroelectric. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 1208–1216 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, D. et al. Temperature controls guest uptake and release from Zn4L4 tetrahedra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14534–14538 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sygula, A., Fronczek, F. R., Sygula, R., Rabideau, P. W. & Olmstead, M. M. A double concave hydrocarbon buckycatcher. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 3842–3843 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kleywegt, G. J. & Jones, T. A. Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. Acta Cryst. D50, 178–185 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mislow, K. & Siegel, J. Stereoisomerism and local chirality. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 3319–3328 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Szymański, M. et al. Mechanochemical encapsulation of fullerenes in peptidic containers prepared by dynamic chiral self-sorting and self-assembly. Chem.—Eur. J. 22, 3148–3155 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Howson, S. E. et al. Origins of stereoselectivity in optically pure phenylethaniminopyridinetris-chelates M(NN′)3n+ (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn). Dalton Trans. 40, 10416–10433 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dragna, J. M. et al. In situ assembly of octahedral Fe(II) complexes for the enantiomeric excess determination of chiral amines using circular dichroism spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4398–4407 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bandera, D., Baldridge, K. K., Linden, A., Dorta, R. & Siegel, J. S. Stereoselective coordination of C5-symmetric corannulene derivatives with an enantiomerically pure [RhI(nbd*)] metal complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 865–867 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoshizawa, M. et al. Discrete stacking of large aromatic molecules within organic-pillared coordination cages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 1810–1813 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schmidt, B. M., Osuga, T., Sawada, T., Hoshino, M. & Fujita, M. Compressed corannulene in a molecular cage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1561–1564 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, H. et al. Pillararene host–guest complexation induced chirality amplification: a new way to detect cryptochiral compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 10868–10872 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jensen, F. R., Noyce, D. S., Sederholm, C. H. & Berlin, A. J. The energy barrier for the chair-chair interconversion of cyclohexane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 1256–1257 (1960).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, EP/P027067/1) and the European Research Council (695009). Y.Y. acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22071083) and the support of the Jiangsu Overseas Visiting Scholar Program from the Jiangsu Provincial Education Department. We thank Diamond Light Source for beamtime on Beamline I19 (CY21497) and the computing facilities of the CRCMM of Marseille. We also thank Dr. D. Zhang for the useful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.R.N. and Y.Y. conceived the study, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. Y.Y. performed the experiments. T.K.R. collected the X-ray data, T.K.R. and Y.Y. refined the structures. Z.L. performed the CD studies. J.Z. performed parts of the experiments. N.V. and A.M. resolved the ligands and determined the configurations. All authors discussed the results and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan R. Nitschke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Ronson, T.K., Lu, Z. et al. A curved host and second guest cooperatively inhibit the dynamic motion of corannulene. Nat Commun 12, 4079 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24344-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24344-w

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing