Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Converting copper sulfide to copper with surface sulfur for electrocatalytic alkyne semi-hydrogenation with water

## Abstract

Electrocatalytic alkyne semi-hydrogenation to alkenes with water as the hydrogen source using a low-cost noble-metal-free catalyst is highly desirable but challenging because of their over-hydrogenation to undesired alkanes. Here, we propose that an ideal catalyst should have the appropriate binding energy with active atomic hydrogen (H*) from water electrolysis and a weaker adsorption with an alkene, thus promoting alkyne semi-hydrogenation and avoiding over-hydrogenation. So, surface sulfur-doped and -adsorbed low-coordinated copper nanowire sponges are designedly synthesized via in situ electroreduction of copper sulfide and enable electrocatalytic alkyne semi-hydrogenation with over 99% selectivity using water as the hydrogen source, outperforming a copper counterpart without surface sulfur. Sulfur anion-hydrated cation (S2−-K+(H2O)n) networks between the surface adsorbed S2− and K+ in the KOH electrolyte boost the production of active H* from water electrolysis. And the trace doping of sulfur weakens the alkene adsorption, avoiding over-hydrogenation. Our catalyst also shows wide substrate scopes, up to 99% alkenes selectivity, good reducible groups compatibility, and easily synthesized deuterated alkenes, highlighting the promising potential of this method.

## Introduction

Selective hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes is a fundamental and significant transformation in synthetic chemistry. This transformation is also a classical model reaction to evaluate the performance of a newly developed catalyst or hydrogenation method1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Although significant progress has been achieved, current reports are still mainly relying on the expensive noble-metal catalysts (e.g., Pt, Pd, Ru, or their related alloys)9,10,11,12,13 or complicated metal complexes14,15,16,17 with gaseous hydrogen (H2) or expensive and/or toxic organic hydrogen sources, causing severe concerns on the cost, safety, and sustainability. To solve these problems, an electrochemical strategy has been recently developed by our group for selective semi-hydrogenation of alkynes over a Pd-P cathode by using H2O as the hydrogen source18. However, good alkenes selectivity required the accurate control of the applied potential and reaction time. So, time-prolonged or potential-sensitive over-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkanes is still a big obstacle for the practical synthesis of high-purity alkenes19,20. At present, a catalyst that can intrinsically govern the semi-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes is still lacking. Thus, exploring a non-noble-metal-nanostructured electrocatalyst for highly selective alkyne semi-hydrogenation in a wide range of potential with time-independent selectivity is urgently demanded.

Electrochemistry has provided an efficient and sustainable platform for synthesizing value-added fine chemicals21,22,23,24,25,26. Cu-based catalysts are widely used in many electrochemical reactions due to their abundance, robustness, and superior catalytic activity27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. As the hydrogen adsorption free energy (ΔGH*) is relatively large27, Cu materials can inhibit the competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and thus serve as the ideal candidates for electroreduction reactions (e.g., carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2 RR)28,29,30,31, halide deuteration33, and nitrate RR34). Doping and surface modification are advantageous to high carbon products of CO2 reduction by controlling the adsorption of intermediates29,30. In fact, the electrode materials often experience structural reconstruction, including the changes in morphology, composition, and crystal face under the electrochemical conditions. For instance, copper oxide-derived nanostructures exhibited an improved performance for CO2 RR for rich grain boundaries, exposed high-index facets, and low-coordinated Cu34. Metal chalcogenides and MoNi alloy reconstructed to produce surface-adsorbed chalcogenates35 and Mo2O72− ions36, both of which were proven to accelerate water electrolysis. In addition, surface Sδ− adsorbed inert Au or In would promoted water electrolysis to generate the active atomic hydrogen (H*)37,38. Furthermore, doping S into Pd could weaken the adsorption of alkenes to inhibit its over-hydrogenation in the H2-participated thermal catalysis39 and the semi-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes has also been achieved by homogeneous and heterogeneous Cu catalysis under high pressure of H2 at elevated temperature40,41,42. In these regards, we speculated that sulfur-modified Cu nanostructures, especially synthesized via in situ electroreduction of self-supported precursors, might be highly efficient for electrocatalytic semi-hydrogenation of alkynes. However, in situ electrochemically formed Cu nanostructures with surface sulfur have not been explored for selective semi-hydrogenation of alkynes using H2O as the hydrogen source.

Here, surface sulfur-doped and -adsorbed Cu nanowire sponges (Cu-S NSs) were designedly synthesized by in situ electroreduction of CuS nanowire arrays/Cu foam (CuS NAs). Cu-S NSs were highly active for electrochemical transfer semi-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes with up to 99% selectivity, broad substrate scope, and good functional group compatibility by using H2O as the hydrogen source (Fig. 1). Electrochemical in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) demonstrated the conversion process from CuS NAs to Cu-S NSs. Both experimental and computational results revealed the crucial roles of surface-adsorbed and lattice-doped sulfur in Cu-S NSs for selective alkyne semi-hydrogenation. This sulfur-promoted method was also suitable for the hydrodehalogenation of aryl iodide.

## Results

### Materials synthesis and characterizations

The self-supported CuS NAs were synthesized by a facile sulfuration of Cu(OH)2 nanowire precursors (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Figs. 1a, b). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Figs. 2a–c) showed that CuS nanowires assembled by small nanoparticles were directly grown on a copper foam (CF). The lattice fringes with an interplanar distance of 0.305 nm in the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image (Supplementary Fig. 2d) were attributed to the (102) planes of CuS42. The energy-dispersive X-ray mapping image (Supplementary Fig. 2e) implied that Cu and sulfur were uniformly distributed throughout the entire nanostructure. All the diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern (Fig. 2c) could be indexed to the hexagonal structure of CuS (JCPDS No. 06-0464). The prominent peaks at 932.8 eV (Cu 2p3/2) and 952.8 eV (Cu 2p1/2) in the X-ray photoelectron spectra belonged to Cu2+, whereas the characteristic signals at 163.5 eV (S 2p3/2) and 162.3 eV (S 2p1/2) were assigned to S2− (Supplementary Figs. 2e and  3)43. These results suggested the successful synthesis of CuS NAs.

The as-prepared CuS NAs were then transformed into Cu-S NSs via an electrochemical reduction in 1.0 M KOH with a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 (Fig. 2a). The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves showed three typical reduction peaks at −0.8, −1.05, and −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO corresponding to the reduction of CuS/Cu8S5, Cu8S5/Cu2S, and Cu2S/Cu, respectively. These reduction peaks first appeared, gradually faded, and finally vanished at the fourth LSV scan, indicating the rapidly complete reduction of CuS precursors (Fig. 2b). The details will be discussed later. This result is consistent with the Pourbaix diagram of Cu-S system (Supplementary Fig. 4), in which CuS is not thermodynamically stable in aqueous solutions at pH 14, and can become metallic Cu at potentials more negative than −0.8 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode (−1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO)44,45. The electroreduction-induced sulfur stripping could decrease the size of the nanowires and cause the transformation of NAs to NSs (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Figs. 5a–c). The XRD pattern showed the disappearance of CuS and the presence of Cu2O after the electroreduction (Fig. 2c), which might be owing to the inevitable oxidation of the sample in air. The clear fringes with a lattice spacing of 0.24 nm in the HRTEM image also confirmed the Cu2O phase (Supplementary Fig. 5b). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) data suggested the sulfur content of the Cu-S NSs was about 5.5%, implying the severe leaching of sulfur during the reduction process and the existence of trace sulfur in the in situ-formed Cu-S NSs (Supplementary Fig. 6). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was also used to investigate the valence state of Cu-S NSs. After the electroreduction conversion, the atomic percentage of sulfur decreased from 42% to 4.6%, in accordance with the EDS results. The peaks at 163 eV (S 2p3/2) and 162 eV (S 2p1/2) were assigned to S2−. Further, a new peak at 168 eV was derived from the oxidation of surface sulfur species in air44. In Cu spectra, the peaks at 932.8 and 953.8 eV were assigned to the Cu+ 2p3/2 and Cu+ 2p1/2 of Cu2O, whereas the small peaks at 954.1 and 934.6 eV with the satellite peak at 942 eV correspond to the Cu2+ of CuO because of its oxidation in air46. These results indicated that CuS NAs underwent morphological and structural evolution during the electrochemical reduction process.

X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) data suggested the sulfur content of the Cu-S NSs was about 5.5%, implying the severe leaching of sulfur during the reduction process and the existence of trace sulfur in the in situ-formed Cu-S NSs (Supplementary Fig. 6). XPS was also used to investigate the valence state of Cu-S NSs. After the electroreduction conversion, the atomic percentage of sulfur decreased from 42% to 4.6%, in accordance with the EDS results. The peaks at 163 eV (S 2p3/2) and 162 eV (S 2p1/2) were assigned to S2−. Then, a new peak at 168 eV was derived from the oxidation of surface sulfur species in air44. In Cu spectra, the peaks at 932.8 and 953.8 eV were assigned to the Cu+ 2p3/2 and Cu+ 2p1/2 of Cu2O, whereas the small peaks at 954.1 and 934.6 eV with the satellite peak at 942 eV correspond to the Cu2+ of CuO because of its oxidation in air46. These results indicated that CuS NAs underwent morphological and structural evolution during the electrochemical reduction process.

Furthermore, a series of in situ characterizations (the following characterizations were performed in situ unless otherwise stated) were conducted to study the structural evolution of CuS under the electrochemical condition. First, potential-dependent XRD was used to monitor the phase transformation of the sample (Fig. 3a). To exclude the substrate interference, CuS powders were first stripped off from Cu foam substrate and loaded on carbon fiber paper (CP) for XRD tests. The peak at 54.5° was one of the characteristic peaks of CP (JCPDS No. 26–1076). The XRD pattern of the initial sample showed two peaks at 48.1° and 59.2°, corresponding to the (110) and (116) crystal face of the covellite CuS phase. When the applied potential was decreased, the above two peaks disappeared and a new peak at 47.5° probably belonged to Cu8S5 (113) raised at −0.85 V vs. Hg/HgO. At −1.0 V vs. Hg/HgO, three characteristic peaks of the hexagonal Cu2S phase at 46.0°, 48.3°, and 53.9° became prominent at the expense of the Cu8S5. At −1.2 V vs. Hg/HgO, two characteristic peaks at 43.3° and 50.6° of cubic Cu appeared, corresponding to the (111) and (200) crystal facets. With the potential decreasing, the two new peaks became stronger and the Cu2S peaks vanished ultimately. Thus, these XRD analyses suggested the reduced conversion process of CuS → Cu8S5 → Cu2S → Cu. No peaks from CuO or Cu2O were observed in these XRD patterns, indicating the detection of Cu2O and CuO in the ex situ XRD and XPS was due to the oxidation of metal Cu through exposure to air. As a result, metal Cu with trace surface sulfur was the final stable phase for the in situ electroreduction of CuS NAs, although its easy oxidation in air.

The conversion process from CuS NAs to Cu-S NSs was also confirmed by electrochemical Raman spectroscopy. Figure 3b depicted that the S–S bond vibration of CuS at 472 cm−1 decreased gradually with decreasing the applied potential43 and completely disappeared at −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO, reflecting that the detected surface sulfur in EDS and XPS was isolated in Cu-S NSs. The isolated surface sulfur indicated the S-doping and -adsorption on the surface of in situ-formed Cu. Meanwhile, the background fluorescent intensity of Cu ascended with the decrease of the applied potential, further accounting for converting CuS to Cu. Thus, the Raman data confirmed the complete conversion of CuS to Cu and the surface S-doping and adsorption on in situ-formed Cu.

To understand the real electronic configuration and local coordination environment of in situ-formed Cu-S NSs, electrochemical XAS was performed. The Cu K-edge extended X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra (XANES) and the corresponding derivative curves of Cu-S NSs at −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO both exhibited similar features to Cu foil (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 7), consistent with the XRD results in Fig. 3a47. However, the absorption edge position of Cu-S NSs was located between those of Cu2S and Cu, suggesting Cu-S was more oxidized than Cu foil (inset in Fig. 3c). This might be ascribed to the existence of low-coordinated unsaturated Cu, which was caused by the stripping of sulfur in electrochemical reduction. The local coordination environment was further analyzed by the Fourier-transformed extended X-ray absorption fine structure curves (Fig. 3d). Under the applied potential of −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO, the sample mainly consisted of Cu-Cu bonds with a bond length of 2.3 Å and a small amount of Cu-S bond with a bond length of 1.8 Å. The latter further confirmed the presence of surface sulfur in in situ-formed samples. The simulated coordination number of as-formed Cu-S was lower than that of Cu foil. Thus, the in situ-formed Cu-S NSs owned more low-coordinated Cu atoms, as observed in oxide-derived Cu34. In addition, the absence of the Cu-O bond in XAS spectra confirmed that the Cu2O phase of the XRD pattern (Fig. 2c) originated from the oxidation of activated Cu-S NSs in air. This hypothesis was further proved by the quickly complete conversion from Cu-S into Cu2O after exposing the fresh Cu-S NSs to air without bias, as shown in the XAS results (Supplementary Fig. 8). Thus, in situ-formed Cu-S NSs were very unstable in air and should be directly used as the electrocatalyst without air exposure.

The above ex situ and in situ results and discussions demonstrated that the rationally designed in situ electroduction of CuS NAs could successfully synthesize low-coordinated Cu with surface sulfur doping and adsorption as our target materials. This in situ electroreduction strategy of CuS precursors might be an important addition to the toolbox of chemical conversion synthesis48.

### Electrocatalytic semi-hydrogenation of alkynes with H2O over Cu-S NSs

After Cu-S NSs were in situ synthesized in a divided three-electrode system (Supplementary Fig. 9), 4-ethynylaniline (1a), the model substrate, was rapidly added to the 1.0 M KOH electrolyte containing 1, 4-dioxane (Diox, VDiox:VWater = 2:5) as the co-solvents at a constant potential for evaluating the electrocatalytic semi-hydrogenation of alkynes. The LSV curves displayed that the current density increased slightly between −1.15 and −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO after adding 1a, implying the easier reduction of 1a than HER in this potential range. At below −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO, the two LSV curves almost overlapped, and the increase in current density might mainly be ascribed to the HER (Supplementary Fig. 10). Impressively, over 99% selectivity of product alkene 2a was observed from −1.25 to −1.5 V vs. Hg/HgO (Fig. 4a), suggesting this potential-independent selectivity over Cu-S NSs. From −1.3 to −1.4 V vs. Hg/HgO, 99% conversion yields were achieved with the complete consumption of 1a within 4.0 h. Time-dependent curves showed that 2a selectivity did not vary with reaction time, even after the complete disappearance of 1a (Fig. 4b).

These satisfactory results demonstrated the highly selective semi-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes was governed by the Cu-S NSs cathode itself, which was hardly impossible to the current reports. As expected, the inherent selectivity of the catalyst enabled the reaction to maintain excellent alkenes selectivity (>98%) even under constant current conditions (Supplementary Fig. 11), further demonstrating the excellent alkene selectivity was intrinsically controlled by the Cu-S NSs rather than the input potential/current or the reaction time. In addition, the conversion yield and selectivity of 2a were much worse when employing in situ-formed Cu by the electroreduction of Cu(OH)2 NAs as the cathode (Fig. 4c). In particular, no 2a was detected from −1.3 to −1.4 V vs. Hg/HgO as we expected, further demonstrating the unique advantage of our Cu-S NSs in controlling the selectivity of alkenes. Furthermore, in situ-formed Cu-S NSs cathode was highly active and durable for this selective hydrogenation (Fig. 4d), implying good durability. Deuterium-labeling experiments verified H2O was the sole hydrogen source for this electrochemical semi-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes (Supplementary Fig. 21). Thus, the excellent selectivity and activity for the semi-hydrogenation of alkynes with water as the hydrogen source were potential-independent and time-independent over the in situ-formed Cu-S NSs cathode, holding promising potential for practical and long-term alkene synthesis.

### Mechanistic insight into surface sulfur promotion

Recent studies have demonstrated that the surface-adsorbed anions (e.g., Sδ−, Cl, F) exerted a vital role in accelerating the activation of H2O in alkaline media37,38. The anion-hydrated cation networks (Sδ−-K+(H2O)n) could be formed in the double layer structure through the non-covalent Coulomb interaction between the surface anion and the hydrated cation. The proposed cation/anion pair complex facilitated the dissociation of H2O to form active H* species, which was usually a slow step and restrained the HER via the Volmer step (2H2O + M + 2e → 2M-H* + 2OH). Therefore, control experiments were done to verify whether a similar promoting effect was involved in our hydrogenated reaction. When 1.0 M tetramethylammonium hydroxide solution was used instead of KOH electrolyte, Cu-S NSs exhibited much poor HER activity and sluggish alkynes hydrogenation rate at −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO under identified conditions (Figs. 5c, d), which might be due to the weaker interaction between S2− and TMA+ than hydrated K+, and hence more inferior capability to promote H2O dissociation. By changing the cation from K+ to Na+, slight decreases for both HER and 1a transformation were observed (Figs. 5c, d). We rationalized the better performance for K+ might be due to the smaller ionic hydration number and radius of the hydrated cation of K+(H2O)n (n = 7 for K+ vs. 13 for Na+)49 that resulted in stronger interactions with S2− on Cu surface, thus promoting the water activation. Furthermore, for Cu(OH)2-derived Cu without surface sulfur, we could not observe noticeable differences in the HER activity after adding different cations (Supplementary Fig. 13). These results revealed that the surface-adsorbed S2− on Cu enhanced the alkyne semi-hydrogenation activity by promoting H2O activation via the interaction of S2− with hydrated cations.

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to fundamentally understand the promoting origin of surface sulfur in this electrochemical semi-hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes. We first calculated the reaction Gibbs free energies (ΔG) for the HER on pure Cu and sulfur-doped and -adsorbed Cu-S NSs. The ΔG values of H* formation on Cu atoms near and far from S atoms in Cu-S were −19.3 and −12.54 kJ/mol, respectively, which were more positive than the value of −21.23 kJ/mol for pure Cu (Fig. 6a). The relatively weak H* affinity of Cu-S was favorable for the subsequent semi-hydrogenation of the alkynes, accounting for the experiment results. In addition, the free energy of alkene 2a on Cu-S was positive than that on pure Cu, indicating that 2a was readily desorbed from Cu-S (Fig. 6b). We have also compared the ΔG for further hydrogenation of 2a by adding another H over Cu-S and pure Cu, respectively. The ΔG of +3.13 kJ/mol suggested that over-hydrogenation of alkenes to alkanes was thermodynamically unfavorable for Cu-S NSs, implying the intrinsically high selectivity of alkenes over Cu-S NSs (Fig. 6b). In fact, 2a could be completely hydrogenated to the corresponding alkanes over Cu(OH)2-derived Cu, but 2a could not be further hydrogenated to alkane over Cu-S NSs, supporting the theoretical discussion (Supplementary Fig. 14). Therefore, a possible reaction mechanism was proposed in Fig. 6c (1a as the example). A Sδ−-K+(H2O)n network was formed via the interaction between the surface Sδ− and hydrated K+. The near-surface water molecules were facilely activated to produce the adsorbed H* species on the Cu atom close to S. In our alkaline system (pH = 13.6), the proton-coupled electron transfer process might be not involved for the semi-hydrogenation of alkynes because of the extremely low concentration of proton50. We thus reasoned an addition pathway of H* to alkynes accounting for the formation of alkene products. Subsequently, H* was transferred to 1a, which was activated and adsorbed on a nearby Cu atom, and then coupled with another H* to generate the alkene product 2a. Because of the weak adsorption of 2a on Cu-S and the thermodynamic constraints for further hydrogenation, 2a desorbed with the regeneration of the Cu-S surface for the next cycle.

### The universality of the electrocatalytic semi-hydrogenation of alkynes with H2O over Cu-S NSs

The general applicability of this electrochemical semi-hydrogenation over Cu-S NSs was tested (Table 1). A series of terminal alkynes with both electron-withdrawing and -donating substituents on the aryl ring reacted well to deliver the corresponding alkenes with excellent selectivity (99%) and good to high conversion yields (2a to 2i). In particular, the easily reducible C-Cl, C-Br, and C=O bonds, which were usually challenging by traditional methods, retained well during the electrochemical process, providing good chances for assembling more complex molecules (2df). The -NH2, -COOH, pyridyl, and thienyl groups, which usually posed deactivation to the metal catalysts, had nearly no influence on the activity and product selectivity, demonstrating the robust property of our Cu-S NSs cathode (2a, 2g, 2ij). Interestingly, by replacing H2O with D2O, our method was readily applied to the selective synthesis of deuterated alkenes with high yields, selectivity, and deuterated efficiency (99%), which could serve as important building blocks for synthesizing deuterated drug molecules, advanced functional materials, or probe molecules for studying reaction mechanism51,52.

As discussed in the mechanism section above, the introduction of Na2S to in situ-formed Cu could boost the alkyne semi-hydrogenation. We thus check the universality of the sulfur-modified strategy in other hydrogenation reactions. The hydrodehalogenation was selected as the model reaction due to its essential role in organic synthesis32. As expected, an obvious improvement of the electrochemical conversion of 2-iodobenzyl alcohol to benzyl alcohol was observed after adding 0.05 mmol of S2− into the system by employing in situ-formed Cu NAs as the cathode (Fig. 7), further demonstrating the general applicability of this sulfur-treating method.

## Discussion

In summary, the boosted active hydrogen species (H*) and the weak alkenes adsorption were proposed to achieve electrocatalytic alkyne semi-hydrogenation with high activity and selectivity. These considerations made sulfur-doped and -adsorbed low-coordinated Cu an ideal cathode for realizing potential- and time-independent selective alkyne semi-hydrogenation using water as the hydrogen source. Then, the in situ electroreduction of CuS NA precursors were developed to prepare Cu-S NSs. A combined ex situ and in situ result demonstrated the conversion process of CuS → Cu8S5 → Cu2S → low-coordinated Cu with surface-doped and -adsorbed sulfur (Cu-S NSs). Experimental and theoretical results suggested the surface-adsorbed sulfur on Cu-S NSs could interact with the hydrated K+ to form the Sδ−-K+(H2O)n network, contributing to the dissociation of H2O to adsorbed active H* species. The lattice-doped sulfur played a decisive role in controlling the high selectivity of alkenes by weakening alkene adsorption. Furthermore, surface sulfur also made the further hydrogenation of alkene thermodynamically unfavorable, which was another key factor to determine the intrinsically high selectivity of alkenes over Cu-S NSs. This method showed good university to various substrates and the easily fragile functional groups (e.g., C-Br, C=O) could retain well. In addition, the deuterated alkenes with high yield, selectivity, and deuterated ration rate were easily synthesized. Furthermore, the surface sulfur modification method could also promote electrochemical hydrodehalogenation, illustrating the methodology generality. Our work not only provides an understanding of the activity and selectivity origin of sulfur-modified transition metal toward highly selective semi-hydrogenation of alkynes but also offers a paradigm for designing and synthesizing low-cost, nanostructured electrode via an in situ electrochemical treatment for other electrocatalytic hydrogenation reactions.

## Methods

### Synthesis of self-supported Cu(OH)2 NAs

Cu(OH)2 NAs were synthesized with slight modification according to the previous report53. The commercial CF was cut into a rectangular shape with the size of 1.0 × 3.0 cm2. Then the small pieces of CF were carefully washed with 3.0 M acid, acetone, and deionized (DI) water, respectively. Cu(OH)2 NAs supported on CF were self-grown by simple oxidization of the Cu substrate in an alkaline environment. NaOH (3.0 g) and 0.68 g (NH4)2S2O8 were dissolved in 30 mL DI water under vigorous stirring and the precleaned Cu substrate was immersed in it. After 20 min, a blue hydroxide layer was observed on the surface of Cu. The Cu substrate covered with nanowires was taken out from the solution and repeatedly rinsed with DI water, and then dried at room temperature.

### Synthesis of self-supported CuS NAs

CuS NAs were prepared by the reported hydrothermal sulfidation method53. Thiourea (0.22 g) was dissolved into 30 mL ethylene glycol under magnetic stirring at room temperature. Then, the solution was loaded into a 50 ml Teflon-lined autoclave and a piece of freshly treated CF was also added into the autoclave, sealed, heated to 80 °C, and kept at this temperature for 60 min. After the reaction cooled down naturally, the CF with products on it was taken out, washed with water, and dried naturally.

### Synthesis of Cu-S NSs via in situ electroreduction of CuS NAs

The electroreduction of Cu-S NNs was conducted on an Ivium-n-Stat electrochemical workstation (Ivium Technologies B.V.) in a typical three-electrode system in 1.0 M KOH. A Hg/HgO with 1.0 M KOH as the inner reference electrolyte was used as the reference electrode. A carbon rod was used as the counter-electrode. CuS NAs/CF was in advance sealed with epoxy, to ensure the exposed area of 1.0 cm2, and then used as the working electrode. The LSV was recorded in the voltage range −0.7 ~ −1.5 V vs. Hg/HgO at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1 until the reductive peaks disappeared.

### Synthesis of Cu NAs via in situ electroreduction of Cu(OH)2 NAs

Cu(OH)2-derived Cu NAs were synthesized by a similar in situ electroreduction strategy to those of Cu-S NSs, where CuS NAs were replaced by Cu(OH)2 NAs.

### Characterization

The SEM images were taken with a FEI Apreo S LoVac scanning electron microscope. The TEM images were obtained with the JEOL-2100F system equipped with the EDAX Genesis XM2. XPS measurements were performed on a photoelectron spectrometer using Al Kα radiation as the excitation source (PHI 5000 VersaProbe). All the peaks were calibrated with the C1s spectrum at a binding energy of 284.8 eV. The ex situ and in situ XRD were measured at the Rigaku Smartlab9KW Diffraction System using a Cu Kα source (λ = 0.15406 nm). The in situ Raman spectroscopy was acquired on a Renishaw inVia reflex Raman microscope under an excitation of 532 nm laser. The XAS measurements were undertaken at the 1W1B beamline of the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF). The XAS spectra were analyzed with the ATHENA software package. To exclude the interference of Cu substrate, CuS powders were stripped off from the Cu substrate and loaded on CP for in situ XRD, in situ Raman, and in situ XANES tests. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on Varian Mercury Plus 400 instruments at 400 MHz (1H NMR) and 101 MHz (13C NMR). Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million downfield from internal tetramethysilane. Multiplicity was indicated as follows: s (singlet), d (doublet), m (multiplet). Coupling constants were reported in hertz (Hz). The gas chromatograph (GC)-mass spectrometry was carried out with TRACE DSQ. The GC was measured on Agilent 7890A with thermal conductivity and flame ionization detector. The injection temperature was set at 300 °C. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at 1.5 mL min−1. The high-performance liquid chromatography was measured on the Agilent 1220.

### Electrochemical measurements

Electrochemical measurements were carried out in a divided three-compartment electrochemical cell consisting of a working electrode, a carbon rod counter-electrode, and a Hg/HgO reference electrode. The cathode cell (10 mL) and anode cell (10 mL) containing 1.0 M KOH solution (2.0 mL Diox and 5.0 mL H2O), respectively, were separated by the membrane. After the Cu-S NSs in situ formed, 0.1 mmol of alkynes dissolved in 2.0 ml Diox were rapidly added into the cathode and stirred to form a homogeneous solution. Then, chronoamperometry was carried out at a given constant potential −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO and stirred until the starting substrates disappeared. After that, the products at the cathode were extracted with dichloromethane (DCM). The DCM phase was removed and the residuals were subjected to be separated either by flash column chromatography or using a thin-layer chromatography plate to give the isolated yields or was analyzed by GC to provide the GC conversion yields. The GC yields were calculated according to standard calibration curves. The procedure and reaction setup of electrochemical semideuteration of alkynes was similar to the semi-hydrogenation process, except that the H2O and 1.0 M KOH were replaced by D2O and 0.5 M K2CO3, respectively. The procedure and reaction setup of electrochemical semi-hydrogenation of alkynes over Cu NAs were similar to that of Cu-S NSs, except that the working electrode changed to Cu NAs.

The procedure for the hydrodehalogenation of 2-iodobenzyl alcohol was similar to that of the alkyne semi-hydrogenation. Typically, 0.2 mmol of 2-iodobenzyl alcohol was added into the cathode cell. The LSV curves were recorded voltage range −0.9 ~ −1.5 V vs. Hg/HgO at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 and chronoamperometry was carried out at a given constant potential −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO for 1 h using in situ-formed Cu NAs as cathode with and without adding 0.05 mmol of Na2S, respectively. After adding Na2S, the current density increased obviously and the conversion of 2-iodobenzyl alcohol improved from 36% to 99%, demonstrating the general applicability of our treating method.

### Quantitative reductive product

The conversion (%), selectivity (%), and Faradic efficiency (FE, %) of alkenes, as well as the deuterated ratio (%) of deuterated alkenes were calculated using Eqs. (1)–(3):

$${\rm{Conversion}}\,\left(\% \right)=\frac{{\mathrm{mol}}\,{\mathrm{of}}\,{\mathrm{formed}}\,{\mathrm{alkene}}}{{\rm{mol}}\,{\mathrm{of}}\,{\mathrm{initial}}\,{\mathrm{alkyne}}}\times 100 \%$$
(1)
$${\rm{Selectivity}}\,\left( \% \right)=\frac{{\rm{mol}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{formed}}\,{\rm{alkene}}}{{\rm{mol}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{consumed}}\,{\rm{alkyne}}}\times 100 \%$$
(2)
$${{\rm{Deuteration}}\,{\rm{ratio}}}\,\left( \% \right)=100-\left[\left(\frac{{{\rm{residual}}\,{\rm{integral}}}}{{{\rm{number}}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{labeling}}\,{\rm{sites}}}}\right)\times 100 \% \right]$$
(3)

#### Electrochemical in situ XRD measurements

The in situ electrochemical XRD pattern were measured at a Rigaku Smartlab9KW Diffraction System using a Cu Kα source (λ = 0.15406 nm). The electrolytic cell was homemade by Teflon with Pt wire as the counter-electrode and Hg/HgO electrode as the reference electrode. The pattern was collected in the 2θ ranging from 40.5° to 60.5° under the applied potential from without bias to −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO. Each diffraction pattern was collected for 5 min for statistics.

#### Electrochemical in situ Raman measurements

The in situ electrochemical Raman spectroscopy was recorded on the Renishaw inVia reflex Raman microscope under an excitation of 532 nm laser under controlled potentials by an electrochemical workstation. The electrolytic cell was homemade by Teflon with a piece of round quartz glass as the cover to protect the objective. The working electrode was set to keep the plane of the sample perpendicular to the incident laser. Pt wire as the counter-electrode was rolled to a circle around the working electrode. Hg/HgO electrode with an internal reference electrolyte of 1.0 M KOH was used as the reference electrode. The spectrum was recorded every 30 s under the applied potential from without bias to −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO.

#### Electrochemical in situ XAS measurements

The in situ electrochemical XAS at the Cu K-edge was recorded at at the 1W1B beamline of the BSRF. The electrolytic cell was homemade by Teflon with Pt plate as the counter-electrode and Hg/HgO electrode as the reference electrode. The applied potential was set at −1.3 V vs. Hg/HgO during the activation. The photon energy was calibrated with the first inflection point of the Cu K-edge in Cu metal foil. The XAS spectra were analyzed with the ATHENA software package.

### Computational details

In this work, all calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package based on the DFT54,55. Projector augmented wave pseudo-potentials were used56. The exchange-correlation contributions to the total energy were estimated by the generalized gradient approximation with Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof form57. The Hubbard U approach (DFT+U) was adopted to better describe the on-site Coulomb correlation of the localized 3d electrons for Cu with U–J = 3.87 eV58,59. An empirical dispersion-corrected DFT method (DFT-D3) was carried out to reasonably describe the weak long-distance van der Waals effects60. The kinetic energy cutoff for the plane-wave expansion was set to 500 eV. An energy convergence threshold of 10−4 eV was set in the self-consistent field iteration. The geometry optimization within the conjugate gradient method was performed with forces on each atom <0.05 eV Å−1. A p (2 × 2) slab model with three atomic layers was adopted to simulate the Cu (111) surface. A vacuum layer of 15 Å was inserted along the c direction to eliminate the periodic image interactions. S-doped Cu surface was modeled with one surface Cu being replaced by an S atom. The bottom atomic layer was fixed, while other layers and the adsorbates were fully relaxed during structural optimizations. The Brillouin zone was sampled by a k-point mesh of 4 × 4 × 1. The reaction free energy change can be obtained with the following equation:

$$\Delta G=\Delta E+\Delta {E}_{\mathrm{ZPE}}-T\Delta S$$

where ΔE is the total energy difference between the products and the reactants of each reaction step, and ΔEZPE and ΔS are the differences of zero-point energy and entropy, respectively. The zero-point energy of free molecules and adsorbates were obtained from the vibrational frequency calculations. The free energy change of each step that involves an electrochemical proton–electron transfer was described by the computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) model proposed by Nørskov et al.61. In this technique, zero voltage is defined based on the reversible hydrogen electrode, in which the reaction is defined to be in equilibrium at zero voltage, at all values of pH, at all temperatures, and with H2 at 101,325 Pa pressure. Therefore, in the CHE model, the free energy of a proton–electron pair is equal to half of the free energy of gaseous hydrogen at a potential of 0 V.

## Data availability

The data that support other plots within this paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

## References

1. 1.

Studt, F. et al. Identification of non-precious metal alloy catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Science 320, 1320–1322 (2008).

2. 2.

Oger, C., Balas, L., Durand, T. & Galano, J. M. Are alkyne reductions chemo-, regio-, and stereoselective enough to provide pure (Z)-olefins in polyfunctionalized bioactive molecules? Chem. Rev. 113, 1313–1350 (2013).

3. 3.

McCue, A. J. & Anderson, J. A. Recent advances in selective acetylene hydrogenation using palladium containing catalysts. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 9, 142–153 (2015).

4. 4.

Niu, Y. et al. Manipulating interstitial carbon atoms in the nickel octahedral site for highly efficient hydrogenation of alkyne. Nat. Commun. 11, 3324 (2020).

5. 5.

Li, B. & Ge, H. Highly selective electrochemical hydrogenation of alkynes: rapid construction of mechanochromic materials. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2774 (2019).

6. 6.

Sherbo, R. S., Delima, R. S., Chiykowski, V. A., MacLeod, B. P. & Berlinguette, C. P. Complete electron economy by pairing electrolysis with hydrogenation. Nat. Catal. 1, 501–507 (2018).

7. 7.

Hodge, K. L. & Goldberger, J. E. Transition metal-free alkyne hydrogenation catalysis with BaGa2, a hydrogen absorbing layered zintl phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19969–19972 (2019).

8. 8.

Chernichenko, K. et al. A frustrated-Lewis-pair approach to catalytic reduction of alkynes to cis-alkenes. Nat. Chem. 5, 718–723 (2013).

9. 9.

Wang, Z. et al. Enhancement of alkyne semi-hydrogenation selectivity by electronic modification of platinum. ACS Catal. 10, 6763–6770 (2020).

10. 10.

Feng, Q. et al. Isolated single-atom Pd Sites in intermetallic nanostructures: high catalytic selectivity for semihydrogenation of alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 7294–7301 (2017).

11. 11.

Chan, C. et al. Interstitial modification of palladium nanoparticles with boron atoms as a green catalyst for selective hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 5, 5787 (2014).

12. 12.

Fedorov, A., Liu, H.-J., Lo, H.-K. & Coperet, C. Silica-supported Cu nanoparticle catalysts for alkyne semihydrogenation: effect of ligands on rates and selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16502–16507 (2018).

13. 13.

Zhao, X. et al. Thiol treatment creates selective palladium catalysts for semihydrogenation of internal alkynes. Chem 4, 1080–1091 (2018).

14. 14.

Ramirez, B. L. & Lu, C. C. Rare-earth supported nickel catalysts for alkyne semihydrogenation: chemo- and regioselectivity impacted by the Lewis acidity and size of the support. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5396–5407 (2020).

15. 15.

Song, L. et al. Ru-catalyzed migratory geminal semihydrogenation of internal alkynes to terminal olefin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 17441–17451 (2019).

16. 16.

Gorgas, N. et al. Efficient Z-selective semihydrogenation of internal alkynes catalyzed by cationic iron(II) hydride complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 17452–17458 (2019).

17. 17.

Wang, Y., Huang, Z. & Huang, Z. Catalyst as colour indicator for endpoint detection to enable selective alkyne trans-hydrogenation with ethanol. Nat. Catal. 2, 529–536 (2019).

18. 18.

Wu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, C., Lu, S. & Zhang, B. Selective transfer semihydrogenation of alkynes with H2O (D2O) as the H (D) source over a Pd-P cathode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 21170–21175 (2020).

19. 19.

Crespo-Quesada, M., Cárdenas-Lizana, F., Dessimoz, A. L. & Kiwi-Minsker, L. Modern trends in catalyst and process design for alkyne hydrogenations. ACS Catal. 2, 1773–1786 (2012).

20. 20.

Lu, Y. et al. Highly selective semihydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes by using an unsupported nanoporous palladium catalyst: no leaching of palladium into the reaction mixture. ACS Catal. 7, 8296–8303 (2017).

21. 21.

Xiang, J. et al. Hindered dialkyl ether synthesis with electrogenerated carbocations. Nature 573, 398–402 (2019).

22. 22.

Fu, N., Sauer, G. S., Saha, A., Loo, A. & Lin, S. Metal-catalyzed electrochemical diazidation of alkenes. Science 357, 575–579 (2017).

23. 23.

Lum, Y. et al. Tuning OH binding energy enables selective electrochemical oxidation of ethylene to ethylene glycol. Nat. Catal. 3, 14–22 (2020).

24. 24.

Zeng, L. et al. Electrochemical oxidative aminocarbonylation of terminal alkynes. Nat. Catal. 3, 438–445 (2020).

25. 25.

Badalyan, A. & Stahl, S. Cooperative electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation with electron-proton-transfer mediators. Nature 535, 406–410 (2016).

26. 26.

Han, S., Shi, Y., Wang, C., Liu, C. & Zhang, B. Hollow cobalt sulfide nanocapsules for electrocatalytic selective transfer hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde with water. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2, 100337 (2021).

27. 27.

Morales-Guio, C. G., Stern, L. A. & Hu, X. Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6555–6569 (2014).

28. 28.

Vasileff, A., Xu, C., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y. & Qiao, S. Z. Surface and interface engineering in copper-based bimetallic materials for selective CO2 electroreduction. Chem 4, 1809–1831 (2018).

29. 29.

Xia, C. et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat. Energy 4, 776–785 (2019).

30. 30.

Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).

31. 31.

Luc, W. et al. Two-dimensional copper nanosheets for electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide to acetate. Nat. Catal. 2, 423–430 (2019).

32. 32.

Liu, C., Han, S., Li, M., Chong, X. & Zhang, B. Electrocatalytic deuteration of halides with D2O as the deuterium source over a copper nanowire arrays cathode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 18527–18531 (2020).

33. 33.

Wang, Y., Zhou, W., Jia, R., Yu, Y. & Zhang, B. Unveiling the activity origin of a copper-based electrocatalyst for selective nitrate reduction to ammonia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 5350–5354 (2020).

34. 34.

Lei, Q. et al. Investigating the origin of enhanced C2+ selectivity in oxide-/hydroxide-derived copper electrodes during CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 4213–4222 (2020).

35. 35.

Shi, Y. et al. Unveiling the promotion of surface-adsorbed chalcogenate on the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 22470–22474 (2020).

36. 36.

Du, W., Shi, Y., Zhou, W., Yu, Y. & Zhang, B. Unveiling the in situ dissolution and polymerization of Mo in Ni4Mo alloy for promoting hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7051–7055 (2021).

37. 37.

Staszak-Jirkovsky, J. et al. Design of active and stable Co-Mo-Sx chalcogels as pH-universal catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Mater. 15, 197–203 (2016).

38. 38.

Ma, W. et al. Promoting electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate via sulfur-boosting Water activation on indium surfaces. Nat. Commun. 10, 892 (2019).

39. 39.

Albani, D. et al. Selective ensembles in supported palladium sulfide nanoparticles for alkyne semi-hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2634 (2018).

40. 40.

Wakamatsu, T., Nagao, K., Ohmiya, H. & Sawamura, M. Copper-catalyzed semihydrogenation of internal alkynes with molecular hydrogen. Organometallics 35, 1354–1357 (2016).

41. 41.

Huang, F. et al. Anchoring Cu1 species over nanodiamond-graphene for semi-hydrogenation of acetylene. Nat. Commun. 10, 4431 (2019).

42. 42.

Karunananda, M. K. & Mankad, N. P. E-selective semi-hydrogenation of alkynes by heterobimetallic catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 14598–14601 (2015).

43. 43.

Chandra, M., Bhunia, K. & Pradhan, D. Controlled synthesis of CuS/TiO2 heterostructured nanocomposites for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation through water splitting. Inorg. Chem. 57, 4524–4533 (2018).

44. 44.

Shinagawa, T., Larrazábal, G. O., Martín, A. J., Krumeich, F. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Sulfur-modified copper catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate. ACS Catal. 8, 837–844 (2018).

45. 45.

Oversteeg, C. H. M. et al. Copper sulfide derived nanoparticles supported on carbon for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Catal. Today https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.09.020 (2020).

46. 46.

Zhang, Z. et al. Site-resolved Cu2O catalysis in the oxidation of CO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 4276–4280 (2019).

47. 47.

Weng, Z. et al. Active sites of copper-complex catalytic materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 9, 415 (2018).

48. 48.

Yu, Y., Shi, Y. & Zhang, B. Synergetic transformation of solid inorganic-organic hybrids into advanced nanomaterials for catalytic water splitting. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1711–1721 (2018).

49. 49.

Ma, W. et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C-C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat. Catal. 3, 478–487 (2020).

50. 50.

Wei, J. et al. Heterostructured electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions. Nanomicro Lett. 10, 75 (2018).

51. 51.

Wang, X. et al. General and practical potassium methoxide/disilane-mediated dehalogenative deuteration of (hetero) arylhalides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10970–10974 (2018).

52. 52.

Kurimoto, A. et al. Electrolytic deuteration of unsaturated bonds without using D2. Nat. Catal. 3, 719–726 (2020).

53. 53.

Liu, X. L. & Zhu, Y. J. CuS nanotubes prepared using Cu(OH)2 nanowires as self-sacrificial template. Mater. Lett. 65, 1089–1091 (2011).

54. 54.

Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

55. 55.

Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

56. 56.

Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

57. 57.

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

58. 58.

Dudarev, S., Botton, G., Savrasov, S., Humphreys, C. & Sutton, A. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U Study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

59. 59.

Xu, H., Cheng, D., Cao, D. & Zeng, X. C. A universal principle for a rational design of single-atom electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 339–348 (2018).

60. 60.

Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

61. 61.

Nørskov, J., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A. & Lindqvist, L. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-Cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).

## Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (number 21871206) for support. We acknowledge Dr. Lirong Zheng and the 1W1B beamline of the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility for supporting this project.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

B.Z. conceived the idea and directed the project. B.Z. and Y.W. designed the experiments. Y.W and C.L. carried out the experiments. C.W. performed and analyzed the DFT calculations. Y.S. and Y.W. carried out the in situ XRD measurements. Y.W. and C.L. wrote the paper. B.Z. revised the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Zhang.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribtuions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Wu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, C. et al. Converting copper sulfide to copper with surface sulfur for electrocatalytic alkyne semi-hydrogenation with water. Nat Commun 12, 3881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24059-y

• Accepted:

• Published: