Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Defective folate metabolism causes germline epigenetic instability and distinguishes Hira as a phenotype inheritance biomarker


The mechanism behind transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is unclear, particularly through the maternal grandparental line. We previously showed that disruption of folate metabolism in mice by the Mtrr hypomorphic mutation results in transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of congenital malformations. Either maternal grandparent can initiate this phenomenon, which persists for at least four wildtype generations. Here, we use genome-wide approaches to reveal genetic stability in the Mtrr model and genome-wide differential DNA methylation in the germline of Mtrr mutant maternal grandfathers. We observe that, while epigenetic reprogramming occurs, wildtype grandprogeny and great grandprogeny exhibit transcriptional changes that correlate with germline methylation defects. One region encompasses the Hira gene, which is misexpressed in embryos for at least three wildtype generations in a manner that distinguishes Hira transcript expression as a biomarker of maternal phenotypic inheritance.


Environmental stressors can impact an individual’s health and that of their progeny1,2,3,4,5. The phenotypic risk that persists for several generations in the absence of the stressor is termed transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI)6. Although the mechanism is unclear, this non-conventional inheritance likely occurs independent of DNA base-sequence mutations and involves the inheritance of an epigenetic factor(s) via the germline6,7. Candidate factors in mammals include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and/or non-coding RNA1,2,4,8,9,10. How an epigenetic message resists reprogramming and is transmitted between one or even multiple generations to cause disease remains elusive. Few mammalian models of TEI exist and most focus on paternal inheritance1,2,8,9,10,11. We previously reported the Mtrrgt mouse line, a rare model of maternal grandparental TEI in which congenital malformations are transgenerationally inherited for at least four wildtype generations3 (see below, Supplementary Fig. 1a, d–e). While the germline is implicated, the epigenetic mechanism remains unclear.

MTRR (methionine synthase reductase) is a key enzyme required for one-carbon metabolism (i.e., folate and methionine metabolism; Supplementary Fig. 2)12,13,14. Folate is a well-known vitamin important for neural tube closure, yet its function in development is complex and poorly understood. One-carbon metabolism is required for thymidine synthesis15 and cellular methylation. Indeed, it transmits methyl groups for the methylation of homocysteine by methionine synthase (MTR) to form methionine and tetrahydrofolate16. Methionine acts as a precursor for S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which serves as the sole methyl-donor for substrates involved in epigenetic regulation (e.g., DNA, RNA, histones)17,18,19. MTRR activates MTR through the reductive methylation of its vitamin B12 cofactor14 (Supplementary Fig. 2). Consequently, the progression of one-carbon metabolism requires MTRR to maintain genetic and epigenetic stability.

The hypomorphic Mtrrgt mutation reduces wildtype Mtrr transcript expression in mice3,12, which is sufficient to diminish MTR activity by ~60% (ref. 12). Consequently, the progression of one-carbon metabolism is inhibited by the Mtrrgt mutation. Similar to mutations in the human MTRR gene13,20,21,22 or dietary folate deficiency in humans23, Mtrrgt/gt mice display hyperhomocysteinemia3,12 and macrocytic anaemia24 in adulthood, as well as altered DNA methylation patterns associated with gene misexpression3 and a broad range of incompletely penetrant developmental phenotypes at midgestation (e.g., growth defects and/or congenital malformations including heart, placenta, and neural tube closure defects)3. Therefore, Mtrrgt mice are suitable for studying defective folate metabolism.

Crucially, the Mtrrgt mouse line is a model of TEI that occurs via the maternal grandparental lineage3. Through highly controlled genetic pedigrees (Supplementary Fig. 1a, d–e), we demonstrated that an Mtrr+/gt heterozygous male or female mouse (i.e., the F0 generation) can initiate TEI of developmental phenotypes at embryonic day (E) 10.5 in the wildtype (Mtrr+/+) descendants until the F4 generation3. This phenomenon occurs when all mice are wildtype for the Mtrr gene except for the initiating F0 Mtrr+/gt individual (Supplementary Fig. 1d–e). The phenotypes are similar in kind to those observed in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses (see above), though present at slightly lower frequencies3. Also, the phenotypes associate with locus-specific changes in DNA methylation that are linked to gene misexpression3 giving functional relevance to this epigenetic disruption.

Regardless of whether an F0 Mtrr+/gt male or female initiates TEI, the spectrum and frequency of developmental phenotypes in the F2-F4 wildtype generations are largely comparable between pedigrees when inherited via their daughters3. The exception is the F1 generation where phenotypic risk at E10.5 occurs only when F1 individuals are derived from F0 Mtrr+/gt females (Supplementary Fig. 1d–e)3. That is, the F1 progeny of F0 Mtrr+/gt males do not exhibit phenotypes at E10.5, reinforcing that these phenotypes are not transmitted through the male lineage (Supplementary Fig. 1d–e)3. However, F1 wildtype mice derived from F0 Mtrr+/gt males display indicators of direct epigenetic inheritance including locus-specific epigenetic dysregulation in placentas at E10.5 associated with gene misexpression in the absence of gross phenotype3, a hematopoietic phenotype later in life24, and the ability of F1 wildtype females to perpetuate epigenetically inherited phenotypes to their offspring in a manner similar to those derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt female (Supplementary fig. 1d–e)3.

Since TEI in the Mtrrgt model implicates the maternal lineage, we previously performed a blastocyst transfer experiment to show that phenotype inheritance occurred via the germline and was independent of the uterine environment. More specifically, F2 wildtype blastocysts derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt maternal grandparent and F1 wildtype mother were transferred into the uteri of control females (Supplementary Fig. 1f)3. The risk for congenital malformations persisted after blastocyst transfer, indicating that phenotypic inheritance was not attributed to the uterine environment of the original mother but instead to the inheritance of an unknown epigenetic factor via the germline3. Therefore, we hypothesise that wildtype gametes from either Mtrr+/gt maternal grandparent can initiate phenotypic inheritance via the F1 wildtype daughters for several generations3. However, the mechanism(s) of TEI remains unclear in the Mtrrgt model including the identity of the inherited epigenetic factor(s) and whether there are different epigenetic cues in the F0 male and female germlines that can initiate similar effects in their grandprogeny.

Here, we investigate the potential mechanism(s) of TEI in the Mtrrgt model using a genome-wide approach. First, we demonstrate that Mtrrgt/gt mice are genetically stable and hence reassert focus on an epigenetic mechanism. Second, we show that germline DNA methylation is altered in F0 Mtrr+/gt males. F0 sperm were chosen for analysis because: (i) F0 Mtrr+/gt males initiate TEI of phenotypes in a similar manner to F0 Mtrr+/gt females, (ii) sperm are more experimental tractable than oocytes, and (iii) when assessing heritable effects, the uterine environment does not need to be controlled for in F0 Mtrr+/gt males. Even though differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in sperm of F0 Mtrr+/gt males are reprogrammed in somatic tissue of wildtype F1 and F2 progeny, our data shows evidence of transcriptional changes associated with germline epigenetic disruption that persists at least until the F3 generation. This proposed transcriptional memory of sperm DMRs includes misexpression of Hira, a gene important for chromatin stability25,26 and production of rRNA27, which we propose as a biomarker and potential mediator of maternal phenotypic inheritance in the Mtrrgt model.


Genetic stability in Mtrr gt mice

As one-carbon metabolism is directly linked to DNA synthesis15, we first addressed whether the Mtrrgt allele influences genetic stability. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on phenotypically normal C57Bl/6 J control embryos (N = 2) and Mtrrgt/gt embryos with congenital malformations (N = 6) derived from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses (Supplementary Fig. 1a, c). DNA libraries were sequenced separately resulting in ~30× coverage per embryo (~3.5 × 108 paired-end reads/genome). The sequenced genomes were compared to the C57Bl/6 J reference genome to identify structural variants (SVs) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

The Mtrrgt mutation was generated by a gene-trap (gt) insertion into intron nine of the Mtrr gene (Chr13) in the 129P2Ola/Hsd mouse strain before eight generations of backcrossing into the C57Bl/6 J strain3. As a result, the majority of variants identified in Mtrrgt/gt embryos were located on Chr13 in the genomic region surrounding the Mtrr locus (Supplementary Fig. 3a–b). These variants included the gene-trap and several SNPs that showed sequence similarity to the 129P2Ola/Hsd genome and likely persisted due to Mtrrgt genotype selection and regional crossover frequency. Variant identification in this region acted as an internal positive control of our bioinformatic method, demonstrating that it is capable of distinguishing genetic differences between experimental groups. Using these SNPs, we defined a 20 Mb region of 129P2Ola/Hsd sequence surrounding the Mtrrgt allele (Fig. 1a). When this region was bioinformatically masked, C57Bl/6 J and Mtrrgt/gt embryos contained a similar mean (±sd) frequency of SNPs (C57Bl/6 J: 4,871 ± 791 SNPs/embryo; Mtrrgt/gt: 5138 ± 398 SNPs/embryo; p = 0.781) and SVs (C57Bl/6 J: 342 SVs/embryo; Mtrrgt/gt: 301 SVs/embryo; p = 0.6886; Fig. 1b, c) implying that the de novo mutation rate was unchanged by the Mtrrgt/gt mutation. These values were in line with expected de novo mutation rates28. Only 25 (21 SNPs and 4 SVs) variants were present in all six Mtrrgt/gt embryos and absent in C57Bl/6 J embryos (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f, Supplementary Tables 12). When all SNPs and SVs were considered, the majority represented non-coding variants or were located in non-coding regions (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). Moreover, genetic variation within the masked region had the minimal functional effect (beyond the gene-trap insertion) since no variant overlapped with a known enhancer, and expression of individual genes was similar among C57Bl/6 J, 129P2Ola/Hsd and Mtrrgt/gt mice (Fig. 1a, d). Genomic stability was further supported by the preserved repression of transposable elements29,30 in Mtrrgt/gt tissue (Fig. 1e) despite global DNA hypomethylation caused by the Mtrrgt/gt mutation3. Overall, these data support genetic integrity within the Mtrrgt model, and that phenotypic inheritance was unlikely caused by an increased frequency of de novo mutation. Therefore, the focus shifted to an epigenetic mechanism.

Fig. 1: The Mtrrgt mouse line is genetically stable.

ac Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of normal C57Bl/6 J embryos (N = 2 embryos) and severely affected Mtrrgt/gt embryos (N = 6 embryos) at embryonic day (E) 10.5 to determine the frequency of genetic variants compared to the C57Bl/6 J reference genome. a The frequency of 129P2Ola/Hsd (129P2) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the region surrounding the gene-trap insertion site in the Mtrr gene (red line) on chromosome 13 (Chr13). The majority of genes within the 20 megabase (Mb) region surrounding the Mtrr gene are shown below the graph. b, c The average number of b SNPs and c structural variants (SVs) per embryo (mean ± standard deviation [sd]) in C57Bl/6 J embryos (C57, black bars) and Mtrrgt/gt embryos (gt/gt, white bars). Two-tailed unpaired t test with Welch’s correction. The 20 Mb region shown in a was masked when calculating the average number of genetic variants in b, c. d Graphs showing RT-qPCR analysis of selected genes (highlighted red in a) in embryos (E10.5; N = 6–8 embryos/group), placentas (E10.5; N = 6–8 placentas/group) and/or adult testes (N = 5–6 males/group) from C57Bl/6 J (black bars), 129P2Ola/Hsd (grey bars) and phenotypically normal Mtrrgt/gt (blue bars) mice. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *p = 0.022, **p = 0.007. e Graphs showing RNA expression of specific groups of transposable elements as determined by RT-qPCR in adult liver (N = 6–8 livers/group) and placentas (E10.5; N = 6–7 placentas/group) from C57Bl/6 J mice (black bars) and Mtrrgt/gt mice (blue bars: phenotypically normal; white bars: severely affected). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, *p = 0.011, **p = 0.005. Data from RT-qPCR analyses in d, e are shown as mean ± sd and relative to C57Bl/6 J tissue levels (normalised to 1). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Germline DNA methylation is altered in the Mtrr gt model

MTRR protein has a direct role in the transmission of one-carbon methyl groups for DNA methylation3,12,14. Therefore, germline DNA methylation was considered as a potential mediator of phenotype inheritance. As an Mtrr+/gt female or male can initiate TEI (Supplementary Fig. 1d–e)3 and due to the experimental tractability of male gametes, we focussed our analysis on sperm. Spermatogenesis and male fertility are normal in Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males31. Mature spermatozoa were collected from caudal epididymides of C57Bl/6 J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c) and sperm purity was confirmed by assessing imprinted regions of known methylation status via bisulfite pyrosequencing (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Global 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) levels were consistent across all Mtrr genotypes relative to C57Bl/6 J control as determined by mass spectrometry (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2: Characterisation of differential DNA methylation in spermatozoa from Mtrrgt mouse line.

a Global 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) in spermatozoa from C57Bl/6 J (black bars), wildtype (Mtrr+/+; purple bars), Mtrr+/gt (green bars) and Mtrrgt/gt (blue bars) adult males (N = 9 males/genotype, analysed in three pools of three males/genotype) as assessed by mass spectrometry. Data are presented as the ratio of methylated cytosines per genomic cytosines (5mC/C or 5hmC/C; mean ± standard deviation [sd]). One-way ANOVA. bc Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq) of spermatozoa DNA from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males relative to C57Bl/6 J control males was performed to determine differentially methylated regions (DMRs). N = 8 males/group. b An intersectional analysis of DMRs in Mtrr+/+ (purple), Mtrr+/gt (green), and Mtrrgt/gt (blue) relative to C57Bl/6 J controls. c A heat map plotting log2FoldChange (log2[FC]) of CpG methylation in spermatozoa from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males compared to C57Bl/6 J males (p < 0.05). DMRs that were common between all Mtrr genotypes, paired between two Mtrr genotypes, or unique to a single Mtrr genotype when compared to C57Bl/6 J controls are shown. Relative to C57Bl/6 J sperm: DMR hypermethylation shown in purple, DMR hypomethylation shown in green, normal DMR methylation shown in white. Darker colour intensity indicates greater differential methylation. d Examples of DMRs identified via MeDIP-seq and validated by bisulfite pyrosequencing in sperm from the male genotype in which the DMR was found. Data are shown as percentage methylation at each CpG site assessed (mean ± sd). C57Bl/6 J (black circles), Mtrr+/+ (purple circles), Mtrr+/gt (green circles) or Mtrrgt/gt (blue circles) males. N = 8 males/group including four males from the MeDIP-seq analysis and four independent males. DMR ID and chromosomal location are shown along with a schematic of each DMR in relation to the closest gene. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests performed on mean methylation per CpG site per genotype group, p < 0.0001 for all comparisons. See also Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 5. eg Relative distribution of methylated regions identified via MeDIP-seq in C57Bl/6 J sperm (background methylome) and sperm DMRs from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males among e unique sequences and repetitive elements, f coding and non-coding regions and g CpG islands (CGIs), shores and shelves. Statistical analyses: e, g one-tailed Chi-squared test; f Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. LTR long terminal repeats, LINEs long interspersed nuclear elements, SINEs small interspersed nuclear elements. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To analyse the genome-wide distribution of sperm DNA methylation, methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq) was performed. This approach allowed the unbiased detection of locus-specific changes in DNA methylation by identifying clusters of differentially methylated cytosines, thus reducing the potential impact of single-nucleotide variants4,32. MeDIP libraries of sperm DNA were prepared using eight males each from C57Bl/6 J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Sequencing generated 179 million paired-end mappable reads on average per group (C57Bl/6 J: 164 million reads; Mtrr+/+: 172 million reads; Mtrr+/gt: 203 million reads; Mtrrgt/gt: 179 million reads). Using MEDIPS package33, each Mtrr genotype was independently compared to C57Bl/6 J controls. Loci of >500 bp with a methylation change of >1.5-fold and p < 0.01 were defined as DMRs. The number of sperm DMRs identified increased with the severity of Mtrr genotype: 91 DMRs in Mtrr+/+ males, 203 DMRs in Mtrr+/gt males and 599 DMRs in Mtrrgt/gt males (Fig. 2b, c). The presence of DMRs in sperm from Mtrr+/+ males indicated a parental effect of the Mtrrgt allele on offspring germline methylome since Mtrr+/+ males derive from Mtrr+/gt intercrosses (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Hypo- and hypermethylated regions were identified in each Mtrr genotype when compared with C57Bl/6 J controls (Fig. 2c), consistent with earlier findings in placentas3. These data suggested that the Mtrrgt allele was sufficient to dysregulate sperm DNA methylation.

To ensure the robustness and reliability of the MeDIP-seq data, we randomly selected hyper- and hypomethylated DMRs to validate using bisulfite pyrosequencing. Sperm DNA from C57Bl/6 J, Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males was assessed (N = 8 males/group: four sperm samples from MeDIP-seq experiment plus four independent samples). DMRs were validated in the Mtrr genotype in which they were identified (Figs. 2d, 3, Supplementary Fig. 5). The overall validation rate was 94.1% in hypomethylated DMRs and 58.3% in hypermethylated DMRs (Supplementary Table 3) and indicated a high degree of corroboration between techniques. The majority of DMRs that did not validate showed extensive methylation (>80% CpG methylation) in C57Bl/6 J sperm and were identified as hypermethylated in the MeDIP-seq experiment (Supplementary Fig. 5). This might reflect some false positives in line with another study4.

Fig. 3: Sperm DMRs are reprogrammed in somatic tissue of F1-F2 wildtype generations.

CpG methylation at specific sperm differentially methylated regions (DMRs) identified in F0 Mtrr+/gt males was assessed in the F1 and F2 wildtype embryos and placentas at E10.5. Pedigrees indicate a specific mating scheme (see also Supplementary Fig. 1a, 1d). F0, parental generation; F1 first filial generation; F2, second filial generation. aj Schematic drawings of the sperm DMRs (green rectangles) assessed and the relationship to the closest gene and enhancer (Enh; grey line in c), if present. Graphs to the right in each panel show the average percentage of methylation at individual CpG sites for the corresponding DMR as determined by bisulfite pyrosequencing (mean ± standard deviation [sd]). In each graph, methylation was assessed in sperm from F0 Mtrr+/gt males (green circles), phenotypically normal F1 wildtype (Mtrr+/+) embryos or placentas at E10.5 (orange circles), and phenotypically normal (purple circles) or severely affected (pink circles) F2 wildtype embryos or placentas at E10.5. C57Bl/6 J (black circles) for each tissue type are shown as controls. Specific N values for each DMR and experimental group are shown in Supplementary Table 7. In brief, the following N values were used (represented as a number of individuals/CpG site/genotype): sperm: N = 3–8; F1 embryos: N = 3–5; F1 placentas: N = 6–8; F2 embryos: N = 3–5; F2 placentas: N = 3–8. Data are shown as mean ± sd for each CpG site. Two-way ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, performed on mean methylation per CpG site per genotype group. p values indicated are for all CpG site comparisons within the DMR unless otherwise indicated. n.s., not significant. Pedigree legend: circle, female; square, male; blue outline, C57Bl/6 J control; black outline, Mtrrgt mouse line; white filled, Mtrr+/+; half-white/half-black filled, Mtrr+/gt. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

For most DMRs assessed, methylation change was consistent across all CpG sites and the absolute change in CpG methylation ranged from 10 to 80% of control levels (Figs. 2d, 3, Supplementary Fig. 5). Within each genotypic group, a high degree of inter-individual consistency of methylation change was also observed. Therefore, we conclude that the Mtrrgt mutation, or parental exposure to it as in Mtrr+/+ males, is sufficient to lead to distinct DNA methylation changes in sperm.

Most DMRs associate with metabolic dysregulation, not genetic effects

A proportion of the DMRs was located within the region around the gene-trap insertion site in Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 6b, c), consistent with Mtrrgt/gt liver34 and suggesting that the gene-trap or underlying 129P2Ola/Hsd sequence might epigenetically dysregulate the surrounding region. However, a comparison of the MeDIP-seq and WGS data sets revealed that genetic variation did not influence DMR calling to a great extent since only a small proportion (2.8–5.5%) of these DMRs contained one or more SNP. Eight DMRs overlapped with known enhancers (Supplementary Table 4), none of which associated with promoters35 containing a genetic variant. Outside of the Mtrr genomic region, 54 DMRs were common to Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males (Fig. 2b, c, Supplementary Table 5) and were primarily located in distinct chromosomal clusters (Supplementary Fig. 6a–d). These data implicate epigenetic hotspots or underlying genetic effects. However, beyond a polymorphic duplication on Chr19 in the C57Bl/6 J strain36 that accounted for a minor number of DMRs (2.5–15.8% of DMRs), no DMRs overlapped with an SV or were located <1 kb of an SV. Once potential genetic effects were accounted for, the majority of sperm DMRs in Mtrr+/+ and Mtrr+/gt males (76/91 DMRs and 142/203 DMRs, respectively), and a proportion of sperm DMRs in Mtrrgt/gt males (174/599 DMRs) were attributed to the long-term metabolic consequences of the Mtrrgt mutation.

Sperm DMR genomic distribution and potential regulatory function

DMR distribution was determined to explore the regional susceptibility of the sperm methylome to the effects of the Mtrrgt allele. First, the sperm ‘background methylome’ was established to resolve the expected genome-wide distribution of CpG methylation (see Methods). By comparing the regional distribution of sperm DMRs to the background methylome, we revealed that DMRs in all Mtrr genotypes were not significantly enriched in repetitive regions (Fig. 2e). However, sperm DMRs in Mtrr+/+ and Mtrr+/gt males were over-represented in introns and exons, and under-represented in intergenic regions (p < 0.0003, Chi-squared test; Fig. 2f). This was not the case for Mtrrgt/gt males since DMRs were proportionately distributed among most genomic regions (Fig. 2f). Although the majority of sperm DMRs were located within CpG deserts, a proportion of DMRs from Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males were enriched in CpG islands (p < 0.0014, Chi-squared; Fig. 2g), which has implications for gene regulatory control. Finally, when considering only the subset of common DMRs shared by all Mtrr genotypes, a similar genomic distribution to Mtrr+/+ and Mtrr+/gt males was observed (Supplementary Fig. 6d, e).

During sperm maturation, histones are replaced by protamines37. However, ~1% of histone-containing nucleosomes are retained38 providing scope for epigenetic inheritance39. Nucleosome retention occurs primarily at promoters of developmentally regulated genes and gene-poor repeat regions, though regional distribution and frequency differ between reports40,41. To determine whether sperm DMRs in Mtrr males were enriched in known sites of nucleosome retention, we utilised the MNase-seq data set from C57Bl/6 J spermatozoa in Erkek et al.41. First, by randomly selecting 10,000 regions of 500 bp as a proxy for DMRs, we determined that the expected frequency of DMR overlap with sites of nucleosome retention was 1.94%. Crucially, we observed that 14.5–34.1% of DMRs identified in sperm from Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males were located in nucleosome retention regions (Table 1), indicating a significant enrichment (p < 0.0001, binomial test). Therefore, these DMRs represented candidate regions for epigenetic inheritance.

Table 1 Representation of sperm DMRs in candidate  regions of epigenetic inheritance with in Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males.

To better understand the normal epigenetic signatures within regions identified as sperm DMRs and to predict a potential gene regulatory role, mean enrichment for histone modifications and/or chromatin accessibility in mouse spermatozoa42, epiblast and extraembryonic ectoderm at E6.543 was determined using published ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq data sets. All DMRs, except those surrounding the Mtrr gene-trapped site, were analyzed (N = 379 DMRs from all Mtrr genotypes combined) alongside 379 randomly selected regions representing the ‘baseline genome’ (see Methods). Compared with the sperm baseline genome, the majority of our DMRs were likely to associate with a closed chromatin state due to collective enrichment for protamine 1 (PRM1) and repressive histone mark H3K9me3, but not active histone marks (e.g., H3K4me1, H3K27ac) or Tn5 transposase sensitive sites (THSS)42 (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). This finding reinforces heterogeneity of DMR association with retained nucleosomes41 or protamines (Table 1). In contrast, the DMRs were more likely in an open chromatin conformation state in epiblast and extraembryonic ectoderm at E6.5 based on collective enrichment for THSS when compared with tissue-specific baseline genomes43 (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Therefore, it is possible that the genomic regions identified as DMRs in Mtrr sperm have a regulatory role during development.

Some DMRs were located in regions of reprogramming resistance

DNA methylation is largely reprogrammed during pre-implantation development and in the developing germline44,45 to ‘reset’ the methylome between each generation. Recently, several loci were identified as ‘reprogramming resistant’46,47,48 and thus, are implicated in epigenetic inheritance. Using published methylome data sets46,47, we determined that 40.7–54.3% of sperm DMRs across all Mtrr genotypes fell within loci resistant to pre-implantation reprogramming (Table 1). Sixteen of these DMRs were common among Mtrr+/+, Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males. Fewer DMRs correlated with regions resistant to germline reprogramming (2.2–3.8% of DMRs/Mtrr genotype; Table 1) or both pre-implantation and germline reprogramming (2.0–2.7% of DMRs/Mtrr genotype; Table 1). Only one DMR located in a region resistant to germline reprogramming was common to all Mtrr genotypes. Furthermore, several DMRs were characterised as regions of reprogramming resistance46,47 and nucleosome retention41 (Table 1). Overall, differential methylation of these key regions in sperm of Mtrrgt males might have important implications for epigenetic inheritance.

Sperm DMRs are reprogrammed in wildtype F1 and F2 generations

TEI in the Mtrrgt model occurs via the maternal grandparental lineage3 (Supplementary Fig. 1d–e). To determine the heritability of germline DMRs, bisulfite pyrosequencing was used to validate 10 sperm DMRs from F0 Mtrr+/gt males in the tissue of wildtype F1 and F2 progeny (i.e., the maternal grandfather pedigree). The breeding scheme was as follows: F0 Mtrr+/gt males were mated with C57Bl/6 J control females. The resulting F1 progeny was either collected at E10.5 for analysis or allowed to litter out. In the latter case, adult F1 wildtype females were mated with C57Bl/6 J control males and the F2 wildtype progeny was collected at E10.5 for analysis (Supplementary fig. 1d). The advantage of assessing inheritance of DNA methylation in F0 sperm rather than in F0 oocytes was that potential confounding effects of the F0 uterine environment could be avoided. Candidate DMRs were hyper- or hypomethylated, and localised to regions of reprogramming resistance and/or to intra- or intergenic regions (Supplementary Table 6). In general, all DMRs tested lost their differential methylation in wildtype F1 and F2 embryos and placentas at E10.5, and showed DNA methylation patterns similar to C57Bl/6 J tissue (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 7). This result occurred even when wildtype F2 conceptuses displayed congenital malformations (Fig. 3). DMRs were also assessed in Mtrrgt/gt conceptuses at E10.5 to determine whether these regions were capable of differential methylation outside of the germline. In a manner similar to sperm from Mtrr+/gt males (Fig. 3), seven out of 10 DMRs were hypermethylated in Mtrrgt/gt embryos and/or placentas compared to control conceptuses (Supplementary Fig. 8a–j). In this case, it was unclear whether DNA methylation in these regions resisted epigenetic reprogramming or was erased and abnormally re-established/maintained due to intrinsic Mtrrgt/gt homozygosity. Overall, altered patterns of DNA methylation in sperm of Mtrr+/gt males were not evident in somatic tissue of wildtype progeny and grandprogeny. This result was reminiscent of mouse models of parental exposure to environmental stressors (e.g., maternal under-nutrition4, paternal folate deficiency49, or paternal cigarette smoking50), which induced sperm DMRs associated with phenotypes in the direct offspring even though the DMRs were resolved in offspring somatic tissue. As a result, other epigenetic mechanisms (e.g., germline RNA content and/or histone modifications) with DNA methylation are implicated in phenotypic inheritance.

Potential transcriptional memory of sperm DMRs

A previous study in mice suggests that sperm DMRs can associate with perturbed transcription in offspring even when DNA methylation is re-established to normal levels4. To assess whether transcriptional memory associated with sperm DMRs occurred in the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandfather pedigree, expression of six genes located in or near sperm DMRs from F0 Mtrr+/gt males (Supplementary Table 6) was assessed in F1 and F2 wildtype individuals. Although all six genes displayed normal expression in F1 tissues (Fig. 4a–c), three of these genes including Hira (histone chaperone), Cwc27 (spliceosome-associated protein) and Tshz3 (transcription factor) were misexpressed in F2 wildtype embryos or adult livers compared to C57Bl/6 J controls (Fig. 4d–f). This result might reflect transcriptional memory of the associated sperm DMR or wider epigenetic dysregulation in sperm of the F0 Mtrr+/gt males.

Fig. 4: Transcriptional changes associated with some DMR-associated genes in F1 and F2 wildtype somatic tissue.

af RT-qPCR analysis of mRNA expression of genes located in close proximity to sperm DMRs in a, d embryos at E10.5, b, e placental trophoblast at E10.5, and c, f adult livers of wildtype (Mtrr+/+) F1 and F2 progeny. Tissue from phenotypically normal F1 wildtype individuals (orange bars) or F2 wildtype individuals (purple bars) or severely affected F2 wildtype individuals (pink bars) derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt male was assessed. C57Bl/6 J control tissues (black bars) were assessed as controls. Pedigrees indicate specific mating schemes assessed (see also Supplementary Fig. 1a, d). Data are plotted as mean ± standard deviation, and are presented as relative expression to C57Bl/6 J levels (normalised to 1). Embryos: C57Bl/6 J, N = 4–5 embryos; F1 Mtrr+/+, N = 4–5 embryos; F2 Mtrr+/+ phenotypically normal or severely affected, N = 5 embryos. Trophoblast: C57Bl/6 J, N = 5–7 placentas; F1 or F2 Mtrr+/+, N = 8 placentas. Liver: C57Bl/6 J, N = 6–8 livers; F1 Mtrr+/+, N = 6 livers; F2 Mtrr+/+, N = 5–6 livers. Independent t tests or one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons tests were performed. d Hira **p = 0.0049, ***p = 0.0002; f Tshz3 **p = 0.0011; Cwc27 **p = 0.0095. Each gene was associated with the following sperm DMR shown in Fig. 3: Tshz3, DMR E115; Dynlt1a, DMR E52; Exoc4, DMR E112; March5, DMR C7; Cwc27, DMR D20; Hira, DMR A10. F0, parental generation; F1 first filial generation; F2, second filial generation. Pedigree legend: circle, female; square, male; blue outline, C57Bl/6 J control; black outline, Mtrrgt mouse line; white filled, Mtrr+/+; half-white/half-black filled, Mtrr+/gt. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To further predict whether the Hira, Cwc27 and Tshz3 DMRs demarcate gene regulatory regions, their specific genetic and epigenetic characteristics beyond CpG methylation were considered. Genomically, the DMRs were located intragenically (Cwc27 and Tshz3 DMRs) or within 6 kb downstream of the gene (Hira DMR; Fig. 5a, Supplementary Figs. 910). Furthermore, Cwc27 DMR overlapped with a known enhancer (Supplementary Fig. 9) while Hira and Tshz3 DMRs overlapped with CpG islands51 (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 10). Next, we assessed the three DMRs for the enrichment of specific histone modifications during normal development using published ChIP-seq data sets35 in wildtype embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and trophoblast stem cells (TSCs). Although histone marks were largely absent at all three DMRs in TSCs, enrichment for one or more methylated histone marks (e.g., H3K4me3 and/or H3K9me3) at this DMRs was apparent in ESCs (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 910). Altogether, DMRs identified in sperm of Mtrr+/gt males highlight regions that might be important for transcriptional regulation in the early conceptus by other epigenetic mechanisms. Therefore, future analyses of broader epigenetic marks at these sites are required in the Mtrrgt mouse line.

Fig. 5: Epigenetic characteristics of Hira DMR in mice.

a Enrichment of DNA binding proteins (CCTC-binding factor, CTCF) and histone modifications (H3K27ac, H3K27me3, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9me3) in the Hira locus on mouse chromosome (Chr) 16 using published data sets35 of chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) analyses in cultured wildtype embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and trophoblast stem cells (TSCs). Dark grey rectangles indicate enrichment peak calling for each histone modification. Pink rectangle and light grey shading indicate the Hira differentially methylated region (DMR) identified in sperm of Mtrr+/gt and Mtrrgt/gt males. Blue rectangles indicate CpG islands. Green rectangles indicate enhancers. Schematics of protein-encoding (brown) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) encoding (purple) Hira isoforms are shown. Region of qPCR primer sets 1 and 2 are also indicated (black boxes). b Partial schematic drawing of Hira transcripts and Hira DMR (pink rectangle) in relation to MeDIP-seq reads in sperm from C57Bl/6 J (black), wildtype (Mtrr+/+; purple), Mtrr+/gt (green) and Mtrrgt/gt (blue) males. N = 8 males/group. c The average percentage methylation at individual CpG sites (mean ± standard deviation) in the Hira DMR in sperm from C57Bl/6 J males (black circles; N = 4 males), Mtrr+/+ males (purple circles; N = 4 males), Mtrr+/gt males (green circles; N = 8 males) and Mtrrgt/gt males(blue circles; N = 8 males). Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test performed on mean methylation per CpG site. p values are indicated for each male genotype compared to C57Bl/6 J and were similar for all CpG sites assessed within one genotype as indicated: C57Bl/6 J versus Mtrr+/+, not significant (n.s.); C57Bl/6 J versus Mtrr+/gt males or Mtrrgt/gt males, p < 0.0001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

HIRA as a potential biomarker of maternal phenotypic inheritance

The importance of the Hira DMR in phenotypic inheritance was further considered based on its known resistance to germline reprogramming46, and its potential function in gene regulation (Fig. 5a) and transcriptional memory (Fig. 4d). HIRA is a histone H3.3 chaperone, which lends itself well to a role in epigenetic inheritance given its broad functionality in transcriptional regulation26, maintenance of chromatin structure in the developing oocyte25 and the male pronucleus after fertilisation27, and in rRNA transcription27. Hira−/− mice52 and the Mtrrgt mouse line3 display similar phenotypes including growth defects, congenital malformations, and embryonic lethality by E10.5. Furthermore, Mtrrgt genotypic severity correlated with the degree of hypermethylation in the Hira DMR in sperm (Fig. 5b, c), suggesting that the Hira DMR is responsive to alterations in folate metabolism.

The potential regulatory legacy of the Hira DMR in sperm was further explored in the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandfather pedigree. The Hira DMR, which was 6 kb downstream of the Hira gene and overlaps with a CpG island and CTCF binding site in ESCs and TSCs (Fig. 5a), was substantially hypermethylated in sperm of F0 Mtrr+/gt males compared with controls (39.0 ± 4.1% more methylated CpGs per CpG site assessed; Fig. 5b, c). As with the other sperm DMRs assessed (Fig. 3), the Hira DMR was reprogrammed in F1–F3 wildtype embryos and placentas at E10.5 (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 11a). Although we originally assessed Hira mRNA in the F1-F2 generations in the maternal grandfather pedigree (Fig. 4), further analysis revealed that Hira isoforms (mRNA and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA 209); Fig. 5a) were differentially regulated at E10.5 (Fig. 6a–c). Hira lncRNA function is unknown, though lncRNA-based mechanisms often control cell fates during development by influencing the nuclear organisation and transcriptional regulation53. Notably, this pattern of RNA expression was associated with generational patterns of phenotypic inheritance. For instance, we observed down-regulation of Hira mRNA in F2–F3 wildtype embryos and not F1 wildtype embryos at E10.5 (Fig. 6a–c). Conversely, significant upregulation of Hira lncRNA expression was apparent only in F1 wildtype embryos at E10.5 (Fig. 6a–c). This expression pattern was embryo-specific since the corresponding placentas showed normal Hira transcript levels in each generation assessed compared to controls (Fig. 6a–b). Since phenotypes at E10.5 were apparent in F2 generation onwards, yet were absent in the F1 generation of the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandfather pedigree3, embryo-specific Hira RNA misexpression reflected the pattern of phenotypic inheritance.

Fig. 6: Dysregulation of Hira RNA expression in embryos aligns with a pattern of maternal phenotypic inheritance.

ad RT-qPCR analysis of Hira mRNA (solid bars, primer set 1) and Hira lncRNA (striped bars, primer set 2) expression in embryos and placentas at E10.5. The tissue and pedigrees were assessed (see also Supplementary Fig. 1a, d–e for the breeding scheme): a F1 wildtype (Mtrr+/+) conceptuses from F0 Mtrr+/gt males (orange bars; N = 4–5 embryos, N = 8 placentas), b F2 wildtype conceptuses from F0 Mtrr+/gt males (purple bars, N = 5 embryos and N = 7–8 placentas from phenotypically normal (n) conceptuses; pink bars, N = 5 severely affected (a) embryos), c F3 wildtype conceptuses from F0 Mtrr+/gt males (teal bars, N = 3–4 phenotypically normal embryos; turquoise bars; N = 3 severely affected embryos), and d F1 wildtype embryos from F0 Mtrr+/gt females (orange bars, N = 7 phenotypically normal embryos; green bars, N = 3 severely affected embryos), F2 wildtype embryos from F0 Mtrr+/gt females (purple bars, N = 7 phenotypically normal embryos; pink bars, N = 7 severely affected embryos), and F3 wildtype embryos from F0 Mtrr+/gt females (teal bars, N = 5–7 phenotypically normal embryos; turquoise bars, N = 3 severely affected embryos). C57Bl/6 J conceptuses were controls (black bars, N = 4–8 embryos or placenta/experiment). eh Western blot analysis showing HIRA protein expression in F1 wildtype (orange bars) and F2 wildtype (purple bars) conceptuses derived from e to f F0 Mtrr+/gt males or gh F0 Mtrr+/gt females. C57Bl/6 J (C57) conceptuses (black bars) were assessed as controls. e, f C57Bl6/J: N = 4–5 embryos, N = 4–5 placentas; F1: N = 4 embryos, N = 3–8 placentas; F2: N = 7–9 embryos, N = 7–8 placentas. Images of western blot gels showing HIRA protein with β-actin as a loading control in f and h were quantified in e and g, respectively, using the background subtraction method. HIRA protein levels were normalised to β-actin. All RNA and protein data were plotted as mean ± standard deviation and relative to C57Bl/6 J (normalised to 1). Experiments were conducted in technical duplicates (protein) or triplicates (RNA). Statistical analyses: ad Two-tailed independent t test or Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. a **p = 0.0034; b **p = 0.0049, ***p = 0.0002; c ***p = 0.0004, ****p < 0.0001; d F1: **p = 0.0056, F2 (primer set 1): #p = 0.06, *p = 0.0203, F2 (primer set 2): *p = 0.0457, F3: *p = 0.0161. e, f One-way ANOVA. p values are shown on graphs. Pedigree legend: circle, female; square, male; blue outline, C57Bl/6 J line; black outline, Mtrrgt mouse line; white fill, Mtrr+/+; half-black-half-white fill, Mtrr+/gt; black fill, Mtrrgt/gt. F0, parental generation; F1, first filial generation; F2, second filial generation; F3, third filial generation. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To further investigate a potential link between Hira expression and phenotypic inheritance, we analysed wildtype F1–F3 conceptuses at E10.5 derived from F0 Mtrr+/gt females (i.e., the maternal grandmother pedigree; Supplementary Fig. 1e). The breeding scheme was as follows: F0 Mtrr+/gt females were mated with C57Bl/6 J control males. The F1 progeny was collected at E10.5 for genotype and phenotype analysis or allowed to litter out. The resulting adult F1 wildtype females were mated with C57Bl/6 J males. The F2 wildtype progeny was similarly collected at E10.5 for analysis or adult F2 wildtype females were mated with C57Bl/6 J control males to generate F3 wildtype conceptuses for analysis at E10.5 (Supplementary Fig. 1e). In this pedigree, all generations, including the F1 generation, display a broad spectrum of developmental phenotypes3. Supporting our hypothesis, Hira mRNA expression was downregulated in F1–F3 wildtype embryos derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt female compared to C57Bl/6 J controls (Fig. 6d), thus correlating with maternal phenotypic inheritance. As expected, Hira lncRNA transcripts were unchanged in F1 and F3 wildtype embryos (Fig. 6d). However, Hira lncRNA was downregulated in F2 wildtype embryos (Fig. 6d), which display the highest frequency of phenotypes among the three generations3. Regardless, these data suggested that altered Hira mRNA transcripts might be a potential biomarker of maternal phenotypic inheritance since dysregulation of Hira mRNA occurred only in wildtype embryos with high phenotypic risk as a result of their derivation from an oocyte with Mtrrgt ancestry rather than sperm (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7: Proposed model of maternal grandparental phenotype inheritance in Mtrrgt model that implicates epigenetic instability in the germline.

A model proposing how epigenetic instability generated by the Mtrrgt mutation might be differently inherited over multiple generations depending upon whether TEI is initiated by a an oocyte or b sperm of an F0 Mtrr+/gt individual. Trends of Hira mRNA expression are shown. Pedigree legend: circle, female; square, male; blue outline, C57Bl/6 J control; black outline, Mtrrgt mouse line; white filled, Mtrr+/+; half-white/half-black filled, Mtrr+/gt. See also Supplementary Fig. 1 for breeding schemes. Scale bar: 500 μm. F0, parental generation; F1, first filial generation; F2, second filial generation; F3, third filial generation.

How the Hira gene is regulated is unknown. Mtrrgt/gt embryos at E10.5 (derived from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses), which demonstrate a greater phenotypic risk than the Mtrr+/gt maternal grandparental pedigrees3, also displayed dysregulation of Hira mRNA and lncRNA expression (Supplementary Figs. 8k–m, 11d). This finding was in association with normal DNA methylation at the Hira DMR in Mtrrgt/gt embryos at E10.5 (Supplementary Fig. 8b), implicating additional mechanisms of epigenetic regulation. Histone methylation profiles at the Hira locus in normal ESCs and TSCs indicate a potential role for the Hira promoter and Hira DMR (Fig. 5a) in gene regulation that will require future investigation.

HIRA protein levels were also dysregulated in Mtrrgt/gt embryos and F2 wildtype embryos and placentas (Fig. 6e–h, Supplementary Fig. 11e, f). The pattern of dysregulation did not always occur in a manner predicted by the direction of Hira mRNA expression. For example, there was an increase in HIRA protein levels in F2 wildtype embryos when Hira mRNA was downregulated (Fig. 6b, d–h). This discrepancy might result from defective HIRA protein degradation, drastic translational upregulation of HIRA protein to compensate for low mRNA levels, or alternatively, negative feedback to down-regulate Hira mRNA owing to high levels of HIRA protein in the embryo. Further work will be required to delineate whether the HIRA chaperone mediates maternal phenotypic inheritance in the Mtrrgt model and other models of TEI.


We investigated potential mechanisms contributing to epigenetic inheritance in Mtrrgt mice, a unique model of mammalian TEI3. In the Mtrrgt model, inheritance of developmental phenotypes and epigenetic instability occurs via the maternal grandparental lineage with an F0 Mtrr+/gt male or female initiating the TEI effect3. Here, we assessed DNA methylation in spermatozoa to understand how the germline epigenome was affected by the Mtrrgt allele. We chose sperm due to its experimental tractability and to avoid the confounding factors of the F0 uterine environment when assessing epigenetic inheritance via the germline. We identified several distinct DMRs in regions of predicted importance in transcriptional regulation and epigenetic inheritance including regions of nucleosome retention and reprogramming resistance. This result illustrates widespread epigenetic instability in the male germline of the Mtrrgt model, particularly in the F0 Mtrr+/gt males of the maternal grandfather pedigree. While largely resolved in somatic tissue of subsequent wildtype generations, some germline DMRs were correlated with transcriptional changes at associated loci in the F1–F3 progeny. This proposed transcriptional memory of a germline DMR persisted for at least three generations, longer than previously reported in another model4. This observation indicates additional epigenetic factors beyond DNA methylation in the mechanism of TEI. Furthermore, the histone chaperone gene Hira emerged as a transcriptional biomarker and potential mediator of maternal phenotypic inheritance.

The extent to which genetic and epigenetic factors interact in this and other TEI models is unclear. One-carbon metabolism is involved in thymidine synthesis54, and DNA breaks triggered by folate deficiency-induced uracil misincorporation were demonstrated in erythrocytes of splenectomised patients55 and prostate adenoma cells56. However, WGS of Mtrrgt/gt embryos excluded genetic instability in the Mtrrgt mouse line because de novo mutations occurred at an expected28 and comparable frequency to control embryos. The WGS data also discounted alternative phenotype-causing mutations outside of the Mtrr locus and, when compared with our sperm methylome data set, showed that differential CpG methylation was unlikely due to underlying genetic variation in the Mtrrgt mouse line. Therefore, the epigenetic consequences of the Mtrrgt allele rather than genetic instability are more likely to instigate TEI in this model. Generating alternative Mtrr mutations and/or backcrossing the Mtrrgt allele into a different mouse strain will further assess whether genetics has a role in TEI.

Our data show that inheritance of sperm DMRs by offspring somatic tissue was unlikely, as have other studies4,49,50. Instead, somatic cell lineages might inherit germline epigenetic instability in a broader sense. For instance, despite normal DNA methylation in F1–F3 wildtype embryos and placentas (E10.5) at the genomic locations highlighted by sperm DMRs, epigenetic instability associated with gene misexpression is still evident in F1 and F2 wildtype placentas at several loci3. It is possible that abnormalities in the sperm epigenome of F0 Mtrr+/gt males might be reprogrammed and then stochastically and abnormally re-established/maintained in other genomic regions in wildtype offspring. This hypothesis might explain inter-individual phenotypic variability in the F2–F3 generations. However, we showed that sperm of Mtrr+/+ males exhibited several DMRs that overlapped with sperm DMRs in Mtrr+/gt males (representing their fathers). Therefore, reconstruction of specific atypical F0 germline methylation patterns in the F1 wildtype germline is possible in the Mtrrgt model. Vinclozolin toxicant exposure model of TEI shows dissimilar DMRs in spermatozoa of F1 and F3 offspring8, which suggests that epigenetic patterns might shift as the generational distance from the F0 individual increases.

Dietary folate deficiency causes differential methylation in sperm and craniofacial defects in the immediate offspring49, though whether it leads to TEI is unknown. There was no overlap of DMRs when sperm methylomes were compared between the diet model and Mtrr+/gt males. This result disputes the existence of folate-sensitive epigenomic hotspots in sperm. However, the severity of insult or technical differences (e.g., MeDIP-array49 versus MeDIP-seq) might explain the discrepancy. Why only one Mtrrgt allele sufficiently initiates TEI is unknown since a direct paramutation effect was not evident3 and Mtrr+/gt mice do not display similar metabolic derangement to Mtrrgt/gt mice3,12.

Whether specific DNA methylation patterns observed in F0 sperm of the maternal grandfather pedigree are reconstructed57,58 in F1 oocytes is yet-to-be determined. Extensive differences between sperm and oocytes methylomes59 will make this difficult to resolve and yet also emphasizes that additional epigenetic mechanisms are likely involved, such as histone modifications10, sncRNA expression1,9 and/or changes in nucleosome composition and spacing that alter nuclear architecture59. Several of these mechanisms implicate regulators like HIRA25,26,27 (see below). Future studies will explore the extent to which differential epigenetic marks in oocytes from F0 Mtrr+/gt females are reconstructed in oocytes of subsequent generations, through embryo transfer experiments will be required to exclude the confounding effects of the F0 uterine environment60.

Several recent studies have assessed sncRNA expression (e.g., microRNA or tRNA fragments [tsRNA])1,2,9 in sperm as a mechanism in the direct epigenetic inheritance of disease. For example, manipulating paternal diet in mice is sufficient to alter tsRNA content in spermatozoa leading to altered expression of genes associated with MERVL elements in early F1 embryos9 and metabolic disease in F1 adult offspring1. It is possible that sncRNAs in sperm from F0 Mtrr+/gt males are misexpressed and/or abnormally modified61, and that this might contribute to TEI mechanisms. Although it is currently unclear how sperm ncRNA content causes phenotypic inheritance beyond the F1 generation, genes involved in the development of the primordial germ cell population within the F1 wildtype female embryo might be among those affected. Exploring sncRNA content in germ cells of the Mtrrgt model will help to better understand this question.

Several sperm DMRs in Mtrr+/gt males (e.g., Cwc27, Tshz3, Hira) were associated with transcriptional changes in F2–F3 wildtype embryos and adult liver. We focused our analysis on the Hira DMR due to its responsiveness to the severity of the Mtrrgt genotype, the fact that Hira−/− embryos52 phenocopy embryos in the Mtrrgt model3, and because the potential consequences of HIRA dysfunction are multifaceted and implicated in epigenetic inheritance. The HIRA histone chaperone complex regulates histone deposition/recycling required to maintain chromatin integrity in the oocyte and zygote25,26,62. Additionally, HIRA is implicated in rRNA transcription27. Therefore, dysregulation of HIRA expression and/or function in the Mtrrgt model might alter nucleosome spacing and ribosome heterogeneity63,64 with substantial implications for regulation of transcriptional pathways during germ cell and embryo development.

Since the F1 progeny differ phenotypically when derived from an F0 Mtrr+/gt male versus F0 Mtrr+/gt female3, the mechanism initiating TEI potentially differs between sperm and oocytes. The extent of mechanistic overlap is not well understood. Certainly, paternally inherited epigenetic factors1,2,4,9,10,49,61,65 are better studied than maternally-inherited factors60,66. The difference in phenotypic severity in the Mtrrgt model might relate to a cytoplasmically inherited factor in the F1 wildtype zygote (Fig. 7). HIRA is a suitable candidate since maternal HIRA25,67 is involved in protamine replacement by histones in the paternal pronucleus27. Therefore, abnormal HIRA expression or function in oocytes would potentially perpetuate epigenetic instability in the next generation. In the case of the Mtrrgt model, dysregulation of Hira and/or other maternal factors in oocytes might have a greater impact on epigenetic integrity in the early embryo than when dysregulated in sperm.

Overall, we show the potential long-term transcriptional and phenotypic impact of abnormal folate metabolism on germline DNA methylation and emphasise the complexity of epigenetic mechanisms involved in TEI. Ultimately, our data indicate the importance of normal folate metabolism in both women and men of reproductive age for healthy pregnancies in their daughters and granddaughters.


Ethics statement

This research was regulated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012 following ethical review by the University of Cambridge Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body.

Animal model

MtrrGt(XG334)Byg (MGI:3526159) mouse line, referred to as the Mtrrgt model, was generated when a β-geo gene-trap (gt) vector was inserted into intron 9 of the Mtrr gene in 129P2Ola/Hsd ESCs3. Mtrrgt ESCs were injected into C57Bl/6 J blastocysts. Upon germline transmission, the Mtrrgt allele was backcrossed into the C57Bl/6 J genetic background for at least eight generations3. Mtrr+/+ and Mtrr+/gt mice were produced from Mtrr+/gt intercrosses (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Mtrrgt/gt mice were produced from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses (Supplementary Fig. 1c). C57Bl/6 J mice from The Jackson Laboratories ( and 129P2Ola/Hsd from Envigo (previously Harlan Laboratories []) were used as controls and were bred in house and separately from the Mtrrgt mouse line. Mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with a 12 h light–dark cycle. All mice were fed a normal chow diet (Rodent No. 3 chow, Special Diet Services) ad libitum from weaning, which included (per kg of diet): 1.6 g choline, 2.73 mg folic acid, 26.8 μg vitamin B12, 3.4 g methionine, 51.3 mg zinc. Mice were killed via cervical dislocation. Genotyping for the Mtrr+ and Mtrrgt alleles and for sex (Rbm31) was performed3,68,69 using PCR on DNA extracted from ear tissue or yolk sac using primer sequences in Supplementary Table 8.

To determine the multigenerational effects of the Mtrrgt allele in the maternal grandfather, the following mouse pedigree was established (Supplementary Fig. 1d). For the F1 generation, F0 Mtrr+/gt males were mated with C57Bl/6 J females and the resulting Mtrr+/+ progeny were analysed. For the F2 generation, F1 Mtrr+/+ females were mated with C57Bl/6 J males and the resulting Mtrr+/+ progeny were analysed. For the F3 generation, F2 Mtrr+/+ females were mated with C57Bl/6 J males and the resulting Mtrr+/+ progeny was analysed. A similar pedigree was established to assess the effects of the Mtrrgt allele in the maternal grandmother with the exception of the F0 generation, which involved the mating of an Mtrr+/gt female with a C57Bl/6 J male (Supplementary Fig. 1e).

Tissue dissection and phenotyping

For embryo and placenta collection, timed matings were established and noon on the day that the vaginal plug was detected was considered embryonic day (E) 0.5. Embryos and placentas were dissected at E10.5 in cold 1× phosphate-buffered saline and were scored for phenotypes (see below), photographed, weighed, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at −80 °C. All conceptuses were dissected using a Zeiss SteREO Discovery V8 microscope with an AxioCam MRc5 camera (Carl Zeiss). Livers were collected from pregnant female mice (gestational day 10.5), weighed and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at −80 °C. Both male and female conceptuses at E10.5 were assessed, as no sexual dimorphism is apparent at this stage70. While many individual mice were assessed over the course of this study, some of the individual tissue samples were assessed for the expression of multiple genes or for methylation at multiple DMRs.

A rigorous phenotyping regime was performed at E10.5 as previously described3. In brief, all conceptuses were scored for one or more congenital malformation (as appropriate for the developmental stage) including failure of the neural tube to close in the cranial or spinal cord region, malformed branchial arches, pericardial edema, reversed heart looping, enlarged heart, and/or eccentric chorioallantoic attachment. Twinning or haemorrhaging was also scored as a severe abnormality. Conceptuses with severe abnormalities were categorised separately from resorptions, the latter of which consisted of maternal decidua surrounding an indistinguishable mass of fetally derived tissue. Resorptions were not assessed in this study as they represented dead conceptuses. Embryos with <30 somite pairs were considered developmentally delayed. Embryos with 30–39 somite pairs but a crown-rump length more than two standard deviations (sd) from the mean crown-rump length of C57Bl/6 J control embryos were considered growth restricted or growth enhanced. Conceptuses were considered phenotypically normal if they were absent of congenital malformations, had 30–39 somite pairs, and had crown-rump lengths within two sd of controls. AxioVision 4.7.2 imaging software was used to measure crown-rump lengths (Carl Zeiss). Conceptus size at E10.5 was unaffected by litter size in all Mtrrgt pedigrees assessed70.

Spermatozoa collection

Spermatozoa from cauda epididymides and vas deferens were collected from 16 to 20 week-old fertile mice using a swim-up procedure as previously described38 with the following amendments. Spermatozoa were released for 20 min at 37 °C in Donners Medium (25 mM NaHCO3, 20 mg/ml bovine serum albumin,, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.53% (vol/vol) sodium dl-lactate in Donners stock (135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2 and 30 mM HEPES)). Samples were centrifuged at 500 × g (21 °C) for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred and centrifuged at 1300 × g (4 °C) for 15 min. After the majority of supernatant was discarded, the samples were centrifuged at 1300 × g (4 °C) for 5 min. Further supernatant was discarded and the remaining spermatozoa were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 1 min and stored at −80 °C.

Nucleic acid extraction

For embryo, trophoblast and liver tissue, genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was extracted from tissues using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). For sperm, Solution A (75 mM NaCl pH 8; 25 mM EDTA) and Solution B (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8; 10 mM EDTA; 1% SDS; 80 mM DTT) were added to the samples followed by RNAse A incubation (37 °C, 1 h) and Proteinase K incubation (55 °C, overnight) as was previously described4. DNA was extracted using phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol mix (25:24:1) (Sigma-Aldrich) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and pelleted using standard methods in TE buffer. DNA quality and quantity were confirmed using gel electrophoresis and QuantiFluor dsDNA Sample kit (Promega) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Whole-genome sequencing

Non-degraded gDNA from two whole C57Bl/6 J embryos at E10.5 (one male, one female) and six whole Mtrrgt/gt embryos with congenital malformations at E10.5 (four males, two females) derived from Mtrrgt/gt intercrosses (Supplementary Fig. 1a, c) was sent to BGI (Hong Kong) for library preparation and sequencing. The libraries of each embryo were sequenced separately. Sequencing was performed with 150 bp paired-end reads on an Illumina HiSeq X machine. Quality control of reads assessed with FastQC (version 0.11.5, Adaptors and low-quality bases removed using Trim Galore (version 0.6.4, galore/). Summary metrics were created across all samples using the MultiQC package (version 1.4, FastQ files were merges using seqkit (version 0.8.0)72. Sequencing reads were aligned to the C57Bl/6 J reference genome (GRCm38, mm10) using BowTie2 with default parameters (version 2.3.4, Duplicates were marked using Picard (version 2.9.0,

SV analysis was performed using Manta (version 0.29.6)74. SV were filtered using vcftools (version 0.1.15)75. In order to identify SNPs, the data were remapped to the mm10 reference mouse genome using BWA (version 0.7.15-r1144- dirty)76. Reads were locally realigned and SNPs and short indels identified using GenomeAnalysisTK (GATK, version 3.7)77. Homozygous variants were called when >90% of reads at the locus supported the variant call, whereas variants with at least 30% of reads supporting the variant calls were classified as heterozygous. Two rounds of filtering of variants were performed as follows. First, low-quality and biased variant calls were removed. Second, variants with: (i) simple repeats with a periodicity <9 bp, (ii) homopolymer repeats >8 bp, (iii) dinucleotide repeats >14 bp, (iv) low mapping quality (<40), (v) overlapping annotated repeats or segmental duplications, and (vi) >3 heterozygous variants fell within a 10 kb region were removed using vcftools (version 0.1.15) and bcftools (version 1.3.1) as was previously described78. The 129P2/OlaHsd mouse genome variation data were downloaded from Mouse Genomes Project79. The functional effect of SNPs was predicted using snpEff (version 4.3t)80.

Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing

MeDIP-seq81 was carried out using 3 μg of sperm gDNA that was sonicated using a Diagenode Bioruptor UCD-200 to yield 200–700 bp fragments that were end-repaired and dA-tailed. Illumina adaptors for paired-end sequencing were ligated using the NEB Next DNA Library Prep Master Mix for Illumina kit (New England Biolabs). After each step, the DNA was washed using Agencourt AMPure XP SPRI beads (Beckman Coulter). IPs were performed in triplicate using 500 ng of DNA per sample, 1.25 μl of mouse anti-human 5mC antibody (0.1 mg/0.1 mL, clone 33D3; Eurogentec Ltd., Cat No. BI-MECY, RRID:AB_2616058), and 10 μl of Dynabeads coupled with M-280 sheep anti-mouse IgG bead (Invitrogen). The three IPs were pooled and purified using MinElute PCR Purification columns (Qiagen). Libraries were amplified by PCR (12 cycles) using Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix and adaptor-specific iPCR tag primers (Supplementary Table 9), and purified using Agencourt AMPure XP SPRI beads. The efficiency of the IP was verified using qPCR to compare the enrichment for DNA regions of known methylation status (e.g., methylated in sperm: H19 and Peg3 ICR, Supplementary Fig. 5a)49 in the pre-amplification input and the IP fractions. MeDIP library DNA concentrations were estimated using the Kapa Library Quantification kit (Kapa Biosystems) and were further verified by running on an Agilent High Sensitivity DNA chip on an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer. Sequencing of MeDIP libraries was performed using 100 bp paired-end reads on an Illumina HiSeq platform at the Babraham Institute Next Generation Sequencing Facility (Cambridge, UK).

Quality assessment of the sequencing reads was performed using FastQC (version 0.11.5, Adaptor trimming was performed using Trim Galore (version 0.6.4, galore/). Reads were mapped to the GRCm38 (mm10) reference genome using Bowtie2 (version 2.3.4, All programmes were run with default settings unless otherwise stated. Sample clustering was assessed using principle component analysis, using the 500 most variable windows with respect to read coverage (as a proxy for methylation) for 5 kb window across all samples. Further data quality checks and differential methylation analysis was performed using the MEDIPS package in R (version 1.40.0, using R version 3.4.2)33. The following key parameters were defined: BSgenome = BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10, uniq = 1e-3, extend = 300, ws = 500, shift=0. DMRs were defined as windows (500 bp) in which there was at least 1.5-fold difference in methylation (reads per kilobase million mapped reads (RPKM)) between C57Bl/6 J and Mtrr sperm methylation level with a p value <0.01. Adjacent windows were merged using BEDTools (version 2.27.0)82. The background methylome was defined as all 500 bp windows across the genome at which the sum of the average RPKM per genotype group was >1.0. The genomic localisations of DMRs including association with coding/non-coding regions and CpG islands were determined using annotation downloaded from University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC)83. The percentage of DMRs associated with repetitive regions of the genome was calculated using RepeatMasker software (version,

Enrichment analysis of published ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq data

Mean enrichment of specific histone modifications and THSS, CTCF, H3.3 and PRM1 binding in the DMR regions were determined using published data sets including ChIP-seq data in CD1 spermatozoa collected from cauda epididymis42, ESCs35 and TSCs35, and ATAC-seq data in CD1 spermatozoa collected from cauda epididymis42 and B6D2F1 epiblast and extraembryonic ectoderm at E6.543. The source and accession numbers of processed ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq wig/bigwig files are shown in Supplementary Table 10 and accessible on GitHub ( To ensure that the analysis was consistent across public data sets, all wig files were converted to bigwig using UCSC tools “wigToBigWig -clip” (

DMRs identified in sperm from all three Mtrr genotypes (MeDIP-seq analysis) were combined to generate a list of 893 DMRs. To prevent the inclusion of DMRs associated with genomic variation, the 20 Mb region surrounding the Mtrr gene (Chr13:58060780-80060780) was identified as 129P2Ola/Hsd genomic sequence was masked. This resulted in 459 DMRs for subsequent analysis. The ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq files in sperm42 were originally aligned to mouse reference genome mm9. The files were converted to mouse reference genome mm10 to match the other published data sets in this analysis using LiftOver with the mm9ToMm10.over.chain ( To identify the baseline enrichment profiles around the DMRs for specific histone modifications, THSS, CTCF, H3.3 or PRM1, a similar number of genomic regions were randomly selected using bedtools (v2.26.0)82 with the following command: “bedtools shuffle -i DMRs.bed -g Mus_GRCm38_chrall.fa.fai -chrom -seed 27442958 -noOverlapping -excl Mtrr_mask20Mb.bed”. The DMR profiles were created using deeptools (version 2.3.1)84, via computeMatix 3 kb scaled windows, flanking regions of 6 kb, and a bin size of 200 bp, and plotted with plotProfile.

Enhancer analysis

To determine whether genetic variants or DMRs overlapped with known enhancer regions, FANTOM5 enhancer database85 for GRCm38 mouse genome (; F5.mm10.enhancers.bed.gz) was used. All.bed files were applied to UCSC Genome Browser83 to check for region-specific features. The distance in base pairs between DMRs and genes or between enhancers and genes was calculated using the closest coordinates (the start/end of DMR or enhancer) to the transcriptional start site (TSS) minus the TSS and then plus 1. To determine further interactions between enhancers and promoters, we analysed public Hi-C data sets35 for ESC and TSC (E-MTAB-6585; ESC_promoter-other_interactions_GOTHiC.txt and

TSC_promoter-other_interactions_GOTHiC.txt) using WashU Epigenome Browser86.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)

For RNA expression analysis, cDNA was synthesised using RevertAid H Minus reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific) and random hexamer primers (Thermo Scientific) using 1–2 μg of RNA in a 20-μl reaction according to manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification was conducted using MESA Green qPCR MasterMix Plus for SYBR Assay (Eurogentec Ltd.) on a DNA Engine Opticon2 thermocycler (BioRad). The following cycling conditions were used: 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles: 95 °C for 30 sec, 60 °C for 1 min, followed by melt curve analysis. Transcript levels were normalised to Hprt and/or Gapdh RNA levels. Relative cDNA expression levels were analysed using the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method87. Experiments were conducted in technical triplicate with biological replicates indicated in the figure legends. Transcript levels in C57Bl/6 J tissue were normalised to 1. For primer sequences and concentrations, refer to Supplementary Table 8.

Bisulfite mutagenesis and pyrosequencing

Between 250 ng and 2 μg of gDNA extracted from each tissue sample was bisulfite treated with an Imprint DNA Modification Kit (Sigma). Control samples lacking DNA template were run to ensure that there was no contamination during the bisulfite conversion of DNA. To quantify DMR CpG methylation, pyrosequencing was performed. In all, 50 ng of bisulfite-converted DNA was used as a template for PCR, together with 0.2 μM of each biotinylated primer and 0.25 units of HotStarTaq PlusDNA Polymerase (Qiagen). Refer to Supplementary Table 11 for primer sequences, which were designed using PyroMark Assay Design Software 2.0 (Qiagen). PCR was performed in triplicate using the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 sec, 56 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 55 sec and then 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were purified using Strepdavidin Sepharose High Performance beads (GE healthcare). The beads bound to DNA were washed in 70% ethanol, 0.4 M NaOH and 10 mM Tris-acetated (pH 7.6) and then hybridized to the sequencing primer in PyroMark annealing buffer (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Pyrosequencing was conducted using PyroMark Gold reagents kit (Qiagen) on a PyroMark MD pyrosequencer (Biotage). The mean CpG methylation was calculated using three to eight biological replicates and at least two technical replicates. Analysis of methylation status was performed using Pyro Q-CpG software (version 1.0.9, Biotage).

Mass spectrometry

Sperm gDNA was digested into individual nucleoside components using the DNA Degradase Plus kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The heat inactivation step was omitted. In all, 100 ng of degraded DNA per individual was sent to the Babraham Institute Mass Spectrometry Facility (Cambridge, UK), where global cytosine, 5mC and 5hmC was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as previously described88. The sperm of nine males were assessed per genotype and analysed in pools each containing three unique individuals. All pooled samples were analysed in triplicate. Global 5mC and 5hmC levels are reported as percentages relative to C.

Western blotting

Embryos and placentas at E10.5 were homogenised in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mM ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4 and complete mini EDTA-free proteases inhibitor cocktail [Roche Diagnostics]) with Lysing Matrix D ceramic beads (MP Biomedical) using a MagNA Lyser (Roche Diagnostics) at 5500 rpm for 20 sec. Samples were incubated on ice for 5 min and then homogenised again at 5500 rpm for 20 sec. Homogenates were then incubated on ice for 20 min with brief intervening vortexing steps occurring every 5 min. Samples were then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant from each sample was transferred to a new tube and centrifuged again at 10,000 × g for 5 min to ensure that all residual tissue was removed. The protein concentration of tissue lysates was determined using bicinchoninic acid (Sigma-Aldrich). Proteins were denatured with gel loading buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 100 mN DTT, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol and a trace amount of bromophenol blue) at 70 °C for 10 min. Equivalent amounts of protein were resolved by 8–10% SDS–PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose (0.2 μm, Amersham Protran) with a semi-dry blotter (GE Healthcare). The membrane was stained with Ponceau S solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and the resulting scanned image was used as a loading control. After washing, the membrane was blotted with 5% skimmed milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) before incubation with 1:1000 dilution of monoclonal rabbit anti-human HIRA (clone D2A5E, Cell Signalling Technology, cat. No. 13307, RRID:AB_2798177) overnight at 4 °C or 1:10,000 dilution of monoclonal mouse anti-human β-actin (clone AC-74, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. A2228, RRID:AB_476997) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in TBS-T. The membrane was incubated with 1:10,000 dilution of donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP; GE Healthcare, cat. No. NA934, RRID:AB_772206) diluted in 2.5% skimmed milk in TBS-T or 1:10,000 dilution of sheep anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (GE Healthcare, cat. No. NA931V, RRID:AB_772210) diluted in TBS-T. The signal of resolved protein was visualized by Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western Blotting Analysis System (GE Healthcare) using Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare). A flat-bed scanner (HP Scanjet G4050) was used to scan films. Experiments were conducted in technical duplicates with the biological replicates indicated in the figure legends. Band intensities were determined with background subtraction using ImageJ (64-bit) software (version 1.48; NIH, USA). Full gel blots are available in the Source Data file.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 7). RT-qPCR data were analysed by independent two-tailed unpaired t tests or ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s or Sidak’s multiple comparison testing. SV and SNP data were analysed by independent two-tailed unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction. Bisulfite pyrosequencing data, SV chromosome frequency and DMR distribution at repetitive elements were analysed by two-way ANOVAs with Dunnett’s, Sidak’s or Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests. A binomial test (Wilson/Brown) was used to compare the observed frequency of nucleosome occupancy at DMRs to expected values. Western blot data were analysed using a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. p < 0.05 was considered significant unless otherwise stated.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. WGS data have been deposited in ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI under accession number E-MTAB-8513 and MeDIP-Seq data accession number is E-MTAB-8533. The Hi-C data35 accession number is E-MTAB-6585. The source and accession numbers of processed ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq wig/bigwig files are listed in Supplementary Table 10.  Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The in-house scripts used for the analysis can be found freely accessible in the following online repository: and


  1. 1.

    Chen, Q. et al. Sperm tsRNAs contribute to intergenerational inheritance of an acquired metabolic disorder. Science 351, 397–400 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gapp, K. et al. Implication of sperm RNAs in transgenerational inheritance of the effects of early trauma in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 667–9 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Padmanabhan, N. et al. Mutation in folate metabolism causes epigenetic instability and transgenerational effects on development. Cell 155, 81–93 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Radford, E. J. et al. In utero effects. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism. Science 345, 1255903 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anway, M. D., Cupp, A. S., Uzumcu, M. & Skinner, M. K. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308, 1466–9 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blake, G. E. & Watson, E. D. Unravelling the complex mechanisms of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 33, 101–7 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Heard, E. & Martienssen, R. A. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157, 95–109 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Beck, D., Sadler-Riggleman, I. & Skinner, M. K. Generational comparisons (F1 versus F3) of vinclozolin induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of sperm differential DNA methylation regions (epimutations) using MeDIP-Seq. Environ. Epigenet. 3, dvx016 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Sharma, U. et al. Biogenesis and function of tRNA fragments during sperm maturation and fertilization in mammals. Science 351, 391–396 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Siklenka, K. et al. Disruption of histone methylation in developing sperm impairs offspring health transgenerationally. Science 350, aab2006 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jimenez-Chillaron, J. C. et al. Intergenerational transmission of glucose intolerance and obesity by in utero undernutrition in mice. Diabetes 58, 460–8 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Elmore, C. L. et al. Metabolic derangement of methionine and folate metabolism in mice deficient in methionine synthase reductase. Mol. Genet. Metab. 91, 85–97 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Leclerc, D. et al. Cloning and mapping of a cDNA for methionine synthase reductase, a flavoprotein defective in patients with homocystinuria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3059–64 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yamada, K., Gravel, R. A., Toraya, T. & Matthews, R. G. Human methionine synthase reductase is a molecular chaperone for human methionine synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9476–81 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Field, M. S., Kamynina, E., Chon, J. & Stover, P. J. Nuclear folate metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 38, 219–243 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shane, B. & Stokstad, E. L. Vitamin B12-folate interrelationships. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 5, 115–41 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ghandour, H., Lin, B. F., Choi, S. W., Mason, J. B. & Selhub, J. Folate status and age affect the accumulation of L-isoaspartyl residues in rat liver proteins. J. Nutr. 132, 1357–60 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jacob, R. A. et al. Moderate folate depletion increases plasma homocysteine and decreases lymphocyte DNA methylation in postmenopausal women. J. Nutr. 128, 1204–12 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wainfan, E., Moller, M. L., Maschio, F. A. & Balis, M. E. Ethionine-induced changes in rat liver transfer RNA methylation. Cancer Res. 35, 2830–5 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wilson, A. et al. A common variant in methionine synthase reductase combined with low cobalamin (vitamin B12) increases risk for spina bifida. Mol. Genet. Metab. 67, 317–23 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rosenblatt, D. S., Cooper, B. A., Schmutz, S. M., Zaleski, W. A. & Casey, R. E. Prenatal vitamin B12 therapy of a fetus with methylcobalamin deficiency (cobalamin E disease). Lancet 1, 1127–9 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schuh, S. et al. Homocystinuria and megaloblastic anemia responsive to vitamin B12 therapy. An inborn error of metabolism due to a defect in cobalamin metabolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 310, 686–90 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Koury, M. J. & Ponka, P. New insights into erythropoiesis: the roles of folate, vitamin B12, and iron. Annu Rev. Nutr. 24, 105–31 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Padmanabhan, N. et al. Abnormal folate metabolism causes age-, sex- and parent-of-origin-specific haematological defects in mice. J. Physiol. 596, 4341–4360 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nashun, B. et al. Continuous histone replacement by Hira is essential for normal transcriptional regulation and de novo DNA methylation during mouse iogenesis. Mol. Cell 60, 611–25 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pchelintsev, N. A. et al. Placing the HIRA histone chaperone complex in the chromatin landscape. Cell Rep. 3, 1012–9 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lin, C. J., Koh, F. M., Wong, P., Conti, M. & Ramalho-Santos, M. Hira-mediated H3.3 incorporation is required for DNA replication and ribosomal RNA transcription in the mouse zygote. Dev. Cell 30, 268–79 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Simon, M. M. et al. A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains. Genome Biol. 14, R82 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim, S. et al. PRMT5 protects genomic integrity during global DNA demethylation in primordial germ cells and preimplantation embryos. Mol. Cell 56, 564–79 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Deniz, O., Frost, J. M. & Branco, M. R. Regulation of transposable elements by DNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 417–431 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Blake, G. E. T., Hall, J., Petkovic, G. E. & Watson, E. D. Analysis of spermatogenesis and fertility in adult mice with a hypomorphic mutation in the Mtrr gene. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 31, 1730–1741 (2019).

  32. 32.

    Taiwo, O. et al. Methylome analysis using MeDIP-seq with low DNA concentrations. Nat. Protoc. 7, 617–36 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lienhard, M., Grimm, C., Morkel, M., Herwig, R. & Chavez, L. MEDIPS: genome-wide differential coverage analysis of sequencing data derived from DNA enrichment experiments. Bioinformatics 30, 284–6 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Orozco, L. D. et al. Epigenome-wide association of liver methylation patterns and complex metabolic traits in mice. Cell Metab. 21, 905–17 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schoenfelder, S. et al. Divergent wiring of repressive and active chromatin interactions between mouse embryonic and trophoblast lineages. Nat. Commun. 9, 4189 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Watkins-Chow, D. E. & Pavan, W. J. Genomic copy number and expression variation within the C57BL/6J inbred mouse strain. Genome Res 18, 60–6 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Casas, E. & Vavouri, T. Sperm epigenomics: challenges and opportunities. Front. Genet. 5, 330 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hisano, M. et al. Genome-wide chromatin analysis in mature mouse and human spermatozoa. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2449–70 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Brunner, A. M., Nanni, P. & Mansuy, I. M. Epigenetic marking of sperm by post-translational modification of histones and protamines. Epigenetics Chromatin 7, 2 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Carone, B. R. et al. High-resolution mapping of chromatin packaging in mouse embryonic stem cells and sperm. Dev. Cell 30, 11–22 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Erkek, S. et al. Molecular determinants of nucleosome retention at CpG-rich sequences in mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 868–75 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jung, Y. H. et al. Chromatin states in mouse sperm correlate with embryonic and adult regulatory landscapes. Cell Rep. 18, 1366–1382 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Smith, Z. D. et al. Epigenetic restriction of extraembryonic lineages mirrors the somatic transition to cancer. Nature 549, 543–547 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Seah, M. K. Y. & Messerschmidt, D. M. From germline to soma: epigenetic dynamics in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 128, 203–235 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tang, W. W., Kobayashi, T., Irie, N., Dietmann, S. & Surani, M. A. Specification and epigenetic programming of the human germ line. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 585–600 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hackett, J. A. et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 339, 448–52 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kobayashi, H. et al. Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002440 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Smallwood, S. A. et al. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat. Genet. 43, 811–4 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lambrot, R. et al. Low paternal dietary folate alters the mouse sperm epigenome and is associated with negative pregnancy outcomes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2889 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Murphy, P. J. et al. NRF2 loss recapitulates heritable impacts of paternal cigarette smoke exposure. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008756 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gardiner-Garden, M. & Frommer, M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 261–82 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Roberts, C. et al. Targeted mutagenesis of the Hira gene results in gastrulation defects and patterning abnormalities of mesoendodermal derivatives prior to early embryonic lethality. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 2318–28 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Batista, P. J. & Chang, H. Y. Long noncoding RNAs: cellular address codes in development and disease. Cell 152, 1298–307 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Stover, P. J. One-carbon metabolism-genome interactions in folate-associated pathologies. J. Nutr. 139, 2402–5 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Blount, B. C. et al. Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3290–5 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bistulfi, G., Vandette, E., Matsui, S. & Smiraglia, D. J. Mild folate deficiency induces genetic and epigenetic instability and phenotype changes in prostate cancer cells. BMC Biol. 8, 6 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Jablonka, E. Epigenetic inheritance and plasticity: the responsive germline. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 111, 99–107 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Miska, E. A. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Transgenerational inheritance: models and mechanisms of non-DNA sequence-based inheritance. Science 354, 59–63 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Messerschmidt, D. M., Knowles, B. B. & Solter, D. DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation embryos. Genes Dev. 28, 812–28 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Watson, E. D. & Rakoczy, J. Fat eggs shape offspring health. Nat. Genet. 48, 478–9 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Dnmt2 mediates intergenerational transmission of paternally acquired metabolic disorders through sperm small non-coding RNAs. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 535–540 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Torne, J. et al. Two HIRA-dependent pathways mediate H3.3 de novo deposition and recycling during transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1057–1068 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zhang, Y., Shi, J., Rassoulzadegan, M., Tuorto, F. & Chen, Q. Sperm RNA code programmes the metabolic health of offspring. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15, 489–498 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Holland, M. L. et al. Early-life nutrition modulates the epigenetic state of specific rDNA genetic variants in mice. Science 353, 495–8 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Gapp, K. et al. Alterations in sperm long RNA contribute to the epigenetic inheritance of the effects of postnatal trauma. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 2162–2174 (2018).

  66. 66.

    Branco, M. R. et al. Maternal DNA methylation regulates early trophoblast development. Dev. Cell 36, 152–63 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Park, S. J., Shirahige, K., Ohsugi, M. & Nakai, K. DBTMEE: a database of transcriptome in mouse early embryos. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D771–6 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jiang, Z. et al. Zic3 is required in the extra-cardiac perinodal region of the lateral plate mesoderm for left-right patterning and heart development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 879–89 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Tunster, S. J. Genetic sex determination of mice by simplex PCR. Biol. Sex. Differ. 8, 31 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Padmanabhan, N. et al. Multigenerational analysis of sex-specific phenotypic differences at midgestation caused by abnormal folate metabolism. Environ. Epigenet. 3, dvx014 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ewels, P., Magnusson, M., Lundin, S. & Kaller, M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32, 3047–8 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y. & Hu, F. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 11, e0163962 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–9 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Chen, X. et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics 32, 1220–2 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–8 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–60 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–303 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Oey, H., Isbel, L., Hickey, P., Ebaid, B. & Whitelaw, E. Genetic and epigenetic variation among inbred mouse littermates: identification of inter-individual differentially methylated regions. Epigenetics Chromatin 8, 54 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Keane, T. M. et al. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477, 289–94 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. (Austin) 6, 80–92 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Senner, C. E., Krueger, F., Oxley, D., Andrews, S. & Hemberger, M. DNA methylation profiles define stem cell identity and reveal a tight embryonic-extraembryonic lineage boundary. Stem Cells 30, 2732–45 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–2 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Meyer, L. R. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: extensions and updates 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D64–9 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Ramirez, F., Dundar, F., Diehl, S., Gruning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–91 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Andersson, R. et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 507, 455–461 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Li, D., Hsu, S., Purushotham, D., Sears, R. L. & Wang, T. WashU epigenome browser update 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W158–W165 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402–8 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Ficz, G. et al. FGF signaling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 13, 351–9 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Drs Nozomi Takahashi and Tessa Bertozzi for their technical support, Dr. Claire Senner for critical discussion, and Drs Jamie Hackett and Miguel Branco for .bed files. The MeDIP-seq and LC-MS/MS were performed at the Babraham Institute (UK). WGS was performed by BGI (Hong Kong). This work was funded by grants from Lister Institute for Preventative Medicine and the Centre for Trophoblast Research (CTR) to E.D.W and from the MRC MR/J001597 and Wellcome Trust WT095606 (to A.C.F.-S). The following support was provided: Wellcome Trust 4-year DTP in Developmental Mechanisms (to G.E.T.B.) and CTR funding (to G.E.T.B., H.W.Y., X.Z., R.S.H.).

Author information




E.D.W. conceived the project. G.E.T.B. collected sperm, performed DNA/RNA extractions, generated WGS and MeDIP libraries, and performed RT-qPCR and bisulfite pyrosequencing analyses. G.E.T.B. and E.D.W. dissected tissue and phenotyped conceptuses. G.E.T.B. and E.D.W. collected and analysed the data. X.Z., R.S.H. and G.E.T.B. designed and performed bioinformatics analyses. H.W.Y. performed the western blotting analysis. G.E.T.B., A.C.F.-S., G.J.B. and E.D.W. designed the experiments and interpreted the results. E.D.W. and G.E.T.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica D. Watson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Qi Chen, Jerome Jullien and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blake, G.E.T., Zhao, X., Yung, H.w. et al. Defective folate metabolism causes germline epigenetic instability and distinguishes Hira as a phenotype inheritance biomarker. Nat Commun 12, 3714 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing