Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Radioisotope constraints of Arctic deep water export to the North Atlantic


The export of deep water from the Arctic to the Atlantic contributes to the formation of North Atlantic Deep Water, a crucial component of global ocean circulation. Records of protactinium-231 (231Pa) and thorium-230 (230Th) in Arctic sediments can provide a measure of this export, but well-constrained sedimentary budgets of these isotopes have been difficult to achieve in the Arctic Ocean. Previous studies revealed a deficit of 231Pa in central Arctic sediments, implying that some 231Pa is either transported to the margins, where it may be removed in areas of higher particle flux, or exported from the Arctic via deep water advection. Here we investigate this “missing sink” of Arctic 231Pa and find moderately increased 231Pa deposition along Arctic margins. Nonetheless, we determine that most 231Pa missing from the central basin must be lost via advection into the Nordic Seas, requiring deep water advection of 1.1 – 6.4 Sv through Fram Strait.


Deep water export from the Arctic to the North Atlantic through the Nordic Seas affects the formation of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW)1,2, a critical component of thermohaline circulation. Because NADW plays a prominent role in the oceanic transport of latent and sensible heat and the sequestration of atmospheric CO2, a well-defined record of Arctic contributions to NADW formation is critically important.

The ratio of 231Pa (t1/2 = 3.2 × 104 y) and 230Th (t1/2 = 7.5 × 104 y) in deep-sea sediments can be used as a proxy for deep water circulation and help constrain changes in Arctic outflow. These two naturally occurring radioactive isotopes are produced constantly and ubiquitously in the water column through the decay of uranium isotopes. Due to their long oceanic residence times, uranium isotopes have relatively uniform concentrations and produce 231Pa and 230Th in a constant ratio of 0.093. Unlike their soluble uranium parents, 231Pa and 230Th are particle reactive, and their contrasting removal rates by adsorption onto settling particles (scavenging) can be exploited to gain information about ocean circulation and particle fluxes.

Thorium-230 has a high particle affinity, and thus a short oceanic residence time of ~20–40 years3. As a result, this isotope is generally removed from solution in the same geographic location as it is produced, such that the inventory of 230Th in sediments balances its production in the overlying water column4. Protactinium-231 is somewhat more soluble, with an oceanic residence time of ~100–200 years, and can therefore be preferentially affected by lateral transport, including advection, before scavenging and deposition in sediments3. This differential scavenging results in sedimentary 231Pa/230Th ratios that diverge from the water column production ratio of 0.0933,5,6,7. In areas of low particle flux, some 231Pa can escape scavenging and be laterally transported, resulting in low 231Pa/230Th ratios (<0.093) in underlying sediments. In areas of high particle flux, such as ocean margins, a greater proportion of dissolved 231Pa and 230Th are removed via scavenging (a process called boundary scavenging5,8). Because there may be additional 231Pa in the water column that was transported from areas of low particle flux, this enhanced removal can result in sedimentary 231Pa/230Th ratios > 0.093.

Sedimentary 231Pa/230Th ratios across the central Arctic are low9,10,11,12,13,14,15, indicating that 231Pa is laterally transported away from this region of low particle flux. However, the low spatial resolution of sedimentary observations along the margins of the Arctic basin has made it difficult to determine if the 231Pa missing from the central basin is deposited in margin sediments as a result of boundary scavenging or if 231Pa is being exported out of the Arctic. The Fram Strait is the only deep conduit in the Arctic, connecting the Eurasian Basin to the North Atlantic through the Nordic Seas (Fig. 1), thus a loss of 231Pa from the Arctic indicates southward advection of deep water into the Nordic Seas. Finding the “missing sink” of 231Pa is therefore essential to the interpretation of sedimentary 231Pa/230Th ratios as a proxy for deep water transport out of the Arctic10,11.

Fig. 1: Map of the Arctic Ocean.

Blue shading denotes the region considered to be the central basin for the purposes of this study, generally following the 1500 m isobath (bold contour).

Here, we expand the geographic coverage of 231Pa/230Th measurements in Arctic sediments and find slightly elevated 231Pa/230Th ratios along the margins, consistent with enhanced 231Pa deposition via boundary scavenging. Still, a mass balance calculation indicates that most of the 231Pa missing from the central basin must be lost via advection into the Nordic Seas. This revised budget is consistent with 231Pa loss via the advection of Arctic intermediate and deep waters to the Nordic Seas and North Atlantic, demonstrating the utility of the 231Pa/230Th ratio as a proxy for past changes in Arctic contributions to NADW. Further, this mass balance provides a geochemical constraint on modern advection through Fram Strait, indicating that the southward flow of Arctic intermediate and deep water is ~1.1–6.4 Sv, averaged over the 100–200 y residence time of this radioisotope.

Results and discussion

Coretop 231Pa/230Th ratios

To improve the Arctic-wide 231Pa budget, we have expanded the coverage of 231Pa/230Th measurements in surface sediments along the margins of the Arctic Ocean (continental slopes on the periphery of the Eurasian and Amerasian Basins) and in the central Canada Basin. Because the majority of our samples were collected from elevated locations near continental margins where sedimentation rates are high, we assume that the 231Pa/230Th ratios are not appreciably influenced by radioactive decay, bioturbation, or turbidites. Although sedimentation rates are significantly lower in the basins, these assumptions are unlikely to change the final 231Pa/230Th ratios by more than a few percent (see Supplementary Discussion).

231Pa/230Th ratios in margin sediments are generally higher than those in the basin (Fig. 2). The average 231Pa/230Th ratio based on previously published data from the central basin9,10,11,12,13,14,15 was 0.063 ± 0.003 (±SE, n = 36); this ratio is not significantly changed by the addition of our new data, increasing slightly to 0.068 ± 0.003 (n = 45) (Fig. 3). However, the addition of 40 new samples at the margins notably increases the average margin ratio from 0.077 ± 0.007 (n = 15; previous studies10,15,16) to 0.101 ± 0.005 (n = 55). Because the surface sediment samples are not evenly distributed throughout the study area, we also determined area-normalized averages by gridding the data into equal-area bins (Supplementary Fig. 1). This area-normalization does not change the margin 231Pa/230Th (0.101 ± 0.005; n = 40), and only slightly decreases the basin average to 0.065 ± 0.004 (n = 33).

Fig. 2: Excess protactinium-231/thorium-230 activity ratios in bulk surface sediments.

Symbol shape indicates the data source; new data provided by this study are shown in circles. Orange and red symbols indicate 231Pa/230Th ratios above the production ratio (0.093), blue symbols indicate 231Pa/230Th ratios below the production ratio. The 1500 m isobath is shown in bold.

Fig. 3: Violin plot of excess 231Pa/230Th ratios in margin samples (orange) and basin samples (blue).

The shape of each plot represents the kernel density estimation, the white dot represents the median, the thick black bar represents the interquartile range, and the thin black line represents the upper and lower adjacent values (±1.5 interquartile range). Wider sections of the plot indicate a higher probability that a data point in the group will have that value, while narrow sections indicate a low probability that the data in the group falls in that range.

Protactinium-231 mass balance

The addition of many new margin samples with 231Pa/230Th ratios near or slightly above the water column production ratio of 0.093 provides evidence of boundary scavenging of 231Pa: the enhanced accumulation of 231Pa in sediments resulting from higher particle fluxes. To quantify how much of the 231Pa missing from the central basin is deposited along the margins, we follow the mass balance approach developed by Luo and Lippold16, which first assumes that all of the 231Pa missing from the central basin is balanced by boundary scavenging along the margins, in order to determine the expected margin 231Pa/230Th ratio (231Pa/230Thmargin). This expected 231Pa/230Thmargin is then compared to the observed 231Pa/230Thmargin to determine the fraction of 231Pa that can be explained by boundary scavenging. Importantly, this method assumes that the inventory of 230Th in sediments is balanced by its inventory in the overlying water column (i.e., any changes in the 231Pa/230Th ratio are due to the addition or removal of 231Pa). Previous studies have shown minimal export of 230Th from the Arctic, supporting this assumption10,13,17.

Comparing the area-normalized average 231Pa/230Th in the basin (231Pa/230Thbasin; 0.065 ± 0.004) to the expected production ratio of 0.093 and assuming that 100% of the 230Th produced is buried in underlying sediments10,13,17 indicates that 70 ± 4% of the 231Pa produced in the basin is buried there. If all of the missing 231Pa is deposited along the margins, the expected 231Pa/230Thmargin is 0.305 ± 0.024. However, the observed area-normalized average 231Pa/230Thmargin is 0.101 ± 0.005, thus only 4 ± 1% of the 231Pa produced in the basin can be accounted for at the margins, and the remaining 26 ± 2% must be exported to the Nordic Seas.

Recent water column measurements of 231Pa support a net export of 231Pa through Fram Strait15, and previous Arctic-wide assessments of surface sediments (based on very few 231Pa/230Th measurements along the margins) concluded that ~30–40% of the 231Pa produced in the Arctic is exported10,11. The greatly improved spatial coverage in this study therefore provides a much better constrained (and slightly decreased) estimate of 231Pa leaving the Arctic of ~26%, but upholds the conclusion that advection through Fram Strait is the main sink for the 231Pa that is missing from central basin sediments.

Advection through Fram Strait

While the circulation and fluxes of Arctic surface waters have been the subject of detailed investigation2,18,19, less is known about deep water circulation and fluxes. Fram Strait (~2600 m) is the only entry and exit point for intermediate and deep waters; additional water inputs through the Barents Sea (200–300 m) and Bering Strait (~50 m), and outputs through the Canadian Archipelago (150–230 m), are all shallow. Atlantic inflow through Fram Strait is therefore the primary source of intermediate and deep waters, with additional contributions from the subduction of dense water formed through brine formation and winter convection on Arctic shelves2,20. Intermediate waters (extending from the halocline down to ~1500–1700 m) circulate cyclonically along the margins of the Eurasian and Amerasian Basins, with pathways following the Lomonosov and Gakkel Ridges in the Eurasian Basin, and recirculating cyclonic loops in the Makarov and Canada Basins2. Deep water (>1700 m) circulation pathways are less understood, but are thought to follow a cyclonic circulation from the Eurasian Basin into the Amerasian Basin. Southward flowing cold, dense intermediate and deep waters are transported through Fram Strait and contribute to Denmark Strait Overflow Water and NADW2,21,22,23.

Protactinium-231 is an excellent geochemical tracer of intermediate and deep circulation because 231Pa concentrations are low in surface waters (<0.05–0.1 dpm m−3 above 500 m)9,15,24,25,26 but increase with depth. A mass balance of 231Pa in the Arctic can therefore reasonably exclude surface waters and focus on intermediate and deep water exchange through Fram Strait.

Using surface sediment ratios, we have determined that ~74% of the 231Pa produced in the Arctic is buried there, and ~26% must be exported via intermediate and deep water advection. By combining these estimates with water column concentrations, we can determine the amount of intermediate and deep water exchange that must occur through Fram Strait. At steady state, the sources of 231Pa to the Arctic Ocean (production of 231Pa via radioactive decay and advection of intermediate and deep waters from the Greenland Sea into the Arctic) are balanced by losses (particle scavenging and subsequent deposition in sediments, and advection of intermediate and deep waters out of the Arctic). The advective sources and sinks of 231Pa depend on the water fluxes through Fram Strait and the concentrations of 231Pa in the Greenland Sea and Arctic Ocean. To our knowledge, there is only one published measurement of 231Pa in the Greenland Sea: 0.15 dpm m−3 (at 1700 m)10. However, similar activities of 0.11–0.16 dpm m−3 were measured in Fram Strait Branch water in the Nansen Basin north of the Barents Sea15; this is water that has just recently entered the Arctic through Fram Strait. We therefore use a range of 0.11–0.16 dpm m−3 for inflowing intermediate and deep waters. Activities in Canada Basin intermediate and deep waters typically increase from ~0.1 dpm m−3 around 500 m to ~0.6 dpm m−3 near the bottom (>3000 m), while Eurasian Basin intermediate and deep waters increase from ~0.1 to ~0.5 dpm m−3,9,15,24,25,26,27. We therefore assume that average 231Pa activities in intermediate and deep waters exported from the Arctic are 0.2–0.3 dpm m−3.

Geostrophic estimates of water transport through Fram Strait suggest a net transport of ~2 Sv out of the Arctic2,28. However, most of this transport occurs at the surface. Marnela et al.29 suggest that the exchange of intermediate and deep waters (defined therein as σ > 28.06) results in a net southward export of ~0.4 Sv. Assuming that the Arctic intermediate and deep water outflow is 0.4 Sv greater than the Greenland Sea inflow, the 231Pa mass balance indicates a southward outflow of Arctic waters of 1.1–4.8 Sv, and an inflow of 0.7– 4.4 Sv from the Greenland Sea (minimum and maximum exchanges based on the range in water column 231Pa activities). Alternatively, we can assume that the inflow and outflow of intermediate and deep waters are equal; an inverse model of volume fluxes through Arctic gateways suggests that deep water inflow and outflow through Fram Strait are approximately balanced30. In this case, the mass balance yields an exchange of 1.3–6.4 Sv. Consequently, an export of 1.1–6.4 Sv of southward flowing Arctic intermediate and deep waters is needed to explain the observed 231Pa deficit in Arctic surface sediments.

This estimate is within the lower bounds of the significantly larger range of fluxes inferred previously from geostrophy and ADCP analyses, which range from 1.8 to 18.4 Sv18,28,29,31, depending on the density or depth range chosen and the measurement approach. Our geochemistry-based estimate also offers an advantage over more direct volume measurements, because the activities of 231Pa reflect conditions integrated over the water column residence time of this isotope (~100–200 years), unlike snapshot measurements. Our 231Pa-based estimate could be improved by increasing the number of dissolved 231Pa measurements in the Greenland Sea, which would refine the estimate of the northward 231Pa flux through Fram Strait. If the 231Pa activity of inflowing water is higher than the range estimated here (0.11–0.16 dpm m−3), it would increase the flux of southward flowing intermediate and deep waters, and vice-versa.

Export of 1.1– 6.4 Sv from an Arctic Ocean basin volume of 1.1474 × 107 km3 (>1500 m, Fig. 1) implies that the residence time of water below 1500 m is 57–331 y. Previously reported residence times for Arctic intermediate waters are on the order of decades32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39, while deep water residence time estimates range from ~200 to 600 years in the Amerasian Basin and ~150–300 years in the Eurasian Basin38,39,40,41. Our estimate includes both deep waters and intermediate waters, thus it is reasonable that our range falls on the lower end of previous estimates for deep water residence times.

The revised Arctic 231Pa budget presented herein provides a geochemical constraint on modern circulation in Fram Strait while also providing evidence that the 231Pa/230Th ratio can be applied as a proxy for past changes in Arctic circulation. Given these improved constraints on the 231Pa/230Th ratios of Holocene Arctic sediments, future work should focus on developing downcore records to investigate how changing Arctic outflows may have influenced the formation of NADW through time. In particular, further constraints on the amount of Arctic ventilation during the Last Glacial Maximum are needed to resolve conflicting records of persistent deep water export11,16 and indications of an isolated, stagnant Arctic basin during this period42.


Study region and sample locations

Samples were collected from existing cores archived in multiple international repositories (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA; U.S. Geological Survey, USA; Institute of Ocean Sciences, Canada; Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany; GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany). Most samples were taken from the top 0 to 1 cm of cores, however in some of the cores collected along the Beaufort shelf and slope (MC-12, MC-21, MC-26, MC-42, MC-46) the top of the core was missing and samples were collected from the shallowest available depth (deepest interval was 4–5 cm).

Isotopic analyses

Thorium (230Th, 232Th), protactinium (231Pa), and uranium (234U, 238U) concentrations were measured using isotope dilution and mass spectrometry on an Element 2 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University. Approximately 100 mg of sediment was spiked with 229Th, 233Pa, and 236U before digestion in HClO4, HNO3 and HF43. Isotopes were separated by co-precipitation with Fe(OH)3 followed by anion exchange column chemistry (AG1-X8 anion resin)44,45. Reproducibility was assessed using internal standards of homogenized Arctic sediments and North Atlantic sediments; relative standard deviations were <6% for all isotopes. Background contamination was corrected for with Milli-Q water blanks that were digested and analyzed using the same procedure as samples.

Excess 230Th and 231Pa (230Thxs, 231Paxs) were calculated by subtracting lithogenic 230Th and 231Pa (230Thlith, 231Palith) from total 230Th and 231Pa (230Thtot, 231Patot), respectively (all in activity per sample mass, or dpm/g):


This corrects for 230Th and 231Pa sourced from continental material rather than produced via U decay in the water column. The lithogenic 230Th activity was determined for each sample using the activity ratio of 238U and 232Th in lithogenic material, (238U/232Th)lith, and the measured activity of 232Th (dpm/g), which is solely of lithogenic origin46:

$${\,\!}^{230}Th_{lith}=({\,\!}^{238}U/{\,\!}^{232}Th)_{lith}{\ast} {\,\!}^{232}Th$$

Similarly, lithogenic 231Pa activity was calculated using Eq. 3 multiplied by 0.046, the natural 235U/238U activity ratio:

$${\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{lith}=0.046\ast ({\,\!}^{238}U/{\,\!}^{232}Th)_{lith}\ast {\,\!}^{232}Th$$

This approach assumes that 238U and 235U are in secular equilibrium with 230Th and 231Pa, respectively, and that (238U/232Th)lith is known. Previous pan-Arctic studies have used (238U/232Th)lith ratios between 0.5 and 0.7, most commonly 0.6 ± 0.110,11,15,16. However, the Amerasian Basin is likely to have a higher average (238U/232Th)lith than the Eurasian Basin due to the presence of detrital carbonates in the Canadian Shield47, which can have 238U/232Th ratios as high as 448. The bulk sediment 238U/232Th ratios measured in our samples were higher in the Canada Basin compared to the Makarov, Nansen, and Amundsen Basins, in line with previous studies10,14 (Supplementary Fig. 2). Due to this geographic variation, we use a 238U/232Th ratio of 0.7 ± 0.1 to correct for lithogenic inputs in the Canada Basin, and a ratio of 0.6 ± 0.1 to correct for lithogenic inputs elsewhere. Using a higher lithogenic ratio causes the 231Paxs/230Thxs ratio (referred to hereafter and in the main text as 231Pa/230Th ratio) to increase slightly.

Authigenic 230Th and 231Pa (produced through the in-situ decay of U that has precipitated in reducing sediments) were not accounted for because we assume a surface sediment age of 0 ka, thus no time has elapsed during which 230Th and 231Pa could have accumulated from authigenic U decay (see Supplementary Discussion).

Errors on individual 231Pa/230Th ratios are reported as 2\(\sigma\). As the errors on the ICP measurements are only a few percent, the largest sources of error are the sizeable lithogenic correction and the error on the detrital (238U/232Th)lith ratio. Errors on averaged 231Pa/230Th ratios are reported as standard error (SE = \({\rm{\sigma }}/\sqrt{{\rm{n}}}\)), to reflect increased confidence in the value as data coverage improves.

To compare our results with published data, we recalculated previously reported 231Pa/230Th ratios in the Canada Basin using a (238U/232Th)lith ratio of 0.7 when possible10,11,15. For two samples in the Canada Basin near the Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge, total 231Pa and 230Th were not reported and excess activities were based on measured uranium activities rather than the (238U/232Th)lith ratio12,14.

Margin-basin designation

Samples were separated into central basin and margin bins by eye based on proximity to the continental slope. As ridges are the second largest physiographic province in the Arctic (preceded by continental shelves)49, it is impossible to use a cutoff based on depth or distance to an isobath; this approach would incorrectly place many of the samples collected from ridges into the margin category. Sensitivity tests were performed to ensure that samples located in areas that could be considered part of either bin (e.g., near the Chukchi Plateau, Lomonosov Ridge near Siberia) did not change the conclusions of this study. In all cases, moving these samples from one bin to another changed the average 231Pa/230Th ratios of the margin and basin bins by <2%. Samples located in the Greenland Sea and on the shallow shelf (<400 m) were not included in either the basin or margin groups (n = 4).

Equal-area grid

Area-normalized averages were determined by gridding the data into equal-area bins (Supplementary Fig. 1). Each bin has a height of 1-degree, and an area of ~12,400 km2. The longitude range of each bin grows larger toward the pole, as the number of bins per degree of latitude decreases. The assignment of each bin as basin or margin is based on the location of the samples inside the bin, rather than the center of the bin. Changing the bin size does not notably affect the results; doubling the height of each bin from 1 to 2-degrees of latitude increases the average margin 231Pa/230Th ratio by 5% and does not change the average basin ratio.

Sediment mass balance of protactinium-231

If all the 231Pa lost from the central basin was balanced by boundary scavenging along the margins (i.e., if the Arctic had no deep water connection to the Atlantic), then the deficit of 231Pa reflected in 231Pa/230Th ratios measured in the central basin (231Pa/230Thbasin) multiplied by the volume of the central basin (Vbasin) must be balanced by 231Pa excesses in the margin ratios (231Pa/230Thmargin) multiplied by the volume of the margin box (Vmargin)16:

$$({\,\!}^{231}Pa/{\,\!}^{230}T{h}_{margin}-0.093)\ast {V}_{margin}=(0.093-{}^{231}Pa/{\,\!}^{230}T{h}_{basin})\ast {V}_{basin}$$

In reality, not all of the 231Pa missing from the central basin is deposited along the margins, but some is exported to the Nordic Seas. To determine the fraction of missing 231Pa that can be found at the margins (f), the observed margin ratio is compared to the expected value determined in Eq. 5:16

$$f=\frac{({{\rm{measured}}}^{231}{Pa}{{/}^{230}{Th}}_{{margin}}-0.093)}{({{\rm{expected}}}^{231}{Pa}{{/}^{230}{Th}}_{{margin}}-0.093)}\times 100 \%$$

The volume of the central basin was determined by drawing a polygon following the 1500 m isobath but including the ridges, such that regions shallower than 1500 m inside the polygon were considered part of the basin (Fig. 1). The volume inside the polygon (Vbasin) is 1.1474 × 107 km3 (based on the ETOPO2_v2 2 min gridded bathymetry from NOAA; The volume of the margins (Vmargin; shelves and slope down to 1500 m) was determined to be 0.1516 × 107 km3 by subtracting the basin volume from the total Arctic volume (1.2990 × 107 km3)50.

Water column mass balance of protactinium-231

The mass balance of 231Pa in the Arctic water column is summarized in Eq. 7:

$${V}_{AO}\ast \partial {\,\!}^{231}Pa/\partial t={\beta }_{231}{V}_{AO}-{S}_{231}{V}_{AO}+({\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{GS}){F}_{GS}-({\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{AO}){F}_{AO}$$

Where β231 is the production rate of 231Pa (dpm m−3 y−1), S231 is the scavenging rate of 231Pa (dpm m−3 y−1), 231PaGS and 231PaAO are the activities of 231Pa in the Greenland Sea and Arctic Ocean, respectively (dpm m−3), FGS and FAO are the northward and southward water fluxes through Fram Strait, respectively (m3 y−1), VAO is the total volume of the Arctic Ocean50, and ∂231Pa/ ∂t is the change in Arctic 231Pa concentration through time. At steady state, ∂231Pa/ ∂t is zero. Based on our 231Pa sediment mass balance, S231 is equal to 0.74 β231. Because both FGS and FAO are unknowns, another equation is needed to solve for the volume exchange through Fram Strait. If we assume that the inflow and outflow of intermediate and deep waters is the same (F = FGS = FAO), Eq. 7 then simplifies to:

$$F=0.26{\beta }_{231}{V}_{AO}/({\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{AO}-{\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{GS})$$

If we assume a net southward export of 0.4 Sv (1.26 × 1013 m3 y−1)29, then FAO = FGS + 1.26 × 1013 m3 y−1 and Eq. 9 can be solved for FAO:

$${F}_{AO}=({\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{GS}\ast 1.26\times {10}^{13}-0.26{\beta }_{231})/({\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{GS}-{\,\!}^{231}P{a}_{AO})$$

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available through the World Data Service for Paleoclimatology ( and in Supplementary Dataset 1.


  1. 1.

    Aagaard, K., Swift, J. H. & Carmack, E. C. Thermohaline circulation in the Arctic Mediterranean Seas. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 4833–4846 (1985).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rudels, B. Arctic Ocean Circulation. in Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences 211–225 (Elsevier, 2009).

  3. 3.

    Anderson, R. F., Bacon, M. P. & Brewer, P. G. Removal of 230Th and 231Pa from the open ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 62, 7–23 (1983).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Henderson, G. M., Heinze, C., Anderson, R. F. & Winguth, A. M. E. Global distribution of the 230Th flux to ocean sediments constrained by GCM modelling. Deep. Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 46, 1861–1893 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anderson, R. F., Bacon, M. P. & Brewer, P. G. Removal of 230Th and 231Pa at ocean margins. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 66, 73–90 (1983).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shimmield, G. B. et al. The distribution and behaviour of 230Th and 231Pa at an ocean margin, Baja California, Mexico. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 2499–2507 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yang, H. S., Nozaki, Y., Sakai, H. & Masuda, A. The distribution of 230Th and 231Pa in the deep-sea surface sediments of the Pacific Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 81–89 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Spencer, D. W., Bacon, M. P. & Brewer, P. G. Models of the distribution of 210Pb in a section across the North Equatorial Atlantic Ocean. J. Mar. Res. 39, 119–138 (1981).

  9. 9.

    Scholten, J. C., Rutgers van der Loeff, M. M. & Michel, A. Distribution of 230Th and 231Pa in the water column in relation to the ventilation of the deep Arctic basins. Deep. Res. Part II 42, 1519–1531 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moran, S. B. et al. 231Pa and 230Th in surface sediments of the Arctic Ocean: Implications for 231Pa/230Th fractionation, boundary scavenging, and advective export. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 234, 235–248 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hoffmann, S. S., McManus, J. F., Curry, W. B. & Brown-Leger, L. S. Persistent export of 231Pa from the deep central Arctic Ocean over the past 35,000 years. Nature 497, 603–606 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ku, T.-L. & Broecker, W. S. Rates of sedimentation in the Arctic ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 4, 95–104 (1967).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hillaire-Marcel, C. et al. A New Chronology of Late Quaternary Sequences From the Central Arctic Ocean Based on “Extinction Ages” of Their Excesses in 231Pa and 230Th. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 18, 4573–4585 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Not, C. & Hillaire-Marcel, C. Time constraints from 230Th and 231Pa data in late Quaternary, low sedimentation rate sequences from the Arctic Ocean: An example from the northern Mendeleev Ridge. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 3665–3675 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gdaniec, S. et al. 231Pa and 230Th in the Arctic Ocean: implications for boundary scavenging and 231Pa-230Th fractionation in the Eurasian Basin. Chem. Geol. 532, 119380 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Luo, Y. & Lippold, J. Controls on 231Pa and 230Th in the Arctic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5942–5949 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hoffmann, S. & McManus, J. Is there a 230Th deficit in Arctic sediments? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 258, 516–527 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rudels, B. Arctic Ocean circulation and variability - Advection and external forcing encounter constraints and local processes. Ocean Sci. 8, 261–286 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Timmermans, M. L. & Marshall, J. Understanding Arctic Ocean Circulation: a Review of Ocean Dynamics in a Changing Climate. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 125, e2018JC014378 (2020).

  20. 20.

    Roeske, T., Rutgers van der Loeff, M., Middag, R. & Bakker, K. Deep water circulation and composition in the Arctic Ocean by dissolved barium, aluminium and silicate. Mar. Chem. 132–133, 56–67 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jeansson, E. et al. Sources to the East Greenland Current and its contribution to the Denmark Strait Overflow. Prog. Oceanogr. 78, 12–28 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rudels, B. et al. The interaction between waters from the Arctic Ocean and the Nordic Seas north of Fram Strait and along the East Greenland Current: Results from the Arctic Ocean-02 Oden expedition. J. Mar. Syst. 55, 1–30 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rudels, B., Friedrich, H. J. & Quadfasel, D. The Arctic Circumpolar Boundary Current. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 46, 1023–1062 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Edmonds, H. N., Moran, S. B., Cheng, H. & Edwards, R. L. 230Th and 231Pa in the Arctic Ocean: Implications for particle fluxes and basin-scale Th/Pa fractionation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 227, 155–167 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Edmonds, H. N., Moran, S. B., Hoff, J. A., Smith, J. N. & Edwards, R. L. Protactinium-231 and thorium-230 abundances and high scavenging rates in the Western Arctic Ocean. Science 280, 405–407 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Grenier, M. et al. Changes in Circulation and Particle Scavenging in the Amerasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean over the Last Three Decades Inferred from the Water Column Distribution of Geochemical Tracers. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 124, 9338–9363 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bacon, M. P., Huh, C. A. & Moore, R. M. Vertical profiles of some natural radionuclides over the Alpha Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 95, 15–22 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rudels, B. et al. Circulation and transformation of Atlantic water in the Eurasian Basin and the contribution of the Fram Strait inflow branch to the Arctic Ocean heat budget. Prog. Oceanogr. 132, 128–152 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Marnela, M., Rudels, B., Houssais, M. N., Beszczynska-Möller, A. & Eriksson, P. B. Recirculation in the Fram Strait and transports of water in and north of the Fram Strait derived from CTD data. Ocean Sci. 9, 499–519 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tsubouchi, T. et al. The Arctic Ocean in summer: a quasi-synoptic inverse estimate of boundary fluxes and water mass transformation. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 117, C01024 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Marnela, M. et al. Transports of Nordic Seas water masses and excess SF6 through Fram Strait to the Arctic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 78, 1–11 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Casacuberta, N. et al. Tracing the Three Atlantic Branches Entering the Arctic Ocean With 129I and 236U. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 123, 6909–6921 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ekwurzel, B., Schlosser, P., Mortlock, R. A., Fairbanks, R. G. & Swift, J. H. River runoff, sea ice meltwater, and Pacific water distribution and mean residence times in the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 106, 9075–9092 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rutgers van der Loeff, M. et al. Radium Isotopes across the Arctic Ocean show Time Scales of Water Mass Ventilation and Increasing Shelf Inputs. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. (2018).

  35. 35.

    Schlosser, P. et al. Pathways and mean residence times of dissolved pollutants in the ocean derived from transient tracers and stable isotopes. Sci. Total Environ. 237–238, 15–30 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Smethie, W. M., Schlosser, P., Bönisch, G. & Hopkins, T. S. Renewal and circulation of intermediate waters in the Canadian Basin observed on the SCICEX 96 cruise. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 105, 1105–1121 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Smith, J. N., McLaughlin, F. A., Smethie, W. M., Moran, S. B. & Lepore, K. Iodine-129, 137Cs, and CFC-11 tracer transit time distributions in the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 116, C04024 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Tanhua, T. et al. Ventilation of the arctic ocean: Mean ages and inventories of anthropogenic CO2 and CFC-11. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 114, C01002 (2009).

  39. 39.

    Kipp, L. E. et al. Shelf‐Basin Interactions and Water Mass Residence Times in the Western Arctic Ocean: Insights Provided by Radium Isotopes. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2019JC014988 (2019).

  40. 40.

    Schlosser, P. et al. The first trans-Arctic 14C section: comparison of the mean ages of the deep waters in the Eurasian and Canadian basins of the Arctic Ocean. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 123, 431–437 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Deng, H., Ke, H., Huang, P., Chen, X. & Cai, M. Ventilation time and anthropogenic CO2 in the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean based on carbon tetrachloride measurements. J. Oceanogr. 74, 439–452 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Thornalley, D. J. R. et al. A warm and poorly ventilated deep Arctic Mediterranean during the last glacial period. Science 349, 706–710 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fleisher, M. Q. & Anderson, R. F. Assessing the collection efficiency of Ross Sea sediment traps using 230Th and 231Pa. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 50, 693–712 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kraus, K. A., Moore, G. E. & Nelson, F. Anion-exchange Studies. XXI. Th(IV) and U(IV) in Hydrochloric Acid. Separation of Thorium, Protactinium and Uranium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 2692–2695 (1956).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lao, Y., Anderson, R. F., Broecker, W. S., Hofmann, H. J. & Wolfli, W. Particulate fluxes of 230Th, 231Pa, and 10Be in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 205–217 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Brewer, P. G., Nozaki, Y., Spencer, D. W. & Fleer, A. P. Sediment trap experiments in the deep North Atlantic: isotopic and elemental fluxes. J. Mar. Res. 38, 703–728 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Polyak, L. & Jakobsson, M. Quaternary Sedimentation in the Arctic Ocean: recent Advances and Further Challenges. Oceanography 24, 52–64 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Missiaen, L. et al. Downcore Variations of Sedimentary Detrital (238U/232Th) Ratio: implications on the Use of 230Thxs and 231Paxs to Reconstruct Sediment Flux and Ocean. Circulation. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 2560–2573 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jakobsson, M., Grantz, A., Kristoffersen, Y. & Macnab, R. Physiographic provinces of the Arctic Ocean seafloor. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 115, 1443–1455 (2003).

  50. 50.

    Jakobsson, M. Hypsometry and volume of the Arctic Ocean and its constituent seas. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 3, 1–18 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful for the help of Marty Fleisher, Kassandra Costa, and Yuxin Zhou, who assisted L.E.K. with sample preparation, ICP-MS analyses, and data processing. Helpful discussions with Sharon Hoffmann improved this study. We thank Lloyd Keigwin, Brian Buczkowski, Robie Macdonald, Rüdiger Stein, and Robert Spielhagen for providing sediment samples. Robie Macdonald, Rüdiger Stein, and Robert Spielhagen also provided helpful comments that improved this paper. A subset of samples for this work were provided by the U.S. Extended Continental Shelf (ECS) Project. The opinions, findings, and conclusions stated herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. ECS Project or the U.S. Geological Survey. Samples were also provided by the Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar und Marine Research (grant nos. AWI-PS17, -PS27, -PS44, -PS70, -PS72, -PS87, -PS93.1_01, -PS115.1-01), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Canadian Institute of Ocean Sciences, and GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. Research funding was provided by the Ocean Frontier Institute, through an award from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund. Additional funding was provided through a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Climate Center Award to L.E.K. and J.F.M. This research was supported in part by NSF award AGS 16-35019 to J.F.M.

Author information




L.E.K., J.F.M. and M.K. collaborated on study design, interpretation of results, and text of the final paper. L.E.K. analyzed samples and wrote the first draft of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren E. Kipp.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Susan Allen, S. Bradley Moran and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kipp, L.E., McManus, J.F. & Kienast, M. Radioisotope constraints of Arctic deep water export to the North Atlantic. Nat Commun 12, 3658 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing