Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20039-w, published online 15 December 2020.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the Peer review information. The Peer review information section originally incorrectly read:

“Nature Communications thanks Meghan Meyer, Theodore Satterthwaite and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.”

The correct version states:

Nature Communications thanks Meghan Meyer, Theodore Satterthwaite and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.”

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.