Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A small molecule HIF-1α stabilizer that accelerates diabetic wound healing

Abstract

Impaired wound healing and ulcer complications are a leading cause of death in diabetic patients. In this study, we report the design and synthesis of a cyclometalated iridium(III) metal complex 1a as a stabilizer of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). In vitro biophysical and cellular analyses demonstrate that this compound binds to Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and inhibits the VHL–HIF-1α interaction. Furthermore, the compound accumulates HIF-1α levels in cellulo and activates HIF-1α mediated gene expression, including VEGF, GLUT1, and EPO. In in vivo mouse models, the compound significantly accelerates wound closure in both normal and diabetic mice, with a greater effect being observed in the diabetic group. We also demonstrate that HIF-1α driven genes related to wound healing (i.e. HSP-90, VEGFR-1, SDF-1, SCF, and Tie-2) are increased in the wound tissue of 1a-treated diabetic mice (including, db/db, HFD/STZ and STZ models). Our study demonstrates a small molecule stabilizer of HIF-1α as a promising therapeutic agent for wound healing, and, more importantly, validates the feasibility of treating diabetic wounds by blocking the VHL and HIF-1α interaction.

Introduction

Poor wound healing, especially in diabetic patients, leads to substantial morbidity and mortality and can have a far-reaching socioeconomic impact1. The annual worldwide market for advanced wound healing products for hard-to-heal wounds and scars exceeds US$5 billion2. Wound healing in diabetic patients is compromised due to impaired wound contraction, reduced blood supply, and infection3,4,5. To date, several treatment strategies for diabetic wounds are available, including regular debridement, surgical revascularization, infection therapy, pressure-offloading, and bioengineered alternative tissue products6,7,8. However, most treatments are effective only for mild to moderate wounds and are not 100% effective in preventing the risk of amputation and recovering full skin functionalities9,10. Therefore. the development of novel drugs or therapies for the treatment of diabetic wound healing in clinical practice is desperately needed.

Wound healing is a systematic and dynamic process involving epithelialization, angiogenesis, granulation tissue formation, and wound contraction, all of which are regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-1α)11,12. In normal tissues, HIF-1α steady-state levels are low due to oxygen-dependent hydroxylation of HIF-1α by prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins (PHDs)13. This allows HIF-1α to combine with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor protein to generate a complex that is readily recognized by the proteasome and rapidly degraded14,15. Notably, hyperglycemia can decrease the stability of HIF-1α, leading to the inhibition of HIF-1α target gene expression, which could account for the poor healing and ulcer complications in diabetic patients16. This suggests that strategies to improve the stability of HIF-1α, such as by blocking the interaction between VHL and HIF-1α, could be a promising strategy for the treatment of diabetes wound complications. Currently, several reported inhibitors of PHDs as stabilizers for HIF-1α have entered clinical trials for the treatment of chronic anemia17. However, PHDs inhibitors are associated with side effects, such as fatal liver necrosis for FG-2216, raising concerns about their safety and tolerability for widespread use18.

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are attractive targets in drug discovery19. For example, venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor used for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, was the first small molecule inhibitor of PPIs approved by the FDA20. Ciulli and co-workers were the first to report a bona-fide VHL–HIF-1α protein–protein interaction inhibitor VH298 as a high-quality chemical probe of the HIF-signaling cascade in the hypoxia signaling pathway21. This inhibitor represented an attractive starting point to the development of potential new therapeutics targeting hypoxia signaling21,22,23.

Over the last decade, metal-based compounds possessing several promising advantages have been explored for targeting PPIs24. Metal complexes, with their high structural diversity and readily tunable steric and electronic properties, can adopt a wide range of geometrical shapes based on the oxidation state of their metal center, and the nature of their co-ligands25,26,27,28,29,30. The sophisticated three-dimensional geometries available to transition metal complexes might allow them to be more effective in generating compounds with suitable shapes and functional groups that are complementary to the binding regions of PPI surfaces31,32. In this study, we report the identification of an iridium(III) complex as a potent inhibitor of the VHL–HIF-1α PPI, which can effectively induce the accumulation of HIF-1α in cellulo and in vivo. Moreover, we also evaluated the potential of this complex on wound healing in three diabetic mouse models, including leptin-receptor-deficient (db/db), streptozotocin-induced (STZ) and high-fat diet/streptozotocin-treated (HFD/STZ) diabetic mice models, demonstrating that the blocking of the VHL and HIF-1α interaction is a viable strategy for treating diabetic ulcers.

Results

Screening and structure-based optimization of small molecules as potential HIF-1α stabilizers by monitoring HRE-driven luciferase activity

A library of cyclometalated Ir(III)/Rh(III) metal complexes 114 (as racemates) with diverse structures were selected for initial screening, in order to identify favorable substructures for the design of the next round of complexes (Fig. 1a). In cells, HIF-1α moves into the nucleus and binds to the hypoxia response element (HRE) in the promoters of transactivated genes. In this study, the dual-luciferase reporter (DLR) assay was performed to monitor the variations of HRE-driven luciferase activity induced by the complexes (Fig. 1f). Human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells were treated with complexes (10 μM) for 8 h, and the HRE-driven luciferase activity of the cell lysates was determined. Complexes that inhibit the interaction between VHL and HIF-1α would be expected to increase the level of HRE-driven luciferase activity in the cell lysates. The Rh(III) complex Rh(brpy)2(dmeophen) 1 (where brpy = 2-(4-bromophenyl)pyridine and dmeophen = 4,7-dimethoxy-1,10-phenanthroline) emerged as the top candidate in the first round of screening (Fig. 1b), with slightly higher activity compared to the positive control compound, P1 ((2S)-4-hydroxy-1-(2-(((Z)-2-(3-methoxybenzylidene)-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro benzofuran-6-yl)oxy)acetyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid) (Supplementary Fig. 1), a previously reported inhibitor of the VHL–HIF-1α PPI discovered by our group33.

Fig. 1: Effect of complexes on HIF-1α activation of the HRE-driven reporter as determined via a dual-luciferase reporter assay.
figure1

a Chemical structures of the small molecules used for preliminary screening. All complexes are as racemic PF6 salts. b Effect of complexes 114 on HIF-1α activation of the HRE-driven reporter. HEK293 cells were treated with complexes 114 or P1 for 8 h. Error bars represent the standard deviations (SD) of the results from three independent experiments. P values were calculated using a two-sided t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. DMSO group. c Chemical structures of the focused library of cyclometallated Ir(III) and Rh(III) complexes. d Effect of complexes 1a–1n on HIF-1α activation of the HRE-driven reporter. HEK293 cells were treated with complexes 1a–1n or P1 for 8 h. e Dose-dependent effect of complex 1a on HIF-1α-driven activity. HEK293 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of complex 1a for 8 h. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments), P values were calculated using a two-sided t-test. #P < 0.05 1a vs. P1, NS (not significant, P > 0.05) 1 vs. P1. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. DMSO group. f Schematic diagram of the DLR showing co-transfected HRE-luciferase and pRL-TK plasmids in HEK293 cells. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Based on the structure of complex 1, a focused library of 14 cyclometalated Rh(III) and Ir(III) complexes containing different C^N or N^N donor ligands were designed and synthesized (1a1n) (Fig. 1c). This library was enriched in the brpy C^N and dmeophen N^N ligands that were identified in the first round of screening to be favorable substructures for potency. In the second round of screening, the Ir(III) complex 1a, containing two 2-phenyl pyridines (ppy) C^N ligands and the dmeophen N^N ligand, showed the highest activation of HRE-drive luciferase activity and was about twice as potent as both the parent complex 1 as well as the positive control compound P1 (Fig. 1d). Notably, complex 1a demonstrated remarkable stability in a [d6]DMSO/D2O (9:1) solution for at least 7 days at 298 K as verified by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 2) and in acetonitrile/H2O (9:1) solution for at least 7 days at 298 K as determined by UV/Vis spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 3).

To further investigate the potency of complex 1a at modulating HIF-1α transcriptional activity, a dose–response assay was carried out. The results showed that complex 1a exhibited dose-dependent activation of HRE-driven luciferase activity in HEK293 cells (Fig. 1e). Moreover, the effects of the isolated ligands of complex 1a on HRE-drive luciferase activity were also studied. The results showed that neither brpy nor dmeophen had any significant effect on HRE-drive luciferase activity (Supplementary Fig. 4). This demonstrates the role of the Ir(III) center in coordinating the structure of the entire complex in order to confer HIF-1α transcriptional activity.

Complex \({\bf{1a}}\) binds to VHL and antagonizes the interaction of VHL–HIF-1α in cellulo

We performed co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments to further understand the mechanism of action of complex 1a. HEK293 cells were incubated with complex 1a for 2 h, and cell lysates were subjected to co-IP using VHL antibodies. The results showed that complex 1a dose-dependently reduced the amount of HIF-1α-OH co-precipitating with VHL, suggesting that it was able to inhibit the VHL–HIF-1α interaction in the treated cells (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 5).

Fig. 2: Complex 1a disrupts the VHL–HIF-1α interaction by selectively engaging VHL.
figure2

a Complex 1a inhibits the interaction of VHL–HIF-1α in cellulo. HEK293 cells were treated with vehicle DMSO (1% for 2 h), 1a (0.3, 1, 3, 6 and 9 μM for 2 h), VH298 (100 μM for 2 h), MG132 (20 μM for 3 h), or FG-4592 (100 μM for 2 h) before lysis. Cell lysates were collected and incubated with VHL antibody overnight at 4 °C. The proteins were immunoprecipitated using agarose beads. The levels of hydroxy-HIF-1α co-precipitated with VHL were detected using a hydroxy-HIF-1α antibody. b Cellular thermal shift assays to monitor cellular target engagement of VHL and HIF-1α. HEK293 cell lysates were treated with 1a (3 μM) at room temperature for 30 min and then heated at different temperatures ranging from 48 to 68 °C for 5 min. The protein samples were collected and detected by Western blotting using either VHL or PHD2 antibodies. c Fluorescence-based protein thermal shift assay of VBC in the presence or absence of VH298 (100 μM) and complex 1a (100 μM). d ITC titration of complex 1a (300 μM) into recombinant VHL protein (30 μM). ITC experiments were carried out in a MicroCal PEAQ-ITC isothermal titration calorimeter (Malvern Panalytical). e A competitive fluorescence polarization binding assay was performed to evaluate displacement of a fluorescent peptide (FAM-DEALAHyp-YIPD) binding to VBC (Kd = 421.50 ± 65.23 nM) by complex 1a. The IC50 of complex 1a (Kd = 2.06 μM) was determined to be 3.79 μM in the presence of 125 nM the fluorescent peptide and 450 nM VBC using a four-parameter logistic equation. f BLI kinetic analysis of the interaction between complex 1a and VBC. VBC was surface-immobilized to Ni-NTA biosensors. BLI sensorgrams showing the binding of complex 1a to surface-immobilized VBC. The Kd values for a 1:1 interaction were calculated from the kinetic fit (Kd = 6.74 ± 0.19 μM) and steady-state fit (Kd = 5.80 ± 0.64 μM), respectively. The Ni-NTA biosensor tips coated with His-tagged VBC were dipped in increasing concentrations of 1a (0.78, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, and 12.5 μM) to measure the binding affinity of 1a to VBC (kon = 5.22 × 102 M−1 s−1) and subsequently moved to wells containing buffer to measure dissociation rates (koff = 3.52 × 10−2 s−1). Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments for figures a and b, samples for figures c and e), P values were calculated using a two-sided t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. DMSO group. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

It is generally known that the efficacy of therapeutics is dependent on the extent of binding of the drug to the target protein. Therefore, the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) was performed to verify the engagement between complex 1a and VHL and PHD2. After incubating HEK293 cell lysates with complex 1a followed by heating to set temperatures, VHL and PHD2 levels in the soluble fraction were quantitated by Western blotting. In the presence of complex 1a (3 μM), an obvious shift of about 6 °C in the VHL melting curve was observed (Fig. 2b). This result indicates that complex 1a could stabilize VHL in cell lysates. In contrast, complex 1a had no appreciable effect on the thermal stabilization of PHD2 (Fig. 2b). We performed further biophysical experiments to demonstrate the direct binding of complex 1a to VHL in vitro. We first prepared plasmids to express and purify human recombinant VHL:ElonginB:ElonginC (VBC) complex (Supplementary Fig. 6a), which was verified using a pull-down assay (Supplementary Fig. 6b). Circular dichroism (CD) measurements showed a distinct shift of the signal when VBC complex was incubated with 3 μM of 1a in 1% DMSO, while no significant changes were observed with 1% DMSO alone, indicating that 1a could regulate VBC secondary structure via directly binding to VBC complex (Supplementary Fig. 6c). We also verified VBC’s high-affinity interaction with the HIF-1α peptide DEALAHyp-YIPD34,35,36, which is involved with mediating the VHL–HIF-1α interface (Supplementary Fig. 6d–f). The stabilization of complex 1a towards VBC was also corroborated using a fluorescence-based protein thermal shift assay (FTS), which revealed by a marked shift of the melting curve (ca. 3.0 °C) of purified VBC in the presence of complex 1a with VH298 (ca. 5.0 °C) as a positive control (Fig. 2c). Meanwhile, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) revealed a Kd value of 1.08 ± 0.20 μM (Fig. 2d) between complex 1a and VBC complex, similar to the Kd value of 2.06 μM determined using a competitive fluorescence polarization assay (Fig. 2e). The ITC data in Fig. 2d also indicates that 1a binds to VBC complex with a 1:1 stoichiometry, and that the binding between 1a and VBC is strongly enthalpy-driven (ΔG = −8.14 kcal/mol, −TΔS = −0.29 kcal/mol, ΔH = −7.85 kcal/mol), suggesting that hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions may play a key role in this binding. Moreover, the binding kinetics of 1a from VBC was characterized by biolayer interferometry (BLI), which revealed that 1a bound to the immobilized recombinant His-tagged VBC protein complex with Kd values of 6.74 ± 0.19 μM (kinetic fit) and 5.80 ± 0.64 μM (steady-state fit). These biophysical experiments are in good agreement for the Kd and stoichiometry for 1a with VBC. Taken together, these data demonstrate that 1a is able to bind to the VBC complex and displace a high-affinity HIF-1α peptide from VBC.

Finally, we showed that complex 1a was unlikely to activate HIF signaling via oxygen depletion, PHD inhibition, and/or proteasomal inhibition (Supplementary Fig. 7). Similarly, complex 1a had no effect on the level and activity of HIF-2α, which is essential in activating the COX-2 signaling axis in cancer cells (Supplementary Fig. 8)37,38. These results suggest that complex 1a selectively targets VHL and inhibits the VHL–HIF-1α interaction.

Complex 1a up-regulates HIF-1α target gene products in cellulo

Previous studies have demonstrated that inhibition of the interaction between VHL and HIF-1α results in an accumulation of HIF-1α and the up-regulation of HIF-1α target gene products, including VEGF39, GLUT140, and EPO41. Therefore, we investigated the effect of complex 1a on HIF-1α and HIF-1α target protein levels in cellulo. After incubation of HEK293 cells with complex 1a for 2 h, the expression levels of HIF-1α, VEGF, GLUT1 and EPO were increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3a). This can be attributed at least in part to the disruption of the VHL–HIF-1α interaction by complex 1a.

Fig. 3: Effect of complex \({\bf{1a}}\) on HIF-1α target gene products in cellulo.
figure3

a Effect of complex 1a on specific proteins (GLUT1, VEGF, and EPO) mediated by HIF-1α in HEK293 cells. HEK293 cells were treated with 1a for 2 h. Cell lysates were collected and analyzed by Western blotting. b Complex 1a has no effect on HIF-1α accumulation in a VHL null cancer cell line. A498 (VHL-null), or HEK293 cells were treated with 1% DMSO, 1a (3 μM), VH298 (100 μM), and FG-4592 (100 μM) for 2 h before lysis. c Effect of complex 1a on EPO, GLUT1, and VEGF levels in HEK293 cells with or without HIF-1α knockdown. Left: The expression levels of EPO, GLUT1, and VEGF in HEK293 cells with or without knockdown HIF-1α in the presence or absence of 1a. Right: Densitometry analysis of EPO, GLUT1, and VEGF levels on the Western blot. HIF-1α siRNA (sense, 5′-CUGAUGACCAGCAACUUGA-3′, antisense, 5′-UCAAGUUGCUGGUCAUCAG-3′). Negative control (NC) siRNA (sense, 5′-UAGCGACUAAACACAUCAA-3′, antisense, 5′-UUGAUGUGUUUAGUCGCUA-3′). Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments), P values were calculated using a two-sided t-test. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 HIF-1α siRNA vs. NC siRNA, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 1a vs. vehicle/DMSO group, respectively. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To confirm that the increase of HIF-1α was due to the inhibition of VHL activity, clear cell renal cell carcinoma A498 cells, which lack functional VHL, were treated with 1a or VH298, a potent inhibitor of the VHL–HIF-1α PPI21. The PHD inhibitor FG-4592 was also used as a reference compound. As expected, no increase in HIF-1α levels was observed in A498 cells treated with 1a or VH298, whereas HEK293 cells showed a clear accumulation of HIF-1α in the presence of VHL inhibitors (Fig. 3b). These data provide evidence for the stabilization of HIF-1α by 1a via binding to VHL and antagonizing the interaction of VHL–HIF-1α in cellulo.

A knockdown assay was performed to further verify the on-target effect of complex 1a. EPO, GLUT1, and VEGF are target genes regulated by HIF-1α. As expected, knockdown of HIF-1α in HEK293 cells using siHIF-1α reduced the accumulation of EPO, GLUT1, and VEGF compared with control cells (Fig. 3c). Importantly, when compared its effect in normal cells, 1a was less able to increase the accumulation of EPO, GLUT1, and VEGF in HIF-1α knockdown cells. This provides evidence that 1a acts via a HIF-1α-dependent pathway in order to exert its on-target effects in HEK293 cells. However, as only partial effects of HIF-1α knockdown are observed, we do not rule out the possibility that other pathways could be involved in mediating the on-target effects of complex 1a. Taken together, the above results suggest that complex 1a can be potentially developed as a drug candidate for the treatment of human diseases related to impaired angiogenesis or wound healing, resulting from effective and specific blockade of the VHL–HIF-1α interaction.

Complex \({\bf{1a}}\) accelerates wound healing in diabetic mice

Inspired by the in vitro results, the effect of complex 1a on wound healing in vivo was investigated in db/db, STZ, and HFD/STZ diabetic mice. The db/db and age-matched wild-type (WT) mice were locally administered with vehicle (0.8% w/v Carbopol 974P NF in distilled water, pH 7.0) and 0.25 mg/mL complex 1a (mixed in 0.8% w/v Carbopol 974P NF in distilled water) every other day for 8 days, respectively (Fig. 4a). The local application of complex 1a did not affect body weight during the experimental period, for both WT and db/db mice (Supplementary Fig. 9). STZ mice were obtained by a single injection of high-dose streptozotocin (150 mg/kg) (Supplementary Fig. 10a)42. HFD/STZ mice were generated by 8 weeks HFD feeding, followed by low-dose streptozotocin injection for 7 days (40 mg/kg/day) (Supplementary Fig. 11a)43. 3 days after streptozotocin injection, STZ or HFD/STZ mice with fasting blood glucose levels between 15 and 28 mmol/L were considered as diabetic mice and used in wound healing experiments. STZ and HFD/STZ mice were intraperitoneally injected with either vehicle (PEG 400:distilled water = 6:4, v/v) or 1.25 mg/kg complex 1a every other day for 8 days, respectively. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis confirmed the presence of iridium in skin samples of dosed mice from STZ and HFD/STZ mice, demonstrating that complex 1a could reach the target area (Supplementary Fig. 12). In both HFD/STZ and STZ models, neither diabetic nor normal control mice (NC) showed obvious changes in blood glucose levels (Supplementary Fig. 13a and b) or body weight (Supplementary Fig. 13c and d) after exposure to complex 1a.

Fig. 4: Complex \({\bf{1a}}\) (0.25 mg/mL) accelerates wound closure in db/db mice.
figure4

a Timeline for in vivo experiments. b Image of representative wound (left) and wound closure rate (right) (n = 5 mice). c H&E and Masson’s trichrome staining of dorsal skin section and skin thickness from the top of the epidermis to the bottom of the dermis in mice after 8 days post-injury (n = 4 mice). Scale bar = 200 μm. d Laser doppler imager in dorsal skin: representative images were shown for each group (left) and baseline perfusion on back skin of mice (right) after 2 days post-injury (dotted line circle represents the wound bed in mice of each group and arrow represents perfusion intensity (n = 5 mice). e CD31 and DAPI double staining in wound bed of mice after 8 days post-injury (n = 4 mice). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are expressed as means ± SD, P values were calculated using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 WT vs. db/db, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 1a vs. vehicle.

In the wound healing experiment, two full-thickness skin lesions were excised in the interscapular area of each mouse, and the wound area was monitored every other day. In the WT/NC groups, the rates of wound closure were approximately 21%/22%, 42%/41%, 63%/57%, and 77%/74% after 2 days, 4 days, 6 days, and 8 days post-injury, respectively (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Figs. 10b and 11b). Treatment of complex 1a in WT/NC mice accelerated wound closure compared to the vehicle group, approaching about 64%/65% of closure after 4 days and almost complete wound closure by 8 days (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Figs. 10b and 11b). The wound closure rates of the diabetic mice group were lower than those of the WT/NC group on corresponding days; only about 14%, 62% and 44% of the wound was healed after 8 days post-injury for db/db, HFD/STZ and STZ mice, respectively, compared to 77%/74% for WT/NC mice (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Figs. 10b and 11b). As expected, complex 1a accelerated wound closure in all three diabetic mouse models. The rates of wound closure in 1a-treated db/db mice were about 28% after 4 days and 40% after 8 days post-injury (cf. 9% and 14% in untreated db/db mice, respectively) (Fig. 4b); the rates of wound closure in 1a-treated HFD/STZ mice were 62% after 4 days and 82% after 8 days post-injury (cf. 30% and 62% in untreated HFD/STZ mice, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 11b); and the rates of wound closure in 1a treated STZ mice were 50% after 4 days and 76% after 8 days post-injury (cf. 24% and 44% in untreated STZ mice, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 10b). Taken together, these results indicate that complex 1a could accelerate wound healing in both normal and diabetic mice, with a greater effect being observed in the diabetic group.

The epithelial thickness of the regenerated skin in each group was compared using H&E staining and Masson’s trichrome staining. Encouragingly, in both normal and diabetic mice groups, complex 1a increased skin thickness after 8 days post-injury (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figs. 10c and 11c), and also enhanced collagen deposition in wound areas (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figs. 10c and 11c). One of the key processes related to wound healing is tissue angiogenesis. Skin perfusion pressure tests indicated that complex 1a remarkably increased skin blood flow rate after 2 days post-injury in both normal and diabetic mice (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Figs. 10d and 11d). Moreover, CD31 immunostaining images showed that complex 1a significantly enhanced microvessel density in the wound areas in both normal and diabetic groups (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Figs. 10e and 11e). Taken together, these results indicate that complex 1a is effective at both increasing wound healing and angiogenesis in vivo, in both normal and diabetic mice.

The expression of HIF-1α, VEGF, GLUT1, and EPO was significantly increased in the wound tissue of 1a-treated WT/NC, db/db, HFD/STZ and STZ groups at 8 days post-wounding, compared with the vehicle mice as shown by Western blotting (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Figs. 14a and 15a). The expression levels of HIF-1α and its target genes were significantly lower in the diabetic group compared to the WT/NC group, demonstrating that HIF-1α signal transduction was impaired (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Figs. 14a and 15a)44. Moreover, HIF-1α target genes essential for wound healing cell motility (i.e. HSP-90), angiogenesis (i.e. VEGFR-1), and recruitment of CAG (i.e. SDF-1, SCF, and Tie-2) were also increased in the wound tissue of 1a-treated diabetic mice as revealed by qRT-PCR, with weaker effects being observed in the WT/NC mice (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Figs. 14b and 15b, Supplementary Table S2). Taken together, these results provide a mechanistic basis for the observed enhancement of wound healing and angiogenesis induced by complex 1a in diabetic mice.

Fig. 5: Complex \({\bf{1a}}\) (0.25 mg/mL) activates gene expression regulated by HIF-1α in db/db mice at 8 days post-injury.
figure5

a Western blot analyses and quantitation of HIF-1α, VEGF, GLUT1, and EPO in wound tissue (n = 3 mice). All proteins were normalized by β-actin. b The mRNA levels of HIF-1α target genes involved in wound healing were analyzed by qRT-PCR in wound tissues (n = 5 mice). Data are expressed as means ± SD, P values were calculated using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 WT vs. db/db, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 1a vs. vehicle. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Discussion

World diabetes patients are expected to reach 400 million by 203010. Wound healing complications, leading to foot ulcers or even amputation, are a major factor contributing to diabetes-induced mortality45. Therefore, novel drugs are needed for promoting wound healing, particularly in diabetic patients. HIF-1α is critical in wound healing because it plays a key role in regulating vital processes involved in tissue repair16,46. PHD inhibitors have been previously developed as HIF-1α stabilizers17. Several PHDs inhibitors have been introduced into clinical trials for anemia or ischemia, including BAY-853934, FG-4592, FG-2216 and GSK1278863. Of these, FG-4592 has entered phase 3 trials to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease17. The effectiveness of PHDs inhibitors in clinical trials demonstrates that HIF-1α signaling can serve as a drug target for angiogenesis-related diseases16. However, there are a few disadvantages to PHDs inhibitors, such as poor target selectivity and adverse side effects47. For example, during a phase 2 trial of FG-2216, many patients exhibited abnormal liver enzyme test results and one patient developed fatal hepatic necrosis18. Previous studies have shown that hyperglycemia destabilizes HIF-1α and impairs its function in diabetic mice through a VHL-dependent mechanism16. Thus, stabilizing HIF-1α via blocking the downstream interaction of HIF-1α and VHL is a potentially superior strategy to inhibiting upstream PHDs, in order to avoid HIF-independent off-target effects as has been observed with PHD inhibitors in clinical development. In this context, interrupting the VHL–HIF-1α PPI may be a highly effective strategy for the treatment of diabetic wounds21,35,48. Until now, few inhibitors of the interaction between VHL and HIF-1α have been discovered21,22,33,35,49,50, and only VH298 has been reported to promote enthesis healing and wound healing in vivo51,52.

Recently, Group 9 metal complexes have emerged as versatile scaffolds for drug discovery or bioanalysis due to their easily adjustable reactivity (from liable to inert), high aqueous solubility, inertness to air and synthetic accessibility31,53. The unique but adaptable properties of metal compounds, including their electronic properties, chemical reactivities, and molecular architectures, enable them to adopt three-dimensional geometries that can probe hitherto unexplored hotspots of the binding site of proteins. In this study, we report the Ir(III) complex 1a as the first metal-based inhibitor of the VHL–HIF-1α interaction. Complex 1a was identified after two rounds of screening, allowing preliminary structure–activity relationship (SAR) trends to be drawn for this series of compounds. In the first round of screening, the Rh(III) complex 1, containing two brpy C^N ligands and a 4,7-dmeophen N^N ligand, displayed the highest activation of HIF-1α transcriptional activity (Fig. 1a and b). As no other complexes in the first round of screening contain bromine groups, this could suggest the importance of the bromine group is activating HIF-1α activity. Complex 9, containing fluorine groups, showed low activity, indicating that fluorine is less preferred than bromine for potency. Moreover, complexes 6 and 7 bearing C^N ligands derived from 2-phenylquinoline (phq) also showed low activity, suggesting that C^N ligands based on 2-phenyl pyridine (ppy) are more favored. After complex 1, the Rh(III) complex 5 containing the 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (dpphen) N^N ligand was the next most potent candidate. This suggests that conjugating phenyl groups to the 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) N^N ligand could also be somewhat tolerated, although the methoxy groups of 4,7-dmophen (as in complex 1) were still preferred for activating HIF-1α transcriptional activity.

A focused library of 14 cyclometalated Rh(III) and Ir(III) complexes (1a1n) containing different C^N or N^N donor ligands was subsequently synthesized based on the structure of the lead complex 1 (Fig. 1c). Analysis of the data from the second round of screening (Fig. 1d) revealed additional SAR trends. The most potent complex 1a, bearing containing two 2-phenylpyridine (ppy) C^N ligands and the dmeophen N^N ligand, is substantially more active than the Rh(III) congener 1b, indicating that the Ir(III) metal center is very important for the biological potency of 1a. In contrast, the Ir(III) congener (1c) of the original parent Rh(III) complex 1 showed drastically reduced activity, indicating that for this combination of C^N and N^N ligands, the Rh(III) center is greatly preferred. Upon comparing the Ir(III) complexes 1c and 1a, it can be seen that changing the C^N ligand from brpy (as in 1c) to ppy (as in 1a) vastly improves the activity of the complex. After 1a, the second-most potent compound was the Ir(III) complex 1g, which differs from 1a only by the presence of an additional methyl group at the 8-position of the ppy C^N ligand. However, adding a methyl group to the 6-position of the ppy ligand (as in 1e) substantially weakens the activity of the complex, indicating that steric factors are highly important for the interaction of the complexes with the target. Upon comparing the N^N ligands, it can be seen that the dmeophen ligand of the parent complex still remains the preferred scaffold. For example, changing from 1a to 1h, which has the 4,4′-dimethoxy-2,2′-bipyridine (dmobpy) ligand rather than dmeophen, led to a decrease in activity, indicating that the additional fused phenyl ring in 1a is important for biological potency. Replacing the two methoxy groups of 1a with hydrogen groups (as in 1i or 1j), bromine groups (as in 1k or 1l) or phenyl groups (as in 1m or 1n) also led to drastically reduced activity for both the Rh(III) and Ir(III) congeners, respectively. This indicates that the biological activity of the complexes is highly sensitive to the nature of the substituents on the N^N ligand.

Complex 1a selectively targeted VHL in vitro as revealed by CETSA and biophysical experiments (including ITC, FP, and BLI), leading to the disruption of the VHL–HIF-1α interaction in cellulo as shown by co-IP, and the stimulation of HIF-1α-directed signaling as revealed using the DLR assay. Moreover, complex 1a effectively up-regulated HIF-1α target gene products in cellulo. HIF-1α levels are decreased under hyperglycemia16. In murine diabetes models, complex 1a induced the accumulation of HIF-1α and the activation of HIF-1α-driven genes that are important for angiogenesis, including VEGFR, SDF-1α and SCF. Importantly, complex 1a significantly improved wound healing and angiogenesis in diabetic mice. This study, therefore, demonstrates the validity of inhibiting the VHL–HIF-1α interaction as a therapeutic avenue for diabetic wound healing via both topical and intraperitoneal delivery routes.

VH298 is the most effective VHL–HIF-1α PPI inhibitor described to date, and has ca. 100-fold stronger binding affinity to VHL than complex 1a21,22,23. VH298 engages with high affinity and specificity with VHL as its only major cellular target, leading to selective on-target accumulation of hydroxylated HIF-α in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent fashion in different cell lines21. As an alternative scaffold class, the metal complex 1a has shown promising wound healing results in in vivo models of diabetes. In this study, HFD/STZ mice were prepared through a HFD with subsequent multiple injections of a low dose of STZ. The key advantage of this model is to mimic the slow pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes that occurs in humans, encompassing the slow development from adult-onset diet-induced obesity to glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, the resulting compensatory insulin release and finally STZ-induced partial β-cell death. In this type 2 diabetes model, complex 1a showed promising wound healing activity when administered via intraperitoneal injection. Additionally, the topical application of complex 1a was performed on another widely used diabetic model, db/db mice, to confirm that our compound could also promote wound closure when applied externally.

While the binding affinity of complex 1a is around 100-fold lower than that of the existing VHL–HIF-1α inhibitor VH298, we have demonstrated here that administering complex 1a at higher dosages (over 30-fold higher compared to the dosage of VH298 used in a previous study52) and through various routes can lead to a significant accumulation of complex 1a at injured skin tissue and promising wound healing effects in animal models of diabetes (including db/db, HFD/STZ and STZ) without significant toxicity. Hence, this report provides an additional scaffold for the development of wound healing therapeutics and also validates the feasibility of VHL–HIF-1α inhibitors on treating diabetic wounds through different routes of drug administrations, including intraperitoneal injection and topical application. However, it should be noted that the db/db, HFD/STZ and STZ models used in this study each have their own limitations and cannot fully mimic human diabetes54,55. Thus, further research is still needed in order to validate VHL–HIF-1α inhibition as a target for wound healing in clinical practice.

Methods

General synthesis of [M2(C^N)4Cl2] complexes

Cyclometalated dichloro-bridged dimers of the general formula [M2(C^N)4Cl2], where M = Ir(III)/Rh(III), were synthesized according to a literature method56. In brief, MCl3·3H2O was heated to 130 °C with 2.2 equivalents of cyclometallated C^N ligands in 3:1 methoxymethanol and deionized water under a nitrogen atmosphere for 12 h. The reaction was cooled to room temperature, and the product was filtered and washed with three portions of deionized water and then three portions of ether (3 × 50 mL) to yield the corresponding dimer.

General synthesis of [M(C^N)2(N^N)]PF6 complexes

These complexes were synthesized using a modified literature method56,57,58. Briefly, a suspension of [M2(C^N)4Cl2] (0.2 mM) and corresponding N^N (0.44 mM) ligands in a mixture of dichloromethane:methanol (1:1, 20 mL) was refluxed overnight under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting solution was allowed to cool to room temperature and was filtered to remove the unreacted cyclometalated dimer. To the filtrate, an aqueous solution of ammonium hexafluorophosphate (excess) was added and the filtrate was reduced in volume by rotary evaporation until precipitation of the crude product occurred. The precipitate was then filtered and washed with several portions of water (2 × 50 mL) followed by diethyl ether (2 × 50 mL). The product was recrystallized by acetonitrile:diethyl ether vapor diffusion to yield the titled compound. Complexes 114 and 1a1m were characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and elemental analysis.

Transient transfection59

HEK293 cells were seeded in six-well plates 24 h before transfection. HRE-luciferase plasmid (4 μg) and pRL-TK plasmid (4 μg) and TurboFect reagent (6 μL) were mixed together in a serum-free DMEM medium and the resulting solution was incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The mixture was added dropwise to the HEK293 cells in the wells. The cells were incubated for 32 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator before use.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay59

The inhibition of HIF-1α activity was assayed by a reporter assay using a DLR assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Transiently transfected cells were treated with complexes or P1 for 8 h before measurement. Luciferase activity was integrated over a 10 s period and measured using a spectrophotometer (Spectra-max M5, Molecular Devices, USA). The results were standardized with the activity of Renilla luciferase. All data are expressed as means ± SD.

Co-immunoprecipitation60

The inhibition of VHL–HIF-1α interactions was investigated using a co-IP assay following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, HEK293 cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were treated with indicated concentrations of complex 1a, P1 (30 μM) or DMSO for 2 h. After cell lysis and protein lysate separation, 100 μg of total protein was incubated with VHL antibody (1:1000; GTX101087, GeneTex) at 4 °C overnight. The proteins were immunoprecipitated using agarose beads. The levels of co-precipitated HIF-1α-OH were visualized using ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare).

Western blotting59

After electrophoresis of protein samples (30 µg of total protein) on SDS–PAGE gels, the samples were transferred to a PVDF membrane and incubated at room temperature with a blocking solution for 1 h. The membrane was treated with primary antibodies and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After 1 h incubation with the secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table S1), protein bands were visualized using ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare).

Cellular thermal shift assay61

CETSA was performed to monitor the target engagement of 1a in HEK293 cell lysates. Briefly, 1 × 106 HEK293 cells were lysed and lysates were collected, diluted in PBS and separated into aliquots. Each aliquot was treated with 1a (10 μM) or DMSO. 30 min after incubation at room temperature, the complex-treated lysates were divided into 50 μL in each of PCR tubes and heated individually at different temperatures (Veriti thermal cycler, Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies). The heated lysates were centrifuged and the supernatants were analyzed on SDS–PAGE followed by immunoblotting analysis by probing with antibodies.

Isothermal titration calorimetry

ITC experiments were carried in a MicroCal PEAQ-ITC isothermal titration calorimeter (Malvern Panalytical)22. Briefly, complex 1a and recombinant VBC complex were dialyzed into the ITC buffer (20 mM Bis–Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 1% DMSO) overnight. Complex 1a (300 μM) was titrated against 30 μM VBC complex, consisting of 19 injections of 2 μL complex 1a solution at a rate of 2 s/μL at 150 s time intervals. An initial injection of ligand (0.4 μL) was made and discarded during data analysis. The experiment was carried out at 25 °C while stirring at 750 rpm. The generated data were fitted to a single binding site model using the Setup MicroCal PEAQ-ITC Analysis Software provided by the manufacturer. Three control titrations, in which (1) 1a is titrated into VBC buffer; (2) VBC buffer is titrated into VBC complex; (3) VBC buffer is titrated into VBC buffer, were also analyzed by using a composite model.

Biolayer interferometry

The binding affinities of inhibitors to recombinant VBC were measured by BLI on an OctetRed 96 (Fortebio). Ni-NTA biosensors were loaded with 25 μg/mL His-tagged VBC in BLI kinetics buffer (PBS buffer containing 0.02% Tween 20 and 0.1% BSA) with a binding value of ca. 5.5 nm, washed in the same buffer and transferred to wells containing complex 1a or HIF-1α peptide at indicated concentrations in the same buffer. The Ni-NTA biosensor tips coated with His-tagged protein complex were dipped in increasing concentrations of 1a or HIF-1α for 300 s and subsequently dissociated in the wells containing buffer for another 300 s. Negative control performed with BLI kinetics buffer against Ni-NTA biosensors was subtracted from the sample response against VBC-loaded Ni-NTA biosensors. The equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) value for a 1:1 interaction was calculated from the kinetic fit and steady-state fit, respectively. The Kd and associated standard errors were calculated using Octet analysis software.

Knockdown assay

HEK293 cells were seeded in the six-well plate at 80% confluence in DMEM medium for 24 h. Lipofectamine 3000 reagent and siRNA were gently mixed and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Remove growth medium from cells and replace with 0.5 mL of fresh medium. Then the mixture of 500 μL was added to each well. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator for 72 h post-transfection before further research.

Animal experimental42,62

Male db/db mice were purchased from the Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China). Male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the animal facility of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau. All mice were housed in the animal facility of the University of Macau, maintained at 23 ± 1 °C (50 ± 5% relative humidity) with 12 h light/dark cycles with free access to water and a regular chow diet. For the db/db model, 10‒12 weeks old WT and db/db mice were randomly divided into two groups, respectively. The vehicle and 1a groups were locally treated with vehicle (0.8% w/v Carbopol 974P NF in distilled water, pH 7.0, Chineway, Shanghai, China) or 0.25 mg/mL complex 1a (mixed in 0.8% w/v Carbopol 974P NF in distilled water) every other day for 8 days. For the STZ model, 10‒12 weeks old mice were randomly divided into two groups. One group of mice were intraperitoneally injected with streptozocin (150 mg/kg body weight, 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 4.5, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to induce diabetes, and the other group of mice was intraperitoneally injected with the same volume of citrate buffer (NC). The mice were maintained for 3 days. After fasted for 6 h, the blood glucose levels were measured by a One-Touch Ultra glucometer (Lifescan, Milpitas, CA, USA). For the HFD/STZ model, 6‒8 weeks old mice were randomly divided into two groups, fed a regular chow diet (NC) or HFD (60% calories from fat, Trophic Animal Feed High-Tech Co., Nantong, Jiangsu, China) for 8 weeks. Then, the HFD-fed mice were received a daily intraperitoneal injection of streptozocin (40 mg/kg) for 7 days. For STZ and HFD/STZ models, the mice with blood glucose between 15.0 and 28.0 mmol/L, accompanied by manifestations of polydipsia, polyuria and polyphagia, were considered to be diabetic mice for the following experiments. The NC, STZ and HFD/STZ mice were randomly allocated into two groups, respectively. The vehicle and 1a groups were intraperitoneally injected with the vehicle (PEG 400:distilled water = 6:4, v/v) and 1.25 mg/kg complex 1a every other day for 8 days. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee of the University of Macau (No. ICMS-AEC-2014-06). All experiments complied with all relevant ethical regulations.

Skin wound model16

Mice were anesthetized by inhalation of 3% isoflurane. Prior to excision for wounds, dorsal hair was shaved with an electric clipper followed by a depilatory cream. The skin was rinsed with alcohol and two full-thickness wounds extending through the panniculus carnosus were created on the dorsum on each side of midline, using a 6-mm biopsy punch. Digital photographs were recorded on the day of surgery and every other day post-injury. A circular reference was placed alongside to permit correction for the distance between the camera and the animals. Wound area was quantitated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health); wound closure rates were calculated as the following formulation: (wound area on day 0−wound area on day X)/wound area on day 0 × 100%.

Histological analysis and microvessel density assay43

After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, the skin samples were embedded in paraffin and sectioned (5 μm). For histological evaluation, sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated followed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome staining. For immunohistochemical staining of CD31, the wound tissue sections were deparaffinized and stained with CD31 antibody (1:1000; ABclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA). The slides were examined under ×400 magnification to identify the area with the highest vascular density, and five randomly high-power field areas of the highest microvessel density were selected for each section. The average was calculated as the microvessel density of this sample.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. All experimental data were presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation), and each experiment has performed a minimum of three times. Significant differences between groups were determined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) unless otherwise noted. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout the study.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.  Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Callaghan, M. J. et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate normal and diabetic wound healing by increasing endogenous FGF-2 release. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 121, 130–141 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jackson, W. M., Nesti, L. J. & Tuan, R. S. Concise review: clinical translation of wound healing therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 1, 44–50 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Falanga, V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet 366, 1736–1743 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arya, A. K., Tripathi, R., Kumar, S. & Tripathi, K. Recent advances on the association of apoptosis in chronic non healing diabetic wound. World J. Diabetes 5, 756 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Long, M. et al. An essential role of NRF2 in diabetic wound healing. Diabetes 65, 780–793 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Powers, J. G., Higham, C., Broussard, K. & Phillips, T. J. Wound healing and treating wounds: chronic wound care and management. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 74, 607–625 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ranjbar-Mohammadi, M., Rabbani, S., Bahrami, S. H., Joghataei, M. & Moayer, F. Antibacterial performance and in vivo diabetic wound healing of curcumin loaded gum tragacanth/poly (ε-caprolactone) electrospun nanofibers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 69, 1183–1191 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Braun, L. R., Fisk, W. A., Lev-Tov, H., Kirsner, R. S. & Isseroff, R. R. Diabetic foot ulcer: an evidence-based treatment update. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 15, 267–281 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhong, S., Zhang, Y. & Lim, C. Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2, 510–525 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tam, J. C. W. et al. The in vivo and in vitro diabetic wound healing effects of a 2-herb formula and its mechanisms of action. J. Ethnopharmacol. 134, 831–838 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gill, S. E. & Parks, W. C. Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: regulators of wound healing. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 40, 1334–1347 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sunkari, V. G. et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), which contributes to improved wound healing in diabetic mice. Wound Repair Regen. 23, 98–103 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Stroka, D. M. et al. HIF-1 is expressed in normoxic tissue and displays an organ-specific regulation under systemic hypoxia. FASEB J. 15, 2445–2453 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee, K. et al. LW6, a novel HIF-1 inhibitor, promotes proteasomal degradation of HIF-1alpha via upregulation of VHL in a colon cancer cell line. Biochem. Pharmacol. 80, 982–989 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lee, J. W., Bae, S. H., Jeong, J. W., Kim, S. H. & Kim, K. W. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1)alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp. Mol. Med. 36, 1–12 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Botusan, I. R. et al. Stabilization of HIF-1 alpha is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19426–19431 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Provenzano, R. et al. Oral hypoxia–inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat (FG-4592) for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 982–991 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Haase, V. H. HIF-prolyl hydroxylases as therapeutic targets in erythropoiesis and iron metabolism. Hemodial. Int. 21, S110–S124 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wells, J. A. & McClendon, C. L. Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces. Nature 450, 1001–1009 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mullard, A. Pioneering apoptosis-targeted cancer drug poised for FDA approval. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 147–U183 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Frost, J. et al. Potent and selective chemical probe of hypoxic signalling downstream of HIF-alpha hydroxylation via VHL inhibition. Nat. Commun. 7, 13312 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Galdeano, C. et al. Structure-guided design and optimization of small molecules targeting the protein–protein interaction between the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase and the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunit with in vitro nanomolar affinities. J. Med. Chem. 57, 8657–8663 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Soares, P. et al. Group-based optimization of potent and cell-active inhibitors of the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase: structure–activity relationships leading to the chemical probe (2 S, 4 R)-1-((S)-2-(1-cyanocyclopropanecarboxamido)-3, 3-dimethylbutanoyl)-4-hydroxy-N-(4-(4-methylthiazol-5-yl) benzyl) pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (VH298). J. Med. Chem. 61, 599–618 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hartinger, C. G., Metzler-Nolte, N. & Dyson, P. J. Challenges and opportunities in the development of organometallic anticancer drugs. Organometallics 31, 5677–5685 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Farrer, N. J. & Sadler, P. J. Photochemotherapy: targeted activation of metal anticancer complexes. Aust. J. Chem. 61, 669–674 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Muhammad, N. & Guo, Z. J. Metal-based anticancer chemotherapeutic agents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 19, 144–153 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Turkoglu, G., Heinemann, F. W. & Burzlaff, N. Transition metal complexes bearing a 2,2-bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)propionate ligand: one methyl more matters. Dalton Trans. 40, 4678–4686 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gothe, Y., Marzo, T., Messori, L. & Metzler-Nolte, N. Iridium(I) compounds as prospective anticancer agents: solution chemistry, antiproliferative profiles and protein interactions for a series of iridium(I) N-heterocyclic carbene complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 12487–12494 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Derrick, J. S. et al. Stereochemistry of metal tetramethylcyclam complexes directed by an unexpected anion effect. Dalton Trans. 46, 13166–13170 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Li, G., Sun, L., Ji, L. & Chao, H. Ruthenium(ii) complexes with dppz: from molecular photoswitch to biological applications. Dalton Trans. 45, 13261–13276 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Leung, C. H., Lin, S., Zhong, H. J. & Ma, D. L. Metal complexes as potential modulators of inflammatory and autoimmune responses. Chem. Sci. 6, 871–884 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Leung, C. H. et al. Metal complexes as inhibitors of transcription factor activity. Coord. Chem. Rev. 257, 3139–3151 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yang, C. et al. Discovery of a VHL and HIF1alpha interaction inhibitor with in vivo angiogenic activity via structure-based virtual screening. Chem. Commun. 52, 12837–12840 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lucas, X., Van Molle, I. & Ciulli, A. Surface probing by fragment-based screening and computational methods identifies ligandable pockets on the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase. J. Med. Chem. 61, 7387–7393 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Buckley, D. L. et al. Targeting the von Hippel–Lindau E3 ubiquitin ligase using small molecules to disrupt the VHL/HIF-1 alpha interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4465–4468 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Van Molle, I. et al. Dissecting fragment-based lead discovery at the von Hippel–Lindau protein: hypoxia inducible factor 1α protein–protein interface. Chem. Biol. 19, 1300–1312 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xue, X. & Shah, Y. M. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2α is essential in activating the COX2/mPGES-1/PGE 2 signaling axis in colon cancer. Carcinogenesis 34, 163–169 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhao, J., Du, F., Shen, G., Zheng, F. & Xu, B. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor-2 in digestive system cancers. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1600 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen, P. Y. et al. The docking protein FRS2 alpha is a critical regulator of VEGF receptors signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5514–5519 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hamed, S. et al. Topical erythropoietin promotes wound repair in diabetic rats. J. Investig. Dermatol. 130, 287–294 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sen, C. K. Wound healing essentials: let there be oxygen. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 1–18 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Li, D. et al. Antidiabetic effect of flavonoids from Malus toringoides (Rehd.) Hughes leaves in diabetic mice and rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 153, 561–567 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Qi, W. W. et al. High levels of pigment epithelium-derived factor in diabetes impair wound healing through suppression of Wnt signaling. Diabetes 64, 1407–1419 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ruthenborg, R. J., Ban, J. J., Wazir, A., Takeda, N. & Kim, J. W. Regulation of wound healing and fibrosis by hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Mol. Cells 37, 637–643 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Levin, M. E. Management of the diabetic foot: preventing amputation. South. Med. J. 95, 10–20 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hong, W. X. et al. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor in wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 3, 390–399 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Rabinowitz, M. H. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain oxygen sensors: tricking the body into mounting orchestrated survival and repair responses. J. Med. Chem. 56, 9369–9402 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Muchnik, E. & Kaplan, J. HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for anemia. Expert. Opin. Investig. Drugs 20, 645–656 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xue, X. et al. Discovery of novel inhibitors disrupting HIF-1α/von Hippel–Lindau interaction through shape-based screening and cascade docking. PeerJ 4, e2757 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Buckley, D. L. et al. Small‐Molecule Inhibitors of the Interaction between the E3 Ligase VHL and HIF1α. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 11463–11467 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Qiu, S. et al. Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein antagonist, VH298, promotes functional activities of tendon-derived stem cells and accelerates healing of entheses in rats by inhibiting ubiquitination of hydroxy-HIF-1α. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 505, 1063–1069 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Qiu, S. et al. Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein antagonist VH298 improves wound healing in streptozotocin-induced hyperglycaemic rats by activating hypoxia-inducible factor-(HIF-) 1 signalling. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 1897174 (2019).

  53. 53.

    Ma, D. L., Chan, D. S. H. & Leung, C. H. Group 9 organometallic compounds for therapeutic and bioanalytical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 3614–3631 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kleinert, M. et al. Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 140 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Srinivasan, K. & Ramarao, P. Animal model in type 2 diabetes research: an overview. Indian J. Med. Res. 125, 451 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lowry, M. S., Hudson, W. R., Pascal, R. A. & Bernhard, S. Accelerated luminophore discovery through combinatorial synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 14129–14135 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Schmid, B., Garces, F. O. & Watts, R. J. Synthesis and characterizations of cyclometalated iridium(III) solvento complexes. Inorg. Chem. 33, 9–14 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    King, K. A., Spellane, P. J. & Watts, R. J. Excited-state properties of a triply ortho-metalated iridium(III) complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 1431–1432 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Yang, C. et al. Anticancer osmium complex inhibitors of the HIF-1α and p300 protein-protein interaction. Sci. Rep. 7, 42860 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yang, C. et al. A Rhodium(III)-based inhibitor of lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 as an epigenetic modulator in prostate cancer cells. J. Med. Chem. 60, 2597–2603 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Liu, L. J. et al. Antagonizing STAT5B dimerization with an osmium complex. Sci. Rep. 6, 36044 (2016).

  62. 62.

    Qi, W. et al. High levels of pigment epithelium-derived factor in diabetes impair wound healing through suppression of Wnt signaling. Diabetes 64, 1407–1419 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Simon Ming-Yuen Lee, Dr. Rui-Bing Wang, Dr. Hiu-Yee Kwan, Dr. Li Wang and Mr. Rui-Hong Chen for technical assistance. We also acknowledged the animal facility of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau. This work is supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF/14150561), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22077109, 21775131 and 81872754), the Hong Kong Baptist University Century Club Sponsorship Scheme 2020, the Interdisciplinary Research Matching Scheme (RC-IRMS/16-17/03), the Interdisciplinary Research Clusters Matching Scheme (RC-IRCs/17-18/03), SKLEBA and HKBU Strategic Development Fund (SKLP_1920_P02), the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macao SAR (0072/2018/A2 and 0031/2019/A1), the University of Macau (MYRG2019-00002-ICMS, MYRG2018-00037-ICMS and MYRG2018-00187-ICMS).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.L., C.Y., and G.-J.Y. carried out the in vitro and in cellulo experiments. C.-N.K. and W.W. carried out synthesis and optimization of metal complexes. D.L. performed the in vivo experiments. G.L., C.-N.K., D.L. and C.Y. performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. C.D.P., V.K.W.W. and Y.X. analyzed the results. L.L., D.-L.M. and C.-H.L. designed the experiments and analyzed the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ligen Lin or Dik-Lung Ma or Chung-Hang Leung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Alessio Ciulli, Anthony Mittermaier and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Ko, CN., Li, D. et al. A small molecule HIF-1α stabilizer that accelerates diabetic wound healing. Nat Commun 12, 3363 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23448-7

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing