The P-type ATPase transporter ATP7A promotes angiogenesis by limiting autophagic degradation of VEGFR2

VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk1) signaling in endothelial cells (ECs) plays a central role in angiogenesis. The P-type ATPase transporter ATP7A regulates copper homeostasis, and its role in VEGFR2 signaling and angiogenesis is entirely unknown. Here, we describe the unexpected crosstalk between the Copper transporter ATP7A, autophagy, and VEGFR2 degradation. The functional significance of this Copper transporter was demonstrated by the finding that inducible EC-specific ATP7A deficient mice or ATP7A-dysfunctional ATP7Amut mice showed impaired post-ischemic neovascularization. In ECs, loss of ATP7A inhibited VEGF-induced VEGFR2 signaling and angiogenic responses, in part by promoting ligand-induced VEGFR2 protein degradation. Mechanistically, VEGF stimulated ATP7A translocation from the trans-Golgi network to the plasma membrane where it bound to VEGFR2, which prevented autophagy-mediated lysosomal VEGFR2 degradation by inhibiting autophagic cargo/adapter p62/SQSTM1 binding to ubiquitinated VEGFR2. Enhanced autophagy flux due to ATP7A dysfunction in vivo was confirmed by autophagy reporter CAG-ATP7Amut -RFP-EGFP-LC3 transgenic mice. In summary, our study uncovers a novel function of ATP7A to limit autophagy-mediated degradation of VEGFR2, thereby promoting VEGFR2 signaling and angiogenesis, which restores perfusion recovery and neovascularization. Thus, endothelial ATP7A is identified as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of ischemic cardiovascular diseases.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection No software was used for data collection Data analysis Statistic analysis were performed by GraphPad Prism (v4)software. CD31+ capillaries and sprout length durin EC sprouting were analyzed by image J software (v 1 .52) described in methods section. Images captured by Axio scope microscope (Zeiss) or confocal microscopy (Zeiss) and processed by AxioVision 4.8 or LSM510 or ZEN 2.3 software (Zeiss).
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability All data are presented within the manuscript, the online data supplemental file, or are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

nature research | reporting summary
April 2020 Field-specific reporting Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sample size
For all experiments, we have compared at least three testing and control samples and we show either representative data from one experiments or data pooled data from all experiments. The exact numbers are indicated in the figure legends. No statistical analysis was done to pre determine sample size.
Data exclusions No data was excluded from the analysis.

Replication
All experiments were repeated successfully at least three times.
Randomization All mice and cells were randomized before experiments.

Blinding
The investigators were blinded to group allocation during data collection and analysis.

Behavioural & social sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Study description
Briefly describe the study type including whether data are quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods (e.g. qualitative cross-sectional, quantitative experimental, mixed-methods case study).

Research sample
State the research sample (e.g. Harvard university undergraduates, villagers in rural India) and provide relevant demographic information (e.g. age, sex) and indicate whether the sample is representative. Provide a rationale for the study sample chosen. For studies involving existing datasets, please describe the dataset and source.

Sampling strategy
Describe the sampling procedure (e.g. random, snowball, stratified, convenience). Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient. For qualitative data, please indicate whether data saturation was considered, and what criteria were used to decide that no further sampling was needed.

Data collection
Provide details about the data collection procedure, including the instruments or devices used to record the data (e.g. pen and paper, computer, eye tracker, video or audio equipment) whether anyone was present besides the participant(s) and the researcher, and whether the researcher was blind to experimental condition and/or the study hypothesis during data collection.

Timing
Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection. If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort.

Data exclusions
If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, provide the exact number of exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.

Non-participation
State how many participants dropped out/declined participation and the reason(s) given OR provide response rate OR state that no participants dropped out/declined participation.

Randomization
If participants were not allocated into experimental groups, state so OR describe how participants were allocated to groups, and if allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled.

Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sampling strategy
Note the sampling procedure. Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.

Data collection
Describe the data collection procedure, including who recorded the data and how.

Location
State the location of the sampling or experiment, providing relevant parameters (e.g. latitude and longitude, elevation, water depth).

Describe any disturbance caused by the study and how it was minimized.
Reporting for specific materials, systems and methods We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies. Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study. If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response. Validation All antibodies have been tested for reactivity against the appropriate species on the specification sheets on the providers' websites or in published articles. In addition number of antibodies were used in our previous publications.

Mycoplasma contamination
All cells were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination by the providing company Lonza.

Commonly misidentified lines (See ICLAC register)
No commonly misidentified cell line were used.

Specimen provenance
Provide provenance information for specimens and describe permits that were obtained for the work (including the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information).

Specimen deposition
Indicate where the specimens have been deposited to permit free access by other researchers.

Dating methods
If new dates are provided, describe how they were obtained (e.g. collection, storage, sample pretreatment and measurement), where they were obtained (i.e. lab name), the calibration program and the protocol for quality assurance OR state that no new dates are provided.
Tick this box to confirm that the raw and calibrated dates are available in the paper or in Supplementary Information.

Ethics oversight
Identify the organization(s) that approved or provided guidance on the study protocol, OR state that no ethical approval or guidance was required and explain why not.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Animals and other organisms
Policy information about studies involving animals; ARRIVE guidelines recommended for reporting animal research Laboratory animals CAG-RFP-EGFP-LC3 mice were bought from Jackson Laboratory (Stock No: 027139). ATP7A fl/fl mice were breded in house and were described in method section. Blotchy ATP7A mutant (ATP7Amut) mice on a C57BL/6JEiJ background were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine).Both male and female mice of age 8 to 10 weeks were used for the experiments.

Wild animals
The study did not involve wild animals.
Field-collected samples No field collected samples were used in this study.

Ethics oversight
Study protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Institutional Biosafety Committee of Augusta University.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Ethics oversight
Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Clinical data
Policy information about clinical studies All manuscripts should comply with the ICMJE guidelines for publication of clinical research and a completed CONSORT checklist must be included with all submissions.
Clinical trial registration Provide the trial registration number from ClinicalTrials.gov or an equivalent agency.

Study protocol
Note where the full trial protocol can be accessed OR if not available, explain why.

Data collection
Describe the settings and locales of data collection, noting the time periods of recruitment and data collection.

Outcomes
Describe how you pre-defined primary and secondary outcome measures and how you assessed these measures.

Dual use research of concern
Policy information about dual use research of concern

Hazards
Could the accidental, deliberate or reckless misuse of agents or technologies generated in the work, or the application of information presented in the manuscript, pose a threat to:

Experiments of concern
Does the work involve any of these experiments of concern: No Yes Confirm that both raw and final processed data have been deposited in a public database such as GEO.
Confirm that you have deposited or provided access to graph files (e.g. BED files) for the called peaks.

nature research | reporting summary
April 2020

Data access links
May remain private before publication.
For "Initial submission" or "Revised version" documents, provide reviewer access links. For your "Final submission" document, provide a link to the deposited data.