Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

In situ correlation between metastable phase-transformation mechanism and kinetics in a metallic glass

Abstract

A combination of complementary high-energy X-ray diffraction, containerless solidification during electromagnetic levitation and transmission electron microscopy is used to map in situ the phase evolution in a prototype Cu-Zr-Al glass during flash-annealing imposed at a rate ranging from 102 to 103 K s−1 and during cooling from the liquid state. Such a combination of experimental techniques provides hitherto inaccessible insight into the phase-transformation mechanism and its kinetics with high temporal resolution over the entire temperature range of the existence of the supercooled liquid. On flash-annealing, most of the formed phases represent transient (metastable) states – they crystallographically conform to their equilibrium phases but the compositions, revealed by atom probe tomography, are different. It is only the B2 CuZr phase which is represented by its equilibrium composition, and its growth is facilitated by a kinetic mechanism of Al partitioning; Al-rich precipitates of less than 10 nm in a diameter are revealed. In this work, the kinetic and chemical conditions of the high propensity of the glass for the B2 phase formation are formulated, and the multi-technique approach can be applied to map phase transformations in other metallic-glass-forming systems.

Introduction

At room temperature, applied strain on metallic glasses (MGs) results in inhomogeneous plastic flow initially localized into ~10–20 nm thick shear bands1. Yielding of MGs, with a universal shear strain of 2.67 ± 0.02%2, is accompanied by significant softening, resulting in a catastrophic failure. By controlling and tuning intrinsic heterogeneities in MGs3 via external stimuli, such as non-affine thermal4 and elastic5 strains, significant improvement in MGs’ formability is achieved—compressive plastic strain can increase up to ~6%4, and MGs can show strain-hardening6.

Plasticity can be enhanced by introducing a deformable crystalline phase(s) into the glass7,8. For such composites, the mechanical properties can be controlled by tuning the type and size of the crystals formed. For example, in pure nanocrystalline Cu, a bimodal crystal size distribution might be beneficial, with nanometer-sized grains providing strength, combined with micrometer-sized grains giving strain-hardening9. The composite formation is better controlled on heating MGs, giving access to a wide range of heating rates (Φ) of about 8 orders of magnitude, rather than on cooling the liquid.

In the archetype equimolar CuZr and derived CuZr-based MGs, the presence of the B2 CuZr phase (space group \({\rm{Pm}}\bar{3}{\rm{m}}\)) is beneficial for enhancing plastic compliance of metallic-glass–crystal composites10. Some Cu-rich phases give hardness to composites, and they can also provide additional functionalities such as antibacterial properties11, though such crystals are brittle and prone to corrosion. The B2 phase is stable at T > 900 K, but it can already form on isothermal annealing at 671 K, or during primary crystallization on conventional heating at Φ ≤ 60 K min−1 where the crystallization onset temperature, Tx, lies below the B2 forming temperature in the binary system12,13,14. The volume fraction of the B2 phase formed at such conditions is low and B2 decomposes into the equilibrium phases below 900 K13.

The B2 phase has been shown to form on fast heating, it can form on a millisecond timescale, translating to Φ in the range of ~102 K s−1. Flash-annealing suppresses the formation of the low-temperature thermodynamic equilibrium phases Cu10Zr7 (space group C2ca) and CuZr2 (space group I4/mmm), and gives the possibility to control the B2 phase content. For the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 MG studied here, Φ as high as ~700 K s−1 was suggested to be needed, though Cu10Zr7 could not be fully suppressed15. Composites formed by flash-annealing with Φ >  100 K s−1 during resistive (Joule)15 and inductive heating16 dominated by the metastable B2 phase can achieve a compressive strain of about 10% (crystals: ~10 μm in diameter and ~15 vol.% of B2) for Cu-Zr-based bulk MGs16. Flash-annealing may introduce crystals as small as ~1.5–2 nm, which is close to the theoretical limit of the critical nucleus, that can promote crystallization in MGs upon deformation, thereby also improving plasticity when an optimum grain-size range is reached17,18. So far, flash-annealing techniques15,16,19,20,21,22,23,24 and ultra-fast differential scanning calorimetry (FDSC)25,26,27, or a combination of both24, have been predominantly used to study the kinetics of the glass-transition temperature, Tg, and Tx at Φ up to ~106 K s−1 in Cu-Zr-based MGs. Yet, the crystallization mechanism underlying the observed kinetics could only be accessed ex situ, based on the microstructure and XRD phase analysis, and the existing phase-transformation diagrams have been mostly derived by plotting the projection of CuZr equilibria. The Φ range for in situ X-ray experimental studies of crystallization in Cu50Zr50 MG, for which details of the mechanism were suggested12,13,14, has been limited to conventional Φ ≤ 60 K min−1, which is 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than the Φ required for composite formation. Küchemann and Samwer carried out an in situ X-ray diffraction study of the crystallization sequence during flash-annealing of Zr64.0Cu28.2Al7.8 MG ribbons19. However, due to the capacitor-discharge heating, Φ remained limited to high heating rates of ~106 K s−1, and the crystallization was dominated by ZrO2 formation19.

The competition between the formation of the phases needs to be clearly understood to create composites with on-demand and often multifaceted properties, such as has been widely applied to make composites with low-energy-loss soft-magnetic properties29. Hitherto, tracking and understanding in situ the phase evolution underlying the fast kinetics was impossible because Φ was not in a region relevant for composite formation, limited by conventional experimental techniques. Therefore, crystallization mechanisms could be deduced from ex situ examinations only, for which, as will be shown later, unwanted phase transformation on cooling may occur. Also, crystallization mechanisms of ternary alloys have been extrapolated from binary systems, especially from Cu50Zr50 glass, which is a too simplified approach.

In this work, a combination of in situ high-energy X-ray diffraction with a high temporal resolution is carried out during resistive flash-annealing and during containerless solidification via electromagnetic levitation (EML), and those are complemented by in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The crystallization mechanism of the low- and high-temperature phases (represented by Cu10Zr7, CuZr2 and B2 phase, respectively) and kinetics can be correlated in Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 glassy ribbons on ~4 ms timescale. Controlled cooling in a chamber flushed with helium is demonstrated to maximize the B2 content in the composite. The local microstructure is analyzed by atom probe tomography (APT) and TEM; the presence of nanometer-length-scale Al-rich precipitates within and around the B2 phase is resolved.

Results

The kinetic conditions of phase transformation

A critical Φ to form a composite with a predominant fraction of the B2 CuZr phase in Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 was suggested to be ~700 K s−1.15 Two flash-annealing examples are presented in detail by in situ XRD: one case shows a subcritical Φ in the range 100–150 K s−1 (Fig. 1), and the other a supercritical Φ of about 1100 K s−1 (Fig. 2) in a vacuum. The full Φ-dependence is discussed later in the “Mapping the correlation between kinetics and crystallization mechanism” section. For low Φ, the resistive heating is non-linear (Fig. 1a—red curve). All the Φ values given here are estimated by assuming linear heating from room temperature to Tx, and are comparable with flash-annealing15,30 and FDSC28. It must be noted that according to APT results, the local stoichiometry was reached for the B2 phase only, independent of heating/cooling conditions as detailed in the latter sections. For simplicity, the stoichiometric compound nomenclature is kept throughout the manuscript.

Fig. 1: In situ high-energy X-ray diffraction revealing the crystallization mechanism on flash-annealing at a subcritical heating rate of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 ribbon in a vacuum.
figure1

a Time-dependent temperature (red) and resistance (black) on flash-annealing at Φ ≈ 100–150 K s−1. b The temporal evolution of high-energy X-ray pattern. The inset shows a close-up of the crystallization onset for Cu10Zr7 (black arrows) and B2 CuZr (red arrows) phases. The right-hand part in part b plots the relative X-ray intensities which are normalized to the highest-intensity peak. c Selected individual XRD patterns showing the different stages of crystallization and phase transformations. Full and open symbols label respectively the position of the most pronounced peaks of the identified and possible phases revealed by Rietveld refinement—details can be found in Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. 2 (high-energy XRD) and Supplementary Fig. 3 (laboratory XRD). The labeled points correspond to the time of 1: 3505 ms; 2: 3532 ms; 3: 3588 ms; 4: 3610 ms; and 5: 6645 ms. Source data of the XRD patterns are provided on https://archive.materialscloud.org/61.

Fig. 2: In situ high-energy X-ray diffraction revealing the crystallization mechanism on flash-annealing at a supercritical-heating rate of the glass in a vacuum.
figure2

a Time-dependent temperature (red) and resistance (black) of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 glassy ribbon when resistively heated at a heating rate of Φ ≈  1100 K s−1 and cooled in a vacuum. b The corresponding temporal evolution of high-energy X-ray patterns on heating and cooling. The inset, in part b, shows a close-up of the crystallization onset for B2 (red arrow) and Cu2ZrAl (orange arrow) phases. Right-hand part in part b: The relative X-ray intensities are normalized to the highest-intensity peak. For clarity, only selected Cu10Zr7 diffraction peaks are plotted (see Fig. 1, part b, for the complete plot). c Selected individual XRD patterns showing the different stages of crystallization and phase transformations. Full symbols label the position of the most pronounced peaks of the identified phases revealed by Rietveld refinement—details can be found in Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. 4 (heating), and Supplementary Fig. 6 (cooling). The labeled points correspond to the time of 1: 489 ms; 2: 520 ms; 3: 552 ms; 4: 566 ms; and 5: 1300 ms. Source data of the XRD patterns are provided on https://archive.materialscloud.org/61.

On subcritical heating at 100–150 K s−1, Tx is 831 K represented by the sharp drop in the resistance at tx = 3532 ms and the temperature rise on the T(t)-curve due to recalescence (Fig. 1a). A 3-D representation of the temporal evolution of XRD patterns is given in Supplementary Fig. 1. The following phase identification, and all others discussed in the upcoming sections, is rationalized by Rietveld refinement. For the subcritical Φ, the best-fit refinement is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. The identified phases at specific stages of heating and cooling are shown in Fig. 1c (only the most pronounced peaks are marked by the corresponding symbols). The crystallization proceeds via the formation of the equilibrium low-temperature Cu10Zr7 phase preceding the B2 phase formation by ~56 ms (Fig. 1b, c). By analyzing 20 summed intensities taken around point 4 in Fig. 1a, t = 3628–3704 ms and T ≈  1007–1013 K, the Rietveld refinement confirmed the presence of the two main phases (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The low-temperature CuZr2 phase, reported in the literature to form parallel to and/or just after Cu10Zr7 during the primary crystallization12,13,14, could not be unambiguously identified in the individual high-energy XRD patterns on heating. This is because of CuZr2 possible low quantity and the low associated XRD intensity, and because the XRD patterns are predominated by Cu10Zr7 in the Q-range of interest for CuZr2. The Rietveld refinement, Supplementary Fig. 2b, hints at the possible presence of CuZr2 phase around point 4 in Fig. 1a, but considering high uncertainty of the fitting this just gives an indicative trend, and the exact T and t for the CuZr2 formation on heating and cooling could not be resolved in situ. The possible presence of CuZr2 could also be hinted by analyzing laboratory XRD measurements of the final microstructure at room temperature (see Rietveld refinement shown in Supplementary Fig. 3); yet, if anything, the phase fraction must be quite low. When the electrical current ceases at t = 5000 ms, the initial cooling rate is ~300 K s−1 in a vacuum of 10−4 mbar. Due to the low X-ray intensity, there was macroscopically no detectable Cu10Zr7 coarsening via B2 decomposition as would be expected from the eutectoid reaction of 13CuZr → Cu10Zr7 + 3CuZr2 on cooling Cu50Zr5025; where Te = 975 K for the studied glass28.

On supercritical heating at ~1100 K s−1 (Fig. 2), the Cu10Zr7 crystallization was suppressed, and B2 became the primary phase at Tx ≈ 927 K. Because of the higher temperature reached and the suppressed Cu10Zr7 formation, the high-temperature Cu2ZrAl phase (τ4, space group \({\rm{Fm}}\bar{3}{\rm{m}}\)) formed as the secondary phase at T ≈ 1103 K delayed by ~32 ms (Fig. 2b, c). The presence of the two main phases on heating was confirmed by Rietveld analysis (Supplementary Fig. 4) of 10 summed intensities around point 4 in Fig. 2a, i.e., between t = 552–589 ms corresponding to T ≈ 1103–1145 K. It is worth noting that this point is about ~150 K higher than the point 4 shown in Fig. 1a. The ternary phase typically forms on isothermal annealing at temperatures of 1000−1100 K11,31, or at Tx = 861 K on heating Cu46Zr46Al8 glass at 20 K min−132. The formation of Cu2ZrAl during heating was not considered in a FDSC study of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 glass as calorimetry does not provide any information required for phase identification28. Yet, a DSC trace of heating at Φ  = 1000 K s−1 (see Fig. 2a in ref. 28) shows a possible two-step crystallization and, by deconvoluting the peak into two gives a second onset temperature for phase formation of ~950 K—this is close to that of ~927 K at Φ ≈ 1100 K s−1 in the present work. The values of Tg ≈ 750 K, Tx = 831 K at 100–150 K s−1 and Tg ≈ 775 K, Tx = 927 K at ~1100 K s−1 are in good agreement with those obtained by FDSC28. This trend also indicates that the linear Φ-approximation for flash-annealing gives a reasonable value for an effective Φ. The fast-heated ribbon could be partially melted while maintaining its shape. When the solidus temperature Ts = 1148 K was reached, the Cu2ZrAl and the B2 phases started to melt; on prolonged annealing, the Cu2ZrAl phase melted completely (Fig. 2b, and Supplementary Fig. 3 showing a 3-D representation of the crystallization, re-melting, and the onset of Newtonian cooling). On ceasing the current at t = 845 ms, a cooling rate of ~140 K s−1 and a small effective supercooling of ΔT ≈ 66 K (=TlT; Tl—liquidus temperature) were achieved before the solidification of Cu2ZrAl and re-growth of the B2 phase, giving the recalescence at t = 1139 ms, took place. With further cooling, Cu10Zr7 phase formed from the supercooled liquid at T = 1132 K and t = 1300 ms (Fig. 2c), and this phase formation is generally difficult to suppress (Supplementary Fig. 6). Later, in the TEM and the microstructure-analysis paragraphs, we will show that Cu10Zr7 coarsens upon cooling in a vacuum; this is also an effect observed for Cu-Zr-based cast glasses33. In Fig. 2, the B2 continuous growth was observed on cooling down to ~1100 K. For the supercritical-heating conditions, the CuZr2 phase could not be identified by the phase analysis neither during heating nor during cooling stages (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 6). As in Fig. 1, the similarity in the Bragg reflections makes the CuZr2 quantification by XRD difficult, since no distinct peaks were observed we conclude that its fraction must be much lower than for slower Φ shown in Fig. 1. The CuZr2 phase will be resolved later by EML.

The above results suggest that there is the formation of the brittle low-temperature phases, predominantly Cu10Zr7 and possibly minor CuZr2, on cooling in vacuum. To suppress this undesirable formation and to better control the B2 phase fraction, a chamber flushed with He giving cooling rates 1000–2000 K s−1, one order of magnitude higher than in a vacuum, was used. In Fig. 3, about two times larger electric power was applied to compensate for the efficient cooling to achieve Φ comparable with flash-annealing in a vacuum. The highest temperature reached was 1023 K (Fig. 3a), ~50 K above Te. The primary crystallization was dominated by the B2 phase formation at Tx ≈ 885 K, tx = 545 ms (Fig. 3c). Defining one average Φ, unlike in vacuum, is rather too simplified in the case of He atmosphere. When the glass enters its supercooled liquid region, the efficient He cooling results in effectively much slower Φ (see the slowing down in the effective Φ in Fig. 3a). This provided some time for the appearance of the sluggish Cu10Zr7 phase, yet its fraction was extremely low, and it could only be detected at later stages of heating, when a larger volume fraction had formed (see Supplementary Fig. 7 showing Rietveld analysis at point 4 of the heating part in Fig. 3a; 20 individual XRD patters were summed between t = 609–686 ms corresponding to T ≈ 978–1024 K). There was no evidence for the presence of CuZr2 and Cu2ZrAl phases in the XRD pattern by the Rietveld refinement. On cooling, unlike in Fig. 2, there was no detectable Cu10Zr7 coarsening (see also Supplementary Fig. 8 for a 3-D representation).

Fig. 3: In situ X-ray diffraction revealing crystallization mechanism on flash-annealing in a chamber fluxed with He.
figure3

a Time-dependent temperature (red) and resistance (black) of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 ribbon when resistively heated at a heating rate of Φ ≈ 1000 K s−1 while being fluxed with He. b The corresponding temporal evolution of the high-energy X-ray pattern. The inset shows a close-up of the crystallization onset for B2 phase (red arrow). Right-hand part: The relative X-ray intensities are normalized to the highest-intensity peak. For better clarity, only selected Cu10Zr7 diffraction peaks are plotted. c Selected individual XRD patterns showing the different stages of crystallization and phase transformations. Full symbols label the position of the most pronounced peaks of the identified phases revealed by Rietveld refinement—details can be found in Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. 7. The labeled points correspond to the time of 1: 541 ms; 2: 545 ms; 3: 606 ms; 4: 657 ms; 5: 1165 ms, and 6: 7468 ms (room temperature). Source data of the XRD patterns are provided on https://archive.materialscloud.org/61.

In order to understand the details of the solidification of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 supercooled liquid and the competition in phase formation on cooling, containerless processing34 via EML (Fig. 4) was used to complement the flash-annealing. The XRD instability seen in Fig. 4b during heating up to Ts was caused by sample oscillations (shape instabilities) whilst levitating the solid-state alloy inside a Cu-coil, and extra peaks belonging to the Al2O3 sample support were detected. Heating was used to determine Tl for pyrometer calibration only. The liquid supercooling ΔT was calculated from the lowest T-point read by the pyrometer before a steep temperature rise occurred due to the recalescence. Along the lines of thoughts for flash-annealing, Rietveld analysis of the XRD intensity, taken at point 4 in Fig. 4a, t = 50.2 s and T = 1134 K, was carried out. The presence of all phases being relevant in this study, i.e., B2 CuZr, Cu10Zr7, CuZr2, and Cu2ZrAl can be seen in Supplementary Fig. 9. On cooling, the B2 always nucleated as the primary phase—the kinetics is evaluated in the next section. In the experiment presented in Fig. 4, B2 phase formed at an apparent nucleation temperature of Tn = 972 K (ΔT = 232 K), followed by Cu2ZrAl and CuZr2 phases both forming at T ~ 987 K and delayed by 0.4 s relative to the appearance of B2; where the delay time Δt = txtl; tl = 0 s when Tl is passed on cooling. For some supercooling conditions, weak Bragg reflections of the B2 phase were identified before the recalescence event resolved by pyrometer, a possible consequence of the stochastic nature of the nucleation. Although the CuZr2 phase could not be unambiguously identified in flash-annealing, the complementary data by EML readily evidence this phase, and that the overall phase-transformation mechanism conforms to the flash-annealing results. The Cu10Zr7 phase possibly nucleated during the recalescence, but it could only be identified on XRD intensity beginning from point 4, shown in Fig. 4a, c, when enough volume fraction had formed.

Fig. 4: In situ high-energy X-ray diffraction showing phase-formation sequence during solidification of supercooled Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 liquid in EML facility.
figure4

a Temperature profile showing the achieved supercooling of ΔT = 232 K = (TlT); Tl is the liquidus temperature. A typical cooling rate before the recalescence is ~20 K s−1. b The corresponding evolution of X-ray pattern measured at 5 Hz. The inset shows a close-up of the solidification process. Right-hand part: The relative XRD intensities of selected peaks normalized to the highest-intensity peak are depicted. c Selected individual XRD patterns showing the different stages of solidification on cooling. Full symbols label the position of the most pronounced peaks of the identified phases revealed by Rietveld refinement—details can be found in Supplementary Information, Supplementary Fig. 9. The labeled points correspond to the time of 1: 47 s; 2: 48.2 s; 3: 48.6 s; 4: 50.2 s; and 5: 80 s. Source data of the XRD patterns are provided on https://archive.materialscloud.org/61.

Complementing the in situ XRD studies above, heating inside TEM was used to understand local conditions under which the individual phases form on heating and on cooling (Fig. 5). Local amorphicity in the as-spun ribbon, without indications of clustering and phase separation, was confirmed by HRTEM and SAED (Supplementary Fig. 10). The composition by EDX was Cu48Zr47Al5 (±1 at.%). A top oxide layer, ~5 nm thick, had no observable influence on the annealing experiments. No thermal drift was observed35. Heating of a thin foil at Φ ≈ 220 K s−1, a Φ-range dominated by Cu10Zr7 formation, revealed a distinct two-step crystallization with Tx1 = 750 K (tx1 = 2.06 s) and Tx2 = 820 K (tx2 = 2.35 s) corresponding to Cu10Zr7 and the B2 phases (Fig. 5a—SAED patterns), respectively. Faster heating could not be achieved inside the TEM. Once the Cu10Zr7 phase had appeared, it did not grow, unlike the B2 phase, which coarsened until ~944 K. The presence of two minor phases could be distinguished from the SAED patterns: (i) CuZr2—mostly detected at the initial stages of heating; its appearance agrees with the possible presence of CuZr2 during subcritical Φ (Fig. 1), although at different stages. It was not possible to detect any time delay between the Cu10Zr7 and CuZr2 formation in TEM, which conforms to the conventional in situ XRD study of Cu50Zr50 glass at a heating rate of 10 K min−1 by Kalay et al.13. (ii) Cu2ZrAl—detected at the cooling onset. On cooling, predominantly Cu10Zr7 phase coarsening without noticeable B2 growth was observed. The Cu10Zr7 coarsening is evidenced in Supplementary Fig. 11, which shows the integrated temporal evolution of the SAED patterns. Because of the confined crystallization, Tx1 is suppressed by about 100 K compared to a ribbon28, and the delay of ~0.3 s in the B2 formation is about one order of magnitude longer than for flash-annealing (Fig. 1). A non-monotonic size-dependent crystallization, in terms of Tx and phase selection, was also observed for a sandwiched thin-film Cu-Zr36 and a Pt-based MG in a form of nanorods with diameters of <200 nm37.

Fig. 5: In situ TEM showing the crystallization mechanism and the final microstructure formed in a confined environment at a subcritical heating rate of about 220 K s−1 in a vacuum.
figure5

a Heating profile of a glassy Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 thin foil. Two crystallization temperatures Tx1 and Tx2 corresponding respectively to the onset of Cu10Zr7 and B2 phase formation—represented on the right-hand by SAED patterns—can be identified. The value of the glass-transition temperature, Tg, of a ribbon sample is taken from Cheng et al.28 and was obtained by ultra-fast scanning calorimetry. The maximum temperature reached on heating was Tmax ≈ 944 K, followed by cooling at a rate of ~1090 K s−1. The phase transformation was confined to a volume of ~16 × 0.05 μm3 (area × thickness). b Bright-field STEM micrograph and SAED (inset in the top-right corner) of the final microstructure. The white rectangle highlights a B2 grain surrounded mostly by Cu10Zr7, and it also marks the area of the corresponding fast-Fourier-transform pattern shown as the inset in the bottom-right corner. c HAADF image and the corresponding EDX of the individual elements (Cu: green; Zr: red; and Al: blue) of the area in the B2 crystal vicinity from part b.

Mapping the correlation between kinetics and crystallization mechanism

The comprehensive in situ evaluation of the kinetics presented above can be summarized and represented by a Kissinger plot38 (Fig. 6a) and by a continuous-heating-transformation (CHT) diagram (Fig. 6b) for crystallization—which can be correlated with the phase-transformation mechanisms given above—and by the dependence of Tn, and the delay time, Δt, on ΔT for levitation (Fig. 6c). Tx is taken from the first XRD pattern when a given phase is detected, which, for a primary phase, typically lies slightly before a recalescence event. Independent of the crystallization mechanism, any present-work primary phase formed superimposes on the overall kinetics by FDSC28 at a given Φ (Fig. 6a, b); some discrepancy arises due to Φ approximations. Unlike calorimetry measurements, the kinetics of the individual phases can readily be resolved. A Kissinger plot38 reflects the temperature-dependent activation energy for crystallization39 and by taking the Arrhenius parts it gives Ea(B2) = 134 ± 5 kJ mol−1; Ea(Cu10Zr7) = 106 ± 4 kJ mol−1; and Ea(Cu2ZrAl) = 75 ± 12 kJ mol−1 (T < 950 K); where Ea = 342 ± 8 kJ mol−1 by taking the conventional DSC only. For Φ < 500 K s−1, Cu10Zr7 is the primary phase, and for Φ > 500 K s−1 and higher, the low-temperature phase is suppressed and B2 becomes the primary phase up to the measured ~1500 K s−1 and likely extends up to the critical heating rate of ~10,000 K s−1 beyond which crystallization is avoided28. The lowest Tx at which Cu2ZrAl was detected was ~890 K; the Ea leveling off after 950 K (Fig. 6a) and the nose at ~1050 K at ~1500 K s−1 in CHT (Fig. 6b) suggest that the phase may have reached its maximum transformation rate39 and it becomes kinetically suppressed on approaching Ts. For EML, the solidification is nucleation-dominated for all phases that formed from the supercooled liquid. The solidification mechanism was nearly independent of ΔT in the range 141–251 K, where the latter corresponds to 953 K (0.83Ts) which lies below the expected maximum in the polymorphic crystal-growth rate at ~1000 K40,41. There was a tendency for Cu2ZrAl to nucleate before the CuZr2 phase at smaller ΔT, whereas they formed in parallel at larger ΔT. The largest ΔT, a relative ΔT/Tl = 0.21, is smaller than that achieved for Cu50Zr50 liquid via electrostatic levitation42.

Fig. 6: Correlating the kinetics and phase-transformation mechanism in metallic-glass Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0.
figure6

a A Kissinger plot for the crystallization of the individual phases during flash-annealing. The CuZr2 phase is not plotted because it could not be unambiguously resolved during flash-annealing. The apparent activation energies for crystallization are shown by the solid lines representing best-fits by assuming Arrhenius kinetics. The ultra-fast-heating (FDSC) and conventional calorimetry data for Tx are taken from Cheng et al.28 The dashed contours show the nominal heating rates. b Continuous-heating-transformation phase diagram for flash-annealing (present work) and for ultra-fast differential scanning calorimetry taken from the literature28. Only Tg obtained by FDSC is shown as this can be measured more accurately than by flash-annealing. The plotted nominal heating rates in K s−1 are based on values obtained from FDSC. The range of temperature and heating rate under which ductile composites can be formed during flash-annealing is highlighted by the hatched area. c The dependence of the apparent nucleation temperature, Tn (left-hand axis—full symbols) and the delay time, Δt – defined as 0 s at Tl – (right-hand axis – open symbols) on supercooling (ΔT = TlT) obtained by containerless solidification via electromagnetic levitation. The dashed lines show linear best-fits to the experimental data. For Tn and Δtn at large ΔT, the error bars are smaller than the symbols size.

Nanostructure and composition of the transformed systems

The in situ TEM, Fig. 5, showed that the final microstructure remained partially amorphous (SAED in Fig. 5b, top-right corner; and see also Supplementary Fig. 12 in Supplementary Information which shows an HRTEM image from one of the largest amorphous regions and the corresponding SAED pattern), and these regions probably separate the B2 crystals from Cu10Zr7 grains. A B2 crystal, oriented close to the [100] zone axis, is in the center of Fig. 5b (marked by the rectangle) and is surrounded by Cu10Zr7 crystals. EDX of the CuZr crystal confirmed a 50.5:49.5 (±0.5 at.%) ratio. There were some regions with a higher atomic fraction of Zr in comparison with Cu, yet, their origin remained unclear and they seemed to spatially correlate with the amorphous regions. Most notably, precipitation of Al around the B2 crystal could be detected (Fig. 5c, bottom-right image).

A representative SEM micrograph of a polycrystalline sample after flash-annealing in vacuum shows dendrites of Cu10Zr7 phase surrounded by spheroidal grains of B2 (Fig. 7a; a lower-magnification micrograph is presented in Supplementary Fig. 13). The surface density of nuclei, Ns, calculated from a high-speed video taken in situ by camera30 was nearly constant ~(0.2–1.2) × 105 m−2 (Supplementary Fig. 14) in the range of 50–950 K s−1. Similar independence of Ns on isothermal annealing temperature was observed in oxide-based glass-forming liquids43. The volume nuclei density decreased from 1.23 × 1017 to 2.63 × 1016 m−3 with increasing Φ (Supplementary Fig. 14). Although this contrasts with the usual trend, at least within the range of conventional Φ, similar Nv–Φ dependence was reported for flash-annealed Cu44Zr44Al8Hf2Co2 bulk MG by Kosiba et al.16, who suggested a lower effective nucleation rate during flash-annealing than for steady-state conditions.

Fig. 7: Atom probe tomography reconstructions of the local microstructure after flash-annealing at a supercritical-heating rate as shown in Fig. 2.
figure7

a Left: SEM micrograph of an area from which APT samples were extracted. Middle: Transmission Kikuchi diffraction image quality map showing details of the interface between Cu10Zr7 (the region enclosed by the yellow borderline) and B2 phases (uncolored); the latter contains CuZr2 phase (the region enclosed by the blue borderline). Right: Individual Kikuchi patterns taken from the mapping depicted in the middle (blue: CuZr2, yellow: Cu10Zr7, orange: amorphous). The letters in the left and the middle micrographs mark different regions where the APT samples illustrated in bd were extracted from. b 3-D atom map showing precipitates within the B2 matrix and a local eutectoid microstructure consisting of linear features arranged as a plane with the corresponding 1-D concentration profiles. c 3-D atom map of a region dominated by Cu10Zr7 phases is shown together with the corresponding 1-D concentration profile. d Aluminum precipitation within the B2 crystal and the corresponding 1-D concentration profile.

Based on the APT analysis, no chemical heterogeneities were detected in the as-spun ribbon. The bulk composition of Cu46.5Zr47.0Al5.3 (Supplementary Fig. 15) was measured which is close to nominal. The difference of ~1.5 at.% can be attributed to measurement errors and to the presence of trace elements such as oxygen and hydrogen. APT samples of the flash-annealed glasses were taken from the vicinity of the Cu10Zr7/B2 interface by site-specific FIB lift-out preparation. The locations are labeled by the corresponding letters and presented in Fig. 7, parts (b), (c), and (d) for vacuum-heated glasses. A supercritical-heating rate of ~900 K s−1 to predominantly from the B2 phase was used, which conforms to the thermal history shown in Fig. 2 without the melting step. The maximum temperature was 1050 K, ~75 K above Te. Local Kikuchi mapping showed that some parts remained amorphous (Fig. 7a—orange Kikuchi pattern), which conforms to the TEM observations (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 12). Some regions of the material contained unindexed crystallization phases because mapping with extremely low confidence indexing was excluded. The yellow region highlights the indexed area of a macroscopic Cu10Zr7 region surrounded by the B2 phase (uncolored). A small amount of CuZr2 phase was identified—highlighted in blue (Fig. 7a). Different microstructural features were identified in APT reconstructions. The APT sample matrix consisted of the B2 phase with a composition close to 1:1 Cu:Zr ratio (Fig. 7b; see Supplementary Fig. 16 for chemical analysis). There were two kinds of Zr-rich precipitates in the B2 matrix: spheroidal particles of up to ~20 nm in diameter with the atomic ratio Cu:Zr ≈ 0.36 (Fig. 7b) and, in some samples, eutectoid-like structures (lamella thickness of ~5 nm) consisting of lamellae with nearly equiatomic CuZr composition and with Cu:Zr ≈ 0.67 ratio. The latter ratio represents some transient (metastable) composition, frozen-in states on the way to the equilibrium phases, and it is close to that in Cu5Zr8 (Cu:Zr = 0.63) whose existence in the binary glass is still in dispute in the literature13. Also, Zr-rich precipitates with Cu:Zr ≈ 0.73 ratio could be identified located at the interface between B2 phase and Cu10Zr7 dendrites (Fig. 7c). The Cu:Zr atomic ratio in the Cu-rich phase at the interface was ≈1.21, which corresponds to slight Cu-deficiency of the nominal Cu10Zr7 (Cu:Zr = 1.43) phase. All of these reveal a possible tendency towards the formation of CuZr2 phase along with Cu10Zr7 phase. Interestingly, Al-enriched precipitates with a diameter of <10 nm, containing up to ~12 at.% of Al, were typically located along the internal boundaries within the B2 phase (Fig. 7d). The local Al precipitation conforms to that revealed by TEM around the B2 crystal (Fig. 5c).

A ZrOx layer (Supplementary Fig. 17), ~20 nm thick, was found at the interface shown in Fig. 7c, while no macroscopic oxides were observed by XRD, though Cu-Zr-based MGs are prone to oxidation44. A detailed study of the surface conditions by Auger and XPS analysis found that for the pristine surface the Zr3d binding energy revealed Zr in the form of an oxide and Cu2p was metallic. Down to a depth of a few nanometers, Zr3d existed in two oxidation states as an oxide and metal, while Cu2p remained metallic (Supplementary Figs. 18 and 19 showing Auger and XPS spectra, respectively). The oxide thickness decreased from ~15 to ~10 nm as Φ increased. The glass properties are oxygen-sensitive—higher oxygen content may have a strong influence on the balance between surface and volume crystallization43; it reduces the glass-forming ability and suppresses the B2 phase growth45, therefore higher critical heating rate has to be applied to obtain predominant B2 phase for glasses with a higher content of oxygen.

Representative SEM micrographs of glasses heated under helium are shown in Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 20. APT samples were taken from the interface between the dendritic and spheroidal grains (Fig. 8a). APT reconstruction of a pure B2 phase confirmed the nearly equimolar composition (Fig. 8a—the B2 matrix) conforming to vacuum heating. Detailed analysis of the interface found a compact oxide layer of ZrOx, ~20 nm thick (Fig. 8a), which was more pronounced than in the vacuum-heated ribbons. Auger spectroscopy confirmed the oxide layer of <20 nm thick (Supplementary Fig. 21). The chemical nature of Zr and Cu conformed to those before and after sputtering found during vacuum heating (Supplementary Fig. 19). Below the oxide layer, Cu-rich and Zr-rich phases were found. The former phase atomic ratio was Cu:Zr ≈ 1.38, which is close to that of Cu10Zr7, and the latter was Cu:Zr ≈ 0.63, resembling, as in a vacuum, the ratio in the speculated Cu5Zr8 phase (Fig. 8b)13. Because of the complex, non-planar interface morphology, different compositions could be mapped including one suggestive of the high-temperature Cu2Zr phase, <5 nm thick (Fig. 8a). As for vacuum heating, local Al-enriched precipitates, ~10 at.% and less of Al could be found in the B2 matrix (Fig. 8a).

Fig. 8: Atom probe tomography reconstructions of the local microstructure of a metallic-glass-crystal composite formed in a chamber fluxed with He.
figure8

a Left: SEM micrographs showing the B2 (spheroid)/Cu10Zr7 (dendrite) interface from which an APT sample was prepared. Middle: APT volume rendering of the interface. Right: The corresponding 1-D concentration profile. b APT volume rendering of Al from a different region and showing the precipitation.

Discussion

In situ XRD under isothermal annealing (T = 671 K, t = 37 min)12 and at conventional13 Φ = 10 K min−1 of the equimolar Cu50Zr50 glass, often used as the prototype crystallization mechanism, suggested that fine Cu10Zr7 particles are formed during primary crystallization; on prolonged annealing Cu10Zr7 grows, accompanied by solute partitioning leading to Zr enrichment in the glass. This is followed by the appearance of CuZr2, which is quickly terminated when <20 nm thick, and which already templates the B2 phase growth during primary crystallization. The B2 then dissolves and re-precipitates at 1002 K on heating13.

Here, we provide direct experimental evidence that the crystallization mechanism originally suggested for the equimolar binary glass can only be extended to ternary systems and to higher Φ with caution. The proposed templated-growth mechanism of the B2 phase could not be clearly resolved, although, especially fur subcritical Φ it is reasonable to suggest that the dendrites are located at the center of B2 grains (Supplementary Fig. 13) and Cu10Zr7 particles could act as nuclei for the B2 phase. For flash-annealing, all phases formed directly from the supercooled liquid, there were no detectable solid-state transformations, and no B2 re-precipitation could be observed. The B2 phase did not undergo any detectable martensitic transition to the previously reported B19’ and B33 two-phase structure13,46. The in situ XRD (Figs. 1, 2, for vacuum and Fig. 3 for He-atmosphere heating) did not reveal any eutectoid reaction of Cu10Zr7 + 3CuZr2 → 13CuZr; only local eutectoid-like microstructure could be revealed in some samples by APT. As shown in Fig. 7b, a local fine-scale eutectoid microstructure of alternating B2 and Zr-rich phases can exist, the latter probably locally compensating for the formation of Cu10Zr7 phase; also, local variations in the composition and cooling rates may exist. Arguably, both flash-annealing XRD and TEM (for the latter a strong phase selection due to nanoconfined crystallization cannot be ruled out) only hint at the presence of CuZr2 phase during heating/cooling. The absence of the CuZr2 phase on heating would contradict highly sensitive calorimetry experiments where the eutectoid reaction in a thin-film equimolar CuZr glass could be resolved even on fast heating (Φ ≈ 21,000 K s−1)25,47. On the other hand, the APT reconstructions revealed the presence of a different Zr-rich phase, where the Cu:Zr ratio resembled that of Cu5Zr813. The compositions from APT should not be simplified by using binary chemistry only. Clearly, Al is always present in the quoted phases, but no tendency to phase separation in the glass, as in an Al-rich MG48, and no composition resembling, for example, that of Cu2ZrAl in the composite were found. There was a clear tendency to partition Al from the B2 phase, but not from the other phases: an Al-enrichment, with thickness <10 nm, around the nanoconfined B2 phase boundary was found by TEM (Fig. 5c); and Al-enriched precipitates, with diameter less than ~10 nm, containing up to ~12 at.%, were typically observed along the internal boundaries within the B2 spheroid by APT (Figs. 7d and 8a). Generally, Al helps to improve the glass-forming ability49, and its partitioning supports the fast polymorphic growth of the B2 phase. Also, aluminum is highly mobile; the self-diffusion coefficient is 7.2 × 10−9 m2 s−1 at T = 980 K50, and this is high enough to permit strain-induced intermixing51 and the formation of pure Al nanocrystals52 inside shear bands. Interestingly, for the equimolar binary glass, recent APT work showed a tendency to the formation of the equilibrium Cu10Zr7 and CuZr2 phases in shear bands on deformation at room and nominal 80 K temperature53.

Under what conditions can ductile composites be made? A critical Φ relevant for the composites is ~500 K s−1 and higher (Fig. 6b). Below that value, Cu10Zr7 precedes the B2-phase formation. B2 becomes the primary and dominant phase followed by Cu2ZrAl at a higher temperature, whose formation is quickly suppressed beyond ~1500 K s−1. Although Cu10Zr7 could not be detected at high Φ, probably because of low X-ray sensitivity, it may be that some nuclei of Cu10Zr7 may still be present, whether existing predominantly on the surface or in the volume remains unclear, which can grow on consequent cooling. To obtain composites with a maximized fraction of the B2 phase on heating, a minimum Φ of ~1500 K s−1 should be applied, giving Tx ~930 K. Such a high Φ gives a relatively narrow temperature range of ~200 K for which the upper-limiting temperature can be controlled before melting is reached. The other way to control the composite formation is by flash-annealing in a chamber flushed with helium. The efficient cooling gives much better control of the upper-limiting temperature, suppresses the possible unwanted phase transformation on cooling, and gives composites with a lower fraction of Cu10Zr7, though its formation could not be fully avoided. No local eutectoid-like microstructure could be found under He atmosphere, and it is known that when B2 phase is cooled sufficiently fast such decomposition can be avoided or suppressed in the binary MG47. The helium atmosphere helps to avoid the temperature overshoot around Tx which would quickly result in fully crystalline samples.

The high propensity of the glass for the B2 phase formation seems to stem from the following factors: (i) kinetics—higher Φ promotes polymorphic crystallization; (ii) chemistry—local Al-enrichments are induced on crystallization resulting in having the B2 phase close to 50:50 ratio, i.e., the only composition corresponding to the equilibrium to be found among the crystallization products; (iii) atomic packing—there is effectively no difference in the number density between CuZr B2 crystal (0.0576 Å−3) and Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 glass (0.0577 Å−3), while the number density of Cu10Zr7 (0.0609 Å−3) and CuZr2 (0.0518 Å−3) phases is, respectively, ≈5.5% and ≈10.2% smaller54. Therefore, the formation of Cu10Zr7 and/or CuZr2 phase in the glassy matrix may result in significant raise of local stress; and (iv) atomic structure—there is a close resemblance for the Cu-Zr atomic pairs in the first-coordination shell of the glass and the B2 phase as shown in the structural study elsewhere54. Interestingly, composites containing the nanocrystalline B2 phase can be obtained through thermal cycling of the ternary glass between room and liquid-nitrogen temperature55—supporting the high propensity of the glass for the B2 phase formation.

To conclude, the mechanism of crystallization and solidification could be correlated in situ with phase-transformation kinetics and related to the formation of ductile metallic-glass─crystal composites on flash-annealing of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 glass. A complex CHT diagram was directly obtained, unlike the former projections based on CuZr phase equilibria. The primary onset parameters, namely crystallization time and temperature, clearly correlate with the former kinetics measurements obtained via ultra-fast-heating calorimetry. For calorimetry, the kinetics could not be understood in terms of the crystallization mechanism of individual phases and no high-temperature phase transformations following the primary crystallization could be detected. The B2 phase, beneficial for plasticity, becomes the primary crystallization phase when Φ is 500 K s−1 and higher. Such a critical rate exceeds that for the low-temperature phase Cu10Zr7 to be kinetically suppressed, though it cannot be fully avoided in the final composites. EML evidenced the presence of the CuZr2 phase, which can be expected on fast heating, but it could not be unambiguously resolved in the high-energy X-ray patterns of flash-annealing, by in situ TEM or by APT. On the other hand, higher rates of ~1500 K s−1 are needed to get better control of the crystallization sequence upon which the brittle high-temperature Cu2ZrAl phase is suppressed. The lowest temperature at which Cu2ZrAl formed was ~890 K. So, both the low- and the high-temperature phases need to be suppressed on heating. The eutectoid crystallization mechanism suggested for the prototype binary Cu50Zr50 glass was not identified by the in situ XRD, but a local nanometer-length-scale eutectoid structure consisting of alternating B2 and Zr-rich phase was identified by APT. Because of the unwanted Cu10Zr7 formation on cooling, the B2 fraction can be enhanced by employing heating in He atmosphere to achieve a cooling rate of 1000–2000 K s−1.

One way the glass increases its propensity for B2 phase formation is by partitioning Al from the growing crystals to form locally Al-enriched precipitates, <10 nm in diameter, and containing up to 12 at.% of Al. Such a kinetic mechanism of Al precipitation is still pronounced even when fast cooling is achieved in a chamber flushed with helium. Because of highly non-equilibrium conditions of flash-annealing, mainly metastable compositions were detected. The multi-technique approach used in this work can be applied to map phase transformations in other metallic-glass-forming systems and to understand the phase-transformation kinetics in order to control processing parameters to form composites with enhanced ductility.

Methods

Sample preparation

A pre-alloy of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5.0 (at.%) was prepared from high-purity elements (≥99.99%) by arc-melting in Ti-gettered Ar-atmosphere. Each ingot was re-melted three times to ensure chemical homogeneity. The ribbon (~30 µm thick and ~2 mm wide) was melt-spun from the master alloy at T ≈ 1320 K on a Cu wheel rotating with a peripheral speed of 29 m s−1.

Flash-annealing and in situ synchrotron experimental setups

Details of the constant-current resistive-heating device and its implementation into a high-energy X-ray beam at DESY, Hamburg, are given in ref. 30 Ribbons were resistively heated in a constant-current mode by using a Delta Elektronika SM 52-30 power supply. Ribbon surface temperature was monitored by using a LumaSense IGA 320/23-LO pyrometer with a temporal resolution of 2 ms (in analog mode) and calibrated on the known melting point of the glass. All signals were acquired by a National Instruments USB-6211 acquisition card—data were collected at a sampling rate of up to 48 kS s−1. The typical error in the measured resistance was <0.5%. All heating experiments were carried out in transmission mode either in a vacuum of 10−4 mbar or in a chamber flushed with helium (6 N) at 5 cm3 min−1 to control cooling. High-energy X-ray diffraction was done in situ at the P21.1 beamline (wavelength 0.1204 Å, beam size 900 × 900 μm2). Scattered intensities were captured using a hybrid pixel Dectris PILATUS3 X CdTe 2 M detector (pixel size 172 × 172 µm2) operated at 250 Hz. The sample-to-detector distance was 1021 mm for vacuum heating (Figs. 1 and 2) and 1412 mm for heating under He (Fig. 3). Diffractograms were derived from the recorded 2-D patterns by azimuthal integration using the Fit2D v17.006 software56,57,58. The diffraction patterns of individual phases are taken as: ICDD PDF number 00-047-1028 for Cu10Zr7 phase; ICSD collection code 103163 for B2 phase; ICSD collection code 656062 for Cu2ZrAl phase; and ICSD collection code 151846 for CuZr2 phase. Rietveld refinement was done in HighScore Plus59 4.7a (built 4.7.1.25061) by using ICCD database versions PDF-4 + 2019 and PDF-4 + 2020.

Electromagnetic levitation

Details of the EML device used for the measurements can be found in ref. 60 Metallic-glass samples of weight 0.5–0.7 g were used. The EML chamber was initially evacuated to 5 × 10−5 mbar and then re-filled with a high-purity He gas up to a pressure of 500–700 mbar. Glass heating and positioning were controlled via a water-cooled copper coil powered by a 10-kW generator operating at 280 kHz; the sample was cooled by recirculating the inert gas across the sample with a flow of up to 28 l min−1; while maintaining levitation, samples could be cooled down to ~780 K. The temperature was monitored by a pyrometer, implemented in a LASCON Process Controller LPC03 unit, with a temporal resolution of 20 ms and this was calibrated on the known liquidus temperature of the alloy, Tl = 1204 K.

The high-energy X-ray scattering experiments were carried out in transmission geometry, the beam energy was 101.537 keV (corresponding to a wavelength of 0.1221 Å), and data were collected using a hybrid pixel Dectris PILATUS3 X CdTe 2 M detector (pixel size 172 × 172 µm2) operated at 5–50 Hz. The sample-to-detector distance was 1100 mm. Diffractograms were derived from the recorded 2-D patterns by azimuthal integration using the Fit2D v17.006 software56,57,58.

In situ transmission electron microscopy

A cross-sectional specimen with a final thickness of 50–100 nm was prepared by FIB milling using a Helios Nanolab FIB/SEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). This specimen was transferred from the ribbon sample to a windowed point on a chip (DENSsolutions). A thin layer of platinum (thickness of 200 nm) was deposited over the target area using an electron beam before the ion-beam exposure. A standard in situ procedure was adopted for lift-out. The sample was secured on the chip with the stage at 45° tilt (in-plane to the chip membrane) with ion-beam-deposited platinum. The chip was then re-oriented with the stage at 10–16° for thinning of the thin foil. Further thinning was conducted until the platinum appeared transparent in a 5 kV electron-beam image, indicating a thin-foil thickness of 150 nm. The final thinning was at a reduced voltage of 2 kV to a final electron transparency at 3 kV electron energy. This procedure minimizes the amount of damaged material and reduces the levels of implanted gallium in the final thin foil.

The image and diffraction acquisition and spectroscopic analysis were conducted using a Tecnai Osiris TEM/STEM (FEI) with field-emission gun operated at 200 keV, equipped with a Super-X windowless EDX detector. In situ study was carried out by using a heating holder (DENSsolutions) under the usual TEM vacuum (<10−8 mbar). The resistance of the platinum coil in the chip is monitored in a four-point configuration, and the temperature was calculated using calibration constants provided by the manufacturer. The heating holder allowed for controlling the sample temperature with a temperature accuracy of >95%, a temperature homogeneity of >99.5%, and thermal stability of 0.005 K. The details of the calibration are given in ref. 35 The temperature ramp had a duration of 3 s for heating and 0.6 s for cooling. Time-series data of SAED diffractions were recorded with an acquisition time of 0.1 s. SAED patterns and associated images were acquired with a Gatan US1000 charge-coupled device camera. The SAED aperture was ~200 nm, and the camera length was set to cover the high-Q range up to 12.2 Å−1. Due to the absence of thermal drift, data acquisition could be performed during the high-speed heating and cooling process. The chemical composition was analyzed using the EDX detector after crystallization at room temperature.

Atom probe tomography

Specimens for APT analysis were prepared on a FEI Helios Nanolab 600 focused ion beam milling instrument equipped with a Ga source. APT experiments were carried out on CAMECA LEAP 5000 XR and XS instruments. The atom probe was operated in a laser pulse mode using a repetition rate of 125 kHz, pulse energy of 40 pJ, and samples at a temperature of 60 K. Subsequent APT data reconstruction and post-processing were done using the commercial IVAS 3.8.4 software. Regions containing high and low compositions of different elements were identified by reconstruction via an iso-concentration surface.

Kikuchi mapping

Transmission Kikuchi diffraction analysis (TKD) was conducted using a Bruker Optimus TKD detector in a Zeiss Merlin field-emission SEM. This system can provide orientation mapping along with phase detection using pre-defined crystal structure inputs of possible phases with a lateral spatial resolution in the order of 10 nm. TKD data were acquired at 30 kV and with 0° sample tilt. Post-processing of TKD data was conducted using the Bruker-ESPIRIT software.

Auger spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

A JAMP 9500 spectrometer (JEOL, Japan) was used for the AES measurements. Electron beam parameters were 10 keV and 10 nA; a spherical electron analyzer was operated in a FRR mode at 0.32%. Concentration quantification was done by taking the peak-to-peak height ratios from differentiated spectra using standard single-element sensitivity factors. An argon-ion beam operated at 1 keV was used for depth profiling; the sputtering rate equivalent was 3.3 nm min−1 for SiO2.

The XPS measurements were carried out at a PHI 5600 CI system (Physical Electronics, USA). Monochromatized Al K-alpha X-rays (350 W) were used and spectra were collected with a hemispherical analyzer operated at 29 eV pass energy. Cleaning by sputtering was done using Ar+ ions at 3.5 keV.

Data availability

Source data of the temporal evolution of the XRD patterns presented in Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4 are available online at (https://archive.materialscloud.org/record/2020.160): https://doi.org/10.24435/materialscloud:nn-38 [ref. 61]. All requests for additional data, for example, raw unprocessed data, background, and geometry calibration files, etc., should be sent to Dr Jiri Orava (j.orava@ifw-dresden.de; jiri.orava@ujep.cz) and Dr Ivan Kaban (i.kaban@ifw-dresden.de).

References

  1. 1.

    Chen, M. A brief overview of bulk metallic glasses. NPG Asia Mater. 3, 82–90 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sun, Y., Concustell, A. & Greer, A. L. Thermomechanical processing of metallic glasses: extending the range of the glassy state. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16039 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Qiao, J. C. Structural heterogeneities and mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 104, 250–329 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ketov, S. V. et al. Rejuvenation of metallic glasses by non-affine thermal strain. Nature 524, 200–203 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ross, P. et al. Linking macroscopic rejuvenation to nano-elastic fluctuations in a metallic glass. Acta Mater. 138, 111–118 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pan, J., Ivanov, Yu. P., Zhou, W. H. & Greer, A. L. Strain-hardening and suppression of shear-banding in rejuvenated bulk metallic glasses. Nature 578, 559–564 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Qiao, J., Jia, H. & Liaw, P. K. Metallic glass matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 100, 1–69 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Orava, J. et al. Fast-heating-induced formation of metallic-glass/crystal composites with enhanced plasticity. Thermochim. Acta 677, 198–205 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, F. & Ma, E. High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419, 912–915 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pauly, S., Gorantla, S., Wang, G., Kühn, U. & Eckert, J. Transformation-mediated ductility in CuZr-based bulk metallic glasses. Nat. Mater. 9, 473–477 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Villapun, V. M., Esat, F., Bull, S., Dover, L. G. & Gonzalez, S. Tuning the mechanical and antimicrobial performance of a Cu-based metallic glass composite through cooling rate control and annealing. Materials 10, 506 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cullinan, T. et al. Mechanisms of isothermal devitrification in amorphous Cu50Zr50. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46, 600–613 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kalay, I., Kramer, M. J. & Napolitano, R. E. High-accuracy X-ray diffraction analysis of phase evolution sequence during devitrification of Cu50Zr50 metallic glass. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42, 1144–1153 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kalay, I., Kramer, M. J. & Napolitano, R. E. Crystallization kinetics and phase transformation mechanisms in Cu56Zr44 glassy alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46, 3356–3363 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Okulov, I. V. et al. Flash Joule heating for ductilization of metallic glasses. Nat. Commun. 6, 7932 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kosiba, K. et al. Transient nucleation and microstructural design in flash-annealed bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 127, 416–425 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hajlaoui, K. et al. Shear localization and crack blunting of a metallic glass containing nanoparticles: in situ deformation in TEM analysis. Scr. Mater. 54, 1829–1834 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hajlaoui, K., Alsaleh, N., Alrasheedi, N. H. & Yavari, A. R. Coalescence and subsequent twinning of nanocrystals during deformation of CuZr-based metallic glasses: the grain size effect. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 464, 39–43 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Küchemann, S. & Samwer, S. Ultrafast heating of metallic glasses reveals disordering of the amorphous structure. Acta Mater. 104, 119–124 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Küchemann, S. et al. From ultrafast to slow: heating rate dependence of the glass transition temperature in metallic systems. Philos. Mag. Lett. 96, 454–460 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Küchemann, S. et al. Energy storage in metallic glasses via flash annealing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1805385 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Johnson, W. L. et al. Beating crystallization in glass-forming metals by millisecond heating and processing. Science 332, 828–833 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Okulov, I. et al. Fabrication of metastable crystalline nanocomposites by flash annealing of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass using Joule heating. Nanomaterials 10, 84 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Talaat, A., Greve, D. W., Suraj, M. V. & Ohodnicki, P. R. Jr. Electromagnetic assisted thermal processing of amorphous and nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys: Fundamentals and advances. J. Alloy. Compd. 854, 156480 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lee, D. Crystallization behavior upon heating and cooling in Cu50Zr50 metallic glass thin films. Acta Mater. 121, 68–77 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Miao, Y., Villarreal, R., Talapatra, A., Arróyave, R. & Vlassak, J. J. Nanocalorimetry and ab initio study of ternary elements in CuZr-based shape memory alloy. Acta Mater. 182, 29–38 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Miao, Y. & Vlassak, J. J. Explosive martensitic transformation of supercooled austenite in CuZr-based thin-film shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 200, 162–170 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cheng, Q. et al. Phase transformations in a Cu-Zr-Al metallic glass. Scr. Mater. 183, 61–65 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Silveyra, J. M., Ferrara, E., Huber, D. L. & Monson, T. C. Soft magnetic materials for a sustainable and electrified world. Science 362, eaao0195 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Orava, J. et al. Fast-current-heating devices to study in situ phase formation in metallic glasses by using high-energy synchrotron radiation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 073901 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gustmann, T. et al. Properties of Cu-based shape-memory alloys prepared by selective laser melting. Shap. Mem. Superelasticity 3, 24–36 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kosiba, K. Flash-annealing of Cu-Zr-Al-based bulk metallic glasses (Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2017).

  33. 33.

    Wang, D. et al. Bulk metallic glass formation in the binary Cu-Zr system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4029–4031 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Herlach, D. M., Cochrane, R. F., Egry, I., Fecht, H. J. & Greer, A. L. Containerless processing in the study of metallic melts and their solidification. Int. Mater. Rev. 38, 273–347 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ivanov, Yu. P., Meylan, C. M., Panagiotopoulos, N. T., Georgarakis, K. & Greer, A. L. In-situ TEM study of the crystallization sequence in a gold-based metallic glass. Acta Mater. 196, 52–60 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Duan, Y. et al. Crystallization behavior of a confined CuZr metallic liquid film with a sandwich-like structure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 13738–13745 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sohn, S., Xie, Y., Jung, Y., Schroers, J. & Cha, J. Tailoring crystallization phases in metallic glass nanorods via nucleus starvation. Nat. Commun. 8, 1980 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kissinger, H. E. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal. Chem. 29, 1702–1706 (1957).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Orava, J. & Greer, A. L. Kissinger method applied to the crystallization of glass-forming liquids: regimes revealed by ultra-fast-heating calorimetry. Thermochim. Acta 603, 63–68 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kokotin, V., Hermann, H. & Eckert, J. Computer simulation of the matrix-inclusion interphase in bulk metallic glass based nanocomposites. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 425403 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Orava, J. & Greer, A. L. Fast and slow crystal growth kinetics in glass-forming melts. J. Phys. Chem. 140, 214504 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang, Q. et al. Diffusion-controlled crystal growth in deeply undercooled Zr50Cu50 melt on approaching the glass transition. Phys. Rev. B 83, 014202 (2011).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Müller, R., Zanotto, E. D. & Fokin, V. M. Surface crystallization of silicate glasses: nucleation sites and kinetics. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 274, 208–231 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lim, K. R. et al. Oxidation resistance of the supercooled liquid in Cu50Zr50 and Cu46Zr46Al8 metallic glasses. J. Mater. Res. 27, 1178–1186 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    de Campos Neto, N. D. et al. Phase formation maps in Zr48Cu46.5Al4Nb1.5 bulk metallic glass composites as a function of cooling rate and oxygen concentration. Mater. Charact. 158, 109932 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhou, S. H. & Napolitano, R. E. Identification of the B33 martensite phase in Cu-Zr using first-principles and X-ray diffraction. Scr. Mater. 59, 1143–1146 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zheng, J. et al. Phase transformations in equiatomic CuZr shape memory thin films analyzed by differential nanocalorimetry. Acta Mater. 159, 320–331 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sahu, K. K. et al. Phase separation mediate devitrification of Al88Y7Fe5 glasses. Acta Mater. 58, 4199–4206 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wu, Y. et al. Formation of Cu-Zr-Al bulk metallic glass composites with improved tensile properties. Acta Mater. 59, 2928–2936 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kargl, F., Weis, H., Unruh, T. & Meyer, A. Self diffusion in liquid aluminium. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 340, 012077 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Balachandran, S. et al. Elemental re-distribution inside shear bands revealed by correlative atom-probe tomography and electron microscopy in a deformed metallic glass. Scr. Mater. 168, 14–18 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Boucharat, N., Hebert, R., Rösner, H., Valiev, R. & Wilde, G. Nanocrystallization of amorphous Al88Y7Fe5 alloy induced by plastic deformation. Scr. Mater. 53, 823–828 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chellali, M. R., Nandam, S. H. & Hahn, H. Deformation-induced chemical inhomogeneity and short-circuit diffusion in shear bands of a bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 205501 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kaban, I. et al. Atomic structure and formation of CuZrAl bulk metallic glasses and composites. Acta Mater. 100, 369–376 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Guo, W., Saida, J., Zhao, M., Lü, S. & Wu, S. Non-thermal crystallization process in heterogeneous metallic glass upon deep cryogenic cycling treatment. J. Mater. Sci. 54, 8778–8785 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hammersley, A. P. et al. Calibration and correction of distortions in two-dimensional detector systems. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2729–2733 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hammersley, A. P., Svensson, S. O., Hanfland, M., Fitch, A. N. & Häusermann, D. Two-dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan. High. Press. Res. 14, 235–248 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hammersley, A. P. ESRF Internal Report, ESRF98HA01T, FIT2D V9.129 Reference Manual V3.1, (1998).

  59. 59.

    Degen, T., Sadki, M., Bron, E., König, U. & Nénert, G. The HighScore suite. Powder Diffr. 29, S13–S18 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Shuleshova, O. et al. Metastable phase formation in undercooled Fe-Co melts under terrestrial and microgravity conditions. IFW Dresd.: Annu. Rep. 2017, 39–42 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Orava, J. et al. In situ high-energy X-ray diffraction of a CuZr-based metallic glass. Mater. Cloud Arch. 2020, 160 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.O., S.B., M.H., and I.K. are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), contracts No.: Ka-3209/9-1 and HE 7225/1-1, for funding. Y.P.I. and A.L.G. acknowledge support from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant ERC-2015-AdG-695487: Extend Glass). We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, for the provision of experimental facilities. Parts of this research were carried out at the beamline P21.1 at PETRA III. We are grateful to S. Donath, S. Kaschube, B. Opitz, H. Siegel and S. Ziller (IFW Dresden) for technical support.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.O. and I.K. led the project and wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors. X.H. synthesized master alloys and prepared ribbons. J.O., X.H., I.S., and I.K. constructed the flash-annealing device. I.S. developed software for controlled heating. I.S. and O.G. implemented and synchronized flash-annealing with beamline and detector. J.O., X.H., and I.K. did synchrotron measurements of flash-annealing. J.O., X.H., and O.S. analyzed high-energy X-ray diffraction data. J.O., X.H., O.S., and I.K. performed and analyzed containerless experiments. O.G., O.I., A.C.D., and Mv.Z. were responsible for running the synchrotron facility. S.B., E.N., D.R., and M.H. did the atom probe tomography measurements and data interpretation together with J.O. Y.P.I., and A.L.G. carried out TEM measurements and data interpretation. S.O. measured and analyzed Auger and XPS spectra. I.K. and M.H. obtained the funding to support the study. All authors contributed to the interpretation and presentation of the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiri Orava or Shanoob Balachandran or Xiaoliang Han or Ivan Kaban.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Marios Demetriou, Si Lan and Howard Sheng for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orava, J., Balachandran, S., Han, X. et al. In situ correlation between metastable phase-transformation mechanism and kinetics in a metallic glass. Nat Commun 12, 2839 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23028-9

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing