Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

N-aryl pyrido cyanine derivatives are nuclear and organelle DNA markers for two-photon and super-resolution imaging


Live cell imaging using fluorescent DNA markers are an indispensable molecular tool in various biological and biomedical fields. It is a challenge to develop DNA probes that avoid UV light photo-excitation, have high specificity for DNA, are cell-permeable and are compatible with cutting-edge imaging techniques such as super-resolution microscopy. Herein, we present N-aryl pyrido cyanine (N-aryl-PC) derivatives as a class of long absorption DNA markers with absorption in the wide range of visible light. The high DNA specificity and membrane permeability allow the staining of both organelle DNA as well as nuclear DNA, in various cell types, including plant tissues, without the need for washing post-staining. N-aryl-PC dyes are also highly compatible with a separation of photon by lifetime tuning method in stimulated emission depletion microscopy (SPLIT-STED) for super-resolution imaging as well as two-photon microscopy for deep tissue imaging, making it a powerful tool in the life sciences.


Synthetic fluorescent dyes that stain DNA are widely used in life sciences research. In addition to gel electrophoresis1, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in molecular biology2, and flow cytometry3, they are also greatly used in cell biological study such as for visualizing nuclear and organelle DNA4,5, cell proliferation analysis6, and diagnosis of viral infection7. The ideal properties for a synthetic DNA marker in living cells include (i) high specificity of DNA over ribonucleic acid (RNA), (ii) the applicability to long wavelength photoexcitation (>532 nm)8, and (iii) the ability to stain DNA in diverse living cells and tissues. A marker with these properties, however, has not yet developed.

The blue emitting Hoechst 333429 is currently the most popular DNA marker although it requires phototoxic UV light for photoexcitation10. To overcome this drawback, the Hoechst tagging strategy, fusing a fluorescent dye excited by visible wavelength to Hoechst through a linker, has been recently reported11,12. Especially, silicon-rhodamine (SiR)-Hoechst, which fused a far-red emissive SiR to Hoechst 33342, stained the nucleus with no significant phototoxicity and is compatible with stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy12,13,14. In exchange for these preferable properties, however, the linking of the additional fluorescent dye decreases the DNA-binding strength of Hoechst12,14.

Unsymmetrical cyanine fluorescent dyes, such as SYBR-Green I (SG)15 and Pico-Green (PG)16, are also widely used as DNA markers. These dyes, unlike Hoechst, can also stain mitochondrial DNA (mt-DNA) in addition to nuclear DNA in living cells5,17,18,19. Unfortunately, however, these dyes are mostly excited with phototoxic short wavelength lasers such as the 488 nm laser8 and do not have a high specificity for DNA over RNA20,21. So far, a fluorescent DNA marker which fulfills all the desirable properties is not available.

In the present study, we introduce a series of long wavelength (500 to 700 nm) absorptive DNA-binding dyes, containing a pyrido cyanine (PC) backbone. In addition to not requiring UV light excitation, they also display great cell permeability in various cell types and exceptional high DNA specificity for clear DNA staining of nuclear and organellar DNA in living cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate their compatibility with various optical microscopes such as two-photon excitation microscopy (2PEM), fluorescent lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), and separation of photon by lifetime tuning (SPLIT) method in STED nanoscopy (SPLIT-STED)22.


Molecular design and in vitro characterization of N-aryl PC derivatives

To achieve long absorption DNA selective markers with a small-molecule fluorophore, we envisioned that PC core could serve as a useful backbone due to its extended π-conjugation and the extendable methine unit23,24. As the result of several investigation, we discovered that the N-aryl moiety is an essential component for DNA binding. We first synthesized PC1 and examined its photophysical properties (Fig. 1a). UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra measurements revealed that the maximum absorption wavelength of free PC1 was 532 nm upon binding to DNA (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1a). The fluorogenic properties (IdsDNA/Ifree) of PC1 increased 1600-fold upon binding to DNA, whereas only 110-fold increase was observed upon binding to RNA (IRNA/Ifree) (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2a). The value of DNA/RNA specificity (IdsDNA/IRNA) of PC1 was higher than both Hoechst 3334225 and PG21 (Supplementary Fig. 2b, j, k). Fluorescence titration with three hairpin oligonucleotides (AATTDNA, CCGGDNA, and AAUURNA)12,26 revealed that PC1 binds preferentially to AATTDNA, while binding to CCGGDNA and AAUURNA was not observed (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 3). These results suggest that PC1 specifically bind to the AT base-pair of nucleic acids. We also examined competitive experiment in DNA sequence using AATTDNA hairpin oligo and found that PC1 shares the same AATTDNA sequences with Hoechst (Supplementary Fig. 3k). Furthermore, to assess the binding mode of PC1 to double stranded DNA (dsDNA), we measured circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of PC1 complexed with dsDNA. The CD spectrum clearly showed a positive cotton effect appeared at the maximum absorption band, similar to that of DNA minor-groove binders, Hoechst27 and DAPI28 (Supplementary Fig. 4a). This result suggests that PC1 binds to dsDNA with minor-groove. The similar binding mode of Hoechst would contribute the high selectivity of PC1 to DNA over RNA. Next, to investigate the higher DNA selectivity of PC dyes (PC14) than Hoechst’s, we synthesized a PC dye with a (methyl)piperazine site by replacing one of the two diethylamino groups of PC4 with (methyl)piperazine and examined the fluorogenic properties (PC9, Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 2i). As a result, the fluorescence intensity of PC9 increased 250-fold upon binding RNA, which was five times higher than that of PC4 (53-fold) (Supplementary Fig. 2d, i). This result suggests that the binding of the (methyl) piperazine moiety to RNA is thought to be a factor that reduces DNA selectivity.

Fig. 1: Molecular design and in vitro characterization of N-aryl PC derivatives.

a The structure and structural components of PC1. b The comparison of DNA/RNA selectivity of PC1, Hoechst 33342, and PG. c The titration curve of 100 nM PC1 with various concentration of hairpin oligonucleotides. Fluorescence intensity is expressed in arbitrary units (arb. u.). The error bars indicate means ± s.d. of three independent replicates. Source Data is available as a source data file. d The general structure of PC dyes and their substituent patters with corresponding compound names; the unit of methylene length and N-aryl groups are represented as “n” and “R” respectively. The normalized absorption (e) and fluorescence spectra (f) of all PC dyes when complexed with calf thymus double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in tris-EDTA buffer solution. (pH = 8.0); see details in Figs. S1, S2.

Table 1 Photophysical properties of all synthesized N-aryl PC derivatives.

To achieve further optical red-shift, we introduced various N-aryl groups29 as well as extended monomethine to trimethine30 (Fig. 1d). By selecting the proper N-aryl groups and methine lengths, the absorption wavelength of N-aryl PC dyes can be shifted from 500 to 700 nm, providing researchers with many color options (Fig. 1e, f). Importantly, the high DNA/RNA selectivity and high DNA-based fluorogenic properties are not impaired by substitution with various N-aryl groups (Table 1 and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). We revealed that PC5 specifically binds to AT-pairs (Supplementary Fig. 3f) and the CD spectrum showed a strong positive cotton effect (Supplementary Fig. 4b). This result suggests that PC5 binds to dsDNA with minor-groove, playing a part in having comparable DNA/RNA specificity, unlike SG backbone30.

Application of N-aryl PC dyes in various living-cell types

To examine N-aryl PC dyes for nuclear marker, we stained HeLa cells with each synthesized N-aryl PC dyes at a concentration of 1 µM and found that they were able to label nuclear DNA (Supplementary Fig. 5). To determine the binding specificity of N-aryl PC dyes in live cell nucleus, we co-stained the AT-rich sequence binding dye, Hoechst 3334225,26 with PC1 or PC3 (Supplementary Fig. 6). We found that the N-aryl PC dyes were excluded from the nucleus by Hoechst 33342 in a dose dependent manner. These results indicate that they scramble for AT sequences pairs with Hoechst, which is consistent with our in vitro study using hairpin oligonucleotides (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 3). The ability of N-aryl PC dyes to selectively stain DNA without a washing process was compared with commercially available cell permeable SYTO dyes, which have similar excitation and emission spectra. PC1 and PC3 clearly stain the nucleus and chromosomes with little background from cytosol, whereas the SYTO dyes failed to stain the nucleus even at higher concentrations. The SYTO dyes instead stained the cytosol and nucleolus, which contain large amounts of RNA (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 7). Moreover, cell proliferation analysis and corresponding time-lapse imaging revealed that PC1 and PC3 showed little cytotoxicity and phototoxicity compared with SYTO dyes (Fig. 2b). PC1 and PC3 were also investigated using other mammalian cell types (U-2OS, C6, and NIH3T3). We found that PC1 and PC3 could uniformly stain nuclear DNA without addition of a reagent to facilitate cell permeability (Fig. 2c). Considering that SiR-Hoechst requires the voltage-dependent calcium channel inhibitor, verapamil, for homogeneous staining of nuclear DNA in U-2OS cells12,14, these results indicate that cell permeability of N-aryl PC dyes is substantially higher than that of SiR-Hoechst. Next, we investigated the ability of N-aryl PC dyes to stain the nucleus of plant tissues which are composed of multicell layers with thick cell walls. We demonstrated this using the Arabidopsis leaf and root tissues (Fig. 2d). The epidermal cells including the stomata and mesophyll cells underneath the epidermis were completely stained in the nucleus of the leaf tissue in the absence of any washing steps (Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). Time-lapse analysis revealed that the root hairs as well as the main root tissue grew normally and were also clearly stained in their nucleus by PC1 (Supplementary Movie 3). We next employed 2PEM excited with 1000 nm to investigate the dye penetration in the main root. Using 2PEM, we observed the entire nuclei of the root tip region by overall cross optical sections (~100 µm) while single photon excitation with 488 nm enabled visualization of only the half cross sections (~50 µm) (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Movie 4). We did not detect any cytotoxicity or phototoxicity in the plant cells stained by PC dyes. Cell division with root growth was frequently observed using 2PEM time-lapse imaging (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Movie 5). These results indicate that the N-aryl PC dyes penetrated deep into the root layer with no apparent toxicity and are very suitable for 2PEM possibly because of the symmetrical donor–acceptor–donor pi-conjugation of PC dyes31.

Fig. 2: Live cell imaging with PC1 and PC3.

a Live cell fluorescent microscopy with PC1, PC3, and commercialized red fluorescent DNA dyes. HeLa cells were stained with each dye at 100 nM. Images are maximum z-projections of total planes (1 µm intervals). b Quantification of cell proliferation rate of cells stained with DNA labeling dyes. HeLa cells were stained with each dye at 30 nM and observed every 5 min with z-sectioning (six frames at 3 µm steps) for 24 h. The proliferation rate was quantified as fold changes based on the number of cells between the first frame (0 h) and the last frame (24 h) of bright-field images. Gray bars indicate the results from only bright-field time-lapse imaging without fluorescent time-lapse imaging and white bars indicate the results from both bright-field and fluorescent time-lapse imaging. Error bar shows mean ± s.d. from three independent biological replicates (>25 cells per replicate). Individual data points were also indicated in black cross. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) of difference from control condition was examined by two-sided student t-test using Microsoft Excel. Source Data is available as a source data file. c Live cell fluorescent images of different culture cell types with 500 nM PC1 and PC3. The images are maximum z-projections of total planes (1 µm intervals) The representative images are shown from at two to three similar images. d Live cell fluorescent images of Arabidopsis leaf and root cells with 1 µM PC1 and PC3. The images are maximum z-projections of total planes (1.1 µm intervals) The representative images are shown from five to six similar images. e Comparison of imaging penetration for single and two-photon excitation microscopy in Arabidopsis root tip stained with 1 µM PC1. Images were shown every 10 µm steps from z-sectioning images at 1 µm interval. The representative images are shown from four similar images. f Time-lapse observation by two-photon microscopy excited with 1000 nm in Arabidopsis root stained with 5 µM PC1. Root tip was observed every 2 min with z-sectioning (50 frames at 2 µm steps). The representative images are shown from four similar images.

Discriminating between nuclear DNA and organellar DNA using fluorescence lifetime of N-aryl PC dyes

Even at only 10 nM, PC1 stained the nucleus with very little cytoplasmic background (Fig. 3a). In contrast, many cytoplasmic spots were also observed at a concentration of 1 nM and these spot signals became predominant by further dilution of PC1 to 100 pM (Fig. 3b, c). These results are similar to our previous results using SG, which stained not only nucleus but mitochondrial nucleoids (mt-nucleoids), the core complexes of mt-DNA replication and transcription19. Next, we confirmed that the fluorescence spots resided in mitochondria by co-staining with PC1 and MitoTracker dye and nicely overlapped with those of SG (Supplementary Fig. 8). These results indicate that PC1 enables to stain mt-DNA as well as nuclear DNA in a dose dependent manner. Since the synthetic probes for mt-DNA have so far been limited to DAPI32, SG5,17, and PG18, red fluorescent N-aryl PC dyes will provide researchers with an additional color channel for mt-DNA imaging. Furthermore, we found that the fluorescent lifetime of PC1 in the nucleus (~1.1 ns) was substantially longer than that observed in mt-nucleoids (~0.5 ns). The shorter fluorescent lifetime in mt-nucleoids can be due to the self-absorption because PC dyes with short stokes-shifts are cationic and tend to accumulate in mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 9)33,34. Taking advantage of these properties, we employed FLIM and phasor plot analysis to discriminate between nuclear DNA and mt-DNA in various cell types (Fig. 3d–l). Similar results were obtained in the PC3 stained cells (Supplementary Fig. 10). Then, we envisioned that the FLIM analysis combined with N-aryl PC dye staining could in plant cells also distinguish chloroplast DNA (ch-DNA), from mt-DNA and nuclear DNA. Next, we employed FLIM analysis of PC1 in living stomata of Arabidopsis and found that PC1 in chloroplasts (yellow) had an intermediate fluorescence lifetime (~0.9 ns) compared with that in mitochondria (cyan) and in nucleus (red) (Fig. 3k and Supplementary Movie 6). Thus, FLIM analysis stood out the talented ability of PC dyes, where we successfully demonstrated that PC1, on its own achieved to discern all three DNA containing organelles (nucleus, mitochondria, and plastid) in eukaryotes.

Fig. 3: Discrimination between nuclear DNA and mt-DNA with fluorescence lifetime of PC1.

ac Concentration dependence of staining pattern with PC1. a 10 nM, b 1 nM, c 100 pM. The images are maximum z-projections of total planes (0.3 µm intervals). The representative images are shown from three to four similar images in each concentration. dl Fluorescent intensity images (d, g, j) and FLIM based separation images of nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA (e, h, k) by phasor plot analysis (f, i, l). The pseudo colors of (e, h, k) correspond to the colors of circles in (f, i, l). The nuclear DNA, mt-DNA, and ch-DNA are shown in red, cyan, and yellow, respectively. HeLa cells (df) and NIH3T3 (gi) were stained with 1 nM and 10 nM PC1, respectively and the fluorescent spectrum were collected between 540–650 nm excited at 532 nm. The representative images are shown from 5 and 13 similar images, respectively. Stomata in Arabidopsis leaf cells was stained with 300 nM PC1 and excited at 532 nm. The fluorescent spectrum of PC1 and chlorophyll autofluorescence were collected between 540–620 nm and 680–700 nm shown in green and magenta in (k), respectively. The representative images are shown from similar images of ten guard cells.

Application of N-aryl PC dyes for live-cell SPLIT-STED nanoscopy

To our knowledge, probes detecting mt-nucleoids that are compatible with live cell super-resolution microscopy have not been reported to date, even though there is the great need for probes to examine mt-nucleoids with sizes smaller than the diffraction limit of visible light35,36. Therefore, we evaluated the compatibility of N-aryl-PC dyes with SPLIT-STED nanoscopy. We firstly confirmed that live-cell SPLIT-STED nanooscopy in HeLa cells stained with 1 µM PC3 showed detailed chromatin structures with smaller than a diffraction limit. (Supplementary Fig. 11). Then, we applied SPLIT-STED nanoscopy to mt-nucleoids in HeLa cells stained with 10 nM PC3 and achieved to visualize mt-nucleoids at a much smaller size than the visualization in conventional confocal microscopy (Fig. 4a, b). Similar results were also obtained with live NIH/3T3 cells as well as with plant cells (Supplementary Figs. 12, 13). Next, we calculated a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of minor axis of mt-nucleoids to estimate the size of mt-nucleoids in HeLa cells (Fig. 4c). The FWHM value was 100 ± 9 nm at 3 ns of delay time, which is good agreement with the previous study (Fig. 4d)37,38. Taken together, these results indicate that N-aryl PC dyes have a great compatibility with STED nanoscopy in various cell types and useful tool for the study of nuclear and mt-DNA in living cells.

Fig. 4: Comparison of confocal and SPLIT-STED imaging in living HeLa cells stained with PC3.

a Confocal and super-resolution images of mt-DNA stained with 10 nM PC3 in living HeLa cells. Super-resolution images were obtained by two component separations using an n-exponential reconvolution model. b Enlarged images of the white dotted square region of a. The representative images are shown from five similar images. c An example of normalized fluorescence intensity profiles obtained from the region between arrows in b. Line profiles in STED and confocal image are shown in black and gray, respectively. FWHM values estimated by fitting with a Gaussian function are also indicated in the black line profile. d Box-whisker plots of FWHM value as a function of delay time in the minor axis of mt-nucleoids (n = 15 from three independent cells). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5x interquartile range. Individual data points and the mean points are also indicated in white circle and black cross, respectively. Source Data is available as a source data file.


There has been a growing appreciation of the role of DNA probes without UV excitation for live imaging. In this study, we developed a series of DNA markers with a PC backbone to fulfill all three required properties described above. Firstly, we actualized that all N-aryl PC dyes were applicable to long wavelength excitation over 532 nm as planned. This achievement is due to our molecular design focusing on PC23, possessing an extended π-conjugation with a monomethine cyanine unit compared with hitherto unsymmetrical cyanine dyes such as SG and PG. Secondly, all eight N-aryl PC dyes including trimethine dyes have high DNA selectivity and are capable of staining nucleus. Among them, PC1 and PC3 have an unexpectedly great property of DNA sequence selectivity at AT-pairs rich region and a high fluorogenic property upon binding DNA, succeeding in staining nuclear DNA at very low concentration. And thirdly, these dyes exhibited high cell and tissue permeability to stain nuclear DNA in various cell types. Especially in PC1 stained plant root, 2PEM revealed whole nuclei without apparent toxicity in root growth and cell division.

In addition to the above basic properties, we also succeeded to bring out other key properties of N-aryl PC dyes. We found that N-aryl PC dyes obviously stained mt-DNA at ultralow concentration and also labeled both mt-DNA and nuclear DNA by optimizing the staining dye concentration. Since the synthetic probes for mt-DNA have been limited to staining DAPI32, SG5,17, and PG18, our red fluorescent PC dyes will provide researchers with an additional optical channel. More importantly, by using FLIM, we also successfully revealed that N-aryl PC dyes, on their own, allow to discriminate between mt-DNA and nuclear DNA in mammalian cells and also to distinguish all three types in plant cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that N-aryl PC dyes were applicable to SPLIT-STED nanoscopy. Therefore, our dye will be useful for the biology field in mt-nucleoid as well as nuclear chromatin dynamics. The recent work investigating the structural relationship between mt-nucleoids and mitochondrial cristae revealed that super-resolution imaging of cristae was perfectly performed using SNAP-Cell Sir labeling system but the use of PG did not allow the revealing of structural detail of mt-nucleoids beyond the optical resolution39. We hope that N-aryl PC dyes would help to achieve dual STED nanoscopy in the challenging study. Last of all, together with these useful characters and talented applicability to various microscope techniques, we believe that N-aryl PC dyes would serve as powerful molecular tools in molecular and cellular biology research.


Binging of hairpin DNA and RNA oligonucleotides

For the oligonucleotides binding studies, synthetic DNA oligonucleotides, 5′-CGCGAATTCGCGTTTTCGCGAATTCGCG-3′ (28 bp) and 5′-CGCGCCGGCGCGTTTTCGCGCCGGCGCG-3′ (28 bp) were purchased by eurofins, whereas RNA 5′-CGCGAAUUCGCGUUUUCGCGAAUUCGCG-3′ (28 bp) was obtained from FASMAC. Each oligonucleotide was dissolved in 1× TBS buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) at 200 µM concentration and adjusted various concentrations by serial dilution with TBS. These oligonucleotide solutions were heated at 95 °C for 1 min followed by cooling down at room temperature. On the other hand, each PC dye was dissolved in TBS with 2 mg/mL BSA at 200 nM concentration. The fluorescent intensity of equal amount mixture of oligonucleotide and PC dye solution was measured by EnSpire (PerkinElmer). Each dye was excited at its absorption peak wavelength and fluorescence was detected at the fluorescent peak wavelength.

Fluorescent titration

Calf thymus dsDNA, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co, and RNA from torula yeast, purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, were used in the fluorescence titration40,41. DNA/RNA selectivity of PC1 was compared with commercialized nucleus markers (Pico-Green, Hoechst 33342; ThermoFisher Scientific). All chemicals are used without additional treatment or further purifications. UV/Vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-3510 spectrometer with a resolution of 0.5 nm and emission spectra were measured with an FP-6600 Hitachi spectrometer with a resolution of 0.2 nm. CD spectra were measured with a JASCO FT/IR6100. 1.0 cm square quartz cell was used for all optical measurements. About 1.0 g/L dsDNA solution (1.0 mL) or 2.0 g/L RNA solution (1.0 mL) were added to dye solutions (2.0 mL) with absorbance around 0.2 at each maximum wavelength at room temperature by using a micro pipet. After titration, the combined solution was gently shaken several times to stabilize the absorbance and fluorescence intensities of all samples. (see detailed results in the supporting information)

Fluorescence quantum yield

The fluorescence quantum yields of dye-dsDNA complexes were determined with a Hamamatsu C9920-02 calibrated by the integrating sphere system. Measurements of absolute fluorescence quantum yields (ΦFdsDNA) of PC dyes were performed with scan excitation mode at around maximum absorption wavelength (λabsdsDNA), and values of ΦFdsDNA of monomethine dyes were calculated by using averaged values. Relative method was applied to determine the intrinsic fluorescence quantum yields (ΦFfree). The values of ΦFfree for monomethine and trimethine PC are determined in relative to Rhodamine 6 G ethanol in solution (ΦF = 0.94)42 and Cresyl violet in methanol solution (ΦF = 0.54)43 according to following equations.

$${{\varPhi }_{F}}^{{\mathrm{free}}}={{\varPhi }_{F}}^{{\mathrm{reference}}}\times ({F}^{{\mathrm{free}}-{\mathrm{dye}}}/{F}^{{\mathrm{reference}}})\times ({A}^{{\mathrm{reference}}}/{A}^{{\mathrm{free}}-{\mathrm{dye}}})\times {({n}^{{\mathrm{free}}-{\mathrm{dye}}}/{n}^{{\mathrm{reference}}})}^{2}$$

where ΦFreferece represents fluorescence quantum yield of reference samples, Ffree-dye and Freference stand for the area of corrected fluorescence spectra of dyes and reference sample using same excitation wavelength, Areference and Afree-Dye are the recorded absorbance of reference sample and dyes at the wavelength for the photoexcitation, and nfree-dye and nreference represent the reflective index of the solvents for the measurements. Reflective index value of TE buffer solution was calculated using that of water (n = 1.333). The values of reflective index for ethanol (n = 1.359)44 and methanol (n = 1.327)44 were used for the detailed calculation.

Fluorescence lifetime

The light source used was a wavelength-tunable optical parametric amplifier based on a regeneratively amplified mode-locked Ti: sapphire laser with a pulse duration of 200 fs and a repetition rate of 200 kHz. The excitation wavelengths were set around the maximum absorption wavelengths for each sample. Emitted photons were detected using a single monochromator with an avalanche photodiode (SPD-050-CTE-N1; MPD). The detection wavelengths were tuned to the emission peak wavelengths for each sample. Each photon arrival times were recorded using time-correlated single-photon counting boards (SPC-130EM-N1; Becker & Hickl GmbH).

Circular dichroism

The measurements of CD were performed using FT/IR6100 (JASCO) with 1 cm square quartz cell. Before measurements, PC1 and PC5 were titrated with excess of dsDNA and are shaken several times.

Animal and plant cell cultures for fluorescence imaging

Cell culture lines, HeLa (RCB0007; RIKEN BRC), U-2OS (HTB96; ATCC), C6 (RCB2854; RIKEN BRC), and NIH3T3 (RCB1862; RIKEN BRC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Wako) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/95% air incubator. These lines (2 × 104 cells/mL) were transferred on each well of a glass-bottom 8-well slide and cultured 1 day before imaging. DNA staining was performed in DMEM (−) containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) without washing. The Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (Col-0) was also used. After keeping at 4 °C for 3 days on Murashige and Skoog medium, seeds were cultured under continuous white light at 22–23 °C for germination and cultured for 7–12 days. For time-lapse imaging of root elongation, seedlings were grown between the cover glass and the medium45. Four milliliters of MS-agar medium was placed in a coverglass chamber (no. 5202001; IWAKI), the long side section (~5 × 45 mm) of the agar was removed, and seeds were placed between the cover glass and the medium and incubated standing at an angle of about 70°.

Time-lapse imaging for cell proliferation assay

For assessment of cytotoxicity and phototoxicity of PC dyes, we also used commercialized red fluorescence nucleus markers (SYTO 80, SYTO 82, SYTO 84; ThermoFisher Scientific). HeLa cells were stained with each dye in DMEM ( + ) and the time-lapse observation was performed by an inverted microscope system (IX-71; Olympus) equipped with an UPlanSApo IR 20x/0.75 objective lens (Olympus), and a CMOS camera (ORCA Flash 4.0 V3 C13440; Hamamatsu photonics). The TRITC-A-Basic fluorescent filter set (FF01-542/20, FF570-Di01, FF01-620/52; Semrock Inc.) was used for all nucleus markers. The stage incubator system (Tokai Hit Co, Ltd.) was used to keep temperature at 37 °C and 5% CO2/95% air condition. The fluorescence and bright-field time-lapse images were taken with or without excitation using an imaging software (MetaMorph; Molecular Devices) and cell proliferation rate was assessed by visual inspection from bright-field time-lapse images.

Confocal microscopy

A confocal laser scanning microscopy system (TCS SP8 FALCON gSTED; Leica) equipped with a pulsed white light laser (WLL; 80 MHz) and a HyD detector was used for fluorescence imaging of nuclear DNA in various animal cultured cells at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/95% air condition (Fig. 2a, c). For low and high magnification observation, HC PL APO CS2 20×/0.75 and HC PL APO CS2 100×/1.40 oil objective were used, respectively. Cells stained with PC1 or SYTO 80 were excited with a 532 nm and their emission was collected at 540–670 nm. Cells stained with PC3 were excited with a 552 nm or a 561 nm and their emission was collected at 560–670 nm or 570–670 nm. When stained at ultralow concentration (100 pM), cells were excited with 561 nm and their emission was detected at 570–769 nm. Cells stained with SYTO 82 were excited with a 543 nm and their emission was detected at 550–670 nm. Cells stained with SYTO 84 were excited with a 561 nm and their emission was detected at 570–670 nm. Gated detection between 0.1–12 ns was performed for all fluorescence imaging. A confocal microscope system (LSM 7 Duo; Zeiss) equipped with a 20×/0.8 Plan-Apochromat lens and 32-channel gallium arsenide phosphide (GaASP) detector array was used for Arabidopsis leaf and root imaging. Cells stained with PC1 were excited with a 514 nm and their fluorescence were collected at 517–614 nm in leaf cells and 517–693 nm in root cells, respectively. Cells stained with PC3 were excited with a 560 nm and their fluorescence were collected at 561–605 nm in leaf cells and 570–693 nm in root cells, respectively. In leaf cell imaging, chlorophyll autofluorescence was also detected at 675–693 nm. Time-lapse imaging in Arabidopsis root was also performed every 5 min using a confocal laser scanninig microscope (CV1000; Yokogawa) equipped with a 20×/0.75. Collected images were further processed using open-source software ImageJ ( and Adobe Photoshop CS6.

Two-photon excitation microscopy

Two-photon imaging was performed using a laser scanning microscope (LSM 7 Duo; Zeiss) equipped with a widely tunable Ti: Sapphire femtosecond pulse laser (Chameleon; Coherent) and LD C-Apochromat 40×/1.1 water immersion lens. The same Arabidopsis root stained with PC1 were excited with 1000 nm as well as 488 nm and their fluorescence were detected at 500–690 nm and 490–596 nm, respectively.

FLIM and SPLIT-STED microscopy

A confocal laser scanning microscopy system (TCS SP8 FALCON gSTED; Leica) equipped with a pulsed white light laser (WLL; 80 MHz), 660 STED laser (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Figs. 12,13), 775 STED laser (Supplementary Fig. 11) HC PL APO CS2 100×/1.40 oil objective lens, and a HyD detector was used for fluorescence imaging of nuclear and mt-DNA in various animal cultured cells at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/95% air condition (Fig. 4a–i). For observation of Arabidopsis stomata, HC PL APO CS2 93×/1.30 GLYC objective lens was used and z-sectioning image was obtained from 26 frames at 0.26 µm steps. For SPLIT-STED imaging, cells were excited with 561 nm and their emission was corrected at 570–650 nm with or without 660 nm STED laser. STED image was obtained by separation of a FLIM image to two exponential components thorough n-exponential reconvolution model or τ-STED function22. Confocal and STED imaging were acquired alternately between lines. Fluorescent lifetime based separation images were displayed with different pseudo colors by phaser plot analysis22,46. Collected images were deconvoluted by default setting of Huygens; signal-to-noise ratio and quality threshold were set to 7 and 0.05 for STED images, 20 and 0.05 for conventional CLSM images, respectively. Images were further processed using ImageJ. From the line profile obtained by ImageJ, FWHM was estimated by fitting with a Gaussian function47.

Co-staining of N-aryl PC dyes with Hoechst 33342 in living HeLa cells

HeLa cells were co-stained with 100 nM PC dyes with various concentration of Hoechst 33342 (0, 100, 1, and 3 µM). The confocal images were obtained with a TCS SP8 (Leica) equipped with HC PL APO CS2 100×/1.40 oil objective. The image channels used were Ex 405 nm and Em 420–480 nm for Hoechst 33342, Ex 532 nm/Em 540–670 nm for PC1, and Ex 561 nm/Em 570–670 nm for PC3, respectively.

Co-staining of PC dyes with a mitochondrial staining dye

HeLa cells were co-stained with 1 nM PC dyes with 20 nM MitoTracker Deep Red. The confocal images were obtained with a TCS SP8 (Leica) equipped with HC PL APO CS2 100×/1.40 oil objective. The image channels used were Ex 514 nm and Em 520–610 nm for PC1, Ex 561 nm/Em 570–610 nm for PC3, and Ex 633 nm/Em 640–680 nm for MitoTracker Deep Red, respectively.

Co-staining of PC dyes with a mt-DNA staining dye

HeLa cells were co-stained with 1 nM PC dyes with 300,000-fold dilution of SG. The confocal images were obtained with a LSM780 equipped with Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 oil objective. The image channels used were Ex 514 nm and Em 517–695 nm. Linear-deconvolution images were obtained using each reference spectra of PC1, PC3, and SG.

Time-lapse analysis of Arabidopsis root and root hairs

Arabidopsis root stained with 1 µM PC1 was observed every 5 min excited with 488 nm and the emission spectrum was collected through band-pass filter BP525/50. The fluorescence images are maximum z-projections of 20 planes (4.3 µm intervals).

Chemical synthesis

Unless otherwise noted, all materials including dry solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. The starting materials such as 1-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)−4-methylpyridin-1-ium chloride48 and 5a49 were prepared according to the reported procedures. All work-up and purification procedures were carried out with reagent-grade solvents. High-resolution mass spectra analyses were carried out using FT-ESI mass analyzer. Melting points of all compounds were measured on a MPA100 Optimelt automated melting point system. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel 60 N (Kanto Chemical Co., spherical, neutral, 40–50 mesh) for the purification of PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5, PC6, PC7, and PC8. Column chromatography was performed with amino silica gel (Fuji Sylysia Chemical LTD, Cat. No. Hu 41003) for the purification of 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, PC8, and PC9. Purifications of the other compounds were performed by silica gel 60 N (Kanto Chemical Co., spherical, neutral, 40–100 mesh). The detail synthetic procedure of each N-aryl PC dye and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were available in the supporting information file. NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL JNM-ECA-400 (1H 400 MHz, 13C 100 MHz) and JEOL ECA 600II with Ultra COOL probe (1H 600 MHz, 13C 150 MHz) spectrometers in dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (d-DMSO) ((CD3)2SO). Chemical shifts for 1H NMR are expressed in parts per million (ppm) relative to (CD3)2SO (δ 2.49 ppm). Chemical shifts for 13C NMR are expressed in ppm relative to (CD3)2SO (δ 39.5 ppm). Data were reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s singlet, d doublet, dd doublet of doublets, ddd doublet of doublet of doublets, dt doublet of triplets, td triplet of doublets, t triplet, q quartet, quin quintet, m multiplet, br broad), coupling constant (Hz), and integration. The purity of all PC dyes used for DNA stains are demonstrated by 1H-NMR.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data of this study are available within the manuscript and its supplementary files are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. 1.

    Tiselius, A. A new apparatus for electrophoretic analysis of colloidal mixtures. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 524–531 (1937).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Higuchi, R., Dollinger, G., Walsh, P. S. & Griffith, R. Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Biotechnology 10, 413–417 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hirons, G. T., Fawcett, J. J. & Crissman, H. A. TOTO and YOYO: new very bright fluorochromes for DNA content analyses by flow cytometry. Cytometry 15, 129–140 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hayashi, J.-I., Takemitsu, M., Goto, Y.-I. & Nonaka, I. Human mitochondria and mitochondrial genome function as a single dynamic cellular unit. J. Cell Biol. 125, 43–50 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nishimura, Y., Higashiyama, T., Suzuki, L., Misumi, O. & Kuroiwa, T. The biparental transmission of the mitochondrial genome in Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii visualized in living cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 77, 124–133 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Richards, W. L. et al. Measurement of cell proliferation in microculture using Hoechst 33342 for the rapid semiautomated micro fluorimetric determination of chromatin DNA. Exp. Cell Res. 159, 235–246 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ferri, K. F. et al. Apoptosis control in syncytia induced by the HIV type 1-envelope glycoprotein complex: role of mitochondria and caspases. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1081–1092 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wäldchen, S., Lehmann, J., Klein, T., van de Linde, S. & Sauer, M. Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy. Sci. Rep. 5, 15348 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bucevičius, J., Lukinavičius, G. & Gerasimaitė, R. The use of Hoechst dyes for DNA staining and beyond. Chemosensors 6, 18 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Durand, R. E. & Olive, P. L. Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity and DNA damage by Hoechst 33342. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 30, 111–116 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nakamura, A. et al. Hoechst tagging: a modular strategy to design synthetic fluorescent probes for live-cell nucleus imaging. Chem. Commun. 50, 6149–6152 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lukinavičius, G. et al. SiR-Hoechst is a far-red DNA stain for live-cell nanoscopy. Nat. Commun. 6, 8497 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Legant, W. R. et al. High-density three-dimensional localization microscopy across large volumes. Nat. Methods 13, 359–365 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bucevičius, J., Keller-Findeisen, J., Gilat, T., Hell, S. W. & Lukinavičius, G. Rhodamine–Hoechst positional isomers for highly efficient staining of heterochromatin. Chem. Sci. 10, 1962–1970 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jin, X. et al. A new fluorescent dye optimized for detection of picogram amounts of DNA in gels. Biophys. J. 66, A159 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ahn, S. J., Costa, J. & Emanuel, J. R. PicoGreen quantitation of DNA: effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2623–2625 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ban-Ishihara, R., Ishihara, T., Sasaki, N., Mihara, K. & Ishihara, N. Dynamics of nucleoid structure regulated by mitochondrial fission contributes to cristae reformation and release of cytochrome c. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11863–11868 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ashley, N., Harris, D. & Poulton, J. Detection of mitochondrial DNA depletion in living human cells using PicoGreen staining. Exp. Cell Res. 303, 432–446 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sasaki, T., Sato, Y., Higashiyama, T. & Sasaki, N. Live imaging reveals the dynamics and regulation of mitochondrial nucleoids during the cell cycle in Fucci2-HeLa cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 11257 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Suzuki, T., Fujikura, K., Higashiyama, T. & Takata, K. DNA staining for fluorescence and laser confocal microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 45, 49–53 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Singer, V. L., Jones, L. J., Yue, S. T. & Haugland, R. P. Characterization of PicoGreen reagent and development of a fluorescence-based solution assay for double-stranded DNA quantitation. Anal. Biochem. 249, 228–238 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lanzanò, L. et al. Encoding and decoding spatio-temporal information for super-resolution microscopy. Nat. Commun. 6, 6701 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Leubner, I. H. Synthesis and properties of pyrido- and azapyridocyanines. J. Org. Chem. 38, 1098–1102 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tolbert, L. M. & Zhao, X. Beyond the cyanine limit: peierls distortion and symmetry collapse in a polymethine dye. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3253–3258 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Latt, S. A. & Stetten, G. Spectral studies on 33258 Hoechst and related bisbenzimidazole dyes useful for fluorescent detection of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 24, 24–33 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Breusegem, S. Y., Clegg, R. M. & Loontiens, F. G. Base-sequence specificity of Hoechst 33258 and DAPI binding to five (A/T)4 DNA sites with kinetic evidence for more than one high-affinity Hoechst 33258-AATT complex. J. Mol. Biol. 315, 1049–1061 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Moon, J. H., Kim, S. K., Sehlstedt, U., Rodger, A. & Nordén, B. DNA structural features responsible for sequence-dependent binding geometries of Hoechst 33258. Biopolymers 38, 593–606 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kapuściński, J. & Szer, W. Interactions of 4’, 6-diamidine-2-phenylindole with synthetic polynucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 3775–3799 (1978).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Reus, C., Stolar, M., Vanderkley, J., Nebauer, J. & Baumgartner, T. A convenient N-arylation route for electron-deficient pyridines: the case of π-extended electrochromic phosphaviologens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11710–11717 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Uno, K. et al. Key structural elements of unsymmetrical cyanine dyes for highly sensitive fluorescence turn-on DNA probe. Chem. Asian J. 12, 233–238 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Albota, M. et al. Design of organic molecules with large two-photon absorption cross sections. Science 281, 1653–1656 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Williamson, D. H. & Fennell, D. J. Visualization of yeast mitochondrial DNA with the fluorescent stain ‘DAPI’. Meth. Enzymol. 56, 728–733 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kristoffersen, A. S., Erga, S. R., Hamre, B. & Frette, Ø. Testing fluorescence lifetime standards using two-photon excitation and time-domain instrumentation: rhodamine B, coumarin 6 and lucifer yellow. J. Fluoresc. 24, 1015–1024 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bunting, J. R., Phan, T. V., Kamali, E. & Dowben, R. M. Fluorescent cationic probes of mitochondria. Metrics and mechanism of interaction. Biophys. J. 56, 979–993 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jakobs, S. & Wurm, C. A. Super-resolution microscopy of mitochondria. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 20, 9–15 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ježek, P., Špaček, T., Tauber, J. & Pavluch, V. Mitochondrial nucleoids: superresolution microscopy analysis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 106, 21–25 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kukat, C. et al. Super-resolution microscopy reveals that mammalian mitochondrial nucleoids have a uniform size and frequently contain a single copy of mtDNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13534–13539 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Brown, T. A. et al. Superresolution fluorescence imaging of mitochondrial nucleoids reveals their spatial range, limits, and membrane interaction. Mol. Cell Biol. 31, 4994–5010 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Stephan, T., Roesch, A., Riedel, D. & Jakobs, S. Live-cell STED nanoscopy of mitochondrial cristae. Sci. Rep. 9, 12419 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zipper, H., Brunner, H., Bernhagen, J. & Vitzthum, F. Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e103 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, Q. et al. RNA-selective, live cell imaging probes for studying nuclear structure and function. Chem. Biol. 13, 615–623 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fischer, M. & Georges, J. Fluorescence quantum yield of rhodamine 6G in ethanol as a function of concentration using thermal lens spectrometry. Chem. Phys. Lett. 260, 115–118 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Magde, D., Brannon, J. H., Cremers, T. L. & Olmsted, J. III Absolute luminescence yield of cresyl violet. A standard for the red. J. Phys. Chem. 83, 696–699 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Albuquerque, L., Ventura, C. & Gonçalves, R. Refractive indices, densities, and excess properties for binary mixtures containing methanol, ethanol, 1,2-ethanediol, and 2-methoxyethanol. J. Chem. Eng. Data 41, 685–688 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nakamura M. et al. Auxin and ROP GTPase signaling of polar nuclear migration in root epidermal hair cells. Plant Physiol. 176, 378–391 (2018).

  46. 46.

    Digman, M. A., Caiolfa, V. R., Zamai, M. & Gratton, E. The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. Biophys. J. 94, L14–L16 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wang, C. et al. A photostable fluorescent marker for the superresolution live imaging of the dynamic structure of the mitochondrial cristae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15817–15822 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Genisson, Y., Marazano, C., Mehmandoust, M., Gnecco, D. & Das, B. C. Zincke’s reaction with chiral primary amines: a practical entry to pyridinium salts of interest in asymmetric synthesis. Synlett 431–434 (1992).

  49. 49.

    Coe, B. J. et al. Quadratic nonlinear optical properties of N-aryl stilbazolium dyes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 12, 110–116 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are deeply grateful to Prof. K. Itami and Prof. T. Higashiyama at Nagoya University for enormous help of this work such as invaluable comments, discussion, and financial support. We thank Dr. H. Ito, Dr. Y. Segawa, Dr. T. Fujikawa, and Dr. K. Kato at Nagoya University for many helpful comments. We also thank M. Tsuzuki (Nagoya University) for supporting cell culture and cell toxicity assessment. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS (14J03652 to K.U., 19H05364, 20H05412 to Y.S., 16H06464, 16K21727, JP16H06280 to T.H.), Toyoaki scholarship Foundation and Ohsumi Frontier Science Foundation to Y.S., the ERATO program from JST (JPMJER1302 to K.I.) and the CREST program from JST (JPMJCR1924 to Y.Tsuchiya, Nagoya University).

Author information




K.U. and Y.S conceived and designed this research. K.U performed synthesis of all PC dyes and most of the spectroscopic measurements. Y.S. and N.S. performed fluorescence titration experiments using hairpin oligonucleotides and all imaging experiments. K.U. and Y.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshikatsu Sato.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The patent application, “Cyanine compound and fluorescent dye” (WO2019012963) invented by Y.S. and K.U. has been published ( N.S. declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Itaru Hamachi, Jürgen Seibel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uno, K., Sugimoto, N. & Sato, Y. N-aryl pyrido cyanine derivatives are nuclear and organelle DNA markers for two-photon and super-resolution imaging. Nat Commun 12, 2650 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing