ZBP1 not RIPK1 mediates tumor necroptosis in breast cancer

Baik, Jin Young; Liu, Zhaoshan; Jiao, Delong; Kwon, Hyung-Joon; Yan, Jiong; Kadigamuwa, Chamila; Choe, Moran; Lake, Ross; Kruhlak, Michael; Tandon, Mayank; Cai, Zhenyu; Choksi, Swati; Liu, Zheng-gang

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23004-3

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 11 May 2021

ZBP1 not RIPK1 mediates tumor necroptosis in breast cancer

Jin Young Baik¹,
Zhaoshan Liu¹,
Delong Jiao¹,
Hyung-Joon Kwon¹,
Jiong Yan¹,
Chamila Kadigamuwa¹,
Moran Choe¹,
Ross Lake²,
Michael Kruhlak³,
Mayank Tandon ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1675-5040^4,5,
Zhenyu Cai ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6252-5879⁶,
Swati Choksi¹ &
…
Zheng-gang Liu¹

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 2666 (2021) Cite this article

10k Accesses
76 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Tumor necrosis happens commonly in advanced solid tumors. We reported that necroptosis plays a major role in tumor necrosis. Although several key necroptosis regulators including receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) have been identified, the regulation of tumor necroptosis during tumor development remains elusive. Here, we report that Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1), not RIPK1, mediates tumor necroptosis during tumor development in preclinical cancer models. We found that ZBP1 expression is dramatically elevated in necrotic tumors. Importantly, ZBP1, not RIPK1, deletion blocks tumor necroptosis during tumor development and inhibits metastasis. We showed that glucose deprivation triggers ZBP1-depedent necroptosis in tumor cells. Glucose deprivation causes mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release to the cytoplasm and the binding of mtDNA to ZBP1 to activate MLKL in a BCL-2 family protein, NOXA-dependent manner. Therefore, our study reveals ZBP1 as the key regulator of tumor necroptosis and provides a potential drug target for controlling tumor metastasis.

MLKL in cancer: more than a necroptosis regulator

Article 05 May 2021

Sofie Martens, Jolien Bridelance, … Nozomi Takahashi

The resurrection of RIP kinase 1 as an early cell death checkpoint regulator—a potential target for therapy in the necroptosis era

Article Open access 28 September 2022

Eunjin Ju, Kyeong Ah Park, … Gang Min Hur

The AMPK-related kinase NUAK2 suppresses glutathione peroxidase 4 expression and promotes ferroptotic cell death in breast cancer cells

Article Open access 06 May 2022

Tanu Singh, Alexander Beatty & Jeffrey R. Peterson

Introduction

Necrosis is a form of cell death distinct from apoptosis. While apoptotic cells normally have plasma membrane blebbing and nuclear fragmentation and retain membrane integrity, necrotic cells bear the character of rounding of the cell, gaining in cell volume, the rupture of plasma membrane and the release of intracellular contents^1,2,3,4. Necroptosis is a programmed necrosis^1,2,3,4,5. By studying TNF-induced necroptosis, our understanding of the molecular mechanism of necroptosis has been greatly improved. It is now known that receptor interacting protein kinase 1 and 3 (RIPK1 and RIPK3) and the mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) constitute the core of the necroptosis machinery^2,3,4,5. Importantly, RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation of MLKL results in oligomerization of the latter and its subsequent translocation to the plasma membrane^6,7,8,9. While this pathway is also critical for other death factors, such as FasL or TRAIL, -induced necroptosis, RIPK1 is not involved in viral infection and Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated necroptosis, although RIPK3 and MLKL seem to be the common players of necroptosis⁵. Two other proteins, Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1), also known as DAI/DLM-1, and TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β (TRIF) are known to function upstream of RIPK3 and interact with RIPK3 through their RHIM (RIP homotypic interaction motif) domains to mediate necroptosis in response to viral infection or TLR signaling respectively^10,11.

Although recent studies have reported that the necroptotic pathway may be involved in tumorigenesis¹², it is not clear if tumor cells undergo necroptosis during tumor development, and if so, what role necroptosis of tumor cells plays in tumorigenesis and tumor metastasis. Foci of cell death are commonly observed in core regions of solid tumors as a result of inadequate vascularization and subsequent metabolic stresses such as hypoxia and nutrient deprivation^13,14. Because the morphology of dead tumor cells appears to be necrotic, these foci of cell death are referred as tumor necrosis^12,15,16. Recently, we demonstrated that tumor necrosis is mainly necroptotic¹⁷. Tumor necrosis is thought to be caused by hypoxia and nutrient deprivation^13,14, but it is not clear whether these conditions lead to necroptosis of tumor cells. On the other hand, some recent studies suggested that tumor necroptosis may be triggered by death factors and engages RIPK1 and RIPK3 pathway during tumor development^18,19. However, a recent study showed that RIPK1 is needed for inflammatory diseases, but not tumor growth or metastasis²⁰. Therefore, the underlying mechanism of tumor necroptosis during tumorigenesis remains elusive. Particularly, the role of RIPK1 in tumor necroptosis has not been directly evaluated. In this current study, we report that Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1), not RIPK1, mediates necroptosis of tumor cells during tumor development in preclinical cancer models. We found that the levels of ZBP1 and RIPK3 expression are dramatically elevated in necrotic tumors during tumor development. Importantly, we demonstrated that deletion of ZBP1 blocks necroptosis of tumor cells during tumor development and consequently inhibits tumor metastasis in MVT-1 breast cancer model. In addition, we showed that glucose deprivation (GD), not hypoxia or glutamine deprivation (GlnD), triggers ZBP1-depedent necroptosis. Therefore, our study reveals ZBP1 as the key regulator of tumor necroptosis during tumor development.

Results

RIPK1 is not required for MVT-1 tumor necroptosis

To investigate the role of RIPK1 in tumor necroptosis, we first tested if the specific RIPK1 inhibitor, Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1), has any effect on tumor necroptosis in the MVT-1 mouse breast cancer model^21,22 as others and our early studies showed that Nec-1 effectively blocks TNF-induced necroptosis in vivo^1,23,24. In our previous study, we demonstrated that the status of tumor necrosis and MLKL phosphorylation, which happens mainly in tumor cells, reflects the level of tumor necroptosis in solid tumors¹⁷. We found that tumor necrosis and MLKL phosphorylation were not affected by the administration of Nec-1 (Fig. 1a, b). These results imply that necroptosis of tumor cells may be independent of RIPK1. To confirm this possibility, we generated RIPK1 knockout (RIPK1 KO) and CRISPR control (CRISPR CT) MVT-1 cells with CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Supplementary Fig. 1a). RIPK1 deletion does not affect the in vitro and in vivo proliferation of MVT-1 cells and MVT-1 tumor growth (Supplementary Fig. 1b–d). Importantly, we found that RIPK1 deletion actually increased, instead of reducing, tumor necrosis and MLKL phosphorylation in RIPK1 KO tumors (Fig. 1c, d). The deletion of RIPK1 protein does not affect the expression levels of MLKL and RIPK3 in tumors (Fig. 1e). Consistent with our previous report¹⁷, necroptosis is the predominant form of cell death in tumor necrosis areas as there are limited apoptotic cells in both CRISPR CT and RIPK1 KO tumors (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Therefore, these data suggest that RIPK1 is not required to undergo necroptosis during tumor development in MVT-1 breast cancer model.

**Fig. 1: RIPK1 is not required for MVT-1 mammary tumor necroptosis.**

ZBP1 is highly expressed in necrotic tumors

Since RIPK1 is not essential for necroptosis of tumor cells during tumor development, we searched for possible tumor necroptosis mediators upstream of RIPK3. We examined the expression levels of two other known RIPK3 upstream effectors of necroptosis, Z-DNA-binding protein 1 (ZBP1), also known as DAI/DLM-1, and TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β (TRIF) in MVT-1 and MMTV-PyMT tumors, a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of breast cancer^10,11,25. We found that the expression levels of ZBP1 are significantly increased in the later stages of these tumors when necrosis happens (Fig. 2a, b)¹⁷. The expression levels of RIPK3 protein are also elevated. However, neither RIPK1 nor TRIF expression level is increased in these tumors (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). To exclude the possibility that this increase of ZBP1 expression is due to infiltrating immune cells that are known to have ZBP1 expression²⁶, we generated GFP-expressing MVT-1 cells and isolated pure population of tumor cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). Consistent with our findings with tumor lysates, the levels of ZBP1 and RIPK3, but not RIPK1, are dramatically increased in GFP-MVT-1 cells isolated from tumors compared to that in cultured cells (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, RIPK1 protein level is decreased in the isolated tumor cells. The increased expression of ZBP1 and RIPK3 also happens in mouse melanoma B16, mouse lung cancer LLC, human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 tumors as their expression levels are significantly higher in the cells from tumors compared to that in the cultured parental cells (Fig. 2d, e and Supplementary Fig. 2e, f). These results confirmed that ZBP1 and RIPK3 proteins are also highly expressed in other types of solid tumors. In addition, we found that RIPK1 protein levels are significantly decreased in these tumors as well. While there is a modest decrease of RIPK1 mRNA level in tumors, the mRNA levels of ZBP1 and RIPK3 are significantly increased in isolated tumor cells (Fig. 2f). Therefore, these results suggest that the expression of ZBP1 and RIPK3 are increased at the advance stages of solid tumors. Through bioinformatic analysis of the human cancer datasets, we found that human ZBP1 expression is significantly increased in human breast cancer and several other types of solid tumors when compared to their normal tissue (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 2g, h). Previous studies have suggested that RIPK3 expression is low in primary tumors due to DNA methylation²⁷. In both MVT-1 and MMTV-PyMT tumors (Fig. 2a, b), while RIPK3 levels are very low/undetectable in the early stages of tumor development, RIPK3 expression is dramatically upregulated when tumor reaches certain sizes. We found that DNA methylation of RIPK3 and DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) are dramatically decreased in late stage MVT-1 tumors, suggesting that the reprogramming of RIPK3 expression is likely due to the reduction of DNA methylation (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Fig. 2i).

**Fig. 2: ZBP1 is highly increased in late stage of mouse and human tumors.**

ZBP1 is essential for tumor necroptosis

To examine whether ZBP1 is needed for tumor necroptosis during MVT-1 mammary tumor development, we generated CRISPR ZBP1 knockout (ZBP1 KO) and CRISPR control (CRISPR CT) MVT-1 cells by transient transfection and selected clones with no Cas9 expression for our study because Cas9 is immunogenic²⁸. We found that ZBP1 deletion does not affect in vitro and in vivo proliferation of MVT-1 cells and MVT-1 tumor growth (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). When examining the levels of necroptosis of the tumors from these cells, we found that tumor necrosis is dramatically reduced in ZBP1 KO tumors compared to CRISPR CT tumors by comparing the middle sections of four different WT and ZBP1 KO tumors and the serial sections of three different pairs of WT and ZBP1 KO tumors (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 3d) and that, while there is abundant MLKL phosphorylation in necrotic areas of CRISPR CT tumors, little MLKL phosphorylation is detected in ZBP1 KO tumors (Fig. 3c). In contrast, the cleaved Casp-3 positive and TUNEL positive cells in ZBP1 KO tumors are dramatically increased compared to CRISPR CT tumors, indicating blocking necroptosis leads to the increase of apoptosis as we reported previously¹⁷ (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 3c). These observations with IHC are confirmed in the ZBP1 KO tumor lysates by western blot analysis (Fig. 3d). These results suggest that ZBP1 plays a critical role in tumor necroptosis in MVT-1 breast cancer model. These findings were confirmed using a different ZBP1 sgRNA to knock out ZBP1 in MVT-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). This conclusion is further supported by knocking down of ZBP1 in B16 mouse melanoma tumor model (Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). We found that ZBP1 knockdown leads to the reduction of tumor necrosis and MLKL phosphorylation, but increases of cleaved Casp-3 and TUNEL positive cells in B16 melanoma tumors (Supplementary Fig. 3i, k). Therefore, ZBP1 is essential for tumor necroptosis during tumor development in these cancer models.

**Fig. 3: ZBP1 is critical for tumor necroptosis and lung metastasis.**

The MVT-1 breast cancer model is known to develop lung metastasis at 4 to 5 weeks post-implantation²². Examining the effect of ZBP1 deletion on lung metastasis, we found that mice implanted with CRISPR CT tumor cells had high lung metastasis whereas mice with ZBP1 KO MVT-1 cells had little lung metastasis (Fig. 3e). These data were confirmed using the second ZBP1 sgRNA KO cells (Supplementary Fig. 3l). ZBP1 deletion does not affect MVT-1 cells’ ability to migrate and extravasation (Supplementary Fig. 3m, n). Therefore, these data suggest that ZBP1 deletion dramatically reduces lung metastasis in MVT-1 breast cancer model.

Glucose deprivation induces ZBP1-dependent necroptosis

RIPK1 is essential for death factor-induced necroptosis^{2,3,4,5,29,30}. As we demonstrated that RIPK1 is dispensable for tumor necroptosis, it is unlikely that death factors including TNF are the key triggers in tumor necroptosis. On the other hand, as necroptosis is crucial for tumor necrosis and tumor necrosis is thought to be caused by hypoxia and nutrient deprivation^13,14, we then tested whether hypoxia, glucose deprivation (GD) or glutamine deficiency (GlnD) could induce necroptosis in tumor cells. We found that GD, but not GlnD or hypoxia, induced MVT-1 and MMTV-PyMT tumor cells to undergo necroptosis, without caspase-3 activation within 36 h (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Extended treatment of GlnD or hypoxia for 72 h and longer was needed to trigger apoptosis, not necroptosis, in these tumor cells (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). In addition, as interferons (IFNs) are known to induce tumor cell death and ZBP1 expression³¹, we also checked if IFNs could induce necroptosis in these tumor cells and found that IFNs do not induce MLKL phosphorylation, but some Casp-3 cleavage (Supplementary Fig. 4f, g). Since necroptosis is the dominant form of tumor cell death in necrotic tumors, these results indicate that GD is the possible trigger for tumor necroptosis during tumor development. We next tested whether ZBP1 is required for GD-induced necroptosis in MVT-1 cells. Because the levels of ZBP1 and RIPK3 proteins are quite low in cultured MVT-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4h), we need to elevate the expression levels of these proteins before GD treatment. To restore the RIPK3 expression, we treated cells with the DNA methyl-transferase inhibitor, 5-AD (5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine), and found that not only RIPK3 expression is increased, but surprisingly, the ZBP1 protein level is also dramatically elevated (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 4h). Importantly, we found that GD treatment induced MLKL phosphorylation in CRISPR CT, but not in ZBP1 KO cells and at the same time, while GD treatment leads to little Casp-3 activation in CRISPR CT cells, Casp-3 cleavage is increased in ZBP1 KO cells (Fig. 4b). Consistently, ZBP1 deletion significantly reduced GD-induced cell death (Fig. 4b). We verified the role of ZBP1 in GD-induced necroptosis by knocking down ZBP1 with shRNA in MVT-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4i) as well as in B16 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4j). Importantly, we confirmed this observation with CRISPR CT and ZBP1 KO cells from MVT-1 tumors without 5-AD treatment (Supplementary Fig. 4k). Additionally, we found that IFN-induced apoptosis is RIPK1-independent in MVT-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4l). These results suggest that ZBP1 is essential for GD-induced necroptosis in tumor cells. Consistent with our early finding that RIPK1 is not required for tumor necroptosis during tumor development, we found that RIPK1 is not required for GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation (Fig. 4c). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a, GD triggers a graduate decrease of RIPK3 protein while MLKL phosphorylation is increasing. We confirmed that the decrease of RIPK3 protein is due to protein degradation as the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 blocks the GD-induced decrease of RIPK3 (Supplementary Fig. 4m).

**Fig. 4: Glucose deprivation (GD) induces tumor necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.**

The glucose analog, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), is known to block glycolysis at the phosphoglucoisomerase level because it cannot undergo further glycolysis³². Since it has been shown that 2DG blocks GD-induced cell death³³, we therefore tested if 2DG inhibits GD-induced necroptosis in MVT-1 cells. We found that 2DG treatment blocks GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation in MVT-1 cells (Fig. 4d). More importantly, as a previous study reported that 2DG has limited effect on tumor growth in the orthotopic breast tumor model³², we then examined if 2DG blocks tumor necroptosis in our MVT-1 tumor model by administering 2DG, daily for two weeks, to mice 3 weeks after implantation of MVT-1 cells. As shown in Fig. 4e, we found that 2DG treatment significantly reduced MLKL phosphorylation in MVT-1 tumors. This result indicates that glucose deprivation plays a key role in triggering tumor necroptosis during tumor development.

The Z-DNA binding domain 2 (Zα2) of ZBP1 is critical for ZBP1 to mediate tumor necroptosis

ZBP1 is known to interact with RIPK3 to mediate viral infection-induced necroptosis¹¹. We examined if GD treatment induces ZBP1 and RIPK3 interaction. Due to the lack of suitable anti-ZBP1 antibody for immunoprecipitating endogenous ZBP1 protein, we generated HA-ZBP1 MVT-1 cells by stably expressing HA-ZBP1 protein and performed immunoprecipitation experiment with anti-HA antibody. After 5-AD treatment that elevates RIPK3 expression in these cells, HA-ZBP1 protein was immunoprecipitated from cells collected at different time points after GD treatment. As shown in Fig. 5a, RIPK3 protein was co-precipitated with HA-ZBP1 after 12 h of GD treatment, suggesting that GD treatment triggers the formation of ZBP1/RIPK3 complex. For viral infection-induced necroptosis, it has been reported that the Z-DNA binding domain 2 (Zα2) of ZBP1 is critical for sensing the viral nucleic acids³⁴. To gain some insight into how ZBP1 senses the signal from GD treatment, we generated Zα2 ZBP1 mutant protein and tested if the Zα2 domain is critical for ZBP1 to mediate GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation (Fig. 5b). Since the RHIM A domain of ZBP1 is known to mediates the interaction with RIPK3, we also mutated this domain as a control for the loss of function of ZBP1 protein. We then transfected the WT and these mutant ZBP1 plasmids into ZBP1 KO MVT-1 cells and examined if they could restore GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation. As shown in Fig. 5b, while WT ZBP1 is able to restore GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation in ZBP1 KO MVT-1 cells, both Zα2 and RHIM A ZBP1 mutants failed to do so. These results suggested that Zα2 domain is critical for ZBP1 to mediate GD-induced necroptosis in MVT-1 cells.

**Fig. 5: The Z-DNA binding domain 2 (Zα2) of ZBP1 is critical for mediating tumor necroptosis.**

To evaluate if the Zα2 domain is critical for ZBP1 to mediate tumor necroptosis during tumor development, we implanted MVT-1 CT, ZBP1 KO, and WT or different mutant ZBP1 reconstituted KO cells into the fat pads of mice and examined the status of MLKL phosphorylation and Casp-3 cleavage in the resulting tumors of these different cells. As shown in Fig. 5c, while WT ZBP1 protein restored the MLKL phosphorylation that is absent in ZBP1 KO tumors, the Zα2 mutant ZBP1 protein failed to do so. The presence of the WT, not the Zα2 mutant, ZBP1 protein also reduced the cleavage of Casp-3 in tumor cells. These observations were confirmed by western blotting of different tumor samples (Fig. 5d). We examined the lung metastasis in mice implanted with WT or Zα2 mutant ZBP1 reconstituted ZBP1 KO MVT-1 cells. While WT ZBP1 restored the metastasis of ZBP1 KO cells, Zα2 mutant ZBP1 failed to do so (Fig. 5e). This data suggests that the Z-DNA binding domain of ZBP1 is required for its function in promoting metastasis. Therefore, these results suggested that the Zα2 domain of ZBP1 is critical for ZBP1 to mediate tumor necroptosis during tumor development and imply that ZBP1 may need to sense some nucleic acids signal triggered by GD to engage necroptosis.

Release of mitochondrial DNA needed for GD-induced necroptosis

It is reported that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is released to the cytosol and binds to ZBP1 under stress conditions³⁵. To test if cytosolic mtDNA is involved in GD-induced necroptosis, we first examined if mtDNA is released under GD condition. The enhanced cytosolic DNA staining and the reduction of mtDNA mitochondrial localization indicated that mtDNA may be released into the cytosol in MVT-1 and tumor cells from MVT-1 or MMTV-PyMT under GD conditions (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 5a–c). We confirmed that mtDNA is indeed released into the cytoplasm under GD condition by detecting the presence of mitochondrial genes, cytochrome B (CytB) and NADH dehydrogenase 2 (Nd2), in the cytosolic DNAs (Fig. 6b). We examined whether mtDNA is released in MVT-1 tumor paraffin sections of 2-week or 4-week from mice implanted with MVT-1 cells by co-staining mitochondria (green)³⁶ and mitochondrial DNA (red)³⁷. The data suggest that mtDNA may be relased from mitochondria in some tumor cells of 4-week tumor (Supplementary Fig. 5d), implying that mtDNA may be released to the cytosol in tumors that bear necroptosis. We found that the cytosolic mtDNA binds to ZBP1 as the mitochondrial CytB and Nd2 DNAs were co-precipitated with ZBP1 under GD condition with or without 5-AD (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. 5e). The 5-AD treatment alone does not induce the release of mtDNA to the cytosol (input) and mtDNA binding to ZBP1 (IP) while GD alone is sufficient to trigger the release and binding. However, the presence of 5-AD made the cells more sensitive to GD and the release of mtDNA as shown (input), likely the toxicity of 5-AD made cells more fragile. Simillar results were obtained with the immunoprecipitation of endogenous ZBP1 (Supplementary Fig. 5f). Importantly, transfection of the cytosolic DNAs isolated from GD-treated MVT-1 cells induces ZBP1-mediated MLKL phosphorylation (Fig. 6d). Because a previous report suggested that the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway, cGAS/STING, may be involved in necroptosis³⁸, we knocked out STING in MVT-1 cells and found that STING deletion has no effect on GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 5g). To further demonstrate the role of the cytosolic mtDNA in GD-induced necroptosis, we explore whether the release of mtDNA is critical for this process. As mitochondrial proteins, NOXA and PUMA, are implied in regulating mitochondrial integrity under different cell stress conditions^35,39, we then tested if these proteins are involved in the engagement of necroptosis in response to GD. We found that that PUMA knockdown has no effect on GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 5h). However, NOXA knockdown by either siRNA or shRNA dramatically reduced GD-induced cytosolic release of mtDNAs and MLKL phosphorylation in MVT-1 cells (Fig. 6e–g and Supplementary Fig. 5i). The effect of NOXA knockdown on GD-induced cytosolic release of mtDNAs and MLKL phosphorylation was also confirmed in B16, Met-1 and MCF7 cells (Supplementary Fig. 5j–n). Taken together, these data indicate that the mtDNA is released from mitochondria under GD and the cytosolic mtDNAs are critical for triggering GD-induced necroptosis.

**Fig. 6: Glucose deprivation (GD) promotes mitochondrial DNA release and triggers necroptosis.**

Discussion

Evasion of apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer and is critical for tumor development⁴⁰. As programmed necrosis, the role of necroptosis in tumorigenesis has been investigated and both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing effects of necroptosis on tumor development were reported^41,42. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of tumor necroptosis will be critical for elucidating the role of tumor necroptosis in tumorigenesis. Although it has been implied that RIPK1 may be involved in tumor necroptosis, the role of RIPK1 in tumor necroptosis has not been evaluated directly and the regulation of tumor necroptosis is largely unknown. In this current study, we found that RIPK1 is not required for tumor necroptosis during tumor development in MVT1 breast cancer model and may have an inhibitory effect on the induction of tumor necroptosis, this finding is consistent with previous reports that the necroptosis-inducing activity of ZBP1 is hindered by RIPK1 during normal embryonic development⁴³. Importantly, we demonstrated that ZBP1 is the key mediator of tumor necroptosis during tumor development in both MVT-1 and B16 syngeneic orthotopic cancer models and that ZBP1 deletion inhibits tumor metastasis in MVT-1 model. While both RIPK1 and ZBP1 are capable of recruiting RIPK3 to mediate necroptosis, our results indicate that there is little redundancy among these two proteins in mediating tumor necroptosis during tumor development. As RIPK1 is involved in multiple aspects of cellular responses to inflammation and stresses^18,20, it is possible that RIPK1 may be involved in the development of certain types of tumors by regulating these pathways, but not necroptosis. Previous reports studied the possible involvement of necroptosis in tumor development and metastasis, using RIPK1 or RIPK3 KO cells/mice without directly examining tumor necroptosis.

ZBP1 is only expressed in certain normal tissues such as bone marrow and lymphoid tissues^26,44 and is known as a interferon stimulated gene (ISG)^26,45. Given the fact that tumor cells and infiltrating immune cells produce IFNs during tumor development, it is likely that the elevation of ZBP1 expression in tumors is achieved by IFNs induction. We confirmed that ZBP1 expression could be induced by IFNs in MVT-1 tumor cells. Interestingly, while both RIPK3 and ZBP1 expression in MVT-1 cells are induced by the DNA methyl-transferase inhibitor, 5-AD, the induction of these two genes may be through different mechanism in response to 5-AD treatment as RIPK3 expression is only restored by 5-AD-induced DNA demethylation, but not IFNs (Supplementary Fig. 6a). The increase of ZBP1 expression by 5-AD is possibly triggered by the cellular stress responses to 5-AD treatment.

Although hypoxia and nutrient deprivation are thought to be the causes of tumor necrosis, our study showed that only GD induces ZBP1-dependent necroptosis in primary tumor cells. Interestingly, extended treatment for more than 3 days under GlnD or hypoxia did not result in any necroptosis either except some apoptosis in the primary cells (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). Importantly, our finding that the glucose analog, 2DG, blocks GD-induced MLKL phosphorylation in tumors suggests that glucose deprivation plays a key role in tumor necroptosis during tumor development. In addition, some recent publications showed that ZBP1 acts as a key mediator of IFNs-induced necroptotic cell death^31,46,47. In these studies, IFNs trigger necroptosis in the presence of cell cycle inhibitors or IAP inhibitors⁴⁷. As IFNs are known to induce apoptosis in tumor cells⁴⁸, we tested if IFNs induce necroptosis in primary MVT-1 and PyMT tumor cells and only observed minor apoptosis, but no necroptosis (Supplementary Fig. 4f, g). This observation is consistent with the fact that most tumor cells do not undergo necroptosis except those in the core regions of tumors although they are exposed to IFNs during tumor development. Therefore, our data suggests that IFNs is not the trigger of tumor necroptosis during tumor development. We tested the possibility that TNF signaling is involved in GD-induced apoptosis in ZBP1 KO cells. Neutralizing anti-TNFα antibody has no effect on GD-induced cell death in ZBP1 KO MVT-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 6b). As GD leads to mitochondria damage, the remaining cell death is most likely due to the mitochondria-mediated intrinsic apoptotic pathway, which is in a slower kinetics comparing to necroptosis in WT cells.

We found that RIPK1 levels are dramatically decreased in tumor cells. While this decrease of RIPK1 level in tumor cells may accelerate ZBP1-induced tumor necroptosis, loss of RIPK1 combined with the increase of ZBP1 expression is not sufficient to trigger necroptosis in tumor cells as observed in RIPK1 KO MVT-1 tumors (Fig. 1). In other words, these RIPK1 KO cells still need some additional signal such as GD in the core region of tumors to undergo necroptosis. We found that GD triggers the release of mtDNA, which binds to ZBP1 and is essential for GD-induced necroptosis. The essentiality of Zα2 domain of ZBP1 in GD-induced necroptosis supports the idea that ZBP1 sense the cytosolic mtDNA to initiate tumor necroptosis. Interestingly, we found that the mitochondrial protein NOXA is crucial for GD-induced mtDNA release. Previous studies suggested that NOXA plays a key role in the process of mitochondrial membrane damage during apoptosis. Our finding suggests that NOXA may play a similar role in mediating the release of mtDNA during GD-induced necroptosis. However, because NOXA is known to be involved in multiple aspects of mitochondrial functions and biology, such as inhibiting MCL1 and BCL2 functions, and the level of NOXA expression is critical for tumor growth^49,50, and also tumor growth and mitochondrial functions are key factors in regulating the onset and the kinetics of tumor necrosis. In addition to mtDNA release, the role of NOXA in tumor necrosis will be complex and could not be evaluated by simply examining necrosis. The role of NOXA in tumor necrosis and necroptosis will be systematically studied in our future work.

While recent literature demonstrated the involvement of necroptosis in tumor growth, many fundamental questions regarding the regulation and the role of necroptosis in tumorigenesis remain elusive. For example, we found that blocking tumor necroptosis significantly reduces tumor metastasis. However, we still do not know the underlying mechanism about how necroptosis promotes metastasis. Necroptosis in known to promote inflammation and we found that it is true that the macrophages isolated from necroptosis bearing WT tumors are more inflammatory comparing to those from necroptosis null tumors (Supplementary Fig. 6c). Future work is needed to evaluate the possible role of necroptosis-induced inflammation in metastasis. Nevertheless, our work reveals ZBP1, not RIPK1, as the key mediator upstream of RIPK3 in tumor necroptosis and provide new insights about the regulation of tumor necroptosis during tumor development. Particularly, our work identified ZBP1 as a potential target for inhibiting tumor necroptosis as a possible cancer therapy.

Methods

Reagents and antibodies

Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) was purchased from Tocris bioscience. 5-AD (5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine, A3656) and 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) was purchased from Sigma. Interferon β and γ were purchased from R&D systems. Anti-ZBP1 (AG-20B-0010) for mouse from AdipoGen; phospho-MLKL (ab196436) for mouse, MLKL (184718) and RIPK3 (ab72106) for human from Abcam; RIPK3 (2283) for mouse from ProSci; RIPK1 (610459) from BD Biosciences; Ki-67 (12202S), STING (13647), PUMA (14570S), DNMT1(5032), cleaved Caspase-3 (9664), Caspase-3 (14220) and HIF1-α (3434) from Cell Signaling Technology; ZBP1 (AF6309) for human from R&D systems; ZBP1 (sc-271483) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; HA (sc-80s) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; β-Actin (A3853) from Sigma.

Mice

Female FVB/NJ, and FVB/N-Tg (MMTV-PyVT) 634Mul/J (MMTV-PyMT) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. All animal experiments were performed under protocols approved by National Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee and followed NIH guidelines. For orthotopic model, MVT-1 cells (derived from mammary tumor in MMTV-Myc-VEGF bitransgenic mouse were suspended in 100 µl of Matrigel Matrix (Corning) solution (diluted 1:1 with PBS) and then injected (2 × 10⁶/mouse) into the right inguinal mammary fat pad of FVB/NJ mice. Tumor volume was monitored weekly. Mice were routinely euthanized when tumors reached to 1500 mm³ in volume and the whole tumor mass was excised. For B16 melanoma cells or LLC mouse lung cancer cells were suspended in 100 μl of Matrigel Matrix solution (diluted 1:1 with PBS) and then injected (5 × 10⁶/mouse) into the flank of C57BL/6J mice. For human breast cancer cells, MCF7 cells or MDA-MB-231 cells were suspended as described in above and injected (5 × 10⁶/mouse) into nude (BALB/c-nu/nu) mice. Tumor volume was monitored every week upon inoculation. For tail vein injection, the mice were injected with MVT-1 CRISPR CT or MVT-1 ZBP1 KO cells (1 × 10⁶/mouse) into tail vein. The lungs from each group were collected at 2 weeks. For Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) injection, the mice were injected with MVT-1 cells into mammary fat pad and treated with i.v. injection of vehicle or Nec-1 (2.5 mg/kg, mixed with PBS) at 3-week until 5-week by weekly. For 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) injection, the mice were injected with MVT-1 cells into mammary fat pad and treated with i.p. injection of vehicle or 2DG (1 g/kg, mixed with PBS) at 3-week until 5-week by daily. To be comparable to the late stage necrotic MMTV-PyMT and MVT-1 tumors, the tumors from these models were collected as indicated.

RNA-seq analysis of TCGA data

RNA-Seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network was retrieved from NCI’s Genomic Data Commons (GDC) repository using the TCGABiolinks R package⁵¹. Data from GDC’s harmonization pipeline⁵² were downloaded as upper-quantile normalized fragments-per-kilobase-exon (FPKM) values for 56,512 transcripts in each of 11,093 samples from 33 TCGA datasets, along with all available phenotype information. For visualization purposes, only the 15 datasets that contained more than ten normal samples were included. Summarization and visualization were performed in R version 3.6.0⁵³ using the dplyr (version 0.8.3) and ggplot2 (version 3.2.1) packages. For the breast cancer dataset (TCGA-BRCA), differential expression analysis was performed for each tumor stage separately. Lowly expressed genes with a mean FPKM of less than 100 were removed, yielding 46,172 transcripts from 1190 samples. FPKM values were log2-transformed and differential expression was computed using the ‘limma’ package (version 3.40.6)⁵⁴, allowing for the prior variance to be adjusted according to the intensity-variance trend. P values were adjusted for using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

Primary cell culture

We modified and used previously reported methods to isolate tumor cells from primary tumors^55,56. Briefly, MMTV-PyMT tumors from 15-week-old MMTV-PyMT mice or MVT-1 tumors from mice injected with MVT-1 cells at 5 weeks were collected. The tumor tissue was digested in PBS buffer containing 0.5% BSA (Sigma), 2 mM EDTA (Quality Biological), collagenase II (Sigma), collagenase IV (Sigma) and DNase I (Sigma) for 15 min at 37 °C. After incubation, the cells were filtered with 100 μm cell strainer (Corning) and were added with ACK lysing buffer (Quality Biological) to remove RBCs and plated into 10 cm dish. After 16 h, the cells were replated as needed for further experiments.

GFP-MVT-1 sorting

MVT-1 cells were lentiviral transfected with CMV-GFP-T2A-Luciferase Lentivector (SBI system biosciences), successfully transfected MVT-1 cells were GFP positively sorted by using BD FACSAria Fusion sorter (BD bioscience). Then, GFP-MVT-1 cells (2×10⁶) were injected into fat pad of FVB/NJ mice. After 5 weeks, tumor was collected and digested in PBS buffer as in above described. The GFP-positive MVT-1 cells were then sorted from total cells by using a BD FACSAria Fusion sorter. After sorting, GFP-positive MVT-1 cells were lysised in M2 buffer and used for further Immunoblot analysis.

Flow cytometry

A flow cytometer (Sony SA3800) was used for analyses. Relative change in fluorescence was analyzed with FlowJo software. For measurement of cell proliferation, cells were labeled with FITC BrdU Flow Kit (51-2354AK, BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For analysis of cell death, cells were labeled with propidium iodide (PI, Invitrogen).

Histology analysis

Tumors were bisected into two pieces in the middle of the tumor at the longest diameter orientation using a razor blade: one-half of the tumor was immediately placed in 4% buffered formalin (Z-fix) overnight, and the other half was frozen for protein extraction. The fixed tumors were embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm-thick serial sections staining using standard histological procedures. Every 3rd slide was routinely stained with haematoxylin and eosin as described⁵⁷. Tumor sections from the center of excised tumors of similar size were used for analysis. Tumor necrosis was designated on H&E-stained slides as areas of dark-haematoxylin-stained necrotic tumor cells immediately adjacent to light-haematoxylin-stained viable tissues⁵⁸. The quantitation of tumor necrotic/death area was counted using Image J and represented as the percentage of tumor necrotic/death area within whole tumor. Mice tumor sections (4 µm) were deparaffinized by incubation at 56 °C for 30 min and subsequent xylene washes then rehydrated with a graded ethanol. The paraffin sections were subjected to antigen retrieval with retrieval buffer (Dako) at 95 °C for 10 min and cooled down until room temperature. The slides were then treated with 3% H₂O₂ for 5 min washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The slides then were blocked with 2% normal goat serum, followed by overnight incubation with primary antibodies against p-MLKL (1:5000) or cl.Casp-3 (1:1000). Signals were developed using VECTASTIN ABC Elite kit (Vector Laboratories) and DAB Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories) followed by manufacturer’s instructions. For in situ detection of apoptosis, the slides were stained with TUNEL kit (ab206386, abcam) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The slides were counter stained with Hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories) to detect nucleus. For the quantitation of metastatic burden, paraffin-embedded lung tissues were sectioned 400 μm apart throughout the whole lung followed by H&E staining. The frequency of the metastatic foci was counted manually in a blinded fashion.

Generation of ZBP1 knockout cells by CRISPR

MVT-1 cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin mixture. To generate ZBP1 knockout (ZBP1 KO) MVT-1 cells, lentiviral sgRNA vector targeting ZBP1 was constructed by ligation of hybridized oligos into LentiCRISPR V2 (pXPR_001, GeCKO) vector. ZBP1 gRNA sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1. 293T cells were transfected with sgRNA vector, pPAX2 (Addgene) and pCMV-VSV-g (Addgene) for 24 hr. MVT-1 cells were then infected with lentivirus-containing supernatants with polybrene (Millipore) for 24 h. After 3 days of selection with puromycin (2 µg ml⁻¹, Sigma-Aldrich), the ZBP1 KO cells were placed into 96 well plate to undergo clonal selection without puromycin. Single clones with complete knockout of ZBP1 was verified by DNA sequencing and western blot analysis.

Generation of RIPK1 knockout cells by inducible CRISPR system

MVT-1 inducible RIPK1 KO stable cells were generated using the Lenti-X tet-on 3G CRISPR-Cas9 system from Clontech (Takara Bio). Briefly, 293T cells were transfected with pLVX-EF1a-Tet3G, pLVX-TRE3G-Cas9-puro, and pLVX-hyg-sgRIPK1 for 48 h. RIPK1 gRNA sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1. MVT-1 cells were sequentially transduced with lentivirus-containing supernatants with polybrene and selected with G418 (500 µg ml⁻¹), puromycin (2 µg ml⁻¹), and hygromycin (1 mg ml⁻¹), respectively. The stable cells were treated with 2 µg ml⁻¹ doxycycline for two weeks before clonal selection. Single clones with complete knockout of RIPK1 was verified by western blot analysis.

Western blotting analysis and immunoprecipitation

Tumor tissues or in vitro cultured cells were lysed in RIPA buffer or M2 buffer, respectively. Tumor and cell lysates were separated by 4–20% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by probing with anti-MLKL, anti-mouse p-MLKL, anti-RIPK1, anti-RIPK3, anti-ZBP1, anti-cl.Casp-3, anti-HIF1-α, anti-HA, or anti-β-Actin antibodies. Signals were developed by using enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Bio-Rad). For immunoprecipitation, the lysates were precipitated with antibodies (1 μg) and protein-G agarose bead by incubation at 4 °C overnight. The beads were washed four to six times with 1 ml of M2 buffer and the bound proteins were removed by boiling in SDS buffer and resolved in 4-20% SDS-polyacrylamide gels for western blot analysis.

Transwell migration assay

To assess tumor cell migration activity, 2 × 10⁴ MVT-1 CRISPR-CT or MVT-1-ZBP1 KO cells were cultured in serum-free DMEM in the upper compartment of a transwell insert (8 µm pore size, Corning). The lower compartment was filled with DMEM containing 10% FBS. After 12 h, cells in the upper compartment were removed and the transwell membrane was stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich). Migrated cells on the membrane were counted under a light microscope (Zeiss).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Tumor lysates or in vitro cultured cells were subjected to RNA extraction using TriPure isolation reagent (Roche) along with a chloroform extraction method. cDNA synthesis was conducted using Superscript III First-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Predesigned qPCR primers for ZBP1 and β-Actin (Integrated DNA Technologies) were used and relative mRNA expression was measured using SensiFAST Probe Hi-ROX Mix (Bioline) on QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 2^−ΔΔCT method was used to quantify fold induction. To determine RIPK1 and RIPK3 (primer, qPCR was performed with SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI StepOnePlus system according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each cDNA data was normalized by β-Actin expression. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Methylation-specific PCR

Methylation assay were performed as previously described²⁷. Briefly, Genomic DNA was extracted using Quick-DNA Miniprep kit (ZYMO Research, D3024). Methylation status of RIPK3 was determined by methylation-specific PCR. Briefly, genomic DNA was bisulphite-treated with BisuFlash DNA Bisulfite Conversion Easy Kit (Epigentek, P-1054-050). Bisulphite-treated DNA was amplified using primers specific for either methylated or unmethylated DNA. The sequences of methylated-specific (M) primer and unmethylated-specific (U) primer for RIPK3 are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Plasmid construction

Mouse ZBP1 vector was obtained from Vector Builder. Mouse ZBP1 point mutant for RHIM A domain and Zα2 domain was generated by using site-direct mutagenesis. Briefly, to generate RHIM A domain point mutant, four amino acids IQIG from 192 to 195 of ZBP1 were substituted to four alanine AAAA and confirmed by DNA sequencing. To generate Zα2 domain point mutant, asparagine from 122 and tyrosine from 126 were substituted to aspartate and alanine, respectively, and confirmed by DNA sequencing.

shRNA

The shRNA lentiviral plasmids were purchased from Sigma. The shRNA against mouse ZBP1 (NM_021394) or Noxa (NM_021451.1) corresponds to the 3′-untranslated region. The genomic DNA was isolated for PCR.

siRNA

siRNAs (SMARTpool) against mouse Noxa, human NOXA and non-targeting siRNA were purchased from Dharmacon and transfected using RNAi lipofectamine (Invitrogen) according to manufacture protocol. To determine the knockdown effect of Noxa, we performed and confirmed by PCR. The sequences of primers for mouse Noxa and human NOXA are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Mitochondrial DNA analysis

Cytosolic fraction was isolated using Qproteome Mitochondria isolation kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA was extracted from cytosolic fractions, and total cell lysates using the Quick-DNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Presence of mitochondrial DNA was confirmed by PCR. The sequences of primers for mitochondrial genes are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Confocal fluorescence microscopy

MVT-1 cells were treated with GD. Primary MVT-1 cells isolated from 5-week mice were implanted to μ-Dish ibiTreat (80136, Ibidi) and treated for 16 h with GD. Mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA were analyzed by confocal fluorescence microscopy after cell staining with PicoGreen (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at 37 °C and 25 nM MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 10 min. Colocalization of MitoTracker Red and PicoGreen was quantified by analysis of Pearson’s correlation using Image J software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Super-resolution microscopy

Images were acquired using a Nikon Ti-2 microscope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU-W1 SoRa spinning disk unit, 20x plan-apochromat (N.A. 0.75) and 60x plan-apochromat (N.A. 1.49) objective lenses, and Photometrics BSI sCMOS camera. Confocal extended field of view tile images were collected using the CSU-W1 confocal spinning disk and 20x objective lens, and stitched together using the Nikon Elements software. Super-resolution images were collected using the 60x objective and the SoRa spinning disk. Z-stacks were collected using a 0.200 um step size. The images were deconvolved using a Richardson-Lucy constrained iterative algorithm included in the Nikon Elements software.

mtDNA FISH

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of mtDNA on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues³⁶ was performed manually followed by manufacturer’s instructions using ViewRNA™ ISH Tissue Assay kit (Thermo Fisher, 19931). Briefly, the FFPE slides were baked at 60 °C for 1 h, and subsequent xylene washes 3 times for 5 min. Then the slides were rehydrarted twice in 100% ethanol for 5 min. The slides were subjected to 1X Pretreatment Solution at 95 °C for 15 min and incubated with protease solution at 40 °C for 30 min. The slide then were fixed with 10% NBP (4% formaldehyde in PBS) for 5 min at room temperature. The slide were incubated with Mus musculus Cyb561 (1:40, Thermo Fisher, VB1-3029378) at 40 °C for 2 h followed by the standard amplification steps as the manufacturer’s instruction. The slides were counter stained with IraZolve-Mito (Cayman Chemical, 25910)³⁷ to detect mitochondria.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed with the Graphpad Prism 8 software. Two-sided student’s t test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between groups. Differences with P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, its Supplementary Information files, and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. TCGA data referenced in this study are available from NCI’s Genomic Data Commons (GDC) repository, and were accessed using the R package ‘TCGABiolinks’. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Galluzzi, L. et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 25, 486–541 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Green, D. R. The coming decade of cell death research: five riddles. Cell 177, 1094–1107 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galluzzi, L. & Kroemer, G. Necroptosis: a specialized pathway of programmed necrosis. Cell 135, 1161–1163 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Christofferson, D. E. & Yuan, J. Necroptosis as an alternative form of programmed cell death. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 263–268 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wallach, D., Kang, T. B., Dillon, C. P. & Green, D. R. Programmed necrosis in inflammation: toward identification of the effector molecules. Science 352, aaf2154 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cai, Z. et al. Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 55–65 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Translocation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein to plasma membrane leads to necrotic cell death. Cell Res. 24, 105–121 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dondelinger, Y. et al. MLKL compromises plasma membrane integrity by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates. Cell Rep. 7, 971–981 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein MLKL causes necrotic membrane disruption upon phosphorylation by RIP3. Mol. Cell 54, 133–146 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. J. et al. Toll-like receptor 3-mediated necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 31268–31279 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Upton, J. W., Kaiser, W. J. & Mocarski, E. S. DAI/ZBP1/DLM-1 complexes with RIP3 to mediate virus-induced programmed necrosis that is targeted by murine cytomegalovirus vIRA. Cell Host Microbe 11, 290–297 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Caruso, R. et al. Histologic coagulative tumour necrosis as a prognostic indicator of aggressiveness in renal, lung, thyroid and colorectal carcinomas: a brief review. Oncol. Lett. 3, 16–18 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. & William, W. R. Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 437–447 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gatenby, R. A. & Gillies, R. J. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 891–899 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Makki, J. Diversity of breast carcinoma: histological subtypes and clinical relevance. Clin. Med Insights Pathol. 8, 23–31 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Richards, C. H., Mohammed, Z., Qayyum, T., Horgan, P. G. & McMillan, D. C. The prognostic value of histological tumor necrosis in solid organ malignant disease: a systematic review. Future Oncol. 7, 1223–1235 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jiao, D. et al. Necroptosis of tumor cells leads to tumor necrosis and promotes tumor metastasis. Cell Res. 28, 868–870 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seifert, L. et al. The necrosome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via CXCL1 and Mincle-induced immune suppression. Nature 532, 245–249 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yatim, N. et al. RIPK1 and NF-kappaB signaling in dying cells determines cross-priming of CD8(+) T cells. Science 350, 328–334 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Patel, S. et al. RIP1 inhibition blocks inflammatory diseases but not tumor growth or metastases. Cell Death Differ. 27, 161–175 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Trikha, P. et al. E2f3 in tumor macrophages promotes lung metastasis. Oncogene 35, 3636–3646 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pei, X. F. et al. Explant-cell culture of primary mammary tumors from MMTV-c-Myc transgenic mice. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 40, 14–21 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Ito, Y. et al. RIPK1 mediates axonal degeneration by promoting inflammation and necroptosis in ALS. Science 353, 603–608 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu, Q. et al. The cytoplasmic nuclear receptor RARgamma controls RIP1 initiated cell death when cIAP activity is inhibited. Nat. Commun. 8, 425 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lin, E. Y. et al. Progression to malignancy in the polyoma middle T oncoprotein mouse breast cancer model provides a reliable model for human diseases. Am. J. Pathol. 163, 2113–2126 (2003).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fu, Y. et al. Cloning of DLM-1, a novel gene that is up-regulated in activated macrophages, using RNA differential display. Gene 240, 157–163 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koo, G.-B. et al. Methylation-dependent loss of RIP3 expression in cancer represses programmed necrosis in response to chemotherapeutics. Cell Res. 25, 707–725 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chew, W. L. et al. A multifunctional AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 and its host response. Nat. Methods 13, 868–874 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ashkenazi, A. & Dixit, V. M. Death receptors: signaling and modulation. Science 281, 1305–1308 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guicciardi, M. E. & Gores, G. J. Life and death by death receptors. FASEB J. 23, 1625–1637 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ingram, J. P. et al. ZBP1/DAI drives RIPK3-mediated cell death induced by IFNs in the absence of RIPK1. J. Immunol. 203, 1348–1355 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cheong, J. H. et al. Dual inhibition of tumor energy pathway by 2-deoxyglucose and metformin is effective against a broad spectrum of preclinical cancer models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 10, 2350–2362 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, X. X. et al. Nuclear receptor Nur77 facilitates melanoma cell survival under metabolic stress by protecting fatty acid oxidation. Mol. Cell 69, 480–492 e487 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sridharan, H. et al. Murine cytomegalovirus IE3‐dependent transcription is required for DAI/ZBP1‐mediated necroptosis. EMBO Rep. 18, 1429–1441 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, D. et al. PUMA amplifies necroptosis signaling by activating cytosolic DNA sensors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3930–3935 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sorvina, A. et al. Mitochondrial imaging in live or fixed tissues using a luminescent iridium complex. Sci. Rep. 8, 8191 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. An in situ atlas of mitochondrial DNA in mammalian tissues reveals high content in stem and proliferative compartments. Am. J. Pathol. 190, 1565–1579 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schock, S. N. et al. Induction of necroptotic cell death by viral activation of the RIG-I or STING pathway. Cell Death Differ. 24, 615–625 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seo, Y. W. et al. The molecular mechanism of Noxa-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in p53-mediated cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48292–48299 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Najafov, A., Chen, H. & Yuan, J. Necroptosis and cancer. Trends Cancer 3, 294–301 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Z. G. & Jiao, D. Necroptosis, tumor necrosis and tumorigenesis. Cell Stress 4, 1–8 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Newton, K. et al. RIPK1 inhibits ZBP1-driven necroptosis during development. Nature 540, 129–133 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rothenburg, S., Schwartz, T., Koch-Nolte, F. & Haag, F. Complex regulation of the human gene for the Z-DNA binding protein DLM-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 993–1000 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kuriakose, T. & Kanneganti, T. D. ZBP1: innate sensor regulating cell death and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 39, 123–134 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, D. et al. ZBP1 mediates interferon-induced necroptosis. Cell Mol Immunol. 17, 356–368 (2020).
Frank, T. et al. Cell cycle arrest in mitosis promotes interferon-induced necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 26, 2046–2060 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thyrell, L. et al. Interferon alpha-induced apoptosis in tumor cells is mediated through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 24152–24162 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jeong, S. et al. Cannabidiol-induced apoptosis is mediated by activation of Noxa in human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 447, 12–23 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liang, L. et al. Role of Noxa in proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy in human adenoid cystic carcinoma. J. Oral. Pathol. Med. 48, 52–59 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Colaprico, A. et al. TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e71 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gao, G. F. et al. Before and after: comparison of legacy and harmonized TCGA genomic data commons’ data. Cell Syst. 9, 24–34 e10 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Britt-Marie Ljung, B. M. et al. Cell dissociation techniques in human breast cancer Variations in tumor cell viability and DNA ploidy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 13, 153–159 (1989).
Article Google Scholar
Sharon, Y., Alon, L., Glanz, S., Servais, C. & Erez, N. Isolation of normal and cancer-associated fibroblasts from fresh tissues by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). J. Vis. Exp. 17, e4425, (2013).
Fischer, A. H., Jacobson, K. A., Rose, J. & Zeller, R. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. CSH Protoc. 2008, pdb.prot4986, (2008).
Elmore, S. A. et al. Recommendations from the INHAND Apoptosis/Necrosis Working Group. Toxicol. Pathol. 44, 173–188 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Bethesda, MD, USA
Jin Young Baik, Zhaoshan Liu, Delong Jiao, Hyung-Joon Kwon, Jiong Yan, Chamila Kadigamuwa, Moran Choe, Swati Choksi & Zheng-gang Liu
National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, Bethesda, MD, USA
Ross Lake
National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
Michael Kruhlak
National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health, Collaborative Bioinformatics Resource, Bethesda, MD, USA
Mayank Tandon
Advanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
Mayank Tandon
Tongji University Cancer Center, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Zhenyu Cai

Authors

Jin Young Baik
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhaoshan Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Delong Jiao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hyung-Joon Kwon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jiong Yan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chamila Kadigamuwa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Moran Choe
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ross Lake
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael Kruhlak
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mayank Tandon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhenyu Cai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Swati Choksi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng-gang Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.Y.B. designed and performed most of the experiments. Z.S.L. conducted some mouse experiments, and mitochondrial experiments. D.J. and H.K. conducted some mouse experiments. J.Y. generated RIPK1 knockout cells. C.K., M.C., and Z.C. helped with experiments. R.L. and M.K. helped with confocal microscopy. M.T. helped with TCGA data analysis. S.C. helped with experiments and manuscript preparation. Z.-G..L. conceived, supervised and directed the project and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng-gang Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Junying Yuan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baik, J.Y., Liu, Z., Jiao, D. et al. ZBP1 not RIPK1 mediates tumor necroptosis in breast cancer. Nat Commun 12, 2666 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23004-3

Download citation

Received: 03 April 2020
Accepted: 12 April 2021
Published: 11 May 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23004-3

This article is cited by

Crosstalk between metabolism and cell death in tumorigenesis
- Shichao Yang
- Caden Hu
- Yahui Zhu
Molecular Cancer (2024)
PANoptosis: bridging apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in cancer progression and treatment
- Jie Gao
- Anying Xiong
- Xiang He
Cancer Gene Therapy (2024)
Highly Expressed Z-DNA Binding Protein 1 in Esophageal Cancer Promotes Tumor Growth
- Shabahaiti Wusiman
- Yining Liu
- Ling Liu
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2024)
Tumor necroptosis-mediated shedding of cell surface proteins promotes metastasis of breast cancer by suppressing anti-tumor immunity
- Zhaoshan Liu
- Swati Choksi
- Zheng-gang Liu
Breast Cancer Research (2023)
Dynamic alternative DNA structures in biology and disease
- Guliang Wang
- Karen M. Vasquez
Nature Reviews Genetics (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.