Therapeutic B-cell depletion reverses progression of Alzheimer’s disease

Kim, Ki; Wang, Xin; Ragonnaud, Emeline; Bodogai, Monica; Illouz, Tomer; DeLuca, Marisa; McDevitt, Ross A.; Gusev, Fedor; Okun, Eitan; Rogaev, Evgeny; Biragyn, Arya

doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22479-4

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 12 April 2021

Therapeutic B-cell depletion reverses progression of Alzheimer’s disease

Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 2185 (2021) Cite this article

16k Accesses
72 Citations
63 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The function of B cells in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is not fully understood. While immunoglobulins that target amyloid beta (Aβ) may interfere with plaque formation and hence progression of the disease, B cells may contribute beyond merely producing immunoglobulins. Here we show that AD is associated with accumulation of activated B cells in circulation, and with infiltration of B cells into the brain parenchyma, resulting in immunoglobulin deposits around Aβ plaques. Using three different murine transgenic models, we provide counterintuitive evidence that the AD progression requires B cells. Despite expression of the AD-fostering transgenes, the loss of B cells alone is sufficient to reduce Aβ plaque burden and disease-associated microglia. It reverses behavioral and memory deficits and restores TGFβ⁺ microglia, respectively. Moreover, therapeutic depletion of B cells at the onset of the disease retards AD progression in mice, suggesting that targeting B cells may also benefit AD patients.

Contribution of endogenous antibodies to learning deficits and astrocytosis in human P301S mutant tau transgenic mice

Article Open access 14 August 2020

Julia van der Hoven, Annika van Hummel, … Lars M. Ittner

B cells in autoimmune and neurodegenerative central nervous system diseases

Article 11 November 2019

Joseph J. Sabatino Jr, Anne-Katrin Pröbstel & Scott S. Zamvil

Acute targeting of pre-amyloid seeds in transgenic mice reduces Alzheimer-like pathology later in life

Article 16 November 2020

Ruth E. Uhlmann, Christine Rother, … Mathias Jucker

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that mostly affects elderly people. It is associated with impaired clearance of toxic protein aggregates from the brain parenchyma, such as amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides of aberrantly cleaved amyloid precursor protein (APP)¹. Although resident microglial cells phagocytize extracellular Aβ plaques with the help of astrocytes and TGFβ (refs. ^2,3), chronic inflammation, and Aβ production dysregulate this process, causing proliferation and subsequent replacement of homeostatic microglia with disease-associated microglia (DAM)⁴. As in mice with genetic TGFβ deficiency, which suffer from microgliosis and neuronal death⁵, DAM further exacerbate neuroinflammation and neuronal degeneration in AD^6,7, at least in part, through expression of proinflammatory cytokines and downregulation of phagocytosis of Aβ plaques^8,9,10. Consistent with a positive association between AD risk and old age¹¹, when systemic inflammation is increased¹², disease progression also depends on peripheral inflammation and activation of innate immune cells¹³. The role of the adaptive immunity in AD however remains poorly understood, and is mostly linked to T cells exerting both beneficial and harmful functions. For example, in APP/PS1 mice expressing the K670N and M671L Swedish mutations of human APP and L166P mutated presenilin 1 (PS1), the infiltration of Th1 CD4⁺ T cells in the brain either improves¹⁴ or exacerbates AD¹⁵. Moreover, the amelioration of AD in Rag2-deficient APP/PS1 mice is primarily linked to the loss of pathogenic T cells¹⁶. Although Rag deficiency also retards development of functional B cells (besides T cells), the role of B cells in AD is rarely explored and mostly considered to be beneficial. Their main product, nonspecific immunoglobulin and Aβ-specific antibodies in peripheral blood (PB) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of people^17,18 and mice^19,20 with AD, provides neuroprotective benefit. In 5×FAD mice, which overexpress APP with the Swedish (K670N, M671L), Florida (I716V) and London (V717I) mutations, and PS1 with M146L and L286V mutations, Rag deficiency exacerbates AD due to loss of nonspecific immunoglobulin that activates microglial phagocytosis and consequent clearance of Aβ plaques²¹. However, B cells are a heterogenous population of cells. Their function and subset accumulation are regulated by the inflammatory milieu. For example, we recently reported that inflammaging activates monocytes to convert innate B1a cells into pathogenic 4-1BBL⁺ TNFα⁺ MHC-Ι^High B cells (termed 4BL cells), which then induce cytolytic CD8⁺ T cells and insulin resistance in elderly humans, macaques, and mice^22,23. However, the role of these or other activated B cells in aging-associated diseases, such as AD remains unknown.

Here, using three, widely utilized transgenic AD mouse models with or without genetic B-cell deficiency, we provide evidence and mechanistic insight that the loss of mature B cells alone is sufficient to markedly retard the AD progression. Although B cells are thought not to infiltrate the AD brain, we link their presence in the brain parenchyma to the disease progression. Importantly, therapeutic depletion of circulating B cells at the onset of the disease eliminates B cells, and their immunoglobulin deposits in the brain and blocks the AD manifestation. Our data not only warrants a new look to B cells as pathogenic, AD-promoting cells in humans with AD, but also suggests that their B cells should be targeted to control the disease progression.

Results

To assess the involvement of B cells in AD, we first performed a flow cytometry evaluation of B cells in the circulation of congenic and sex- and age-matched C57BL/6 (WT) and 3×TgAD mice, a model for early-onset AD (EOAD, harbors the Swedish APP mutation, the M146V mutation on PS1 and the P301L in MAPT)^24,25. Note: from here on and unless specified, we used aged (60–70 weeks old) female 3×TgAD mice due to their more pronounced AD-like symptom manifestation²⁵. Compared with control mice, 3×TgAD mice significantly upregulated the frequency and numbers of B cells in the circulation and secondary lymphoid organs (Supplementary Fig. 1A and not depicted; gating strategy is in Supplementary Fig. 9A), with innate CD5⁺ B1a and CD5⁻ B1b cells (CD11b⁺ or/and CD23⁻ CD43⁺ CD19⁺cells, respectively) markedly increased, and conventional B2 cells decreased in the spleen and cervical lymph nodes (cLN; Fig. 1A–C and Supplementary Fig. 1B–D). The 3×TgAD mice also contained higher amounts of activated B cells expressing IFNγ, IL6, IL10, and TGFβ in circulation than control mice (Fig. 1D–G), mostly within B1a cells and, at lesser extent B1b and follicular B cells (Supplementary Fig. 1E–H). The AD mouse B cells, particularly B1a cells, markedly upregulated 4-1BBL (Supplementary Fig. 1I, J), resembling pathogenic B1a cells of aged subjects^22,23 and suggesting their potential involvement in AD. To test this possibility, we have generated B-cell-deficient 3×TgAD mice (termed 3×TgAD-BKO, Supplementary Fig. 2A) by crossing 3×TgAD mice with J_HT mice, which lack functional B cells due to the immunoglobulin J_H locus deletion that terminates B-cell development at the pro-B cell stage²⁶. When mice reached 50–60 weeks of age, they were evaluated for hippocampus-dependent cognitive behavior, using the Morris water maze (MWM) task. During the 5-day hidden platform training, both 3×TgAD and 3×TgAD-BKO mice showed comparable performance (not depicted). However, 24 h after the last training session, a probe trial conducted in the absence of the hidden platform, revealed that 3×TgAD-BKO mice spent a significantly longer time in the target quadrant than their 3×TgAD littermates (p = 0.017, n = 13–15, Fig. 2A), indicating a stronger spatial memory of the platform’s location. We also tested exploratory behavior anomalies using the open field arena (OFA, a commonly used assay in 3×TgAD mice^27,28). While 3×TgAD mice exhibited reduced activity as compared with WT mice in the OFA, the impairment was no longer detectable in age-matched 3×TgAD-BKO littermates (left panel, one-way ANOVA F(2,29) = 21.68, p < 0.0001; WT vs 3×TgAD p < 0.0001, 3×TgAD vs 3×TgAD-BKO p < 0.0001, n = 10–11, and Fig. 2B), implying that 3×TgAD-associated behavioral impairments required B cells.

**Fig. 1: Activated B cells were increased in 3×TgAD mice.**

**Fig. 2: Progression of AD required B cells.**

To confirm this conclusion, we tested APP/PS1 mice, another model of EOAD, that exhibit earlier AD pathology compared with 3×TgAD mice²⁹. Of note: subsequent experiments were therefore conducted in female and male, 20–35-week-old mice. Flow cytometry evaluation of circulating B cells revealed that APP/PS1 mice also markedly upregulated B cells expressing IL10 (Fig. 2C) as in 3×TgAD mice (Fig. 1F). However, APP/PS1 mice did not upregulate 4-1BBL⁺ B cells (presumably due to their relatively young age^22,23) despite a significant increase of B1a cells in circulation and the cLN compared with control littermates (Supplementary Fig. 2B, C). We next generated B-cell-deficient APP/PS1-BKO mice by crossing APP/PS1 and J_HT mice. Analysis of spatial learning using the MWM revealed that compared with age- and sex-matched APP/PS1 or WT littermates, B-cell deficiency significantly improved learning deficiency in APP/PS1 mice as evident by latency to reach the escape platform (F(2,33 = 8.288, p = 0.0012; WT vs APP/PS1 p = 0.0006, APP/PS1 vs APP/PS1-BKO p = 0.003, n = 12, Fig. 2D); and in the number of platform region crossings in a probe test conducted 24 h following learning (Kruscal–Wallis ANOVA p = 0.0004; WT vs APP/PS1 p = 0.0002; APP/PS1 vs APP/PS1-BKO p = 0.028, Fig. 2E). Consistent with the lack of exploratory behavior impairment in APP/PS1 mice³⁰, no difference in exploratory behavior of our mice in the OFA (not depicted). Thus, the spatial learning impairments exhibited by APP/PS1 are B-cell dependent.

Because the memory impairments in EOAD are caused by accumulation of Aβ plaques and hippocampal microgliosis³¹, we conducted an immunofluorescent analysis for Aβ plaques (using the 6E10 Ab) and ionized calcium binding adaptor 1 (Iba, a microglial cell marker) in cryopreserved brain sections of APP/PS1-BKO (30 weeks old), 3×TgAD-BKO (60–70 weeks old) and age- and sex-matched control mice. Given that in this model the early intraneuronal Aβ deposition in the subiculum is linked to cognitive impairments³², and that the subiculum and hippocampal CA1 atrophy is increased in AD patients³³, from hereon we primarily analyzed the subiculum. It showed a marked upregulation of Aβ plaques in APP/PS1 and 3×TgAD mice (as compared with healthy control mice), which was reversed in APP/PS1-BKO and 3×TgAD-BKO mice respectively (n = 4–7, Fig. 3A–C and Supplementary Fig. 3A–D). Analysis of frontal cortex and hippocampus in 3×TgAD-BKO mice also revealed that the increase of soluble Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₀ was reversed (n = 2–6, Fig. 3D and Supplementary Fig. 3E). Since both 3×TgAD and 3×TgAD-BKO mice express high levels of the APP transgene in hippocampal neurons (Fig. 3E), we concluded that the benefit of the B-cell deficiency was probably in reduced formation and/or increased clearance of Aβ peptides. Accordingly, large ameboid microglial cells (>5 μm²), which indicate dysfunctional overactivation^34,35 and impaired clearance of Aβ plaques³⁶, were significantly decreased in 3×TgAD-BKO mice to almost that of in WT mice (p < 0.05, compared with 3×TgAD, n = 3–9, Fig. 3F and Supplementary Fig. 3F, G). In contrast, activated microglia (regardless of their size) remained increased in APP/PS1 and APP/PS1-BKO mice (Fig. 3G and Supplementary Fig. 3H). To understand this discrepancy, we compared the function of microglia in these two models. Brain myeloid cells were isolated and stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin (PMAi, which induces microglial cytokine expression and proliferation³⁷) for 4–6 h in the presence of monensin, and then surface markers and intracellular (IC) cytokines of microglia (CD45^IntCD11b⁺) were analyzed using flow cytometry. The loss of B cells did not affect interleukin (IL)1β expression, which was markedly upregulated in both 3×TgAD and APP/PS1 (Supplementary Fig. 4A and Fig. 4A and not depicted; gating strategy is in Supplementary Fig. 9B). In contrast, we noted a marked decrease in TGFβ⁺ and IFNγ⁺ microglia (presumably quiescent and resting microglia^38,39,40) in APP/PS1 and 3×TgAD mice (Fig. 4B, C and Supplementary Fig. 4B–D). The TGFβ⁺ (at lesser extent IFNγ⁺) microglial cells were normalized to the levels of WT control in APP/PS1-KO and 3×TgAD-KO mice (Fig. 4B, C and Supplementary Fig. 4B–D). Brain and hippocampal RNA microarray analyses indicated that B-cell deficiency prevented loss of TGFβ1⁺ microglia in the hippocampi and brains of 3×TgAD mice, as its expression was upregulated (Fig. 4D) while DAM-related transcriptional signature genes, such as Itgax, Cst7, Clec7a, Mamdc2, and Saa3 (ref. ⁴) were downregulated in 3×TgAD-BKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 4E, Supplementary Data 1–3, and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE165111). B-cell deficiency did not affect expression of IL1β nor other DAM genes, such as TNFα, Igf1, and Lilrb4 (Supplementary Fig. 4E and Supplementary Data 1–3). In sum, despite expression of AD-promoting transgenes, DAM accumulation, Aβ plaque deposition, and thus the disease progression required B cells in both 3×TgAD and APP/PS1 models of AD.

**Fig. 3: B-cell deficiency reduced the Aβ plaque burden and microglial activation in the hippocampus of AD mice.**

**Fig. 4: B-cell deficiency at least in part reversed the DAM phenotype.**

Next, we sought to test whether progression of EOAD can also be controlled by a therapeutic inactivation or depletion of B cells at the disease onset. To test this idea, 3×TgAD mice (60–70 weeks old, female) were intraperitoneally injected with anti-CD20/B220 antibody (which depletes B cells in the circulation) for 2 months. Control mice were treated with isotype-matched IgG. The anti-CD20/B220 Ab efficiently depleted B cells in the circulation (Supplementary Fig. 5A). Compared with control treated mice, the anti-CD20/B220 Ab-treated 3×TgAD showed a trend toward increased activity in the OFA (p = 0.07, 30 min, n = 5, Supplementary Fig. 5B). The treatment however significantly reduced the number of Aβ plaques in the subiculum of AD mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 4E, F), but did not affect the number of large (>50 µm²) Iba1⁺ microglial cells in the hippocampus (Supplementary Fig. 5C). To understand this discrepancy, we repeated anti-CD20/B220 Ab treatment in a different cohort of female 60–70-week-old 3×TgAD mice for 2 months (n = 6–7) and then performed a flow cytometry evaluation of microglial cytokines in the perfused brains. As noted above, in 3×TgAD-BKO mice, B-cell depletion significantly reversed the decrease of TGFβ⁺ and IFNγ⁺ microglia in 3×TgAD mice to almost the levels in WT mice (both in terms of frequency and numbers, p < 0.05, Fig. 4C, G and Supplementary Fig. 5D, E) while not affecting IL1β⁺ microglia, which was comparably upregulated in aged 3×TgAD and WT mice (Supplementary Fig. 5F).

To validate these results, we used a third mouse model of EOAD, the 5×FAD mice that develop a more aggressive AD pathology by 40 weeks of age because of a large burden of Aβ plaques caused by additive effects of five familial AD mutations⁴¹. In this model, others have linked AD progression to a decrease in frequency of potentially beneficial B1a cells⁴². However, our cohorts of 5×FAD mice did not exhibit a decrease in B cells, including B1a and B1b cells (both in terms of number and frequency), as compared with control age-matched littermates (Supplementary Fig. 6A, B). The B cells and B1 cells in 5×FAD mice instead appeared to be activated, as they significantly upregulated expression of 4-1BBL (Supplementary Fig. 6C, D). In concordance, IC cytokine staining of splenic cells revealed marked increase of IL10, TGFβ, and IFNγ in B cells (Supplementary Fig. 6E). To test whether depletion of these activated B cells also ameliorates AD, 5×FAD mice (35–47 weeks old, female) were i.p. injected with anti-CD20/B220 Ab or control IgG (n = 7–12) for 2 months. Mice were then evaluated in the OFA for exploratory behavior and anxiety. While control IgG-treated 5×FAD mice showed reduced exploratory behavior compared with WT littermates, this effect was reversed in B-cell-depleted mice (F(2,25) = 5.25, p = 0.013; wt vs 5×FAD p = 0.03, 5×FAD+IgG vs 5×FAD + αCD20 p = 0.02, Fig. 5A). To confirm this result, we quantified Aβ plaques and activated microglia in the hippocampus of these mice. Compared with IgG treatment, B-cell depletion in 5×FAD mice significantly reduced the number of Aβ plaques (Fig. 5B, C) and the large-sized Iba1⁺microglia (Fig. 5D). We repeated the 2-month B-cell depletion experiment in a different cohort of age-matched, female 5×FAD and WT mice (n = 5–12), and evaluated microglial cells using flow cytometry in perfused with saline brains. Similar to 3×TgAD and APP/PS1 mice, TGFβ⁺ and IL10⁺ microglia were significantly decreased in 5×FAD mouse brains as compared with that of WT mice (p < 0.001, Fig. 5E, F). B-cell depletion reversed the decrease of TGFβ⁺ and IL10⁺ microglia in 5×FAD mice (Fig. 5E, F). As in other models, the treatment did not decrease hippocampal IL1β⁺ microglia (Supplementary Fig. 7A, B), presumably to support clearance of Aβ plaques⁴³. Collectively, we concluded that depletion of B cells can retard progression of AD even if applied at the onset of the disease.

**Fig. 5: Therapeutic depletion of B cells improves AD symptoms in 5×FAD mice.**

We then wondered whether B cells promote AD by infiltrating the brain parenchyma. Since the low numbers of B cells (<1% of CD45⁺ cells, not depicted) detected in flowcytometric analyses cannot discriminate between cells residing inside or outside of the parenchyma, we performed immune fluorescent staining of perfused and cryopreserved brain sections of mice. Unlike control age-matched WT mouse brains, we clearly detected a significant increase of B cells in the parenchyma of frontal cortex and hippocampus of 5×FAD mice (Fig. 5G and Supplementary Fig. 7C–E). Importantly, this increase of B cells was almost completely lost in B-cell-depleted 5×FAD mice (Fig. 5G and Supplementary Fig. 7D, E), implying that the cells originated in the circulation. We also stained the brain sections for the presence of IgG. While WT mouse brains were almost devoid of immunoglobulin (Fig. 5H, I), readily detectable and numerous IgG foci were present in the hippocampus parenchyma of 5×FAD mice often colocalized with microglia and Aβ plaques (Fig. 5H, I). This brain IgG increase was lost in B-cell-depleted 5×FAD mice (Fig. 5H, I). However, the depletion did not affect levels of total IgG nor minuscule amounts of Aβ-specific antibody in the circulation (Supplementary Fig. 8A–C), implying that B cells in the brain parenchyma produced IgG and presumably promoted AD.

Discussions

Taken together, we provide counterintuitive evidence for a “dark” side of B cells—they exacerbate manifestation of AD-like symptoms in addition to producing potentially beneficial Aβ plaque-reducing immunoglobulins^{17,18,19,20,21} and expressing AD-ameliorating cytokines⁴². Although the exacerbation in Rag-deficient APP and 5×FAD mice is linked to the loss of protective B cells and T cells^16,21, our data revealed that the genetic loss of B cells alone or their transient depletion at the onset of AD improves the disease symptoms of three different mouse models. Unlike a recent report that linked AD progression to the reduction of anti-inflammatory B1a cells in 5×FAD mice⁴², the numbers of B1a and B1b cells in PB, spleen, and cLN were either unaffected (in 5×FAD mice even when followed for 4, 7, and 12 months) or upregulated (in 3×TgAD and APP/PS1 mice). However, regardless of their numbers, we recently reported that the function of B1a cells is not static and is rather controlled by the inflammatory milieu. In the aged hosts, B1a cells lose their anti-inflammatory activity and acquire pathogenic functions, such as becoming 4-1BBL⁺ B1a cells (termed 4BL cells) that induce cytolytic granzyme-B⁺ CD8⁺ T cells and promote insulin resistance^23,44. In concordance, B1 cells (as well B2 cells, in some models) in AD mice also appeared to acquire an inflamed phenotype, as they upregulated expression of cytokines, such as IFNγ, IL6, TNFα, and IL10, and/or upregulated TGFβ and 4-1BBL. Although age-associated B cells (CD21⁻ CD23⁻ CD19⁺) also accumulate in aging, we did not detect their involvement in our three types of mice with AD.

Consistent with a recent RNA-seq report that revealed presence of mature B cells in the brains of AD mice⁴, our data indicate that AD increases B cells in the brain, and their IgG in the cortex and hippocampus parenchyma, which was often colocalized with Aβ plaques and activated microglia. As in multiple sclerosis and cognitive dysfunction following stroke^45,46,47, B cells in the brain presumably produce immunoglobulins and proinflammatory factors exacerbating AD-promoting neuroinflammation. First, transfer of IgG from the circulation into the brain is an inefficient process, as only 0.0017% of intravenously injected immunoglobulin reaches the hippocampus of WT and AD mice⁴⁸. Second, consistent with presumed ability of the intra-blood-brain-barrier sites of AD patients to synthesize immunoglobulin⁴⁹, transient depletion of B cells in 5×FAD mice significantly decreased brain B cells and IgG without affecting Aβ-specific and nonspecific antibody levels in sera. Although immunoglobulin is thought to activate and promote microglial uptake of Aβ plaques²¹, the Aβ–IgG complex in CSF is thought to negatively affect the cognitive status of AD patients⁵⁰. Our data also indicate that the loss of B cells, thus IgG, in the brain significantly retards the development of AD. Although the mechanism of this process is a topic of a different study, we think that brain IgG (or its immune complex) alone or in concert with B-cell cytokines exacerbates neuroinflammation in AD. To do this, the brain IgG presumably targets chronically stressed DAMs (and other brain cells)⁴ through their upregulated Fc-receptors and complement^51,52,53, as recently shown for myelin–IgG immune complexes from the brain of people with multiple sclerosis, which break immune tolerance of human microglia to microbial stimuli and cause harmful neuroinflammation via FcγRI and FcγRIIa⁵⁴. This in turn leads to downregulation of TGFβ⁺ microglia, i.e., reduction in survival of resting M0 microglia and Aβ plaque clearance^3,40,55. Similar decrease in expression of TGFβ in DAM and increase in signals of mature B cells is also noted in recent brain RNA-seq results of AD mice⁴. Conversely, the loss of B cells increased TGFβ⁺ microglia as well downregulated expression of Trem2, Clec7a, and Itgax in the hippocampus, i.e., replacement of DAM with microglia that eliminate Aβ oligomers and other neurotoxic debris^8,9,10, reduced Aβ plaques and improved behavioral impairments of our AD mice. It is tempting to speculate that B cells similarly participate in EOAD in humans, as the severity of the disease in humans with mild AD is correlated with accumulation of double negative memory CCR6⁺ B cells in the circulation⁵⁶. Moreover, elderly humans accumulate pathogenic 4-1BBL⁺TNFα⁺ B cells that induce antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells and promote insulin resistance^22,23, two events linked to AD^57,58. We therefore propose that the inactivation of B cells can also benefit humans with AD, as therapeutic B-cell removal even at the onset of the disease reversed manifestation of AD in mice.

Methods

Mice

The animal protocols were approved and permission was granted to perform animal experiments by the ACUC committee of the National Institute on Aging (ASP 321-LMBI-2022) under the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 86-23, 1985). AD transgenic mice (5–80 weeks of age, females) were bred, aged, and housed in the same, specific pathogen-free environment at the National Institute on Aging (NIA). Female C57BL/6j mice (Stock # 000664) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and congenic 3×TgAD mice (triple transgenic with three human genes associated with familial AD, B6;129-Psen1^tm1Mpm Tg(APPSwe,tauP301L)1 Lfa/Mmjax))^24,25, APP/PS1 mice (B6.Cg-Tg(APPswe,PSEN1DE9) 85Dbo/J)¹⁶, 5×FAD mice expressing mutant human APP and PSEN1 genes (B6.Cg-Tg;APPSwFILon,PSEN1*M146L*L286V)²¹ and J_HT mice (B6.129P2-Igh-J^tm1Cgn/J), which do not develop functional B cells in the circulation due to the immunoglobulin J_H locus deletion²⁶, were bred and maintained at NIA, Baltimore, MD. Transient B-cell depletion was performed as previously reported^22,59, such as mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p., three to six times for 2–3 months) with anti-CD20 Ab (clone 5D2, Genetech, 100 μg/mouse) and anti-B220 Ab (150 μg/mouse, TIB-146, BioXCell).

Tissues and blood processing

Single-cell suspension of spleen and cLN was prepared using a 70 μm cell strainer (BD Falcon, Bedford, MA). Blood was collected in tube with 2 mg/ml of Na-heparin (Sigma). Spleen and blood cell suspensions were treated with ACK buffer to remove red blood cells. The brains were dissociated with Adult Brain Dissociation kit for mouse and rat (MiltenyiBiotec, Auburn, CA) using GentleMACS™ Dissociator (MiltenyiBiotec), following the manufacturer’s instruction.

Flow cytometry (FACS)

Antibodies (Ab, see Supplementary Data 4) to mouse CD19, CD5, CD11b, CD43, 4-1BBL, IFNγ, IL1β, TGFβ, IL10, IL6, CD11b, and CD45 and their isotype-matched control Ab were purchased from Biolegend, eBioscience, BD Bioscience, and R&D Systems, unless specified. For IC cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml PMA (Tocris Bioscience) and 500 ng/ml ionomycin (Tocris Bioscience) for 1–2 h, followed by Golgi stop for 3–4 h using 10 μmol/l of Monensin or Brefeldin A (eBioscience); and then stained following manufacturer’s instruction for IC fixation and permeabilization (eBioscience). Concentration of antibody used in FACS staining was 1 μg per 10⁶ cells. Data were analyzed on FACS Canto II (BD) or CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.) or CytExpert software (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).

Brain immune fluorescent staining

Mice were perfused with PBS for 20–30 min after euthanasia with CO₂, and the brains were removed and washed with PBS, and then half brain was fixed by 4% PFA in PBS. After 24-h fixation, the brain was transferred to PBS buffer containing 30% sucrose in 15 ml tubes for ~2 days until the brain sank to the bottom. Next, the brains were embedded in OCT compound, frozen on dry ice and stored in −80 °C before cryosection. A total of 30-µm thick coronal sections containing hippocampus were collected with 240 µm interval to get eight sets and two to six slices of each mouse were stained for each immunofluorescence staining. For immunofluorescence staining, we adopted free-floating staining method: after two washes with PBS, the brain slices were incubated in 0.3 M glycine buffer for 30 min at room temperature (RT), and then blocked and permeabilized with IF buffer (2% donkey serum, 2% BSA, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 30–60 min at RT. Brain slices were incubated with designated Abs or their isotype control immunoglobulins purchased from Abcam, overnight at 4 °C followed by 15–60-min incubations at RT. After three washes with PBS, brain slices were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary Abs from Abcam (Donkey anti-mouse IgG H&L-Alexa Fluor 488; Donkey anti-rabbit IgG H&L-Alexa Fluor 568; Donkey anti-rat IgG H&L-Alexa Fluor 568; Donkey anti-goat IgG H&L-Alexa Fluor 647;) at RT for 2 h. After three washes with PBS, slides were mounted with ProLong™ Gold/Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen). For IgG staining, brain slices were incubated with Iba1 antibody for 2 h at RT followed by wash with PBS, and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 labeled F(ab′)2-Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Antibody (cat # A-11017) and Donkey anti-rabbit IgG H&L-Alexa Fluor 568. The information of the first antibodies used is as below: purified anti-β-Amyloid, 1-16 Antibody (clone 6E10, cat # 803002), Recombinant Anti-Iba1 antibody (cat # ab178846), Mouse IL1 beta /IL-1F2 Antibody (cat # AF-401-NA), Anti-CD45R (B220) antibody (cat # ab64100), ZO-1 Polyclonal Antibody (cat # 40-2300), and Mouse Laminin alpha 4 Antibody (cat # AF3837).

Images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope equipped with a ×20/0.8 and a ×20 Plan-Apochromat dry objectives (Carl Zeiss). For Aβ plaque and microglia quantification, subculum region for 3×TgAD model, or dentate gyrus region for APP/PS1 model, or whole hippocampus region for 5×FAD model were respectively identified in the coronal brain slices and imaged. For brain IL1β or IgG quantification, subculum region was imaged. For brain B220⁺ B-cell quantification, the whole brain was observed and images for B220⁺ B cells were captured. The quantification of all images was performed with ImageJ software. For Aβ and microglia quantification, the image of up to six slices per mouse were acquired and quantified in the subiculum region (3×TgAD model), DG region (APP/PS1 model), or whole hippocampus (5×FAD model). Briefly, the single channel image was converted into 8-bit image and proper threshold was chosen and fixed for all the images in the same experiment, then “analyze particles” function was used for quantified the number or area of 6E10 plaque and Iba1⁺ microglia. The representative image for microglia quantification was shown in Supplementary Fig. 3G. For B220⁺ B-cell quantification, the whole brain region was carefully observed and the images of B220⁺ B cells were acquired, and the location of B cells was distinguished by ZO-1 or laminin a4 staining or bright field.

Measurement of soluble Aβ_40/42 peptides

Cerebral cortex and hippocampus were separated from PBS-perfused mouse brains, and stored at −80 °C. Soluble and insoluble protein fractions were purified using a modification of previously published protocol for Aβ peptides⁶⁰. Briefly, tissues were mechanically homogenized in in TBS-Triton 1% (120 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mg/ml (tissue/buffer)), including protease inhibitor cocktail (1:100, P2714, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), then incubated on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation for 120 min at 17,000 × g at 4 °C. Supernatant, containing TBS-T-soluble fraction of mouse Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 was removed and stored at −20 °C. The remaining pellet, containing insoluble Aβ was resuspended in 70% formic acid and incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at the same conditions as mentioned above. Formic acid-soluble supernatant was separated and neutralized using 1 M Tris (pH = 11, 20-time the volume of the formic acid) and stored at −20 °C. Total protein concentration was determined using the BCA method (cat # 23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). TBS-S and formic acid soluble levels Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42 in the cortex were measured using sandwich-ELISA protocol in 96-well polystyrene microplates (655061, Greinerbio-one, Monroe, NC) were covered with 50 μl of anti-rabbit-N-terminus Aβ_1–14 (ab2539, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at a concentration of 5 μg/ml in carbonate–bicarbonate buffer (pH = 9.6) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Plates were washed four times in PBS-T solution (0.1% Triton X in PBS) and blocked with 2% BSA solution in PBS. A total of 50 μl of tissue homogenate were applied to each well, and incubated for 60 min at RT. Plates were then washed five times in PBS-T, and the following detection antibodies were added: Anti-Aβ_1–40 antibody (ab20068, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) diluted at 1:500 or anti Aβ_1–42 antibody (05-831, Millipore, Billerica, MA) at 1:2500, and incubated for 60 min at RT. Next, plates were washed five times in PBS-T and secondary goat anti-mouse IgG HRP-conjugated antibody was added (115-035-003, Peroxidase AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse, Jackson immunoresearch, PA) at a dilution of 1:5000. Plates were washed five times with PBS-T and 50 μl of 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine substrate (00-4201-56, Affimetrix eBioscience, San Diego, CA) was added. The color reaction was allowed to develop for 3 min and was stopped by adding 50 μl of 2 M H₂SO₄. Optical density was measured at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer. Standard curve was carried out using known concentrations of recombinant Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42.

Behavioral tests

For the MWM test, we used a 140-cm-diameter tub containing a 15 × 15 cm square platform submerged 1 cm below the water surface. Water was maintained at 21 ± 1 °C and colored with white paint. Mice underwent four trials per day, released from each of four compass points (N, S, W, E) in a randomized order. If a mouse did not find the hidden platform within 60 s, it was gently guided to the platform. All mice remained on the platform for 10 s at the end of each trial, were towel tried, and returned to their home cage. After 5 days of training mice were subjected to a 60-s probe trial that took place 24 h after the last training trial. The platform was removed and mice were placed on the opposite wall at the point furthest from the former platform location. The day after the probe trial, mice were tested for four trials in their ability to swim to a visible platform. Swimming was analyzed with ANY-Maze software (Stoelting). For the open field test, mice were placed in a 34 × 34 × 25 cm white acrylic chamber and recorded by overhead camera for 60 min. Because the first few minutes in this test are maximally sensitive to AD transgenic mice³⁰, we focused analysis on the initial 5 minutes. Tracks were analyzed with ANY-Maze software. Analysis in all behavior experiments was performed using ANY-Maze software. For the gait analysis, mice were tested on a fixed-speed treadmill apparatus (DigiGait; Mouse Specifics). Mice were habituated to the apparatus for 1 min, and then given a 1-min run at 5 cm/s. Following a 1-min rest, the treadmill speed was increased to 15 cm/s. Video was collected at high speed from a ventrally placed camera, and 3–5 s of representative gait video was selected by an experienced user for automated analysis.

Microarray analysis

From PBS-perfused brains or hippocampi of mice, total RNA was isolated with RNeasy Plus micro kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Microarray analysis was performed using the Illumina and Agilent platforms, then we quantile-normalized the gene expression profiles⁶¹, log2-transformed the raw probe intensity values and estimated the gene expression using the probe with the highest average expression⁶². Microarray data are submitted at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE165111.

Immunoglobulin ELISA

Blood was collected in BD Microtainer^® Tubes and serum was separated by centrifugation following the manufacturer’s instruction. For Aβ-specific immunoglobulin ELISA, sera (diluted in 0.05% Tween20/2% BSA/PBS) were incubated in 96-well plates coated with 4–8 μg/ml Aβ_1–42 peptide (AnaSpec, cat # AS-24224) and quantified using HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgA, IgM, or IgG antibodies. For serum immunoglobulin ELISA, Ig Isotyping Mouse Uncoated ELISA Kit (Invitrogen, Cat No. # 88-50630-88) was used, following the manufacturer’s instruction.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism (Prism 8; Graph Pad Software, Inc.). Normality tests were conducted to decide whether the data are from normally distributed population. Unpaired t test or one-way ANOVA, for two groups or three groups, respectively, was used if the data are considered to be normally distributed, otherwise Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used for two groups or three groups, respectively. Due to changes in variance across days of invisible platform testing in MWM, as is typical in this task⁶³, each day was individually analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Bonferroni post hoc tests were conducted when appropriate. The results were presented as the mean with each individual data point or in bar graph ± SEM. A p value <0.05 was considered significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data associated with this study can be found in the paper or supplementary materials. The microarray data are deposited at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE165111. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Hardy, J. & Selkoe, D. J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 297, 353–356 (2002).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, D. et al. TGF-beta induced by interleukin-34-stimulated microglia regulates microglial proliferation and attenuates oligomeric amyloid beta neurotoxicity. Neurosci. Lett. 529, 86–91 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tichauer, J. E. & von Bernhardi, R. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates beta amyloid uptake by microglia through Smad3-dependent mechanisms. J. Neurosci. Res. 90, 1970–1980 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Keren-Shaul, H. et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169, 1276–1290 e1217 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brionne, T. C., Tesseur, I., Masliah, E. & Wyss-Coray, T. Loss of TGF-beta 1 leads to increased neuronal cell death and microgliosis in mouse brain. Neuron 40, 1133–1145 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Monje, M. L., Toda, H. & Palmer, T. D. Inflammatory blockade restores adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Science 302, 1760–1765 (2003).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ekdahl, C. T., Claasen, J. H., Bonde, S., Kokaia, Z. & Lindvall, O. Inflammation is detrimental for neurogenesis in adult brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13632–13637 (2003).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rogers, J., Strohmeyer, R., Kovelowski, C. J. & Li, R. Microglia and inflammatory mechanisms in the clearance of amyloid beta peptide. Glia 40, 260–269 (2002).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
DeWitt, D. A., Perry, G., Cohen, M., Doller, C. & Silver, J. Astrocytes regulate microglial phagocytosis of senile plaque cores of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 149, 329–340 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mawuenyega, K. G. et al. Decreased clearance of cns beta-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Science 330, 1774–1774 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
in t’ Veld, B. A. et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1515–1521 (2001).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Thevaranjan, N. et al. Age-associated microbial dysbiosis promotes intestinal permeability, systemic inflammation, and macrophage dysfunction. Cell Host Microbe 21, 455–466 e454 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Holmes, C. et al. Systemic infection, interleukin 1beta, and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 74, 788–789 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fisher, Y., Nemirovsky, A., Baron, R. & Monsonego, A. T cells specifically targeted to amyloid plaques enhance plaque clearance in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 5, e10830 (2010).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Browne, T. C. et al. IFN-gamma production by amyloid beta-specific Th1 cells promotes microglial activation and increases plaque burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Immunol. 190, 2241–2251 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Spani, C. et al. Reduced beta-amyloid pathology in an APP transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease lacking functional B and T cells. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 3, 71 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Gold, M., Mengel, D., Roskam, S., Dodel, R. & Bach, J. P. Mechanisms of action of naturally occurring antibodies against beta-amyloid on microglia. J. Neuroinflammation 10, 5 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Britschgi, M. et al. Neuroprotective natural antibodies to assemblies of amyloidogenic peptides decrease with normal aging and advancing Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12145–12150 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Morgan, D. et al. A beta peptide vaccination prevents memory loss in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 408, 982–985 (2000).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Olkhanud, P. B. et al. DNA immunization with HBsAg-based particles expressing a B cell epitope of amyloid beta-peptide attenuates disease progression and prolongs survival in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Vaccine 30, 1650–1658 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marsh, S. E. et al. The adaptive immune system restrains Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by modulating microglial function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1316–E1325 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee-Chang, C. et al. Accumulation of 4-1BBL+ B cells in the elderly induces the generation of granzyme-B+ CD8+ T cells with potential antitumor activity. Blood 191, 4141–4151 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bodogai, M. et al. Commensal bacteria contribute to insulin resistance in aging by activating innate B1a cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaat4271 (2018).
Oddo, S. et al. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron 39, 409–421 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sterniczuk, R., Antle, M. C., Laferla, F. M. & Dyck, R. H. Characterization of the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: part 2. Behavioral and cognitive changes. Brain Res. 1348, 149–155 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in B cell deficient mice generated by targeted deletion of the JH locus. Int. Immunol. 5, 647–656 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Filali, M. et al. Cognitive and non-cognitive behaviors in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease expressing mutated APP, PS1, and Mapt (3xTg-AD). Behav. Brain Res. 234, 334–342 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chiquita, S. et al. A longitudinal multimodal in vivo molecular imaging study of the 3xTg-AD mouse model shows progressive early hippocampal and taurine loss. Hum. Mol. Genet. 28, 2174–2188 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Borchelt, D. R. et al. Accelerated amyloid deposition in the brains of transgenic mice coexpressing mutant presenilin 1 and amyloid precursor proteins. Neuron 19, 939–945 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
O’Leary, T. P., Hussin, A. T., Gunn, R. K. & Brown, R. E. Locomotor activity, emotionality, sensori-motor gating, learning and memory in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. Bull. 140, 347–354 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Atwood, C. S. & Bowen, R. L. A unified hypothesis of early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J. Alzheimers Dis. 47, 33–47 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roda, A. R., Esquerda-Canals, G., Marti-Clua, J. & Villegas, S. Cognitive impairment in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of alzheimer’s disease is affected by abeta-immunotherapy and cognitive stimulation. Pharmaceutics 12, 944 (2020).
Greene, S. J. & Killiany, R. J., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I. Hippocampal subregions are differentially affected in the progression to Alzheimer’s disease. Anat. Rec. 295, 132–140 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Stence, N., Waite, M. & Dailey, M. E. Dynamics of microglial activation: a confocal time-lapse analysis in hippocampal slices. Glia 33, 256–266 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bachstetter, A. D. et al. Disease-related microglia heterogeneity in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and hippocampal sclerosis of aging. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 3, 32 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
El Hajj, H. et al. Ultrastructural evidence of microglial heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease amyloid pathology. J. Neuroinflammation 16, 87 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stebbing, M. J., Cottee, J. M. & Rana, I. The role of ion channels in microglial activation and proliferation - a complex interplay between ligand-gated ion channels, K(+) channels, and intracellular Ca(2.). Front. Immunol. 6, 497 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Abutbul, S. et al. TGF-beta signaling through SMAD2/3 induces the quiescent microglial phenotype within the CNS environment. Glia 60, 1160–1171 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Schilling, T., Nitsch, R., Heinemann, U., Haas, D. & Eder, C. Astrocyte-released cytokines induce ramification and outward K+ channel expression in microglia via distinct signalling pathways. Eur. J. Neurosci. 14, 463–473 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Butovsky, O. et al. Identification of a unique TGF-beta-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 131–143 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oakley, H. et al. Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J. Neurosci. 26, 10129–10140 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baulch, J. E. et al. Immune and inflammatory determinants underlying Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 15, 852–862 (2020).
Shaftel, S. S. et al. Sustained hippocampal IL-1 beta overexpression mediates chronic neuroinflammation and ameliorates Alzheimer plaque pathology. J. Clin. Investig. 117, 1595–1604 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee-Chang, C. et al. Aging converts innate B1a cells into potent CD8+ T cell inducers. J. Immunol. 196, 3385–3397 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Michel, L. et al. B cells in the multiple sclerosis central nervous system: trafficking and contribution to CNS-compartmentalized inflammation. Front. Immunol. 6, 636 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Cepok, S. et al. Short-lived plasma blasts are the main B cell effector subset during the course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 128, 1667–1676 (2005).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Doyle, K. P. et al. B-lymphocyte-mediated delayed cognitive impairment following stroke. J. Neurosci. 35, 2133–2145 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
St-Amour, I. et al. Brain bioavailability of human intravenous immunoglobulin and its transport through the murine blood-brain barrier. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 33, 1983–1992 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Blennow, K. et al. Intra-blood-brain-barrier synthesis of immunoglobulins in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 4, 79–86 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maftei, M. et al. Increased levels of antigen-bound beta-amyloid autoantibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s disease patients. PLoS ONE 8, e68996 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, P. et al. IFN-gamma promotes complement expression and attenuates amyloid plaque deposition in amyloid beta precursor protein transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 184, 5333–5343 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Diamond, B., Huerta, P. T., Mina-Osorio, P., Kowal, C. & Volpe, B. T. Losing your nerves? Maybe it’s the antibodies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 449–456 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Doens, D. & Fernandez, P. L. Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid beta for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J. Neuroinflammation 11, 48 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
van der Poel, M., Hoepel, W., Hamann, J., Huitinga, I. & Dunnen, J. D. IgG immune complexes break immune tolerance of human microglia. J. Immunol. 205, 2511–2518 (2020).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Caraci, F. et al. TGF-beta 1 protects against Abeta-neurotoxicity via the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway. Neurobiol. Dis. 30, 234–242 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bulati, M. et al. Double negative (IgG+IgD-CD27-) B cells are increased in a cohort of moderate-severe Alzheimer’s disease patients and show a pro-inflammatory trafficking receptor phenotype. J. Alzheimers Dis. 44, 1241–1251 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Merlini, M., Kirabali, T., Kulic, L., Nitsch, R. M. & Ferretti, M. T. Extravascular CD3+ T cells in brains of alzheimer disease patients correlate with tau but not with amyloid pathology: an immunohistochemical study. Neurodegener. Dis. 18, 49–56 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ferreira, L. S. S., Fernandes, C. S., Vieira, M. N. N. & De Felice, F. G. Insulin resistance in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 12, 830 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bodogai, M. et al. Anti-CD20 antibody promotes cancer escape via enrichment of tumor-evoked regulatory B cells expressing low levels of CD20 and CD137L. Cancer Res. 73, 2127–2138 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Illouz, T., Madar, R., Griffioen, K. & Okun, E. A protocol for quantitative analysis of murine and human amyloid-beta1-40 and 1-42. J. Neurosci. Methods 291, 28–35 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dunning, M. J., Smith, M. L., Ritchie, M. E. & Tavare, S. beadarray: R classes and methods for Illumina bead-based data. Bioinformatics 23, 2183–2184 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, J. A. et al. Strategies for aggregating gene expression data: the collapseRows R function. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 322 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vorhees, C. V. & Williams, M. T. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc. 1, 848–858 (2006).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. A. C. Chan (Genentech, Inc.) for providing anti-CD20 Ab; Drs. K. Becker, E. Lehrmann, and Y. Zhang (NIA) for microarray assay and bioinformatics analysis; and Mrs. A. Lustig (NIA) and Dr. Chandamany Arya (Lilly) for proofreading. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging, NIH, and by grant NIH R01 AG054712-01A1.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Ki Kim, Xin Wang, Emeline Ragonnaud, Monica Bodogai.

Authors and Affiliations

Immunoregulation Section, Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biology, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA
Ki Kim, Xin Wang, Emeline Ragonnaud, Monica Bodogai, Marisa DeLuca & Arya Biragyn
The Mina and Everard Goodman faculty of Life Sciences, Ramat Gan, Israel
Tomer Illouz & Eitan Okun
The Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Tomer Illouz & Eitan Okun
The Paul Feder Laboratory on Alzheimer’s disease research, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Tomer Illouz & Eitan Okun
Mouse Phenotyping Unit, Comparative Medicine Section, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA
Ross A. McDevitt
Department of Genomics and Human Genetics, Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Fedor Gusev & Evgeny Rogaev
Center for Genetics and Genetic Technologies, Faculty of Biology, Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Evgeny Rogaev
Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
Evgeny Rogaev
Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia
Evgeny Rogaev

Authors

Ki Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xin Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Emeline Ragonnaud
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Monica Bodogai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tomer Illouz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marisa DeLuca
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ross A. McDevitt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fedor Gusev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eitan Okun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Evgeny Rogaev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Arya Biragyn
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.K., X.W., E.Ra., and M.B. performed the research and collected and analyzed data; T.I., M.D., and R.M. performed experiments; F.G. provided bioinformatics support, E.Ro. and E.O. provided critical interpretation; and A.B. wrote the manuscript and conceived, designed, and supervised the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arya Biragyn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Jacques Galipeau and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K., Wang, X., Ragonnaud, E. et al. Therapeutic B-cell depletion reverses progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 12, 2185 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22479-4

Download citation

Received: 10 December 2019
Accepted: 12 March 2021
Published: 12 April 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22479-4

This article is cited by

Modeling the neuroimmune system in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases
- Wendy Balestri
- Ruchi Sharma
- Yvonne Reinwald
Journal of Neuroinflammation (2024)
Understanding immune microenvironment alterations in the brain to improve the diagnosis and treatment of diverse brain diseases
- Xiaotong Xu
- Yi Han
- Sijin Liu
Cell Communication and Signaling (2024)
Immunological aspects of central neurodegeneration
- Mireia Niso-Santano
- José M. Fuentes
- Lorenzo Galluzzi
Cell Discovery (2024)
Distinguishing features of depression in dementia from primary psychiatric disease
- Daniel W. Fisher
- Jeffrey T. Dunn
- Hongxin Dong
Discover Mental Health (2024)
Advancements in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Research for Neurological Diseases
- Bingjie Yang
- Shuqi Hu
- Hao Zhang
Molecular Neurobiology (2024)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.