Autophagy of the m6A mRNA demethylase FTO is impaired by low-level arsenic exposure to promote tumorigenesis

Here we show that FTO as an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA demethylase is degraded by selective autophagy, which is impaired by low-level arsenic exposure to promote tumorigenesis. We found that in arsenic-associated human skin lesions, FTO is upregulated, while m6A RNA methylation is downregulated. In keratinocytes, chronic relevant low-level arsenic exposure upregulated FTO, downregulated m6A RNA methylation, and induced malignant transformation and tumorigenesis. FTO deletion inhibited arsenic-induced tumorigenesis. Moreover, in mice, epidermis-specific FTO deletion prevented skin tumorigenesis induced by arsenic and UVB irradiation. Targeting FTO genetically or pharmacologically inhibits the tumorigenicity of arsenic-transformed tumor cells. We identified NEDD4L as the m6A-modified gene target of FTO. Finally, arsenic stabilizes FTO protein through inhibiting p62-mediated selective autophagy. FTO upregulation can in turn inhibit autophagy, leading to a positive feedback loop to maintain FTO accumulation. Our study reveals FTO-mediated dysregulation of mRNA m6A methylation as an epitranscriptomic mechanism to promote arsenic tumorigenicity.

For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

April 2020
Data Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A list of figures that have associated raw data -A description of any restrictions on data availability The data have been deposited in the GEO repository with the accession numbers GSE145923 and can be accessed at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/ acc.cgi?acc=GSE145923.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sample size
Generally Three to more independent replicates were used to perform statistical analyses.
Data exclusions No data were excluded from analysis.

Replication
Experiments were independently repeated two to three times. Replications were successful and were described in the method.
Randomization For the mouse model, animals were randomly assigned into groups receiving UVB/Arsenic treatment. For the xenograft model, animals were randomly assigned into groups receiving various cell line injections. Randomization (formal or otherwise) was not relevant for other data included in the manuscript. We work with cell cultures and compare specific experimental conditions or wild type versus treated cell lines, which cannot be randomized.

Blinding
For immunofluorescence (IF)/PLA experiment, blind staining and blind analysis were carried out. For other experiments, the investigators were not blinded to group allocation during data collection and/or analysis since all data are obtained and presented in an unbiased manner.

Reporting for specific materials, systems and methods
We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies. Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study. If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response.

Authentication
All cell lines were authenticated according to the ATCC cell line authentication test recommendations, including morphology check by microscope, growth curve analysis, and mycoplasma test.

Mycoplasma contamination
All cell lines were tested to be mycoplasma negative. All lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination.
Commonly misidentified lines (See ICLAC register) No commonly misidentified cell lines listed by ICLAC were used.

Animals and other organisms
Policy information about studies involving animals; ARRIVE guidelines recommended for reporting animal research

Laboratory animals
Athymic Nude Female mice were obtained from Envigo and Charles River. Female mice (6-8 weeks of age) were used in subcutaneous injection. NSG mice Female (severely combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) gamma chain null) were obtained