Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Observation of strong excitonic magneto-chiral anisotropy in twisted bilayer van der Waals crystals


The interplay between chirality and magnetism generates a distinct physical process, the magneto-chiral effect, which enables one to develop functionalities that cannot be achieved solely by any of the two. Such a process is universal with the breaking of parity-inversion and time-reversal symmetry simultaneously. However, the magneto-chiral effect observed so far is weak when the matter responds to photons, electrons, or phonons. Here we report the first observation of strong magneto-chiral response to excitons in a twisted bilayer tungsten disulfide with the amplitude of excitonic magneto-chiral (ExMCh) anisotropy reaches a value of ~4%. We further found the ExMCh anisotropy features with a spectral splitting of ~7 nm, precisely the full-width at half maximum of the excitonic chirality spectrum. Without an externally applied strong magnetic field, the observed ExMCh effect with a spontaneous magnetic moment from the ferromagnetic substrate of thulium iron garnet at room temperature is favorable for device applications. The unique ExMCh processes provide a new pathway to actively control magneto-chiral applications in photochemical reactions, asymmetric synthesis, and drug delivery.


The magneto-chiral (MCh) effect is a fundamental physical process that merges chirality and magnetism in a chiral medium1,2,3,4. Such a link has been explored ever since the discovery of the natural optical activity by Arago and magnetically induced optical activity by Faraday in the early 19th century5. Besides the observation in synthetic molecular compounds under a magnetic field6,7,8,9, researchers have observed the MCh effect in organic liquids10, diamagnetic crystals11, magnetic thin films12,13,14, liquid crystals15, and chiral metamaterials16. The MCh effect also gives rise to an unambiguous enantiomeric excess in a photochemical reaction and a separation of racemic mixtures which were not possible solely by natural or magnetically induced optical activity17,18. However, the MCh effect observed so far is weak, especially in the visible spectral region at room temperature, with the MCh anisotropy on the level of 0.1%. Such a low MCh anisotropy that signifies the ability to induce the enantiomeric excess that is important for photochemical reactions, asymmetric synthesizes, and drug delivery thereby hinders many applications.

We discover the strong excitonic magneto-chiral (ExMCh) response of 4% in an atomically thin twisted bilayer tungsten disulfide (TB-WS2), a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) crystal. We understand this strong effect with the unique excitonic processes associated with valley excitons in the TMD of our device. First, the valley excitons enhance the chirality in TB-WS2 by strong spin–orbit coupling19. The valley excitons also facilitate a strong response to a magnetic field that lifts the degeneracy between the two valleys20,21,22,23,24. The interplay among valley excitons, chirality, and magnetic field generates a new physical process called the ExMCh effect. We further enhance the ExMCh effect via exchange magnetic interactions by stacking the atomically thin TB-WS2 on top of a ferromagnetic substrate, thulium iron garnet (TIG), whose Curie temperature is higher than the room temperature25,26. Without an externally applied strong magnetic field, the observed strong ExMCh effect with the spontaneous magnetic moment from the TIG substrate at room temperature is desired for device applications and hence offering new opportunities to manipulate MCh systems.


In such systems, light-matter interactions behave quantum mechanically with the Hamiltonian written as \(H_{{\mathrm{interaction}}} = - \mu \cdot {\mathbf{E}} - m \cdot {\mathbf{B}}\), where μ, m, E, and B are electric dipole, magnetic dipole, electric field, and magnetic field, respectively. For a common medium, the interaction between electric dipoles (μμ), such as the ubiquitous Rayleigh scattering, that is even regarding both the parity-inversion and time-reversal symmetry (Fig. 1a) dominates. For a chiral medium, on the other hand, the parity-inversion symmetry breaking induces a magnetic dipole interaction. Thus, the chiral light-matter interaction (Fig. 1b) that keeps the time-reversal symmetry conserved is a product of imμ, where i is a result of the time-reversal symmetry operator in quantum mechanics. Moreover, when applied a static magnetic field that breaks the time-reversal symmetry, light-matter interactions in a common medium also contain a magnetic dipole interaction (μmμ) as designated in Fig. 1c. Furthermore, a chiral medium with an applied static magnetic field not only breaks the parity-inversion and time-reversal symmetry simultaneously but also induces a new physical process, the MCh effect (immμ), as shown in Fig. 1d.

Fig. 1: Light-matter interactions in chiral media.

ad Multipolar light-matter interactions with symmetry analysis. The horizontal axis is the time (t), and the arrows are light waves (purple) at the frequency of ω and a static magnetic field (blue), correspondingly. In a comment medium a electric dipole interactions (μμ) generally dominate light-matter interaction processes, in which the parity-inversion (P) and time-reversal symmetry (T) are both conserved (+). The breaking of parity-inversion symmetry (P) in a chiral material (b) leads to magnetic dipoles (m) interacting with electric dipoles (μ) while keeping the time-reversal symmetry conserved (im). An external magnetic field breaks the time-reversal symmetry and introduces magnetic dipoles in a general material. c By breaking both the two symmetries simultaneously (PT), a second-order product (immμ), or so-called magneto-chiral (MCh) effect, stands out in a chiral medium in the presence of a static magnetic field (d). e Schematic shows that stacking two tungsten disulfide monolayers with a twist (θ) offers a chirality and the ferromagnetic thulium iron garnet (TIG) provides an exchange magnetic field. f Optical images of a twisted bilayer tungsten disulfide (TB-WS2) with the twisting angle of 26° on the TIG. The scale bar represents a length of 10 μm.

The overall MCh effect depends on the inner product of the magnetic field and the wavevector of the radiation together with the derivative chiral dispersion as phenomenologically described in the Methods section. We demonstrate a strong ExMCh effect in a two-dimensional TB-WS2 on a TIG substrate. Figure 1e shows the schematic of the demonstration, in which the TIG provides a spontaneous magnetic moment for a magnetic proximity effect at room temperature. Meanwhile, the TB-WS2 with a twisting angle of θ offers a strong chirality that leads to a net population difference between the two valley excitons, which we observe via luminescence spectra. Moreover, optically excited valley excitons in WS2 monolayers enhance the chirality via spin–orbit coupling and magnetic responses via magnetic exchange interactions simultaneously and hence demonstrating strong ExMCh effect. The optical image in Fig. 1f shows the TB-WS2 we exfoliate on the ferromagnetic TIG substrate with the top monolayer twisted clockwise by an angle of 26°. We determine the relative stacking angles by comparing the microscopic edges since they tend to align well with crystallography orientations during the exfoliation27,28.

Excitonic chirality with nonmagnetic substrates

We obtain a geometrically induced chirality that corresponds to the scenario in Fig. 1b by stacking two ML-WS2 with a twisting angle of θ on an oxidized silicon substrate that is nonmagnetic (Fig. 2a). We understand the chirality by the overlapping, or so-called dephasing29, of the separated wave functions at the middle point of the top and bottom monolayers30. Without time-reversal symmetry breaking, the two wave functions in real-space have opposite phase but with the same periodicity of 2π/6 because of the hexagonal lattice of the monolayers. As a result, the chirality reaches the maximum with the overlapping of the two wave functions being the largest by shifting at the twisting angle around π/6, in consistent with that in twisted-graphene layers31. More importantly, the optically excited valley excitons enhance the geometrically induced chirality in TB-WS2 because of the strong spin-orbit coupling32. Equivalently, Fig. 2b shows that the shifting of wavefunctions induced by chirality leads to an equal population difference but with opposite signs (V+ and V−) determined by the relative twisting directions (clockwise or counterclockwise) for the two valleys located at the K-point of the first Brillouin zone33. Details of the optical chirality in twisted bilayers are in the Supplementary Information.

Fig. 2: Excitonic chirality in twisted WS2 monolayers on an oxidized silicon substrate.

a Twisting two WS2 monolayers with a deterministic angle of θ breaks the parity-inversion symmetry, which leads to a geometrically induced chirality (Fig. 1b), interacting distinctly with left- and right-circularly polarized light (LCP and RCP), in the homostructure. b The handiness of the input light (LCP and RCP) locks with the helicity of the photoluminescence for the two valleys (σ and σ+) at the K-point of the Brillouin zone. The twisting of monolayers equivalently exerts a population difference to the two valleys (V+ and V−), leading to the intensity difference of the photoluminescence between them. c A twisted bilayer (TB) WS2 possesses geometrically induced chirality, and hence the luminescence intensity for σ and σ+ excitons are different (solid curves). The top monolayer twists counterclockwise with an angle of 28° leading to a higher luminescence intensity of σ exciton (solid blue) compared to that of σ+ exciton (solid red). The amplitude of the difference in luminescence intensity reaches a value of ~5%. d A linearly polarized light that comprises an equal amount of LCP and RCP shows a vanishing preference on the excitation of the two valleys of σ and σ+ in a monolayer (ML) WS2 on a SiO2/Si substrate at room temperature (dashed curves). Which unambiguously shows we have corrected all system errors that might lead to any discrepancy of the two valleys, verifying the geometrically induced chirality in c.

During the experiment, a linearly polarized light at the wavelength of 560 nm impinges on the WS2 and excites the valley excitons. We subsequently analyze the left and right circular polarization (LCP and RCP) components of the photoluminescence emission. Governed by the optical selection rules, those circular components lock with the two valley excitons (σ and σ+) accordingly. By twisting the top monolayer counterclockwise with an angle of 28°, we observe a higher luminescence intensity for σ excitons (solid blue) compared to that for σ+ excitons (solid red) in Fig. 2c, signifying the existence of the geometrically induced chirality. The amplitude of the difference of excitonic photoluminescence reaches a value of ~5%, equivalent to rotate the polarization plane of ~2.6°. We further verify the existence of the chirality by twisting the top monolayer clockwise with an angle of 26° (Supplementary Fig. 1). Indeed, we observe the chirality flips resulting in a lower luminescence intensity for σ excitons (solid blue) under the same excitation condition. The absolute amplitude of chirality, however, is difficult to compare owing to unknown interlayer slip as described in the Supplementary Information. On the other hand, with an ML-WS2 on an oxidized silicon substrate, Fig. 2d shows an identical behavior between the two photoluminescence spectra. This phenomenon is because the linearly polarized light excites an equal amount of valley excitons in the ML-WS2. Without the geometrically induced chirality, the population difference between σ and σ+ vanishes consequently. The result also unambiguously shows that our experiments have corrected all system errors that could lead to the luminescence difference between the two valley excitons.

Magneto-optical effects in a monolayer atomic crystal

With time-reversal symmetry breaking, the valley excitons also facilitate the coupling with an out-of-plane magnetic field that lifts the degeneracy of the two valleys leading to a spectral splitting as well as a population difference between σ (blue) and σ+ (red) excitons in the ML-WS2 under the pumping of Eph, where Eph is the pumping energy (Fig. 3a). Instead of externally applying a strong magnetic field, we introduce a spontaneous magnetic moment from a ferromagnetic substrate (TIG) to boost such magnetic responses via magnetic exchange interactions between WS2 and TIG. According to the magnetic response in Supplementary Fig. 2, we magnetize the TIG using a permeant magnet with a small magnetic field (~100 Oe). At the temperature of 78 K, we observe a splitting of ~0.5 nm (~1.7 meV) between the two valleys using linearly polarized excitation light at the wavelength of 560 nm (Fig. 3b). The observed splitting (ΔEK−K′) effectively corresponds to an exchange magnetic field (Beff) of ~7 T given that ΔEK−K′ =4 µBBeff, where µB is the Bohr magneton21. The Beff further reduces to ~2.7 T at the room temperature governed by Bloch’s law for the temperature dependence of spontaneous ferromagnetism, providing that the Curie temperature of TIG is ~400 K26. The first-order approximation of Bloch’s law is the following: \(M(T) = M(0)\left[ {1 - \left( {\frac{T}{{T_C}}} \right)^{1.5}} \right]\), where M(0) is the spontaneous magnetization at absolute zero, T is temperature, and TC is Curie temperature. Therefore, the splitting is further estimated to be ~0.2 nm that is hardly observable in excitonic photoluminescence spectra with thermal broadening at room temperature.

Fig. 3: Magneto-optical effects in a monolayer WS2 on TIG.

a The time-reversal symmetry breaking with an out-of-plane exchange magnetic field provided by TIG induces a spectral splitting and an intensity difference between σ (blue) and σ+ (red) in the ML-WS2 under the pumping of Eph. b The observed splitting of ~0.5 nm (~1.7 meV) corresponds to an exchange magnetic field of ~7 T at the temperature of 78 K from the TIG. The splitting is estimated to be ~0.2 nm that is hardly measurable in spectra with the reduced exchange magnetic field of ~2.7 T at 298 K. c An alternative method to characterize the magneto-optical effect (Fig. 1C) is using the rotation of linear polarization (blue arrows) of light upon reflection. d A differential reflection spectrum, defined as the difference in reflectance of the sample (WS2) and substrate (TIG) normalized to that of a reference (silver mirror), consists of a peak of light-matter interaction at the wavelength of ~617 nm. e Analysis of the polarization of reflected light from WS2 at 617 nm with up (purple) and down (yellow) magnetic moments. The 0° represents that the polarization of the output and input light is the same. The minima of curves designate the polarization of the outgoing light showing a rotation angle of ~2° compared to that of the input light. By flipping the exchange magnetic field (B ↑ and B ↓), the rotation angle changes the sign indicating that the rotation is due to the magneto-optical effect. In the absence of the exchange magnetic field, the polarization of the light reflected from a reference silver mirror (inset) is the same as that of the input light, which manifests as the minimum at 0°, further confirming the magneto effect being the origin of the rotation. The error bar of ±0.5° is system uncertainty.

Fortunately, a magnetically induced optical activity with a static magnetic field as that in Fig. 1c also rotates the plane of linear polarization at room temperature. We manage to measure the magnetically induced rotation of an ML-WS2 using a differential reflection technique with a broadband white-light source under the exchange magnetic field provided by the TIG (Fig. 3c). This differential reflection technique with the experimental setup shown in Supplementary Fig. 3 is similar to the so-called polar magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements commonly used for studying magneto-optical materials34,35,36. In particular, the differential reflection refers to the difference in reflectance between a sample (ML-WS2) and substrate (TIG) normalized to that of a reference (silver mirror). Based on a scattering process, this technique overcomes the difficulty caused by the dephasing of valley photoluminescence at the same time reflects the absorption of the material37. A typical differential reflection spectrum for the ML-WS2 encompasses a significant peak of light-matter interaction located at the wavelength of ~617 nm (Fig. 3d). Compared to that at 78 K (Fig. 3b), the increase of the peak wavelength, or the decrease of the photon energy, is due to the thermal reduction of the electronic bandgap38. At the peak wavelength, we detect the magnetically induced rotation by analyzing the polarization of the reflected light compared to that of the incident light (Fig. 3e).

To increase the sensitivity, we place the sample in between a pair of polarizers with the optical axis of the polarizer at the output terminal nearly perpendicular to that of the polarizer at the input terminal (see details in the Methods). In this case, the minimum, ideally zero, output intensity designates that the polarization of light right behind the reflection plane is precisely perpendicular to the output polarizer. The location of the minima referenced to that of the input light, which we assign the angle of 0°, is the angle of rotation caused the exchange magnetic field. The sign of the minima is the direction of the magnetically induced rotation, either clockwise (+) or counterclockwise (−). With the ML-WS2 on TIG, Fig. 3e clearly shows a rotation of ~2° that results from the strong exchange magnetic field provided by the ferromagnetic substrate at room temperature. By flipping the magnetic field, the sign of the rotation is also flipped, confirming that the rotation is due to the magnetic field of TIG. Indeed, without the magnetic field, light reflected from a silver mirror shows zero rotation of the polarization (Fig. 3e, inset). Although a polar MOKE measurement procedure at room temperature can resolve better than ±0.02 × 10−3 degrees39, our resolution is around ±0.1 degrees, mainly limited by the uncertainty of reading angles on the mechanical rotational mount for polarizers. However, this resolution is sufficient for unambiguously measuring the polarization rotation of ~2 degrees in our experiments.

Observation of the excitonic magneto-chiral effect

We have distinctly observed the natural (chirality) and magnetically induced circular anisotropy (MCA), all evident in magnetic dipole interactions in two-dimensional atomic layers. While the first one is due to the parity-inversion symmetry breaking, the second is because of the time-reversal symmetry breaking. Here we find a link, the ExMCh effect, that unifies the two phenomena by stacking two ML-WS2 with a twist on the ferromagnetic TIG, which breaks both the parity-inversion and time-reversal symmetry simultaneously as shown in Fig. 4a. The ExMCh effect is not a simple linear superposition of the chirality and magnetically induced optical activity but rather a second-order effect. Mathematically, the ExMCh effect is proportional to the inner product of the magnetic field and wavevector together with the derivative of the chirality (see details in the Methods). Phenomenologically, the spectral splitting in the ExMCh effect equals to the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the spectrum for natural circular anisotropy (NCA), which is in distinct contrast to the splitting for the MCA.

Fig. 4: The strong excitonic magneto-chiral anisotropy.

a The schematic of the magneto-chiral effect that lifts the degeneracy and exerts a population difference to the two valleys simultaneously. b Circular anisotropy spectra for σ and σ+ excitons at room temperature. The natural circular anisotropy (NCA) spectrum (red) extracted from the same sample in Fig. 2c that situated on an oxidized silicon substrate possesses a significant peak with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of ~7 nm, signifying the chirality. The circular anisotropy spectrum (blue) induced by the spontaneous magnetic field (MCA) for an ML-WS2 on TIG is zero at all wavelengths. The magneto-chiral anisotropy (MChA) spectra for a twisting angle of 26° (c) and −23° (d) show opposite spectral behaviors, except both of them, contain a peak and a dip with a spectral distance precisely the same as the FWHM of NCA in b. Moreover, for both c and d, when the spontaneous magnetic field flip from parallel (red cross) to antiparallel (blue plus) to the wavevector k, the spectra also flip.

The circular anisotropy is the difference in photoluminescence intensity for the two valley excitons normalized to the average of the two. We obtain the NCA spectrum from the TB-WS2 on an oxidized silicon and MCA spectrum from the ML-WS2 on TIG. Figure 4b shows that the FWHM of NCA (red) is ~7 nm, and the spectral splitting of MCA (blue) is not observable at 298 K. For a TB-WS2 with a twisting angle of 26° (clockwise) under an estimated exchange magnetic field of ~2.7 T, we observe a peak and a dip in the magneto-chiral anisotropy (MChA) spectra in Fig. 4c. For a single-peak spectrum, its derivative spectral behavior will be a peak and a dip instead. Therefore, our observation validates the theoretical analysis (see Methods section) that the ExMCh effect is related to the derivative of single-peak chirality in Fig. 4b. We obtain the MChA with a differential PL spectrum by subtracting the two PL spectra for the two valley excitons, because the two valleys lock with each other by time-reversal, equivalent to the reversal of the wavevector (k)32,37. The spectral distance of ~7 nm is precisely the FWHM of NCA for chirality, and it is around 35 times larger than the magnetically induced splitting estimated at room temperature (~0.2 nm). Moreover, we achieve a flip of the spectral behavior for the ExMCh effect by flipping the magnetic moment of TIG, which changes the exchange magnetic field from parallel to antiparallel to the wavevector of the luminescence. This observation verifies the second characteristic feature that the pseudoscalar of B·k determines the ExMCh effect. The MChA that designates the ability to generate enantiomeric excess reaches a value of ~4% at room temperature. Furthermore, when the twisting angle changes from clockwise (26°) to counterclockwise (−23°), the MCh behaviors also flip, as shown in Fig. 4d. The results confirm the observation of the ExMch effect in the twisted atomic layers.

In summary, we observe an ExMCh effect in twisted bilayer WS2 induced by a spontaneous magnetic moment of the ferromagnetic substrate (TIG) at room temperature. In the observed ExMCh effect, the twisting of two atomic layers artificially breaks the parity-inversion symmetry, and the ferromagnetism spontaneously breaks the time-reversal symmetry. More importantly, the chirality, magnetism, and valley excitons manifest in a unified manner, which could provide a new way to manipulate the valley degree of freedom for valleytronics40,41. Furthermore, the electronic nature of valley excitons fascinates the manipulation of enantiomeric excess in MCh systems for photochemical reactions17, molecular synthesis42, and drug delivery43.


Interpretation of the MCh effect

A phenomenological description of electro- and magneto-optical effects is the expansion of the natural dielectric susceptibility, εN, with vectors and tensors that characterize either the wave itself or an external force44. With the terms related to this work, the expansion is the following: \(\varepsilon _ \pm \left( {\omega ,{\mathbf{B}},{\mathbf{k}}} \right) = \varepsilon _{\mathrm{N}}\left( \omega \right) \pm \varepsilon _{\mathrm{M}}\left( {\mathbf{B}} \right) \pm \varepsilon _{{\mathrm{Ch}}}\left( {\mathbf{k}} \right) + \varepsilon _{{\mathrm{MCh}}}({\mathbf{B}},{\mathbf{k}})\), where ω is the angular frequency of the right (+) and left (−) circularly polarized light, B is a magnetic field, and k is a wavevector; the subscription of M, Ch, and MCh are the magnetically induced rotation, chirality, and MCh effect, respe ctively. For a general isotropic medium, the well-known magnetically induced rotation, Faraday or magnetic Kerr effect, results from a Larmor precession of electrons with the angular velocity ΩL = −eB/2mc, where e is the negative electron charge, m is the mass, and c is the velocity of light in vacuum. Therefore, the right and left circularly polarized light experiences the dielectric susceptibility, not at the frequency of ω but a shifted frequency of ω± = ω ± ΩL. And hence, the dielectric susceptibility for the magneto-optical effect writes as:

$$\varepsilon _ \pm \left( {\omega \pm \Omega _{\mathrm{L}}} \right) = \varepsilon _{\mathrm{N}}(\omega ) \pm \frac{{\left| e \right|}}{{2mc}} \cdot \frac{{\partial \varepsilon _{\mathrm{N}}}}{{\partial \omega }}{\mathbf{B}}.$$

On the other hand, the dielectric susceptibility of a chiral medium is described by \(\varepsilon _ \pm \left( \omega \right) = \varepsilon _{\mathrm{N}}(\omega ) \pm \alpha _{{\mathrm{Ch}}}(\omega ){\mathbf{k}}\). Similarly, light waves in a chiral medium under an externally applied magnetic field experience a new dielectric susceptibility:

$$\varepsilon _ \pm \left( {\omega \pm \Omega _{\mathrm{L}}} \right) = \varepsilon _{\mathrm{N}}\left( {\omega \pm \Omega _{\mathrm{L}}} \right) \pm \alpha _{{\mathrm{Ch}}}\left( {\omega \pm \Omega _{\mathrm{L}}} \right){\mathbf{k}},$$

which is also written as

$$\varepsilon _ \pm \left( {\omega ,{\mathbf{B}},{\mathbf{k}}} \right) = \varepsilon _N \pm \frac{{\left| e \right|}}{{2mc}} \cdot \frac{{\partial \varepsilon _{\mathrm{N}}}}{{\partial \omega }}{\mathbf{B}} \pm \alpha _{{\mathrm{Ch}}}{\mathbf{k}} + \frac{{\left| e \right|}}{{2mc}} \cdot \frac{{\partial \alpha _{{\mathrm{Ch}}}}}{{\partial \omega }}({\mathbf{B}} \cdot {\mathbf{k}}),$$

where the last term signifies the MCh effect that depends on the inner product of the magnetic field and wavevector together with the derivative of the chirality-induced dielectric susceptibility. An oversimplified graphical illustration of the phenomenological model is in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Device fabrication

A 10-nm thick TIG (Tm3Fe5O12) film was grown on a single-crystal substituted gadolinium gallium garnet (SGGG) substrate via a pulsed-laser deposition at the temperature of ~500 °C with oxygen and ozone in the chamber26. Because of the large lattice-mismatch between SGGG and TIG as well as the negative magnetostriction constant, the TIG film provides an intrinsic exchange magnetic field that is mainly in the out-of-plane direction for WS2 atomic layers in the close vicinity. The vibrating sample magnetometry characterized ferromagnetic responses of the TIG films at room temperature. The WS2 monolayers were mechanically exfoliated from a bulk crystal using tape and subsequently transferred onto target samples, such as the TIG and a silicon wafer with an oxide layer with the thickness of 285 nm on top. The WS2 monolayers were identified using optical contrast and photoluminescence spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 5). For twisted bilayer devices, the first WS2 monolayer situated on the TIG that mounted on a rotational stage, and the second WS2 monolayer stacked onto the first one with an angle by rotating the stage with an accuracy of ~1° (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Photoluminescence spectroscopy

A WS2 atomic layer changes from an indirect to direct-bandgap semiconductor when thinning down to the monolayer limit, which features with a significantly large photoluminescence peak at the wavelength of ~615 nm at room temperature. In sharp contrast to a natural bilayer WS2, a TB-WS2 preserves the direct-bandgap nature by stacking two monolayers with a twist. Two sets of photoluminescence spectroscopy were employed to characterize the devices. The first one was performed to identify WS2 monolayers using a Raman system (Horiba Labram HR Evolution) under normal incidence of linearly polarized excitation light at the wavelength of 473 nm. A ×100 objective collected the photoluminescence of the sample with an integration time of 5 s. A charge-coupled device camera after a grating of 600 g/mm recorded the spectral behavior of the photoluminescence. The second photoluminescence spectroscopy was performed with ultrafast excitation laser pulses at the wavelength of 560 nm to characterize the devices. The time-averaged power of the laser pulses that have a duration of 100 fs and a repetition rate of 80 MHz is ~145 μw. After passing through a set of polarizers and waveplates for controlling the intensity and polarization, the laser pulses impinge on and excite the sample with the photoluminescence collected by a ×40 objective. The excited photoluminescence was separated from the excitation laser by a set of filters and analyzed with a quarter waveplate and linear polarizer together with a grating of 1200 g/mm before being collected by an electronically cooled silicon camera. During the experiment, all spectra using the latter photoluminescence spectroscopy are an average of five consecutive measurements.

Differential reflection spectroscopy

The two valleys at the K-point of the first Brillouin zone excited by LCP and RCP light quickly lose the coherency at room temperature, which is the so-called dephasing effect that causes a randomized polarization in photoluminescence spectra. Consequently, the photoluminescence spectroscopy hardly detects the angle of rotation induced by the magnetically induced effect with linearly polarized incident light under an external magnetic field. However, the differential spectroscopy overcomes the difficulty caused by the dephasing effect at the same time reflects the absorption of the material by detecting the difference in reflectance between a sample and substrate normalized to that of a reference with white light. The linearly polarized white light is from a fiber-coupled tungsten halogen source with the polarization being further tailored by a half-wave plate before impinging on the sample through a ×40 objective. A set of half-wave plates and linear polarizers in front of the spectrometer analyze the polarization of light reflected from the sample (Supplementary Fig. 3). The difference between the two polarizations before and after reflecting from the sample is the angle of the magnetically induced rotation caused by the magnetic field.

Data availability

All data supporting this study and its findings are available within the article and its Supplementary Information or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Wagnière, G. H. On Chirality and the Universal Asymmetry: Reflections on Image and Mirror Image. (Wiley-VCH, 2007).

  2. 2.

    Rikken, G. L. J. A., Folling, J. & Wyder, P. Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236602 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ideue, T. et al. Bulk rectification effect in a polar semiconductor. Nat. Phys. 13, 578–583 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nomura, T. et al. Phonon magnetochiral effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 145901 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mason, S. F. Universal dissymmetry and the origin of biomolecular chirality. Biosystems 20, 27–35 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Raupach, E. Observation of magneto-chiral dichroism. Nature 390, 493–494 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Train, C. et al. Strong magneto-chiral dichroism in enantiopure chiral ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 7, 729–734 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Taniguchi, K. et al. Strong magnetochiral dichroism for visible light emission in a rationally designed paramagnetic enantiopure molecule. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 045202 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Atzori, M. et al. A chiral Prussian blue analogue pushes magneto-chiral dichroism limits. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 20022–20025 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vallet, M. et al. Observation of magnetochiral birefringence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 183003 (2001).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kalugin, N. G., Kleindienst, P. & Wagniere, G. H. The magnetochiral birefringence in diamagnetic solutions and in uniaxial crystals. Chem. Phys. 248, 105–115 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kitagawa, Y., Miyatake, T. & Ishii, K. Magneto-chiral dichroism of artificial light-harvesting antenna. Chem. Commun. 48, 5091–5093 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Eslami, S. et al. Chiral nanomagnets. ACS Photonics 1, 1231–1236 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nakagawa, N. et al. Magneto-chiral dichroism of CsCuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 96, 121102(R) (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Koerdt, C., Duchs, G. & Rikken, G. L. J. A. Magnetochiral anisotropy in Bragg scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 073902 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Armelles, G. et al. Interaction effects between magnetic and chiral building blocks: a new route for tunable magneto-chiral plasmonic structures. ACS Photonics 2, 1272–1277 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Raupach, E. Enantioselective magnetochiral photochemistry. Nature 405, 932–935 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Banerjee-Ghosh, K. et al. Separation of enantiomers by their enantiospecific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates. Science 360, 1331–1334 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Poshakinskiy, A. V., Kazanov, D. R., Shubina, T. V. & Tarasenko, S. A. Optical activity in chiral stacks of 2D semiconductors. Nanophotonics 7, 753–762 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, Y. L. et al. Valley splitting and polarization by the Zeeman effect in monolayer MoSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266804 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Srivastava, A. et al. Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 141–147 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Aivazian, G. et al. Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 148–152 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    MacNeill, D. et al. Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayer MoSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 037401 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhong, D. et al. Layer-resolved magnetic proximity effect in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 187–191 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhao, C. et al. Enhanced valley splitting in monolayer WSe2 due to magnetic exchange field. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 757–762 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tang, C. et al. Above 400-K robust perpendicular ferromagnetic phase in a topological insulator. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700307 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Guo, Y. et al. Distinctive in-plane cleavage behaviors of two-dimensional layered materials. ACS Nano 10, 8980–8988 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lan, S., Rodrigues, S. P., Kang, L. & Cai, W. Visualizing optical phase anisotropy in black phosphorus. ACS Photonics 3, 1176–1181 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Morell, E. S., Chico, L. & Brey, L. Twisting Dirac fermions: circular dichroism in bilayer graphene. 2D Mater. 4, 035015 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yang, N. & Cohen, A. E. Local geometry of electromagnetic fields and its role in molecular multipole transitions. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 5304–5311 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kim, C. J. et al. Chiral atomically thin films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 520–525 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mak, K. F., He, K. L., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494–498 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Yao, W., Liu, G. B. & Yu, H. Y. Interlayer coupling in commensurate and incommensurate bilayer structures of transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 95, 115429 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Stupakiewicz, A. et al. Direct imaging of the magnetization reversal in microwires using all-MOKE microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 103702 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fan, X. et al. All-optical vector measurement of spin-orbit-induced torques using both polar and quadratic magneto-optic Kerr effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 122406 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lee, K. Y. et al. Fast Magneto-ionic switching of interface anisotropy using yttria-stabilized zirconia gate oxide. Nano Lett. 20, 3435–3441 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jones, A. M. et al. Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 634–638 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Odonnell, K. P. & Chen, X. Temperature-dependence of semiconductor band-gaps. Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2924–2926 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Uba, L., Uba, S. & Antonov, V. N. Magneto-optical Kerr spectroscopy of noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 96, 235132 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Xia, F. N., Wang, H., Xiao, D., Dubey, M. & Ramasubramaniam, A. Two-dimensional material nanophotonics. Nat. Photonics 8, 899–907 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Duan, X. D., Wang, C., Pan, A. L., Yu, R. Q. & Duan, X. F. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides as atomically thin semiconductors: opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8859–8876 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gruselle, M., Train, C., Boubekeur, K., Gredin, P. & Ovanesyan, N. Enantioselective self-assembly of chiral bimetallic oxalate-based networks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 250, 2491–2500 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Slowing, I. I., Vivero-Escoto, J. L., Wu, C. W. & Lin, V. S. Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 1278–1288 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Baranova, N. B. & Zeldovich, B. Y. Theory of a new linear magneto-refractive effect in liquids. Mol. Phys. 38, 1085–1098 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (award no.5722) and the Ernest S. Kuh Endowed Chair Professorship. S.L. acknowledges the start-up funding from Texas A&M University and the Governor’s University Research Initiative (GURI).

Author information




S.L. and X.Z. conceived the idea and initiated the project. S.L. formulated the theory. S.L., X.L., H.Z., C.G., and S.Y. built the experimental setup and carried out the optical measurements. S.L. and S.W. fabricated the devices. Y.L and J.S. provided the ferromagnetic substrates and carried out the magnetic characterizations. S.L., Y.W., and X.Z. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. X.Z. and Y.W. supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Celcilia Noguez and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lan, S., Liu, X., Wang, S. et al. Observation of strong excitonic magneto-chiral anisotropy in twisted bilayer van der Waals crystals. Nat Commun 12, 2088 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing