Abstract
A crucial phase in the infection process, which remains poorly understood, is the localization of suitable host cells by bacteria. It is often assumed that chemotaxis plays a key role during this phase. Here, we report a quantitative study on how Salmonella Typhimurium search for T84 human colonic epithelial cells. Combining timelapse microscopy and mathematical modeling, we show that bacteria can be described as chiral active particles with strong active speed fluctuations, which are of biological, as opposed to thermal, origin. We observe that there exists a giant range of interindividual variability of the bacterial exploring capacity. Furthermore, we find Salmonella Typhimurium does not exhibit biased motion towards the cells and show that the search time statistics is consistent with a random search strategy. Our results indicate that in vitro localization of host cells, and also cell infection, are random processes, not involving chemotaxis, that strongly depend on bacterial motility parameters.
Introduction
Gastrointestinal infections by pathogenic, flagellated bacteria, such as Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium (ST) involve multiple steps. The infection starts with bacteria performing threedimensional movements in the gut lumen until reaching specific areas inside the gastrointestinal tract^{1}. The next phase requires bacteria to approach the intestinal epithelium, move on it, to finally reach and dock on host cells (HCs)^{2}. The final step of the invasion in ST involves the internalization inside the HCs^{2,3}. After anchoring to the cell membrane, bacteria make use of the Type III secretion system^{4} to trigger a series of complex processes that culminate by the formation of an endocytic vesicle that allow bacteria to enter into the cell. Our understanding of the role played by bacterial motility in the infection process is very limited. Experiments with mice with motile and nonmotile bacteria have provided evidence that active motility facilitates infection^{5,6}. In line with these results, in vitro experiments with HCs attached to abiotic surfaces have shown that cell invasion is enhanced by active motility^{7,8,9}. This observation is also consistent with results obtained on biotic (cellular) surfaces^{2}. Furthermore, recent studies performed with gut explants have shown that active motility becomes essential to breach the mucus layer, as well as to locate mucusfree areas (e.g., the cecum in mice) in order to obtain direct access to the tissue^{1}. How bacteria navigate towards these suitable areas of the gastrointestinal tract and identify host cells remains poorly understood. Specifically, there is no quantitative understanding of the bacterial search strategy. Though chemotaxis is assumed to play a key role, it has been found that it is not essential for infection on glass surfaces or tissue culture cells^{2}, but it is required to promote the infection in the gut^{5,6}.
Surfaces are of fundamental physiological relevance for bacteria: the level of nutrients is higher near them and host cells sit off them, when it is not that the surface itself is a cellular tissue prone to be infected. Bacterial swimming patterns near surfaces are fundamentally different from those observed in the bulk^{10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20}. Near a surface, bacteria experience an effective, hydrodynamicinduced attraction towards the surface^{10,11,12,13,14}, tumbling events are strongly suppressed^{21,22}, and hydrodynamicinduced torques^{18,19,20,23} force bacteria to move in circular trajectories^{10,11,12,13,14,24,25}. Furthermore, depending on the properties of the surface and bacterial adhesins, optimal surface exploration requires bacteria to perform transient adhesion events at a given frequency^{26}. For too strong or too weak adhesion properties, adhesion events are detrimental for surface exploration^{26}, as occurs for ST on the glass.
Here, we present a quantitative study that combines timelapse microscopy and active matter modeling to characterize the motion of pathogenic bacteria in the search of HC. We use ST as pathogenic bacteria and T84 human colonic epithelial cells as HCs. We show that nearsurface motion of ST corresponds to that of a chiral active particle, characterized by an angular speed Ω, with an important distinctive feature: ST exhibits strong active speed fluctuations. We provide evidence that the observed speed fluctuations are of biological, as opposed to thermal, origin. Furthermore, we show that in the absence of transient surface adhesion, active speed fluctuations play a key role in the exploration capacity—i.e., diffusion coefficient—of these bacteria, which can account for up to 40% of its value when Ω > 1 s^{−1}. In addition, we find that there exists a large interindividual variability—over four orders of magnitude—of exploration capacity within the population of motile bacteria. Our analysis indicates that ST does not exhibit chemotaxis towards the HCs. Furthermore, we show that the statistics of encounter times between ST and HC—hittingtime statistics—are fully consistent with a random search strategy (RST), implying that encounters are fortuitous events. We use this knowledge to discuss the relation between motility parameters and bacterial virulence.
Results
We study first the motility of wildtype ST, strain SL1344 (from now on STWT) near the bottom glass coverslip of an invitrogen Attoflour chamber without HC, filled with 4 mm height liquid film of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) at 37 ^{∘}C using phasecontrast microscopy at 40× magnification (for further details, see Methods). Experiments with human T84 epithelial colonic cells (HC) are performed under identical conditions. In order to determine whether chemotaxis is used by STWT, we perform control experiments with nonchemotactic ST mutants—strain M935 (from now on STM935)—in the presence of HC. In order to determine the level of bacterial infection, we report results from infection experiments in which the number of bacteria internalized inside HCs is estimated. These experiments are performed with STWT as well as a control experiment with nonflagellated mutants, strain M913 (from now on STM913). Estimates are provided 60 min after inoculation of bacteria (for further details, see Methods).
Bacterial motion in the absence of host cells
We start out by analyzing bacterial trajectories in the absence of HC. Note that the bacterial population, as observed in vivo and in vitro experiments, includes flagellated as well as nonflagellated bacteria owing to phenotypic noise^{27}. Nonflagellated bacteria perform passive diffusion dominated by thermal and environmental fluctuations, thus they are inefficient to explore space and locate HCs. Here, we focus on flagellateddriven bacteria and analyze their capacity to explore the environment and locate HCs. For an illustration of trajectories of actively moving bacteria, see Fig. 1a–d and Supplementary Movies 1–4. We proceed as follows. For each bacterium, we compute the position of its center of mass, with a positional error estimate of 0.3 μm, every Δt = 0.03 s, with Δt the time between two consecutive frames, and construct \({{\Delta }}{{\bf{x}}}_{i,n}=({{\Delta }}{x}_{i,n},{{\Delta }}{y}_{i,n})=(x({t}_{i}+n{{\Delta }}t)x({t}_{i}),y({t}_{i}+n{{\Delta }}t)y({t}_{i}))\), where t_{i} refers to the time associated to frame i, and n is a nonnegative integer. From Δx_{i,n}, we obtain the velocity vector V_{i,n} = Δx_{i,n}/(nΔt) and extract the speed \({u}_{i,n}=\sqrt{{{\Delta }}{x}_{i,n}^{2}+{{\Delta }}{y}_{i,n}^{2}}/(n{{\Delta }}t)\); see Supplementary Fig. 1. Note that V_{i,n} and u_{i,n} are average quantities, even for n = 1, of an underlying continuoustime process. For instance, one can express \({{\bf{V}}}_{i,n}={(n{{\Delta }}t)}^{1}[\mathop{\int}\nolimits_{{t}_{i}}^{{t}_{i}+n{{\Delta }}t}\dot{{\bf{x}}}(s)ds+{{\bf{E}}}_{i,n}(t)]\), where \(\dot{{\bf{x}}}\) the instantaneous velocity in the underlying continuous process and E_{i,n}(t) is the experimental error performed in the velocity estimation. It is worth stressing that \(\dot{{\bf{x}}}\) and E_{i,n} are stochastic independent variable, E_{i,n} is independent of n (E_{i,n} = E_{i}), whereas the variance of \(\mathop{\int}\nolimits_{{t}_{i}}^{{t}_{i}+n{{\Delta }}t}\dot{{\bf{x}}}(s)ds\) grows with n. As result of this, as explained in detail in Supplementary Note 2, it is possible to discriminate for n > 1 contributions to fluctuations coming from experimental errors from those genuinely related to the underlying physical/biological process, in order to obtain a reliable characterization of speed fluctuations. Although we use n > 1 to obtain accurate estimates, note that the observed speed fluctuations (over time) are significantly larger than the experimental error (±10 μm/s) even for n = 1 [Fig. 1e]. In the following, to ease the notation we refer to the average velocity as V(t), to its magnitude as u(t), and drop the index n and use continuoustime t instead of i. We find that u(t) is normally distributed [Fig. 1f], whereas the speed autocorrelation A(t) [Fig. 1g] takes the form:
where k_{v} is the timerelaxation constant, \(\bar{v}\) denotes the average (along the trajectory) of the speed, and \({\langle \cdots \rangle }_{t^{\prime} }\) indicates average over \(t^{\prime}\). The autocorrelation of the moving direction—defined as \({\bf{e}}(t)=\frac{{\bf{V}}(t)}{u(t)}\)—exhibits the following functional form [Fig. 1h]:
where Ω is a constant frequency (or angular speed) and D_{θ} a timerelaxation constant.
The speed and moving direction correlations given by Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively, are consistent with the following equations of motion for chiral active particles with active speed fluctuations:
where dots refer to temporal derivatives, x is the position of the center of mass of the bacterium, \({\bf{e}}(\theta (t))=(\cos \theta (t),\sin \theta (t))\) is a unit vector that indicates the bacterium moving direction, and v(t) corresponds to the instantaneous active speed. Recall that u(t) refers to the average speed. Both noises ξ_{m}(t) are deltacorrelated such that \(\langle {\xi }_{m}(t^{\prime} ){\xi }_{m}(t^{\prime\prime} )\rangle =\delta (t^{\prime} t^{\prime\prime} )\) for m = θ, v. Eq. (3c) defines an OrnsteinUhlenbeck process, whose steady state speed distribution p(u) is then given by:
The estimation of k_{v} is obtained from Eq. (1), whereas \(\bar{v}\) and the amplitude of speed fluctuations D_{v} are estimated by the procedure detailed in Supplementary Note 2. Finally, the rotation frequency Ω and the amplitude of moving direction fluctuations D_{θ} are obtained from Eq. (2). A detailed derivation of Eqs. (1) and (2) from Eqs. (3) is provided in Supplementary Note 1 and further details on the estimation of parameters can be found in Supplementary Note 2. Note that assumption of an OU process in the speed allows us to take into account active (as well as thermal) speed fluctuations^{28,29,30}). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first model of active chiral particles with active speed fluctuations; in the absence of active fluctuations, the model reduces to the one studied in^{31,32,33,34}.
The analysis of the model given by Eq. (3) reveals various remarkable features of chiral active particles with active speed fluctuations. The first moment, 〈x(t)〉, in the presence of moving direction fluctuations is an inward spiral that asymptotically converges to a point, as previously reported in ref. ^{33}. In the absence of such fluctuations, it becomes, due to active speed fluctuations, in sharp contrast to the previous scenario, an outward spiral that asymptotically converges to a limit cycle, see insets in Fig. 2a and b; the expression and derivation of 〈x(t)〉 are given in Supplementary Note 1, see Supplementary Eq. (14). From the study of 〈x^{2}(t)〉, we learn that when both fluctuations are present, i.e., D_{v} > 0 and D_{θ} > 0, the meansquare displacement displays decaying oscillations mounted on a linearly increasing function of time, Fig. 2b; the expression and derivation of 〈x^{2}(t)〉 is given in Supplementary Note 1, see Supplementary Eq. (17). We find that even in the absence of moving direction fluctuations (D_{θ} = 0) the meansquare displacement grows with time, Fig. 2a. Finally, the active diffusion coefficient D of these particles is given by:
where the second term, \({D}_{B}=\frac{{D}_{v}}{2{k}_{v}}\frac{\left({k}_{v}+{D}_{\theta }\right)}{\left({\left({k}_{v}+{D}_{\theta }\right)}^{2}+{{{\Omega }}}^{2}\right)}\), is exclusively due to the presence of speed fluctuations and reduces to \({D}_{B}={D}_{v}/(2{k}_{v}^{2})\) for k_{v} ≫ D_{θ}, Ω. For details on the derivation of Eq. (5), see Supplementary Note 1. We find that D grows with speed fluctuations (D_{v}), Fig. 2c, decreases with Ω, Fig. 2d, and exhibits a maximum with moving direction fluctuations (D_{θ}), Fig. 2e. It is worth stressing that while speed fluctuations are typically negligible for nonchiral active particles, here we show that for chiral active particles, active speed fluctuations can have a measurable and significant impact in the transport properties of these particles, including in the diffusion coefficient, provided Ω is large enough (in bacteria, see below, for Ω > 1 s^{−1}).
Figure 3a shows that the diffusion of individual, flagellardriven ST bacteria swimming near a surface ranges from 1 to 10^{4} μm^{2}/s. Note that though we analyze here flagellardriven bacteria only, diffusion coefficient values of the order of 1 μm^{2}/s, precisely 0.2 μm^{2}/s, are similar to those expected for nonflagellated bacteria driven by thermal Brownian motion^{1}. On the other hand, diffusion coefficients of the order of 100 μm^{2}/s, observed for ∣Ω∣ = 1/s, coincide with those for flagellated bacteria in the nearsurface colonic mucus layer^{1}. Such a large interindividual variability of diffusion coefficients—for flagellated bacteria in the same medium—is a direct consequence of the nonlinear functional form of D, Eq. (5), and its functional dependency with Ω, which varies in the range −3 s^{−1} < Ω < 1 s^{−1}. To illustrate this fact, we compute the diffusion coefficient D_{AV}(Ω) of a representative bacterium, whose motility parameters, but the rotation frequency Ω, correspond to the average values obtained using allanalyzed bacterial trajectories, that we express, using Eq. (5) in the limit k_{v} ≫ D_{θ}, Ω, as \({D}_{\text{AV}}({{\Omega }})=\frac{{\langle \bar{v}\rangle }^{2}\langle {D}_{\theta }\rangle }{2({\langle {D}_{\theta }\rangle }^{2}+{{{\Omega }}}^{2})}+\frac{1}{2}\langle \frac{{D}_{v}}{{k}_{v}^{2}}\rangle\), with mean values: \(\langle \bar{v}\rangle =39.45\ \mu \text{m}\,\ {\text{s}}^{1}\), \(\langle {D}_{v}/{k}_{v}^{2}\rangle =2.38\ {\text{m}}^{2}{\text{s}}^{1}\), and 〈D_{θ}〉 = 0.076 s^{−1}. The diffusion coefficient D_{AV}(Ω) is shown by a solid red curve in Fig. 3a and b. For further details on the statistics of the trajectories, see Supplementary Note 3 as well as Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3. To assess the contribution of active speed fluctuations to the diffusion coefficient, we compare in Fig. 3b the value of D_{B} with respect to D. We find that for ∣Ω∣ > 1 the estimated value of the D can only be explained by considering speed fluctuations, which can account for up to 40% of the actual value. On the other hand, for vanishing values of ∣Ω∣ we observe the largest D, with ∣Ω∣ → 0 not diverging but corresponding to the D of a nonchiral active particle subject to fluctuation in the moving direction. Note that a correlation between the aspect ratio ω of a bacterium and its measured Ω value seems to exist, Fig. 3c. This observation seems consistent with arguments put forward in ref. ^{35}, however other explanation^{33,36} may provide alternative explanations.
As indicated above, details on experimental fluctuation estimations are provided in Supplementary Note 2. Specifically, measurements of speed fluctuations are performed by studying displacement fluctuations in time intervals nΔt with 5 < n ≤ 7, making use of Supplementary Eq. (18) and the method explained in Supplementary Note 2; see Supplementary Fig. 1c. The developed procedure allows accurate and reliable measurements of \({D}_{v}/{k}_{v}^{2}\), and thus of speed fluctuations. In the following, we focus on the possible origin of the observed fluctuations. In the analysis, we ignore the fact that thermal fluctuations in \(\hat{z}\) lead to changes in drag coefficients, thus contributing effectively to D_{θ} and D_{v}. However, fluctuations induced by thermal motion in \(\hat{z}\), in nearsurface swimming, lead to correction smaller than the one found in our experiments^{37}. If fluctuations are of thermal origin, then we expect to observe that D_{θ} is proportional to K_{B}T/ζ_{R} and measurements of \({D}_{v}/{k}_{v}^{2}\) to K_{B}T/ζ_{0}, where K_{B} is the Boltzmann constant, T the temperature (in Kelvin), and ζ_{R} and ζ_{0} drag constants associated to rotations and displacements of the bacterium, respectively. Note that there exist several drag friction coefficient models for spherocylinders that depend on the viscosity of the liquid, length, and radius of the object. We use the socalled Shishkebab and ellipsoid models^{38,39} for bulk drags, which provide an upper bound for thermal fluctuation estimates. Figure 3d shows the estimated values of D_{θ} and compares them with the expected values of these two models, using the maximum and minimum measured bacterial aspect ratio. The figure indicates that measured values of D_{θ} are consistent with thermal fluctuations at 37 °C. Moreover, the measured value 〈D_{θ}〉 ≈ 0.076 s^{−1} is remarkably close to the early estimates of thermal rotational diffusion for bacteria by Berg^{15}. Performing the same exercise for \({D}_{v}/{k}_{v}^{2}\), which has dimensions of spatial diffusion coefficient, we find, Fig. 3d, that the measured values are systematically higher than the expected values of both Shishkebab and ellipsoid model. For further details, see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Movie 4. This finding indicates that speed fluctuations are not consistent with thermal fluctuations. The observed higher values, we speculate, result from the combined effect of thermal fluctuations and fluctuations coming from the swimming propulsion machinery, likely to result from a nontrivial interplay of fluctuations of the individual flagella forming the bundle^{40,41}.
Bacterial motility in the presence of host cells
In the following, we study the behavior of ST in the presence of HC (see Supplementary Movie 5). The comparison of experiments with (i) STWT in the absence of HC, (ii) STWT in the presence of HC, and (iii) the nonchemotactic mutant STM935 in the presence of HC allows us to provide solid evidence that STWT does not display biased motion towards HC, see Fig. 4a–c. In order to do that, we define for each bacterium the quantity l_{min} that measures the distance (from the bacterium) to the closest HC. The temporal evolution of l_{min} for an experimental trajectory is shown in Fig. 4d. The sign of the temporal derivative of l_{min}, \(m(t)=\frac{{\rm{d}}{l}_{min}}{{\rm{d}}t}\), indicates whether the bacterium is approaching or moving away from the closest HC at time t, see Fig. 4e. We use the temporal average of m(t) for a trajectory—denoted by \(\bar{m}\)—as “bias” order parameter. For an ensemble of trajectories, in absence of biased motion, the (population) average of \(\bar{m}\) is expected to be centered about 0: half of the trajectories are approaching cells, whereas the other half is moving away. The presence of biased motion toward HCs introduces a shift of the average of \(\bar{m}\) towards negative values. This observation can be easily verified in simulations with and without chemotactic bias towards HCs [Fig. 4e]. The method applied to experiments with STWT and with nonchemotactic mutant STM935 in the presence of T84 cells shows that for both, wildtype and mutant, the distribution of \(\bar{m}\) is centered ~0. A binomial test, using the sign of \(\bar{m}\), yields in experiments with STWT a p value = 0.60, whereas in experiment with STM935, p value = 0.99. This indicates that the null hypothesis—absence of chemotactic bias, for which the probability of observing for a trajectory \(\,{\text{sgn}}\,(\bar{m})> 0\) is 0.5—is consistent with the data. Thus, this proves that a chemotactic bias is neither present for nonchemotactic mutants nor for wildtype ST. Other tests, included in Supplementary Note 5, lead to the same conclusion. Note that motility parameters between STWT without HC and STM935 do not display a significant difference, whereas those for STWT in the presence of HC are slightly modified, see Fig. 4c and Supplementary Table 1. For further details on biased motion tests, see Supplementary Note 5 as well as Supplementary Figs. 4–6.
We study the statistics of search times—i.e. the time that takes for a bacterium to reach an HC—which we characterize by the (cumulative) probability S(τ) that this time is larger or equal to τ. Figure 5a shows S(τ) in experiments with STWT and with the nonchemotactic STM935 in the presence of HC, as well as in a control statistical test. The control test consists of using trajectories of STWT in absence of HC to compute the time these trajectories hit randomly distributed areas that mimic the presence of HC (for details, see Supplementary Note 6); the distribution of positions and sizes of HCs using in the test correspond to those in experiments with HC (Supplementary Note 7 and Supplementary Fig. 7). The analysis reveals that S(τ) is almost identical for the wildtype (STWT), the nonchemotactic mutant (STM935), and the control test. These results support the finding that the encounter of ST and HC does not involve biased motion towards HCs and results from a random process. All this indicates that the distribution of τ can be estimated as the firstpassage time of the random chiral walker defined by Eq. (3), and thus, one expects the statistics of τ to strongly depend on mobility parameters, specially Ω; Supplementary Fig. 7 shows 〈τ〉 vs. Ω. Figure 5b and c show that in experiments, 〈τ〉 is larger when ∣Ω∣ > Ω_{0} than when ∣Ω∣ < Ω_{0}, which confirms the sensitivity of 〈τ〉 to the motility parameter Ω. In the figure, we have used Ω_{0} = 0.3 s^{−1} to illustrate this effect, but any other value of Ω_{0} can be used. The conclusion is always that bacteria with ∣Ω∣ > Ω_{0} require in average more time to find a HC than those with ∣Ω∣ < Ω_{0}. Under the condition \(\bar{v}{{{\Omega }}}^{1}\ll 1/\sqrt{{\rho }_{\rm{HC}}}\), with ρ_{HC} the host cell density, 〈τ〉 can be roughly estimated as \(\langle \tau \rangle \sim {[4{\rho }_{\rm{HC}}D({{\Omega }})]}^{1}\)^{[ 42}, otherwise the encounter of ST and HC is given by a “ballistic” regime that does not depend on D. This is illustrated in Fig. 5d that displays 〈τ〉 as function of D in experiments (symbols) and in simulations of the active chiral particle model for various Ω values, using for other motility parameters the (population) average values. Such a relation between 〈τ〉 and D does not apply at high bacterial concentration—bacterial motion in these conditions can turn out to be superdiffusive^{43}—or in the presence of an external flow^{44}.
We make use of our knowledge on the search time to simulate infections as follows. We first randomly distribute HCs over the space (at densities and size distributions as those in the experiments) and then integrate Eq. (3) to obtain bacterial trajectories. Whenever a bacterium encounters an HC, with probability p_{s} the bacterium invades the HC, i.e., gets inside the HC, otherwise continues exploring the space. We compute, for a fixed time, the number of invading bacteria (NIB), i.e. the bacteria that managed to invade HC. Figure 5e shows NIB as function of 1/〈τ〉, which provides a clear indication of the relevance of 〈τ〉 in the infection process, with NIB inversely proportional to 〈τ〉. All this suggests that the large range of individual D values within the same population (cf. Fig. 3) may also imply interindividual virulence variability. Finally, in order to assess the role of speed fluctuations in the computation of 〈τ〉 and in the infection process, i.e., in the estimation of NIB, we compute both quantities in simulations that include speed fluctuations, as well as in simulations that neglect them, for values of Ω in the range 0–5 s^{−1} and using for other motility parameters, the average values obtained in STWT experiments. We find that for Ω ≥ 1, speed fluctuations lead to statistically significant increments of NIB (and decrease of 〈τ〉). This is illustrated in Fig. 5f for Ω = 2.5 s^{−1}, where the contribution due to speed fluctuations represents a 15% increase in NIB. For other values of Ω, see Supplementary Fig. 10, and for further details on the implementation of the infection model and statistical tests, see Supplementary Note 8. Importantly, NIB can be directly estimated in experiments; for details see Methods. Finally, Fig. 5g compares results obtained in experiments^{7} and in simulations. These results confirm that ST is actually invading HC and that motility plays an essential role in the infection process, as is evident from the low virulence exhibited by the nonflagellated mutants STM913^{7}. The agreement between experiments and the infection model provides additional support to the relevance of motility in the infection process.
Discussion
Through the performed quantitative analysis of ST motility patterns in absence of HC, we showed that ST can be described as chiral active particles with active speed fluctuations. The developed mathematical model of bacterial behavior allowed us to extract motility parameters and to compute the active diffusion coefficient (D) of individual flagellardriven bacteria. It is worth stressing that given that bacteria, near the surface, behave as chiral swimmers, speed fluctuations contribute to the active diffusion coefficient for large enough values of the rotation frequency ∣Ω∣. Let us recall that for nonchiral particles, the contribution of active speed fluctuations to D is too weak to be measurable. In the experiments, we found that active speed fluctuations can contribute up to 40% of the diffusion coefficient value, when ∣Ω∣ > 1 s^{−1}. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental example, where the contribution of active fluctuations to transport coefficients is measurable and significant. In addition, we showed that the measured speed fluctuations could not be of thermal origin, which led us to speculate that this phenomenon is related to fluctuations of the flagellar machinery^{40,41}; further experiments, combining molecular biology and new microscopical techniques, may provide direct evidence of the correlation between speed fluctuations and the flagellar motor^{45}. Furthermore, we observed that the obtained interindividual variability of motility parameters lead to a diffusion coefficient that ranges over four orders of magnitude. We presume that such variability among flagellardriven motile bacteria is related to phenotypic noise, which has been shown in ST to play an important role in flagella synthesis and pathogenesis^{27}. Note that bacterial population includes flagellated as well as nonflagellated bacteria^{27}, whereas here we provide evidence of the existence of large interindividual variability among the subpopulation of flagellardriven motile bacteria.
In the presence of HCs, motility parameters are only slightly modified and the performed chemotaxis statistical tests indicate that ST does not exhibit biased motion towards cells, in line with the previous studies^{2} that showed that in vitro chemotaxis is not essential for interaction with HCs. Nevertheless, note that in vivo chemotaxis is required to promote the infection in the gut^{5,6}. The absence of chemotaxis has been also observed under some conditions, in which ST displays high motility and expresses virulence factors. This lets us speculate that HCs may induce the activation of type III secretion system without affecting ST motility^{46,47}.
The absence of biased motion towards HCs suggests that the time required for a bacterium to find an HC can be computed as a firstpassage problem using the proposed chiral active model. The experimentally obtained search time statistics confirmed this idea, showing that bacterial behavior in the presence of HCs is analogous to the motion of active particles through a complex environment^{48,49,50,51}. In short, our results indicate the strategy applied by bacteria to locate HCs corresponds to an RST. RSTs are commonly found in biology^{52}. We speculate that a similar RST may be used by ST to find breaches in the mucus layer and reach the epithelium^{1}.
Finally, since the search time statistics can be understood as a firstpassage time problem of active chiral particles, with a mean search time 〈τ〉 function of the active diffusion coefficient D, we proposed a simple mathematical infection model that mechanistically relates motility parameters with infection capacity. Specifically, we argued that the number of invading bacteria (NIB) is determined by 〈τ〉, and thus by D. In the light of this mathematical model, the large interindividual variability found in D translate into a large interindividual variability of infection capacities among the subpopulation of flagellardriven bacteria.
A comprehensive quantitative understanding of the bacterial infection process, and in particular of the role played by bacterial active motility, requires extensions of the heredeveloped motility model to characterize and describe bacterial motion within the mucus layer^{1} and by passive transport in the lumen, as well as incorporating the complex interactions that take place when bacteria and host cells are in physical contact^{2,7,8,9}. These issues should be the focus of future studies.
Methods
Bacteria
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (ST) strain SL1344 was kindly provided by Stéphane Méresse, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, Centre d’Immunologie de MarseilleLuminy (CIML), INSERMCNRS, Marseille, France. The nonchemotactic mutant strain M935 (cheY::Tn10) and the nonflagellated mutant strain M913 (fliGHI::Tn10) were kindly provided by WolfDietrich Hardt from the Institute of Microbiology, DBIOL, ETH Zurich, Switzerland^{5}. Bacteria were stored in LuriaBertani (LB) medium plus 15% glycerol at −80 °C.
Cell lines
The human T84 colonic cell line was obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (Salisbury, England). The T84 culture medium contained a 1:1 mixture of DulbeccoVogt modified Eagle medium and Ham’ sF12 medium (DMEM/F12) supplemented with 50 μg/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma, France), and 4% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, France).
Preparation for videomicroscopy
ST strain SL1344, which is a tumbling bacterial strain and the nonchemotactic mutant M935, were grown overnight into LB broth medium without shaking (a condition that preserved flagellum). Bacteria were pelleted by gentle centrifugation (1100 × g for 10 minutes) and resuspended in DMEM medium. For experiments without T84 cells, 2 ml of liquid was disposed into invitrogen Attoflour cell chambers, leading to a density of ~10^{6} bacteria/dishes. The circular cell chambers have a diameter of 25 mm, which leads to a height of ~4 mm of the liquid above the bottom glass surface of the cell chamber. For experiments with T84 cells, the cells were seeded at a density of 10^{6} cells/dish in a 35 mm glassbottom dish (Mat Tek Corporation, USA). Twentyfour hours later culture medium was changed to medium without serum nor antibiotics for 12 hours. In order to perform infection, ST were added to cell chamber (~5 × 10^{7} bacteria/dishes). For timelapse videomicroscopy, the chambers were placed in a humidity (95%), CO_{2} (5%), and temperature (37°C)—controlled environment. The focus was set on the coverslip at the bottom of the cell chamber, in order to record bacterial motion close to the surface glass/liquid. At least 30 minutes were given to the system to equilibrate prior to recording bacterial motion.
Records of videomicroscopy and bacterial tracking
Motile bacteria were recorded by phasecontrast microscopy using a Leica DMI6000 B inverted microscope equipped with a highsensitive Ropper CoolSnap HQ2 CCD camera (Photometrics) at ×40 magnification (numerical aperture: 0.75, Leica HCX PL Fluotar PH2). Images were acquired with the LASAF v4.0 software (Leica, Germany) at a rate of 35 fps. Images were 224.14 × 167.38 μm^{2} (696 px × 520 px), 1 px ≈ 0.32 μm. Videos of bacterial motion were analyzed using the ImageJ platform v1.53c^{53}. Trajectories of individual bacteria were tracked using MtrackJ v1.5.1 and the semiautomatic tracking tool from TrackMate v3.4.2 software^{54,55}. Analysis of trajectories and figures were made using the algorithms detailed in Supplementary Note 2 implemented with Python 2.7.18 and Matlab R2016a.
Infection procedure for invasion assays
T84 cells were seeded into sixwell tissue culture plates at 10^{6} cells per well. Twentyfour hours later, the culture medium was changed to medium without serum and antibiotics and maintained in this medium overnight. Infection was performed as described above for video microscopic procedure. Bacterial infection to T84 cells was quantified using the following method. After 1 h of infection, bacteria (outside cells) were eliminated by extensive washes with sterile phosphatebuffered saline (PBS). Cells were then incubated for an additional hour with DMEM/F12 containing 100 μg of gentamicin per ml. Since gentamicin was not concentrated in epithelial cells, intracellular bacteria survived the incubation, while adherent and extracellular bacteria were killed. The monolayers were then washed with sterile PBS, and epithelial cells with intracellular bacteria were detached by trypsin and lysed in water containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. Different dilutions of the suspension were plated on LBagar medium for colonyforming unit (CFU) number determination. CFU provides rough estimates of the number of bacteria contained inside T84 cells.
Statistics and reproducibility
Motility experiments were done n = 3 times. Images were captured from different cell chambers at different times. The field inside each cell chamber was chosen randomly. Tracked bacteria, larger than 0.2 sec were chosen randomly from different cell chambers and different experiments. For STWT in the absence of T84 cells, 89 independent trajectories were analyzed, for STWT and T84 cells, 60 trajectories, and for STM935 in the presence of T84 cells, 75 trajectories. Bacterial invasion experiments were replicated n = 3.
Data availability
The raw data that support the findings of this study are available at http://data.centrescientifique.mc/Otte_data.html. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The computer codes used for simulations and numerical calculations are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Furter, M., Sellin, M. E., Hansson, G. C. & Hardt, W.D. Mucus architecture and nearsurface swimming affect distinct Salmonella typhimurium infection patterns along the murine intestinal tract. Cell Rep. 27, 2665–2678 (2019).
Misselwitz, B. et al. Near surface swimming of Salmonella typhimurium explains targetsite selection and cooperative invasion. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002810 (2012).
Patel, J. C., Rossanese, O. W. & Galan, J. E. The functional interface between Salmonella and its host cell: opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 26, 564–570 (2005).
Galán, J. E. & WolfWatz, H. Protein delivery into eukaryotic cells by type III secretion machines. Nature 444, 567–573 (2006).
Stecher, B. et al. Flagella and chemotaxis are required for efficient induction of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium colitis in streptomycinpretreated mice. Infect. Immun. 72, 4138–4150 (2004).
Stecher, B. et al. Motility allows S. typhimurium to benefit from the mucosal defence. Cell. Microbiol. 10, 1166–1180 (2008).
PontierBres, R. et al. Modification of Salmonella typhimurium motility by the probiotic yeast strain Saccharomyces boulardii. PLoS ONE 7, e33796 (2012).
Gog, J. R. et al. Dynamics of Salmonella infection of macrophages at the single cell level. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 2696–2707 (2012).
Achouri, S. et al. The frequency and duration of Salmonellamacrophage adhesion events determines infection efficiency. Phyl. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140033 (2015).
Berke, A. P., Turner, L., Berg, H. C. & Lauga, E. Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 038102 (2008).
Di Leonardo, R., Dell Arciprete, D., Angelani, L. & Lebba, V. Swimming with an image. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 038101 (2011).
Drescher, K., Dunkel, J., Cisneros, L. H., Ganguly, S. & Goldstein, R. E. Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cell – cell and cell – surface scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 10940–10945 (2011).
Spagnolie, S. E. & Lauga, E. Hydrodynamics of selfpropulsion near a boundary, predictions and accuracy of farfield approximations. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 105–147 (2012).
Schaar, K., Zöttl, A. & Stark, H. Detention times of microswimmers close to surfaces: Influence of hydrodynamic interactions and noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 038101 (2015).
Berg, H. C. Random Walks in Biology (Princeton University Press, 1993).
Berg, H. C. & Brown, D. A. Chemotaxis in escherichia coli analysed by threedimensional tracking. Nature 239, 500–504 (1972).
Frymier, P. D., Ford, R. M., Berg, H. C. & Cummings, P. T. Threedimensional tracking of motile bacteria near a solid planar surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6195 (1995).
Lauga, E., DiLuzio, W. R., Whitesides, G. M. & Stone, H. A. Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. Biophys. J. 90, 400–412 (2006).
Lauga, E. & Powers, T. R. The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009).
Elgeti, J., Winkler, R. G. & Gompper, G. Physics of microswimmers, single particle motion and collective behavior: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 056601 (2015).
Molaei, M., Barry, M., Stocker, R. & Sheng, J. Failed escape: solid surfaces prevent tumbling of Escherichia coli. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 068103 (2014).
Molaei, M. & Shen, J. Succeed escape: flow shear promotes tumbling of escherichia colinear a solid surface. Sci. Rep. 6, 35290 (2016).
Hu, J., Wysocki, A., Winkler, R. G. & Gompper, G. Physical sensing of surface properties by microswimmers–directing bacterial motion via wall slip. Sci. Rep. 5, 9586 (2015).
Lemelle, L., Palierne, J.F., Chatre, E. & Place, C. Counterclockwise circular motion of bacteria swimming at the airliquid interface. J. Bacteriol. 192, 6310 (2010).
Lemelle, L., Palierne, J.F., Chatre, E., Vaillant, C. & Place, C. Curvature reversal of the circular motion of swimming bacteria probes for slip at solid/liquid interfaces. Soft Matter 9, 9759 (2013).
Ipiña, E. P., Otte, S., PontierBres, R., Czerucka, D. & Peruani, F. Bacteria display optimal transport near surfaces. Nat. Phys. 15, 610 (2019).
Freed, N. E. et al. A simple screen to identify promoters conferring high levels of phenotypic noise. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000307 (2008).
Schienbein, M. & Gruler, H. Langevin equation, fokkerplanck equation and cell migration. B. Math. Biol. 55, 585–608 (1993).
Peruani, F. & Morelli, L. G. Selfpropelled particles with fluctuating speed and direction of motion in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 010602 (2007).
Romanczuk, P. & SchimanskyGeier, L. Brownian motion with active fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230601 (2011).
van Teeffelen, S. & Löwen, H. Dynamics of a brownian circle swimmer. Phys. Rev. E 78, 020101 (2008).
Ebbens, S., Jones, R. A. L., Ryan, A. J., Golestanian, R. & Howse, J. R. Selfassembled autonomous runners and tumblers. Phys. Rev. E 82, 015304 (2010).
Kümmel, F. et al. Circular motion of asymmetric selfpropelling particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 198302 (2013).
Sevilla, F. J. Diffusion of active chiral particles. Phys. Rev. E 94, 062120 (2016).
Lopez, D. & Lauga, E. Dynamics of swimming bacteria at complex interfaces. Phys. Fluids 26, 071902 (2014).
Debnath, D., Ghosh, P. K., Li, Y., Marchesoni, F. & Li, B. Diffusion of eccentric microswimmers. Soft Matter 12, 2017–2024 (2016).
Li, G., Tam, L.K. & Tang, J. X. Amplified effect of brownian motion in bacterial nearsurface swimming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 18355–18359 (2008).
Doi, M. & Edwards, S. F.The theory of polymer dynamics, vol. 73 (oxford university press, 1988).
Han, Y. et al. Brownian motion of an ellipsoid. Science 314, 626–630 (2006).
Meacci, G. & Tu, Y. Dynamics of the bacterial flagellar motor with multiple stators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 3746–3751 (2009).
Eisenbach, M. et al. Pausing, switching and speed fluctuation of the bacterial flagellar motor and their relation to motility and chemotaxis. J. Mol. Biol. 211, 551–563 (1990).
Redner, S.A guide to firstpassage processes (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Ariel, G. et al. Swarming bacteria migrate by levy walk. Nat. Commun. 6, 8396 (2015).
Mathijssen, A. J. et al. Oscillatory surface rheotaxis of swimming e. coli bacteria. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–12 (2019).
Delalez, N. J. & Armitage, J. P. The bacterial flagellar rotary motor in action. In Molecular Motors, 33–49 (Springer, 2018).
Mariconda, S., Wang, Q. & Harshey, R. M. A mechanical role for the chemotaxis system in swarming motility. Mol. Microbiol. 60, 1590–1602 (2006).
Wang, Q., Frye, J. G., McClelland, M. & Harshey, R. M. Gene expression patterns during swarming in Salmonella typhimurium: genes specific to surface growth and putative new motility and pathogenicity genes. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 169–187 (2004).
Chepizhko, O. & Peruani, F. Diffusion, subdiffusion, and trapping of active particles in heterogeneous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160604 (2013).
Bechinger, C. et al. Active particles in complex and crowded environments. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016).
Peruani, F. & Aranson, I. S. Cold active motion: how timeindependent disorder affects the motion of selfpropelled agents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 238101 (2018).
Chepizhko, O. & Franosch, T. Ideal circle microswimmers in crowded media. Soft Matter 15, 452–461 (2019).
Bénichou, O., Loverdo, C., Moreau, M. & Voituriez, R. Intermittent search strategies. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 81 (2011).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an opensource platform for biologicalimage analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Meijering, E., Dzyubachyk, O. & Smal, I. Methods for cell and particle tracking. Methods Enzymol. 504, 183–200 (2012).
Tinevez, J.Y. et al. Trackmate: an open and extensible platform for singleparticle tracking. Methods 115, 80–90 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank L. Gómez Nava, R. Großmann, A. Koppler, M. Polin, and G. Volpe for insightful comments on the text. Experiments were performed at C3M Imaging Core Facility (Microscopy and Imaging platform Côte d’Azur, MICA) and simulations at CRIMSON clusters belonging to Observatoire Côte d’Azur. We acknowledge support from Agence Nationale de la Recherche via project BactPhys, Grant ANR15CE30000201 and from Biocodex S.A., Gentilly, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.C. and F.P. designed the study. D.C. and R.P.B. performed experiments. E.P.I., S.O., and F.P. performed the image and statistical analysis of the data and derived the mathematical models used to interpret the data. F.P. wrote the manuscript with the help of all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Stefan Klumpp and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Otte, S., Ipiña, E.P., PontierBres, R. et al. Statistics of pathogenic bacteria in the search of host cells. Nat Commun 12, 1990 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021221566
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021221566
This article is cited by

Strain specific motility patterns and surface adhesion of virulent and probiotic Escherichia coli
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.