Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ultracold atom interferometry in space


Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in free fall constitute a promising source for space-borne interferometry. Indeed, BECs enjoy a slowly expanding wave function, display a large spatial coherence and can be engineered and probed by optical techniques. Here we explore matter-wave fringes of multiple spinor components of a BEC released in free fall employing light-pulses to drive Bragg processes and induce phase imprinting on a sounding rocket. The prevailing microgravity played a crucial role in the observation of these interferences which not only reveal the spatial coherence of the condensates but also allow us to measure differential forces. Our work marks the beginning of matter-wave interferometry in space with future applications in fundamental physics, navigation and earth observation.


Interference of two BECs constitutes the hallmark of macroscopic coherence. The first observation1 of the corresponding fringes has ushered in the new era of coherent matter-wave optics.

The condensates can be engineered and probed by optical techniques2,3,4,5 making them a promising source for precision measurements. In addition, their large spatial coherence and their slow expanding wave function6 allow for experiments on macroscopic time scales.

Indeed, space displays an enormous potential for advancing high-precision matter-wave interferometry because the size of the device is no longer determined by the dropping height required on ground7. Additionally, low external influences and the reduced kinematics of the source allow us to control systematic effects. For these reasons quantum tests of general relativity8,9,10, the search for the nature of dark matter and energy9,11,12,13,14, the detection of gravitational waves9,15,16 and satellite gravimetry17,18,19,20,21 represent only a few of the many promising applications of atom interferometry in space.

Being at the very heart of the aforementioned proposals, our experiments set the beginning of space-borne coherent atom optics. They have benefited from our earlier studies on BEC interferometry at the drop tower in Bremen22,23 exploring methods for high-precision inertial measurements. Moreover, in other groups interferometry with laser-cooled atoms was performed on parabolic flights24 and a cold-atom clock was studied on a satellite25. Exploration of degenerate quantum gases is currently continued with the Cold Atom Laboratory (CAL) in orbit26.

In this article we report on the first interference experiments performed during the recent space flight of the MAIUS-1 rocket27 demonstrating the macroscopic coherence of the BECs engineered in this microgravity environment.


In contrast to1 which used an optical double-well potential to interfere two BECs, we employ Bragg processes as well as phase imprinting simultaneously in different magnetic spinor components. The resulting rich interference pattern stretches across the complete spatial distribution of the wave packets. We analyse its contrast as its temporal evolution can be exploited to detect forces acting differently on the spinor components. Applied to three dimensions, this arrangement could serve as a vector magnetometer. Moreover, due to the higher achievable spatial resolution, our method compares favourably to the determination of the BEC position based on a fit of the envelope of its spatial density distribution. The latter was e.g. proposed for the measurement of gravity gradients in the STE-QUEST8 mission designed as a space-borne quantum test of the equivalence principle.


Our interferometer is based on an atom-chip apparatus for trapping and cooling of the atomic ensembles delivering BECs of about 105 rubidium-87 atoms within 1.6 seconds28,29. The atom chip enables a very compact and robust design required by the demanding constraints of the rocket in terms of mass, volume, power consumption as well as vibrations and accelerations during launch. The necessary autonomous experimental control is realised by a customised onboard software allowing for image analysis, self-optimisation of parameters, operation of a decision tree and real time interaction with the ground control.

The BECs are created in the magnetic hyperfine ground state F = 2, mF = +2 and then released from the trap. We transfer the freely falling matter-wave packet into a superposition of several spinor components by employing radio frequencies30, or by changing the magnetic field orientation. Optionally, we spatially separate them after the interferometry sequence by a Stern–Gerlach arrangement.

The experiments reported here were performed with a superposition of atoms in the three spinor components mF = ±1 and 0, which are synchronously and identically irradiated by a single or sequential light pulses creating spatial matter-wave interferences. Figure 1a depicts the arrangement of the light fields, which are detuned by 845 MHz with respect to the D2 transition in rubidium, and drive several processes detailed in Fig. 1b–d.

Fig. 1: Optical setup.

Optical arrangement for space-borne light-pulse interferometry employing a BEC and associated diffraction processes. a, b After release of the multi-component rubidium BEC two light beams, A and B, with different frequencies νA and νB, and intensities travel in opposite directions parallel to the atom chip and generate a moving optical lattice driving Bragg processes, which coherently transfer momentum to the atomic wave packet along the x-direction (b). Two additional light beams tilted by two degrees emerge due to reflections of the beams A and B on the optical viewports. c Their interference with the lattice beams gives rise to a traveling spatial intensity modulation in the y-direction modifying the BEC wave function as well as inducing weak double-Bragg processes in x-direction (not shown). d In addition, the light beams are diffracted at the atom chip and the arising interference modulates their intensity in y-direction. The various effects of the light pulses on the multi-component wave packet are detected by a CCD-camera recording the shadow of the BEC irradiated by light (green circle) from the z-direction. Earth gravity pulls along the x-direction during space flight, and along the xz diagonal on ground.

Perpendicular to the direction of absorption imaging (green circle) along z, two counterpropagating light beams A and B run parallel to the atom chip, and induce Bragg diffraction in the x-direction such that the diffracted wave packets gain two photon recoils in momentum. The direction of momentum transfer is tilted with respect to the longitudinal axis of the sounding rocket, which is oriented along the diagonal of the xz plane. This configuration is chosen such that in space, the separation points along Earth’s gravitational pull g, and on ground, at an angle of 45° to the latter.

Bragg diffraction (Fig. 1b) is resonantly driven by tuning the frequency difference, νA − νB, between the two light beams to create an optical lattice travelling with half of the speed of the diffracted wave packets. Timing and duration as well as frequency difference and power adjustment are performed autonomously via acousto-optical modulators during space flight.

Reflections of the Bragg beams on the optical viewports of the vacuum chamber create additional low-intensity light beams with a tilt of about two degrees determined by comparing experiments and simulations. They interfere with the original beams A and B giving rise to an additional spatial intensity modulation moving approximately along the y-direction. This effect leads to an averaged phase imprinting on the wave function2 (Fig. 1c) as well as to Bragg double-diffraction of the wave packets, which is comparably weak due to the low intensities of the reflections. In addition, the light beams A and B are diffracted at the edges of the atom chip, and hence, feature a spatial intensity modulation, which also causes phase imprinting roughly oriented along the y-direction (Fig. 1d).

For a systematic analysis we implemented numerical simulations of our experiments. The theoretical images of the spatial density distributions depict simulations modelling the evolution of the different spinor components of the wave packets including the atom-light interaction in position space31,32. Parameters, such as relative intensities, frequencies and the geometry, are independently determined by the experimental setup. The 2° beam angle and an overall intensity adjustment were adapted.

Coherent manipulation by light pulses

The key processes of our interference experiments can be understood by analysing the effect of a single light-pulse on the multi-spinor BECs. Figure 2 compares the experiments in space (left column) and on ground (right column), in which the light fields interact for 60 μs with a multi-component wave packet 15 ms after its release. Moreover, the experimental results obtained with multiple spinor components are contrasted with the corresponding simulations, which serve as a reference and consider a single wave packet in the state F = 2, mF = 0.

Fig. 2: Effects of a single light-pulse.

Depicted are the experimental observations (two upper panels) and theoretical simulations (lower panels) of the impact of a single light-pulse simultaneously inducing Bragg processes and phase imprinting on a matter-wave packet released from the trap in the low gravity environment of space (a) (left column), and on ground (b) (right column). Each picture shows the undiffracted and the diffracted parts due to Bragg and weak double-Bragg processes. In space, the striking feature is the amplitude modulation of all Bose-Einstein condensates along the y-direction which in our ground experiments was not visible, in accordance with our theoretical simulations. On ground, the free expansion time of the BECs was short (31 ms) to keep them in the Bragg beams and the focal region of the detection. In space, the longer expansion times (86 ms) lead to a larger fringe spacing which allows us to resolve the imprint. In addition, the phase imprinting due to the moving amplitude modulation vanishes on ground due to the Doppler shift caused by the larger detuning between the light beams A and B, resulting in a much larger velocity of the light pattern. In contrast to our model assuming a single BEC component, the experimental fringe patterns feature spatial distortions as well as a much lower contrast. The latter holds even in the case when only a segment of the picture along the y-direction (orange line) is analysed.

The figure shows the spatial density distribution of the wave packets and its Bragg diffracted parts. The experimental images were obtained by absorption imaging 31 ms and 86 ms after release on ground and during the rocket flight, respectively.

Most strikingly, the results obtained in space feature a pronounced horizontal stripe pattern, which is oriented almost along the y-direction with a period of roughly 60 μm. In contrast, the pictures on ground do not display such a pattern.

We identify four reasons for this clear distinction between ground and space experiments: (i) In order to cope with the gravitational pull on ground, a time of flight shorter than in space had to be chosen as to ensure that the wave packet is detected close to the focal plane of the imaging. (ii) The corresponding shorter expansion time leads to a smaller size of the wave packet, and the fringe spacing imprinted onto the wave packet by the diffraction of the Bragg beams at the edges of the atom chip is below the image resolution. (iii) On ground, the frequencies of the Bragg beams were adjusted to compensate the projection of the gravitational pull. Therefore, the interference pattern of the reflected and incoming light fields moves with a larger speed than in space and wash out the related phase imprint. (iv) Double-Bragg process are suppressed as they are non-resonant.

However, in the microgravity environment of the sounding rocket, the frequency difference of the light beams tuned to the Bragg resonance results in an optical interference pattern travelling with a lower speed and a temporal periodicity close to the recoil frequency. This motion is slow enough to leave a phase imprint albeit with lower amplitude due to temporal averaging over the 60 µs of interaction. Our simulations of the experiments with and without gravity confirm this difference and allow us to deduce the reflection angle from the fringe spacing.

In our space experiments the observed fringe contrast is still much lower than predicted by our simulations based on a single spinor component. This deviation becomes even more prominent when we consider a slice through the intensity modulation along the y-direction indicated by the orange line in Fig. 2. The existence of several spinor components in presence of a residual magnetic field gradient explains this reduction. Indeed, the latter suffices to accelerate the individual components relative to each other according to their different magnetic susceptibilities. Since our imaging does not distinguish between the different components we arrive at a lower contrast.

Interference experiments

This assumption is confirmed by the experiments summarised in Fig. 3. Here we study interferences generated by three sequential light pulses acting synchronously and identically on all spinor components. Moreover, we perform a Stern–Gerlach analysis of the interferometer output ports, which can be clearly distinguished by their kinetic momenta due to the use of BECs as a source.

Fig. 3: Experimental and simulated spatial matter-wave fringes.

The interference is created in a multi-component BEC by a sequence of three light pulses applied after release. a The associated Bragg processes create several spatially displaced, but still largely overlapping wave packets, resulting in an interference pattern in the three output ports of the interferometer corresponding to a transfer of either +1, −1 or 0 effective photon recoils. The fringes are recorded with and without a prior Stern–Gerlach-type spatial separation of the different spinor components. We model the experiment by solving the 2D-Gross-Pitaevskii equation of a BEC interacting with the light fields discussed in Fig. 1. b, c A close-up of one output port is shown with the corresponding line integrals along the red line (bottom) as well as their theoretical counterparts. The experiment displays a lower contrast due to spatially varying Rabi frequencies. The temporal sequence of the three light pulses also leads to an effective phase imprinting. di The stripe pattern (left) and contrast for a data slice (right) observed with and without the Stern–Gerlach separator are depicted. Without Stern–Gerlach separation the stripe pattern obtained for the slice along the orange line (d) features a lower contrast than our model (e) which might result from the relative motion of the spinor components. We observe a higher contrast for different magnetic states (f). Indeed, the components mF = ±1 feature a tilt of opposite sign with respect to the component mF = 0 which points to a residual magnetic field with a curvature in agreement with our numerical simulations (gi).

Figure 3a depicts the interferometric arrangement to coherently split, deflect and recombine the different spinor components leading to a grid-like stripe pattern detailed in Fig. 1b–d. The sequence of pulses is reminiscent of a Mach–Zehnder-type interferometer but our Bragg processes were weak and a momentum transfer occurred only to a small fraction of a BEC.

The pictures were taken 50 ms after exposure of the released BECs to the magnetic field gradient for state separation, and 67 ms after the third light-pulse. This choice of parameters guaranteed that the exit ports were spatially separated on the absorption images according to their momenta and spinor components at as indicated by the red lines in Fig. 3a.

Moreover, the time between the light pulses was 1 or 2 ms and, hence short enough, that the wave packets largely overlap at the exit ports giving rise to interference fringes modulated approximately along the x-direction. Therefore, the experimental arrangement resembles a shearing interferometer probing the spatial coherence of the different spinor components.

Figure 3b, c depicts the enlarged view of the output port corresponding to the mF = −1 state together with the line integral along a fringe, and our theoretical simulations of both, respectively. Indeed, the pattern analysis shares similarities with point-source interferometry23,33. While theory and experiment feature the same spatial periodicity, we had to add an inhomogeneous field in our simulation to obtain agreement of the tilts of the fringe pattern. Such a residual field is also required to explain the orientation of the phase imprint discussed below. The low contrast observed in the experiment, of about 20% in the line integral, can be explained by inhomogeneities of the light beams used for Bragg diffraction leading to a spread of Rabi frequencies. In these experiments we have benefited from the point-source character of the BEC as our theoretical simulation reveals that the spatial interference pattern would vanish already for a thermal cloud of atoms with temperatures of a few hundred nK.

The interaction of the BEC with the three light fields also leads to phase imprinting, and hence, to a notable stripe pattern along the y-direction as confirmed by our simulations.

According to our theory such a pattern can originate from a repetitive imprint by light diffracted at the chip edge as discussed in Fig. 1d. Even more remarkably and despite the averaging, our theory also reveals that, for our optical arrangement depicted in Fig. 1a, the moving amplitude modulation detailed in Fig. 1c, leads to a phase imprint featuring the observed fringe spacing.

Without the Stern–Gerlach analysis and therefore spatially overlapping spinor components, the absorption images and simulations of the patterns exemplified by Fig. 3d, e, show a low contrast. In comparison, the Stern–Gerlach separation leads to a higher fringe contrast, and allows us to selectively visualise the fringe patterns for the different spinor components as illustrated in Fig. 3f.

In order to separate the effect of the fringe tilts and inhomogeneities we restrict our analysis to vertical segments along the orange line. Indeed, the patterns corresponding to mF = ±1 are rotated in opposite direction which can be explained by a magnetic field curvature. While a homogeneous magnetic field gradient would just lead to a translation of the mF = ±1 components with respect to the mF = 0 component, a curvature induces tilts. Our simulations shown in Fig. 3g–i confirm this effect and feature corresponding patterns for a value of 3.5 µT/mm2 for the curvature of the magnetic field.


Hence, simultaneous imprinting of a stripe pattern onto a multi-component or multi-species wave packet formed from a BEC using a spatially modulated far-detuned light beam allows us to analyse differential forces due to external electric or magnetic field gradients and curvatures, or to detect a differential velocity of the components. While a pure translation can be observed by the resulting loss of contrast, the detection of tilts would preferably be combined with a Stern–Gerlach separation.

To detect forces by tracking the motion of the center-of-mass of the wave packets is a frequently used technique. For example, it was exploited in drop tower experiments22, is studied with CAL26, and proposed for STE-QUEST8 to characterise the environment and movement of the atomic ensemble. Our method improves the sensitivity for wave packet displacements by fitting the smaller spatial fringe period instead of the envelopes. The principle of using an interference modulation in the signal is reminiscent of the increased resolution in the Michelson stellar interferometer34.

We foresee several extensions of the imprint method: (i) adaption to gravity in order to avoid loss of modulation depth due to the moving grating, (ii) application to three dimensions by spectral spatial light modulators for a 3D imprint and (iii) measurements of inertial forces acting on a single species or multiple ones in cases where Mach–Zehnder interferometers are not available, or their dynamic measurement range is surpassed.

In conclusion, we have employed light-pulse interferometry induced by Bragg processes as well as phase imprinting to investigate and exploit the spatial coherence of multi-component BECs on a sounding rocket. Our experiments mark the beginning of matter-wave interferometry in space and lay the groundwork for future in-orbit interferometry performed with CAL and its future successor BECCAL35, for the next MAIUS missions, and generally, for high-precision interferometry in space.


The optical setup for interferometry consists of two collimated and counterpropagating light beams A and B as well as their reflections with an angle of two degrees with respect to A and B as shown in Fig. 1a. Their frequencies are detuned by 845 MHz from the Rubidium-87 D2 line. To fulfil the Bragg condition, both beams need a relative detuning which at the beginning of the flight was set to νA − νB = 15.1 kHz. Unfortunately, a residual movement of the atoms after release from the magnetic trap reduced the diffraction efficiency. Therefore, it was adjusted during flight to a value of 18.8 kHz for later measurements.

The light pulse has a length of 60 µs and beam A an intensity of 4.1 mW/cm2 while the beam B has an intensity of 8.0 mW/cm2 for the analysis of single interactions. In the three-pulse sequences the intensity of beam A remains the same, whereas the intensity for beam B is doubled for the second pulse leading to an increased diffraction ratio. Approximately 5% of both light beams are reflected on the optical viewports of the vacuum chamber.

On ground, the interferometry axis is tilted by 45° with respect to gravity. In free fall the Doppler shift leads to a detuning of νA − νB = 259.4 kHz. For this reason, double diffraction is suppressed.

Data availability

The image data for Figs. 2 and 3 are provided under The analysed data are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Code availability

The simulation code is available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Andrews, M. R. et al. Observation of interference between two Bose condensates. Science 275, 637–641 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Denschlag, J. et al. Generating solitons by phase engineering of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Science 287, 97–101 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Birkl, G., Gatzke, M., Deutsch, I. H., Rolston, S. L. & Phillips, W. D. Bragg scattering from atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2823–2826 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bongs, K. et al. Spectroscopy of dark soliton states in Bose-Einstein condensates. J. Opt. B 5, 124–130 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hagley, E. W. et al. Measurement of the coherence of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3112–3115 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Anderson, M. H., Ensher, J. R., Matthews, M. R., Wieman, C. E. & Cornell, E. A. Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science 269, 198–201 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Asenbaum, P., Overstreet, C., Kim, M., Curti, J. & Kasevich M. A. Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence principle at the 10−12 level. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 191101 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aguilera, D. N. et al. STE-QUEST test of the universality of free fall using cold atom interferometry. Class. Quantum Gravity 31, 115010 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tino, G. M. et al. SAGE: A proposal for a space atomic gravity explorer. Eur. Phys. J. D. 73, 228 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Battelier, B. et al. Exploring the foundations of the universe with space tests of the equivalence principle. Preprint at (2019).

  11. 11.

    Lämmerzahl, C. The search for quantum gravity effects. Appl. Phys. B. 84, 551–562 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hamilton, P. et al. Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy. Science 349, 849–851 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chiow, S.-W. & Yu, N. Multiloop atom interferometer measurements of chameleon dark energy in microgravity. Phys. Rev. D. 97, 044043 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    El-Neaj, Y. A. et al. AEDGE: atomic experiment for dark matter and gravity exploration in space. EPJ Quantum Technol. 7, 6 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hogan, J. M. & Kasevich, M. A. Atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detection using heterodyne laser links. Phys. Rev. A. 94, 033632 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Graham, P. W., Hogan, J. M., Kasevich, M. A. & Rajendran, S. New method for gravitational wave detection with atomic sensors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 171102 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bongs, K. et al. Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 731–739 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Trimeche, A. et al. Concept study and preliminary design of a cold atom interferometer for space gravity gradiometry. Class. Quantum Gravity 36, 215004 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carraz, O., Siemes, C., Massotti, L., Haagmans, R. & Silvestrin, P. Spaceborne gravity gradiometer concept based on cold atom interferometers for measuring earth’s gravity field. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 26, 139–145 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Douch, K., Wu, H., Schubert, C., Müller, J. & Pereira dos Santos, F. Simulation-based evaluation of a cold atom interferometry gradiometer concept for gravity field recovery. Adv. Space Res. 61, 1307–1323 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lévèque, T. et al. Correlated atom accelerometers for mapping the Earth gravity field from Space. Int. Conf. Space Opt. 11180, 344–352 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    van Zoest, T. et al. Bose-Einstein condensation in microgravity. Science 328, 1540–1543 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Müntinga, H. et al. Interferometry with Bose-Einstein condensates in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 093602 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Barrett, B. et al. Dual matter-wave inertial sensors in weightlessness. Nat. Commun. 7, 13786 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu, L. et al. In-orbit operation of an atomic clock based on laser-cooled 87Rb atoms. Nat. Commun. 9, 2760 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Aveline, D. C. et al. Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth-orbiting research lab. Nature 582, 193–197 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Becker, D. et al. Space-borne Bose–Einstein condensation for precision interferometry. Nature 562, 391–395 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schkolnik, V. et al. A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket. Appl. Phys. B. 122, 217 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Grosse, J. et al. Design and qualification of an UHV system for operation on sounding rockets. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 34, 031606 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Camparo, J. C. & Frueholz, R. P. A dressed atom interpretation of adiabatic rapid passage. J. Phys. B 17, 4169 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fitzek, F. et al. Universal atom interferometer simulator of elastic scattering processes. Sci Rep 10, 22120 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pager, Z. et al. Symmetric Bloch oscillations of matter waves. Phys. Rev. A 102, 053312 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dickerson, S. M. et al. Multiaxis inertial sensing with long-time point source atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 083001 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Michelson, A. A. On the application of interference methods to astronomical measurements. Astrophys. J. 51, 257 (1920).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Frye, K. et al. The Bose-Einstein condensate and cold atom laboratory. EPJ Quantum Technol. 8, 1 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all members of the QUANTUS-collaboration for their support and acknowledge fruitful discussions with M. Cornelius, P. Stromberger and W. Herr. This work is supported by the DLR Space Administration with funds provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) under grant numbers DLR 50WM1131-1137, 50WM0940, 50WM1240, 50WM1556, 50WM1641, 50WM1861, 50WM1956, 50WP1431-1435 and 50WM2060, and is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—EXC-2123 QuantumFrontiers—390837967. W.P.S. thanks Texas A&M University for a Faculty Fellowship at the Hagler Institute for Advanced Study at Texas A&M University and Texas A&M AgriLife for support of this work. The research of the IQST is financed partially by the Ministry of Science, Research and Arts Baden-Württemberg. H.A. acknowledges financial support from “Niedersächsisches Vorab” through “Förderung von Wissenschaft und Technik in Forschung und Lehre” for the initial funding of research in the new DLR-SI Institute. N.G. acknowledges funding from “Niedersächsisches Vorab” through the Quantum- and Nano-Metrology (QUANOMET) initiative within the project QT3. We thank ESRANGE Kiruna and DLR MORABA Oberpfaffenhofen for assistance during the test and launch campaign.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information




M.D.L., H.A., D.B., A.N.D., J.G., O.H., H.M., V.S., T.W., A.We. and B.W., with S.T.S. as scientific lead, planned and executed the campaign. M.D.L. and H.A. evaluated the data. H.A. and N.G. carried out the simulations. E.M.R., W.P.S., M.D.L. and H.A. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all authors. C.B., W.E., M.K., C.L., D.L., A.P., W.P.S., K.S., A.Wi. and P.W. are the co-principal investigators of the project, and E.M.R. its principal investigator.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst M. Rasel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lachmann, M.D., Ahlers, H., Becker, D. et al. Ultracold atom interferometry in space. Nat Commun 12, 1317 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing