Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cell non-autonomy amplifies disruption of neurulation by mosaic Vangl2 deletion in mice

Abstract

Post-zygotic mutations that generate tissue mosaicism are increasingly associated with severe congenital defects, including those arising from failed neural tube closure. Here we report that neural fold elevation during mouse spinal neurulation is vulnerable to deletion of the VANGL planar cell polarity protein 2 (Vangl2) gene in as few as 16% of neuroepithelial cells. Vangl2-deleted cells are typically dispersed throughout the neuroepithelium, and each non-autonomously prevents apical constriction by an average of five Vangl2-replete neighbours. This inhibition of apical constriction involves diminished myosin-II localisation on neighbour cell borders and shortening of basally-extending microtubule tails, which are known to facilitate apical constriction. Vangl2-deleted neuroepithelial cells themselves continue to apically constrict and preferentially recruit myosin-II to their apical cell cortex rather than to apical cap localisations. Such non-autonomous effects can explain how post-zygotic mutations affecting a minority of cells can cause catastrophic failure of morphogenesis leading to clinically important birth defects.

Introduction

Neural tube (NT) defects such as spina bifida continue to affect an average of 1:1000 pregnancies globally, with higher disease burden in developing countries1. They arise due to failure of NT closure in the early embryo2. Mouse models faithfully recapitulate these conditions and have historically led to the identification of diagnostic and preventative strategies, as well as identifying genes and pathways required for NT closure3,4,5. Key genes include members of the Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway and enzymes of folate metabolism6, with the latter already a clinical target for primary prevention. Homozygous mutation of core PCP components reproducibly produces the most severe form of NT defect, craniorachischisis, in which much of the brain and all of the spinal cord remain open2. Mutations in core PCP components including VANGL2 have been identified in human foetuses with craniorachischisis7, and in individuals with NT defects such as spina bifida8,9,10. Nonetheless, most affected families do not receive an interpretable genetic diagnosis. One possible explanation is that disease-causing mutations may arise during post-zygotic embryonic development, rather than in the germ line, producing mosaicism that is not readily detectable with conventional genetic diagnostic methods11,12. Indeed, post-zygotic mutations in PCP components have recently been implicated in human spina bifida11.

Mouse neurulation starts with narrowing and elongation of the relatively flat neural plate through PCP-dependant convergent extension. Neural folds subsequently elevate at the neural plate edges and meet at the embryonic dorsal midline, zippering to propagate closure along the length of the embryo2. Caudal to the initiation site, Closure 1, the region of open spinal neural folds (termed the posterior neuropore, PNP) undergoes closure through a fundamentally biomechanical process, requiring force-generating cellular behaviours such as apical constriction to elevate and appose the neural folds13,14. Analysis of VANGL2’s roles in spinal NT closure is hindered by the fact that its homozygous deletion precludes the earlier step of closure initiation15,16. Heterozygous Vangl2 mutant mice close their PNP successfully in most cases, although a very small percentage develop open spina bifida5. In keeping with this, heterozygous PCP gene mutations have been associated with spina bifida in humans9,17, although the mechanisms linking such genetic findings with failed NT closure are unclear.

We recently reported that targeted deletion of Vangl2 by Grhl3Cre in a proportion of neuroepithelial cells and throughout the surface ectoderm causes distal spina bifida14. In that model, spina bifida was preceded by failure of neural fold elevation and biomechanical disruption of closure. The uninducible, multilineage recombination of Grhl3Cre precluded attribution of Vangl2’s primary role to either the neuroepithelium or surface ectoderm. In other epithelia, PCP complexes comprise asymmetric transmembrane components between neighbouring cells, with VANGL and frizzled (FZD) located on opposing surfaces18. Core components are preferentially oriented on either rostral/proximal or caudal/distal cell membranes, such that tissue polarity emerges non-cell autonomously. Consequently, mislocalisation of PCP components in individual mutant cells necessarily prevents their neighbours from correctly localising the opposing complex components19,20,21. Protein-level planar-polarised orientation of VANGL2 is not apparent in the late PNP of the mouse embryo, where pseudostratified neuroepithelial cells have complex apical shapes often without predictably oriented borders14,22. Nonetheless, planar-polarised properties do emerge in this complex epithelium, including preferential arrangement of cell apices and supra-cellular actomyosin profiles in a mediolateral orientation14,22.

Actomyosin reorganisation is a well-documented outcome of VANGL/PCP signalling in the early mouse neural plate and well as Xenopus neuroepithelium23,24,25,26. Pulsed recruitment of actomyosin to the apical surface is necessary for epithelial apical constriction in Drosophila27,28. Mechanisms of apical constriction described in different cell types require radial apical cap organisations or cortical actomyosin driving sequential junctional shrinkage29. Both the spatial and temporal pattern of actomyosin recruitment to epithelial apical surfaces is regulated by PCP signalling. In Xenopus mesoderm explants, knockdown of PCP components accelerates pulses of myosin recruitment to the apical cell cortex30. Shuttling of actomyosin contractility regulators towards the cell’s apex is facilitated by microtubules in many different epithelia and stabilised microtubule bundles correlate with the onset of apical constriction during various morphogenetic events31,32,33,34,35. However, apically-arranged microtubules may also oppose apical constriction. Their polymerisation continuously pushes against cell junctions, curving under compressive forces from actomyosin-generated constriction36. Knockdown of Vangl2 in mammalian Sertoli cells causes reorganisation of microtubules from long bundles into short, disorganised fragments37, and in oligodendroglial cells VANGL2 increases microtubule density38. Thus, both the microtubule and actomyosin cytoskeletons are VANGL2 targets and contribute to apical constriction.

Neuroepithelial apical constriction has been documented in the mouse by ourselves and others13,22,39,40. The neuroepithelium has a predominantly apical localisation of F-actin and non-muscle myosin-II41,42. Pharmacological inhibition of myosin activation reduces apical neuroepithelial mechanical tension and causes PNP widening22. The molecular regulation of apical constriction has been extensively studied in non-mammalian vertebrates, demonstrating cell-autonomous basolateral-to-apical shuttling of myosin onto an apical F-actin network24,30,43. Mouse embryos have been less amenable to subcellular resolution live imaging of neurulation due to their fragility, awkward 3D shape and movement artefact partly caused by their heartbeat, which is a desirable indicator of embryo viability. Previous live imaging of early mouse embryos, prior to formation of the PNP, demonstrated that global mutation of Vangl2 reduces neural plate apical neighbour exchange during convergent extension movements without altering basal protrusive activity44. We have recently optimised mouse whole-embryo static culture for live imaging of later-stage embryos to allow subcellular visualisation of zippering45.

Here we provide mechanistic evidence that mosaicism for somatic mutations in PCP components, even with only a small minority of mutant neuroepithelial cells, is indeed sufficient to cause NT defects. We explore the hypothesis that non-cell autonomous effects amplify the morphogenetic disruption caused by mosaic mutations. We find that Vangl2-deleted cells prevent multiple neighbours from recruiting myosin-II to their cell cortex, thereby diminishing the apical constriction of a majority of neuroepithelial cells. Remarkably, Vangl2-deleted cells themselves continue to constrict apically. Nevertheless, the amplifying effect of the non-autonomous anti-morphogenetic influence of mosaic Vangl2-deletion leads to reduction in apical neuroepithelial mechanical tension and failure of neural fold elevation, causing spina bifida.

Results

Mosaic neuroepithelial Vangl2 deletion impairs posterior neuropore closure

We initially characterised a mouse transgenic model, in which induced deletion of Vangl2 in a minority of neuroepithelial cells is sufficient to stall PNP closure. To our knowledge, no currently available constitutive Cre drivers selectively yet persistently lineage trace the ventral PNP neuroepithelium. Tamoxifen-inducible CreERT2 drivers are limited because early tamoxifen administration by intraperitoneal injection prevents embryo implantation and is teratogenic46. We recently validated an oral tamoxifen administration protocol which robustly activates embryonic CreERT2 without impeding NT closure47. Using this method to induce Sox2CreERT2 led to extensive lineage tracing of neuroepithelial cells in the closed NT, but only to a very limited extent in the open PNP given the temporally-restricted window of CreERT2 activation (Supplementary Fig. 1)48. In contrast, the neuromesodermal progenitor marker Nkx1.2CreERT2 lineage traces cells in both the ventral PNP and closed NT49 (Fig. 1a–c).

Fig. 1: Mosaic Vangl2 deletion causes spina bifida.
figure1

a, b PNP 3D reconstructions illustrating Nkx1.2CreERT2 lineage tracing using the mTmG reporter. In b non-recombined cells which express tdTom are not shown. Asterisk (*) indicates the zippering point. c Bright field image of E9.5 mouse embryo indicating the zippering point (*) and PNP (arrowhead). d Surface-subtracted wholemount immunolocalisation of VANGL2 in the apical neuroepithelium of control (No Cre) and Cre;Fl/- embryo, showing mosaic deletion (white dotted lines) in the latter. Scale = 20 µm. Whole-PNP images are 3D reconstructions. e Quantification of VANGL2 immunolocalisation on cell borders lineage traced with EGFP or tdTom in Cre;Fl/Fl and Cre;Fl/− embryos. Average VANGL2 intensity in non-recombined (tdTom) cells was set at 100% in each embryo (four embryos from independent litters per genotype). p values from ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni. f Optical cross-section through the neuroepithelium of a Cre;Fl/− embryo showing endogenous EGFP and immunofluorescently-detected VANGL2. White circles indicate borders between two EGFP+ cells, which are devoid of Vangl2 signal. Scale = 20 µm. g Quantification of the proportion of recombined neuroepithelial cells in E10.5 Cre;Fl/− embryos which closed (n = 6) or failed to close (n = 7) their PNP. VANGL2+ indicates the proportion of recombined cells in Nkx1.2CreERT2/+Vangl2+/+Rosa26mTmG/+ embryos with wild-type VANGL2 (n = 6). p value from Students T-test. h Early (left) and late (right) PNPs illustrating progressive shortening and narrowing during physiological closure. Cells in the caudal, open PNP (blue dots) translocate to the dorsal, closed PNP (blue arrows) during closure. i 3D cross-section of the dorsal closed NT illustrating the region where EGFP+ neuroepithelial cells were analysed. j Images of two E10.5 Cre;Fl/− embryos with low (left) and high (right) recombination assessed from EGFP expression. Left: 37 somites, successful PNP closure. Right: 39 somites, tile-scan of a pre-spina bifida lesion (white bracket). Dashed white boxes denote the closed neural tube where recombination was quantified. k Phenotypes of Cre;Fl/Fl and Cre;Fl/− embryos at E12.5. Cre;Fl/Fl embryos developed dorsally kinked tails (arrow). Cre;Fl/− embryos also develop spina bifida (dashed line, seen in embryos from three independent litters). Scale = 100 µm unless otherwise indicated.

In Nkx1.2CreERT2/+; Vangl2Fl/-; Rosa26mTmG/+ embryos (henceforth called Cre;Fl/−), CreERT2-induced EGFP reporter expression identifies cells in which Vangl2 has been deleted, 24 h after tamoxifen treatment. This produces a patchy, mosaic pattern of VANGL2 deletion in the neuroepithelium (Fig. 1d). Loss of VANGL2 protein in EGFP lineage-traced cells was confirmed by quantifying its immunolocalisation, finding that its reduction is significantly greater when one allele is pre-deleted in Cre;Fl/− embryos compared with Cre;Fl/Fl (Fig. 1e, f).

The PNP fails to close, producing pre-spina bifida lesions, in 54% (7/13) of Cre;Fl/- embryos at E10.5 compared with 0% (0/23, Fisher’s exact test p < 0.001) of Cre;Fl/Fl embryos. Cre;Fl/Fl embryos occasionally develop dorsally flexed tails suggestive of delayed PNP closure (Supplementary Fig. 2a). In this study, Cre-negative littermate embryos were used as controls for the Cre;Fl/Fl and Cre;Fl/− genotypes. Recombined cell proportions were compared between Cre;Fl/− embryos in the dorsal, closed neural tube because cells in the ventral PNP normally translocate to this location50 (Fig. 1g–j). Vangl2-deleted cells, lineage traced with EGFP, are more abundant in Cre;Fl/− embryos with pre-spina bifida lesions than those which achieved PNP closure (Fig. 1g, j). Even so, there is substantial overlap between these groups and some embryos failed to close their PNPs after losing Vangl2 in only 16% of neuroepithelial cells (Fig. 1g). Loss of Vangl2 did not change the proportion of neuroepithelial cells lineage-traced by Nkx1.2CreERT2/+ compared with a Vangl2-wild-type background (Fig. 1g), indicating Vangl2-deleted cells were not lost from the neuroepithelium.

Pre-spina bifida lesions (persistently open PNP) reflect a pathological state, progressing to spina bifida in Cre;Fl/− embryos (Fig. 1k), making them difficult to compare to control embryos with a physiological, closed NT. Morphometric analyses were therefore performed at earlier developmental stages to identify the first quantifiable phenotype before failure of PNP closure. Dorsolateral and medial hinge points do not differ overtly between the PNPs of Cre;Fl/− and control embryos (Supplementary Fig. 2b), whereas PNP length is significantly longer in Cre;Fl/− embryos than in controls at late stages of closure (Supplementary Fig. 2c–e). Preceding this, the neural folds are less elevated in Cre;Fl/− embryos than in controls (Fig. 2a, b). Thus, the first morphometrically quantifiable tissue-level consequence of mosaic Vangl2 deletion is failure of neural fold elevation. Neither PNP length (Supplementary Fig. 2d) nor neural fold elevation (Fig. 2b) were significantly different between Cre;Fl/Fl embryos and Cre-negative controls, and there was no significant difference in neuroepithelial thickness between genotypes (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2: Mosaic Vangl2 deletion disrupts planar polarised neuroepithelial apical orientation.
figure2

a Optical cross-sections through the caudal PNP (at 75% of rostrocaudal PNP length, shown in schematic) of No Cre and Cre;Fl/− embryos at E9.5, visualised using reflection imaging. The white arrow indicates the quantified eversion of the apical neuroepithelium, which should elevate its lateral margins to form neural folds. Scale = 50 µm. b, c Quantification of neural fold elevation (b, positive values) or eversion (b, negative values) and mid-PNP neuroepithelial thickness (c) in control, Cre;Fl/Fl and Cre;Fl/− embryos at 16–20 somite stages, before the PNP is significantly longer in Cre;Fl/− embryos. The inset shows an optical cross-section through a phalloidin-stained PNP indicating the thickness of the neuroepithelium (cyan bracket). b Control = 7, Cre;Fl/Fl = 6, Cre;Fl/− = 7 embryos. c Control = 9, Cre;Fl/Fl = 6, Cre;Fl/− = 7 embryos. Scale = 50 µm. d Representative (>6 embryos) surface-subtracted images of the apical neuroepithelium in a Cre;Fl/Fl embryo and Cre;Fl/− littermate showing the apical marker ZO1 and recombined cells lineage traced with EGFP. Scale = 20 µm. e Quantification of the orientation of the apical long axis of neuroepithelial cells in No Cre, Cre;Fl/Fl and Cre;Fl/− embryos. Blue arrows indicate the median orientation; p values from Chi2 with Yates continuity correction; EGFP and tdTom not significantly different within genotypes. No Cre 5592 cells from six embryos; Cre;Fl/Fl EGFP/tdTom 318/2373 cells from five embryos; Cre;Fl/− EGFP/tdTom 267/3799 cells from six embryos. RC rostrocaudal, ML mediolateral. f Apical surfaces from d colour coded to illustrate orientation. Bright colours indicate medio-lateral, dark colours indicate rostro-caudal orientation. Scale = 50 µm. g Quantification of neuroepithelial apical area. Each point represents the median value for an embryo and lines link points from the same embryo, n = 6 embryos per genotype. p values from ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni. Embryos compared had 15–20 somites and had been administered tamoxifen 24–28 h prior to analysis.

At the cellular level, mediolateral orientation of cell apical surfaces is a readily quantifiable planar-polarised phenotype in the mouse PNP neuroepithelium14. Cells in control embryos, as well as both EGFP+ and tdTom+ cells in Cre;Fl/Fl embryos had preferentially mediolaterally-oriented apical surfaces (median orientation 52−53°, Fig. 2d–f). In contrast, neither Vangl2-deleted (EGFP+) nor Vangl2-replete (tdTom+) cells showed preferential mediolateral orientation in Cre;Fl/− embryos (median orientation 42° each, Fig. 2e). The proportions of deleted and replete cells in each orientation bracket were significantly different from control embryos (Fig. 2e). Apical orientations of Vangl2-deleted and Vangl2-replete cells did not differ significantly from each other, suggesting non-autonomous disruption of apical planar polarity. However, cell apical areas were smaller in Vangl2-deleted cells than in Vangl2-replete cells in the same Cre;Fl/− embryos (Fig. 2g). Vangl2 deletion did not alter neuroepithelial proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 2f, g).

Mosaic Vangl2 deletion diminishes neuroepithelial apical tension

In both mouse and chick embryos, neural fold elevation requires apical tension generated by actomyosin-dependent apical constriction22,26, and variable apical areas in Cre;Fl/− embryos suggest differential constriction within the mosaic neuroepithelium. Cellular mechanical tension is commonly inferred from recoil of cell borders immediately following laser ablation. We previously demonstrated that annular laser ablations in the apical neuroepithelium produce actomyosin-dependant, rapid initial shrinkage of the cluster of cells within the annulus as they are untethered from the surrounding tissue22. Here, the reduction in apical area of cells or cell clusters following ablation is referred to as retraction to differentiate it from spontaneous apical constriction during live imaging. Apical retraction is smaller in some neuroepithelial cells in Cre;Fl/− embryos (Fig. 3a–d), but not in Cre;Fl/Fl (Supplementary Fig. 3a), compared with controls. This suggests Vangl2 deletion diminishes neuroepithelial apical contractility.

Fig. 3: Mosaic Vangl2 deletion non-autonomously diminishes neuroepithelial apical retraction.
figure3

a Representative (>6 embryos) live-imaged neuroepithelium before and after annular laser ablation. Ablations were made in regions including (with EGFP) or excluding (no EGFP) Vangl2-deleted cells. b Particle image velocimetry (arrows superimposed on grey cell borders) illustrating apical retraction of a cluster of cells within the ablated annulus. c Quantification of the retraction (% change in area) of cell clusters within the ablated annulus. Dots represent a cluster in an individual embryo; each embryo was only ablated once. Control n = 20, EGFP+ n = 10, No EGFP n = 6 embryos. d Schematic illustration of cell retraction due to immediate constriction when released from connections to surrounding cells. e, f Representative live-imaged neuroepithelium from control (No Cre, 20 embryos) and Cre;Fl/− (10 embryos). A cell is traced before and after ablation in the No Cre control. The # and * correspond to the cells shown in f, illustrating retraction. g Quantification of the retraction (% change in area) of individual cells within the ablated annulus. Ablations included 2–3 Vangl2-deleted (EGFP) and Vangl2-replete (tdTom) neighbours of the deleted cells. Retractions of cells of the same type were averaged in each cluster, n = 10 embryos per genotype. Scale bars = 20 µm. p values from ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni.

To corroborate this finding in an independent model, we used Ghrl3Cre to mosaically delete neuroepithelial Vangl2. Ghrl3Cre deletion of Vangl2Fl/Fl produces late depletion of neuroepithelial VANGL2 and distal spina bifida, without requiring pre-deletion of a Vangl2 allele14. Neuroepithelial expression of the Grhl3 gene is very low and patchy at E8.5, when it is largely restricted to the surface ectoderm overlying the neural folds, but increases at later stages51. Consistent with this, the knock-in Grhl3Cre lineage-traces a small proportion of neuroepithelial cells as early as the 8-somite stage and this proportion increases during development14,45,52. Grhl3Cre/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos show patchy loss of neuroepithelial VANGL2 protein at later stages of development, beyond the ~19-somite stage, but not earlier (Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Neuroepithelial annular ablations performed at earlier developmental stages, before VANGL2 protein is diminished, showed no difference in apical tension between Grhl3Cre/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos and their control littermates (Supplementary Fig. 4d). In contrast, at later developmental stages when VANGL2 is predictably diminished, Grhl3Cre/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos underwent less retraction following neuroepithelial annular ablation than control littermates (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Additionally, Grhl3Cre deletes Vangl2 in the surface ectoderm cells surrounding the open PNP14. These cells assemble long actomyosin cables which biomechanically couple the recently-fused zippering point to the caudal, open PNP13,14 (Supplementary Fig. 4e). We previously confirmed that these cables remain present in Grhl3Cre/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos14. In the current study, we performed cable laser ablations to test whether loss of VANGL2 diminishes contractility of these structures as well (Supplementary Fig. 4f). Cable recoil following ablation was equivalent between Grhl3Cre/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos and control littermates (Supplementary Fig. 4g), suggesting that loss of VANGL2 reduces contractility selectively in the apical neuroepithelium.

Mosaic Vangl2 deletion non-autonomously impairs apical constriction

In Cre;Fl/− embryos, the reduction in apical retraction following annular ablation is limited to cell clusters which include Vangl2-deleted cells. Selective annular ablations which do not include Vangl2-deleted cells produce equivalent retractions to control embryos (Fig. 3c). This shows apical tension is diminished locally in association with the Vangl2-deleted cells. To test whether the local diminution of neuroepithelial apical retraction around Vangl2-deleted cells occurs cell autonomously, apical areas of Vangl2-deleted EGFP+ cells were analysed separately from their Vangl2-replete tdTom+ neighbours. Whereas Vangl2-deleted cells were found to retract similarly to cells in control embryos, their Vangl2-replete neighbours retracted less (Fig. 3e–g). Retraction magnitude was not correlated with the number of EGFP+ cells in each cluster (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c). Both EGFP+ cells and tdTom+ neighbours retracted similarly to controls in Cre;Fl/Fl embryos (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Thus, the diminution of apical retraction following mosaic Vangl2 deletion is non-cell autonomous: Vangl2-replete neighbours of Vangl2-deleted cells fail to undergo apical retraction, whereas the Vangl2-deleted cells themselves continue to retract despite most of them neighbouring other EGFP+ cells.

To expand this analysis of neighbouring cells, we analysed the apical area of Vangl2-replete cells neighbouring different numbers of Vangl2-deleted cells using a semi-automated segmentation pipeline in fixed embryos (Supplementary Fig. 5a). This confirmed that Vangl2-deleted cells have smaller apical areas than their neighbours, but neighbours’ apical areas were not correlated with the number of Vangl2-deleted cells they touched (Supplementary Fig. 5b, c). Thus, we do not find evidence of a dose-dependent influence of the number of Vangl2-deleted cells contacted on the apical properties of Vangl2-replete neighbours. Other morphometric comparators of apical shape quantified were not significantly different between cell groups (Supplementary Fig. 5d–f).

Potential explanations for the observed differences in apical area and retraction following laser ablation include changes in cell adhesion, material properties, or actomyosin-dependent constriction. Vangl2-deleted cells and their neighbours continue to assemble adherens junctions labelled with N-cadherin (CDH2) and active β-catenin (CTNNB1), as well as tight junctions labelled with ZO1 and an apical F-actin cortex (Supplementary Fig. 6a–e), suggesting that differences in retraction are not caused by differential cell adhesion.

We next sought to directly assess apical constriction through visualisation in live-imaged embryos. The length of live-imaged sequences was limited by substantial changes in tissue morphology as the PNP continued to narrow (Supplementary Fig. 7a) and time constraints of imaging at least one control and one comparable Cre;Fl/- embryo from each litter, while avoiding prolonged culture. Live-imaged sequences were therefore limited to 20 min. Over this time, neuroepithelial cells were found to vary their apical surfaces in an asynchronous, frequently pulsatile manner characteristic of apical constriction in other cell types (Supplementary Fig. 7b–d). Individual cells could be in constriction or dilation phases at the start of imaging. In order to rationalise the data, the apical sizes of individual cells were temporally aligned by their largest observed apical area. This produced averaged traces of dilation followed by constriction (Supplementary Fig. 7b–d). A pilot study analysing a wild-type embryo showed that 24 cells need to be analysed to detect a 20% difference in apical area reduction (p = 0.05, power = 0.8).

Vangl2-deleted cells in Cre;Fl/− embryos dilate faster than cells in control embryos, but subsequently constrict at a similar rate (Fig. 4a–c). This pattern could be explained by either a change in constriction frequency or magnitude, but we cannot discriminate between these with the available data (Supplementary Fig. 7e). In contrast, Vangl2-replete neighbours of Vangl2-deleted cells dilate similarly to controls, but then fail to constrict (Fig. 4d). Changes in apical areas of Vangl2-deleted and neighbouring cell pairs were not predictably correlated, showing that Vangl2-replete neighbours do not dilate as Vangl2-deleted cells constrict (Supplementary Fig. 8). Vangl2-replete cells which do not contact Vangl2-deleted cells in Cre;Fl/− embryos (Distant cells in Fig. 4d) dilate and constrict similarly to cells in control embryos. These findings corroborate the laser ablation analyses by implicating non-autonomous failure of apical constriction in Vangl2-replete neighbour cells, which leads to diminution of overall neuroepithelial apical tension.

Fig. 4: Vangl2-replete neighbours of Vangl2-deleted cells fail to apically constrict.
figure4

a Representative live-imaged sequences of No Cre (n = 6) and Cre;Fl/− (n = 6) embryos. Cyan: apically-expanding cell. Yellow: apically constricting cell. Blue: constricting then partly dilating Vangl2-deleted (EGFP+) cell. Scale bar = 20 µm. b Heat maps illustrating the change in apical areas of each analysed cell in No Cre and Cre;Fl/− embryos. Dark colours indicate large apical areas (up to 100% of observed sizes). c, d Quantification of changes in cells’ apical areas during live imaging. c No Cre compared with EGFP recombined cells. d No Cre compared with cells neighbouring EGFP recombined cells, and more distant cells that do not contact EGFP recombined cells. Each cell is aligned at T = 0 when it reaches the biggest observed apical area. Negative time points represent increasing apical areas (dilation), positive time points represent constriction. Asterisk (*) indicate p < 0.05 at each indicated time point by mixed model analysis with Bonferroni post-hoc. No Cre: 38 cells from five embryos, Cre;Fl/− 36 cells of each type from five embryos. Points represent the mean ± SEM. e Schematic illustration of the live imaging and laser ablation results. EGFP+Vangl2 cells constrict/retract similarly to cells in control embryos. EGFP-Vangl2+ neighbours (Nei.) of Vangl2-deleted cells do not constrict/retract. EGFPVangl2+ distant (Dist.) cells which do not contact Vangl2-deleted cells constrict/retract normally. Magenta arrow thickness indicates constriction magnitude.

Three subgroups of cells were defined for further analysis: 1) Vangl2-/EGFP+ cells which constrict, 2) Vangl2+/EGFP neighbouring cells which do not constrict and, 3) Vangl2+/EGFP distant cells which do constrict (Fig. 4e).

Mosaic Vangl2 deletion alters the actomyosin and microtubule cytoskeletons

Cytoskeletal regulation by VANGL/PCP signalling is well established in other contexts, and both actomyosin and microtubule changes may underlie differential apical constriction in the neuroepithelium following mosaic Vangl2 deletion23,24,25,37,53,54. Neuroepithelial cells assemble apical phosphorylated, active non-muscle myosin light chain-II around their cell cortex (Fig. 5a). In addition, phospho-myosin light chain (pMLC)-II decorates the apical cap of individual neuroepithelial cells (Fig. 5a). This pattern is accentuated when total myosin heavy chain (MHC)-IIb is visualised, producing marked differences in localisation to the cell cortex, with or without staining on apical caps (Fig. 5b). Mosaic Vangl2 deletion did not significantly change overall MHC-IIb staining intensity (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b), but significantly reduced the variability of apical cap staining across the neuroepithelium (Supplementary Fig. 9c).

Fig. 5: Autonomous and non-autonomous cytoskeletal changes may underlie diminished apical constriction.
figure5

a, b Surface-subtracted neuroepithelial pMLCII (a) and total MHC-IIb (b) wholemount images. * apical staining. Dashed boxes indicate the cells shown in d. c Quantification of MHC-IIb intensity along 1: EGFP-Neighbour, 2: Neighbour–Neighbour, 3: Distant–Distant. Lines indicate values from the same embryo (n = 6 per genotype), compared by repeated measures ANOVA. d Representative cells showing apical cap arrangements (Cap) or primarily cortical (Cortex) MHC-IIb staining seen in >20 embryos. Fire LUT. Arrows indicate two types of MHC-IIb staining. e Quantification of the proportion of cells with primarily cortical or apical cap MHC-IIb. p values by X2. Cre;Fl/− EGFP = 98 cells, neighbour = 175, distant = 156 cells from six embryos; No Cre = 711 cells from six embryos. f Maximum-projection showing neuroepithelial MHC-IIb and β-tubulin (Tub) staining. Tubulin in the cyan boxed region is shown below. Cells with apical cap MHC-IIb have apical microtubules (cell outlined by dashed line). Bottom panel: optical cross-section showing apical cap myosin (white arc) overlies cells without long tubulin tails (magenta arrows/arc). g Quantification of average tubulin tail length in No Cre (n = 9) and Cre;Fl/− (n = 10) embryos. Points represent individual embryos. Magenta bracket indicates the length of tubulin tails. p value from Student’s T-test. h Maximum-projected optical cross-section showing tubulin tails in a Cre;Fl/− embryo. White lines indicate tail length. i Tubulin tail lengths in Vangl2-deleted (EGFP+) and Vangl2-replete (EGFP−) neuroepithelial cells. Points represent individual tails (EGFP = 64 tails, tdTom = 72 tails from four embryos from four independent litters). p value from Mann–Whitney U-test. j Representative (six embryos) surface-subtracted apical neuroepithelium of a Cre;Fl/− embryo showing apical tubulin, MHC-IIb and EGFP staining. k Tubulin staining intensity on the apical cap of surface-subtracted Vangl2-deleted (EGFP+), neighbouring and distant (EGFP−) cells. Lines indicate intensities from the same embryo (n = 8), compared by repeated measures ANOVA. l Schematic of cytoskeletal features in Vangl2-deleted (green) and neighbouring Vangl2-replete cells. Arrows = pro-constriction (blue) and opposing force (magenta). Images obtained using AiryScan; scale bars = 20 µm.

The effect of mosaic Vangl2 deletion on both cortical and apical cap MHC-IIb was therefore assessed sequentially. The same distinct cortical and apical cap staining pattern is observed with a second commercial anti-MHC-IIb antibody (Supplementary Fig. 10a). MHC-IIb staining visualised on cell borders is the average between adjacent cells: 1) EGFP/neighbour borders are between a contractile and a non-contractile cell, 2) neighbour/neighbour borders are between two non-contractile cells, and 3) distant/distant borders are between two contractile cells. Average MHC-IIb staining intensity was found to be highest along the most contractile distant/distant borders of Cre;Fl/- embryos, whereas EGFP/neighbour and neighbour/neighbour borders had significantly lower intensity that did not differ between them (Fig. 5c).

MHC-IIb is enriched on the apical cap of approximately half of PNP neuroepithelial cells in wild-type embryos (Fig. 5d–e). Apical cap MHC-IIb forms a pattern of punctate staining or linear arrangements resembling stress fibres (Fig. 5d cap). However, Vangl2-deleted cells show primarily cortical, rather than apical cap MHC-IIb staining (Fig. 5e). This effect is cell-autonomous as neither neighbouring nor distant Vangl2+/EGFP cells in Cre;Fl/− embryos are different from controls (Fig. 5e).

Apical cap MHC-IIb arrangements have been described in insect cells, and are enhanced in mammalian cells with diminished microtubule turnover55. Vangl2 deletion alters microtubule organisation in other mammalian cells37,38. Non-mitotic PNP neuroepithelial cells were found to assemble microtubules in two predominant patterns: apically-enriched radiating fibres versus apicobasally-elongated tails (Fig. 5f). Both apical pools and the elongated tails stain positively for the stable microtubule marker acetylated α-tubulin (Supplementary Fig. 10b). Both of these microtubule arrangements influence apical constriction in other contexts: apical networks counteract, whereas apicobasal tails promote constriction34,35,36,56.

Apical radiating microtubule fibres were mainly seen in neuroepithelial cells with apical cap myosin, whereas elongated tails were found to be associated with a primarily cortical myosin distribution (Fig. 5f). The small proportion of neuroepithelial cells in mitosis at any one time have a tubulin network which is apical to and distinct from the centrosomal network (Supplementary Fig. 10c). Both microtubule patterns are preserved in neuroepithelia with mosaic Vangl2 deletion, but the length of microtubule tails was found to be shorter in Cre;Fl/− embryos than in wild-type littermates (Fig. 5g). This effect appears non-autonomous as Vangl2-deleted cells have longer tails than their neighbours (Fig. 5h, i). Conversely, Vangl2-deleted cells have less abundant apical microtubule networks than their neighbours (Fig. 5j, k).

Thus, Vangl2-deleted cells preferentially localise myosin to the contractile cell cortex in a cell-autonomous manner, while both autonomously (less dense apical microtubules) and non-autonomously (shorter apicobasal tails) altering microtubule organisation in a pattern expected to favour their constriction (Fig. 5l). One mechanism by which VANGL2 may regulate both the actomyosin and microtubule cytoskeleton is through Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK). We previously reported that the commonly-used compound Y27632 diminishes Rho/ROCK signalling by reducing active Rho in mouse whole embryo culture, preventing down-stream responses including restricted apical localisation of actomyosin and apical constriction of the neuroepithelium22,41. Our previously-published time course experiments show that Y27632 treatment begins to cause PNP widening within two hours of treatment in mouse whole embryo culture22. In the current study, we observed that 2 h of ROCK inhibition with 10 µM Y27632 markedly increases apical microtubule staining while shortening apicobasal tails of PNP neuroepithelial cells in wild-type embryos (Fig. 6a–d). ROCK1 is primarily localised around cell borders and multicell junctions, with low levels variably decorating the apical cap (Fig. 6e). Its staining intensity is significantly lower in the apical neuroepithelium of Cre;Fl/- embryos than their littermate controls (Fig. 6e, f). ROCK1 cortical staining intensity is not significantly different between the cell types compared (Fig. 6g), but Vangl2-deleted cells have more intense apical cap staining than either their neighbours or distant Vangl2-replete cells (Fig. 6h, i). Thus, VANGL/PCP signalling may influence the microtubule cytoskeleton through ROCK to promote apical constriction (Fig. 6j), in addition to ROCK’s well-established regulation of neuroepithelial apical actomyosin localisation22,41.

Fig. 6: ROCK activity enhances apical microtubules but shortens their apicobasal tails.
figure6

ad Wild-type embryos were cultured in vehicle or 10 µm Y27632 (Y27). a Representative surface-subtracted images showing β-tubulin staining in vehicle and Y27-treated embryos (n = 8 each). b Quantification of microtubule apical staining in Y27-treated embryos compared with vehicle controls. c Optically-resliced cross-section showing microtubule apicobasal tails (from n = 6 embryos each). d Quantification of apicobasal tail length in vehicle and Y27-treated embryos. p values from Student’s T-test. e Representative surface-subtracted images showing ROCK1 staining in the apical neuroepithelium of control (n = 8) and Cre;Fl/− (n = 7) littermate embryos. The Cre;Fl/− embryo image is shown with (right) and without (left) the Vangl2-deleted EGFP cells. Scale bar = 20 µm. f Quantification of overall ROCK1 intensity in the apical neuroepithelium of control (n = 8) and Cre;Fl/− (n = 7) littermate embryos, demonstrating significantly lower signal in the latter. p value by Students T-test. g, h Quantification of ROCK1 staining intensity selectively, g along cell borders or h in the apical cap of neuroepithelial cells in control embryos lacking Cre or the indicated cell types in Cre;Fl/− embryos (n = 7 per genotype). These graphs are shown on the same scale to emphasise that ROCK1 border staining is much greater than apical cap staining, limiting visualisation of the latter. Points represent average values for cell types from individual embryos, lines link cell types from the same embryo. *p < 0.05 by mixed model analysis accounting for repeated measures from the same embryos. i High-power image of ROCK1 staining in the apical neuroepithelium shown in Fire LUT. Green border = Vangl2-deleted cell surrounded by Vangl2-replete neighbours. Arrow = ROCK1 localisation at junctions. Scale bar = 10 µm. j Schematic illustration of ROCK’s action. Refer to Fig. 5 for colour coding. ROCK activity favours apicobasal microtubule tails over their apical networks. ROCK localises more intensely in the apical cap of Vangl2-deleted cells (green), which have diminished apical microtubules but longer tails than their neighbours. All microscopy images were taken using AiryScan.

Non-autonomy amplifies mosaic Vangl2 deletion

Having demonstrated non-autonomous suppression of apical constriction by Vangl2-deleted cells, we sought to quantify the potential for effect amplification as a result of each deleted cell inhibiting multiple neighbours. Lewis’ law predicts that the apical area of epithelial cells should correlate linearly with the number of cells they neighbour, and that the average cell should have six apical neighbours57,58. In agreement with this law, Vangl2-deleted cells have 5.7 total neighbours on average, of which 5.3 are Vangl2-replete (Fig. 7a, b). The proportion of Vangl2-replete cells neighbouring a Vangl2-deleted cell is greater in embryos with more recombined cells within the range of recombination achievable with Nkx1.2CreERT2 (Fig. 7c). However, cells share neighbours, so the number of unique neighbours per Vangl2-deleted cell decreases as the proportion of deleted cells increases (neighbours/deleted cell shown in Fig. 7d). In other words, as more cells lose Vangl2 they each have fewer unique neighbours. Thus, neighbour-sharing limits amplification of effect size through non-autonomy and individual Vangl2-deleted cells have the greatest impact in embryos with low levels of recombination.

Fig. 7: The proportion of Vangl2-replete cells neighbouring a deleted cell correlates with PNP eversion.
figure7

a Illustrative examples of surface-subtracted neuroepithelia with low and high levels of EGFP recombination. Cell borders were determined from ZO1 staining. Green = Vangl2-deleted, blue = neighbour and white = distant cells. Scale bar = 50 µm. b Correlation between apical area and the number of neighbours (as predicted by Lewis’ law) of Vangl2-deleted cells. EGFP+ cells infrequently neighboured each other so total and Vangl2-replete (tdTom) cells were counted separately. Each dot represents a cell (234 cells from three embryos). c Positive correlation between the proportion of neuroepithelial cells which are EGFP+ and the proportion of EGFP− cells which neighbour an EGFP+ cell. Each dot represents an embryo. d Inverse correlation between the proportion of unique Vangl2-replete neighbours per Vangl2-deleted cell and overall % Cre-mediated recombination, demonstrating that non-autonomous effect amplification is limited by neighbour-sharing. e, f Correlation between neural fold eversion (negative elevation) in Cre;Fl− embryos and the proportion of cells which are Vangl2-deleted (e) or neighbours (f) in 15–20 somite stage embryos. The magenta box indicates the minimum degree of neural fold elevation observed in No Cre littermates. Each data point represents an individual embryo. p values and linear trend lines from Pearson correlation.

To test this, we investigated correlations between the proportion of Vangl2-deleted cells versus neural fold eversion, the earliest phenotype detected in Cre;Fl/− embryos. The proportion of Vangl2-deleted neuroepithelial cells does not correlate with magnitude of neural fold eversion (Fig. 7e). However, the proportion of Vangl2+/EGFP neighbour cells is significantly correlated with neural fold eversion (Fig. 7f). This supports a model in which non-autonomous inhibition of neighbour cells’ apical constriction underlies failure of PNP closure following mosaic Vangl2 deletion.

Discussion

Post-zygotic somatic mutations are pervasive59,60. Human foetal forebrain neural progenitors accumulate 8.6 new genomic variants per cell division and each harbours up to 12 non-benign variants61. The importance of somatic mosaicism is clinically established in dermatology, causing both malignant transformation and benign phenotypes62. One such example is epidermal naevus syndrome, which affects 1–3:1000 births63. This prevalence is comparable to that of NT defects. Post-zygotic mutations have been implicated in various congenital malformations64,65 and mutations in PCP components have specifically been identified in individuals with NT defects11. Here we demonstrate, in a mammal, that these mutations only need to disrupt PCP in a small percentage of neuroepithelial cells, around 16%, to cause spina bifida.

Presumptive spinal cord neuroepithelial cells are thought to primarily derive from neuromesodermal progenitors which persist throughout neurulation66,67. Thus, de novo mutations in this population would be propagated to their daughter cells throughout PNP closure. We took advantage of this property in the current study to persistently delete Vangl2 in a variable proportion of neuroepithelial cells using Nkx1.2CreERT2. Resulting deletion of Vangl2 occurs relatively late in neurulation, after the convergent extension movements which initiate NT closure at E8-8.5. This Cre-driver does not itself impair NT closure even when homozygous49, nor when used to delete Rac152. In the current study, a single administration of tamoxifen only predictably deleted Vangl2 when one allele was pre-deleted. Single administration was critical to ensure predictable deletion dynamics such that EGFP lineage tracing could be used to identify Vangl2-deleted cells. Temporally restricted CreERT2 activation by tamoxifen is also shown here by the inability of Sox2CreERT2 to persistently lineage trace the ventral PNP, despite strong expression of its endogenous gene in this tissue48. The lack of temporal control over Grhl3Cre activation precludes its use to identify Vangl2-deleted cells, but this Cre driver recapitulates phenotypes observed with Nkx1.2CreERT2 without requiring pre-deletion of a Vangl2 allele.

Pre-deletion of a Vangl2 allele followed by CreERT2-mediated recombination represents two genetic hits. It is less likely that two somatic mutations would occur in the same gene, in the same cell, spontaneously. However, double heterozygous mutations of different PCP components is sufficient to cause NT defects68 and di-genic variants in PCP components are readily documented in human patients17. Somatic mutations in other PCP membrane complex components, including FZD6 and CELSR1, have also been identified in individuals who have spina bifida11, suggesting that the effects documented here may extend beyond VANGL2.

Human mutations in core PCP genes disrupt this pathway when engineered into Drosophila69. Mammalian embryonic tissues achieve planar polarity through ligand gradient-sensing, as in the case of Fat/Dachsous PCP, or through non-autonomous propagation of directionality through asymmetrical complex organisation characteristic of the ‘core’ PCP pathway studied here18,70. In Drosophila epithelia, asymmetrical PCP localisation emerges gradually from seemingly-homogeneous initial distributions71,72. This may also happen in mammals, for example as indicated by the finding of more apparent Vangl2 planar polarity at later stages of oviduct maturation in mice73. Symmetry-breaking of membrane complexes may be induced by mutual repulsion between core components, directional transendocytosis of Vangl2 between adjacent cells, or extrinsic cues such as mechanical tension18,70,71. Immunolocalisation of mammalian PCP components is notoriously limited by the unavailability of adequate antibodies, although the knockout-validated 2G4 anti-VANGL2 antibody74 used here allows robust detection of VANGL2 in the mouse PNP. Vangl1 is not widely expressed in the mouse PNP neuroepithelium75. This makes Vangl2 a particularly valuable target to explore the functions of PCP signalling during PNP closure. Ubiquitous Vangl2 deletion causes failure of convergent extension migration at the onset of neurulation15 whereas, after the PNP forms, neuroepithelial cells migrate laterally and dorsally to form the dorsolateral hinge points50. Vangl2 appears to control convergent extension cell-autonomously. In chimeric embryos containing Vangl2-mutant cells, the wild-type cells self-segregate during early convergent extension of the neural plate15. This contrasts with non-autonomous control of apical constriction described here. Vangl2 deletion also did not significantly change the proportion of cells lineage traced by Nkx1.2CreERT2 in the dorsal closed neural tube, which suggests that this translocation event is regulated differently from convergent extension.

While the role of PCP signalling in polarised junction shrinkage which underlies convergent extension is well established, its role in regulating apical constriction is incompletely understood. Substantial progress has been made by studying chick neurulation, where knockdown of PCP core components results in larger neuroepithelial apical sizes and failure of neural plate dorsal bending consistent with failed apical constriction26, as seen in mice in this study. Neuroepithelial apical tension is largely unchanged in Nkx1.2CreERT2/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos despite mild yet significant reduction in VANGL2 immunolocalisation. Similarly, Grhl3Cre/+Vangl2Fl/Fl embryos retain neuroepithelial apical tension at earlier developmental stages when this non-inducible Cre abundantly lineage-traces the neuroepithelium but loss of VANGL2 is not yet apparent. Both these models suggest either VANGL2 abundance or activity must fall below a threshold for reduced apical constriction to become detectable. A threshold may be caused by the requirement for an absolute number of VANGL2 membrane complexes to establish PCP signalling, or to aggregate cellular responses dependent on its downstream signalling. This distinction may be important for patients who harbour hypomorphic versus null mutations in this gene8,17,69, and should be investigated in future work.

The molecular mechanisms downstream of PCP signalling involve dishevelled-dependent recruitment of ROCK and the F-actin polymerising protein dishevelled-associated activator of morphogenesis (DAAM)126. Vangl2 may suppress this contractile machinery because it suppresses dishevelled/DAAM1 interaction76, potentially explaining why Vangl2-deleted cells apically constrict more than their neighbours. Previous mouse studies suggest aspects of this pathway are conserved in mammals: pharmacological inhibition of ROCK similarly stops apical constriction in mouse embryos, and although Daam1 homozygous deletion does not stop NT closure it interacts genetically with heterozygous Vangl2 mutation to cause spina bifida77. However, there are important species differences in this pathway between chick and mouse embryos. Whereas pharmacological ROCK inhibition very dramatically reduces neuroepithelial F-actin intensity in chick embryos26,78, its inhibition with the same compound expands the region of F-actin apical localisation due to an increase in F-actin versus G-actin proportion in mouse embryos22,41. Additionally, whereas the adherens junctions in the anterior chick neuroepithelium are primarily composed of high-affinity E-cadherin26,79, the mouse PNP neuroepithelium exclusively expresses lower-affinity N-cadherin protein80,81. Here, we show that these adherens junction complexes remain apparent in both Vangl2-deleted cells and their neighbours.

Adherens junctions physically couple the contractile actomyosin cytoskeleton between cells, allowing force transmission across epithelia. Two pools of myosin generate apical constriction forces transmitted through these junctions: circumferential contractile networks around the cell cortex and medio-apical networks29. Previous studies of myosin activation in the apical neuroepithelium have identified cortical networks in mouse, chick and Xenopus. Phosphorylated, active myosin-II is primarily localised to these cell borders. A large body of work in Xenopus demonstrates that the apical determinant Par3 physically associates with PCP components to localise them to the apical surface82, where they reside preferentially at contractile cell-cell junctions83. Resulting apical constriction of neuroepithelial cells requires the endosomal trafficking protein Rab1184, whose apical translocation is vangl2-dependant in Xenopus blastopore lip cells24. While it has not yet been possible to determine whether these molecular interactions are conserved in mammals, here we demonstrate that the presence of VANGL2 is required for neighbouring cells to recruit myosin-II to their cortex.

In addition to its predominantly cortical localisation, super-resolution imaging also revealed active myosin on the mouse neuroepithelium apical cap. Visualisation of apical cap myosin was substantially improved when total myosin-IIb was visualised. We propose this difference is likely due to simple stoichiometry: the phosphorylated form of the small regulatory light chain presents a far less substantial target for visualisation than the long heavy chain. Alternative explanations may include differential turnover of apical cap myosin, or F-actin cross-linking roles of myosin-II occur independently of its regulatory light chain-dependant motor function85,86. Irrespective, the co-occurrence of apical myosin and dense apical microtubules in interphase cells is striking. The actomyosin and microtubule cytoskeletons are physically linked and myosin contractility deforms the microtubule network87,88. Here we find that they are also linked in their regulation by ROCK, whose pharmacological inhibition reduces apicobasal tail length but increases the density and homogeneity of the apical network. Equally dramatic increases in microtubule stability following ROCK inhibition have previously been reported in cultured cells89. ROCK inhibition may therefore impair apical constriction through both deregulation of actomyosin localisation, as previously documented22,41, and by expanding the apical microtubule network which must be deformed during constriction.

Apical localisation of PCP components occurs through trafficking in vesicles along apicobasally-oriented microtubules in the zebrafish neuroepithelium54. Apicobasally-oriented non-centrosomal microtubule tails have been extensively documented in the Xenopus neuroepithelium90,91,92. The consensus that they biomechanically contribute to NT closure in that model is consistent with our findings. Here we show that Vangl2 deletion non-autonomously shortens microtubule tails in the mouse neuroepithelium, placing VANGL2/ROCK signalling upstream of microtubule organisation. However, whereas the primary function of microtubule tails in the bilayered Xenopus neuroepithelium is believed to be cell elongation93, shortened tails in the pseudostratified epithelium of Cre;Fl/− embryos were not associated with apical-basal shortening. Our findings are also in contrast to previous studies which implicate microtubule polymerisation in the establishment and maintenance of PCP component polarisation54,94. Molecular mechanisms underlying this seemingly bidirectional interaction are a matter for future work, but our findings reveal a dynamic interplay between PCP, microtubules and actomyosin in the mammalian neuroepithelium. It has been suggested that promotion of apical constriction is one of the beneficial consequences of folate, which may contribute to its ability to prevent a proportion of human NT defects95,96. These interactions may therefore be specifically disrupted in patients with mosaic PCP mutations and may identify more widely-applicable therapeutic targets.

Patients with non-syndromic NT defects rarely receive a genetic diagnosis relevant to prevention or genetic counselling. Our findings may begin to explain this short-fall. Mutations in neuromesodermal progenitor cells which affect only a small proportion of neuroepithelial cells would not be detectable with diagnostic genotyping methods. These mutations may be predisposed to by agents known to decrease genomic stability and increase NT defect risk, including pollutants97,98,99, folate deficiency100,101, and diabetes102,103,104,105. Our findings provide a framework to understand the consequences of mosaic mutations on congenital structural malformations.

Methods

Animal procedures

Studies were performed under the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the Medical Research Council’s Responsibility in the Use of Animals for Medical Research (1993). Mice were time-mated overnight and the morning a copulation plug was identified was considered E0.5. Five transgenic alleles were used in this manuscript. Rosa26mTmG (mTmG)106 is a reporter allele which causes all cells to express membrane tdTomato red fluorescent protein, but is recombined by Cre to express membrane EGFP instead. The conditional Vangl2 floxed (Vangl2Fl) allele was as previously described107 and a Vangl2-null allele was generated by crossing to ActinCre, and subsequent breeding out of that ubiquitous Cre more than ten generations before the start of these studies. Three conditional Cre drivers were used in this study. Sox2CreERT2 was as previously reported48. Nkx1-2CreERT2 is a tamoxifen-inducible Cre driver which recombines in axial progenitor cells, persistently lineage-tracing the neuroepithelium49. Stud males with Nkx1-2CreERT2/+ and Vangl2Fl/− alleles were bred with females harbouring conditional Vangl2 alleles as well as homozygous mTmG reporters. This cross was used to lineage-trace Vangl2-deleted cells at least 24 h after tamoxifen administration. The third conditional Cre driver used was Grhl3Cre 108. This Cre recombines throughout the surface ectoderm, and in an increasing proportion of neuroepithelial cells as previously observed14. Activation of neuroepithelial Grhl3Cre is not temporally restricted, but predictably produces mosaic recombination at later stages of posterior neuropore closure. All mouse colonies were maintained in house on a C57Bl/6 background and bred from 8 weeks of age. Cre-negative littermates generated in the course of colony maintenance were used as WT controls for embryo culture. Tamoxifen (10 mg/mouse) was administered at 8:00 a.m. on E8 as previously validated47. This dose of tamoxifen was halved when collecting foetuses later than E11 as the high dose produced foetotoxic effects in wild-types.

Embryo collection and culture

Embryos were harvested around E9-13.5, dissected free of extra-embryonic tissues109 and rinsed in PBS prior to fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, pH 7.4, overnight at 4 °C. For tubulin staining, embryos were dissected, washed and fixed in solutions pre-warmed to 37 °C. Yolk sacs were collected from each embryo for genotyping. Mouse whole embryo culture and treatment with the ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Cambridge Biosciences, SM02-1) was performed using well-established protocols22,52.

Whole mount staining

Primary antibodies were: rabbit anti-VANGL2 (Millipore clone 2G4, as previously validated74, 1:100 dilution), rabbit anti-MHCIIb (BioLegend PRB-445 and Abcam clone 3H2, 1:200), rabbit anti-Ser19 pMLCII (Cell Signalling Technology #3671, 1:100), rabbit anti-K40 acetylated α-TUBULIN (Abcam EPR16772, 1:200), mouse anti-β TUBULIN (Insight Biotechnology clone AT5B2, 1:200), mouse anti-β-CATENIN (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, clone E-5, 1:100), mouse anti-N-cadherin (Cell Signalling Technology clone 13A9, 1:150), rabbit anti-ZO1 (Thermo Scientific clone 40-2200, 1:100), rabbit anti-ROCK1 (Abcam, ab45171, 1:100) and chicken anti-GFP (Abcam ab13970, 1:300). Alexa Fluor™ 405, 488, 568 and 647-conjugated secondary antibodies and phalloidin were from Thermo Scientific. EGFP was typically detected using endogenous fluorescence, but this was quenched when antigen retrieval was required.

Paraformaldehyde-fixed embryos were permeabilised in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBT) for 1 h at room temperature, blocked overnight in a 5% BSA/PBT at 4 °C and incubated overnight in a 1:150 dilution of primary antibody in blocking solution at 4 °C. Embryos were then washed 3 × 1 h at room temperature in blocking solution, incubated for 2 h at room temperature in 1:300 dilution of Alexa Fluor®-conjugated secondary antibodies. Excess secondary antibody was removed by washing for 1 h in blocking solution and a further 2 × 1 h in PBT at room temperature. Visualisation of pMLC-II and N-Cadherin required antigen retrieval. This was performed by pre-incubating embryos in 10 mM sodium citrate acid, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0 for 30 min at room temperature to ensure penetration throughout the embryo, replacing the sodium citrate solution and incubating the embryo at 95 °C for 20 min, then cooling at room temperature for 30 min. In some cases, mild cross-reactivity of the anti-chick secondary was observed, producing faint additional signal in the EGFP track which did not impede identification of EGFP+ cells and was readily corrected by subtracting the original signal.

Images were captured on a Zeiss Examiner LSM880 confocal using a 20×/NA1.0 Plan Apochromat dipping objective. Embryos were typically imaged with X/Y pixel sizes of 0.59 µm and Z-step of 1.0 µm (speed = 8, bidirectional imaging, 1024 × 1024 pixels). Images were processed with Zen2.3 software and visualised as maximum projections (to show intensity) or 3D reconstructions (to show structure) in Fiji.

Myosin and tubulin imaging was performed on a Zeiss Examiner LSM880 confocal using a 20×/NA1.0 Plan Apochromat dipping objective with AiryScan Fast using FS (low zoom) or SR (high zoom) in-built settings.

In order to selectively visualise the apical surface (~3 µm deep into the tissue), our previously-described Surface Subtraction macro was used14,81. Images which have undergone this processing are described as being surface-subtracted.

Morphometric analyses

PNP length, neural fold elevation and neuroepithelial cross-section analyses were performed in phalloidin wholemount or reflection-imaged PNPs. Reflection mode images were captured using a 633 nm laser and MBS T80/R20 beam filter. To measure neuroepithelial thickness, transverse signal was enhanced post acquisition using sequential local contrast enhancement (CLAHE) in Fiji (block size 50, histogram bins 150, maximum slope 3 then repeated with block size 30, histogram bins 100, maximum slope 3) with 30 pixel rolling ball radius background subtraction before each CLAHE iteration.

Semi-automated cell segmentation was performed with Cellpose110, which implements a pre-trained U-net neural network to predict intracellular spatial flows (https://github.com/MouseLand/cellpose). One embryo was excluded from further analysis due to poor segmentation. Cells at image edges were excluded by replacing labels within a 30 pixel-wide border of each image with background values. EGFP fluorescence intensity was rescaled to floating point (0–1). A cell was defined as EGFP+ if the intensity of at least 75% of intracellular pixels was greater than 0.08; conversely, a cell was defined as EGFP− if the intensity of at least 75% of intracellular pixels was less than 0.06. Cells were classed as neighbours if the mask of one cell was found to overlap with the dilated mask of another. EGFP negative cells without an EGFP positive neighbour were classed as tdTom distant (D), and those with a neighbour were classed as tdTom neighbour (N). Cell area (A), perimeter (P), solidity, and minor and major axis lengths were calculated in scikit-image111. All images, outputs, and code used to generate these data is available as a jupyter notebook at https://github.com/timjedwar/Vangl2-cell-morpho.112

Laser ablation and live embryo imaging

Annular and cable laser ablations were performed using a MaiTai laser (SpectraPhysics Mai Tai eHP DeepSee multiphoton laser). For annular ablations a 30 µm diameter ring was ablated at 710 nm wavelength, 80% laser power, 0.34 µs pixel dwell time, 10 iterations. Cable ablations were performed using the same laser settings applied to a vertical (y-axis) line ~10 µm long. Immediately prior to ablation, embryos were dissected from the amnion, stained for 5 min at 37 °C in CellMaskTM Deep Red (Thermo Fisher, 1:100 dilution in DMEM), positioned in wells cut out of 4% agarose gel in DMEM, submerged in dissection medium and maintained at 37 °C throughout imaging. Microsurgical needles from 11-0 Mersilene (TG140-6, Ethicon) and 10-0 Prolene (BV75-3, Ethicon) were used to hold the PNP pointing upwards. Cluster retraction was analysed by measuring the change in cluster area before and immediately after ablation using peripheral landmarks, such as cell junctions to define cluster boundaries. Cell retraction was analysed by drawing around each cell before and immediately after ablation, then averaging the results for cells of the same type such that the embryo was used as the unit of measure. Illustrative particle image velocimetry (PIV) was performed in Fiji.

Live imaging was carried out using previously-described culture and imaging conditions13,45. Endogenous membrane-localised tdTomato or EGFP expressed from the mTmG locus was visualised. Each embryo was positioned by making a small hole through the amnion and yolk sac and exteriorising the PNP to allow visualisation. A 10-0 Prolene microsurgical needle was curved through the allantois into agarose to keep the PNP pointing upwards and other needles were used to stop the yolk sac drifting onto it. The heart beat continued throughout imaging and the PNP commonly drifted as the embryo grew/deformed. Z-stacks of the neuroepithelium were captured once per minute and the field of view was recentred after every two or three stacks. The resulting stacks were concatenated, processed with five iterations of Richardson-Lucy deconvolution using DeconvolutionLab, and 3D-registered in Fiji. Only cells which were present in all imaged time points were analysed, in each case by manually identifying the last Z-slice in which the cell’s apical surface was visible and drawing around it sequentially at every time point. While this is far more laborious than the commonly-used approach of selecting an optical cross-section for analysis, it is essential because the tissue curves during progression of closure. When analysing PNPs with recombined cells, for each EGFP+ cell a neighbour and a distant cell with similar initial morphology were selected for annotation. Cells which divided during imaging were not analysed.

Statistical analysis and reproducibility

Comparisons between two groups were by Student’s t-test accounting for homogeneity of variance in Excel or in SPSS (IBM Statistics 22). Comparison of multiple groups was by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni in OriginPro 2017 (Origin Labs), which also tests normality and homogeneity of variance. Multivariate analysis was by linear mixed models in SPSS accounting for repeated measured from individual cells and embryos, and for multiple testing with a posthoc Bonferroni. Graphs were made in OriginPro 2016 (Origin Labs) and are represented as box plots or as the mean ± SEM when several groups are shown per measurement level. Box plots show the median, interquartile range and 95% CI.

Sample sizes for morphometric and laser ablation experiments were based on previous studies. A pilot study of quantifying apical constriction is described in the results. Blinding to CreERT2 positivity was generally not possible, but analyses were carried out without knowing whether embryos were Cre;Fl/Fl (no spina bifida) or Cre;Fl/-. Thus, analyses were generally blinded to Vangl2 deletion status and no embryos were excluded after analysis. There were three exceptions to this blinding. The first exception is when VANGL2 itself was visualised given loss of VANGL2 signal was obvious in Cre;Fl/− embryos only; these data are analysed quantitatively. The second exception was when selecting embryos for live imaging. In order to ensure that control and experimental embryos were imaged, GLG inspected neural fold eversion, which by then was a recognised feature of Cre;Fl/− embryos (note that this is only possible when the whole PNP can be seen, not when processing zoomed images of the apical neuroepithelium). This was only mis-judged in one embryo. The third exception was AiryScan imaging of myosin and tubulin, for which only experimental embryos could be imaged due to processing limitations. To circumvent this, when quantifying tubulin tail length each tail was saved as a separate image with a blinded key indicating whether it was EGFP+ or not.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and all tests were two-tailed. All images are representative of observations in at least three embryos from independent litters.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper as both the values used to generate each graph and SVG images at original resolution available through the Mendeley data repository113. All reagents are commercially available. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Cellpose processing is available on GitHub https://github.com/timjedwar/Vangl2-cell-morpho.112 In-house Fiji processing tools and related resources are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request or previously published14.

References

  1. 1.

    Zaganjor, I. et al. Describing the prevalence of neural tube defects worldwide: a systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 11, e0151586 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nikolopoulou, E., Galea, G. L., Rolo, A., Greene, N. D. & Copp, A. J. Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms. Development 144, 552–566 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    van Straaten, H. W. & Copp, A. J. Curly tail: a 50-year history of the mouse spina bifida model. Anat. Embryol. 203, 225–237 (2001).

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Greene, N. D., Leung, K. Y. & Copp, A. J. Inositol, neural tube closure and the prevention of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res. 109, 68–80 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Harris, M. J. & Juriloff, D. M. Mouse mutants with neural tube closure defects and their role in understanding human neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res. Part A 79, 187–210 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Copp, A. J., Stanier, P. & Greene, N. D. Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. Lancet Neurol. 12, 799–810 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Robinson, A. et al. Mutations in the planar cell polarity genes CELSR1 and SCRIB are associated with the severe neural tube defect craniorachischisis. Hum. Mutat. 33, 440–447 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Juriloff, D. M. & Harris, M. J. A consideration of the evidence that genetic defects in planar cell polarity contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res. Part A 94, 824–840 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kibar, Z. et al. Contribution of VANGL2 mutations to isolated neural tube defects. Clin. Genet. 80, 76–82 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lei, Y. P. et al. VANGL2 mutations in human cranial neural-tube defects. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 2232–2235 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tian, T. et al. Somatic mutations in planar cell polarity genes in neural tissue from human fetuses with neural tube defects. Hum. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-020-02172-0 (2020).

  12. 12.

    Erickson, R. P. Somatic gene mutation and human disease other than cancer: an update. Mutat. Res. 705, 96–106 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Galea, G. L. et al. Biomechanical coupling facilitates spinal neural tube closure in mouse embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E5177–E5186 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Galea, G. L. et al. Vangl2 disruption alters the biomechanics of late spinal neurulation leading to spina bifida in mouse embryos. Dis. Model. Mech. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.032219 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Ybot-Gonzalez, P. et al. Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure. Development 134, 789–799 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Torban, E., Wang, H. J., Groulx, N. & Gros, P. Independent mutations in mouse Vangl2 that cause neural tube defects in looptail mice impair interaction with members of the dishevelled family. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 52703–52713 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang, L. et al. Digenic variants of planar cell polarity genes in human neural tube defect patients. Mol. Genet. Metab. 124, 94–100 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Aw, W. Y. & Devenport, D. Planar cell polarity: global inputs establishing cellular asymmetry. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 44, 110–116 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ezan, J. & Montcouquiol, M. Revisiting planar cell polarity in the inner ear. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 499–506 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Phillips, H. M. et al. Non-cell-autonomous roles for the planar cell polarity gene Vangl2 in development of the coronary circulation. Circ. Res. 102, 615–623 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Strutt, H. & Strutt, D. Nonautonomous planar polarity patterning in Drosophila: dishevelled-independent functions of frizzled. Dev. Cell 3, 851–863 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Butler, M. B. et al. Rho kinase-dependent apical constriction counteracts M-phase apical expansion to enable mouse neural tube closure. J. Cell Sci. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.230300 (2019).

  23. 23.

    McGreevy, E. M., Vijayraghavan, D., Davidson, L. A. & Hildebrand, J. D. Shroom3 functions downstream of planar cell polarity to regulate myosin II distribution and cellular organization during neural tube closure. Biol. Open 4, 186–196 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ossipova, O., Chuykin, I., Chu, C. W. & Sokol, S. Y. Vangl2 cooperates with Rab11 and Myosin V to regulate apical constriction during vertebrate gastrulation. Development 142, 99–107 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ossipova, O., Kim, K. & Sokol, S. Y. Planar polarization of Vangl2 in the vertebrate neural plate is controlled by Wnt and Myosin II signaling. Biol. Open 4, 722–730 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nishimura, T., Honda, H. & Takeichi, M. Planar cell polarity links axes of spatial dynamics in neural-tube closure. Cell 149, 1084–1097 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    An, Y. et al. Apical constriction is driven by a pulsatile apical myosin network in delaminating Drosophila neuroblasts. Development 144, 2153–2164 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vasquez, C. G., Tworoger, M. & Martin, A. C. Dynamic myosin phosphorylation regulates contractile pulses and tissue integrity during epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 206, 435–450 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Martin, A. C. & Goldstein, B. Apical constriction: themes and variations on a cellular mechanism driving morphogenesis. Development 141, 1987–1998 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shindo, A., Inoue, Y., Kinoshita, M. & Wallingford, J. B. PCP-dependent transcellular regulation of actomyosin oscillation facilitates convergent extension of vertebrate tissue. Dev. Biol. 446, 159–167 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Corrigall, D., Walther, R. F., Rodriguez, L., Fichelson, P. & Pichaud, F. Hedgehog signaling is a principal inducer of Myosin-II-driven cell ingression in Drosophila epithelia. Dev. Cell 13, 730–742 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lee, C., Scherr, H. M. & Wallingford, J. B. Shroom family proteins regulate gamma-tubulin distribution and microtubule architecture during epithelial cell shape change. Development 134, 1431–1441 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee, J. Y. & Harland, R. M. Actomyosin contractility and microtubules drive apical constriction in Xenopus bottle cells. Dev. Biol. 311, 40–52 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Booth, A. J. R., Blanchard, G. B., Adams, R. J. & Roper, K. A dynamic microtubule cytoskeleton directs medial actomyosin function during tube formation. Dev. Cell 29, 562–576 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fernandes, V. M., McCormack, K., Lewellyn, L. & Verheyen, E. M. Integrins regulate apical constriction via microtubule stabilization in the Drosophila eye disc epithelium. Cell Rep. 9, 2043–2055 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Singh, A. et al. Polarized microtubule dynamics directs cell mechanics and coordinates forces during epithelial morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1126–1133 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen, H., Xiao, X., Lui, W. Y., Lee, W. M. & Cheng, C. Y. Vangl2 regulates spermatid planar cell polarity through microtubule (MT)-based cytoskeleton in the rat testis. Cell Death Dis. 9, 340 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jarjour, A. A. et al. The formation of paranodal spirals at the ends of CNS myelin sheaths requires the planar polarity protein Vangl2. Glia https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23809 (2020).

  39. 39.

    Brown, J. M. & Garcia-Garcia, M. J. Secretory pathway calcium ATPase 1 (SPCA1) controls mouse neural tube closure by regulating cytoskeletal dynamics. Development https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.170019 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Sulistomo, H. W., Nemoto, T., Yanagita, T. & Takeya, R. Formin homology 2 domain-containing 3 (Fhod3) controls neural plate morphogenesis in mouse cranial neurulation by regulating multidirectional apical constriction. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 2924–2934 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Escuin, S. et al. Rho-kinase-dependent actin turnover and actomyosin disassembly are necessary for mouse spinal neural tube closure. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2468–2481 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Grego-Bessa, J., Hildebrand, J. & Anderson, K. V. Morphogenesis of the mouse neural plate depends on distinct roles of cofilin 1 in apical and basal epithelial domains. Development 142, 1305–1314 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Christodoulou, N. & Skourides, P. A. Cell-autonomous Ca(2+) flashes elicit pulsed contractions of an apical actin network to drive apical constriction during neural tube closure. Cell Rep. 13, 2189–2202 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Williams, M., Yen, W., Lu, X. & Sutherland, A. Distinct apical and basolateral mechanisms drive planar cell polarity-dependent convergent extension of the mouse neural plate. Dev. Cell 29, 34–46 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mole, M. A. et al. Integrin-mediated focal anchorage drives epithelial zippering during mouse neural tube closure. Dev. Cell 52, 321–334 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ved, N., Curran, A., Ashcroft, F. M. & Sparrow, D. B. Tamoxifen administration in pregnant mice can be deleterious to both mother and embryo. Lab Anim. 53, 630–633 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Savery, D. et al. Refinement of inducible gene deletion in embryos of pregnant mice. Birth Defects Res. 112, 196–204 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mugele, D. et al. Genetic approaches in mice demonstrate that neuro-mesodermal progenitors express T/Brachyury but not Sox2. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/503854 (2018).

  49. 49.

    Rodrigo Albors, A., Halley, P. A. & Storey, K. G. Lineage tracing of axial progenitors using Nkx1-2CreER(T2) mice defines their trunk and tail contributions. Development https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.164319 (2018).

  50. 50.

    McShane, S. G. et al. Cellular basis of neuroepithelial bending during mouse spinal neural tube closure. Dev. Biol. 404, 113–124 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    De Castro, S. C. P. et al. Neural tube closure depends on expression of Grainyhead-like 3 in multiple tissues. Dev. Biol. 435, 130–137 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rolo, A. et al. Regulation of cell protrusions by small GTPases during fusion of the neural folds. Elife 5, e13273 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dos-Santos Carvalho, S. et al. Vangl2 acts at the interface between actin and N-cadherin to modulate mammalian neuronal outgrowth. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51822 (2020).

  54. 54.

    Mathewson, A. W., Berman, D. G. & Moens, C. B. Microtubules are required for the maintenance of planar cell polarity in monociliated floorplate cells. Dev. Biol. 452, 21–33 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ito, S. et al. Induced cortical tension restores functional junctions in adhesion-defective carcinoma cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 1834 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ko, C. S., Tserunyan, V. & Martin, A. C. Microtubules promote intercellular contractile force transmission during tissue folding. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2726–2742 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lewis, F. T. The effect of cell division on the shape and size of hexagonal cells. Anat. Rec. 33, 331–355 (1926).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kim, S., Cai, M. & Hilgenfeldt, S. Lewis’ law revisited: the role of anisotropy in size-topology correlations. N. J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015024 (2014).

  59. 59.

    De, S. Somatic mosaicism in healthy human tissues. Trends Genet. 27, 217–223 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Campbell, I. M., Shaw, C. A., Stankiewicz, P. & Lupski, J. R. Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics. Trends Genet. 31, 382–392 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bae, T. et al. Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science 359, 550–555 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lim, Y. H., Moscato, Z. & Choate, K. A. Mosaicism in cutaneous disorders. Annu. Rev. Genet. 51, 123–141 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Asch, S. & Sugarman, J. L. Epidermal nevus syndromes. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 132, 291–316 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Manheimer, K. B. et al. Robust identification of mosaic variants in congenital heart disease. Hum. Genet. 137, 183–193 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wright, C. F. et al. Clinically-relevant postzygotic mosaicism in parents and children with developmental disorders in trio exome sequencing data. Nat. Commun. 10, 2985 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Tzouanacou, E., Wegener, A., Wymeersch, F. J., Wilson, V. & Nicolas, J. F. Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. Dev. Cell 17, 365–376 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Henrique, D., Abranches, E., Verrier, L. & Storey, K. G. Neuromesodermal progenitors and the making of the spinal cord. Development 142, 2864–2875 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Murdoch, J. N. et al. Genetic interactions between planar cell polarity genes cause diverse neural tube defects in mice. Dis. Model Mech. 7, 1153–1163 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Humphries, A. C., Narang, S. & Mlodzik, M. Mutations associated with human neural tube defects display disrupted planar cell polarity in Drosophila. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53532 (2020).

  70. 70.

    Fisher, K. H. & Strutt, D. A theoretical framework for planar polarity establishment through interpretation of graded cues by molecular bridges. Development https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.168955 (2019).

  71. 71.

    Strutt, H. & Strutt, D. Asymmetric localisation of planar polarity proteins: mechanisms and consequences. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 957–963 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Aw, W. Y., Heck, B. W., Joyce, B. & Devenport, D. Transient tissue-scale deformation coordinates alignment of planar cell polarity junctions in the mammalian skin. Curr. Biol. 26, 2090–2100 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Shi, D. et al. Dynamics of planar cell polarity protein Vangl2 in the mouse oviduct epithelium. Mech. Dev. 141, 78–89 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Belotti, E. et al. Molecular characterisation of endogenous Vangl2/Vangl1 heteromeric protein complexes. PLoS ONE 7, e46213 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Pryor, S. E. et al. Vangl-dependent planar cell polarity signalling is not required for neural crest migration in mammals. Development 141, 3153–3158 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Seo, H. S., Habas, R., Chang, C. & Wang, J. Bimodal regulation of dishevelled function by Vangl2 during morphogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 2053–2061 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Lopez-Escobar, B. et al. The non-canonical Wnt-PCP pathway shapes the mouse caudal neural plate. Development https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.157487 (2018).

  78. 78.

    Sai, X., Yonemura, S. & Ladher, R. K. Junctionally restricted RhoA activity is necessary for apical constriction during phase 2 inner ear placode invagination. Dev. Biol. 394, 206–216 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Dady, A., Blavet, C. & Duband, J. L. Timing and kinetics of E- to N-cadherin switch during neurulation in the avian embryo. Dev. Dyn. 241, 1333–1349 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Panorchan, P. et al. Single-molecule analysis of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 119, 66–74 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nikolopoulou, E. et al. Spinal neural tube closure depends on regulation of surface ectoderm identity and biomechanics by Grhl2. Nat. Commun. 10, 2487 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Chuykin, I., Ossipova, O. & Sokol, S. Y. Par3 interacts with Prickle3 to generate apical PCP complexes in the vertebrate neural plate. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37881 (2018).

  83. 83.

    Butler, M. T. & Wallingford, J. B. Spatial and temporal analysis of PCP protein dynamics during neural tube closure. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36456 (2018).

  84. 84.

    Ossipova, O. et al. Role of Rab11 in planar cell polarity and apical constriction during vertebrate neural tube closure. Nat. Commun. 5, 3734 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Laevsky, G. & Knecht, D. A. Cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin II is a major contributor to cortical integrity and cell motility in restrictive environments. J. Cell Sci. 116, 3761–3770 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Xu, X. S. et al. During multicellular migration, myosin ii serves a structural role independent of its motor function. Dev. Biol. 232, 255–264 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Yvon, A. M., Gross, D. J. & Wadsworth, P. Antagonistic forces generated by myosin II and cytoplasmic dynein regulate microtubule turnover, movement, and organization in interphase cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8656–8661 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Cao, T. T., Chang, W., Masters, S. E. & Mooseker, M. S. Myosin-Va binds to and mechanochemically couples microtubules to actin filaments. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 151–161 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Schofield, A. V., Steel, R. & Bernard, O. Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase (ROCK) protein controls microtubule dynamics in a novel signaling pathway that regulates cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 43620–43629 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Karfunkel, P. The role of microtubules and microfilaments in neurulation in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 25, 30–56 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Suzuki, M., Hara, Y., Takagi, C., Yamamoto, T. S. & Ueno, N. MID1 and MID2 are required for Xenopus neural tube closure through the regulation of microtubule organization. Development 137, 2329–2339 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Inoue, Y. et al. Mechanical roles of apical constriction, cell elongation, and cell migration during neural tube formation in Xenopus. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 15, 1733–1746 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Suzuki, M., Morita, H. & Ueno, N. Molecular mechanisms of cell shape changes that contribute to vertebrate neural tube closure. Dev. Growth Differ. 54, 266–276 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Matis, M., Russler-Germain, D. A., Hu, Q., Tomlin, C. J. & Axelrod, J. D. Microtubules provide directional information for core PCP function. Elife 3, e02893 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Balashova, O. A., Visina, O. & Borodinsky, L. N. Folate receptor 1 is necessary for neural plate cell apical constriction during Xenopus neural tube formation. Development 144, 1518–1530 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Martin, J. B., Muccioli, M., Herman, K., Finnell, R. H. & Plageman, T. F., Jr. Folic acid modifies the shape of epithelial cells during morphogenesis via a Folr1 and MLCK dependent mechanism. Biol. Open https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.041160 (2019).

  97. 97.

    Wang, B. et al. Levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in maternal serum and risk of neural tube defects in offspring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 588–596 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Wang, L. et al. Indoor air pollution and neural tube defects: effect modification by maternal genes. Epidemiology 25, 658–665 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Bai, H., Wu, M., Zhang, H. & Tang, G. Chronic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure causes DNA damage and genomic instability in lung epithelial cells. Oncotarget 8, 79034–79045 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Swayne, B. G. et al. Investigating the effects of dietary folic acid on sperm count, DNA damage and mutation in Balb/c mice. Mutat. Res. 737, 1–7 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Beetstra, S., Thomas, P., Salisbury, C., Turner, J. & Fenech, M. Folic acid deficiency increases chromosomal instability, chromosome 21 aneuploidy and sensitivity to radiation-induced micronuclei. Mutat. Res. 578, 317–326 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Binici, D. N., Karaman, A., Coskun, M., Oglu, A. U. & Ucar, F. Genomic damage in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Genet. Couns. 24, 149–156 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Attia, S. M., Helal, G. K. & Alhaider, A. A. Assessment of genomic instability in normal and diabetic rats treated with metformin. Chem. Biol. Interact. 180, 296–304 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Mowla, S., Gissler, M., Raisanen, S. & Kancherla, V. Association between maternal pregestational diabetes mellitus and spina bifida: a population-based case–control study, Finland, 2000–2014. Birth Defects Res. 112, 186–195 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Anderson, J. L. et al. Maternal obesity, gestational diabetes, and central nervous system birth defects. Epidemiology 16, 87–92 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Ramsbottom, S. A. et al. Vangl2-regulated polarisation of second heart field-derived cells is required for outflow tract lengthening during cardiac development. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004871 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Camerer, E. et al. Local protease signaling contributes to neural tube closure in the mouse embryo. Dev. Cell 18, 25–38 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Pryor, S. E., Massa, V., Savery, D., Greene, N. D. & Copp, A. J. Convergent extension analysis in mouse whole embryo culture. Methods Mol. Biol. 839, 133–146 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Stringer, C., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.02.931238 (2020).

  111. 111.

    van der Walt, S. et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Edwards, T. J. Vangl2-cell-morpho. GitHub, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4400300. (2020).

  113. 113.

    Galea, G. L. Mendeley Data, https://doi.org/10.17632/67yxz58zc9.1 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded partly by a Wellcome Trust Postdoctoral Clinical Research Training Fellowship (107474/Z/15/Z) and partly by a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (211112/Z/18/Z), both to G.L.G. A.R.M. was supported by a Child Health Research CIO award (to N.D.E.G.). A.J.C. and N.D.E.G. are supported by Great Ormond Street Hospital Children’s Charity. Research infrastructure within the institute is supported by the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. We thank Dr Dale Moulding for his help with image processing, as well as Dawn Savery and the biological services staff for help with transgenic colonies.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: G.L.G.; Methodology: G.L.G., E.M., A.R.M., T.J.E.; Formal analysis: G.L.G., E.M., A.R.M., T.J.E. and I.A.; Investigation: G.L.G., E.M., A.R.M.; Resources: G.L.G., N.D.E.G., A.J.C.; Data curation: G.L.G., T.J.E.; Writing—original draft: G.L.G.; Writing—review & editing: all authors; Figure creation: G.L.G., T.J.E.; Supervision: G.L.G., N.D.E.G., A.J.C.; Project administration: G.L.G.; Funding acquisition: G.L.G., N.D.E.G., A.J.C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel L. Galea.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.J.C. acts as paid consultant for ViiV Healthcare Limited, with fees going to support his research programme. G.L.G, E.M., T.J.E, A.R.M, I.M. and N.D.E.G declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galea, G.L., Maniou, E., Edwards, T.J. et al. Cell non-autonomy amplifies disruption of neurulation by mosaic Vangl2 deletion in mice. Nat Commun 12, 1159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21372-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing