Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Asymmetric introgression reveals the genetic architecture of a plumage trait

Abstract

Genome-wide variation in introgression rates across hybrid zones offers a powerful opportunity for studying population differentiation. One poorly understood pattern of introgression is the geographic displacement of a trait implicated in lineage divergence from genome-wide population boundaries. While difficult to interpret, this pattern can facilitate the dissection of trait genetic architecture because traits become uncoupled from their ancestral genomic background. We studied an example of trait displacement generated by the introgression of head plumage coloration from personata to alba subspecies of the white wagtail. A previous study of their hybrid zone in Siberia revealed that the geographic transition in this sexual signal that mediates assortative mating was offset from other traits and genetic markers. Here we show that head plumage is associated with two small genetic regions. Despite having a simple genetic architecture, head plumage inheritance is consistent with partial dominance and epistasis, which could contribute to its asymmetric introgression.

Introduction

Hybrid zones have long been recognized as windows into the evolutionary process1,2,3,4,5. If hybrids are not completely sterile, hybridization will often result in backcrossing and a flux of foreign alleles into parental populations, i.e. introgression. Introgression rates vary substantially across the genome due to local differences in the strength of selection, frequency of recombination, and the interplay between selection and recombination along chromosomes6,7,8,9. Loci directly targeted by divergent selection (or closely linked to its targets) will show particularly reduced introgression rates compared to the genome-wide average (assuming minimal coupling and a lack of strong barriers to gene flow), aiding in the detection of loci associated with population divergence10,11,12.

An intriguing observation, now recorded in several study systems, is the geographic displacement of a trait under selection away from the majority of genetic markers13,14,15,16. This pattern poses an evolutionary quandary. In a given hybrid zone, we expect loci underpinning traits under divergent selection to show narrower clines than those of neutral loci elsewhere in the genome. Yet, if these divergently selected loci act as “barriers” promoting incipient speciation, we also expect their cline centers to be co-located with the cline centers of neutral loci varying across species. Asymmetric sexual or natural selection is often invoked to explain this pattern. Indeed, simulation studies suggest that differences in allele fitness and selection strength17,18, as well as epistasis19, and deviation from codominant genetic inheritance of selected phenotypes17 can contribute to asymmetric introgression. However, there exist few empirical examples in the literature due to the difficulty of dissecting the genetic architecture of phenotypic traits in natural study systems—data crucial for distinguishing among these potential mechanisms. Furthermore, the connection between trait genetic architecture and asymmetric introgression under a scenario of positive assortative mating—commonly found in the hybrid zones—remains poorly understood19.

The white wagtail (Motacilla alba) is a small passerine bird with nine commonly recognized subspecies distributed across most of Eurasia, North Africa, and northwestern North America20,21. Historically, white wagtails likely bred on the banks of rivers and other water bodies22; now they are a common synanthropic species in many parts of their range20,23. The subspecies M. a. alba and M. a. personata differ in a suite of phenotypic traits that distinguish allopatric populations (e.g., body size, head patterning, intensity of gray plumage on the back, and amount of white plumage on the wing) and hybridize in two geographically isolated regions in Iran and central Siberia16,20 (Fig. 1a). A previous study of phenotypic geographic clines in the Siberian hybrid zone revealed that only coloration of head and neck plumage showed a sharp, ~100-kilometer transition, while other phenotypic traits varied gradually16 (Fig. 1b). Further, the segregation pattern of head plumage recorded in the same study included only a few discrete intermediate categories (Fig. 1c), suggesting that head plumage is determined by few genes of large effect. The majority of individuals in the geographic area across which head plumage transitioned possessed either alba (33%) or personata (29%) head plumages, while the remaining individuals were 20% alba-like hybrids, 4% intermediates, and 14% personata-like hybrids (n = 104). Strong positive assortative mating by head plumage (i.e., the composition of social pairs deviated significantly from a scenario of random mating based on randomization statistical analysis16) and the observed predominance of parental phenotypes over hybrids are consistent with the maintenance of restricted introgression of head plumage by selection.

Fig. 1: Distribution of alba and personata subspecies of the white wagtail and their hybridization patterns.
figure1

a Geographic distribution and sampling localities used in the present study (black dots). Areas of red (alba) and blue (personata) color overlap are their hybrid zones. b Geographic clines in head plumage coloration (orange) and genetic ancestry (green) for a 3000 km transect across the alba and personata hybrid zone in central Siberia (redrawn from ref. 16). Dashed lines show cline centers, shading is a 95% CI. c Plumage differences between alba and personata, and intermediate variants of head plumage observed in their hybrid zone. The allopatric alba and personata samples originate from terminal parts of the transect in Russia and Uzbekistan, respectively. The individuals we refer to as sympatric alba and personata and all intermediate head plumage phenotypes, were sampled in the area of range overlap (see Supplementary Table 1 for sampling details). Drawings are courtesy of Jillian Ditner.

The apparent role for head plumage as a reproductive barrier is hard to reconcile with the advanced introgression of the melanic personata head phenotype into the alba genomic background16, revealed by a 323-kilometer displacement between the centers of the head plumage and genetic ancestry geographic clines (Fig. 1b). Many locations across the contact zone are characterized by individuals with the personata head phenotype, but genetic ancestry indistinguishable from allopatric alba populations16. This introgression pattern could be due to hybrid zone movement towards the range of the alba subspecies, where the head plumage cline represents the leading edge of the moving hybrid zone and the genetic ancestry cline is displaced due to genome-wide flux of selectively neutral alleles towards personata—a common finding in moving hybrid zones24. Alternatively, personata head plumage could be asymmetrically introgressing away from an otherwise spatially stable area of genome-wide transition. While multiple mechanisms, potentially involving selection, can be invoked to explain the pattern of asymmetric introgression, they are hard to disentangle without knowing the genetic loci that underlie the trait of interest. Beyond being a striking and unsolved evolutionary puzzle, asymmetric introgression of head plumage in wagtails also offers a rare opportunity to dissect the genetic basis of a phenotype mediating assortative mating due to its decoupling from the ancestral genomic background.

In this study, we utilize whole genome analysis of many individuals to investigate the genetic architecture of alba and personata head plumage differences. We show that head plumage is associated with only two small (150–200 kb in size) genomic regions on chromosomes 1A and 20, of which the latter contains the agouti signaling protein gene and appears to have the major phenotypic effect. Despite seemingly simple genetic architecture, head plumage inheritance patterns support a model of partial dominance and epistatic interactions between the two genomic regions. Our findings suggest that peculiarities of genetic architecture may contribute to asymmetric introgression of head plumage, therefore illuminating the connection between mechanisms of formation of reproductive barriers between nascent species and evolutionary dynamics of these barriers.

Results

Genetic architecture of plumage differences in wagtails

We sequenced whole genomes of allopatric alba (n = 10), allopatric personata (n = 10), and 62 individuals from the hybrid zone (18 phenotypic alba and 20 phenotypic personata, 11 alba-like hybrids, four strict intermediates, nine personata-like hybrids) at 5–7.5× depth of coverage (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1), as well as one individual each from two outgroup species, Mekong wagtail Motacilla samveasnae and citrine wagtail M. citreola. Sequence reads were mapped to an eastern yellow wagtail M. tschutschensis tschutschensis draft reference genome (see the “Methods” section). After applying stringent filters (see the “Methods” section), we obtained ~10.6M SNPs for downstream analyses.

Genomic differentiation between remote allopatric populations of alba and personata was low (weighted FST = 0.046), but sufficient to detect population structure (Supplementary Fig. 2). Overall, differences between subspecies were concentrated in numerous, mostly narrow, regions of high FST (Fig. 2a). Genomic differentiation between alba and personata head plumage phenotypes sampled within their hybrid zone was an order of magnitude lower (FST = 0.002), with only two strongly differentiated regions located on chromosomes 1A (~200 kb in size) and 20 (~150 kb in size) (Fig. 2b–d), and no genome-wide signal of population structure (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 2: Whole-genome differentiation between alba and personata subspecies and the results of admixture mapping.
figure2

a, b Show relative genomic differentiation (FST) between remote allopatric populations and sympatric alba and personata head plumage phenotypes, respectively, estimated in 25 kb windows with 10 kb steps. Note that among multiple regions differentiated between allopatric populations, only two peaks on chromosomes 1A and 20 (highlighted in blue) remain distinct in sympatry. c, d Expand the highlighted regions on chromosomes 1A and 20. Gray circles are by-locus Weir-and-Cockerham FST, light gray and black lines are window-based estimates of the relative (FST) and absolute (dXY) differentiation, respectively. Red and blue lines are window-based estimates of nucleotide diversity in alba and personata, respectively. Orange dots are window-based ABBA–BABA (fd) indicating a fraction of shared ancestry between sympatric and allopatric personata (50 kb windows with 10 kb steps, see the “Methods” section for details). Below each plot are gene models with arrows indicating the direction of reading frame where it is known. Note that the divergent peak on chromosome 1A is mostly located in a non-coding region but includes the coiled-coil domain-containing protein 91 (CCDC91) gene. The peak on chromosome 20 overlaps three genes: adenosylhomocysteinase (AHCY), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit beta (EIF2S2), and is centered around agouti signaling protein (ASIP). e Results of admixture mapping for head plumage. Each dot is a −log10-transformed P-value for rejecting a model assuming no association between variation in a trait and a genetic locus. Dashed lines on a and b are 0.995 quantiles.

We performed admixture mapping using whole genomes of 62 individuals sampled within the hybrid zone to test for an association between individual SNPs and variation in head plumage. The only genomic regions with strong plumage associations coincided with peaks of genomic differentiation on chromosomes 1A and 20, with the region on chromosome 20 exhibiting the strongest signal (maximum −log10 P = 22.5, Fig. 2e) compared to 1A (maximum −log10 P = 8.1). Further, an analysis of genetic architecture of head plumage using a Bayesian sparse linear mixed model (BSLMM) indicated that 96.4 ± 3.6% of the phenotypic variance was explained by the complete set of ~11M SNPs, of which sparse effect terms (i.e., alleles with large phenotypic effect) accounted for 96.0 ± 4.0%. The average number of SNPs in the best model was 5.3 ± 2.6 loci, with up to 11.8% and 50.9% of variance explained by SNPs in divergent regions on chromosomes 1A and 20, respectively, all consistent with a simple genetic architecture of head plumage. To assess the predictive power of BSLMM, we used leave-one-out cross validation. Specifically, we iteratively excluded the phenotypic information from one individual and used the model fit for the remaining individuals to predict that phenotype based on its genotype (Supplementary Fig. 3). This analysis revealed high predictive power for sympatric parental phenotypes (adjusted R2 = 0.78) but rather moderate predictive power for hybrids (adjusted R2 = 0.54), suggesting that the relationship between phenotypic and genetic variation is non-linear to some extent and indicating potential deviations from additive and codominant inheritance models.

Local increases in relative (FST) and absolute (dXY) divergence in the regions on chromosomes 1A and 20 (Fig. 2c, d) were consistent with selection maintaining genetic differences despite gene flow25. Further, an admixture proportion estimated in the context of ABBA–BABA (fd)26 revealed a strong excess of shared ancestry between allopatric and sympatric personata in both regions (Fig. 2c, d), supporting the hypothesis that the two genomic regions separating sympatric personata from alba have introgressed from allopatric personata. The peak on chromosome 1A was located in a highly homozygous (Supplementary Fig. 4) stretch of non-coding sequence between the genes 5′-nucleotidase domain-containing protein 3 (NT5D3) and coiled-coil domain-containing protein 91 (CCDC91) (Fig. 2c). The peak on chromosome 20 overlapped three genes (Fig. 2d) and was centered around agouti signaling protein (ASIP)—a well-studied gene regulating melanogenesis—with highly homozygous non-coding regions (Supplementary Fig. 4) occurring upstream and downstream of the ASIP reading frame in “masked” personata-like phenotypes (Supplementary Fig. 4).

To examine inheritance patterns of head plumage, we first assessed genotypic variation by extracting loci with the highest admixture mapping signal from the divergent regions on chromosome 1A (43 SNPs spanning ~138 kb) and on chromosome 20 (49 SNPs spanning 86 kb) (Fig. 3). The majority of SNPs in both regions were fixed to alternative states in allopatric populations, indicating that intermediate genotypes observed in the hybrid zone are due to hybridization and backcrossing (Fig. 3c). Within the hybrid zone, we used a hybrid index (a composite genotype scaled from 0 to 1) and heterozygosity at these loci to better characterize their contributions to hybrid phenotypes (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3: Genetic architecture and inheritance mechanism of head plumage differences in wagtails.
figure3

a Typical phenotypes for each group. b Distribution of head plumage values estimated as a number of white pixels on standardized photographs of specimens. c Genotypes of loci most strongly associated with plumage differences inferred by admixture mapping on chromosomes 1A (43 loci) and around agouti signaling protein (ASIP) on chromosome 20 (49 loci) ordered by their position in the genome. Red and blue colors are homozygous genotypes typical for allopatric alba and personata, respectively, yellow are heterozygotes and white are missing data. d Heterozygosity plotted against hybrid index for genotypes shown on c. Dashed lines show limits in allopatric populations. e Putative inheritance mechanism of head plumage and frequency of genotypes found in each phenotypic group. P and p are personata-type alleles, A and a are alba-type alleles. Partially dominant alleles are capitalized. Asterisks on ce indicate two personata-like hybrids with highly recombinant ASIP genotypes with a few personata-specific homozygous loci that may be key for determining the “masked” head plumage type.

Parental genotypes were expected to have hybrid indices close to 0 (alba) or 1 (personata) and low heterozygosity. First-generation hybrid genotypes were expected to fall in the very top-center of each plot because they should have the highest heterozygosity and the most intermediate hybrid index possible, whereas more recombined genotypes of advanced-generation hybrids (i.e., F2 and backcrosses) should have lower heterozygosity and intermediate hybrid indices27. Backcrosses should have varying degrees of heterozygosity and hybrid indices closer to the respective parental genotypes27. To evaluate how distinct combinations of genotypic states match variation in head plumage, we categorized genotypes into “parental” states typical for allopatric populations and “intermediate” genotypes typical for hybrids and backcrosses.

Inheritance of head plumage and its asymmetric introgression

Our findings suggest that the ASIP region has the major phenotypic effect, that there is partially dominant expression of alba alleles, and that the region interacts epistatically with the region on 1A. We originally inferred this architecture and mode of inheritance of ASIP (Fig. 3e) from the following observations. Carriers of mostly heterozygous ASIP genotypes (Ap) were found among alba and intermediate head plumage phenotypes, but most commonly in alba-like hybrids. Supporting the idea of dominant expression of alba phenotype, the majority of individuals with both an intermediate hybrid index and high heterozygosity for both genomic regions—likely F1 hybrids—had phenotypes of alba-like hybrids and less commonly had strict intermediate phenotypes (Fig. 3d). The “masked” plumage of personata and personata-like hybrids is typically produced when individuals possess a homozygous personata-type ASIP genotype (pp). Two personata-like hybrids (indicated by asterisks in Fig. 3c–e) exhibited recombinant ASIP genotypes but with at least two shared homozygous personata SNP genotypes that may be among those playing the primary role in head plumage coloration.

The phenotypic expression of the genomic region on chromosome 1A depends on the ASIP genotype. The alba-type ASIP homozygotes (AA) or heterozygotes (Ap) produce alba head plumage in combination with the alba-type 1A genotype (aa). These two ASIP genotypes produce alba-like hybrids or intermediate plumage types when combined with intermediate (aP) or personata-type (PP) genotypes on 1A. Most personata-like hybrids have alba-type (aa) or sometimes highly recombinant (aP) 1A genotypes combined with personata-type ASIP genotype (pp). The 1A heterozygotes (aP) typically have no phenotypic effect when combined with personata-type ASIP genotype (pp) and are commonly found in personata head phenotype. Interestingly, we did not observe any genotypes with personata-type genotype at 1A (PP) and the alba-type ASIP (AA), suggesting it is either a very rare direction of hybridization or that carriers of this genotype are inviable. To formally test the hypothesized mechanism of head plumage inheritance, we compared a series of models with additive/codominant, completely and partially dominant, and epistatic interactions. In these models, we followed an assumption of our working hypothesis that the regions on chromosomes 1A and 20 act as a two-locus bi-allelic system (although there are likely a few SNPs or haplotype blocks with key roles in influencing gene expression). The model with partially dominant inheritance of personata chromosome 1A alleles, partially dominant inheritance of alba chromosome 20 alleles and with epistatic interactions between the two loci best explained phenotypic variation (Supplementary Table 2). Among the determinants of model fit, interactions between chromosome 20 alleles had the largest effect (−54.2), followed by interactions between chromosome 1A alleles (−22.6) and the epistatic term (15.9).

Given the partially dominant expression of the alba phenotype, we further explored whether this deviation from a codominant inheritance pattern could contribute to the observed asymmetric introgression of head plumage from personata into the alba genomic background. We used forward-time simulations28, where we assumed that the degree of dominance in an allele determining a phenotypic cue directly influences the probability of backcrossing (see the “Methods” section). We simulated geographic clines for one or two-locus mating traits, varying the dominance coefficient and the degree of assortativity. These simulations revealed that cline centers for mating trait loci will often not stay stable in space (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the direction of cline movement (i.e. towards dominant vs. recessive homozygote) was highly stochastic and variable both across and within the tested scenarios (Fig. 4a). In 30% (14–42%) of simulation outcomes, the cline moved towards the dominant homozygote, matching the scenario in the alba and personata hybrid zone (Fig. 4b). When the trait cline moved towards the dominant homozygote, in seven out of eight simulations the mating trait cline was significantly displaced from the neutral genomic background towards the dominant homozygote, again consistent with the observed patterns (Fig. 4c). The average magnitude of mating trait and genomic cline displacement predicated by our simulations (358.4 km across eight simulated scenarios, SD = 240.8) closely matched the observed displacement between the head plumage and ancestry clines in the wagtail hybrid zone (323 km16).

Fig. 4: Simulations of temporal dynamics of hybridization where alleles for a reproductive barrier trait have partially dominant expression in one population, and with incomplete assortative mating.
figure4

Throughout the figure, red and blue colors indicate mating trait and selectively neutral clines, respectively. a Position of cline centers (Y axis) over a course of 500 generations of hybridization (X axis). The eight scenarios vary in the strength of assortative mating, degree of partial dominance and a number of loci underlying mating trait. All clines have centers initially positioned at 0.5 and are allowed to move towards a trait encoded by recessive homozygote (0) or dominant homozygote (1). Clines moving towards dominant homozygote in mating trait and selectively neutral loci are highlighted. b Frequency of cline centers displaced towards recessive homozygote (RH, 0–0.44), staying relatively stable in space (S, 0.45–0.55) and displaced towards dominant homozygote (DH, 0.56–1) by the end of the simulation. c Distribution of cline center positions for selectively neutral and mating trait loci for a subset of mating clines moved towards dominant homozygote (DH). Mean centers are indicated by dashed lines. P-values stand for paired one-sided Wilcoxon test. Note that under the tested parameter combinations, the mating cline will rarely stay stable in space and will be moving towards recessive or dominant homozygote genotype. The latter scenario, matching the pattern observed in the wagtail hybrid zone, was an especially likely outcome under the moderate partial dominance and moderate assortative mating.

Discussion

Identifying the molecular basis of traits targeted by divergent selection is a key step towards understanding the evolution of phenotypic variation. Here we show that a distinct plumage signal in a pair of white wagtail subspecies is associated with two narrow autosomal genomic regions, one of which contains the gene encoding ASIP and appears to have the major phenotypic effect. Further, our results suggest partially dominant expression of ASIP alleles: the mostly black head plumage of one subspecies (personata) is a homozygous recessive trait, while a significant proportion of heterozygotes exhibit the mostly white plumage of the other subspecies (alba). Our simulations suggest that this inheritance mechanism, in combination with plumage-mediated assortative mating, might contribute to asymmetric introgression of the personata plumage signal into the alba genomic background.

As we hypothesized, the simple segregation pattern of head plumage previously documented in the personataalba hybrid zone corresponded to only two small genomic regions harboring a few genes. Importantly, our results suggest that non-coding genetic variation plays an important role in determining head plumage differences between wagtail subspecies, as has been found in other recent studies of plumage variation in birds29,30,31. Long runs of homozygosity upstream and downstream of ASIP in personata-type plumages likely overlap with promoters and enhancers of this gene. This finding adds to a growing collection of studies connecting genetic variation in ASIP and animal coloration32,33,34,35,36,37, and particularly highlights the role of regulatory genetic elements in evolutionary change38,39,40. Given that a few homozygous SNPs upstream and downstream of ASIP in highly recombinant phenotypes (Fig. 3c, d) are potentially sufficient to determine plumage differences (although we cannot rule out the role of structural genetic variation), it appears likely that these nucleotide substitutions play a role in changing the binding affinity of one or more transcription factors and regulation of ASIP expression. On chromosome 1A, a second major FST and admixture mapping peak (also located in a stretch of non-coding DNA) also appears to contribute to determination of head plumage, although with a minor phenotypic effect. The peak on 1A mostly occurs within non-coding sequence and the functional importance of this locus remains unclear. The nearby gene Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHLH) is involved in hair follicle development in mice41, suggesting its regulation might similarly affect feather patterning in birds. Supporting this hypothesis, PTHLH has been associated with plumage diversification in munias33. Moreover, two other genes (Fig. 2c) in the vicinity of the peak—phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) and tyrosinase hydroxylase (TH)—are involved in melanogenesis42,43. Finally, the region on 1A could be a trans-acting regulatory element affecting expression of ASIP—a possibility that is hard to evaluate using sequence data alone.

Our results suggest that mostly black personata-type plumage is largely determined by a recessive homozygous locus that includes ASIP. ASIP plays a critical role in pigment switching because it is an antagonist to the transmembrane receptor melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) that, when activated, promotes biochemical cascades of melanin production and darker coloration (reviewed in ref. 36). Expression of ASIP blocks MC1R signaling, resulting in reduced intensity of melanin pigmentation. The plausible explanation of head inheritance patterns observed in wagtails is that the regulatory effect of the alba allele increases expression of ASIP and thereby causes lighter coloration, and that a single gene dosage is sufficient to explain the partial dominance effect.

Given the strong positive assortative mating by head plumage and the fact that most ASIP heterozygotes resemble alba head phenotype, it appears likely that first-generation hybrids between alba and personata wagtails have a much higher likelihood of mating with alba than personata. This particularly opens up an opportunity for sex-biased introgression, if females choose mates based on head plumage, and F1 males are more likely to attract female alba than personata. Our simulations suggest that such a mechanism could contribute to the observed head plumage cline displacement under certain degrees of assortative mating and dominance of phenotypic alleles (Fig. 4), even in the absence of selective preference for personata phenotype. However, we emphasize that this outcome, while plausible, is a stochastic result of unpredictable hybridization dynamics under non-equilibrium inheritance of a trait involved in assortative mating, and it may differ when assortative mating is absent (e.g. ref. 17).

The genetic architecture of the plumage trait we documented in white wagtails (i.e., two epistatically interacting genomic regions) share properties with the genetic architecture of plumage color in the Carrion (Corvus (corone) corone) and Hooded (Corvus (corone) cornix) crows. In these taxa, plumage differences between darker and lighter melanin-based body coloration is governed by two genomic regions: one containing a major-effect gene norrin (NDP), the other harboring a cluster of genes with suppressed recombination that interact epistatically with NDP29,44. Moreover, simulations parameterized to crow plumage inheritance patterns suggest that assortative mating coupled with this epistatic genetic architecture can alone promote sexual trait introgression similar to results presented here19. Together, these results and our own findings support the long-standing hypothesis17, that peculiarities of barrier trait architecture governed by dominance, epistasis, or both, can drive asymmetric introgression. We stress, however, that the simulations alone do not rule out the possibility that the wagtail head plumage cline has moved as a consequence of other mechanisms. Although the displacement of the head plumage cline from the genomic background in wagtails was not associated with asymmetric mating preferences in social pairs16, selective advantage of one allele over another, social dominance, asymmetric aggressive behavior and skewed extra-pair mating all can promote asymmetric introgression18,45,46. Long-term monitoring of the alba and personata hybrid zone will be necessary to determine whether observed introgression patterns are due to whole zone movement (i.e. the ancestry cline is moving too, but at a slower rate) or asymmetric introgression of head plumage alone.

Substantial variation in head plumage and a complex evolutionary history in Motacilla wagtails have long puzzled biologists20,21,47,48. The reticulate nature of phenotypic variation in head and neck plumage47 suggests that variation in a small number of genes may underlie the rich phenotypic diversity in wagtails. Our study suggests that only two loci contribute to head plumage differences in alba and personata subspecies. Differentiation at the two loci is retained in allopatry despite hybridization and these loci, located on different chromosomes, introgress asymmetrically together from one population into another. These results suggest epistatic interactions contribute to the evolution of sexual signals and that the genetic architecture of a trait is an important determinant in introgression.

Methods

Sampling

We utilized 316 breeding individuals previously sampled along a 3000 km transect spanning the allopatric range of alba in western Siberia, the alba–personata hybrid zone in the western foothills of Altai mountains in Siberia, and the allopatric range of personata from southern Siberia to Uzbekistan16. Based on identifiable and discrete variation in head plumage (Supplementary Fig. 1), we selected 18 individuals with alba and 20 individuals with personata head plumage, 11 alba-like and nine personata-like hybrids, and four individuals that we refer to as “strictly intermediate”. All were males and originated from a ~100-kilometer zone of transition in the head plumage (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, we sequenced 10 males of each alba and personata from allopatric populations that are most remote from the areas of admixture: western Siberia (alba) and Uzbekistan (personata). A female Motacilla samveasnae collected in Stung Treng, Cambodia (Swedish Museum of Natural History 20016761/JWDKH13) and a male M. citreola citreola collected in Bayan Ovoo, Hentiy Aymag, Mongolia (University of Washington Burke Museum: 59798/CSW 5764) were used as outgroups.

Whole genome sequencing and variant calling

Genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen). Whole-genome libraries were prepared using Nextera XT (Illumina) v.2 kit, fragmented and 400–600 bp-long fragments were selected using BluePippin (Sage Science). Paired-end sequencing was performed on the NovaSEQ 6000 (Illumina) platform aiming to achieve ~10× coverage. Outgroup taxa were prepared separately using Illumina TruSeq PCR-free library preparations with a 350 bp insert size and sequenced on a NovaSEQ 6000 with a target sequencing coverage of 20×. We used FastQC v.0.11.749 to assess read quality and Trimmomatic v.0.3950 to trim poor-quality reads and Illumina adapters with default settings. Next, bwa mem51 v.0.7.17-r1188 was used to align reads to the draft eastern yellow wagtail (Motacilla tschutschensis tschutschensis) reference genome (see below). Bam files were sorted, duplicates were marked, and files were indexed using samtools v. 1.3.152 and picard-tools v.2.8.153. Variants were called using HaplotypeCaller from GATK54 v.4.2. The resulting gvcfs were merged using CombineGVCFs and genotyped with GenotypeGVCFs followed by VariantFiltration using GATK-recommended filters. Finally, we used VCFtools55 v.0.1.15 to remove indels, keep only biallelic SNP with minor allele frequency above 5%, minQ > 20, min-meanDP > 4, max-meanDP < 75 and max-missing = 0.75. This resulted in a final dataset of 10,634,326 SNPs used for downstream analysis. Examples of all scripts are available via GitHub: https://github.com/erikrfunk/whole_genome_bioinformatics/blob/master/rosyfinch_notes.md. Raw read data associated with this project are publicly available as NCBI BioProject PRJNA690099 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA690099.

Assembling of the reference genome

The reference genome file was generated using ALLPATH-LG 4.7.056 using a fragment library (180 bp) and two jumping libraries (3000 and 6000 bp) sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500. We used MUMmer v.4.0 to establish the synteny between the yellow wagtail reference genome and a high-quality chromosome-level assembly of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_009859065.1/). We ran MUMmer for each zebra finch chromosome separately using default setting except increasing—maxgap to 1000 to boost from default of 90 to account for structural rearrangements in a divergent reference https://github.com/elinck/syma_speciation/blob/master/scripts/wgs_align_mummer.sh.

Summary statistics, population structure, and windowed ABBA–BABA57

We used Python scripts developed by Simon Martin (“genomics_general”26) (https://github.com/simonhmartin/genomics_general) to estimate the relative FST (Kst58 but with a modification to account for missing genotypes on a pair-by-pair basis) and the absolute dXY59 genomic divergence, and the nucleotide diversity59 in 25 kb sliding windows with 10 kb step. We used the default option (“coordinate”) to define the size of sliding windows. In this case, windows will cover a fixed range in the genome and if there are missing data, this can lead to variable numbers of sites used for each window. Per-site Weir-and-Cockerham FST60 was estimated with VCFtools55. To test a hypothesis about introgression of personata alleles into alba genomic background, we utilized a further functionality of the “genomics_general” scripts to estimate windowed ABBA–BABA (fd)26. Here, we used a topology where P1 = sympatric alba, P2 = sympatric personata, P3 = allopatric personata, and P4 was designated as the outgroup. To estimate ancestral and derived allelic states, we polarized sites based on the genomes of a species closely related to the white wagtail (M. samvesnae) and a more distantly related member of the genus (M. citreola)21. Because using a small number of SNPs per window can generate stochastic errors that may cause fd to have meaningless values even when D is positive, the “genomics_general” documentation suggests a minimum window size that allows at least 100 biallelic SNPs per window. To meet these criteria, we imposed a 50 kb sliding window with a 10 kb step. This resulted in an average of 505 loci per window (range: 176–1020). If shared variation between P3 and P2 (positive D) is of interest, then fd might not be the best approach. Therefore, we utilized an alternative statistic fdM26, to better fit this scenario. Both metrics revealed similar patterns. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to assess population structure, and to summarize genomic variation of regions of interest. For the analysis of whole genome population structure, we thinned the dataset to retain one SNP per 10 kb window to avoid using loci in physical linkage. All SNPs were used for PCA in divergent regions on chromosomes 1A and 20. We ran PCA on the mean-centered genetic covariance matrix of SNP genotypes using the R v.3.6.1 (RStudio v.1.1.453) function prcomp.

Gene annotation

We used MAKER v.2.31.10 pipeline (https://www.yandell-lab.org/software/maker.html) to annotate focal scaffolds in the yellow wagtail reference genome using zebra finch (http://useast.ensembl.org/Taeniopygia_guttata/Info/Index?redirect=no) protein and cDNA databases. Genes were predicted using SNAP (see MAKER documentation), which was trained iteratively until gene models converged. A few gene models had poor convergence between consecutive SNAP iterations. Therefore, as an alternative method we confirmed gene models within regions of divergence using the Flo lift over pipeline (https://github.com/wurmlab/flo) again using the Zebra Finch annotations (taeGut1: GCA_000151805.2).

Quantification of plumage variation

Coloration of head and neck in white wagtails varies as a proportion of white unpigmented area on an otherwise black, melanin-based plumage. In personata, only a small “mask” is unpigmented, whereas alba has white ear coverts, malar area, and neck sides (Fig. 1c). Hybrids demonstrate a few categories of intermediate plumage (Supplementary Fig. 1). We used photographs of study skins taken in a standardized position, with a ruler grid and a white balance card. Images were pre-processed in Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Adobe) to standardize white balance. The total number of white pixels on the head and neck sides was estimated using ImageJ61 with standardized threshold settings (see ref. 16 for details).

Admixture mapping

We used GEMMA v.0.98 (genome-wide efficient mixed-model association)62 to conduct admixture mapping for head plumage. To minimize the effects of isolation-by-distance and population structure we used only samples (n = 62) from the alba and personata hybrid zone. To estimate effects of isolated SNPs, we ran linear mixed-effects models (LMM, -lmm 1 option of GEMMA). To account for potential relatedness between individuals, we estimated a relatedness matrix using the -gk 1 option of GEMMA, which then was supplied as a covariate for LMM and BSLMM analyses used to assess genetic architecture of head plumage. For BSLMM, we ran four chains with a burn-in of five million steps and a subsequent 20 million MCMC steps sampling every 1000 iterations. We assessed four BSLMM hyperparameters: PVE (the proportion of variance explained by all SNPs), PGE (the proportion of genetic variance explained by alleles with measurable effect), posterior number of SNPs explaining trait variance in the model and gamma parameter assessing the proportion of variance explained by an individual locus of interest. We used a leave-one-out cross-validation approach to assess the posterior predictive power of BSLMM. More specifically, we excluded phenotypic information for one individual at a time and used the remaining dataset (n = 61) to predict its phenotype based on genotype by running BSLMM with the setting indicated above. Linear regression was then used to estimate the proportion of variance explained by predicted phenotypes as a measure of predictive performance57.

Testing for dominance and epistasis

Given an apparent non-linear relationship between genotypic and head plumage variation, we compared a series of inheritance models with additive/codominant, partially dominant and completely dominant inheritance modes for genomic regions on chromosomes 1A and 20, and with epistatic interactions between 1A and 20. In these models, we encoded genotypes in the two genomic regions as alba-type, heterozygotes, or personata-type based on hybrid index and heterozygosity (Fig. 3d). We excluded three personata-like hybrids (1766, 1787, and 1842) due to highly recombinant genotypes and missing data for some loci that made it their genotype classification ambiguous. We then used linear models to assess power and contribution of each term in predicting head plumage values63.

Geographic clines

We re-analyzed published data for the wagtail hybrid zone (https://search.datacite.org/works/10.5061/dryad.fg49r) to construct geographic cines for head plumage and ancestry. We summarized genomic variation using PCA and used PC1 scores as a proxy for ancestry16. Quantitative estimates for head plumage were taken as described above. We fit empirical data to five geographic cline models as described in ref. 64 using Metropolis–Hastings MCMC algorithm implemented HZAR65 v.0.2–5 package in R.

Runs of homozygosity

We used the R package detectRUNS66 v.0.9.6 to search for homozygosity-rich regions in the two differentiated genomic regions on the chromosomes 1A and 20. We applied a window size of 12 loci, minSNP = 11 (minimum number of homozygous/heterozygous SNP in the window) and minLengthBps = 9000, with the rest of parameters being as described in the manual (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/detectRUNS/vignettes/detectRUNS.vignette.html).

Hybrid zone simulations

To evaluate whether partial dominance of a plumage trait involved in mate choice might lead to displacement between phenotypic and genomic background clines, we ran forward-time simulations using a modified version of the R program HZAM28 v.2.0.0, which models one-dimensional hybrid zone dynamics in the presence of assortative mating, underdominance, and other processes. Our modification extended HZAM’s base features to support partial dominance of mating trait loci, using a user-defined dominance coefficient indicating the proportion of the homozygous dominant phenotype expressed by heterozygotes. Full code and an interactive web app implementing it can be found at https://github.com/elinck/hzam_shiny. Given that available evidence suggests that two regions on chromosomes 1A and 20 effectively work as a two-locus system (with the locus on chromosome 20 having the major effect) in determining head plumage in wagtails, we focused our simulations on genetic architectures with one or two mating trait loci. We ran 50 replicate simulations of 500 generations each with one or two mate choice loci and three neutral loci, 0.5 and 0.75 ratios of heterospecific to homospecific matings, a dominance coefficient of 0.5 and 0.75, a per-species carrying capacity of 800, initial range limits of 0–0.48 and 0.52–1 (given a total transect size of 1), a population growth rate of 1.05, a density dependence effect standard deviation of 0.01, and no loss of hybrid fitness. We fit clines for mating trait and neutral loci every five generations using a general additive model (GAM) implemented in the R package mgcv67 v.1.8–31 with the gam() function, using the formula allele_frequency ~ s(transect_location) and the "P-ML" method. We then used the predict_gam() function in the R package tidymv v.2.2.0 (https://github.com/stefanocoretta/tidymv) to generate model predictions for evenly spaced transect values, and used these to calculate cline width and cline center. To calculate cline width and center, we used Irwin’s28 "eightieth percentile" approach, which defines hybrid zone width as the geographic area between the locations at which the GAM cline fit crosses HI (hybrid index) = 0.1 and HI = 0.9, and center as the region within half a dispersal distance from the location at which the cline fit crosses HI = 0.5. Using these data, we performed Wilcoxon paired one-sided signed rank tests to determine whether cline center differed between neutral and mating trait loci. To compare the degree of asymmetry between introgression patterns in our simulations and the wagtail hybrid zone, we scaled displacement between simulated cline centers via means of dispersal distance63.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Raw read sequencing data associated with this project and the reference genome generated as a part of this study are available as NCBI BioProject PRJNA690099). Genomic datasets are publicly available at Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dv41ns1wv. Zebra Finch protein and cDNA databases used int this study can be accessed at http://useast.ensembl.org/Taeniopygia_guttata/Info/Index?redirect=no. DNA samples are available from the authors upon request.

Code availability

Previously published code used in this study: https://github.com/erikrfunk/whole_genome_bioinformatics/blob/master/rosyfinch_notes.md, https://github.com/elinck/syma_speciation/blob/master/scripts/wgs_align_mummer.sh, https://github.com/simonhmartin/genomics_general, https://github.com/wurmlab/flo. Custom code generated as a part of this study: https://github.com/elinck/wagtails [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4321544], https://github.com/elinck/hzam_shiny [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4321524], https://github.com/georgysemenov/wagtails [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4319060].

References

  1. 1.

    Endler, J. A. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines (Princeton University Press, 1977).

  2. 2.

    Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341, 497–503 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mallet, J. et al. Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in Heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 4, 921–936 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Larson, E. L. et al. Differential introgression in a mosaic hybrid zone reveals candidate barrier genes. Evolution 67, 3653–3661 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Taylor, S. A. et al. Hybrid zones: windows on climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 398–406 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barton, N. H. & Bengtsson, B. O. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridizing populations. Heredity 57, 357–376 (1986).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wu, C.-I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 851–865 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schumer, M. et al. Natural selection and local recombination rates shape the genome evolution of swordtail hybrids. Science 360, 656–660 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Martin, S. H. et al. Recombination rate variation shapes barriers to introgression across butterfly genomes. PLoS Biol. 17, e2006288 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. Analysis of hybrid zones. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 16, 113–148 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Payseur, B. A. Using differential introgression in hybrid zones to identify genomic regions involved in speciation. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10, 806–820 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Harrison, R. G. & Larson, E. L. Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J. Hered. 1, 795–809 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Brumfield, R. T. et al. Evolutionary implications of divergent clines in an avian (Manacus: Aves) hybrid zone. Evolution 55, 2070–2087 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Baldassarre, D. T. et al. Genomic and morphological analysis of a semipermeable avian hybrid zone suggests asymmetrical introgression of a sexual signal. Evolution 68, 2644–2657 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Toews, D. P. L. et al. Migration, mitochondria and the yellow-rumped warbler. Evolution 68, 241–255 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Semenov, G. A. et al. Effects of assortative mate choice on the genomic and morphological structure of a hybrid zone between two bird subspecies. Mol. Ecol. 26, 6430–6444 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mallet, J. Hybrid zones of Heliconius butterflies in Panama and the stability and movement of warning colour clines. Heredity 56, 191–202 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Brodin, A. et al. Gene-flow across the European crow hybrid zone—a spatial simulation. J. Avian Biol. 44, 281–287 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Metzler, D. et al. Assortative mate choice and epistatic mating-trait architecture induces complex hybrid-zone movement. Preprint at bioxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.10.985333 (2020).

  20. 20.

    Alström, P. & Mild, K. Pipits & Wagtails of Europe, Asia and North America (Princeton University Press, 2003).

  21. 21.

    Harris, R. B. et al. Discordance between genomic divergence and phenotypic variation in a rapidly evolving avian genus (Motacilla). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 120, 183–195 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Koblik, E. A. Family Motacillidae. In Bird Diversity, Vol. 3, (ed. Kalyakin, M. B.) (Moscow State University, Moscow, 2006).

  23. 23.

    Cramp, S. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rheindt, F. E. & Edwards, S. V. Genetic introgression: an integral but neglected component of speciation in birds. Auk 128, 620–632 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cruickshank, T. E. & Hahn, M. W. Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3133–3157 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Martin, S. H. et al. Evaluating the use of ABBA–BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 244–257 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gompert, Z. & Buerkle, C. A. What, if anything, are hybrids: enduring truths andchallenges associated with population structure and gene flow. Evol. Appl. 9, 909–923 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Irwin, D. E. Assortative mating in hybrid zones is remarkably ineffective in promoting speciation. Am. Nat. 195, E150–E167 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Poelstra, J. W. et al. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 344, 1410–1414 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Toews, D. P. et al. Plumage genes and little else distinguish the genomes of hybridizing warblers. Curr. Biol. 26, 2313–2318 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Campagna, L. et al. Repeated divergent selection on pigmentation genes in a rapid finch radiation driven by sexual selection. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602404 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bultmans, S. J., MichauD, E. J. & Woychik, R. P. Molecular characterization of the mouse agouti locus. Cell 71, 1195–1204 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stryjewski, K. F. & Sorenson, M. D. Mosaic genome evolution in a recent and rapid avian radiation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1912–1922 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jones, M. R. et al. Adaptive introgression underlies polymorphic seasonal camouflage in snowshoe hares. Science 360, 1355–1358 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Barrett, R. D. H. et al. Linking a mutation to survival in wild mice. Science 363, 499–504 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Orteu, A. & Jiggins, C. D. The genomics of coloration provides insights into adaptive evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 461–475 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Funk, E. R. & Taylor, S. A. High-throughput sequencing is revealing genetic associations with avian plumage color. Auk 136, ukz048 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wray, G. A. The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 206–216 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wittkopp, P. J. & Kalay, G. Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Genet. 13, 59–69 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jiggins, C. D. et al. Waiting in the wings: what can we learn about gene co-option from the diversification of butterfly wing patterns? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 372, 20150485 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wysolmerski, J. J. et al. Overexpression of parathyroid hormone-related protein in the skin of transgenic mice interferes with hair follicle development. Proc, Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1133–1137 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Farihian, R. A. & Whittaker, J. R. Phenylalanine lowers melanin synthesis in mammalian melanocytes by reducing tyrosine uptake: implications for pigment reduction in phenylketonuria. J. Investig. Dermatol. 74, 85–89 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Marles, L. K. et al. Tyrosine hydroxylase Isoenzyme I is present in human melanosomes: a possible novel function in pigmentation. Exp. Dermatol. 12, 61–70 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Knief et al. Epistatic mutations under divergent selection govern phenotypic variation in the crow hybrid zone. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 570–576 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Stein, A. C. & Uy, J. A. C. Unidirectional introgression of a sexually selected trait across an avian hybrid zone: a role for female choice? Evolution 60, 1476–1485 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Baldassarre, D. T. & Webster, M. S. Experimental evidence that extra-pair mating drives asymmetrical introgression of a sexual trait. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20132175 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Semenov, G. A. et al. Extensive phenotypic diversification coexists with little genetic divergence and a lack of population structure in the white wagtail subspecies complex (Motacilla alba). J. Evol. Biol. 31, 1093–1108 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mayr, E. The interpretation of variation among the yellow wagtails. Br. Birds 49, 115–119 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (2010).

  50. 50.

    Bolger et al. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997v1 (2013).

  52. 52.

    Li et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Picard Toolkit. Broad Institute http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ (2018).

  54. 54.

    Poplin et al. Detailed description of HaplotypeCaller; best reference for germline joint calling. bioRxiv (2017).

  55. 55.

    Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ribeiro, F. J. et al. Finished bacterial genomes from shotgun sequence data. Genome Res. 22, 2270–2277 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Semenov et al. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dv41ns1wv (2020).

  58. 58.

    Hudson et al. A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 138–151 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Nei, M. & Li, W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5269–5273 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Abramoff, M. D. et al. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 11, 36–42 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zhou, X. & Stephens, M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 44, 821–824 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Semenov et al. Github https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4319060 (2020).

  64. 64.

    Scordato, E. S. C. et al. Migratory divides coincide with species barriers across replicated avian hybrid zones above the Tibetan Plateau. Ecol. Lett. 23, 231–241 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Derryberry, E. P. et al. HZAR: hybrid zone analysis using an R software package. Mol. Ecol. Res 14, 652–663 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Marras, G. G. et al. Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy. Anim. Genet. 46, 110–121 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wood, S. N. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. (B) 73, 3–36 (2011).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the National Genomics Infrastructure in Genomics Production Stockholm funded by Science for Life Laboratory, British Ornithologists’ Union, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Swedish Research Council, and SNIC/Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science for assistance with massively parallel sequencing and access to the UPPMAX computational infrastructure. G.A.S. was supported by a research grant from the American Genetic Association (82445072). P.A. was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2015-04402) and Jornvall Foundation. We thank Maxim Mitropolskiy and Irina Malykh for help with field sampling, and Erica Larson, David Toews, Jochen Wolf, David Zonana and members of the Taylor lab for helpful comments. Sampling was approved by the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals program of biodiversity collections (Bird Ecology Research Group committee led by Alexander Yurlov).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.A.S. and S.A.T. designed the study. G.A.S., D.R.K., and P.A. collected data in the field. G.A.S., E.L., E.D.E., and R.B.H. analyzed the data. G.A.S. wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgy A. Semenov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Zacharia Gompert and Catherine Linnen for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semenov, G.A., Linck, E., Enbody, E.D. et al. Asymmetric introgression reveals the genetic architecture of a plumage trait. Nat Commun 12, 1019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21340-y

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing